Utility Admin Dashboard (ONB02US01)
Overall Coverage Summary
Total Coverage: 100% (5/5 Acceptance Criteria Covered)
- Total Test Cases: 10 (8 Functional + 2 Non-Functional)
- Total Acceptance Criteria: 5 (Based on user story requirements)
- Coverage Percentage: (5/5) × 100 = 100%
Acceptance Criteria Coverage Mapping:
- AC1: Display overall utility setup progress as percentage with visual indicators → TC_001, TC_002
- AC2: Break down configuration completion by section with individual progress percentages → TC_003, TC_004
- AC3: Allow direct navigation to configuration sections via "Configure Section" buttons → TC_005, TC_006
- AC4: Display operational metrics related to completed configurations → TC_007, TC_008
- AC5: Log all configuration changes with timestamp and user information → TC_009, TC_010
Additional Coverage:
- Cross-Platform Compatibility: TC_009
- Error Handling & Edge Cases: TC_010
- Cross-module data integration and synchronization → TC_007, TC_008
- Real-time progress updates and calculation accuracy → TC_002, TC_004
- User interface responsiveness and accessibility → TC_001, TC_005
- Data validation and error handling → TC_009, TC_010
- System performance and reliability → TC_009, TC_010
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality
- Dashboard Overview Display - Main dashboard rendering with all KPI widgets
- Configuration Progress Tracking - Overall and section-wise progress monitoring
- KPI Metrics Display - Revenue, billing, service requests, work orders visualization
- Configuration Section Management - Navigation and completion of setup sections
- Cross-Module Data Integration - CX, BX, MX, WX module data correlation
- Alert and Issue Management - Critical alerts and issue resolution workflows
Business Rules Testing
- KPI Calculation Validation - All weighted calculations as per business rules
- Configuration Dependency Logic - Section completion prerequisites
- Progress Tracking Accuracy - Real-time updates and percentage calculations
- Data Validation Rules - Configuration change validation requirements
User Journeys
- Initial Utility Setup Journey - Complete end-to-end configuration process
- Daily Operations Monitoring - Regular dashboard usage patterns
- Issue Resolution Workflow - Alert identification to configuration adjustment
- Performance Optimization Journey - Metric analysis to configuration improvement
Integration Points
- CX Module Integration - Customer service data synchronization
- BX Module Integration - Billing system data integration
- MX Module Integration - Meter management system integration
- WX Module Integration - Work order system integration
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance
- Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
- KPI calculation response time < 500ms
- Configuration save operations < 2 seconds
- Cross-module data refresh < 1 second
Security
- Authentication and session management
- Role-based access control validation
- Sensitive data encryption (billing, customer data)
- Configuration change audit logging
Compatibility
- Chrome Latest (primary focus)
- Cross-resolution support (1920x1080, 1024x768)
- Mobile responsiveness for dashboard viewing
Usability
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions
- Maximum/minimum values for KPI calculations
- Configuration completion percentages (0%, 100%)
- Large dataset handling (high volume of work orders, service requests)
- Concurrent user limit testing
Invalid Inputs
- Invalid configuration data entry
- Unauthorized access attempts
- Malformed API requests
- Data corruption scenarios
System Failures
Test Case 1: Verify Overall Utility Setup Progress Display and Visual Indicators
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_001
Title: AC1 - Verify Overall Utility Setup Progress Display and Visual Indicators
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of overall progress display functionality
Integration_Points: Onboarding Services, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC1
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Onboarding Services, Configuration Database
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds load time
Data_Requirements: Test utility with 60% overall completion
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Smart360 platform configured with test utility data
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Test utility with 60% overall completion, mixed section progress
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Utility Admin Dashboard | Dashboard loads successfully | URL: https://smart360-staging.com/dashboard | Performance validation - must load within 3 seconds |
2 | Locate "Utility Setup Progress" section at top of dashboard | Section is prominently displayed | Overall Progress Section Header | Visual prominence check - should be at top of page |
3 | Verify overall progress percentage display | Shows "% Complete" by calculating the complition of 6 steps as core, staff, calender, services, pricing, id | Expected: 60% (calculated from 6 sections: Core:67%, Staff:67%, Calendar:50%, Service:50%, Pricing:33%, ID:67% = (67+67+50+50+33+67)/6 = 55.67% ≈ 60%) | AC1 - Percentage display validation |
4 | Verify progress bar visual indicator | Blue progress bar filled to % count and rest uncomplete in gray background | Visual bar: 60% blue fill, 40% gray background | AC1 - Visual indicator matches percentage |
5 | Verify progress bar styling and animation | Smooth visual representation with proper colors | Blue (#007bff), Gray background (#e9ecef), smooth CSS transition | Visual design validation with specific color codes |
6 | Check progress text formatting | Clear, readable percentage text | "60% Complete" format, font-size: 16px, font-weight: bold | Text clarity and accessibility |
7 | Verify progress section positioning | Located at top of dashboard for visibility | Top section of page, margin-top: 20px, width: 100% | Information hierarchy validation |
8 | Test progress bar responsiveness | Maintains visual integrity across screen sizes | Resize browser: 1920x1080, 1024x768, responsive breakpoints | Responsive design validation |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Overall utility setup progress displays as 60% with corresponding visual progress bar
Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators are clear and properly styled, progress bar accurately represents percentage
Negative_Verification: No broken visual elements, percentage matches actual completion state
Test Case 2: Verify Overall Progress Calculation Accuracy and Updates
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_002
Title: AC1 - Verify Overall Progress Calculation Accuracy and Updates based on refresh
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of progress calculation logic
Integration_Points: Onboarding Services, Configuration API, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC1
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Logic-Validation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Configuration API, Onboarding Services, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for calculation updates
Data_Requirements: Test utility with known configuration states
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Test utility with defined section completion states
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: 6 sections with mixed completion percentages
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Record initial overall progress percentage | Note baseline % based on complition of section mention in TC- 01 | Initial: 60% = (67+67+50+50+33+67)/6 sections | AC1 - Baseline measurement using average calculation |
2 | Navigate to lowest completion section visible on cards present in configuration section | Section loads successfully | Pricing & Billing section with 1 of 3 fields complete | Section has Rate Plans, Payment Methods, Billing Cycles |
3 | Complete % of remaining configuration in section | Configuration saves successfully | Add Payment Methods configuration (2 of 3 fields complete) | Partial completion test - specific field addition |
4 | Return to dashboard | Overall progress updates automatically | Expected real-time update within 500ms | AC1 - Real-time update validation |
5 | Verify overall progress calculation | Should increase proportionally | Expected: ~64.5% = (67+67+50+50+67+67)/6 = 61.33% | AC1 - Calculation accuracy using formula |
6 | Verify visual progress bar updates | Bar reflects new percentage visually | Visual bar at ~61.33%, blue fill increases | AC1 - Visual indicator update |
7 | Complete remaining section configuration | All required fields completed | Complete Billing Cycles configuration (3 of 3 fields = 100%) | Full section completion |
8 | Verify final overall progress update | Progress reflects 100% section completion | Expected: ~66.83% = (67+67+50+50+100+67)/6 | AC1 - Complete section impact calculation |
9 | Test calculation with multiple section updates | Update 2 more sections simultaneously | Update Service Areas (50% to 100%) and Calendar (50% to 100%) | Multiple updates validation |
10 | Verify progress calculation performance | Updates occur within 500ms | Real-time calculation speed measurement | Performance requirement validation |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Overall progress percentage calculates correctly and updates in real-time with visual indicators
Secondary_Verifications: Calculations happen within 500ms, visual progress bar accurately reflects percentage changes
Negative_Verification: Progress never exceeds 100%, calculations remain accurate with multiple simultaneous updates
Test Case 3: Verify Individual Configuration Section Progress Display
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_003
Title: AC2 - Verify Individual Configuration Section Progress Display
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of individual section progress display
Integration_Points: Onboarding Services, Configuration Database
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC2
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Configuration-Quality, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Onboarding Services, Configuration Database
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for section data load
Data_Requirements: Test utility with varied section completion levels
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Test utility with known section completion states
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: 6 configuration sections with different completion percentages
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Configuration Sections area | Section displays all 6 configuration cards | Bottom section of dashboard, grid layout | AC2 - Section breakdown visibility validation |
2 | Verify Core System Settings displays individual progress and navigate to Verify Core System Settings after click on configure button | Shows "%" with visual indicator | Expected: 67% (2 of 3 fields: Organization Details, Utility Services completed) | AC2 - Individual percentage calculation |
3 | Verify Staff & Access Control displays individual progress and navigate to Verify Staff & Access Control after click on configure button | Shows "%" with visual indicator | Expected: 67% (2 of 3 fields: Admin Users, Role Permissions completed) | AC2 - Individual percentage validation |
4 | Verify Calendar & Scheduling displays individual progress and navigate to Calendar & Scheduling after click on configure button | Shows "%" with visual indicator | Expected: 50% (1 of 2 fields: Working Hours completed, Holidays pending) | AC2 - Individual percentage accuracy |
5 | Verify Service Areas displays individual progress and navigate to Service Areas after click on configure button | Shows "%" with visual indicator | Expected: 50% (1 of 2 fields: Geographic Regions completed, Coverage Maps pending) | AC2 - Individual percentage display |
6 | Verify Pricing & Billing displays individual progress and navigate to Pricing & Billing after click on configure button | Shows "%" with visual indicator | Expected: 33% (1 of 3 fields: Rate Plans completed, Payment Methods & Billing Cycles pending) | AC2 - Individual percentage verification |
7 | Verify ID & Reference Numbers displays individual progress and navigate to ID after click on configure button | Shows "%" with visual indicator | Expected: 67% (2 of 3 fields: Customer ID Format, Invoice Numbering completed) | AC2 - Individual percentage consistency |
8 | Check that each section has distinct progress indicators | All sections show different percentages correctly | 6 different completion levels: 67%, 67%, 50%, 50%, 33%, 67% | AC2 - Section-specific progress validation |
9 | Verify visual consistency across all section cards | Consistent styling and layout for all sections | Uniform card design: 300px width, 200px height, consistent padding | Visual design validation |
10 | Test section progress independence | Each section progress is calculated independently | No cross-section interference in calculations | Independent calculation verification |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All 6 configuration sections display individual progress percentages as specified in AC2
Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators are consistent, percentages reflect actual section completion
Negative_Verification: No missing sections, incorrect percentages, or broken visual indicators
Test Case 4: Verify Section Progress Calculation Logic and Updates
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_004
Title: AC2 - Verify Section Progress Calculation Logic and Updates
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of section progress calculation logic
Integration_Points: Onboarding Services, Configuration API, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC2
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Business-Logic-Validation, Configuration-Quality
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Configuration API, Onboarding Services, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for progress recalculation
Data_Requirements: Section with known field requirements
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Access to section configuration details
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Pricing & Billing section with 3 required fields, 1 completed
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_003 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Record initial Pricing & Billing section progress | Note baseline: % (1 of 3 fields complete) | Initial: 33% = (1 completed field / 3 total fields) × 100 | AC2 - Baseline calculation validation |
2 | Navigate to Pricing & Billing configuration | Section loads with current field states | Fields: Rate Plans (✓), Payment Methods (✗), Billing Cycles (✗) | Configuration state verification |
3 | Complete one additional required field | Field saves successfully | Add Payment Methods configuration with ACH, Credit Card, Check options | Incremental progress testing |
4 | Return to dashboard and verify section progress | Should show updated % (2 of 3 fields complete) | Expected: 67% = (2 completed fields / 3 total fields) × 100 | AC2 - Calculation accuracy validation |
5 | Verify progress calculation independence | Other sections remain unchanged | Other sections maintain: Core:67%, Staff:67%, Calendar:50%, Service:50%, ID:67% | AC2 - Section independence verification |
6 | Complete remaining field in Pricing & Billing | All required fields completed | Add Billing Cycles: Monthly, Quarterly, Annual cycles | Full completion testing |
7 | Verify section shows 100% completion | Progress updates to 100% | Expected: 100% = (3 completed fields / 3 total fields) × 100 | AC2 - Complete state validation |
8 | Test partial field completion handling | Partially filled fields don't count as complete | Enter incomplete rate plan data (missing price) | Partial completion logic verification |
9 | Verify section progress doesn't increment prematurely | Progress remains at previous level | Should stay at 67% until field validation passes | AC2 - Validation requirement testing |
10 | Test progress calculation performance | Updates occur within 500ms | Real-time calculation speed: timestamp measurements | Performance validation requirement |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Individual section progress calculates correctly based on completed vs. required fields per AC2
Secondary_Verifications: Section progress updates independently, calculations happen in real-time within 500ms
Negative_Verification: Partial completions don't increment progress, other sections unaffected by individual updates
Test Case 5: Verify Direct Navigation to Configuration Sections
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_005
Title: AC3 - Verify Direct Navigation to Configuration Sections via Configure Buttons
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of configuration section navigation
Integration_Points: Onboarding Services, Navigation Router
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC3
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: User-Experience, Navigation-Flow
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Onboarding Services, Configuration modules
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for navigation
Data_Requirements: All configuration sections available
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: All configuration sections properly configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: 6 configuration sections with "Configure Section" buttons
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_003 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Locate all "Configure Section" buttons on dashboard | 6 blue "Configure Section" buttons visible | All 6 configuration cards with blue buttons (#007bff) | AC3 - Button availability verification |
2 | Click "Configure Section" on Core System Settings | Navigates directly to Core System configuration page | Core System Settings card → /config/core-system | AC3 - Direct navigation validation |
3 | Verify navigation success and page load | Configuration page loads within 2 seconds | Expected: Core System config page with Organization Details form | AC3 - Successful navigation timing |
4 | Return to dashboard and test Staff & Access Control | Click button navigates to Staff configuration | Staff & Access Control card → /config/staff-access | AC3 - Navigation consistency check |
5 | Test Calendar & Scheduling navigation | Button navigates to Calendar configuration page | Calendar & Scheduling card → /config/calendar | AC3 - All sections accessible validation |
6 | Test Service Areas navigation | Button navigates to Service Areas configuration | Service Areas card → /config/service-areas | AC3 - Complete navigation coverage |
7 | Test Pricing & Billing navigation | Button navigates to Pricing configuration page | Pricing & Billing card → /config/pricing | AC3 - Critical section navigation |
8 | Test ID & Reference Numbers navigation | Button navigates to ID configuration page | ID & Reference Numbers card → /config/id-reference | AC3 - Final section navigation |
9 | Verify button styling and accessibility | All buttons have consistent styling and are clickable | Blue buttons, white text, hover effect (#0056b3) | UI consistency and accessibility |
10 | Test navigation performance across all sections | All navigations complete within 2 seconds | Measure load times for all 6 sections | Performance validation requirement |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All 6 "Configure Section" buttons provide direct navigation to their respective configuration pages per AC3
Secondary_Verifications: Navigation completes within 2 seconds, consistent button styling and behavior
Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing buttons, or navigation failures
Test Case 6: Verify Configuration Section Access and Return Navigation Flow
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_006
Title: AC3 - Verify Configuration Section Access and Return Navigation Flow
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of navigation flow and return paths
Integration_Points: Onboarding Services, Navigation system
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC3
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: User-Experience, Navigation-Quality
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Onboarding Services, Configuration modules
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for navigation
Data_Requirements: Configuration sections with save/cancel functionality
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: All configuration sections operational
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Sections with configurable fields and navigation controls
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Pricing & Billing via "Configure Section" | Configuration page loads successfully | Pricing & Billing section at /config/pricing | AC3 - Access validation with URL verification |
2 | Verify configuration form and fields display | All configuration fields are accessible | Rate Plans form, Payment Methods checkboxes, Billing Cycles dropdown | AC3 - Section functionality validation |
3 | Make configuration changes and save | Changes save successfully with confirmation | Add new rate plan "Residential Basic" - $0.15/kWh, Tier 1: 0-500 kWh | Save functionality with specific test data |
4 | Use back/return navigation to dashboard | Returns to dashboard successfully | Browser back button or "Return to Dashboard" link | AC3 - Return navigation validation |
5 | Verify dashboard reflects configuration changes | Progress percentage updates on return | Pricing & Billing progress increases from 33% to 67% | Integration validation between sections |
6 | Test navigation to different section without saving | Navigate to Service Areas from Pricing & Billing | Unsaved changes in Pricing & Billing configuration | Cross-section navigation testing |
7 | Verify unsaved changes handling | System prompts to save or discard changes | "Save changes before leaving?" confirmation modal | Data protection mechanism validation |
8 | Test direct dashboard navigation from section | Use main navigation to return to dashboard | Dashboard menu link in header navigation | Alternative return path testing |
9 | Test browser refresh within configuration section | Section reloads properly with current data | F5 refresh on configuration page, data persistence check | Data persistence validation |
10 | Verify breadcrumb or navigation state | Clear indication of current location | Breadcrumb: "Dashboard > Configuration > Pricing & Billing" | User orientation and navigation context |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Complete navigation flow works from dashboard to configuration sections and back per AC3
Secondary_Verifications: Data persistence, unsaved changes protection, alternative navigation paths work
Negative_Verification: No navigation deadends, data loss, or broken return paths
Test Case 7: Verify Operational Metrics Display for Completed Configurations
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_007
Title: AC4 - Verify Operational Metrics Display for Completed Configurations
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of operational metrics display
Integration_Points: CX Services, BX Services, MX Services, Cross-module APIs
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC4
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Financial-Accuracy, Operational-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: CX Services, BX Services, MX Services, Cross-module APIs, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for metrics load
Data_Requirements: Operational data from completed configurations
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Completed configurations with operational data
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Revenue: $1.23M, Service Requests: 142, Work Orders: 87/112, Billing: 76%
Prior_Test_Cases: Configuration completion tests must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to dashboard and locate operational metrics | 4 main KPI widgets display at top | Monthly Revenue, Billing Cycle, Service Requests, Work Orders | AC4 - Metrics visibility validation |
2 | Verify Monthly Revenue metrics display | Shows monthly revenue with growth indicator | Expected: $1.23M current month, Previous: $1.13M, Growth: ((1.23-1.13)/1.13)*100 = 8.85% ≈ 8.5% | AC4 - Financial metrics with growth formula |
3 | Verify Billing Cycle operational metrics | Shows % complete with "In Progress" status in orange | Expected: 76% = (Generated: 52,430, Delivered: 49,856, Paid: 36,701) Progress = (Delivered/Generated)*100 = 95%, Cycle = 76% | AC4 - Billing operations calculation |
4 | Verify Service Requests operational metrics | Shows open requests with growth indicator % increase trend | Expected: 142 current, 127 previous, Increase: ((142-127)/127)*100 = 11.81% ≈ 12% | AC4 - Customer service metrics with trend |
5 | Verify Work Orders operational metrics | Shows out of total completed with "On Track" status | Expected: 87 completed, 112 total, Completion Rate: (87/112)*100 = 77.68%, Status: On Track | AC4 - Field operations metrics calculation |
6 | Verify Revenue Collection detailed metrics | Collection efficiency: %, Today's collection: $ collected today | Expected: Collection Efficiency = (Total Collected/Total Billable)*100 = (427,200/480,000)*100 = 89% | AC4 - Financial collection accuracy |
7 | Verify Customer Service breakdown | raise Service requests, raise Complaints, Resolution rate calculation | Complaint Resolution Rate = (Resolved Complaints/Total Complaints)*100 = (200/234)*100 = 85.47% | AC4 - Customer service calculations |
8 | Verify Meter Management metrics | Reading cycle %, Alerts shows, Exception handling counts with growth indicator | Reading Cycle Completion = (Completed Readings/Total Scheduled)*100 = (8,400/10,000)*100 = 84% | AC4 - Meter management calculations |
9 | Test metric updates upon refresh | Metrics refresh within 500ms when data changes | Simulate new work order completion, verify count updates | AC4 - Real-time update validation |
10 | Verify cross-module data integration | All metrics reflect data from respective modules (CX, BX, MX, WX) | Cross-module data consistency check | AC4 - Integration validation |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All operational metrics display correctly with accurate calculations per AC4
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates work, cross-module integration functions properly
Negative_Verification: No missing metrics, calculation errors, or data inconsistencies
Test Case 8: Verify KPI Calculation Validation and Cross-Module Integration
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_008
Title: AC4 - Verify KPI Calculation Validation and Cross-Module Integration
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: API/Integration
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of KPI calculation and cross-module integration
Integration_Points: CX, BX, MX, WX modules, KPI Calculation API
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC4
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: API-Health, Cross-Module-Integration, Financial-Accuracy
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: All module APIs (CX, BX, MX, WX), KPI Calculation Service, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for KPI calculations
Data_Requirements: Cross-module operational data
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: All modules operational with test data
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Multi-module test data for KPI calculations
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_007 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Test Revenue Collection KPI calculation | API returns accurate collection efficiency | Total Billable: $480,000, Collected: $427,200, Efficiency: (427,200/480,000)*100 = 89% | AC4 - Financial KPI formula validation |
2 | Test Billing Cycle Progress calculation | API returns correct billing cycle metrics | Generated: 52,430, Delivered: 49,856, Paid: 36,701, Cycle Progress: 76% | AC4 - Billing operations calculation |
3 | Test Service Request metrics from CX module | API returns accurate service request data | Open Requests: 142, Previous: 127, Growth: ((142-127)/127)*100 = 11.81% | AC4 - CX module integration |
4 | Test Work Order metrics from WX module | API returns correct work order completion | Completed: 87, Total: 112, In Progress: 15, Overdue: 10, Completion Rate: 77.68% | AC4 - WX module integration |
5 | Test Meter Management from MX module | API returns meter reading and alert data | Reading Completion: 84%, Total Alerts: 37, Exception Rate: (37/10,000)*100 = 0.37% | AC4 - MX module integration |
6 | Test cross-module data correlation | Service requests link to work orders correctly | Service Request SR-2024-1001 → Work Order WO-2024-5501 correlation | AC4 - Cross-module relationship |
7 | Test API performance under load | All KPI APIs respond within 500ms | Concurrent API calls: 50 requests/second performance test | AC4 - Performance validation |
8 | Test error handling for module unavailability | Graceful degradation when modules are down | Simulate BX module down, verify error handling and partial metrics display | AC4 - Error resilience testing |
9 | Test data consistency across modules | KPI calculations remain consistent | Cross-validate billing data between BX module and dashboard KPIs | AC4 - Data integrity validation |
10 | Test real-time synchronization | KPI updates when module data changes | Update work order status in WX, verify dashboard reflects change within 500ms | AC4 - Real-time sync validation |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All KPI calculations are accurate and cross-module integration works correctly per AC4
Secondary_Verifications: API performance meets requirements, error handling functions properly
Negative_Verification: No data corruption, calculation errors, or integration failures
Test Case 9: Verify Configuration Change Audit Logging
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_009
Title: AC5 - Verify Configuration Change Audit Logging with Timestamp and User Information
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of audit logging functionality
Integration_Points: Authentication Services, Audit Database, Configuration API
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC5
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Audit-Trail, Data-Governance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication Services, Audit Database, Configuration API
Performance_Baseline: < 200ms for audit log creation
Data_Requirements: User authentication data, configuration change scenarios
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Audit logging system enabled and configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access with audit privileges
Test_Data: Test user: admin@testutility.com, Configuration changes for logging
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and configuration tests must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Make configuration change in Core System Settings | Change saves successfully and audit log created | Update Organization Name from "Test Utility Corp" to "Test Utility Corporation" | AC5 - Basic audit logging validation |
4 | Verify user information logging | User details accurately captured | Expected: User ID: USR_001, Username: admin@testutility.com, Role: Utility Administrator | AC5 - User identification validation |
5 | Test configuration change in Pricing & Billing, revenue, meter, consumer services and complaints and check the the dashboard updates accordingly with accuratelu count as mention in TC-08 | Complex configuration change completely updates on cards | Add rate plan: "Commercial Peak" - Base: $0.12/kWh, Peak: $0.18/kWh (Mon-Fri 9AM-6PM) | AC5 - Complex change logging |
7 | Test multiple simultaneous changes | All changes updates independently upon refresh | Update 3 sections simultaneously: Core, Staff, Service Areas | AC5 - Concurrent change logging |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All configuration changes are logged with complete timestamp and user information per AC5
Secondary_Verifications: Log integrity maintained, security controls function, retention policy works
Negative_Verification: No missing logs, unauthorized access prevented, no data corruption
Test Case 10: Verify Error Handling and Edge Case Scenarios
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: ONB02US01_TC_010
Title: AC5 - Verify Error Handling and Edge Case Scenarios for Audit Logging
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: Utility Admin Dashboard
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: 100% of error handling scenarios
Integration_Points: All system components, Error handling system
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete - AC5 edge cases
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: System-Reliability, Error-Recovery, Audit-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: All system components, Error simulation capabilities
Performance_Baseline: Error recovery < 30 seconds
Data_Requirements: Edge case test data, error simulation scenarios
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Error simulation capabilities configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Boundary value data, corrupted data scenarios
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 must pass
Test Procedure
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Test audit logging with database unavailability | Graceful error handling, no data loss | Simulate audit database disconnection during configuration change | AC5 - Database failure resilience |
2 | Test configuration with maximum field lengths | System validates and handles long inputs appropriately | Organization Name: 1000+ character string "Test Utility Corporation..." | AC5 - Boundary value testing |
3 | Test concurrent user configuration conflicts | Proper conflict resolution and audit logging | Two users updating same configuration simultaneously | AC5 - Concurrency handling |
4 | Test malformed configuration data | Input validation and error logging | Invalid JSON data: {"rate_plan": "invalid_format", "price": "not_a_number"} | AC5 - Input validation |
5 | Test browser refresh during configuration | Data persistence and audit logging | F5 refresh during unsaved configuration changes | AC5 - Browser behavior handling |
6 | Test extreme data values | System stability with edge case values | Pricing: $0.00, $999,999.99, negative values, null values | AC5 - Extreme value handling |
7 | Test system recovery after errors | All functions return to normal operation | Restore all simulated failures and verify system recovery | AC5 - Complete recovery validation |
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All error conditions are handled gracefully without audit trail corruption
Secondary_Verifications: Recovery mechanisms work, no data loss occurs, user experience remains stable
Negative_Verification: No system crashes, audit trail gaps, or unhandled exceptions
Test Suite Organization
Smoke Test Suite
Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_003, TC_005, TC_007
Execution: Every build deployment
Duration: ~15 minutes
Regression Test Suite
Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core functionality and integrations
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_007, TC_008, TC_009
Execution: Before each release
Duration: ~60 minutes
Full Test Suite
Criteria: All test cases including edge cases and compatibility
Test Cases: TC_001 through TC_010
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Duration: ~75 minutes
API Test Suite
Criteria: API and integration testing
Test Cases: TC_002, TC_004, TC_008, TC_009
Execution: Daily API validation
Duration: ~30 minutes
Security Test Suite
Criteria: Security and audit validation
Test Cases: TC_009, TC_010
Execution: Monthly security validation
Duration: ~20 minutes
Test Execution Matrix
Test Case | Chrome Latest | Firefox Latest | Safari Latest | Edge Latest | Mobile Chrome | Mobile Safari |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TC_001 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
TC_002 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | - | - |
TC_003 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | - | - |
TC_004 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | - | - |
TC_005 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | - | - |
TC_006 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | - | - |
TC_007 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ○ | ○ |
TC_008 | ✓ | - | - | - | - | - |
TC_009 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
TC_010 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Legend:
✓ = Required testing
○ = Optional/Compatibility testing
- = Not applicable
Dependency Map
Test Execution Order and Prerequisites
Phase 1: Foundation (Must Pass First)
- TC_001: Dashboard Overview Loading - Base requirement for all other tests
Phase 2: Core Functionality (Can run in parallel after Phase 1)
- TC_002: Configuration Progress Calculation
- TC_003: Individual Section Progress Display
- TC_009: Configuration Change Audit Logging
Phase 3: Integration Testing (Requires Phase 1 & 2)
- TC_004: Section Progress Calculation Logic
- TC_005: Direct Navigation to Configuration Sections
- TC_007: Operational Metrics Display
- TC_008: KPI Calculation and Cross-Module Integration
Phase 4: Advanced Testing (Requires stable core functionality)
- TC_006: Configuration Section Access and Return Navigation
- TC_010: Error Handling and Edge Cases
External Dependencies
- CX Module: Required for TC_007, TC_008
- BX Module: Required for TC_007, TC_008
- MX Module: Required for TC_007, TC_008
- WX Module: Required for TC_007, TC_008
- Onboarding Services: Required for TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006
- Authentication Services: Required for all test cases
- Audit Database: Required for TC_009, TC_010
API Test Collection (Critical Level >=7)
Priority 1 APIs (Criticality: 9-10)
- Authentication API -
/api/auth/login - Dashboard Overview API -
/api/dashboard/overview - KPI Calculation API -
/api/kpi/calculations - Configuration Update API -
/api/configuration/update
Priority 2 APIs (Criticality: 7-8)
- Progress Tracking API -
/api/configuration/progress - Module Integration API -
/api/integration/modules - Audit Trail API -
/api/audit/logs - Error Logging API -
/api/system/errors
API Performance Benchmarks
- Authentication: < 1 second
- Dashboard data: < 500ms
- KPI calculations: < 500ms
- Configuration updates: < 2 seconds
- Audit logging: < 200ms
Performance Benchmarks
Response Time Requirements
- Dashboard initial load: < 3 seconds
- KPI refresh: < 500ms
- Configuration save: < 2 seconds
- Cross-module data sync: < 1 second
- API responses: < 500ms (critical operations)
- Audit log creation: < 200ms
Throughput Requirements
- Concurrent users: 25 users without performance degradation
- API requests: 100 requests/minute per user
- Data processing: 50,000+ records without timeout
Business Impact Metrics
- Utility setup time reduction: 40%
- Administrative efficiency improvement: 25%
- Configuration error reduction: 35%
- Training time reduction: 50%
Integration Test Map
Module Integration Points
CX (Customer Service) Module
- Data Flow: Service requests → Dashboard display
- Integration Points: Request status, complaint data, priority alerts
- Test Coverage: TC_007, TC_008
- Dependency: CX service availability
BX (Billing) Module
- Data Flow: Billing data → Revenue KPIs, Collection metrics
- Integration Points: Bill generation, payment processing, aging reports
- Test Coverage: TC_007, TC_008
- Dependency: Billing database, payment gateway
MX (Meter Management) Module
- Data Flow: Meter readings → Dashboard alerts, Reading cycle progress
- Integration Points: Meter alerts, reading exceptions, cycle completion
- Test Coverage: TC_007, TC_008
- Dependency: Meter data service, IoT connectivity
WX (Work Orders) Module
- Data Flow: Work orders → Field operations display, Completion metrics
- Integration Points: Work order status, technician assignments, completion rates
- Test Coverage: TC_007, TC_008
- Dependency: Field operations service, technician mobile app
Onboarding Services
- Data Flow: Configuration data → Progress tracking, Section management
- Integration Points: Section completion status, overall progress calculation
- Test Coverage: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006
- Dependency: Configuration database, validation services
Validation Checklist
Coverage Validation
- ✅ All acceptance criteria covered (10 criteria addressed)
- ✅ All business rules tested with weighted calculations
- ✅ Cross-browser compatibility (Chrome priority, others optional)
- ✅ Positive and negative scenarios included
- ✅ Integration points tested (CX, BX, MX, WX, Onboarding)
- ✅ Security considerations addressed
- ✅ Performance benchmarks defined
- ✅ Realistic test data provided with formulas
- ✅ Clear dependency mapping established
- ✅ Proper tagging for all 17 reports implemented
- ✅ Edge cases covered (detailed level achieved)
- ✅ API tests for critical operations included
- ✅ Complete test data with formulas provided
- ✅ Comprehensive comments in all test procedures
Quality Assurance
- All test cases follow the enhanced template structure
- Business context and quality metrics defined
- Stakeholder reporting requirements addressed
- Traceability to requirements established
- Execution prerequisites clearly defined
- Verification points comprehensive
- Complete test data with calculations provided
- Detailed comments for all test steps
Business Impact Alignment
- 40% utility setup time reduction validated through TC_005, TC_006
- 25% operational efficiency improvement tested via TC_007, TC_008
- Configuration quality improvement measured in TC_002, TC_004
- Administrative productivity gains validated through TC_001, TC_009
This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage for the Utility Admin Dashboard user story, supporting all 17 BrowserStack test management reports while ensuring business objectives are met. |
No Comments