Skip to main content

User Access and Management (ONB02US03)

Overall Coverage Summary

Total Coverage: 100% (10/10 Acceptance Criteria Covered)

  • Total Test Cases: 12 (10 Functional + 2 Non-Functional)
  • Total Acceptance Criteria: 10 (Based on user story requirements)
  • Coverage Percentage: (10/10) × 100 = 100%

Acceptance Criteria to Test Case Mapping

Acceptance Criteria

Test Case ID

Coverage Status

1. Display users in sortable table

ONB02US03_TC_001

✅ Covered

2. Multi-select filtering capability

ONB02US03_TC_002

✅ Covered

3. Search function for name and email

ONB02US03_TC_003

✅ Covered

4. Add new users with guided interface

ONB02US03_TC_004

✅ Covered

5. Clear user status with visual indicators

ONB02US03_TC_005

✅ Covered

6. Edit functionality for user information

ONB02US03_TC_006

✅ Covered

7. Clear action buttons with icons/tooltips

ONB02US03_TC_007

✅ Covered

8. Data validation with clear error messages

ONB02US03_TC_008

✅ Covered

9. Tooltips and contextual help

ONB02US03_TC_009

✅ Covered

10. Responsive design for different screen sizes

ONB02US03_TC_010

✅ Covered


Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

  1. User Dashboard Display - View user statistics and metrics
  2. User Listing & Navigation - Display, sort, and navigate user accounts
  3. User Search & Filtering - Find users using search and filter options
  4. User Creation - Add new users through guided workflow
  5. User Status Management - Modify user status (Active, Inactive, Invited, Expired)
  6. User Information Editing - Update user details and role assignments
  7. Bulk Operations - Handle multiple users simultaneously
  8. Email Notifications - Send invitation emails using Postmark template

Business Rules Implementation:

  1. Email Uniqueness Validation - Ensure unique email addresses
  2. Mandatory Field Validation - Enforce required fields during user creation
  3. Status Lifecycle Management - Handle status transitions and rules
  4. Department-Role Relationships - Validate appropriate role assignments
  5. Invitation Expiry Logic - Manage invitation timeframes and expiration

User Journeys:

  1. System Admin User Management Journey - Complete workflow for IT Director
  2. Utility Administrator User Provisioning Journey - Complete workflow for Utility Admin
  3. New User Onboarding Journey - From invitation to activation

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance:

  • Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
  • User list rendering < 2 seconds for up to 1000 users
  • Search response time < 500ms
  • Filter application time < 1 second

Usability:

  • Intuitive navigation flow
  • Clear error messaging
  • Responsive design for desktop
  • Tooltip and help guidance effectiveness

Reliability:

  • Data consistency across operations
  • Graceful error handling
  • Session management

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions:

  • Maximum field lengths
  • Special characters in names/emails
  • Large user datasets
  • Concurrent user operations

Invalid Inputs:

  • Malformed email addresses
  • Duplicate email entries
  • Missing required fields
  • Invalid role-department combinations



Test Cases
Test Case 1: Verify User Table Display with Sortable Columns (AC-1)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_001

Title: Verify User Table Display with Sortable Columns

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-1

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Onb Services, HappyPath, Onboarding

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, User Management API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: user-table-service, sorting-engine, ui-components
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-1 (User Display Requirements)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web


Stakeholder Reporting:

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering

Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Experience

Trend_Tracking: Yes

Executive_Visibility: Medium

Customer_Impact_Level: High


Requirements Traceability:

Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US03_TC_002, ONB02US03_TC_003


Test Environment:

Environment: Staging

Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest

Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

Dependencies: User Management API, Database, UI framework

Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds load time

Data_Requirements: Minimum 10 users with varied data


Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements:

User logged in as System Admin or Utility Administrator

Sample user data exists in system (minimum 10 users)

User Management module accessible from main navigation

Database populated with test users

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

Username: admin@utilitytest.com

Password: SecurePass123!

Test Users: Alice Johnson, Bob Smith, John Doe

Departments: Administration, IT, Customer Service

Various user statuses and roles

Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication verified, Navigation functionality confirmed

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to User Management from main menu

User Management page loads with user table

N/A

Verify page loads

2

Verify table columns display

Table shows columns: Name, Email, Department, Role, Status, Last Login.

Column headers visible

Check all required columns

3

Click on "Name" column header

Table sorts alphabetically by user name (A-Z)

Users: Alice, Bob, John

Ascending sort verification

4

Click "Name" header again

Table sorts in reverse order (Z-A)

Users: John, Bob, Alice

Descending sort verification

5

Click "Email" column header

Table sorts alphabetically by email address

Email sorting

Email column sort

6

Click "Department" column header

Table sorts by department name

Dept A-Z order

Department sorting

7

Click "Role" column header

Table sorts by role alphabetically

Role A-Z order

Role sorting

8

Click "Status" column header

Table sorts by status priority order

Active, Inactive, Invited, Expired

Status sorting

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All required columns are displayed and sortable
  • Secondary_Verifications: Sort indicators show current sort direction, data accuracy maintained
  • Negative_Verification: No broken layouts or missing data during sorting



ONB02US03_TC_002: Verify Multi-Select Filtering for Departments, Roles, and Statuses

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_002

Title: Verify Multi-Select Filtering for Departments, Roles, and Statuses

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-2

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AuthServices, HappyPath,

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, Validation Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: validation-service, form-handler, error-messaging
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-8 (Data Validation Requirements)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Validation-Testing, Security-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: High
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation engine, Form processing service, Error messaging system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Various invalid input scenarios

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User creation/edit forms accessible
  • Various validation scenarios can be tested
  • Error messaging system functional
  • Validation engine operational

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • Invalid email formats: "invalid-email-format", "user$%@domain.com"
  • Long text strings: 300+ character inputs
  • Existing user email for duplicate testing
  • Special characters and edge case inputs

Prior_Test_Cases: Form access verified, User management interface functional

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click "Filters" dropdown button

Filter panel opens with sections

N/A

Filter panel access

2

Expand "Department" filter section

Department checkboxes displayed

All departments listed

Department options

3

Select multiple departments

Multiple checkboxes selected

Administration, IT, Customer Service

Multi-select functionality

4

Click "Apply Filters"

Table shows users from selected departments only

Filtered results

Department filtering

5

Expand "Role" filter section

Role checkbox displayed with multi-select

All system roles

Role filter options

6

Select multiple roles

Additional role filters applied

System Admin, Manager roles

Combined filtering

7

Expand "Status" filter section

Status checkbox with selected role

Active, Inactive, Invited

Status filter options

8

Select statuses

Status filters combined with existing

Active + Invited statuses

Multi-criteria filtering

9

Verify filter badge display

Shows "X filters applied" indicator

Filter count badge

Active filter indication

10

Click "Clear Filters"

All filters removed, full user list displayed

Complete user list

Filter reset

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Multi-select works for all three filter categories
  • Secondary_Verifications: Filters combine correctly, results update in real-time
  • Negative_Verification: Conflicting filters handled appropriately



ONB02US03_TC_003: Verify Search Function for Name and Email Matching (AC-3)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_003

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Test Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-3

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium,HappyPath

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, Search Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-3 (Search Functionality)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Search-Performance, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Medium
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search engine, Database indexing, User data
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms search response
  • Data_Requirements: Users with known names and email addresses

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User Management page loaded and accessible
  • Test users with known names and email addresses exist
  • Search functionality is visible and enabled
  • Search indexing operational

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

Prior_Test_Cases: User Management interface loaded, User data populated

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate search field

Search field visible with placeholder text

"Search users..."

Search field identification

2

Click in search field

Cursor appears, field is active

N/A

Field activation

3

Type partial name

Results filter to show matching names

"John" → Shows John Doe

Partial name matching

4

Clear search, type full name

Exact name match displayed

"Jane Smith" → Jane Smith only

Full name matching

5

Clear search, type partial email

Results filter to matching emails

"john.doe" → john.doe@example.com

Partial email matching

6

Clear search, type full email

User with exact email shown

"jane.smith@example.com"

Full email matching

7

Type non-existent search term

"No users found" message displayed

"XYZ123" → No results

No match scenario

8

Clear search field

All users displayed again

Empty search → Full list

Search reset

9

Test case-insensitive search

Search works regardless of case

"JOHN" → Shows john doe

Case insensitivity

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search finds matches in both name and email fields
  • Secondary_Verifications: Partial matching works, case-insensitive search
  • Negative_Verification: Appropriate "no results" message for invalid searches



ONB02US03_TC_004: Verify Add New User Interface with Built-in Guidance (AC-4)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_004

Title: Verify Add New User Interface with Built-in Guidance

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-4

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyPath

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Setup-Configuration
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, Email Service, Validation Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-4 (User Creation Workflow)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Onboarding, Workflow-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: High
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: User creation service, Email service, Form validation
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds form submission
  • Data_Requirements: Department and role configurations

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User logged in as System Admin or Utility Administrator
  • User Management page accessible
  • Required departments and roles configured in system
  • Email service operational for invitation sending

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • New User: Thomas Anderson, thomas.anderson@company.com
  • Departments: Administration, IT, Customer Service, Operations
  • Roles: Manager, Supervisor, Technician, Administrator
  • Valid phone numbers, addresses as needed

Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication verified, Department/Role setup completed

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click "Add User" button

Modal dialog opens with user creation form

N/A

Modal display

2

Verify form fields and labels

Name*, Email*, Department*, Role* fields visible

Required field indicators

Form layout verification

3

Check built-in guidance

Placeholder text and field descriptions present

"Enter full name", "Enter email address"

Guidance elements

4

Select department

Department dropdown shows all available options

Administration, IT, Customer Service, etc.

Department selection

5

Verify role updates

Role dropdown updates based on selected department

Department-specific roles

Dynamic role filtering

6

Fill required fields with valid data

All fields accept valid input

"Thomas Anderson", "thomas@company.com"

Valid data entry

7

Click "Create User" button

User creation processes successfully

N/A

User creation

8

Verify success feedback

Success message displayed and user appears in list

"User created successfully"

Creation confirmation

9

Verify guided workflow

Process flows logically with clear next steps

Step-by-step guidance

Workflow validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Add user interface provides clear guidance throughout process
  • Secondary_Verifications: Required fields marked, dynamic field updates, success feedback
  • Negative_Verification: Form prevents submission without required fields



ONB02US03_TC_005: Verify User Status Display with Visual Indicators and Tooltips (AC-5)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_005

Title: Verify User Status Display with Visual Indicators and Tooltips

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-5

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: UI/Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Onb Services, HappyPath

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, UI Framework
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-5 (Status Visualization)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: UI-Testing, User-Experience, Visual-Standards
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: Low
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: UI framework, Tooltip system, Status management
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second tooltip display
  • Data_Requirements: Users with different statuses

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User Management table displayed with users in different statuses
  • Test data includes users with Active, Inactive, Invited, and Expired statuses
  • Tooltip system operational
  • Status indicators properly configured

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • Active User: John Doe (Green indicator)
  • Inactive User: Robert Johnson (Gray/Red indicator)
  • Invited User: Sarah Brown (Blue indicator)
  • Expired User: Michael Wilson (Red indicator)

Prior_Test_Cases: User Management interface loaded, User statuses configured

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate user with "Active" status

Green indicator with "Active" text displayed

John Doe - Active

Active status visual

2

Hover over Active status indicator

Tooltip explains "User has active access to system"

Tooltip content

Active status tooltip

3

Locate user with "Inactive" status

Gray/Red indicator with "Inactive" text

Robert Johnson - Inactive

Inactive status visual

4

Hover over Inactive status indicator

Tooltip explains "User access is currently disabled"

Tooltip content

Inactive status tooltip

5

Locate user with "Invited" status

Blue indicator with "Invited" text

Sarah Brown - Invited

Invited status visual

6

Hover over Invited status indicator

Tooltip explains "User invited but not yet activated"

Tooltip content

Invited status tooltip

7

Locate user with "Expired" status

Red indicator with "Expired" text

Michael Wilson - Expired

Expired status visual

8

Hover over Expired status indicator

Tooltip explains "User invitation has expired"

Tooltip content

Expired status tooltip

9

Verify color consistency

Same status uses consistent colors across all users

Multiple users per status

Color consistency

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Each status has distinct visual indicator with clear tooltips
  • Secondary_Verifications: Color coding is consistent, tooltips are informative
  • Negative_Verification: No missing or unclear status indicators



ONB02US03_TC_006: Verify Edit Functionality with Appropriate Fields for User Information (AC-6)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_006

Title: Verify Edit Functionality with Appropriate Fields for User Information

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-6

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,HappyPath

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, Validation Engine, Audit Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-6 (User Information Management)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Management, Data-Integrity
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Medium
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: User edit service, Validation engine, Audit logging
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds save operation
  • Data_Requirements: Existing users with editable information

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User logged in with edit permissions
  • Existing users available for editing
  • All departments and roles configured
  • Audit logging system operational

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

Prior_Test_Cases: User Management interface loaded, User data populated

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate user in table

Find existing user for editing

John Doe

Target user

2

Click edit icon in Actions column

User edit interface opens (modal/panel)

N/A

Edit access

3

Verify editable fields present

Name, Email, Department, Role, Status fields shown

Current user data pre-filled

Field availability

4

Modify user name

Name field allows editing and accepts changes

Change to "Johnathan Doe"

Name editing

5

Update email address

Email field editable with validation

"johnathan.doe@company.com"

Email editing

6

Change department

Department dropdown shows all options

Change from IT to Customer Service

Department change

7

Verify role field updates

Role options update based on new department

Customer Service roles only

Dynamic role update

8

Select new appropriate role

Role selection works correctly

CSO Manager

Role selection

9

Change user status

Status dropdown allows status modification

Change to Inactive

Status editing

10

Click "Save Changes"

Changes processed and confirmed

N/A

Save functionality

11

Verify updates in user list

Modified information reflects in table

Updated user details

Change verification

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All appropriate fields are editable with proper validation
  • Secondary_Verifications: Dynamic field updates work, changes persist correctly
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid changes are prevented with clear feedback



ONB02US03_TC_007: Verify Clear Action Buttons with Appropriate Icons and Tooltips (AC-7)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_007

Title: Verify Clear Action Buttons with Appropriate Icons and Tooltips

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-7

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: UI/Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Onb Services, HappyPath

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, UI Framework, Accessibility
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-7 (UI Action Standards)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: UI-Testing, User-Experience, Accessibility-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: Low
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: UI framework, Icon library, Tooltip system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second tooltip display
  • Data_Requirements: Users with various statuses for action testing

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User Management interface loaded
  • User table displayed with action buttons
  • Various user statuses available for testing
  • Tooltip system operational

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • Active User: John Doe (for deactivate action)
  • Inactive User: Jane Smith (for activate action)
  • Invited User: Bob Johnson (for resend action)
  • Expired User: Sarah Wilson (for resend action)

Prior_Test_Cases: User Management interface functional, User statuses configured

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Check status change actions

Status-specific action buttons visible

Activate, Deactivate, Resend

Status action buttons

2

Hover over status action buttons

Each button has descriptive tooltip

Action-specific tooltips

Status button tooltips

3

Verify button visual design

All buttons clearly distinguishable and consistent

Button styling

Visual consistency

4

Test button accessibility

Buttons accessible via keyboard navigation

Tab navigation

Accessibility check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All action buttons have clear icons and informative tooltips
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual consistency, accessibility compliance
  • Negative_Verification: No unclear or missing button labels/tooltips



ONB02US03_TC_008: Verify Data Validation on Input Fields with Clear Error Messages (AC-8)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_008

Title: Verify Data Validation on Input Fields with Clear Error Messages

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-8

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Negative

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Setup-Configuration
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, Validation Engine, Security
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-8 (Data Validation Requirements)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Validation-Testing, Security-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: High
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation engine, Form processing service, Error messaging system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Various invalid input scenarios

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User creation/edit forms accessible
  • Various validation scenarios can be tested
  • Error messaging system functional
  • Validation engine operational

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • Invalid Emails: "invalid-email-format", "user$%@domain.com", "@domain.com", "user@"
  • Long Text: 300+ character strings for name fields
  • Special Characters: SQL injection attempts, XSS payloads
  • Existing User Email: john.doe@company.com (for duplicate testing)
  • Boundary Values: Single character names, maximum length inputs

Prior_Test_Cases: Form access verified, User management interface functional

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open Add User modal

Form displayed with empty fields

N/A

Form access

2

Submit form without filling required fields

Clear validation errors for each required field

Empty form submission

Required field validation

3

Verify name field error message

"Name must be at least 2 characters" error displayed near field

Empty name field

Name validation message

4

Verify email field error message

"Please enter a valid email address" error displayed

Empty email field

Email validation message

5

Enter invalid email format

"Please enter a valid email address" error shown

"invalid-email-format"

Email format validation

6

Enter email with special characters

Appropriate validation error displayed

"user$%@domain.com"

Special character validation

7

Test duplicate email prevention

"Email already exists" error message

Existing user email

Duplicate validation

8

Test maximum field length

Error for fields exceeding character limits

300+ character inputs

Length validation

9

Verify error message positioning

Errors appear near relevant fields

Field-specific placement

Error positioning

10

Test error message clarity

All error messages use clear, non-technical language

User-friendly language

Message clarity

11

Fill valid data after errors

Error messages disappear and form submits

Valid user data

Error resolution

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All input fields have appropriate validation with clear error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are helpful and positioned correctly
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid data is consistently rejected with informative feedback



ONB02US03_TC_009: Verify Tooltips and Contextual Help for Interface Elements (AC-9)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_009

Title: Verify Tooltips and Contextual Help for Interface Elements

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-9

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Usability
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Usability, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, HappyPath

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Nice-to-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, UI Framework, Help System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-9 (Help and Guidance Requirements)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: User-Experience, Help-System, Usability-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: Low
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Tooltip system, Help content management, UI framework
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second tooltip/help display
  • Data_Requirements: Various interface elements with help content

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User Management interface fully loaded
  • All interactive elements visible and functional
  • Help system components available
  • Tooltip system operational

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • Interface Elements: Status indicators, action buttons, form fields, filters
  • Help Content: Status meanings, button functions, field requirements
  • Complex Features: Multi-select filters, bulk operations, search functionality

Prior_Test_Cases: User Management interface loaded, All UI components functional

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Hover over user status indicators

Tooltips explain each status meaning

Status definitions

Status help

2

Hover over action buttons

Descriptive tooltips for all action buttons

Button purposes

Action help

3

Check form field help

Input fields have placeholder text or help icons

Field guidance

Form help

4

Look for contextual help icons

Help icons (?) available near complex features

Help icon placement

Contextual help

5

Click help icons

Help content displays relevant information

Feature explanations

Help content

6

Verify help content accuracy

Help information matches actual functionality

Current feature behavior

Content accuracy

7

Test help content usefulness

Help assists with completing user tasks

Task completion guidance

Help effectiveness

8

Check tooltip timing

Tooltips appear after appropriate hover delay

~1 second delay

Tooltip timing

9

Verify tooltip dismissal

Tooltips disappear when hover ends

Mouse movement

Tooltip behavior

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All interface elements have appropriate tooltips and help content
  • Secondary_Verifications: Help content is accurate, useful, and well-timed
  • Negative_Verification: No missing help for complex features



ONB02US03_TC_010: Verify Responsive Design and Usability on Different Screen Sizes (AC-10)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_010

Title: Verify Responsive Design and Usability on Different Screen Sizes

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: AC-10

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: UI/Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Responsive, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, CrossBrowser

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, UI Framework, Responsive Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: AC-10 (Responsive Design Requirements)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web (Multi-Device)

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: UI-Testing, Responsive-Design, Cross-Device-Support
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Medium
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 14+, Android 10+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: Responsive CSS framework, Device emulation tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across all screen sizes
  • Data_Requirements: Sufficient users for layout testing

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User Management interface accessible on multiple devices
  • Test data populated with sufficient users for layout testing
  • Browser developer tools available for responsive testing
  • Device emulation capabilities configured

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin or Utility Administrator access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • Test Users: 10+ users with varied data lengths
  • Long names and emails for overflow testing
  • Various departments and roles for column width testing

Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified on desktop, User data populated

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open User Management on desktop (1920x1080)

Full table layout with all columns visible

N/A

Desktop baseline

2

Verify table column spacing

All columns properly spaced, no overflow

Column width distribution

Desktop layout

3

Resize browser to tablet size (1024x768)

Layout adapts, maintains functionality

N/A

Tablet simulation

4

Check table responsiveness at tablet size

Table scrolls horizontally or columns adjust

Column behavior

Tablet table layout

5

Verify action buttons on tablet

Buttons remain accessible and properly sized

Button sizing

Tablet button layout

6

Verify text readability

Text remains readable at all screen sizes

Font size consistency

Text responsiveness

7

Test orientation changes

Layout adapts to portrait/landscape changes

Orientation handling

Device rotation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Interface maintains usability across all target screen sizes
  • Secondary_Verifications: No horizontal scrolling issues.
  • Negative_Verification: No layout breaks or inaccessible elements at any screen size



Test Case 11: Verify Performance and Load Time Requirements (Non-Functional Performance)

Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_011

Title: Verify Performance and Load Time Requirements

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: Non-Functional Performance

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-NonFunctional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,Load-Testing, Performance

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Database, Performance Monitoring, CDN
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: Non-Functional Performance Requirements
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Monitoring, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: High
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, Network throttling capabilities, Load testing tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3s, Search < 500ms, Operations < 2s
  • Data_Requirements: 100+ user records for load testing

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • User Management system under normal load conditions
  • Network connection available for throttling tests
  • Performance monitoring tools configured (Browser DevTools, Network throttling)
  • Large dataset (100+ users) available for testing
  • Clean browser state for accurate measurements

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

  • Username: admin@utilitytest.com
  • Password: SecurePass123!
  • 100+ user records for performance testing
  • Various search terms: "John", "admin", "test"
  • Filter combinations: Multiple departments, roles, statuses
  • Network throttling settings: 3G, Slow 3G simulation
  • Concurrent user simulation tools

Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified, System under normal load

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Measure initial page load time

User Management page loads within 3 seconds

Load time < 3s

Page load performance

2

Test with 100 users displayed

Table renders within 2 seconds with 100 users

100 user records

Large dataset performance

3

Measure search response time

Search results appear within 500ms

Various search terms

Search performance

4

Test filter application speed

Filters apply within 1 second

Multiple filter combinations

Filter performance

5

Measure sort operation time

Column sorting completes within 1 second

All sortable columns

Sort performance

6

Test Add User modal load

Modal opens within 500ms

N/A

Modal performance

7

Measure form submission time

User creation processes within 2 seconds

Valid user data

Form submission performance

8

Test with slow network (3G)

Interface remains usable with appropriate loading indicators

Network throttling

Slow connection testing

9

Verify loading states

Loading indicators shown during operations

Loading spinner/progress

Loading feedback

10

Test concurrent user scenario

System performs adequately with multiple users

Simulated concurrent users

Concurrent load testing

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All operations complete within acceptable time limits
  • Secondary_Verifications: Loading indicators provide feedback, system remains responsive
  • Negative_Verification: No timeouts or hanging operations under normal load



Test Case 12: Verify Browser Compatibility and Cross-Platform Functionality (Non-Functional Compatibility)
Test Case ID: ONB02US03_TC_012

Title: Verify Browser Compatibility and Cross-Platform Functionality

Test Case Metadata:

  • Created By: Arpita
  • Created Date: 2025-06-10
  • Version: 1.0
  • Acceptance Criteria: Non-Functional Compatibility

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Access and Management
  • Test Type: Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-NonFunctional, Platform-Multi, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, CrossBrowser

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: OnbServices, Cross-Browser Engine, UI Framework
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
  • Requirement_Coverage: Cross-Platform Compatibility Requirements
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web (Multi-Browser)

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Compatibility-Testing, Cross-Browser-Support, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Medium
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 14+, Android 10+
  • Screen_Resolution: Multiple resolutions per platform
  • Dependencies: Multiple browser environments, Cross-platform testing tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across all browsers
  • Data_Requirements: Consistent test data across all platforms

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

  • Access to multiple browsers and operating systems
  • User Management system accessible across all target platforms
  • Test data consistent across all testing environments
  • Browser compatibility testing tools configured

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access across all platforms

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test Chrome browser functionality

All features work correctly in Chrome

N/A

Chrome compatibility

2

Test Firefox browser functionality

All features work correctly in Firefox

N/A

Firefox compatibility

3

Test Safari browser functionality

All features work correctly in Safari

N/A

Safari compatibility

4

Test Edge browser functionality

All features work correctly in Edge

N/A

Edge compatibility

5

Verify CSS rendering consistency

Visual appearance consistent across browsers

UI elements

Cross-browser styling

6

Test JavaScript functionality

All interactive features work in each browser

User interactions

JavaScript compatibility

7

Verify form validation across browsers

Validation works consistently in all browsers

Invalid form data

Form compatibility

8

Check keyboard navigation

Keyboard accessibility works across all browsers

Tab navigation

Keyboard compatibility

9

Verify tooltip display

Tooltips render correctly in each browser

Hover interactions

Tooltip compatibility

10

Test modal behavior

Modals function properly across browsers

Add/Edit user modals

Modal compatibility

11

Check responsive breakpoints

Responsive design works consistently

Various screen sizes

Responsive compatibility

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All functionality works consistently across supported browsers
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual consistency maintained, no browser-specific issues
  • Negative_Verification: No critical functionality breaks in any supported browser



Non-Functional Test Cases Summary

Test Case Coverage Summary:

  • ONB02US03_TC_011: Performance and Load Time Testing
  • ONB02US03_TC_012: Browser Compatibility and Cross-Platform Testing

Additional Coverage Metrics:

  • Performance Testing: Load time, response time, concurrent user handling
  • Compatibility Testing: Multi-browser, cross-platform, device responsiveness
  • Total Test Cases: 12 (10 Functional + 2 Non-Functional)
  • Complete Coverage: 100% of acceptance criteria addressed

Test Execution Priority:

  1. P1-Critical: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_006, TC_008 (Smoke & Core functionality)
  2. P2-High: TC_005, TC_007, TC_010, TC_011, TC_012 (Regression & Performance)
  3. P3-Medium: TC_009 (Acceptance & Usability)



No Comments
Back to top