Skip to main content

GL Codes Management (BX05US01)

Coverage Summary

  • Total Coverage: 100%
  • Total Test Cases: 57 (45 Functional + 8 Performance/Integration + 4 Security)
  • Total Acceptance Criteria: 20 (from user story)
  • Priority Distribution: P1-Critical 28 (49%) + P2-High 18 (32%) + P3-Medium 8 (14%) + P4-Low 3 (5%)



1. Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

  1. Entity Dashboard Metrics Display - Real-time calculation and display of entity counts
  2. Entity Status Management - Toggle between active/inactive states with validation
  3. GL Code Assignment and Validation - Inline editing with format validation and duplicate prevention
  4. Search and Filter Operations - Multi-criteria filtering and search functionality
  5. Bulk Operations Management - Multi-select operations for status and GL code management
  6. Entity Configuration Management - Complete entity lifecycle management

Business Rules Coverage:

  1. Dashboard Calculation Rules - Percentage calculations and count validations
  2. GL Code Format Validation - ####-#### format enforcement
  3. Status Toggle Restrictions - Prevent activation without GL codes
  4. Uniqueness Constraints - Entity name and GL code uniqueness validation
  5. Category and Utility Assignments - System-defined categorization rules

User Journeys:

  1. Billing Manager Revenue Monitoring - End-to-end dashboard review and entity management
  2. System Admin Entity Configuration - Complete entity setup and GL code assignment workflow
  3. Bulk Entity Management - Mass operations for seasonal adjustments and configurations

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance:

  • Dashboard loading < 1 second
  • Search response < 500ms
  • Bulk operations processing
  • Concurrent user handling (1 req/min baseline)

Security:

  • Role-based access control validation
  • Input validation and sanitization
  • Audit trail verification
  • Data integrity protection

Compatibility:

  • Chrome latest version compatibility
  • Responsive design validation
  • Cross-resolution testing

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions:

  • Maximum entity limits (17+ entities as per sample data)
  • GL code format boundaries
  • Search term length limits
  • Bulk selection limits

Invalid Inputs:

  • Malformed GL codes
  • Duplicate GL code attempts
  • Invalid search characters
  • Unauthorized access attempts



2. Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Dashboard Metrics Calculation Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_001
Title: Verify dashboard entity count calculations and percentage displays
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, BxServices, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboard calculation functionality
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard calculation service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Entity database, calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second response time
  • Data_Requirements: Sample data with 17 entities (8 active, 9 inactive, 9 configured)

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: GL Entity Management module configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Sample entity dataset as per user story
  • Prior_Test_Cases: None

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to GL Entity Management page

Page loads successfully with dashboard metrics visible

Valid billing manager credentials

Verify page load time < 1s

2

Verify Total Entities count

Shows Total Entities count

"17" with description "Total GL entities in the system"

N/A

Count should match actual entity records

3

Verify Active Entities count and percentage

Shows Active Entities count and percentage

entities with status "Active".

"8" with "47% of total entities"

Calculation: 8/17*100 = 47.06% (rounded to 47%)

Active Entities= (active ent./total ent. *100)

Indicator= (current -previous/previous count) *100

Percentage calculation verification

4

Verify Inactive Entities count and percentage

Shows Inactive Entities count and percentage

"9" with "53% of total entities"

Calculation: 9/17*100 = 52.94% (rounded to 53%) inactive/total gl code*100

Inactive Entities= (Inactive ent./total ent. *100)

Indicator= (current -previous/previous count) *100

Percentage calculation verification

5

Verify Configured with GL Codes count and percentage

Shows Configured with GL Codes count and percentage

"9" with "53% have GL codes assigned"

Calculation: 9/17*100 = 52.94% (rounded to 53%) Configured/total gl code*100

Configured with GL Codes = (Configured with GL Codes/total ent. *100)

Indicator= (current -previous/previous count) *100

Only entities with GL codes != "Not set"

6

Verify dashboard metric icons and tooltips

Each card displays appropriate icon with informational tooltip

N/A

Visual validation

7

Refresh page and verify metrics persistence

All counts remain consistent after refresh

N/A

Data persistence check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All dashboard counts match calculated values with correct percentages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Icons display correctly, tooltips provide helpful information
  • Negative_Verification: No calculation errors or display inconsistencies, card loads with accurate data with icons mention in ui



Test Case 2: Entity Status Toggle with GL Code Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_002
Title: Verify entity status toggle validation prevents activation without GL codes
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, BxServices, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of status toggle validation
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Entity status management, validation engine
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Entity database, validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for toggle response
  • Data_Requirements: Entity with "Not set" GL code status

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Entity with inactive status and no GL code
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: UPI entity (Payment Channels, All utilities, Not set GL code, Inactive)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate entity name in the entity list

entity name visible with "Not set" GL code and Inactive status

Entity: UPI, Category: Payment Channels, Utility: All

Entity should be visible in table

2

Attempt to toggle entity entity status to Active

Toggle attempt blocked with validation error message

Click on inactive toggle switch

System should prevent activation

3

Verify error message display

Error message: "Cannot activate entity without GL code assignment"

N/A

Clear validation message shown

4

Verify entity status remains Inactive

Toggle switch returns to Inactive position

N/A

Status should not change

5

Verify dashboard metrics unchanged

Active entities count remains at 8, inactive remains at 9

N/A

No impact on dashboard counts

6

Assign GL code to UPI entity

GL code successfully assigned

GL Code: 1001-2003

Use edit action to assign code

7

Retry status toggle to Active

Entity successfully activated

N/A

Toggle should work after GL code assignment

8

Verify dashboard metrics updated

Active entities: 9 (53%), Inactive entities: 8 (47%), Configured: 10 (59%)

Updated calculations based on status change

Dashboard reflects changes

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System prevents activation of entities without GL codes
  • Secondary_Verifications: Dashboard metrics update correctly after successful activation
  • Negative_Verification: No entities can be activated without proper GL code assignment



Test Case 3: GL Code Inline Editing with Format Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_003
Title: Verify GL code inline editing with format validation and duplicate prevention
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, BxServices, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of GL Code Management
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: GL Code Management
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: GL code validation service, duplicate check service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Entity without GL code, existing GL codes for duplicate testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Entity with "Not set" GL code
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager edit access
  • Test_Data: UPI entity for testing, existing GL codes: 4001-1001, 1001-2001
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click edit icon for entity GL code field

GL code field becomes editable with input box

Entity: UPI (Not set GL code)

Inline editing mode activated

2

Enter invalid GL code format

Validation error displayed, save disabled

Test Data: "ABC-123", "12345", "1234-ABC"

Format validation: ####-####

3

Verify error message for invalid format

Error: "GL code must follow ####-#### format"

N/A

Clear format instruction

4

Enter duplicate GL code

Duplicate validation error displayed

Test Data: "4001-1001" (existing code)

Duplicate prevention check

5

Verify duplicate error message

Error: "GL code already exists for another entity"

N/A

Prevent duplicate assignments

6

Enter valid unique GL code

GL code accepted, save option enabled

Test Data: "1001-2003"

Valid format and unique

7

Click save button

GL code saved successfully, edit mode exits

N/A

Successful save operation

8

Verify GL code displayed in table

New GL code "1001-2003" shown in GL Code column

N/A

Visual confirmation of save

9

Click cancel during edit

Edit cancelled, original value restored

Test another entity for cancel test

Cancel functionality

10

Verify dashboard "Configured with GL Codes" count updated

Count increases from 9 to 10 (59%)

Calculation: 10/17*100 = 58.82% (rounded to 59%)

Dashboard metric update

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: GL code format validation enforces ####-#### pattern
  • Secondary_Verifications: Duplicate prevention works, dashboard updates correctly
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid formats and duplicates are rejected



Test Case 4: Search Functionality with Partial Match

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_004
Title: Verify entity search functionality with partial match capability
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, BxServices, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Search and Filter
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Search and Filter
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search service, entity database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms search response
  • Data_Requirements: Sample entities with various names

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Complete entity dataset loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Entities including "Water Consumption", "Wastewater Charges", "Payment" entities
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Enter "Water" in search box

Results show: Water Consumption, Wastewater Charges

Search term: "Water"

Partial match on entity names

2

Enter "Payment" in search box

Results show: Late Payment Fees, all Payment Channel entities

Search term: "Payment"

Cross-category search

3

Enter "4001" in search box

Results show all entities with GL codes starting with 4001

Search term: "4001"

GL code search capability

4

Enter non-existent term

"No entities found" message displayed

Search term: "XYZ123"

Handle no results gracefully

5

Clear search box

All entities displayed again

Clear search field

Reset to full list

6

Test case-insensitive search

Results match regardless of case

Search terms: "water", "WATER", "Water"

Case insensitivity check

7

Verify search result count accuracy

Search result count matches displayed entities

N/A

Result count validation

8

Test search with special characters

Search handles special characters appropriately

Search term: "NEFT/RTGS"

Special character handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search returns accurate results with partial matching
  • Secondary_Verifications: Case insensitive, handles special characters, accurate counts
  • Negative_Verification: No false positives in search results



Test Case 5: Multi-Criteria Filtering Functionality

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_005
Title: Verify multi-criteria filtering with status and utility combinations
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Search and Filter
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Search and Filter
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Filter service, entity database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response
  • Data_Requirements: Entities with various status and utility combinations

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Complete entity dataset with mixed statuses and utilities
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Mix of Active/Inactive entities across Water, Wastewater, All utilities
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_004 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Select "Active" from Status dropdown

Table shows only active entities (8 entities)

Filter: Status = Active

Status filter application

2

Select "Water" from Utilities dropdown while Active filter applied

Shows only active Water utility entities

Filter: Status = Active, Utility = Water

Combined filter test

3

Verify filtered results accuracy

Results show: Water Consumption, Fixed Charges (both active, water utility)

N/A

Result accuracy validation

4

Select "All Utilities" from dropdown

Shows all active entities across all utilities

Filter: Status = Active, Utility = All

Utility filter expansion

5

Change status to "Inactive"

Shows only inactive entities

Filter: Status = Inactive, Utility = All

Status filter change

6

Clear all filters using Clear button

All entities displayed

Click "Clear" button

Filter reset functionality

7

Apply "Wastewater" utility filter only

Shows entities with Wastewater utility

Filter: Utility = Wastewater

Single utility filter

8

Combine search with filters

Search "Charges" with "Active" status filter

Search: "Charges", Filter: Status = Active

Search + filter combination

9

Verify filter persistence during page operations

Filters remain active during entity edits

N/A

Filter state persistence

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Filters work individually and in combination accurately
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear function resets all filters, filters persist during operations
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect entities shown when filters applied



Test Case 6: Bulk Entity Selection and Operations

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_006
Title: Verify bulk entity selection and multi-entity operations
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, BxServices, Database, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Bulk Operations
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Bulk Operations
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Bulk operation service, entity database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for bulk operations
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple entities with various configurations

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple entities available for bulk operations
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager bulk operation access
  • Test_Data: Mix of entities with and without GL codes
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click checkbox entity

Entity selected, checkbox checked

Entity: Water Consumption

Single entity selection

2

Click checkboxes for Multiple entities

Multiple entities selected (3 total)

Entities: Water Consumption, Fixed Charges, Wastewater Charges

Multi-select functionality

3

Verify bulk operation options appear

Bulk action buttons/menu becomes available

N/A

Bulk operation UI activation

4

Attempt bulk deactivation of selected entities

Confirmation dialog appears with impact preview

Selected: 3 active entities

Bulk status change confirmation

5

Confirm bulk deactivation

All 3 entities changed to Inactive status

N/A

Bulk operation execution

6

Verify dashboard metrics updated

Active: 5 (29%), Inactive: 12 (71%)

Calculation: (8-3)=5 active, (9+3)=12 inactive

Dashboard recalculation

7

Select entities without GL codes for bulk activation

System prevents bulk activation, shows warning

Entities: UPI (if no GL code assigned)

Bulk validation enforcement

8

Select all entities using header checkbox

All visible entities selected

N/A

Select all functionality

9

Deselect individual entities

Individual entities deselected while others remain selected

N/A

Selective deselection

10

Clear all selections

All checkboxes cleared, bulk options disabled

N/A

Clear selection functionality

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Bulk operations work correctly with proper validation
  • Secondary_Verifications: Dashboard updates reflect bulk changes, confirmation dialogs appear
  • Negative_Verification: Bulk activation prevented for entities without GL codes



Test Case 7: Dashboard Metric Real-time Updates

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_007
Title: Verify dashboard metrics update after entity modifications
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional/Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, BxServices, Database, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Dashboard Updates
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard Updates
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Real-time calculation service, dashboard update service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for metric updates
  • Data_Requirements: Baseline entity counts for comparison

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Known baseline entity counts
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Starting state: 17 total, 8 active, 9 inactive, 9 configured
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Record initial dashboard metrics

Baseline: Total=17, Active=8(47%), Inactive=9(53%), Configured=9(53%)

N/A

Establish baseline

2

Activate one inactive entity with GL code

Dashboard updates: Active=9(53%), Inactive=8(47%)

Entity: Late Payment Fees (has GL code 4002-1001)

Single status change

3

Verify percentage recalculation

Active: 9/17100=52.94% (rounds to 53%), Inactive: 8/17100=47.06% (rounds to 47%)

Calculation verification

Real-time calculation

4

Assign GL code to entity without one

Configured count increases by 1 to 10 (59%)

Entity: UPI, GL Code: 1001-2003

GL code assignment impact

5

Verify configured percentage update

Configured: 10/17*100=58.82% (rounds to 59%) as mention in above test case TC-

Calculation: 10/17*100

Percentage calculation

6

Perform bulk status change (deactivate 2 entities)

Active decreases by 2, Inactive increases by 2

Entities: Any 2 active entities

Bulk operation impact

7

Verify bulk change dashboard update

Metrics update simultaneously with bulk operation completion

N/A

Real-time bulk update

8

Test dashboard update speed

All metric updates complete within 1 second

N/A

Performance validation

9

Refresh page and verify persistence

Metrics remain consistent after page refresh

N/A

Data persistence check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard metrics update immediately after any entity modification
  • Secondary_Verifications: Percentage calculations are accurate, updates complete within performance baseline
  • Negative_Verification: No delayed or incorrect metric updates



Test Case 8: Entity Status Activation Prevention Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_008
Title: Verify system prevents activation of entities without GL code assignments
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, BxServices, Database, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Entity Status Validation
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Entity Status Validation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Status validation service, GL code validation
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Entities with "Not set" GL codes

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Entities without GL code assignments
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Entities showing "Not set" in GL Code column
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Identify entities with "Not set" GL codes

List shows entities with "Not set" in GL Code column

Example: UPI entity

Prerequisite validation

2

Attempt to toggle inactive entity without GL code to active

Toggle blocked, remains in inactive position

Entity: UPI (Not set GL code)

Primary validation test

3

Verify validation error message display

Clear error message about GL code requirement

Error: "Cannot activate entity without GL code"

User feedback validation

4

Verify toggle visual feedback

Toggle switch returns to original position with visual indication

N/A

UI feedback check

5

Test multiple entities without GL codes

All entities without GL codes prevent activation

Any entities with "Not set" status

Comprehensive validation

6

Verify no dashboard metric changes

Active/Inactive counts remain unchanged after failed activation attempts

N/A

Metric integrity check

7

Assign minimal valid GL code and retry activation

Entity successfully activates after GL code assignment

GL Code: 1001-2003

Validation bypass test

8

Test bulk activation prevention

Bulk activation blocked if any selected entity lacks GL code

Mixed selection: some with/without GL codes

Bulk validation test

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System consistently prevents activation without GL codes
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages, no unintended metric changes, UI feedback appropriate
  • Negative_Verification: No entities activate without proper GL code assignment



Test Case 9: GL Code Duplicate Prevention System

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_009
Title: Verify GL code duplicate prevention across utility types
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Negative, BxServices, Database, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of GL Code Validation
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: GL Code Validation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: GL code validation service, duplicate check database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms duplicate check response
  • Data_Requirements: Existing GL codes across different utilities

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Existing entities with assigned GL codes
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager edit access
  • Test_Data: Existing GL codes: 4001-1001 (Water), 1001-2001 (All), 4001-1002 (Wastewater)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_003 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Attempt to assign existing GL code to different entity

Duplicate validation error displayed

Existing GL code: 4001-1001

Cross-entity duplicate check

2

Verify specific duplicate error message

Error: "GL code 4001-1001 already assigned to Water Consumption"

N/A

Detailed error information

3

Test duplicate prevention across different utilities

System prevents same GL code for different utility types

Try assigning 4001-1001 to Wastewater entity

Cross-utility duplicate check

4

Test duplicate prevention within same utility

System prevents duplicate within same utility type

Try assigning 4001-1002 to another Water entity

Same-utility duplicate check

5

Verify duplicate check case sensitivity

System treats codes as case sensitive for validation

Test: 4001-1001 vs 4001-1001 (same)

Case sensitivity validation

6

Test duplicate prevention during bulk operations

Bulk GL code assignment prevents duplicates

Bulk assign existing codes to multiple entities

Bulk duplicate prevention

7

Verify duplicate check performance

Duplicate validation completes within 500ms

N/A

Performance validation

8

Test duplicate check with special characters

System handles special characters in duplicate checking

Test codes with special characters if applicable

Edge case handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System prevents all GL code duplicates across all entities
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages with entity details, performance within baseline
  • Negative_Verification: No duplicate GL codes allowed under any circumstances



Test Case 10: Entity Name and Category Display Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_010
Title: Verify entity names and categories are system-defined and display correctly
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: Negative, Database, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Entity Display Management
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Entity Display Management
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Entity definition service, category management
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second page load
  • Data_Requirements: Complete entity dataset with categories

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: System-defined entities and categories configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager view access
  • Test_Data: Entities across Consumer Billing and Payment Channels categories
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify Consumer Billing category entities display

Shows: Water Consumption, Wastewater Charges, Fixed Charges, Late Payment Fees

Category: Consumer Billing

Category-based entity grouping

2

Verify Payment Channels category entities display

Shows: Razorpay, NEFT/RTGS, UPI

Category: Payment Channels

Payment channel entity validation

3

Verify category visual indicators

Each category displays with distinct color-coded labels

Consumer Billing (blue), Payment Channels (purple)

Visual categorization

4

Verify entity names are non-editable

Entity name column shows read-only text, no edit controls

N/A

System-defined validation

5

Verify category column is non-editable

Category column shows read-only labels, no edit controls

N/A

System-defined validation

6

Test category filter functionality

Filter by category shows only entities in selected category

Filter: Consumer Billing only

Category-based filtering

7

Verify entity name uniqueness within categories

No duplicate entity names within same category

N/A

Uniqueness constraint validation

8

Verify proper entity-utility associations

Entities show correct utility assignments per business rules

Water Consumption → Water, Razorpay → All

Entity-utility mapping validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All entity names and categories display correctly as system-defined
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators work, filtering by category functional
  • Negative_Verification: No ability to edit entity names or categories through UI



Test Case 11: Advanced Search with GL Code Patterns

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_011
Title: Verify advanced search functionality including GL code pattern matching
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Advanced Search
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Advanced Search
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search engine, GL code indexing service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms search response
  • Data_Requirements: Entities with various GL code patterns

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Entities with assigned GL codes in different patterns
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: GL codes like 4001-1001, 4001-1002, 1001-2001, 1001-2002
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_004 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Search for GL code prefix pattern

Returns all entities with GL codes starting with pattern

Search: "4001" → Returns Consumer Billing entities

Pattern-based search

2

Search for complete GL code

Returns specific entity with exact GL code match

Search: "4001-1001" → Returns Water Consumption

Exact match search

3

Search for partial entity names

Returns entities containing the search term

Search: "Water" → Returns Water Consumption, Wastewater Charges

Partial name matching

4

Search for utility types

Returns entities associated with searched utility

Search: "All" → Returns entities with "All" utility

Utility-based search

5

Search for category keywords

Returns entities in matching categories

Search: "Payment" → Returns Late Payment Fees + Payment Channel entities

Category-based search

6

Test search with mixed criteria

Handles complex search terms appropriately

Search: "4001 Water"

Multi-criteria search

7

Verify search result highlighting

Search terms highlighted in results where applicable

N/A

Visual search feedback

8

Test search performance with various term lengths

All searches complete within 500ms baseline

Terms: single char, long strings

Performance validation

9

Test search with empty results

Graceful handling of no-match searches

Search: "NonExistent123"

No results handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search accurately finds entities by names, GL codes, and patterns
  • Secondary_Verifications: Performance meets baseline, proper highlighting, graceful no-results handling
  • Negative_Verification: No irrelevant results returned for specific searches



Test Case 12: Filter Reset and Clear Functionality

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_012
Title: Verify filter reset functionality restores complete entity view
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, MOD-BX, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Filter Management
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Filter Management
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Filter service, UI state management
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms clear operation
  • Data_Requirements: Full entity dataset for restoration validation

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Filters applied to entity list
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Complete entity dataset (17 entities)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_005 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Apply multiple filters

Entity list filtered to subset

Status: Active, Utility: Water

Multiple filter application

2

Verify filtered state

Shows only entities matching all applied filters

Expected: 2-3 entities

Filtered state confirmation

3

Click "Clear" button

All filters reset to default "All" values

N/A

Primary clear functionality

4

Verify complete entity restoration

All 17 entities displayed in table

Count: 17 total entities

Full restoration validation

5

Verify filter dropdown resets

All dropdowns show "All" options selected

Status: All Status, Utility: All Utilities

Dropdown state reset

6

Clear search term with filters applied

Search field cleared while maintaining filter state

Search: "Water" + Status: Active

Selective clearing

7

Verify clear button performance

Clear operation completes within 500ms

N/A

Performance validation

8

Test clear with no filters applied

Clear button has no effect when no filters active

N/A

Edge case handling

9

Verify dashboard metrics after clear

Dashboard shows full dataset metrics

Total: 17, Active: 8, Inactive: 9, Configured: 9

Metric restoration

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Clear functionality restores complete unfiltered entity view
  • Secondary_Verifications: Dashboard metrics update correctly, performance within baseline
  • Negative_Verification: No residual filter effects after clear operation



Test Case 13: Responsive Design Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_013
Title: Verify GL Entity Management interface responsive design across screen resolutions
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: UI/Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, UI, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Responsive UI Design
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Responsive UI Design
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Multiple (Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667)
  • Dependencies: Responsive CSS framework
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds responsive layout adjustment
  • Data_Requirements: Complete entity dataset for layout testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Browser developer tools for resolution testing
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Full entity list with various content lengths
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Load page at 1920x1080 resolution

Full desktop layout displays correctly

Resolution: 1920x1080

Desktop baseline validation

2

Resize to tablet resolution 1024x768

Layout adjusts appropriately, all elements accessible

Resolution: 1024x768

Tablet responsive test

3

Verify table responsiveness at tablet size

Table columns adapt or scroll horizontally if needed

N/A

Table responsive behavior

4

Test dashboard metric cards at tablet size

Metric cards stack or resize appropriately

N/A

Dashboard responsive layout

6

Verify filter controls at mobile size

Filters accessible and usable at mobile resolution

N/A

Mobile filter accessibility

7

Test entity action buttons at mobile size

Edit and toggle buttons remain accessible and properly sized

N/A

Mobile action button usability

8

Verify search functionality at mobile size

Search box properly sized and functional

N/A

Mobile search usability

9

Test scroll behavior across resolutions

Content scrolls appropriately without layout breaks

N/A

Scroll behavior validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Interface remains fully functional and visually appropriate across all resolutions
  • Secondary_Verifications: No overlapping elements, all controls accessible, proper content flow
  • Negative_Verification: No layout breaks or inaccessible elements at any resolution



Test Case 14: Cross-Browser Compatibility Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_014
Title: Verify GL Entity Management functionality across Chrome browser versions
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, API, BxServices, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Browser Compatibility
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Browser Compatibility
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (primary), Chrome Latest-1 (secondary)
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Browser compatibility testing tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
  • Data_Requirements: Standard entity dataset

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple Chrome browser versions installed
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Complete entity dataset
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test core functionality in Chrome Latest

All features work as expected

N/A

Baseline browser test

2

Test dashboard metrics calculation in Chrome Latest-1

Metrics calculate and display correctly

Verify: Total=17, Active=8, etc.

Cross-version calculation test

3

Test GL code editing in different Chrome versions

Inline editing works consistently

Test GL code: 1001-2004

Edit functionality consistency

4

Test search functionality across versions

Search returns consistent results

Search term: "Water"

Search consistency validation

5

Test filter operations across versions

Filters work identically in both versions

Filter: Status=Active

Filter consistency test

6

Test status toggle functionality

Toggle behavior consistent across browsers

Entity: Any active entity

Toggle consistency validation

7

Verify visual rendering consistency

UI elements display consistently

N/A

Visual consistency check

8

Test performance consistency

Response times similar across browser versions

N/A

Performance consistency

9

Test error handling consistency

Error messages display consistently

Invalid GL code: ABC-123

Error handling consistency

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All functionality works consistently across Chrome browser versions
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual rendering identical, performance comparable, error handling consistent
  • Negative_Verification: No browser-specific functionality failures



Test Case 15: Data Integrity and Persistence Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_015
Title: Verify data integrity and persistence across user sessions
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Negative, BxServices, Database, API, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Data Persistence
  • Integration_Points: Database, BxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Data Persistence
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database persistence layer, session management
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for data reload
  • Data_Requirements: Modified entity data for persistence testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Ability to logout/login and refresh browser
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Entities with known modifications to track
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_003 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Make specific entity modifications

Changes saved successfully

Modify UPI entity: GL Code=1001-2005, Status=Active

Create trackable changes

2

Record modified entity state

Document current entity configuration

Entity: UPI, GL Code: 1001-2005, Status: Active

State documentation

3

Refresh browser page

All modifications persist after refresh

N/A

Browser refresh persistence

4

Verify dashboard metrics reflect changes

Metrics show updated counts including modifications

Updated counts based on changes

Metric persistence validation

5

Logout and login again

All entity modifications remain intact

N/A

Session persistence test

6

Verify modified entity still shows changes

UPI entity shows GL Code=1001-2005, Status=Active

N/A

Individual entity persistence

7

Make additional changes and close browser

New changes saved before browser closure

Additional test modification

Browser closure test

8

Reopen browser and navigate to page

All changes including latest modifications persist

N/A

Full persistence validation

9

Verify audit trail captures all changes

Change history shows all modifications with timestamps

N/A

Audit trail persistence

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All entity modifications persist across sessions and browser actions
  • Secondary_Verifications: Dashboard metrics remain accurate, audit trails preserved
  • Negative_Verification: No data loss during normal browser operations



Test Case 16: Integration with Financial Systems Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_016
Title: Verify entity status changes integrate with downstream billing and financial systems
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: System Integration
  • Test Type: Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, BxServices, Database, API, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of System Integration
  • Integration_Points: Database, API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: System Integration
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Billing system integration, financial system APIs, accounting system sync
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for integration sync
  • Data_Requirements: Entities that impact financial reporting

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Integration with external financial systems enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access with integration permissions
  • Test_Data: Revenue-impacting entities for integration testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_007 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Activate revenue-generating entity

Integration triggers to downstream systems

Entity: Water Consumption (revenue entity)

Revenue entity activation

2

Verify integration sync completion

Integration status shows successful sync within 5 seconds

N/A

Integration performance check

3

Deactivate payment channel entity

Payment system notified of channel deactivation

Entity: Razorpay (payment channel)

Payment integration test

4

Verify integration notification delivery

Downstream systems receive entity status updates

N/A

Integration delivery validation

5

Assign GL code to unconfigured entity

Accounting system receives new GL code mapping

Entity: UPI, GL Code: 1001-2006

GL code integration test

6

Verify accounting system sync

New GL code appears in accounting system integration

N/A

Accounting integration validation

7

Perform bulk status changes

Multiple entity changes sync to all relevant systems

Bulk change: 3 entities status toggle

Bulk integration test

8

Monitor integration error handling

System handles integration failures gracefully

Simulate integration failure if possible

Error handling validation

9

Verify audit trail includes integration status

Change history shows integration success/failure status

N/A

Integration audit validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All entity changes successfully integrate with downstream systems
  • Secondary_Verifications: Integration completes within performance baseline, error handling appropriate
  • Negative_Verification: No entity changes lost due to integration failures



Test Case 17: Performance Under Load Conditions

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_017
Title: Verify system performance under concurrent user load and large dataset conditions
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, API, Database, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of System Performance
  • Integration_Points: Database, API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: System Performance
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Load testing tools, performance monitoring
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1s dashboard load, < 500ms operations, 1 req/min sustained
  • Data_Requirements: Extended entity dataset for load testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Load testing environment configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple user accounts for concurrent testing
  • Test_Data: Expanded entity dataset (50+ entities)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Load dashboard with 50+ entities

Page loads within 1 second

Dataset: 50 entities

Large dataset performance

2

Perform concurrent user access

Multiple users access simultaneously without degradation

5 concurrent users

Concurrent access test

3

Execute bulk operations under load

Bulk operations complete within performance baseline

Bulk select/modify 20+ entities

Bulk operation performance

4

Test search performance with large dataset

Search results return within 500ms

Search across 50+ entities

Search performance validation

5

Simulate sustained load (1 req/min)

System maintains performance under sustained load

Continuous operations for 10 minutes

Sustained load test

6

Monitor dashboard metric calculation performance

Real-time calculations complete within baseline

50+ entity metrics calculation

Calculation performance

7

Test filter performance with large dataset

Filter operations complete within 500ms

Multiple filters on 50+ entities

Filter performance validation

8

Verify memory usage stability

No memory leaks during extended usage

Monitor during sustained operations

Memory stability check

9

Test recovery after peak load

System returns to normal performance after load reduction

N/A

Load recovery validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All operations meet performance baseline under load conditions
  • Secondary_Verifications: No performance degradation with multiple users, stable memory usage
  • Negative_Verification: No system timeouts or failures under normal load conditions



Test Case 18: Security and Access Control Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_018
Title: Verify role-based access control and security measures for GL Entity Management
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: HappyPath, Database, AuthServices, MOD-BX, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Security and Access Control
  • Integration_Points: Database, API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Security and Access Control
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication service, authorization service, role management
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for authorization checks
  • Data_Requirements: Different user role accounts

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Billing Manager and System Admin user accounts configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Access to both role types for testing
  • Test_Data: Sensitive entity operations for permission testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_001 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Billing Manager

Full access to GL Entity Management features

Valid Billing Manager credentials

Billing Manager access validation

2

Verify edit permissions for Billing Manager

Can edit GL codes, toggle status, perform bulk operations

N/A

Billing Manager permission scope

3

Login as System Admin

Full administrative access to all entity operations

Valid System Admin credentials

System Admin access validation

4

Verify System Admin additional permissions

Can create entities, modify system configurations

N/A

System Admin permission scope

5

Test unauthorized access prevention

Access denied for users without proper roles

Invalid or insufficient credentials

Unauthorized access prevention

6

Test authorization check performance

Permission checks complete within 2 seconds

N/A

Authorization performance

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Role-based access control properly restricts functionality
  • Secondary_Verifications: Session management secure, input validation prevents attacks
  • Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access to restricted functionality



Test Case 19: Error Handling and User Feedback Validation

Test Case ID: BX05US01_TC_019
Title: Verify comprehensive error handling and user feedback mechanisms
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 06, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: GL Codes Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Negative, Database, API, MOD-BX, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Error Handling and User Experience
  • Integration_Points: Database, API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Error Handling and User Experience
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Error handling service, notification system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for error message display
  • Data_Requirements: Various error scenarios for testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Error scenarios configured for testing
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Invalid data for error testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX05US01_TC_003 (passed)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Enter invalid GL code format

Clear format error message with guidance

Invalid input: "ABC-123"

Format validation error

2

Verify error message clarity and positioning

Error displays near input field with clear instruction

Error: "GL code must follow ####-#### format"

Error message UX validation

3

Attempt duplicate GL code assignment

Specific duplicate error with conflicting entity details

Duplicate code: "4001-1001"

Duplicate error specificity

4

Try to activate entity without GL code

Prevention message explains requirement clearly

Entity: UPI without GL code

Activation prevention feedback

5

Test network error handling

Graceful handling of connection issues with retry options

Simulate network disconnection

Network error resilience

6

Verify success feedback for valid operations

Positive confirmation for successful operations

Valid GL code save: "1001-2007"

Success feedback validation

7

Test error message dismissal

Error messages can be dismissed and don't persist inappropriately

N/A

Error message lifecycle

8

Verify error message accessibility

Error messages are screen reader accessible

N/A

Accessibility compliance

9

Test bulk operation error handling

Clear feedback when bulk operations partially fail

Mixed valid/invalid bulk selection

Bulk error handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All error conditions provide clear, actionable feedback to users
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are accessible, dismissible, and appropriately positioned
  • Negative_Verification: No cryptic or technical error messages shown to end users



3. Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1-Critical priority, basic functionality validation
Execution: Every build deployment
Test Cases:

  • BX05US01_TC_001 (Dashboard Metrics Calculation)
  • BX05US01_TC_002 (Entity Status Toggle Validation)
  • BX05US01_TC_003 (GL Code Inline Editing)
  • BX05US01_TC_018 (Security Access Control)

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, automated and core manual tests
Execution: Before each release
Test Cases:

  • All P1-Critical cases (TC_001 through TC_003, TC_006, TC_007, TC_008, TC_015, TC_016, TC_018, TC_020)
  • All P2-High cases (TC_004, TC_005, TC_010, TC_011, TC_013, TC_014, TC_017, TC_019)

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including edge cases
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Test Cases: All 20 test cases covering 100% of acceptance criteria



4. Integration & Dependency Handling

External System Dependencies

  • Accounting System Integration: GL code synchronization and validation
  • Payment Processing Systems: Payment channel entity status management
  • Billing System: Revenue entity status impact on billing processes
  • Audit System: Change tracking and compliance reporting

Test Execution Dependencies

  • Prerequisites: TC_001 must pass before all dashboard-related tests
  • Sequential: Security tests (TC_018) before audit tests (TC_020)
  • Parallel Execution: UI tests (TC_013, TC_014) can run in parallel
  • Failure Handling: Skip integration tests if core functionality fails



5. Performance Benchmarks

Response Time Requirements

  • Dashboard Loading: < 1 second
  • Search Operations: < 500ms
  • Filter Applications: < 500ms
  • GL Code Validation: < 500ms
  • Status Toggle Operations: < 500ms
  • Bulk Operations: < 2 seconds
  • Integration Sync: < 5 seconds

Load Requirements

  • Concurrent Users: 1 request/minute baseline (5 concurrent users for testing)
  • Entity Capacity: Support 50+ entities without performance degradation
  • Search Performance: Maintain response time with large datasets



6. API Test Cases (Critical Level >=7)

Test Case API_001: Dashboard Metrics API Validation

Priority: P1-Critical (Level 9)

  • Endpoint: GET /api/gl-entities/dashboard-metrics
  • Validation: Response includes total, active, inactive, configured counts
  • Performance: < 500ms response time
  • Error Handling: Proper error codes for system failures

Test Case API_002: Entity Status Update API

Priority: P1-Critical (Level 9)

  • Endpoint: PATCH /api/gl-entities/{id}/status
  • Validation: Status change with GL code requirement enforcement
  • Performance: < 500ms response time
  • Integration: Triggers downstream system notifications

Test Case API_003: GL Code Assignment API

Priority: P1-Critical (Level 8)

  • Endpoint: PATCH /api/gl-entities/{id}/gl-code
  • Validation: Format validation (####-####) and duplicate prevention
  • Performance: < 500ms response time
  • Error Handling: Specific error messages for validation failures

Test Case API_004: Bulk Operations API

Priority: P1-Critical (Level 8)

  • Endpoint: PATCH /api/gl-entities/bulk-update
  • Validation: Batch processing with individual validation
  • Performance: < 2 seconds for batch operations
  • Error Handling: Partial success handling with detailed error reporting



7. Security Testing for B2B Utility SaaS

Authentication & Authorization

  • Multi-role Authentication: Billing Manager vs System Admin access levels
  • Session Management: Secure session handling with appropriate timeouts
  • Permission Validation: Role-based access control for all operations
  • Password Policy: Compliance with utility industry security standards

Data Protection

  • Input Sanitization: Prevention of XSS and injection attacks in GL code fields
  • Data Encryption: Sensitive financial data encryption in transit and at rest
  • Audit Trail Security: Tamper-proof audit logging for compliance
  • Access Logging: Complete access logs for security monitoring

System Security

  • API Security: Rate limiting and authentication for all endpoints
  • Error Information: No sensitive data exposure in error messages
  • Integration Security: Secure communication with external financial systems
  • Compliance: SOC2 and utility industry compliance validation



8. Business Rules Coverage with Calculations

Rule 1: Dashboard Calculation Formulas

  • Total Entities: COUNT(all_entities)
  • Active Percentage: (COUNT(status='Active')/COUNT(all_entities))*100
  • Inactive Percentage: (COUNT(status='Inactive')/COUNT(all_entities))*100
  • Configured Percentage: (COUNT(gl_code!='Not set')/COUNT(all_entities))*100

Rule 2: GL Code Format Validation

  • Pattern: ####-#### (4 digits, hyphen, 4 digits)
  • Uniqueness: No duplicate GL codes across all entities
  • Requirement: GL code required before entity activation

Rule 3: Entity Status Management

  • Activation Constraint: IF gl_code = 'Not set' THEN prevent_activation = TRUE
  • Status Toggle: Only allow Active ↔ Inactive transitions
  • Impact Tracking: Log all status changes with user attribution

Rule 4: Category and Utility Constraints

  • System Defined: Entity names and categories not user-editable
  • Valid Categories: 'Consumer Billing', 'Payment Channels'
  • Valid Utilities: 'Water', 'Wastewater', 'All', 'Electricity', 'Gas'
  • Uniqueness: Entity name unique within category+utility combination



9. Validation Checklist

Functional Coverage ✓

  • [x] All 20 acceptance criteria covered with dedicated test cases
  • [x] All business rules tested with weighted calculations
  • [x] Cross-browser compatibility (Chrome latest versions)
  • [x] Positive and negative scenarios included
  • [x] Integration points tested with external systems
  • [x] Security considerations addressed comprehensively

Test Case Quality ✓

  • [x] Realistic test data using utility company examples
  • [x] Clear dependency mapping between test cases
  • [x] Proper tagging for all 17 BrowserStack reports
  • [x] Performance benchmarks defined and testable
  • [x] Edge cases covered with 80% detail level
  • [x] API tests for critical operations (importance >=7)

Framework Compliance ✓

  • [x] Enhanced test case structure with all required sections
  • [x] Business context and stakeholder reporting included
  • [x] Coverage tracking and quality metrics defined
  • [x] Integration and dependency handling specified
  • [x] Execution matrix with browser/device combinations
  • [x] Suite definitions for smoke, regression, and full testing


No Comments
Back to top