New Connection Application Detail View (CIS01US04)
Total Test Cases - 18
Total Acceptance Criteria - 17
Total Coverage = 100%
Test Scenario Summary
This test suite covers the complete workflow for New Connection Application processing in a B2B utility SaaS environment, supporting both Customer Executive and Utility Administrator user roles across six workflow stages: Application Review, Site Inspection, Approval, Installation, Activation, and Follow-up.
Functional Test Scenarios Overview:
- Application Review Workflow: Document verification, requirements validation, application decision making
- Site Inspection Management: Scheduling, location verification, inspection results processing
- Approval Process: Requirements validation, inspection results review, final approval decisions
- Installation Management: New meter installation scheduling and existing meter assignment
- Service Activation: Meter configuration, communication setup, service enablement
- Cross-Stage Navigation: Workflow progress tracking and stage transition validation
Non-Functional Test Scenarios:
- Performance Testing: Page load times, document processing, concurrent user handling
- Security Testing: Role-based access, data protection, audit trails
- Compatibility Testing: Chrome 115+ browser support, cross-device responsiveness
- Integration Testing: WX Dispatcher integration, meter management systems
Test Suite Organization
Smoke Test Suite (P1 Priority - Critical Business Functions)
- Application Review: Document verification and acceptance workflow
- Site Inspection: Basic scheduling and completion flow
- Approval: Final approval decision process
- Installation: Meter assignment or scheduling capability
- Activation: Service enablement with basic requirements
Regression Test Suite (P1-P2 Priority - Core Features & Integration)
- Complete end-to-end workflow execution
- Document management and verification accuracy
- Work order integration with WX Dispatcher
- Application status tracking and updates
- User role-based functionality validation
Test Case 1: Application Review Workflow Test Cases
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_001
Title: Verify Application Review Tab displays all required information panels with countdown timer
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Information Panels, Countdown Timer, Consumer Number Display
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Active user session, application database, countdown service
Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Valid application with customer data
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: User logged in as Customer Executive
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive role with application review access
Test_Data: Application ID: APP-20230615-001, Customer: Alex Johnson
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All three information panels (Contact, Account, Application Details) displayed with correct data, workflow progress indicator shows all 6 stages, countdown timer functional and accurate
Secondary_Verifications: Consumer number follows required APP-YYYYMMDD-XXX format, service and billing addresses displayed separately with clear labels, complete audit information shown with user attribution
Negative_Verification: No error messages displayed, no missing data fields, workflow stages properly restricted with future stages disabled, countdown timer never shows negative values
Test Case 2: Required Documents Display and Management
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_002
Title: Verify Required Documents section displays all 4 core documents with verification status
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Required Documents Display and Management
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Document-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Application with uploaded documents, document management service
Performance_Baseline: Document list load < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Application with 4 uploaded core documents
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with 4 required documents uploaded
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with document verification access
Test_Data: Identity Proof, Property Ownership Document, Previous Utility Bill, Service Application Form uploaded on 2023-06-15
Prior_Test_Cases: Application created with documents uploaded
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Exactly 4 core documents displayed with correct names (Identity Proof, Property Ownership Document, Previous Utility Bill, Service Application Form) and pending verification status
Secondary_Verifications: Upload dates shown consistently, action buttons present for each document, verification summary displays accurate counts, bulk actions available
Negative_Verification: No duplicate documents shown, no missing action buttons, no extra documents beyond the 4 required, no incorrect status indicators
Test Case 3: Document Verification Workflow
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_003
Title: Verify document verification workflow - Mark document as Verified
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Document Verification Actions and Status Updates
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Verification-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Document viewer service, audit logging system
Performance_Baseline: Document view load < 2 seconds, verification action < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Identity Proof document available for verification
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with Identity Proof document uploaded and pending verification
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with document verification permissions
Test_Data: Identity Proof document in pending verification status
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_002 - Required Documents Display successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Document status successfully changes from "Pending Verification" to "Verified" with green checkmark, and summary counts update correctly showing "1 verified", "0 rejected", "3 pending"
Secondary_Verifications: Requirements checklist reflects partial completion appropriately, action buttons update to show only "View" and "Reject" for verified document, audit trail captures verification action with user attribution
Negative_Verification: Other documents remain unaffected by this verification, no system errors occur, verified document cannot be verified again, requirements checklist does not show complete until all documents verified
Test Case 4: Document Rejection Workflow
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_004
Title: Verify document rejection workflow with reason capture
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Document Rejection Process and Reason Capture
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Rejection-Tracking
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Document management system, audit logging service
Performance_Baseline: Rejection dialog load < 1 second, rejection processing < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Property Ownership Document in pending verification status
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with Property Ownership Document uploaded and pending verification
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with document rejection permissions
Test_Data: Property Ownership Document available for rejection testing
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_002 - Document display successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Document successfully rejected, status changes to "Rejected" with red indicator, and summary counts update correctly to show "0 verified", "1 rejected", "3 pending"
Secondary_Verifications:Validation message for document rejection Negative_Verification: rejection doesn't affect other documents
Test Case 5: Requirements Checklist Validation
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_005
Title: Verify Requirements Checklist validation for application acceptance
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Critical
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Complete Requirements Validation and Application Acceptance
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice,
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Logic-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Document verification system, payment processing system, business rules engine
Performance_Baseline: Requirements validation < 1 second, application acceptance < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: All 4 documents available for verification, payment details configured
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with all 4 required documents uploaded
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with application acceptance permissions
Test_Data: Identity Proof, Property Document, Utility Bill, Application Form all available for verification
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_002 - Document display successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: All requirements checklist items show as completed (green checkmarks) when documents are verified: "All documents verified", "No rejected documents", "Service location verified", and "Accept Application" button becomes enabled only when all criteria met
Secondary_Verifications: Payment details displayed correctly with Amount ($150.00), Payment Option (Pay Later), Payment Mode (Credit Card), Payment Status (Pending), workflow progression occurs properly after acceptance
Negative_Verification: "Accept Application" button disabled when requirements incomplete, cannot proceed to next workflow stage without meeting all requirements, rejected documents prevent application acceptance, incomplete payment information blocks acceptance
Test Case 6: Consumer Number Auto-Generation
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_006
Title: Verify Consumer Number auto-generation follows APP-YYYYMMDD-XXX format
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Consumer Number Auto-Generation and Format Validation
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Business-Logic-Coverage, Number-Generation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Application creation system, number generation service
Performance_Baseline: Number generation < 500ms
Data_Requirements: Customer information for new application creation
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: System configured for new application creation
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with application creation access
Test_Data: Customer information: Sarah Johnson, service address, contact details
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Consumer numbers auto-generated following exact APP-YYYYMMDD-XXX format (e.g., APP-20230615-001) with proper date encoding and sequential numbering
Secondary_Verifications: Sequential numbering increments properly within same day, daily sequence resets appropriately, uniqueness guaranteed across all applications, number persists unchanged after creation
Negative_Verification: No duplicate numbers generated under any circumstances, format never violated even under high load, numbers never change after initial assignment,
Test Case 7: Service and Billing Address Separation
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_007
Title: Verify Service Address displayed separately from Billing Address
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Data Display
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Address Separation Display and Consistency
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Data-Display-Coverage, Address-Management
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Address management system, contact information service
Performance_Baseline: Address display load < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Application with distinct service and billing addresses
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with different service and billing addresses configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with address viewing access
Test_Data: Service Address: 123 Main Street, Anytown, AT 12345; Billing Address: 456 Billing St, Finance City, FC 56789
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_001 - Information panels display successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Service and billing addresses displayed as separate, clearly labeled sections with complete address information (street, city, state, ZIP code)
Secondary_Verifications: Visual separation maintained between address types, service address consistently used across Site Inspection and Installation workflows, proper formatting for both identical and different addresses
Negative_Verification: Addresses not confused or merged inappropriately,labels always present and accurate
Test Case 8: Workflow Progress Indicator and Stage Restrictions
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_008
Title: Verify workflow progress indicator and stage access restrictions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Workflow Progress Tracking and Stage Access Control
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Workflow-Coverage, Access-Control
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Workflow management system, access control service
Performance_Baseline: Workflow state check < 500ms
Data_Requirements: New application in initial pending state
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: New application created in initial workflow state
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with workflow navigation permissions
Test_Data: New application APP-20230616-001 in initial state
Prior_Test_Cases: Application creation successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Users cannot access future workflow stages (Site Inspection, Approval, Installation, Activation)until current stage (Application Review) requirements are satisfied, with proper visual indicators showing accessible vs restricted stages
Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators accurately reflect stage completion status with green checkmarks for completed stages, current stage highlighted, navigation allowed only between completed and current stages
Negative_Verification: future stages never become accidentally accessible
Test Case 09: Site Inspection Scheduling Functionality
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_009
Title: Verify Site Inspection scheduling with WX Dispatcher integration
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Site Inspection Scheduling and WX Integration
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Integration-Coverage, External-System-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: WX Dispatcher system, service order templates, mapping service
Performance_Baseline: WX integration call < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Accepted application ready for site inspection
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application accepted and progressed to Site Inspection stage
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with site inspection scheduling permissions
Test_Data: Accepted application with service address: 123 Main Street, Anytown, AT 12345
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_005 - Application acceptance successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Site inspection successfully scheduled with selected service order and date, work order created in WX Dispatcher system with correct customer and location information
Secondary_Verifications: Service location details displayed accurately with map and GPS coordinates, special instructions captured and transmitted to WX system, workflow progresses appropriately after scheduling
Negative_Verification: Cannot schedule inspection without required fields (service order, date), invalid dates rejected, WX integration failures handled gracefully with error messages, duplicate scheduling prevented
Test Case 10: Application Notes and Team Communication
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_010
Title: Verify Application Notes functionality for team communication
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Communication
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Application Notes and Team Communication
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Communication-Coverage, Audit-Trail
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: User management system, audit logging service
Performance_Baseline: Note creation < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Active application with user session
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: User logged in as Customer Executive with active application
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with note creation and viewing permissions
Test_Data: Application APP-20230615-001, User: Chris Scott - Customer Service Engineer
Prior_Test_Cases: Application access successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Application notes successfully created with proper user attribution showing "Chris Scott - Customer Service Engineer" format, timestamps accurate, and chronological ordering maintained
Secondary_Verifications: Notes persist across workflow stages and page refreshes, multi-user support functional with distinct user attribution, note creation interface intuitive and responsive
Negative_Verification: Cannot create empty notes, character limits enforced appropriately, notes never lose attribution or timestamps, note history never corrupted or lost
Test Case 11: Timeline Chronological Progression Display
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_011
Title: Verify Timeline displays chronological progression of application workflow
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Timeline Progression Tracking and Workflow History
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Workflow-Coverage, Timeline-Tracking
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Workflow tracking system, audit system
Performance_Baseline: Timeline load < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Application with multiple completed workflow stages
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with document verification and site inspection completed
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with timeline viewing access
Test_Data: Application with completed stages: submission, document verification, site inspection
Prior_Test_Cases: Document verification and site inspection completed
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Timeline accurately reflects complete chronological progression of application workflow stages with proper timestamps: "Application submitted - Jun 15, 2023 2:30 PM", "Document verification - Jun 16, 2023 10:15 AM", "Site inspection - Jun 20, 2023 9:00 AM"
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates occur when new actions performed, chronological ordering maintained in reverse order (newest first), status indicators accurate with green checkmarks for completed and orange clocks for pending
Negative_Verification: No duplicate timeline entries created, no missing workflow steps in timeline, timeline never shows incorrect timestamps, status indicators never misrepresent actual status
Test Case 12: Payment Details Display and Validation
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_012
Title: Verify Payment Details section display and validation for application acceptance
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Critical
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Payment Details Display and Financial Validation
Integration_Points:Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Financial-Validation-Coverage, Payment-Processing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Payment processing system, financial validation service
Performance_Baseline: Payment validation < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Application with payment details configured
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with payment information configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with payment viewing and validation access
Test_Data: Payment Amount: $150.00, Payment Option: Pay Later, Payment Mode: Credit Card, Payment Status: Pending
Prior_Test_Cases: Application Review tab accessible
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Payment Details section displays complete information with Amount ($150.00), Payment Option (Pay Later), Payment Mode (Credit Card), Payment Status (Pending) all properly formatted and clearly labeled
Secondary_Verifications: Payment information completeness validation works correctly before application acceptance, different payment scenarios (Pay Now vs Pay Later) handled appropriately, currency formatting consistent for various amounts with proper comma and decimal placement
Negative_Verification: Incomplete payment information prevents application acceptance, payment validation errors display appropriate messages, payment status never misrepresented, amount formatting never shows incorrect values, invalid payment amounts properly rejected
Test Case 13: Comprehensive Audit Trail Management
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_013
Title: Verify comprehensive audit information tracking for all user actions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Audit
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Compliance-Critical
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Complete Audit Information Tracking and User Attribution
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Audit-Coverage, Compliance-Tracking
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Audit logging system, user management service
Performance_Baseline: Audit log retrieval < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Multi-user application workflow with various actions
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with multiple user interactions and workflow actions
User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple users with different roles for comprehensive testing
Test_Data: Application created by John Smith, updated by Jane Doe, actions by Chris Scott
Prior_Test_Cases: Multi-user workflow actions completed
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Skip inspection successfully progresses workflow directly from Site Inspection to Approval stage, Site Inspection shows as completed with green checkmark
Secondary_Verifications: Workflow progress indicator updates correctly,
Negative_Verification:
Test Case 14: Service Activation Requirements and Communication Setup
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_014
Title: Verify Service Activation requirements and communication preferences configuration
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Service Activation Requirements and Communication Setup
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Activation-Coverage, Communication-Setup
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Communication system, meter management service
Performance_Baseline: Activation page load < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Application with completed installation ready for activation
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with meter installation completed successfully
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with service activation permissions
Test_Data: Meter Serial: WM-2023-001, Device No: DEV-W-1234, Installation Date: May 15, 2023
Prior_Test_Cases: Meter installation completion
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Activation requirements displayed with proper validation status showing unchecked Communication Method and Meter Configuration, meter information accurate (WM-2023-001, DEV-W-1234, Active ✓ Connected)
Secondary_Verifications: Communication preferences available (Email, SMS, Phone Call, E-bill, Paper-bill), installation audit information complete (May 15, 2023, John Smith), initial reading properly displayed (0 gal, May 25, 2023)
Negative_Verification: Cannot activate service without selecting required communication preferences, activation status remains "Pending Requirements" until all criteria met, meter configuration cannot be bypassed
Test Case 15: Final Service Activation Completion
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_015
Title: Verify Service Activation completion workflow and final status update
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Critical
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Final Service Activation and Workflow Completion
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Completion-Coverage, Revenue-Recognition
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Service management system, communication service, workflow engine
Performance_Baseline: Service activation < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Application ready for final activation with all prerequisites met
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application with all activation requirements configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with service activation completion permissions
Test_Data: Communication preferences selected, meter configuration completed
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_015 - Activation requirements setup successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Service successfully activated when all requirements met (Communication Method ✓, Meter Configuration ✓, communication preferences selected), application status changes to "Activated"
Secondary_Verifications: All workflow stages show completed with green checkmarks, activation audit trail captures final completion with user attribution, communication preferences properly enforced and validated
Negative_Verification: Cannot activate service without required communication method selected, activation status validation prevents premature completion, workflow completion only occurs after all stages properly finished
Test Case 16: Meter Installation - Schedule New Installation
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_016
Title: Verify Schedule New Installation workflow with WX Dispatcher integration
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: New Meter Installation Scheduling
Integration_Points:Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Installation-Coverage, WX-Integration
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: WX Dispatcher system, meter management system
Performance_Baseline: WX integration < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Approved application ready for installation
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application approved and progressed to Installation stage
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with meter installation scheduling permissions
Test_Data: Approved application for installation scheduling
Prior_Test_Cases: Application approval successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: New installation successfully scheduled with work order creation in WX Dispatcher, service order "MI-2023-5678" selected, installation date June 25, 2023
Secondary_Verifications: Latest reading (0) and reading date (June 25, 2023) captured correctly, installation summary displayed in right panel, special instructions transmitted to WX system
Negative_Verification: Cannot schedule without required fields (service order, date, reading), invalid dates rejected, WX integration failures handled with error messages, duplicate installations prevented
Test Case 17 : Meter Installation - Assign Existing Meter
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_017
Title: Verify Assign Existing Meter workflow with meter search and selection
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Existing Meter Assignment and Multi-Utility Support
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API , Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Meter-Management-Coverage, Multi-Utility-Support
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Meter management system, utility service databases
Performance_Baseline: Meter search < 2 seconds, assignment < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Available meters in inventory for assignment
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application approved with available meters in inventory
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with meter assignment permissions
Test_Data: Available meters: WM-2023-001, WM-2023-002 with device numbers
Prior_Test_Cases: Application approval successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Existing meter WM-2023-002 successfully assigned to customer account with reading data (150.5, June 25, 2023), meter search functions correctly by meter number
Secondary_Verifications: Selected meter details (WM-2023-002, DEV-W-2345) displayed accurately, multi-utility tabs functional, meter inventory shows available meters with correct status
Negative_Verification: Cannot assign meter without reading and date, already assigned meters not available for selection, invalid reading values rejected, meter assignment prevents double assignment
Test Case 18: Site Inspection
Test Case Metadata
Test Case ID: CIS01US04_TC_018
Title: Verify Skip Inspection functionality and workflow progression
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification
Module/Feature: New Connection Application Detail View
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Alternative-Workflow
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
Feature_Coverage: Skip Inspection Alternative Workflow Path
Integration_Points: Service-CX, API ,Happy path
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Stakeholder Reporting
Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Alternative-Workflow-Coverage, Business-Logic
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+,
Device/OS: Windows 10/11,
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Workflow management system, business rules engine
Performance_Baseline: Workflow skip operation < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Accepted application ready for site inspection stage
Prerequisites
Setup_Requirements: Application accepted and progressed to Site Inspection stage
User_Roles_Permissions: Customer Executive with inspection skip permissions
Test_Data: Accepted application APP-20230617-001 in Site Inspection stage
Prior_Test_Cases: NSC_TC_005 - Application acceptance successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
Primary_Verification: Skip inspection functionality successfully progresses workflow directly from Site Inspection to Approval stage, Site Inspection shows as completed with green checkmark, and Approval stage becomes accessible without inspection data
Secondary_Verifications: Workflow progress indicator updates correctly showing skipped status, Approval section displays and functions properly without inspection results, confirmation dialog prevents accidental skipping, stage navigation works correctly with skipped stage
Negative_Verification: Skipped inspection doesn't block subsequent approval process, workflow integrity maintained despite skipped stage, skip action is irreversible once confirmed, no required inspection data causes approval failures, cannot schedule inspection after skipping
No Comments