Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
Asset Module Data Migration - Comprehensive Test Cases
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
- Core Functionality: Asset data upload, validation, mapping, and migration
- Business Rules: Primary key management, data validation, cross-reference integrity
- User Journeys: End-to-end data migration workflow with error handling
- Integration Points: Asset-Facility-System/Network relationships
- Data Flow: CSV upload → AI mapping → validation → migration → reporting
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
- Performance: 50,000 record processing, response times <3s
- Security: Role-based access, data encryption, audit trails
- Compatibility: Cross-browser support, file format validation
- Usability: Error messaging, progress tracking, bulk operations
- Reliability: Data integrity, rollback capability, system recovery
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
- Boundary Conditions: File size limits, data field limits, date ranges
- Invalid Inputs: Malformed CSV, missing required fields, duplicate IDs
- System Failures: Network interruptions, large file timeouts
- Data Inconsistencies: Reference mismatches, circular dependencies
Test Case 1: Asset Data Upload with Valid CSV File
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_001
- Title: Successful asset data upload with valid CSV file containing all required fields
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 85%
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, File-Upload
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Feature-Adoption
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, File Upload Service, Database
- Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds upload processing
- Data_Requirements: Valid asset CSV with 100 records
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Asset Module enabled, templates downloaded
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with upload permissions
- Test_Data: Valid asset_upload_template.xlsx with sample data
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful
Test Data
- Asset Name/Description,Facility,Systems/Network,Asset Class,Asset Type,Location,Installation Year,Serial Number,Useful Life,Manufacturer,Status,Installation Cost ($),Replacement Cost ($),Depreciation Method,Current Value ($)
- Main Water Pump,FAC001,SYS001,Pumps,Centrifugal Pump,Pump House A,2020,WP-2020-001,25,AquaTech,Active,15000.00,18000.00,Straight Line,12000.00
- Backup Generator,FAC001,,Electrical,Emergency Generator,Electrical Room,2019,GEN-2019-002,20,PowerMax,Active,25000.00,30000.00,Straight Line,21250.00
- Control Valve,FAC002,SYS002,Valves,Gate Valve,Control Room,2021,CV-2021-003,15,FlowControl Inc,Active,3500.00,4200.00,Straight Line,3150.00
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All 100 records successfully migrated with correct data mapping
- Secondary_Verifications: Migration report accuracy, database record creation, audit log entries
- Negative_Verification: No duplicate records created, no data corruption
Test Case 2: Asset Upload with Missing Required Fields
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_002
- Title: Asset upload validation with missing required fields (Asset Name, Facility, Asset Class)
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 75%
- Integration_Points: Data-Validation, Error-Handling
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Error-Handling-Coverage
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, Validation Engine
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds validation processing
- Data_Requirements: Invalid asset CSV with missing required fields
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Asset Module enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role
- Test_Data: CSV file with missing required fields
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful
Test Data - Invalid CSV Sample
- Asset Name/Description,Facility,Asset Class,Asset Type,Status
- ,FAC001,Pumps,Centrifugal Pump,Active
- Backup Generator,,Electrical,Emergency Generator,Active
- Control Valve,FAC002,,Gate Valve,Active
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Validation correctly identifies and reports all missing required fields
- Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and actionable, migration is prevented
- Negative_Verification: No records with missing required fields are migrated
Test Case 3: Asset Upload with Invalid Facility References
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_003
- Title: Asset upload with invalid Facility ID references that don't exist in system
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90%
- Integration_Points: Database, Reference-Validation, Cross-Module
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, Data-Integrity
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, Facility Service, Database
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds reference validation
- Data_Requirements: CSV with non-existent facility references
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Known valid facilities in system (FAC001, FAC002)
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role
- Test_Data: CSV with invalid facility references (FAC999, FAC888)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Facility data exists in system
Test Data - Invalid References Sample
- Asset Name/Description,Facility,Systems/Network,Asset Class,Asset Type,Status
- Water Pump A,FAC999,SYS001,Pumps,Centrifugal Pump,Active
- Generator B,FAC888,SYS002,Electrical,Emergency Generator,Active
- Valve C,FAC777,SYS003,Valves,Gate Valve,Active
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All invalid facility references are detected and reported accurately
- Secondary_Verifications: Error messages provide clear correction guidance, migration is prevented
- Negative_Verification: No assets with invalid facility references are migrated to system
Test Case 4: Large File Upload Performance (10,000 Records)
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_004
- Title: Performance validation of maximum file size upload (50,000 asset records)
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: File-Upload, Database, Memory-Management
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, Scalability-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, File Upload Service, Database with performance monitoring
- Performance_Baseline: Upload <30 seconds, Processing <5 minutes, Total <10 minutes
- Data_Requirements: CSV file with exactly 50,000 valid asset records
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled, sufficient server resources
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with bulk upload permissions
- Test_Data: Generated CSV with 50,000 realistic asset records (~15MB file)
- Prior_Test_Cases: System performance baseline established
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All 50,000 records processed within performance benchmarks
- Secondary_Verifications: System stability maintained, memory usage within limits, UI responsiveness
- File Upload: <30 seconds for 15MB file
- AI Analysis: <2 minutes for 50,000 records
- Data Validation: <3 minutes for full dataset
- Migration Execution: <5 minutes total processing
- Memory Usage: <2GB peak usage
- CPU Usage: <80% peak during processing
- Database Performance: <500ms average query time
- Negative_Verification: No timeouts, no memory leaks, no system crashes during processing
Test Case 5: AI Column Mapping Accuracy
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_005
- Title: Validate AI-powered column mapping accuracy with various column name formats
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 80%
- Integration_Points: AI-Engine, Column-Mapping, Data-Analysis
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: AI-Performance, Feature-Accuracy
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, AI Mapping Engine
- Performance_Baseline: Mapping analysis <10 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV files with various column naming conventions
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: AI mapping engine enabled and trained
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role
- Test_Data: Multiple CSV files with different column naming patterns
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic upload functionality verified
Test Data - Column Name Variations
- Exact Match CSV:
- Asset Name/Description,Facility,Systems/Network,Asset Class,Asset Type,Status
- Underscore Variations CSV:
- Asset_Name,Facility_ID,System_Network,Asset_Class,Asset_Type,Current_Status
- Abbreviated Names CSV:
- Name,Fac,Sys,Class,Type,Stat,Install_Cost,Replace_Cost
- Custom Names CSV:
- Equipment_Description,Location_Code,Network_Code,Category,Subcategory,Operational_Status
Test Procedure
Expected Mapping Results
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: AI mapping accuracy meets confidence level thresholds (High >90%, Medium 60-90%, Low <60%)
- Secondary_Verifications: Manual override functionality works correctly, confidence indicators are accurate
- Negative_Verification: No incorrect high-confidence mappings, no system crashes with unusual column names
Test Suite Organization Summary
Smoke Test Suite (P1 Priority - Critical Path)
- AX06US01_TC_001: Valid asset upload (Happy path)
- AX06US01_TC_002: Missing required fields validation
- Basic authentication and navigation tests
Regression Test Suite (P1-P2 Priority - Core Features)
- AX06US01_TC_001: Valid asset upload
- AX06US01_TC_002: Missing required fields
- AX06US01_TC_003: Invalid facility references
- AX06US01_TC_005: AI column mapping accuracy
- Cross-browser compatibility tests
- Role-based access control tests
Performance Test Suite (Performance Validation)
- AX06US01_TC_004: Large file upload (50,000 records)
- Concurrent user upload scenarios
- Memory and CPU usage monitoring
- Database performance under load
Full Test Suite (Complete Coverage)
- All above test cases
- Edge cases and boundary testing
- Security penetration testing
- Accessibility compliance testing
- Mobile responsiveness validation
- API integration testing
Test Case 6: System Data Mapping - Conditional Screen
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_006
- Title: Validate System Data Mapping screen for unmapped critical system fields
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 85%
- Integration_Points: UI-Components, Bulk-Operations, Data-Assignment
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: UX-Enhancement, Workflow-Optimization
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, System Types Service, UI Components
- Performance_Baseline: Screen load <2 seconds, bulk operations <5 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV with unmapped Asset Class, Asset Type, System/Network fields
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: System Types and Asset Classifications data loaded
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with bulk assignment permissions
- Test_Data: CSV file with 200 assets missing system field mappings
- Prior_Test_Cases: Column mapping completed with unmapped system fields
Test Data - Unmapped System Fields CSV Sample
- Asset Name/Description,Facility,Installation Year,Status,Installation Cost ($),Asset Class,Asset Type,Systems/Network
- Main Pump A,FAC001,2020,Active,15000.00,,Centrifugal Pump,
- Backup Generator,FAC001,2019,Active,25000.00,Electrical,,SYS001
- Control Valve,FAC002,2021,Active,3500.00,,Gate Valve,
- Emergency Pump,FAC001,2022,Active,18000.00,Pumps,,
- Flow Meter,FAC002,2020,Active,8000.00,,Flow Meter,SYS002
Test Procedure
System Data Assignment Options
- Asset Classes: Pumps, Electrical, Valves, Instrumentation, Mechanical
- Asset Types: Centrifugal Pump, Gate Valve, Emergency Generator, Flow Meter, Control Panel
- Systems/Networks: SYS001, SYS002, SYS003, NET001, NET002
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All unmapped system fields can be assigned through bulk operations
- UI Verification Points
- Tab Navigation: Smooth switching between unmapped field tabs
- Search Performance: Real-time search results with <500ms response
- Filter Combinations: Multiple filters work together correctly
- Visual Indicators: Clear selection states and assignment tagging
- Progress Tracking: Accurate percentage calculations and updates
- Responsive Design: Functional on desktop and tablet screen sizes
- Secondary_Verifications: UI responsiveness, progress tracking accuracy, assignment persistence
- Negative_Verification: Cannot proceed until all required mappings completed, no UI freezing during bulk operations
Test Case 7: Data Update vs New Upload Selection
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_007
- Title: Validate selection between "Upload New Data" and "Update Existing Data" options
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90%
- Integration_Points: Template-Generation, Field-Selection, Upload-Control
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Update-Operations
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, Template Generation Service
- Performance_Baseline: Template generation <3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Existing assets in system for update testing
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Existing asset records in system (minimum 50 records)
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with update permissions
- Test_Data: N/A for initial selection test
- Prior_Test_Cases: System contains valid asset data
Test Procedure
Field Selection Options (Update Mode)
Updatable Fields (12 fields):
- Asset Name/Description ✓
- Location ✓
- Installation Year ✓
- Serial Number ✓
- Useful Life ✓
- Manufacturer ✓
- Status ✓
- Installation Cost ✓
- Replacement Cost ✓
- Depreciation Method ✓
- Current Value ✓
- Systems/Network ✓
Non-Updatable Fields (3 fields):
- Facility (Structural relationship)
- Asset Class (Classification lock)
- Asset Type (Classification lock)
Template Control Validation
- Template Download Mandatory: Upload disabled until template downloaded
- Template Format Check: File format validation against downloaded template
- Column Validation: Exact column match requirement
- Asset ID Validation: Presence and format checking
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Clear distinction between new upload and update workflows
- Secondary_Verifications: Template generation accuracy, upload control enforcement, field selection persistence
- Negative_Verification: Cannot upload without proper template, cannot update non-updatable fields
Test Case 8: Partial Field Update Execution
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_008
- Title: Execute partial field updates on existing asset records using template-based approach
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: Database-Updates, Audit-Logging, Data-Validation
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Data-Operations, Update-Success-Rate
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, Database, Audit Service
- Performance_Baseline: Update processing <2 minutes for 100 records
- Data_Requirements: 100 existing assets with known Asset IDs
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Existing asset records with Asset IDs: ASSET001-ASSET100
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with update permissions
- Test_Data: Update template with cost and status changes
- Prior_Test_Cases: Update workflow selected and template downloaded
Test Data - Update Template Sample
- Asset ID,Installation Cost ($),Replacement Cost ($),Status
- ASSET001,16500.00,19800.00,Active
- ASSET002,27500.00,33000.00,Under Maintenance
- ASSET003,3850.00,4620.00,Active
- ASSET004,19800.00,23760.00,Active
- ASSET005,8800.00,10560.00,Inactive
Test Procedure
Update Scenarios Tested
- Cost Updates: Installation and replacement cost increases (10-15%)
- Status Changes: Active → Under Maintenance, Active → Inactive
- Mixed Updates: Some records with cost changes, others with status changes
- Partial Records: Not all existing assets included in update file
Database Verification Queries
-- Verify cost updates
SELECT Asset_ID, Installation_Cost, Replacement_Cost, Status
FROM Assets
WHERE Asset_ID IN ('ASSET001', 'ASSET002', 'ASSET003');
-- Check audit trail
SELECT Asset_ID, Field_Name, Old_Value, New_Value, Updated_By, Updated_Date
FROM Asset_Audit_Log
WHERE Updated_Date >= CURRENT_DATE;
-- Verify unchanged fields
SELECT Asset_ID, Facility, Asset_Class, Asset_Type
FROM Assets
WHERE Asset_ID IN ('ASSET001', 'ASSET002');
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All 100 records updated successfully with correct values in selected fields
- Secondary_Verifications: Audit logging accuracy, unchanged field preservation, performance within benchmarks
- Negative_Verification: No updates to non-selected fields, no corruption of existing data
Test Case 9: Migration History and Rollback
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_009
- Title: Validate migration history logging and rollback capability within 3-day window
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Support
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90%
- Integration_Points: History-Service, Rollback-Engine, Audit-System
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Data-Recovery, Admin-Operations
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Asset Module Service, History Service, Rollback Engine
- Performance_Baseline: Rollback completion <5 minutes for 100 records
- Data_Requirements: Recent migration history with both new uploads and updates
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Admin role access, recent migration operations in history
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Administrator role with rollback permissions
- Test_Data: Previous successful new upload and update operations
- Prior_Test_Cases: AX06US01_TC_001 and AX06US01_TC_008 completed successfully
Test Procedure
History Entry Metadata Format
{
"operation_id": "OP_20250109_001",
"timestamp": "2025-01-09T10:30:00Z",
"user": "testuser@company.com",
"operation_type": "UPDATE",
"record_count": 50,
"affected_fields": ["Installation_Cost", "Replacement_Cost", "Status"],
"file_name": "asset_cost_updates.csv",
"success_rate": "100%",
"rollback_eligible": true,
"rollback_deadline": "2025-01-12T10:30:00Z"
}
Rollback Operation Types
- Update Rollback:
- Restores old field values for updated records
- Maintains record existence
- Logs field-level changes reversed
- New Upload Rollback:
- Deletes all newly created records
- Removes associated transaction logs
- Cleans up all related data
Rollback Validation Points
- Data Accuracy: All restored values match pre-operation state
- Referential Integrity: No broken relationships after rollback
- Audit Trail: Complete logging of rollback operations
- Performance: Rollback completion within acceptable timeframes
- User Feedback: Clear progress indication and completion messages
Time Window Testing
- Valid Rollback: Operations from 1-3 days ago
- Expired Rollback: Operations older than 3 days (rollback option not available)
- Timezone Handling: Correct calculation across different timezones
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Rollback successfully restores data to pre-operation state
- Secondary_Verifications: History logging accuracy, rollback eligibility calculation, user permission validation
- Negative_Verification: Cannot rollback operations older than 3 days, no data corruption during rollback
Test Case 10: Cross-Browser Compatibility
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX06US01_TC_010
- Title: Validate asset migration functionality across supported browsers and devices
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: 2025-01-09
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement for Asset (AX06US01)
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 70%
- Integration_Points: UI-Components, File-Upload, Browser-APIs
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Partial
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Compatibility-Matrix, Browser-Support
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: Cross-browser file upload support
- Performance_Baseline: Consistent across all browsers
- Data_Requirements: Standard asset upload CSV file
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Multiple browser/device combinations available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role
- Test_Data: Standard 50-record asset CSV file
- Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality verified in primary browser
Test Procedure - Cross-Browser Matrix
Detailed Test Steps (Per Browser)
Mobile/Tablet Specific Tests
- Touch Interface: Drag-and-drop with touch gestures
- File Selection: Mobile file picker functionality
- Responsive Layout: UI adaptation to smaller screens
- Performance: Acceptable performance on mobile devices
Browser-Specific Features
- File API Support: Modern file handling APIs
- CSS Grid/Flexbox: Layout consistency
- JavaScript ES6+: Modern JavaScript feature support
- WebSocket Support: Real-time progress updates
Known Browser Limitations
- Safari iOS: File upload size limitations
- Firefox: Different file type MIME handling
- Edge: Compatibility mode considerations
- Mobile Chrome: Memory constraints for large files
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Core migration functionality works identically across all supported browsers
- Secondary_Verifications: UI consistency, performance parity, feature availability
- Negative_Verification: No browser-specific crashes, no data corruption, no functional degradation
No Comments