Skip to main content

Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)

Total Test Cases :-20
Total Acceptance Criteria:-19
Total Coverage Percentage:-95%

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality Scenarios

  1. Service Order Creation Workflow
    • Single meter selection and order creation
    • Multiple meter selection (batch creation)
    • Service type selection and validation
    • Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) selection
    • Notes and instructions addition
    • Order summary and confirmation
  2. Service Order Tracking & Management
    • Dashboard view with all orders
    • Status-based filtering (All Orders, Created, Assigned, In Progress, Completed, Approved)
    • Search functionality by order number, meter information
    • Status progression tracking
    • Order details viewing
  3. Business Rules Enforcement
    • Unique work order ID generation (WO-YYYY-###)
    • Mandatory field validation
    • Status progression validation
    • Integration with WX dispatch system

Integration Point Scenarios

  1. WX System Integration
    • Service order logging to WX dispatch tab
    • Status synchronization between systems
    • Allocation tab updates in meter details page
  2. Data Flow Scenarios
    • Meter selection from master data
    • Service type and SOP association
    • Status change propagation

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance Scenarios

  • Dashboard loading with large datasets
  • Search and filter operations performance
  • Concurrent user handling (multiple meter managers)
  • API response times (1 req/min baseline)

Usability Scenarios

  • Multi-step form navigation
  • Error handling and user feedback
  • Visual status indicators effectiveness
  • Cross-browser compatibility

Reliability Scenarios

  • System recovery from failures
  • Data integrity maintenance
  • Service availability during peak usage

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

  • Maximum number of meters in batch selection
  • Long text in notes field
  • Date range filtering limits

Invalid Inputs

  • Unauthorized access attempts
  • Invalid service type selections
  • Malformed search queries

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Service Order Creation - Single Meter

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_001
Title: Create service order for single meter with all mandatory fields
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, 
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: WX System, Meter Master Data
  • Code_Module_Mapped: MeterService
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Meter Master Data, WX System
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
  • Data_Requirements: Valid meter data, user authentication

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Valid meter WM-12345, John Smith consumer
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Service Orders module

Service Orders dashboard displays

-

Verify main navigation

2

Click "Create Service Order" button

Create Service Order modal opens with Step 1

-

Modal should be responsive

3

Search for meter by Device number

Meter list filters to matching results

Search: "WM-12345"

Verify search functionality

4

Select meter WM-12345 by checking checkbox

Meter selection count updates to "1 meter(s) selected"

Meter: WM-12345

Visual confirmation required

5

Click "Next" button

Navigate to Step 2 - Service Configuration

-

Disabled until selection made

6

Select "Replacement" from Service Type dropdown

SOP dropdown becomes enabled

Service Type: Replacement

Dropdown dependency validation

7

Select "Standard Meter Replacement" from SOP dropdown

Selected meters section shows WM-12345

SOP: Standard Meter Replacement

Verify meter display

8

Click "Next" button

Navigate to Step 3 - Final Details

-

Form progression validation

9

Enter notes in Notes field

Text appears in notes field

Notes: "Routine replacement due to age"

Optional field testing

10

Review Service Order Summary

Summary shows: 1 meter, REPLACEMENT type, Standard Meter Replacement SOP

-

Data accuracy verification

11

Click "Create Order" button

Order created successfully, modal closes, returns to dashboard

-

Success message display

12

Verify new order appears in dashboard

New order visible with "Created" status and unique WO-YYYY-### ID

-

Auto-generation validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Service order created with unique ID and "Created" status
  • Secondary_Verifications: WX system integration logged, meter data accuracy
  • Negative_Verification: No duplicate orders created, no system errors

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 2: Service Order Creation - Multiple Meters (Batch)

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_002
Title: Create batch service order for multiple meters with same service type
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-End-to-End, Batch-Processing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 90%
  • Integration_Points: WX System, Meter Master Data, Batch Processing
  • Code_Module_Mapped: MeterService
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Meter Master Data, WX System, Batch Processing Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds batch processing
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple valid meters, user authentication

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, multiple meters available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Valid meters WM-12345, WM-23456, WM-56789, Multiple consumers Execution Analytics:
  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: MX01US04_TC_001
  • Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_018
  • Parallel_Tests: MX01US04_TC_003, MX01US04_TC_004
  • Sequential_Tests: Must follow TC_001

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for utility companies managing large meter inventories
  • Edge_Cases: Maximum meter selection limits, timeout handling
  • Risk_Areas: Batch processing failures, partial completions
  • Security_Considerations: Bulk data validation, authorization for batch operations

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Service Orders and click "Create Service Order"

Create Service Order modal opens

-

Starting point

2

Click "Select All (3)" checkbox

All 3 visible meters selected, count shows "3 meter(s) selected"

Meters: WM-12345, WM-23456, WM-56789

Bulk selection feature

3

Click "Next" to proceed to service configuration

Step 2 displays with all 3 meters in Selected Meters section

-

Batch processing validation

4

Select "Maintenance" from Service Type dropdown

SOP dropdown enabled with maintenance options

Service Type: Maintenance

Consistency requirement

5

Select "Preventive Maintenance" from SOP dropdown

Configuration complete with all meters visible

SOP: Preventive Maintenance

Same SOP for all meters

6

Click "Next" to final details

Step 3 shows summary with 3 meters selected

-

Multi-meter summary

7

Add notes and click "Create Order"

Single order created for all 3 meters with same service type

Notes: "Quarterly maintenance cycle"

Batch order creation

8

Verify dashboard shows new order

Order appears with unique ID, "Created" status, shows meter count

-

Batch order display

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Single order created containing all 3 meters
  • Secondary_Verifications: All meters have same service type and SOP, WX logging successful
  • Negative_Verification: No individual orders created, no partial failures

Test Case 3: Service Order Dashboard - Status Filtering

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_003
Title: Filter service orders by different status types using status tabs
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Filtering,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 75%
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Service, Status Management
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meterservice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UX-Metrics, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Service Order Database, Status Management Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second filter response
  • Data_Requirements: Service orders in various statuses

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, sample orders in all statuses
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Orders: WO-2023-001 (Approved), WO-2023-002 (In Progress), WO-2023-003 (Created), WO-2023-004 (Assigned), WO-2023-005 (Completed)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Sample orders created

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Login, Sample data setup
  • Blocked_Tests: None
  • Parallel_Tests: MX01US04_TC_004, MX01US04_TC_013
  • Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Essential for meter manager daily operations and workload tracking
  • Edge_Cases: Empty status categories, large datasets, rapid status changes
  • Risk_Areas: Filter performance with large datasets, status synchronization
  • Security_Considerations: Access control for status visibility, data filtering authorization

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Service Orders dashboard

All orders display by default in "All Orders" tab

-

Default view verification

2

Click "Created" status tab

Only orders with "Created" status display with gray indicators

Expected: WO-2023-003

Color coding validation

3

Click "Assigned" status tab

Only orders with "Assigned" status display with purple indicators

Expected: WO-2023-004

Status-specific filtering

4

Click "In Progress" status tab

Only orders with "In Progress" status display with blue indicators

Expected: WO-2023-002

Active work identification

5

Click "Completed" status tab

Only orders with "Completed" status display with green indicators

Expected: WO-2023-005, WO-2023-006

Completed work tracking

6

Click "Approved" status tab

Only orders with "Approved" status display with green indicators

Expected: WO-2023-001

Final status verification

7

Return to "All Orders" tab

All orders display regardless of status

All test orders visible

Complete view restoration

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Each tab shows only orders matching that status
  • Secondary_Verifications: Color indicators match status types, counts are accurate
  • Negative_Verification: No cross-status contamination in filtered views

Test Case 4: Service Order Search Functionality

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_004
Title: Search service orders using order number and meter information
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Search-Functionality,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 80%
  • Integration_Points: Search Service, Database Query Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UX-Metrics, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search Index, Database, Service Order Repository
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second search response
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple service orders with varied data

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, search index populated
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Orders: WO-2023-002, Meter: WM-23456, Consumer: Sarah Johnson
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Service orders exist

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Login, Service order creation
  • Blocked_Tests: None
  • Parallel_Tests: MX01US04_TC_003, MX01US04_TC_013
  • Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for finding specific orders in large datasets
  • Edge_Cases: Special characters, partial matches, empty results
  • Risk_Areas: Search performance, index synchronization, result accuracy
  • Security_Considerations: Search query sanitization, access control for search results

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

In Service Orders dashboard, click search field

Search field becomes active with cursor

-

Search activation

2

Enter complete work order number

Filtered results show only matching order

Search: "WO-2023-002"

Exact match search

3

Clear search and enter partial order number

Results show all orders containing the partial match

Search: "2023"

Partial match capability

4

Clear search and enter meter number

Results show orders associated with that meter

Search: "WM-23456"

Meter-based search

5

Clear search and enter consumer name

Results show orders for that consumer

Search: "Sarah Johnson"

Consumer-based search

6

Enter non-existent search term

"No results found" message displays

Search: "INVALID123"

No results handling

7

Clear search field

All orders display again

-

Search reset functionality

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search returns accurate results for all search types
  • Secondary_Verifications: Partial matches work, no results message appears appropriately
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid searches don't crash system, clear function works

Test Case 5: Service Type and SOP Validation

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_005
Title: Validate service type selection and corresponding SOP associations
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-Point, Business-Rules,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: Service Type Repository, SOP Management Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Coverage, Compliance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Service Type Database, SOP Repository, Business Rules Engine
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds dropdown population
  • Data_Requirements: All service types and associated SOPs

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, service types configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Meter: WM-12345, All service types: Installation, Replacement, Maintenance, Disposal
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Meter selection completed

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: MX01US04_TC_001 (meter selection)
  • Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_006
  • Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific UI state)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must follow meter selection

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical business rule validation ensuring correct procedures are followed
  • Edge_Cases: Missing SOPs, invalid service types, dynamic SOP updates
  • Risk_Areas: Business rule enforcement, SOP-service type mapping accuracy
  • Security_Considerations: Authorization for service type access, SOP procedure security

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Start service order creation and select a meter

Proceed to service type selection step

Meter: WM-12345

Setup for validation

2

Click Service Type dropdown without selection

SOP dropdown remains disabled

-

Dependency validation

3

Select "Installation" from Service Type

SOP dropdown enables with installation-specific procedures

Service Type: Installation

Type-specific SOPs

4

Verify available SOPs for Installation

Only "Standard Meter Installation" appears

Expected SOP: Standard Meter Installation

Correct association

5

Change Service Type to "Replacement"

SOP dropdown updates with replacement procedures

Service Type: Replacement

Dynamic SOP update

6

Verify available SOPs for Replacement

"Standard Meter Replacement" and "Emergency Meter Replacement" appear

Expected SOPs: Standard/Emergency Replacement

Multiple options

7

Change Service Type to "Maintenance"

SOP dropdown shows maintenance procedures

Service Type: Maintenance

Maintenance-specific SOPs

8

Verify available SOPs for Maintenance

"Preventive Maintenance" and "Corrective Maintenance" appear

Expected SOPs: Preventive/Corrective

Maintenance options

9

Change Service Type to "Disposal"

SOP dropdown shows disposal procedure

Service Type: Disposal

Disposal-specific SOP

10

Verify SOP for Disposal

Only "Meter Disposal" appears

Expected SOP: Meter Disposal

Single disposal option

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: SOP options correctly filter based on selected service type
  • Secondary_Verifications: Dropdown dependency works, all service types have appropriate SOPs
  • Negative_Verification: Cannot proceed without both selections, no invalid combinations allowed

Test Case 6: Mandatory Field Validation

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_006
Title: Validate mandatory field requirements during service order creation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Validation
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-Point, Validation,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 90%
  • Integration_Points: Form Validation Service, Business Rules Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Validation-Coverage, Error-Handling-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation Service, Form Processing Engine
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid form data sets

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, validation rules configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Meter: WM-12345, Various incomplete form states
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Service order creation flow initiated

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open Create Service Order modal

Step 1 displays with meter selection

-

Starting validation

2

Click "Next" without selecting any meters

Error message appears, cannot proceed

Error: "At least one meter must be selected"

Meter selection required

3

Select a meter and proceed to Step 2

Service type selection step displays

Meter: WM-12345

Proceed after correction

4

Click "Next" without selecting service type

Error message appears, cannot proceed

Error: "Service type is required"

Service type validation

5

Select service type, click "Next" without SOP

Error message appears, cannot proceed

Error: "Standard Operating Procedure is required"

SOP validation

6

Select SOP and proceed to Step 3

Final details step displays

SOP: Standard Meter Replacement

Validation passed

7

Click "Create Order" with empty required fields

Validation prevents submission

-

Final validation check

8

Complete all mandatory fields and submit

Order created successfully

-

Successful submission

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System prevents submission when mandatory fields are missing
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages display, form maintains entered data
  • Negative_Verification: No partial orders created, no system errors


Test Case 7: Work Order ID Generation

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_007
Title: Verify unique work order ID generation follows WO-YYYY-### format
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-Point, ID-Generation,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: ID Generation Service, Database Sequence Management
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity-Metrics, System-Reliability
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: ID Generation Service, Database, Sequence Management
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second ID generation
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple concurrent order creation scenarios

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, ID generation service running
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Multiple meters for sequential order creation
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, System initialized

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: System initialization, Database connectivity
  • Blocked_Tests: All order creation tests depend on this
  • Parallel_Tests: Can test with MX01US04_TC_011 (concurrent users)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must verify sequential numbering

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for order tracking and system integrity across the organization
  • Edge_Cases: Year boundary transitions, system restarts, concurrent generation
  • Risk_Areas: ID collision, sequence gaps, year rollover handling
  • Security_Considerations: ID predictability, sequence protection, audit trail

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open Create Service Order modal

Step 1 displays with meter selection

-

Starting validation

2

Click "Next" without selecting any meters

Error message appears, cannot proceed

Error: "At least one meter must be selected"

Meter selection required

3

Select a meter and proceed to Step 2

Service type selection step displays

Meter: WM-12345

Proceed after correction

4

Click "Next" without selecting service type

Error message appears, cannot proceed

Error: "Service type is required"

Service type validation

5

Select service type, click "Next" without SOP

Error message appears, cannot proceed

Error: "Standard Operating Procedure is required"

SOP validation

6

Select SOP and proceed to Step 3

Final details step displays

SOP: Standard Meter Replacement

Validation passed

7

Click "Create Order" with empty required fields

Validation prevents submission

-

Final validation check

8

Complete all mandatory fields and submit

Order created successfully

-

Successful submission

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System prevents submission when mandatory fields are missing
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages display, form maintains entered data
  • Negative_Verification: No partial orders created, no system errors



Test Case 8: Status Progression Validation

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_008
Title: Validate service order status follows correct progression workflow
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-External-Dependency, Status-Workflow,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: WX System, Status Management Service, Audit Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Workflow-Compliance, Integration-Health
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: WX System, Status Management Service, Audit Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds status update response
  • Data_Requirements: Service order in various status states

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 and WX systems accessible, integration active
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role, WX system access
  • Test_Data: Service order in "Created" status, WX dispatch capabilities
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation successful, WX integration active

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: MX01US04_TC_007 (order creation), WX system availability
  • Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_016 (allocation updates)
  • Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific status states)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must follow exact status progression

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for workflow integrity and compliance with utility operations
  • Edge_Cases: Invalid status transitions, system failures during updates
  • Risk_Areas: Status synchronization between systems, audit trail integrity
  • Security_Considerations: Status change authorization, audit trail protection

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create new service order

Order appears with "Created" status and gray indicator

-

Initial status validation

2

Simulate assignment in WX system

Status changes to "Assigned" with purple indicator

Status: Created → Assigned

WX integration

3

Simulate work start in WX system

Status changes to "In Progress" with blue indicator

Status: Assigned → In Progress

Work initiation

4

Simulate work completion in WX

Status changes to "Completed" with green indicator

Status: In Progress → Completed

Work completion

5

Simulate final approval

Status changes to "Approved" with green indicator

Status: Completed → Approved

Final approval

6

Verify status history is maintained

All status changes logged with timestamps

-

Audit trail

7

Attempt invalid status transition

System prevents invalid progression

-

Business rule enforcement

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Status follows exact progression: Created → Assigned → In Progress → Completed → Approved
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators update correctly, timestamps recorded
  • Negative_Verification: No skipped statuses, no backward progression allowed

Test Case 9: WX System Integration

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_009
Title: Verify service order integration with WX dispatch system
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Integration/API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-External-Dependency, WX-System,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: WX Dispatch System, Data Synchronization Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Integration-Health, System-Reliability, Data-Integrity
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: WX Dispatch System, Integration APIs, Message Queue
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds synchronization time
  • Data_Requirements: Active WX system, test dispatch environment

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Both SMART360 and WX systems operational, integration configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role in SMART360, dispatch access in WX
  • Test_Data: Test service order WO-2025-001, meter and consumer data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation successful, WX system connectivity verified

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: WX system availability, Integration service health
  • Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_016 (allocation updates), MX01US04_TC_008 (status progression)
  • Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific system states)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must follow order creation and status updates

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Core integration ensuring field operations receive work assignments
  • Edge_Cases: WX system downtime, partial data sync, network interruptions
  • Risk_Areas: Data consistency between systems, sync failures, message queue issues
  • Security_Considerations: Secure data transmission, API authentication, data integrity

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create new service order

Order appears with "Created" status and gray indicator

-

Initial status validation

2

Simulate assignment in WX system

Status changes to "Assigned" with purple indicator

Status: Created → Assigned

WX integration

3

Simulate work start in WX system

Status changes to "In Progress" with blue indicator

Status: Assigned → In Progress

Work initiation

4

Simulate work completion in WX

Status changes to "Completed" with green indicator

Status: In Progress → Completed

Work completion

5

Simulate final approval

Status changes to "Approved" with green indicator

Status: Completed → Approved

Final approval

6

Verify status history is maintained

All status changes logged with timestamps

-

Audit trail

7

Attempt invalid status transition

System prevents invalid progression

-

Business rule enforcement

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Status follows exact progression: Created → Assigned → In Progress → Completed → Approved
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators update correctly, timestamps recorded
  • Negative_Verification: No skipped statuses, no backward progression allowed

Test Case 10: Performance Testing - Dashboard Load

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_010
Title: Validate dashboard performance with large dataset of service orders
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Load-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 70%
  • Integration_Points: Database Query Optimization, Caching Layer, UI Rendering
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, System-Scalability, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Performance Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Load Testing Database (1000+ orders), Performance Monitoring Tools
  • Performance_Baseline: 1 req/min, < 3 seconds page load
  • Data_Requirements: 1000+ service orders across all statuses and types

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance test environment, large dataset prepared
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: 1000+ service orders, varied statuses and dates
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic dashboard functionality verified

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Data preparation, Environment setup
  • Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_011 (concurrent testing)
  • Parallel_Tests: Can run with other performance tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Must have baseline measurements

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for enterprise customers with large service order volumes
  • Edge_Cases: Memory limits, browser performance variations, network latency
  • Risk_Areas: Database query performance, UI rendering with large datasets
  • Security_Considerations: Performance monitoring data protection, load test isolation

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Prepare test data with 1000+ service orders

Database contains large dataset

1000+ orders across all statuses

Data preparation

2

Navigate to Service Orders dashboard

Dashboard loads within 3 seconds

-

Initial load performance

3

Measure page load time

Complete rendering under 3 second threshold

Baseline: < 3 seconds

Performance measurement

4

Apply status filter (Created)

Filter response within 1 second

~200 Created orders

Filter performance

5

Apply status filter (In Progress)

Filter response within 1 second

~300 In Progress orders

Active filter performance

6

Perform search operation

Search results within 1 second

Search: partial order ID

Search performance

7

Switch between multiple status tabs rapidly

Each tab switch under 1 second

All status tabs

Tab switching performance

8

Test pagination performance

Page navigation under 1 second

50 orders per page

Pagination efficiency

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 3 seconds with 1000+ orders
  • Secondary_Verifications: All operations (filter, search, pagination) under 1 second
  • Negative_Verification: No timeouts, no performance degradation with concurrent users

Test Case 11: Concurrent User Testing

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_011
Title: Test multiple meter managers creating service orders simultaneously
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Performance/Concurrency
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Concurrency-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 80%
  • Integration_Points: Concurrency Control, Database Locking, Session Management
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, System-Scalability, Concurrency-Health
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Performance Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Multiple browser instances
  • Device/OS: Multiple workstations or virtual machines
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Multiple user accounts, Concurrency monitoring tools
  • Performance_Baseline: 1 req/min maintained across all users
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple meter manager accounts, sufficient meter inventory

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: 5+ user accounts, concurrent session support
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple Meter Manager accounts (Manager1-5)
  • Test_Data: Different meters per user, non-overlapping resources
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Single user functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Have 5 meter managers login simultaneously

All users login successfully

Users: Manager1-5

Concurrent login

2

All managers navigate to Service Orders

Dashboards load for all users

-

Concurrent dashboard access

3

All managers start creating orders simultaneously

Creation modals open for all

-

Concurrent form access

4

All managers select different meters

No meter selection conflicts

Different meters per user

Resource contention

5

All managers submit orders simultaneously

All orders created with unique IDs

5 unique order IDs

ID generation under load

6

Verify all orders appear in each dashboard

All users see all new orders

Total orders visible

Data consistency

7

Test simultaneous status filtering

All filter operations work correctly

Different filters per user

Concurrent operations

8

Verify system performance remains stable

No degradation in response times

Baseline: 1 req/min maintained

Performance stability

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System handles 5+ concurrent users without issues
  • Secondary_Verifications: Unique ID generation, data consistency, performance maintained
  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no system errors, no performance degradation

Test Case 12: API Testing - Service Order Creation

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_012
Title: API endpoint testing for service order creation functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-API, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-End-to-End, API-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: REST API, Database, Authentication Service, Business Logic
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: API (Platform Independent)

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: API-Health, Integration-Coverage, Security-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: API Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: API Client (Postman/cURL)
  • Device/OS: Independent
  • Screen_Resolution: N/A
  • Dependencies: API Gateway, Authentication Service, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
  • Data_Requirements: Valid API authentication tokens, test meter data

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, authentication configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: API access credentials, service account permissions
  • Test_Data: Valid JSON payloads, meter IDs, service types
  • Prior_Test_Cases: API authentication successful

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Send POST request to create service order endpoint

HTTP 201 Created response

Valid JSON payload

API creation

2

Verify response contains generated work order ID

Response includes WO-YYYY-### format ID

Expected format validation

ID generation API

3

Send GET request to retrieve created order

HTTP 200 OK with order details

Order ID from step 1

Retrieval validation

4

Send POST with missing mandatory fields

HTTP 400 Bad Request with error details

Invalid payload

Validation testing

5

Send POST with invalid service type

HTTP 400 Bad Request with specific error

Invalid service type

Business rule API

6

Send POST with invalid authentication

HTTP 401 Unauthorized

Invalid/missing token

Security testing

7

Test API rate limiting

HTTP 429 after exceeding limits

Multiple rapid requests

Rate limit testing

8

Verify database persistence

Order stored correctly in database

Direct DB query

Data persistence

API Payload Example:

{
  "meters": ["WM-12345"],
  "serviceType": "REPLACEMENT",
  "sop": "Standard Meter Replacement",
  "notes": "API test order",
  "createdBy": "testuser@utility.com"
}

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: API correctly creates service orders and returns proper responses
  • Secondary_Verifications: Validation works, security enforced, data persisted
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid requests properly rejected, rate limiting functional

Test Case 13: Cross-Browser Compatibility

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_013
Title: Verify service order functionality across different browsers
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, 
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Browser-Compatibility,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Browser Engines, CSS Rendering, JavaScript Execution
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Compatibility-Matrix, Browser-Support, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Cross-Browser Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Multiple browser installations, Browser testing tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
  • Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role in each browser
  • Test_Data: Standard service order test data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Functional tests passing in primary browser


Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test complete order creation in Chrome

Full functionality works correctly

Standard test data

Chrome validation

2

Test complete order creation in Firefox

Full functionality works correctly

Standard test data

Firefox validation

3

Test complete order creation in Safari

Full functionality works correctly

Standard test data

Safari validation

4

Test complete order creation in Edge

Full functionality works correctly

Standard test data

Edge validation

5

Test dashboard filtering in all browsers

Filters work consistently

All status filters

Cross-browser filtering

6

Test search functionality in all browsers

Search works identically

Various search terms

Search compatibility

7

Test modal responsiveness in all browsers

Modals display correctly

-

UI consistency

8

Test form validation in all browsers

Validation messages appear consistently

Invalid inputs

Validation compatibility

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All functionality works identically across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI elements render correctly, performance consistent
  • Negative_Verification: No browser-specific bugs, no functional differences

Test Case 14: Error Handling and Recovery

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_014
Title: Validate system error handling and recovery mechanisms
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Error Handling
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Error-Handling,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: Error Handling Service, Recovery Mechanisms, User Notification
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Error-Handling-Coverage, System-Reliability, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Error Simulation Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Error Simulation Tools, Network Control Tools
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds error recovery
  • Data_Requirements: Various error scenarios, partial data states

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Error simulation capabilities, network control tools
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Corrupted data scenarios, invalid inputs
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Normal functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Simulate network timeout during order creation

Graceful error message, data preserved

-

Network failure handling

2

Attempt order creation with database unavailable

Clear error message, retry option provided

-

Database failure handling

3

Submit order with corrupted session

Redirect to login, preserve form data

-

Session handling

4

Create order when WX system is down

Order created locally, queued for WX sync

-

External system failure

5

Test form recovery after browser crash

Form data recoverable from local storage

Partial form data

Data recovery

6

Submit invalid meter ID that doesn't exist

Clear validation error, suggest alternatives

Invalid meter: WM-99999

Data validation

7

Test system behavior during maintenance

Maintenance message displayed, graceful degradation

-

Maintenance mode

8

Recover from partial order creation failure

System cleanup, no orphaned records

-

Transaction integrity

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System handles all error conditions gracefully without data loss
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages, recovery options available
  • Negative_Verification: No system crashes, no data corruption, no security breaches

Test Case 15: Data Integrity and Validation

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_015
Title: Validate data integrity throughout service order lifecycle
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Data Integrity
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-Point, Data-Integrity,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 90%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Data Validation Service, Audit Trail
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Data-Quality, System-Reliability, Compliance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Data Integrity Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database, Audit Systems, Data Validation Services
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds data validation
  • Data_Requirements: Various data scenarios, special characters, concurrent access

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Database access, audit trail enabled, validation services active
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role, database query access for verification
  • Test_Data: Complete order data, special character sets, concurrent user scenarios
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic order creation successful

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create order and verify all data fields

All entered data accurately stored

Complete order data

Data accuracy

2

Update order status and verify history

Status history maintained with timestamps

Status progression

Audit trail

3

Test concurrent access to same order

Data consistency maintained

Multiple users

Concurrency safety

4

Verify meter data consistency

Meter details match across all references

Cross-system data

Reference integrity

5

Test special characters in notes field

Special characters stored and displayed correctly

Notes: "Test @#$%^&*()_+"

Character encoding

6

Validate date/time accuracy

All timestamps accurate to system time

-

Time accuracy

7

Test data persistence after system restart

All data remains intact

-

Data durability

8

Verify referential integrity

Related data remains consistent

Foreign key relationships

Database integrity

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All data maintains integrity throughout order lifecycle
  • Secondary_Verifications: Audit trails accurate, concurrent access safe
  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no orphaned records, no inconsistencies

Test Case 16: Allocation Tab Integration

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_016
Title: Verify service order entries appear in meter details allocation tab
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Integration/UI
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, 
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-Point, Allocation-Tab,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: Meter Details Service, Allocation Management, Status Synchronization
  • Code_Module_Mapped: MeterService
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Integration-Health, Feature-Coverage, Data-Consistency
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Integration Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Meter Management System, Allocation Service, Status Sync Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds allocation update
  • Data_Requirements: Service orders for Replace/Install/Uninstall types

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Meter management system accessible, allocation service active
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role, meter details access
  • Test_Data: Meter WM-12345, service orders of qualifying types
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation, Status updates functional

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create service order for meter WM-12345

Order created successfully

Service Type: Replace, Install, Uninstall

Order creation

2

Navigate to meter details page for WM-12345

Meter details page loads

-

Navigation verification

3

Click on "Allocation" tab

Allocation tab displays

-

Tab accessibility

4

Verify service order entry appears

New entry visible with order details

Order ID, service type, status

Integration confirmation

5

Update order status to "Approved" in WX

Status updates in allocation tab

Status: Created → Approved

Status synchronization

6

Create multiple orders for same meter

All orders appear in allocation tab

Multiple service types

Multiple entries

7

Test with different service types

All qualifying service types logged

Replace, Install, Uninstall only

Service type filtering

8

Verify allocation entry data accuracy

All details match service order

Cross-reference validation

Data consistency

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Service orders for Replace/Install/Uninstall appear in meter allocation tab
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data accuracy, status updates, multiple entries supported
  • Negative_Verification: Non-qualifying service types don't appear, no duplicate entries

Test Case 17: Security and Access Control

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_017
Title: Validate security controls and access restrictions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, 
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Access-Control,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Engine, Audit System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control-Matrix, Vulnerability-Assessment
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Security Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication System, Security Testing Tools, Audit Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second authentication response
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple user roles, security test vectors

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Security testing environment, multiple user accounts
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Various roles: meter_manager, field_technician, admin
  • Test_Data: Security test payloads, injection vectors, unauthorized access attempts
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system functional

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access service orders without login

Redirect to login page

-

Authentication required

2

Login with non-meter manager role

Service orders not accessible

User: field_technician

Role-based access

3

Login with meter manager role

Full access to service orders

User: meter_manager

Authorized access

4

Attempt SQL injection in search

Input sanitized, no database access

Search: "'; DROP TABLE --"

Input sanitization

5

Test XSS prevention in notes field

Script tags escaped, no execution

Notes: "<script>alert('test')</script>"

XSS prevention

6

Attempt unauthorized API access

HTTP 401 Unauthorized response

Invalid/missing token

API security

7

Test session timeout handling

Session expires, redirect to login

Idle for configured time

Session management

8

Verify audit logging

All actions logged with user details

-

Audit trail

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Only authorized meter managers can access service order functionality
  • Secondary_Verifications: Input sanitization works, audit logging functional
  • Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, no injection vulnerabilities

Test Case 18: Bulk Operations Performance

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_018
Title: Test performance with maximum bulk meter selection
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, 
Integration-Point, Bulk-Operations, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, Database Optimization, UI Performance
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Assessment, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Performance Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Large meter dataset (100+), Performance monitoring tools
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds bulk processing, UI responsive
  • Data_Requirements: 100+ meters available for selection

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Large meter dataset prepared, performance monitoring enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: 100+ meters with varied types and statuses
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Single meter operations verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Load meter selection page with 100+ meters

Page loads within 3 seconds

100+ meters in database

Large dataset handling

2

Use "Select All" to select all visible meters

All meters selected within 2 seconds

-

Bulk selection performance

3

Proceed to service type selection

Page transition under 2 seconds

-

Navigation performance

4

Complete bulk order creation

Order creation under 5 seconds

All selected meters

Bulk processing time

5

Verify order appears in dashboard

Dashboard updates within 3 seconds

-

Display performance

6

Test search with bulk selection

Search results within 1 second

Various search terms

Search with large dataset

7

Test filter performance with large dataset

Filter operations under 1 second

-

Filter performance

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System handles bulk operations efficiently within time thresholds
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI remains responsive, no performance degradation
  • Negative_Verification: No timeouts, no memory issues, no UI freezing

Test Case 19: Edge Cases and Boundary Testing

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_019
Title: Test system behavior at boundaries and edge cases
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: Functional/Boundary
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, 
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, 
Integration-Point, Boundary-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 70%
  • Integration_Points: Input Validation, Data Limits, System Boundaries
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Edge-Case-Coverage, System-Robustness, Quality-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Edge Case Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Boundary testing tools, Data generation utilities
  • Performance_Baseline: Graceful handling of edge cases
  • Data_Requirements: Boundary value datasets, special character sets

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Edge case testing data prepared, validation rules configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
  • Test_Data: Maximum length strings, special characters, boundary dates
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Normal functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Enter maximum length text in notes field

Text accepted up to limit, excess truncated

1000+ character string

Field length limit

2

Test with minimum required data

Order creates with minimal data

Only mandatory fields

Minimum data requirements

3

Create order at year boundary (Dec 31)

ID generation handles year transition

Test at 11:59 PM Dec 31

Year rollover testing

4

Test with special characters in meter numbers

System handles special characters correctly

Meter: "WM-12345@#"

Special character handling

5

Test pagination at boundaries

First/last page navigation works

Navigate to page 1, last page

Pagination boundaries

6

Test search with empty string

Appropriate handling of empty search

Search: "" (empty)

Empty search handling

7

Test with maximum simultaneous orders

System handles peak load

Create 50+ orders rapidly

Load boundary testing

8

Test order creation at exactly midnight

Timestamp accuracy maintained

Create at 00:00:00

Time boundary testing

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System handles all boundary conditions gracefully
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data validation enforced, limits respected
  • Negative_Verification: No system errors, no data corruption at boundaries

Test Case 20: API Integration - Status Updates

Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_020
Title: API testing for service order status update functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
  • Test Type: API/Integration
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags:

MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-API, Platform-Web, 
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, 
Integration-External-Dependency, Status-Updates,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: Status API, WX Integration, Database Updates, Audit Trail
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: API (Platform Independent)

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: API-Health, Integration-Coverage, Status-Workflow-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: API Integration Testing Environment
  • Browser/Version: API Client (Postman/cURL)
  • Device/OS: Independent
  • Screen_Resolution: N/A
  • Dependencies: Status API, WX System, Database, Message Queue
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms status update response
  • Data_Requirements: Service orders in various statuses, API authentication

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, WX integration active, authentication configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: API access credentials, system integration permissions
  • Test_Data: Service orders in all status states, valid status transition data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation via API successful, WX system connectivity verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create service order via API

HTTP 201 Created, order in "Created" status

-

Initial state

2

Send PUT request to update status to "Assigned"

HTTP 200 OK, status updated successfully

Status: "ASSIGNED"

Valid progression

3

Send GET request to verify status

Response shows "Assigned" status

-

Status verification

4

Update status to "In Progress" via API

HTTP 200 OK, status updated

Status: "IN_PROGRESS"

Work started

5

Attempt invalid status transition

HTTP 400 Bad Request, status unchanged

Status: "APPROVED" (skip steps)

Business rule validation

6

Update to "Completed" via API

HTTP 200 OK, status updated

Status: "COMPLETED"

Valid progression

7

Final update to "Approved"

HTTP 200 OK, final status set

Status: "APPROVED"

Completion

8

Verify status history via API

All status changes recorded with timestamps

-

History tracking

API Request Example:

PUT /api/service-orders/WO-2025-001/status
{
  "status": "ASSIGNED",
  "updatedBy": "system@wx.com",
  "timestamp": "2025-06-03T10:30:00Z"
}

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: API correctly handles status updates following business rules
  • Secondary_Verifications: Invalid transitions rejected, history maintained
  • Negative_Verification: No status corruption, no unauthorized updates

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite (Critical Path)

Execution: Every build deployment
Duration: ~30 minutes
Test Cases:

  • MX01US04_TC_001 (Single meter order creation)
  • MX01US04_TC_005 (Service type validation)
  • MX01US04_TC_006 (Mandatory field validation)
  • MX01US04_TC_007 (Work order ID generation)
  • MX01US04_TC_014 (Basic error handling)

Regression Test Suite (Full Functional)

Execution: Before each release
Duration: ~4 hours
Test Cases:

  • All P1-Critical and P2-High priority test cases
  • Integration test cases (TC_009, TC_016, TC_020)
  • Performance test cases (TC_010, TC_011)
  • Security test cases (TC_017)

Full Test Suite (Complete Coverage)

Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Duration: ~8 hours
Test Cases:

  • All test cases including P3-Medium and P4-Low
  • Cross-browser compatibility (TC_013)
  • Edge cases and boundary testing (TC_019)
  • Extended performance testing (TC_018)

API Test Suite (Backend Validation)

Execution: Continuous integration
Duration: ~1 hour
Test Cases:

  • MX01US04_TC_012 (Service order creation API)
  • MX01US04_TC_020 (Status update API)
  • Related authentication and validation APIs

Integration & Dependency Matrix

External System Dependencies

System

Dependency Type

Test Cases Affected

Fallback Strategy

WX Dispatch

Real-time sync

TC_008, TC_009, TC_016, TC_020

Queue for later sync

Meter Master Data

Reference data

TC_001, TC_002, TC_015

Use cached data

Authentication System

Security

TC_017

Local authentication

Test Execution Dependencies

Test Case

Prerequisites

Blocking Tests

Can Run Parallel

TC_001

Login successful

None

TC_003, TC_004

TC_002

TC_001 passed

None

TC_005, TC_006

TC_008

TC_001, TC_009

TC_007

None

TC_010

Large dataset

TC_001-TC_009

TC_011, TC_018


Quality Metrics and Reporting

Coverage Metrics

  • Functional Coverage: 95% of acceptance criteria
  • Integration Coverage: 100% of external touchpoints
  • API Coverage: 90% of endpoints
  • Browser Coverage: 4 major browsers
  • Performance Coverage: Critical user paths under load

Success Criteria

  • Pass Rate: ≥95% for P1-Critical tests
  • Performance: All operations under defined thresholds
  • Security: Zero critical vulnerabilities
  • Integration: 100% external system sync success

Risk Assessment

  • High Risk: WX integration failures, performance degradation
  • Medium Risk: Cross-browser inconsistencies, concurrent user issues
  • Low Risk: UI cosmetic issues, edge case handling

Conclusion

This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the Meter Service Orders (MX01US04) user story with 20 detailed test cases spanning:

  • Functional Testing: Core creation and tracking workflows
  • Integration Testing: WX system and meter allocation synchronization
  • Performance Testing: Load handling and response times
  • Security Testing: Access control and input validation
  • API Testing: Backend service validation
  • Compatibility Testing: Cross-browser support

The test cases are designed to support all 17 BrowserStack test management reports with proper tagging, business context, and stakeholder mapping. Each test case includes detailed execution steps, verification points, and supports both manual and automated execution strategies.