Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
Total Test Cases :-20
Total Acceptance Criteria:-19
Total Coverage Percentage:-95%
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality Scenarios
- Service Order Creation Workflow
- Single meter selection and order creation
- Multiple meter selection (batch creation)
- Service type selection and validation
- Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) selection
- Notes and instructions addition
- Order summary and confirmation
- Service Order Tracking & Management
- Dashboard view with all orders
- Status-based filtering (All Orders, Created, Assigned, In Progress, Completed, Approved)
- Search functionality by order number, meter information
- Status progression tracking
- Order details viewing
- Business Rules Enforcement
- Unique work order ID generation (WO-YYYY-###)
- Mandatory field validation
- Status progression validation
- Integration with WX dispatch system
Integration Point Scenarios
- WX System Integration
- Service order logging to WX dispatch tab
- Status synchronization between systems
- Allocation tab updates in meter details page
- Data Flow Scenarios
- Meter selection from master data
- Service type and SOP association
- Status change propagation
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance Scenarios
- Dashboard loading with large datasets
- Search and filter operations performance
- Concurrent user handling (multiple meter managers)
- API response times (1 req/min baseline)
Usability Scenarios
Reliability Scenarios
- System recovery from failures
- Data integrity maintenance
- Service availability during peak usage
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions
- Maximum number of meters in batch selection
- Long text in notes field
- Date range filtering limits
Invalid Inputs
Detailed Test Cases
Test Case 1: Service Order Creation - Single Meter
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_001
Title: Create service order for single meter with all mandatory fields
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 85%
- Integration_Points: WX System, Meter Master Data
- Code_Module_Mapped: MeterService
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Meter Master Data, WX System
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
- Data_Requirements: Valid meter data, user authentication
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Valid meter WM-12345, John Smith consumer
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Service Orders module | Service Orders dashboard displays | - | Verify main navigation |
2 | Click "Create Service Order" button | Create Service Order modal opens with Step 1 | - | Modal should be responsive |
3 | Search for meter by Device number | Meter list filters to matching results | Search: "WM-12345" | Verify search functionality |
4 | Select meter WM-12345 by checking checkbox | Meter selection count updates to "1 meter(s) selected" | Meter: WM-12345 | Visual confirmation required |
5 | Click "Next" button | Navigate to Step 2 - Service Configuration | - | Disabled until selection made |
6 | Select "Replacement" from Service Type dropdown | SOP dropdown becomes enabled | Service Type: Replacement | Dropdown dependency validation |
7 | Select "Standard Meter Replacement" from SOP dropdown | Selected meters section shows WM-12345 | SOP: Standard Meter Replacement | Verify meter display |
8 | Click "Next" button | Navigate to Step 3 - Final Details | - | Form progression validation |
9 | Enter notes in Notes field | Text appears in notes field | Notes: "Routine replacement due to age" | Optional field testing |
10 | Review Service Order Summary | Summary shows: 1 meter, REPLACEMENT type, Standard Meter Replacement SOP | - | Data accuracy verification |
11 | Click "Create Order" button | Order created successfully, modal closes, returns to dashboard | - | Success message display |
12 | Verify new order appears in dashboard | New order visible with "Created" status and unique WO-YYYY-### ID | - | Auto-generation validation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Service order created with unique ID and "Created" status
- Secondary_Verifications: WX system integration logged, meter data accuracy
- Negative_Verification: No duplicate orders created, no system errors
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Test Case 2: Service Order Creation - Multiple Meters (Batch)
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_002
Title: Create batch service order for multiple meters with same service type
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-End-to-End, Batch-Processing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 90%
- Integration_Points: WX System, Meter Master Data, Batch Processing
- Code_Module_Mapped: MeterService
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Performance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Meter Master Data, WX System, Batch Processing Service
- Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds batch processing
- Data_Requirements: Multiple valid meters, user authentication
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, multiple meters available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Valid meters WM-12345, WM-23456, WM-56789, Multiple consumers Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: MX01US04_TC_001
- Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_018
- Parallel_Tests: MX01US04_TC_003, MX01US04_TC_004
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow TC_001
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for utility companies managing large meter inventories
- Edge_Cases: Maximum meter selection limits, timeout handling
- Risk_Areas: Batch processing failures, partial completions
- Security_Considerations: Bulk data validation, authorization for batch operations
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Service Orders and click "Create Service Order" | Create Service Order modal opens | - | Starting point |
2 | Click "Select All (3)" checkbox | All 3 visible meters selected, count shows "3 meter(s) selected" | Meters: WM-12345, WM-23456, WM-56789 | Bulk selection feature |
3 | Click "Next" to proceed to service configuration | Step 2 displays with all 3 meters in Selected Meters section | - | Batch processing validation |
4 | Select "Maintenance" from Service Type dropdown | SOP dropdown enabled with maintenance options | Service Type: Maintenance | Consistency requirement |
5 | Select "Preventive Maintenance" from SOP dropdown | Configuration complete with all meters visible | SOP: Preventive Maintenance | Same SOP for all meters |
6 | Click "Next" to final details | Step 3 shows summary with 3 meters selected | - | Multi-meter summary |
7 | Add notes and click "Create Order" | Single order created for all 3 meters with same service type | Notes: "Quarterly maintenance cycle" | Batch order creation |
8 | Verify dashboard shows new order | Order appears with unique ID, "Created" status, shows meter count | - | Batch order display |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Single order created containing all 3 meters
- Secondary_Verifications: All meters have same service type and SOP, WX logging successful
- Negative_Verification: No individual orders created, no partial failures
Test Case 3: Service Order Dashboard - Status Filtering
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_003
Title: Filter service orders by different status types using status tabs
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Filtering,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 75%
- Integration_Points: Dashboard Service, Status Management
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meterservice
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UX-Metrics, Performance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Service Order Database, Status Management Service
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second filter response
- Data_Requirements: Service orders in various statuses
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, sample orders in all statuses
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Orders: WO-2023-001 (Approved), WO-2023-002 (In Progress), WO-2023-003 (Created), WO-2023-004 (Assigned), WO-2023-005 (Completed)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Sample orders created
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Login, Sample data setup
- Blocked_Tests: None
- Parallel_Tests: MX01US04_TC_004, MX01US04_TC_013
- Sequential_Tests: Can run independently
Additional Information:
- Notes: Essential for meter manager daily operations and workload tracking
- Edge_Cases: Empty status categories, large datasets, rapid status changes
- Risk_Areas: Filter performance with large datasets, status synchronization
- Security_Considerations: Access control for status visibility, data filtering authorization
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Service Orders dashboard | All orders display by default in "All Orders" tab | - | Default view verification |
2 | Click "Created" status tab | Only orders with "Created" status display with gray indicators | Expected: WO-2023-003 | Color coding validation |
3 | Click "Assigned" status tab | Only orders with "Assigned" status display with purple indicators | Expected: WO-2023-004 | Status-specific filtering |
4 | Click "In Progress" status tab | Only orders with "In Progress" status display with blue indicators | Expected: WO-2023-002 | Active work identification |
5 | Click "Completed" status tab | Only orders with "Completed" status display with green indicators | Expected: WO-2023-005, WO-2023-006 | Completed work tracking |
6 | Click "Approved" status tab | Only orders with "Approved" status display with green indicators | Expected: WO-2023-001 | Final status verification |
7 | Return to "All Orders" tab | All orders display regardless of status | All test orders visible | Complete view restoration |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Each tab shows only orders matching that status
- Secondary_Verifications: Color indicators match status types, counts are accurate
- Negative_Verification: No cross-status contamination in filtered views
Test Case 4: Service Order Search Functionality
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_004
Title: Search service orders using order number and meter information
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Search-Functionality,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 80%
- Integration_Points: Search Service, Database Query Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UX-Metrics, Performance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Search Index, Database, Service Order Repository
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second search response
- Data_Requirements: Multiple service orders with varied data
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, search index populated
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Orders: WO-2023-002, Meter: WM-23456, Consumer: Sarah Johnson
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Service orders exist
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Login, Service order creation
- Blocked_Tests: None
- Parallel_Tests: MX01US04_TC_003, MX01US04_TC_013
- Sequential_Tests: Can run independently
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for finding specific orders in large datasets
- Edge_Cases: Special characters, partial matches, empty results
- Risk_Areas: Search performance, index synchronization, result accuracy
- Security_Considerations: Search query sanitization, access control for search results
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | In Service Orders dashboard, click search field | Search field becomes active with cursor | - | Search activation |
2 | Enter complete work order number | Filtered results show only matching order | Search: "WO-2023-002" | Exact match search |
3 | Clear search and enter partial order number | Results show all orders containing the partial match | Search: "2023" | Partial match capability |
4 | Clear search and enter meter number | Results show orders associated with that meter | Search: "WM-23456" | Meter-based search |
5 | Clear search and enter consumer name | Results show orders for that consumer | Search: "Sarah Johnson" | Consumer-based search |
6 | Enter non-existent search term | "No results found" message displays | Search: "INVALID123" | No results handling |
7 | Clear search field | All orders display again | - | Search reset functionality |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Search returns accurate results for all search types
- Secondary_Verifications: Partial matches work, no results message appears appropriately
- Negative_Verification: Invalid searches don't crash system, clear function works
Test Case 5: Service Type and SOP Validation
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_005
Title: Validate service type selection and corresponding SOP associations
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-Point, Business-Rules,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 85%
- Integration_Points: Service Type Repository, SOP Management Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Coverage, Compliance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Service Type Database, SOP Repository, Business Rules Engine
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds dropdown population
- Data_Requirements: All service types and associated SOPs
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, service types configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Meter: WM-12345, All service types: Installation, Replacement, Maintenance, Disposal
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Meter selection completed
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: MX01US04_TC_001 (meter selection)
- Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_006
- Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific UI state)
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow meter selection
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical business rule validation ensuring correct procedures are followed
- Edge_Cases: Missing SOPs, invalid service types, dynamic SOP updates
- Risk_Areas: Business rule enforcement, SOP-service type mapping accuracy
- Security_Considerations: Authorization for service type access, SOP procedure security
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Start service order creation and select a meter | Proceed to service type selection step | Meter: WM-12345 | Setup for validation |
2 | Click Service Type dropdown without selection | SOP dropdown remains disabled | - | Dependency validation |
3 | Select "Installation" from Service Type | SOP dropdown enables with installation-specific procedures | Service Type: Installation | Type-specific SOPs |
4 | Verify available SOPs for Installation | Only "Standard Meter Installation" appears | Expected SOP: Standard Meter Installation | Correct association |
5 | Change Service Type to "Replacement" | SOP dropdown updates with replacement procedures | Service Type: Replacement | Dynamic SOP update |
6 | Verify available SOPs for Replacement | "Standard Meter Replacement" and "Emergency Meter Replacement" appear | Expected SOPs: Standard/Emergency Replacement | Multiple options |
7 | Change Service Type to "Maintenance" | SOP dropdown shows maintenance procedures | Service Type: Maintenance | Maintenance-specific SOPs |
8 | Verify available SOPs for Maintenance | "Preventive Maintenance" and "Corrective Maintenance" appear | Expected SOPs: Preventive/Corrective | Maintenance options |
9 | Change Service Type to "Disposal" | SOP dropdown shows disposal procedure | Service Type: Disposal | Disposal-specific SOP |
10 | Verify SOP for Disposal | Only "Meter Disposal" appears | Expected SOP: Meter Disposal | Single disposal option |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: SOP options correctly filter based on selected service type
- Secondary_Verifications: Dropdown dependency works, all service types have appropriate SOPs
- Negative_Verification: Cannot proceed without both selections, no invalid combinations allowed
Test Case 6: Mandatory Field Validation
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_006
Title: Validate mandatory field requirements during service order creation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Validation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-Point, Validation,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 90%
- Integration_Points: Form Validation Service, Business Rules Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Validation-Coverage, Error-Handling-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Validation Service, Form Processing Engine
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
- Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid form data sets
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, validation rules configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Meter: WM-12345, Various incomplete form states
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, Service order creation flow initiated
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System prevents submission when mandatory fields are missing
- Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages display, form maintains entered data
- Negative_Verification: No partial orders created, no system errors
Test Case 7: Work Order ID Generation
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_007
Title: Verify unique work order ID generation follows WO-YYYY-### format
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-Point, ID-Generation,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: ID Generation Service, Database Sequence Management
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity-Metrics, System-Reliability
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: ID Generation Service, Database, Sequence Management
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second ID generation
- Data_Requirements: Multiple concurrent order creation scenarios
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, ID generation service running
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Multiple meters for sequential order creation
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful, System initialized
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: System initialization, Database connectivity
- Blocked_Tests: All order creation tests depend on this
- Parallel_Tests: Can test with MX01US04_TC_011 (concurrent users)
- Sequential_Tests: Must verify sequential numbering
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for order tracking and system integrity across the organization
- Edge_Cases: Year boundary transitions, system restarts, concurrent generation
- Risk_Areas: ID collision, sequence gaps, year rollover handling
- Security_Considerations: ID predictability, sequence protection, audit trail
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Open Create Service Order modal | Step 1 displays with meter selection | - | Starting validation |
2 | Click "Next" without selecting any meters | Error message appears, cannot proceed | Error: "At least one meter must be selected" | Meter selection required |
3 | Select a meter and proceed to Step 2 | Service type selection step displays | Meter: WM-12345 | Proceed after correction |
4 | Click "Next" without selecting service type | Error message appears, cannot proceed | Error: "Service type is required" | Service type validation |
5 | Select service type, click "Next" without SOP | Error message appears, cannot proceed | Error: "Standard Operating Procedure is required" | SOP validation |
6 | Select SOP and proceed to Step 3 | Final details step displays | SOP: Standard Meter Replacement | Validation passed |
7 | Click "Create Order" with empty required fields | Validation prevents submission | - | Final validation check |
8 | Complete all mandatory fields and submit | Order created successfully | - | Successful submission |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System prevents submission when mandatory fields are missing
- Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages display, form maintains entered data
- Negative_Verification: No partial orders created, no system errors
Test Case 8: Status Progression Validation
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_008
Title: Validate service order status follows correct progression workflow
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-External-Dependency, Status-Workflow,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: WX System, Status Management Service, Audit Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Workflow-Compliance, Integration-Health
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: WX System, Status Management Service, Audit Database
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds status update response
- Data_Requirements: Service order in various status states
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 and WX systems accessible, integration active
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role, WX system access
- Test_Data: Service order in "Created" status, WX dispatch capabilities
- Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation successful, WX integration active
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: MX01US04_TC_007 (order creation), WX system availability
- Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_016 (allocation updates)
- Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific status states)
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow exact status progression
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for workflow integrity and compliance with utility operations
- Edge_Cases: Invalid status transitions, system failures during updates
- Risk_Areas: Status synchronization between systems, audit trail integrity
- Security_Considerations: Status change authorization, audit trail protection
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Status follows exact progression: Created → Assigned → In Progress → Completed → Approved
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators update correctly, timestamps recorded
- Negative_Verification: No skipped statuses, no backward progression allowed
Test Case 9: WX System Integration
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_009
Title: Verify service order integration with WX dispatch system
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Integration/API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-External-Dependency, WX-System,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: WX Dispatch System, Data Synchronization Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Integration-Health, System-Reliability, Data-Integrity
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: WX Dispatch System, Integration APIs, Message Queue
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds synchronization time
- Data_Requirements: Active WX system, test dispatch environment
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Both SMART360 and WX systems operational, integration configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role in SMART360, dispatch access in WX
- Test_Data: Test service order WO-2025-001, meter and consumer data
- Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation successful, WX system connectivity verified
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: WX system availability, Integration service health
- Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_016 (allocation updates), MX01US04_TC_008 (status progression)
- Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific system states)
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow order creation and status updates
Additional Information:
- Notes: Core integration ensuring field operations receive work assignments
- Edge_Cases: WX system downtime, partial data sync, network interruptions
- Risk_Areas: Data consistency between systems, sync failures, message queue issues
- Security_Considerations: Secure data transmission, API authentication, data integrity
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Create new service order | Order appears with "Created" status and gray indicator | - | Initial status validation |
2 | Simulate assignment in WX system | Status changes to "Assigned" with purple indicator | Status: Created → Assigned | WX integration |
3 | Simulate work start in WX system | Status changes to "In Progress" with blue indicator | Status: Assigned → In Progress | Work initiation |
4 | Simulate work completion in WX | Status changes to "Completed" with green indicator | Status: In Progress → Completed | Work completion |
5 | Simulate final approval | Status changes to "Approved" with green indicator | Status: Completed → Approved | Final approval |
6 | Verify status history is maintained | All status changes logged with timestamps | - | Audit trail |
7 | Attempt invalid status transition | System prevents invalid progression | - | Business rule enforcement |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Status follows exact progression: Created → Assigned → In Progress → Completed → Approved
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators update correctly, timestamps recorded
- Negative_Verification: No skipped statuses, no backward progression allowed
Test Case 10: Performance Testing - Dashboard Load
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_010
Title: Validate dashboard performance with large dataset of service orders
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Load-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 70%
- Integration_Points: Database Query Optimization, Caching Layer, UI Rendering
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, System-Scalability, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Performance Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Load Testing Database (1000+ orders), Performance Monitoring Tools
- Performance_Baseline: 1 req/min, < 3 seconds page load
- Data_Requirements: 1000+ service orders across all statuses and types
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Performance test environment, large dataset prepared
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: 1000+ service orders, varied statuses and dates
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic dashboard functionality verified
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Data preparation, Environment setup
- Blocked_Tests: MX01US04_TC_011 (concurrent testing)
- Parallel_Tests: Can run with other performance tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must have baseline measurements
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for enterprise customers with large service order volumes
- Edge_Cases: Memory limits, browser performance variations, network latency
- Risk_Areas: Database query performance, UI rendering with large datasets
- Security_Considerations: Performance monitoring data protection, load test isolation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Prepare test data with 1000+ service orders | Database contains large dataset | 1000+ orders across all statuses | Data preparation |
2 | Navigate to Service Orders dashboard | Dashboard loads within 3 seconds | - | Initial load performance |
3 | Measure page load time | Complete rendering under 3 second threshold | Baseline: < 3 seconds | Performance measurement |
4 | Apply status filter (Created) | Filter response within 1 second | ~200 Created orders | Filter performance |
5 | Apply status filter (In Progress) | Filter response within 1 second | ~300 In Progress orders | Active filter performance |
6 | Perform search operation | Search results within 1 second | Search: partial order ID | Search performance |
7 | Switch between multiple status tabs rapidly | Each tab switch under 1 second | All status tabs | Tab switching performance |
8 | Test pagination performance | Page navigation under 1 second | 50 orders per page | Pagination efficiency |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 3 seconds with 1000+ orders
- Secondary_Verifications: All operations (filter, search, pagination) under 1 second
- Negative_Verification: No timeouts, no performance degradation with concurrent users
Test Case 11: Concurrent User Testing
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_011
Title: Test multiple meter managers creating service orders simultaneously
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Performance/Concurrency
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Concurrency-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 80%
- Integration_Points: Concurrency Control, Database Locking, Session Management
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, System-Scalability, Concurrency-Health
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Performance Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Multiple browser instances
- Device/OS: Multiple workstations or virtual machines
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Multiple user accounts, Concurrency monitoring tools
- Performance_Baseline: 1 req/min maintained across all users
- Data_Requirements: Multiple meter manager accounts, sufficient meter inventory
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: 5+ user accounts, concurrent session support
- User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple Meter Manager accounts (Manager1-5)
- Test_Data: Different meters per user, non-overlapping resources
- Prior_Test_Cases: Single user functionality verified
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Have 5 meter managers login simultaneously | All users login successfully | Users: Manager1-5 | Concurrent login |
2 | All managers navigate to Service Orders | Dashboards load for all users | - | Concurrent dashboard access |
3 | All managers start creating orders simultaneously | Creation modals open for all | - | Concurrent form access |
4 | All managers select different meters | No meter selection conflicts | Different meters per user | Resource contention |
5 | All managers submit orders simultaneously | All orders created with unique IDs | 5 unique order IDs | ID generation under load |
6 | Verify all orders appear in each dashboard | All users see all new orders | Total orders visible | Data consistency |
7 | Test simultaneous status filtering | All filter operations work correctly | Different filters per user | Concurrent operations |
8 | Verify system performance remains stable | No degradation in response times | Baseline: 1 req/min maintained | Performance stability |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System handles 5+ concurrent users without issues
- Secondary_Verifications: Unique ID generation, data consistency, performance maintained
- Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no system errors, no performance degradation
Test Case 12: API Testing - Service Order Creation
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_012
Title: API endpoint testing for service order creation functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-API, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-End-to-End, API-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: REST API, Database, Authentication Service, Business Logic
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: API (Platform Independent)
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: API-Health, Integration-Coverage, Security-Compliance
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: API Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: API Client (Postman/cURL)
- Device/OS: Independent
- Screen_Resolution: N/A
- Dependencies: API Gateway, Authentication Service, Database
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
- Data_Requirements: Valid API authentication tokens, test meter data
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, authentication configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: API access credentials, service account permissions
- Test_Data: Valid JSON payloads, meter IDs, service types
- Prior_Test_Cases: API authentication successful
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Send POST request to create service order endpoint | HTTP 201 Created response | Valid JSON payload | API creation |
2 | Verify response contains generated work order ID | Response includes WO-YYYY-### format ID | Expected format validation | ID generation API |
3 | Send GET request to retrieve created order | HTTP 200 OK with order details | Order ID from step 1 | Retrieval validation |
4 | Send POST with missing mandatory fields | HTTP 400 Bad Request with error details | Invalid payload | Validation testing |
5 | Send POST with invalid service type | HTTP 400 Bad Request with specific error | Invalid service type | Business rule API |
6 | Send POST with invalid authentication | HTTP 401 Unauthorized | Invalid/missing token | Security testing |
7 | Test API rate limiting | HTTP 429 after exceeding limits | Multiple rapid requests | Rate limit testing |
8 | Verify database persistence | Order stored correctly in database | Direct DB query | Data persistence |
API Payload Example:
{
"meters": ["WM-12345"],
"serviceType": "REPLACEMENT",
"sop": "Standard Meter Replacement",
"notes": "API test order",
"createdBy": "testuser@utility.com"
}
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: API correctly creates service orders and returns proper responses
- Secondary_Verifications: Validation works, security enforced, data persisted
- Negative_Verification: Invalid requests properly rejected, rate limiting functional
Test Case 13: Cross-Browser Compatibility
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_013
Title: Verify service order functionality across different browsers
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Browser-Compatibility,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Browser Engines, CSS Rendering, JavaScript Execution
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Compatibility-Matrix, Browser-Support, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Cross-Browser Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Multiple browser installations, Browser testing tools
- Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
- Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role in each browser
- Test_Data: Standard service order test data
- Prior_Test_Cases: Functional tests passing in primary browser
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Test complete order creation in Chrome | Full functionality works correctly | Standard test data | Chrome validation |
2 | Test complete order creation in Firefox | Full functionality works correctly | Standard test data | Firefox validation |
3 | Test complete order creation in Safari | Full functionality works correctly | Standard test data | Safari validation |
4 | Test complete order creation in Edge | Full functionality works correctly | Standard test data | Edge validation |
5 | Test dashboard filtering in all browsers | Filters work consistently | All status filters | Cross-browser filtering |
6 | Test search functionality in all browsers | Search works identically | Various search terms | Search compatibility |
7 | Test modal responsiveness in all browsers | Modals display correctly | - | UI consistency |
8 | Test form validation in all browsers | Validation messages appear consistently | Invalid inputs | Validation compatibility |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All functionality works identically across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge
- Secondary_Verifications: UI elements render correctly, performance consistent
- Negative_Verification: No browser-specific bugs, no functional differences
Test Case 14: Error Handling and Recovery
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_014
Title: Validate system error handling and recovery mechanisms
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Error Handling
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Error-Handling,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Support
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 85%
- Integration_Points: Error Handling Service, Recovery Mechanisms, User Notification
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Error-Handling-Coverage, System-Reliability, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Error Simulation Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Error Simulation Tools, Network Control Tools
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds error recovery
- Data_Requirements: Various error scenarios, partial data states
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Error simulation capabilities, network control tools
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Corrupted data scenarios, invalid inputs
- Prior_Test_Cases: Normal functionality verified
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Simulate network timeout during order creation | Graceful error message, data preserved | - | Network failure handling |
2 | Attempt order creation with database unavailable | Clear error message, retry option provided | - | Database failure handling |
3 | Submit order with corrupted session | Redirect to login, preserve form data | - | Session handling |
4 | Create order when WX system is down | Order created locally, queued for WX sync | - | External system failure |
5 | Test form recovery after browser crash | Form data recoverable from local storage | Partial form data | Data recovery |
6 | Submit invalid meter ID that doesn't exist | Clear validation error, suggest alternatives | Invalid meter: WM-99999 | Data validation |
7 | Test system behavior during maintenance | Maintenance message displayed, graceful degradation | - | Maintenance mode |
8 | Recover from partial order creation failure | System cleanup, no orphaned records | - | Transaction integrity |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System handles all error conditions gracefully without data loss
- Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages, recovery options available
- Negative_Verification: No system crashes, no data corruption, no security breaches
Test Case 15: Data Integrity and Validation
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_015
Title: Validate data integrity throughout service order lifecycle
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Data Integrity
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-Point, Data-Integrity,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 90%
- Integration_Points: Database, Data Validation Service, Audit Trail
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Data-Quality, System-Reliability, Compliance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Data Integrity Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Database, Audit Systems, Data Validation Services
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds data validation
- Data_Requirements: Various data scenarios, special characters, concurrent access
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Database access, audit trail enabled, validation services active
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role, database query access for verification
- Test_Data: Complete order data, special character sets, concurrent user scenarios
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic order creation successful
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Create order and verify all data fields | All entered data accurately stored | Complete order data | Data accuracy |
2 | Update order status and verify history | Status history maintained with timestamps | Status progression | Audit trail |
3 | Test concurrent access to same order | Data consistency maintained | Multiple users | Concurrency safety |
4 | Verify meter data consistency | Meter details match across all references | Cross-system data | Reference integrity |
5 | Test special characters in notes field | Special characters stored and displayed correctly | Notes: "Test @#$%^&*()_+" | Character encoding |
6 | Validate date/time accuracy | All timestamps accurate to system time | - | Time accuracy |
7 | Test data persistence after system restart | All data remains intact | - | Data durability |
8 | Verify referential integrity | Related data remains consistent | Foreign key relationships | Database integrity |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All data maintains integrity throughout order lifecycle
- Secondary_Verifications: Audit trails accurate, concurrent access safe
- Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no orphaned records, no inconsistencies
Test Case 16: Allocation Tab Integration
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_016
Title: Verify service order entries appear in meter details allocation tab
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Integration/UI
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-Point, Allocation-Tab,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: Meter Details Service, Allocation Management, Status Synchronization
- Code_Module_Mapped: MeterService
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Integration-Health, Feature-Coverage, Data-Consistency
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Integration Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Meter Management System, Allocation Service, Status Sync Service
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds allocation update
- Data_Requirements: Service orders for Replace/Install/Uninstall types
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Meter management system accessible, allocation service active
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role, meter details access
- Test_Data: Meter WM-12345, service orders of qualifying types
- Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation, Status updates functional
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Create service order for meter WM-12345 | Order created successfully | Service Type: Replace, Install, Uninstall | Order creation |
2 | Navigate to meter details page for WM-12345 | Meter details page loads | - | Navigation verification |
3 | Click on "Allocation" tab | Allocation tab displays | - | Tab accessibility |
4 | Verify service order entry appears | New entry visible with order details | Order ID, service type, status | Integration confirmation |
5 | Update order status to "Approved" in WX | Status updates in allocation tab | Status: Created → Approved | Status synchronization |
6 | Create multiple orders for same meter | All orders appear in allocation tab | Multiple service types | Multiple entries |
7 | Test with different service types | All qualifying service types logged | Replace, Install, Uninstall only | Service type filtering |
8 | Verify allocation entry data accuracy | All details match service order | Cross-reference validation | Data consistency |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Service orders for Replace/Install/Uninstall appear in meter allocation tab
- Secondary_Verifications: Data accuracy, status updates, multiple entries supported
- Negative_Verification: Non-qualifying service types don't appear, no duplicate entries
Test Case 17: Security and Access Control
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_017
Title: Validate security controls and access restrictions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Security
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Access-Control,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Engine, Audit System
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control-Matrix, Vulnerability-Assessment
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Security Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Authentication System, Security Testing Tools, Audit Database
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second authentication response
- Data_Requirements: Multiple user roles, security test vectors
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Security testing environment, multiple user accounts
- User_Roles_Permissions: Various roles: meter_manager, field_technician, admin
- Test_Data: Security test payloads, injection vectors, unauthorized access attempts
- Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system functional
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access service orders without login | Redirect to login page | - | Authentication required |
2 | Login with non-meter manager role | Service orders not accessible | User: field_technician | Role-based access |
3 | Login with meter manager role | Full access to service orders | User: meter_manager | Authorized access |
4 | Attempt SQL injection in search | Input sanitized, no database access | Search: "'; DROP TABLE --" | Input sanitization |
5 | Test XSS prevention in notes field | Script tags escaped, no execution | Notes: "<script>alert('test')</script>" | XSS prevention |
6 | Attempt unauthorized API access | HTTP 401 Unauthorized response | Invalid/missing token | API security |
7 | Test session timeout handling | Session expires, redirect to login | Idle for configured time | Session management |
8 | Verify audit logging | All actions logged with user details | - | Audit trail |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Only authorized meter managers can access service order functionality
- Secondary_Verifications: Input sanitization works, audit logging functional
- Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, no injection vulnerabilities
Test Case 18: Bulk Operations Performance
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_018
Title: Test performance with maximum bulk meter selection
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-ServiceOrderCreation, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium,
Integration-Point, Bulk-Operations, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 85%
- Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, Database Optimization, UI Performance
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Assessment, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Performance Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Large meter dataset (100+), Performance monitoring tools
- Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds bulk processing, UI responsive
- Data_Requirements: 100+ meters available for selection
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Large meter dataset prepared, performance monitoring enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: 100+ meters with varied types and statuses
- Prior_Test_Cases: Single meter operations verified
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Load meter selection page with 100+ meters | Page loads within 3 seconds | 100+ meters in database | Large dataset handling |
2 | Use "Select All" to select all visible meters | All meters selected within 2 seconds | - | Bulk selection performance |
3 | Proceed to service type selection | Page transition under 2 seconds | - | Navigation performance |
4 | Complete bulk order creation | Order creation under 5 seconds | All selected meters | Bulk processing time |
5 | Verify order appears in dashboard | Dashboard updates within 3 seconds | - | Display performance |
6 | Test search with bulk selection | Search results within 1 second | Various search terms | Search with large dataset |
7 | Test filter performance with large dataset | Filter operations under 1 second | - | Filter performance |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System handles bulk operations efficiently within time thresholds
- Secondary_Verifications: UI remains responsive, no performance degradation
- Negative_Verification: No timeouts, no memory issues, no UI freezing
Test Case 19: Edge Cases and Boundary Testing
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_019
Title: Test system behavior at boundaries and edge cases
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: Functional/Boundary
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-ServiceOrderManagement, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low,
Integration-Point, Boundary-Testing,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Could-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 70%
- Integration_Points: Input Validation, Data Limits, System Boundaries
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Edge-Case-Coverage, System-Robustness, Quality-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Edge Case Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Boundary testing tools, Data generation utilities
- Performance_Baseline: Graceful handling of edge cases
- Data_Requirements: Boundary value datasets, special character sets
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Edge case testing data prepared, validation rules configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role
- Test_Data: Maximum length strings, special characters, boundary dates
- Prior_Test_Cases: Normal functionality verified
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enter maximum length text in notes field | Text accepted up to limit, excess truncated | 1000+ character string | Field length limit |
2 | Test with minimum required data | Order creates with minimal data | Only mandatory fields | Minimum data requirements |
3 | Create order at year boundary (Dec 31) | ID generation handles year transition | Test at 11:59 PM Dec 31 | Year rollover testing |
4 | Test with special characters in meter numbers | System handles special characters correctly | Meter: "WM-12345@#" | Special character handling |
5 | Test pagination at boundaries | First/last page navigation works | Navigate to page 1, last page | Pagination boundaries |
6 | Test search with empty string | Appropriate handling of empty search | Search: "" (empty) | Empty search handling |
7 | Test with maximum simultaneous orders | System handles peak load | Create 50+ orders rapidly | Load boundary testing |
8 | Test order creation at exactly midnight | Timestamp accuracy maintained | Create at 00:00:00 | Time boundary testing |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System handles all boundary conditions gracefully
- Secondary_Verifications: Data validation enforced, limits respected
- Negative_Verification: No system errors, no data corruption at boundaries
Test Case 20: API Integration - Status Updates
Test Case ID: MX01US04_TC_020
Title: API testing for service order status update functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)
- Test Type: API/Integration
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-ServiceOrderTracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-API, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High,
Integration-External-Dependency, Status-Updates,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 95%
- Integration_Points: Status API, WX Integration, Database Updates, Audit Trail
- Code_Module_Mapped: Meter Service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: API (Platform Independent)
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: API-Health, Integration-Coverage, Status-Workflow-Compliance
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: API Integration Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: API Client (Postman/cURL)
- Device/OS: Independent
- Screen_Resolution: N/A
- Dependencies: Status API, WX System, Database, Message Queue
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms status update response
- Data_Requirements: Service orders in various statuses, API authentication
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, WX integration active, authentication configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: API access credentials, system integration permissions
- Test_Data: Service orders in all status states, valid status transition data
- Prior_Test_Cases: Service order creation via API successful, WX system connectivity verified
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Create service order via API | HTTP 201 Created, order in "Created" status | - | Initial state |
2 | Send PUT request to update status to "Assigned" | HTTP 200 OK, status updated successfully | Status: "ASSIGNED" | Valid progression |
3 | Send GET request to verify status | Response shows "Assigned" status | - | Status verification |
4 | Update status to "In Progress" via API | HTTP 200 OK, status updated | Status: "IN_PROGRESS" | Work started |
5 | Attempt invalid status transition | HTTP 400 Bad Request, status unchanged | Status: "APPROVED" (skip steps) | Business rule validation |
6 | Update to "Completed" via API | HTTP 200 OK, status updated | Status: "COMPLETED" | Valid progression |
7 | Final update to "Approved" | HTTP 200 OK, final status set | Status: "APPROVED" | Completion |
8 | Verify status history via API | All status changes recorded with timestamps | - | History tracking |
API Request Example:
PUT /api/service-orders/WO-2025-001/status
{
"status": "ASSIGNED",
"updatedBy": "system@wx.com",
"timestamp": "2025-06-03T10:30:00Z"
}
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: API correctly handles status updates following business rules
- Secondary_Verifications: Invalid transitions rejected, history maintained
- Negative_Verification: No status corruption, no unauthorized updates
Test Suite Organization
Smoke Test Suite (Critical Path)
Execution: Every build deployment
Duration: ~30 minutes
Test Cases:
- MX01US04_TC_001 (Single meter order creation)
- MX01US04_TC_005 (Service type validation)
- MX01US04_TC_006 (Mandatory field validation)
- MX01US04_TC_007 (Work order ID generation)
- MX01US04_TC_014 (Basic error handling)
Regression Test Suite (Full Functional)
Execution: Before each release
Duration: ~4 hours
Test Cases:
- All P1-Critical and P2-High priority test cases
- Integration test cases (TC_009, TC_016, TC_020)
- Performance test cases (TC_010, TC_011)
- Security test cases (TC_017)
Full Test Suite (Complete Coverage)
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Duration: ~8 hours
Test Cases:
- All test cases including P3-Medium and P4-Low
- Cross-browser compatibility (TC_013)
- Edge cases and boundary testing (TC_019)
- Extended performance testing (TC_018)
API Test Suite (Backend Validation)
Execution: Continuous integration
Duration: ~1 hour
Test Cases:
- MX01US04_TC_012 (Service order creation API)
- MX01US04_TC_020 (Status update API)
- Related authentication and validation APIs
Integration & Dependency Matrix
External System Dependencies
System | Dependency Type | Test Cases Affected | Fallback Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
WX Dispatch | Real-time sync | TC_008, TC_009, TC_016, TC_020 | Queue for later sync |
Meter Master Data | Reference data | TC_001, TC_002, TC_015 | Use cached data |
Authentication System | Security | TC_017 | Local authentication |
Test Execution Dependencies
Test Case | Prerequisites | Blocking Tests | Can Run Parallel |
---|---|---|---|
TC_001 | Login successful | None | TC_003, TC_004 |
TC_002 | TC_001 passed | None | TC_005, TC_006 |
TC_008 | TC_001, TC_009 | TC_007 | None |
TC_010 | Large dataset | TC_001-TC_009 | TC_011, TC_018 |
Quality Metrics and Reporting
Coverage Metrics
- Functional Coverage: 95% of acceptance criteria
- Integration Coverage: 100% of external touchpoints
- API Coverage: 90% of endpoints
- Browser Coverage: 4 major browsers
- Performance Coverage: Critical user paths under load
Success Criteria
- Pass Rate: ≥95% for P1-Critical tests
- Performance: All operations under defined thresholds
- Security: Zero critical vulnerabilities
- Integration: 100% external system sync success
Risk Assessment
- High Risk: WX integration failures, performance degradation
- Medium Risk: Cross-browser inconsistencies, concurrent user issues
- Low Risk: UI cosmetic issues, edge case handling
Conclusion
This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the Meter Service Orders (MX01US04) user story with 20 detailed test cases spanning:
- Functional Testing: Core creation and tracking workflows
- Integration Testing: WX system and meter allocation synchronization
- Performance Testing: Load handling and response times
- Security Testing: Access control and input validation
- API Testing: Backend service validation
- Compatibility Testing: Cross-browser support
The test cases are designed to support all 17 BrowserStack test management reports with proper tagging, business context, and stakeholder mapping. Each test case includes detailed execution steps, verification points, and supports both manual and automated execution strategies.
No Comments