Setting--Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
Condition Parameters Management - Complete Test Suite (AX04US03)
Test Scenario Summary
A. Functional Test Scenarios
- Core Parameter Management - Create, Read, Update, Delete operations
- Weighted Scoring System - Weight assignment and percentage calculations
- Total Weightage Validation - 100% validation and visual indicators
- Search Functionality - Parameter search and filtering
- Inline Editing - Direct edit mode from list view
- Modal Operations - Add new parameter workflow
- Business Rule Enforcement - Uniqueness, mandatory fields, weight ranges
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
- Performance - Page load, calculation speed, concurrent users
- Security - Authentication, authorization, data protection
- Compatibility - Cross-browser, cross-device, responsive design
- Usability - User experience, navigation, error handling
- Reliability - Data integrity, calculation accuracy, system stability
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
- Boundary Conditions - Min/max weight values, character limits
- Invalid Inputs - Malformed data, SQL injection attempts
- System Failures - Network timeouts, service unavailability
- Data Inconsistencies - Duplicate parameters, corrupted calculations
Test Case 1: Add New Condition Parameter - Happy Path
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_001
- Title: Successfully add a new condition parameter with valid data and verify percentage calculations
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 30% of total Condition Parameters feature
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Happy-path
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Feature-Progress
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, PostgreSQL Database 13+, Redis Cache 6.2+
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for modal load, < 500ms for calculation
- Data_Requirements: Clean parameter list with Total Weightage < 100%, at least 2 existing parameters
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Staging environment accessible
- Test database seeded with sample parameters
- Asset Manager role configured with full CRUD permissions
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Create, Read, Update, Delete permissions for Condition Parameters
- Test_Data:
- Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
- Password: TestPass123!
- Company: Pacific Northwest Utility Corp
- Tax ID: 91-1234567
- Existing Parameters: "External Surface Condition" (15.0%), "Age" (20.0%), "Failure Frequency" (25.0%)
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication test must pass, navigation test must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: New parameter "Operational Performance" successfully created with weight score 4 and calculated percentage 26.7%
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Modal closes automatically after successful submission
- All existing parameter percentages recalculated correctly
- Total Weightage reaches 100.0% and displays in green
- Parameter data persists after page refresh
- No duplicate entries created
- Negative_Verification:
- No system errors or exceptions thrown
- No data corruption in existing parameters
- No memory leaks or performance degradation
- No unauthorized parameter creation
Test Case 2: Add Parameter - Duplicate Name Validation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_002
- Title: Validate system prevents duplicate parameter names and displays appropriate error message
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 15% of total Condition Parameters feature
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Error-Handling, Validation-Coverage
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Validation Service v1.3, PostgreSQL Database 13+
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for validation response
- Data_Requirements: Existing parameter named "Age" must be present in database
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Test database contains parameter named "Age"
- Validation service running and accessible
- Error message translations loaded
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Create permissions for Condition Parameters
- Test_Data:
- Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
- Password: TestPass123!
- Existing Parameter: "Age" (weight: 4, percentage: 20.0%)
- Duplicate Test Name: "Age" (exact match)
- Alternative Test: "age" (case sensitivity test)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login authentication successful, navigation to Condition Parameters page successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Duplicate parameter name prevention with clear error message display
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Modal remains open for user correction
- Form data preserved during error state
- Case-insensitive duplicate detection
- Whitespace trimming in validation
- Error clears when name corrected
- Negative_Verification:
- No duplicate parameter created in database
- No system crashes or exceptions
- Original parameters remain unchanged
- No partial data corruption
Test Case 3: Edit Parameter Weight
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_003
- Title: Successfully edit parameter weight using inline editing and verify percentage recalculation
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 25% of total Condition Parameters feature
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Calculation-Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Calculation-Accuracy, Business-Logic
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Calculation Engine v3.0, PostgreSQL Database 13+, Redis Cache 6.2+
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for calculation, < 2 seconds for UI update
- Data_Requirements: Multiple parameters with Total Weightage = 100.0%, known baseline percentages
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Complete parameter set with 100% total weightage
- Calculation engine service running
- Database in consistent state
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Update permissions for Condition Parameters
- Test_Data:
- Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
- Password: TestPass123!
- Baseline Parameters:
- External Surface Condition: Weight 3, Percentage 20.0%
- Age: Weight 4, Percentage 26.7%
- Failure Frequency: Weight 5, Percentage 33.3%
- Operational Performance: Weight 3, Percentage 20.0%
- Target Parameter: "Failure Frequency"
- New Weight Value: 2 (down from 5)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Parameter creation tests successful, 100% weightage achieved
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Weight change from 5 to 2 for "Failure Frequency" results in percentage change from 33.3% to 14.3%
- Secondary_Verifications:
- All other parameter percentages recalculated proportionally
- Total Weightage remains exactly 100.0% with green color
- Mathematical accuracy to appropriate decimal places
- Inline edit interface functions smoothly
- Save button collapses edit view
- Cancel button discards changes properly
- Negative_Verification:
- No calculation errors or rounding issues
- No data corruption during weight change
- No UI glitches or display issues
- No unauthorized parameter modifications
Test Case 4: Delete Parameter with Confirmation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_004
- Title: Successfully delete a condition parameter with confirmation dialog and verify system recalculation
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 20% of total Condition Parameters feature
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Calculation-Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity, User-Safety
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Confirmation Dialog Service v1.1, PostgreSQL Database 13+
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for deletion, < 500ms for recalculation
- Data_Requirements: At least 4 parameters with 100% total weightage, no external dependencies on target parameter
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Multiple parameters configured (minimum 4)
- No asset assessments using target parameter
- Confirmation dialog service enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Delete permissions for Condition Parameters
- Test_Data:
- Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
- Password: TestPass123!
- Target Parameter: "External Surface Condition"
- Baseline Parameters:
- External Surface Condition: Weight 3, Percentage 21.4%
- Age: Weight 4, Percentage 28.6%
- Failure Frequency: Weight 2, Percentage 14.3%
- Operational Performance: Weight 3, Percentage 21.4%
- Repair Costs: Weight 3, Percentage 21.4%
- Prior_Test_Cases: Parameter management tests completed, 100% weightage established
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: "External Surface Condition" parameter successfully deleted with proper confirmation
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Confirmation dialog prevents accidental deletion
- Cancel button preserves all data
- All remaining parameters recalculated correctly
- Total Weightage maintained at 100.0%
- Parameter permanently removed from database
- No orphaned data or broken references
- Negative_Verification:
- No accidental deletions without confirmation
- No system errors during deletion process
- No data corruption in remaining parameters
- No calculation errors in recalculation
Test Case 5: Total Weightage Color Validation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_005
- Title: Validate Total Weightage color changes correctly based on 100% validation rule
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 15% of total Condition Parameters feature
- Integration_Points: CxServices, Calculation-Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UI-Testing, Visual-Validation
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, CSS Framework v2.0
- Performance_Baseline: < 100ms for color transition
- Data_Requirements: Configurable parameter set allowing weightage manipulation
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Parameters configured for easy manipulation
- CSS color values properly defined (#00FF00 for green, #FF0000 for red)
- Real-time calculation enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Full parameter management permissions
- Test_Data:
- Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
- Password: TestPass123!
- Test Parameters allowing various total combinations:
- Parameter A: Weight 2 (20.0%)
- Parameter B: Weight 3 (30.0%)
- Parameter C: Weight 5 (50.0%)
- Total: 100.0% (baseline green state)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Parameter creation successful, color CSS definitions loaded
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Total Weightage color accurately reflects 100% rule (green=exactly 100%, red=any other value)
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Color changes happen immediately upon calculation
- No intermediate or incorrect colors displayed
- Decimal precision maintained in color logic
- Visual contrast sufficient for accessibility
- Negative_Verification:
- No color display bugs or flickering
- No incorrect green display for non-100% values
- No accessibility issues with color choices
Test Case 6: Search Parameters Functionality
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_006
- Title: Validate parameter search functionality by name and description with various search patterns
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Could-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 10% of total Condition Parameters feature
- Integration_Points: CxServices, Search-Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Experience, Search-Analytics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Search Service v1.2, Elasticsearch 7.10+
- Performance_Baseline: < 300ms search response time
- Data_Requirements: Diverse parameter set with varied names and descriptions
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Multiple parameters with diverse names and descriptions
- Search indexing service running
- Search functionality enabled in UI
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Read permissions for Condition Parameters
- Test_Data:
- Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
- Password: TestPass123!
- Search Test Parameters:
- "External Surface Condition" - "Assessment of visible deterioration, corrosion, damage"
- "Age" - "Evaluation based on asset age relative to expected useful life"
- "Failure Frequency" - "Analysis of breakdown patterns, maintenance incidents"
- "Operational Performance" - "Assessment of efficiency, output, and adherence"
- "Repair Costs" - "Analysis of cumulative maintenance and repair costs"
- Prior_Test_Cases: Multiple parameters created and indexed for search
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Search filters parameters correctly by name and description with real-time results
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Case-insensitive search functionality
- Partial string matching works
- Clear/reset functionality restores full list
- Empty search results handled gracefully
- Search performance meets requirements (< 300ms)
- Negative_Verification:
- No incorrect filtering or false positives
- No system errors with special characters
- No performance degradation with large datasets
Test Case 7: Cross-Browser Compatibility - Firefox
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_007
- Title: Validate Condition Parameters functionality across Firefox browser environment
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of core functionality across browsers
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Cross-Browser-Testing
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Compatibility-Matrix, Browser-Support
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Firefox 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: All standard dependencies, Firefox-specific CSS/JS compatibility
- Performance_Baseline: Same as Chrome baseline
- Data_Requirements: Same test data as core functionality tests
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Firefox browser installed and updated
- Same test environment as Chrome tests
- Cross-browser CSS/JS compatibility verified
- User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Full permissions
- Test_Data:
- Same credentials and test data as TC_001
- Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality tests passed in Chrome
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All core functionality works identically to Chrome browser
- Secondary_Verifications:
- UI elements render correctly without styling issues
- Interactive components (sliders, modals) function properly
- Mathematical calculations produce identical results
- Performance meets same benchmarks as Chrome
- Negative_Verification:
- No Firefox-specific bugs or limitations
- No degraded user experience
- No data corruption or calculation errors
Test Case 8: API Integration - CRUD Operations
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_008
- Title: Validate complete API endpoint functionality for parameter CRUD operations with comprehensive data validation
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of API endpoints
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Authentication-Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, API-Health, Integration-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Postman/API Testing Tool
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: N/A (API Testing)
- Dependencies: API Gateway v3.1, Parameter Service v2.1, PostgreSQL 13+, Authentication Service v2.0
- Performance_Baseline: < 200ms for GET, < 500ms for POST/PUT/DELETE
- Data_Requirements: Clean database state, valid authentication tokens
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- API endpoints accessible
- Authentication service running
- Database in clean state
- Valid API keys/tokens available
- User_Roles_Permissions: API access with Asset Manager permissions
- Test_Data:
- API Base URL: https://api-staging.utilityassets.com/v2
- Auth Token: [Generated via OAuth flow]
- Company ID: pac-northwest-utility-001
Test Parameter Payloads:
{ "name": "API Test Parameter", "description": "Parameter created via API testing", "weight": 3}
- Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication API tests successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All CRUD operations return correct HTTP status codes and properly formatted data
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Response schemas match API specification
- Percentage calculations accurate in all scenarios
- Error responses provide clear, actionable messages
- Authentication and authorization properly enforced
- Rate limiting implemented correctly
- Negative_Verification:
- Invalid requests rejected with appropriate errors
- No data corruption during operations
- No unauthorized access possible
- No performance degradation under load
Test Case 9: Performance Load Testing
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_009
- Title: Validate system performance under various load conditions and concurrent user scenarios
- Created By: Prachi
- Created Date: August 08, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 30 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: Performance aspects of all features
- Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Cache-Layer, Load-Balancer
- Code_Module_Mapped: AX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance, Scalability-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Performance Testing Environment (Production-like)
- Browser/Version: JMeter/LoadRunner/K6 Performance Tools
- Device/OS: Load Testing Infrastructure
- Screen_Resolution: N/A (Performance Testing)
- Dependencies: Full system stack, monitoring tools, performance baseline data
- Performance_Baseline:
- Page load: < 3 seconds
- API response: < 500ms
- Calculation: < 100ms
- Concurrent users: 100+ without degradation
- Data_Requirements: Large dataset (1000+ parameters), realistic user patterns
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements:
- Performance testing environment configured
- Monitoring and metrics collection enabled
- Baseline performance measurements established
- Load testing tools configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple test user accounts with varying permissions
- Test_Data:
- 50 simulated Asset Manager accounts
- 1000+ condition parameters in database
- Realistic parameter names and descriptions
- Varied weight distributions
- Prior_Test_Cases: Functional tests pass, system stability verified
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: System maintains acceptable performance under 100 concurrent users with < 25% degradation
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Page load times remain under 4 seconds under load
- API response times stay under 750ms under load
- No memory leaks or resource exhaustion
- Error rates remain below 1% under peak load
- System recovers to baseline after load reduction
- Negative_Verification:
- No system crashes or service failures
- No data corruption under concurrent access
- No permanent performance degradation
- No cascade failures in dependent services
TEST EXECUTION ANALYTICS
Execution Matrix by Priority and Phase
Test Relationships and Dependencies
Blocking Relationships
- Authentication Tests → All functional tests
- TC_001 (Add Parameter) → TC_003 (Edit Parameter), TC_004 (Delete Parameter)
- TC_003 (Edit Parameter) → TC_005 (Color Validation)
- Database Setup → TC_009 (API Tests)
Parallel Execution Groups
- Group A: TC_006 (Search), TC_007 (Firefox), TC_008 (Mobile) - Can run simultaneously
- Group B: TC_002 (Validation), TC_005 (Color) - Independent tests
- Group C: API tests (TC_009) can run parallel to UI tests
Sequential Requirements
- Setup Phase: Authentication → Navigation → Data Setup
- Core CRUD: TC_001 → TC_003 → TC_004
- Validation: TC_002 → TC_005
- Performance: Functional tests complete → TC_010
Maintenance and Automation Recommendations
High Automation Priority
- TC_001: Core functionality, high execution frequency
- TC_002: Validation logic, regression critical
- TC_009: API tests, perfect for automation
- TC_010: Performance tests, automated monitoring
Manual Testing Requirements
- TC_005: Color validation requires visual verification
- TC_007, TC_008: Cross-browser/mobile testing needs manual validation
- TC_003: Complex UI interactions benefit from manual verification
Maintenance Effort Assessment
- Low Maintenance: TC_009 (API), TC_010 (Performance) - Stable interfaces
- Medium Maintenance: TC_001-004 (Core CRUD) - UI changes may require updates
- High Maintenance: TC_007, TC_008 (Compatibility) - Browser/device updates
COMPREHENSIVE REPORTING SUPPORT
Report Category Mapping for 17 BrowserStack Reports
1. Engineering Reports
- Primary Tests: TC_001, TC_003, TC_006, TC_009, TC_010
- Focus: Core functionality, API integration, performance
- Metrics: Pass/fail rates, execution time, code coverage
2. Product Reports
- Primary Tests: TC_004, TC_008
- Focus: User experience, mobile functionality, feature adoption
- Metrics: User journey completion, mobile usage patterns
3. QA Reports
- Primary Tests: TC_002, TC_005, TC_007
- Focus: Quality metrics, validation coverage, compatibility
- Metrics: Defect density, test coverage, browser support
4. Customer Success Reports
- Primary Tests: All tests with Customer-Enterprise tag
- Focus: Enterprise customer impact, SLA compliance
- Metrics: Customer-facing feature stability, performance SLA adherence
Business Impact Tracking
Revenue Impact Classification
- High Impact: TC_001, TC_003, TC_009, TC_010 (Core business functionality)
- Medium Impact: TC_002, TC_004, TC_007, TC_008 (Supporting functionality)
- Low Impact: TC_005, TC_006 (User experience enhancements)
Risk Assessment Matrix
- Critical Risk: TC_009 (API), TC_010 (Performance) - System stability
- High Risk: TC_001, TC_003, TC_004 (Core CRUD) - Data integrity
- Medium Risk: TC_002, TC_005, TC_007, TC_008 - User experience
- Low Risk: TC_006 - Secondary features
Executive Dashboard Metrics
Key Performance Indicators
- Feature Stability: Percentage of P1-Critical tests passing
- Cross-Platform Support: Browser/mobile compatibility scores
- Performance Compliance: SLA adherence metrics
- API Health: Integration endpoint success rates
- User Experience: Mobile and responsive design scores
Trend Tracking Elements
- Weekly: Core functionality test results (TC_001, TC_003, TC_009)
- Monthly: Full regression suite results
- Quarterly: Performance baseline comparisons (TC_010)
- Release: Complete compatibility matrix (TC_007, TC_008)
Compliance and Audit Support
Regulatory Compliance Coverage
- Data Protection: API security tests (TC_009)
- Accessibility: Mobile and responsive tests (TC_008)
- Industry Standards: Performance and reliability tests (TC_010)
Audit Trail Requirements
- Test Execution Records: All test cases with timestamps and results
- Requirements Traceability: Full mapping to acceptance criteria
- Change Documentation: Version control for test case updates
- Performance Baselines: Historical performance data for trend analysis
SECURITY TESTING INTEGRATION
Authentication and Authorization Testing
Covered in Test Cases
- TC_009: API authentication and authorization validation
- All Tests: Role-based access control verification
Additional Security Considerations
- Session Management: Timeout handling across all test scenarios
- Data Encryption: Verification of sensitive data protection
- Audit Logging: Parameter change tracking and monitoring
- Input Validation: SQL injection and XSS prevention testing
Data Protection Compliance
B2B Utility SaaS Specific Requirements
- Utility Data Protection: Parameter configurations affecting critical infrastructure
- Multi-Tenant Security: Company data isolation verification
- Regulatory Compliance: SOC2, utility industry standards adherence
- Backup and Recovery: Parameter configuration backup integrity
INTEGRATION TESTING STRATEGY
Internal System Integrations
Asset Management System
- Integration Point: Parameter data feeds into asset condition scoring
- Test Coverage: Verify parameter changes update asset scores correctly
- Data Flow: Parameter weights → Calculation engine → Asset health scores
Reporting and Analytics
- Integration Point: Parameter data used in dashboard analytics
- Test Coverage: Verify reporting reflects parameter configuration changes
- Data Flow: Parameter configurations → Analytics engine → Dashboard displays
Audit and Compliance
- Integration Point: Parameter changes logged for audit trails
- Test Coverage: Verify all parameter modifications captured in audit logs
- Data Flow: Parameter CRUD operations → Audit service → Compliance reports
External System Dependencies
Third-Party Risk Assessment Tools
- Integration Point: Parameter weights may feed external risk calculation systems
- Test Coverage: API endpoint compatibility and data format validation
- Monitoring: External system availability and response time tracking
Regulatory Reporting Systems
- Integration Point: Parameter configurations may be required for regulatory submissions
- Test Coverage: Data export functionality and format compliance
- Compliance: Industry-specific reporting requirements validation
No Comments