Skip to main content

Data Migration Info Content for the data types

Data Migration Enhancement V2 - Comprehensive Test Cases

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

  1. File Upload & Processing: CSV validation, size limits, processing time tracking
  2. Data Type Selection: Category navigation, mandatory field validation
  3. Column Mapping: Field mapping, confidence scoring, transformation configuration
  4. Data Relationship Mapping: Invalid relationship handling, bulk assignment
  5. Template Management: Save, reuse, tracking usage
  6. Migration History: Status tracking, success rate calculation

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

  1. Performance: File processing under 30s, response times
  2. Security: File validation, data protection, access control
  3. Compatibility: Cross-browser, cross-device testing
  4. Usability: Navigation flow, error handling, progress tracking

Test Case 1: CSV File Upload Validation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_001
  • Title: Validate CSV file upload with size and format restrictions
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Upload, File-Validation, MOD-DataMigration, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Happy-Path
  • Integration Points: File-System, Validation-Service
  • Business Priority: Must-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: Enterprise/SMB
  • Revenue Impact: High
  • Business Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance Required: Yes
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: High
  • Complexity Level: Medium
  • Expected Execution Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: High
  • Failure Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 15% of upload feature
  • Integration Points: File-System, Validation-Engine
  • Code Module Mapped: FileUploadService
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: Yes
  • Customer Impact Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File validation service, storage service
  • Performance Baseline: < 3 seconds response time
  • Data Requirements: Test CSV files of various sizes

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Data migration module enabled
  • User Roles/Permissions: Admin or Data Manager role
  • Test Data:
    • Valid CSV: customer_data_valid.csv (5MB, 1000 rows)
    • Large CSV: customer_data_large.csv (22MB, 10000 rows)
    • Invalid format: customer_data.xlsx
  • Prior Test Cases: User authentication must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Data Migration page

Data Migration page loads successfully

N/A

Verify page elements

2

Click "Upload Data" tab

Upload interface displays

N/A

Check tab activation

3

Select "Upload New Data" option

File upload section appears

N/A

Verify option selection

4

Choose "Consumers" data type

Consumer upload form displays with mandatory field warning

N/A

Check data type selection

5

Upload valid CSV file (5MB)

File uploads successfully, shows processing status

customer_data_valid.csv

Monitor upload progress

6

Verify processing results

Shows: 1000 rows processed, 7 columns found, 5MB file size, processing time

N/A

Validate statistics

7

Upload oversized file (22MB)

Error: "File exceeds maximum size of 20MB"

customer_data_large.csv

Test size validation

8

Upload invalid format (.xlsx)

Error: "Only CSV files are supported"

customer_data.xlsx

Test format validation

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Valid CSV uploads successfully with correct statistics
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Processing time displayed accurately
    • File size calculated correctly
    • Row and column counts match file content
  • Negative Verification:
    • Files over 20MB are rejected
    • Non-CSV files are rejected
    • Appropriate error messages displayed

Test Results Template

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual Results: [Record actual behavior]
  • Execution Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots/Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 2: Column Mapping with High Confidence

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_002
  • Title: Verify automatic column mapping with high confidence scoring
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Column-Mapping, AI-Confidence, MOD-DataMigration, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product
  • Integration Points: AI-Engine, Mapping-Service
  • Business Priority: Must-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: All
  • Revenue Impact: High
  • Business Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance Required: No
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: Medium
  • Complexity Level: High
  • Expected Execution Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 25% of mapping feature
  • Integration Points: AI-Engine, Column-Mapping-Service
  • Code Module Mapped: ColumnMappingService, AIConfidenceEngine
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Product
  • Report Categories: AI-Performance, Mapping-Accuracy
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: Yes
  • Customer Impact Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 118+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: AI mapping service, column analysis engine
  • Performance Baseline: < 2 seconds for mapping suggestions
  • Data Requirements: CSV with standard column names

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: AI mapping service operational
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role
  • Test Data:
    • CSV file: customer_standard_columns.csv
    • Columns: customer_id, first_name, last_name, email_address, phone_number, street_address, city_name, state_code, postal_code
  • Prior Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete file upload process

File processed successfully

customer_standard_columns.csv

From previous test

2

Click "Next: Map Columns"

Column mapping screen loads

N/A

Navigation verification

3

Verify automatic mappings

System suggests mappings with confidence levels

N/A

Check AI suggestions

4

Verify Customer ID mapping

customer_id → Customer ID with 95% High Confidence (Green)

N/A

Check required field

5

Verify Name field mappings

first_name → First Name, last_name → Last Name both 95% High Confidence

N/A

Check name mappings

6

Verify Address mappings

street_address → Address, city_name → City with High Confidence

N/A

Check address fields

7

Verify contact mappings

email_address → Email (Medium 75%), phone_number → Phone (Medium 75%)

N/A

Check contact fields

8

Check transformed data preview

Sample data displays correctly in preview columns

N/A

Verify data preview

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: All standard columns automatically mapped with appropriate confidence levels
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Required fields marked with red "Required" badge
    • Confidence levels color-coded (Green >90%, Yellow 50-89%, Red <50%)
    • Sample data preview matches source data
  • Negative Verification: No mappings should show incorrect field assignments

Test Case 3: Data Transformation - Add Prefix Configuration

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_003
  • Title: Configure and apply Add Prefix transformation with conditional rules
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Transformation, Email, Add-Prefix, Conditional, MOD-DataMigration, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering
  • Integration Points: Transformation-Engine, Data-Processing
  • Business Priority: Should-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue Impact: Medium
  • Business Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance Required: No
  • SLA Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: Medium
  • Complexity Level: High
  • Expected Execution Time: 7 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 30% of transformation feature
  • Integration Points: Transformation-Engine, Preview-Service
  • Code Module Mapped: TransformationService, PrefixProcessor
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report Categories: Feature-Functionality, Transformation-Usage
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: No
  • Customer Impact Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Transformation service, preview engine
  • Performance Baseline: < 1 second for transformation preview
  • Data Requirements: CSV with email addresses

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Transformation module enabled
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role
  • Test Data:
    • Email samples: john.smith@email.com, jane.doe@company.com, bob@test.org
  • Prior Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Email field transformation

Email row selected in mapping table

N/A

From column mapping

2

Click transformation dropdown

Dropdown shows all transformation options

N/A

Verify options available

3

Select "Add Prefix"

Add Prefix Configuration popup opens

N/A

Check popup display

4

Enter prefix text "user_"

Prefix text field accepts input

"user_"

Text input validation

5

Select "All rows" option

Radio button selected

N/A

Default selection

6

View preview section

Before: "john.smith@email.com", After: "user_john.smith@email.com"

N/A

Verify transformation

7

Click "Apply Transformation"

Popup closes, Email field shows "Add Prefix" with gear icon

N/A

Confirm application

8

Check transformed data column

Shows prefixed emails in preview

user_john.smith@email.com

Verify in main table

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Prefix correctly applied to email addresses with preview
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Configuration popup displays all options correctly
    • Preview shows before/after comparison
    • Transformation persists in main mapping table
  • Negative Verification: Original email format preserved in transformation

Test Case 4: Data Relationship Mapping - Invalid Plan Resolution

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_004
  • Title: Identify and resolve invalid plan relationships in data mapping
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Negative, Relationship-Mapping, Invalid-Data, Plan-Validation, MOD-DataMigration, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA
  • Integration Points: Validation-Service, Relationship-Engine
  • Business Priority: Must-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: All
  • Revenue Impact: High
  • Business Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance Required: Yes
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: High
  • Complexity Level: Medium
  • Expected Execution Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: High
  • Failure Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 40% of relationship mapping feature
  • Integration Points: Validation-Service, Plan-Master-Data
  • Code Module Mapped: RelationshipValidator, PlanMappingService
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: QA
  • Report Categories: Data-Quality, Validation-Coverage
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: Yes
  • Customer Impact Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Plan master data, validation service
  • Performance Baseline: < 2 seconds for validation
  • Data Requirements: Customer data with invalid plan references

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Plan master data populated
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role
  • Test Data:
    • Valid plans: "Basic Plan", "Premium Plan"
    • Invalid plans: "Invalid Plan A", "Invalid Plan B"
    • Customer records with mixed valid/invalid plan assignments
  • Prior Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_003 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete column mapping

Mapping completed successfully

N/A

From previous step

2

Click "Data Relation Mapping"

Relationship mapping screen loads

N/A

Navigation check

3

Verify invalid plan warning

"2 out of 4 rows have invalid plan details" displayed in red

N/A

Error summary

4

Check Plan column data

CON001: "Invalid Plan A" (red), CON002: "Basic Plan" (green)

N/A

Visual validation

5

Select invalid plan record

CON001 checkbox selected

N/A

Record selection

6

Click "Select Plan Values" dropdown

Dropdown shows valid plan options

Basic Plan, Premium Plan

Available options

7

Select "Basic Plan"

Option selected in dropdown

Basic Plan

Plan selection

8

Click "Assign to Selected (1)"

Plan updated to "Basic Plan" (green)

N/A

Assignment verification

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Invalid plans identified and can be corrected to valid plans
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Invalid relationships highlighted in red
    • Valid relationships shown in green
    • Bulk assignment functionality works
    • Progress tracking updates after corrections
  • Negative Verification: Cannot proceed with unresolved invalid relationships

Test Case 5: Template Save and Reuse Functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_005
  • Title: Save mapping configuration as template and verify reuse functionality
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Template-Management, Save-Template, Reuse, MOD-DataMigration, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product
  • Integration Points: Template-Storage, Configuration-Service
  • Business Priority: Should-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue Impact: Medium
  • Business Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance Required: No
  • SLA Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: Low
  • Complexity Level: Medium
  • Expected Execution Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 35% of template management feature
  • Integration Points: Template-Service, User-Profile
  • Code Module Mapped: TemplateManager, ConfigurationSaver
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Product
  • Report Categories: Feature-Usage, Template-Analytics
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: No
  • Customer Impact Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template storage, user authentication
  • Performance Baseline: < 1 second for save operation
  • Data Requirements: Complete mapping configuration

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Template management enabled
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role with template permissions
  • Test Data:
    • Template name: "Customer Data Import Template"
    • Mapping configuration from previous test
  • Prior Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_004 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete mapping configuration

All mappings and transformations configured

N/A

From previous tests

2

Click "Save as Template"

Save Template popup opens

N/A

Popup verification

3

Enter template name

Template name field accepts input

"Customer Data Import Template"

Name validation

4

Verify source file information

Shows original file name, 9 mappings, 1 transformation

N/A

Configuration summary

5

Review mapping summary

Lists all field mappings with confidence percentages

N/A

Mapping verification

6

Click "Save Template"

Template saved successfully, popup closes

N/A

Save operation

7

Navigate to "Saved Templates"

Templates list displays saved template

N/A

Template listing

8

Verify template details

Shows TPL-001, template name, Consumer type, current user, today's date, 1 times usage

N/A

Template metadata

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Template saves successfully and appears in template list
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Template ID auto-generated (TPL-XXX format)
    • Usage count initialized to 1
    • Creator and date recorded correctly
    • Template can be accessed from templates list
  • Negative Verification: Cannot save template without valid name

Test Case 6: Cross-Browser Compatibility - Firefox

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_006
  • Title: Verify data migration functionality across Firefox browser
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Cross-Browser, Firefox, Compatibility, MOD-DataMigration, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA
  • Integration Points: Browser-Compatibility, UI-Rendering
  • Business Priority: Should-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: All
  • Revenue Impact: Low
  • Business Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance Required: No
  • SLA Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: Low
  • Complexity Level: Low
  • Expected Execution Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: None
  • Failure Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 100% feature compatibility
  • Integration Points: UI-Components, File-Upload
  • Code Module Mapped: Frontend-Components
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Firefox

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: QA
  • Report Categories: Browser-Compatibility, Cross-Platform
  • Trend Tracking: No
  • Executive Visibility: No
  • Customer Impact Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Firefox 118+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: All system services
  • Performance Baseline: Same as Chrome baseline
  • Data Requirements: Same test data as functional tests

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Firefox browser installed and updated
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role
  • Test Data: customer_data_valid.csv
  • Prior Test Cases: None (independent compatibility test)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open application in Firefox

Application loads completely

N/A

Initial load test

2

Navigate to Data Migration

Page displays correctly, no layout issues

N/A

UI compatibility

3

Upload CSV file

File upload works, progress bar displays

customer_data_valid.csv

Upload functionality

4

Perform column mapping

All mapping features work, dropdowns functional

N/A

Interactive elements

5

Configure transformations

Popup modals display correctly, buttons responsive

N/A

Modal compatibility

6

Save as template

Template save functionality works

N/A

Form submission

7

Navigate through all screens

All navigation works, no JavaScript errors

N/A

Complete workflow

8

Check responsive design

Interface adapts to window resizing

N/A

Responsive testing

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: All functionality works identically to Chrome
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • No visual layout issues
    • All interactive elements responsive
    • File upload progress displays correctly
    • No JavaScript console errors
  • Negative Verification: No browser-specific bugs or compatibility issues

Test Case 7: Performance - Large File Processing

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_007
  • Title: Verify system performance with maximum allowed file size (20MB)
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Performance, Large-File, 20MB-Limit, Processing-Time, MOD-DataMigration, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering
  • Integration Points: File-Processing, Performance-Monitoring
  • Business Priority: Must-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue Impact: High
  • Business Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance Required: Yes
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: High
  • Complexity Level: High
  • Expected Execution Time: 35 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: High
  • Failure Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 100% of file processing performance
  • Integration Points: File-System, Processing-Engine
  • Code Module Mapped: FileProcessor, PerformanceMonitor
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: Yes
  • Customer Impact Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Performance
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools
  • Performance Baseline: < 30 seconds processing time
  • Data Requirements: 20MB CSV file with 50,000+ rows

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role
  • Test Data: large_customer_data.csv (19.8MB, 50,000 rows, 15 columns)
  • Prior Test Cases: None (independent performance test)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Start performance monitoring

Monitoring tools active

N/A

Baseline measurement

2

Upload 20MB CSV file

Upload initiates successfully

large_customer_data.csv

Upload start

3

Monitor processing time

Processing completes within 30 seconds

N/A

SLA requirement

4

Verify processing statistics

Correct row count (50,000), column count (15), file size (19.8MB)

N/A

Accuracy verification

5

Check system responsiveness

UI remains responsive during processing

N/A

User experience

6

Monitor memory usage

Memory usage stays within acceptable limits

N/A

Resource monitoring

7

Verify data preview

First 5 rows display correctly

N/A

Data integrity

8

Measure end-to-end time

Total process time from upload to preview < 35 seconds

N/A

Overall performance

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Large file processes within 30-second SLA
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • UI remains responsive throughout processing
    • Memory usage stays within limits
    • All processing statistics accurate
    • Data integrity maintained
  • Negative Verification: No system crashes or timeouts during processing

Test Case 8: Security - File Content Validation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_008
  • Title: Validate security measures for malicious file content detection
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Security, Malicious-Content, File-Validation, SQL-Injection, MOD-DataMigration, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-CSM
  • Integration Points: Security-Scanner, Content-Validation
  • Business Priority: Must-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: All
  • Revenue Impact: High
  • Business Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer Journey: Support
  • Compliance Required: Yes
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: High
  • Complexity Level: High
  • Expected Execution Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: High
  • Failure Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 100% of security validation
  • Integration Points: Security-Service, Malware-Scanner
  • Code Module Mapped: SecurityValidator, ContentScanner
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: CSM
  • Report Categories: Security-Dashboard, Threat-Detection
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: Yes
  • Customer Impact Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Security
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Security scanning service, malware detection
  • Performance Baseline: < 5 seconds for security scan
  • Data Requirements: CSV files with malicious content patterns

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Security scanning enabled
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role
  • Test Data:
    • malicious_sql_injection.csv (contains SQL injection attempts)
    • malicious_xss.csv (contains XSS scripts)
    • malicious_executable.csv (contains executable code patterns)
  • Prior Test Cases: None (independent security test)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Upload CSV with SQL injection

File rejected with security warning

malicious_sql_injection.csv

Security validation

2

Upload CSV with XSS content

File rejected with appropriate error message

malicious_xss.csv

Script detection

3

Upload CSV with executable code

File rejected, security alert generated

malicious_executable.csv

Malware detection

4

Verify security logging

Security events logged for audit

N/A

Audit trail

5

Check user notification

User receives clear security warning message

N/A

User communication

6

Verify system protection

No malicious content processed by system

N/A

System integrity

7

Test with clean file after

Clean file uploads normally after security rejection

customer_data_valid.csv

System recovery

8

Validate admin notification

Security team notified of malicious upload attempt

N/A

Security alerting

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Malicious content detected and rejected before processing
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Appropriate security error messages displayed
    • Security events logged for compliance
    • System remains functional after security rejection
    • Admin notifications sent for security events
  • Negative Verification: No malicious content passes through validation

Test Case 9: API Integration - Template Retrieval

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_009
  • Title: Verify API endpoint for template retrieval and usage tracking
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: API, Template-Retrieval, Usage-Tracking, Integration, MOD-DataMigration, P2-High, Phase-Integration, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering
  • Integration Points: Template-API, Database
  • Business Priority: Should-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: All
  • Revenue Impact: Medium
  • Business Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance Required: No
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: Medium
  • Complexity Level: High
  • Expected Execution Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 100% of template API functionality
  • Integration Points: Template-Service, API-Gateway
  • Code Module Mapped: TemplateAPI, UsageTracker
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: API

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report Categories: API-Performance, Integration-Health
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: No
  • Customer Impact Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Integration
  • Browser/Version: API Testing Tool (Postman/Newman)
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: N/A (API testing)
  • Dependencies: Template database, API gateway
  • Performance Baseline: < 500ms response time
  • Data Requirements: Existing template data

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: API testing environment configured
  • User Roles/Permissions: API access token with template permissions
  • Test Data:
    • Template ID: TPL-001
    • API endpoint: /api/v2/templates/{id}
    • Valid authentication token
  • Prior Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_005 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Send GET request to template endpoint

API returns 200 OK status

GET /api/v2/templates/TPL-001

Basic API call

2

Verify response structure

JSON contains all template fields

N/A

Schema validation

3

Check template metadata

Returns template name, data type, creator, creation date

N/A

Data accuracy

4

Verify usage tracking

Usage count incremented by 1

N/A

Usage counter

5

Test invalid template ID

Returns 404 Not Found

GET /api/v2/templates/TPL-999

Error handling

6

Test unauthorized access

Returns 401 Unauthorized

Invalid token

Security validation

7

Measure response time

Response time under 500ms

N/A

Performance check

8

Verify audit logging

API call logged in system audit trail

N/A

Compliance logging

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: API returns correct template data with proper status codes
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • Response time meets performance requirements
    • Usage tracking increments correctly
    • Proper error handling for edge cases
    • Security validations in place
  • Negative Verification: Invalid requests properly rejected with appropriate error codes

Test Case 10: End-to-End Migration Workflow

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_010
  • Title: Complete end-to-end data migration workflow validation
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: September 03, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Migration Enhancement V2
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Acceptance
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: End-to-End, Complete-Workflow, Acceptance, Integration, MOD-DataMigration, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Happy-Path
  • Integration Points: All-Services, Complete-Pipeline
  • Business Priority: Must-Have

Business Context

  • Customer Segment: All
  • Revenue Impact: High
  • Business Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance Required: Yes
  • SLA Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk Level: High
  • Complexity Level: High
  • Expected Execution Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility Score: High
  • Data Sensitivity: High
  • Failure Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature Coverage: 100% of complete migration workflow
  • Integration Points: All-System-Components
  • Code Module Mapped: Complete-Migration-Pipeline
  • Requirement Coverage: Complete
  • Cross Platform Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary Stakeholder: Product
  • Report Categories: User-Journey, Feature-Completeness
  • Trend Tracking: Yes
  • Executive Visibility: Yes
  • Customer Impact Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Pre-Production
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: All system services operational
  • Performance Baseline: Complete workflow < 5 minutes
  • Data Requirements: Complete customer dataset

Prerequisites

  • Setup Requirements: Full system deployment
  • User Roles/Permissions: Data Manager role with all permissions
  • Test Data:
    • customer_complete.csv (2MB, 1000 customer records)
    • All mandatory fields present
    • Mix of valid and invalid relationships
  • Prior Test Cases: System must be fully functional

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Data Migration

Landing page displays with success statistics

N/A

Entry point

2

Select Upload New Data

Upload interface appears with guidance

N/A

User guidance

3

Choose Consumers data type

Consumer upload form with mandatory field warnings

N/A

Data type selection

4

Upload customer CSV file

File processes successfully with statistics

customer_complete.csv

File processing

5

Review data preview

First 5 rows display correctly

N/A

Data validation

6

Proceed to column mapping

Auto-mapping with confidence levels

N/A

AI mapping

7

Configure email transformation

Add prefix transformation applied

"user_" prefix

Transformation

8

Save mapping as template

Template saved successfully

"Complete Customer Template"

Template creation

9

Proceed to relationship mapping

Invalid relationships identified

N/A

Relationship validation

10

Resolve invalid plan mappings

All relationships corrected to valid plans

Basic Plan, Premium Plan

Relationship correction

11

Continue to final validation

Validation successful, ready to migrate

N/A

Final checks

12

Complete migration process

Migration completes with success metrics

N/A

Migration execution

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Complete migration workflow executes successfully
  • Secondary Verifications:
    • All data processed accurately
    • Template created and accessible
    • Migration history updated
    • Success metrics calculated correctly
    • User can view migrated data
  • Negative Verification: No data loss or corruption during migration

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_001, DATA_MIG_V2_TC_002, DATA_MIG_V2_TC_004 Execution: Every build deployment Duration: ~15 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core features and integrations Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_001 through DATA_MIG_V2_TC_009 Execution: Before each release Duration: ~45 minutes

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including edge cases and performance Test Cases: All DATA_MIG_V2_TC_001 through DATA_MIG_V2_TC_010 Execution: Weekly and major releases Duration: ~90 minutes

Performance Test Suite

Criteria: Performance and load testing Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_007, plus dedicated load tests Execution: Performance testing cycles Duration: ~120 minutes

Security Test Suite

Criteria: Security validation and penetration testing Test Cases: DATA_MIG_V2_TC_008, plus dedicated security tests Execution: Security testing cycles Duration: ~60 minutes

Execution Matrix

Browser/Device Combinations

Test Case

Chrome 115+

Firefox 118+

Edge 117+

Safari 16+

TC_001-005

Required

Required

Optional

Optional

TC_006

N/A

Required

N/A

N/A

TC_007-010

Required

Optional

Optional

Optional

Environment Coverage

Environment

Test Cases

Purpose

Development

TC_001-003

Basic functionality

Staging

TC_001-008

Full feature testing

Performance

TC_007

Performance validation

Security

TC_008

Security testing

Pre-Prod

TC_010

Acceptance testing

API Test Collection (Critical Level >=7)

High Priority API Tests

  1. Template Management API (Level 8)
    • GET /api/v2/templates/{id}
    • POST /api/v2/templates
    • PUT /api/v2/templates/{id}
    • DELETE /api/v2/templates/{id}
  2. File Upload API (Level 9)
    • POST /api/v2/upload
    • GET /api/v2/upload/status/{id}
    • POST /api/v2/upload/validate
  3. Migration Status API (Level 8)
    • GET /api/v2/migrations/{id}/status
    • GET /api/v2/migrations/history
    • POST /api/v2/migrations/{id}/cancel

Integration Dependencies

  • External Systems: File storage service, validation engine, AI mapping service
  • Internal APIs: User management, audit logging, notification service
  • Database Dependencies: Template storage, migration history, user preferences

Performance Benchmarks

Expected Performance Criteria

  • File Upload: < 3 seconds for files up to 10MB
  • Processing Time: < 30 seconds for files up to 20MB
  • AI Mapping: < 2 seconds for confidence scoring
  • Template Save: < 1 second for template creation
  • API Response: < 500ms for all API endpoints
  • UI Responsiveness: < 1 second for page transitions

Load Testing Parameters

  • Concurrent Users: Up to 50 simultaneous uploads
  • Peak File Size: 20MB per file
  • Sustained Load: 100 migrations per hour
  • Memory Usage: < 2GB per processing instance
No Comments
Back to top