Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)

Total Test cases:-27
Total Acceptance Criteria -
Total Coverage:

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality Scenarios

Read Cycle List View Management
- Display read cycles with status indicators
- Filter cycles by month, status, and sort order
- Search cycles by name
- View cycle summary counters
Read Cycle Detail View Management
- Display comprehensive cycle information
- Show performance metrics with historical comparisons
- Display meter reading quality breakdown
- Show route completion status
Route Assignment and Dispatch
- Assign routes to available meter readers
- Unassign routes from meter readers
- Validate reader availability and workload
- Manage route status transitions
Real-time Data Integration
- Sync with meter reader mobile submissions
- Update completion rates dynamically
- Refresh performance metrics
- Handle concurrent supervisor access

Business Rules Scenarios

Status Transition Validation
Workload Calculation and Assignment Rules
Completion Percentage Calculations
Quality Metrics Calculations

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance Scenarios

Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
Route assignment response time
Real-time data sync performance
Concurrent user handling

Security Scenarios

Authentication and session management
Role-based access control
Data protection and audit trails

Compatibility Scenarios

Cross-browser compatibility
Responsive design validation
Mobile integration compatibility

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

Maximum cycles, routes, and meters handling
Date range validations
Workload limit validations

System Failures

Mobile app connectivity issues
Real-time sync failures
Concurrent assignment conflicts

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Cycle List View Display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_001
Title: Verify Read Cycle List View displays correctly with all required elements
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of list view feature covered
Integration_Points: Database, MX-Service, UI Layer
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC01, AC02, AC03
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_003, TC_004

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Database with sample read cycle data, MX-Service API
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: 5 read cycles with different statuses

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database initialized with test data
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: At least 5 read cycles exist (2 Not Dispatched, 1 Dispatched, 1 In Progress, 1 Completed)
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication test must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Photo Meter Reads section	Page loads within 3 seconds showing "Photo Meter Reads" header with breadcrumb "Home > Reads > Photo"	N/A	Performance validation
2	Verify status counter tiles display	Four tiles showing "Not Dispatched: 2", "Dispatched: 1", "In Progress: 1", "Completed: 1" with correct counts	Current month data	Business rule validation
3	Verify filter controls are present	Month dropdown (default: current month), Status dropdown (default: All Statuses), Sort By dropdown (default: Next Run Date), and Search bar with placeholder text	N/A	UI element validation
4	Verify data table headers	Table shows columns: Read Cycle Name, Month, Meters, Consumers, Readings, Meter Quality (Normal/Faulty/RCNT), Completion %, Status, Last Run Date, Next Run Date, Actions	N/A	Column structure validation
5	Verify sample data display	"Downtown Area Q2" shows: April 2025, 145 meters, 128 consumers, 89 readings, Normal: 72, Faulty: 12, RCNT: 5, 61% completion with blue progress bar	"Downtown Area Q2" cycle	Data format validation
6	Verify action buttons	"View" button enabled for all cycles, "Dispatch" button enabled for non-completed cycles, disabled for completed cycles	N/A	Action availability validation
7	Verify responsive design	Table columns adjust appropriately on tablet resolution	Tablet view	Responsive validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All UI elements display correctly and page loads within 3-second baseline
Secondary_Verifications: Data formatting correct, counter calculations accurate, button states appropriate
Negative_Verification: No error messages, broken UI elements, or performance issues

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual behavior observed]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC01: ✅ Status indicators (Not Dispatched, Dispatched, In Progress, Completed) clearly displayed
AC02: ✅ Filter controls (Month, Status, Sort By, Search) present and functional
AC03: ✅ Key metrics (Meters, Consumers, Readings, Completion %) displayed for each cycle

Test Case 2: Status Counter Calculations

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_002
Title: Verify status counter tiles calculate and display correct counts for current month
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of counter calculation logic covered
Integration_Points: Database query aggregation, MX-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC01, Business Rules for counter calculations
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_004

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Database with known test data counts, MX-Service API
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second counter calculation
Data_Requirements: Specific test data setup with known counts

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database reset with controlled test data
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Exactly 2 Not Dispatched, 1 Dispatched, 1 In Progress, 1 Completed cycles for current month; Additional cycles from previous months
Prior_Test_Cases: Database connectivity test must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Photo Meter Reads	Page loads with status counter tiles visible	N/A	Initial load
2	Verify "Not Dispatched" counter	Displays "2" matching database count for current month only	2 cycles with status="Not Dispatched", month=current	Business rule: current month filter
3	Verify "Dispatched" counter	Displays "1" matching database count for current month only	1 cycle with status="Dispatched", month=current	Business rule validation
4	Verify "In Progress" counter	Displays "1" matching database count for current month only	1 cycle with status="In Progress", month=current	Business rule validation
5	Verify "Completed" counter	Displays "1" matching database count for current month only	1 cycle with status="Completed", month=current	Business rule validation
6	Change month filter to "March 2025"	Counters update to show March data: Not Dispatched=0, Dispatched=0, In Progress=0, Completed=1	March 2025 test data	Filter impact validation
7	Reset filter to current month	Counters return to original values: 2, 1, 1, 1	Current month data	Filter reset validation
8	Verify counter sum equals total cycles	Sum of all counters (2+1+1+1=5) equals total cycles displayed	Total cycle count	Math validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Counter calculations match expected values based on current month filter business rule
Secondary_Verifications: Counters update correctly when filters change, calculations are real-time
Negative_Verification: Previous month data doesn't affect current month counters

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual counter values observed]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of counter displays]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC01: ✅ Status indicators display with accurate counts
Business Rule: ✅ Counters reflect only current month cycles as specified

Test Case 3: Cycle Search Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_003
Title: Verify search functionality filters cycles by name (case-insensitive)
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of search functionality covered
Integration_Points: Database search queries, MX-Service search API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC02, Search business rule (case-insensitive matching)
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_004

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest
Dependencies: Database with diverse cycle names, MX-Service search endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms search response
Data_Requirements: Cycles with names containing "Downtown", "Area", mixed case variations

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database populated with test cycles having varied names
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Cycles named "Downtown Area Q2", "East Industrial Zone", "NORTH RESIDENTIAL", "south residential"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 (List view display) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter "downtown" in search box	Only cycles containing "downtown" (case-insensitive) are displayed: "Downtown Area Q2" shown	"downtown"	Case-insensitive search
2	Enter "AREA" in search box	Only cycles containing "area" are displayed: "Downtown Area Q2" shown	"AREA"	Case-insensitive validation
3	Enter "residential" in search box	Cycles containing "residential" are displayed: "NORTH RESIDENTIAL", "south residential"	"residential"	Multiple match validation
4	Enter "xyz123" in search box	"No results found" or empty table with message displays	"xyz123"	No matches scenario
5	Clear search box (delete all text)	All cycles display again in original order	""	Clear search validation
6	Enter partial name "Down"	Cycles containing "Down" are displayed: "Downtown Area Q2"	"Down"	Partial match validation
7	Enter special characters "East!"	System handles gracefully, shows "East Industrial Zone" if partial match exists	"East!"	Special character handling
8	Test search with spaces " area "	Trims spaces and returns cycles containing "area"	" area "	Space handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Search returns correct filtered results based on cycle name matching (case-insensitive)
Secondary_Verifications: Partial matches work, special characters handled, spaces trimmed
Negative_Verification: Invalid searches show appropriate "no results" message without errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record search results for each test input]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if search issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of search results]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC02: ✅ Search functionality provides filtering capability for read cycles
Business Rule: ✅ Case-insensitive search matching implemented correctly

Test Case 4: Filter Combinations

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_004
Title: Verify multiple filter combinations work correctly together
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of filter combination logic covered
Integration_Points: Database complex queries, MX-Service filtering API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Integration-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC02, Filter combination business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_003, TC_013, TC_014, TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest
Dependencies: Database with diverse test data, MX-Service API
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second filter application
Data_Requirements: Multiple cycles across different months and statuses

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database with cycles spanning multiple months and statuses
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: April 2025: "Downtown Area Q2" (In Progress), March 2025: "Commercial District" (Completed)
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Set Month filter to "April 2025"	Only April 2025 cycles display, counters update accordingly	"April 2025"	Month filter baseline
2	Set Status filter to "In Progress"	Only April 2025 "In Progress" cycles display (Downtown Area Q2)	"In Progress"	Combined month + status
3	Set Sort By to "Next Run Date"	Results sorted by Next Run Date ascending order	"Next Run Date"	Sort with filters
4	Add search term "Downtown"	Only April 2025, In Progress cycles containing "Downtown", sorted by Next Run Date	"Downtown"	All filters combined
5	Verify result count updates	Status counters and result count reflect filtered data	Filter result validation	Count accuracy
6	Change Status to "All Statuses"	Show all April 2025 cycles containing "Downtown" sorted by Next Run Date	"All Statuses"	Partial filter modification
7	Reset all filters to default	All cycles display in default order (Next Run Date)	Reset all	Complete filter reset
8	Apply invalid combination test	Set future month with current data, verify empty results handled gracefully	"December 2025"	Edge case validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Multiple filters work correctly in combination without conflicts
Secondary_Verifications: Filter combinations don't break each other, sorting works with filters, counters update
Negative_Verification: No unexpected results when combining filters, graceful handling of no-result scenarios

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record filtered results for each combination]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if filter conflicts found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of filter combinations]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC02: ✅ Multiple filtering capabilities work together (Month, Status, Sort, Search)
Business Rule: ✅ Filter combinations apply correctly without conflicts

Test Case 5: Cycle Detail View Navigation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_005
Title: Verify navigation to cycle detail view and cycle information display
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80% of detail view navigation covered
Integration_Points: Navigation service, MX-Service cycle details API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC05, Navigation requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_006, TC_017

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
Dependencies: MX-Service cycle details API, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds navigation time
Data_Requirements: "Downtown Area Q2" cycle with complete information

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test cycle "Downtown Area Q2" exists with complete data
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Cycle with Name="Downtown Area Q2", Type="Photo Read", Month="April 2025", Status="In Progress"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 (List view) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "View" button for "Downtown Area Q2" cycle	Navigate to cycle detail page within 2 seconds, URL changes to include cycle ID	"Downtown Area Q2"	Navigation performance
2	Verify page header and dropdown	Page shows "Downtown Area Q2" in header with searchable dropdown showing selected value	Cycle header	Header validation
3	Verify breadcrumb navigation	Breadcrumb displays "Home > Photo Reads > Downtown Area Q2"	Breadcrumb path	Navigation context
4	Verify tab structure	Two tabs present: "Details" (active/highlighted) and "Dispatch"	Tab structure	Tab layout
5	Verify cycle information section	Shows: Cycle Name="Downtown Area Q2", Read Type="Photo Read", Month/Period="April 2025", Status="In Progress" badge	Cycle information	Data accuracy
6	Verify additional cycle details	Shows: Date Range="Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025", Number of Routes=6, Number of Meters=145, Number of Consumers=128	Additional details	Complete information
7	Test Back button functionality	Clicking "Back" returns to list view, maintaining previous filter state	Navigation back	Return navigation
8	Test direct URL access	Accessing detail page URL directly loads correctly with proper context	Direct URL access	URL handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Detail view loads correctly with proper cycle information and navigation context
Secondary_Verifications: Navigation elements work, breadcrumbs accurate, tabs functional, URL handling correct
Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing information, or navigation errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record navigation behavior and data display]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if navigation issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of detail view]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC05: ✅ Detailed view of each read cycle provides comprehensive cycle information
Navigation: ✅ Proper navigation flow between list and detail views

Test Case 6: Performance Metrics Display and Calculations

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_006
Title: Verify performance metrics display correctly with proper calculations and historical comparisons
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance calculation logic covered
Integration_Points: Calculation engine, MX-Service metrics API, Database aggregations
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Performance-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC06, AC07, Business rules for metric calculations
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_005, TC_007, TC_023

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Cycle with known metrics data, previous cycle data for comparisons, MX-Service calculation API
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second metric calculation
Data_Requirements: "Downtown Area Q2" with 89 readings out of 145 meters, quality breakdown: 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test cycle with controlled metrics data, previous cycle data for comparisons
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Current cycle: 89 readings, 145 meters, 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT; Previous cycle data for comparison
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view navigation) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to "Downtown Area Q2" detail view	Performance metrics section displays with 4 metric cards	"Downtown Area Q2"	Setup validation
2	Verify Completion Rate calculation	Shows "61%" calculated as (89÷145)*100 = 61.38% rounded to 61%	89 readings, 145 meters	Business rule: (Readings÷Meters)*100
3	Verify Reading Accuracy calculation	Shows "80.9%" calculated as (72÷89)*100 = 80.90%	72 normal out of 89 total	Business rule: (Normal÷Total)*100
4	Verify Avg. Turnaround calculation	Shows turnaround time in days format (e.g., "3.2 days") calculated from assignment to reading upload times	Assignment to upload timestamps	Business rule: Average time per reader
5	Verify Photo Submission calculation	Shows percentage of readings with valid photos, e.g., "65%" calculated as (Photo count÷Total readings)*100	Photo metadata count	Business rule: (Photos÷Readings)*100
6	Verify historical comparison indicators	Each metric shows percentage change from last cycle with color coding: Green ↑ for improvement, Red ↓ for decrease	Previous cycle metrics	Trend calculation: ((Current-Previous)÷Previous)*100
7	Verify metric icons and styling	Completion Rate has progress icon, Reading Accuracy has checkmark, Turnaround has clock, Photo Submission has camera	Visual indicators	UI consistency validation
8	Test metric refresh when data changes	If new reading submitted, metrics update within 30 seconds	Real-time data change	Real-time calculation validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All metrics calculate correctly according to documented business rules with proper rounding
Secondary_Verifications: Historical comparisons accurate, visual indicators appropriate, real-time updates work
Negative_Verification: No incorrect calculations, missing percentage changes, or display errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual metric values and calculations]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of metrics display]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC06: ✅ Performance metrics (completion rate, reading accuracy, turnaround, photo submission) calculated and displayed
AC07: ✅ Historical comparisons shown with percentage changes from previous cycle

Test Case 7: Meter Reading Quality Breakdown

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_007
Title: Verify meter reading quality breakdown displays correct counts and percentages
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of quality breakdown logic covered
Integration_Points: Quality classification service, MX-Service metrics API, Database aggregations
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC04, Quality classification business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_006, TC_023

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Quality classification data, MX-Service quality API
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms quality calculation
Data_Requirements: 89 total readings: 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test cycle with known quality breakdown data
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Quality data: 72 Normal, 12 Faulty, 5 RCNT readings from total 89
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Meter Reading Quality section	Displays quality breakdown with three categories and progress bars	Quality section	Visual layout validation
2	Verify Normal reading count and percentage	Shows "Normal: 72 (80.9%)" calculated as (72÷89)*100 = 80.90%	72 normal out of 89 total	Normal calculation validation
3	Verify Faulty reading count and percentage	Shows "Faulty: 12 (13.5%)" calculated as (12÷89)*100 = 13.48% ≈ 13.5%	12 faulty out of 89 total	Faulty calculation validation
4	Verify RCNT reading count and percentage	Shows "RCNT: 5 (5.6%)" calculated as (5÷89)*100 = 5.62% ≈ 5.6%	5 RCNT out of 89 total	RCNT calculation validation
5	Verify total percentages sum to 100%	Normal + Faulty + RCNT percentages equal 100% (80.9% + 13.5% + 5.6% = 100%)	Percentage totals	Math validation
6	Verify visual progress bars	Each category shows progress bar proportional to percentage with appropriate colors (Green-Normal, Orange-Faulty, Red-RCNT)	Visual representation	Progress bar accuracy
7	Verify color coding consistency	Normal shows green, Faulty shows orange/yellow, RCNT shows red across all UI elements	Color standards	Visual consistency
8	Test quality breakdown with zero values	When no readings exist, shows "0 (0%)" for all categories gracefully	Zero state data	Edge case validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Quality breakdown shows correct counts and calculated percentages for Normal, Faulty, RCNT
Secondary_Verifications: Visual progress bars match percentages, totals add up correctly, color coding consistent
Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, missing data, or incorrect visual representations

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record quality breakdown values and percentages]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if quality calculation errors found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of quality breakdown section]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC04: ✅ Reading quality categorized into Normal, Faulty, and RCNT with counts and percentages
Business Rule: ✅ Quality percentages calculated correctly and sum to 100%

Test Case 8: Route Completion Status Display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_008
Title: Verify route completion status shows individual route progress correctly
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95% of route status display covered
Integration_Points: Route progress calculation, MX-Service route API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC08, AC14, Route progress calculation business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_005, TC_013

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Route completion data, MX-Service route status API
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second status calculation
Data_Requirements: Routes with various completion levels: 100%, 78%, 75%, 78%, 14%, 0%

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test routes with known completion percentages
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Downtown Routes 1-6 with completions: 28/28, 25/32, 18/24, 15/19, 3/22, 0/20
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Route Completion Status section	Shows list of all 6 routes with completion percentages and progress bars	Route completion section	Section display validation
2	Verify "Downtown Route 1" completion	Shows 100% with full green progress bar, calculated as (28÷28)*100 = 100%	28/28 meters read	Completed route validation
3	Verify "Downtown Route 2" completion	Shows 78% with blue progress bar at 78%, calculated as (25÷32)*100 = 78.125% ≈ 78%	25/32 meters read	In progress route validation
4	Verify "Downtown Route 3" completion	Shows 75% with blue progress bar at 75%, calculated as (18÷24)*100 = 75%	18/24 meters read	In progress route validation
5	Verify "Downtown Route 6" completion	Shows 0% with empty/grey progress bar, calculated as (0÷20)*100 = 0%	0/20 meters read	Not started route validation
6	Verify progress bar color coding	Completed (100%) shows green, in-progress (>0% <100%) shows blue, not started (0%) shows grey	Visual color indicators	Color coding validation
7	Verify route names are clickable	Route names have hover effects and are interactive (may link to route details)	Interactive elements	Route interaction validation
8	Test sorting of routes	Routes appear in logical order (by route number or completion percentage)	Route ordering	Sorting validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Route completion percentages calculate correctly as (Meters Read ÷ Total Meters) × 100
Secondary_Verifications: Visual progress bars accurate, color coding appropriate, interactive elements work
Negative_Verification: No incorrect completion percentages or visual inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record route completion percentages and visual display]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if route status issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of route completion section]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC08: ✅ Route completion status provided for all routes with percentage indicators
AC14: ✅ Route status indicated with color-coded labels (green=completed, blue=in progress, grey=not started)

Test Case 9: Dispatch Tab Navigation and Display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_009
Title: Verify Dispatch tab displays route assignment interface correctly
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of dispatch interface covered
Integration_Points: Route management service, MX-Service dispatch API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC13, AC15, AC17, Dispatch interface requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_005, TC_010, TC_013, TC_014, TC_015, TC_016

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Route assignment data, MX-Service dispatch endpoints
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds tab load time
Data_Requirements: 6 routes with various assignment statuses and due dates

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test cycle with routes in different assignment states
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Routes with statuses: Completed, In Progress, Problem, Dispatched, Not Dispatched
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view navigation) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Dispatch" tab in cycle detail view	Navigate to dispatch view within 2 seconds, tab becomes active/highlighted	Dispatch tab	Tab navigation performance
2	Verify filter controls display	Shows three filter sections: Status dropdown (All Statuses), Meter Reader dropdown (All Readers), Date Range with Start Date and End Date pickers	Filter controls	Filter availability validation
3	Verify search functionality	"Search by route name..." search bar is present with placeholder text and search icon	Search interface	Search availability validation
4	Verify route table headers	Table displays columns: Select (checkbox), Route Name, Meters, Consumers, Premises, Readings, Assigned To, Assigned Date, Due Date, Status, Actions	Table structure	Column header validation
5	Verify sample route data displays	"Downtown Route 1" shows: 28 meters, 25 consumers, 20 premises, 28/28 readings, John Smith, Mar 10 2025, Apr 10 2025, Completed status badge	Route sample data	Data display validation
6	Verify Action buttons are status-appropriate	"Completed" routes show "Unassign" (disabled), "In Progress" routes show "Unassign" (disabled), "Dispatched" routes show "Unassign" (enabled), "Not Dispatched" routes show "Assign" (enabled)	Status-based actions	Action button logic validation
7	Verify status badge color coding	Completed=green, In Progress=blue, Problem=orange/yellow, Dispatched=light blue, Not Dispatched=grey	Status visual indicators	Status color validation
8	Verify pagination or scroll	If more than 10 routes, pagination controls or infinite scroll present	Route pagination	Large dataset handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dispatch interface loads with all required elements and proper route assignment functionality
Secondary_Verifications: Filters functional, search works, table data displays correctly, action buttons appropriate
Negative_Verification: No broken interface elements, missing functionality, or incorrect action button states

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record dispatch interface display and functionality]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if dispatch interface issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of dispatch tab]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC13: ✅ Detailed route information displayed (meters, consumers, premises, readings)
AC15: ✅ Assigned dates and due dates tracked and displayed
AC17: ✅ Actions appropriate to route status (Assign/Unassign based on status)

Test Case 10: Route Assignment Modal Display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_010
Title: Verify route assignment modal displays available meter readers with correct information
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of assignment modal functionality covered
Integration_Points: User management service, workload calculation, MX-Service assignment API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC10, AC19, Meter reader workload business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_009, TC_011, TC_025

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: User management system, workload calculation service, MX-Service reader API
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second modal load time
Data_Requirements: 5 meter readers with varying workloads and availability status

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test meter readers with known workloads and availability
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Readers: John Smith (5 routes, Available), Emma Johnson (3 routes, Available), Sarah Wilson (4 routes, Unavailable)
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Assign" button for "Downtown Route 6"	Assignment modal opens within 1 second with title "Assign Meter Reader to Downtown Route 6"	"Downtown Route 6"	Modal opening performance
2	Verify modal header and close options	Modal shows title, route name, and X close button in top-right corner	Modal header	Modal structure validation
3	Verify search functionality in modal	Search bar displays with placeholder "Search by name or ID..." and search icon	Search interface	Reader search availability
4	Verify meter reader table headers	Table shows columns: User ID, Name, Contact, Workload, Rating, Availability	Table headers	Reader information structure
5	Verify John Smith reader data	Shows: ID=1, Name="John Smith", Contact="john.smith@example.com", Workload="5 routes", Rating=5 stars, Availability="Available" (green badge)	John Smith data	Available reader validation
6	Verify Sarah Wilson unavailable status	Shows: ID=4, Name="Sarah Wilson", Contact="s.wilson@example.com", Workload="4 routes", Rating=4 stars, Availability="Unavailable" (red badge), row greyed out or disabled	Sarah Wilson data	Unavailable reader indication
7	Verify workload calculation accuracy	Each reader's workload count matches number of routes currently assigned across all active cycles	Workload validation	Business rule: count of Dispatched + In Progress routes
8	Verify modal action buttons	"Cancel" and "Assign" buttons present at bottom, "Assign" initially disabled until reader selected	Modal actions	Button availability and states
9	Test reader selection	Clicking available reader enables "Assign" button, unavailable readers cannot be selected	Reader selection	Selection logic validation
10	Test modal closure	Clicking X or "Cancel" closes modal without changes, route remains unassigned	Modal closure	Close functionality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Assignment modal displays complete meter reader information with accurate workload calculations
Secondary_Verifications: Search functionality works, availability status clear, selection logic correct
Negative_Verification: Unavailable readers clearly indicated and not selectable, modal closes properly without unintended changes

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record modal display and reader information accuracy]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if modal issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of assignment modal]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC10: ✅ Route assignment to available meter readers with workload visibility
AC19: ✅ Meter reader workload displayed to prevent overallocation

Test Case 11: Route Assignment Business Rules Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_011
Title: Verify route assignment respects business rules for reader availability and workload
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of assignment business rule validation covered
Integration_Points: Assignment validation service, workload service, user management, MX-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Critical-Path-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC10, AC11, Assignment business rules, workload calculation rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_010, TC_025

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Assignment validation service, workload calculation API, MX-Service assignment endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds assignment processing
Data_Requirements: Available and unavailable readers with known workloads

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test readers with controlled availability and workload states
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Robert Brown (2 routes, Available), Sarah Wilson (4 routes, Unavailable), unassigned "Downtown Route 6"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_010 (Assignment modal) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open assignment modal for "Downtown Route 6"	Modal displays with available readers and current workloads	"Downtown Route 6"	Setup validation
2	Attempt to select unavailable reader (Sarah Wilson)	Reader selection disabled, row greyed out, or error message "Reader is currently unavailable"	Sarah Wilson (Unavailable)	Availability validation
3	Select available reader with low workload (Robert Brown)	Reader can be selected, "Assign" button becomes enabled	Robert Brown (2 routes, Available)	Low workload selection validation
4	Click "Assign" button	Assignment processes within 2 seconds, modal closes, success message displays	Assignment action	Successful assignment processing
5	Verify route table updates	Route now shows "Robert Brown" in Assigned To column, status changes to "Dispatched", assigned date shows current date	Updated route data	Status and data update validation
6	Verify reader workload increases	If opening assignment modal again and viewing Robert Brown, workload now shows "3 routes" (increased from 2)	Workload tracking	Workload increment validation
7	Test assignment validation rules	Attempt to assign same route again should show already assigned status or disable assign action	Already assigned route	Duplicate assignment prevention
8	Test concurrent assignment scenario	If another supervisor attempts to assign same route simultaneously, proper conflict handling occurs	Concurrent assignment	Concurrency validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Assignment only succeeds for available readers with proper business rule validation
Secondary_Verifications: Workload tracking accurate, status updates correctly, concurrent access handled
Negative_Verification: Cannot assign to unavailable readers, no duplicate assignments, proper error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record assignment behavior and validation responses]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if business rule violations found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of assignment process]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC10: ✅ Route assignment to available meter readers enforced
AC11: ✅ Assignment to unavailable readers prevented with proper validation

Test Case 12: Route Unassignment Process

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_012
Title: Verify route unassignment process works correctly with confirmation dialog
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of unassignment process covered
Integration_Points: Assignment management service, MX-Service unassignment API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC12, AC18, Unassignment confirmation requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_011, TC_025

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Assignment management API, MX-Service unassignment endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second unassignment processing
Data_Requirements: Assigned route ready for unassignment testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Route assigned to meter reader (from TC_011 or pre-assigned)
**User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Robert Brown (2 routes, Available), Sarah Wilson (4 routes, Unavailable), unassigned "Downtown Route 6"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_010 (Assignment modal) must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Assign" button for "Downtown Route 6"	Assignment modal opens with title "Assign Meter Reader to Downtown Route 6"	"Downtown Route 6"	Modal opening
2	Verify search functionality in modal	Search bar with placeholder "Search by name or ID..." is functional	Search interface	Reader search
3	Verify meter reader table headers	Shows: User ID, Name, Contact, Workload, Rating, Availability	Table headers	Reader information structure
4	Verify reader data displays correctly	John Smith shows: ID=1, Contact=john.smith@example.com, Workload=5 routes, Rating=5 stars, Available	Sample reader data	Data accuracy
5	Verify unavailable reader indication	Sarah Wilson shows as "Unavailable" with different visual styling	Unavailable reader	Availability status
6	Verify action buttons in modal	"Cancel" and "Assign" buttons are present and functional	Modal actions	Button availability
7	Verify modal can be closed	Clicking X or Cancel closes modal without changes	Modal closure	Close functionality

Primary Verification: Assignment modal displays complete meter reader information Secondary Verifications: Search works, availability status clear, buttons functional Negative Verification: Unavailable readers clearly indicated, modal closes properly

Test Case 13: Route Status Filtering

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_013
Title: Verify route status filtering works correctly in dispatch view
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of status filtering functionality covered
Integration_Points: Filtering service, MX-Service filter API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Filter-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC09, Status filtering business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_009, TC_014, TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Route filtering API, MX-Service filter endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response time
Data_Requirements: Routes with all possible statuses

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Routes with diverse statuses available
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Routes with statuses: Not Dispatched, Dispatched, In Progress, Completed, Problem
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Set Status filter to "Not Dispatched"	Only routes with "Not Dispatched" status display, route count updates	"Not Dispatched" filter	Status filtering validation
2	Set Status filter to "Dispatched"	Only routes with "Dispatched" status display, other statuses hidden	"Dispatched" filter	Dispatched status validation
3	Set Status filter to "In Progress"	Only routes with "In Progress" status display	"In Progress" filter	Progress filtering validation
4	Set Status filter to "Completed"	Only routes with "Completed" status display	"Completed" filter	Completed filtering validation
5	Set Status filter to "Problem"	Only routes with "Problem" status display (if any exist)	"Problem" filter	Problem status validation
6	Set Status filter to "All Statuses"	All routes display regardless of status, full list restored	"All Statuses" filter	Filter reset validation
7	Verify route count indicator updates	Route count at bottom of table updates based on filtered results	Count validation	Result count accuracy
8	Test filter persistence	Filter selection persists when navigating away and back to dispatch tab	Filter persistence	State persistence validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Status filtering returns correct routes for each status category
Secondary_Verifications: Filter reset works, route counts accurate, filter state persists
Negative_Verification: No routes from excluded statuses appear in filtered results

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record filtering behavior for each status]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if filtering issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of filtered results]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC09: ✅ Route filtering by status implemented correctly

Test Case 14: Meter Reader Filtering

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_014
Title: Verify meter reader filtering works correctly showing assigned and unassigned routes
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of reader filtering functionality covered
Integration_Points: Reader assignment service, MX-Service reader filter API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Assignment-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC09, Reader assignment filtering business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_013, TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Reader assignment data, MX-Service reader filter endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response time
Data_Requirements: Routes assigned to various readers and some unassigned

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Routes with mixed assignment states
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Routes assigned to: John Smith, Emma Johnson, Michael Davis; Some routes unassigned (N/A)
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Set Meter Reader filter to "Assigned"	Only routes with assigned readers display (Assigned To column shows reader names, not "N/A")	"Assigned" filter	Assigned routes filtering
2	Set Meter Reader filter to "Unassigned"	Only routes without assigned readers display (Assigned To column shows "N/A")	"Unassigned" filter	Unassigned routes filtering
3	Set Meter Reader filter to "John Smith"	Only routes assigned to John Smith display	"John Smith" specific filter	Specific reader filtering
4	Set Meter Reader filter to "Emma Johnson"	Only routes assigned to Emma Johnson display	"Emma Johnson" specific filter	Another reader filtering
5	Set Meter Reader filter to "All Readers"	All routes display regardless of assignment status	"All Readers" filter	Filter reset validation
6	Combine with status filter	Apply Status="Dispatched" and Reader="John Smith" simultaneously	Combined filters	Multiple filter validation
7	Verify filter dropdown population	Reader dropdown shows only readers who currently have assigned routes plus "All Readers", "Assigned", "Unassigned"	Dropdown options	Dynamic dropdown validation
8	Test filter with no results	Select reader with no assigned routes, verify graceful "no results" handling	No results scenario	Edge case validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Reader filtering correctly separates assigned/unassigned routes and filters by specific readers
Secondary_Verifications: Specific reader filtering works, combined filters work, dropdown populated correctly
Negative_Verification: Filtered results don't include routes outside filter criteria

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record reader filtering behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if reader filtering issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of reader-filtered results]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC09: ✅ Route filtering by meter reader implemented correctly

Test Case 15: Date Range Filtering

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_015
Title: Verify date range filtering works correctly for route due dates
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of date filtering functionality covered
Integration_Points: Date filtering service, MX-Service date filter API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Date-Handling
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC09, AC15, Date range filtering business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_013, TC_014

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Date filtering API, MX-Service date filter endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response time
Data_Requirements: Routes with various due dates spanning multiple weeks

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Routes with diverse due dates
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Routes with due dates: Apr 10, Apr 15, Apr 20, Apr 25, Apr 30, 2025
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Set Start Date to "April 1, 2025"	Date picker accepts the date, displays in MM/DD/YYYY format	"04/01/2025"	Start date selection validation
2	Set End Date to "April 15, 2025"	Date picker accepts the date, displays correctly	"04/15/2025"	End date selection validation
3	Apply date range filter	Only routes with due dates between April 1-15 display (routes due Apr 10, Apr 15)	Date range "04/01-04/15"	Date filtering validation
4	Verify filtered results accuracy	All displayed routes have due dates within the specified range, routes due Apr 20+ hidden	Due date validation	Range accuracy validation
5	Clear start date only	End date filter still applies, routes with due dates ≤ April 15 display	Clear start date	Partial range validation
6	Clear end date, set start date	Start date filter applies, routes with due dates ≥ specified date display	Clear end date	Partial range validation
7	Clear both date filters	All routes display again regardless of due date	Clear all dates	Filter reset validation
8	Test invalid date range (End before Start)	Error message displays: "End date must be after start date" or End date auto-adjusts	Invalid range: End=Apr 1, Start=Apr 15	Error handling validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Date range filtering returns routes within specified date range based on due dates
Secondary_Verifications: Date pickers functional, invalid ranges handled, partial ranges work
Negative_Verification: Routes outside date range are excluded, error handling for invalid inputs

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record date filtering behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if date filtering issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of date-filtered results]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC09: ✅ Route filtering by date range implemented correctly
AC15: ✅ Due date tracking enables effective date-based filtering

Test Case 16: Route Search in Dispatch View

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_016
Title: Verify route search functionality works correctly in dispatch view
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of route search functionality covered
Integration_Points: Search service, MX-Service search API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Search-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC16, Route search business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_003, TC_009

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Route search API, MX-Service search endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 300ms search response time
Data_Requirements: Routes with varied names for search testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Routes with diverse names available
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Routes named: "Downtown Route 1", "Downtown Route 2", "East Industrial Route", "NORTH ROUTE"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter "Route 1" in search box	Only routes containing "Route 1" display: "Downtown Route 1"	"Route 1"	Specific route search
2	Enter "downtown" in search box	Only routes containing "downtown" (case-insensitive) display: "Downtown Route 1", "Downtown Route 2"	"downtown"	Case-insensitive search
3	Enter "ROUTE" in search box	Routes containing "route" display regardless of case: all routes with "Route" in name	"ROUTE"	Case validation
4	Enter partial name "Down"	Routes containing "Down" are displayed: "Downtown Route 1", "Downtown Route 2"	"Down"	Partial match validation
5	Enter non-existent route name	"No routes found" message displays or empty table with appropriate message	"XYZ999"	No matches scenario
6	Clear search box (delete all text)	All routes display again in default order	""	Clear search validation
7	Enter search with special characters	System handles gracefully, may show partial matches if applicable	"Route-1!"	Special character handling
8	Test search with filters active	Search works in combination with applied filters (status, reader, date)	Search + filters	Combined functionality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Route search returns correct filtered results based on route name matching
Secondary_Verifications: Case-insensitive search works, partial matches work, special characters handled
Negative_Verification: Invalid searches show "no results" message, search works with other filters

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record search behavior for each input]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if search issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of search results]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC16: ✅ Route search by name functionality implemented correctly

Test Case 17: Cycle Dropdown Navigation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_017
Title: Verify cycle dropdown allows switching between active cycles
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPath, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95% of cycle navigation functionality covered
Integration_Points: Cycle management service, MX-Service cycle API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Navigation-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC05, Active cycle navigation business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_005

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Cycle data with various statuses, MX-Service cycle endpoint
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second cycle switching time
Data_Requirements: Multiple cycles with active statuses and at least one completed cycle

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple cycles with different statuses available
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Active cycles: "Downtown Area Q2", "East Industrial Zone"; Completed cycle: "Commercial District"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view navigation) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click cycle dropdown in detail view	Dropdown opens showing searchable list with current cycle selected	Cycle dropdown	Dropdown functionality
2	Verify only active cycles are shown	Only cycles with status "Not Dispatched", "Dispatched", "In Progress" appear; "Completed" cycles excluded	Active cycles only	Business rule validation
3	Search for specific cycle in dropdown	Type "East" and see "East Industrial Zone" appear in filtered results	"East" search term	Dropdown search validation
4	Select different cycle from dropdown	Navigate to "East Industrial Zone" detail view within 1 second	"East Industrial Zone"	Cycle switching performance
5	Verify page updates with new cycle data	All metrics, routes, and information update to reflect selected cycle; URL updates	New cycle data	Data refresh validation
6	Verify URL and breadcrumb updates	URL shows new cycle ID, breadcrumb shows "Home > Photo Reads > East Industrial Zone"	URL/breadcrumb change	Navigation state validation
7	Test dropdown search with partial matches	Partial search terms return appropriate cycles	Partial search	Search functionality
8	Test dropdown with no search results	Search for non-existent cycle shows "No cycles found" message	Invalid search	No results handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Cycle dropdown allows switching between active cycles with proper data refresh
Secondary_Verifications: Search in dropdown works, data updates correctly, navigation state maintained
Negative_Verification: Completed cycles don't appear in dropdown, invalid searches handled gracefully

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record cycle switching behavior and data updates]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if cycle navigation issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of cycle dropdown and switching]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC05: ✅ Detailed view navigation between cycles implemented correctly
Business Rule: ✅ Only active cycles (not completed) available in dropdown

Test Case 18: Real-time Data Sync

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_018
Title: Verify real-time data synchronization when meter readers submit readings
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, CrossModule, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of real-time sync functionality covered
Integration_Points: Meter reader mobile app, real-time sync service, MX-Service sync API, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web, Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Real-time-Performance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC20, Real-time sync business requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_019, TC_023

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Meter reader mobile app, real-time sync service, MX-Service sync endpoints
Performance_Baseline: Updates within 30 seconds
Data_Requirements: Route assigned to meter reader with mobile app access

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Real-time sync service operational, mobile app configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned, meter reader with mobile access
Test_Data: "Downtown Route 2" assigned to "Emma Johnson" with unread meters available
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_011 (Route assignment) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Note current completion percentage	Record baseline: "Downtown Route 2" showing 25/32 readings (78% completion)	Starting: 25/32 (78%)	Baseline measurement
2	Meter reader submits reading via mobile app	Reading submitted successfully on mobile side with photo attachment	Mobile app submission	External action simulation
3	Wait 30 seconds and refresh web interface	Completion updates to 26/32 readings (81% completion), readings count increases by 1	Updated: 26/32 (81%)	Real-time sync validation
4	Verify route status updates	If route progresses from "Dispatched" to "In Progress" on first reading	Status transition	Business rule validation
5	Verify performance metrics update	Overall cycle completion rate and reading accuracy reflect new reading data	Metrics update	Calculation refresh
6	Submit multiple readings (batch test)	Submit 3 more readings, verify all sync correctly within 30 seconds each	Batch: 29/32 (91%)	Bulk sync validation
7	Verify photo submission tracking	Photo submission percentage updates as readings with photos are added	Photo tracking	Photo metadata sync
8	Test sync failure recovery	Simulate network interruption, verify readings sync when connectivity restored	Network recovery	Error recovery validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Real-time data synchronization works within 30-second SLA requirement
Secondary_Verifications: Status transitions occur correctly, metrics update accurately, batch sync works
Negative_Verification: No data loss during sync interruptions, proper error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record sync timing and data accuracy]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if sync issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of before/after sync states]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC20: ✅ Automatic cycle status updates base# Photo Meter Reads - Complete Test Suite (MX02US03)

Test Case 19: Concurrent User Access

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_019
Title: Verify multiple supervisors can work on same cycles simultaneously without conflicts
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, CrossModule, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80% of concurrent access scenarios covered
Integration_Points: Session management, data locking service, MX-Service concurrency handling
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Concurrency-Testing, Data-Integrity
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC20, Concurrent access business rules
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_018, TC_023

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Multi-user session management, MX-Service concurrency APIs
Performance_Baseline: No performance degradation with concurrent users
Data_Requirements: Test cycle with assignable routes

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Two different browser sessions or separate user accounts
User_Roles_Permissions: Two Meter Reading Supervisor accounts with access to same cycles
Test_Data: "Downtown Area Q2" cycle with routes available for assignment
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab), TC_011 (Assignment) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	User A and User B both navigate to same cycle dispatch view	Both users see current route assignment status without conflicts	Same cycle access	Concurrent access setup
2	User A assigns "Downtown Route 3" to "John Smith"	Assignment succeeds, route status updates to "Dispatched"	Route 3 assignment	First user action
3	User B refreshes and views same cycle	User B sees Route 3 is now assigned to John Smith with updated status	Updated status visibility	Data consistency check
4	User A assigns Route 4, User B assigns Route 5 simultaneously	Both assignments succeed without conflict, both routes get assigned	Simultaneous assignments	Parallel action validation
5	Both users attempt to assign same Route 6 to different readers	System prevents conflict with error message or first-come-first-served logic	Same route conflict	Conflict prevention test
6	Verify final state consistency	Both users see consistent final assignment state after refresh	Final state validation	Data integrity check
7	Test concurrent unassignment	User A unassigns route while User B views same route	Concurrent unassignment	Unassignment concurrency
8	Test real-time updates	Changes made by one user appear for other user within 30 seconds	Real-time sync	Live update validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Multiple users can work simultaneously without data corruption or conflicts
Secondary_Verifications: Concurrent assignments work properly, conflicts handled appropriately, real-time updates work
Negative_Verification: No race conditions, data inconsistencies, or lost updates

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record concurrent user behavior and conflict handling]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if concurrency issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots from both user sessions]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC20: ✅ System handles concurrent supervisor access without data integrity issues
Concurrency Requirement: ✅ Multiple supervisors can work on same cycles simultaneously

Test Case 20: Performance - Dashboard Load Time

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_020
Title: Verify dashboard loads within 3 seconds performance requirement
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance requirements covered
Integration_Points: Database query optimization, MX-Service performance, CDN
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance SLA requirement < 3 seconds
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_005

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Production-like data volume, CDN, MX-Service performance optimization
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds complete page load
Data_Requirements: 100+ cycles loaded for realistic performance testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database with realistic data volume (100+ cycles)
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Large dataset simulating production environment
Prior_Test_Cases: System connectivity tests must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache and cookies	Cache cleared successfully, fresh browser state	N/A	Clean test environment
2	Navigate to Photo Meter Reads page and start timer	Page begins loading, timer starts	URL navigation	Load initiation
3	Measure time until page fully loads	Complete page load (all elements rendered) within 3 seconds	Load time < 3s	Performance validation
4	Verify all elements loaded correctly	Status counters, filters, table data, pagination all present and functional	Complete UI elements	Functional validation
5	Repeat test 5 times to get average	Average load time remains under 3 seconds across all runs	5 test iterations	Consistency validation
6	Test with different data volumes	Performance remains acceptable with varying data sizes (50, 100, 200+ cycles)	Variable data sets	Scalability testing
7	Test with slow network simulation	Performance degrades gracefully, loading indicators shown	Throttled connection	Network condition testing
8	Measure specific component load times	Status counters < 0.5s, table data < 1s, filters < 0.3s	Component timing	Component performance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 3-second SLA requirement consistently
Secondary_Verifications: All UI components load within individual time budgets, performance scales with data
Negative_Verification: Performance doesn't degrade significantly with larger data sets

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual load times for each test run]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken for full test]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if performance issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring screenshots and timing logs]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

Performance SLA: ✅ Dashboard loads within 3-second requirement
Scalability: ✅ Performance maintained with realistic data volumes

Test Case 21: Cross-Browser Compatibility

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_021
Title: Verify Photo Meter Reads functionality works across all supported browsers
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Cross_Platform_Support-Web, MXService

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of core functionality across browsers
Integration_Points: Browser compatibility layer, MX-Service browser handling
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Report, Compatibility-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Cross-browser support requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: All functional test cases

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Dependencies: Cross-browser testing infrastructure
Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and updated
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Standard test cycle and route data
Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality tests validated on primary browser

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Test basic navigation in Chrome	All pages load correctly, navigation works smoothly	Chrome testing	Chrome baseline validation
2	Test basic navigation in Firefox	All pages load correctly, navigation works smoothly	Firefox testing	Firefox compatibility
3	Test basic navigation in Safari	All pages load correctly, navigation works smoothly	Safari testing	Safari compatibility
4	Test basic navigation in Edge	All pages load correctly, navigation works smoothly	Edge testing	Edge compatibility
5	Test interactive elements across browsers	Dropdowns, modals, buttons, date pickers work consistently	Cross-browser interactions	Interaction validation
6	Test assignment modal across browsers	Modal displays correctly, reader selection works	Assignment modal	Modal compatibility
7	Test performance metrics display	Charts, progress bars, percentages render correctly	Metrics display	Visual element compatibility
8	Verify CSS styling consistency	Colors, fonts, layouts appear consistent across browsers	Visual consistency	Styling validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Core functionality works identically across all supported browsers
Secondary_Verifications: Visual consistency maintained, interactive elements function properly
Negative_Verification: No browser-specific errors, layout issues, or functionality gaps

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record browser-specific behavior differences]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if browser compatibility issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots from each browser]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

Cross-Browser Support: ✅ Functionality consistent across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
Visual Consistency: ✅ UI elements render consistently across browsers

Test Case 22: Mobile Responsive Design

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_022
Title: Verify Photo Meter Reads interface is responsive on mobile devices
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Mobile, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Cross_Platform_Support-Mobile, MXService

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 70% of mobile responsiveness covered
Integration_Points: Responsive design framework, MX-Service mobile optimization
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile, Tablet

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Mobile-Testing, Responsive-Design
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Mobile responsiveness requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_021

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Device/OS: iPhone (375x667), Android (360x640), Tablet (1024x768)
Dependencies: Responsive design framework
Performance_Baseline: Usable interface on mobile devices
Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Mobile testing devices or browser developer tools
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Standard cycle and route data
Prior_Test_Cases: Desktop functionality tests must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Photo Meter Reads on mobile device	Interface adapts to mobile screen size, elements remain accessible	Mobile view	Responsive layout validation
2	Test touch interactions	Buttons, dropdowns, and modals work with touch input	Touch testing	Mobile interaction validation
3	Verify table scrolling	Data tables scroll horizontally on small screens without breaking layout	Table responsiveness	Horizontal scroll validation
4	Test assignment modal on mobile	Modal displays properly sized and usable on mobile screen	Mobile modal	Modal responsiveness
5	Verify filter functionality on mobile	Filters collapse appropriately and remain functional on mobile	Mobile filters	Filter usability
6	Test landscape/portrait orientation	Interface adapts correctly to orientation changes	Orientation testing	Orientation handling
7	Verify text readability	Font sizes appropriate, text remains readable on small screens	Text readability	Typography validation
8	Test navigation on tablet	Interface utilizes tablet screen real estate effectively	Tablet testing	Tablet optimization

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Interface is usable and functional on mobile devices
Secondary_Verifications: Touch interactions work, text readable, tables scroll properly
Negative_Verification: No UI elements are inaccessible or unusable on mobile

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record mobile interface behavior and usability]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if mobile issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots from mobile devices]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

Mobile Responsiveness: ✅ Interface adapts to mobile screen sizes
Touch Compatibility: ✅ Touch interactions functional on mobile devices

Test Case 23: Data Validation - Business Rules

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_023
Title: Verify all business rule calculations are accurate and consistent
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of business rule calculations covered
Integration_Points: Calculation engine, MX-Service calculation APIs, Database aggregations
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Critical-Path-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC06, AC07, All business rule calculations
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_006, TC_007, TC_018, TC_019

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Calculation service, test data with known values, MX-Service calculation endpoints
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second calculation time
Data_Requirements: Test data with precisely known calculation inputs and expected outputs

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test data with controlled calculation inputs
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Known values: 89 readings out of 145 meters, 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_006 (Performance metrics) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Verify completion percentage calculation	Shows 61.38% calculated as (89÷145)*100, rounded to 61%	89 readings ÷ 145 meters	Business rule: (Readings÷Meters)*100
2	Verify reading accuracy calculation	Shows 80.90% calculated as (72÷89)*100	72 normal ÷ 89 total readings	Business rule: (Normal÷Total)*100
3	Verify quality breakdown percentages	Normal: 80.90%, Faulty: 13.48%, RCNT: 5.62%, totaling 100%	Individual category calculations	Each: (Category÷Total)*100
4	Verify status transition rules	Status changes from "Not Dispatched" → "Dispatched" → "In Progress" → "Completed"	Status progression	Business logic validation
5	Verify historical comparison calculations	Shows +2.5% as ((Current-Previous)÷Previous)*100	Trend calculation formula	Percentage change formula
6	Verify counter aggregations	Status counters match actual cycle counts per month filter	Count validation	Aggregation accuracy
7	Test calculation rounding rules	Percentages round to appropriate decimal places (1 decimal for accuracy, whole numbers for completion)	Rounding standards	Rounding consistency
8	Test zero-division handling	When no readings exist, calculations show 0% gracefully without errors	Edge case: 0 readings	Error prevention

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All calculations follow documented business rules with correct mathematical formulas
Secondary_Verifications: Percentages round correctly, status transitions follow rules, aggregations accurate
Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, division by zero handled, no inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual calculation values vs expected]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of calculation displays with values]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC06: ✅ All performance metrics calculated correctly according to business rules
AC07: ✅ Historical comparisons use proper percentage change calculations
Business Rules: ✅ All weighted calculations and status transitions validated

Test Case 24: Error Handling - Network Failures

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_024
Title: Verify system handles network failures and connectivity issues gracefully
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature:Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-High, CrossModule, MXService

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of error handling scenarios covered
Integration_Points: Network error handling, MX-Service error responses, retry mechanisms
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Error-Handling, Reliability-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Error handling and network resilience requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_018, TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Network simulation tools, MX-Service error simulation
Performance_Baseline: Graceful degradation during network issues
Data_Requirements: Standard test data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Network simulation tools available
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Standard cycle and route data
Prior_Test_Cases: Normal functionality tests must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate network disconnection during page load	Appropriate error message displays: "Unable to load data. Please check your connection."	Network offline	Connection error handling
2	Attempt route assignment during network issue	Error message shows: "Assignment failed. Please try again." Assignment doesn't complete partially	Assignment attempt	Assignment error handling
3	Restore network connection	User can retry operations successfully, data loads normally	Network restored	Recovery validation
4	Simulate slow network conditions (3G)	Loading indicators show, operations complete eventually, timeout after 30 seconds	Slow connection	Timeout handling
5	Test retry functionality	"Retry" button appears on failed operations, clicking retry attempts operation again	Retry operations	Retry mechanism validation
6	Verify data consistency after network issues	No partial or corrupted data from failed operations, clean state maintained	Data integrity	Consistency validation
7	Test auto-refresh failure	When auto-refresh fails, shows notification without disrupting user workflow	Auto-refresh error	Background error handling
8	Test API timeout scenarios	Long-running requests timeout gracefully with appropriate user messaging	API timeout	Timeout error handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System handles network issues gracefully without data corruption
Secondary_Verifications: Error messages clear and actionable, retry functionality works, recovery possible
Negative_Verification: No partial data corruption, application crashes, or undefined states

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record error handling behavior and recovery]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if error handling issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of error states and recovery]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

Error Handling: ✅ Network failures handled gracefully with appropriate user feedback
Data Integrity: ✅ No data corruption during network issues

Test Case 25: Security - Session Management

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_025
Title: Verify proper session management and timeout handling
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Data_Sensitivity-High, CrossModule, MXService

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of security session management covered
Integration_Points: Authentication service, session management, MX-Service security
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Compliance-Report
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Security and authentication requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_010, TC_011, TC_012

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Authentication service, session management system, MX-Service security
Performance_Baseline: Secure session handling without performance impact
Data_Requirements: Valid user credentials and session configuration

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Session timeout configured for testing (e.g., 30 minutes)
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: Valid supervisor credentials for authentication
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication functionality must be validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Log in and navigate to Photo Meter Reads	Session established successfully, page loads with proper authentication	Valid credentials	Session establishment
2	Leave browser idle for session timeout period	Session expires automatically, user redirected to login page	Idle timeout period	Timeout validation
3	Attempt to perform actions after timeout	Operations fail with "Session expired" message, login required	Expired session	Security validation
4	Test concurrent sessions	Multiple browser sessions handled correctly, each with independent session	Multiple sessions	Session isolation
5	Verify session data clearing	Session data cleared completely on logout, no residual data	Logout action	Data cleanup validation
6	Test invalid session handling	Invalid session tokens rejected with "Unauthorized access" error	Invalid tokens	Security check validation
7	Test session refresh on activity	User activity extends session timeout automatically	User interaction	Session extension validation
8	Verify secure route assignment	Route assignment operations require valid session and proper permissions	Assignment with session	Permission validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Session management follows security best practices with proper timeout and cleanup
Secondary_Verifications: Timeouts work correctly, concurrent sessions handled, permissions enforced
Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access with expired sessions, no session data leakage

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record session management behavior and security responses]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of security states and error messages]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

Security: ✅ Session management implements proper timeout and security controls
Authentication: ✅ Route assignment operations properly secured with authentication

API Test Case 26: Route Assignment API

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_API_001
Title: Verify route assignment API endpoint functions correctly with validation
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-PhotoMeterReads, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, CrossModule, MXService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of assignment API functionality covered
Integration_Points: Assignment service, user management, workload calculation, MX-Service assignment API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: API

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: API-Testing-Report, Integration-Testing, Critical-Path-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC10, AC11, Assignment API specification
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_010, TC_011, TC_025

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Assignment API service, user management API, MX-Service backend
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
Data_Requirements: Valid route IDs, reader IDs, authentication tokens

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: API service running, test data configured
User_Roles_Permissions: API access with Meter Reading Supervisor permissions
Test_Data: Route ID: "route_123", Reader IDs: "reader_001" (available), "reader_999" (unavailable)
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication API tests must pass

API Endpoint

URL: POST /api/routes/{routeId}/assign
Headers: Authorization: Bearer {token}, Content-Type: application/json
Body: {"readerId": "reader_001", "assignedBy": "supervisor_id"}

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Send valid assignment request	HTTP 200 response with assignment confirmation JSON	Valid route ID "route_123", reader ID "reader_001"	Successful assignment
2	Verify response payload structure	Response includes: assignmentId, routeId, readerId, assignedDate, status	JSON structure validation	Response format validation
3	Send request with invalid route ID	HTTP 404 response with error: "Route not found"	Non-existent route ID "route_999"	Route validation
4	Send request with unavailable reader	HTTP 400 response with error: "Reader is currently unavailable"	Unavailable reader ID "reader_unavailable"	Reader availability validation
5	Send request with invalid authentication	HTTP 401 response with error: "Unauthorized access"	Invalid/expired token	Authentication validation
6	Test concurrent assignment requests	Second request returns HTTP 409 "Route already assigned" if same route assigned simultaneously	Multiple simultaneous requests	Concurrency handling
7	Verify database update	Database shows route assigned to reader with correct timestamp and status	Database query validation	Data persistence validation
8	Test API performance	Response time under 500ms for valid assignment requests	Performance measurement	Performance validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: API handles route assignments correctly with proper validation and error responses
Secondary_Verifications: Response format correct, database updated, performance acceptable
Negative_Verification: Invalid requests rejected with appropriate HTTP status codes and error messages

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record API responses, status codes, and timing]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if API issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [API response logs and database state screenshots]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC10: ✅ Route assignment API properly validates reader availability
AC11: ✅ API prevents assignment to unavailable readers with proper error responses

API Test Case 27: Real-time Data Sync API

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX02US03_API_002
Title: Verify real-time data synchronization API for meter reading updates
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Test Type: API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of sync API functionality covered
Integration_Points: Mobile app integration, real-time sync service, MX-Service sync API, Database updates
Code_Module_Mapped: MX
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: API, Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: API-Testing-Report, Real-time-Performance, Integration-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC20, Real-time sync requirements, mobile integration
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_018, TC_019, TC_023

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Dependencies: Real-time sync service, mobile app simulation, MX-Service sync endpoints
Performance_Baseline: < 200ms API response, sync within 30 seconds
Data_Requirements: Valid reading data, route assignments, meter IDs

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Sync service operational, test route assigned to reader
User_Roles_Permissions: Mobile app API access, sync service permissions
Test_Data: Route "route_123" assigned to "reader_001", meter IDs for reading submission
Prior_Test_Cases: Assignment API tests must pass

API Endpoint

URL: POST /api/readings/sync
Headers: Authorization: Bearer {mobile_token}, Content-Type: application/json
Body: {"readingId": "reading_001", "meterId": "meter_123", "value": "1234.5", "photoUrl": "photo_url", "timestamp": "ISO_datetime"}

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Send reading update from mobile app	HTTP 200 response with sync confirmation, reading accepted	Valid reading data: meter_123, value: 1234.5	Sync validation
2	Verify web interface updates within 30 seconds	Completion percentages and metrics update in web interface	Web UI polling	Real-time sync verification
3	Send batch reading updates	HTTP 200 response, all readings processed correctly in batch	Multiple readings array	Batch processing validation
4	Send invalid reading data	HTTP 400 response with validation errors: "Invalid meter ID"	Invalid meter ID "meter_invalid"	Data validation
5	Test API rate limiting	HTTP 429 "Too Many Requests" after exceeding rate limit	High volume requests	Rate limiting validation
6	Verify data consistency	No data loss or corruption during sync, database reflects all valid readings	Database consistency check	Data integrity validation
7	Test sync failure recovery	Failed sync attempts are retried, eventual consistency achieved	Network interruption simulation	Error recovery validation
8	Test duplicate reading handling	Duplicate readings ignored or updated appropriately without creating conflicts	Same reading ID submitted twice	Duplicate handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Real-time sync API maintains data consistency with proper error handling
Secondary_Verifications: Batch processing works, rate limiting enforced, recovery mechanisms function
Negative_Verification: Invalid data rejected, no sync failures cause data corruption

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record sync behavior, timing, and data consistency]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if sync issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [API logs, sync timing, database state changes]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC20: ✅ Real-time data synchronization API updates cycle status automatically
Sync Performance: ✅ Data synchronization completes within 30-second SLA

Test Suite Organization and Execution Summary

Smoke Test Suite (Execute on every build - 5 critical tests)

TC_001: Cycle List View Display (3 min)
TC_005: Cycle Detail View Navigation (3 min)
TC_009: Dispatch Tab Navigation (4 min)
TC_020: Performance Dashboard Load Time (15 min)
TC_025: Security Session Management (8 min)
Total Smoke Suite Time: ~33 minutes

Regression Test Suite (Execute before each release - P1-P2 tests)

All P1-Critical tests (13 tests): TC_001, TC_002, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_009, TC_010, TC_011, TC_018, TC_020, TC_023, TC_025, API_001, API_002
All P2-High tests (9 tests): TC_003, TC_004, TC_008, TC_012, TC_013, TC_014, TC_015, TC_016, TC_017, TC_019, TC_021, TC_024
Total Regression Suite Time: ~120 minutes

Full Test Suite (Execute weekly or major releases - All tests)

All 27 test cases including P3-Medium: TC_022
Total Full Suite Time: ~135 minutes

Performance Benchmarks

Metric	Target	Test Case	Measurement Method
Dashboard Load Time	< 3 seconds	TC_020	Page load complete event
Route Assignment Response	< 1 second	TC_011	API response time
Real-time Sync Delay	< 30 seconds	TC_018, API_002	Mobile to web update time
API Response Time	< 500ms	API_001, API_002	HTTP response timing
Concurrent Users	50+ simultaneous	TC_019	Load testing simulation

Integration Dependencies Map

External System Dependencies

Meter Reader Mobile App
- Reading submission integration (TC_018, API_002)
- Photo upload functionality
- User authentication sync
Database Systems
- Read cycle data storage (All DB-tagged tests)
- Route assignment tracking
- Performance metrics calculation
MX-Service APIs
- Assignment management (API_001)
- Real-time sync service (API_002)
- Data calculation engines

BrowserStack Report Categories Coverage

Report Category	Covered By Test Cases	Primary Stakeholder
Quality Dashboard	TC_001, TC_006, TC_009, TC_010, TC_020, TC_023, TC_025	Engineering/QA
Module Coverage	All functional tests (TC_001-TC_025)	QA
Performance Report	TC_020, API_001, API_002	Engineering
Cross-Browser Report	TC_021, TC_022	QA
API Testing Report	API_001, API_002	Engineering
Security Report	TC_025	Engineering
Integration Report	TC_018, TC_019, API_001, API_002	Engineering
Business Rules Report	TC_002, TC_006, TC_007, TC_011, TC_023	Engineering
User Experience Report	TC_005, TC_009, TC_017, TC_022	Product
Error Handling Report	TC_024	QA
Concurrent Testing Report	TC_019	QA
Real-time Performance	TC_018, API_002	Engineering
Critical Path Testing	TC_006, TC_011, TC_023, API_001	Engineering
Compliance Report	TC_025, TC_020, TC_018	Engineering
Executive Summary	All P1-Critical tests	Executive
Filter Testing	TC_003, TC_004, TC_013, TC_014, TC_015, TC_016	QA
Assignment Testing	TC_010, TC_011, TC_012, API_001	QA

Risk Assessment Matrix

High Risk Areas (Require P1-Critical testing)

Real-time data synchronization (TC_018, API_002)
Route assignment business rules (TC_011, API_001)
Performance under load (TC_020)
Business rule calculations (TC_023)
Security and session management (TC_025)

Medium Risk Areas (P2-High testing adequate)

Cross-browser compatibility (TC_021)
Concurrent user access (TC_019)
Error handling and recovery (TC_024)
Filter combinations (TC_013, TC_014, TC_015)

Low Risk Areas (P3-Medium testing sufficient)

Mobile responsive design (TC_022)
Basic UI display elements
Simple navigation flows

Final Validation Summary

✅ Total Test Cases Generated: 27 (25 Functional + 2 API)
✅ Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100% (All 20 criteria covered)
✅ Business Rules Coverage: 100% (All calculations and validations covered)
✅ Integration Points Coverage: 100% (Mobile app, Database, MX-Service, Cross-service)
✅ Performance Requirements: 100% (All SLA requirements tested)
✅ Security Requirements: 100% (Authentication, session management, permissions)
✅ Error Handling Coverage: 100% (Network failures, invalid inputs, concurrency)
✅ Cross-Platform Support: 100% (Web browsers, mobile responsiveness, API)

Quality Gates for Test Execution

Smoke Test Pass Criteria

All 5 smoke tests must pass (100% pass rate)
Performance benchmarks met (< 3 second load time)
No critical security issues

Regression Test Pass Criteria

≥ 95% pass rate for P1-Critical tests
≥ 90% pass rate for P2-High tests
All business rule calculations accurate
No data integrity issues

Full Suite Pass Criteria

≥ 95% overall pass rate
All acceptance criteria validated
Cross-browser compatibility confirmed
API integration fully functional
Real-time sync within SLA requirements

Test Suite Status: COMPLETE AND READY FOR EXECUTION ✅### Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Route assigned to meter reader (from TC_011 or pre-assigned)
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
Test_Data: "Downtown Route 5" assigned to "Robert Brown" with status "Dispatched"
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab), TC_011 (Assignment) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Unassign" button for "Downtown Route 5"	Confirmation dialog opens with title "Unassign Route"	"Downtown Route 5"	Unassignment initiation
2	Verify confirmation dialog content	Shows route name "Downtown Route 5", current assigned reader "Robert Brown", and confirmation message "Are you sure you want to unassign this route?"	Route and reader details	Dialog content validation
3	Verify dialog action buttons	"Cancel" and "Confirm" buttons present with appropriate styling (Cancel=secondary, Confirm=primary/danger)	Dialog actions	Button availability
4	Click "Cancel" in confirmation dialog	Dialog closes without making changes, route remains assigned to "Robert Brown" with status "Dispatched"	Cancel action	Cancel functionality validation
5	Click "Unassign" again and then "Confirm"	Route status changes to "Not Dispatched", Assigned To changes to "N/A", Assigned Date changes to "N/A"	Confirm action	Successful unassignment
6	Verify action button changes	"Unassign" button changes to "Assign" button for the unassigned route	Button state change	Action button update validation
7	Verify reader workload decreases	Robert Brown's workload decreases by 1 route (from 3 to 2 routes)	Workload tracking	Workload decrement validation
8	Test unassignment of in-progress route	Attempt to unassign route with "In Progress" status shows warning or restriction	"In Progress" route	Business rule validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Unassignment process requires confirmation and updates route correctly
Secondary_Verifications: Confirmation dialog functional, button states update, workload tracking accurate
Negative_Verification: Cancel doesn't make changes, confirmation required for unassignment

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record unassignment process behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if unassignment issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of unassignment dialog]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC12: ✅ Route unassignment functionality with appropriate status changes
AC18: ✅ Confirmation required before unassigning routes from meter readers

System Admin Dashboard (ONB01US01)

Utility Admin Dashboard (ONB02US01)

Data Migration (ONB04US01)

User Access and Management (ONB02US03)

Calendar & Scheduling Management (ONB02US04)

Service Areas (ONB02US08)

Organization Setup (ONB01US01)

Payment Gateway Integration (ONB03US01)

ID & Reference Format Settings (ONB02US07)

Bento Menu (ONB07)

Utility Management (ONB02US06)

Utility Plans & Tariffs Management - (ONB02US05)

Core System Settings - (ONB02US02)

Utility Plans & Tariffs Management - ss

Account Management & Session Control (AU01US03)

Settings (CIS01US07)

Service Request Management (CIS01US06)

Complaints (CIS01US05)

Consumer management (CIS01US02)

New Service Connection Application Form (CIS01US03)

New Connection Application Detail View (CIS01US04)

CSO Dashboard (CIS01US01)

Payment Channel and Modes Configuration (CIS01US13)

Payments Management (CIS01US09)

Outstanding Management System (CIS01US08)

Operational SLA Management (CIS01US14)

Disconnection Request Flow (CIS01US10)

Account Transfer Request (CIS01US12)

Reconnection Flow (CIS01US11)

New Connection Configuration (CIS01US16)

Consumer Portal Authentication (CSS01US01)

Bill Management (CSS01US02)

Payment Agreement Management (CSS01US04)

Payment History Management (CSS01US05)

Credit Notes Management (CSS01US06)

Usage & Consumption Smart Overview (CSS01US07)

Service & Support Management (CSS01US08)

In-App Notification System (CSS01US09)

Request Tracker (CSS01US10)

Preferences Management (CSS01US12)

Profile Details (CSS01US11)

FAQ Access (CSS01US13)

Consumer Self-Service Portal Dashboard (CSS01US15)

Service Payment Management (CSS01US03)

Self-Service Portal Management (CIS01US15)

Service Center Finder (CSS01US14)

My performance (CC01US02)

Call Center Dashboard (CC01US01)

Master (WX01US01)

Field Force Management (WX02US02)

Dispatcher Management System ( WX05US05 )

System Settings Configuration Management ( WX04US04 )

Service Order Dashboard (WX03US03)

Bill Cycle Setup (BX03US02)

Billing Dashboard (BX02US01)

Printing & Distribution Management (BX06US01)

Bill Template Management System (BX03US01)

Single Bill Generation V2 (BX01US04)

Master Bill Viewer (BX04US01)

GL Codes Management (BX05US01)

Bill Generation - (BX01US03)

Route Management (MX02US01)

Read Cycle Management (MX02US02)

Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)

Manual Meter Reads (MX02US04)

Meter Device Summary Dashboard (MX01US01)

Meter Service Orders (MX01US04)

Meter Device Management (MX01US02)

Meter Reading Validation Dashboard (MX00US01)

Meter Inventory Management Test Cases (MX01US03)

Meter Reading Format (MX04US01)

Manual Reading Validation (MX03US03)

Read Cycle List and Validation Configurations (MX03US01)

Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)

Photo Read Validation (MX03US02)

Individual & Bulk messaging (UX02US02)

Message Template Management System (UX06US06)

Message History Management System (UX05US05 )

Utility Contact List Management (UX03US03)

Communication Workflows (UX03US04)

Total Test cases:-27
Total Acceptance Criteria -
Total Coverage: