Skip to main content

Utility management Test Cases - ONB05US03


 Test Case 1: Setup Dashboard Display and 6 Configuration Steps Breakdown

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_001
  • Title: Verify Setup Dashboard displays detailed breakdown of 6 configuration steps with progress tracking
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

 Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Onboarding, UI, MOD-Utility, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Dashboard-Services, Configuration-Management, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise/SMB/All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Services, Configuration API, Progress Tracking
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-Dashboard
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Customer-Segment-Analysis
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication service, Dashboard API, Configuration database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds dashboard load
  • Data_Requirements: System Admin credentials, test utility data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Access to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/, System Admin role configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
  • Test_Data: Username: admin@test.com, Password: Admin123!, Test utility: UT-001 Metropolitan Water District
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and login successful

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/

Platform login page displays with username/password fields

URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/

Initial page load validation

2

Enter System Admin credentials and click Login

Authentication successful, main dashboard loads with navigation menu

Username: admin@test.com, Password: Admin123!

Login functionality verification

3

Click on "Utility Setup" from left navigation menu

Setup Dashboard page loads with "Configure your utility management system and track setup progress" header

Navigation: Left menu → Utility Setup

Navigation to setup section

4

Verify "Overall Setup Progress" section displays

Progress card shows with "73%" completion and "Almost there! Complete all utilities to finish setup" message

Expected: Progress indicator visible

Overall progress section validation

5

Verify 6 configuration steps are clearly displayed

All 6 steps visible: 1) Core system settings, 2) Staff and access control, 3) Calendar and scheduling, 4) Service area, 5) Plans and tariffs, 6) ID's and references

Configuration steps: 6 distinct sections

AC-1: 6 steps breakdown verification

6

Check each step has clear status indicator

Each step shows status (Not Started/In Progress/Completed) with visual indicators

Status types: Not Started, In Progress, Completed

AC-2: Step status visibility

7

Verify "Configured Utilities" section displays utility cards

Utility cards show with entity IDs, names, progress bars, and action buttons

Test utilities: UT-001, UT-002, UT-003 with respective progress

Utility listing verification

8

Check utility progress percentages are displayed

Each utility card shows accurate progress percentage (12%, 100%, 64%)

UT-001: 12%, UT-002: 100%, UT-003: 64%

Progress accuracy validation

9

Verify "Add Utility" button is prominently displayed

Blue "Add Utility" button visible in top-right corner

Button: "+ Add Utility" (blue, top-right)

Add utility functionality access

10

Measure dashboard load time performance

Dashboard loads completely within 2 seconds

Performance baseline: < 2 seconds

Performance requirement validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: 6 configuration steps clearly displayed with accurate labels
  • Secondary_Verifications: Progress indicators functional, utility cards display correctly, navigation responsive
  • Negative_Verification: No broken UI elements, no missing configuration steps, no incorrect progress calculations

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Dashboard load time: X seconds, 6 steps displayed: Yes/No, Progress accuracy: Verified/Failed]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Authentication successful
  • Blocked_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_002, ONB05US03_TC_003
  • Parallel_Tests: Performance tests, cross-browser tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Must run before configuration flow tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical smoke test for utility setup feature
  • Edge_Cases: Large number of utilities (>20), slow network conditions
  • Risk_Areas: Dashboard API availability, progress calculation accuracy
  • Security_Considerations: Admin role validation, session management

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Dashboard performance with 50+ utilities
  • Type: Performance/Edge Case
  • Rationale: User story mentions scalability for multiple utility management
  • Priority: P3-Medium



 Test Case 2: Mandatory vs Optional Configuration Steps Identification

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_002
  • Title: Verify mandatory configuration steps are clearly distinguished from optional steps with proper validation enforcement
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Functional/Validation
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

 Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Negative, Validation, MOD-Utility, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Security-Validation, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Validation-Services, Form-Validation, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Validation Services, Form API, Business Rules Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-Forms
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Regression-Coverage, Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Form validation service, Business rules engine, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds form validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Test utility UT-001 data, validation rules configuration

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Logged in as System Admin, access to Add New Utility modal
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with utility configuration permissions
  • Test_Data: Entity: UT-001, Valid email: contact@metrowater.com, Valid phone: (415) 555-8734
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US03_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Setup Dashboard and click "+ Add Utility" button

"Add New Utility" modal opens with form fields visible

Button: "+ Add Utility" (top-right corner)

Modal opening verification

2

Identify all fields marked with red asterisk (*) as mandatory

5 mandatory fields identified: Utility Name*, Email*, Contact Number*, State*, Address*

Required fields: Utility Name*, Email*, Contact Number*, State*, Address*

BR-6: Required field identification

3

Identify fields without asterisk as optional

2 optional fields identified: Website URL, Logo Upload

Optional fields: Website URL, Logo Upload

Optional field identification

4

Verify GST/HST/VAGST Registration field behavior

Field shows as optional with helper text "Tax registration number (if applicable)"

GST field: Optional with helper text

Tax registration field validation

5

Leave all mandatory fields empty and click "Save Utility"

Validation errors appear for all 5 mandatory fields, form submission blocked

Test: Empty form submission

BR-4: Mandatory validation enforcement

6

Fill only Utility Name field and attempt save

4 validation errors remain for Email*, Contact Number*, State*, Address*

Utility Name: "Metropolitan Water District"

Partial mandatory field validation

7

Fill only optional fields and attempt save

All 5 mandatory field errors still present, save blocked

Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com, Logo: test-logo.png

Optional-only submission test

8

Fill all mandatory fields with valid data

Form accepts data, no validation errors for mandatory fields

UT-001: Metropolitan Water District, contact@metrowater.com, (415) 555-8734, California, 1234 Reservoir Avenue

Valid mandatory data test

9

Verify optional fields can be left empty with valid mandatory data

Form submits successfully with optional fields empty

Optional fields: Leave empty

Optional field behavior validation

10

Test mandatory field validation error messages

Clear, specific error messages for each mandatory field

Error messages: "Utility Name is required", "Email is required", etc.

Error message clarity validation

11

Verify City dropdown dependency on State selection

City field shows "Select a state first" until State is selected

State: California → City options populate

BR-6: Dropdown dependency validation

12

Test State selection enables City dropdown

After selecting State, City dropdown becomes active with relevant cities

State: California → Cities: San Francisco, Los Angeles, etc.

State-City dependency verification

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Mandatory fields clearly marked with asterisk and validation enforced
  • Secondary_Verifications: Optional fields function without validation, error messages clear and helpful
  • Negative_Verification: Cannot submit form without mandatory fields, optional fields don't trigger validation errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Mandatory fields: 5 identified, Validation: Working/Failed, Optional fields: 2 identified]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Validation bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Form validation evidence]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_001
  • Blocked_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_005 (End-to-end flow)
  • Parallel_Tests: Cross-browser validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Must run before submission tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for preventing incomplete utility configurations
  • Edge_Cases: Special characters in required fields, maximum length validations
  • Risk_Areas: Validation bypass, incorrect field marking
  • Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, XSS prevention in validation messages

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Real-time validation (validation on field blur vs form submit)
  • Type: UX/Functional
  • Rationale: User story emphasizes user experience improvement
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Scenario_2: Validation message accessibility (screen reader compatibility)
  • Type: Accessibility
  • Rationale: Enterprise compliance requirements
  • Priority: P3-Medium



 Test Case 3: Progress Percentage Accuracy and Real-time Updates

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_003
  • Title: Verify progress percentage accurately reflects completed configuration steps with real-time updates
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Functional/API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

 Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Progress-Tracking, Calculation, MOD-Utility, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-API-Test-Results, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Progress-API, Real-time-Updates, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Progress API, Configuration Services, Real-time Updates
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-API-Progress
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: API-Test-Results, Performance-Metrics, Integration-Testing, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Progress calculation API, Configuration database, Real-time update service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds progress update response
  • Data_Requirements: Fresh utility entity UT-004, 6 configuration steps data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Clean utility entity UT-004 with 0% progress
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with configuration permissions
  • Test_Data: UT-004: "Pacific Energy Solutions", 6 configuration steps: Core system, Staff access, Calendar, Service area, Plans, IDs
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US03_TC_001, ONB05US03_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Setup Dashboard and locate utility UT-004

UT-004 displays with 0% progress and "Not Started" status

Entity: UT-004 "Pacific Energy Solutions"

Baseline progress verification

2

Click "Continue Setup" on UT-004 utility card

Configuration interface opens showing 6 steps, all marked "Not Started"

6 steps: Core system, Staff access, Calendar, Service area, Plans, IDs

Initial step status verification

3

Complete Step 1 (Core system settings) fully

Progress updates to 16.67% (1/6 completed), Step 1 shows "Completed"

Step 1 data: System name, configuration settings

BR-2: Single step calculation (1/6 = 16.67%)

4

Verify real-time progress update in main dashboard

Navigate back to dashboard, UT-004 shows 16.67% progress

Progress bar: 16.67% visually represented

Real-time update validation

5

Return to configuration and complete Step 2 (Staff access)

Progress updates to 33.33% (2/6 completed), Step 2 shows "Completed"

Step 2 data: Staff roles, access permissions

Two-step calculation (2/6 = 33.33%)

6

Complete Step 3 (Calendar scheduling)

Progress updates to 50% (3/6 completed), Step 3 shows "Completed"

Step 3 data: Calendar settings, scheduling rules

Mid-point calculation (3/6 = 50%)

7

Verify progress persistence after browser refresh

Refresh page, progress remains at 50%, completed steps retain status

Browser action: F5 refresh

Progress persistence validation

8

Complete Steps 4 and 5 simultaneously

Progress updates to 83.33% (5/6 completed), both steps show "Completed"

Steps 4&5: Service area + Plans configuration

Multiple step completion

9

Complete final Step 6 (IDs and references)

Progress reaches 100% (6/6 completed), all steps show "Completed"

Step 6 data: ID formats, reference settings

Full completion calculation

10

Verify overall dashboard progress reflects 100% completion

UT-004 shows 100% progress, status changes to "Active"

Final status: 100% complete, Active status

Complete workflow verification

11

Test partial step completion (start Step 7 on new utility)

If step partially filled, shows "In Progress" status

New utility UT-005: Partial data entry

In-progress status validation

12

Measure progress update response time

Each progress update completes within 2 seconds

Performance: < 2 seconds per update

Performance baseline validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Progress percentage = (Completed Steps / 6 Total Steps) * 100
  • Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates functional, status persistence across sessions, visual progress bar accuracy
  • Negative_Verification: Progress never exceeds 100%, cannot decrease unless steps are uncompleted

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Progress calculations: Accurate/Inaccurate, Real-time updates: Working/Failed, Performance: <2s/>2s]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Progress calculation bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Progress tracking evidence]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_001, ONB05US03_TC_002
  • Blocked_Tests: Performance tests, user behavior tracking tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Multiple utility progress tracking
  • Sequential_Tests: Must run after basic setup validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for user confidence and setup completion tracking
  • Edge_Cases: Network latency affecting real-time updates, concurrent user modifications
  • Risk_Areas: Progress calculation accuracy, API response times
  • Security_Considerations: Progress data integrity, unauthorized progress modifications

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Progress calculation with partial step rollbacks
  • Type: Edge Case
  • Rationale: User story mentions configuration editing capability
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Scenario_2: Bulk progress updates for multiple utilities
  • Type: Performance
  • Rationale: User story indicates multi-utility management capability
  • Priority: P3-Medium



 Test Case 4: Complete Form Field Validation and Business Rules

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_004
  • Title: Verify comprehensive form field validation according to business rules with proper error handling
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Functional/Negative/Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

 Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Negative, Validation, Security, Form-Testing, MOD-Utility, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Validation-Engine, Input-Sanitization, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Validation Engine, Security Services, Business Rules API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Validation-Engine
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation service, Security scanning, Business rules engine, Email validation API
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Valid/invalid test data sets, malicious input samples

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Access to Add New Utility form, validation rules configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with utility creation permissions
  • Test_Data: Valid samples from user story, invalid/malicious test cases prepared
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US03_TC_001, ONB05US03_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open "Add New Utility" modal and test Utility Name validation

Accepts valid utility names, rejects empty/invalid input

Valid: "Metropolitan Water District", Invalid: "", "123", special chars only

BR-6: Utility name validation

2

Test Email field format validation comprehensively

Accepts valid email format, rejects malformed emails

Valid: contact@metrowater.com, Invalid: invalid-email, @domain.com, test@, test.com

BR-6: Email format validation

3

Test Contact Number format validation

Accepts proper phone formats, rejects invalid formats

Valid: (415) 555-8734, Invalid: 123abc, phone, 1234567890123456789

BR-6: Phone format validation

4

Test State dropdown functionality and validation

Shows list of states, selection required for City field

States: California, Texas, New York, etc.

BR-6: State selection validation

5

Test City dropdown dependency validation

City field disabled until State selected, shows relevant cities after State selection

State: California → Cities: San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, etc.

BR-6: City dependency validation

6

Test Address field validation

Accepts complete addresses, rejects empty input, handles special characters

Valid: "1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110", Invalid: "", "123"

BR-6: Address validation

7

Test Website URL format validation (optional field)

Accepts valid URL formats when provided, allows empty

Valid: https://www.metrowater.com, http://domain.com, Invalid: invalid-url, just-text

BR-6: URL format validation

8

Test GST/HST/VAGST registration number validation

Accepts valid tax registration formats, allows empty (optional)

Valid: GST123456789, HST987654321, VAGST456789123, Invalid: 123, invalid-format

BR-6: Tax registration validation

9

Test Logo upload file type and size validation

Accepts valid image files (.jpg, .png, .gif), rejects invalid types and oversized files

Valid: logo.jpg (2MB), logo.png (1MB), Invalid: logo.exe, oversized.jpg (20MB)

BR-6: File upload validation

10

Test input length limits for all text fields

Enforces maximum character limits, provides character counters

Utility Name: 100 chars max, Email: 255 chars max, Address: 500 chars max

BR-6: Length limit validation

11

Test special character handling and SQL injection prevention

Properly sanitizes input, prevents SQL injection attempts

Malicious input: '; DROP TABLE utilities; --, <script>alert('xss')</script>

Security: Input sanitization

12

Test concurrent field validation (multiple errors)

Shows all relevant validation errors simultaneously

Multiple invalid fields: empty name, invalid email, malformed phone

Multi-field validation

13

Test validation error message clarity and helpfulness

Error messages are specific, actionable, and user-friendly

Error examples: "Please enter a valid email address", "Phone number must be in format (XXX) XXX-XXXX"

User experience validation

14

Test form validation performance under load

Validation responds within 2 seconds even with complex rules

Complex validation: All fields filled with edge case data

Performance validation

15

Test validation persistence and form state management

Form retains valid data after validation errors, doesn't reset correctly filled fields

Scenario: Fix one invalid field, others remain filled

Form state management

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All field validations work according to business rules, security threats prevented
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages clear and helpful, form performance acceptable, state management functional
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid inputs properly rejected, malicious input sanitized, no validation bypass possible

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Validation rules: X/15 passed, Security tests: Passed/Failed, Performance: <2s/>2s]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Validation/security bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Validation test evidence]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_002
  • Blocked_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_005 (End-to-end flow)
  • Parallel_Tests: Security penetration tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Must run before submission workflow tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical security and data integrity test
  • Edge_Cases: Unicode characters, very long inputs, concurrent validation requests
  • Risk_Areas: Validation bypass vulnerabilities, performance degradation
  • Security_Considerations: XSS prevention, SQL injection protection, file upload security

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Cross-site scripting (XSS) prevention in all input fields
  • Type: Security
  • Rationale: B2B SaaS security requirements mentioned in user story
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Scenario_2: File upload virus scanning and malicious file detection





Test Case 5: End-to-End Configuration Flow with 6 Steps Completion

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_005
  • Title: Verify complete end-to-end utility configuration process through all 6 configuration steps
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Integration/End-to-End
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, End-to-End, Integration, Workflow, MOD-Utility, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Engineering, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Complete-Workflow, Configuration-Management, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: All configuration services, Database persistence, File upload, Progress tracking
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Complete-Workflow
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Integration-Testing, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Quality-Dashboard, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: All system services, Database, File storage, Progress API, Configuration services
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds per step, < 30 seconds total workflow
  • Data_Requirements: Complete test data set for all 6 configuration steps

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Clean system state, all services operational
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with full configuration permissions
  • Test_Data: Complete data set for UT-006 "Pacific Energy Solutions", 6-step configuration data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US03_TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004 must all pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/ and login

Platform loads, authentication successful, dashboard displays

URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/, Credentials: admin@test.com/Admin123!

Initial platform access

2

Navigate to Utility Setup section from main menu

Setup Dashboard displays with "Configure your utility management system and track setup progress" header

Navigation: Main menu → Utility Setup

Setup section access

3

Click "+ Add Utility" button to create new utility

"Add New Utility" modal opens with all form fields visible

Button: "+ Add Utility" (blue, top-right)

New utility creation initiation

4

Complete utility basic information form with all mandatory fields

Form accepts all data, validation passes, "Save Utility" enabled

UT-006: Pacific Energy Solutions, admin@pacificenergy.com, (650) 555-9821, California, San Jose, 4567 Innovation Drive

Basic utility information setup

5

Click "Save Utility" and verify utility creation

Modal closes, new utility UT-006 appears in dashboard with 0% progress

Complete utility data saved successfully

Utility creation verification

6

Click "Continue Setup" on newly created UT-006 utility

Configuration interface opens showing 6 distinct steps: Core system, Staff access, Calendar, Service area, Plans, IDs

6 steps displayed: 1) Core system settings, 2) Staff and access control, 3) Calendar and scheduling, 4) Service area, 5) Plans and tariffs, 6) ID's and references

6-step configuration interface

7

Complete Step 1: Core system settings configuration

Step 1 marked "Completed", progress updates to 16.67% (1/6)

Step 1 data: System name, core configurations, operational settings

Core system configuration

8

Complete Step 2: Staff and access control setup

Step 2 marked "Completed", progress updates to 33.33% (2/6)

Step 2 data: Staff roles, access permissions, security settings

Staff access configuration

9

Complete Step 3: Calendar and scheduling configuration

Step 3 marked "Completed", progress updates to 50% (3/6)

Step 3 data: Calendar settings, scheduling rules, availability windows

Calendar scheduling setup

10

Complete Step 4: Service area definition

Step 4 marked "Completed", progress updates to 66.67% (4/6)

Step 4 data: Service boundaries, geographic coverage, zone definitions

Service area configuration

11

Complete Step 5: Plans and tariffs setup

Step 5 marked "Completed", progress updates to 83.33% (5/6)

Step 5 data: Pricing plans, tariff structures, billing configurations

Plans and tariffs setup

12

Complete Step 6: ID's and references configuration

Step 6 marked "Completed", progress updates to 100% (6/6)

Step 6 data: ID formats, reference numbers, external system IDs

Final step completion

13

Verify overall progress reaches 100% completion

Progress indicator shows 100%, all steps marked "Completed"

Final progress: 100% complete

Complete workflow verification

14

Navigate back to Setup Dashboard

UT-006 utility shows 100% progress, status changes to "Active"

Dashboard view: UT-006 at 100% progress

Dashboard status update

15

Verify utility is now fully operational

Utility appears in active utilities list, "Manage Utility" option available

Status: Active, Management options enabled

Operational utility verification

16

Test configuration data persistence

Refresh browser, all configuration data retained and accessible

Browser refresh: F5, data persistence check

Data persistence validation

17

Measure complete workflow performance

Total workflow completion time under 30 seconds (excluding data entry time)

Performance target: < 30 seconds system response time

Performance validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Complete 6-step configuration workflow executes successfully
  • Secondary_Verifications: Progress tracking accurate throughout, data persistence confirmed, utility becomes operational
  • Negative_Verification: No data loss during process, no workflow interruptions, no system errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [6 steps completed: Yes/No, Progress tracking: Accurate/Inaccurate, Performance: <30s/>30s, Data persistence: Working/Failed]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Workflow bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Complete workflow evidence]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004
  • Blocked_Tests: Performance optimization tests, user behavior analytics
  • Parallel_Tests: Cross-browser end-to-end tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Must be final integration test

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical acceptance test for complete utility setup feature
  • Edge_Cases: Network interruptions during workflow, browser crashes mid-process
  • Risk_Areas: Data consistency across steps, workflow state management
  • Security_Considerations: Session management during long workflow, data integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Workflow interruption and resume capability
  • Type: Edge Case/Recovery
  • Rationale: User story mentions configuration process complexity requiring guidance
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Scenario_2: Multi-user concurrent configuration of same utility
  • Type: Concurrency
  • Rationale: Enterprise environment may have multiple administrators
  • Priority: P3-Medium



Test Case 6: Configuration Step Status Management and Persistence

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_006
  • Title: Verify configuration steps accurately track and persist status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Functional/Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Status-Management, State-Persistence, MOD-Utility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-State-Management, Status-Tracking, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Status API, Database persistence, Session management
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Status-Management
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Integration-Testing, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Status management API, Database, Session storage, Real-time updates
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds status update response
  • Data_Requirements: Test utility UT-007 with configurable steps

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Fresh utility UT-007 with no configuration progress
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with configuration access
  • Test_Data: UT-007: "Regional Water Authority", 6 configuration steps available
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US03_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Setup Dashboard and locate UT-007 utility

UT-007 displays with 0% progress, all 6 steps show "Not Started" status

Entity: UT-007 "Regional Water Authority"

Initial status verification

2

Click "Continue Setup" on UT-007 to open configuration

Configuration interface shows 6 steps, all with "Not Started" visual indicators

6 steps: Core system, Staff access, Calendar, Service area, Plans, IDs

Step status interface access

3

Begin Step 1 (Core system) by entering partial data

Step 1 status changes to "In Progress", visual indicator updates

Step 1: Enter system name only, leave other fields empty

Partial completion status

4

Navigate away and return to verify "In Progress" persistence

Step 1 remains "In Progress", partial data retained

Navigation: Dashboard → Continue Setup

In-progress persistence

5

Complete Step 1 fully with all required data

Step 1 status changes to "Completed", visual indicator shows completion

Step 1 complete data: System name, configurations, settings

Completion status update

6

Verify Step 1 "Completed" status persists after browser refresh

Browser refresh, Step 1 remains "Completed" with check mark/green indicator

Browser action: F5 refresh

Completion persistence

7

Start Step 2 (Staff access) with partial data entry

Step 2 changes to "In Progress" while Step 1 remains "Completed"

Step 2: Enter staff roles, leave permissions empty

Multiple step status management

8

Complete Step 2 and verify dual completion status

Both Step 1 and Step 2 show "Completed", progress updates to 33.33%

Step 2 complete: Staff roles and permissions

Dual completion verification

9

Test status rollback by editing completed Step 1

Edit Step 1 data, status remains "Completed" if all required fields maintained

Step 1 edit: Change system name but keep all data valid

Status stability during edits

10

Clear required data from completed Step 1

Step 1 status changes back to "In Progress" or "Not Started" based on data completeness

Step 1: Remove required system name field

Status regression testing

11

Verify visual status indicators are clear and distinct

Each status has distinct visual representation (colors, icons, labels)

Visual check: Not Started (gray), In Progress (blue), Completed (green)

Visual indicator clarity

12

Test concurrent step editing and status management

Multiple steps can be in "In Progress" simultaneously

Steps 3, 4, 5: Start all with partial data

Concurrent status management

13

Complete all 6 steps and verify final status state

All steps show "Completed", overall progress 100%, utility status becomes "Active"

Complete all 6 steps with full data sets

Final status verification

14

Test status persistence across user sessions

Logout and login, all step statuses retained correctly

Session test: Logout → Login → Check statuses

Cross-session persistence

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Step statuses accurately reflect completion state with proper visual indicators
  • Secondary_Verifications: Status persistence across sessions and browser refreshes, concurrent step status management
  • Negative_Verification: Status doesn't change incorrectly, visual indicators match actual status

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Status tracking: Accurate/Inaccurate, Persistence: Working/Failed, Visual indicators: Clear/Unclear]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Status management bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Status tracking evidence]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_001
  • Blocked_Tests: User behavior analytics, progress reporting
  • Parallel_Tests: Progress calculation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Should run with configuration flow tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for user understanding of configuration progress
  • Edge_Cases: Rapid status changes, network interruptions during status updates
  • Risk_Areas: Status synchronization, visual indicator consistency
  • Security_Considerations: Status data integrity, unauthorized status modifications

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Status synchronization across multiple browser tabs
  • Type: Concurrency
  • Rationale: Users may open multiple tabs during configuration
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Scenario_2: Status audit trail and change history
  • Type: Compliance
  • Rationale: Enterprise requirements for configuration tracking
  • Priority: P3-Medium



Test Case 7: User Guidance System for Incomplete Configuration Steps

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_007
  • Title: Verify users receive clear guidance and direction for incomplete configuration steps
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Functional/Usability
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, User-Guidance, Usability, Help-System, MOD-Utility, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-CSM, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Help-System, User-Experience, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Help system, Guidance engine, User interface
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-User-Guidance
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Quality-Dashboard, Product, CSM
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Help system, Guidance content management, User interface
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds guidance display
  • Data_Requirements: Partially configured utility UT-008 with incomplete steps

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utility UT-008 with some completed and some incomplete configuration steps
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with configuration access
  • Test_Data: UT-008: "Metro Utilities Corp" with 50% configuration progress (3/6 steps completed)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US03_TC_001, ONB05US03_TC_006 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Setup Dashboard and locate UT-008 with partial progress

UT-008 displays with 50% progress, incomplete steps visually highlighted

Entity: UT-008 "Metro Utilities Corp" at 50% progress

Partial progress identification

2

Hover over incomplete step indicator in dashboard

Tooltip appears with guidance message "Complete remaining configuration steps"

Hover action: Incomplete step progress bar

Tooltip guidance availability

3

Click "Continue Setup" on UT-008 utility

Configuration interface opens highlighting incomplete steps with visual cues

Incomplete steps: Service area, Plans, IDs (steps 4, 5, 6)

Incomplete step highlighting

4

Hover over incomplete Step 4 (Service area)

Guidance tooltip displays: "Define your service boundaries and coverage areas"

Step 4: Service area configuration guidance

Step-specific guidance

5

Click on incomplete Step 4

Step opens with helpful instruction text and field explanations

Step 4 interface: Instruction text, field help, examples

Detailed step guidance

6

Verify help text clarity and actionability

Help text is specific, actionable, and guides user to completion

Help content: Clear instructions, required field indicators, examples

Guidance quality verification

7

Test guidance for Step 5 (Plans and tariffs)

Hover and click guidance provides specific plan setup instructions

Step 5 guidance: "Configure pricing plans and tariff structures for billing"

Plans guidance specificity

8

Test guidance for Step 6 (ID's and references)

Guidance explains ID format requirements and reference number setup

Step 6 guidance: "Set up ID formats and external system reference numbers"

ID setup guidance

9

Verify progress indicator guidance

Overall progress shows clear indication of remaining work

Progress guidance: "3 of 6 steps remaining" or similar clear messaging

Progress clarity

10

Test contextual help availability throughout configuration

Help icons or links available in each step for additional guidance

Help accessibility: ? icons, help links, context-sensitive assistance

Contextual help availability

11

Follow guidance to complete one incomplete step

Guidance leads to successful step completion

Complete Step 4 using provided guidance

Guidance effectiveness

12

Verify guidance updates after step completion

Completed step no longer shows guidance, focus shifts to remaining incomplete steps

Updated guidance: Step 4 completed, focus on steps 5, 6

Dynamic guidance updates

13

Test guidance accessibility and usability

Guidance is accessible via keyboard navigation and screen readers

Accessibility: Tab navigation, ARIA labels, screen reader compatibility

Accessibility compliance

14

Measure guidance system performance

Guidance content loads within 2 seconds of user interaction

Performance: < 2 seconds guidance display time

Performance validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Clear, actionable guidance provided for all incomplete configuration steps
  • Secondary_Verifications: Guidance leads to successful completion, help content is contextually relevant
  • Negative_Verification: No confusing or misleading guidance, no broken help links

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Guidance clarity: Clear/Unclear, Effectiveness: Helpful/Unhelpful, Performance: <2s/>2s]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Guidance system bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Guidance system evidence]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Partial

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: ONB05US03_TC_001, ONB05US03_TC_006
  • Blocked_Tests: User behavior analytics, help system metrics
  • Parallel_Tests: Usability testing, accessibility testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Should run after status management tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for user experience and configuration completion rates
  • Edge_Cases: Very long guidance text, multiple help requests simultaneously
  • Risk_Areas: Guidance content accuracy, help system availability
  • Security_Considerations: Help content injection prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Interactive guidance with step-by-step walkthroughs
  • Type: Enhanced UX
  • Rationale: User story emphasizes improved user understanding and confidence
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Scenario_2: Personalized guidance based on user role and experience level
  • Type: Advanced Feature
  • Rationale: Enterprise users may have varying technical expertise
  • Priority: P4-Low



 Test Case 8: Chrome Browser Compatibility and Performance Validation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_008
  • Title: Verify utility configuration functionality works optimally in Chrome 115+ with consistent performance and visual rendering
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Compatibility/Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Chrome-Compatibility, Browser-Optimization, Performance-Validation, MOD-Utility, P3-Medium, Phase-Full, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-QA, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Performance-Metrics, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Chrome-Optimization, Browser-Performance, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Chrome browser engine, CSS framework, JavaScript optimization
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Chrome-Platform
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Results, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, Performance-Metrics, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Chrome browser engine, CSS/JS frameworks optimized for Chrome
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds consistent performance in Chrome
  • Data_Requirements: Standard test utility UT-009 configuration data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Chrome 115+ browser installed, test utility UT-009 prepared
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access in Chrome browser
  • Test_Data: UT-009: "Universal Energy Systems", standard configuration data set
  • Prior_Test_Cases: All functional tests must pass baseline

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Launch Chrome 115+ and navigate to platform

Chrome opens successfully, platform loads optimally

Browser: Chrome 115+, URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/

Chrome launch validation

2

Test Chrome DevTools compatibility

DevTools function properly for debugging and performance monitoring

Chrome DevTools: Console, Network, Performance tabs

Development tools validation

3

Execute complete configuration flow in Chrome

All functionality works perfectly with optimal performance

UT-009 configuration data in Chrome

Chrome functionality baseline

4

Test Chrome-specific JavaScript features

Modern JavaScript features work correctly (ES6+, async/await, modules)

JavaScript: Arrow functions, promises, modules

Modern JS compatibility

5

Verify Chrome CSS rendering optimization

CSS Grid, Flexbox, animations render smoothly

CSS testing: Modern layout features, transitions

CSS rendering optimization

6

Test Chrome form autofill integration

Browser autofill works with utility configuration forms

Form autofill: Name, email, address fields

Autofill integration

7

Test Chrome security features

HTTPS enforcement, secure cookie handling, CSP compliance

Security: SSL validation, secure headers

Chrome security validation

8

Verify Chrome file upload optimization

File drag-and-drop, multiple file selection work optimally

File upload: Drag-drop logo files, file picker

File handling optimization

9

Test Chrome memory management

No memory leaks during extended configuration sessions

Memory testing: Extended use, multiple utilities

Memory management validation

10

Test Chrome caching behavior

Page caching improves subsequent load times

Cache testing: First visit vs. return visits

Caching optimization

11

Verify Chrome responsive design features

Chrome's mobile simulation works correctly

Responsive testing: Device simulation in Chrome

Responsive design validation

12

Test Chrome accessibility features

Screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation optimized

Accessibility: Chrome accessibility tools

Accessibility optimization

13

Measure Chrome-specific performance metrics

Core Web Vitals meet Google standards (LCP, FID, CLS)

Performance: Lighthouse audit, Core Web Vitals

Performance optimization

14

Test Chrome extension compatibility

Common business extensions don't interfere with functionality

Extensions: Ad blockers, password managers, VPNs

Extension compatibility

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All functionality works optimally in Chrome 115+ with superior performance
  • Secondary_Verifications: Chrome-specific features integrated, Core Web Vitals meet standards
  • Negative_Verification: No Chrome-specific bugs, no performance degradation, no extension conflicts

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Chrome performance: Optimal/Degraded, Core Web Vitals: Pass/Fail, Extensions: Compatible/Issues]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Chrome-specific bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Chrome performance reports, Lighthouse scores]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: All functional tests (TC_001-007)
  • Blocked_Tests: Performance optimization, Chrome-specific enhancements
  • Parallel_Tests: Mobile testing, performance testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Should run after functional validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Optimized for Chrome 115+ as primary supported browser
  • Edge_Cases: Chrome updates, extension conflicts, developer mode usage
  • Risk_Areas: Chrome version compatibility, extension interference
  • Security_Considerations: Chrome security model, same-origin policy compliance

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Chrome version upgrade impact testing
  • Type: Browser Version Management
  • Rationale: Chrome updates frequently, need to ensure compatibility
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Scenario_2: Chrome enterprise policy compliance testing
  • Type: Enterprise Environment
  • Rationale: Enterprise environments may have Chrome policies affecting functionality
  • Priority: P3-Medium




Test Case 9: Performance Testing and Load Validation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB05US03_TC_09
  • Title: Verify utility configuration performance meets baseline requirements under various load conditions
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-12
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility management
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Performance, Load-Testing, Scalability, MOD-Utility, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-API-Test-Results, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Performance-Services, Load-Validation, Happy-Path]

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 30 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Performance monitoring, Load balancers, Database performance, API gateways
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Performance-Layer
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Engineering, Quality-Dashboard, API-Test-Results, Integration-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging (Production-like)
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, Load testing framework, Database performance metrics
  • Performance_Baseline: Dashboard < 2s, Form submission < 2s, File upload < 2s
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple test utilities (UT-011 through UT-050) for load testing

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment, monitoring tools configured, baseline measurements established
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with performance testing access
  • Test_Data: Bulk utility data set (40 utilities), various file sizes for upload testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: All functional tests must pass under normal load

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Measure baseline dashboard load time with 1 user

Dashboard loads within 2 seconds, baseline performance established

Single user: admin@test.com, 10 utilities displayed

Baseline performance measurement

2

Test dashboard load time with 50 utilities displayed

Dashboard maintains <2 second load time with increased data volume

50 utilities: UT-011 through UT-060

Data volume performance

3

Measure form submission performance under normal load

Form submission completes within 2 seconds consistently

Standard utility configuration data

Form submission baseline

4

Test concurrent user load (10 users)

System maintains performance with 10 simultaneous users configuring utilities

10 concurrent sessions: Different utility configurations

Concurrent user testing

5

Test concurrent user load (25 users)

System maintains acceptable performance with 25 simultaneous users

25 concurrent sessions: Mixed operations

Medium load testing

6

Test high concurrent user load (50 users)

System maintains functional performance with 50 simultaneous users

50 concurrent sessions: Configuration operations

High load testing

7

Test file upload performance with various file sizes

Small files (<1MB) upload <2s, Large files (5MB) upload <10s

File sizes: 500KB, 2MB, 5MB logo files

File upload performance

8

Test progress calculation performance under load

Progress updates respond within 2 seconds even with high load

Multiple simultaneous progress updates

Progress calculation load

9

Test database performance with large data sets

Configuration queries maintain <2s response with 1000+ utilities

Database: 1000 utility records

Database performance testing

10

Test API endpoint performance under load

All configuration APIs respond within 2 seconds under load

API load: POST, PUT, GET configuration endpoints

API performance validation

11

Measure memory usage and resource consumption

System resources remain within acceptable limits during load

Resource monitoring: CPU, Memory, Network usage

Resource consumption analysis

12

Test system recovery after load spike

System recovers to normal performance after high load period

Load spike: 100 users for 5 minutes, then normal load

Recovery performance

13

Test performance degradation patterns

Identify performance degradation points and limits

Gradual load increase: 10→25→50→75→100 users

Performance limit identification

14

Validate SLA compliance under realistic load

All SLA metrics met under expected production load patterns

Realistic load: 25 users, mixed operations, 8-hour test

SLA compliance validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All operations maintain <2 second response time under normal load
  • Secondary_Verifications: System handles concurrent users gracefully, resource usage acceptable
  • Negative_Verification: No system crashes, no data loss under load, no performance degradation below SLA

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Dashboard load: <2s/>2s, Form submission: <2s/>2s, Concurrent users: X supported, SLA compliance: Met/Not met]
  • Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution time]
  • Defects_Found: [Performance bug IDs]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring reports]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: All functional tests (TC_001-009)
  • Blocked_Tests: Production deployment, capacity planning
  • Parallel_Tests: Security testing under load
  • Sequential_Tests: Should run after functional validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for enterprise deployment and SLA compliance
  • Edge_Cases: Network latency variations, database connection limits, memory leaks
  • Risk_Areas: Database performance, file upload handling, concurrent session management
  • Security_Considerations: DDoS protection, rate limiting, resource exhaustion prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Long-duration stress testing (24-hour continuous load)
  • Type: Endurance Testing
  • Rationale: Enterprise systems require continuous operation reliability
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Scenario_2: Performance testing with real-world network conditions
  • Type: Realistic Performance
  • Rationale: Enterprise users may have varying network quality
  • Priority: P3-Medium





No Comments
Back to top