Payment History Management Test Cases - CSS01US05

Test Case 1: Payment History Dashboard Summary Cards

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_001
• Title: Verify payment history dashboard displays summary cards with total payments (6), total amount ($402.45), and completed count (6)
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, API, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PaymentService, Integration-AuthService, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, AuthService, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, Customer-Segment-Analysis
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC1 - Dashboard summary cards display
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002, CSS01US05_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Consumer authentication service, Database connection
• Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Consumer account with 6 payments totaling $402.45

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Valid consumer account with payment history containing 6 payments
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access permissions
• Test_Data: Consumer account with payments: PAY-001 ($78.45), PAY-002 ($42.30), PAY-003 ($105.75), PAY-004 ($38.20), PAY-005 ($85.50), PAY-006 ($52.25)
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication login test must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads with email and password fields	URL: smart360 tenant	Verify login page accessibility
2	Enter valid consumer credentials in email and password fields	Login successful, consumer dashboard displays with navigation menu	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	AC - Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" option in left side navigation menu	Billing & Payments main page loads showing tabs: View Bills, Services, Installments, Payment History, Credit Notes	Menu item: "Billing & Payments"	Verify navigation structure
4	Click "Payment History" tab in the billing section	Payment History dashboard loads displaying summary cards section at top	Tab: "Payment History"	AC1 - Dashboard with summary cards
5	Verify "Total Payments" summary card displays correct count	Card shows "6" as total payments with appropriate label and styling	Expected value: 6 payments	AC1 - Total payments count validation
6	Verify "Total Amount" summary card displays correct sum	Card shows "$402.45" as total amount with currency formatting	Expected value: $402.45	AC1 - Total amount calculation accuracy
7	Verify "Completed" summary card displays correct completed count	Card shows "6" as completed payments count with green status indicator	Expected value: 6 completed	AC1 - Completed count validation
8	Verify summary cards are positioned above the payment list table	Cards appear in header section before payment transactions table	Layout: Cards above table	UI layout verification

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Summary cards display correct metrics: 6 total payments, $402.45 total amount, 6 completed
• Secondary_Verifications: Currency formatting ($X.XX), card styling consistency, responsive layout
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect calculations or missing summary data

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual summary card values and display]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: Authentication login test
• Blocked_Tests: All payment history feature tests
• Parallel_Tests: None (foundation test)
• Sequential_Tests: Must execute before all other payment history tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Foundation test for payment history feature validation
• Edge_Cases: Empty payment history, single payment scenarios
• Risk_Areas: Calculation accuracy, data consistency
• Security_Considerations: Authenticated access only, payment data protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Summary card refresh behavior when new payment processed
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Real-time updates mentioned in business rules
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 2: Unified Payment List View with Required Columns

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Title: Verify payment history shows unified list view with columns: Payment ID, Status, Payment Type, Date, Amount, Payment Method, Payment For, Detail View button
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PaymentService, UI-TableDisplay, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, Database, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-ListView
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC2 - Unified list view with required columns
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_001, CSS01US05_TC_010

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Database connection, UI component library
• Performance_Baseline: Table rendering < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Consumer account with 6 sample payments as specified in user story

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with complete payment history data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history view permissions
• Test_Data: Sample payments: PAY-001 (Billing, $78.45, Credit Card), PAY-002 (Service, $42.30, Bank Account), PAY-003 (Installment, $105.75, Credit Card)
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and click login	Login successful, consumer dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads with multiple tabs	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigation to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list table	Tab: "Payment History"	Access payment list view
5	Verify "Payment ID" column header and data format	Column header visible, data shows format: PAY-001, PAY-002, PAY-003	Sample IDs: PAY-001, PAY-002, PAY-003	AC2 - Payment ID column validation
6	Verify "Status" column header and status values	Column header visible, data shows: Completed, Failed, Pending	Sample statuses: Completed, Failed	AC2 - Status column validation
7	Verify "Payment Type" column header and type categories	Column header visible, data shows: Billing, Service, Installment	Sample types: Billing, Service, Installment	AC2 - Payment Type column validation
8	Verify "Date" column header and date format	Column header visible, data shows format: Mar 5, 2025, Feb 8, 2025	Sample dates: Mar 5, 2025, Feb 8, 2025	AC2 - Date column validation
9	Verify "Amount" column header and currency format	Column header visible, data shows format: $78.45, $42.30, $105.75	Sample amounts: $78.45, $42.30, $105.75	AC2 - Amount column validation
10	Verify "Payment Method" column header and method types	Column header visible, data shows: Credit Card, Bank Account	Sample methods: Credit Card, Bank Account	AC2 - Payment Method column validation
11	Verify "Payment For" column header and contextual identifiers	Column header visible, data shows: Bill-12345, Service-67890, Installment-001	Sample: Bill-12345, Service-67890, Installment-001	AC2 - Payment For column validation
12	Verify "Detail View" button column and button presence	Column with "View Details" button for each payment row	Button text: "View Details"	AC2 - Detail View button validation
13	Verify table displays "Showing 6 of 6 payments" counter	Counter displays below table showing current pagination status	Expected: "Showing 6 of 6 payments"	Table pagination indicator

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All 8 required columns present with correct headers and data formats
• Secondary_Verifications: Table styling, column alignment, data consistency across rows
• Negative_Verification: No missing columns, no malformed data display

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual table structure and column data]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: All column-specific tests
• Parallel_Tests: None
• Sequential_Tests: Prerequisite for detail view and filtering tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Core list view validation for payment history feature
• Edge_Cases: Empty table state, single payment display
• Risk_Areas: Data formatting consistency, column alignment
• Security_Considerations: Data masking for sensitive payment information

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Table sorting behavior by column headers
• Type: UI Enhancement
• Rationale: Improve user experience for data navigation
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 3: Color-Coded Payment Type Badges

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_003
• Title: Verify payment categorization with color-coded badges: Billing (blue), Service (purple), Installment (orange)
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UIComponents, VisualValidation, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: UI-Components, CSS-Styling
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-UI
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC3 - Color-coded payment type badges with specific colors
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: CSS styling framework, UI component library
• Performance_Baseline: Visual rendering < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Payments of all three types: Billing, Service, Installment

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments of all three types
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Billing), PAY-002 (Service), PAY-003 (Installment) with respective color coding
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication validation
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access payment list view
5	Locate Billing payment type in Payment Type column	Badge displays "Billing" with blue background color	Payment: PAY-001, Type: Billing, Color: Blue (#007bff)	AC3 - Billing blue badge validation
6	Verify blue color consistency for Billing badge	Blue badge color matches specified hex value or CSS blue	CSS Color: #007bff or equivalent blue	Color specification validation
7	Locate Service payment type in Payment Type column	Badge displays "Service" with purple background color	Payment: PAY-002, Type: Service, Color: Purple (#6f42c1)	AC3 - Service purple badge validation
8	Verify purple color consistency for Service badge	Purple badge color matches specified hex value or CSS purple	CSS Color: #6f42c1 or equivalent purple	Color specification validation
9	Locate Installment payment type in Payment Type column	Badge displays "Installment" with orange background color	Payment: PAY-003, Type: Installment, Color: Orange (#fd7e14)	AC3 - Installment orange badge validation
10	Verify orange color consistency for Installment badge	Orange badge color matches specified hex value or CSS orange	CSS Color: #fd7e14 or equivalent orange	Color specification validation
11	Verify badge text readability with colored backgrounds	All badge text is clearly readable against colored backgrounds	Text contrast: White text on colored backgrounds	Accessibility validation
12	Verify badge styling consistency across all payment types	All badges have consistent size, padding, border radius, and font	Styling: Consistent badge appearance	UI consistency validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment type badges display correct colors: Billing (blue), Service (purple), Installment (orange)
• Secondary_Verifications: Color consistency, text readability, badge styling uniformity
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect colors, no unreadable text, no styling inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual badge colors and visual appearance]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other UI validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic list view validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Visual validation test requiring manual color verification
• Edge_Cases: High contrast mode, accessibility considerations
• Risk_Areas: Color blindness accessibility, cross-browser color rendering
• Security_Considerations: None specific to color coding

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Color accessibility validation for color-blind users
• Type: Accessibility
• Rationale: Ensure inclusive design compliance
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 4: Case-Insensitive Search with Partial Matching

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_004
• Title: Verify search bar accepts payment ID, method, or type keywords with case-insensitive partial matching
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-API-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-SearchService, SearchFunctionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: SearchService, Database, API-Gateway
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Search
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, API-Test-Results, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC4 - Search functionality with case-insensitive partial matching
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002, CSS01US05_TC_028

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Search service API, Database indexing, Payment service
• Performance_Baseline: Search response < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Multiple payments with various IDs, methods, and types for search testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with diverse payment data for comprehensive search testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history search permissions
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Credit Card, Billing), PAY-002 (Bank Account, Service), multiple payment methods and types
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with search bar at top	Tab: "Payment History"	Access search functionality
5	Enter exact payment ID in search bar	Search results show matching payment only	Search: "PAY-001", Expected: 1 result (PAY-001)	AC4 - Exact payment ID search
6	Clear search and enter partial payment ID	Search results show all payments matching partial ID	Search: "PAY-", Expected: All payments with PAY- prefix	AC4 - Partial payment ID search
7	Clear search and enter lowercase payment ID	Search results show matching payment (case-insensitive)	Search: "pay-001", Expected: 1 result (PAY-001)	AC4 - Case insensitive search
8	Clear search and enter partial payment method	Search results show payments matching payment method	Search: "Credit", Expected: All Credit Card payments	AC4 - Partial payment method search
9	Clear search and enter lowercase payment method	Search results show matching payments (case-insensitive)	Search: "credit card", Expected: All Credit Card payments	AC4 - Case insensitive method search
10	Clear search and enter partial payment type	Search results show payments matching payment type	Search: "Bill", Expected: All Billing payments	AC4 - Partial payment type search
11	Clear search and enter lowercase payment type	Search results show matching payments (case-insensitive)	Search: "billing", Expected: All Billing payments	AC4 - Case insensitive type search
12	Clear search and enter mixed case search term	Search results show matching payments regardless of case	Search: "BiLLing", Expected: All Billing payments	AC4 - Mixed case search validation
13	Enter non-matching search term	Search results show "No results found" message	Search: "NonExistent", Expected: "No results found"	Error handling validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Search functionality works with case-insensitive partial matching for payment ID, method, and type
• Secondary_Verifications: Search performance, result accuracy, real-time filtering
• Negative_Verification: Non-matching searches display appropriate "No results found" message

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual search results and behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: Advanced search functionality tests
• Parallel_Tests: Filter functionality tests
• Sequential_Tests: Prerequisite for combined search and filter tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical search functionality validation requiring comprehensive test coverage
• Edge_Cases: Special characters in search, very long search strings, SQL injection attempts
• Risk_Areas: Search performance, database query optimization, security validation
• Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, SQL injection prevention, XSS protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Search with special characters and SQL injection attempts
• Type: Security
• Rationale: Ensure search input is properly sanitized
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 5: Status Filter Dropdown Options

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_005
• Title: Verify status filter dropdown includes options: All Status, Completed, Failed
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-FilterService, FilterFunctionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: FilterService, Database, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Filter
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC5 - Status filter dropdown with specific options
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_006, CSS01US05_TC_007

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Filter service, Database, UI dropdown components
• Performance_Baseline: Filter response < 300ms
• Data_Requirements: Payments with different statuses: Completed, Failed for comprehensive filter testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments having different statuses
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history filter permissions
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Completed), PAY-005 (Failed), mixed status payments for filter validation
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with filters section	Tab: "Payment History"	Access filter functionality
5	Locate "Payment Status" filter dropdown in filters section	Status filter dropdown is visible and clickable	Filter Label: "Payment Status"	AC5 - Status filter presence
6	Click on Payment Status dropdown to open options	Dropdown opens showing available status filter options	Action: Click dropdown	Dropdown functionality
7	Verify "All Status" option is present and selectable	"All Status" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "All Status"	AC5 - All Status option validation
8	Verify "Completed" option is present and selectable	"Completed" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "Completed"	AC5 - Completed option validation
9	Verify "Failed" option is present and selectable	"Failed" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "Failed"	AC5 - Failed option validation
10	Select "Completed" status filter	Dropdown closes, shows only completed payments	Filter: Completed, Expected: 6 completed payments	Filter application validation
11	Verify filtered results show only completed payments	Payment list displays only payments with "Completed" status	Expected Results: Only completed status payments	Filter accuracy validation
12	Select "Failed" status filter	Dropdown closes, shows only failed payments	Filter: Failed, Expected: Failed payments only	Failed filter validation
13	Select "All Status" to reset filter	Dropdown closes, shows all payments regardless of status	Filter: All Status, Expected: All 6 payments	Reset filter validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Status filter dropdown contains exactly three options: All Status, Completed, Failed
• Secondary_Verifications: Filter functionality works correctly, dropdown UI behavior
• Negative_Verification: No unauthorized status options, proper filter reset behavior

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual dropdown options and filter behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: Combined filter tests
• Parallel_Tests: Type filter tests
• Sequential_Tests: Prerequisite for multi-filter combinations

Additional Information

• Notes: Core filter functionality validation for payment status
• Edge_Cases: No payments matching filter criteria
• Risk_Areas: Filter performance, UI responsiveness
• Security_Considerations: Input validation, unauthorized filter options

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Filter persistence during page refresh
• Type: UI Behavior
• Rationale: User experience continuity
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 6: Type Filter Dropdown Options

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_006
• Title: Verify type filter dropdown includes options: All Types, Billing, Service, Installment
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-FilterService, TypeFiltering, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: FilterService, Database, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-TypeFilter
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC6 - Type filter dropdown with specific payment type options
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_007

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Filter service, Database, UI dropdown components
• Performance_Baseline: Filter response < 300ms
• Data_Requirements: Payments of all three types: Billing, Service, Installment

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments of all payment types
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history type filter permissions
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Billing), PAY-002 (Service), PAY-003 (Installment) for comprehensive type testing
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with filters section	Tab: "Payment History"	Access filter functionality
5	Locate "Payment Type" filter dropdown in filters section	Type filter dropdown is visible and clickable	Filter Label: "Payment Type"	AC6 - Type filter presence
6	Click on Payment Type dropdown to open options	Dropdown opens showing available type filter options	Action: Click dropdown	Dropdown functionality
7	Verify "All Types" option is present and selectable	"All Types" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "All Types"	AC6 - All Types option validation
8	Verify "Billing" option is present and selectable	"Billing" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "Billing"	AC6 - Billing option validation
9	Verify "Service" option is present and selectable	"Service" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "Service"	AC6 - Service option validation
10	Verify "Installment" option is present and selectable	"Installment" option visible in dropdown list	Option: "Installment"	AC6 - Installment option validation
11	Select "Billing" type filter	Dropdown closes, shows only billing payments	Filter: Billing, Expected: 2 billing payments	Billing filter validation
12	Verify filtered results show only billing payments	Payment list displays only payments with "Billing" type badge	Expected: Only billing type payments	Filter accuracy validation
13	Select "Service" type filter	Dropdown closes, shows only service payments	Filter: Service, Expected: Service payments only	Service filter validation
14	Select "Installment" type filter	Dropdown closes, shows only installment payments	Filter: Installment, Expected: Installment payments only	Installment filter validation
15	Select "All Types" to reset filter	Dropdown closes, shows all payments regardless of type	Filter: All Types, Expected: All 6 payments	Reset filter validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Type filter dropdown contains exactly four options: All Types, Billing, Service, Installment
• Secondary_Verifications: Filter functionality works correctly for each payment type
• Negative_Verification: No unauthorized type options, proper filter reset behavior

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual dropdown options and filter behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: Combined filter tests
• Parallel_Tests: Status filter tests
• Sequential_Tests: Prerequisite for multi-filter combinations

Additional Information

• Notes: Core filter functionality validation for payment types
• Edge_Cases: No payments matching filter criteria
• Risk_Areas: Filter performance, type categorization accuracy
• Security_Considerations: Input validation, unauthorized filter manipulation

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Type filter with color badge validation during filtering
• Type: Visual Validation
• Rationale: Ensure badge colors remain consistent during filtering
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 7: Multiple Simultaneous Filters Application

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_007
• Title: Verify multiple filters can be applied simultaneously including search, status, and type filters
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, Integration, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-FilterService, Integration-SearchService, MultiFilterFunctionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 30%
• Integration_Points: FilterService, SearchService, Database, API-Gateway
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-MultiFilter
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC7 - Multiple simultaneous filters with date range capability
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Filter service, Search service, Database, API gateway for complex queries
• Performance_Baseline: Combined filter response < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Diverse payment data for comprehensive multi-filter testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with varied payments for comprehensive filter combinations
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with full payment history filter and search permissions
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Billing, Completed, Credit Card), PAY-002 (Service, Completed, Bank Account), diverse payment combinations
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with all filters available	Tab: "Payment History"	Access multi-filter functionality
5	Select "Completed" from Payment Status dropdown	Filter applied, shows only completed payments	Filter: Status = Completed, Expected: 6 completed payments	AC7 - First filter application
6	Verify status filter applied and payment count updated	Payment list shows completed payments only, counter updates	Expected: "Showing X of 6 payments" where X ≤ 6	First filter validation
7	Select "Billing" from Payment Type dropdown while status filter active	Both filters applied, shows completed billing payments only	Filter: Status = Completed AND Type = Billing, Expected: Completed billing payments	AC7 - Second filter application
8	Verify combined status and type filters show correct results	Payment list shows only completed billing payments	Expected: Payments matching both criteria	Combined filter validation
9	Enter "Credit" in search bar while both filters active	All three filters applied simultaneously	Search: "Credit" + Status = Completed + Type = Billing, Expected: Completed billing payments paid by credit card	AC7 - Third filter application
10	Verify all three filters work together correctly	Payment list shows payments matching all criteria: completed billing payments paid by credit card	Expected: Highly filtered specific results	Triple filter validation
11	Verify payment counter shows accurate filtered count	Counter displays "Showing X of 6 payments" reflecting filtered results	Expected: Accurate count of filtered results	Counter accuracy with filters
12	Add date range filter by selecting custom date range	Fourth filter applied with all previous filters maintained	Date Filter: Last 30 days + previous filters	AC7 - Date range filter addition
13	Verify all four filters work simultaneously	Payment list shows results matching all four filter criteria	Expected: Results matching search + status + type + date criteria	Comprehensive multi-filter validation
14	Verify system performance with multiple filters	Page remains responsive, filters apply within 1 second	Performance: < 1 second response time	Performance validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Multiple filters (search, status, type, date range) can be applied simultaneously and work correctly together
• Secondary_Verifications: Filter performance, accurate result counting, UI responsiveness
• Negative_Verification: No filter conflicts, proper result intersection logic

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual multi-filter behavior and results]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: High
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006
• Blocked_Tests: Advanced filtering scenarios
• Parallel_Tests: None (integration test)
• Sequential_Tests: Must execute after individual filter tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical integration test for multi-filter functionality
• Edge_Cases: No results matching all criteria, filter order dependency
• Risk_Areas: Query performance, database optimization, filter logic complexity
• Security_Considerations: Complex query injection protection, filter validation

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Filter order dependency testing (apply filters in different sequences)
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Ensure filter logic is order-independent
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 8: Payment Status Color Coding Validation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_008
• Title: Verify payment status displays with appropriate color coding: Completed (green), Failed (red)
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UIComponents, StatusVisualization, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: UI-Components, CSS-Framework
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-StatusDisplay
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC8 - Payment status color coding with specific colors
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: CSS styling framework, UI component library
• Performance_Baseline: Visual rendering < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Payments with different statuses: Completed, Failed

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments having different statuses
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Completed status), PAY-005 (Failed status) for color validation
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication validation
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access payment status display
5	Locate completed payment in Status column	Payment status shows "Completed" with green color indicator	Payment: PAY-001, Status: Completed, Color: Green (#28a745)	AC8 - Completed green status validation
6	Verify green color specification for completed status	Green color matches CSS specification or equivalent	CSS Color: #28a745 or success green	Color specification validation
7	Locate failed payment in Status column	Payment status shows "Failed" with red color indicator	Payment: PAY-005, Status: Failed, Color: Red (#dc3545)	AC8 - Failed red status validation
8	Verify red color specification for failed status	Red color matches CSS specification or equivalent	CSS Color: #dc3545 or danger red	Color specification validation
9	Verify status text readability with colored backgrounds	Status text is clearly readable against colored backgrounds	Text contrast: White or dark text on colored backgrounds	Accessibility validation
10	Check status color consistency across multiple completed payments	All completed payments use same green color consistently	Multiple completed payments: Consistent green color	Color consistency validation
11	Check status color consistency across multiple failed payments (if available)	All failed payments use same red color consistently	Multiple failed payments: Consistent red color	Color consistency validation
12	Verify status color persistence during filtering	Status colors remain consistent when filters are applied	Apply filters: Colors maintain consistency	Color persistence validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment status displays correct colors: Completed (green), Failed (red)
• Secondary_Verifications: Color consistency, text readability, color persistence
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect colors, no color inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual status colors and visual appearance]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other UI validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic list view validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Visual validation test requiring manual color verification
• Edge_Cases: High contrast mode, accessibility considerations
• Risk_Areas: Color accessibility for color-blind users, cross-browser color rendering
• Security_Considerations: None specific to status color coding

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Status color accessibility for color-blind users
• Type: Accessibility
• Rationale: Ensure inclusive design compliance
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 9: Payment Methods Clear Display

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_009
• Title: Verify payment methods are clearly shown in list view (Credit Card, Bank Account, etc.)
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-PaymentService, PaymentMethodDisplay, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-PaymentMethods
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Cross-Browser-Results
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC9 - Payment methods clearly displayed in list view
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, UI display components
• Performance_Baseline: Method display rendering < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Payments with different payment methods

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments using different payment methods
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Credit Card), PAY-002 (Bank Account), diverse payment methods
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access payment method display
5	Locate Credit Card payment method in Payment Method column	Payment method displays "Credit Card" clearly and prominently	Payment: PAY-001, Method: Credit Card	AC9 - Credit Card method clarity
6	Verify Credit Card text is readable and properly formatted	Text is legible, properly spaced, and consistently formatted	Expected: Clear "Credit Card" text	Text readability validation
7	Locate Bank Account payment method in Payment Method column	Payment method displays "Bank Account" clearly and prominently	Payment: PAY-002, Method: Bank Account	AC9 - Bank Account method clarity
8	Verify Bank Account text is readable and properly formatted	Text is legible, properly spaced, and consistently formatted	Expected: Clear "Bank Account" text	Text readability validation
9	Check Payment Method column alignment and spacing	Column is properly aligned with adequate spacing between entries	Expected: Consistent column alignment	UI consistency validation
10	Verify payment method data accuracy matches payment records	Displayed methods match actual payment transaction data	Expected: Accurate method representation	Data accuracy validation
11	Test payment method display with different browser zoom levels	Methods remain clearly visible at 90%, 100%, 110% zoom	Zoom levels: 90%, 100%, 110%	Display scalability validation
12	Verify payment method column header is clear and descriptive	Column header "Payment Method" is visible and appropriately labeled	Expected: "Payment Method" header	Column identification validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment methods (Credit Card, Bank Account) are clearly displayed and easily readable
• Secondary_Verifications: Text formatting consistency, column alignment, data accuracy
• Negative_Verification: No unclear text, no formatting inconsistencies, no misaligned columns

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual payment method display and readability]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other display validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic list view validation

Additional Information

• Notes: UI validation test ensuring payment method clarity for user comprehension
• Edge_Cases: Very long payment method names, special payment types
• Risk_Areas: Text truncation, responsive design consistency
• Security_Considerations: None specific to payment method display

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Payment method display with very long method names
• Type: UI Edge Case
• Rationale: Ensure text truncation or wrapping works properly
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 10: Detail View Button Functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_010
• Title: Verify Detail View button for each payment transaction opens detailed payment information
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PaymentService, DetailViewAccess, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, UI-DetailView, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-DetailAccess
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC10 - Detail View button opens detailed payment information
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002, CSS01US05_TC_017

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Detail view modal/page components, Database
• Performance_Baseline: Detail view open < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Multiple payments for detail view testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with multiple payments for detail view access
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment detail view permissions
• Test_Data: PAY-001, PAY-002, PAY-003 with complete payment information
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list and detail buttons	Tab: "Payment History"	Access detail view functionality
5	Verify "View Details" button presence for first payment	Button labeled "View Details" is visible and clickable for first payment	Payment: PAY-001, Button: "View Details"	AC10 - Detail button presence
6	Click "View Details" button for first payment	Detail view opens displaying comprehensive payment information	Payment: PAY-001, Action: Click "View Details"	AC10 - Detail view opening
7	Verify detail view contains complete payment information	Detail view shows Payment ID, Amount, Date, Method, Status, Type	Expected: Complete payment details for PAY-001	AC10 - Information completeness
8	Verify detail view modal/page loads properly	Detail view interface loads without errors and displays correctly	Expected: Proper UI rendering	Detail view functionality
9	Close detail view and return to payment list	Detail view closes, returns to payment history list successfully	Action: Close detail view, Expected: Return to list	Navigation flow validation
10	Click "View Details" for second payment	Detail view opens for different payment with correct information	Payment: PAY-002, Expected: PAY-002 details	AC10 - Different payment access
11	Verify detail view shows correct payment information	Detail view displays information specific to selected payment	Expected: PAY-002 specific details	Payment-specific validation
12	Test detail view button for third payment	Detail view opens for third payment with accurate data	Payment: PAY-003, Expected: PAY-003 details	Multiple payment validation
13	Verify all detail view buttons are functional	All "View Details" buttons in payment list work correctly	Expected: All buttons functional	Comprehensive button testing

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Detail View button opens detailed payment information for each payment transaction
• Secondary_Verifications: Detail view content accuracy, navigation flow, UI functionality
• Negative_Verification: No broken detail views, no incorrect payment information display

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual detail view behavior and content]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_017, CSS01US05_TC_018
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires sequential detail view access)
• Sequential_Tests: Prerequisite for all detail view content tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Foundation test for detail view access functionality
• Edge_Cases: Detail view with incomplete data, network interruption during load
• Risk_Areas: Detail view performance, data loading accuracy
• Security_Considerations: Authorized access only, payment data protection in detail view

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Detail view accessibility via keyboard navigation
• Type: Accessibility
• Rationale: Ensure detail view access for keyboard-only users
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 11: Clear Button Reset Functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_011
• Title: Verify Clear button resets all applied filters and search criteria to default state
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-FilterService, ResetFunctionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: FilterService, SearchService, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Reset
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC11 - Clear button resets all filters and search criteria
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006, CSS01US05_TC_007

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Filter service, Search service, UI reset functionality
• Performance_Baseline: Reset action < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Multiple payments for comprehensive reset testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment history for filter and reset testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history filter and reset permissions
• Test_Data: 6 payments total for comprehensive reset validation
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with all filters and search	Tab: "Payment History"	Access reset functionality
5	Enter search term in search bar	Search filter applied, results filtered	Search: "PAY-001", Expected: 1 result	Apply first filter for reset testing
6	Select "Completed" from Payment Status dropdown	Status filter applied with search active	Filter: Status = Completed, Expected: Completed payments matching search	Apply second filter
7	Select "Billing" from Payment Type dropdown	Type filter applied with search and status active	Filter: Type = Billing, Expected: Payments matching all criteria	Apply third filter
8	Verify multiple filters are active simultaneously	Payment list shows filtered results, counter shows reduced count	Expected: "Showing X of 6 payments" where X < 6	Multi-filter state validation
9	Locate and click "Clear" button in filters section	Clear button is clickable and accessible	Button: "Clear" or "Reset Filters"	AC11 - Clear button access
10	Verify search field is cleared after clicking Clear	Search bar becomes empty, no search term visible	Expected: Empty search field	AC11 - Search reset validation
11	Verify Payment Status filter returns to "All Status"	Status dropdown shows "All Status" as selected option	Expected: "All Status" selected	AC11 - Status filter reset validation
12	Verify Payment Type filter returns to "All Types"	Type dropdown shows "All Types" as selected option	Expected: "All Types" selected	AC11 - Type filter reset validation
13	Verify complete payment list is restored	Payment list shows all 6 payments without any filtering	Expected: All 6 payments displayed	AC11 - Complete list restoration
14	Verify payment counter shows full count	Counter displays "Showing 6 of 6 payments"	Expected: "Showing 6 of 6 payments"	Full count restoration validation
15	Verify page performance during reset action	Reset completes within 500ms, UI remains responsive	Performance: < 500ms reset time	Performance validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Clear button resets all filters (search, status, type) and restores complete payment list
• Secondary_Verifications: Reset performance, UI responsiveness, filter state validation
• Negative_Verification: No partial resets, no filter persistence after clear

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual reset behavior and filter states]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires filter state setup)
• Sequential_Tests: Must execute after filter functionality tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical reset functionality ensuring user can return to default state
• Edge_Cases: No filters applied scenario, partial filter combinations
• Risk_Areas: Filter state management, UI synchronization
• Security_Considerations: Proper state cleanup, no data exposure

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Clear button behavior when no filters are applied
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Ensure graceful handling of reset in default state
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 12: Default Date Sorting Descending Order

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_012
• Title: Verify payments are sorted by date in descending order (most recent first) by default
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, API, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, DefaultSorting, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Database, SortingService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Sorting
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC12 - Default date sorting in descending order
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database sorting functionality, Payment service API
• Performance_Baseline: Sorting operation < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Multiple payments with different dates for sorting validation

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments spanning multiple dates
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: Payments with dates: Mar 5, 2025 (PAY-001), Feb 8, 2025 (PAY-002), Jan 10, 2025 (PAY-003), Dec 8, 2024 (PAY-004), Nov 15, 2024 (PAY-005), Oct 22, 2024 (PAY-006)
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access default sorting validation
5	Verify first payment has most recent date	First row shows payment with date: Mar 5, 2025	Payment: PAY-001, Date: Mar 5, 2025	AC12 - Most recent date first
6	Verify second payment has second most recent date	Second row shows payment with date: Feb 8, 2025	Payment: PAY-002, Date: Feb 8, 2025	AC12 - Descending date sequence
7	Verify third payment has third most recent date	Third row shows payment with date: Jan 10, 2025	Payment: PAY-003, Date: Jan 10, 2025	AC12 - Date sequence continuation
8	Verify fourth payment has fourth most recent date	Fourth row shows payment with date: Dec 8, 2024	Payment: PAY-004, Date: Dec 8, 2024	AC12 - Year transition validation
9	Verify fifth payment has fifth most recent date	Fifth row shows payment with date: Nov 15, 2024	Payment: PAY-005, Date: Nov 15, 2024	AC12 - Continued descending order
10	Verify last payment has oldest date	Last row shows payment with date: Oct 22, 2024	Payment: PAY-006, Date: Oct 22, 2024	AC12 - Oldest date last validation
11	Verify complete date sequence is descending	Full sequence: Mar 2025 → Feb 2025 → Jan 2025 → Dec 2024 → Nov 2024 → Oct 2024	Expected: Descending chronological order	AC12 - Complete sequence validation
12	Refresh page and verify sorting persists	After page refresh, sorting remains in descending date order	Action: Page refresh, Expected: Same sort order	Default sorting persistence

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payments are sorted by date in descending order (most recent first) by default
• Secondary_Verifications: Sorting persistence after page refresh, correct date formatting
• Negative_Verification: No ascending order, no random ordering, no date inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual payment order and dates]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other data validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Foundation for sorting-related tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Foundation test validating default data presentation order
• Edge_Cases: Payments with same date, timezone considerations
• Risk_Areas: Database sorting configuration, date handling across timezones
• Security_Considerations: None specific to date sorting

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Sorting behavior with payments having identical timestamps
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Ensure consistent secondary sorting logic
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 13: Payment Counter Display Validation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_013
• Title: Verify "Showing X of Y payments" counter displays below filters and updates accurately
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-FilterService, CounterDisplay, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: FilterService, Database, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Counter
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC13 - Payment counter display below filters
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004, CSS01US05_TC_005, CSS01US05_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Filter service, Database, UI counter components
• Performance_Baseline: Counter update < 200ms
• Data_Requirements: 6 payments total for accurate counter testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with 6 payments for counter validation
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: 6 total payments for comprehensive counter testing
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment counter	Tab: "Payment History"	Access counter functionality
5	Locate payment counter below filters section	Counter is positioned below filter controls and above payment table	Expected: Counter below filters	AC13 - Counter position validation
6	Verify initial counter display shows full count	Counter displays "Showing 6 of 6 payments" for complete list	Expected: "Showing 6 of 6 payments"	AC13 - Full count display
7	Apply status filter to "Completed"	Counter updates to show filtered count	Filter: Completed, Expected: "Showing 6 of 6 payments"	AC13 - Filtered count update
8	Verify counter accuracy with status filter	Counter shows correct count of completed payments	Expected: Accurate completed payment count	Counter accuracy validation
9	Apply additional type filter to "Billing"	Counter updates to show combined filter results	Filter: Completed + Billing, Expected: Updated count	Multiple filter counter update
10	Enter search term to further filter results	Counter updates to show search result count	Search: "PAY-001", Expected: "Showing 1 of 6 payments"	Search filter counter update
11	Verify counter shows accurate search result count	Counter displays correct count for search results	Expected: "Showing X of 6 payments" where X = search results	Search accuracy validation
12	Click "Clear" button to reset all filters	Counter returns to full count display	Action: Clear, Expected: "Showing 6 of 6 payments"	Reset counter validation
13	Verify counter format and styling consistency	Counter text is properly formatted and consistently styled	Expected: Consistent counter appearance	Counter presentation validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment counter displays "Showing X of Y payments" below filters and updates accurately
• Secondary_Verifications: Counter positioning, format consistency, real-time updates
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect counts, no missing counter updates

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual counter behavior and accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Filter functionality tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic filter tests

Additional Information

• Notes: UI element validation ensuring accurate result count communication
• Edge_Cases: Zero results counter, very large result counts
• Risk_Areas: Counter synchronization with filter results
• Security_Considerations: None specific to counter display

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Counter behavior with zero search results
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Ensure proper handling of empty result sets
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 14: Unique Payment ID Generation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_014
• Title: Verify system generates unique Payment IDs from transaction IDs and references
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, API, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-API-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PaymentService, UniqueIDGeneration, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, Database, ID-Generation-Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-IDGeneration
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, API-Test-Results, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC14 - Unique Payment ID generation from transaction IDs and references
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Database, ID generation service
• Performance_Baseline: ID generation < 100ms
• Data_Requirements: Multiple payments for uniqueness validation

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with multiple payments for ID validation
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: Multiple payments: PAY-001, PAY-002, PAY-003, PAY-004, PAY-005, PAY-006
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access Payment ID validation
5	Verify Payment ID format consistency	All Payment IDs follow consistent format pattern	Expected: PAY-001, PAY-002, PAY-003 format	AC14 - Format consistency validation
6	Check Payment ID uniqueness across all payments	All displayed Payment IDs are unique with no duplicates	IDs: PAY-001, PAY-002, PAY-003, PAY-004, PAY-005, PAY-006	AC14 - Uniqueness validation
7	Verify Payment ID sequential pattern	Payment IDs follow logical sequential numbering	Expected: Sequential increment pattern	ID sequence validation
8	Refresh page and verify Payment ID persistence	Same payments display same Payment IDs after refresh	Action: Page refresh, Expected: Consistent IDs	AC14 - ID persistence validation
9	Navigate away and return to verify ID stability	Payment IDs remain stable across navigation sessions	Action: Navigate away and return, Expected: Same IDs	ID stability validation
10	Verify Payment ID length and character constraints	All IDs meet specified length and character requirements	Expected: Consistent ID length and format	Format specification validation
11	Check Payment ID integration with transaction references	Payment IDs properly correlate with underlying transaction data	Expected: Proper transaction correlation	Reference integration validation
12	Verify no Payment ID conflicts or overlaps	No duplicate or conflicting Payment IDs exist in system	Expected: Zero conflicts across all payments	Conflict prevention validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System generates unique Payment IDs with consistent format and no duplicates
• Secondary_Verifications: ID persistence, format consistency, sequence logic
• Negative_Verification: No duplicate IDs, no format inconsistencies, no ID conflicts

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual Payment ID patterns and uniqueness validation]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other data integrity tests
• Sequential_Tests: Foundation for payment identification

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical data integrity test ensuring unique payment identification
• Edge_Cases: High volume payment scenarios, concurrent payment processing
• Risk_Areas: ID collision prevention, database constraints, system scalability
• Security_Considerations: Payment ID predictability, unauthorized access prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Payment ID generation under high concurrent load
• Type: Performance/Integrity
• Rationale: Ensure uniqueness under stress conditions
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 15: 24-Month Default Display Period

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_015
• Title: Verify payment history displays transactions from past 24 months by default
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, API, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, DateRangeDefault, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Database, DateFilterService, PaymentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-DateRange
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC15 - 24-month default display period
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002, CSS01US05_TC_012

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database date filtering, Payment service, Date calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: Date range filtering < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Payments spanning multiple time periods for range validation

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments spanning different time periods
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: Payments from various dates within and outside 24-month range
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with default date range	Tab: "Payment History"	Access date range validation
5	Check oldest payment date in displayed list	Oldest payment is within 24 months from current date	Current Date: Aug 2025, Oldest: Aug 2023 or later	AC15 - 24-month range validation
6	Verify no payments older than 24 months are displayed	Payment list contains no payments older than 24 months	Expected: No payments before Aug 2023	AC15 - Range limitation validation
7	Calculate date range from current date	Verify range spans exactly 24 months from current date	Calculation: Aug 2025 - 24 months = Aug 2023	Date calculation validation
8	Verify most recent payments are included	Current an# Enhanced Consumer Payment History Management Test Cases

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment history displays only transactions from past 24 months by default
• Secondary_Verifications: Date calculation accuracy, automatic range application, range persistence
• Negative_Verification: No payments older than 24 months displayed, no manual range selection required

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual date range behavior and payment inclusion]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Date-related functionality tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic list display validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Business rule validation ensuring appropriate historical data display
• Edge_Cases: Account creation date less than 24 months ago, timezone considerations
• Risk_Areas: Date calculation accuracy, timezone handling, leap year considerations
• Security_Considerations: Data access within appropriate time boundaries

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Date range behavior across timezone changes
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Ensure consistent date range calculation across timezones
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 16: Real-Time Status Updates

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_016
• Title: Verify system shows real-time payment status updates without requiring page refresh
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Integration, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PaymentService, RealTimeUpdates, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, WebSocket/Polling, Real-time Updates
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-RealTime
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Performance-Metrics, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC16 - Real-time status updates without page refresh
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_008

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Real-time update service, WebSocket/Polling mechanism
• Performance_Baseline: Status update propagation < 5 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Payments with changeable status for real-time testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments that can have status changes
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: Payments with various statuses that can be updated in real-time
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_008 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with current payment statuses	Tab: "Payment History"	Access real-time functionality
5	Note current payment statuses for all payments	Record current status of each payment in the list	Expected: Current status baseline	AC16 - Baseline status recording
6	Keep payment history page open without refreshing	Page remains open and active for real-time monitoring	Action: Keep page open	Real-time monitoring setup
7	Simulate payment status change in backend (if possible)	Payment status updates automatically in UI without refresh	Simulated status change	AC16 - Real-time update validation
8	Monitor for automatic status updates	Status changes appear automatically within expected timeframe	Expected: Automatic status updates within 5 seconds	Update timing validation
9	Verify visual indicators for status changes	Status changes include visual feedback (color changes, animations)	Expected: Visual status change indicators	Visual feedback validation
10	Test multiple payment status updates simultaneously	Multiple status changes are handled correctly	Multiple payments with status changes	Concurrent update handling
11	Verify summary cards update with status changes	Summary cards reflect updated payment statuses automatically	Expected: Summary card updates	Summary synchronization
12	Confirm no page refresh is required	Status updates occur without any manual page refresh	AC16 - No refresh requirement	Manual refresh independence
13	Test real-time update consistency during filtering	Status updates work correctly when filters are applied	Apply filters, verify updates continue	Filtered state update validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment status updates appear in real-time without requiring page refresh
• Secondary_Verifications: Update timing, visual feedback, summary card synchronization
• Negative_Verification: No missed updates, no delayed status changes, no refresh requirements

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual real-time update behavior and timing]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: High
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_008
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires controlled status changes)
• Sequential_Tests: Must execute after status display validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Complex integration test requiring backend coordination for status changes
• Edge_Cases: Network interruption during updates, browser tab switching
• Risk_Areas: WebSocket connection stability, polling frequency optimization
• Security_Considerations: Real-time data security, unauthorized update prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Real-time update behavior during network connectivity issues
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Ensure graceful handling of connectivity problems
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 17: Payment Information Section Detail View

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_017
• Title: Verify Payment Information section in detail view displays Payment ID, Amount, Payment Date, Payment Method, Status, Payment Type
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Database, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PaymentService, DetailView, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, Database, UI-DetailView
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-DetailView
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC17 - Payment Information section with specific fields
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_010, CSS01US05_TC_018

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Detail view modal/page components
• Performance_Baseline: Detail view load < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Complete payment information for detail display

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment containing complete information
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment detail view access
• Test_Data: PAY-001 with complete data: $78.45, Mar 5, 2025, Credit Card, Completed, Billing
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_010 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access detail view functionality
5	Click "View Details" button for first payment	Detail view opens showing payment information	Payment: PAY-001, Action: "View Details"	AC17 - Detail view access
6	Verify "Payment Information" section header exists	Section header "Payment Information" is visible and properly styled	Expected: "Payment Information" section header	AC17 - Section identification
7	Verify Payment ID field display	Field shows "Payment ID: PAY-001" with proper labeling	Expected: Payment ID: PAY-001	AC17 - Payment ID field validation
8	Verify Amount field display	Field shows "Amount: $78.45" with currency formatting	Expected: Amount: $78.45	AC17 - Amount field validation
9	Verify Payment Date field display	Field shows "Payment Date: Mar 5, 2025" with proper date format	Expected: Payment Date: Mar 5, 2025	AC17 - Payment Date field validation
10	Verify Payment Method field display	Field shows "Payment Method: Credit Card" with method details	Expected: Payment Method: Credit Card	AC17 - Payment Method field validation
11	Verify Status field display	Field shows "Status: Completed" with status information	Expected: Status: Completed	AC17 - Status field validation
12	Verify Payment Type field display	Field shows "Payment Type: Billing" with type information	Expected: Payment Type: Billing	AC17 - Payment Type field validation
13	Verify all fields are properly formatted and aligned	All Payment Information fields have consistent formatting and alignment	Expected: Consistent field formatting	Field presentation validation
14	Close detail view and open different payment	Detail view closes and opens for different payment with correct data	Payment: PAY-002, Expected: Different payment details	Multi-payment validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment Information section displays all six required fields with accurate data
• Secondary_Verifications: Field formatting, section styling, data accuracy
• Negative_Verification: No missing fields, no incorrect data display

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual detail view content and field display]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_010
• Blocked_Tests: Payment Details section tests
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires detail view state)
• Sequential_Tests: Prerequisite for contextual detail tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Core detail view validation ensuring complete payment information display
• Edge_Cases: Missing payment information, partial data scenarios
• Risk_Areas: Data completeness, field rendering consistency
• Security_Considerations: Sensitive payment data protection in detail view

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Detail view accessibility and keyboard navigation
• Type: Accessibility
• Rationale: Ensure detail view is accessible to all users
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 18: Contextual Payment Details Display

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_018
• Title: Verify Payment Details section shows contextual information: Bill Number for Billing, Service ID for Service, Installment Number for Installment
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PaymentService, ContextualData, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, BillingService, ServiceManagement, InstallmentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-ContextualDetails
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC18 - Contextual payment details based on payment type
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_017, CSS01US05_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Billing service, Service management system, Installment service
• Performance_Baseline: Detail view load < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Payments of all three types with contextual identifiers

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments of all three types with proper contextual data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment detail view access
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Billing, Bill Number: BILL-12345), PAY-002 (Service, Service ID: SRV-67890), PAY-003 (Installment, Installment Number: INST-001)
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_017 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access contextual detail functionality
5	Click "View Details" for billing payment	Detail view opens for billing payment	Payment: PAY-001, Type: Billing	AC18 - Billing payment detail access
6	Verify "Payment Details" section header exists	Section header "Payment Details" is visible below Payment Information	Expected: "Payment Details" section header	Section identification
7	Verify Bill Number field for billing payment	Field shows "Bill Number: BILL-12345" for billing payment type	Expected: Bill Number: BILL-12345	AC18 - Billing contextual data validation
8	Close detail view and navigate back to payment list	Detail view closes, returns to payment history list	Action: Close detail view	Navigation validation
9	Click "View Details" for service payment	Detail view opens for service payment	Payment: PAY-002, Type: Service	AC18 - Service payment detail access
10	Verify Service ID field for service payment	Field shows "Service ID: SRV-67890" for service payment type	Expected: Service ID: SRV-67890	AC18 - Service contextual data validation
11	Close detail view and navigate back to payment list	Detail view closes, returns to payment history list	Action: Close detail view	Navigation validation
12	Click "View Details" for installment payment	Detail view opens for installment payment	Payment: PAY-003, Type: Installment	AC18 - Installment payment detail access
13	Verify Installment Number field for installment payment	Field shows "Installment Number: INST-001" for installment payment type	Expected: Installment Number: INST-001	AC18 - Installment contextual data validation
14	Verify contextual field changes based on payment type	Each payment type shows different contextual field appropriately	Expected: Type-specific contextual information	Dynamic contextual validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment Details section displays contextual information based on payment type: Bill Number (Billing), Service ID (Service), Installment Number (Installment)
• Secondary_Verifications: Field labeling accuracy, data format consistency, section organization
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect contextual data, no missing type-specific information

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual contextual details for each payment type]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_017
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires specific payment type data)
• Sequential_Tests: Must execute after Payment Information section validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical validation of contextual data integration across payment types
• Edge_Cases: Missing contextual identifiers, malformed ID formats
• Risk_Areas: Data integration accuracy, service dependencies
• Security_Considerations: Contextual identifier data protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Contextual data validation with missing or invalid identifiers
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Ensure graceful handling of incomplete contextual data
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 19: Recorded By Field Display

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_019
• Title: Verify Recorded By field shows "System" for self-service payments or actual user name for manual entries
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PaymentService, RecordedByField, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, UserManagement, AuditTrail
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-RecordedBy
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC19 - Recorded By field display based on payment source
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_017, CSS01US05_TC_018

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, User management system, Audit trail service
• Performance_Baseline: Detail view load < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Payments from both self-service and manual entry sources

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments from different sources (self-service and manual)
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment detail view access
• Test_Data: Self-service payment and manual payment with different recorded by values
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_017 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access recorded by field validation
5	Click "View Details" for self-service payment	Detail view opens for self-service payment	Payment: Self-service payment	AC19 - Self-service detail access
6	Locate "Recorded By" field in Payment Details section	Field is visible in Payment Details section	Expected: "Recorded By" field present	Field identification
7	Verify "Recorded By" field shows "System" for self-service	Field displays "Recorded By: System" for self-service payment	Expected: "Recorded By: System"	AC19 - Self-service validation
8	Close detail view and return to payment list	Detail view closes, returns to payment list	Action: Close detail view	Navigation flow
9	Click "View Details" for manual payment entry (if available)	Detail view opens for manual payment entry	Payment: Manual entry payment	AC19 - Manual entry detail access
10	Verify "Recorded By" field shows actual user name for manual entry	Field displays "Recorded By: [Staff Name]" for manual entry	Expected: "Recorded By: Staff Member Name"	AC19 - Manual entry validation
11	Verify field formatting and consistency	"Recorded By" field has consistent formatting across payment types	Expected: Consistent field presentation	Field formatting validation
12	Test multiple self-service payments	All self-service payments show "System" consistently	Multiple self-service payments	Consistency validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Recorded By field shows "System" for self-service payments and actual user names for manual entries
• Secondary_Verifications: Field formatting consistency, proper source identification
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect source attribution, no missing recorded by information

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual recorded by field values and source attribution]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_017
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other detail view field tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after Payment Details section validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Audit trail validation ensuring proper payment source tracking
• Edge_Cases: Payments with missing source information, system name variations
• Risk_Areas: Source attribution accuracy, audit trail integrity
• Security_Considerations: User identity protection, audit trail security

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Recorded By field behavior with missing or corrupted source data
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Ensure graceful handling of incomplete audit information
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 20: Payment For Column Context Display

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_020
• Title: Verify Payment For column in list view shows relevant identifier (Bill Number/Service ID/Installment Number)
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PaymentService, PaymentForColumn, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, BillingService, ServiceManagement, InstallmentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-PaymentFor
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC20 - Payment For column shows relevant identifier based on payment type
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002, CSS01US05_TC_018

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Billing service, Service management, Installment service
• Performance_Baseline: Column data load < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Payments of all three types with proper identifiers

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payments of all types with contextual identifiers
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: PAY-001 (Billing, Bill-12345), PAY-002 (Service, Service-67890), PAY-003 (Installment, Installment-001)
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with payment list	Tab: "Payment History"	Access Payment For column validation
5	Locate "Payment For" column header in payment table	Column header "Payment For" is visible and properly labeled	Expected: "Payment For" column header	AC20 - Column identification
6	Find billing payment in list and check Payment For value	Payment For column shows "Bill-12345" for billing payment	Payment: PAY-001 (Billing), Expected: "Bill-12345"	AC20 - Billing identifier validation
7	Find service payment in list and check Payment For value	Payment For column shows "Service-67890" for service payment	Payment: PAY-002 (Service), Expected: "Service-67890"	AC20 - Service identifier validation
8	Find installment payment in list and check Payment For value	Payment For column shows "Installment-001" for installment payment	Payment: PAY-003 (Installment), Expected: "Installment-001"	AC20 - Installment identifier validation
9	Verify identifier format consistency across payment types	All identifiers follow consistent "Type-Number" format pattern	Expected: Consistent format pattern	AC20 - Format consistency validation
10	Check Payment For column alignment and readability	Column data is properly aligned and easily readable	Expected: Proper column alignment	Column presentation validation
11	Verify Payment For values match payment type context	Identifiers correctly correspond to payment type (billing, service, installment)	Expected: Correct type-identifier correlation	Context accuracy validation
12	Test Payment For column during filtering	Payment For values remain accurate when filters are applied	Apply filters, verify identifier accuracy	Filtered state validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment For column shows correct contextual identifiers: Bill Number for Billing, Service ID for Service, Installment Number for Installment
• Secondary_Verifications: Format consistency, column alignment, context accuracy
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect identifiers, no mismatched payment types

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual Payment For column values and context accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other contextual data tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic list view validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Contextual data validation ensuring proper payment identification in list view
• Edge_Cases: Missing identifiers, malformed identifier formats
• Risk_Areas: Data integration accuracy, identifier correlation
• Security_Considerations: Identifier data protection, unauthorized access prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Payment For column behavior with missing or invalid identifiers
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Ensure graceful handling of incomplete contextual data
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 21: Responsive Design Mobile and Desktop

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_021
• Title: Verify responsive design for mobile and desktop viewing
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-Mobile-Compatibility, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-UIComponents, ResponsiveDesign, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: UI-Components, CSS-Framework
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Responsive
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Cross-Browser-Results, Mobile-Compatibility, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC21 - Responsive design for mobile and desktop viewing
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
• Dependencies: CSS responsive framework, UI component library
• Performance_Baseline: Layout adaptation < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Standard payment data for responsive testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment history for responsive testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: 6 payments for layout testing across different screen sizes
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads at desktop resolution	Tab: "Payment History"	Access responsive design validation
5	Verify desktop layout at 1920x1080 resolution	All elements properly displayed, table columns visible	Resolution: 1920x1080	AC21 - Desktop layout validation
6	Resize browser to tablet dimensions (1024x768)	Layout adapts responsively, maintains functionality	Resolution: 1024x768	AC21 - Tablet responsiveness
7	Verify tablet layout functionality	All interactive elements remain accessible and functional	Expected: Functional tablet layout	Tablet functionality validation
8	Resize browser to mobile dimensions (375x667)	Layout adapts to mobile view, potentially with stacked elements	Resolution: 375x667	AC21 - Mobile responsiveness
9	Verify mobile layout usability	Payment list remains usable, filters accessible, buttons touchable	Expected: Usable mobile interface	Mobile usability validation
10	Test horizontal scrolling on mobile if needed	Horizontal scroll works smoothly for table data	Mobile horizontal scroll	Mobile data access
11	Verify summary cards responsiveness	Summary cards stack or resize appropriately across screen sizes	Expected: Responsive summary cards	Card responsiveness
12	Test filter functionality across all screen sizes	Filters work consistently across desktop, tablet, and mobile	All resolutions: Functional filters	Cross-resolution functionality
13	Verify text readability at all resolutions	Text remains readable and properly sized across screen sizes	Expected: Readable text at all sizes	Text scalability validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment history interface adapts responsively for mobile and desktop viewing
• Secondary_Verifications: Functionality preservation, text readability, element accessibility
• Negative_Verification: No broken layouts, no inaccessible elements, no functionality loss

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual responsive behavior across different screen sizes]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other UI validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic layout validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical responsive design validation for multi-device accessibility
• Edge_Cases: Very small screen sizes, landscape/portrait orientation changes
• Risk_Areas: CSS breakpoint accuracy, touch interface usability
• Security_Considerations: None specific to responsive design

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Responsive behavior during orientation changes on mobile devices
• Type: UI Behavior
• Rationale: Ensure layout stability during device rotation
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 22: Performance Load Time Validation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_022
• Title: Verify payment history loads within 3 seconds under normal conditions
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Performance, API, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PaymentService, LoadTime, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: PaymentService, Database, API-Gateway
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Performance
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC22 - Payment history loads within 3 seconds under normal conditions
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_001, CSS01US05_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Payment service API, Database, Network with standard bandwidth
• Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Standard 6 payments for realistic load testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with standard payment history data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: 6 payments with complete data for performance testing
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache and cookies	Browser cache cleared, fresh state established	Action: Clear cache	Performance baseline setup
2	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Login page loads within acceptable time	URL: smart360 tenant	Initial load performance
3	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login completes within 2 seconds	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication performance
4	Start performance timer for payment history load	Timer initiated for load time measurement	Timer: Start measurement	AC22 - Performance measurement start
5	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Page loads within 1 second	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigation performance
6	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment history dashboard loads completely within 3 seconds	Tab: "Payment History", Expected: < 3 seconds	AC22 - Load time validation
7	Stop performance timer and record load time	Total load time recorded and verified against 3-second requirement	Expected: ≤ 3.0 seconds	Load time verification
8	Verify all elements are fully loaded	Summary cards, payment list, filters all visible and functional	Expected: Complete page functionality	Complete load validation
9	Test multiple consecutive loads	Subsequent loads maintain performance consistency	Multiple loads: Each < 3 seconds	Performance consistency
10	Measure individual component load times	Summary cards < 1s, payment list < 2s, filters < 0.5s	Component timing breakdown	Component performance
11	Test performance with browser refresh	Page refresh completes within 3 seconds	Action: Refresh, Expected: < 3 seconds	Refresh performance
12	Verify performance under normal network conditions	Standard broadband connection maintains sub-3-second loads	Network: Standard broadband	Network condition validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment history loads within 3 seconds under normal conditions
• Secondary_Verifications: Component load times, consistency across multiple loads
• Negative_Verification: No load times exceeding 3 seconds, no incomplete page loads

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual load times and performance metrics]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires controlled performance conditions)
• Sequential_Tests: Should be run in isolation for accurate measurements

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical performance validation ensuring acceptable user experience
• Edge_Cases: Slow network conditions, high server load scenarios
• Risk_Areas: Database query optimization, API response times, network latency
• Security_Considerations: Performance testing should not expose sensitive timing information

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Performance under high concurrent user load
• Type: Performance Stress
• Rationale: Ensure performance scales with user volume
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 23: Session Maintenance During Navigation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_023
• Title: Verify user session is maintained during payment history navigation
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Security, Authentication, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-AuthService, SessionMaintenance, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: AuthService, SessionManagement, PaymentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Session
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC23 - User session maintained during payment history navigation
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_030

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication service, Session management, Payment service
• Performance_Baseline: Session validation < 200ms
• Data_Requirements: Valid session with payment history access

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with valid session management
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history navigation permissions
• Test_Data: Valid session tokens and payment history data
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication test must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Session establishment
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, session established	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	AC23 - Session creation
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Navigation successful, session maintained	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Session during navigation
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment history loads, session remains valid	Tab: "Payment History"	AC23 - Session persistence
5	Navigate to different tabs within billing section	Session maintained across tab switches	Tabs: View Bills, Services, Installments	Multi-tab session validation
6	Return to Payment History tab	Previous session state preserved, no re-authentication required	Expected: Immediate access	Session state preservation
7	Apply filters and search in payment history	Session maintained during filtering operations	Apply multiple filters	Session during operations
8	Click detail view for payment	Detail view opens without session interruption	Payment detail access	Session during detail access
9	Navigate back to main dashboard and return	Session persists across dashboard navigation	Dashboard → Payment History	Cross-section navigation
10	Verify session timeout handling	Session remains valid within expected timeout period	Expected: Valid session maintained	Session timeout validation
11	Test browser back/forward navigation	Session maintained during browser navigation	Browser back/forward buttons	Browser navigation session
12	Verify no unexpected authentication prompts	No re-authentication required during normal navigation	Expected: Seamless navigation	AC23 - No auth interruption

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: User session is maintained throughout payment history navigation without interruption
• Secondary_Verifications: Session state preservation, timeout handling, cross-section navigation
• Negative_Verification: No unexpected logouts, no re-authentication prompts during normal use

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual session behavior during navigation]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: Authentication validation test
• Blocked_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_030
• Parallel_Tests: Other session-dependent tests
• Sequential_Tests: Should run after authentication validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical security validation ensuring uninterrupted user experience
• Edge_Cases: Network interruptions, browser tab switching, concurrent sessions
• Risk_Areas: Session hijacking prevention, timeout management, state synchronization
• Security_Considerations: Session token security, unauthorized access prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Session behavior during network connectivity issues
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Ensure graceful session recovery after network problems
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 24: User Authorization Validation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_024
• Title: Verify user authorization validation before displaying payment data
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Negative, Consumer, Security, Authorization, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Critical, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-AuthService, AuthorizationValidation, Security

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Critical
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: AuthService, PaymentService, AccessControl
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Authorization
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC24 - User authorization validation before displaying payment data
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_023, CSS01US05_TC_029

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication service, Authorization service, Payment service API
• Performance_Baseline: Authorization check < 300ms
• Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts for authorization testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple consumer accounts with different authorization levels
• User_Roles_Permissions: Various permission levels for comprehensive authorization testing
• Test_Data: Authorized and unauthorized user accounts
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication mechanism validation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Attempt to access payment history URL without authentication	Redirect to login page or access denied message	URL: Direct payment history access	AC24 - Unauthenticated access prevention
2	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Proper authentication entry point
3	Enter valid consumer credentials for authorized user	Login successful, authorization validated	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authorized user validation
4	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Authorization check passes, page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Permission validation
5	Click "Payment History" tab	Authorization validated, payment data displayed	Tab: "Payment History"	AC24 - Authorized data access
6	Verify payment data is displayed for authorized user	User sees their own payment data only	Expected: User-specific payment data	Data access validation
7	Logout and attempt login with unauthorized user (if available)	Login may succeed but payment access denied	Unauthorized user credentials	Unauthorized access testing
8	Attempt to access payment history with unauthorized user	Access denied or no data displayed	Expected: Access denial	AC24 - Unauthorized prevention
9	Test API access with invalid authorization tokens	API returns 401/403 status for invalid tokens	Invalid API tokens	API authorization validation
10	Verify authorization is checked on every payment data request	Each data request validates current authorization	Expected: Continuous authorization validation	Ongoing authorization checks
11	Test authorization with expired session	Expired session prevents payment data access	Expired session scenario	Session expiry authorization
12	Verify no payment data leakage to unauthorized users	Unauthorized users cannot access any payment information	Expected: Zero data leakage	AC24 - Data protection validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: User authorization is validated before displaying any payment data
• Secondary_Verifications: API authorization, session-based authorization, data isolation
• Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, no data leakage, proper access denials

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual authorization behavior and access control]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: High
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: Authentication mechanism validation
• Blocked_Tests: All data access tests
• Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Foundation for all authorization-dependent functionality

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical security test ensuring proper access control for sensitive payment data
• Edge_Cases: Concurrent authorization changes, role-based access scenarios
• Risk_Areas: Authorization bypass vulnerabilities, privilege escalation
• Security_Considerations: Payment data protection, GDPR compliance, access logging

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Authorization validation during concurrent user sessions
• Type: Security
• Rationale: Ensure authorization integrity with multiple active sessions
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 25: Network Error Handling

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_025
• Title: Verify graceful network error handling without losing filter settings
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Error Handling
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Negative, Consumer, ErrorHandling, Network, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorHandling, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-NetworkHandling, ErrorRecovery, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: NetworkHandling, ErrorRecovery, FilterService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-ErrorHandling
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC25 - Graceful network error handling without losing filter settings
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_007, CSS01US05_TC_011

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Network simulation tools, Filter service, Error handling mechanisms
• Performance_Baseline: Error recovery < 3 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Payment data for filter state preservation testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment history and network simulation capability
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: Multiple payments for comprehensive filter testing
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_007, CSS01US05_TC_011 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads	Tab: "Payment History"	Access error handling validation
5	Apply multiple filters to establish filter state	Filters applied: Status = Completed, Type = Billing, Search = "PAY"	Filter state: Multiple active filters	AC25 - Filter state establishment
6	Verify filtered results are displayed	Payment list shows filtered results with applied criteria	Expected: Filtered payment list	Filter state validation
7	Simulate network disconnection during filter operation	Network connection interrupted during active session	Simulated network interruption	Network error simulation
8	Observe error handling behavior	System displays appropriate error message without crashing	Expected: Graceful error message	AC25 - Graceful error handling
9	Verify filter settings are preserved during network error	Applied filters remain visible and selected	Expected: Preserved filter state	AC25 - Filter preservation
10	Restore network connection	Network connectivity restored	Action: Restore network	Network recovery
11	Test automatic retry or manual refresh	System recovers gracefully with preserved filter settings	Expected: Automatic recovery with filters	AC25 - Graceful recovery
12	Verify filtered results display correctly after recovery	Payment list shows correct filtered results after network recovery	Expected: Correct filtered data display	Recovery validation
13	Test network timeout scenario	Simulate slow network causing timeout	Slow network simulation	Timeout handling validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Network errors are handled gracefully without losing filter settings
• Secondary_Verifications: Error message clarity, automatic recovery, user experience continuity
• Negative_Verification: No application crashes, no complete filter loss, no data corruption

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual error handling behavior and filter preservation]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: High
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_007, CSS01US05_TC_011
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: None (requires controlled network conditions)
• Sequential_Tests: Must run after filter functionality validation

Additional Information

• Notes: ResilMissing Scenarios Identified
• Scenario_1: Concurrent session validation across multiple browser tabs
• Type: Security
• Rationale: Ensure session consistency across multiple access points
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 26: Accessibility Navigation Support

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_026
• Title: Verify accessible navigation and keyboard support for interactive elements
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Accessibility
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Accessibility, UI, MOD-PaymentHistory, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Accessibility, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-AccessibilityFramework, KeyboardNavigation, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: AccessibilityFramework, UI-Components, KeyboardHandling
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Accessibility
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC26 - Accessible navigation and keyboard support for interactive elements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_003, CSS01US05_TC_010

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Accessibility framework, ARIA attributes, Keyboard event handlers
• Performance_Baseline: Keyboard navigation response < 100ms
• Data_Requirements: Standard payment data for accessibility testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment history for accessibility testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access
• Test_Data: 6 payments for comprehensive accessibility validation
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360 using only keyboard	Login page accessible via keyboard navigation	URL: smart360 tenant, Navigation: Tab key only	Keyboard-only access
2	Enter credentials using keyboard and navigate to login	Login successful using keyboard input only	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123, Navigation: Tab + Enter	Keyboard login validation
3	Navigate to "Billing & Payments" using only keyboard	Menu accessible and selectable via Tab/Enter keys	Menu: "Billing & Payments", Navigation: Tab + Enter	AC26 - Keyboard menu navigation
4	Navigate to "Payment History" tab using keyboard	Tab accessible via keyboard navigation	Tab: "Payment History", Navigation: Tab + Enter	Keyboard tab navigation
5	Test keyboard navigation through payment list	All payment rows accessible via Tab key	Navigation: Tab through payment list	AC26 - List keyboard access
6	Navigate to search bar using keyboard	Search field accessible and focusable via Tab	Search field focus via Tab key	Keyboard search access
7	Test keyboard input in search field	Search functionality works with keyboard input	Search: "PAY-001" via keyboard	Keyboard search functionality
8	Navigate to filter dropdowns using keyboard	Filter dropdowns accessible via Tab and Arrow keys	Filters: Status and Type dropdowns	AC26 - Keyboard filter access
9	Test dropdown navigation with arrow keys	Dropdown options navigable with Up/Down arrow keys	Dropdown navigation: Arrow keys	Keyboard dropdown control
10	Navigate to "View Details" buttons using keyboard	Detail buttons accessible via Tab navigation	"View Details" buttons focus	Keyboard detail access
11	Open detail view using Enter key	Detail view opens with Enter key press	Action: Enter key on "View Details"	AC26 - Keyboard detail opening
12	Test keyboard navigation within detail view	All elements in detail view accessible via keyboard	Detail view navigation: Tab key	Detail view keyboard support
13	Test "Clear" button accessibility via keyboard	Clear button accessible and functional via keyboard	"Clear" button: Tab + Enter	Keyboard clear functionality
14	Verify keyboard navigation is logical and intuitive	Tab order follows logical flow through interface	Expected: Logical tab sequence	Navigation logic validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All interactive elements are accessible via keyboard navigation with logical tab order
• Secondary_Verifications: ARIA labels, focus indicators, keyboard shortcuts
• Negative_Verification: No keyboard traps, no inaccessible elements, no broken tab sequences

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual keyboard accessibility behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_002
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other accessibility tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after basic UI functionality validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Accessibility compliance testing ensuring inclusive design for all users
• Edge_Cases: Screen reader compatibility, high contrast modes, magnification tools
• Risk_Areas: WCAG compliance, keyboard trap prevention, focus management
• Security_Considerations: None specific to accessibility features

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Screen reader compatibility and ARIA label validation
• Type: Accessibility
• Rationale: Ensure compatibility with assistive technologies
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 27: Audit Logging Security

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_027
• Title: Verify payment history access attempts are logged for security auditing
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Security, Consumer, AuditTrail, Logging, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Critical, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-AuditService, SecurityLogging, Security

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Critical
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: AuditService, SecurityLogging, PaymentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-AuditLogging
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC27 - Payment history access attempts logged for security auditing
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_024

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Audit logging service, Security monitoring, Log analysis tools
• Performance_Baseline: Log entry creation < 100ms
• Data_Requirements: Audit log access for verification

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with audit logging enabled and log access for verification
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access, audit log review access
• Test_Data: Payment history access scenarios for logging validation
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_024 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Login page loads, initial access logged	URL: smart360 tenant	Initial access logging
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, authentication event logged	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication logging
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Navigation logged in audit trail	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigation event logging
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment history access attempt logged	Tab: "Payment History"	AC27 - Payment history access logging
5	Verify audit log entry for payment history access	Log contains: timestamp, user ID, action, IP address, session ID	Expected: Complete audit entry	Audit entry validation
6	Apply filters to payment history	Filter operations logged in audit trail	Apply status and type filters	Filter action logging
7	Perform search operation	Search activities logged with search terms	Search: "PAY-001"	Search operation logging
8	Click "View Details" for payment	Payment detail access logged	Payment detail view access	Detail access logging
9	Verify comprehensive audit trail	All payment history interactions logged with appropriate detail	Expected: Complete interaction trail	AC27 - Comprehensive logging
10	Test unauthorized access attempt (if possible)	Unauthorized access attempts logged with failure details	Unauthorized access simulation	Failure logging validation
11	Verify log entry data completeness	Logs include all required security audit information	Required: User, timestamp, action, result, IP	Log completeness validation
12	Test log entry timestamp accuracy	Log timestamps accurate to within seconds of actual events	Expected: Accurate timestamps	Timestamp precision validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All payment history access attempts are logged with comprehensive audit information
• Secondary_Verifications: Log completeness, timestamp accuracy, security event capture
• Negative_Verification: No missing log entries, no incomplete audit information

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual audit logging behavior and log entry details]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: High
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_024
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Should run after authorization validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical security compliance test ensuring audit trail integrity
• Edge_Cases: High-volume logging, concurrent access logging, log retention
• Risk_Areas: Log tampering prevention, audit trail completeness, regulatory compliance
• Security_Considerations: Log security, audit trail integrity, compliance requirements

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Audit log integrity validation and tamper detection
• Type: Security
• Rationale: Ensure audit logs cannot be modified or deleted
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 28: Empty Search Results Handling

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_028
• Title: Verify appropriate messaging for empty search results
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Negative, Consumer, UI, ErrorHandling, MOD-PaymentHistory, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-SearchService, EmptyResultsHandling, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: SearchService, UI-Components
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-EmptyResults
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC28 - Appropriate messaging for empty search results
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Search service, UI messaging components
• Performance_Baseline: Empty result display < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Payment data for search testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment history for search testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history search access
• Test_Data: Payment data that allows for both matching and non-matching search scenarios
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_004 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication required
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads with search functionality	Tab: "Payment History"	Access empty results validation
5	Enter non-matching search term in search bar	Search field accepts input	Search: "NonExistentPayment"	AC28 - Non-matching search input
6	Execute search with non-matching term	Search completes, no results found	Expected: Empty results state	Search execution
7	Verify "No results found" message displays	Clear, user-friendly message shown for empty results	Expected: "No results found" or similar	AC28 - Empty results messaging
8	Verify message is appropriately positioned and styled	Message appears in payment list area with proper styling	Expected: Prominent, readable message	Message presentation validation
9	Test with completely invalid search criteria	Invalid search shows appropriate guidance	Search: "!@#$%^&*()", Expected: "No results found"	Invalid input handling
10	Verify search counter shows zero results	Payment counter indicates "Showing 0 of X payments"	Expected: "Showing 0 of 6 payments"	Counter accuracy with empty results
11	Test empty results with applied filters	Empty results message appropriate with active filters	Apply filters + non-matching search	Combined filter empty results
12	Clear search and verify normal results return	Clearing search restores normal payment list	Action: Clear search, Expected: Full payment list	AC28 - Results restoration

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Appropriate "No results found" message displays for empty search results
• Secondary_Verifications: Message styling, counter accuracy, search clearing functionality
• Negative_Verification: No blank screens, no error messages, no application crashes

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual empty results handling and messaging]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other error handling tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after search functionality validation

Additional Information

• Notes: User experience validation ensuring helpful guidance for empty search results
• Edge_Cases: Multiple consecutive empty searches, empty results with different filter combinations
• Risk_Areas: Message clarity, user guidance quality
• Security_Considerations: None specific to empty results handling

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Empty results handling during network connectivity issues
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Ensure distinction between no results and connection problems
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 29: View-Only Access Permissions

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_029
• Title: Verify authorized users can view but cannot modify payment records
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Security, Permissions, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-AuthService, ViewOnlyAccess, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: AuthService, PermissionService, PaymentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-ViewOnlyAccess
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC29 - Authorized users can view but cannot modify payment records
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_024

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication service, Permission service, Payment service API
• Performance_Baseline: Permission validation < 200ms
• Data_Requirements: Payment records with view-only access permissions

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with view-only permissions for payment history
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with read-only payment history access
• Test_Data: Payment records that should be viewable but not modifiable
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_024 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, view-only permissions established	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Authentication with view-only access
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads with view permissions	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment history loads, data visible for viewing	Tab: "Payment History"	AC29 - View access validation
5	Verify payment data is visible and readable	All payment information displayed correctly	Expected: Complete payment data visibility	View permission validation
6	Inspect UI for absence of modification controls	No edit, delete, or modify buttons present	Expected: No modification controls visible	AC29 - Modification prevention
7	Click "View Details" for payment	Detail view opens in read-only mode	Payment detail access	Detail view permission
8	Verify detail view is read-only	Detail view shows information without edit capabilities	Expected: Read-only detail information	AC29 - Read-only detail view
9	Attempt to modify payment data via UI	No modification options available in interface	Expected: No editable fields	UI modification prevention
10	Test API calls for modification attempts (if possible)	API rejects modification requests with appropriate error	API modification attempts	AC29 - API modification prevention
11	Verify search and filter functionality remains available	View-only users can search and filter payment data	Search and filter: Functional	View functionality preservation
12	Test payment action buttons (view, print, download) availability	View-related actions available, modification actions absent	Expected: View actions only	AC29 - Action permission validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Authorized users can view payment records but cannot modify them in any way
• Secondary_Verifications: UI controls absence, API protection, view functionality preservation
• Negative_Verification: No modification capabilities, no edit interfaces, no unauthorized changes

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual view-only access behavior and permission enforcement]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_024
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other permission validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Should run after authorization validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical security validation ensuring data integrity through proper permission enforcement
• Edge_Cases: Role changes during session, permission escalation attempts
• Risk_Areas: Permission bypass vulnerabilities, unauthorized data modification
• Security_Considerations: Data integrity protection, audit trail for access attempts

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Permission validation during concurrent user sessions with different roles
• Type: Security
• Rationale: Ensure permission integrity across multiple user contexts
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 30: Valid Session Requirement for Payment Actions

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: CSS01US05_TC_030
• Title: Verify valid session requirement for payment actions (view/print/download) accessed from detail view
• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: August 15, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Payment History Management
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Negative, Consumer, Security, Authentication, MOD-PaymentHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-AuthService, SessionValidation, Security

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: AuthService, SessionManagement, PaymentService
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web-PaymentHistory-Security
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC30 - Valid session requirement for all payment actions
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_017, CSS01US05_TC_024

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication service, Session management, Payment service API
• Performance_Baseline: Session validation < 200ms
• Data_Requirements: Valid payment data for action testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Consumer account with payment history and session management enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: Consumer role with payment history access and action permissions
• Test_Data: PAY-001 with available actions: view, print, download
• Prior_Test_Cases: CSS01US05_TC_017 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://consumer-staging.bynry.com/login/smart360	Consumer login page loads successfully	URL: smart360 tenant	Prerequisites setup
2	Enter valid consumer credentials and login	Login successful, dashboard displayed with valid session	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Establish valid session
3	Click "Billing & Payments" in left navigation menu	Billing & Payments page loads	Menu: "Billing & Payments"	Navigate to billing section
4	Click "Payment History" tab	Payment History dashboard loads	Tab: "Payment History"	Access payment actions
5	Click "View Details" for first payment	Detail view opens with payment actions available	Payment: PAY-001, Expected: Detail view with actions	AC30 - Valid session action access
6	Verify payment actions are accessible with valid session	View, print, download actions are enabled and clickable	Actions: View details, Print receipt, Download PDF	Valid session action validation
7	Open browser developer tools and clear session storage	Session storage cleared while detail view remains open	Action: Clear session data	Session invalidation simulation
8	Attempt to click "Print" action with invalid session	Action fails, redirected to login or error message displayed	Action: Print, Expected: Authentication required	AC30 - Invalid session prevention
9	Verify system detects invalid session for payment actions	System prevents action execution and requires re-authentication	Expected: Authentication challenge or error	Session validation enforcement
10	Re-authenticate with valid credentials	Login successful, session restored	Email: consumer@test.com, Password: Test@123	Session restoration
11	Navigate back to payment detail view	Detail view loads successfully with restored session	Payment: PAY-001, Expected: Actions enabled	Session restoration validation
12	Verify payment actions work with restored valid session	All actions (view, print, download) function correctly	Actions: All payment actions, Expected: Successful execution	Valid session functionality restoration
13	Test session timeout scenario	After session timeout, actions require re-authentication	Timeout: Wait for session expiry, Expected: Re-authentication required	Session timeout validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Payment actions require valid session and are blocked when session is invalid
• Secondary_Verifications: Proper authentication challenges, session restoration functionality
• Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access to payment actions with invalid session

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual session validation behavior and security responses]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: CSS01US05_TC_017
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: Can run after detail view functionality validation

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical security test ensuring payment data protection through session validation
• Edge_Cases: Session timeout during action execution, concurrent session scenarios
• Risk_Areas: Session hijacking prevention, unauthorized data access
• Security_Considerations: Payment data protection, authentication bypass prevention, session management security

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Concurrent session validation across multiple browser tabs
• Type: Security
• Rationale: Ensure session consistency across multiple access points
• Priority: P1