Meter Device Management Test Cases -MX01US02

Test Case 1: Dashboard Status Display

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_001

Title: Verify dashboard displays correct meter counts by status (Total, Assigned, Unassigned, Under Maintenance, Disposed)

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Database, UI, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Database, Dashboard-Metrics, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Database, Meter Service API, Status Management
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC1, Business Rule: "System must display a dashboard showing counts of meters by status"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_002, MX01US02_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Meter Service API, Status Management Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds dashboard load
• Data_Requirements: Test meters in all status categories

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter database with predefined status distribution
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Total Meters: 23490
  • Assigned Meters: 23471 (meters with status 'Assigned')
  • Unassigned Meters: 18 (meters with status 'Unassigned')
  • Under Maintenance: 0 (meters with status 'Maintenance')
  • Disposed: 1 (meters with status 'Disposed')
• Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Device Management > Meter from main navigation	Meter Devices page loads with dashboard metrics visible	URL: /device-management/meter	AC1 - Dashboard access
2	Verify "Total Meters" metric card displays	Shows "23490" with blue circular icon and "Total number of meters in the system" description	Expected: 23490	AC1 - Total count verification
3	Verify "Assigned Meters" metric card displays	Shows "23471" with green checkmark icon and "Meters currently assigned to consumers" description	Expected: 23471	AC1 - Assigned count verification
4	Verify "Unassigned Meters" metric card displays	Shows "18" with orange X icon and "Meters available for assignment" description	Expected: 18	AC1 - Unassigned count verification
5	Verify "Under Maintenance" metric card displays	Shows "0" with yellow wrench icon and "Meters currently being serviced or repaired" description	Expected: 0	AC1 - Maintenance count verification
6	Verify "Disposed" metric card displays	Shows "1" with red trash icon and "Meters that have been decommissioned" description	Expected: 1	AC1 - Disposed count verification
7	Validate total calculation accuracy	Total Meters (23490) = Assigned (23471) + Unassigned (18) + Maintenance (0) + Disposed (1)	Calculation: 23471+18+0+1=23490	AC1 - Mathematical accuracy
8	Verify dashboard visual layout	All metric cards properly aligned with consistent styling and responsive design	N/A	AC1 - UI consistency
9	Check dashboard load performance	Page loads within 3 seconds with all metrics populated	Load time: <3 seconds	AC1 - Performance requirement
10	Verify real-time data accuracy	Dashboard counts match current database state	Database query validation	AC1 - Data integrity

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All meter status counts accurately reflect database records and sum to total
• Secondary_Verifications: Visual icons correct, descriptions present, responsive layout maintained
• Negative_Verification: No negative counts, no missing metrics, no calculation errors

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record actual counts and any discrepancies]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: User authentication
• Blocked_Tests: All subsequent meter management tests
• Parallel_Tests: None (dashboard must load first)
• Sequential_Tests: Filter and search functionality tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for operational awareness and system health monitoring
• Edge_Cases: Large meter counts (10,000+), real-time updates during status changes
• Risk_Areas: Incorrect counts affecting operational decisions, performance degradation with large datasets
• Security_Considerations: Role-based access to dashboard metrics, audit trail for dashboard access

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Dashboard refresh behavior during concurrent meter status changes
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Real-time accuracy critical for operational decisions
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Dashboard performance with 50,000+ meters
• Type: Performance
• Rationale: Scalability requirement for enterprise utilities
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 2: Meter Type Filtering

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_002

Title: Verify meter filtering by type (All, Manual, Photo, Smart) with accurate counts and proper tab functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, UI, Filter, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Filter-Service, Meter-Classification, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Filter Service API, Meter Classification Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC2, Business Rule: "The system must allow filtering of meters by type with accurate counts"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001, MX01US02_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Filter Service API, Meter Type Classification Database
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds filter response
• Data_Requirements: Meters distributed across all types (Manual, Photo, Smart)

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Database with meters of different types
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Mixed meter types in database
  • Manual meters: subset of total
  • Photo meters: subset of total
  • Smart meters: subset of total
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001 (Dashboard load)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Verify "All Meters" tab is active by default	"All Meters" tab highlighted/active, shows total count in parentheses	Tab: "All Meters" (active)	AC2 - Default filter state
2	Count total meters displayed in list	List shows all meters regardless of type	Count: All database meters	AC2 - Complete dataset display
3	Click "Manual Meters" tab	Tab becomes active, filter applied, only manual meters shown	Tab: "Manual Meters"	AC2 - Manual filter activation
4	Verify Manual Meters count in tab	Tab displays count in parentheses matching filtered results	Format: "Manual Meters (X)"	AC2 - Count accuracy in tab
5	Validate only Manual meters in list	All displayed meters have "Type" column showing "Manual"	Type column: "Manual" only	AC2 - Filter correctness
6	Click "Photo Meters" tab	Tab becomes active, filter applied, only photo meters shown	Tab: "Photo Meters"	AC2 - Photo filter activation
7	Verify Photo Meters count in tab	Tab displays count in parentheses matching filtered results	Format: "Photo Meters (X)"	AC2 - Count accuracy in tab
8	Validate only Photo meters in list	All displayed meters have "Type" column showing "Photo" or meter type indicating photo reading	Type indication: Photo meters	AC2 - Filter correctness
9	Click "Smart Meters" tab	Tab becomes active, filter applied, only smart meters shown	Tab: "Smart Meters"	AC2 - Smart filter activation
10	Verify Smart Meters count in tab	Tab displays count in parentheses matching filtered results	Format: "Smart Meters (X)"	AC2 - Count accuracy in tab
11	Validate only Smart meters in list	All displayed meters have "Type" column showing "Smart"	Type column: "Smart" only	AC2 - Filter correctness
12	Return to "All Meters" tab	All meters visible again, total count matches dashboard	Tab: "All Meters"	AC2 - Filter reset functionality
13	Verify filter performance	Each filter change completes within 2 seconds	Response time: <2 seconds	AC2 - Performance requirement
14	Check tab count mathematical accuracy	Manual count + Photo count + Smart count = All Meters count	Sum validation	AC2 - Mathematical consistency

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Filter accurately displays only meters of selected type with correct counts
• Secondary_Verifications: Tab highlighting, count display format, performance standards
• Negative_Verification: No meters of other types shown when filter active, no count mismatches

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record filter behavior and count accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: Search functionality tests
• Parallel_Tests: None
• Sequential_Tests: Combined filter and search scenarios

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for meter inventory management and operational planning
• Edge_Cases: Empty filter results, all meters of single type, filter with search combination
• Risk_Areas: Incorrect filtering affecting inventory decisions, performance with large datasets
• Security_Considerations: Ensure filter doesn't bypass access controls, audit filter usage

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Filter behavior with concurrent database updates (new meters added during filtering)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Data consistency during real-time operations
• Priority: P3
• Scenario_2: Combined filter and search functionality
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Common user workflow combining filters with search
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 3: Search Functionality

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_003

Title: Verify search functionality for Meter Number, Consumer Name, and Account Number with accurate results

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Search, UI, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Search-Service, Search-Functionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Search Service API, Consumer Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC3, Business Rule: "Search should work for Meter Number, Consumer Name, Account Number"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001, MX01US02_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Search Service API, Consumer Database
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second search response
• Data_Requirements: Test meters with known consumer assignments

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Database with searchable meter and consumer data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 assigned to consumer "testing draft" with account Con74
  • Meter ME56663 assigned to consumer "sdsdssd sdsds" with account Con80
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001 (Dashboard access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate search bar with placeholder "Search smart meters..."	Search input field visible and accessible	Element: Search input field	AC3 - Search interface availability
2	Enter exact meter number in search field	Search field accepts input and shows typed text	Search term: "ME57700"	AC3 - Meter number search input
3	Execute search (press Enter or click search)	Results filtered to show only matching meter ME57700	Expected result: 1 meter (ME57700)	AC3 - Exact meter number match
4	Verify search result accuracy	Displayed meter matches search term exactly	Meter No: ME57700, Consumer: testing draft	AC3 - Search result validation
5	Clear search field completely	Search field empty, all meters displayed	Action: Clear search	AC3 - Search reset functionality
6	Enter consumer name in search field	Search field accepts consumer name input	Search term: "testing draft"	AC3 - Consumer name search input
7	Execute consumer name search	Results show meters assigned to consumer "testing draft"	Expected: Meters for "testing draft"	AC3 - Consumer name matching
8	Verify consumer name search results	All returned meters show "testing draft" in Consumer Name column	Consumer Name: "testing draft"	AC3 - Consumer search accuracy
9	Clear search and enter account number	Search field cleared and account number entered	Search term: "Con74"	AC3 - Account number search input
10	Execute account number search	Results show meters for account Con74	Expected: Meters for account Con74	AC3 - Account number matching
11	Verify account number search results	All returned meters show "Con74" in Account Number column	Account Number: Con74	AC3 - Account search accuracy
12	Test partial meter number search	Enter partial meter number and verify results	Search term: "ME577"	AC3 - Partial match capability
13	Verify partial search results	Shows meters containing the partial string	Expected: ME57700 and similar	AC3 - Partial matching validation
14	Test non-existent search term	Enter non-existent meter number	Search term: "INVALID123"	AC3 - No results scenario
15	Verify empty results handling	System shows "No results found" or empty list with appropriate message	Expected: Empty state display	AC3 - Empty results handling
16	Test search performance	All searches complete within 1 second	Response time: <1 second	AC3 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Search accurately returns results for meter number, consumer name, and account number
• Secondary_Verifications: Partial matching works, empty results handled gracefully, search performance meets standards
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect results returned, no system errors on invalid searches

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record search behavior and result accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Filter functionality tests
• Sequential_Tests: Combined search and filter scenarios

Additional Information

• Notes: Essential for quick meter location and customer service operations
• Edge_Cases: Special characters in names, case sensitivity, leading/trailing spaces
• Risk_Areas: Performance degradation with large datasets, search index corruption
• Security_Considerations: Prevent SQL injection, limit search scope based on user permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Search with special characters and case sensitivity testing
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Real-world data may contain special characters affecting search accuracy
• Priority: P3
• Scenario_2: Combined search and filter operations
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Users often combine search with type filters for refined results
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 4: Detailed Meter View

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_004

Title: Verify detailed meter view displays all required information tabs (Readings, Details, Allocation, Alerts, Work Orders, Logs, Notes)

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Details, UI, Navigation, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Multiple-Services, Meter-Details, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Meter Details API, Consumer API, Alert Service, Work Order Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC4, Business Rule: "System must display a detailed view of individual meters with tabs for different information categories"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_003, MX01US02_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Meter Details API, Consumer Service, Alert Service, Work Order Management
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds detail view load
• Data_Requirements: Complete meter profile with all data types

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with complete data profile across all tabs
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with full profile
  • Consumer assignment: "testing draft"
  • Account: Con74
  • Installation date: 2025-08-06
• Prior_Test_Cases: Navigation to meter list (TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click on meter ME57700 from meter list	Navigate to meter detail view, page loads with meter header	Meter: ME57700	AC4 - Detail view navigation
2	Verify meter header information display	Shows "Photo Meter" type, consumer "testing draft", consumption data section	Header: Photo Meter, Consumer: testing draft	AC4 - Header information
3	Verify "Readings" tab is visible and active by default	"Readings" tab highlighted as active, consumption history visible	Tab: Readings (active)	AC4 - Default active tab
4	Verify consumption tracking section	Shows "Last Month Consumption: 0 Cubic Meters" and monthly average	Consumption: 0 Cubic Meters	AC4 - Consumption display
5	Verify key stats section on right	Shows "Days in service: 11", "Installed: 2025-08-06", "Alerts (3 months): 0", "Last maintenance: NA"	Stats: Days=11, Installed=2025-08-06	AC4 - Key statistics
6	Click "Details" tab	Tab becomes active, shows meter information and technical specifications	Tab: Details	AC4 - Details tab functionality
7	Verify Details tab content	Shows "Meter Information" section with Device Number, Type, Status, Premise, Install Date, Consumer	Details: Device Number=test009, Type=Photo Meter	AC4 - Meter information display
8	Verify Technical Specifications section	Shows "No technical specifications available for this meter" with "Add Technical Specifications" button	Tech specs: Not available	AC4 - Technical specs placeholder
9	Click "Allocation" tab	Tab becomes active, shows consumer and premise allocation information	Tab: Allocation	AC4 - Allocation tab functionality
10	Verify Consumer & Premise Allocation section	Shows current consumer "testing draft" with status "Current", account Con74, contact details	Consumer: testing draft, Status: Current	AC4 - Consumer allocation display
11	Verify Premise Details section	Shows premise "U10-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN WEST-B3", area, utility service	Premise: U10-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN WEST-B3	AC4 - Premise information
12	Click "Alerts" tab	Tab becomes active, shows alerts section	Tab: Alerts	AC4 - Alerts tab functionality
13	Click "Work Orders" tab	Tab becomes active, shows service orders section	Tab: Work Orders	AC4 - Work orders tab functionality
14	Click "Logs" tab	Tab becomes active, shows activity log section	Tab: Logs	AC4 - Activity log tab functionality
15	Click "Notes" tab	Tab becomes active, shows notes interface with "Add a note..." field and "Add Note" button	Tab: Notes	AC4 - Notes tab functionality
16	Verify tab navigation performance	Each tab switch completes within 1 second	Response time: <1 second	AC4 - Navigation performance
17	Verify action buttons availability	"Raise Service Order" and "Edit" buttons visible and accessible	Buttons: Raise Service Order, Edit	AC4 - Action controls

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All required tabs present and functional with appropriate content display
• Secondary_Verifications: Tab navigation works smoothly, content loads correctly, action buttons accessible
• Negative_Verification: No missing tabs, no broken navigation, no missing critical information

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record tab functionality and content accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: Individual tab content tests
• Parallel_Tests: None
• Sequential_Tests: Specific tab functionality tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Core functionality for meter lifecycle management and operational decisions
• Edge_Cases: Meters with missing data, incomplete profiles, large data sets in tabs
• Risk_Areas: Performance with complex meter profiles, data consistency across tabs
• Security_Considerations: Role-based access to different tabs, sensitive data protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Tab content loading with slow network conditions
• Type: Performance
• Rationale: Field operations may have limited connectivity
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Deep linking to specific tabs (bookmark specific tab URLs)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Users may want to share direct links to specific meter information
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 5: Technical Specifications Tracking

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_005

Title: Verify technical specifications display with manufacturer and model data handling

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Technical, Specifications, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Settings-Service, Technical-Specs, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Settings Service, Technical Specifications Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Engineering, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC5, Business Rule: "Technical specifications must be standardised by meter type and manufacturer as mentioned in settings"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Technical Specifications Service, Settings Configuration
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Meter with technical specifications configuration

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Settings configuration for technical specifications
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 without technical specifications
  • Settings service configured for technical specs display
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 detail view	Detail view loads successfully	Meter: ME57700	AC5 - Access meter details
2	Click "Details" tab	Details tab becomes active, content loads	Tab: Details	AC5 - Navigate to technical specs
3	Locate "Technical Specifications" section	Section visible with heading "Technical Specifications"	Section: Technical Specifications	AC5 - Section visibility
4	Verify technical specifications placeholder	Shows "No technical specifications available for this meter."	Message: No technical specifications available	AC5 - Placeholder display per business rule
5	Verify "Add Technical Specifications" button	Button present and clickable with "+" icon	Button: + Add Technical Specifications	AC5 - Future functionality button
6	Verify manufacturer field display	Shows manufacturer field with "NA" value	Manufacturer: NA	AC5 - Settings dependency indication
7	Verify model field display	Shows model field with "NA" value	Model: NA	AC5 - Settings dependency indication
8	Check "Basic Info" subsection	Shows basic information fields with "NA" values	Basic Info: Fields with NA	AC5 - Basic info placeholder
9	Check "Technical" subsection	Shows technical fields with "NA" values	Technical: Fields with NA	AC5 - Technical data placeholder
10	Verify business rule compliance	All technical specification fields show "NA" until settings is created	All fields: NA values	AC5 - Business rule adherence
11	Verify section layout and formatting	Technical specifications section properly formatted and styled	UI: Proper formatting	AC5 - User interface consistency
12	Check future functionality indication	Clear indication that feature depends on settings configuration	Indication: Settings dependency	AC5 - User guidance

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Technical specifications section properly structured with NA values per business rule
• Secondary_Verifications: Placeholder messaging, future functionality buttons present
• Negative_Verification: No actual technical data displayed until settings are configured

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record technical specifications display behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: Future technical specifications configuration tests
• Parallel_Tests: None
• Sequential_Tests: Settings configuration tests (when available)

Additional Information

• Notes: Placeholder functionality until settings module is implemented
• Edge_Cases: Different meter types, manufacturer-specific specifications
• Risk_Areas: User confusion about missing data, future migration of existing data
• Security_Considerations: Access control for technical specifications modification

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Technical specifications display after settings configuration is implemented
• Type: Future Enhancement
• Rationale: Core functionality dependent on settings module completion
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Manufacturer and model dropdown functionality from settings
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Key business workflow for meter classification
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 6: Consumer Allocation History

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_006

Title: Verify complete consumer allocation history tracking with current and previous assignments

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Consumer, Allocation, History, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Report-Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Consumer-Service, Allocation-History, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Consumer Service, Allocation History Service, Premise Management
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Revenue-Impact-Tracking
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC6, Business Rule: "System must maintain and display complete consumer allocation history for each meter"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_013

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Consumer Service API, Allocation History Database, Premise Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Meter with consumer allocation history

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with current and historical consumer assignments
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700
  • Current consumer: "testing draft", Account: Con74
  • Period: 2025-08-08 - Present
  • Phone: 7788990022, Email: testingdraft001@yopmail.com
  • Premise: U10-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN WEST-B3
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view navigation)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 allocation tab	Allocation tab opens and becomes active	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Allocation	AC6 - Allocation tab access
2	Verify "Consumer & Premise Allocation" section header	Section header visible and properly formatted	Header: Consumer & Premise Allocation	AC6 - Section structure
3	Verify "Consumer History" subsection	Shows consumer history with current assignment	Subsection: Consumer History	AC6 - Consumer history display
4	Verify current consumer status indicator	Shows "Current" status badge for active consumer	Status: Current (green badge)	AC6 - Status indication
5	Verify current consumer name display	Shows "testing draft" as consumer name	Consumer: testing draft	AC6 - Consumer name accuracy
6	Verify current consumer account	Shows "Con74" as account number	Account: Con74	AC6 - Account information
7	Verify service period display	Shows "2025-08-08 - Present" as date range	Period: 2025-08-08 - Present	AC6 - Service period tracking
8	Verify consumer contact information	Shows phone "7788990022" and email "testingdraft001@yopmail.com"	Phone: 7788990022, Email: testingdraft001@yopmail.com	AC6 - Contact details
9	Verify consumer type classification	Shows consumer type (Domestic/Residential or Non-Domestic/Commercial)	Type: As per data	AC6 - Consumer classification
10	Verify "View Details" button functionality	Button present and clickable for consumer details	Button: View Details	AC6 - Consumer detail navigation
11	Verify "Premise Details" section	Shows premise information with name and location	Section: Premise Details	AC6 - Premise information
12	Verify premise name display	Shows "U10-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN WEST-B3"	Premise: U10-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN WEST-B3	AC6 - Premise identification
13	Verify area and sub-area information	Shows area "U10-DMA00-Fuluasou JR" and sub-area details	Area: U10-DMA00-Fuluasou JR	AC6 - Geographic classification
14	Verify utility service type	Shows "Water" as utility service	Utility Service: Water	AC6 - Service type
15	Verify "Route & Reading Cycle" section	Shows route and read cycle information	Section: Route & Reading Cycle	AC6 - Operational details
16	Verify route information	Shows route ID or "NA" if not assigned	Route: NA	AC6 - Route assignment
17	Verify read cycle information	Shows read cycle or "NA" if not configured	Read Cycle: NA	AC6 - Reading schedule
18	Verify total consumption tracking	Shows "NA Cubic Meters" or actual consumption total	Total Consumption: NA Cubic Meters	AC6 - Consumption summary

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All consumer allocation data displayed accurately with complete history preservation
• Secondary_Verifications: Contact information accuracy, premise details correctness, operational data
• Negative_Verification: No missing consumer data, no unauthorized data access, no data corruption

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record allocation history accuracy and completeness]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: Consumer reassignment tests
• Parallel_Tests: None
• Sequential_Tests: Consumer management integration tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for billing accuracy and customer service operations
• Edge_Cases: Multiple consumer changes, incomplete consumer data, premise relocations
• Risk_Areas: Data integrity during consumer changes, performance with extensive history
• Security_Considerations: PII protection, access control for customer data, audit trails

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Historical consumer data display (previous assignments)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Complete allocation history tracking includes previous consumers
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Consumer reassignment impact on allocation history
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: History preservation during consumer changes is business critical
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 7: Service Order Creation

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_007

Title: Verify service order creation with specific types (Maintenance, Replacement, Uninstall), dates, and reasons

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, ServiceOrder, WorkOrder, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-WorkOrder-Service, Service-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Service Order API, Work Order Management System, Meter Status Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, Smoke-Test-Results
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC7, Business Rule: "All physical changes to a meter require a corresponding work order"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_012

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Service Order API, Work Order Management, Status Management Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Active meter requiring service order

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Operational meter with service order capability
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with service order creation rights
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 in operational status
  • Available service types: Maintenance, Replacement, Uninstall
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 detail view	Detail view loads with action buttons visible	Meter: ME57700	AC7 - Access service order function
2	Locate "Raise Service Order" button	Button visible and clickable in action area	Button: Raise Service Order	AC7 - Service order initiation
3	Click "Raise Service Order" button	Service order creation form/modal opens	Action: Click Raise Service Order	AC7 - Form accessibility
4	Verify service order form structure	Form displays with required fields: Service Type, Description, Date, Reason	Form fields: Service Type, Description, Date, Reason	AC7 - Form completeness
5	Verify "Service Type" dropdown options	Dropdown shows "Maintenance", "Replacement", "Uninstall" options	Options: Maintenance, Replacement, Uninstall	AC7 - Service type options per business rule
6	Select "Maintenance" as service type	Service type selected successfully	Selection: Maintenance	AC7 - Service type selection
7	Enter service description	Description field accepts text input	Description: "Regular preventive maintenance check"	AC7 - Description input
8	Select scheduled date	Date picker allows future date selection	Date: 2025-02-15	AC7 - Future date validation
9	Enter service reason	Reason field accepts text input	Reason: "Scheduled preventive maintenance as per maintenance schedule"	AC7 - Reason documentation
10	Verify form validation	All required fields properly validated before submission	Validation: Required field checks	AC7 - Input validation
11	Submit service order	Click "Create Service Order" or equivalent submit button	Action: Submit form	AC7 - Order creation
12	Verify service order creation success	Success message displayed and form closes	Message: Service order created successfully	AC7 - Creation confirmation
13	Navigate to "Work Orders" tab	Tab opens showing newly created service order	Tab: Work Orders	AC7 - Order tracking verification
14	Verify service order in list	New service order appears with correct details	Order details: Type=Maintenance, Date=2025-02-15	AC7 - Order persistence
15	Verify order status	New order shows "Pending" or initial status	Status: Pending	AC7 - Initial status assignment
16	Verify order metadata	Shows creation date, creator, and all entered details	Metadata: Created by current user, current date	AC7 - Order audit information

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Service order created successfully and tracked in system with all specified details
• Secondary_Verifications: Form validation works, date restrictions enforced, order appears in tracking
• Negative_Verification: Cannot create orders with invalid data, past dates rejected, required fields enforced

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record service order creation process and results]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: Work order status update tests
• Parallel_Tests: None
• Sequential_Tests: Work order lifecycle management tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical workflow for meter maintenance and service management
• Edge_Cases: Emergency service orders, bulk service order creation, order cancellation
• Risk_Areas: Service order data integrity, integration with field service systems
• Security_Considerations: Service order authorization, audit trails for maintenance activities

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Service order validation for different meter statuses (can't service disposed meters)
• Type: Business Rule
• Rationale: Business rule prevents service orders for certain meter states
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Service order impact on meter status (automatic status updates)
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Service orders may trigger automatic meter status changes
• Priority: P1

---

Test Case 8: Reading History with Validation

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_008

Title: Verify meter reading history displays validation status (Normal, Faulty, RCNT) and validator information

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Readings, Validation, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-Engineering, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Reading-Service, Reading-Validation, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Reading Service API, Validation Service, Consumer Billing
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC8, Business Rule: "Track meter reading history with validation status and validator information"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_009

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Reading Service API, Validation Service, Meter Reading Database
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Meter with reading history and validation data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with reading history and validation records
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with reading history
  • Validator: "kaushal"
  • Reading status options: Normal, Faulty, RCNT
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 readings tab	Readings tab active by default, content loads	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Readings	AC8 - Reading history access
2	Verify consumption history section	Shows "Consumption History" header and chart area	Section: Consumption History	AC8 - Visual consumption display
3	Verify monthly consumption chart	Chart displays consumption data over time periods	Chart: Monthly consumption visualization	AC8 - Graphical representation
4	Locate reading details below chart	Reading list or table visible below consumption chart	Section: Reading details list	AC8 - Detailed reading records
5	Verify reading validation status display	Each reading shows status: "Normal", "Faulty", or "RCNT"	Status examples: Normal, Faulty, RCNT	AC8 - Validation status per business rule
6	Verify validator information	Each reading shows validator name "kaushal" or relevant validator	Validator: kaushal	AC8 - Validator attribution
7	Verify reading date information	Each reading shows date when reading was taken	Date format: YYYY-MM-DD or equivalent	AC8 - Reading timestamp
8	Verify reading value display	Each reading shows consumption value "0 Cubic Meters" or actual values	Value: 0 Cubic Meters (as per test data)	AC8 - Reading value accuracy
9	Verify uploaded by information	Shows who uploaded/recorded reading (MX for manual, meter reader name, OEM for smart)	Uploaded by: MX (manual meter reader)	AC8 - Reading source attribution
10	Check reading status color coding	Normal=green, Faulty=red, RCNT=yellow or appropriate color scheme	Color coding: Status-based	AC8 - Visual status indication
11	Verify "View All Readings" functionality	Link or button to expand reading history with pagination	Link: View All Readings	AC8 - Extended history access
12	Test reading history pagination	Click "View All Readings" to see more historical data	Action: Expand reading history	AC8 - Historical data access
13	Verify reading chronological order	Readings sorted by date (newest first or chronological)	Order: Date-based sorting	AC8 - Reading sequence
14	Check reading data consistency	Chart data matches tabular reading data	Consistency: Chart vs table data	AC8 - Data integrity

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Reading history accurately displays with validation status and validator information
• Secondary_Verifications: Chart functionality, pagination works, chronological ordering
• Negative_Verification: No missing validation data, no incorrect status assignments

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record reading history display and validation accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: Reading validation workflow tests
• Parallel_Tests: Consumption analysis tests
• Sequential_Tests: Reading data export tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for billing accuracy and consumption analysis
• Edge_Cases: Large reading histories, mixed validation statuses, missing validator data
• Risk_Areas: Reading data integrity, validation accuracy, billing impact
• Security_Considerations: Reading data access control, validator identity verification

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Reading validation workflow (how readings get validated and status assigned)
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Understanding complete validation process is critical for accuracy
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Reading data export with validation status included
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Users may need to export reading data for analysis including validation status
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 9: Consumption History Display

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_009

Title: Verify consumption history displays in both tabular and graphical formats with accurate data consistency

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Consumption, Visualization, Analytics, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Report-Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Analytics-Service, Consumption-Analysis, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Consumption Analytics API, Chart Rendering Service, Data Export Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Customer-Segment-Analysis
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC9, Business Rule: "System must display consumption history in both tabular and graphical formats"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_008, MX01US02_TC_018

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Consumption API, Chart Library, Data Analytics Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds chart rendering
• Data_Requirements: Meter with 6+ months of consumption data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with consumption history data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with consumption history
  • Time period: Last 6 months (Feb 2025 - Jul 2025)
  • Current consumption: 0 Cubic Meters
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 readings tab	Readings tab loads with consumption history visible	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Readings	AC9 - Consumption display access
2	Verify "Consumption History" section header	Section clearly labeled and positioned prominently	Header: Consumption History	AC9 - Section identification
3	Verify consumption chart display	Chart shows consumption data over time with x-axis (months) and y-axis (consumption)	Chart: Line/bar chart with time series	AC9 - Graphical format requirement
4	Check chart time period default	Chart displays last 6 months by default (Feb 2025 - Jul 2025)	Time range: Feb 2025 - Jul 2025	AC9 - Default time period per business rule
5	Verify chart data points	Chart shows consumption values for each month period	Data points: Monthly consumption values	AC9 - Data visualization
6	Check chart interactivity	Chart allows hover/click interactions to see specific values	Interaction: Hover shows values	AC9 - Chart functionality
7	Locate consumption table below chart	Tabular data section visible below the chart	Table: Consumption data table	AC9 - Tabular format requirement
8	Verify table column headers	Table shows columns for Date Range, Consumption Value, Number of Days	Columns: Date Range, Consumption, Days	AC9 - Table structure per business rule
9	Check table data format	Each row shows date range "current reading date - previous reading date"	Format: Date range between readings	AC9 - Date range calculation per business rule
10	Verify consumption value display	Table shows consumption values in correct units (Cubic Meters)	Units: Cubic Meters	AC9 - Value accuracy
11	Check number of days calculation	Table shows days between current and previous reading	Days: Calculated period between readings	AC9 - Days calculation per business rule
12	Verify data consistency	Chart and table display identical consumption values	Consistency: Chart data = Table data	AC9 - Data integrity requirement
13	Check "Export" button functionality	Export button visible and clickable for data download	Button: Export (with download icon)	AC9 - Export capability
14	Test chart responsiveness	Chart adjusts properly to browser window resize	Responsiveness: Chart adapts to window size	AC9 - UI responsiveness
15	Verify empty state handling	If no consumption data, appropriate message displayed	Empty state: "No consumption data available"	AC9 - Edge case handling
16	Check chart rendering performance	Chart loads and renders within 2 seconds	Performance: <2 seconds rendering	AC9 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Consumption data accurately displayed in both chart and table formats with identical values
• Secondary_Verifications: Chart interactivity, export functionality, responsive design
• Negative_Verification: No data mismatches between chart and table, no rendering errors

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record consumption display accuracy and format consistency]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: Export functionality tests
• Parallel_Tests: Reading history tests
• Sequential_Tests: Consumption analytics tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Important for consumption pattern analysis and billing verification
• Edge_Cases: Zero consumption periods, data gaps, large consumption values
• Risk_Areas: Chart rendering performance, data synchronization between formats
• Security_Considerations: Consumption data access control, export permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Chart time period customization (select different date ranges)
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Users may need different time periods for analysis
• Priority: P3
• Scenario_2: Consumption comparison features (year-over-year, meter-to-meter)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Advanced analytics for consumption pattern analysis
• Priority: P4

---

Test Case 10: Activity Log Maintenance

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_010

Title: Verify complete activity log tracking of all meter-related actions with timestamps and user attribution

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, ActivityLog, Audit, Compliance, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Report-Security-Validation, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Audit-Service, Activity-Tracking, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Activity Log Service, Audit Trail Database, User Management
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Engineering
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC10, Business Rule: "System should display all the activities that are done related to the meter"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_007

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Activity Log Service, Audit Database, User Authentication Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds log loading
• Data_Requirements: Meter with comprehensive activity history

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with various logged activities (creation, status changes, service orders)
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with activity history
  • Activities: Installation, status changes, service orders, assignments
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 logs tab	Logs tab becomes active and activity log loads	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Logs	AC10 - Activity log access
2	Verify activity log section structure	Activity log section visible with proper heading and layout	Section: Activity log display	AC10 - Log interface
3	Check log entry format	Each log entry shows action, user, timestamp in consistent format	Format: Action - User - Timestamp	AC10 - Entry structure per business rule
4	Verify meter installation log entry	Initial "Meter installed" or "Meter created" entry present	Entry: "Meter installed" with timestamp 2025-08-06	AC10 - Creation record
5	Check installation entry details	Installation entry shows installation date, user who added meter	Details: Installation date=2025-08-06, User=installer	AC10 - Installation tracking
6	Verify status change log entries	Status updates recorded as "Status changed from X to Y"	Entry: "Status changed to Assigned"	AC10 - State transition logging
7	Check consumer assignment log	Consumer assignment/unassignment activities logged	Entry: "Consumer assigned: testing draft"	AC10 - Assignment tracking
8	Verify service order creation log	Service order activities appear in log	Entry: "Service order created: Maintenance"	AC10 - Service activity logging
9	Check log chronological order	Entries sorted by timestamp (newest first or oldest first consistently)	Order: Most recent activities first	AC10 - Chronological sequence
10	Verify user attribution	Each log entry shows who performed the action	User: Current user, system user, or specific user name	AC10 - User tracking per business rule
11	Check timestamp accuracy	Timestamps show date and time of actions accurately	Format: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS or equivalent	AC10 - Time tracking
12	Verify log completeness	All performed actions during test appear in log	Coverage: All test actions logged	AC10 - Complete audit trail
13	Test log entry details	Click on log entries to see additional details if available	Action: Expand log entry details	AC10 - Detailed information
14	Check log pagination/scrolling	For extensive logs, pagination or scrolling works properly	Navigation: Log history navigation	AC10 - Log navigation
15	Verify log data persistence	Log entries remain accurate after page refresh	Persistence: Data retained after refresh	AC10 - Data integrity
16	Check log performance	Activity log loads within 2 seconds	Performance: <2 seconds load time	AC10 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All meter activities properly logged with accurate timestamps and user attribution
• Secondary_Verifications: Chronological ordering, log completeness, data persistence
• Negative_Verification: No missing activities, no incorrect user attribution, no timestamp errors

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record activity log accuracy and completeness]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Audit compliance tests
• Sequential_Tests: Log export and reporting tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for compliance, troubleshooting, and audit requirements
• Edge_Cases: Bulk operations logging, system-initiated actions, concurrent user actions
• Risk_Areas: Log data integrity, performance with extensive history, storage management
• Security_Considerations: Audit trail protection, access control for sensitive activities

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Activity log export functionality for compliance reporting
• Type: Compliance
• Rationale: Audit requirements may need exportable activity logs
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Activity log filtering and search capabilities
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Large activity logs need filtering for specific action types or date ranges
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 11: Notes Management

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_011

Title: Verify notes addition and viewing functionality with creator attribution and timestamp tracking

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Notes, Collaboration, Communication, MOD-Meter, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Engineering, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Notes-Service, Collaboration-Tools, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Notes Service API, User Management Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Product
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC11, Business Rule: "System should allow user to create notes and view notes created by others with information like created by and created on"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Notes Service API, User Authentication
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second note save
• Data_Requirements: Clean meter record for note testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Operational meter with notes capability
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with notes creation rights
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700
  • Test note content examples
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 notes tab	Notes tab becomes active, notes interface loads	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Notes	AC11 - Notes interface access
2	Verify notes section header	"Notes" section clearly labeled with description "View notes of this meter"	Header: Notes, Description: View notes of this meter	AC11 - Section identification per user story
3	Verify notes input interface	Text area with placeholder "Add a note..." and "Add Note" button visible	Interface: Text area + Add Note button	AC11 - Note creation interface per user story
4	Check text area functionality	Text area accepts input and displays typed content	Input field: Functional text area	AC11 - Input capability
5	Enter note content	Type note text in text area	Note content: "Meter calibration scheduled for next month due to unusual reading patterns"	AC11 - Note input
6	Verify "Add Note" button state	Button becomes enabled when text is entered	Button state: Enabled with text input	AC11 - Button activation
7	Click "Add Note" button	Note saves successfully and appears in notes list	Action: Save note	AC11 - Note creation per business rule
8	Verify note display format	New note shows with creator name and timestamp	Format: Note text + Created by: [current user] + Created on: [timestamp]	AC11 - Note metadata per business rule
9	Check note creator attribution	Note shows "Created by: [current user name]"	Creator: Current logged-in user	AC11 - Creator tracking per business rule
10	Verify note timestamp	Note shows "Created on: [current date/time]"	Timestamp: Current date and time	AC11 - Timestamp tracking per business rule
11	Add second note	Enter and save additional note to test multiple notes	Note content: "Customer reported water quality concerns - follow up required"	AC11 - Multiple notes support
12	Verify note ordering	Notes displayed in chronological order (newest first or consistent order)	Order: Most recent note first	AC11 - Note sequencing
13	Check note persistence	Notes remain visible after page refresh	Persistence: Notes retained after refresh	AC11 - Data persistence
14	Verify note viewing by others	Notes created by other users visible with their creator information	Visibility: Multi-user note access	AC11 - Collaborative viewing per business rule
15	Test note content display	Long notes display properly without truncation or with expand functionality	Content: Full note text visibility	AC11 - Content display
16	Check note save performance	Note saving completes within 1 second	Performance: <1 second save time	AC11 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Notes can be created and viewed by all authorized users with proper creator and timestamp attribution
• Secondary_Verifications: Note ordering, persistence, multi-user functionality
• Negative_Verification: No note loss, no incorrect attribution, no unauthorized access

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record note creation and viewing functionality]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Monthly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Activity log tests
• Sequential_Tests: Note management workflow tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Facilitates team communication and knowledge sharing about specific meters
• Edge_Cases: Very long notes, special characters, concurrent note creation
• Risk_Areas: Note data loss, incorrect user attribution, performance with many notes
• Security_Considerations: Note access control, user authentication for note creation

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Note editing and deletion functionality
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Users may need to correct or update notes after creation
• Priority: P4
• Scenario_2: Note search and filtering capabilities
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Meters with many notes may need search functionality
• Priority: P4

---

Test Case 12: Work Order Tracking

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_012

Title: Verify work order tracking with status updates (Pending, In Progress, Completed, Cancelled) and completion records

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, WorkOrder, Tracking, Status, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-WorkOrder-System, Service-Tracking, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Work Order Service, Status Management API, Service Order System
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, Smoke-Test-Results
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC12, Business Rule: "Work orders must have one of the following statuses: Pending, In Progress, Completed, Cancelled"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_007, MX01US02_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Work Order Service, Status Management API, Service Orders (WX) System
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Meter with existing work orders in various statuses

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with work order history including different statuses
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with work order viewing rights
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with work orders
  • Sample work orders: "MAINTENANCE" (COMPLETED), others in various statuses
  • Created by: "John Smith", "Mike Johnson"
  • Dates: "2024-12-10", "2025-04-15"
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_007 (Service order creation)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 work orders tab	Work Orders tab becomes active, service orders list loads	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Work Orders	AC12 - Work order access
2	Verify work orders section structure	Section shows list of service orders with proper headers	Section: Service orders list	AC12 - Order tracking interface
3	Check work order display format	Each order shows service type in bold/larger text	Format: Service type prominently displayed	AC12 - Order identification per user story
4	Verify "MAINTENANCE" work order	Shows "MAINTENANCE" service type prominently	Service type: "MAINTENANCE"	AC12 - Service type display per user story
5	Check work order notes/description	Shows notes added during service order creation	Notes: Service order description/notes	AC12 - Order details per user story
6	Verify created by information	Shows "Created By: John Smith" and "Mike Johnson"	Created By: "John Smith", "Mike Johnson"	AC12 - Creator attribution per user story
7	Check work order dates	Shows creation dates "2024-12-10" and "2025-04-15"	Date: "2024-12-10", "2025-04-15"	AC12 - Date tracking per user story
8	Verify status indicators	Shows status "COMPLETED" with appropriate visual indicator	Status: "COMPLETED"	AC12 - Status display per business rule
9	Check status options compliance	Verify statuses are from allowed set: Pending, In Progress, Completed, Cancelled	Status set: Pending/In Progress/Completed/Cancelled	AC12 - Status validation per business rule
10	Verify visual status indicators	Each status has distinct visual representation (color, icon, etc.)	Visual: Status-specific indicators	AC12 - Status visualization
11	Check completion information	Completed orders show completion date and additional details	Completion: Date and completion data	AC12 - Completion tracking per business rule
12	Verify work order chronological order	Orders sorted by date (newest first or consistent order)	Order: Date-based sorting	AC12 - Order sequencing
13	Check work order details expandability	Click on orders to see additional details if available	Action: Expand order details	AC12 - Detailed information access
14	Verify work order count accuracy	Number of displayed orders matches actual count	Count: Accurate order count	AC12 - Data accuracy
15	Check integration with service orders (WX)	Information fetched from service orders (WX) system	Integration: WX system data	AC12 - System integration per business rule
16	Verify work order performance	Work orders load within 2 seconds	Performance: <2 seconds load time	AC12 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All work orders tracked with accurate status updates and completion records from WX system
• Secondary_Verifications: Status transitions valid, creator attribution accurate, dates correct
• Negative_Verification: No invalid statuses, no missing completion data, no unauthorized status changes

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record work order tracking accuracy and status management]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_007
• Blocked_Tests: Work order completion workflow tests
• Parallel_Tests: Service order management tests
• Sequential_Tests: Work order status transition tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for service delivery tracking and operational efficiency
• Edge_Cases: Large numbers of work orders, concurrent status updates, integration failures
• Risk_Areas: Status synchronization with WX system, data integrity during updates
• Security_Considerations: Work order access control, status change authorization

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Work order status transition workflow (Pending → In Progress → Completed)
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Complete lifecycle management critical for service delivery
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Work order filtering and search by status, date, or creator
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Large work order lists need filtering for efficient management
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 13: Meter Reassignment

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_013

Title: Verify meter reassignment to different consumers with historical tracking and status updates

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

lk Meter Addition

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_015

Title: Verify bulk meter addition functionality through data upload module with CSV validation and processing

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, BulkAdd, DataUpload, CSV, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Performance-Metrics, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-DataUpload-Service, Bulk-Operations, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Data Upload Module, File Validation Service, Bulk Processing API
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, Performance-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC15, Business Rule: "Bulk Add button should navigate user to data upload module"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001, MX01US02_TC_016

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Data Upload Module, File Processing Service, Bulk Validation API
• Performance_Baseline: < 10 seconds for 100 meters
• Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file with meter data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Data upload module operational and accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with bulk addition rights
• Test_Data:
• • CSV file with valid meter data (10-20 test meters)
  • Required CSV columns: Device Number, Utility Service, Meter Type, Category, etc.
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001 (Dashboard access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter list view	Meter list displays with bulk add button visible	View: Meter list	AC15 - Access bulk addition
2	Locate "Bulk Add Meter" button	Button visible and accessible in meter list interface	Button: Bulk Add Meter	AC15 - Bulk add interface per user story
3	Click "Bulk Add Meter" button	Navigation to data upload module occurs	Action: Navigate to upload module	AC15 - Navigation per business rule
4	Verify data upload module interface	Upload interface loads with file upload area and instructions	Interface: Data upload module	AC15 - Upload module access
5	Check upload interface components	File upload area, instructions, and processing controls visible	Components: Upload area + instructions	AC15 - Upload interface completeness
6	Verify file format instructions	Clear instructions for CSV format and required columns	Instructions: CSV format requirements	AC15 - User guidance
7	Select CSV file for upload	File selection dialog opens and allows CSV file selection	File: Valid meter CSV	AC15 - File selection capability
8	Upload CSV file	File uploads successfully and is accepted by system	Upload: CSV file processing	AC15 - File upload functionality
9	Verify file validation process	System validates CSV structure and content	Validation: File format and data validation	AC15 - Data validation
10	Check data preview functionality	Preview of meter data shown before final processing	Preview: CSV data display	AC15 - Data preview per user story
11	Verify data validation results	Validation errors highlighted, valid records identified	Results: Validation feedback	AC15 - Validation reporting
12	Confirm bulk upload processing	Click confirm/process to proceed with bulk meter addition	Action: Confirm bulk processing	AC15 - Bulk processing execution
13	Monitor processing progress	Progress indicator shows bulk processing status	Progress: Processing status indicator	AC15 - Processing feedback
14	Verify processing completion	Success message and processing summary displayed	Completion: Processing results summary	AC15 - Processing completion
15	Return to meter list	Navigate back to meter list to verify additions	Navigation: Back to meter list	AC15 - Result verification
16	Verify meter count update	Dashboard meter count increased by number of added meters	Count: Dashboard total increased	AC15 - Count update per user story
17	Check individual meter addition	New meters appear in meter list with correct data	Verification: Individual meters listed	AC15 - Individual meter verification per user story
18	Verify bulk processing performance	Processing completed within acceptable time limits	Performance: <10 seconds for 100 meters	AC15 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Bulk meter addition successfully processes and adds all valid meters to system
• Secondary_Verifications: Data validation works, processing feedback provided, counts updated
• Negative_Verification: Invalid data rejected, partial failures handled gracefully, no data corruption

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record bulk addition process and results]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Monthly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Individual meter addition tests
• Sequential_Tests: Bulk data validation tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for large-scale meter deployments and system migration
• Edge_Cases: Large files (1000+ meters), malformed CSV data, duplicate meter numbers
• Risk_Areas: File processing performance, data validation accuracy, system resource usage
• Security_Considerations: File upload security, data validation, bulk operation authorization

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Error handling for malformed CSV files and duplicate meter numbers
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Bulk operations must handle data quality issues gracefully
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Bulk processing rollback for failed uploads
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Failed bulk operations should not leave system in inconsistent state
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 14: Alert Tracking and Display

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_014

Title: Verify alert conditions tracking and active alert count display for RCNT, Faulty, and Exemption alerts

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Alerts, Monitoring, Validation, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Security-Validation, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Alert-Service, Alert-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Alert Service API, Validation System, Meter Validation Page
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, Security-Validation
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC14, Business Rule: "Display alerts regarding meter in cases of RCNT, Faulty, Exemptions received for the meters"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_008

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Alert Service API, Validation System, Meter Validation Integration
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Meter with validation alerts (RCNT, Faulty, Exemption)

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with validation alerts generated from validation process
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with alerts
  • Alert types: RCNT, Faulty, Exemptions
  • Current alert count: 0 (as shown in key stats)
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 detail view	Detail view loads with key stats visible	Meter: ME57700	AC14 - Alert count access
2	Verify key stats section	Key stats section shows "Alerts (3 months): 0"	Stats: Alerts (3 months): 0	AC14 - Alert count display per user story
3	Check alert count time period	Alert count specifically shows "3 months" time frame	Period: 3 months	AC14 - Time period specification per user story
4	Navigate to "Alerts" tab	Alerts tab becomes active, alerts section loads	Tab: Alerts	AC14 - Alert details access
5	Verify alerts section structure	Shows alerts list with proper headers and layout	Section: Alerts display area	AC14 - Alert interface
6	Check alert types supported	System supports RCNT, Faulty, Exemption alert types	Types: RCNT, Faulty, Exemptions	AC14 - Alert categories per business rule
7	Verify alert card format	Each alert shows name, date, details button format	Format: Alert name + Date + Details button	AC14 - Alert display format per user story
8	Check alert creation date	Shows when alert was logged with accurate timestamp	Date: Alert creation timestamp	AC14 - Alert timestamp per user story
9	Verify "Details" button functionality	Details button navigates to meter validation page	Button: Details → Validation page	AC14 - Alert details navigation per user story
10	Test alert details navigation	Click Details button opens meter validation page for specific alert	Navigation: To meter validation page	AC14 - Validation page integration per user story
11	Verify alert logging source	Alerts are logged after validation process completion	Source: Post-validation logging	AC14 - Alert creation process per user story
12	Check alert status indication	Shows if alert is active, resolved, or acknowledged	Status: Active/Resolved status	AC14 - Alert lifecycle tracking
13	Verify alert count accuracy	Alert count in key stats matches number of active alerts	Accuracy: Count = Active alerts	AC14 - Count accuracy
14	Test alert filtering by type	If multiple alerts, verify type-based organization	Filter: Alert type grouping	AC14 - Alert categorization
15	Check alert persistence	Alerts remain after page refresh and maintain accuracy	Persistence: Data retained	AC14 - Alert data integrity
16	Verify alert performance	Alerts section loads within 2 seconds	Performance: <2 seconds load	AC14 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All meter alerts properly tracked and displayed with accurate counts for RCNT, Faulty, and Exemption types
• Secondary_Verifications: Alert navigation works, timestamps accurate, details accessible
• Negative_Verification: No false alerts, no missing alerts, proper categorization only

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record alert tracking and display accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: Alert resolution workflow tests
• Parallel_Tests: Validation system tests
• Sequential_Tests: Alert notification and escalation tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Important for proactive meter issue identification and resolution
• Edge_Cases: High alert volumes, alert resolution workflows, alert escalation
• Risk_Areas: Alert accuracy, timely alert generation, alert resolution tracking
• Security_Considerations: Alert access control, alert data integrity, validation system security

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Alert resolution workflow and status management
• Type: Integration
• Rationale: Complete alert lifecycle management including resolution and acknowledgment
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Alert notification and escalation for critical meter issues
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Critical alerts may require immediate notification to appropriate personnel
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 15: Bulk Meter Addition

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_015

Title: Verify bulk meter addition functionality through data upload module with CSV validation and processing

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, BulkAdd, DataUpload, CSV, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Performance-Metrics, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-DataUpload-Service, Bulk-Operations, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Data Upload Module, File Validation Service, Bulk Processing API
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering, Performance-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC15, Business Rule: "Bulk Add button should navigate user to data upload module"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001, MX01US02_TC_016

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Data Upload Module, File Processing Service, Bulk Validation API
• Performance_Baseline: < 10 seconds for 100 meters
• Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file with meter data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Data upload module operational and accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with bulk addition rights
• Test_Data:
• • CSV file with valid meter data (10-20 test meters)
  • Required CSV columns: Device Number, Utility Service, Meter Type, Category, etc.
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001 (Dashboard access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter list view	Meter list displays with bulk add button visible	View: Meter list	AC15 - Access bulk addition
2	Locate "Bulk Add Meter" button	Button visible and accessible in meter list interface	Button: Bulk Add Meter	AC15 - Bulk add interface per user story
3	Click "Bulk Add Meter" button	Navigation to data upload module occurs	Action: Navigate to upload module	AC15 - Navigation per business rule
4	Verify data upload module interface	Upload interface loads with file upload area and instructions	Interface: Data upload module	AC15 - Upload module access
5	Check upload interface components	File upload area, instructions, and processing controls visible	Components: Upload area + instructions	AC15 - Upload interface completeness
6	Verify file format instructions	Clear instructions for CSV format and required columns	Instructions: CSV format requirements	AC15 - User guidance
7	Select CSV file for upload	File selection dialog opens and allows CSV file selection	File: Valid meter CSV	AC15 - File selection capability
8	Upload CSV file	File uploads successfully and is accepted by system	Upload: CSV file processing	AC15 - File upload functionality
9	Verify file validation process	System validates CSV structure and content	Validation: File format and data validation	AC15 - Data validation
10	Check data preview functionality	Preview of meter data shown before final processing	Preview: CSV data display	AC15 - Data preview per user story
11	Verify data validation results	Validation errors highlighted, valid records identified	Results: Validation feedback	AC15 - Validation reporting
12	Confirm bulk upload processing	Click confirm/process to proceed with bulk meter addition	Action: Confirm bulk processing	AC15 - Bulk processing execution
13	Monitor processing progress	Progress indicator shows bulk processing status	Progress: Processing status indicator	AC15 - Processing feedback
14	Verify processing completion	Success message and processing summary displayed	Completion: Processing results summary	AC15 - Processing completion
15	Return to meter list	Navigate back to meter list to verify additions	Navigation: Back to meter list	AC15 - Result verification
16	Verify meter count update	Dashboard meter count increased by number of added meters	Count: Dashboard total increased	AC15 - Count update per user story
17	Check individual meter addition	New meters appear in meter list with correct data	Verification: Individual meters listed	AC15 - Individual meter verification per user story
18	Verify bulk processing performance	Processing completed within acceptable time limits	Performance: <10 seconds for 100 meters	AC15 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Bulk meter addition successfully processes and adds all valid meters to system
• Secondary_Verifications: Data validation works, processing feedback provided, counts updated
• Negative_Verification: Invalid data rejected, partial failures handled gracefully, no data corruption

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record bulk addition process and results]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Monthly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Individual meter addition tests
• Sequential_Tests: Bulk data validation tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for large-scale meter deployments and system migration
• Edge_Cases: Large files (1000+ meters), malformed CSV data, duplicate meter numbers
• Risk_Areas: File processing performance, data validation accuracy, system resource usage
• Security_Considerations: File upload security, data validation, bulk operation authorization

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Error handling for malformed CSV files and duplicate meter numbers
• Type: Error Handling
• Rationale: Bulk operations must handle data quality issues gracefully
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Bulk processing rollback for failed uploads
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Failed bulk operations should not leave system in inconsistent state
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 16: Meter Information Editing

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_016

Title: Verify meter information editing with field-level permissions and change history maintenance

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Edit, ChangeHistory, Permissions, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-Engineering, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Security-Validation, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Change-Management, Meter-Editing, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Meter Update API, Change Log Service, Permission Management
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC16, Business Rule: "Edit should open add form in edit mode and fields editable are mentioned above"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_010

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Meter Update API, Change History Service, Permission Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Existing meter with complete profile

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with complete data profile for editing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with editing rights
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700 with current data
  • Test modification data: Floor change, geolocation update
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 detail view	Detail view loads with Edit button visible	Meter: ME57700	AC16 - Access edit functionality
2	Click "Edit" button	Edit form opens in edit mode with current data populated	Button: Edit	AC16 - Edit mode activation per user story
3	Verify form displays current meter data	All fields populated with existing meter information	Data: Current meter values	AC16 - Data population in edit mode
4	Check editable fields per business rules	Category, Subcategory, Premise, Floor, Latitude, Longitude are editable	Editable: Category, Subcategory, Premise, Floor, Lat, Long	AC16 - Editable fields per business rule
5	Verify non-editable fields per business rules	Device Number, Utility Service, Meter Type are non-editable/disabled	Non-editable: Device Number, Utility Service, Meter Type	AC16 - Protected fields per business rule
6	Test Category field editability	Category field allows modification via searchable dropdown	Field: Category (editable)	AC16 - Field permission verification
7	Test Subcategory field editability	Subcategory field allows modification via searchable dropdown	Field: Subcategory (editable)	AC16 - Field permission verification
8	Test Premise field editability	Premise field allows modification via searchable dropdown	Field: Premise (editable)	AC16 - Field permission verification
9	Modify Floor field	Change floor number successfully	Modification: Floor: "2"	AC16 - Data modification per user story
10	Update geolocation coordinates	Change latitude and longitude values	Modification: Lat: 12.345, Long: 67.890	AC16 - Location update per user story
11	Verify consumer assignment toggle functionality	Toggle can be turned on/off for consumer assignment	Toggle: Consumer assignment control	AC16 - Assignment modification capability
12	Test manufacturer and model fields	Fields editable based on availability in settings	Fields: Manufacturer, Model (editable if in settings)	AC16 - Settings-dependent editability
13	Save changes	Form submits successfully with updated data	Action: Save modifications	AC16 - Save operation per user story
14	Verify changes reflected in detail view	Updated data appears in meter details immediately	Verification: Changes visible	AC16 - Data persistence per user story
15	Check activity log for edit action	Edit action logged with details of changes made	Log: "Meter information updated" action	AC16 - Change tracking per user story
16	Verify change history maintenance	Specific changes documented in activity log	History: Modified fields listed	AC16 - Change history per business rule
17	Test data validation during edit	Invalid data rejected with appropriate error messages	Validation: Field validation active	AC16 - Edit validation
18	Verify edit performance	Edit form saves and updates within 3 seconds	Performance: <3 seconds save	AC16 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Meter information successfully updated with proper field restrictions and change tracking
• Secondary_Verifications: Field permissions enforced, validation active, change logging accurate
• Negative_Verification: Protected fields cannot be modified, invalid data rejected, unauthorized edits prevented

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record edit functionality and permission enforcement]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Medium
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Permission management tests
• Sequential_Tests: Change approval workflow tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Important for maintaining accurate meter information while protecting critical data
• Edge_Cases: Concurrent edits, permission changes during editing, validation rule changes
• Risk_Areas: Data integrity during edits, permission enforcement, change tracking accuracy
• Security_Considerations: Edit authorization, field-level security, audit trail protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Concurrent editing prevention (edit conflicts when multiple users edit simultaneously)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Data integrity requires handling of simultaneous edit attempts
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Edit approval workflow for critical field changes
• Type: Business Rule
• Rationale: Some field changes may require approval before taking effect
• Priority: P3

---

Test Case 17: Key Statistics Display

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_017

Title: Verify key statistics display with accurate calculations for days in service, installation date, alerts count, and maintenance history

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Statistics, Analytics, Calculations, MOD-Meter, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Analytics-Service, Statistics-Display, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Analytics Service, Calculation Engine, Alert Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics, User-Acceptance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC17, Business Rule: "Days in service: total number of days the meter is in service from installed to disposed"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004, MX01US02_TC_014

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Analytics Service, Date Calculation Engine, Alert Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Meter with known installation date and history

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter with complete installation and service history
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Meter ME57700
  • Installation date: 2025-08-06
  • Current date for calculation: 2025-08-17 (11 days)
  • Alerts count: 0 (last 3 months)
  • Last maintenance: NA
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter ME57700 detail view	Detail view loads with Key Stats section visible	Meter: ME57700	AC17 - Statistics access
2	Locate "Key Stats" section	Key Stats section clearly labeled and positioned	Section: Key Stats	AC17 - Statistics section identification
3	Verify "Days in service" calculation	Shows "Days in service: 11" (calculated from installation to current date)	Calculation: 11 days (2025-08-06 to 2025-08-17)	AC17 - Days calculation per business rule
4	Check days in service accuracy	Calculation matches actual days between installation date and current date	Accuracy: Installation=2025-08-06, Current=2025-08-17	AC17 - Auto-calculation per user story
5	Verify "Installed" date display	Shows "Installed: 2025-08-06" from original installation	Date: 2025-08-06	AC17 - Installation date per user story
6	Check installation date source	Date matches original installation date from add meter form	Source: Original installation date	AC17 - Historical data accuracy
7	Verify "Alerts (3 months)" count	Shows "Alerts (3 months): 0" for last 3 months period	Count: 0 alerts	AC17 - Alert summary per user story
8	Check alerts time period specification	Alert count specifically covers "3 months" time frame	Period: 3 months	AC17 - Time period per business rule
9	Verify "Last maintenance" display	Shows "Last maintenance: NA" when no maintenance performed	Maintenance: NA	AC17 - Maintenance tracking per user story
10	Check last maintenance logic	If no maintenance done, displays installation date or NA	Logic: Display installation date if no maintenance	AC17 - Maintenance fallback per business rule
11	Verify date calculations update	Statistics reflect current state and update with changes	Updates: Real-time calculation	AC17 - Dynamic updates per user story
12	Check statistical accuracy	All date-based calculations are mathematically correct	Accuracy: Correct date arithmetic	AC17 - Calculation accuracy per user story
13	Verify real-time data updates	Statistics update when meter data changes (status, alerts, etc.)	Updates: Dynamic statistics	AC17 - Real-time updates per user story
14	Check display formatting	All statistics properly formatted and clearly readable	Format: Consistent display format	AC17 - UI consistency
15	Verify missing data handling	Graceful handling when data is not available (NA values)	Handling: NA for missing data	AC17 - Missing data handling per user story
16	Check statistics performance	All statistics calculate and display within 1 second	Performance: <1 second calculation	AC17 - Performance requirement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All key statistics accurately calculated and displayed with real-time updates
• Secondary_Verifications: Date calculations correct, missing data handled properly, formatting consistent
• Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, no missing statistics, proper handling of edge cases

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record statistics accuracy and calculation results]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Alert tracking tests
• Sequential_Tests: Statistics reporting tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Provides quick operational overview of meter status and history
• Edge_Cases: Leap years in date calculations, timezone considerations, meter disposal impact
• Risk_Areas: Date calculation accuracy, real-time update performance, data synchronization
• Security_Considerations: Statistics data access control, calculation integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Statistics behavior after meter disposal (days in service calculation from installed to disposed)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Business rule specifies calculation should include disposal date
• Priority: P3
• Scenario_2: Statistics export functionality for reporting purposes
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Users may need to export key statistics for reports
• Priority: P4

---

Test Case 18: Export Functionality

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_018

Title: Verify export functionality for meter data and consumption history with accurate data extraction

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Export, DataExtract, CSV, MOD-Meter, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Export-Service, Data-Export, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Export Service, File Generation API, Data Formatting Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Product
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC18, Business Rule: "System must provide export functionality for meter data and consumption history"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001, MX01US02_TC_009

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Export Service, File Generation API, Download Management
• Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for 1000 records
• Data_Requirements: Meter list and consumption data for export testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter list with exportable data and consumption history
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with export rights
• Test_Data:
• • Multiple meters in system for bulk export
  • Meter ME57700 with consumption history for specific export
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_001 (Meter list access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter list view	Meter list displays with export option visible	View: Main meter list	AC18 - Export access from list
2	Locate "Export CSV" button	Export button visible and accessible in meter list interface	Button: Export CSV (with download icon)	AC18 - Export interface per user story
3	Click "Export CSV" button	Export process initiates with progress indication	Action: Initiate export	AC18 - Export process start
4	Monitor export processing	Export progress indicator or confirmation message appears	Progress: Export processing feedback	AC18 - Export processing
5	Verify file download	CSV file downloads to local machine automatically	Download: meters_export.csv or similar	AC18 - File download per user story
6	Check downloaded file accessibility	File successfully saved and can be opened	File: Accessible CSV file	AC18 - File accessibility
7	Open and verify CSV structure	File opens in spreadsheet application with proper CSV format	Format: Standard CSV structure	AC18 - File format validation per user story
8	Check exported data completeness	All visible meter fields included in export	Fields: Complete meter data	AC18 - Data completeness per user story
9	Verify data accuracy	Exported data matches meter list display exactly	Accuracy: Export = Display data	AC18 - Data integrity per user story
10	Navigate to specific meter consumption	Access meter ME57700 consumption history	Meter: ME57700, Tab: Readings	AC18 - Consumption export preparation
11	Locate consumption export button	Export button visible in consumption history section	Button: Export (in consumption section)	AC18 - Consumption export interface
12	Click consumption export button	Consumption data export process initiates	Action: Export consumption data	AC18 - Consumption export per user story
13	Verify consumption file download	Consumption CSV file downloads successfully	Download: consumption_export.csv	AC18 - Consumption file download
14	Check consumption file content	File contains reading history with dates, values, validation status	Content: Reading data with validation	AC18 - Consumption data validation per user story
15	Verify export performance	Large dataset exports complete within acceptable time	Performance: <5 seconds for 1000 records	AC18 - Performance requirement
16	Test export with filtered data	Export functionality works with filtered meter views	Filter: Export filtered results	AC18 - Filtered export capability

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Export functionality generates accurate and complete data files for both meter list and consumption data
• Secondary_Verifications: File format correctness, download performance, data integrity maintained
• Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no missing records, proper handling of large datasets

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record export functionality and file accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Monthly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_001
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Data reporting tests
• Sequential_Tests: External system integration tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Important for data analysis, reporting, and integration with external systems
• Edge_Cases: Very large datasets, special characters in data, network interruptions during download
• Risk_Areas: Export performance with large datasets, data accuracy, file corruption
• Security_Considerations: Export authorization, data privacy, file access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Export format options (Excel, PDF, JSON in addition to CSV)
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Different stakeholders may prefer different export formats
• Priority: P4
• Scenario_2: Scheduled exports and automated reporting
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Regular reporting may benefit from automated export functionality
• Priority: P4

---

Test Case19: Invalid State Transition Prevention

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_019

Title: Verify prevention of invalid meter state transitions with appropriate error messages and business rule enforcement

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Negative
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Negative, Meter, StateTransition, Validation, BusinessRules, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-State-Management, Validation-Engine, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: State Management API, Validation Engine, Business Rule Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC19, Business Rule: "Invalid meter status transitions must be prevented (e.g., cannot go from Disposed to Assigned)"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_020, MX01US02_TC_013

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: State Management API, Validation Engine, Business Rule Engine
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Meters in different states (Disposed, Assigned, Unassigned, Maintenance)

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meters in various states for testing invalid transitions
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access
• Test_Data:
• • Disposed meter for testing invalid transitions
  • Assigned meter for testing disposal restrictions
  • Various status combinations for transition testing
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to disposed meter detail view	Detail view shows meter with "Disposed" status	Status: Disposed	AC19 - Access disposed meter
2	Attempt to access consumer assignment	Assignment functionality disabled or blocked	Action: Try to assign consumer	AC19 - Invalid operation prevention
3	Verify assignment option unavailability	Assignment toggle/option not available or disabled	UI: Assignment controls disabled	AC19 - UI restriction for invalid state
4	Try to create service order for disposed meter	Service order creation blocked or restricted	Action: Attempt service order creation	AC19 - Invalid service operation
5	Verify service order restriction	"Raise Service Order" button disabled or error message shown	Error: Service order blocked for disposed meter	AC19 - Service restriction per business rule
6	Attempt status change from Disposed to Assigned	Status change rejected with error message	Transition: Disposed → Assigned (invalid)	AC19 - Invalid transition prevention
7	Verify error message for invalid transition	Clear error message: "Cannot assign disposed meter" or similar	Error: "Cannot assign disposed meter"	AC19 - Error messaging per user story
8	Navigate to assigned meter	Access meter currently assigned to consumer	Status: Assigned	AC19 - Test disposal restriction
9	Attempt to dispose assigned meter	Disposal action blocked until meter is unassigned	Action: Try to dispose assigned meter	AC19 - Disposal restriction
10	Verify disposal restriction message	Error message: "Must unassign before disposal" or similar	Error: "Must unassign before disposal"	AC19 - Disposal rule per user story
11	Test other invalid transitions	Try various invalid status combinations	Transitions: Invalid state combinations	AC19 - Comprehensive transition validation
12	Verify UI restrictions for invalid states	Interface elements disabled/hidden for invalid operations	UI: State-appropriate controls	AC19 - UI state management
13	Check business rule enforcement	All business rules consistently enforced across interface	Rules: Consistent enforcement	AC19 - Business rule compliance
14	Verify error message clarity	All error messages provide clear guidance to users	Messages: Clear and actionable	AC19 - User guidance
15	Test validation performance	State validation occurs within 1 second	Performance: <1 second validation	AC19 - Performance requirement
16	Verify state consistency	System maintains consistent state after blocked operations	Consistency: State unchanged after blocked action	AC19 - State integrity

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All invalid state transitions properly blocked with clear error messages
• Secondary_Verifications: UI restrictions appropriate, business rules consistently enforced
• Negative_Verification: No unauthorized state changes possible, no system inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record state transition prevention and error handling]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Daily
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Business rule validation tests
• Sequential_Tests: State transition workflow tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Critical for maintaining data integrity and preventing invalid business operations
• Edge_Cases: Concurrent state changes, permission-based restrictions, bulk state operations
• Risk_Areas: Business rule bypass, state inconsistency, unauthorized operations
• Security_Considerations: State change authorization, audit trails for blocked attempts

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Complete state transition matrix validation (all possible valid and invalid transitions)
• Type: Business Rule
• Rationale: Comprehensive validation of all state combinations required for system integrity
• Priority: P1
• Scenario_2: Bulk operation state validation (prevent invalid bulk state changes)
• Type: Edge Case
• Rationale: Bulk operations must respect same state transition rules as individual operations
• Priority: P2

---

Test Case 20: Reason Documentation for Key Actions

Test Case ID: MX01US02_TC_020

Title: Verify reason documentation requirement for key actions like meter disposal and status changes with audit trail preservation

Test Case Metadata

• Created By: Hetal
• Created Date: 2025-01-17
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Meter Device Management
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: Happy-Path, Meter, Documentation, Compliance, Audit, MOD-Meter, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Audit-Service, Compliance-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: Audit Service, Reason Code API, Documentation System
• Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Engineering
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC20, Business Rule: "All changes to meter data must be logged with timestamp and user information"
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_010, MX01US02_TC_019

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Audit Service, Reason Documentation API, Activity Log Service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Unassigned meter ready for disposal testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Meter in unassigned status available for disposal testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor access with disposal rights
• Test_Data:
• • Unassigned meter for disposal testing
  • Reason text examples for documentation
• Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US02_TC_004 (Detail view access)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to unassigned meter detail view	Detail view loads with disposal option available	Status: Unassigned	AC20 - Access disposal function
2	Locate "Dispose" button	Dispose button visible and enabled for unassigned meter	Button: Dispose	AC20 - Disposal option availability
3	Click "Dispose" button	Confirmation dialog appears for disposal action	Dialog: Disposal confirmation	AC20 - Disposal confirmation
4	Verify disposal confirmation dialog	Dialog shows "This meter will be disposed, Do you still want to proceed"	Message: Disposal warning per user story	AC20 - Confirmation message per user story
5	Check dialog options	Dialog provides "Yes" and "No" options	Options: Yes/No buttons	AC20 - Confirmation choices per user story
6	Click "Yes" to proceed	Reason field appears and becomes mandatory	Field: Reason field displayed	AC20 - Reason requirement per user story
7	Verify reason field is mandatory	Cannot proceed without entering reason	Validation: Reason required	AC20 - Mandatory field per user story
8	Attempt to submit without reason	Validation error displayed	Error: "Reason is required" or similar	AC20 - Validation enforcement
9	Enter disposal reason	Reason field accepts detailed text input	Reason: "End of useful life - accuracy degraded beyond acceptable limits"	AC20 - Reason documentation per user story
10	Submit disposal with reason	Disposal process completes successfully	Action: Complete disposal	AC20 - Disposal execution
11	Verify meter status change	Meter status changes to "Disposed"	Status: Disposed	AC20 - Status update
12	Check activity log for disposal record	Disposal action logged with reason in activity log	Log: "Disposed - End of useful life - accuracy degraded beyond acceptable limits"	AC20 - Reason in audit trail per user story
13	Verify reason preservation	Disposal reason permanently stored and viewable	Storage: Reason retained	AC20 - Reason preservation per user story
14	Check timestamp and user attribution	Activity log shows disposal timestamp and user who performed action	Attribution: User and timestamp logged	AC20 - Audit information per business rule
15	Test reason field validation	Reason field validates for minimum content/length if required	Validation: Reason content validation	AC20 - Reason quality control
16	Verify audit trail completeness	Complete audit trail maintained for compliance	Audit: Complete disposal documentation	AC20 - Compliance documentation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All key actions require and store reason documentation with complete audit trails
• Secondary_Verifications: Reason validation active, audit trail accurate, compliance requirements met
• Negative_Verification: Cannot complete actions without required reasons, no audit trail gaps

Test Results (Template)

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Record reason documentation and audit trail accuracy]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

• Execution_Frequency: Weekly
• Maintenance_Effort: Low
• Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

• Blocking_Tests: MX01US02_TC_004
• Blocked_Tests: None
• Parallel_Tests: Audit compliance tests
• Sequential_Tests: Compliance reporting tests

Additional Information

• Notes: Essential for regulatory compliance, audit requirements, and operational accountability
• Edge_Cases: Very long reasons, special characters, reason editing/correction
• Risk_Areas: Audit trail integrity, reason data loss, compliance violations
• Security_Considerations: Reason data protection, audit trail tampering prevention, access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

• Scenario_1: Reason documentation for other key actions (status changes, consumer reassignments)
• Type: Business Rule
• Rationale: Comprehensive reason tracking may be required for all significant meter actions
• Priority: P2
• Scenario_2: Reason code standardization and dropdown selection
• Type: Enhancement
• Rationale: Standardized reason codes improve data consistency and reporting
• Priority: P3