System Admin Dashboard Test Cases - ONB05US01
Test Scenario Summary
This document contains comprehensive enhanced test cases for the System Admin Dashboard feature covering organization setup with weighted progress calculations, utility setup with 3-parameter formula, user adoption monitoring, security activity tracking, data upload functionality, subscription management, and user behavior tracking events.
Test Case 1: Organization Setup Weighted Progress Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_001
- Title: Verify Organization Setup displays 75% progress using weighted calculation (Currency 40% + Date Format 30% + Timezone 30%)
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Organization Setup Progress
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Organization Setup Service, Dashboard API, Calculation Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Organization-Setup-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Organization Setup Service, Database, Calculation Engine
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for progress calculation
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities organization with Currency: Complete, Date Format: Complete, Timezone: Pending
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities organization configured with partial setup
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with full dashboard access
- Test_Data: Organization "Metro Water Utilities", Currency task completed (40% weight), Date Format completed (30% weight), Timezone pending (0% weight)
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Organization Setup section displays exactly 70% progress using weighted calculation formula
- Secondary_Verifications: Individual task statuses are correct, progress bar visual matches percentage, Complete Setup button state aligns with completion
- Negative_Verification: Progress should not show 100% or any incorrect calculation, button should not be enabled
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: User authentication, Organization setup data creation
- Blocked_Tests: Complete Setup button functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other dashboard section tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must run after data setup, before button tests
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical test validating core business rule for weighted progress calculation
- Edge_Cases: Test with different completion combinations to verify formula accuracy
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect progress calculation could mislead users about setup completion
- Security_Considerations: Verify progress data is not manipulable by unauthorized users
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test all possible task completion combinations (8 scenarios) to validate weighted formula
- Type: Edge Case
- Rationale: Business rule specifies exact weightage, need comprehensive validation
- Priority: P1
Test Case 2: Visual Task Status Indicators Consistency
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_002
- Title: Verify visual distinction between completed (✓), in-progress (⧗), and pending (○) tasks using exact wireframe indicators
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Task Status Visualization
- Test Type: UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: None
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Organization Setup Service, UI Component Library
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, UI-Components
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results, Module-Coverage, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 116+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Organization Setup Service, UI Component Library
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for UI rendering
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with mixed task completion states
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities organization with specific task states
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role
- Test_Data: Currency: Complete (✓), Date Format: Pending (○), Timezone: In-Progress (⧗)
- Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_001 passed
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Tasks display appropriate visual indicators (✓, ○, ⧗) based on exact completion status
- Secondary_Verifications: Icons are clearly distinguishable, color coding is consistent, proper alignment maintained
- Negative_Verification: No task should display incorrect status icon or inconsistent visual treatment
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Organization setup data creation, Dashboard load
- Blocked_Tests: Status change workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other visual validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Follows basic dashboard load tests
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for user experience and onboarding clarity
- Edge_Cases: Test with all possible status combinations, different screen resolutions
- Risk_Areas: Inconsistent visual feedback could confuse users during setup process
- Security_Considerations: Status indicators should reflect actual data, not be manipulable
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test status icon changes during real-time updates when tasks are completed
- Type: Integration
- Rationale: Users need immediate visual feedback when completing tasks
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate icon accessibility compliance (color contrast, screen reader support)
- Type: Accessibility
- Rationale: B2B SaaS must meet accessibility standards
- Priority: P3
Test Case 3: Complete Setup Button State Management
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_003
- Title: Verify "Complete Setup" button is enabled only when Metro Water Utilities achieves 100% Organization Setup completion
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Complete Setup Button Logic
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Organization Setup Service, Navigation Service, Button State Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Organization-Setup-Module, Navigation-Controller
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Integration-Testing, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Organization Setup Service, Navigation Service, Org Setup Link handler
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for button state updates
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with configurable completion states
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities organization with controllable task completion states
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with organization setup permissions
- Test_Data: Metro Water Utilities organization, admin user john.admin@metrowater.com
- Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup data initialization successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: "Complete Setup" button is only enabled when Metro Water Utilities achieves 100% Organization Setup completion (all weighted tasks complete)
- Secondary_Verifications: Button state changes dynamically with progress updates, proper navigation to Org setup link occurs, user feedback is clear
- Negative_Verification: Button should not be clickable when setup is incomplete, should not bypass validation rules
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Organization setup initialization, Progress calculation tests
- Blocked_Tests: Organization setup completion workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other button state tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow progress calculation validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical business logic ensuring users complete required setup before proceeding
- Edge_Cases: Test button behavior during concurrent user sessions, network interruptions during completion
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect button state could allow incomplete setups or block valid completions
- Security_Considerations: Verify completion validation cannot be bypassed client-side
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test button state during real-time progress updates from other admin sessions
- Type: Concurrency
- Rationale: Multiple admins may work on setup simultaneously
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate button behavior during network disconnection/reconnection
- Type: Error Handling
- Rationale: Ensure button state remains accurate despite connectivity issues
- Priority: P2
Test Case 4: Continue Setup Button Navigation for Electric Services Co
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_004
- Title: Verify "Continue Setup" button directs Electric Services Co to next incomplete utility setup task (System Settings & Service Coverage at 34.1%)
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Continue Setup Navigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Utility Setup Service, Navigation Service, Utility setup link handler
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Utility-Setup-Module, Navigation-Controller
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Integration-Testing, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Utility Setup Service, Navigation Service, Three-step utility enhancement system
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for navigation response
- Data_Requirements: Electric Services Co utility with 12.38% completion (System Settings: 34.1%, Billing: 0%, Access Control: 0%)
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Electric Services Co utility configured with partial setup completion
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with utility setup permissions
- Test_Data: Electric Services Co utility, System Settings & Service Coverage: 34.1%, Billing & Scheduling Management: 0%, Access Control & References: 0%
- Prior_Test_Cases: Utility setup data initialization successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: "Continue Setup" button directs Electric Services Co to System Settings & Service Coverage section (highest priority incomplete task at 34.1%)
- Secondary_Verifications: Button is always enabled for incomplete setups, proper page navigation with utility context, intelligent routing to appropriate section
- Negative_Verification: Should not redirect to completed sections or incorrect utility context
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Utility setup data initialization, Dashboard load
- Blocked_Tests: Utility setup workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Organization setup button tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow utility progress calculation tests
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for efficient utility setup workflow and user guidance
- Edge_Cases: Test navigation with different completion combinations, multiple utilities scenario
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect navigation could waste user time or cause setup abandonment
- Security_Considerations: Verify navigation respects utility access permissions
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test Continue Setup behavior when multiple utilities have different completion states
- Type: Multi-Entity
- Rationale: Organizations may have multiple utilities requiring prioritization
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate navigation when all three steps have equal completion percentages
- Type: Edge Case
- Rationale: Need deterministic routing logic for tie-breaking scenarios
- Priority: P2
Test Case 5: Daily Active Users Display - Metro Water Utilities
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_005
- Title: Verify current day's active user count displays "2" prominently for Metro Water Utilities with +100% week growth
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - User Adoption Metrics
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: User Activity Service, Analytics Engine, Real-time Data Pipeline
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, User-Analytics-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, User-Acceptance, Performance-Metrics, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: User Activity Service, Analytics Engine, Real-time metrics pipeline
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for metrics loading
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with 2 active users today, week-over-week growth data showing +100%
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with active user tracking enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with analytics access
- Test_Data: Today's Users: 2, Week Growth: +100%, Daily active user definition: users who logged in today
- Prior_Test_Cases: User activity data populated successfully
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Current day's active user count "2" is displayed prominently in User Adoption section for Metro Water Utilities
- Secondary_Verifications: Week growth "+100%" is shown with positive styling, data appears current with proper timestamp
- Negative_Verification: Should not display stale data, negative growth should use different styling, count should not be zero when users are active
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: User activity data generation, Dashboard authentication
- Blocked_Tests: User behavior tracking event tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other analytics section tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow user login activity generation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical metric for onboarding success measurement and user engagement tracking
- Edge_Cases: Test with zero users, very high user counts, different growth scenarios (negative, flat)
- Risk_Areas: Inaccurate user counts could mislead business decisions about adoption success
- Security_Considerations: User activity data should be properly aggregated without exposing individual user details
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test daily active user count accuracy by correlating with actual login events
- Type: Data Accuracy
- Rationale: Business decisions depend on accurate user adoption metrics
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate user activity chart interactivity and drill-down capabilities
- Type: User Experience
- Rationale: Admins need detailed insights beyond summary metrics
- Priority: P3
Test Case 6: Security Activity Daily Breakdown for Electric Services Co
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_006
- Title: Verify Security Activity displays daily breakdown showing 19 authorized logins (green) and 13 unauthorized attempts (red) for Electric Services Co
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Security Activity Monitoring
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Security Logging Service, Authentication System, Analytics Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Security-Analytics-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Security Logging Service, Authentication System, Login attempt tracking
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for security data loading
- Data_Requirements: Electric Services Co with login history: 19 authorized logins, 13 unauthorized attempts across Thursday-Friday period
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Electric Services Co with security logging enabled and historical login data
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with security monitoring access
- Test_Data: Authorized logins: 19 total, Unauthorized attempts: 13 total, Daily breakdown across Thu-Fri timeframe
- Prior_Test_Cases: Security logging system operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Security Activity displays daily breakdown with 19 authorized logins (green bars) and 13 unauthorized attempts (red bars) for Electric Services Co
- Secondary_Verifications: Chart uses consistent color coding, daily granularity is maintained, totals match detailed breakdown
- Negative_Verification: Should not aggregate data inappropriately, mix up authorized/unauthorized categorization, or show incorrect totals
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Security logging setup, Authentication system operational
- Blocked_Tests: Security incident response tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other security monitoring tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow security data collection
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for security compliance and threat detection in B2B utility environment
- Edge_Cases: Test with very high unauthorized attempt counts, zero activity days, sustained attack patterns
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect security data could lead to missed threats or false alarms
- Security_Considerations: Security data integrity is paramount, ensure proper access controls and audit trails
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test security activity drill-down to view specific unauthorized attempt details (IP addresses, usernames, timestamps)
- Type: Security Investigation
- Rationale: Admins need detailed investigation capabilities for security incidents
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate security alert thresholds and notification triggers
- Type: Security Automation
- Rationale: Proactive security monitoring requires automated alerting
- Priority: P1
Test Case 7: Security Login Count Totals Validation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_007
- Title: Verify total count displays exactly "19 logins" (authorized) and "13 attempts" (unauthorized) with proper color coding for Electric Services Co
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Security Totals Display
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Security Logging Service, Data Aggregation Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Security-Analytics-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Security Logging Service, Data Aggregation Engine, Chart rendering system
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for total calculations
- Data_Requirements: Electric Services Co security log data aggregating to exactly 19 authorized and 13 unauthorized
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Electric Services Co with complete security activity history
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with security data access
- Test_Data: Authorized total: 19 logins, Unauthorized total: 13 attempts, matching daily breakdown chart data
- Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_006 (Security Activity Daily Breakdown) passed
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Total authorized logins shows exactly "19 logins" and unauthorized attempts shows exactly "13 attempts" with proper green/red color coding
- Secondary_Verifications: Totals match detailed chart data aggregation, labels use correct terminology, visual presentation is clear
- Negative_Verification: Totals should not include incorrect data, miscalculations, or wrong color associations
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Security data aggregation, Chart rendering
- Blocked_Tests: Security threshold alerting tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other security metric tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow daily breakdown validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for accurate security reporting and compliance documentation
- Edge_Cases: Test with very large numbers, zero values, real-time updates during active login attempts
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect totals could lead to security misassessment and compliance issues
- Security_Considerations: Total accuracy is essential for security audits and incident response planning
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test total recalculation accuracy during real-time login activity
- Type: Real-Time Processing
- Rationale: Totals must remain accurate as new login attempts occur
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate total calculation performance with large datasets (1000+ login attempts)
- Type: Performance
- Rationale: Enterprise environments may have high login volumes
- Priority: P2
Test Case 8: Smart Workforce Subscription Information Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_008
- Title: Verify Smart Workforce subscription displays "Free" plan with up to 5 users included and component features (CX, MX, BX, WX) for Metro Water Utilities
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Smart Workforce Subscription Management
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Subscription Management Service, Billing System, Feature Access Control
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Subscription-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Customer-Segment-Analysis, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Subscription Management Service, Feature Registry, Trial Plan Configuration
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for subscription data loading
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities on Free trial plan with 5-user limit and all trial features enabled
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities configured with Free trial subscription
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with subscription viewing access
- Test_Data: Plan: "Free", User limit: "Up to 5 users included", Features: Customer experience (CX), Meter Data Management (MX), Billing & Collection (BX), Workforce Automation (WX)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Subscription service initialization successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Smart Workforce subscription clearly displays "Free" plan with "Up to 5 users included" and all four component features (CX, MX, BX, WX) with green checkmarks
- Secondary_Verifications: Feature inclusions are clearly listed with checkmarks, upgrade option is available, plan description is accurate
- Negative_Verification: Should not show incorrect plan details, missing features, or premium-only indicators for trial features
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Subscription service setup, Feature registry initialization
- Blocked_Tests: Subscription upgrade workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other subscription display tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow subscription service validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for trial user understanding of included features and upgrade pathways
- Edge_Cases: Test with different subscription tiers, expired trials, feature access validation
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect feature display could lead to user confusion about capabilities or unnecessary upgrade pressure
- Security_Considerations: Feature access should match subscription entitlements exactly
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test component pricing breakdown display (Smart Workforce $90 + Smart Utility $120)
- Type: Pricing Information
- Rationale: User story mentions component-based pricing visibility
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate feature access control matches displayed entitlements
- Type: Access Control
- Rationale: Users should only access features shown as included
- Priority: P1
Test Case 9: System Admin Role-Based Dashboard Access Control
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_009
- Title: Verify System Admin Dashboard access is restricted to System Admin role only, blocking regular users from Metro Water Utilities and Electric Services Co
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Role-Based Access Control
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Authentication System, Authorization Service, Role Management System
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Authentication-Module, Authorization-Controller
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Authentication System, Authorization Service, Role Management Database
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for access control validation
- Data_Requirements: System Admin account: admin@metrowater.com, Regular users: user@metrowater.com, fieldworker@electricservices.com
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different roles configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role vs Regular User role vs Field Worker role
- Test_Data: System Admin: admin@metrowater.com, Regular User: user@metrowater.com, Field Worker: fieldworker@electricservices.com
- Prior_Test_Cases: User role assignment successful
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: System Admin Dashboard access is properly restricted to System Admin role only, blocking all non-admin users regardless of organization
- Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are appropriate, navigation reflects permissions, admin functionality is completely hidden for non-admins
- Negative_Verification: Non-admin users cannot access dashboard through any method (direct URL, navigation, API calls)
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: User role setup, Authentication system operational
- Blocked_Tests: Admin-specific functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other access control tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede all admin dashboard functionality tests
Additional Information
- Notes: Fundamental security requirement for B2B SaaS platform protecting sensitive organizational data
- Edge_Cases: Test with session hijacking attempts, role escalation attempts, concurrent sessions with different roles
- Risk_Areas: Unauthorized admin access could lead to data breaches, system manipulation, and compliance violations
- Security_Considerations: Implement defense in depth with both client-side and server-side access controls
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test role-based access control for API endpoints used by dashboard
- Type: API Security
- Rationale: Dashboard functionality relies on APIs that must also enforce role-based access
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate session timeout and re-authentication for admin users
- Type: Session Security
- Rationale: Admin sessions should have appropriate timeout policies
- Priority: P2
Test Case 10: Real-Time Dashboard Metrics Updates
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_010
- Title: Verify dashboard metrics for Metro Water Utilities update in real-time showing current data with refresh intervals clearly indicated (≤ 5 minutes)
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Real-Time Data Updates
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Real-Time Data Pipeline, User Activity Service, Security Logging Service, WebSocket connections
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Real-Time-Updates-Module, Data-Pipeline
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Integration-Testing, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Real-Time Data Pipeline, WebSocket service, User Activity Service, Security Logging Service
- Performance_Baseline: Updates within 5 minutes, refresh indicator visible
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with active user sessions and ongoing security activity
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with real-time data pipeline enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with real-time data access
- Test_Data: Active users generating login events, ongoing user activity, current baseline: Today's Users: 2, Week Growth: +100%
- Prior_Test_Cases: Real-time data pipeline operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard metrics for Metro Water Utilities update within 5 minutes showing current user activity and security data with clear refresh indicators
- Secondary_Verifications: Refresh timestamps are accurate, manual refresh options work, no stale data persists beyond acceptable intervals
- Negative_Verification: Should not show indefinitely cached data, missing refresh indicators, or updates that take longer than 5 minutes without notification
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Real-time pipeline setup, User activity generation capability
- Blocked_Tests: Performance optimization tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other real-time feature tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow baseline data establishment
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for providing current system insights and maintaining user confidence in data accuracy
- Edge_Cases: Test with high-frequency updates, network interruptions, browser tab focus/unfocus scenarios
- Risk_Areas: Stale data could lead to incorrect business decisions, poor user experience, and reduced system trust
- Security_Considerations: Real-time updates should maintain data integrity and not expose sensitive information inappropriately
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test real-time update behavior during high-volume concurrent user activity
- Type: Load Testing
- Rationale: Enterprise environments may have many simultaneous users
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate real-time update resilience during network connectivity issues
- Type: Network Reliability
- Rationale: Dashboard should gracefully handle connectivity problems
- Priority: P2
Test Case 26: Organization Setup Weighted Progress Calculation Validation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_026
- Title: Verify Organization Setup progress calculation using exact weighted formula: Currency (40%) + Date Format (30%) + Timezone (30%) for all completion combinations
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Weighted Progress Calculation Engine
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Organization Setup Service, Calculation Engine, Progress Tracking Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Organization-Setup-Module, Calculation-Engine
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Organization Setup Service, Calculation Engine, Database with configurable task states
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for progress calculations
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities organization with configurable task completion states for all 8 possible combinations
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities organization with ability to set individual task completion states
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with organization setup access
- Test_Data: Currency weight: 40%, Date Format weight: 30%, Timezone weight: 30%, All 8 completion combinations (000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup service operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Organization Setup progress calculation follows exact weighted formula (Currency 40% + Date Format 30% + Timezone 30%) for all 8 possible completion combinations
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual progress bars match calculated percentages, Complete Setup button state aligns with 100% completion only
- Negative_Verification: Progress should never exceed 100%, show negative values, or use incorrect weightings
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Organization setup service initialization
- Blocked_Tests: Complete Setup workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Utility setup calculation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede button state validation tests
Additional Information
- Notes: Core business rule validation ensuring accurate progress representation for user onboarding decisions
- Edge_Cases: Test concurrent task updates, rapid state changes, calculation consistency across sessions
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect calculations could mislead users about setup completion and impact onboarding success
- Security_Considerations: Progress calculations should be server-side validated and not manipulable client-side
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test weighted calculation accuracy with decimal precision requirements
- Type: Precision Validation
- Rationale: Business calculations require exact mathematical accuracy
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate calculation consistency across different user sessions and concurrent access
- Type: Concurrency
- Rationale: Multiple admins may view/modify setup simultaneously
- Priority: P2
Test Case 27: Multi-Utility Progress Aggregation Formula
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_027
- Title: Verify multi-utility overall progress calculation using 6-utility example: Final Progress = [(Sum Parameter1/6) + (Sum Parameter2/6) + (Sum Parameter3/6)] ÷ 3 = 54.44%
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Multi-Utility Progress Aggregation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Multi-Utility Engine, Calculation Engine, Utility Setup Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Multi-Utility-Module, Aggregation-Calculator
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Multi-Utility Engine, Calculation Engine, Database with 6 utility configurations
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for complex aggregation calculations
- Data_Requirements: 6 utilities with specific parameter completion percentages as per user story example
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Organization with exactly 6 utilities configured with specific completion states
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with multi-utility access
- Test_Data: Utility 1: P1=60%, P2=40%, P3=80%; Utility 2: P1=30%, P2=70%, P3=50%; Utility 3: P1=90%, P2=20%, P3=60%; Utility 4: P1=40%, P2=80%, P3=30%; Utility 5: P1=70%, P2=50%, P3=90%; Utility 6: P1=20%, P2=60%, P3=40%
- Prior_Test_Cases: Multi-utility setup service operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Multi-utility overall progress calculation produces exactly 54.44% using the complex aggregation formula with 6 utilities as specified in user story
- Secondary_Verifications: Individual parameter aggregations are mathematically correct, decimal precision is maintained, real-time recalculation works properly
- Negative_Verification: Should not use simple averaging, ignore utility weighting, or produce incorrect mathematical results
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Multi-utility setup, Individual utility parameter calculations
- Blocked_Tests: Multi-utility dashboard visualization tests
- Parallel_Tests: Single utility progress tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow individual utility setup completion
Additional Information
- Notes: Complex business rule validation for enterprise customers with multiple utility operations
- Edge_Cases: Test with different numbers of utilities (1-10), varying parameter completion patterns, edge case percentages (0%, 100%)
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect multi-utility aggregation could misrepresent overall organizational setup progress
- Security_Considerations: Calculation accuracy is critical for business reporting and compliance
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test multi-utility aggregation performance with enterprise-scale utility counts (50+ utilities)
- Type: Performance
- Rationale: Large utility companies may have many subsidiary utilities
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate aggregation formula with edge cases (all utilities at 0%, 100%, mixed scenarios)
- Type: Edge Case
- Rationale: Formula must work reliably across all possible completion states
- Priority: P1
Test Case 28: Three-Step Utility Setup Enhancement Structure
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_028
- Title: Verify new 3-step utility setup structure: Step 1 (System Settings & Service Coverage), Step 2 (Billing & Scheduling Management), Step 3 (Access Control & References) for Electric Services Co
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Three-Step Utility Setup Enhancement
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Utility Setup Service, Three-Step Enhancement Engine, Progress Tracking
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Utility-Setup-Enhancement-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Utility Setup Service, Three-Step Enhancement System, Card-based UI components
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for step structure loading
- Data_Requirements: Electric Services Co with three-step utility setup: Step 1: 34.1%, Step 2: 0%, Step 3: 0%
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Electric Services Co configured with new three-step utility setup structure
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with utility setup access
- Test_Data: Electric Services Co utility, Step 1 (System Settings & Service Coverage): 34.1%, Step 2 (Billing & Scheduling Management): 0%, Step 3 (Access Control & References): 0%
- Prior_Test_Cases: Three-step utility enhancement system deployed
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Utility Setup displays new three-step structure (System Settings & Service Coverage, Billing & Scheduling Management, Access Control & References) with correct progress percentages for Electric Services Co
- Secondary_Verifications: Each step shows appropriate subsections, card-based layout is implemented, overall progress calculation reflects three-step average
- Negative_Verification: Should not show old utility setup structure, incorrect step names, or completion tick until all steps are 100%
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Three-step enhancement deployment, Utility setup service
- Blocked_Tests: Individual step completion workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Multi-utility aggregation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede step-specific functionality tests
Additional Information
- Notes: Major UI/UX enhancement for improved utility setup user experience and progress tracking
- Edge_Cases: Test with different step completion combinations, multiple utilities with three-step structure, step dependency validation
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect step structure could confuse users and impact utility setup completion rates
- Security_Considerations: Step access should respect completion dependencies and user permissions
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test step completion workflow and dependency validation (e.g., Step 2 accessible only after Step 1 completion)
- Type: Workflow
- Rationale: Three-step structure likely has logical dependencies
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate three-step structure consistency across multiple utility types
- Type: Multi-Entity
- Rationale: All utilities should follow same three-step enhancement structure
- Priority: P2
Test Case 29: User Behavior Tracking Events Implementation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_029
- Title: Verify user behavior tracking events fire correctly: Viewed_Landing_Page, Clicked_Edit_Org_Details, Completed_Org, Viewed_Data_Upload for Metro Water Utilities
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - User Behavior Tracking
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Analytics Engine, Event Tracking Service, User Activity Pipeline
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Analytics-Module, Event-Tracking-System
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, User-Acceptance, Performance-Metrics, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Analytics Engine, Event Tracking Service, Data Pipeline, Browser developer tools for event monitoring
- Performance_Baseline: < 100ms for event capture
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with analytics tracking enabled, event logging capability
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities with user behavior tracking enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with full dashboard access
- Test_Data: Metro Water Utilities organization, admin user admin@metrowater.com, browser developer console for event monitoring
- Prior_Test_Cases: Analytics service operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: User behavior tracking events (Viewed_Landing_Page, Clicked_Edit_Org_Details, Completed_Org, Viewed_Data_Upload) fire correctly with proper properties for Metro Water Utilities
- Secondary_Verifications: Event properties include required data (user_id, timestamps, org_id), events are captured consistently, analytics system receives events
- Negative_Verification: Events should not fire multiple times for single actions, should not include incorrect user data, should not fail to capture
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Analytics service setup, User authentication
- Blocked_Tests: User behavior analysis reports
- Parallel_Tests: Other event tracking tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow dashboard functionality validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for measuring user engagement and identifying onboarding friction points
- Edge_Cases: Test event firing during rapid user actions, concurrent sessions, browser refresh scenarios
- Risk_Areas: Missing events could lead to inaccurate user behavior analysis and poor product decisions
- Security_Considerations: Event data should not expose sensitive information while maintaining analytical value
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test all remaining user behavior events from Section 10 (Clicked_Edit_Utility_Details, Completed_Utility_Setup, Clicked_Upload_Files, Viewed_Subscription_Overview)
- Type: Event Coverage
- Rationale: Complete user behavior tracking requires all defined events
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate event aggregation for DAU/WAU metrics calculation
- Type: Analytics Pipeline
- Rationale: Events must properly contribute to daily/weekly active user metrics
- Priority: P2
Test Case 30: Security Activity Alert Thresholds
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_030
- Title: Verify Security Activity section triggers appropriate alerts when unauthorized attempts exceed threshold (13 attempts) for Electric Services Co
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Security Alert System
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Security
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Security Alert System, Notification Service, Threshold Management Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Security-Alert-Module, Notification-System
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Integration-Testing, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Security Alert System, Notification Service, Threshold Configuration, Email/SMS services
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for alert generation
- Data_Requirements: Electric Services Co with 13 unauthorized attempts triggering alert threshold
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Electric Services Co with security alert thresholds configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with security alert access
- Test_Data: Electric Services Co security data showing 13 unauthorized attempts, alert threshold set at 10+ attempts
- Prior_Test_Cases: Security logging operational, base security data established
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Security Activity section triggers appropriate alerts when Electric Services Co unauthorized attempts (13) exceed configured threshold with proper color coding and notifications
- Secondary_Verifications: Detailed incident investigation data available, alert notifications delivered externally, audit trail maintained
- Negative_Verification: Should not trigger false alerts, should not miss legitimate security threats, should not expose sensitive security data inappropriately
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Security data collection, Alert system configuration
- Blocked_Tests: Security incident response workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other security threshold tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow security data establishment
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for proactive security threat detection and incident response in B2B utility environment
- Edge_Cases: Test with varying threshold levels, sustained attack patterns, false positive scenarios
- Risk_Areas: Missed security alerts could lead to successful attacks, false alerts could cause alert fatigue
- Security_Considerations: Alert system must be secure against tampering, maintain data integrity
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test security alert integration with external security information and event management (SIEM) systems
- Type: External Integration
- Rationale: Enterprise security requires integration with existing security infrastructure
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Validate security alert threshold customization by organization size and risk profile
- Type: Configuration Management
- Rationale: Different utility organizations may need different security thresholds
- Priority: P2
Test Case 31: Component-Based Subscription Pricing Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_031
- Title: Verify Smart Workforce subscription displays component-based pricing breakdown: Smart Workforce ($90) + Smart Utility ($120) for upgrade scenarios
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Component-Based Pricing Display
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Billing System, Subscription Management Service, Pricing Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Subscription-Module, Pricing-Display-Component
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Billing System, Subscription Management Service, Pricing Configuration
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for pricing data loading
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities on Free trial with access to upgrade pricing information
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities configured with Free trial and upgrade pricing visibility
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with subscription management access
- Test_Data: Smart Workforce component: $90, Smart Utility component: $120, combined pricing tiers available
- Prior_Test_Cases: Subscription service and pricing engine operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Smart Workforce subscription displays component-based pricing breakdown showing Smart Workforce ($90) and Smart Utility ($120) with accurate totals
- Secondary_Verifications: Component features are mapped correctly, pricing calculations are accurate, upgrade pathways are functional
- Negative_Verification: Should not show incorrect pricing, hidden fees, or confusing component mappings
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Subscription service setup, Pricing configuration
- Blocked_Tests: Subscription upgrade workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other pricing display tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow basic subscription display validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for revenue generation and user understanding of upgrade value proposition
- Edge_Cases: Test with different pricing tiers, promotional pricing, currency conversion scenarios
- Risk_Areas: Incorrect pricing could lead to revenue loss or customer dissatisfaction
- Security_Considerations: Pricing data integrity must be maintained, no client-side manipulation possible
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test dynamic pricing based on organization size and usage patterns
- Type: Dynamic Pricing
- Rationale: Enterprise pricing often varies based on scale and requirements
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate pricing accuracy across different currency regions and tax jurisdictions
- Type: Internationalization
- Rationale: B2B SaaS may serve international utility companies
- Priority: P3
Test Case 32: Trial Export Functionality Limitations
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_032
- Title: Verify trial plan export functionality is capped at exactly 100 records per operation for Metro Water Utilities Free plan
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Trial Export Limitations
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Export Service, Trial Limitation Engine, Data Access Control
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Export-Module, Trial-Limits-Controller
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, User-Acceptance, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Export Service, Trial Limitation Engine, Test dataset with 500+ records
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for export operation
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial with access to customer data (500+ records available)
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities on Free trial plan with large dataset for export testing
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with export functionality access
- Test_Data: Customer dataset with 500+ records, Free trial plan with 100-record export limit
- Prior_Test_Cases: Export service operational, trial plan activated
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Trial plan export functionality is strictly capped at 100 records per operation for Metro Water Utilities Free plan with clear user messaging
- Secondary_Verifications: Export files contain exactly the limited record count, upgrade pathways are presented, usage tracking works properly
- Negative_Verification: Should not allow exports exceeding 100 records, should not bypass limitation through multiple rapid exports
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Trial plan setup, Export service availability
- Blocked_Tests: Premium export functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other trial limitation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow trial plan activation
Additional Information
- Notes: Important for trial plan value proposition and encouraging upgrades without frustrating users
- Edge_Cases: Test with different data types, concurrent export attempts, edge cases around exactly 100 records
- Risk_Areas: Too restrictive limits could hurt trial experience, too generous limits could reduce upgrade motivation
- Security_Considerations: Export limitations should be server-side enforced and not bypassable
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test export limitation behavior with different file formats (CSV, Excel, PDF)
- Type: Format Validation
- Rationale: Limitations should apply consistently across all export formats
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Validate export limitation reset behavior (daily, weekly, or per-session limits)
- Type: Quota Management
- Rationale: Trial users need predictable export quotas
- Priority: P2
Test Case 33: API Access Restrictions for Trial Plans
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_033
- Title: Verify trial plan API access is limited for Metro Water Utilities Free plan with appropriate error responses for restricted endpoints
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - API Access Control
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Security
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: API Gateway, Authentication Service, Trial Limitation Engine, Rate Limiting System
- Code_Module_Mapped: API-Gateway, Trial-Limits-Controller, Authentication-Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: API-Test-Results, Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: API Gateway, Authentication Service, Trial Limitation Engine, API testing tools (Postman/curl)
- Performance_Baseline: < 200ms for API authentication responses
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial API credentials, restricted and allowed endpoint lists
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial with API access configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin with API access credentials
- Test_Data: API key for Free trial: trial_api_key_metro_water, Restricted endpoints list, Allowed endpoints list
- Prior_Test_Cases: API authentication working, trial plan activated
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Trial plan API access is properly limited for Metro Water Utilities Free plan with appropriate 403/429 error responses for restricted endpoints
- Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and actionable, upgrade pathways are provided, rate limiting works correctly
- Negative_Verification: Should not allow access to premium API features, should not bypass rate limits, should not expose sensitive data beyond trial permissions
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: API Gateway setup, Trial plan configuration
- Blocked_Tests: Premium API functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other trial limitation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must follow API authentication validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for protecting premium API features while providing valuable trial API access
- Edge_Cases: Test API key expiration, concurrent API usage from multiple sessions, API versioning compatibility
- Risk_Areas: API limitation bypass could impact revenue, overly restrictive limits could hurt trial conversion
- Security_Considerations: API access control must be server-side enforced and regularly audited
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test API limitation behavior across different API versions (v1, v2)
- Type: API Versioning
- Rationale: Limitations should be consistent across API versions
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate API access control during trial-to-paid plan transitions
- Type: Plan Migration
- Rationale: API access should update immediately upon plan upgrade
- Priority: P1
Test Case 34: Data Upload File Size Limit Validation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_034
- Title: Verify trial plan data upload is limited to 5GB storage capacity for Metro Water Utilities Free plan with clear quota display
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Data Upload Storage Limits
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Storage Management Service, File Upload Service, Quota Tracking System
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Data-Upload-Module, Storage-Quota-Controller
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, User-Acceptance, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Storage Management Service, File Upload Service, Quota tracking, Test files of various sizes
- Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for storage quota calculations
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial, test files totaling >5GB for limit testing
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial with 5GB storage limit configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with data upload access
- Test_Data: Test files: 2GB customer data, 2GB meter readings, 2GB billing history (total 6GB available for upload)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Data upload service operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Trial plan data upload is strictly limited to 5GB storage capacity for Metro Water Utilities Free plan with clear quota display and enforcement
- Secondary_Verifications: Quota calculations are accurate, storage recovery works properly, upgrade pathways are presented appropriately
- Negative_Verification: Should not allow storage beyond 5GB limit, should not miscalculate storage usage, should not lose quota tracking
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Data upload service setup, Storage management configuration
- Blocked_Tests: Premium storage functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other trial limitation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow basic data upload validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Important for trial plan value proposition and preventing storage abuse while encouraging upgrades
- Edge_Cases: Test with many small files vs few large files, concurrent uploads, file replacement scenarios
- Risk_Areas: Storage limit bypass could impact infrastructure costs, overly restrictive limits could hurt trial experience
- Security_Considerations: Storage quotas must be server-side enforced and regularly audited
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test storage quota behavior with different file types and compression ratios
- Type: File Type Validation
- Rationale: Different file types may have varying storage impact
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Validate storage quota accuracy during concurrent multi-user uploads
- Type: Concurrency
- Rationale: Multiple admins may upload files simultaneously
- Priority: P2
Test Case 35: Advanced Features Preview-Only Access
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_035
- Title: Verify trial plan displays advanced features as preview-only with upgrade prompts for Metro Water Utilities Free plan
- Created By: Hetal
- Created Date: July 31, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: System Admin Dashboard - Advanced Features Preview
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Could-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100%
- Integration_Points: Feature Access Control, Preview Mode Engine, Subscription Management
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard-Web, Feature-Preview-Module, Access-Control
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Quality-Dashboard, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Feature Access Control, Preview Mode Engine, Advanced analytics modules
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for preview mode rendering
- Data_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial with access to preview advanced features
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Metro Water Utilities Free trial with advanced features configured in preview mode
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role with preview access
- Test_Data: Advanced features list: Advanced Analytics, Custom Reports, API Integrations, Automated Workflows
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic dashboard functionality operational
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Trial plan displays advanced features as preview-only with clear upgrade prompts for Metro Water Utilities Free plan
- Secondary_Verifications: Preview mode provides educational value without full functionality, upgrade pathways are consistently presented
- Negative_Verification: Should not provide full advanced feature access, should not confuse users about feature availability
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Monthly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: No
Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: Feature access control setup, Subscription management
- Blocked_Tests: Full feature functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other preview mode tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should follow basic trial functionality validation
Additional Information
- Notes: Important for trial conversion by demonstrating advanced feature value without providing free access
- Edge_Cases: Test preview mode with different user roles, feature combinations, browser compatibility
- Risk_Areas: Too generous previews could reduce upgrade motivation, too restrictive previews could hurt trial conversion
- Security_Considerations: Preview mode should not expose sensitive data or create security vulnerabilities
Missing Scenarios Identified
- Scenario_1: Test preview mode behavior during trial-to-paid transitions
- Type: Plan Migration
- Rationale: Features should unlock immediately upon subscription upgrade
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Validate preview mode educational content accuracy and completeness
- Type: Content Validation
- Rationale: Preview content must accurately represent full feature capabilities
- Priority: P3
API Test Cases (Critical Level ≥7)
API Test Case 1: Dashboard Data Retrieval Performance
Test Case ID: ONB05US01_API_TC_001
Title: Verify GET /api/v1/admin/dashboard returns complete Metro Water Utilities data within 500ms
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: API Performance
Endpoint: GET /api/v1/admin/dashboard
Authentication: Bearer token for admin@metrowater.com
Expected Response Time: < 500ms
Test Data:
- Organization: Metro Water Utilities (75% setup completion)
- Utility: Electric Services Co (12.38% setup completion)
- User Metrics: Today's Users: 2, Week Growth: +100%
- Security Data: 19 authorized logins, 13 unauthorized attempts
Validation Criteria:
- Response code: 200 OK
- Response time: < 500ms
- Data completeness: All dashboard sections included
- Data accuracy: Matches expected Metro Water Utilities values
- Schema validation: Response structure matches API specification
API Test Case 2: Organization Progress Calculation API
Test Case ID: ONB05US01_API_TC_002
Title: Verify GET /api/v1/admin/organization/progress calculates weighted progress using business rules
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: API Functional
Endpoint: GET /api/v1/admin/organization/progress
Authentication: Bearer token for admin@metrowater.com
Expected Response Time: < 300ms
Test Data:
- Currency: Complete (40% weight)
- Date Format: Complete (30% weight)
- Timezone: Incomplete (30% weight)
- Expected Result: 70% progress
Validation Criteria:
- Response code: 200 OK
- Progress calculation: Exactly 70% based on weighted formula
- Individual task status: Accurate completion states
- Calculation performance: < 300ms response time
API Test Case 3: Multi-Utility Aggregation Formula API
Test Case ID: ONB05US01_API_TC_003
Title: Verify GET /api/v1/admin/utilities/progress-aggregate implements complex 6-utility formula
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: API Functional
Endpoint: GET /api/v1/admin/utilities/progress-aggregate
Authentication: Bearer token for admin@metrowater.com
Expected Response Time: < 800ms
Test Data:
- 6 utilities with specific parameter combinations
- Expected Final Progress: 54.44%
- Complex aggregation formula validation
Validation Criteria:
- Response code: 200 OK
- Aggregation accuracy: Exactly 54.44% result
- Formula implementation: Correct parameter averaging
- Performance: < 800ms for complex calculation
Complete Test Execution Summary
Total Test Coverage: 35 Enhanced Test Cases + 3 Critical API Tests
Core Dashboard Functionality (TC_001-010):
- Organization Setup weighted progress (TC_001, TC_026)
- Visual status indicators (TC_002)
- Button state management (TC_003, TC_004)
- User adoption metrics (TC_005, TC_029)
- Security monitoring (TC_006, TC_007, TC_030)
- Subscription display (TC_008, TC_031)
- Access control (TC_009, TC_033)
- Real-time updates (TC_010)
Data Upload Features (TC_011-020):
- File upload functionality with "Go to Data Upload" button
- Multi-format support (CSV, Excel, XML)
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Smart Recognition processing
- Data Mapping capabilities
- Smart Validation engine
- Direct integration workflow
- Real-time feedback
- Template management
- 5GB storage limits (TC_034)
Trial Plan Management (TC_021-025, TC_032-035):
- Free tier provisioning (TC_021)
- 2-user concurrent limits (TC_022)
- 30-day auto-expiration (TC_023)
- Basic Analytics access (TC_024)
- Email Support availability (TC_025)
- 100-record export limits (TC_032)
- API access restrictions (TC_033)
- 5GB storage limits (TC_034)
- Preview-only advanced features (TC_035)
Enhanced Business Logic (TC_026-031):
- Weighted progress calculations (TC_026)
- Multi-utility aggregation formula (TC_027)
- Three-step utility enhancement (TC_028)
- User behavior tracking events (TC_029)
- Security alert thresholds (TC_030)
- Component-based pricing (TC_031)
Browser & Device Compatibility Matrix
Legend: ✓ = Full Support, ○ = Limited/View Only, N/A = Not Applicable
Test Suite Execution Strategy
Smoke Test Suite (Daily - 8 Test Cases):
- ONB05US01_TC_001 (Organization Progress)
- ONB05US01_TC_003 (Complete Setup Button)
- ONB05US01_TC_004 (Continue Setup Button)
- ONB05US01_TC_006 (Security Activity)
- ONB05US01_TC_009 (Access Control)
- ONB05US01_TC_021 (Trial Plan)
- ONB05US01_API_TC_001 (Dashboard API)
- ONB05US01_API_TC_002 (Progress Calculation API)
Regression Test Suite (Pre-Release - 20 Test Cases):
- All P1-Critical and P2-High priority test cases
- Core business logic validation
- Integration point testing
- Security and access control validation
Full Test Suite (Weekly - All 38 Test Cases):
- Complete test coverage including P3-Medium priority
- Cross-browser compatibility testing
- Performance and load validation
- User experience and accessibility testing
Performance Benchmarks
Integration Dependencies
Critical Dependencies:
- Organization Setup Service
- Utility Setup Service
- User Activity Service
- Security Logging Service
- Data Upload Service
- Subscription Management Service
- Real-Time Data Pipeline
- Analytics Engine
External Dependencies:
- Email/SMS Notification Services
- File Processing Services
- Authentication/Authorization Systems
- Billing and Payment Systems
This comprehensive test suite ensures 100% coverage of all 35 acceptance criteria with enhanced business logic validation, realistic test data consistency, and complete 17 BrowserStack report support for enterprise B2B utility SaaS requirements.
No Comments