Skip to main content

Bill Template Management Test Cases - BX03US01


Test Case 1 - Verify dashboard displays accurate template counts and metrics with sample data from user story

Title: Verify dashboard displays accurate template counts and metrics with sample data from user story

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_001
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, UI, Dashboard], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Regression-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Product], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Database, CxServices
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database connection, Template data
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
  • Data_Requirements: 3 templates (Standard Water Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Commercial Gas Bill)

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Valid user session, Sample template data loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager access
  • Test_Data: Templates from user story sample data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User login successful

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Bill Templates dashboard from SMART360 main menu

Dashboard loads successfully within 3 seconds showing "Bill Templates" header and "Design and manage bill formats to standardize consumer billing documents" subtitle

Valid billing manager credentials

Verify page elements load per AC1

2

Verify "Total Templates" metric card

Shows "3" with document icon and "Available bill templates in the system" subtitle

3 templates: Standard Water Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Commercial Gas Bill

Must match sample data count

3

Verify "Active Templates" metric card

Shows "2" with user icon and "Templates currently in use" subtitle

Standard Water Bill (Active), Commercial Gas Bill (Active), Electricity Bill Template (Inactive)

Active status from sample data

4

Verify "Average Usage" metric card

Shows "38" with chart icon and "Average usage per template" subtitle

Usage calculation: (13+56+46)/3 = 38.33 rounded to 38

Formula: Total usage ÷ Total templates

5

Verify "Newest Template" metric card

Shows "2025-03-10" with calendar icon and "Most recently created template" subtitle

Commercial Gas Bill created on 10/3/2025

Latest creation date from sample data

6

Verify template cards display

Three template cards visible with utility type icons W, E, G

Template cards for Water, Electricity, Gas

Visual categorization per AC4

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All metric cards display values matching sample data exactly
  • Secondary_Verifications: Icons display correctly, Subtitles match specification
  • Negative_Verification: No error messages appear, No missing data

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User login authentication
  • Blocked_Tests: Template modification tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None
  • Sequential_Tests: Template detail view tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for daily billing operations visibility
  • Edge_Cases: Large numbers of templates may affect display
  • Risk_Areas: Incorrect metrics could mislead billing decisions
  • Security_Considerations: Ensure only authorized users see template counts

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Template metrics refresh when underlying data changes
  • Type: Integration
  • Rationale: Real-time data accuracy critical for billing operations
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 2 -  Verify template cards display accurate information and status per user story sample data

Title: Verify template cards display accurate information and status per user story sample data

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_002
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, UI, TemplateCard], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Product/CSM], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Database, UI
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template database, User management system
  • Performance_Baseline: Instant display
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill template with exact sample data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded with template data
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager view access
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Admin User, 15/1/2025, Usage: 13, Active)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: BX03US01_TC_001 passed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Standard Water Bill" template card on dashboard

Template card displays with "S" icon in water utility styling

Standard Water Bill from sample data

Visual identification per AC4

2

Verify template name display

Shows "Standard Water Bill" as card header

Template name from sample data

Primary identifier validation

3

Verify creator information

Shows "Created by: Admin User" below template name

Creator: Admin User from sample data

User reference from sample data

4

Verify creation date format

Shows "Created on: 15/1/2025" in DD/MM/YYYY format

Creation date: 15/1/2025 from sample data

Date format per business rules

5

Verify usage count display

Shows "Usage count: 13" with numeric value

Usage count: 13 from sample data

Usage tracking display

6

Verify status toggle state

Toggle switch shows blue/enabled state for "Active" status

Status: Active from sample data

Status indicator per AC5

7

Verify actions menu presence

Three-dot kebab menu icon displays on card

Actions menu availability

Template management access

8

Verify utility type icon

"S" icon represents Water utility type visually

Water utility categorization

Visual categorization per AC4

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All template information matches sample data exactly
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual styling consistent, Icons clear
  • Negative_Verification: No missing fields, No formatting errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: BX03US01_TC_001
  • Blocked_Tests: Template editing tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other template card validations
  • Sequential_Tests: Status toggle tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Template card is primary interaction point
  • Edge_Cases: Long template names may affect layout
  • Risk_Areas: Incorrect status display could cause operational errors
  • Security_Considerations: Only show templates user has access to

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Template card hover interactions and tooltips
  • Type: UI Enhancement
  • Rationale: Improves user experience for template selection
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 3 - Verify template search by name functionality using exact sample data

Title: Verify template search by name functionality using exact sample data

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_003
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, Search, UI], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Regression-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/API-Test-Results], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Search Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Regression-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database connection, Search indexing
  • Performance_Baseline: < 200ms search response
  • Data_Requirements: All three sample templates loaded

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with search field visible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template search access
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Commercial Gas Bill
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard loaded successfully

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click on search field with placeholder "Search by template name or type..."

Cursor appears in search field, field becomes active

Search input element

Field activation per business rules

2

Type "Water" in search field

Search results update dynamically showing only water-related templates

Search term: "Water"

Real-time filtering per AC2

3

Verify filtered results display

Only "Standard Water Bill" template card displays in results

Expected: 1 result (Standard Water Bill)

Partial match validation from sample data

4

Verify result accuracy

Template card shows correct details: Admin User, 15/1/2025, Usage: 13, Active

Standard Water Bill details

Data integrity verification

5

Clear search field completely

All three templates display again in original order

Search reset to empty string

Reset functionality validation

6

Type "Electricity" in search field

Only "Electricity Bill Template" displays in results

Search term: "Electricity"

Different utility type search

7

Verify electricity template result

Shows: John Smith, 20/2/2025, Usage: 56, Inactive status

Electricity Bill Template from sample data

Specific template validation

8

Type "Commercial" in search field

Only "Commercial Gas Bill" displays in results

Search term: "Commercial"

Partial name matching

9

Type "XYZ123" (non-existent term)

No templates display, appropriate "No templates found" message

Invalid search term

No results handling per business rules

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Search filters templates correctly using sample data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Real-time search updates, Case-insensitive search
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid searches show appropriate message

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template data loading
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced search features
  • Parallel_Tests: Other search functionality tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Filter combination tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Search is critical for large template libraries
  • Edge_Cases: Special characters in search terms
  • Risk_Areas: Performance degradation with many templates
  • Security_Considerations: Prevent search injection attacks

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Search history and recent searches functionality
  • Type: Enhancement
  • Rationale: Improves user efficiency for frequent searches
  • Priority: P4




Test Case 4 -  Verify template search by creator using exact sample data creators

Title: Verify template search by creator using exact sample data creators

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_004
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, Search, CreatorFilter], MOD-[BillTemplates], P3-[Medium], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Regression-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/User-Acceptance/Module-Coverage/Customer-Segment-Analysis], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Medium], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 90 seconds
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 5%
  • Integration_Points: User Management, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Regression-Coverage, User-Acceptance
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: User management integration, Search functionality
  • Performance_Baseline: < 200ms search response
  • Data_Requirements: Templates with different creators from sample data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Search functionality operational
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template search and view access
  • Test_Data: Admin User (Standard Water Bill), John Smith (Electricity Bill Template), Sarah Johnson (Commercial Gas Bill)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic search functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Type "Admin" in search field

Templates created by "Admin User" display in results

Creator search: "Admin"

Creator-based search from sample data

2

Verify Admin User results

"Standard Water Bill" appears with "Created by: Admin User"

Standard Water Bill template

Specific creator from sample data

3

Verify result details

Template shows: 15/1/2025, Usage: 13, Active status

Admin User template details

Complete creator template validation

4

Clear search and type "John"

Templates created by "John Smith" display in results

Creator search: "John"

Different creator from sample data

5

Verify John Smith results

"Electricity Bill Template" appears with "Created by: John Smith"

Electricity template

John Smith creator validation

6

Verify John's template details

Shows: 20/2/2025, Usage: 56, Inactive status

John Smith template details

Creator-specific template data

7

Clear search and type "Sarah"

Templates created by "Sarah Johnson" display in results

Creator search: "Sarah"

Third creator from sample data

8

Verify Sarah Johnson results

"Commercial Gas Bill" appears with "Created by: Sarah Johnson"

Gas template

Sarah Johnson creator validation

9

Verify Sarah's template details

Shows: 10/3/2025, Usage: 46, Active status

Sarah Johnson template details

Most recent template from sample data

10

Type "NonExistentUser"

No results display with appropriate message

Invalid creator search

No results handling

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Search correctly filters by creator using exact sample data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Partial name matching works, Case-insensitive search
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid creator names handled gracefully

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User data integration
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced creator filtering
  • Parallel_Tests: Name and type search tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Combined search criteria tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Useful for template ownership tracking
  • Edge_Cases: Users with same names, Deactivated users
  • Risk_Areas: User data synchronization issues
  • Security_Considerations: Ensure user privacy in search results

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Search by multiple creators simultaneously
  • Type: Enhancement
  • Rationale: Useful for team-based template management
  • Priority: P4




Test Case 5 - Verify template creation with water utility pre-configured sections

Title: Verify template creation with water utility pre-configured sections

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_005
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, TemplateCreation, PreConfigured], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Template Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template creation system, Database write access
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds creation
  • Data_Requirements: Water utility section templates

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Valid billing manager session, Write permissions
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template creation permissions
  • Test_Data: New water template name, Water utility configuration
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click "Create New Template" button in top-right of dashboard

Template creation modal opens with utility type selection

Button: "Create New Template"

Navigation per business rules

2

Select "Water" from utility type dropdown

Water utility type selected, water-specific options appear

Utility Type: Water

Pre-configuration trigger per AC3

3

Enter template name in input field

Name field accepts input and validates uniqueness

Template Name: "Premium Water Bill 2025"

Input validation per business rules

4

Click "Create Template" button

Template created successfully, redirected to template editor

Creation action

Template initialization

5

Verify template editor loads with water sections

Editor displays with pre-configured water utility sections enabled

Water-specific sections

Section pre-loading per AC3

6

Verify "Header" section present and enabled

Header section shows with toggle in enabled/blue state

Header section

Standard section verification

7

Verify "Customer Information" section enabled

Customer Information section loaded with water-specific fields

Customer section

Water utility customization

8

Verify "Meter Reading" section with water fields

Meter Reading section includes water meter specific fields

Water meter fields

Water utility specialization

9

Verify "Usage Summary" section enabled

Usage Summary section configured for water consumption display

Water usage fields

Consumption tracking per water utility

10

Verify "Payment Information" section enabled

Payment section includes water billing payment options

Payment section

Payment processing integration

11

Verify "Footer" section present

Footer section available for water utility compliance information

Footer section

Regulatory compliance support

12

Check template appears in dashboard list

Navigate back to dashboard and verify new template listed

Template listing

Persistence verification

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Template created with water-specific pre-configured sections
  • Secondary_Verifications: All sections enabled by default, Editor loads correctly
  • Negative_Verification: No errors during creation, No missing sections

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User authentication, Database connectivity
  • Blocked_Tests: Template editing tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other utility type creation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template configuration tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Core functionality for water utility billing setup
  • Edge_Cases: Network interruption during creation
  • Risk_Areas: Template corruption, Incomplete section loading
  • Security_Considerations: Template access control enforcement

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Template creation with custom starting templates
  • Type: Enhancement
  • Rationale: Advanced users need template customization options
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 6 - Verify drag-and-drop section reordering with real-time preview update

Title: Verify drag-and-drop section reordering with real-time preview update

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_006
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, UI, DragDrop], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[UI], Platform-[Web], Report-[User-Acceptance/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Cross-Browser-Results/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Integration-[Editor], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Template Editor, Preview Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template editor, Real-time preview system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 100ms drag response
  • Data_Requirements: Template with multiple sections for reordering

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor open with Standard Water Bill
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template editing permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill with Header, Customer Information, Billing Details, Usage Summary, Payment Information, Footer sections
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template editor access verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open "Standard Water Bill" template in editor

Template editor loads showing sections panel on left with drag handles visible

Standard Water Bill template

Editor initialization per business rules

2

Verify initial section order in left panel

Sections display in order: Header, Customer Information, Billing Details, Usage Summary, Payment Information, Footer

Default section order

Initial state verification

3

Verify initial preview layout

Preview pane shows sections in same order as left panel

Initial preview order

Preview synchronization

4

Drag "Usage Summary" section above "Billing Details"

Section moves visually during drag with highlighted drop zones

Drag operation

Visual feedback per AC7

5

Drop "Usage Summary" in new position

Section reorders to: Header, Customer Information, Usage Summary, Billing Details, Payment Information, Footer

New section order

Reordering functionality

6

Verify preview updates immediately

Preview pane shows new section order: Header, Customer Information, Usage Summary, Billing Details, Payment Information, Footer

Real-time preview update

Preview synchronization per AC10

7

Drag "Payment Information" section to top position

Section moves with visual drag indicators and drop zones

Payment section drag

Multiple reordering operations

8

Drop "Payment Information" above "Header"

New order: Payment Information, Header, Customer Information, Usage Summary, Billing Details, Footer

Top position placement

Advanced positioning

9

Verify preview reflects final order

Preview displays sections in final reordered sequence

Final preview state

Persistence of changes

10

Save template changes

Template saves successfully with new section order

Save action

Order persistence per business rules

11

Reload template editor

Section order persists after page reload

Template reload

Data persistence verification

12

Verify drag handles remain functional

All sections maintain drag capability after save/reload

Drag functionality

Continued usability

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Sections can be reordered via drag-and-drop with immediate preview updates
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual feedback during drag, Changes persist after save
  • Negative_Verification: No sections lost during reordering, No preview errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template editor loading
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced template configuration
  • Parallel_Tests: Section toggle tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template preview tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for template customization workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Rapid successive drags, Browser-specific drag behavior
  • Risk_Areas: Preview desynchronization, Section order corruption
  • Security_Considerations: Ensure drag operations don't bypass validation

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Drag-and-drop with keyboard accessibility support
  • Type: Accessibility
  • Rationale: Compliance with accessibility standards required
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 7 - Verify section visibility toggle with Customer Information section using sample data

Title: Verify section visibility toggle with Customer Information section using sample data

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_007
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, SectionToggle, Editor], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Regression-Coverage], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Editor], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 12%
  • Integration_Points: Template Editor, Preview Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template editor, Real-time preview
  • Performance_Baseline: < 100ms toggle response
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill with Customer Information section

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor open with all sections enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template editing permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill with Customer Information section containing sample data (John Smith, 123 Main Street, Account: 1234578)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template editor access verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Customer Information" section in left sections panel

Section displays with toggle switch in blue/enabled state

Customer Information section

Current state verification per AC8

2

Verify Customer Information in preview

Preview shows customer details: "John Smith", "123 Main Street, Anytown, ST 12345", Account: "1234578"

Sample customer data from user story

Initial preview state

3

Click toggle switch to disable Customer Information section

Toggle changes to gray/disabled state with visual transition

Section disable action

Visual feedback per business rules

4

Verify preview updates immediately

Customer Information section disappears completely from preview pane

Preview update without customer section

Real-time changes per AC10

5

Verify remaining sections intact

Header, Billing Details, Usage Summary sections remain visible in preview

Other sections unaffected

Section independence

6

Click toggle switch to re-enable Customer Information

Toggle changes back to blue/enabled state

Section enable action

Reverse operation

7

Verify Customer Information reappears in preview

Customer section displays again with original data: John Smith details

Customer section restoration

Data preservation

8

Verify section position maintained

Customer Information appears in original position between Header and Billing Details

Section position consistency

Layout preservation

9

Toggle multiple sections rapidly

Each section responds independently without conflicts

Rapid toggle operations

System responsiveness

10

Save template with Customer Information disabled

Template saves successfully with section hidden

Save with disabled section

State persistence

11

Reload template

Customer Information remains disabled after reload

Template persistence

Configuration permanence

12

Re-enable and verify sample data integrity

Customer data displays correctly: John Smith, 123 Main Street, Account 1234578

Sample data validation

Data integrity preservation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Section visibility controlled by toggle with immediate preview updates
  • Secondary_Verifications: Toggle state persists, Sample data preserved
  • Negative_Verification: No preview errors, No data loss during toggle operations

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template editor initialization
  • Blocked_Tests: Field-level customization tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other section toggle tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Section configuration tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Essential for template flexibility and compliance
  • Edge_Cases: Required sections that cannot be disabled
  • Risk_Areas: Accidental disabling of mandatory sections
  • Security_Considerations: Ensure section visibility respects user permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Section dependency validation (preventing disabling dependent sections)
  • Type: Business Rule
  • Rationale: Some sections may require others for billing compliance
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 8 - Verify field-level customization in Customer Information section with database mapping

Title: Verify field-level customization in Customer Information section with database mapping

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_008
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, FieldCustomization, Editor], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Regression-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Editor], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 18%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Template Editor, Field Mapping
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Regression-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database field mapping system, Template editor
  • Performance_Baseline: < 300ms field update
  • Data_Requirements: Customer Information section with billTo, address, accountNo, billDate, dueDate fields

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor with Customer Information section selected
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Field customization and database mapping permissions
  • Test_Data: Customer Information fields from user story sample (billTo, address, accountNo, billDate, dueDate)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Section selection functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Select "Customer Information" section in left panel

Properties panel opens on right showing "Properties: Customer Information" header

Customer Information section

Section selection per business rules

2

Verify "Field Settings" subsection displays

Field Settings header visible with list of fields: billTo, address, accountNo, billDate, dueDate

Field list from user story

Field availability per AC9

3

Locate "billTo" field with enabled toggle

Field shows blue toggle switch and "Label: Bill To" text input

billTo field from sample data

Initial field state

4

Change "billTo" label from "Bill To" to "Customer Name"

Label input accepts new text and updates immediately

New label: "Customer Name"

Label customization per AC17

5

Verify preview updates with new label

Preview shows "Customer Name" instead of "Bill To" for customer field

Preview with new label

Real-time preview per AC10

6

Click field configuration dropdown for "billTo" field

Database field mapping dropdown opens showing available options

Field mapping interface

Database integration access

7

Verify database field options display

Options include: Customer Name, Customer Address, Customer City, Customer State, Customer ZIP, Customer Email, Customer Phone

Database field list from user story

Available mappings per AC11

8

Select "Customer Name" from database field dropdown

Field maps to Customer Name database field successfully

Database mapping: Customer Name

Field source validation

9

Verify mapping saves and dropdown closes

Selection confirmed, dropdown closes, mapping established

Mapping confirmation

Database integration success

10

Modify "address" field label to "Billing Address"

Address field label updates from "Address" to "Billing Address"

New label: "Billing Address"

Second field customization

11

Map "address" field to "Customer Address" database field

Address field maps to Customer Address database source

Database mapping: Customer Address

Field mapping consistency

12

Verify both changes in preview simultaneously

Preview shows "Customer Name: John Smith" and "Billing Address: 123 Main Street..."

Combined field changes

Multiple field validation

13

Toggle "accountNo" field to disabled state

Account Number field toggle changes to gray, field disappears from preview

Field disable action

Field visibility control per AC9

14

Save all field customizations

Template saves successfully with all field modifications

Save operation

Change persistence

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Fields can be customized with labels and database mappings per user story specifications
  • Secondary_Verifications: Preview updates with changes, Database mapping validates correctly
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid mappings prevented, No preview corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Database connectivity, Field mapping system
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced field configuration
  • Parallel_Tests: Other section customization tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template validation tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Core functionality for template customization and data integration
  • Edge_Cases: Invalid database field mappings, Field mapping conflicts
  • Risk_Areas: Data corruption, Mapping inconsistencies
  • Security_Considerations: Database field access control, Data privacy

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Field validation rules and format constraints
  • Type: Data Validation
  • Rationale: Ensure data integrity in customized fields
  • Priority: P1




Test Case 9  - Verify template status toggle between active and inactive using sample data

Title: Verify template status toggle between active and inactive using sample data

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_009
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, StatusToggle, Integration], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/API-Test-Results], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Status Management System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, API-Test-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database connection, Status management system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 300ms status change
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill template with Active status

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with template cards visible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template status modification permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Active), Electricity Bill Template (Inactive), Commercial Gas Bill (Active)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard display verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Standard Water Bill" template card on dashboard

Template card displays with blue toggle switch in active/enabled state

Standard Water Bill (Active status)

Current state verification per sample data

2

Verify current "Active Templates" metric

Dashboard shows "Active Templates: 2" in metric card

2 active templates (Standard Water Bill, Commercial Gas Bill)

Baseline metric per AC1

3

Click toggle switch on Standard Water Bill card

Toggle changes from blue to gray/disabled state with smooth transition

Status change action

Visual feedback per AC5

4

Verify template status updates to "Inactive"

Toggle switch shows gray state, template marked as inactive

New status: Inactive

Status change confirmation

5

Check "Active Templates" metric updates

Metric card now shows "Active Templates: 1"

Updated count after deactivation

Metric recalculation per business rules

6

Verify "Total Templates" remains unchanged

Total Templates metric still shows "3"

Total count unchanged

Total count stability

7

Refresh dashboard page

Status change persists after page reload

Page refresh action

Data persistence verification

8

Verify persisted inactive status

Standard Water Bill toggle remains in gray/inactive state

Persistent inactive status

Database persistence

9

Click toggle switch to reactivate Standard Water Bill

Toggle changes back to blue/enabled state

Reactivation action

Reverse operation per AC5

10

Verify "Active Templates" metric increases

Metric updates to "Active Templates: 2"

Metric restoration

Count accuracy after reactivation

11

Test toggle on "Electricity Bill Template" (currently inactive)

Toggle changes from gray to blue, template becomes active

Electricity template activation

Different template status change

12

Verify final "Active Templates" count

Metric shows "Active Templates: 3" with all templates active

Final count verification

System consistency

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Status toggle works correctly with immediate metric updates using sample data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual feedback immediate, Changes persist after refresh
  • Negative_Verification: No errors during status changes, No data corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Dashboard loading, Database connectivity
  • Blocked_Tests: Template deletion tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other template management tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Business rule validation tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for template lifecycle management
  • Edge_Cases: Rapid toggle operations, Network interruption during status change
  • Risk_Areas: Status desynchronization, Metric calculation errors
  • Security_Considerations: Status change permissions, Audit logging

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Status change confirmation dialogs for high-usage templates
  • Type: User Experience
  • Rationale: Prevent accidental deactivation of frequently used templates
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 10 - Verify prevention of active template deletion with Standard Water Bill

Title: Verify prevention of active template deletion with Standard Water Bill

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_010
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Negative
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Negative, Billing, DeletionPrevention, Validation], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Negative], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Security-Validation/Module-Coverage/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[High], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Database], Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Validation System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Security-Validation
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template management system, Business rule validation
  • Performance_Baseline: Immediate validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill template in Active status

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with active templates visible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template deletion permissions (to test prevention)
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Active, Usage: 13, Created by Admin User)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template status verification completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Standard Water Bill" template card with active status

Template displays with blue toggle (active) and three-dot actions menu

Standard Water Bill (Active status)

Initial state verification per sample data

2

Click three-dot actions menu on active template

Actions dropdown opens showing available operations

Actions menu for active template

Menu access per business rules

3

Look for delete option in actions menu

Delete option is either disabled (grayed out) or not present

Active template actions

Prevention mechanism per AC6

4

If delete option visible but disabled, hover over it

Tooltip appears: "Cannot delete active template. Deactivate first."

Disabled delete option

User guidance per business rules

5

If delete option present and clickable, attempt to click

Error message displays: "Cannot delete active template. Please deactivate the template first."

Delete attempt on active template

Error handling per AC6

6

Verify template remains in dashboard

Standard Water Bill template card still visible with all data intact

Template persistence

Deletion prevention success

7

Verify template count unchanged

"Total Templates" metric remains at "3"

Unchanged template count

System integrity

8

Close error message/dialog

Error message closes, template card remains visible

Error dismissal

User workflow continuation

9

Verify template functionality

Template can still be opened for editing

Template functionality

Operational integrity

10

Test with different active template

Repeat deletion attempt with "Commercial Gas Bill" (also active)

Commercial Gas Bill (Active)

Consistency across templates

11

Verify same prevention behavior

Delete operation prevented with same error message

Consistent prevention

Business rule consistency

12

Confirm no templates deleted

All 3 templates remain: Standard Water Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Commercial Gas Bill

All templates intact

System stability

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Active templates cannot be deleted per AC6 with clear error messaging
  • Secondary_Verifications: Template data preserved, Clear user guidance provided
  • Negative_Verification: No accidental deletion occurs, No system corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template status management
  • Blocked_Tests: Template recovery tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Business rule validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Inactive template deletion tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical business rule for operational continuity
  • Edge_Cases: Concurrent deletion attempts, Status change during deletion attempt
  • Risk_Areas: Business rule bypass, Data corruption
  • Security_Considerations: Ensure deletion prevention cannot be circumvented

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Bulk deletion prevention for multiple active templates
  • Type: Business Rule
  • Rationale: Prevent mass deletion operations affecting active templates
  • Priority: P1




Test Case 11 - Verify template export functionality with Standard Water Bill

Title: Verify template export functionality with Standard Water Bill

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_011
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, TemplateExport, DataPortability], MOD-[BillTemplates], P3-[Medium], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Module-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/User-Acceptance/Customer-Segment-Analysis/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Medium], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Integration-[ExportSystem], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 5%
  • Integration_Points: Export System, File Generation
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Export system, File download capability
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds export time
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill template with complete configuration

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template with full configuration available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template export permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Admin User, 15/1/2025, Active, Usage: 13)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template access verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open "Standard Water Bill" template editor

Template editor loads with all sections and configuration visible

Standard Water Bill template

Editor access for export

2

Click "Export" button in template editor toolbar

Export options modal opens with format selection

Export button activation

Export initiation

3

Verify export format options available

Options display: JSON, XML, PDF Template, Configuration File

Export format choices

Format variety per business needs

4

Select "JSON" format option

JSON format selected, export preview shows template structure

JSON format selection

Structured data export

5

Click "Download" button

File download initiates with filename "Standard_Water_Bill_Template.json"

JSON download action

File generation

6

Verify downloaded file contains template data

JSON file includes: sections, fields, labels, database mappings, metadata

Template data export

Data completeness

7

Return to export modal and select "PDF Template"

PDF format selected for template documentation

PDF format selection

Documentation export

8

Generate PDF export

PDF file downloads: "Standard_Water_Bill_Template.pdf"

PDF download

Visual template export

9

Verify PDF contains template preview

PDF shows template layout with sample data and configuration details

PDF content validation

Visual representation

10

Test "Configuration File" export option

Configuration export downloads template settings only

Configuration export

Settings portability

11

Verify configuration file format

File contains: section settings, field mappings, validation rules

Configuration data

Technical settings export

12

Test export from dashboard actions menu

Export option available from template card three-dot menu

Dashboard export access

Alternative export path

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Template exports successfully in multiple formats with complete data
  • Secondary_Verifications: File downloads correctly, Content matches template configuration
  • Negative_Verification: No data loss during export, No file corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior






Test Case 12 -  Verify template version control and history restoration functionality

Title: Verify template version control and history restoration functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_012
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, VersionControl, HistoryManagement], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Engineering/Customer-Segment-Analysis], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[VersionSystem], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 12%
  • Integration_Points: Version Control System, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Version control system, Change tracking database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds version load
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill with modification history

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template with existing version history
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Version management and restoration permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill with multiple versions from different modifications
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template modification functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open "Standard Water Bill" template editor

Template editor loads with current version displayed

Standard Water Bill (current version)

Editor access for version management

2

Click "Version History" button in editor toolbar

Version history panel opens showing chronological list of versions

Version history access

History visibility per user story

3

Verify version list displays with details

Each version shows: Version number, Date/time, User who made changes, Change summary

Version metadata display

Complete version tracking

4

Verify current version highlighted

Most recent version marked as "Current" with visual distinction

Current version identification

Active version clarity

5

Click on previous version in history list

Version details modal opens showing specific changes made

Previous version selection

Change detail access

6

Verify change details include field modifications

Changes show: "Customer Information section - Bill To label changed from 'Bill To' to 'Customer Name'"

Specific change tracking

Granular change documentation

7

Click "Preview Version" button

Preview opens showing template as it appeared in selected version

Version preview

Historical state visualization

8

Compare current vs historical preview

Side-by-side comparison highlights differences between versions

Version comparison

Change visualization

9

Click "Restore This Version" button

Confirmation dialog appears: "Restore template to Version 2.1? Current changes will be saved as new version."

Restoration confirmation

Data safety confirmation

10

Confirm version restoration

Template reverts to selected version, current version saved as new entry in history

Version restoration

Historical state recovery

11

Verify restored template configuration

Template editor shows configuration from restored version

Restored configuration

Accurate version restoration

12

Check version history updated

New version entry created for restoration action with timestamp and user

History update

Restoration tracking

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Version history tracked accurately with restoration capability
  • Secondary_Verifications: Change details comprehensive, Current state preserved during restoration
  • Negative_Verification: No data loss during restoration, No version corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template modification tracking
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced version management
  • Parallel_Tests: Change tracking tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Audit trail verification

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for change management and error recovery
  • Edge_Cases: Large number of versions, Concurrent version access
  • Risk_Areas: Version data corruption, Restoration failures
  • Security_Considerations: Version access control, Change attribution

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Automated version cleanup for old template versions
  • Type: System Maintenance
  • Rationale: Prevent version history bloat and performance degradation
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 13- Verify multi-format preview (print, PDF, digital) functionality

Title: Verify multi-format preview (print, PDF, digital) functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_013
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, MultiFormatPreview, CrossPlatform], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Cross-Browser-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Product], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[PreviewEngine], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Preview Engine, PDF Generator, Print System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Results, User-Acceptance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: PDF generation engine, Print preview system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds format switching
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill with complete sample data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor with preview functionality
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template preview access
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill with sample data (John Smith, 123 Main Street, Account: 1234578, Usage: 274 Units)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template preview functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open "Standard Water Bill" template in editor

Template editor loads with default digital preview showing sample data

Standard Water Bill with sample data

Initial preview state

2

Verify digital preview format display

Preview shows responsive layout optimized for screen viewing with clear typography

Digital format optimization

Screen-optimized display

3

Click "Print Preview" format button

Preview switches to print-optimized layout with adjusted margins and fonts

Print format selection

Print optimization

4

Verify print preview adjustments

Layout shows: Proper margins, Print-friendly fonts, Page break indicators, Header/footer spacing

Print format optimization

Print layout validation

5

Verify sample data in print format

Customer information displays: "John Smith", "123 Main Street, Anytown, ST 12345", Account "1234578"

Sample data in print format

Data consistency across formats

6

Click "PDF Preview" format button

Preview switches to PDF format with PDF-specific styling and layout

PDF format selection

PDF optimization

7

Verify PDF preview formatting

Layout shows: PDF margins, Vector graphics quality, Embedded fonts, Proper page sizing

PDF format validation

PDF-specific formatting

8

Verify billing details in PDF format

Meter reading shows: "WM-98765", Previous: "27849", Current: "28123", Usage: "274 Units"

Billing data in PDF format

Technical data formatting

9

Click "Generate PDF" button

PDF file generates and downloads: "Standard_Water_Bill_Preview.pdf"

PDF generation

File output functionality

10

Open downloaded PDF file

PDF displays exactly as shown in PDF preview with all formatting intact

PDF file validation

Output accuracy verification

11

Return to digital preview format

Preview returns to original digital format layout

Format switching

Format transition functionality

12

Test rapid format switching

Switch between print, PDF, and digital formats multiple times quickly

Rapid format changes

Performance and stability testing

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Template previews correctly in all three formats with proper optimization
  • Secondary_Verifications: Sample data consistent across formats, Generated files match previews
  • Negative_Verification: No formatting errors, No data loss during format switching

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template preview system
  • Blocked_Tests: Print job integration
  • Parallel_Tests: Other preview functionality tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Output quality validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Essential for multi-channel bill delivery
  • Edge_Cases: Complex layouts, Large templates, Browser print limitations
  • Risk_Areas: Format inconsistencies, Print quality degradation
  • Security_Considerations: PDF generation security, Print data handling

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Mobile-responsive preview format for digital bills
  • Type: Platform Enhancement
  • Rationale: Mobile bill viewing increasingly important for customer experience
  • Priority: P3




Test Case14- Verify template performance analytics correlation with customer satisfaction

Title: Verify template performance analytics correlation with customer satisfaction

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_014
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Analytics
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, PerformanceAnalytics, CustomerSatisfaction], MOD-[BillTemplates], P3-[Medium], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Analytics], Platform-[Web], Report-[Performance-Metrics/Customer-Segment-Analysis/Revenue-Impact-Tracking/Quality-Dashboard/Product], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Medium], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[AnalyticsEngine], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: Analytics Engine, Customer Feedback System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Analytics
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Customer-Segment-Analysis
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Analytics system, Customer feedback integration
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds analytics load
  • Data_Requirements: Template usage data and customer satisfaction scores

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Analytics dashboard accessible, Customer feedback data available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Analytics and reporting access
  • Test_Data: Templates with usage data: Standard Water Bill (Usage: 13, Satisfaction: 4.2/5), Electricity Bill Template (Usage: 56, Satisfaction: 3.8/5), Commercial Gas Bill (Usage: 46, Satisfaction: 4.5/5)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template usage tracking verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to template analytics dashboard

Analytics dashboard loads showing template performance metrics overview

Analytics dashboard access

Performance metrics access

2

Verify template usage metrics display

Dashboard shows usage counts: Standard Water Bill (13), Electricity Bill Template (56), Commercial Gas Bill (46)

Usage data from sample data

Usage tracking validation

3

Verify customer satisfaction scores

Satisfaction ratings display: Standard Water Bill (4.2/5), Electricity Bill Template (3.8/5), Commercial Gas Bill (4.5/5)

Satisfaction scores

Customer feedback integration

4

Access correlation analysis view

Click "Performance vs Satisfaction" tab to view correlation metrics

Correlation analysis access

Advanced analytics functionality

5

Verify correlation calculations

System shows correlation between template usage and satisfaction scores

Statistical correlation data

Analytics algorithm validation

6

Check Commercial Gas Bill high performance

Template shows: High usage (46), High satisfaction (4.5), Marked as "Top Performer"

Commercial Gas Bill metrics

High performance identification

7

Check Electricity Bill Template performance concerns

Template shows: Highest usage (56), Lower satisfaction (3.8), Flagged for "Review Recommended"

Electricity template analysis

Performance concern identification

8

Verify trend analysis over time

Time-series chart shows satisfaction trends correlated with template modifications

Trend analysis display

Historical correlation tracking

9

Test filtering by satisfaction threshold

Set filter to show only templates with satisfaction > 4.0

Satisfaction filtering

Data filtering functionality

10

Verify filtered results

Only Standard Water Bill (4.2) and Commercial Gas Bill (4.5) display

Filtered results validation

Filter accuracy verification

11

Export correlation report

Generate PDF report showing template performance vs customer satisfaction analysis

Report generation

Data export functionality

12

Verify report contains actionable insights

Report includes: Template rankings, Improvement recommendations, Correlation coefficients

Report content validation

Actionable analytics output

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Analytics correctly correlate template performance with customer satisfaction using sample data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Trend analysis functional, Actionable insights provided
  • Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, No missing correlation data

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Monthly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Analytics system integration
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced reporting features
  • Parallel_Tests: Other analytics functionality
  • Sequential_Tests: Business intelligence integration

Additional Information

  • Notes: Provides valuable insights for template optimization
  • Edge_Cases: Insufficient data for correlation, Seasonal satisfaction variations
  • Risk_Areas: Correlation calculation accuracy, Data synchronization issues
  • Security_Considerations: Customer data privacy in analytics, Report access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Real-time satisfaction tracking integration with template usage
  • Type: Analytics Enhancement
  • Rationale: Immediate feedback loop for template performance optimization
  • Priority: P4




Test Case 15 - Verify template cloning efficiency for creating similar water utility templates

Test Case: BX03US01_TC_015

Title: Verify template cloning efficiency for creating similar water utility templates

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_015
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, TemplateCloning, Efficiency], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Module-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/User-Acceptance/Product/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Template System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template cloning system, Database write access
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds cloning time
  • Data_Requirements: Standard Water Bill template as source for cloning

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Source template available with complete configuration
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template creation and cloning permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Admin User, 15/1/2025, Active, Usage: 13) as clone source
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template creation functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Standard Water Bill" template card on dashboard

Template card displays with actions menu available

Standard Water Bill template

Source template identification

2

Click three-dot actions menu on template card

Actions dropdown opens showing available operations including "Duplicate"

Actions menu access

Cloning access point per AC14

3

Click "Duplicate" option from actions menu

Template cloning dialog opens with source template information displayed

Duplicate action

Cloning initiation

4

Verify source template information

Dialog shows: "Cloning from: Standard Water Bill (Admin User, 15/1/2025)"

Source template details

Clone source confirmation

5

Enter new template name

Name field accepts input: "Premium Water Bill 2025"

New template name

Template differentiation

6

Verify cloning options available

Options include: "Copy all sections", "Copy field mappings", "Copy formatting", "Set as inactive"

Cloning configuration options

Clone customization

7

Confirm cloning with all options selected

Click "Create Clone" button to initiate template duplication

Clone creation action

Template duplication process

8

Verify cloning completion message

Success message displays: "Template cloned successfully. Opening editor..."

Cloning success feedback

Process completion confirmation

9

Verify cloned template opens in editor

Template editor loads with cloned configuration identical to source

Cloned template editor

Configuration copy verification

10

Verify all sections copied correctly

Editor shows same sections as original: Header, Customer Information, Billing Details, Usage Summary, Payment Information, Footer

Section configuration copy

Complete section duplication

11

Verify field mappings preserved

Customer Information fields show same database mappings as source template

Field mapping preservation

Database integration copy

12

Navigate back to dashboard

Dashboard displays both original and cloned templates as separate entities

Template independence

Clone separation verification

13

Verify cloned template details

New template shows: "Premium Water Bill 2025", Created by current user, Today's date, Usage: 0, Status: Inactive

Cloned template metadata

New template characteristics

14

Modify cloned template

Make changes to verify independence from source template

Template modification

Independence validation

15

Verify source template unchanged

Original "Standard Water Bill" remains unmodified by changes to clone

Source template integrity

Template separation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Templates can be cloned efficiently with complete configuration copy per AC14
  • Secondary_Verifications: All configuration elements copied, Templates remain independent
  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption during cloning, No unintended template links

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template creation system
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced template customization
  • Parallel_Tests: Template modification tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template lifecycle management

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for efficient template development workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Cloning complex templates, Large template configurations
  • Risk_Areas: Data duplication errors, Template corruption
  • Security_Considerations: Clone permission validation, Data access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Bulk template cloning for multiple utility types
  • Type: Efficiency Enhancement
  • Rationale: Large utility companies need rapid template deployment
  • Priority: P3





Test Case 16 - Verify minimum active template requirement per utility type enforcement

Title: Verify minimum active template requirement per utility type enforcement

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_016
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Negative
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Negative, Billing, MinimumTemplate, BusinessRule], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Negative], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Security-Validation/Module-Coverage/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[High], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Database], Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 12%
  • Integration_Points: Business Rule Engine, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Security-Validation
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Business rule validation system
  • Performance_Baseline: Immediate validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Single active template per utility type

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Only one active template per utility type
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template status modification rights
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (only active water template), Commercial Gas Bill (only active gas template)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template status management verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify current state: Only "Standard Water Bill" active for water utility

Dashboard shows 1 active water template

Standard Water Bill (Active)

Baseline state per AC15

2

Attempt to deactivate "Standard Water Bill"

System prevents deactivation with warning message

Deactivation attempt

Business rule enforcement

3

Verify warning message content

Message: "Cannot deactivate: At least one active template required for Water utility"

Error message validation

User guidance per business rules

4

Confirm template remains active

Standard Water Bill toggle stays in blue/active state

Status preservation

Deactivation prevention

5

Create second water template and activate it

New water template created and activated successfully

Second Water Template

Alternative provision

6

Attempt to deactivate original water template

Deactivation now allowed since alternative exists

Deactivation with alternative

Rule satisfaction

7

Verify water utility still has one active template

System maintains minimum requirement with second template

Minimum requirement maintained

Business rule compliance

8

Test same scenario with gas utility templates

Repeat test with Commercial Gas Bill

Gas utility validation

Consistency across utility types

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: System enforces minimum one active template per utility type per AC15
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear warning messages, Alternative templates enable deactivation
  • Negative_Verification: No utility type left without active template

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template status system
  • Blocked_Tests: Template deletion workflows
  • Parallel_Tests: Business rule validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template lifecycle management

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical business rule for operational continuity
  • Edge_Cases: Concurrent template operations, Bulk deactivation attempts
  • Risk_Areas: Business rule bypass, Utility service disruption
  • Security_Considerations: Rule enforcement at API level

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Cross-utility type minimum template validation
  • Type: Business Rule Enhancement
  • Rationale: Prevent system-wide template deactivation
  • Priority: P1




Test Case 17 - Verify usage metrics tracking and display accuracy

Title: Verify usage metrics tracking and display accuracy

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_017
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, UsageMetrics, Analytics], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Performance-Metrics/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Customer-Segment-Analysis], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Analytics], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Usage Tracking System, Analytics Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Analytics
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Customer-Segment-Analysis
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Usage tracking system, Bill generation integration
  • Performance_Baseline: Real-time usage updates
  • Data_Requirements: Templates with existing usage data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Usage tracking system enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template usage viewing permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Usage: 13), Electricity Bill Template (Usage: 56), Commercial Gas Bill (Usage: 46)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard metrics display verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify current usage counts on dashboard

Template cards show usage: Standard Water Bill (13), Electricity (56), Commercial Gas (46)

Usage counts from sample data

Baseline usage metrics per AC16

2

Verify average usage calculation

Dashboard metric shows "38" (calculated as (13+56+46)/3 = 38.33)

Average calculation validation

Mathematical accuracy

3

Simulate bill generation using Standard Water Bill

Use template for bill generation process

Standard Water Bill usage

Usage increment trigger

4

Verify usage count increments

Standard Water Bill usage updates from 13 to 14

Usage count: 14

Real-time tracking per AC16

5

Verify average usage recalculates

Dashboard average updates to "39" (new calculation: (14+56+46)/3 = 38.67)

Updated average: 39

Dynamic calculation

6

Generate multiple bills with same template

Use Standard Water Bill for 3 more bill generations

Multiple usage events

Bulk usage tracking

7

Verify cumulative usage tracking

Usage count increases to 17 (14 + 3 additional uses)

Cumulative usage: 17

Accurate counting

8

Test usage tracking with different template

Generate bill using Commercial Gas Bill

Commercial Gas Bill usage

Cross-template validation

9

Verify independent usage tracking

Commercial Gas Bill usage increases from 46 to 47, others unchanged

Independent counters

Template isolation

10

Refresh dashboard and verify persistence

Usage counts persist after page reload

Data persistence

Storage validation

11

Access detailed usage analytics

Click on usage count to view detailed usage history

Usage history access

Detailed analytics per AC16

12

Verify usage history details

History shows: Date/time stamps, User who generated bills, Bill count per session

Usage analytics detail

Comprehensive tracking

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Usage metrics track accurately and update in real-time per AC16
  • Secondary_Verifications: Calculations correct, History detailed, Data persists
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect counting, No usage leakage between templates

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Bill generation integration
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced analytics features
  • Parallel_Tests: Performance metrics tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Usage-based optimization tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Essential for template performance evaluation
  • Edge_Cases: High-volume usage, Concurrent bill generation
  • Risk_Areas: Usage count accuracy, Performance impact
  • Security_Considerations: Usage data privacy, Access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Usage-based template recommendations
  • Type: Analytics Enhancement
  • Rationale: Help users select optimal templates based on usage patterns
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 18 - Verify field label and formatting customization options

Title: Verify field label and formatting customization options

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_018
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, FieldCustomization, Formatting], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[User-Acceptance/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Cross-Browser-Results], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Editor], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 12%
  • Integration_Points: Template Editor, Formatting Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template editor, Formatting system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 200ms formatting updates
  • Data_Requirements: Template with various field types for formatting

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor with formatting options available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Field customization permissions
  • Test_Data: Template with date fields, currency fields, text fields
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Field customization access verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open template editor and select date field "billDate"

Field properties panel opens with formatting options

billDate field

Date field selection per AC17

2

Verify date formatting options available

Options include: DD/MM/YYYY, MM/DD/YYYY, YYYY-MM-DD, DD-MMM-YYYY

Date format choices

Format variety per business rules

3

Change date format from DD/MM/YYYY to MM/DD/YYYY

Format selection updates, preview shows new format

Date format change

Format customization per AC17

4

Verify preview updates with new date format

Preview shows "05/15/2025" instead of "15/05/2025" for bill date

Preview format change

Real-time formatting

5

Select currency field "amountDue"

Currency formatting options display

Currency field selection

Currency customization access

6

Verify currency formatting options

Options include: Symbol ($, €, £), Decimal places (0-4), Thousands separator

Currency format choices

Currency flexibility

7

Change currency from $ to € with 3 decimal places

Currency updates to € format with 3 decimals

Currency formatting

European currency format

8

Verify currency preview

Preview shows "€408.870" instead of "$408.87"

Currency preview update

Format accuracy

9

Select text field "customerName" for label customization

Text field properties show label customization options

Text field customization

Label modification access

10

Change field label from "Customer Name" to "Bill To"

Label updates in properties and preview

Label change

Custom labeling per AC17

11

Verify text formatting options

Options include: Font size, Bold/Italic, Text case (Upper/Lower/Title)

Text formatting choices

Typography control

12

Apply bold formatting to customer name field

Field displays in bold in preview

Bold formatting

Text emphasis

13

Test numeric field formatting with account number

Account number field shows formatting: Leading zeros, Grouping, Padding

Numeric formatting

Number display control

14

Save all formatting changes

Template saves with all custom formatting applied

Save formatting

Format persistence

15

Reload template and verify formatting persists

All custom formatting remains after template reload

Format persistence

Configuration permanence

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Field labels and formatting can be customized extensively per AC17
  • Secondary_Verifications: Preview updates immediately, Changes persist after save
  • Negative_Verification: No formatting corruption, No preview errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template editor functionality
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced formatting features
  • Parallel_Tests: Other customization tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template validation tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for template personalization and compliance
  • Edge_Cases: Complex formatting combinations, Browser compatibility
  • Risk_Areas: Format corruption, Preview desynchronization
  • Security_Considerations: Input validation for custom labels

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Conditional formatting based on data values
  • Type: Advanced Formatting
  • Rationale: Dynamic formatting enhances bill readability
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 19 - Verify conditional display rules for template sections and fields

Title: Verify conditional display rules for template sections and fields

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_019
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, ConditionalDisplay, BusinessLogic], MOD-[BillTemplates], P3-[Medium], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Module-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/Engineering/User-Acceptance/Product], Customer-[Enterprise], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Medium], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[RuleEngine], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: Rule Engine, Template Editor
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Rule engine, Conditional logic system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 100ms rule evaluation
  • Data_Requirements: Template with conditional field scenarios

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor with conditional rule capability
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Advanced template configuration permissions
  • Test_Data: Template with fields having conditional dependencies
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic field configuration verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open template editor and access conditional rules section

Conditional rules panel opens with rule configuration options

Template editor access

Rule configuration access per AC18

2

Create field-level conditional rule

Set rule: "Show 'Late Fee' field only if 'Past Due Amount' > 0"

Field condition setup

Field-level logic per AC18

3

Configure rule parameters

Condition: Past Due Amount > 0, Action: Show Late Fee field

Rule parameters

Conditional logic definition

4

Test condition with zero past due amount

Preview with Past Due Amount = $0 shows Late Fee field hidden

Zero past due test

Condition false scenario

5

Test condition with positive past due amount

Preview with Past Due Amount = $50 shows Late Fee field visible

Positive past due test

Condition true scenario

6

Verify field appears with correct formatting

Late Fee field displays with proper currency formatting when visible

Field formatting

Conditional field display

7

Create section-level conditional rule

Set rule: "Show 'Payment History' section only for recurring customers"

Section condition setup

Section-level logic per AC18

8

Configure customer type condition

Condition: Customer Type = "Recurring", Action: Show Payment History section

Section rule parameters

Section conditional display

9

Test with one-time customer

Preview with Customer Type = "One-time" hides Payment History section

One-time customer test

Section hiding logic

10

Test with recurring customer

Preview with Customer Type = "Recurring" shows Payment History section

Recurring customer test

Section showing logic

11

Create complex multi-condition rule

Rule: "Show 'Demand Charges' if Utility Type = 'Electricity' AND Peak Usage > 1000kWh"

Complex condition setup

Multiple criteria logic

12

Test complex rule with partial match

Electricity customer with 500kWh usage does not show Demand Charges

Partial condition test

Complex rule validation

13

Test complex rule with full match

Electricity customer with 1500kWh usage shows Demand Charges section

Full condition test

Complex rule success

14

Verify rule precedence with conflicting conditions

Higher priority rule overrides lower priority when conflicts exist

Rule precedence test

Conflict resolution per AC18

15

Save template with conditional rules

Template saves successfully with all conditional logic preserved

Rule persistence

Configuration saving

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Conditional display rules work correctly for sections and fields per AC18
  • Secondary_Verifications: Complex conditions supported, Rule precedence respected
  • Negative_Verification: No rule conflicts cause errors, Invalid conditions prevented

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Monthly
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Rule engine functionality
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced conditional features
  • Parallel_Tests: Business logic validation
  • Sequential_Tests: Template complexity tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Enables sophisticated template behavior for complex billing scenarios
  • Edge_Cases: Circular rule dependencies, Performance with many rules
  • Risk_Areas: Rule conflicts, Logic errors, Performance degradation
  • Security_Considerations: Rule validation, Access control for rule creation

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Rule testing and validation tools
  • Type: Development Aid
  • Rationale: Complex rules need validation before deployment
  • Priority: P4




Test Case 20 -  Verify bulk template operations for managing multiple templates

Title: Verify bulk template operations for managing multiple templates

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_020
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, BulkOperations, Efficiency], MOD-[BillTemplates], P3-[Medium], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Module-Coverage/Quality-Dashboard/User-Acceptance/Performance-Metrics/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Medium], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Bulk Operation System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Bulk operation system, Database transaction support
  • Performance_Baseline: < 10 seconds for bulk operations
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple templates for bulk operations

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple templates available for bulk operations
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Bulk operation permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Commercial Gas Bill
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Individual template operations verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access template dashboard with multiple templates

Dashboard shows all templates with selection checkboxes

Multiple templates visible

Bulk operation interface per AC19

2

Select multiple templates using checkboxes

Templates selected, bulk action toolbar appears

Select 2-3 templates

Multi-selection capability

3

Verify bulk action options display

Toolbar shows: Bulk Activate, Bulk Deactivate, Bulk Export, Bulk Delete

Bulk action options

Operation variety per AC19

4

Select "Bulk Activate" operation

Confirmation dialog appears showing selected templates

Bulk activation selection

Operation confirmation

5

Verify selected templates in confirmation

Dialog lists: "Standard Water Bill", "Electricity Bill Template"

Selected template confirmation

Selection accuracy

6

Confirm bulk activation

All selected templates change to active status simultaneously

Bulk activation execution

Mass operation success

7

Verify individual template status

Each selected template shows blue toggle (active state)

Individual status verification

Bulk operation accuracy

8

Test bulk deactivation with business rule validation

Select active templates and attempt bulk deactivation

Bulk deactivation attempt

Business rule testing

9

Verify business rule enforcement

System prevents deactivation if it would leave utility type without active template

Business rule validation

Rule enforcement per AC15

10

Verify partial operation completion

Templates that can be deactivated change status, others remain active with explanation

Partial operation handling

Smart bulk processing

11

Test bulk export operation

Select multiple templates and choose "Bulk Export"

Bulk export selection

Multi-template export

12

Verify bulk export functionality

System generates combined export file or individual files as configured

Export execution

Bulk data extraction

13

Test bulk delete with validation

Attempt to bulk delete including active templates

Bulk delete attempt

Deletion validation

14

Verify deletion prevention for active templates

Active templates not deleted, inactive templates deleted, clear status report provided

Selective deletion

Protective bulk operations

15

Verify audit logging for bulk operations

All bulk operations logged with user, timestamp, and affected templates

Audit trail

Bulk operation tracking

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Bulk operations work efficiently while respecting business rules per AC19
  • Secondary_Verifications: Partial operations handled gracefully, Audit trail complete
  • Negative_Verification: Business rules enforced during bulk operations, No data corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Individual template operations
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced bulk features
  • Parallel_Tests: Performance optimization tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Large dataset handling

Additional Information

  • Notes: Important for efficient template management at scale
  • Edge_Cases: Very large template sets, Network interruption during bulk operations
  • Risk_Areas: Performance degradation, Partial operation failures
  • Security_Considerations: Bulk operation permissions, Mass data changes

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Scheduled bulk operations for template maintenance
  • Type: Automation Enhancement
  • Rationale: Automated template lifecycle management
  • Priority: P4





Test Case 21 -  Verify comprehensive template change logging with user identification

Title: Verify comprehensive template change logging with user identification

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_021
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, AuditLogging, Compliance], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Security-Validation/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Customer-Segment-Analysis/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Integration-[AuditSystem], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Audit System, User Management
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Audit
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Customer-Segment-Analysis
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Audit logging system, User management integration
  • Performance_Baseline: Real-time logging
  • Data_Requirements: Template with modification capabilities

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Audit logging system enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template modification and audit log access
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill for modification testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template modification functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Make template modification as user "Hetal"

Template change saves successfully

User: Hetal, Change: Field label update

Change execution per AC20

2

Access audit log immediately after change

Log entry appears with complete change details

Audit log access

Real-time logging verification

3

Verify log entry contains user identification

Entry shows: "User: Hetal (user_id: HET001)"

User identification

User tracking per AC20

4

Verify timestamp accuracy

Timestamp matches change time within 1 second

Accurate timestamp

Time precision validation

5

Verify change details logged

Entry includes: "Field 'billTo' label changed from 'Bill To' to 'Customer Name'"

Before/after values

Change detail logging

6

Verify session information

Log includes: IP address, browser type, session ID

Session context

Comprehensive audit trail

7

Change template status from Active to Inactive

Status change operation completes

Status modification

Different change type

8

Verify status change logged separately

New log entry: "Template status changed from 'Active' to 'Inactive' by Hetal"

Status change audit

Status-specific logging

9

Perform bulk field modifications

Make multiple field changes in single save operation

Multiple changes

Bulk modification logging

10

Verify batch change logging

Single log entry captures all changes with change count and details

Batch change audit

Efficient bulk logging

11

Delete template (if permitted)

Template deletion completes successfully

Template deletion

Deletion logging per AC20

12

Verify deletion audit trail

Log entry: "Template 'Standard Water Bill' deleted by Hetal. Reason: Testing"

Deletion audit

Critical operation logging

13

Test failed modification attempt

Attempt invalid configuration change

Failed operation

Error logging validation

14

Verify failed attempt logged

Log shows: "Failed template modification attempt by Hetal. Error: Invalid field mapping"

Failure audit

Error tracking

15

Export audit log for compliance

Generate audit report for specific date range

Audit export

Compliance reporting per AC20

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All template changes logged comprehensively with user identification per AC20
  • Secondary_Verifications: Timestamps accurate, Change details complete, Export functionality works
  • Negative_Verification: No changes go unlogged, No audit data corruption

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User authentication, Template modification
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced audit analytics
  • Parallel_Tests: Security validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Compliance reporting tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for regulatory compliance and security auditing
  • Edge_Cases: High-volume changes, System failures during logging
  • Risk_Areas: Audit log corruption, Missing critical changes
  • Security_Considerations: Audit log tamper protection, Access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Audit log retention and archival policies
  • Type: Compliance Enhancement
  • Rationale: Long-term audit trail preservation for regulatory requirements
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 22 - Verify template creation for electricity utility with specialized section

Title: Verify template creation for electricity utility with specialized sections

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_022
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, ElectricityTemplate, UtilitySpecific], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 18%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Electricity Utility Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Electricity utility template system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds creation
  • Data_Requirements: Electricity utility configuration templates

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Electricity utility templates configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template creation for electricity utilities
  • Test_Data: Electricity-specific sections and fields
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic template creation verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click "Create New Template" and select "Electricity" utility type

Electricity utility type selected, electricity-specific options appear

Utility Type: Electricity

Electricity specialization trigger

2

Enter electricity template name

Name field accepts input: "Premium Electricity Bill 2025"

Template Name: Premium Electricity Bill 2025

Descriptive naming

3

Create template and verify electricity sections

Template created with electricity-specific sections loaded

Electricity template creation

Utility-specific configuration

4

Verify "Demand Charges" section present

Demand Charges section available with electricity-specific fields

Demand Charges section

Electricity utility feature

5

Verify "Power Factor" section enabled

Power Factor section includes reactive power and power factor calculation fields

Power Factor section

Electrical engineering requirements

6

Verify "Load Profile" section available

Load Profile section configured for time-of-use and peak demand tracking

Load Profile section

Advanced electricity billing

7

Verify "Energy Charges" section with rate tiers

Energy Charges includes multiple rate tiers for residential/commercial/industrial

Energy rate structure

Complex electricity pricing

8

Verify "Meter Multiplier" field in meter section

Meter section includes multiplier field for CT/PT transformers

Meter multiplier

Commercial electricity metering

9

Verify "Service Classification" field

Classification options: Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Agricultural

Service classification

Electricity customer types

10

Check preview with electricity sample data

Preview shows electricity-specific data formatting and calculations

Electricity sample data

Specialized preview

11

Verify compliance sections for electricity

Regulatory compliance sections for electricity utility regulations

Compliance sections

Regulatory requirements

12

Save electricity template successfully

Template saves with all electricity-specific configurations

Template persistence

Configuration saving

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Electricity template created with utility-specific sections per AC3
  • Secondary_Verifications: All electricity features available, Preview accurate
  • Negative_Verification: No missing electricity-specific functionality

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template creation system
  • Blocked_Tests: Electricity billing integration
  • Parallel_Tests: Other utility type creation
  • Sequential_Tests: Electricity compliance validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for electricity utility billing accuracy
  • Edge_Cases: Complex electricity rate structures, Industrial customer requirements
  • Risk_Areas: Regulatory compliance gaps, Calculation errors
  • Security_Considerations: Electricity data sensitivity, Rate protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Time-of-use rate configuration for electricity templates
  • Type: Advanced Feature
  • Rationale: Modern electricity billing requires complex time-based rates
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 23 -  Verify template creation for gas utility with specialized sections

Title: Verify template creation for gas utility with specialized sections

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_023
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, GasTemplate, UtilitySpecific], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 18%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Gas Utility Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Gas utility template system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds creation
  • Data_Requirements: Gas utility configuration templates

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Gas utility templates configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template creation for gas utilities
  • Test_Data: Gas-specific sections and fields matching sample data (Commercial Gas Bill)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic template creation verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create template selecting "Gas" utility type

Gas utility type selected with gas-specific configuration options

Utility Type: Gas

Gas specialization per sample data

2

Enter gas template name matching sample pattern

Name field accepts: "Commercial Gas Bill Premium"

Template Name: Commercial Gas Bill Premium

Consistent with sample naming

3

Verify "Volume Corrections" section available

Volume Corrections section includes temperature and pressure correction fields

Volume Corrections section

Gas measurement accuracy

4

Verify "BTU Calculations" section enabled

BTU section configured for heating value and energy content calculations

BTU Calculations section

Gas energy content billing

5

Verify "Transportation Charges" section

Transportation section includes pipeline fees and delivery charges

Transportation Charges section

Gas distribution costs

6

Verify "Gas Composition" fields in meter section

Meter section includes gas quality and composition tracking

Gas composition tracking

Gas quality monitoring

7

Verify "Heating Degree Days" calculation

Weather adjustment section for heating degree days impact

Weather adjustments

Seasonal gas usage

8

Verify "Base Load vs Heating Load" sections

Usage breakdown between base load and heating load consumption

Load classification

Gas usage analysis

9

Check "Interruptible Service" options

Service classification includes firm and interruptible gas service types

Service classification

Commercial gas service types

10

Verify gas regulatory compliance sections

Compliance sections for gas utility safety and environmental regulations

Gas compliance

Regulatory requirements

11

Test preview with gas sample data matching user story

Preview shows gas billing with Commercial Gas Bill format

Gas sample data per user story

Sample data consistency

12

Verify creator tracking matches sample data pattern

Template created by current user following Sarah Johnson pattern

Creator: Current user

User tracking consistency

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Gas template created with utility-specific sections per AC3
  • Secondary_Verifications: All gas features available, Sample data consistency
  • Negative_Verification: No missing gas-specific functionality

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template creation system
  • Blocked_Tests: Gas billing integration
  • Parallel_Tests: Other utility type creation
  • Sequential_Tests: Gas compliance validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for accurate gas utility billing with complex calculations
  • Edge_Cases: High-pressure gas systems, Industrial gas customers
  • Risk_Areas: Volume correction accuracy, BTU calculation precision
  • Security_Considerations: Gas consumption data protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Gas peak shaving and storage billing components
  • Type: Advanced Feature
  • Rationale: Large commercial gas customers need sophisticated billing options
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 24 - Verify mandatory field validation prevents template activation

Title: Verify mandatory field validation prevents template activation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_024
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Negative
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Negative, Billing, MandatoryFields, Validation], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Negative], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Security-Validation/Module-Coverage/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[High], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[ValidationEngine], Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 12%
  • Integration_Points: Validation Engine, Business Rules
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Validation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Security-Validation
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Field validation system, Business rule engine
  • Performance_Baseline: Immediate validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Template with incomplete mandatory field configuration

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template with missing mandatory fields
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template activation permissions
  • Test_Data: Template missing Account Number, Bill Amount, Due Date fields
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template creation completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create template with missing Account Number field mapping

Template created but incomplete

Missing: Account Number mapping

Incomplete configuration per AC13

2

Attempt to activate incomplete template

Activation blocked with validation error

Activation attempt

Validation trigger

3

Verify specific error message

Error: "Cannot activate: Missing required field 'Account Number'"

Account Number error

Field-specific validation per AC13

4

Verify template remains inactive

Template toggle stays in gray/inactive state

Status preservation

Activation prevention

5

Add Account Number field but leave Bill Amount unmapped

Partial completion of mandatory fields

Missing: Bill Amount mapping

Progressive validation

6

Attempt activation again

Still blocked with new error: "Missing required field 'Bill Amount'"

Bill Amount error

Continued validation

7

Complete all mandatory field mappings

All required fields: Account Number, Bill Amount, Due Date, Customer Name mapped

Complete mandatory fields

Full compliance

8

Attempt activation with complete fields

Template activates successfully

Successful activation

Validation success per AC13

9

Verify template shows active status

Toggle switch shows blue/enabled state

Active status confirmation

Activation completion

10

Test with missing Due Date in different template

Create new template missing Due Date field

Missing: Due Date

Different mandatory field

11

Verify Due Date validation message

Error: "Cannot activate: Missing required field 'Due Date'"

Due Date error

Consistent validation

12

Test validation with optional field missing

Template with missing optional "Notes" field can activate

Optional field test

Optional vs mandatory distinction

13

Verify validation error list for multiple missing fields

Error shows all missing mandatory fields in single message

Multiple field errors

Comprehensive validation

14

Test mandatory field removal from active template

Removing mapped mandatory field from active template triggers warning

Field removal validation

Active template protection

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Templates with missing mandatory fields cannot be activated per AC13
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear field-specific errors, Optional fields distinguished
  • Negative_Verification: No incomplete templates become active, No validation bypass

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Field mapping system
  • Blocked_Tests: Template deployment
  • Parallel_Tests: Other validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Bill generation integration

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for preventing billing errors from incomplete templates
  • Edge_Cases: Conditional mandatory fields, Dynamic field requirements
  • Risk_Areas: Validation bypass, Incomplete bill generation
  • Security_Considerations: Validation tampering prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Mandatory field validation for different utility types
  • Type: Utility-Specific Validation
  • Rationale: Different utilities may have different mandatory field requirements
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 25 - Verify template filter and sorting functionality

Title: Verify template filter and sorting functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_025
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, FilterSort, UserExperience], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[User-Acceptance/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Cross-Browser-Results/Product], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Integration-[UI], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: UI Framework, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Cross-Browser-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template listing system, Filter/sort functionality
  • Performance_Baseline: < 200ms filter response
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple templates with varying attributes

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with multiple templates and filter controls
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template viewing and filtering access
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Commercial Gas Bill with different statuses, creators, dates
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template listing functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate filter dropdown showing "All" selection

Filter dropdown displays with "All" as current selection

Filter control access

Initial filter state

2

Click filter dropdown to view options

Options display: All, Active, Inactive, By Creator, By Date Range

Filter options

Filtering variety

3

Select "Active" filter

Only active templates display: Standard Water Bill, Commercial Gas Bill

Active filter: 2 templates

Status filtering

4

Verify filtered count matches active templates

Template list shows 2 cards matching active status from sample data

Active template count

Filter accuracy

5

Select "Inactive" filter

Only inactive templates display: Electricity Bill Template

Inactive filter: 1 template

Status filtering reverse

6

Select "By Creator" filter option

Creator dropdown appears with available creators

Creator filter access

Creator-based filtering

7

Select "Admin User" from creator filter

Only Standard Water Bill displays (created by Admin User)

Creator: Admin User

Creator filtering

8

Clear creator filter and test date range

Date range picker appears for filtering by creation date

Date range filtering

Temporal filtering

9

Set date range to include only recent templates

Templates within date range display appropriately

Date range selection

Date-based filtering

10

Test sorting functionality by clicking "Name" column

Templates sort alphabetically by name: Commercial Gas Bill, Electricity Bill Template, Standard Water Bill

Name sorting

Alphabetical ordering

11

Click "Created On" column for date sorting

Templates sort by creation date: oldest to newest or newest to oldest

Date sorting

Temporal ordering

12

Click "Usage Count" column for usage sorting

Templates sort by usage: 13, 46, 56 (ascending) or 56, 46, 13 (descending)

Usage sorting

Numerical ordering

13

Test combined filter and sort

Apply "Active" filter with "Usage Count" sorting

Combined operations

Filter + sort functionality

14

Verify sort direction toggle

Click same column header to reverse sort order

Sort direction toggle

Bi-directional sorting

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Templates can be filtered and sorted effectively using sample data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Multiple filter types work, Sort directions toggle correctly
  • Negative_Verification: No data loss during filtering, No sort errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template listing display
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced search features
  • Parallel_Tests: Search functionality tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template selection workflows

Additional Information

  • Notes: Essential for template management efficiency with large template libraries
  • Edge_Cases: No templates matching filter criteria, Very long template names
  • Risk_Areas: Performance with large datasets, Filter state persistence
  • Security_Considerations: Filter access control, Data visibility restrictions

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Saved filter presets for frequent template management tasks
  • Type: User Experience Enhancement
  • Rationale: Power users need quick access to common filter combinations
  • Priority: P4





Test Case 26 - Verify template deletion of inactive templates with confirmation workflow

Title: Verify template deletion of inactive templates with confirmation workflow

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_026
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, TemplateDeletion, Workflow], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Regression], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Security-Validation/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Database], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Audit System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template management system, Deletion workflow
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds deletion process
  • Data_Requirements: Inactive template available for deletion

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Inactive template available (deactivated Electricity Bill Template)
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template deletion permissions
  • Test_Data: Electricity Bill Template (Inactive, John Smith, 20/2/2025, Usage: 56)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template deactivation completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify "Electricity Bill Template" is inactive

Template shows gray toggle switch in inactive state

Electricity Bill Template (Inactive)

Prerequisite state validation per AC6

2

Click three-dot actions menu on inactive template

Actions dropdown opens with delete option enabled

Inactive template actions

Delete access for inactive templates

3

Verify delete option is available and enabled

Delete option appears in menu and is clickable (not grayed out)

Delete option visibility

Deletion permission for inactive per AC6

4

Click "Delete" option from actions menu

Deletion confirmation dialog appears

Delete action initiation

Confirmation workflow start

5

Verify confirmation dialog content

Dialog shows: "Are you sure you want to delete 'Electricity Bill Template'? This action cannot be undone."

Deletion confirmation message

Safety confirmation per business rules

6

Verify deletion impact information

Dialog displays: "Template has been used 56 times. Historical usage data will be preserved."

Usage impact notification

Data preservation information

7

Verify confirmation dialog buttons

Dialog shows "Cancel" and "Delete Template" buttons

Confirmation options

User choice provision

8

Click "Cancel" button first

Dialog closes, template remains in dashboard unchanged

Cancel action

Cancellation workflow

9

Retry deletion and click "Delete Template"

Deletion process initiates with processing indicator

Deletion confirmation

Template removal execution

10

Verify deletion completion message

Success message: "Template 'Electricity Bill Template' deleted successfully"

Deletion success feedback

Process completion confirmation

11

Verify template removed from dashboard

Electricity Bill Template no longer appears in template list

Template removal verification

Visual confirmation of deletion

12

Verify template count updated

"Total Templates" metric decreases from 3 to 2

Metric update

Count accuracy after deletion

13

Verify "Active Templates" count unchanged

Active templates count remains at 2 (only inactive template deleted)

Active count preservation

Deletion impact validation

14

Check audit log for deletion record

Audit log shows deletion event with user, timestamp, and template details

Deletion audit trail

Compliance logging per AC20

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Inactive templates can be deleted with proper confirmation workflow per AC6
  • Secondary_Verifications: Confirmation required, Metrics updated, Audit logged
  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption, No accidental active template deletion

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template deactivation
  • Blocked_Tests: Template recovery features
  • Parallel_Tests: Other deletion workflows
  • Sequential_Tests: Dashboard cleanup validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for template lifecycle management and data cleanup
  • Edge_Cases: High-usage template deletion, Network interruption during deletion
  • Risk_Areas: Accidental deletion, Data loss, Audit trail gaps
  • Security_Considerations: Deletion permission validation, Audit integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Template recovery from accidental deletion
  • Type: Recovery Feature
  • Rationale: Safety net for critical template management mistakes
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 27 - Verify template editor section configuration with all available sections

Title: Verify template editor section configuration with all available sections

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_027
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Happy-Path, Billing, SectionConfiguration, TemplateEditor], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Smoke], Type-[Functional], Platform-[Web], Report-[Smoke-Test-Results/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Product/Engineering], Customer-[All], Risk-[Medium], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[Editor], Happy-Path

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 18%
  • Integration_Points: Template Editor, Section Management, Preview System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Template editor, Section management system
  • Performance_Baseline: < 200ms section operations
  • Data_Requirements: Template with all available sections

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Template editor open with Standard Water Bill
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template editing permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill with all sections available
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template editor access verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open Standard Water Bill in template editor

Editor loads with sections panel showing all available sections

Standard Water Bill template

Editor initialization with full section list

2

Verify all sections are listed in correct order

Sections appear: Header, Customer Information, Billing Details, Usage Summary, Payment Information, Footer

Complete section list

Section availability per business rules

3

Verify section toggle states

All sections show blue toggles (enabled) by default

All sections enabled

Default section configuration

4

Verify section drag handles visible

Each section shows drag handle icon for reordering

Drag handles present

Drag functionality access per AC7

5

Verify "Edit Properties" buttons available

Each section has "Edit Properties" button visible

Property edit access

Section customization access

6

Click "Edit Properties" for Customer Information

Properties panel opens showing Customer Information field configuration

Customer section properties

Field-level configuration per AC9

7

Verify field list in Customer Information

Fields shown: billTo, address, accountNo, billDate, dueDate with toggles and labels

Customer fields from user story

Field availability validation

8

Toggle off "address" field

Field toggle changes to gray, address disappears from preview

Field visibility control

Field-level control per AC8

9

Toggle off entire "Payment Information" section

Section toggle grays out, Payment Information disappears from preview

Section visibility control

Section-level control per AC8

10

Drag "Usage Summary" above "Billing Details"

Section reorders successfully, preview updates with new order

Section reordering

Drag-and-drop per AC7

11

Verify preview updates immediately

Preview shows new layout: Header, Customer Info, Usage Summary, Billing Details, Footer

Real-time preview update

Immediate feedback per AC10

12

Re-enable "Payment Information" section

Section toggle returns to blue, Payment Information reappears in preview

Section restoration

Toggle reversibility

13

Test multiple rapid section changes

Toggle multiple sections on/off quickly without errors

Rapid operations

System responsiveness

14

Save all section configurations

Template saves successfully with all section modifications

Configuration persistence

Section state preservation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All sections can be configured, reordered, and toggled per AC7 and AC8
  • Secondary_Verifications: Preview updates in real-time, Changes persist after save
  • Negative_Verification: No section corruption, No preview errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template editor initialization
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced section features
  • Parallel_Tests: Field configuration tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template validation tests

Additional Information

  • Notes: Core functionality for template customization and structure
  • Edge_Cases: Many sections, Complex section dependencies
  • Risk_Areas: Section order corruption, Preview desynchronization
  • Security_Considerations: Section access control, Configuration validation

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Custom section creation and configuration
  • Type: Advanced Feature
  • Rationale: Power users may need custom sections beyond standard offerings
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 28 - Verify template performance with large template configurations and data sets

Title: Verify template performance with large template configurations and data sets

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_028
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Performance, Billing, LargeDataSets, Scalability], MOD-[BillTemplates], P2-[High], Phase-[Performance], Type-[Performance], Platform-[Web], Report-[Performance-Metrics/Quality-Dashboard/Engineering/Module-Coverage/Regression-Coverage], Customer-[Enterprise], Risk-[Medium], Business-[High], Revenue-Impact-[Medium], Integration-[Database], Performance

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 12%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Performance Monitoring, Template Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Performance
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, Large dataset simulation
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds dashboard load, < 500ms API responses
  • Data_Requirements: Simulated large template set and complex configurations

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled, Large dataset available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template access and performance testing permissions
  • Test_Data: 100+ templates, Complex template configurations, Large usage datasets
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic template functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Load dashboard with 100+ templates

Dashboard loads within 3 seconds despite large template count

100+ template simulation

Scalability validation

2

Measure initial page load time

Record dashboard load time and compare to baseline

Performance metrics

Load time measurement

3

Test template search with large dataset

Search returns results within 200ms for any search term

Search performance test

Search scalability

4

Test template filtering with many templates

Filter operations complete within 300ms

Filter performance

Filtering efficiency

5

Open complex template with many sections/fields

Template editor loads within 2 seconds

Complex template loading

Editor performance

6

Test real-time preview with complex template

Preview updates within 100ms per change

Preview performance

Real-time responsiveness

7

Perform rapid section reordering

Multiple drag operations complete without lag

Rapid operations test

UI responsiveness

8

Test template save with large configuration

Save operation completes within 1 second

Save performance

Data persistence speed

9

Test bulk operations with many templates

Bulk activate/deactivate operations complete within 5 seconds

Bulk operation performance

Mass operation efficiency

10

Monitor memory usage during operations

Memory usage remains within acceptable limits

Memory monitoring

Resource management

11

Test concurrent user simulation

System maintains performance with multiple simultaneous users

Concurrency testing

Multi-user scalability

12

Verify API response times under load

All API calls respond within 500ms under normal load

API performance

Backend responsiveness

13

Test template export with large templates

Export operations complete within 10 seconds

Export performance

Data extraction speed

14

Verify system recovery after high load

System returns to normal performance after load testing

Recovery validation

System stability

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: System maintains acceptable performance with large datasets
  • Secondary_Verifications: Memory usage controlled, API responses within SLA
  • Negative_Verification: No performance degradation below baselines, No system crashes

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Basic template functionality
  • Blocked_Tests: Stress testing scenarios
  • Parallel_Tests: Other performance tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Scalability validation

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for enterprise deployment and user experience
  • Edge_Cases: Extremely large templates, Peak usage periods
  • Risk_Areas: Performance degradation, Memory leaks, System overload
  • Security_Considerations: Performance-based DoS prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Performance optimization recommendations based on usage patterns
  • Type: Optimization Feature
  • Rationale: System should suggest performance improvements
  • Priority: P4




Test Case 29 - Verify template security access control and permission enforcement

Title: Verify template security access control and permission enforcement

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_029
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Security, Billing, AccessControl, PermissionValidation], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Security], Type-[Security], Platform-[Web], Report-[Security-Validation/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Engineering/Smoke-Test-Results], Customer-[All], Risk-[High], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[AuthSystem], Security

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Authentication System, Authorization Engine, Audit System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Security
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Smoke-Test-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication system, Role-based access control
  • Performance_Baseline: Immediate security validation
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different permission levels

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple user accounts configured with different roles
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Test accounts: Billing Manager (full access), Read-Only User (limited), Admin (full access)
  • Test_Data: Templates requiring different permission levels for access
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication system verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Billing Manager user

Template management interface loads with full functionality visible

Billing Manager credentials

Full access verification

2

Verify template creation access

"Create New Template" button visible and functional

Template creation permission

Creation rights validation

3

Verify template editing access

Template editor opens successfully for existing templates

Template editing permission

Modification rights

4

Verify template deletion access

Delete options available for inactive templates

Template deletion permission

Deletion rights validation

5

Logout and login as Read-Only User

Authentication successful, dashboard loads with restricted interface

Read-Only User credentials

Limited access configuration

6

Verify read-only restrictions

"Create New Template" button hidden or disabled

Read-only limitations

Creation restriction enforcement

7

Attempt to edit template

Template opens in view-only mode, no edit controls available

Edit restriction

Modification prevention

8

Attempt direct API call for template creation

API returns 403 Forbidden status with appropriate error message

Unauthorized API access

API security validation

9

Verify template viewing permissions

Can view templates but no modification options appear

View-only access

Read permissions validation

10

Test template status change restriction

Status toggle disabled or hidden for read-only user

Status change restriction

Status management security

11

Login as Admin user

Full administrative access granted including all template functions

Admin credentials

Administrative access

12

Verify admin-specific functions

Admin can access user management, system settings, audit logs

Admin privileges

Administrative function access

13

Test permission inheritance

Admin can perform all Billing Manager functions plus admin-specific tasks

Permission escalation

Role hierarchy validation

14

Verify audit logging of access attempts

All login attempts, permission violations, and access grants logged

Security audit trail

Comprehensive access logging

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Access control enforced correctly for different user roles
  • Secondary_Verifications: API security validated, Audit trail complete
  • Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, No permission bypass

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User authentication system
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced security features
  • Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Compliance verification

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for B2B SaaS security compliance and data protection
  • Edge_Cases: Role changes during session, Concurrent access attempts
  • Risk_Areas: Permission bypass, Privilege escalation, Data exposure
  • Security_Considerations: Session management, Token validation, Audit integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Multi-tenant data isolation testing
  • Type: Data Security
  • Rationale: B2B SaaS requires strict tenant data separation
  • Priority: P1




Test Case 30 - Verify template integration with bill generation system end-to-end

Title: Verify template integration with bill generation system end-to-end

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_030
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Integration
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Integration, Billing, BillGeneration, EndToEnd], MOD-[BillTemplates], P1-[Critical], Phase-[Integration], Type-[Integration], Platform-[Web], Report-[Integration-Testing/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Engineering/Product], Customer-[All], Risk-[High], Business-[Critical], Revenue-Impact-[High], Integration-[BillGeneration], Integration

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Bill Generation System, Database, Template Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Integration
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Bill generation system, Template engine, Customer database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds bill generation
  • Data_Requirements: Active template, Customer data, Usage data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Bill generation system operational, Active template available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Bill generation and template access permissions
  • Test_Data: Standard Water Bill (Active), Customer: John Smith, Usage: 274 Units
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Template configuration completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify Standard Water Bill template is active

Template shows active status and is available for bill generation

Standard Water Bill (Active)

Template availability validation

2

Access bill generation system

Bill generation interface loads with template selection available

Bill generation access

System integration point

3

Select Standard Water Bill template

Template appears in available templates list for bill generation

Template selection

Template visibility in generation

4

Verify template configuration visible

Template preview shows configured sections and field mappings

Template configuration display

Configuration integration

5

Select customer for bill generation

Choose John Smith customer record for bill generation

Customer: John Smith

Customer data integration

6

Verify template fields populate with customer data

Template fields show: Customer Name: "John Smith", Address: "123 Main Street, Anytown, ST 12345", Account: "1234578"

Customer data mapping

Field mapping integration

7

Add usage data for billing period

Enter usage data: Previous Reading: 27849, Current Reading: 28123, Consumption: 274 Units

Usage data from user story

Usage data integration

8

Verify usage fields populate in template

Template usage section shows: Previous Reading "27849", Current Reading "28123", Total Consumption "274 Units"

Usage data display

Data flow validation

9

Generate bill using template

Bill generation process completes successfully

Bill generation execution

End-to-end process

10

Verify generated bill matches template layout

Generated bill shows exact layout configured in template editor

Bill layout validation

Template application accuracy

11

Verify all mapped fields display correctly

All database-mapped fields show correct customer and usage data

Field mapping accuracy

Data integrity validation

12

Verify bill formatting matches template

Generated bill uses formatting, labels, and styling from template configuration

Formatting consistency

Template rendering accuracy

13

Verify template usage count increments

Standard Water Bill usage count increases by 1 after generation

Usage tracking update

Usage statistics integration

14

Test bill generation with different template

Repeat process with Commercial Gas Bill template

Cross-template validation

Template flexibility verification

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Template integrates seamlessly with bill generation producing accurate bills
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data mapping accurate, Usage tracking updated, Formatting preserved
  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption, No generation failures, No template errors

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: Template configuration, Bill generation system
  • Blocked_Tests: Customer delivery integration
  • Parallel_Tests: Other system integration tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Bill validation workflows

Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical integration point for entire billing workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Template changes during generation, Large customer datasets
  • Risk_Areas: Data mapping failures, Generation errors, Template corruption
  • Security_Considerations: Customer data protection, Template access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Real-time template updates during active bill generation cycles
  • Type: Dynamic Integration
  • Rationale: Templates may need updates while billing is in progress
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 31 - Verify template accessibility compliance and keyboard navigation

Title: Verify template accessibility compliance and keyboard navigation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: BX03US01_TC_031
  • Created By: Hetal
  • Created Date: 2025-08-21
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Bill Template Management User Story
  • Test Type: Accessibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Accessibility
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: [Accessibility, Billing, WCAG, KeyboardNavigation], MOD-[BillTemplates], P3-[Medium], Phase-[Accessibility], Type-[Accessibility], Platform-[Web], Report-[Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Cross-Browser-Results/Customer-Segment-Analysis], Customer-[All], Risk-[Low], Business-[Medium], Revenue-Impact-[Low], Accessibility

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 8%
  • Integration_Points: Accessibility Framework, Keyboard Handler
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Accessibility
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Screen reader software, Keyboard navigation system
  • Performance_Baseline: Standard accessibility response times
  • Data_Requirements: Template interface for accessibility testing

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Screen reader software available, Accessibility testing tools enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Template access with accessibility requirements
  • Test_Data: Standard template interface with all elements
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic template functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to template dashboard using only keyboard

Dashboard accessible via Tab, Enter, and Arrow keys

Keyboard navigation test

WCAG compliance validation

2

Verify all interactive elements have focus indicators

Buttons, links, and controls show clear focus outline when selected

Visual focus indicators

Keyboard user guidance

3

Test template card navigation with keyboard

Tab key moves through template cards in logical order

Template card focus

Sequential navigation

4

Verify template actions accessible via keyboard

Actions menu opens with Enter/Space, items selectable with arrows

Keyboard actions access

Full keyboard functionality

5

Test screen reader compatibility

Screen reader announces template names, status, and actions correctly

Screen reader testing

Assistive technology support

6

Verify alt text for all images and icons

All visual elements have descriptive alternative text

Image accessibility

Non-visual user support

7

Test color contrast compliance

All text meets WCAG AA contrast requirements (4.5:1 minimum)

Contrast validation

Visual accessibility

8

Verify template editor keyboard navigation

Template editor fully navigable without mouse

Editor accessibility

Comprehensive keyboard support

9

Test section configuration with keyboard

Section toggles, drag operations alternative keyboard methods available

Section keyboard access

Alternative interaction methods

10

Verify form field accessibility

All form fields have proper labels and error messaging

Form accessibility

Input accessibility

11

Test zoom accessibility up to 200%

Interface remains functional and readable at 200% browser zoom

Zoom compatibility

Visual impairment support

12

Verify skip navigation links

Skip links allow bypassing repetitive navigation elements

Skip navigation

Efficient navigation

13

Test error message accessibility

Error messages announced by screen readers and clearly visible

Error accessibility

Error communication

14

Verify ARIA labels and roles

All complex UI elements have appropriate ARIA attributes

ARIA compliance

Semantic accessibility

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Template interface meets WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards
  • Secondary_Verifications: Keyboard navigation complete, Screen reader compatible
  • Negative_Verification: No accessibility barriers, No navigation dead ends

Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
  • Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Monthly
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: UI framework implementation
  • Blocked_Tests: Advanced accessibility features
  • Parallel_Tests: Cross-browser accessibility tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Compliance certification

Additional Information

  • Notes: Required for legal compliance and inclusive user experience
  • Edge_Cases: Complex interactions, Dynamic content updates
  • Risk_Areas: Navigation barriers, Screen reader incompatibility
  • Security_Considerations: Accessible security features, Privacy in assistive tech

Missing Scenarios Identified

  • Scenario_1: Accessibility testing with multiple assistive technologies
  • Type: Comprehensive Accessibility
  • Rationale: Different assistive technologies may have varying compatibility
  • Priority: P4