Bill Cycle Setup Test Cases - BX03US02

Test Case 1 : Dashboard Metrics Display

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_001

Title: Verify dashboard displays accurate cycle metrics including consumer coverage percentage, active cycles count, and average run count with trend indicators

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_001
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-CxServices, Integration-API, Dashboard-Metrics, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, Engineering, Product
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1 - Dashboard metrics display with consumer coverage, active cycles, and performance indicators
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_011

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Bill Cycle Service, Database, Authentication Service, Consumer Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Existing bill cycles: "Monthly-Central", "Weekly-North", "Savaii 202501 R2"

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Minimum 3 active billing cycles in system, Consumer data populated
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with dashboard access
Test_Data:
- Active Cycles: 2 cycles
- Total Cycles: 7 cycles
- Consumer Coverage: 84%
- Average Run Count: 13.14
- Growth indicators: "+4 growth this month"
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication login must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Bill Cycle dashboard via Home > Bx > Bill Setup > Billcycle	Dashboard loads successfully within 2 seconds showing "Bill Cycle" header with subtitle "Configure and manage billing cycles to ensure timely and accurate bill generation."	URL: /billcycle	Verify page load performance and header content from user story
2	Verify "Active Cycles" metric card display	Shows "2" with green calendar icon, "28.57% of total configured cycles" subtitle	Expected: 2 active cycles out of 7 total	Metric calculation: 2/7 = 28.57% as per user story
3	Verify "Average Run Count" metric card display	Shows "13.14" with orange bar chart icon and "Average number of times a bill cycle is run" description	Expected: 13.14 average from user story	Derived from historical cycle execution data
4	Verify "Total Billing Cycles" metric card display	Shows "7" with purple stack icon and "+4 growth this month" growth indicator	Expected: 7 total cycles with growth trend	Growth indicator matches user story data
5	Verify dashboard real-time metric updates	Create new test cycle "Test-Monthly-Aug2025" and observe Active Cycles increment to 3	Use cycle creation workflow	Should update without page refresh
6	Verify metric color coding and icons	Active Cycles: green calendar, Average Run Count: orange bars, Total Cycles: purple stack	Visual consistency per user story wireframes	Icon and color validation from user story

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All three dashboard metrics display correct values matching user story sample data
Secondary_Verifications: Icons display correctly, percentage calculations accurate (28.57%), growth indicators present
Negative_Verification: No error messages, broken UI elements, or metric calculation errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual metric values: Active Cycles, Average Run Count, Total Cycles]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: User authentication, Database connectivity
Blocked_Tests: All dashboard-dependent test cases
Parallel_Tests: Navigation and menu tests
Sequential_Tests: Dashboard → Create Cycle → Manage Cycle flow

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for daily operations monitoring by Billing Managers as per user story
Edge_Cases: Zero cycles scenario, maximum cycles display (24+ cycles)
Risk_Areas: Real-time calculation accuracy with large datasets, performance degradation
Security_Considerations: Ensure metrics don't expose sensitive customer financial data

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Consumer Coverage percentage calculation validation with different cycle configurations
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: User story shows 84% coverage but calculation method not validated
Priority: P2

Test Case 2 : Bill Cycle Creation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_002

Title: Verify system allows creation of new bill cycles with unique names, consumer category selection, subcategory filtering, and configurable billing duration parameters

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_002
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Api, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-BillingService, Integration-API, Cycle-Creation, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Billing Service, Database, Consumer Management System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, Engineering, Product
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC2 - New bill cycle creation with unique names and configurable parameters
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_001, BX03US02_TC_003, BX03US02_TC_021

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication Service, Billing Service, Database, Consumer Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for cycle creation
Data_Requirements: Consumer categories: Residential, Commercial; Subcategories: Category A/B, Small/Medium/Large

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Consumer categories and subcategories configured in system
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle creation permissions
Test_Data:
- Unique cycle name: "Monthly-Western-Aug2025"
- Consumer categories: Residential, Commercial
- Residential subcategories: Category A, Category B
- Commercial subcategories: Small, Medium, Large
- Billing duration: 30 days (monthly cycle)
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access (BX03US02_TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Create New Bill Cycle" button from dashboard	Navigate to cycle creation form showing "Create New Bill Cycle" header with back arrow	Button: "Create New Bill Cycle" (blue button)	Button positioning per user story wireframe
2	Enter unique bill cycle name in "Bill Cycle Name" field	Name field accepts input and shows placeholder "Enter a unique name for this cycle"	Input: "Monthly-Western-Aug2025"	Name uniqueness validation per business rules
3	Click "Consumer Categories" dropdown	Dropdown opens showing available categories: "Residential", "Commercial", "Industrial"	Categories from user story sample data	Multi-select dropdown per user story
4	Select "Residential" and "Commercial" categories	Both categories selected, dropdown shows "2 categories selected"	Select: Residential, Commercial	Multiple selection as per user story requirements
5	Click "Subcategories" dropdown	Subcategories populate based on selected categories: Category A, Category B (Residential), Small, Medium, Large (Commercial)	Subcategories per user story breakdown	Dynamic filtering based on category selection
6	Select residential subcategories	Select "Category A" and "Category B" from residential options	Select: Category A, Category B	Subcategory selection per user story
7	Select commercial subcategories	Select "Small" and "Medium" from commercial options	Select: Small, Medium	Business segment selection per user story
8	Enter billing duration	Input "30" in "Billing Duration (Days)" field with validation	Input: 30 days	Monthly cycle configuration per user story
9	Verify "Total Consumers" sidebar updates	Sidebar shows "NA" initially, then updates to actual consumer count after premise selection	Expected: "NA" then actual count	Real-time calculation per user story wireframe
10	Verify "Category Breakdown" sidebar	Shows "No category data available" initially	Expected: "No category data available"	Data dependency per user story
11	Verify "Connection Status" sidebar	Shows three status circles with "NA%" for Active, Paused, Disconnected	Expected: NA% for all statuses	Status distribution per user story

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: New bill cycle configuration saved with specified parameters and unique name validation
Secondary_Verifications: Category/subcategory dynamic filtering, sidebar real-time updates, field validation
Negative_Verification: Cannot create cycle with duplicate name, invalid duration values rejected

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record cycle creation success, validation messages, sidebar updates]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Dashboard access, Authentication
Blocked_Tests: Premise selection, Consumer selection
Parallel_Tests: None (sequential workflow)
Sequential_Tests: Creation → Configuration → Premise Selection

Additional Information

Notes: Core functionality for Billing Managers to establish new billing cycles
Edge_Cases: Maximum name length, special characters in name, category combinations
Risk_Areas: Category/subcategory synchronization, real-time sidebar updates
Security_Considerations: Input sanitization for cycle names, authorization for cycle creation

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Billing duration validation with predefined restrictions (7, 15, 30, 90 days only)
Type: Business Rule Validation
Rationale: User story mentions specific duration restrictions not validated
Priority: P1
Scenario_2: Consumer subcategory dynamic filtering validation
Type: Integration
Rationale: User story shows subcategory dependency on category selection
Priority: P2

Test Case 3 : Consumer Category Selection with Real-time Updates

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_003

Title: Verify system provides consumer category selection with real-time count updates and category breakdown display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_003
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-ConsumerManagement, Integration-Database, Category-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
Integration_Points: Consumer Management System, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Product, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC3 - Consumer category selection with real-time count updates
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_006, BX03US02_TC_032

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Consumer Management System, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for count updates
Data_Requirements: Consumer categories: Residential, Commercial, Industrial with population data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Consumer categories configured, consumer data populated
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with category selection access
Test_Data:
- Residential consumers: 876 (72% of total 1,224)
- Commercial consumers: 245 (20% of total 1,224)
- Industrial consumers: 103 (8% of total 1,224)
- Total consumers: 1,224 across all categories
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle creation initiation (BX03US02_TC_002)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Consumer Categories" dropdown in cycle creation	Dropdown displays available categories: "Residential", "Commercial", "Industrial"	Categories: Residential, Commercial, Industrial	Multi-select dropdown per user story
2	Select "Residential" category only	Category selected, "Total Consumers" sidebar shows "NA" initially	Selection: Residential	Initial selection without premises
3	Observe "Category Breakdown" sidebar	Shows "No category data available" message since no premises selected yet	Expected: "No category data available"	Data dependency validation
4	Select premises and verify count update	After premise selection, "Total Consumers" updates to show actual residential consumer count	Expected: Real-time count based on premises	Real-time calculation per user story
5	Add "Commercial" to selection	Multi-select: both Residential and Commercial categories selected	Multi-selection: Residential + Commercial	Multiple category support
6	Verify "Category Breakdown" updates	Sidebar shows percentage distribution: Residential 72%, Commercial 20%	Residential: 876 (72%), Commercial: 245 (20%)	Percentage calculation per user story
7	Add "Industrial" category	All three categories selected: Residential, Commercial, Industrial	Complete selection: All categories	Full category coverage
8	Verify complete breakdown	Sidebar shows: Residential 72%, Commercial 20%, Industrial 8% totaling 100%	Complete breakdown per user story data	Mathematical accuracy validation
9	Remove "Industrial" category	Category deselected, breakdown updates to show only Residential 72%, Commercial 20% (recalculated to 100%)	Updated breakdown without Industrial	Dynamic recalculation
10	Test category deselection impact	Remove "Residential", verify Commercial becomes 100% in breakdown	Commercial: 100% when alone	Proportional adjustment
11	Verify consumer count accuracy	Cross-reference displayed counts with actual consumer numbers from user story	Count validation: 1,224 total consumers	Data accuracy verification
12	Test category selection persistence	Navigate away and return, verify selected categories persist	State persistence validation	Session management

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Consumer category selection with accurate real-time count updates and percentage calculations
Secondary_Verifications: Multi-category support, dynamic breakdown updates, percentage accuracy
Negative_Verification: No categories selected shows appropriate empty state

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record category selection behavior, count updates, percentage calculations]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle creation form access
Blocked_Tests: Premise selection, consumer validation
Parallel_Tests: Subcategory filtering tests
Sequential_Tests: Category Selection → Premise Selection → Consumer Validation

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for accurate consumer segmentation and billing classification
Edge_Cases: All categories selected, single category selection, no categories selected
Risk_Areas: Real-time calculation accuracy, percentage rounding
Security_Considerations: Category access based on user permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Category selection with insufficient consumer data
Type: Data Validation
Rationale: System behavior when categories exist but no consumers assigned
Priority: P3

Test Case 4 : Premise Selection with Area/Subarea Filtering

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_004

Title: Verify system supports premise selection with hierarchical area/subarea filtering, consumer count updates, and bulk selection capabilities

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_004
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-ConsumerManagement, Integration-Database, Premise-Selection, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Consumer Management System, Database, Authentication Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Product, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC4 - Premise selection with area-based filtering capabilities
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_008

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Consumer Management System, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for premise filtering
Data_Requirements: Premises with area/subarea: U04-DMA00-Alaoa, U10-DMA02-Fuluasou JR, U04-DMA04-Alaoa

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Bill cycle configuration completed, Premise data populated with area/subarea structure
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with premise selection access
Test_Data:
- Premises: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2, U10-DMA02-V-SEESEE-B0, U10-DMA06-V-PESEGA-B0, U04-DMA04-V-LELATA-B0, U04-DMA13-V-MAGIAGI-B10
- Areas: U04-DMA00-Alaoa, U10-DMA02-Fuluasou JR, U10-DMA06-Fuluasou JR, U04-DMA04-Alaoa, U04-DMA13-Alaoa
- Subareas: U04-DMA00-V-Alaoa, U10-DMA02-V-Fuluasou JR, U10-DMA06-V-Fuluasou JR, U04-DMA04-V-Alaoa, U04-DMA13-V-Alaoa
- Consumer counts: 1, 1, 1, 0, 1 respectively
Prior_Test_Cases: Bill cycle creation (BX03US02_TC_002)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to "Premise Selection" section in cycle creation	Section displays with blue info box "Only Active and Temporary Disconnected consumers will be considered for billing."	Section header: "Premise Selection"	Business rule visibility per user story
2	Verify "Premises" tab is active by default	"Premises" tab highlighted, showing premise list with columns: Premise, Area, Subarea, Consumer Count	Default tab: "Premises"	Tab state management per wireframe
3	Verify premise list displays with area/subarea hierarchy	List shows: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2 (Area: U04-DMA00-Alaoa, Subarea: U04-DMA00-V-Alaoa, Count: 1)	Premise data from user story	Hierarchical data structure
4	Click "Show Filters" button	Filter panel expands showing area filtering options	Button: "Show Filters"	Filter panel expansion per user story
5	Use "Search premises..." search box	Enter "U04-DMA00" and verify filtered results show only matching premises	Search: "U04-DMA00"	Partial match search functionality
6	Clear search and test area filtering	Clear search, select area filter and verify premises filtered by selected area	Filter by: "U10-DMA02-Fuluasou JR"	Geographic filtering per user story
7	Select multiple premises using checkboxes	Check premises: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2, U10-DMA02-V-SEESEE-B0, U10-DMA06-V-PESEGA-B0	Select 3 premises	Bulk selection capability
8	Verify consumer count updates in sidebar	"Total Consumers" sidebar updates to show cumulative count: 3 consumers (1+1+1)	Expected: 3 total consumers	Real-time calculation per user story
9	Verify premise with zero consumers	Confirm U04-DMA04-V-LELATA-B0 shows "0" in Consumer Count column	Expected: 0 consumers	Zero consumer handling
10	Test premise deselection	Uncheck one premise and verify consumer count decreases accordingly	Uncheck: U10-DMA06-V-PESEGA-B0	Selection state management
11	Verify pagination controls	Check for pagination arrows at bottom of premise list	Navigation: < > arrows	Large dataset navigation per user story

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Premise selection with area/subarea filtering works correctly and consumer counts update in real-time
Secondary_Verifications: Search functionality, filter combinations, bulk selection, zero consumer handling
Negative_Verification: No premises selected results in appropriate validation

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record premise selection results, consumer count updates, filter effectiveness]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle configuration completion
Blocked_Tests: Consumer selection validation
Parallel_Tests: None (sequential workflow)
Sequential_Tests: Configuration → Premise Selection → Consumer Selection

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for geographic-based billing cycle management
Edge_Cases: No premises in selected area, all premises with zero consumers
Risk_Areas: Performance with large premise datasets, real-time count calculations
Security_Considerations: Premise data access authorization

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Hierarchical area/subarea relationship validation
Type: Data Integrity
Rationale: User story shows complex area/subarea structure requiring validation
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: "Show empty state" toggle functionality
Type: UI Feature
Rationale: Business rules mention empty state visibility control
Priority: P3

Test Case 5 : Consumer Eligibility Validation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_005

Title: Verify system validates consumer eligibility ensuring only Active and Temporary Disconnected consumers are selectable for billing cycles

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_005
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-ConsumerManagement, Integration-Database, Consumer-Validation, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Consumer Management System, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Engineering, QA
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC5 - Consumer eligibility validation for Active and Temporary Disconnected status only
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_004, BX03US02_TC_007, BX03US02_TC_018

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Consumer Management System, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for consumer list loading
Data_Requirements: Consumers with various connection statuses: Active, Temp. Disconnect, Paused, Disconnected

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Premise selection completed, Consumer data with mixed connection statuses
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with consumer selection access
Test_Data:
- Active consumers: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045), Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046)
- Temp. Disconnect consumers: Anjali Mehta (ACC-10047)
- Paused consumers: Vikrant Singh (ACC-10048)
- Disconnected consumers: Priya Mishra (ACC-10049)
- Premises: PRM-9087, PRM-9088, PRM-9089, PRM-9090, PRM-9091
- Areas: North Zone Ward 4, South Zone Ward 7, East Zone Ward 2, West Zone Ward 9
Prior_Test_Cases: Premise selection (BX03US02_TC_004)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Consumers" tab after premise selection	Navigate to consumer selection view showing consumer list with status filters	Tab: "Consumers"	Tab switching per user story wireframe
2	Verify blue info box displays eligibility rules	Info box shows "Only Active and Temporary Disconnected consumers will be considered for billing."	Business rule visibility	Critical business rule per user story
3	Verify consumer list displays with connection status	List shows consumers: Kavita Patil (Active - green pill), Anjali Mehta (Temp. Disconnect - yellow pill)	Consumer data from user story	Status color coding per wireframe
4	Verify excluded statuses are not shown	Confirm Paused and Permanently Disconnected consumers are excluded from selection list	Excluded: Paused, Disconnected statuses	Business rule enforcement
5	Use "Status" filter dropdown	Filter dropdown shows only: "Active", "Temp. Disconnect" options (Paused/Disconnected not available)	Filter options: Active, Temp. Disconnect	Filter options limited per business rules
6	Filter by "Active" status only	List shows only Active consumers: Kavita Patil, Rahul Sharma with green status indicators	Filter: Active status	Status-based filtering
7	Filter by "Temp. Disconnect" status	List shows only Temporary Disconnect consumers: Anjali Mehta with yellow status indicator	Filter: Temp. Disconnect	Status validation
8	Clear status filter and verify all eligible consumers	List shows all Active and Temp. Disconnect consumers together	All eligible consumers visible	Combined eligibility view
9	Verify consumer details display	Each consumer shows: Name, Account Number, Premise, Area, Last Billed Date, Billed Amount, Status, Last Bill Type	Consumer details per user story	Complete information display
10	Test "Search by name..." functionality	Search for "Kavita" and verify only matching eligible consumers appear	Search: "Kavita"	Search within eligible consumers only
11	Verify Area filter works with eligible consumers	Filter by "North Zone Ward 4" and confirm only eligible consumers from that area appear	Area filter: "North Zone Ward 4"	Geographic filtering with eligibility

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Only Active and Temporary Disconnected consumers are selectable for billing cycles
Secondary_Verifications: Status color coding, filter functionality, search capabilities, business rule visibility
Negative_Verification: Paused and Disconnected consumers cannot be selected or are not visible

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record consumer eligibility validation, excluded statuses, filter results]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Premise selection completion
Blocked_Tests: Consumer selection finalization, cycle save
Parallel_Tests: None (sequential workflow)
Sequential_Tests: Premise Selection → Consumer Validation → Cycle Save

Additional Information

Notes: Critical business rule enforcement for billing accuracy and compliance
Edge_Cases: All consumers in Paused status, mixed status scenarios
Risk_Areas: Status synchronization with external systems, real-time status updates
Security_Considerations: Consumer data access based on connection status

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Real-time consumer status updates during selection
Type: Integration
Rationale: Consumer status may change during cycle creation process
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Bulk consumer status validation
Type: Performance
Rationale: Large consumer datasets require efficient status validation
Priority: P3

Test Case 6: Category Breakdown Display

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_006

Title: Verify system displays category breakdown showing accurate Residential vs Commercial distribution with visual indicators

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_006
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database, Category-Breakdown, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 75%
Integration_Points: Database, Consumer Management System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, User-Acceptance, Product, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6 - Category breakdown showing Residential vs Commercial distribution
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_003, BX03US02_TC_007, BX03US02_TC_032

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Consumer Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for breakdown display
Data_Requirements: Mixed consumer types across selected premises

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Premises selected with mixed consumer types, category selection completed
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with breakdown view access
Test_Data:
- Consumer breakdown from user story: Residential 1028 (80.12%), Commercial 131 (10.21%)
- Visual indicators: Blue bars with percentages
- Category labels: Residential, Commercial, Domestic
Prior_Test_Cases: Consumer category selection (BX03US02_TC_003)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to "Category Breakdown" sidebar after premise/category selection	Sidebar displays "Category Breakdown" section with header "Distribution of consumers by category"	Section: "Category Breakdown"	Sidebar visibility per user story
2	Verify Residential category display	Shows "1028 (80.12%)" with blue bar indicator proportional to percentage	Residential: 1028 (80.12%)	Data from user story cycle details
3	Verify Commercial category display	Shows "131 (10.21%)" with blue bar indicator shorter than Residential	Commercial: 131 (10.21%)	Commercial segment per user story
4	Verify Domestic category display	Shows domestic consumer count with percentage and blue bar	Domestic: Per user story data	Additional category per user story
5	Verify percentage calculations	All displayed percentages add up to 100% (allowing for rounding)	Mathematical validation: Total = 100%	Calculation accuracy
6	Verify visual bar proportions	Bar lengths visually represent percentage proportions accurately	Visual validation: Bar length ∝ percentage	Visual representation accuracy
7	Verify color consistency	All category bars use consistent blue color scheme per user story wireframe	Color: Blue bars throughout	Color scheme per user story
8	Test breakdown updates with selection changes	Change premise selection and verify breakdown updates in real-time	Dynamic update validation	Real-time calculation
9	Verify category ordering	Categories display in logical order (largest to smallest percentage)	Order: Residential > Commercial > Domestic	Logical ordering
10	Test breakdown with single category	Select only one category and verify breakdown shows 100% for that category	Single category: 100% display	Edge case handling
11	Verify tooltip/hover information	Hover over bars to check for additional information tooltips	Tooltip functionality	Additional UI features
12	Test breakdown responsiveness	Verify breakdown adapts to different sidebar widths	Responsive design validation	UI adaptability

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Category breakdown displays accurate percentages with proportional visual indicators
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates, visual consistency, mathematical accuracy
Negative_Verification: No categories selected shows appropriate empty state

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record breakdown display, percentage accuracy, visual representation]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Category and premise selection
Blocked_Tests: Consumer selection finalization
Parallel_Tests: Connection status display tests
Sequential_Tests: Category Selection → Breakdown Display → Consumer Selection

Additional Information

Notes: Important for understanding consumer distribution before cycle creation
Edge_Cases: Equal category distributions, single consumer categories
Risk_Areas: Percentage calculation rounding, visual rendering consistency
Security_Considerations: Consumer data aggregation privacy

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Category breakdown with subcategory drill-down
Type: UI Enhancement
Rationale: User story shows subcategories but breakdown interaction unclear
Priority: P3

Test Case 7: Connection Status Distribution

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_007

Title: Verify system displays connection status distribution with accurate percentages and color-coded donut chart visualization

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_007
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database, Connection-Status, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 75%
Integration_Points: Database, Consumer Management System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Product, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC7 - Connection status distribution with percentages
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_006, BX03US02_TC_018

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Consumer Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for status chart rendering
Data_Requirements: Consumers with various connection statuses for accurate distribution

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Consumer data populated with mixed connection statuses
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with status view access
Test_Data:
- Active consumers: 92% (green indicator)
- Paused consumers: 6% (orange indicator)
- Temporary Disconnect: 2% (yellow indicator)
- Permanently Disconnected: (gray indicator)
- Raw counts per status for validation
Prior_Test_Cases: Consumer selection access

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Connection Status" section in sidebar	Section displays with header "Current status of consumer connections"	Section: "Connection Status"	Status overview per user story
2	Verify donut chart visualization	Donut chart displays with colored segments representing status distribution	Donut chart with colored segments	Visual representation per wireframe
3	Verify "Active" status segment	Green segment shows approximately 92% of chart with "NA%" label initially	Active: 92% (green segment)	Active status per user story data
4	Verify "Paused" status segment	Orange segment shows approximately 6% of chart with "NA%" label initially	Paused: 6% (orange segment)	Paused status distribution
5	Verify "Disconnected" status segment	Gray segment shows approximately 2% of chart with "NA%" label initially	Disconnected: 2% (gray segment)	Disconnected status representation
6	Verify status labels below chart	Shows "Active", "Paused", "Temporary Disconnect" with colored indicators	Status labels with color coding	Label consistency
7	Verify consumer count display	Shows "NA consumers" initially, updates with actual counts after data selection	Count display: "NA consumers" → actual numbers	Count progression per user story
8	Test status distribution with real data	Select premises and verify percentages update to actual values from "NA%"	Real percentage calculation	Dynamic update validation
9	Verify percentage calculation accuracy	All status percentages add up to 100% when consumers are selected	Mathematical validation: Total = 100%	Calculation accuracy
10	Test chart interactivity	Click or hover on chart segments to verify interaction behavior	Interactive chart features	User interaction capability
11	Verify color coding consistency	Status colors match throughout application: Active=Green, Paused=Orange, Disconnected=Gray	Color consistency validation	UI consistency per user story
12	Test empty state handling	With no consumers selected, verify chart shows appropriate empty state	Empty state: "NA%" for all statuses	Empty state per user story wireframe

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Connection status distribution displays with accurate percentages and proper color coding
Secondary_Verifications: Chart visualization, interactive features, mathematical accuracy
Negative_Verification: Empty state shows "NA%" appropriately

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record status distribution accuracy, chart visualization, color coding]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Consumer data availability
Blocked_Tests: Consumer eligibility validation
Parallel_Tests: Category breakdown tests
Sequential_Tests: Data Selection → Status Display → Eligibility Validation

Additional Information

Notes: Important for understanding consumer eligibility before billing
Edge_Cases: All consumers same status, no consumers in certain statuses
Risk_Areas: Chart rendering performance, percentage calculation precision
Security_Considerations: Consumer status data privacy

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Real-time status updates during consumer management
Type: Integration
Rationale: Consumer status may change during cycle creation
Priority: P3

Test Case 8: Tab Navigation Between Premises and Consumers

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_008

Title: Verify system allows seamless switching between Premises and Consumers tabs with state preservation and data consistency

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_008
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, UI, MOD-BillCycle, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database, Tab-Navigation, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: None
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 70%
Integration_Points: Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC8 - Tab switching between Premises and Consumers during selection
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_004, BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_009

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for tab switching
Data_Requirements: Premises and associated consumers for tab content validation

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Cycle creation in progress, premise selection section accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with selection access
Test_Data:
- Premises: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2, U10-DMA02-V-SEESEE-B0, U10-DMA06-V-PESEGA-B0
- Associated consumers: Various consumers per premise
- Tab labels: "Premises", "Consumers"
Prior_Test_Cases: Access to premise selection section

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access premise selection section	Section displays with "Premises" tab active by default	Default active tab: "Premises"	Default state per user story wireframe
2	Verify "Premises" tab content	Tab shows premise list with columns: Premise, Area, Subarea, Consumer Count	Premise data from user story	Content validation
3	Select multiple premises using checkboxes	Check 2-3 premises: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2, U10-DMA02-V-SEESEE-B0	Select 2-3 premises	State establishment
4	Click "Consumers" tab	Tab switches to consumer view, "Consumers" tab becomes active	Tab switch: Premises → Consumers	Tab activation
5	Verify consumer data displays	Consumer list shows consumers from previously selected premises only	Filtered consumer list	Data filtering validation
6	Verify consumer list structure	Shows columns: Consumer Name, Account Number, Premise, Area, Status, etc.	Consumer data per user story	Content structure
7	Select some consumers using checkboxes	Check 2-3 consumers: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045), Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046)	Select consumers	Consumer selection
8	Switch back to "Premises" tab	Click "Premises" tab to return to premise view	Tab switch: Consumers → Premises	Return navigation
9	Verify premise selections preserved	Previously selected premises remain checked	Preserved selections	State persistence
10	Switch to "Consumers" tab again	Return to consumer view via tab click	Tab switch: Premises → Consumers	Repeated navigation
11	Verify consumer selections preserved	Previously selected consumers remain checked	Preserved consumer selections	Consumer state persistence
12	Test rapid tab switching	Switch between tabs multiple times quickly	Stable tab switching	Performance validation
13	Verify sidebar updates consistently	Sidebar metrics update correctly regardless of active tab	Consistent sidebar data	Data consistency
14	Test tab visual indicators	Active tab shows highlighted/selected state, inactive tab shows normal state	Visual tab states	UI indication

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Seamless tab switching with complete state preservation between Premises and Consumers views
Secondary_Verifications: Visual tab indicators, performance, data consistency
Negative_Verification: No data loss during tab switching

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record tab switching behavior, state preservation, performance]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Premise selection access
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Search and filter tests
Sequential_Tests: Tab Navigation → Selection → Validation

Additional Information

Notes: Important for user experience during cycle creation workflow
Edge_Cases: No selections made, all items selected
Risk_Areas: State management complexity, browser tab compatibility
Security_Considerations: Session state security

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Tab switching with unsaved changes warning
Type: User Experience
Rationale: User should be warned about potential data loss
Priority: P4

Test case 9: Search Functionality for Premises and Consumers

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_009

Title: Verify system provides comprehensive search functionality for finding specific premises and consumers with multiple search criteria

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_009
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, Search-Functionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Database, Search Engine
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Engineering, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC9 - Search functionality for finding specific premises and consumers
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_004, BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_008

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Search Engine, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for search results
Data_Requirements: Diverse premise and consumer data for comprehensive search testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Premises and consumers data populated, search functionality enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with search access
Test_Data:
- Premises: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2, U10-DMA02-V-SEESEE-B0, U04-DMA13-V-MAGIAGI-B10
- Consumers: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045), Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046), Anjali Mehta (ACC-10047)
- Areas: U04-DMA00-Alaoa, U10-DMA02-Fuluasou JR, U04-DMA13-Alaoa
- Account numbers: ACC-10045, ACC-10046, ACC-10047
Prior_Test_Cases: Access to premise/consumer selection tabs

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Search premises..." box on Premises tab	Search box displays with placeholder "Search premises..."	Search box: "Search premises..."	Search interface per user story
2	Enter partial premise ID search	Search for "U04-DMA00" and verify filtered results	Search: "U04-DMA00"	Partial match search capability
3	Verify search results accuracy	Results show only premises containing "U04-DMA00": U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2	Expected: Matching premises only	Search accuracy validation
4	Clear search and test area search	Clear search, enter "Alaoa" to search by area	Search: "Alaoa"	Geographic area search
5	Verify area-based search results	Results show premises from Alaoa area: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2, U04-DMA13-V-MAGIAGI-B10	Area-based filtering	Geographic search validation
6	Switch to Consumers tab	Click "Consumers" tab to access consumer search	Tab: "Consumers"	Tab switching for consumer search
7	Access consumer search functionality	Search box displays with placeholder "Search by name..."	Consumer search: "Search by name..."	Consumer search interface
8	Search by consumer name	Enter "Kavita" to search for consumer by name	Search: "Kavita"	Name-based search
9	Verify consumer name search results	Results show: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045) with complete details	Expected: Kavita Patil only	Consumer name accuracy
10	Test account number search	Clear search, enter "ACC-10046" to search by account number	Search: "ACC-10046"	Account number search
11	Verify account number results	Results show: Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046) with account details	Expected: Rahul Sharma only	Account number accuracy
12	Test partial account search	Enter "ACC-100" to test partial account number matching	Search: "ACC-100"	Partial account matching
13	Verify partial search results	Results show all consumers with account numbers starting with "ACC-100"	Multiple matching accounts	Partial match validation
14	Test case-insensitive search	Enter "kavita" (lowercase) and verify results	Search: "kavita"	Case sensitivity testing
15	Test search with special characters	Search for premises with special characters in names	Search: "V-COMMERCIAL"	Special character handling
16	Test "no results" scenario	Search for non-existent item "InvalidSearch123"	Search: "InvalidSearch123"	No results handling
17	Verify search performance	Measure search response time with large dataset	Performance validation	Response time testing
18	Test search clear functionality	Use clear/X button to clear search and restore full list	Clear search functionality	Search reset capability

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Search functionality works across premises and consumers with accurate results
Secondary_Verifications: Partial matching, case insensitivity, performance, special characters
Negative_Verification: Non-existent searches show appropriate "no results" message

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record search accuracy, performance, result relevance]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Data availability, tab access
Blocked_Tests: Selection finalization
Parallel_Tests: Filter functionality tests
Sequential_Tests: Search → Filter → Selection

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for efficient premise and consumer location in large datasets
Edge_Cases: Empty search results, very long search terms, special characters
Risk_Areas: Search performance with large datasets, result relevance
Security_Considerations: Search query sanitization, data access permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Advanced search with multiple criteria combination
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Users may need to search by multiple fields simultaneously
Priority: P3

Test Case 10: Consumer Export Functionality

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_010

Title: Verify system exports selected consumers with complete account details in specified format with data integrity

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_010
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database, Export-Functionality, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
Integration_Points: Database, File Generation Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC10 - Export selected consumers with complete account details
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_009, BX03US02_TC_018

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, File Generation Service, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 10 seconds for export generation
Data_Requirements: Selected consumers with complete profile data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Consumer selection completed, export functionality enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with export permissions
Test_Data:
- Selected consumers: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045, PRM-9087), Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046, PRM-9088), Anjali Mehta (ACC-10047, PRM-9089)
- Complete data: Name, Account Number, Premise, Area, Last Billed Date, Billed Amount, Status
- Export formats: Excel (.xlsx), CSV (.csv)
Prior_Test_Cases: Consumer selection (BX03US02_TC_005)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Select multiple consumers using checkboxes	Check 5-7 consumers including: Kavita Patil, Rahul Sharma, Anjali Mehta	Select 5-7 consumers	Multi-selection for export
2	Verify "Export Selected" button becomes enabled	Button becomes clickable with selected consumers	"Export Selected" button active	Export trigger activation
3	Click "Export Selected" button	Export dialog appears or download initiates immediately	Export initiation	Export process start
4	Select export format if prompted	Choose Excel (.xlsx) format for comprehensive data export	Format: .xlsx	File format selection
5	Verify file download initiation	Browser download begins, file appears in downloads folder	Download starts	File generation confirmation
6	Open downloaded Excel file	File opens successfully showing consumer data in tabular format	Excel file opens	File accessibility
7	Verify exported data completeness	File contains all columns: Consumer Name, Account Number, Premise, Area, Last Billed Date, Billed Amount, Status, Last Bill Type	Complete data fields	Data completeness per user story
8	Verify data accuracy for Kavita Patil	Row shows: Kavita Patil, ACC-10045, PRM-9087, North Zone Ward 4, May 15 2025, $124.50, Active, Actual	Kavita's data from user story	Data accuracy validation
9	Verify data accuracy for Rahul Sharma	Row shows: Rahul Sharma, ACC-10046, PRM-9088, North Zone Ward 4, May 15 2025, $187.75, Active, Actual	Rahul's data from user story	Cross-reference validation
10	Verify data accuracy for Anjali Mehta	Row shows: Anjali Mehta, ACC-10047, PRM-9089, South Zone Ward 7, May 12 2025, $82.30, Temp. Disconnect, Estimated	Anjali's data from user story	Status variety validation
11	Test CSV format export	Repeat export process selecting CSV format	Format: .csv	Alternative format testing
12	Verify CSV file structure	CSV file opens with proper comma separation and data integrity	CSV format validation	Format-specific testing
13	Test export with filters applied	Apply area filter, then export to verify only filtered consumers exported	Export respects filters	Filter integration
14	Verify export filename convention	Downloaded file has meaningful name with timestamp or cycle reference	Filename: "BillCycle_Consumers_YYYY-MM-DD.xlsx"	File naming convention
15	Test export with no selections	Attempt export with no consumers selected	"Export Selected" button disabled	Selection requirement
16	Test large dataset export	Select maximum consumers (if available) and test export performance	Large dataset performance	Scalability testing

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Selected consumers export successfully with complete and accurate data
Secondary_Verifications: File format options, data integrity, filter respect, naming conventions
Negative_Verification: Cannot export without selections, handles large datasets gracefully

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record export success, data accuracy, file formats, performance]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Consumer selection completion
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Report generation tests
Sequential_Tests: Selection → Export → Validation

Additional Information

Notes: Important for external analysis and compliance reporting
Edge_Cases: All consumers selected, single consumer export, empty export
Risk_Areas: Large file generation performance, data privacy in exports
Security_Considerations: Export data encryption, access logging, PII protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Scheduled/automated export functionality
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Regular export needs for reporting and analysis
Priority: P4

Test Case 11: Cycle Configuration Save and Activation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_011

Title: Verify system saves cycle configurations with validation and allows activation/deactivation state management

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_011
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Api, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-BillingService, Integration-Database, Cycle-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Billing Service, Database, Authentication Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, Engineering, Product
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC11 - Cycle configuration save and activation/deactivation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_019, BX03US02_TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Billing Service, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for save operation
Data_Requirements: Complete cycle configuration with premises and consumers

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Complete cycle configuration ready for save
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle management permissions
Test_Data:
- Cycle name: "Test-Monthly-Central-Aug2025"
- Categories: Residential, Commercial
- Billing duration: 30 days
- Selected premises: 3-5 premises
- Selected consumers: 10-15 consumers
Prior_Test_Cases: Complete cycle configuration (TC_002-TC_010)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Complete all cycle configuration sections	All required fields populated: name, categories, duration, premises, consumers	Complete configuration data	Pre-save validation
2	Click "Save" button at bottom of form	System validates configuration and displays processing indicator	"Save" button click	Save initiation
3	Verify validation success	Success message displays: "Bill cycle created successfully" or similar	Success confirmation	Save confirmation
4	Verify redirect to cycle list	System navigates back to main cycle list view	Navigation to list view	Post-save navigation
5	Locate new cycle in list	New cycle "Test-Monthly-Central-Aug2025" appears in cycle list	Cycle visible in list	List integration
6	Verify initial cycle status	Cycle shows "Active" status by default after creation	Status: Active	Default status per user story
7	Verify cycle details accuracy	Consumer count, premise count, and other details match configuration	Match configured values	Data integrity
8	Access cycle actions menu	Click three-dot menu (⋯) for the new cycle	Actions menu opens	Action menu access
9	Verify available actions	Menu shows: "View", "Edit", "Run Now" options	Actions: View, Edit, Run Now	Action options per user story
10	Test cycle deactivation	Use status toggle or action to deactivate cycle	Status changes to "Inactive"	Status management
11	Verify deactivated cycle behavior	Deactivated cycle shows different visual indicator, reduced functionality	Visual status change	Deactivation effects
12	Test cycle reactivation	Reactivate the cycle using status controls	Status returns to "Active"	Reactivation capability
13	Verify data persistence	Refresh page and confirm cycle data persists correctly	Data persistence validation	Database persistence
14	Test edit functionality	Use "Edit" action to modify cycle configuration	Edit mode accessible	Configuration modification
15	Verify save validation	Attempt save with invalid data to test validation	Validation prevents invalid save	Error handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Cycle configuration saves successfully with all data intact and proper status management
Secondary_Verifications: Validation, navigation, status toggles, data persistence
Negative_Verification: Invalid configurations rejected, appropriate error messages

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record save success, status management, data persistence, validation behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Complete cycle configuration
Blocked_Tests: Cycle execution, billing operations
Parallel_Tests: None (critical path)
Sequential_Tests: Configuration → Save → Management → Execution

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for cycle lifecycle management and billing operations
Edge_Cases: Save with minimal data, maximum data scenarios
Risk_Areas: Data validation complexity, status synchronization
Security_Considerations: Authorization for cycle management, data validation

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Bulk cycle activation/deactivation
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Managing multiple cycles simultaneously for efficiency
Priority: P3

Test Case 12: Detailed Cycle Information Display

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_012

Title: Verify system displays comprehensive cycle information including last run summary, billing statistics, and performance metrics

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_012
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Engineering, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-BillingService, Integration-Database, Cycle-Details, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Billing Service, Database, Reporting Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Product, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC12 - Detailed cycle information with last run summary and billing statistics
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_011, BX03US02_TC_013, BX03US02_TC_017

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Billing Service, Database, Reporting Service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for details page load
Data_Requirements: Executed cycle with complete run history and billing data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Cycle with execution history, billing data available
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle details access
Test_Data:
- Cycle: "Savaii 202501 R2"
- Last run date: 2025-07-30
- Initiated by: Bynry Support
- Days between runs: 18
- Actual vs Estimated: 12.35% Actual
- Processed: 81, Actual: 10, Estimated: 71
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle existence and execution

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click on cycle name "Savaii 202501 R2" from cycle list	Navigate to cycle detail page showing cycle name and "Run Now" button	Cycle: "Savaii 202501 R2"	Detail navigation per user story
2	Verify "Last Run Summary" section	Section displays with header "Details of the most recent bill cycle run"	Section: "Last Run Summary"	Run summary per user story wireframe
3	Verify run date display	Shows "Run Date: 2025-07-30"	Run Date: 2025-07-30	Date from user story data
4	Verify initiator information	Shows "Initiated By: Bynry Support"	Initiated By: Bynry Support	User tracking per user story
5	Verify days between runs	Shows "Days Between Runs: 18" with clock icon	Days Between Runs: 18	Timing analysis per user story
6	Verify actual vs estimated ratio	Shows "Actual vs Estimated: 12.35% Actual"	12.35% Actual	Performance metric per user story
7	Access "Billing Summary" section	Section expands showing "Statistics about bills processed in this bill cycle"	Section: "Billing Summary"	Billing statistics section
8	Verify processed bills count	Shows "Processed: 81"	Processed: 81	Total processed per user story
9	Verify actual bills count	Shows "Actual Bills: 10" with green color indicator	Actual Bills: 10 (green)	Actual meter readings
10	Verify estimated bills count	Shows "Estimated Bills: 71" with orange color indicator	Estimated Bills: 71 (orange)	Estimated bills per user story
11	Access "Financial Summary" section	Section shows "Financial data for the completed bill cycle run"	Section: "Financial Summary"	Financial metrics section
12	Verify billed amount	Shows "Billed Amount: SAT 0"	Billed Amount: SAT 0	Amount per user story
13	Verify average bill calculation	Shows "Avg Bill: SAT 0"	Avg Bill: SAT 0	Average calculation
14	Verify outstanding amount	Shows "Outstanding: SAT 23439.63"	Outstanding: SAT 23439.63	Outstanding per user story
15	Access "Consumption Summary" section	Section shows "Water usage metrics across all consumers in this cycle"	Section: "Consumption Summary"	Consumption data section
16	Verify consumption metrics	Shows Total: 0, Avg: 0, High: 0, Low: 0 consumption values	Consumption metrics per user story	Usage analysis

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete cycle details display with accurate last run summary and billing statistics
Secondary_Verifications: Section expansion, data accuracy, metric calculations
Negative_Verification: Handles missing data gracefully, shows appropriate empty states

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record detail display accuracy, section functionality, data completeness]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle execution completion
Blocked_Tests: Performance analysis, reporting
Parallel_Tests: Financial summary tests
Sequential_Tests: Cycle Details → Analysis → Reporting

Additional Information

Notes: Important for cycle performance monitoring and troubleshooting
Edge_Cases: First run cycles, cycles with no billing data
Risk_Areas: Data synchronization, calculation accuracy
Security_Considerations: Billing data access controls

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Real-time cycle details updates during execution
Type: Performance
Rationale: Details should update as cycle executes
Priority: P3oa, U10-DMA02-Fuluasou JR, U10-DMA06-Fuluasou JR,

Test Case 13: Financial Summaries with Detailed Calculations

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_013

Title: Verify system displays comprehensive financial summaries including billed amounts, average bill calculations, outstanding balances, and late fee tracking

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_013
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-BillingService, Integration-Database, Financial-Summary, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Billing Service, Database, Payment System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering, Product
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC13 - Financial summaries with billed amounts and average bill calculations
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_012, BX03US02_TC_014, BX03US02_TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Billing Service, Database, Payment System, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for financial data loading
Data_Requirements: "Monthly-Central" cycle with complete financial data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Executed billing cycle with complete financial data, payment records
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with financial data access
Test_Data:
- Cycle: "Monthly-Central"
- Billed Amount: $243,500
- Consumer Count: 1,224
- Average Bill: $201.57 (calculated: $243,500 ÷ 1,224)
- Outstanding Amount: $1,240
- Late Fees: $560
- Processed Bills: 1,224
- Actual Bills: 1,002
- Estimated Bills: 206
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle execution completion

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to "Monthly-Central" cycle details page	Cycle details page loads showing cycle name "Monthly-Central" with "Run Now" button	Cycle: "Monthly-Central"	Access existing cycle from user story
2	Locate "Financial Summary" section	Section displays with header "Financial data for the completed bill cycle run"	Section: "Financial Summary"	Financial data section per user story
3	Verify "Billed Amount" field	Shows "SAT 0" with label "Billed Amount" (Note: User story shows inconsistent data)	Expected: SAT 243,500 or SAT 0	User story shows conflicting values
4	Verify "Avg Bill" calculation	Shows "SAT 0" with label "Avg Bill" (should be Billed Amount ÷ Number of Bills)	Expected: SAT 201.57 calculation	Mathematical validation per user story
5	Verify "Outstanding" amount display	Shows "SAT 23439.63" with label "Outstanding"	Outstanding: SAT 23439.63	Previous cycle unpaid balances
6	Verify "Late Fees" tracking	Shows "SAT 0" with label "Late Fees" in red text	Late Fees: SAT 0	Penalty charges display
7	Verify currency formatting consistency	All amounts display in "SAT" currency format with proper decimal places	Currency: SAT format	Localization per user story
8	Verify financial summary expandability	Click expand/collapse icon to show/hide financial details	Expandable section	UI interaction per wireframe
9	Cross-reference with billing summary	Compare financial figures with "Billing Summary" section: Processed (81), Actual (10), Estimated (71)	Cross-validation with billing data	Data consistency check
10	Verify percentage calculations	Calculate and verify: Actual vs Estimated ratio matches displayed percentages	Actual: 10, Estimated: 71 = 12.35% Actual	Mathematical accuracy
11	Test financial data refresh	Refresh page and verify financial figures persist correctly	Data persistence validation	Data integrity check
12	Verify financial summary tooltip/help	Hover over financial metrics to check for explanatory tooltips	UI help indicators	User guidance features

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All financial metrics display correctly with accurate calculations and currency formatting
Secondary_Verifications: Mathematical accuracy of averages, outstanding tracking, late fee calculations
Negative_Verification: No negative amounts (except legitimate credits), no calculation errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record actual financial amounts, calculation accuracy, currency formatting]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle execution completion, billing data generation
Blocked_Tests: Financial reporting, revenue analysis
Parallel_Tests: Consumption analysis tests
Sequential_Tests: Billing → Financial Summary → Reporting

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for revenue tracking and financial compliance reporting
Edge_Cases: Zero billed amounts, large outstanding balances, currency overflow
Risk_Areas: Calculation accuracy with large datasets, currency precision
Security_Considerations: Financial data encryption, access control

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Service charges calculation and display
Type: Financial Calculation
Rationale: User story shows service charges field but calculation method unclear
Priority: P1
Scenario_2: Outstanding amount breakdown by aging periods
Type: Financial Analysis
Rationale: Outstanding amounts need aging analysis for collection management
Priority: P2

Test Case 14: Consumption Analysis

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_014

Title: Verify system provides comprehensive consumption analysis with high and low usage identification and threshold-based categorization

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_014
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Engineering, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-MeterReading, Integration-Database, Consumption-Analysis, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Meter Reading Service, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Product, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC14 - Consumption analysis with high and low usage identification
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_012, BX03US02_TC_013, BX03US02_TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Meter Reading Service, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for consumption data loading
Data_Requirements: Cycle with consumption data and usage thresholds

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Cycle execution completed with consumption data
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with consumption analysis access
Test_Data:
- Total Consumption: 15,683 KL (from Monthly-Central cycle)
- Average Consumption: 12.8 KL
- High Consumption accounts: 24
- Low Consumption accounts: 18
- Consumer count: 1,224 for average calculation
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle execution with consumption data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Consumption Summary" section in cycle details	Section displays with header "Water usage metrics across all consumers in this cycle"	Section: "Consumption Summary"	Consumption section per user story
2	Verify "Total Consumption" display	Shows "Total Consumption: 15,683 KL"	Total: 15,683 KL	Aggregate usage per user story
3	Verify "Average Consumption" calculation	Shows "Avg Consumption: 12.8 KL" (calculated: 15,683 ÷ 1,224)	Average: 12.8 KL	Mathematical validation
4	Verify "High Consumption" identification	Shows "High Consumption: 24" with orange color indicator	High: 24 (orange)	High usage flagging per user story
5	Verify "Low Consumption" identification	Shows "Low Consumption: 18" with blue color indicator	Low: 18# Bill Cycle Setup - Enhanced Test Cases & Scenarios (BX03US02)

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Consumption analysis displays accurate total, average, and high/low usage identification
Secondary_Verifications: Mathematical accuracy, threshold logic, color coding, unit consistency
Negative_Verification: Handles zero consumption and missing data appropriately

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record consumption calculations, threshold accuracy, visual indicators]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle execution with meter data
Blocked_Tests: Consumption reporting
Parallel_Tests: Financial analysis tests
Sequential_Tests: Meter Reading → Consumption Analysis → Reporting

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for identifying consumption anomalies and service issues
Edge_Cases: All consumers high usage, all consumers low usage, no meter readings
Risk_Areas: Threshold configuration accuracy, calculation performance
Security_Considerations: Consumption data privacy

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Configurable consumption thresholds
Type: Business Configuration
Rationale: Thresholds may need adjustment based on utility policies
Priority: P3

Test Case 15: Monthly Trend Charts

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_015

Title: Verify system displays monthly trend charts showing revenue progression with historical data visualization and consumption overlay

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_015
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, UI, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, Trend-Analysis, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
Integration_Points: Database, Reporting Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Revenue-Impact-Tracking, Product, QA
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC15 - Monthly trend charts showing revenue progression
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_012, BX03US02_TC_013, BX03US02_TC_016

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Reporting Service, Chart Library
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for chart rendering
Data_Requirements: 5+ months of historical billing data for trend analysis

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Historical billing data available, chart rendering enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with trend analysis access
Test_Data:
- Monthly revenue progression: March 2025 (~195K), April 2025 (~200K), May 2025 (~210K), June 2025 (~215K), July 2025 (~220K)
- Consumption overlay data for correlation analysis
- 5-month historical view per user story
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle details access

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Monthly Trend" chart section in cycle details	Chart section displays with header "Five month historical view of revenue and consumption"	Section: "Monthly Trend"	Trend chart per user story wireframe
2	Verify chart time range	Chart shows 5 months: March, April, May, June, July 2025	Time range: 5 months	Historical period per user story
3	Verify revenue bars display	Blue bars show progressive revenue: ~95K, ~85K, ~100K, ~90K, ~95K (from chart)	Revenue bars progression	Revenue visualization
4	Verify revenue progression trend	Bars show general upward trend from March to July	Upward revenue trend	Growth pattern per user story
5	Verify consumption overlay	Line or secondary visualization shows consumption trend parallel to revenue	Consumption overlay	Dual metric display
6	Test chart interactivity	Hover over bars to display exact revenue values in tooltips	Interactive tooltips	User interaction features
7	Verify chart responsiveness	Chart adapts properly to different screen sizes and browser widths	Responsive chart design	Cross-device compatibility
8	Verify chart legend	Legend shows "Revenue" and "Consumption" indicators with proper colors	Chart legend display	Data series identification
9	Test chart data accuracy	Cross-reference chart values with financial summary data	Data consistency validation	Accuracy verification
10	Verify Y-axis scaling	Chart Y-axis scales appropriately to show revenue ranges clearly	Proper axis scaling	Data visualization quality
11	Test chart performance	Verify chart renders within 3 seconds even with large datasets	Performance validation	Rendering speed
12	Verify "Billed Amount" label	Chart section shows "Billed Amount" label below bars	Label: "Billed Amount"	Chart labeling per user story

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Monthly trend chart displays accurate revenue progression with proper visualization
Secondary_Verifications: Interactivity, responsiveness, data accuracy, performance
Negative_Verification: Handles missing monthly data gracefully

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record chart display, trend accuracy, interactive features, performance]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Historical data availability
Blocked_Tests: Advanced analytics
Parallel_Tests: Financial summary tests
Sequential_Tests: Data Collection → Trend Analysis → Business Intelligence

Additional Information

Notes: Important for business trend analysis and revenue forecasting
Edge_Cases: Single month data, missing months, data gaps
Risk_Areas: Chart rendering performance, data accuracy over time
Security_Considerations: Historical revenue data access controls

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Configurable trend period (3, 6, 12 months)
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Different analysis periods for various business needs
Priority: P4

Test Case 16: Actual vs Estimated Bill Ratios

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_016

Title: Verify system displays actual vs estimated bill ratios with historical context and performance indicators

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_016
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-MeterReading, Integration-Database, Bill-Ratio-Analysis, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Meter Reading Service, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Engineering, Product
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC16 - Actual vs estimated bill ratios with historical context
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_012, BX03US02_TC_014, BX03US02_TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Meter Reading Service, Database, Billing Service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for ratio calculation
Data_Requirements: Cycles with both actual and estimated billing data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Billing cycles executed with meter reading data
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with billing analysis access
Test_Data:
- Current cycle ratio: 12.35% Actual, 87.65% Estimated
- Historical average: 80% Actual, 20% Estimated
- Billing counts: Actual Bills: 10, Estimated Bills: 71
- Historical context note: "Based on historical data since cycle creation"
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle execution with billing data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Actual vs Estimated Bills Ratio" section	Section displays with header "Average ratio of actual to estimated bill readings from cycle creation"	Section: Bill ratio analysis	Ratio section per user story
2	Verify current cycle ratio display	Shows "12.35%" in green for Actual, "87.65%" in orange for Estimated	Current: 12.35% Actual, 87.65% Estimated	Current performance per user story
3	Verify historical context display	Shows historical baseline "Based on historical data since cycle creation"	Historical context note	Historical reference per user story
4	Verify percentage calculation accuracy	Verify 12.35% = 10/(10+71) * 100, 87.65% = 71/(10+71) * 100	Mathematical validation: 10/81=12.35%	Calculation accuracy
5	Verify color coding consistency	Actual bills show green color, Estimated bills show orange color	Color: Green=Actual, Orange=Estimated	Color scheme per user story
6	Test ratio updates with new data	If possible, trigger new billing and verify ratio updates	Dynamic ratio updates	Real-time calculation
7	Verify historical comparison	Compare current ratio (12.35%) with historical average (80%) to identify performance variance	Performance comparison	Historical benchmarking
8	Test ratio display formatting	Verify percentages display with proper decimal places and % symbol	Format: XX.XX%	Display formatting
9	Verify ratio total validation	Ensure Actual% + Estimated% = 100%	Total: 12.35% + 87.65% = 100%	Mathematical integrity
10	Test edge cases	Verify behavior with 100% actual or 100% estimated scenarios	Edge case handling	Boundary scenarios
11	Verify tooltip/help information	Check for explanatory tooltips about ratio significance	UI help features	User guidance
12	Test ratio trend indication	Verify if system shows improvement/decline indicators compared to previous cycles	Trend indicators	Performance direction

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Actual vs estimated bill ratios display accurately with proper calculations and historical context
Secondary_Verifications: Color coding, mathematical accuracy, formatting, trend indicators
Negative_Verification: Handles scenarios with no actual or no estimated bills

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record ratio accuracy, calculations, display formatting, historical context]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Billing execution completion
Blocked_Tests: Performance analysis
Parallel_Tests: Consumption analysis tests
Sequential_Tests: Billing → Ratio Analysis → Performance Review

Additional Information

Notes: Key performance indicator for billing accuracy and meter reading efficiency
Edge_Cases: All actual bills, all estimated bills, no bills processed
Risk_Areas: Calculation accuracy, real-time updates
Security_Considerations: Billing performance data confidentiality

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Ratio targets and alerts configuration
Type: Business Configuration
Rationale: Utilities may want to set target ratios and receive alerts
Priority: P3

Test Case 17: Run History Tracking

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_017

Title: Verify system maintains comprehensive run history with initiator tracking, timing analysis, and execution details

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_017
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, Run-History, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 9 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Database, Audit Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Engineering, QA
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC17 - Run history with initiator tracking and timing analysis
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_012, BX03US02_TC_015, BX03US02_TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Audit Service, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for history loading
Data_Requirements: Multiple cycle executions with varied initiators and timing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Cycle with multiple execution history records
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with history access
Test_Data:
- Historical runs: 2025-07-01 (Bynry Support, 18 days, 81 consumers, 12.35% Actual, SAT 23439.63)
- Multiple initiators: Bynry Support, System, Manual users
- Time range filter: "All Time" dropdown
Prior_Test_Cases: Multiple cycle executions

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Run History" tab in cycle details	Tab displays historical execution records in chronological order	Tab: "Run History"	History access per user story
2	Verify history table headers	Table shows columns: Run Date, Initiated By, Days Between Runs, Consumers, Actual vs Estimate, Billed Amount, Actions	Column headers per user story	Table structure validation
3	Verify most recent run data	Top row shows: 2025-07-01, Bynry Support, 18 days, 81, 12.35% Actual, SAT 23439.63	Latest run data per user story	Recent execution details
4	Verify initiator tracking	"Initiated By" column shows "Bynry Support" for manual runs, "System" for automated	Initiator: Bynry Support	User accountability tracking
5	Verify timing analysis	"Days Between Runs" shows 18 days for interval between consecutive executions	Timing: 18 days	Schedule adherence monitoring
6	Verify consumer count tracking	"Consumers" column shows 81 consumers processed in this run	Consumer count: 81	Volume tracking
7	Verify actual vs estimate tracking	Shows "12.35% Actual" indicating billing method distribution	Performance: 12.35% Actual	Quality metric tracking
8	Verify financial tracking	"Billed Amount" shows SAT 23439.63 for this execution	Amount: SAT 23439.63	Revenue tracking
9	Test "Search by initiator..." functionality	Enter "Bynry" in search box to filter runs by specific initiator	Search: "Bynry"	Initiator filtering
10	Verify search results	Table filters to show only runs initiated by users containing "Bynry"	Filtered results	Search accuracy
11	Test time range filter	Use "All Time" dropdown to filter by specific time periods	Time filter: "All Time"	Date range filtering
12	Access "View Report" action	Click "View Report" button for a historical run	Action: "View Report"	Detailed report access
13	Verify chronological ordering	Confirm runs are ordered by date (most recent first)	Chronological order	Sorting validation
14	Test history pagination	If multiple pages exist, verify pagination controls work	Pagination functionality	Large dataset handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Run history displays complete execution records with accurate initiator tracking and timing analysis
Secondary_Verifications: Search functionality, filtering, chronological ordering, action buttons
Negative_Verification: Handles empty history gracefully, shows appropriate messages

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record history accuracy, search functionality, data completeness]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle execution completion
Blocked_Tests: Audit reporting
Parallel_Tests: Performance analysis tests
Sequential_Tests: Execution → History Recording → Audit Trail

Additional Information

Notes: Important for compliance, troubleshooting, and performance analysis
Edge_Cases: First run (no previous history), system vs manual initiated runs
Risk_Areas: Data retention policies, history performance with large datasets
Security_Considerations: Audit trail integrity, user activity tracking

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: History export functionality
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Users may need historical data for external analysis
Priority: P4

Test Case 18: Consumer List Management

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_018

Title: Verify system provides comprehensive consumer list management with status tracking, billing information, and search capabilities

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_018
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Product, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-ConsumerManagement, Integration-Database, Consumer-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Consumer Management System, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, QA, Product
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC18 - Consumer list with status and billing information
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_007, BX03US02_TC_009

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Consumer Management System, Database, Billing Service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for consumer list loading
Data_Requirements: Diverse consumer data with various statuses and billing information

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Consumer data populated with billing history and status information
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with consumer list access
Test_Data:
- Consumers from user story: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045, PRM-9087), Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046, PRM-9088), Anjali Mehta (ACC-10047, PRM-9089)
- Areas: North Zone Ward 4, South Zone Ward 7
- Billing amounts: $124.50, $187.75, $82.30
- Statuses: Active, Temp. Disconnect
- Bill types: Actual, Estimated
Prior_Test_Cases: Consumer data setup and cycle execution

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access "Consumer List" tab in cycle details	Tab displays comprehensive consumer list with all required columns	Tab: "Consumer List"	Consumer list access per user story
2	Verify consumer list table headers	Table shows columns: Consumer, Account No, Service, Consumption, Bill Amount, Outstanding, Total Due, Actions	Headers per user story table	Table structure validation
3	Verify Kavita Patil's information	Row shows: Kavita Patil, ACC-10045, service details, consumption data, $124.50 bill amount	Kavita's data from user story	Individual consumer validation
4	Verify Rahul Sharma's information	Row shows: Rahul Sharma, ACC-10046, service details, consumption data, $187.75 bill amount	Rahul's data from user story	Consumer data accuracy
5	Verify Anjali Mehta's information	Row shows: Anjali Mehta, ACC-10047, service details, consumption data, $82.30 bill amount	Anjali's data from user story	Status variety validation
6	Verify connection status indicators	Status shows as color-coded pills: Active (green), Temp. Disconnect (yellow)	Status colors per user story	Visual status indicators
7	Verify bill type indicators	Last Bill Type shows: Actual (blue), Estimated (yellow)	Bill type colors per user story	Billing method indicators
8	Test "Search by account number" functionality	Enter "ACC-10045" in search box to find Kavita Patil	Search: "ACC-10045"	Account number search
9	Verify search results accuracy	Search returns only Kavita Patil's record	Expected: Single result for Kavita	Search precision
10	Test consumer name search	Clear search, enter "Rahul" to search by name	Search: "Rahul"	Name-based search
11	Verify area/location display	Each consumer shows proper area: North Zone Ward 4, South Zone Ward 7	Geographic data per user story	Location information
12	Test consumer actions	Click action buttons (eye icon) to view consumer details	Action: View details	Consumer detail access
13	Verify billing amount formatting	All amounts display in proper currency format with $ symbol	Currency formatting	Financial data display
14	Test list sorting functionality	Click column headers to sort by different criteria	Sorting capability	Data organization
15	Verify outstanding amount tracking	Outstanding column shows unpaid balances for consumers	Outstanding tracking	Financial status
16	Test consumer list pagination	If large dataset, verify pagination controls work properly	Pagination functionality	Large dataset handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Consumer list displays complete information with accurate status tracking and billing details
Secondary_Verifications: Search functionality, visual indicators, data formatting, action buttons
Negative_Verification: Handles missing data gracefully, shows appropriate empty states

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record consumer list accuracy, search functionality, status indicators]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Consumer data availability
Blocked_Tests: Individual consumer management
Parallel_Tests: Billing summary tests
Sequential_Tests: Data Setup → List Display → Individual Management

Additional Information

Notes: Important for individual consumer management and billing verification
Edge_Cases: Consumers with no billing history, missing contact information
Risk_Areas: Large dataset performance, data privacy
Security_Considerations: Consumer data access controls, PII protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Bulk consumer actions (status updates, notifications)
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Efficiency for managing multiple consumers simultaneously
Priority: P3

Test Case 19: Active Cycle Deletion Prevention

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_019

Title: Verify system prevents deletion of active cycles without prior deactivation to protect operational integrity

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_019
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Negative
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Billing, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Security-Validation, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Database, Cycle-Protection

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Database, Authorization Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Engineering, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC19 - Prevention of active cycle deletion without deactivation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_011, BX03US02_TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Authorization Service, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for validation response
Data_Requirements: Active and inactive cycles for testing different scenarios

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: At least one active cycle and one inactive cycle available
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle management access
Test_Data:
- Active cycle: "Monthly-Central" (Status: Active)
- Inactive cycle: "Test-Inactive-Cycle" (Status: Inactive)
- Actions menu with View, Edit options per user story
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle creation and activation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Identify active cycle in list	Locate cycle with "Active" status: "Monthly-Central"	Cycle: "Monthly-Central" (Active)	Active cycle identification
2	Access cycle actions menu	Click three-dot menu (⋯) for active cycle	Actions menu opens	Menu access validation
3	Verify available actions for active cycle	Menu shows: "View", "Edit", "Run Now" options only	Actions: View, Edit, Run Now	No delete option per user story
4	Confirm delete option absence	Verify "Delete" option is not present in actions menu	Delete option: Not available	Protection mechanism
5	Test direct URL manipulation	Attempt direct navigation to delete URL for active cycle	Access denied or error message	URL protection
6	Verify active cycle remains intact	Confirm cycle still exists with Active status after attempted access	Cycle status: Still Active	Data protection
7	Access inactive cycle actions	Click actions menu for inactive cycle	Actions menu for inactive cycle	Inactive cycle comparison
8	Verify inactive cycle options	Check if delete option is available for inactive cycles	Delete availability for inactive	Status-based permissions
9	Test deactivation workflow	Deactivate the active cycle first	Status changes to Inactive	Deactivation process
10	Verify post-deactivation actions	Check if delete option becomes available after deactivation	Delete option after deactivation	Workflow validation
11	Test error messaging	If delete attempted on active cycle, verify clear error message	Error: "Cannot delete active cycle"	User feedback
12	Verify system stability	Ensure no system errors or crashes during protection testing	System remains stable	Stability validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Active cycles cannot be deleted and system enforces protection rules
Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messaging, system stability, workflow enforcement
Negative_Verification: No data loss, no system crashes, proper error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record protection behavior, error messages, system responses]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle creation and activation
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Creation → Activation → Protection → Deactivation

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for preventing accidental deletion of operational billing cycles
Edge_Cases: Cycles currently running, cycles with pending bills
Risk_Areas: Authorization bypass attempts, concurrent access scenarios
Security_Considerations: Role-based access control, audit logging

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Bulk deletion protection for multiple active cycles
Type: Security
Rationale: Protection should extend to bulk operations
Priority: P2

Test Case 20 - Verify system automatically updates cycle metrics

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_020

Title: Verify system automatically updates cycle metrics in real-time during execution without manual refresh

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_020
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Api, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-BillingService, Integration-Database, Real-time-Updates, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
Integration_Points: Billing Service, Database, Real-time Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC20 - Real-time cycle metrics updates during execution
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_001, BX03US02_TC_011, BX03US02_TC_012

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Billing Service, Database, Real-time Service, WebSocket Connection
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for metric updates
Data_Requirements: Cycle ready for execution with sufficient consumer data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Active cycle ready for execution, real-time updates enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle execution access
Test_Data:
- Test cycle: "Real-time-Test-Cycle"
- Consumer count: 50+ for meaningful execution time
- Baseline metrics before execution
- Expected execution duration: 5-10 minutes
Prior_Test_Cases: Cycle setup and configuration

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Record baseline cycle metrics before execution	Document initial values: Processed=0, Actual=0, Estimated=0, Billed Amount=$0	Baseline metrics	Pre-execution state
2	Navigate to cycle details page	Access detailed view of cycle ready for execution	Cycle details page	Real-time monitoring setup
3	Initiate cycle execution	Click "Run Now" button to start billing cycle	Cycle execution starts	Execution trigger
4	Monitor "Billing Summary" section during execution	Observe "Processed" count incrementing in real-time without page refresh	Real-time count updates	Live metric monitoring
5	Verify "Actual Bills" counter updates	Watch actual bills count increase as meter readings are processed	Actual bills incrementing	Billing method tracking
6	Verify "Estimated Bills" counter updates	Observe estimated bills count increase for consumers without meter readings	Estimated bills incrementing	Estimation processing
7	Monitor "Financial Summary" updates	Watch "Billed Amount" increase as bills are generated	Revenue accumulation	Financial tracking
8	Verify "Last Run Summary" updates	Confirm run date, initiator, and progress indicators update	Run summary refresh	Execution metadata
9	Test concurrent user viewing	Have second user access same cycle details to verify real-time updates for multiple users	Multi-user real-time sync	Concurrent access
10	Verify update frequency	Measure time between metric updates (should be every 1-2 seconds)	Update intervals	Performance validation
11	Monitor browser performance	Ensure real-time updates don't cause memory leaks or performance degradation	Browser stability	Resource management
12	Verify completion state	Confirm all metrics finalize correctly when execution completes	Final state accuracy	Completion validation
13	Test network interruption recovery	Simulate brief network disconnection and verify updates resume	Recovery capability	Resilience testing
14	Verify no manual refresh required	Confirm users never need to refresh page to see latest metrics	Auto-refresh functionality	User experience

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Cycle metrics update automatically in real-time during execution without manual refresh
Secondary_Verifications: Update frequency, multi-user synchronization, performance stability
Negative_Verification: No performance degradation, no data inconsistencies, proper error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record real-time update behavior, performance metrics, user experience]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle execution capability
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Performance monitoring tests
Sequential_Tests: Setup → Execution → Real-time Monitoring → Completion

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for operational visibility during billing cycle execution
Edge_Cases: Very fast execution, network interruptions, browser tab switching
Risk_Areas: Real-time service performance, WebSocket reliability
Security_Considerations: Real-time data transmission security

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Real-time error notifications during execution
Type: Enhancement
Rationale: Users should be notified immediately of execution issues
Priority: P3

Test Case 21 - Verify system handles duplicate cycle name validation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_021

Title: Verify system handles duplicate cycle name validation with clear error messaging and prevention

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_021
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Negative
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Billing, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Security-Validation, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Database, Duplicate-Prevention

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Database, Validation Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Engineering, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Bill cycle name uniqueness validation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_011

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Validation Service, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for validation response
Data_Requirements: Existing cycle names for duplicate testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Existing cycles with known names for duplicate testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle creation access
Test_Data:
- Existing cycle names: "Monthly-Central", "Weekly-North", "Savaii 202501 R2"
- Duplicate test names: "Monthly-Central", "MONTHLY-CENTRAL", "monthly-central"
- Valid unique names: "Monthly-Eastern-Aug2025", "Test-Unique-Cycle"
Prior_Test_Cases: Access to cycle creation form

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access cycle creation form	Navigate to "Create New Bill Cycle" form	Cycle creation form	Form access validation
2	Enter existing cycle name exactly	Input "Monthly-Central" (existing cycle name)	Input: "Monthly-Central"	Exact duplicate test
3	Attempt to proceed or save	Validation error displays: "Cycle name already exists. Please choose a unique name."	Error message validation	Duplicate detection
4	Verify save button behavior	"Save" button remains disabled while duplicate name exists	Save button: Disabled	UI prevention mechanism
5	Test case-sensitive validation	Enter "MONTHLY-CENTRAL" (uppercase variation)	Input: "MONTHLY-CENTRAL"	Case sensitivity testing
6	Verify case-insensitive duplicate detection	System should detect case variation as duplicate	Error: Case-insensitive duplicate	Case handling validation
7	Test lowercase variation	Enter "monthly-central" (lowercase variation)	Input: "monthly-central"	Lowercase duplicate test
8	Verify mixed case handling	System treats all case variations as duplicates	Consistent duplicate detection	Case normalization
9	Test partial duplicate matching	Enter "Monthly-Centra" (partial match) to verify exact matching required	Input: "Monthly-Centra"	Partial match handling
10	Verify partial name acceptance	Partial match should be accepted as unique	Acceptance: Partial match valid	Exact match requirement
11	Test special character handling	Enter "Monthly-Central!" with special character	Input: "Monthly-Central!"	Special character validation
12	Enter valid unique name	Input "Monthly-Eastern-Aug2025" (confirmed unique)	Input: "Monthly-Eastern-Aug2025"	Valid name acceptance
13	Verify validation clearance	Error message disappears, save button becomes enabled	Validation: Cleared	Valid input handling
14	Test real-time validation	Verify validation occurs as user types, not just on submit	Real-time feedback	User experience validation
15	Verify error message clarity	Error message provides clear guidance on uniqueness requirement	Clear user guidance	Error messaging quality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System prevents duplicate cycle names and provides clear validation errors
Secondary_Verifications: Case-insensitive detection, real-time validation, UI behavior
Negative_Verification: Cannot create cycles with duplicate names, appropriate error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record duplicate detection behavior, error messages, validation responses]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Cycle creation form access
Blocked_Tests: Cycle creation completion
Parallel_Tests: Other validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Form Access → Validation → Error Handling

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for maintaining data integrity and preventing operational confusion
Edge_Cases: Very long names, special Unicode characters, whitespace variations
Risk_Areas: Database uniqueness constraints, validation performance
Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, SQL injection prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Duplicate name validation across different user sessions
Type: Concurrency
Rationale: Multiple users might attempt to create cycles with same name simultaneously
Priority: P2

Test Case 22 - Verify system handles zero consumer selection scenario with appropriate validation and user guidance

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_022

Title: Verify system handles zero consumer selection scenario with appropriate validation and user guidance

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_022
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Edge Case
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Consumer, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Engineering, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, Zero-Consumer-Handling

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
Integration_Points: Database, Validation Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, QA, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Minimum consumer requirement for cycle creation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_005, BX03US02_TC_011

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Validation Service, Consumer Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for validation response
Data_Requirements: Premises with no eligible consumers or all disconnected consumers

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Premises with various consumer statuses including premises with no eligible consumers
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle creation access
Test_Data:
- Premises with no consumers: "Empty-Premise-001"
- Premises with only disconnected consumers: "Disconnected-Premise-002"
- Premises with only paused consumers: "Paused-Premise-003"
- Valid premises for comparison: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2
Prior_Test_Cases: Access to premise selection functionality

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access premise selection in cycle creation	Navigate to premise selection section with various premise types	Mixed premise types	Setup for zero consumer scenario
2	Select premise with no consumers	Check premise "Empty-Premise-001" that has zero consumers	Premise: "Empty-Premise-001" (0 consumers)	Zero consumer premise
3	Verify consumer count updates	"Total Consumers" sidebar shows "0" or warning message	Expected: 0 consumers or warning	Count accuracy
4	Switch to Consumers tab	Navigate to consumer tab to verify no consumers available	Tab: "Consumers"	Consumer view validation
5	Verify empty consumer list	Consumer list shows "No eligible consumers found" or similar message	Empty state message	Empty list handling
6	Attempt to save cycle with zero consumers	Click "Save" button with zero consumer selection	Save attempt	Validation trigger
7	Verify validation error	Error message displays: "At least one eligible consumer must be selected"	Error: Minimum consumer requirement	Validation enforcement
8	Verify save button behavior	"Save" button remains disabled with zero consumers	Save button: Disabled	UI prevention
9	Test premise with only disconnected consumers	Select premise with only permanently disconnected consumers	Premise: "Disconnected-Premise-002"	Ineligible consumers test
10	Verify ineligible consumer exclusion	System excludes disconnected consumers, showing zero eligible count	Expected: 0 eligible consumers	Business rule enforcement
11	Test premise with only paused consumers	Select premise with only paused status consumers	Premise: "Paused-Premise-003"	Paused status handling
12	Verify paused consumer exclusion	Paused consumers not counted toward eligible total	Expected: 0 eligible from paused	Status filtering validation
13	Add valid premise with eligible consumers	Add premise with active/temp disconnect consumers to resolve error	Valid premise with active consumers	Error resolution
14	Verify error clearance	Validation error disappears, save button becomes enabled	Validation: Cleared	Valid state restoration
15	Verify user guidance messaging	System provides clear guidance on consumer eligibility requirements	Clear user instructions	User experience

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System prevents cycle creation with zero eligible consumers and provides clear validation
Secondary_Verifications: Business rule enforcement, user guidance, error clearance
Negative_Verification: Cannot proceed without eligible consumers, appropriate error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record zero consumer handling, validation behavior, error messages]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Premise selection functionality
Blocked_Tests: Cycle creation completion
Parallel_Tests: Other validation edge cases
Sequential_Tests: Premise Selection → Consumer Validation → Error Handling

Additional Information

Notes: Important edge case for preventing invalid cycle configurations
Edge_Cases: All premises with zero consumers, mixed premise scenarios
Risk_Areas: Business rule consistency, user experience with edge cases
Security_Considerations: Data validation integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Dynamic consumer eligibility changes during cycle creation
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: Consumer status may change while user is creating cycle
Priority: P3

Test Case 23 - Verify system handles maximum billing duration validation with proper boundary testing and error messaging

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_023

Title: Verify system handles maximum billing duration validation with proper boundary testing and error messaging

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_023
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Boundary
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Billing, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-QA, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Security-Validation, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-ValidationService, Boundary-Testing

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Validation Service, Business Rules Engine
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Security-Validation, Engineering, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Billing duration validation with maximum limits
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_031

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Validation Service, Business Rules Engine
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for validation response
Data_Requirements: Billing duration field with validation rules

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Cycle creation form accessible, validation rules configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with cycle creation access
Test_Data:
- Valid durations: 30, 90 days (assuming standard limits)
- Boundary values: 365, 366 days (assuming 365 is maximum)
- Invalid values: 0, -1, 999, 1000 days
- Non-numeric: "abc", "30.5", "thirty", "∞"
- Edge cases: Very large numbers, special characters
Prior_Test_Cases: Access to cycle creation form

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access billing duration field in cycle creation	Field displays with label "Billing Duration (Days)" and accepts input	Field: "Billing Duration (Days)"	Duration field access
2	Enter maximum valid duration	Input maximum allowed value (assume 365 days)	Input: 365 days	Upper boundary valid
3	Verify maximum value acceptance	Value accepted, no validation error displayed	Validation: Passed	Maximum boundary acceptance
4	Enter value exceeding maximum	Input 366 days (beyond maximum limit)	Input: 366 days	Upper boundary violation
5	Verify maximum limit validation	Error message: "Billing duration cannot exceed 365 days"	Error: Maximum limit exceeded	Boundary validation
6	Test significantly large value	Enter 999 days to test upper boundary enforcement	Input: 999 days	High value rejection
7	Verify large value rejection	Error message about maximum duration policy	Error: Policy violation	Business rule enforcement
8	Enter zero duration	Input 0 to test minimum boundary	Input: 0 days	Minimum boundary test
9	Verify zero value rejection	Error message: "Billing duration must be greater than 0"	Error: Minimum boundary	Zero value handling
10	Enter negative value	Input -1 to test negative boundary	Input: -1 days	Negative value test
11	Verify negative value rejection	Error message: "Billing duration must be a positive number"	Error: Negative values invalid	Negative boundary
12	Test decimal values	Input 30.5 to verify integer requirement	Input: 30.5 days	Decimal validation
13	Verify integer requirement	Error message: "Billing duration must be a whole number"	Error: Integer requirement	Data type validation
14	Test non-numeric input	Input "abc" to test data type validation	Input: "abc"	Non-numeric test
15	Verify non-numeric rejection	Error message: "Please enter a valid number"	Error: Invalid data type	Type validation
16	Test special characters	Input "30!" with special character	Input: "30!"	Special character handling
17	Test very large number	Input maximum integer value to test system limits	Input: 999999999	System boundary test
18	Verify system boundary handling	Appropriate error or system limitation message	System limit handling	Technical boundary

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System enforces maximum billing duration limits with proper boundary validation
Secondary_Verifications: Data type validation, error messaging clarity, boundary consistency
Negative_Verification: Invalid durations rejected with appropriate errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record boundary validation behavior, error messages, acceptance criteria]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Form field access
Blocked_Tests: Cycle configuration completion
Parallel_Tests: Other validation boundary tests
Sequential_Tests: Field Access → Boundary Testing → Validation → Error Handling

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for ensuring business policy compliance and system stability
Edge_Cases: Leap year considerations, international number formats
Risk_Areas: Business policy changes, validation rule consistency
Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, overflow protection

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Billing duration validation with different user role restrictions
Type: Authorization
Rationale: Different roles may have different duration limits
Priority: P3

Test Case 24 - Verify dashboard loads within acceptable time limits with large datasets and maintains performance standards

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_024

Title: Verify dashboard loads within acceptable time limits with large datasets and maintains performance standards

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_024
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, Performance-Testing, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
Integration_Points: Database, Caching Service, CDN
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance Requirements - Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_001, BX03US02_TC_025

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Caching Service, CDN, Load Balancer
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for dashboard load
Data_Requirements: Large dataset with 50+ cycles and extensive historical data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment with large dataset, monitoring tools enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with dashboard access
Test_Data:
- 50+ bill cycles with various statuses
- Historical data spanning 12+ months
- 10,000+ consumers across all cycles
- 5,000+ premises in system
- Concurrent user simulation: 10-50 users
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic dashboard functionality validation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Configure performance monitoring tools	Performance monitoring active (Network tab, performance profiler)	Monitoring tools ready	Baseline measurement setup
2	Clear browser cache and cookies	Fresh browser state for accurate measurement	Clear cache	Clean test environment
3	Navigate to dashboard with large dataset	Record initial load time from navigation to complete render	Load time measurement	Core performance test
4	Verify load time meets baseline	Dashboard loads within 3 seconds with all metrics displayed	Target: < 3 seconds	Performance baseline validation
5	Test dashboard with 50+ cycles	Dashboard handles large cycle count without performance degradation	50+ cycles loaded	Scalability testing
6	Verify metric calculation performance	Real-time metrics (coverage %, active cycles, run count) calculate quickly	Calculation speed	Computation performance
7	Test concurrent user simulation	Simulate 10 concurrent users accessing dashboard simultaneously	10 concurrent users	Load testing
8	Monitor server response times	Verify server response times remain under 1 second	Server response < 1s	Backend performance
9	Test with 25 concurrent users	Increase load to 25 users and monitor performance degradation	25 concurrent users	Increased load testing
10	Test with 50 concurrent users	Maximum load test with 50 users accessing dashboard	50 concurrent users	Peak load testing
11	Monitor memory usage	Verify browser memory usage remains stable during extended use	Memory monitoring	Resource management
12	Test network interruption recovery	Simulate brief network issues and verify graceful recovery	Network simulation	Resilience testing
13	Verify caching effectiveness	Second visit should load faster due to caching	Cache validation	Optimization verification
14	Test with slow network simulation	Verify dashboard remains usable on slower connections	Slow network (3G simulation)	Network performance
15	Monitor CPU usage during peak load	Ensure reasonable CPU usage during high concurrent access	CPU monitoring	System resource usage

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 3 seconds even with large datasets and concurrent users
Secondary_Verifications: Memory stability, CPU usage, network resilience, caching effectiveness
Negative_Verification: No crashes, timeouts, or severe performance degradation under load

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record load times, concurrent user handling, resource usage]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Large dataset setup
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other performance tests
Sequential_Tests: Setup → Load Testing → Monitoring → Analysis

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for user experience during peak business hours
Edge_Cases: Extremely large datasets, network failures, browser limitations
Risk_Areas: Database query optimization, caching strategy effectiveness
Security_Considerations: Performance monitoring data privacy

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Performance testing with different browser types
Type: Compatibility Performance
Rationale: Performance may vary across different browsers
Priority: P3

Test Case 25 - Verify premise selection performance with 10,000+ premises maintains responsiveness and usability

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_025

Title: Verify premise selection performance with 10,000+ premises maintains responsiveness and usability

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_025
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Database, Large-Dataset-Performance, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Database, Search Service, Pagination Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance Requirements - Premise list load < 5 seconds, search < 2 seconds
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_004, BX03US02_TC_024

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Search Service, Pagination Service
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds premise list load, < 2 seconds search
Data_Requirements: 10,000+ premises with realistic data distribution

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance test environment with 10,000+ premises, monitoring enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role with premise selection access
Test_Data:
- 10,000+ premises across multiple areas/subareas
- Realistic geographic distribution
- Varied consumer counts per premise (0-100)
- Mixed premise types and statuses
- Search test data: Common area names, premise IDs
Prior_Test_Cases: Premise selection functionality validation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Setup performance monitoring	Enable network monitoring, performance profiler, memory tracking	Monitoring tools active	Performance measurement setup
2	Navigate to premise selection with large dataset	Access premise selection section with 10,000+ premises	10,000+ premises	Large dataset access
3	Measure initial premise list load time	Record time from navigation to complete premise list render	Load time measurement	Initial load performance
4	Verify load time meets baseline	Premise list loads within 5 seconds	Target: < 5 seconds	Performance baseline validation
5	Test pagination performance	Navigate through multiple pages and measure page change time	Pagination speed	Page navigation performance
6	Test search functionality performance	Search for "DMA00" and measure response time	Search: "DMA00"	Search performance validation
7	Verify search meets baseline	Search results appear within 2 seconds	Target: < 2 seconds	Search baseline validation
8	Test complex search queries	Search for partial matches, special characters	Complex search patterns	Advanced search performance
9	Test bulk selection performance	Select 100+ premises and measure response time	Bulk selection: 100+ items	Selection performance
10	Verify bulk selection responsiveness	UI remains responsive during bulk operations	UI responsiveness	User experience validation
11	Test filter application performance	Apply area filters and measure filter response time	Filter performance	Filtering speed
12	Test combined operations	Search + filter + selection simultaneously	Combined operations	Multi-operation performance
13	Monitor memory usage during operations	Track browser memory consumption with large dataset	Memory monitoring	Resource usage tracking
14	Test scroll performance	Scroll through large premise list and measure smoothness	Scroll performance	UI rendering performance
15	Verify system stability	Ensure no crashes or freezes during extended use	Stability validation	System reliability

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Premise selection remains responsive and usable with 10,000+ premises
Secondary_Verifications: Search performance, pagination speed, bulk operations, memory stability
Negative_Verification: No system crashes, freezes, or severe performance degradation

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record load times, search performance, bulk operation speed, stability]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Large dataset preparation
Blocked_Tests: Consumer selection performance
Parallel_Tests: Dashboard performance tests
Sequential_Tests: Data Setup → Load Testing → Performance Analysis

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for enterprise customers with large premise portfolios
Edge_Cases: Maximum browser limitations, network constraints
Risk_Areas: Database indexing, query optimization, UI rendering
Security_Considerations: Large dataset access controls

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Performance testing with concurrent premise selection by multiple users
Type: Concurrent Performance
Rationale: Multiple users may select premises simultaneously
Priority: P3

Test Case 26 - Verify role-based access control for billing manager functions with proper authorization enforcement

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_026

Title: Verify role-based access control for billing manager functions with proper authorization enforcement

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_026
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Billing, Auth Services, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-AuthService, Role-Based-Access

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Service, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Security Requirements - Role-based access control for billing functions
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_011, BX03US02_TC_027

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication Service, Authorization Service, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for authorization checks
Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different roles

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: User accounts configured with different roles and permissions
User_Roles_Permissions: Test accounts for: Billing Manager, Billing Specialist, Admin, Regular User
Test_Data:
- Billing Manager: Full cycle management access
- Billing Specialist: Limited cycle access (view, execute only)
- Admin: System-wide access
- Regular User: No billing access
- Test cycle: "Security-Test-Cycle"
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication functionality

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as Billing Manager	Successful login with full billing module access	User: Billing Manager	Full access baseline
2	Verify full cycle management access	Can access: Dashboard, Create Cycle, Edit, Delete, Run functions	Full functionality available	Manager privileges
3	Create test cycle as Billing Manager	Successfully create cycle "Security-Test-Cycle"	Cycle creation successful	Creation authorization
4	Logout and login as Billing Specialist	Switch user context to Billing Specialist role	User: Billing Specialist	Role switching
5	Verify limited cycle access	Can view cycles and run existing cycles, cannot create new cycles	Limited functionality	Specialist restrictions
6	Attempt cycle creation as Billing Specialist	"Create New Bill Cycle" button disabled or access denied	Creation: Access Denied	Permission enforcement
7	Verify cycle edit restrictions	Cannot access edit functionality for existing cycles	Edit: Access Denied	Modification restrictions
8	Test cycle execution permission	Can access "Run Now" for existing cycles	Execution: Allowed	Specialist permissions
9	Logout and login as Regular User	Switch to user with no billing permissions	User: Regular User	No billing access
10	Attempt billing module access	Billing module not visible or access denied	Module: Access Denied	Module-level security
11	Test direct URL access	Attempt direct navigation to billing URLs	URL: Access Denied	URL protection
12	Login as Admin user	Switch to administrative user account	User: Admin	Administrative access
13	Verify admin override capabilities	Admin can access all billing functions including cycle management	Admin: Full Access	Administrative privileges
14	Test cross-role security	Verify user cannot escalate privileges or access other role functions	Privilege escalation: Blocked	Security boundary enforcement
15	Test session security	Verify role changes require re-authentication	Re-authentication required	Session management

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Role-based access control properly restricts billing functions based on user roles
Secondary_Verifications: URL protection, session management, privilege escalation prevention
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized users cannot access restricted functions

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record access control behavior, authorization responses, security enforcement]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: User authentication system
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Authentication → Authorization → Access Control

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for maintaining system security and preventing unauthorized billing operations
Edge_Cases: Role changes during active sessions, concurrent access attempts
Risk_Areas: Privilege escalation vulnerabilities, session hijacking
Security_Considerations: Authentication tokens, authorization caching, audit logging

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Role-based access testing with API endpoints
Type: API Security
Rationale: Direct API access should also respect role-based permissions
Priority: P1

Test Case 27 - Verify data validation prevents SQL injection attacks and malicious input sanitization

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_027

Title: Verify data validation prevents SQL injection attacks and malicious input sanitization

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_027
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Billing, Api, Database, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Database, SQL-Injection-Prevention

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Database, Input Validation Service, WAF
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Security Requirements - Input validation and SQL injection prevention
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_026

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Input Validation Service, WAF, Security Scanner
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for validation response
Data_Requirements: Various malicious input patterns for comprehensive testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Security testing tools, input validation enabled, WAF configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role for testing input fields
Test_Data:
- SQL Injection patterns: "'; DROP TABLE cycles; --", "1' OR '1'='1", "UNION SELECT * FROM users"
- XSS patterns: "<script>alert('xss')</script>", "javascript:alert('xss')", "<img src=x onerror=alert('xss')>"
- Command injection: "; rm -rf /", "| cat /etc/passwd", "&& dir"
- Path traversal: "../../../etc/passwd", "..\..\windows\system32"
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic form functionality validation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access cycle creation form with security monitoring	Form loads with input validation enabled	Security monitoring active	Baseline security setup
2	Enter SQL injection in cycle name field	Input sanitized and rejected or safely escaped	Input: "'; DROP TABLE cycles; --"	SQL injection attempt
3	Verify SQL injection prevention	Error message or safe handling, no database impact	No database compromise	Database protection
4	Test union-based SQL injection	Attempt data extraction via UNION SELECT	Input: "' UNION SELECT * FROM users --"	Advanced SQL injection
5	Verify union injection blocking	Malicious query blocked or safely handled	Query execution prevented	Advanced protection
6	Test XSS in cycle name field	Script injection attempt in text field	Input: "<script>alert('xss')</script>"	XSS prevention
7	Verify XSS sanitization	Script tags removed or escaped, no execution	Script not executed	XSS protection
8	Test stored XSS scenario	Save malicious input and verify safe display	Stored malicious content	Persistent XSS prevention
9	Test search field injection	Attempt injection via search functionality	Search: "'; DROP TABLE premises; --"	Search field security
10	Verify search input sanitization	Search queries safely processed	No malicious execution	Search protection
11	Test command injection attempts	Attempt system command execution	Input: "; rm -rf /"	Command injection prevention
12	Verify command injection blocking	System commands not executed	No system compromise	System protection
13	Test file path traversal	Attempt directory traversal attacks	Input: "../../../etc/passwd"	Path traversal prevention
14	Verify path traversal protection	File system access blocked	No unauthorized file access	File system protection
15	Test input length limitations	Verify maximum input length enforcement	Very long malicious input	Buffer overflow prevention
16	Test special character handling	Verify proper encoding of special characters	Various Unicode and special chars	Character encoding security

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All malicious input attempts are properly sanitized or blocked without system compromise
Secondary_Verifications: Error handling, logging, user feedback, system stability
Negative_Verification: No database access, script execution, or system compromise

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record input sanitization behavior, security responses, system protection]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Basic form functionality
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other security validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Basic Input → Security Testing → Vulnerability Assessment

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for preventing data breaches and system compromise
Edge_Cases: Encoded attacks, polyglot payloads, time-based attacks
Risk_Areas: New attack vectors, validation bypass techniques
Security_Considerations: Security logging, incident response, penetration testing

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: API endpoint security testing for injection attacks
Type: API Security
Rationale: Direct API calls may bypass frontend validation
Priority: P1

Test Case 28 - : Verify cycle creation API endpoint validation and response with proper authentication and data integrity

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_028

Title: Verify cycle creation API endpoint validation and response with proper authentication and data integrity

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_028
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, Api, MOD-BillCycle, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-API-Test-Results, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-BillingService, API-Testing, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Billing API, Database, Authentication Service
Code_Module_Mapped: API-BillCycle
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: API-Test-Results, Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Engineering
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: API Requirements - Cycle creation endpoint functionality
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_026, BX03US02_TC_027

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: API Testing Tool (Postman/curl)
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: N/A (API testing)
Dependencies: Billing API, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
Data_Requirements: Valid API authentication tokens, test cycle data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: API testing environment, valid authentication tokens, API documentation
User_Roles_Permissions: API access with Billing Manager permissions
Test_Data:
- Valid JWT token for authentication
- Valid cycle payload: {"name": "API-Test-Cycle", "categories": ["Residential"], "duration": 30}
- Invalid payloads for negative testing
- API endpoint: POST /api/v1/billcycles
Prior_Test_Cases: API authentication validation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Prepare valid API request	Create POST request with valid headers and authentication	Authorization: Bearer {token}	API request setup
2	Send valid cycle creation request	POST to /api/v1/billcycles with valid JSON payload	Valid JSON payload	Valid request test
3	Verify successful response	Response: 201 Created with cycle ID and confirmation	Expected: 201 Created	Success response validation
4	Verify response structure	JSON response contains: {"id": "cycle-id", "name": "API-Test-Cycle", "status": "Active"}	Response structure validation	API contract verification
5	Test authentication requirement	Send request without authentication token	Request without Authorization header	Authentication enforcement
6	Verify unauthorized response	Response: 401 Unauthorized with error message	Expected: 401 Unauthorized	Security validation
7	Test invalid authentication	Send request with expired or invalid token	Invalid/expired token	Token validation
8	Verify invalid token handling	Response: 401 Unauthorized with token error	Token validation response	Authentication security
9	Test invalid payload structure	Send request with malformed JSON	Malformed JSON payload	Input validation
10	Verify payload validation	Response: 400 Bad Request with validation errors	Expected: 400 Bad Request	Request validation
11	Test missing required fields	Send request without required fields (name, categories)	Incomplete payload	Field validation
12	Verify required field validation	Response: 400 Bad Request listing missing fields	Field requirement errors	Validation completeness
13	Test duplicate name handling	Send request with existing cycle name	Duplicate name payload	Business rule validation
14	Verify duplicate prevention	Response: 409 Conflict with duplicate error	Expected: 409 Conflict	Uniqueness enforcement
15	Test response time performance	Measure API response time for valid requests	Performance measurement	API performance validation
16	Verify database persistence	Query database to confirm cycle was created correctly	Database verification	Data integrity

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: API endpoint creates cycles successfully with proper authentication and validation
Secondary_Verifications: Response format, error handling, performance, data persistence
Negative_Verification: Proper error responses for invalid requests, authentication failures

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record API responses, validation behavior, performance metrics]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: API authentication system
Blocked_Tests: Cycle management operations
Parallel_Tests: Other API endpoint tests
Sequential_Tests: Authentication → API Request → Response Validation → Data Verification

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for API-based integrations and third-party system connectivity
Edge_Cases: Network timeouts, large payloads, concurrent requests
Risk_Areas: API security, data validation, performance under load
Security_Considerations: Authentication token security, input validation, audit logging

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: API rate limiting and throttling validation
Type: API Security
Rationale: APIs should have rate limiting to prevent abuse
Priority: P2

Test Case 29 - Verify bill cycle functionality across different browsers with consistent behavior and compatibility

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_029

Title: Verify bill cycle functionality across different browsers with consistent behavior and compatibility

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_029
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Compatibility
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, CrossModule, MOD-BillCycle, P2-High, Phase-Compatibility, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database, Cross-Browser-Testing, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 30 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Browser Compatibility, Web Standards
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Results, Module-Coverage, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Compatibility Requirements - Support for major browsers
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_001, BX03US02_TC_002, BX03US02_TC_030

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 115+, Safari 16+, Edge 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Multiple browser installations, cross-browser testing tools
Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
Data_Requirements: Standard test cycle data for consistent testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple browsers installed, test data prepared
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role for testing functionality
Test_Data:
- Standard test cycle: "Cross-Browser-Test-Cycle"
- Premises: U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN-CENTRAL-B2
- Consumers: Kavita Patil (ACC-10045), Rahul Sharma (ACC-10046)
- Categories: Residential, Commercial
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality validation in Chrome

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Test dashboard in Chrome 115+	Dashboard loads and displays metrics correctly	Standard test data	Chrome baseline
2	Test cycle creation in Chrome	Complete cycle creation workflow functions properly	Cycle: "Cross-Browser-Test-Cycle"	Chrome functionality
3	Test premise selection in Chrome	Premise selection, search, and filtering work correctly	Premise selection workflow	Chrome UI validation
4	Switch to Firefox 115+	Open same application in Firefox browser	Firefox browser	Browser switching
5	Test dashboard in Firefox	Dashboard displays identically to Chrome version	Same dashboard data	Firefox comparison
6	Test cycle creation in Firefox	Cycle creation workflow functions identically	Same cycle creation process	Firefox functionality
7	Verify UI consistency in Firefox	Layout, styling, and interactions match Chrome behavior	UI consistency validation	Cross-browser UI
8	Switch to Safari 16+	Open application in Safari browser (macOS)	Safari browser	Safari testing
9	Test dashboard in Safari	Dashboard functionality works without issues	Dashboard verification	Safari compatibility
10	Test cycle operations in Safari	Create, edit, and manage cycles function properly	Cycle management	Safari functionality
11	Verify Safari-specific features	Ensure proper handling of Safari's unique behaviors	Safari-specific validation	Browser quirks
12	Switch to Edge 115+	Open application in Microsoft Edge browser	Edge browser	Edge testing
13	Test complete workflow in Edge	Full cycle creation and management workflow	Complete workflow	Edge functionality
14	Compare performance across browsers	Measure load times and responsiveness in each browser	Performance comparison	Cross-browser performance
15	Test JavaScript functionality	Verify all interactive elements work in each browser	JavaScript validation	Script compatibility
16	Verify CSS rendering	Ensure consistent styling and layout across browsers	CSS consistency	Visual validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Bill cycle functionality works consistently across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge
Secondary_Verifications: UI consistency, performance parity, JavaScript compatibility
Negative_Verification: No browser-specific bugs or functionality gaps

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record cross-browser behavior, compatibility issues, performance differences]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Core functionality validation
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Mobile responsiveness tests
Sequential_Tests: Chrome Testing → Firefox → Safari → Edge → Comparison

Additional Information

Notes: Important for ensuring broad user accessibility across different browsers
Edge_Cases: Older browser versions, browser-specific extensions, developer tools
Risk_Areas: Browser update compatibility, JavaScript engine differences
Security_Considerations: Browser-specific security features

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Cross-browser testing with different screen resolutions
Type: Compatibility
Rationale: Browser behavior may vary with different screen sizes
Priority: P3

Test Case 30 - Verify bill cycle interface adapts to mobile devices with responsive design and touch functionality

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_030

Title: Verify bill cycle interface adapts to mobile devices with responsive design and touch functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: BX03US02_TC_030
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bill Cycle Setup
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Billing, MOD-BillCycle, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Mobile, Report-QA, Report-Mobile-Compatibility, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database, Mobile-Responsiveness, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 70%
Integration_Points: Responsive Design Framework
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Mobile-Compatibility, User-Acceptance, QA
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: UI Requirements - Mobile responsiveness and touch interface support
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: BX03US02_TC_001, BX03US02_TC_029

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Mobile Safari (iOS), Chrome Mobile (Android)
Device/OS: iPhone 14 (iOS 16+), Samsung Galaxy (Android 13+)
Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Mobile devices, responsive design framework
Performance_Baseline: Usable interface on mobile devices
Data_Requirements: Standard test data optimized for mobile testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Mobile devices or browser developer tools with device simulation
User_Roles_Permissions: Billing Manager role for mobile testing
Test_Data:
- Test cycle: "Mobile-Test-Cycle"
- Limited premise set for mobile testing
- Touch-friendly test scenarios
Prior_Test_Cases: Desktop functionality validation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access dashboard on mobile device	Dashboard adapts to mobile screen size with readable elements	Mobile viewport: 375x667	Mobile dashboard adaptation
2	Verify navigation menu adaptation	Menu collapses to hamburger icon or mobile-friendly navigation	Mobile navigation	Touch-friendly navigation
3	Test dashboard metrics display	Metrics stack vertically or adapt to mobile layout	Dashboard metrics	Responsive layout
4	Access cycle creation on mobile	"Create New Bill Cycle" button accessible and properly sized for touch	Touch target sizing	Mobile accessibility
5	Test form field interactions	Form fields are properly sized and accessible for touch input	Touch form interaction	Mobile form usability
6	Verify dropdown functionality	Dropdowns work with touch interactions and display properly	Touch dropdown testing	Mobile UI elements
7	Test premise selection on mobile	Premise list displays in mobile-friendly format with touch selection	Mobile premise selection	Touch selection
8	Verify horizontal scrolling	Tables scroll horizontally on mobile without breaking layout	Table scrolling	Data table responsiveness
9	Test search functionality on mobile	Search boxes work with mobile keyboards and touch input	Mobile search testing	Touch input validation
10	Verify tab navigation on mobile	Tabs between Premises and Consumers work with touch	Touch tab navigation	Mobile tab interaction
11	Test on tablet viewport	Interface adapts appropriately to tablet screen size (1024x768)	Tablet viewport: 1024x768	Tablet responsiveness
12	Verify touch gestures	Swipe, tap, and pinch gestures work appropriately	Touch gesture testing	Mobile gesture support
13	Test portrait/landscape orientation	Interface adapts to both orientations without breaking	Orientation testing	Device rotation support
14	Verify text readability	All text remains readable without horizontal scrolling	Text legibility	Mobile typography
15	Test performance on mobile	Application remains responsive on mobile devices	Mobile performance	Device performance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Bill cycle interface adapts properly to mobile devices with usable touch interface
Secondary_Verifications: Performance, readability, gesture support, orientation handling
Negative_Verification: No horizontal scrolling required, no unusable interface elements

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record mobile adaptation, touch functionality, responsive behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Desktop functionality validation
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Cross-browser compatibility tests
Sequential_Tests: Desktop → Tablet → Mobile → Orientation Testing

Additional Information

Notes: Important for field workers and mobile access scenarios
Edge_Cases: Very small screens, accessibility features, mobile-specific browsers
Risk_Areas: Touch target sizing, responsive breakpoints, mobile performance
Security_Considerations: Mobile browser security features

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Mobile accessibility testing with screen readers
Type: Accessibility
Rationale: Mobile accessibility compliance important for diverse users
Priority: P4

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System prevents cycle creation with zero eligible consumers and provides clear validation
Secondary_Verifications: Business rule enforcement, user guidance, error clearance
Negative_Verification: Cannot proceed without eligible consumers, appropriate error handling

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record zero consumer handling, validation behavior, error messages]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per Release
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Premise selection functionality
Blocked_Tests: Cycle creation completion
Parallel_Tests: Other validation edge cases
Sequential_Tests: Premise Selection → Consumer Validation → Error Handling

Additional Information

Notes: Important edge case for preventing invalid cycle configurations
Edge_Cases: All premises with zero consumers, mixed premise scenarios
Risk_Areas: Business rule consistency, user experience with edge cases
Security_Considerations: Data validation integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Dynamic consumer eligibility changes during cycle creation
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: Consumer status may change while user is creating cycle
Priority: P3

System Admin Dashboard Test Cases - ONB05US01

User Access and Managemet Test Cases - ONB02US03

Utility Plans & Tariffs Management Test Cases - ONB02US05

ID & Reference Format Settings Test Cases- ONB02US07

Service Areas Management Test Cases- ONB02US08

Core System Settings Test Cases - ONB02US02

Utility management Test Cases - ONB05US03

SMART360 Login Experience Test Cases - AU01US01

SMART360 v2 Automation Project - Management Plan

User stories which we're picking for Phase 1

Consumer management Test Cases - CIS01US02

New Service Connection Application Form Test Cases - CIS01US03

New Connection Application Detail View Test Cases - CIS01US04

Payments Management Test Cases - CIS01US09

Account Transfer Request Test Cases - CIS01US12

Disconnection Request Flow Test Cases - CIS01US10

Profile Details Test Cases - CSS01US11

Service Payment Management Test Cases - CSS01US03

Request Tracker Test Cases - CSS01US10

Service & Support Management Test Cases - CSS01US08

Bill Management Test Case - CSS01US02

Payment History Management Test Cases - CSS01US05

Bill Cycle Setup Test Cases - BX03US02

Printing and Distribution Test Cases - BX06US01

GL Codes Management Test Cases - BX05US01

Single Bill Generation V2 Test Cases - BX01US04

Bill Generation V2 Test Case - BX01US03

Bill Template Management Test Cases - BX03US01

Service Order Dashboard Test Cases - WX03US03

Dispatcher Management System Test Case - WX05US05

Master Test Cases - WX01US01

Field Force Management Test Case - WX02US02

System Settings Configuration Management Test Cases - WX04US04

Meter Device Management Test Cases -MX01US02

Route Management Test Cases -MX02US01

Read Cycle Management Test Cases - MX02US02

Photo Read Validation Test Cases -MX03US02

Read Cycle List and Validation Configurations Test Cases - MX03US01

Photo Meter Reads Test Cases - MX02US03

Communication Hub Dashboard Test Cases - UX01US01

Utility Contact List Management Test Cases -UX03US03

Communication Workflows Test Cases - UX03US04

Message History Management System Test Cases - UX05US05

Individual & Bulk messaging Test Cases - UX02US02

Message Template Management System Test Case - UX06US06

Bill Cycle Setup Test Cases - BX03US02

Test Case 1 : Dashboard Metrics Display

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_001

Test Case 2 : Bill Cycle Creation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_002

Test Case 3 : Consumer Category Selection with Real-time Updates

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_003

Test Case 4 : Premise Selection with Area/Subarea Filtering

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_004

Test Case 5 : Consumer Eligibility Validation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_005

Test Case 6: Category Breakdown Display

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_006

Test Case 7: Connection Status Distribution

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_007

Test Case 8: Tab Navigation Between Premises and Consumers

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_008

Test case 9: Search Functionality for Premises and Consumers

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_009

Test Case 10: Consumer Export Functionality

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_010

Test Case 11: Cycle Configuration Save and Activation

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_011

Test Case 12: Detailed Cycle Information Display

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_012

Test Case 13: Financial Summaries with Detailed Calculations

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_013

Test Case 14: Consumption Analysis

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_014

Test Case 15: Monthly Trend Charts

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_015

Test Case 16: Actual vs Estimated Bill Ratios

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_016

Test Case 17: Run History Tracking

Test Case: BX03US02_TC_017