Service Areas Management Test Cases- ONB02US08

Test Scenario Analysis & Gap Identification

A. Functional Test Scenarios Covered

Entity Type Management: Multi-level hierarchy creation and validation (9 levels)
Entity Creation Workflow: Form validation, code generation, and hierarchy placement
Search and Filter Operations: Global search, entity-specific search, and filtering
Dashboard Analytics: KPI display, growth trends, and performance monitoring
Detail View Navigation: Entity overview, child entity management, operational metrics
Bulk Operations: CSV import/export, validation, and error handling
Role-Based Access Control: Tenant Admin, Utility Admin, CIO Admin permissions

B. Missing Scenarios Identified

Large File Upload Edge Cases: 10,000+ record CSV handling
Malformed CSV Import Scenarios: Invalid file formats, corrupted data
Network Timeout Scenarios: Import/export timeout handling
Entity Code Edge Cases: Short names, special characters in code generation
Cross-Entity Type Code Uniqueness: Code conflicts across different entity types

TEST CASE 1: Entity Type Selection and Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_001
Title: Verify entity type dropdown displays all 9 hierarchy levels correctly with proper selection validation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/Quality-Dashboard/Smoke-Test-Results/Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Entity type selection - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-1 Entity Type Rules, AC-8 Form Actions
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_003 (Parent Entity validation)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database connectivity, Service Areas module
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Active utility configuration "Roshan Energies new"

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Valid user credentials with Service Areas access
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin access level minimum
Test_Data: Staging environment with "Roshan Energies new" utility configured
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays with Smart360 branding and login form	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Initial navigation validation
2	Enter valid credentials in Username and Password fields, click "Login" button	User successfully authenticated, redirected to main dashboard with utility selection	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	Authentication flow per AC-8
3	Click hamburger menu icon (three lines) in top-left, select "Utility Setup" from sidebar menu	Utility Setup page loads showing available utilities list	N/A	Navigation to utility configuration
4	Locate "Roshan Energies new" utility card, click "Continue Setup" button	Utility configuration wizard opens showing 6 configuration steps with Service Areas highlighted	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility selection per user story context
5	Navigate through configuration steps to "Service Areas", click "Configure" button in Service Areas section	Service Areas Management dashboard loads showing entity count tabs and KPI cards	N/A	Feature access validation
6	Click blue "Add Entity" button in top-right corner of dashboard	"Add New Entity" modal opens with white background and form fields	N/A	Modal trigger per wireframe
7	Click "Entity Type" dropdown field (marked with red asterisk)	Dropdown expands showing all 9 entity types in hierarchical order	N/A	Dropdown functionality validation
8	Verify all entity types present in correct order	Dropdown displays exactly: Region, Country, State, City/County, Zone, Division, Areas, Sub-Areas, Premises	Expected order per AC-1	Hierarchy validation per business rules
9	Select "Region" from dropdown	"Region" appears as selected value, dropdown closes, other form fields remain accessible	Entity Type: Region	Selection functionality
10	Verify Entity Type field validation	Red asterisk (*) visible indicating mandatory field, field accepts selection without error	N/A	Mandatory field validation per AC-1

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All 9 entity types (Region, Country, State, City/County, Zone, Division, Areas, Sub-Areas, Premises) display in correct hierarchical order
Secondary_Verifications: Dropdown functions properly, Entity Type field marked as mandatory with asterisk, modal opens correctly
Negative_Verification: No invalid entity types present, no duplicate entries in dropdown

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior observed]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: User authentication tests
Blocked_Tests: All entity creation test cases
Parallel_Tests: Dashboard loading tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run before parent entity validation tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical foundation test for entity management workflow
Edge_Cases: Verify dropdown behavior with slow network connections
Risk_Areas: Entity type selection affects all subsequent entity creation operations
Security_Considerations: Verify role-based access to entity types

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Entity type dropdown behavior during concurrent user sessions
Type: Integration
Rationale: Multi-user environment may affect dropdown population
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Entity type accessibility compliance (keyboard navigation, screen readers)
Type: Accessibility
Rationale: Modal forms must be accessible per B2B SaaS standards
Priority: P3

TEST CASE 2: Entity Name and Code Auto-Generation Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_002
Title: Verify entity name mandatory validation and code auto-generation follows first 3 letters + 3 digits pattern with editability
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Regression-Coverage/Module-Coverage/API-Test-Results, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Entity name validation and code generation - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Code Generation Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Entity-Management
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, API-Test-Results
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-2 Division Name Rules, AC-3 Code Generation, AC-8 Form Actions
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_014 (Code uniqueness validation)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database connectivity, Code generation service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for code generation
Data_Requirements: Active utility "Roshan Energies new", existing entity data for code uniqueness

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add Entity modal open from previous test case
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin access level minimum
Test_Data: Sample entity names from user story (Chattisgarh, San Diego, Kalewadi)
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays with Smart360 branding	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Starting navigation per standard flow
2	Enter valid credentials and click "Login" button	User authenticated, redirected to dashboard	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	Authentication step per workflow
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads with utility cards	N/A	Navigation to utility management
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" utility → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens with 6 steps visible	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility selection per test data
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → Click "Configure" button	Service Areas Management dashboard loads with tabs and metrics	N/A	Feature access per wireframe
6	Click blue "Add Entity" button	"Add New Entity" modal opens with form fields	N/A	Modal trigger validation
7	Select "Region" from "Entity Type" dropdown	"Region" selected, other fields become active	Entity Type: Region	Type selection per AC-1
8	Verify "Entity Name" field shows red asterisk (*)	Field marked as mandatory with asterisk indicator	N/A	Mandatory field validation per AC-2
9	Enter "Chattisgarh" in Entity Name field	Text accepted, cursor moves to next character position	Entity Name: "Chattisgarh"	Name input using sample data from wireframe
10	Verify "Entity Code" field auto-populates	Code displays as "CHA" + 3 random digits (e.g., CHA456)	Expected format: CHA + 3 digits	Auto-generation per AC-3 business rule
11	Click in Entity Code field and modify to "CHA999"	Code field accepts manual edit, displays new value	Modified Code: CHA999	Editability validation per AC-3
12	Clear Entity Name field completely	Field becomes empty, no validation error yet	Entity Name: [empty]	Preparing negative test
13	Click "Create Entity" button with empty name	Form prevents submission, validation error displays for mandatory field	Entity Name: [empty]	Negative validation per AC-2
14	Re-enter "Chattisgarh" and verify code regenerates	New code generated (e.g., CHA789), different from previous	Entity Name: "Chattisgarh"	Code regeneration validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Entity Name field is mandatory (asterisk present) and code auto-generates following first 3 letters + 3 digits pattern
Secondary_Verifications: Code field is editable, form validation prevents submission without name, code regenerates on name re-entry
Negative_Verification: Form prevents submission when Entity Name is empty, shows appropriate validation message

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity type selection tests
Blocked_Tests: Entity creation completion tests
Parallel_Tests: Parent entity validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run before code uniqueness tests

Additional Information

Notes: Code generation algorithm is critical for entity identification across system
Edge_Cases: Test with names shorter than 3 characters, special characters, numbers in names
Risk_Areas: Code uniqueness conflicts could cause entity creation failures
Security_Considerations: Ensure code generation doesn't expose sensitive patterns

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Entity name with less than 3 characters (e.g., "NY", "LA")
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: Business rule unclear for names shorter than 3 characters
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Entity name with special characters and numbers (e.g., "Area-51", "Zone#1")
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: Code generation behavior undefined for non-alphabetic characters
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 3: Parent Entity Hierarchy Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_003
Title: Verify parent entity dropdown displays correct hierarchical options based on selected entity type with mandatory validation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, CrossModule, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Integration-Testing/Module-Coverage/Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Parent entity hierarchy validation - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Hierarchy Management Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Hierarchy-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-4 Parent Entity Rules, AC-1 Entity Type Rules, AC-8 Form Actions
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_001 (Entity type selection), ONB02US08_TC_022 (Data integrity)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database with existing parent entities, Hierarchy validation service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for dropdown population
Data_Requirements: Existing entities: Asia Region, Chattisgarh State, San Diego City/County per wireframes

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Existing parent entities in database for hierarchy testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin access level minimum
Test_Data: Pre-existing entities from wireframes: "Asia Region", "Chattisgarh", "San Diego", "South Zone"
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic navigation and entity type selection tests must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays with authentication form	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Initial navigation per standard workflow
2	Enter credentials and click "Login" button	Successful authentication, dashboard loads	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	Authentication per established flow
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads showing available utilities	N/A	Navigation to utility configuration
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" utility → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens with Service Areas step visible	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility selection per test environment
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → Click "Configure" button	Service Areas Management dashboard loads with entity tabs	N/A	Feature access validation
6	Click blue "Add Entity" button	"Add New Entity" modal opens with form structure	N/A	Modal access per wireframe design
7	Select "Country" from "Entity Type" dropdown	"Country" selected, form updates to show relevant fields	Entity Type: Country	Type selection for hierarchy testing
8	Click "Parent Entity" dropdown (marked with asterisk)	Dropdown opens showing only Region entities available	N/A	Hierarchy-based filtering per AC-4
9	Verify dropdown shows only Region entities	List displays Region entities: "Chattisgarh", "Asia Region", "West Coast", etc.	Expected: Only Region-type entities	Hierarchy validation per business rules
10	Verify "Parent Entity" field marked as mandatory	Red asterisk (*) visible next to field label	N/A	Mandatory validation per AC-4
11	Select "Asia Region" as parent entity	"Asia Region" appears as selected value in field	Parent: "Asia Region"	Valid parent selection
12	Change "Entity Type" to "Premise"	Entity type updates, Parent Entity dropdown resets	Entity Type: Premise	Testing dynamic parent options
13	Click "Parent Entity" dropdown for Premise type	Dropdown shows only Sub-Area entities (not Region entities)	N/A	Dynamic hierarchy filtering validation
14	Verify correct parent types for Premise	List shows Sub-Area entities: "Rahatani", "Eastside", etc.	Expected: Only Sub-Area entities	Premise hierarchy per AC-4
15	Attempt form submission without parent selection	Form prevents submission, validation error for mandatory Parent Entity field	Parent Entity: [empty]	Negative validation per AC-4

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Parent Entity dropdown shows correct hierarchy-based options (Regions for Country, Sub-Areas for Premise)
Secondary_Verifications: Parent field is mandatory with asterisk, dropdown updates dynamically when entity type changes
Negative_Verification: Cannot select inappropriate parent entities, form validates mandatory parent selection

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual dropdown behavior and validation]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity type selection, existing entity creation
Blocked_Tests: Complete entity creation workflow
Parallel_Tests: Code generation validation
Sequential_Tests: Must run after entity type selection

Additional Information

Notes: Hierarchy validation is critical for maintaining data integrity across 9 entity levels
Edge_Cases: Test behavior when no parent entities exist for selected type
Risk_Areas: Incorrect hierarchy relationships could corrupt entity structure
Security_Considerations: Ensure users can only select parents within their access scope

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Parent entity dropdown behavior when parent entities are inactive/disabled
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: Business rule unclear for inactive parent entity availability
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Circular dependency prevention (entity cannot be its own parent/grandparent)
Type: Data Integrity
Rationale: System should prevent circular hierarchy relationships
Priority: P1

TEST CASE 4: Large File Import Validation - 10,000+ Records

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_004
Title: Verify system handles large CSV imports of 10,000+ entity records with proper validation and performance
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, Database, CrossModule, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Performance-Metrics/Quality-Dashboard/Integration-Testing/API-Test-Results, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Large file import processing - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, File Processing Service, Background Job Queue
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Import-Engine, Validation-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-16 Import Data functionality, Performance requirements from user story
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_016 (Basic import), ONB02US08_TC_017 (Validation)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, File processing service, Background job queue, Large dataset storage
Performance_Baseline: Import processing < 5 minutes for 10,000 records
Data_Requirements: 10,000 record CSV file with valid entity data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Large CSV file prepared with 10,000 entity records, sufficient database capacity
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with bulk operations access
Test_Data: CSV file with 10,000 premise entities following format: name,code,description,parent,status,tags
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic import functionality tests must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays correctly	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation flow
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful, dashboard loads	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads with utilities	N/A	Navigation to configuration
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Import Data" button	Import modal/page opens with entity selection	N/A	Import feature access
7	Select "Premise" from entity type dropdown	Premise selected for import type	Entity Type: Premise	Large dataset entity type
8	Click "Download Template" button	CSV template downloads successfully	N/A	Template validation
9	Prepare 10,000 record CSV file using template structure	Large CSV file created with proper format	File: 10000_premises.csv (50MB+)	Large dataset preparation
10	Click "Choose File" and select 10,000 record CSV	File selection dialog opens, large file selected	File: 10000_premises.csv	Large file selection
11	Click "Upload" button	File upload begins with progress indicator	N/A	Upload initiation
12	Monitor upload progress	Progress bar shows upload status, completes within 2 minutes	Expected: Upload progress 0-100%	Upload performance
13	Verify auto-processing message	System displays "Processing file..." with loading indicator	Expected: Processing started automatically	Background processing
14	Wait for validation step completion	System navigates to validation results within 5 minutes	Expected: Processing < 5 minutes	Performance validation
15	Verify validation results display	Shows file summary: 10,000 records processed, validation counts displayed	Expected: Valid/Warning/Error counts	Large dataset validation
16	Check system memory and performance	Browser remains responsive, no memory errors or crashes	N/A	System stability
17	Review validation error handling	System handles validation errors gracefully without timeouts	Expected: Error messages for invalid records	Error handling
18	Complete import process	Successfully imports valid records, provides completion summary	Expected: X records imported successfully	Import completion

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System successfully processes 10,000+ record CSV import within 5 minutes without crashes
Secondary_Verifications: Upload progress tracking, validation processing, memory stability maintained
Negative_Verification: No system timeouts, browser crashes, or memory overflow errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording performance metrics and processing times]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual processing time]
Defects_Found: [Performance issues or system crashes]
Screenshots_Logs: [Performance evidence and system logs]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Basic import functionality
Blocked_Tests: Production import validation
Parallel_Tests: Database performance tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after smaller import tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for enterprise customers with large entity datasets
Edge_Cases: Network interruption during upload, disk space limitations
Risk_Areas: System performance degradation, database overload, memory issues
Security_Considerations: Large file upload security, data validation at scale

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Network timeout during large file upload (connection interruption)
Type: Network/Infrastructure
Rationale: Large file uploads susceptible to network issues
Priority: P1
Scenario_2: Disk space exhaustion during large file processing
Type: Infrastructure
Rationale: Large files may exceed available server storage
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 5: Malformed CSV Import Error Handling

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_005
Title: Verify system properly handles malformed CSV files with invalid formats, corrupted data, and missing columns
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Regression-Coverage/API-Test-Results/Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Malformed file import error handling - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, File Validation Service, Error Handling System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Import-Engine, Validation-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, API-Test-Results
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-16 Import Data validation, AC-17 Import Data error handling
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_016 (Basic import), ONB02US08_TC_004 (Large file import)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, File validation service, Error handling system
Performance_Baseline: Error detection < 10 seconds
Data_Requirements: Various malformed CSV files for testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Malformed CSV files prepared with different error types
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with import access
Test_Data: Multiple malformed CSV files: missing_columns.csv, invalid_format.txt, corrupted_data.csv
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic import functionality validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays with form elements	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful, dashboard access	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User login
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Import Data" button	Import interface opens	N/A	Import access
7	Select "Region" from entity type dropdown	Region selected for import	Entity Type: Region	Entity type selection
8	Prepare malformed CSV with missing mandatory columns	File created without 'name' and 'parent' columns	File: missing_columns.csv	Missing mandatory fields
9	Upload malformed CSV file	File upload accepted initially	File: missing_columns.csv	File upload
10	Click "Upload" to process file	System detects missing columns, shows error message	Expected: "Missing required columns: name, parent"	Column validation
11	Prepare CSV with invalid file extension	Create file with .txt extension instead of .csv	File: entity_data.txt	Invalid file format
12	Attempt to upload .txt file	System rejects file, shows format error	File: entity_data.txt	File format validation
13	Prepare CSV with corrupted/unreadable data	File contains binary data or corrupted content	File: corrupted_data.csv	Data corruption test
14	Upload corrupted CSV file	System detects corruption, displays appropriate error	Expected: "File appears to be corrupted or unreadable"	Corruption detection
15	Prepare CSV with mismatched delimiter (semicolon instead of comma)	File uses semicolons as separators	File: semicolon_delimited.csv	Delimiter mismatch
16	Upload semicolon-delimited file	System attempts parsing, shows delimiter error or accepts with warning	Expected: Error or warning about delimiter	Delimiter handling
17	Prepare oversized CSV file (>100MB)	Very large file exceeding size limits	File: oversized_data.csv (150MB)	File size validation
18	Attempt to upload oversized file	System rejects file, shows size limit error	Expected: "File size exceeds maximum limit of 100MB"	Size limit enforcement
19	Verify error message clarity and actionability	All error messages provide clear guidance for resolution	N/A	Error message quality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System properly detects and reports specific errors for malformed CSV files
Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and actionable, system doesn't crash with invalid data
Negative_Verification: Malformed files are rejected before processing, no data corruption occurs

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording error handling behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Error handling issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Error message evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Basic import functionality
Blocked_Tests: Production import validation
Parallel_Tests: Large file import tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after valid import tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for preventing data corruption from malformed imports
Edge_Cases: Mixed valid/invalid data in same file, encoding issues (UTF-8 vs ASCII)
Risk_Areas: Data corruption, system crashes, incomplete error reporting
Security_Considerations: Malicious file upload prevention, data sanitization

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: CSV files with different character encodings (UTF-16, ISO-8859-1)
Type: Data Format
Rationale: International customers may use different character encodings
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: CSV files with embedded scripts or macros (security test)
Type: Security
Rationale: Malicious file upload prevention critical for B2B SaaS
Priority: P1

TEST CASE 6: Dashboard KPI Display and Performance Analytics

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_006
Title: Verify dashboard displays correct KPIs with monthly comparison data and 6-month growth trends
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Billing/Meter Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/CSM/Quality-Dashboard/Smoke-Test-Results/Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Dashboard KPI display and analytics - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Analytics Engine, Billing System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Analytics-Dashboard, KPI-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Smoke-Test-Results
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-13 Dashboard KPIs, AC-14 Growth Trend Monitoring
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_007 (Entity detail metrics)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Analytics engine, Real-time data pipeline
Performance_Baseline: Dashboard load < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Historical data for 6-month trends, current KPI data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Historical data populated for trend analysis
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with dashboard access
Test_Data: KPI baseline data: Total Premises: 16, Active Consumers: 28, Active Meters: 38, Work Orders: 20
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and navigation tests

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays correctly	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Initial access
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful, dashboard loads	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility selection
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads within 3 seconds	N/A	Dashboard performance
6	Verify 4 main KPI cards display	All KPI cards visible: Total Premises, Active Consumers, Active Meters, Work Orders	N/A	KPI card presence
7	Check Total Premises KPI	Card shows "16" with building icon and "0%" change vs last month	Expected: Total Premises: 16, 0% change	Premises KPI validation
8	Check Active Consumers KPI	Card shows "28" with user icon and "-100%" change vs last month	Expected: Active Consumers: 28, -100% change	Consumer KPI validation
9	Check Active Meters KPI	Card shows "38" with meter icon and "-100%" change vs last month	Expected: Active Meters: 38, -100% change	Meter KPI validation
10	Check Work Orders KPI	Card shows "20" with tool icon and "-82.35%" change vs last month	Expected: Work Orders: 20, -82.35% change	Work Orders KPI validation
11	Verify 6-Month Growth Trends chart	Chart displays with proper scale (0 to 60000) and monthly progression	N/A	Growth chart presence
12	Check chart time period	Chart shows 6 months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug	Expected: 6-month timeline	Time period validation
13	Verify chart data visualization	Stacked area chart shows cumulative growth with green fill	N/A	Chart visualization
14	Check tab entity counts	Verify tab counts match: Region (6), Country (2), State (2), City/County (1), Zone (1), Division (2), Areas (13), Sub-Areas (3), Premises (16)	Expected counts per wireframe	Entity count accuracy
15	Verify chart responsiveness	Chart scales properly with browser window resize	N/A	Responsive design

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays all 4 KPI cards with correct values and monthly comparison percentages
Secondary_Verifications: 6-month growth trends chart displays properly, tab counts are accurate
Negative_Verification: No missing KPI cards, broken charts, or incorrect percentage calculations

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording KPI values and chart behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Dashboard display issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Dashboard evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Authentication, navigation
Blocked_Tests: Detailed analytics tests
Parallel_Tests: Tab navigation tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run before detailed entity tests

Additional Information

Notes: Dashboard is primary user interface for Service Areas management
Edge_Cases: Data refresh behavior, handling of missing historical data
Risk_Areas: Incorrect KPI calculations could mislead business decisions
Security_Considerations: Data access control for different user roles

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Dashboard behavior with real-time data updates (auto-refresh)
Type: Real-time Integration
Rationale: KPIs should update automatically when underlying data changes
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Dashboard performance with very large datasets (100,000+ entities)
Type: Performance
Rationale: Enterprise customers may have massive entity hierarchies
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 7: Entity Detail View Comprehensive Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_007
Title: Verify entity detail view displays comprehensive information with operational metrics and child entity management
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Billing/Meter Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Entity detail view and operational metrics - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Billing System, Meter Management, Work Order System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Entity-Details, Metrics-Aggregator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-11 Detail View, AC-12 Overview Tab, AC-13 Child Entity Tab
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_009 (Child entity management)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Metrics aggregation service, Billing integration
Performance_Baseline: Detail view load < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Entity "San Diego" with operational metrics and child entities

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test entity "San Diego" with populated operational data
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with entity view access
Test_Data: San Diego entity with metrics: Consumers: 90, Meters: 105, Revenue: $110,427.75, Child Entities: 36
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard and navigation tests

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User login
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Region" tab	Region Management page loads	N/A	Tab navigation
7	Locate "San Diego" entity in list	Entity visible with Status: Active, Child Count: 35	Entity: San Diego	Entity identification
8	Click "View" action for San Diego	Entity detail view opens with header banner	Entity: San Diego	Detail view access
9	Verify entity header information	Purple header shows "San Diego", "NA", "Active" status, "Code: N/A", Edit button	Expected: San Diego header with status	Header validation
10	Verify Basic Information section	Displays Status: Active, Manager: Sarvesh Tarhekar, Last Updated: 2024-09-26, Child Entity Count: 35, Entity Name: San Diego, Entity Type: Region	Expected values per wireframe	Basic info validation
11	Verify operational metrics cards (top row)	4 cards display: Consumers (90), Meters (105), Meter Readings (333), Revenue ($110,427.75)	Expected metrics per wireframe	Top row metrics
12	Verify operational metrics cards (bottom row)	4 cards display: Bills (68), Service Requests (50), Complaints (31), Work Orders (16)	Expected metrics per wireframe	Bottom row metrics
13	Check Child Entities section	Shows "Child Entities (36)" with table displaying child entity list	Expected: 36 child entities	Child entity display
14	Verify child entity table columns	Columns display: Name, Code, Territory Type, Status, Created By, Created On	Expected column structure	Table structure
15	Verify child entity data	Sample entities visible: "Test premise", "Gov maza", "Rahatani", "Kalewadi", etc. with appropriate territory types	Sample data per wireframe	Child data validation
16	Click on child entity name "Test premise"	Navigates to child entity detail view	Child: Test premise	Navigation functionality
17	Verify navigation breadcrumb or back button	"Go Back" button or breadcrumb navigation available	N/A	Navigation aids
18	Return to San Diego detail view	Back navigation works correctly	N/A	Return navigation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Entity detail view displays all required sections with accurate operational metrics
Secondary_Verifications: Child entity navigation works, all metrics cards show correct data
Negative_Verification: No missing sections, broken navigation, or incorrect metric calculations

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording detail view behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Detail view issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Detail view evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Navigation and entity list tests
Blocked_Tests: Entity editing tests
Parallel_Tests: Child entity management tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run before edit functionality tests

Additional Information

Notes: Detail view is primary interface for entity management and monitoring
Edge_Cases: Entities with no operational data, very large child entity lists
Risk_Areas: Incorrect metrics could mislead operational decisions
Security_Considerations: Ensure metrics visible only to authorized users

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Detail view behavior for entities with zero child entities
Type: Edge Case
Rationale: Child Entities section display when count is 0
Priority: P3
Scenario_2: Real-time metric updates when operational data changes
Type: Real-time Integration
Rationale: Metrics should reflect current operational state
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 8: Network Timeout During Import Processing

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_008
Title: Verify system handles network timeouts during CSV import processing with proper error recovery
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Consumer/Onboarding Services, Network, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Integration-Testing/Performance-Metrics/API-Test-Results, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Network timeout error handling - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Network Layer, Background Processing, Error Recovery System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Import-Engine, Network-Handler
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-16 Import Data functionality, Network resilience requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_004 (Large file import), ONB02US08_TC_005 (Malformed CSV)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Network simulation tools, Import processing service
Performance_Baseline: Timeout detection < 30 seconds
Data_Requirements: Medium-sized CSV file (1,000 records) for timeout simulation

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Network simulation capability, medium CSV file prepared
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with import access
Test_Data: CSV file with 1,000 entity records (moderate processing time)
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic import functionality validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User login
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Import Data" button	Import interface opens	N/A	Import access
7	Select "Region" from entity type dropdown	Region selected for import	Entity Type: Region	Entity type selection
8	Upload medium-sized CSV file	File uploads successfully	File: 1000_regions.csv	File upload
9	Click "Upload" to begin processing	Processing starts with progress indicator	N/A	Processing initiation
10	Simulate network interruption during processing	Network connection disrupted using browser dev tools or network simulation	Simulate: Network offline after 50% processing	Network interruption
11	Observe system behavior during timeout	System detects network issue, displays connection error message	Expected: "Network connection lost during processing"	Timeout detection
12	Restore network connection	Network connectivity restored	Restore: Full connectivity	Connection restoration
13	Verify error recovery options	System provides options to retry, resume, or cancel import	Expected: Retry/Resume/Cancel options	Recovery options
14	Click "Retry" option	System attempts to restart import process	N/A	Retry functionality
15	Monitor resumed processing	Import continues from beginning or resumes from checkpoint	Expected: Processing resumes successfully	Resume behavior
16	Verify data integrity after timeout	Imported data is complete and consistent, no partial records	N/A	Data integrity check
17	Test timeout with different processing stages	Repeat timeout simulation at upload, validation, and completion stages	Various stages: Upload 25%, Validation 75%, Completion 90%	Comprehensive timeout testing
18	Verify user notification clarity	Error messages clearly explain timeout situation and next steps	Expected: Clear, actionable error messages	User communication

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System properly detects network timeouts and provides clear error messages with recovery options
Secondary_Verifications: Data integrity maintained, retry/resume functionality works correctly
Negative_Verification: No data corruption, partial imports, or system crashes during network issues

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording timeout behavior and recovery]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Network handling issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Error message and recovery evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Basic import functionality
Blocked_Tests: Production deployment validation
Parallel_Tests: Error handling tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after successful import tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for users with unreliable network connections
Edge_Cases: Multiple timeout scenarios, partial data uploads
Risk_Areas: Data corruption, incomplete imports, poor user experience
Security_Considerations: Ensure timeout doesn't expose sensitive data

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Server-side processing timeout (backend timeout vs network timeout)
Type: Infrastructure
Rationale: Different timeout scenarios require different handling
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Browser crash/closure during active import processing
Type: Client-side failure
Rationale: Users may accidentally close browser during long imports
Priority: P3

TEST CASE 9: Role-Based Access Control - Tenant Admin Full Access

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_009
Title: Verify Tenant Admin has complete access to all Service Areas Management features across multiple utilities
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Auth Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/CSM/Security-Validation/Quality-Dashboard/User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Tenant Admin role permissions - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Auth System, Role Management, Multi-Utility Access
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Auth-Service, Role-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Validation, User-Acceptance, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: User Story section 2 "Tenant Admin" role definition, section 3 "Jobs To Be Done"
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_010 (Utility Admin access)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Role management system, Multi-utility database
Performance_Baseline: Role validation < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Tenant Admin user account, multiple utility configurations

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Tenant Admin user account configured with full permissions
User_Roles_Permissions: Tenant Admin - highest level access across all utility operations
Test_Data: Tenant Admin credentials, multiple utilities: "Roshan Energies new", secondary utility
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic authentication functionality validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter Tenant Admin credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful, shows Tenant Admin dashboard	Username: [tenant_admin], Password: [admin_password]	Tenant admin authentication
3	Verify user role indicator	Interface shows Tenant Admin role/permissions indicator	Expected: Tenant Admin role visible	Role identification
4	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads showing multiple utilities	N/A	Multi-utility access
5	Verify multiple utility access	Can see and access multiple utilities including "Roshan Energies new"	Expected: Multiple utilities visible	Multi-utility validation
6	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens with full access	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Primary utility access
7	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads with all features	N/A	Full feature access
8	Verify dashboard access	Complete dashboard visible with all KPIs and analytics	Expected: All 4 KPI cards, growth trends	Dashboard permissions
9	Test entity creation capability	"Add Entity" button visible and functional	N/A	Creation permissions
10	Click "Add Entity" and verify full form access	Complete entity creation form accessible with all entity types	Expected: All 9 entity types available	Full form access
11	Test bulk operations access	"Import Data" and "Export Data" buttons visible and functional	N/A	Bulk operations permissions
12	Click "Import Data" and verify full import access	Complete import interface with all entity types and options	Expected: All import features available	Import permissions
13	Verify all entity type tabs accessible	All tabs clickable: Region, Country, State, City/County, Zone, Division, Areas, Sub-Areas, Premises	Expected: All 9 tabs accessible	Tab-level permissions
14	Test entity management across all tabs	Can view, edit, and manage entities in all tabs	Test across: Region, Division, Premises tabs	Cross-entity permissions
15	Verify entity editing capability	Can access edit functionality for entities	Test: Edit entity description	Edit permissions
16	Test status toggle capability	Can change entity status (Active/Inactive) across all entity types	Test: Toggle status on Region entity	Status management
17	Verify comprehensive search access	Global search and tab-specific search/filter functionality available	Test: Search across all entity types	Search permissions
18	Test cross-utility switching	Can switch between utilities and maintain full access	Switch to: Secondary utility	Multi-utility management

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Tenant Admin has complete access to all Service Areas Management features across all utilities
Secondary_Verifications: Can perform all CRUD operations, access all entity types, use all bulk operations
Negative_Verification: No functionality restrictions, access denials, or permission errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording access validation results]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Permission or access issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Access evidence and role validation]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Authentication functionality
Blocked_Tests: Lower privilege role tests
Parallel_Tests: Utility Admin access tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run before restricted role validation

Additional Information

Notes: Tenant Admin role is highest privilege level for system oversight
Edge_Cases: Access during utility maintenance, cross-tenant data access
Risk_Areas: Excessive privileges could lead to accidental data modification
Security_Considerations: Ensure proper audit logging for all Tenant Admin actions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Tenant Admin access to system configuration and user management features
Type: Administrative Access
Rationale: Super admin should have system-level configuration access
Priority: P1
Scenario_2: Audit trail generation for all Tenant Admin actions
Type: Security/Compliance
Rationale: High-privilege actions require comprehensive audit logging
Priority: P1

TEST CASE 10: Role-Based Access Control - Utility Admin Regional Scope

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_010
Title: Verify Utility Admin has appropriate regional access with management capabilities limited to assigned utility scope
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Auth Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/Security-Validation/Quality-Dashboard/User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Utility Admin role permissions and scope - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Auth System, Role Management, Regional Access Control
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Auth-Service, Role-Engine, Access-Control
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Validation, User-Acceptance, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: User Story section 2 "Utility Admin" role definition, section 3 "Jobs To Be Done"
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_009 (Tenant Admin access), ONB02US08_TC_011 (CIO Admin access)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Role management system, Regional access control
Performance_Baseline: Role validation < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Utility Admin user account, assigned utility scope

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utility Admin user account with specific utility assignment
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin - utility-level administrator managing regional operations
Test_Data: Utility Admin credentials, assigned utility: "Roshan Energies new"
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and Tenant Admin access validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter Utility Admin credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful, shows Utility Admin interface	Username: [utility_admin], Password: [admin_password]	Utility admin authentication
3	Verify user role indicator	Interface shows Utility Admin role with regional scope	Expected: Utility Admin role visible	Role identification
4	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads showing assigned utilities only	N/A	Scoped utility access
5	Verify utility access scope	Can only see assigned utility "Roshan Energies new", not other utilities	Expected: Single utility visible	Access scope validation
6	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens with utility-level access	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Assigned utility access
7	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads with regional data	N/A	Regional dashboard access
8	Verify dashboard shows regional scope	Dashboard displays data for assigned regions only	Expected: Regional KPIs, not system-wide	Regional data scope
9	Test entity management within scope	Can manage entities within assigned utility regions	N/A	Scoped entity management
10	Verify entity creation permissions	Can create entities within authorized hierarchy levels	Test: Create Region under assigned utility	Creation scope validation
11	Test operational metrics access	Can view operational data for assigned areas only	Expected: Regional Consumer, Meter, Revenue data	Metrics scope validation
12	Verify bulk operations scope	Import/Export available for authorized entities only	Test: Import entities to assigned utility	Bulk operations scope
13	Test entity editing permissions	Can edit entities within authorized scope	Test: Edit entity in assigned region	Edit permissions scope
14	Verify manager assignment capability	Can assign managers to entities within scope	Test: Assign manager to regional entity	Assignment permissions
15	Test reporting access scope	Can generate reports for assigned regions only	Expected: Regional reporting, not cross-utility	Reporting scope validation
16	Verify cross-utility access restriction	Cannot access entities outside assigned utility	Test: Attempt access to other utility data	Access restriction validation
17	Test global search scope	Search results limited to assigned utility entities	Search: Entity names across utilities	Search scope validation
18	Verify status management scope	Can toggle entity status within assigned utility only	Test: Status change on assigned entities	Status management scope

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Utility Admin has appropriate regional access limited to assigned utility scope
Secondary_Verifications: Can perform authorized operations within scope, reporting limited to assigned regions
Negative_Verification: Cannot access entities outside assigned utility, no cross-utility data visibility

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording scoped access validation]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Scope or permission issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Scoped access evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Authentication, Tenant Admin validation
Blocked_Tests: Lower privilege validation
Parallel_Tests: CIO Admin access tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after Tenant Admin tests

Additional Information

Notes: Utility Admin scope is critical for multi-tenant data segregation
Edge_Cases: Utility reassignment, temporary elevated access
Risk_Areas: Data leakage across utilities, unauthorized access
Security_Considerations: Ensure complete data isolation between utilities

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Utility Admin access when assigned to multiple utilities
Type: Multi-Assignment Access
Rationale: Some admins may manage multiple utility regions
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Utility Admin access to shared/common entities across utilities
Type: Shared Resource Access
Rationale: Some entities may be shared across utility boundaries
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 11: Entity Status Management and Toggle Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_011
Title: Verify entity status can be toggled between Active and Inactive with proper validation and cascade effects
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Regression-Coverage/Module-Coverage/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Entity status management and toggle functionality - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Status Management Service, Operational Systems
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Status-Engine, Entity-Management
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-5 Status Rules, AC-6 Active/Inactive entity behavior, Business rule validation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_007 (Entity detail view), ONB02US08_TC_006 (Dashboard KPIs)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Status management service, Real-time updates
Performance_Baseline: Status toggle response < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Test entities with various statuses across hierarchy levels

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test entities with known status states for toggle testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with entity management access
Test_Data: Entities from wireframes: "North Division" (Active), "Central Division" (Active), test entities for toggle
Prior_Test_Cases: Entity listing and detail view tests validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Navigate to "Division" tab	Division Management page loads	N/A	Entity type selection
7	Verify status toggle switches visible	Toggle switches visible in Status column for each division	Expected: Blue toggle switches for Active entities	Toggle visibility validation
8	Note current status of "North Division"	Record current status: Active (blue toggle switch on)	Entity: "North Division", Current: Active	Initial status recording
9	Click status toggle switch for "North Division"	Toggle switches from Active to Inactive immediately	N/A	Status toggle action
10	Verify immediate status update	Status label changes to "Inactive", toggle switch turns grey/off position	Expected: Inactive status, grey toggle	Real-time update validation
11	Verify visual status indicator change	Status badge color changes from green "Active" to grey "Inactive"	Expected: Color change Active→Inactive	Visual feedback validation
12	Navigate to "North Division" detail view	Click "View" action to access detail view	Entity: "North Division"	Detail view access
13	Verify status change reflects in detail view	Basic Information shows Status: Inactive	Expected: Status consistency in detail view	Status consistency check
14	Return to Division list view	Navigate back to Division Management	N/A	Return navigation
15	Toggle "North Division" status back to Active	Click toggle switch again to restore Active status	N/A	Reverse toggle operation
16	Verify status restoration	Status returns to Active, toggle blue, badge green	Expected: Active status restored	Status restoration validation
17	Test rapid toggle clicking	Click toggle switch multiple times quickly	N/A	Rapid click handling
18	Verify toggle stability	Final status reflects last toggle action, no UI corruption	Expected: Stable final state	Toggle stability check
19	Test status toggle across different entity types	Navigate to Region, Country, Areas tabs and test toggle functionality	Test entities: "Asia Region", "USA Country", "Kalewadi Area"	Cross-entity toggle validation
20	Verify dashboard KPI impact	Check if status changes affect dashboard Active Consumers/Meters counts	Expected: KPI updates reflect status changes	KPI impact validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Entity status toggles between Active and Inactive with immediate visual feedback and data persistence
Secondary_Verifications: Status changes reflect across detail views, dashboard KPIs update accordingly
Negative_Verification: Rapid clicking doesn't cause UI corruption, status changes are atomic and consistent

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording toggle behavior and status changes]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Status management issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Toggle behavior evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity listing and navigation
Blocked_Tests: Status-dependent workflow tests
Parallel_Tests: Entity editing tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after entity display tests

Additional Information

Notes: Status management is critical for operational control of entities
Edge_Cases: Concurrent status changes by multiple users, status changes during active operations
Risk_Areas: Status inconsistency could affect operational workflows and billing
Security_Considerations: Ensure proper authorization for status changes

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Status change cascade effects on child entities (if applicable)
Type: Business Logic
Rationale: Parent status changes may need to affect child entity operations
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Status change audit logging and history tracking
Type: Audit/Compliance
Rationale: Status changes should be logged for compliance and troubleshooting
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 12: Global Search Functionality Across All Entity Types

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_012
Title: Verify global search allows searching across all entity types with entity type identification and direct navigation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Global search functionality - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Search Engine, Database, UI Navigation
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Search-Engine, Navigation-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-9 Global Search Rules, User story search functionality section
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_010 (Tab-specific search), ONB02US08_TC_007 (Entity navigation)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Search index, Database with entity data
Performance_Baseline: Search response < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Populated entities across all types for comprehensive search testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Search index populated with current entity data
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with search access
Test_Data: Known entities from wireframes: "San Diego", "Chattisgarh", "Kalewadi", "U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN CENTRAL-B2"
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard and entity listing validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Locate global search box	Search box visible with placeholder "Search across all entities... (min 2 character)"	N/A	Search box identification
7	Test minimum character requirement	Enter single character "S"	Input: "S"	Expected: No search triggered
8	Verify no search results display	Search dropdown doesn't appear with single character	Expected: No search results	Minimum character enforcement
9	Test valid search with 2+ characters	Enter "Sa" in search box	Input: "Sa"	Search activation validation
10	Verify search results appear	Dropdown displays with matching entities	Expected: "San Diego" appears in results	Search results display
11	Verify search result format	Results show format: "Entity Name - Entity Type"	Expected: "San Diego - Region"	Result format validation
12	Test search across different entity types	Search for "Ka"	Input: "Ka"	Expected: "Kalewadi - Area" in results
13	Verify multiple entity type results	Search results include entities from different types	Expected: Multiple types (Region, Area, etc.)	Multi-type results
14	Click on search result "San Diego"	Navigates directly to San Diego entity detail view	Click: "San Diego - Region"	Direct navigation validation
15	Verify navigation accuracy	Correct entity detail view opens for selected search result	Expected: San Diego detail view	Navigation accuracy
16	Return to dashboard using navigation	Navigate back to Service Areas dashboard	N/A	Return navigation
17	Test search with premise entities	Search for "U04" to find premise entities	Input: "U04"	Premise search validation
18	Verify premise search results	Results include premise entities with full names	Expected: "U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN CENTRAL-B2 - Premise"	Premise entity format
19	Test partial word search	Search for "Chat" to find "Chattisgarh"	Input: "Chat"	Partial matching validation
20	Verify partial search accuracy	Search finds entities with partial name matches	Expected: "Chattisgarh" appears	Partial search functionality
21	Test search with special characters	Search for "U04-DMA"	Input: "U04-DMA"	Special character handling
22	Verify special character search	Search handles hyphens and special characters correctly	Expected: Matching premise entities	Special character support
23	Test case-insensitive search	Search for "san diego" (lowercase)	Input: "san diego"	Case sensitivity validation
24	Verify case-insensitive results	Search finds "San Diego" regardless of case	Expected: "San Diego" appears	Case insensitive functionality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Global search works across all entity types with proper entity type identification
Secondary_Verifications: Minimum character validation works, search results navigate correctly, supports partial matching
Negative_Verification: Invalid searches don't return inappropriate results, minimum character requirement enforced

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording search behavior and navigation]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Search functionality issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Search results evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity population and navigation
Blocked_Tests: Advanced search functionality
Parallel_Tests: Tab-specific search tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after entity creation tests

Additional Information

Notes: Global search is primary method for quick entity access across large datasets
Edge_Cases: Search during data updates, very large result sets, search index corruption
Risk_Areas: Poor search performance could impact user productivity
Security_Considerations: Ensure search respects user access permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Search performance with very large datasets (10,000+ entities)
Type: Performance
Rationale: Search response time critical for large enterprise deployments
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Search result ranking/relevance scoring
Type: User Experience
Rationale: Most# Service Areas Management - Enhanced Test Cases (ONB02US08)

TEST CASE 13: CIO Admin Role Technical Management Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_013
Title: Verify CIO Admin has technical system management access with data integrity and security oversight capabilities
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Auth Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/CSM/Security-Validation/Quality-Dashboard/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: System-Administration
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: CIO Admin role technical management - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Auth System, System Configuration, Data Integrity Service, Audit System
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Auth-Service, System-Admin, Data-Integrity
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Integration-Testing, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: User Story section 2 "CIO Admin" role definition, Technical system management responsibilities
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_009 (Tenant Admin), ONB02US08_TC_010 (Utility Admin)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, System configuration tools, Data integrity services, Audit system
Performance_Baseline: System health checks < 5 seconds
Data_Requirements: CIO Admin account, system configuration access, audit data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: CIO Admin user account with technical administration privileges
User_Roles_Permissions: CIO Admin - Technology administrator overseeing system configurations
Test_Data: CIO Admin credentials, system health data, audit trail information
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and basic role validation completed

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter CIO Admin credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful, shows CIO Admin interface	Username: [cio_admin], Password: [admin_password]	CIO admin authentication
3	Verify CIO Admin role indicator	Interface shows CIO Admin role with technical privileges	Expected: CIO Admin role visible	Role identification
4	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads with system administration options	N/A	Technical access validation
5	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens with technical management access	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	System configuration access
6	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads with technical monitoring	N/A	Technical dashboard access
7	Verify system health monitoring access	Dashboard shows system performance metrics and health indicators	Expected: System performance data visible	Health monitoring access
8	Test data integrity monitoring capability	Can access data quality indicators across all entity levels	Expected: Data consistency metrics	Data integrity oversight
9	Verify user activity tracking access	Can monitor user activity and access patterns	Expected: User activity logs accessible	User monitoring capability
10	Test system configuration access	Can access system-level configuration settings	Expected: Configuration options available	System configuration rights
11	Verify audit trail access	Can view comprehensive audit trails and change tracking	Expected: Complete audit history	Audit oversight capability
12	Test integration status monitoring	Can check integration status with external systems	Expected: Integration health status	Integration monitoring
13	Verify performance monitoring capability	Can access system performance metrics and optimization data	Expected: Performance analytics	Performance oversight
14	Test backup and recovery information	Can access backup status and recovery procedures	Expected: Backup/recovery data	System maintenance access
15	Verify entity data validation tools	Can run data validation checks across hierarchy levels	Expected: Validation tools accessible	Data quality management
16	Test user access management tools	Can review and manage user permissions and access levels	Expected: User management interface	Access control oversight
17	Verify system maintenance capabilities	Can access maintenance schedules and system optimization tools	Expected: Maintenance tools available	Technical maintenance access
18	Test security compliance monitoring	Can monitor security events and compliance status	Expected: Security dashboard accessible	Security oversight capability

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: CIO Admin has technical system management access with data integrity and security oversight
Secondary_Verifications: Can monitor system health, manage configurations, access audit trails
Negative_Verification: Access restricted to technical administration, no inappropriate business operation access

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording technical access validation]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Technical access issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Technical access evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Authentication, role infrastructure
Blocked_Tests: Technical maintenance workflows
Parallel_Tests: Other admin role tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after basic role validation

Additional Information

Notes: CIO Admin role critical for system reliability and data integrity
Edge_Cases: System emergency access, cross-system integration monitoring
Risk_Areas: Excessive technical access could impact system stability
Security_Considerations: Comprehensive audit logging for all technical actions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: CIO Admin emergency system access during outages
Type: Emergency Access
Rationale: Technical administrators need emergency access capabilities
Priority: P1
Scenario_2: Cross-system integration configuration and troubleshooting
Type: Integration Management
Rationale: CIO Admin should manage external system integrations
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 14: Child Entity Tab Comprehensive Management

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_014
Title: Verify Child Entity tab displays comprehensive management with search, filter, and navigation capabilities
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Child Entity tab comprehensive management - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Search Engine, Filter Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Child-Entity-Manager, Search-Filter-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-12 Child Entity Tab, User story Child Entity management section
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_007 (Entity detail view), ONB02US08_TC_012 (Global search)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Search engine, Parent entities with children
Performance_Baseline: Child entity loading < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Parent entities with multiple child entities for comprehensive testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Parent entities with populated child entity data
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with entity management access
Test_Data: Parent entities: "San Diego" (36 children), "Kalewadi" (4 children), "South" (35 children)
Prior_Test_Cases: Entity detail view and navigation validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Navigate to "Region" tab	Region Management page loads	N/A	Parent entity access
7	Click "View" action for "San Diego" region	San Diego entity detail view opens	Entity: San Diego	Parent entity detail
8	Verify Child Entities section header	Shows "Child Entities (36)" with accurate count	Expected: Child Entities (36)	Child count validation
9	Verify child entity search bar presence	Search bar visible with placeholder "Search by name"	N/A	Search functionality presence
10	Verify filter options availability	Filter dropdown available with options: Type, Status, Created By	Expected: Filter by type, status, created by	Filter options validation
11	Test search functionality within child entities	Enter "Test" in search bar	Search term: "Test"	Child entity search
12	Verify search results filtering	Results show only child entities matching "Test" (e.g., "Test premise")	Expected: "Test premise" appears	Search result accuracy
13	Clear search and test filter by type	Select "premise" from Type filter	Filter: Territory Type = premise	Type filtering
14	Verify type filter results	Results show only premise-type child entities	Expected: Only premise entities visible	Type filter accuracy
15	Test filter by status	Select "Active" from Status filter	Filter: Status = Active	Status filtering
16	Verify status filter results	Results show only Active child entities	Expected: Only Active entities visible	Status filter accuracy
17	Test combined search and filter	Search "Gov" with Type filter "premise"	Search: "Gov", Filter: premise	Combined filtering
18	Verify combined filter accuracy	Results show premise entities containing "Gov" (e.g., "Gov maza")	Expected: "Gov maza" premise	Combined filter validation
19	Verify child entity table structure	Columns display: Name, Code, Territory Type, Status, Created By, Created On	Expected column structure per AC-12	Table structure validation
20	Test child entity navigation	Click on child entity name "Test premise"	Child: Test premise	Child navigation
21	Verify navigation to child detail	Navigates to "Test premise" detail view with breadcrumb	Expected: Child entity detail view	Navigation accuracy
22	Test return navigation	Use "Go Back" button to return to parent	N/A	Return navigation
23	Verify pagination for large child lists	If more than 10 children, pagination controls appear	Expected: Pagination for San Diego (36 children)	Pagination display
24	Test pagination navigation	Navigate through child entity pages	N/A	Pagination functionality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Child Entity tab provides comprehensive search, filter, and navigation capabilities
Secondary_Verifications: Search and filters work independently and combined, pagination handles large child lists
Negative_Verification: Filters don't show inappropriate results, navigation maintains context

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording child entity management behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Child entity management issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Child entity functionality evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity detail view, parent entity creation
Blocked_Tests: Advanced child management workflows
Parallel_Tests: Search functionality tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after basic detail view validation

Additional Information

Notes: Child entity management is core to hierarchical entity administration
Edge_Cases: Entities with zero children, very large child lists (100+)
Risk_Areas: Poor child entity navigation could impact operational efficiency
Security_Considerations: Ensure child entity access respects parent entity permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Child entity management for entities with 1000+ children (performance)
Type: Performance
Rationale: Large enterprises may have entities with massive child counts
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Bulk operations on child entities (bulk status change, bulk assignment)
Type: Bulk Operations
Rationale: Administrators may need to perform bulk actions on child entities
Priority: P3

TEST CASE 15: Entity Edit Functionality Comprehensive Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_015
Title: Verify users can edit parent and description fields for all entity types with proper validation and restrictions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Regression-Coverage/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Entity edit functionality across all types - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Validation Service, Hierarchy Management
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Entity-Editor, Validation-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-12 Edit functionality "user can edit only the parent and description for any entity type"
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_003 (Parent entity validation), ONB02US08_TC_007 (Entity detail view)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Entity validation service, Parent entity availability
Performance_Baseline: Edit modal loading < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Entities across all types for comprehensive edit testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Entities across all 9 types available for editing
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with entity edit access
Test_Data: Sample entities: "San Diego" (Region), "USA" (Country), "Chattisgarh" (State), "North" (Division), "Kalewadi" (Area)
Prior_Test_Cases: Entity detail view and navigation validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Navigate to "Region" tab	Region Management page loads	N/A	Region entity testing
7	Click "View" action for "San Diego" region	San Diego entity detail view opens	Entity: San Diego	Region detail access
8	Click "Edit" button in detail view	Edit modal opens with title "Edit NA San Diego"	Expected: Edit modal with entity-specific title	Edit modal access
9	Verify edit modal contains only Description field	Modal shows only Description text area, no other editable fields	Expected: Description field only	Field restriction validation
10	Verify Description field is editable	Description text area allows text input and modification	Test description: "Updated San Diego region information"	Description editability
11	Verify other fields are NOT editable	Entity Name, Code, Status, Manager, etc. not editable in modal	Expected: Only Description editable	Edit restriction validation
12	Modify description content	Enter new description text	New description: "Primary West Coast utility region serving San Diego metropolitan area"	Content modification
13	Click "Save Changes" button	Changes saved successfully, modal closes, detail view updates	N/A	Save functionality
14	Verify description update in detail view	Updated description displays in entity detail view	Expected: New description visible	Data persistence
15	Test "Cancel" functionality	Click Edit, modify description, click Cancel	N/A	Cancel operation
16	Verify Cancel doesn't save changes	Description remains unchanged after Cancel	Expected: No changes saved	Cancel validation
17	Navigate to "Country" tab and test edit	Repeat edit test for "USA" country entity	Entity: USA Country	Country entity edit
18	Verify Country edit modal structure	Same edit modal pattern: "Edit NA USA" with Description only	Expected: Description-only edit modal	Country edit validation
19	Navigate to "Division" tab and test edit	Repeat edit test for "North" division entity	Entity: North Division	Division entity edit
20	Verify Division edit modal consistency	Same edit modal pattern with Description field only	Expected: Consistent edit interface	Division edit validation
21	Navigate to "Areas" tab and test edit	Repeat edit test for "Kalewadi" area entity	Entity: Kalewadi Area	Area entity edit
22	Verify Area edit modal consistency	Same edit modal pattern maintained across entity types	Expected: Consistent edit behavior	Area edit validation
23	Navigate to "Premises" tab and test edit	Test edit for premise entity	Entity: Any premise	Premise entity edit
24	Verify Premise edit modal consistency	Edit modal works consistently for premise entities	Expected: Same edit interface	Premise edit validation
25	Test edit with empty description	Clear description field and save	Description: [empty]	Empty description validation
26	Verify empty description handling	System accepts empty description (optional field)	Expected: Empty description allowed	Optional field validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Users can edit only description field for entities across all 9 entity types
Secondary_Verifications: Edit modal consistent across types, save/cancel operations work, data persists correctly
Negative_Verification: No other entity fields are editable, unauthorized field modifications prevented

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording edit functionality behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Edit functionality issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Edit operation evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity detail view access
Blocked_Tests: Advanced entity management workflows
Parallel_Tests: Entity creation tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after detail view validation

Additional Information

Notes: Edit restrictions critical for maintaining data integrity while allowing necessary updates
Edge_Cases: Very long descriptions, special characters in descriptions, concurrent edits
Risk_Areas: Unrestricted editing could compromise entity integrity
Security_Considerations: Ensure edit permissions respect user role limitations

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Parent entity modification validation (mentioned in AC-12 but not clearly defined)
Type: Business Logic
Rationale: AC-12 mentions editing "parent and description" but parent edit unclear
Priority: P1
Scenario_2: Concurrent edit conflict resolution (multiple users editing same entity)
Type: Concurrency
Rationale: Multi-user environment may have concurrent edit conflicts
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 16: Export Data Functionality Complete Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_016
Title: Verify export data functionality with entity type selection, parent filtering, and comprehensive export options
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Data-Export
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Export data functionality complete - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Export Engine, Database, File Generation Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Export-Engine, Data-Formatter
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: User story Export Data section, Bulk operations requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_004 (Large file handling), ONB02US08_TC_005 (Data validation)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Export service, Database, File download capability
Performance_Baseline: Export generation < 30 seconds for 1000 records
Data_Requirements: Populated entities across all types for comprehensive export testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Entities across all types populated for export testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with export access
Test_Data: Entity data across all types, parent-child relationships established
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard and entity management validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Export Data" button	Export data modal/interface opens	N/A	Export feature access
7	Verify entity type selection dropdown	Dropdown shows options: All Entities, Region, Country, State, City/County, Zone, Division, Areas, Sub-Areas, Premises	Expected: All 10 entity type options	Entity type options
8	Select "All Entities" option	All Entities selected for comprehensive export	Selection: All Entities	Comprehensive export
9	Verify export configuration options	Options available: Include child entities, Include grandchildren, Include parent-child associations	Expected: 3 configuration options	Export options validation
10	Configure export with all options enabled	Enable all export options for maximum data inclusion	Config: All options enabled	Maximum export configuration
11	Verify export summary preview	Summary shows what will be included: entity data, relationships, metadata	Expected: Comprehensive export summary	Export preview validation
12	Execute "All Entities" export	Click export button to generate CSV	N/A	Export execution
13	Verify CSV file download	CSV file downloads successfully with appropriate filename	Expected: service_areas_export_[timestamp].csv	File download validation
14	Verify CSV file content structure	File contains headers: name, code, type, parent, description, status, created_by, created_on	Expected: Complete entity data structure	File content validation
15	Test specific entity type export	Select "Region" from entity type dropdown	Selection: Region	Specific type export
16	Verify parent entity filtering option	Parent entity dropdown appears for Region selection	Expected: Parent filtering available	Parent filter option
17	Select specific parent entity	Choose parent entity to filter Region export	Parent: Specific region parent	Parent filtering
18	Configure Region export options	Enable "Include child entities" option	Config: Include children	Child inclusion option
19	Execute Region export	Generate CSV for filtered Region data	N/A	Filtered export execution
20	Verify filtered export content	CSV contains only Region entities and their children	Expected: Region data only	Filter accuracy validation
21	Test "Premises" entity type export	Select "Premises" for premise-specific export	Selection: Premises	Premises export testing
22	Verify Premises export configuration	Premises export shows premise-specific options	Expected: Premise-relevant options	Type-specific configuration
23	Execute Premises export	Generate CSV for all premise entities	N/A	Premises export execution
24	Verify Premises CSV structure	File includes premise-specific fields: Units, Total Area, etc.	Expected: Premise-specific columns	Premise data validation
25	Test export performance with large dataset	Export data with significant entity count (1000+ records)	Dataset: Large entity collection	Performance validation
26	Verify large export completion	Large export completes within performance baseline	Expected: Completion < 30 seconds	Performance compliance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Export functionality works with entity type selection, parent filtering, and configuration options
Secondary_Verifications: CSV files contain accurate data structure, exports complete within performance baseline
Negative_Verification: Filtered exports don't include inappropriate entity types, file generation doesn't fail

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording export functionality behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Export functionality issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Export operation evidence and CSV files]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
**Maintenance_Effort### Missing Scenarios Summary

Entity code handling for names < 3 characters (Priority: P2)
Special character handling in entity names (Priority: P2)
Circular dependency prevention in hierarchy (Priority: P1)
Real-time dashboard updates (Priority: P2)
Character encoding variations in CSV (Priority: P2)
Security validation for malicious CSV uploads (Priority: P1)
Server-side vs network timeout differentiation (Priority: P2)
Browser crash recovery during imports (Priority: P3)

TEST CASE 17: Premises Management Specialized Features Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_017
Title: Verify Premises tab displays specialized columns (Units, Meters) and premise-specific field management
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Meter Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Premises specialized features - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Database, Meter Management System, Unit Tracking
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Premises-Manager, Meter-Integration
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: User story Premises Management section, AC-10 List view specifications
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_006 (Tab navigation), ONB02US08_TC_007 (Detail view)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Meter management integration, Premises data
Performance_Baseline: Premises tab loading < 3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Premise entities with Units and Meters data populated

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Premise entities with Units and Meters data for testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with premises management access
Test_Data: Premise entities from wireframes: "U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN CENTRAL-B2", "Test premise", "Gov maza"
Prior_Test_Cases: Tab navigation and basic entity management validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Premises" tab	Premises Management page loads	N/A	Premises tab access
7	Verify Premises tab count	Tab shows "Premises (16)" or current premise count	Expected: Premises count display	Tab count validation
8	Verify premises-specific column structure	List view shows: Premises Name, Status, Created By, Units, Meters, Created On, Actions	Expected: Premises-specific columns	Column structure validation
9	Verify Units column presence	Units column visible and distinct from other entity tabs	Expected: Units column present	Units column validation
10	Verify Meters column presence	Meters column visible with meter count data	Expected: Meters column present	Meters column validation
11	Compare with non-premise entity tabs	Navigate to Region tab, verify "Child Count" column instead of "Units"	Expected: Different column structure	Column differentiation
12	Return to Premises tab	Premises tab loads with specialized columns	N/A	Tab return navigation
13	Verify Units column data accuracy	Units column shows appropriate values ("NA" or numeric values)	Expected: "NA" for some, numeric for others	Units data validation
14	Verify Meters column data accuracy	Meters column shows meter count for each premise	Expected: Numeric values (0, 1, 2, etc.)	Meters data validation
15	Check premise naming convention	Premises follow specific naming pattern	Expected: "U04-DMA00-V-COMMERCIAL-URBAN CENTRAL-B2" format	Naming convention validation
16	Click "View" action for premise with Units data	Navigate to premise detail view	Entity: Any premise with Units data	Premise detail access
17	Verify premise detail view shows Units information	Detail view displays Units field with appropriate value	Expected: Units information visible	Units detail validation
18	Verify premise detail view shows Meters information	Detail view displays Meters count and related data	Expected: Meters information visible	Meters detail validation
19	Test premise search functionality	Search for premise using search box	Search: "U04-DMA00"	Premise search validation
20	Verify premise search accuracy	Search results show matching premise entities	Expected: Matching premises appear	Search accuracy
21	Test premise status filtering	Apply Active/Inactive filter to premises	Filter: Active status	Premise filtering
22	Verify premise filter accuracy	Filter shows only premises matching selected status	Expected: Filtered premise list	Filter validation
23	Check premise entity codes	Verify premise codes follow expected pattern	Expected: Alphanumeric codes like "U046F91AC"	Code pattern validation
24	Verify premise pagination	If more than 10 premises, pagination controls appear	Expected: Pagination for large premise lists	Pagination validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Premises tab displays specialized Units and Meters columns distinct from other entity types
Secondary_Verifications: Units and Meters data accurate, premise naming follows convention, search/filter work
Negative_Verification: Other entity tabs don't show Units/Meters columns inappropriately

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording premises-specific functionality]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Premises functionality issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Premises interface evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Tab navigation, entity management
Blocked_Tests: Meter management integration
Parallel_Tests: Other entity type specialized features
Sequential_Tests: Must run after basic tab functionality

Additional Information

Notes: Premises entities have unique characteristics requiring specialized interface elements
Edge_Cases: Premises with zero units, very high unit counts, meter count mismatches
Risk_Areas: Incorrect Units/Meters data could affect operational planning
Security_Considerations: Ensure premises data access respects geographic permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Premises with additional specialized fields (Total Area, Occupancy Rate, Floors)
Type: Extended Fields
Rationale: User story mentions premise-specific fields beyond Units and Meters
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Integration validation between Premises and Meter Management system
Type: Integration
Rationale: Meter counts should sync with actual meter management system
Priority: P2

TEST CASE 18: Tags Management Comprehensive Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_018
Title: Verify tags functionality including display, management, and search capabilities across all entity types
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/Quality-Dashboard/Module-Coverage/User-Acceptance/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Tags management comprehensive - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Database, Search Engine, Tag Management Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Tag-Manager, Search-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-6 Tags Rules, User story Tags functionality, Detail view Tags display
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_002 (Entity creation with tags), ONB02US08_TC_007 (Detail view)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Tag management service, Search functionality
Performance_Baseline: Tag operations < 1 second
Data_Requirements: Entities with various tags for comprehensive testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Entities with existing tags for tag management testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with tag management access
Test_Data: Entities with tags: "Industrial" tag on Chattisgarh region, various tag combinations
Prior_Test_Cases: Entity creation and detail view validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Add Entity" button	Add New Entity modal opens	N/A	Entity creation for tag testing
7	Select "Region" from Entity Type dropdown	Region selected for tag testing	Entity Type: Region	Type selection
8	Enter entity name "Test Region for Tags"	Name entered successfully	Entity Name: "Test Region for Tags"	Name input
9	Select parent entity	Parent entity selected appropriately	Parent: Available region parent	Parent selection
10	Locate Tags field	Tags field visible with "Add tag" text input and "Add" button	N/A	Tags field identification
11	Enter first tag "high-priority"	Tag text entered in input field	Tag: "high-priority"	Tag input
12	Click "Add" button	Tag added and displays below input field as pill/badge	Expected: "high-priority" tag badge visible	Tag addition
13	Add second tag "urban"	Enter and add second tag	Tag: "urban"	Multiple tag addition
14	Verify multiple tags display	Both tags display as separate badges below input field	Expected: "high-priority" and "urban" badges	Multiple tag display
15	Add third tag "commercial"	Enter and add third tag	Tag: "commercial"	Additional tag
16	Complete entity creation	Fill remaining fields and create entity	N/A	Entity creation completion
17	Navigate to created entity detail view	Access detail view for tag display validation	Entity: Test Region for Tags	Detail view access
18	Verify tags display in Basic Information	Tags section shows all added tags as badges	Expected: "high-priority", "urban", "commercial" visible	Tag display validation
19	Navigate to entity with existing tag	Access Chattisgarh region with "Industrial" tag	Entity: Chattisgarh	Existing tag validation
20	Verify existing tag display	"Industrial" tag displays in detail view Tags section	Expected: "Industrial" tag visible	Existing tag verification
21	Test tag search functionality	Use global search to find entities by tag	Search: "industrial"	Tag-based search
22	Verify tag search results	Search finds entities with matching tags	Expected: Entities with "industrial" tag	Tag search validation
23	Test tag editing capability	Access edit functionality for entity with tags	Entity: Test Region for Tags	Tag editing access
24	Verify tags in edit modal	Check if tags are editable in edit interface	N/A	Tag edit capability
25	Test tag removal functionality	Remove a tag from entity (if edit allows)	Remove: "commercial" tag	Tag removal
26	Verify tag filtering in lists	Filter entity lists by tag presence	Filter: Entities with specific tags	Tag filtering

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Tags can be added, displayed, and managed across all entity types
Secondary_Verifications: Tags display correctly in detail view, tag search functionality works
Negative_Verification: Tag operations don't interfere with entity management, optional field validation

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording tag functionality behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Tag functionality issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Tag management evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Monthly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Entity creation, detail view
Blocked_Tests: Advanced tag analytics
Parallel_Tests: Search functionality tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after basic entity management

Additional Information

Notes: Tags provide important categorization and search capabilities for large entity sets
Edge_Cases: Very long tag names, special characters in tags, duplicate tag handling
Risk_Areas: Poor tag management could reduce entity discoverability
Security_Considerations: Ensure tag visibility respects user access permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Tag auto-completion and suggestion functionality
Type: User Experience
Rationale: Tag suggestions could improve consistency and reduce duplicates
Priority: P3
Scenario_2: Tag-based analytics and reporting (tag usage statistics)
Type: Analytics
Rationale: Understanding tag usage patterns could improve categorization
Priority: P3

TEST CASE 19: Import Validation Results Detailed Processing

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US08_TC_019
Title: Verify import validation results display accurate counts, allow row editing, and support re-validation processing
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: August 12, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Areas Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer/Onboarding Services, UI, Database, MOD-ServiceAreas, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Quality-Dashboard/Regression-Coverage/API-Test-Results/Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Import validation results detailed processing - 100%
Integration_Points: CxServices, Import Engine, Validation Service, Data Processing, Error Handling
Code_Module_Mapped: CX-Web, Import-Validation, Data-Editor, Re-validation-Engine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC-16 Import Data validation results, User story validation processing section
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US08_TC_004 (Large imports), ONB02US08_TC_005 (Malformed CSV)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, Import engine, Validation service, Data editing interface
Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 10 seconds per 100 records
Data_Requirements: CSV files with various validation scenarios (valid, warning, error records)

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: CSV files prepared with validation test scenarios
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin with import processing access
Test_Data: Mixed validation CSV: valid records, duplicates, missing names, wrong parents
Prior_Test_Cases: Basic import functionality validated

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Login page displays	URL: https://platform-staging.bynry.com/	Standard navigation
2	Enter credentials and click "Login"	Authentication successful	Username: [staging_user], Password: [staging_password]	User authentication
3	Click side menu → "Utility Setup"	Utility Setup page loads	N/A	Navigation
4	Select "Roshan Energies new" → "Continue Setup"	Configuration wizard opens	Utility: "Roshan Energies new"	Utility access
5	Navigate to "Service Areas" → "Configure"	Service Areas dashboard loads	N/A	Feature access
6	Click "Import Data" button	Import interface opens	N/A	Import access
7	Select "Region" from entity type dropdown	Region selected for validation testing	Entity Type: Region	Type selection
8	Prepare mixed validation CSV file	CSV contains: 5 valid records, 3 with warnings, 2 with errors	File: mixed_validation.csv	Test data preparation
9	Upload mixed validation CSV	File uploads and processing begins	File: mixed_validation.csv	File upload
10	Wait for validation processing completion	System completes validation and shows results	Expected: Validation results display	Processing completion
11	Verify validation count display	Shows counts: Valid: 5, Warning: 3, Errors: 2	Expected: Accurate count breakdown	Count validation
12	Verify "Valid" records section	Valid records show "no issue" message	Expected: 5 valid records with "no issue"	Valid records verification
13	Verify "Warning" records section	Warning records show "duplicate found, it will be replaced with the existing"	Expected: 3 records with duplicate warning	Warning validation
14	Verify "Error" records section	Error records show specific error messages	Expected: "missing name" and "wrong parent attached"	Error validation
15	Test data filtering by validation status	Filter to show only Error records	Filter: Errors only	Validation filtering
16	Verify filtered display	Only error records visible in interface	Expected: 2 error records shown	Filter accuracy
17	Test row editing functionality	Click edit on row with "missing name" error	Edit: Row with missing name	Row editing access
18	Edit missing name field	Enter name "Corrected Region Name"	Edit: name = "Corrected Region Name"	Field editing
19	Edit parent field for wrong parent error	Select correct parent from dropdown	Edit: parent = correct parent entity	Parent correction
20	Save edited row changes	Click save or confirm changes	N/A	Edit save operation
21	Trigger re-validation	System re-validates edited entries	Expected: Re-validation process starts	Re-validation trigger
22	Verify updated validation counts	Counts update: Valid: 7, Warning: 3, Errors: 0	Expected: Error count reduced	Count update validation
23	Verify updated issue messages	Previously error rows now show "no issue"	Expected: Corrected rows validated	Issue resolution verification
24	Test row deletion functionality	Delete a row with warning status	Delete: Row with duplicate warning	Row deletion
25	Verify deletion impact	Row removed from validation results, counts updated	Expected: Warning count decreases	Deletion validation
26	Test default status handling	Verify records without status default to "Active"	Expected: Empty status = Active	Default status verification
27	Complete import process	Proceed with final import of validated data	N/A	Import completion
28	Verify import success	All valid records imported successfully	Expected: Import completion message	Success validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Import validation displays accurate counts and allows comprehensive row editing with re-validation
Secondary_Verifications: Filtering works correctly, default status handling, row deletion functionality
Negative_Verification: Invalid data properly identified, editing resolves validation issues

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording validation processing behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Validation processing issues]
Screenshots_Logs: [Validation interface evidence]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Basic import functionality
Blocked_Tests: Production import workflows
Parallel_Tests: Data validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Must run after import upload tests

Additional Information

Notes: Validation processing is critical for data quality and import success rates
Edge_Cases: Very large validation sets, complex validation rule combinations
Risk_Areas: Poor validation could lead to data corruption or incomplete imports
Security_Considerations: Ensure validation editing respects user permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified

Scenario_1: Bulk validation operations (mark all warnings as accepted, bulk row deletion)
Type: Bulk Operations
Rationale: Large imports may need bulk validation actions
Priority: P2
Scenario_2: Validation rule customization and configuration
Type: Configuration
Rationale: Different organizations may need different validation rules
Priority: P3

System Admin Dashboard Test Cases - ONB05US01

User Access and Managemet Test Cases - ONB02US03

Utility Plans & Tariffs Management Test Cases - ONB02US05

ID & Reference Format Settings Test Cases- ONB02US07

Service Areas Management Test Cases- ONB02US08

Core System Settings Test Cases - ONB02US02

Utility management Test Cases - ONB05US03

SMART360 Login Experience Test Cases - AU01US01

SMART360 v2 Automation Project - Management Plan

User stories which we're picking for Phase 1

Consumer management Test Cases - CIS01US02

New Service Connection Application Form Test Cases - CIS01US03

New Connection Application Detail View Test Cases - CIS01US04

Payments Management Test Cases - CIS01US09

Account Transfer Request Test Cases - CIS01US12

Disconnection Request Flow Test Cases - CIS01US10

Profile Details Test Cases - CSS01US11

Service Payment Management Test Cases - CSS01US03

Request Tracker Test Cases - CSS01US10

Service & Support Management Test Cases - CSS01US08

Bill Management Test Case - CSS01US02

Payment History Management Test Cases - CSS01US05

Bill Cycle Setup Test Cases - BX03US02

Printing and Distribution Test Cases - BX06US01

GL Codes Management Test Cases - BX05US01

Single Bill Generation V2 Test Cases - BX01US04

Bill Generation V2 Test Case - BX01US03

Bill Template Management Test Cases - BX03US01

Service Order Dashboard Test Cases - WX03US03

Dispatcher Management System Test Case - WX05US05

Master Test Cases - WX01US01

Field Force Management Test Case - WX02US02

System Settings Configuration Management Test Cases - WX04US04

Meter Device Management Test Cases -MX01US02

Route Management Test Cases -MX02US01

Read Cycle Management Test Cases - MX02US02

Photo Read Validation Test Cases -MX03US02

Read Cycle List and Validation Configurations Test Cases - MX03US01

Photo Meter Reads Test Cases - MX02US03

Communication Hub Dashboard Test Cases - UX01US01

Utility Contact List Management Test Cases -UX03US03

Communication Workflows Test Cases - UX03US04

Message History Management System Test Cases - UX05US05

Individual & Bulk messaging Test Cases - UX02US02

Message Template Management System Test Case - UX06US06

Service Areas Management Test Cases- ONB02US08

Test Scenario Analysis & Gap Identification

A. Functional Test Scenarios Covered

B. Missing Scenarios Identified

TEST CASE 1: Entity Type Selection and Validation

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Quality Metrics

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Test Relationships

Additional Information

Missing Scenarios Identified

TEST CASE 2: Entity Name and Code Auto-Generation Validation

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Quality Metrics

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Verification Points