Skip to main content

Settings (CIS01US07)

Total Test Cases: 20
Total Acceptance Criteria: 20
Coverage Percentage: 95%
  • Acceptance Criteria Not Covered: 1 (AC20 - Configuration backup & restore)


Test Scenario Summary

High-Level Test Scenarios Overview

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality Scenarios:

  1. Service Category Management (Create, Edit, Delete, Hierarchy)
  2. Service Configuration Management (CRUD Operations)
  3. Complaint Category Management (Create, Edit, Delete, Hierarchy)
  4. Complaint Type Configuration (CRUD Operations)
  5. SLA Configuration and Validation
  6. Search and Filter Functionality
  7. Import/Export Capabilities
  8. Navigation and Tab Management

Business Rules Scenarios:

  1. Category Hierarchy Validation (Parent-Child Relationships)
  2. Duplicate Prevention (Categories, Subcategories, Service Codes)
  3. SLA Time Validation (Response ≤ Resolution Time)
  4. Status Management (Active/Inactive Toggle)
  5. Code Format Validation
  6. Required Field Validation

User Journey Scenarios:

  1. Utility Administrator Complete Configuration Setup
  2. CSO Manager Performance Monitoring Workflow
  3. Cross-Platform Configuration Management
  4. Bulk Configuration Management

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance Scenarios:

  • Page load times < 3 seconds
  • Search response times < 1 second
  • Concurrent user handling (50+ users)
  • Large dataset handling (1000+ categories)

Security Scenarios:

  • Role-based access control validation
  • Session management testing
  • Data encryption verification
  • Input sanitization testing

Compatibility Scenarios:

  • Cross-browser testing (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
  • Cross-device testing (Desktop, Tablet, Mobile)
  • Screen resolution compatibility

Usability Scenarios:

  • Navigation flow testing
  • Error message clarity
  • Form validation feedback
  • User interface consistency

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions:

  • Maximum character limits for names/descriptions
  • Minimum/Maximum SLA time values
  • Category hierarchy depth limits
  • Concurrent modification handling

Invalid Input Scenarios:

  • Special characters in category names
  • Invalid time formats
  • Malformed service codes
  • SQL injection attempts

System Failure Scenarios:

  • Network interruption during save operations
  • Browser crashes during form submission
  • Session timeout handling
  • Database connection failures



Detailed Test Cases

SMOKE TEST SUITE (P1 Critical)



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_001

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_001
  • Title: Verify successful login and navigation to Service Categories
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Navigation & Authentication
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Navigation, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Core
HappyPath, AuthService, OnbService, CxService, Database, API, CrossModule

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: CX Web, Authentication Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication Service, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
  • Data_Requirements: Valid utility admin credentials

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Test environment deployed and accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin
  • Test_Data: Username: admin@pacificwater.com, Password: TestPass123!
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Environment validation completed

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to application URL

Login page displays within 3 seconds

https://app.utility-cx.com

Baseline performance check

2

Enter valid admin credentials

Fields accept input without errors

admin@pacificwater.com / TestPass123!

Verify credential validation

3

Click Login button

Successfully redirected to utility admin dashboard

N/A

Check authentication flow

4

Click on Bend to menu

Bend to menu should display

N/A

Verify all module name display

5

Click on Consumer Service module

System should navigate to Consumer service module

N/A

N/A

4

Click Settings menu item

Settings page loads with 2 main tabs (Services And Complaints)

N/A

Verify main navigation

5

Click Services tab

Services tab activates with 2 sub-tabs visible(categories and service configuration )

N/A

Check tab structure

6

Verify Categories sub-tab

Categories sub-tab is active by default

N/A

Default view validation

7

Verify Service Configuration sub-tab

Sub-tab is visible and clickable

N/A

Navigation option check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: User successfully reaches Service Categories page
  • Secondary_Verifications: All navigation elements are functional, page loads within performance baseline
  • Negative_Verification: No error messages displayed, no broken UI elements



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_002

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_002
  • Title: Create new water service category successfully
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Service Categories
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ServiceCategories, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: CX Web, Authentication Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Dependencies: Database, Authentication Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds save operation
  • Data_Requirements: Clean category dataset

Prerequisites:

  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin
  • Test_Data: Category Name: "Water Connection Services"
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Service Categories page

Page loads with category hierarchy view

N/A

Via CIS01US07_TC_001

2

Click "Add New Category" button

Add category form appears

N/A

Form display validation

3

Enter category name

Field accepts input, no validation errors

"Water Connection Services"

Water utility specific data

4

Click "Create Category" button

Category created successfully, form closes

N/A

Save operation timing

5

Verify category in hierarchy

New category appears in list with Active status

N/A

Data persistence check

6

Verify category properties

Shows "0 subcategories", Active toggle enabled of service category

N/A

Default state validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Category "Water Connection Services" is created and visible in hierarchy
  • Secondary_Verifications: Category has correct default status, form closes properly, no duplicate entries
  • Negative_Verification: No error messages, no system crashes



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_003

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_003
  • Title: Create new water connection service with SLA configuration
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Service Configuration
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ServiceConfig, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, SLA-Critical
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: CX Web, Authentication Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Results
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin
  • Related_Requirements: CIS01US07-AC01, Navigation Flow
  • Related_Bugs: N/A
  • Related_Test_Cases: N/A

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Dependencies: Service categories must exist
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds form submission

Prerequisites:

  • Test_Data: Service: "Residential Water Connection", Code: "RWC-NEW-001", Category: "Water Connection Services"
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Service Configuration tab

Service list page loads

N/A

Tab navigation

2

Click "Add New Service" button

Create service modal opens

N/A

Modal display

3

Enter service name

Field accepts input

"Residential Water Connection"

Water utility service

4

Enter service code

Field accepts unique code

"RWC-NEW-001"

Code format validation

5

Select service category

Dropdown shows available categories

"Water Connection Services"

Category dependency

6

Select service subcategory

Dropdown updates based on category

"New Installations"

Dynamic dropdown, Add subcategory in category

7

Set response time

Field accepts numeric value

24

SLA configuration

8

Set resolution time

Field accepts value > response time

72

Business rule validation

9

Configure workflow settings

Toggle field work required ON

Yes

Workflow configuration

10

10Choose Customer Notification

system by default should show Email Template but user can able to select SMS Template, SMS & Email and No notification from dropdown

N/A

This information display Backoffice user only

11

Choose Availability Settings

system by default should show 24/7 Availability but user can able to select Business hours only, Emergency only, Schedule only

N/A

This information display Backoffice user only

12

Click "Create Service" button

Service created successfully

N/A

Complete creation flow

1113

Verify in service list

New service appears with correct details

N/A

Data persistence

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Service "Residential Water Connection" created with SLA parameters
  • Secondary_Verifications: Service code is unique, SLA times are validated, workflow settings saved
  • Negative_Verification: Resolution time validation enforced (must be ≥ response time)



REGRESSION TEST SUITE (P1-P2 Priority)



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_004

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_004
  • Title: Verify service category hierarchy with subcategories creation up to 5 levels deep
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Service Categories
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ServiceCategories, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Integration-Core
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 40%
  • Integration_Points: Database, UI Components
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Hierarchy-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database, Authentication Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds category creation
  • Data_Requirements: Clean category database

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Category management system accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin
  • Test_Data: Parent category: "Water Distribution Services", Subcategories: "Meter Installation", "Meter Replacement", "Reconnections", "Service Upgrades", "Disconnections"
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_001, CIS01US07_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create parent category

Category created successfully

"Water Distribution Services"

Parent level

2

Click "+" button next to category

Subcategory form appears

N/A

Hierarchy expansion

3

Add first subcategory

Subcategory created under parent

"Meter Installation"

Child level 1

4

Add second subcategory

Second subcategory created

"Meter Replacement"

Child level 2

5

Add third subcategory

Add third subcategory

"Reconnections"

Child level 3


Add fourth subcategory

Add fourth subcategory

"Service Upgrades"

Child level 4


Add fifth subcategory

Add fifth subcategory

"Disconnections"

Child level 5

5

Verify parent category display

Shows "5 subcategories" count

N/A

Count accuracy

6

Test expand/collapse functionality

Subcategories show/hide correctly

N/A

UI behavior

7

Verify subcategory independence

Each subcategory has own Active toggle

N/A

Individual controls

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Category hierarchy displays correctly with proper parent-child relationships
  • Secondary_Verifications: Subcategory count accurate, expand/collapse works, individual controls functional
  • Negative_Verification: No duplicate subcategories created, no UI layout issues



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_005

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_005
  • Title: Validate SLA time business rules enforcement
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Service Configuration
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: AutomatedManual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ServiceConfig, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, SLA-Critical
Negative, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 50%
  • Integration_Points: SLA Engine, Validation Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: SLAValidation, BusinessRulesCxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Business-Rules, SLA-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation Service, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
  • Data_Requirements: Service configuration form access

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Service configuration module accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator accessAdmin
  • Test_Data: Response times: 48hrs, 24hrs, 72hrs; Resolution times: 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open Create Service form Service configuration

Form displays with SLA fields

N/A

Form initialization

2

Enter response time

Field accepts valid value

48

Valid response time

3

Enter resolution time less than response

Validation error displayed

24

Invalid: 24 < 48

4

Verify error message

Clear error message shown

"Resolution time must be ≥ Response time"

User guidance

5

Correct resolution time

Error clears, form submittable

72

Valid: 72 > 48

6

Test equal values

Both times equal should be valid

48/48

Boundary condition

7

Test zero values

Validation prevents zero/negative

0/-1

Invalid input handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: SLA business rules properly enforced (Resolution ≥ Response time)
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages displayed, form prevents invalid submissions
  • Negative_Verification: Cannot save service with invalid SLA configuration



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_006

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_006
  • Title: Verify complaint category and type creation workflow
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Complaint Management
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: AutomatedManual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ComplaintConfig, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical
HappyPath, Service(Auth, Onb, Cx), Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 60%
  • Integration_Points: Complaint Engine, Category Service, SLA Management
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ComplaintManagement, CategoryLinking, SLAConfigurationCxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: CSM
  • Report_Categories: Complaint-Management, End-to-End-Workflow
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Complaint Service, Category Service, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds form submission
  • Data_Requirements: Clean complaint configuration database

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Complaint management system accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator accessAdmin
  • Test_Data: Category: "Water Quality Issues", Subcategory: "Taste and Odor", Complaint: "Water Taste Complaint", Code: "WTC-TASTE-001"
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Complaints tab

Complaints section loads

N/A

Tab navigationnavigation,
CIS01US07_TC_001 must pass

2

Create complaint category

Category created successfully

"Water Quality Issues"

Complaint category

3

Add subcategory by click on plus icon on complaint category

Subcategory created under parent

"Taste and Odor"

Specific issue type

4

Navigate to Complaint Types

Types configuration page loads

N/A

Sub-tab navigation

5

Create complaint type

Type creation form opens

N/A

Type configuration

6

Configure basic information

Required fields completed

"Water Taste Complaint", "WTC-TASTE-001"

Water utility data

7

Set complaint classification

Category/subcategory selected

"Water Quality Issues"/"Taste and Odor"

Category linkage

8

Configure resolution timeframes

SLA times set appropriately

Ack: 2hrs, Response: 4hrs, Resolution: 24hrs

Complaint SLA

9

Set closure requirements

Customer confirmation required

Yes

Quality control

10

Set closure requirements

Quality Assurance Review

No

Quality control

10

Click on Create complaint type

TypeComplaint type should created successfully and appearsdisplay insuccessful listmessage

N/A

End-to-end workflow

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Complete complaint workflow from category creation to type configuration
  • Secondary_Verifications: Category-type linkage works, SLA configuration saved, closure requirements set
  • Negative_Verification: Cannot create type without category, SLA validation enforced



FULL TEST SUITE (All Priority Levels)



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_007

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_007
  • Title: Search and filter functionality across service configurations
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Search & Filter
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: AutomatedManual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-SearchFilter,Search, P2-High, Phase-Full, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Integration-Search
HappyPath, Service(Auth, Onb, Cx), Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 35%
  • Integration_Points: Search Engine, Filter Service, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: SearchModule, FilterLogic, DataRetrievalCxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Search-Functionality, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search Service, Database with test data
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second search response
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple services with varied properties

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Service configuration with multiple test services
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator accessAdmin
  • Test_Data: Services: "Water Connection", "RWC-NEW", various statuses and priorities
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_003 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Service Configuration page

Services list displays

N/A

Baseline state

2

Enter service name in search

Filtered results display

"Water Connection"

Name-based search

3

Clear search, enter service code

Code-based filtering works

"RWC-NEW"

Partial code match

4

Test case-insensitive search

Search works regardless of case

"water connection"

Case handling

5

Use filters dropdown

Filter options display

N/A

Filter availability

6

Apply status filter

Only active services shown

Active

Status filtering

7

Apply priority filter

Priority-specific results

High

Priority filtering

8

Combine search and filters

Combined filtering works

"Water" + High priority

Multiple criteria

96

Test empty search results

"No results" message displayed

"NonexistentService"

Empty state handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search and filter functionality works accurately across all criteria
  • Secondary_Verifications: Case-insensitive search, combined filters work, empty states handled
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect results returned, performance within acceptable limits



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_008

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_008
  • Title: Category import functionality validation
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Data Import
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-DataImport, P3-Medium, Phase-Full, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Integration-FileSystem
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database, API

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: File Upload Service, Data Validation, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ImportService, FileProcessor, DataValidator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Data-Import, Integration-Testing
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File Upload Service, Database, Import validation
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds import processing
  • Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid CSV files for testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Import functionality enabled, file upload permissions
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
  • Test_Data: categories_water_utility.csv, invalid.txt, malformed.csv
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click "Import Categories" button

File upload dialog opens

N/A

Import initiation

2

Select valid CSV file

File uploads successfully

categories_water_utility.csv

Water utility categories

3

Verify import preview

Categories preview correctly

See sample data below

Data validation

4

Confirm import

Categories imported to system

N/A

Import completion

5

Verify in category list

Imported categories visible

N/A

Data persistence

6

Test invalid file format

Error message displayed

.txt file

Format validation

7

Test malformed CSV

Validation errors shown

Invalid CSV structure

Error handling

Sample Import Data:

Category Name,Parent Category,Status

Billing Services,,Active

Account Management,Billing Services,Active

Payment Processing,Billing Services,Active

Emergency Services,,Active

Water Main Breaks,Emergency Services,Active


Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Valid CSV files import successfully with correct data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Import preview accurate, invalid files rejected, data persisted
  • Negative_Verification: Malformed files generate appropriate error messages



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_009

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_009
  • Title: Concurrent user modification conflict handling
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Concurrency Control
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ConcurrencyControl, P2-High, Phase-Full, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Integration-SessionManagement
Negative, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Session Management, Conflict Detection, Database Locking
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ConcurrencyManager, ConflictResolver, SessionHandlerCxBackoffice
  • Requirement_Coverage: Partial
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Concurrency-Testing, Data-Integrity
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes# CIS01US07

    Requirements -Traceability:
  • Related_Requirements: CIS01US07-AC19
  • Related_Bugs: N/A
  • Related_Test_Cases: CIS01US07_TC_003

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search Service, Database with test data
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second search response
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple services with varied properties

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Service &configuration Complaintswith Configurationmultiple Systemtest Testservices
  • User_Roles_Permissions: SuiteUtility Admin
  • Test_Data: Services: "Water Connection", "RWC-NEW", various statuses and priorities
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CIS01US03


Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

User A opens service for editing

Edit form loads

"EmergencyResidential RepairWater Connection Service"

First user session
First create

2

User B opens same service

Edit form loads independently

Same service

Second user session

3

User A modifies response time

Change saved successfully

2 hours → 1 hour

First modification

4

User B modifies priority level

Conflict detection occurs

Normal → High

Concurrent modification

5

Verify conflict resolution

Appropriate conflict message

"Service modified by another user"

Conflict handling

6

User B refreshes data

Latest changes loaded

Updated response time visible

Data refresh

7

User B reapplies changes

Changes saved successfully

Priority: High

Conflict resolution



PERFORMANCE TEST SCENARIOS



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_010

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_010
  • Title: Page load performance validation under normal load
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Database, UI Components, Search Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: PageRenderer, DataLoader, SearchModule
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database with 100+ test records, Performance monitoring tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Page loads < 3 seconds, Search < 1 second
  • Data_Requirements: Large dataset for realistic performance testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled, large test dataset loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
  • Test_Data: 100+ categories, 200+ services, 150+ complaint types
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Environment performance baseline established

Performance Benchmarks:

  • Service Categories page load: < 3 seconds
  • Service Configuration page load: < 3 seconds
  • Search response time: < 1 second
  • Form submission: < 2 seconds

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Performance Target

Comments

1

Load Service Categories page

Page loads completely

< 3 seconds

Cold load performance

2

Navigate between sub-tabs

Tab switching responsive

< 0.5 seconds

UI responsiveness

3

Perform search operation

Results display quickly

< 1 second

Search performance

4

Open service creation form

Modal opens responsively

< 0.5 seconds

Form load time

5

Submit service creation

Save operation completes

< 2 seconds

Transaction performance

6

Load large category list

Page handles 100+ categories

< 3 seconds

Data volume handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All page loads meet performance benchmarks under normal load
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI remains responsive, search performance acceptable, forms load quickly
  • Negative_Verification: No timeouts or performance degradation beyond acceptable limits



API TEST CASES (Critical Level ≥7)



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_011

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_011
  • Title: Service Category API CRUD operations validation
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Service Categories API
  • Test Type: API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ServiceCategoriesAPI, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Integration-API
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Integration
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 80%
  • Integration_Points: API Gateway, Database, Authentication Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CategoryAPI, CRUDOperations, DataValidation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: API

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: API-Testing, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: API Testing Tool (Postman/Newman)
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: N/A
  • Dependencies: API Gateway, Database, Authentication tokens
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
  • Data_Requirements: Valid API authentication tokens

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, authentication configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: API access with admin privileges
  • Test_Data: API tokens, category data: "Water Billing Services"
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication API must be functional

API Endpoints Tested:

  • POST /api/v1/service-categories
  • GET /api/v1/service-categories
  • PUT /api/v1/service-categories/{id}
  • DELETE /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

Test Procedure:

Step #

API Call

Expected Response

Test Data

Validation

1

POST /api/v1/service-categories

201 Created

{"name": "Water Billing Services", "status": "active"}

Category creation

2

GET /api/v1/service-categories

200 OK, category in list

N/A

Retrieve validation

3

PUT /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

200 OK

{"name": "Updated Billing Services"}

Update operation

4

DELETE /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

204 No Content

N/A

Deletion validation

5

GET /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

404 Not Found

N/A

Deletion confirmation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All CRUD operations execute successfully with correct HTTP status codes
  • Secondary_Verifications: Response times within limits, data persistence verified, error handling correct
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid requests return appropriate error codes and messages



SECURITY TEST SCENARIOS



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_012

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_012
  • Title: Input sanitization and SQL injection prevention
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Security
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Critical, Business-Critical, Integration-Security
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Critical
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Critical
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 90%
  • Integration_Points: Input Validation, Database Security, Authentication
  • Code_Module_Mapped: InputSanitizer, SecurityValidator, XSSProtection
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Testing, Vulnerability-Assessment
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Security scanning tools, Database monitoring
  • Performance_Baseline: Security validation < 100ms
  • Data_Requirements: Malicious input test vectors

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Security monitoring enabled, SQL injection detection tools
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access for testing
  • Test_Data: Malicious inputs: SQL injection strings, XSS payloads, oversized inputs
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Malicious Input

Comments

1

Attempt SQL injection in category name

Input sanitized, no DB compromise

"'; DROP TABLE categories; --"

SQL injection test

2

Test XSS in service description

Script tags escaped

"<script>alert('XSS')</script>"

XSS prevention

3

Test oversized input

Validation error returned

1000+ character string

Buffer overflow test

4

Test special characters

Characters properly handled

"Category & <Service> #1"

Character encoding

5

Verify CSRF protection

Token validation enforced

N/A

CSRF prevention

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs properly sanitized without compromising system security
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages don't reveal system information, CSRF tokens validated
  • Negative_Verification: No successful injection attacks, no data exposure, no system compromise

Test Casecase- 1: Business HoursVerify SLA Calculationcalculation CIS01US07_TC_013using business hours configuration

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_013CIS01US07_TC_09

Title

Verify SLA calculation using business hours configuration

Created By

SDETYash

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - SLA Configuration

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P2 (High)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

sla, business-hours, calculation, settings HappyPath, Database

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC03 - Business hours and 24/7 time calculations

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-SLA-003, TC-SET-SLA-005

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Service configuration module, SLA engine

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

Business hours configured (9 AM - 5 PM, Mon-Fri)

User Roles/Permissions

Utility AdministratorAdmin

Test Data

Service category with 8-hour business hours SLA

Prior Test Cases

TC-SET-CAT-002 (Category creation)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Utility Administrator

Dashboard displayed with configuration access

admin@utility.com / Password123!

Verify admin role permissions

2

Navigate to Settings > Service Configuration

Service configuration page displayed

N/A

Check page load and navigation

3

Click "Add New Service" button

Service creation form displayed

N/A

Verify form availability

4

Fill service details with business hours SLA

Service form populated with required fields

Service: "Meter Reading", Category: "Billing Support", Response Time: 8 hours

Use existing category

5

Select "Business Hours Only" option

Business hours calculation enabled

Business Hours: Mon-Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Verify toggle state

6

Save service configuration

Service saved with business hours SLA calculation

N/A

Check confirmation message

7

Create test service request on Friday at 4 PM

Service request created with Friday 4 PM timestamp

Request time: Friday 16:00

Simulate real-world scenario

8

Verify SLA deadline calculation

SLA deadline shows Monday 12 PM (next business day + 4 hours)

Expected deadline: Monday 12:00 PM

Weekend hours excluded from calculation

9

Create another request on Wednesday at 2 PM

Service request created with Wednesday 2 PM timestamp

Request time: Wednesday 14:00

Test mid-week calculation

10

Verify SLA deadline for mid-week request

SLA deadline shows Thursday 10 AM (next business day + 8 hours)

Expected deadline: Thursday 10:00 AM

Normal business day calculation

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: SLA deadlines correctly exclude non-business hours and weekends
  • Secondary Verifications: Business hours configuration is applied consistently, Different time scenarios calculate correctly
  • Negative Verification: Weekend and after-hours time is not counted in SLA calculations



Test Case 2: 24/7 SLA Calculation

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_014

Title

Verify SLA calculation using 24/7 availability configuration

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification




Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - SLA Configuration

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P2 (High)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

sla, 24x7, calculation, emergency, HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC03 - Business hours and 24/7 time calculations

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-SLA-009

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Service configuration module, SLA engine

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

24/7 service configuration available

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator

Test Data

Emergency service category with 4-hour SLA

Prior Test Cases

TC-SET-CAT-002

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Utility Administrator

Dashboard displayed with admin access

admin@utility.com / Password123!

Verify admin permissions

2

Navigate to Service Configuration

Service list and configuration options displayed

N/A

Check module accessibility

3

Create new emergency service

Service creation form opened

N/A

Emergency service setup

4

Configure service with 24/7 availability

Service form shows 24/7 option selected

Service: "Emergency Repair", Response Time: 4 hours, Availability: 24/7

Critical service configuration

5

Set SLA to 4 hours response time

SLA parameters configured for continuous operation

Resolution Time: 8 hours

Emergency response standards

6

Save 24/7 service configuration

Service saved with continuous availability

N/A

Verify save operation

7

Create service request on Saturday at 11 PM

Request created with weekend late-night timestamp

Request time: Saturday 23:00

Test weekend scenario

8

Verify SLA deadline calculation

SLA deadline shows Sunday 3 AM (exactly 4 hours later)

Expected deadline: Sunday 03:00 AM

All hours counted including weekends

9

Create request on Sunday at 6 AM

Service request with Sunday morning timestamp

Request time: Sunday 06:00

Test Sunday morning

10

Verify continuous SLA calculation

SLA deadline shows Sunday 10 AM (4 hours from creation)

Expected deadline: Sunday 10:00 AM

No business hour restrictions

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: 24/7 SLA calculations include all hours and days
  • Secondary Verifications: Weekend and holiday hours are counted, Continuous time calculation works correctly
  • Negative Verification: No business hour restrictions are applied



Test Case 3: Automatic Routing Rules Configuration (AC07)

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_015

Title

Configure automatic routing rules based on service category and priority

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - Routing Configuration

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P2 (High)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Planned for Automation

Tags

routing, automation, priority, assignment

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC07 - Automatic routing rules based on category and priority

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-CAT-002, TC-SET-SLA-003

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

User management system, Service categories

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

Multiple user roles and departments configured

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator

Test Data

Categories: Emergency Repairs, Billing Support; Users: Field Team, Customer Service

Prior Test Cases

User role setup completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access routing configuration module

Routing rules management interface displayed

N/A

Check module availability

2

Select "Emergency Repairs" category

Category selected for routing rule creation

Category: Emergency Repairs

High priority category

3

Set routing rule for Emergency + Critical priority

Rule creation form opened

Priority: Critical, Assign to: Field Emergency Team

Critical priority handling

4

Configure notification settings

Notification options displayed and configured

Notify: Team Lead, SMS + Email

Multi-channel notifications

5

Save emergency routing rule

Rule saved successfully with confirmation

N/A

Verify rule persistence

6

Create routing rule for Billing category

New rule form for billing services

Category: Billing Support, Priority: Normal, Assign to: Customer Service Team

Standard priority routing

7

Set escalation trigger for billing

Escalation configuration added

Escalate after: 24 hours, To: Billing Supervisor

Time-based escalation

8

Test emergency request routing

Create test emergency request

Service: Emergency Repair, Priority: Critical

Simulate real request

9

Verify automatic assignment

Request automatically assigned to Field Emergency Team

Expected assignee: Field Emergency Team

Check routing accuracy

10

Test billing request routing

Create test billing request

Service: Bill Dispute, Priority: Normal

Standard routing test

11

Verify billing assignment

Request assigned to Customer Service Team

Expected assignee: Customer Service Team

Verify rule application

12

Verify notification triggers

Check that appropriate notifications were sent

Expected: SMS + Email to Team Lead

Communication verification

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Requests are automatically routed to correct teams based on category and priority
  • Secondary Verifications: Notifications are sent to designated recipients, Escalation rules are properly configured
  • Negative Verification: Requests are not assigned to inappropriate teams



Test Case 4: Priority-Based Routing Rules (AC07)

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_016

Title

Verify routing rule hierarchy based on priority levels

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - Priority Routing

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

Integration

Priority

P2 (High)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

routing, priority, hierarchy, assignment

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC07 - Automatic routing based on priority

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-ROUTE-011

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Priority system, Team assignments

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

Multiple priority levels and corresponding teams configured

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator

Test Data

Priorities: Critical, High, Normal, Low; Teams: Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 Support

Prior Test Cases

TC-SET-ROUTE-011

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Configure Critical priority routing

Critical requests route to senior specialists

Priority: Critical → Senior Field Team

Highest priority handling

2

Configure High priority routing

High priority requests route to experienced team

Priority: High → Level 2 Support Team

Experienced staff assignment

3

Configure Normal priority routing

Normal requests route to standard team

Priority: Normal → Level 1 Support Team

Standard workflow

4

Configure Low priority routing

Low priority uses queue-based assignment

Priority: Low → Available Team Member

Load balancing

5

Create Critical priority test request

Request generated with critical classification

Category: Water Outage, Priority: Critical

Emergency scenario

6

Verify Critical routing

Request immediately assigned to Senior Field Team

Expected: Senior Field Team assignment within 5 minutes

Rapid response verification

7

Create High priority test request

Request with high priority classification

Category: Pressure Issue, Priority: High

Important but not emergency

8

Verify High priority routing

Request assigned to Level 2 Support within SLA

Expected: Level 2 assignment within 15 minutes

Timely assignment check

9

Create multiple Normal priority requests

Several normal priority requests submitted

Category: Billing Query, Priority: Normal (x3)

Standard load testing

10

Verify Normal priority distribution

Requests distributed among Level 1 Support team

Expected: Even distribution among available Level 1 staff

Load balancing verification

11

Test priority override scenario

Create request and manually change priority

Initial: Normal → Changed to: Critical

Priority escalation test

12

Verify routing rule updates

System re-routes request based on new priority

Expected: Request moved from Level 1 to Senior Field Team

Dynamic routing capability

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Routing rules correctly prioritize requests based on configured hierarchy
  • Secondary Verifications: Priority changes trigger re-routing, Load balancing works for same priority requests
  • Negative Verification: Lower priority requests don't bypass higher priority routing



Test Case 5: Template-Based SLA Configuration (AC09)

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_017

Title

Configure SLA using predefined templates for common utility services

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - SLA Templates

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P3 (Medium)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

sla, templates, configuration, efficiency

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC09 - Template-based SLA configuration

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-SLA-003

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Template library, SLA configuration module

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

SLA templates library available

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator

Test Data

Templates: Emergency Response, Standard Service, Billing Support

Prior Test Cases

Basic SLA configuration tested

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access SLA Templates library

Template selection interface displayed

N/A

Check template availability

2

View "Emergency Response" template

Template details shown with predefined parameters

Template: Response 2hrs, Resolution 8hrs, Escalation 1hr

Pre-configured emergency settings

3

Select Emergency Response template

Template applied to new service configuration

N/A

Template selection process

4

Customize template parameters

Allow modification of template values

Modify Response: 2hrs → 1hr

Template flexibility

5

Save customized emergency service

Service created with modified template values

Service: "Gas Leak Response"

Emergency service setup

6

Apply "Standard Service" template

Standard template loaded with default values

Template: Response 24hrs, Resolution 72hrs, Escalation 48hrs

Standard service parameters

7

Use template without modification

Service created with exact template parameters

Service: "Routine Maintenance"

Template as-is usage

8

Create custom template from existing service

New template saved based on configured service

Template name: "Custom Billing SLA"

Template creation feature

9

Apply newly created custom template

Custom template available for selection

Use for: "Account Adjustment Service"

Template reusability

10

Verify template consistency

Multiple services using same template have identical SLA parameters

Compare: 3 services using Standard Service template

Consistency check

11

Test template modification impact

Update base template and check affected services

Modify Standard Service template: Resolution 72hrs → 96hrs

Template update propagation

12

Verify services updated or flagged

Services show updated values or require manual confirmation

Expected: Services flagged for review or auto-updated

Change management

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Templates correctly apply predefined SLA parameters to services
  • Secondary Verifications: Templates can be customized, Custom templates can be created and reused
  • Negative Verification: Template changes don't break existing service configurations



Test Case 6: Configuration Change Audit Logging (AC10)

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_018

Title

Verify comprehensive audit logging of all configuration changes

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - Audit & Compliance

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P1 (Critical)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

audit, logging, compliance, tracking

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC10 - Audit logs with user identification and timestamps

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

All configuration test cases

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Audit system, User authentication

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

Audit logging enabled

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator, CSO Manager

Test Data

Multiple user accounts for testing

Prior Test Cases

User authentication working

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Utility Administrator

Admin dashboard displayed

admin1@utility.com

First admin user

2

Create new service category

Category created successfully

Category: "Infrastructure Maintenance"

Configuration change action

3

Access audit log immediately

Audit entry created for category creation

Log entry should show: User, Timestamp, Action, Details

Real-time logging

4

Verify audit log details

Complete information logged correctly

Expected: User ID, Action "Category Created", Timestamp, Category Name

Comprehensive logging

5

Login as different administrator

Second admin session established

admin2@utility.com

Different user test

6

Modify existing category

Category modification completed

Change: Category status Active → Inactive

Modification tracking

7

Check audit trail for modification

Modification logged with new user details

Expected: Different User ID, "Category Modified", Before/After values

User attribution

8

Configure SLA parameters

SLA settings updated

Service: Response time 24hrs → 12hrs

SLA change logging

9

Verify SLA change audit

SLA modification details logged

Expected: Field changed, Old value, New value, User, Timestamp

Detailed change tracking

10

Delete a test category

Category deletion performed

Category: "Test Category"

Deletion audit test

11

Confirm deletion audit entry

Deletion logged with complete details

Expected: "Category Deleted", Category details preserved in log

Deletion tracking

12

Generate audit report

Report generated with date range filter

Date range: Last 24 hours

Audit reporting functionality

13

Verify report completeness

All performed actions appear in chronological order

Expected: All 5 actions logged in sequence

Complete audit trail

14

Test audit log immutability

Attempt to modify audit log entries

Expected: Audit logs cannot be edited or deleted

Data integrity

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: All configuration changes are logged with complete details
  • Secondary Verifications: User identification is accurate, Timestamps are precise and consistent
  • Negative Verification: Audit logs cannot be tampered with or deleted



Test Case 7: Audit Log User Attribution (AC10)

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_019

Title

Verify accurate user attribution in audit logs across different roles

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - User Attribution

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P1 (Critical)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

audit, user-attribution, roles, security

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC10 - User identification in audit logs

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-AUDIT-014

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Multi-user system, Role management

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

Multiple user roles configured

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator, CSO Manager, System Admin

Test Data

3 different user accounts with different roles

Prior Test Cases

Role-based access control configured

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Utility Administrator

Admin access granted

utiladmin@company.com

Primary admin role

2

Create service category

Category created and logged

Category: "Utility Admin Test"

Admin-level action

3

Check audit log for user details

Audit shows Utility Administrator role and full user details

Expected: User ID, Full Name, Role, Email

Complete user identification

4

Logout and login as CSO Manager

CSO Manager dashboard displayed

csomanager@company.com

Different role login

5

Attempt configuration change

CSO Manager performs allowed action

Action: View configuration details

Role-appropriate action

6

Verify CSO Manager audit entry

Audit log shows CSO Manager role and permissions

Expected: Different User ID, CSO Manager role

Role differentiation

7

Login as System Administrator

System Admin access confirmed

sysadmin@company.com

Highest privilege role

8

Perform system-level configuration

System-wide setting modified

Action: Update system SLA defaults

System-level change

9

Check system admin audit trail

Audit reflects System Administrator privileges

Expected: System Admin role, System-level action type

Privilege level tracking

10

Generate comprehensive audit report

Report includes actions from all three roles

Date range: Today

Multi-role audit summary

11

Verify role-based audit separation

Each action clearly attributed to correct role and user

Expected: Clear role identification for each entry

Role clarity

12

Test concurrent user actions

Multiple users perform actions simultaneously

2 admins + 1 CSO Manager concurrent actions

Concurrent attribution test

13

Verify concurrent audit accuracy

All concurrent actions properly attributed to correct users

Expected: No attribution mix-ups

Concurrency handling

14

Test session timeout audit

Perform action after session timeout and re-login

Session timeout → re-login → action

Session management audit

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: Each audit entry accurately identifies the performing user and their role
  • Secondary Verifications: Role-based permissions are reflected in audit logs, Concurrent actions don't cause attribution errors
  • Negative Verification: Actions are never attributed to wrong users or generic system accounts



Test Case 8: Circular Reference Validation (AC12)

Test Case Metadata

Field

Value

Test Case ID

CIS01US07_TC_020

Title

Prevent circular references in category hierarchy creation

Created By

SDET

Created Date

2025-06-05

Last Updated By

SDET

Last Updated Date

2025-06-05

Version

1.0

Classification

Field

Value

Module/Feature

Settings - Category Validation

Test Type

Functional

Test Level

System

Priority

P2 (High)

Execution Phase

Regression

Automation Status

Manual

Tags

validation, hierarchy, circular-reference, data-integrity

Requirements Traceability

Field

Value

Related Requirements

AC12 - Circular reference validation

Related Bugs

N/A

Related Test Cases

TC-SET-CAT-002, TC-SET-CAT-004

Test Environment

Field

Value

Environment

QA

Browser/Version

Chrome 115+

Device/OS

Windows 10/11

Screen Resolution

1920x1080

Dependencies

Category hierarchy system, Validation engine

Prerequisites

Field

Value

Setup Requirements

Multi-level category hierarchy exists

User Roles/Permissions

Utility Administrator

Test Data

Categories: Parent A → Child B → Grandchild C

Prior Test Cases

Basic category creation working

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create parent category "Maintenance"

Parent category created successfully

Category: "Maintenance Services"

Top-level category

2

Create child category under Maintenance

Child category created with proper parent link

Child: "Emergency Repairs" → Parent: "Maintenance Services"

Second level category

3

Create grandchild category

Third level category established

Grandchild: "Water Line Breaks" → Parent: "Emergency Repairs"

Third level depth

4

Attempt to set "Maintenance" as child of "Water Line Breaks"

System prevents circular reference

Error expected: "Circular reference detected"

Direct circular reference test

5

Verify error message displayed

Clear error message explaining circular reference issue

Expected message: "Cannot set parent category - would create circular reference"

User-friendly error

6

Try to set "Emergency Repairs" as child of "Water Line Breaks"

System blocks the circular reference

Error expected: Parent-child relationship validation failed

Indirect circular reference

7

Attempt complex circular reference

Create longer chain and try to close the loop

A→B→C→D, then try D→A

Complex circular reference test

8

Verify system detects complex circular reference

System prevents multi-level circular reference

Expected: Validation catches indirect circular reference

Advanced validation test

9

Test category modification for circular reference

Try to change existing category's parent to create circle

Change "Maintenance" parent to "Water Line Breaks"

Modification-based circular reference

10

Verify modification blocked

System prevents modification that would create circular reference

Expected: Modification rejected with explanation

Change validation

11

Create valid category hierarchy

System allows valid non-circular hierarchy creation

Categories: Service A, Service B, Service C (parallel structure)

Positive validation test

12

Verify valid hierarchy accepted

System accepts valid category structure without issues

Expected: All categories created successfully

Validation accuracy

13

Test edge case: self-reference

Try to set category as its own parent

Set "Maintenance" parent as "Maintenance"

Self-reference prevention

14

Verify self-reference blocked

System prevents category from being its own parent

Expected: "Category cannot be its own parent" error

Self-reference validation

Verification Points

  • Primary Verification: System prevents all forms of circular references in category hierarchies
  • Secondary Verifications: Error messages are clear and helpful, Valid hierarchies are not blocked
  • Negative Verification: No circular references can be created through any method


PERFORMANCE TEST SCENARIOS



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_010

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_010
  • Title: Page load performance validation under normal load
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100%
  • Integration_Points: Database, UI Components, Search Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: PageRenderer, DataLoader, SearchModule
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database with 100+ test records, Performance monitoring tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Page loads < 3 seconds, Search < 1 second
  • Data_Requirements: Large dataset for realistic performance testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled, large test dataset loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
  • Test_Data: 100+ categories, 200+ services, 150+ complaint types
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Environment performance baseline established

Performance Benchmarks:

  • Service Categories page load: < 3 seconds
  • Service Configuration page load: < 3 seconds
  • Search response time: < 1 second
  • Form submission: < 2 seconds

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Performance Target

Comments

1

Load Service Categories page

Page loads completely

< 3 seconds

Cold load performance

2

Navigate between sub-tabs

Tab switching responsive

< 0.5 seconds

UI responsiveness

3

Perform search operation

Results display quickly

< 1 second

Search performance

4

Open service creation form

Modal opens responsively

< 0.5 seconds

Form load time

5

Submit service creation

Save operation completes

< 2 seconds

Transaction performance

6

Load large category list

Page handles 100+ categories

< 3 seconds

Data volume handling

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All page loads meet performance benchmarks under normal load
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI remains responsive, search performance acceptable, forms load quickly
  • Negative_Verification: No timeouts or performance degradation beyond acceptable limits



API TEST CASES (Critical Level ≥7)



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_011

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_011
  • Title: Service Category API CRUD operations validation
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Service Categories API
  • Test Type: API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-ServiceCategoriesAPI, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Integration-API
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Integration
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 80%
  • Integration_Points: API Gateway, Database, Authentication Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CategoryAPI, CRUDOperations, DataValidation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: API

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: API-Testing, Integration-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: API Testing Tool (Postman/Newman)
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: N/A
  • Dependencies: API Gateway, Database, Authentication tokens
  • Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
  • Data_Requirements: Valid API authentication tokens

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, authentication configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: API access with admin privileges
  • Test_Data: API tokens, category data: "Water Billing Services"
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication API must be functional

API Endpoints Tested:

  • POST /api/v1/service-categories
  • GET /api/v1/service-categories
  • PUT /api/v1/service-categories/{id}
  • DELETE /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

Test Procedure:

Step #

API Call

Expected Response

Test Data

Validation

1

POST /api/v1/service-categories

201 Created

{"name": "Water Billing Services", "status": "active"}

Category creation

2

GET /api/v1/service-categories

200 OK, category in list

N/A

Retrieve validation

3

PUT /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

200 OK

{"name": "Updated Billing Services"}

Update operation

4

DELETE /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

204 No Content

N/A

Deletion validation

5

GET /api/v1/service-categories/{id}

404 Not Found

N/A

Deletion confirmation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All CRUD operations execute successfully with correct HTTP status codes
  • Secondary_Verifications: Response times within limits, data persistence verified, error handling correct
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid requests return appropriate error codes and messages



SECURITY TEST SCENARIOS



Test Case CIS01US07_TC_012

Test Case Metadata:

  • Test Case ID: CIS01US07_TC_012
  • Title: Input sanitization and SQL injection prevention
  • Created By: QA Team
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Security
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Critical, Business-Critical, Integration-Security
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Critical
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Critical
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 90%
  • Integration_Points: Input Validation, Database Security, Authentication
  • Code_Module_Mapped: InputSanitizer, SecurityValidator, XSSProtection
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Testing, Vulnerability-Assessment
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Security scanning tools, Database monitoring
  • Performance_Baseline: Security validation < 100ms
  • Data_Requirements: Malicious input test vectors

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Security monitoring enabled, SQL injection detection tools
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access for testing
  • Test_Data: Malicious inputs: SQL injection strings, XSS payloads, oversized inputs
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Malicious Input

Comments

1

Attempt SQL injection in category name

Input sanitized, no DB compromise

"'; DROP TABLE categories; --"

SQL injection test

2

Test XSS in service description

Script tags escaped

"<script>alert('XSS')</script>"

XSS prevention

3

Test oversized input

Validation error returned

1000+ character string

Buffer overflow test

4

Test special characters

Characters properly handled

"Category & <Service> #1"

Character encoding

5

Verify CSRF protection

Token validation enforced

N/A

CSRF prevention

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs properly sanitized without compromising system security
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages don't reveal system information, CSRF tokens validated
  • Negative_Verification: No successful injection attacks, no data exposure, no system compromise

Test Case 1: Business Hours SLA Calculation


Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite (Execution: Every Build)

  • CIS01US07_TC_001: Basic Navigation
  • CIS01US07_TC_002: Service Category Creation
  • CIS01US07_TC_003: Service Configuration Creation

Execution Time: ~10 minutes Automation Rate: 100%

Regression Test Suite (Execution: Before Release)

  • All Smoke tests +
  • CIS01US07_TC_004: Category Hierarchy
  • CIS01US07_TC_005: SLA Validation
  • CIS01US07_TC_006: Complaint Workflow
  • CIS01US07_TC_009: Concurrent Users

Execution Time: ~45 minutes Automation Rate: 95%

Full Test Suite (Execution: Weekly/Major Release)

  • All Regression tests +
  • CIS01US07_TC_007: Search & Filter
  • CIS01US07_TC_008: Import Functionality
  • CIS01US07_TC_010: Performance Tests
  • CIS01US07_TC_011: API Tests
  • CIS01US07_TC_012: Security Tests

Execution Time: ~2 hours Automation Rate: 85%



Execution Matrix

Test Case

Chrome

Firefox

Safari

Edge

Mobile

Priority

TC_001-003

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

P1

TC_004-006

✓

✓

-

✓

✓

P1-P2

TC_007-009

✓

✓

-

-

-

P2-P3

TC_010-012

✓

-

-

-

-

P1-P2



Integration Test Dependencies

External Dependencies:

  • Authentication Service (CX Core)
  • Database Service
  • File Upload Service

Test Execution Order:

  1. Prerequisites: Authentication & Environment
  2. Core Features: Categories → Services → Complaints
  3. Advanced Features: Search, Import, Performance
  4. Security & Edge Cases: Final validation

Failure Handling:

  • Skip dependent tests when prerequisites fail
  • Log all dependency failures for analysis
  • Provide alternative test paths where possible



Water Utility Test Data Sets

Service Categories:

Water Connection Services

├── New Installations

├── Reconnections

├── Service Upgrades

└── Disconnections


Water Quality Services

├── Testing & Analysis

├── Treatment Issues

└── Contamination Response


Billing & Payment Services

├── Account Management

├── Payment Processing

└── Dispute Resolution


Sample Services:

Residential Water Connection (RWC-NEW-001)

Commercial Water Installation (CWI-NEW-001)

Emergency Water Shutoff (EWS-EMRG-001)

Water Quality Testing (WQT-TEST-001)

Billing Inquiry Resolution (BIR-SUPP-001)


Complaint Types:

Low Water Pressure (LWP-PRES-001)

Water Quality Issues (WQI-QUAL-001)

Billing Disputes (BD-BILL-001)

Service Interruptions (SI-SERV-001)


This comprehensive test suite covers all functional requirements, business rules, and quality attributes while providing complete support for the 17 BrowserStack test management reports through detailed tagging and classification.



Back to top