Settings--Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)

Condition Parameters Management - Complete Test Suite (AX04US03)

Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

1. Core Parameter Management - Create, Read, Update, Delete operations
2. Weighted Scoring System - Weight assignment and percentage calculations
3. Total Weightage Validation - 100% validation and visual indicators
4. Search Functionality - Parameter search and filtering
5. Inline Editing - Direct edit mode from list view
6. Modal Operations - Add new parameter workflow
7. Business Rule Enforcement - Uniqueness, mandatory fields, weight ranges

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

1. Performance - Page load, calculation speed, concurrent users
2. Security - Authentication, authorization, data protection
3. Compatibility - Cross-browser, cross-device, responsive design
4. Usability - User experience, navigation, error handling
5. Reliability - Data integrity, calculation accuracy, system stability

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

1. Boundary Conditions - Min/max weight values, character limits
2. Invalid Inputs - Malformed data, SQL injection attempts
3. System Failures - Network timeouts, service unavailability
4. Data Inconsistencies - Duplicate parameters, corrupted calculations

---

DETAILED TEST CASES WITH COMPLETE COVERAGE

Test Case 1: Add New Condition Parameter - Happy Path

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_001
• Title: Successfully add a new condition parameter with valid data and verify percentage calculations
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Negative, Consumer, Billing, Meter, Onboarding, Auth-Services, Api, Database, CrossModule, MOD-ConditionParams, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 30% of total Condition Parameters feature
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Happy-path
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Feature-Progress
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-1 (Add new parameter), AC-11 (Parameter Name mandatory), AC-13 (Modal closes on success), Section 7.B (Modal validation rules), Section 4 (Weighted scoring system)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_002 (Duplicate validation), AX04US03_TC_008 (Total weightage calculation)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, PostgreSQL Database 13+, Redis Cache 6.2+
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for modal load, < 500ms for calculation
• Data_Requirements: Clean parameter list with Total Weightage < 100%, at least 2 existing parameters

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Staging environment accessible
  • Test database seeded with sample parameters
  • Asset Manager role configured with full CRUD permissions
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Create, Read, Update, Delete permissions for Condition Parameters
• Test_Data:
• • Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
  • Password: TestPass123!
  • Company: Pacific Northwest Utility Corp
  • Tax ID: 91-1234567
  • Existing Parameters: "External Surface Condition" (15.0%), "Age" (20.0%), "Failure Frequency" (25.0%)
• Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication test must pass, navigation test must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open browser and navigate to login page	Login page loads within 3 seconds	URL: https://staging.utilityassets.com/login	Verify SSL certificate
2	Enter Asset Manager credentials and click Login	Successful authentication, redirect to dashboard	Email: asset.manager@pacificutility.com, Password: TestPass123!	Check for MFA if enabled
3	Verify dashboard loads and user role	Dashboard displays with Asset Manager permissions visible	N/A	Confirm "Settings" menu available
4	Navigate to Settings → Condition Parameters	Condition Parameters page loads showing breadcrumb and existing parameters	URL: /settings/condition-parameters	Verify breadcrumb: Dashboard > Settings > condition-parameters
5	Verify existing parameters and Total Weightage	Current parameters listed with individual percentages, Total Weightage shows < 100% in red	Expected: External Surface Condition (15.0%), Age (20.0%), Failure Frequency (25.0%), Total: 60.0% (red)	Record baseline for comparison
6	Click "+ Add New Condition Parameter" button	Modal opens with title "Add New Condition Parameter", form fields visible	N/A	Modal should be centered, overlay background dimmed
7	Verify modal form structure	Parameter Name field (mandatory), Description text area, Weight Score slider (1-5)	N/A	Check field labels and required indicators
8	Enter Parameter Name	Field accepts input, no immediate validation errors	"Operational Performance"	Verify character limit (if any)
9	Enter Description in text area	Multi-line text accepted, character count updates if shown	"Assessment of efficiency, output, and adherence to operational standards for optimal asset performance."	Test multi-line functionality
10	Set Weight Score using slider	Slider moves to position 4, label updates to "Weight Score: 4/5"	Value: 4	Verify visual feedback and smooth movement
11	Click "Add Parameter" button	Modal shows loading state briefly, then closes automatically	N/A	No error messages displayed
12	Verify new parameter appears in list	"Operational Performance" appears with calculated percentage	Expected: ~26.7% (4 out of new total 15)	Verify alphabetical or chronological order
13	Verify all percentage recalculations	All existing parameters show updated percentages	External Surface: 20.0%, Age: 26.7%, Failure Frequency: 33.3%, Operational Performance: 26.7%	Math: (3/15)*100, (4/15)*100, (5/15)*100, (4/15)*100
14	Verify Total Weightage update	Total Weightage displays 100.0% in green color	Total: 100.0% (green text)	Color change from red to green
15	Refresh page and verify persistence	All parameters and percentages remain after page reload	N/A	Data persistence validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: New parameter "Operational Performance" successfully created with weight score 4 and calculated percentage 26.7%
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Modal closes automatically after successful submission
  • All existing parameter percentages recalculated correctly
  • Total Weightage reaches 100.0% and displays in green
  • Parameter data persists after page refresh
  • No duplicate entries created
• Negative_Verification:
• • No system errors or exceptions thrown
  • No data corruption in existing parameters
  • No memory leaks or performance degradation
  • No unauthorized parameter creation

---

Test Case 2: Add Parameter - Duplicate Name Validation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_002
• Title: Validate system prevents duplicate parameter names and displays appropriate error message
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Consumer, Api, Database, MOD-ConditionParams, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Validation-Testing

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15% of total Condition Parameters feature
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Error-Handling, Validation-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Section 7.B (Uniqueness Rule), AC-11 (Parameter Name mandatory), Section 9 (Business Rules)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_001 (Prerequisites), AX04US03_TC_003 (Name validation variants)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Validation Service v1.3, PostgreSQL Database 13+
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for validation response
• Data_Requirements: Existing parameter named "Age" must be present in database

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Test database contains parameter named "Age"
  • Validation service running and accessible
  • Error message translations loaded
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Create permissions for Condition Parameters
• Test_Data:
• • Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
  • Password: TestPass123!
  • Existing Parameter: "Age" (weight: 4, percentage: 20.0%)
  • Duplicate Test Name: "Age" (exact match)
  • Alternative Test: "age" (case sensitivity test)
• Prior_Test_Cases: Login authentication successful, navigation to Condition Parameters page successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Condition Parameters page	Page loads with existing parameters including "Age"	N/A	Verify "Age" parameter exists
2	Click "+ Add New Condition Parameter" button	Modal opens successfully	N/A	Standard modal behavior
3	Enter existing parameter name (exact match)	Field accepts input initially, no immediate validation	"Age"	Test exact duplicate
4	Enter valid description	Text area accepts input normally	"Duplicate test for age parameter validation"	Valid data in other fields
5	Set valid weight score	Slider sets to value 3	Value: 3	Valid weight range
6	Click "Add Parameter" button	Validation error appears, modal remains open	N/A	Server-side validation triggered
7	Verify error message display	Clear error message shown near Parameter Name field	"Parameter name 'Age' already exists. Please choose a different name."	User-friendly error text
8	Verify modal state	Modal remains open, form data preserved, focus on Parameter Name field	N/A	Error recovery state
9	Verify no parameter created	Original parameter list unchanged, no duplicate entry	N/A	Database integrity maintained
10	Test case sensitivity	Clear field, enter "age" (lowercase)	"age"	Case insensitivity test
11	Click "Add Parameter" button again	Same validation error appears	N/A	Case-insensitive validation
12	Test with leading/trailing spaces	Clear field, enter " Age " (with spaces)	" Age "	Whitespace handling
13	Click "Add Parameter" button again	Validation error appears (spaces trimmed)	N/A	Proper input sanitization
14	Correct the parameter name	Change to unique name, verify error clears	"Asset Age Analysis"	Error recovery
15	Click "Add Parameter" button	Parameter successfully created	N/A	Confirm fix works

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Duplicate parameter name prevention with clear error message display
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Modal remains open for user correction
  • Form data preserved during error state
  • Case-insensitive duplicate detection
  • Whitespace trimming in validation
  • Error clears when name corrected
• Negative_Verification:
• • No duplicate parameter created in database
  • No system crashes or exceptions
  • Original parameters remain unchanged
  • No partial data corruption

---

Test Case 3: Edit Parameter Weight - Inline Editing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_003
• Title: Successfully edit parameter weight using inline editing and verify percentage recalculation
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Api, Database, MOD-ConditionParams, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Calculation-Engine

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25% of total Condition Parameters feature
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Calculation-Engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Calculation-Accuracy, Business-Logic
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Section 7.C (Inline editing), AC-6 (Edit parameter details), AC-8 (Recalculate percentages), Section 4 (Weighted scoring system), AC-14 (Save button collapses view)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_001 (Parameter creation), AX04US03_TC_008 (Percentage calculations)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Calculation Engine v3.0, PostgreSQL Database 13+, Redis Cache 6.2+
• Performance_Baseline: < 500ms for calculation, < 2 seconds for UI update
• Data_Requirements: Multiple parameters with Total Weightage = 100.0%, known baseline percentages

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Complete parameter set with 100% total weightage
  • Calculation engine service running
  • Database in consistent state
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Update permissions for Condition Parameters
• Test_Data:
• • Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
  • Password: TestPass123!
  • Baseline Parameters:
  • • External Surface Condition: Weight 3, Percentage 20.0%
    • Age: Weight 4, Percentage 26.7%
    • Failure Frequency: Weight 5, Percentage 33.3%
    • Operational Performance: Weight 3, Percentage 20.0%
  • Target Parameter: "Failure Frequency"
  • New Weight Value: 2 (down from 5)
• Prior_Test_Cases: Parameter creation tests successful, 100% weightage achieved

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Condition Parameters page	Page loads with complete parameter list at 100% weightage	N/A	Verify green Total Weightage
2	Record baseline percentages	Document current percentages for comparison	External Surface: 20.0%, Age: 26.7%, Failure Frequency: 33.3%, Operational Performance: 20.0%	Mathematical baseline
3	Locate "Failure Frequency" parameter	Parameter visible in list with current weight and percentage	Parameter: "Failure Frequency", Current: 33.3%	Target identification
4	Click edit icon (pencil) for "Failure Frequency"	Row expands to show inline editing interface	N/A	UI state change
5	Verify inline edit form	Name field, Description field, Weight Score slider visible and populated	Current Weight Score: 5/5	Form pre-population
6	Verify current slider position	Slider positioned at 5, label shows "Weight Score: 5/5"	Current: 5	Baseline confirmation
7	Adjust slider to new value	Drag slider to position 2, label updates to "Weight Score: 2/5"	New Value: 2	Interactive feedback
8	Verify slider responsiveness	Smooth movement, immediate label update, visual feedback	N/A	UI responsiveness
9	Click "Save" button	Loading indicator appears briefly	N/A	User feedback during save
10	Verify inline edit collapse	Row returns to normal view, edit interface hidden	N/A	UI state restoration
11	Verify weight change reflected	"Failure Frequency" shows updated percentage	Expected: ~14.3% (2 out of new total 14)	Primary calculation
12	Verify all percentages recalculated	All parameters show new percentages	External Surface: 21.4%, Age: 28.6%, Failure Frequency: 14.3%, Operational Performance: 21.4%	System-wide recalculation
13	Verify Total Weightage remains valid	Total Weightage still shows 100.0% in green	Total: 100.0% (green)	Validation integrity
14	Verify mathematical accuracy	Manual calculation matches displayed percentages	(3/14)*100=21.43%, (4/14)*100=28.57%, (2/14)*100=14.29%, (3/14)*100=21.43%	Precision verification
15	Test Cancel functionality	Edit another parameter, make change, click Cancel	N/A	Error recovery testing
16	Verify Cancel behavior	Changes discarded, row collapses, original values preserved	N/A	Data integrity

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Weight change from 5 to 2 for "Failure Frequency" results in percentage change from 33.3% to 14.3%
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • All other parameter percentages recalculated proportionally
  • Total Weightage remains exactly 100.0% with green color
  • Mathematical accuracy to appropriate decimal places
  • Inline edit interface functions smoothly
  • Save button collapses edit view
  • Cancel button discards changes properly
• Negative_Verification:
• • No calculation errors or rounding issues
  • No data corruption during weight change
  • No UI glitches or display issues
  • No unauthorized parameter modifications

---

Test Case 4: Delete Parameter with Confirmation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_004
• Title: Successfully delete a condition parameter with confirmation dialog and verify system recalculation
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Api, Database, MOD-ConditionParams, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Data-Integrity

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20% of total Condition Parameters feature
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Calculation-Engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity, User-Safety
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-7 (Delete with confirmation), Section 7.A (Delete icon functionality), AC-8 (Recalculate after deletion), Section 9 (Business rules enforcement)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_003 (Weight editing), AX04US03_TC_005 (Total weightage validation)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Confirmation Dialog Service v1.1, PostgreSQL Database 13+
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second for deletion, < 500ms for recalculation
• Data_Requirements: At least 4 parameters with 100% total weightage, no external dependencies on target parameter

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Multiple parameters configured (minimum 4)
  • No asset assessments using target parameter
  • Confirmation dialog service enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Delete permissions for Condition Parameters
• Test_Data:
• • Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
  • Password: TestPass123!
  • Target Parameter: "External Surface Condition"
  • Baseline Parameters:
  • • External Surface Condition: Weight 3, Percentage 21.4%
    • Age: Weight 4, Percentage 28.6%
    • Failure Frequency: Weight 2, Percentage 14.3%
    • Operational Performance: Weight 3, Percentage 21.4%
    • Repair Costs: Weight 3, Percentage 21.4%
• Prior_Test_Cases: Parameter management tests completed, 100% weightage established

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Condition Parameters page	Page loads with complete parameter list	N/A	Verify 5 parameters present
2	Record baseline Total Weightage	Document current total for comparison	Baseline: 100.0% (green)	Starting state
3	Record all parameter percentages	Document all current percentages	External: 21.4%, Age: 28.6%, Failure: 14.3%, Operational: 21.4%, Repair: 21.4%	Baseline calculations
4	Locate target parameter	Find "External Surface Condition" in parameter list	Parameter: "External Surface Condition"	Target identification
5	Click delete icon (trash can)	Confirmation dialog appears immediately	N/A	Safety mechanism triggered
6	Verify confirmation dialog content	Clear warning message with parameter name	"Are you sure you want to delete the parameter 'External Surface Condition'? This action cannot be undone."	User protection
7	Verify dialog button options	"Cancel" and "Delete" or "Confirm" buttons visible	Buttons: "Cancel", "Delete"	Action choices
8	Test Cancel functionality first	Click "Cancel" button	Dialog closes, parameter remains in list	Safety escape route
9	Verify no changes after Cancel	Parameter list unchanged, all data preserved	All 5 parameters still present	Data protection
10	Click delete icon again	Confirmation dialog appears again	N/A	Consistent behavior
11	Click "Delete" or "Confirm" button	Dialog closes, parameter disappears from list	N/A	Deletion execution
12	Verify parameter removal	"External Surface Condition" no longer visible	Only 4 parameters remain	Visual confirmation
13	Verify remaining parameter count	List shows 4 parameters instead of 5	Count: 4 parameters	Quantity verification
14	Verify percentage recalculation	All remaining parameters show updated percentages	Age: 33.3%, Failure: 16.7%, Operational: 25.0%, Repair: 25.0%	New total = 12, calculations: 4/12, 2/12, 3/12, 3/12
15	Verify Total Weightage	Total shows 100.0% in green (or red if not balanced)	Expected: 100.0% (green)	System integrity
16	Refresh page and verify persistence	Deleted parameter does not reappear	Parameter permanently removed	Data persistence
17	Verify database consistency	No orphaned data or references	N/A	Backend verification

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: "External Surface Condition" parameter successfully deleted with proper confirmation
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Confirmation dialog prevents accidental deletion
  • Cancel button preserves all data
  • All remaining parameters recalculated correctly
  • Total Weightage maintained at 100.0%
  • Parameter permanently removed from database
  • No orphaned data or broken references
• Negative_Verification:
• • No accidental deletions without confirmation
  • No system errors during deletion process
  • No data corruption in remaining parameters
  • No calculation errors in recalculation

---

Test Case 5: Total Weightage Color Validation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_005
• Title: Validate Total Weightage color changes correctly based on 100% validation rule
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, MOD-ConditionParams, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point, UI-Validation, Visual-Testing

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15% of total Condition Parameters feature
• Integration_Points: CxServices, Calculation-Engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UI-Testing, Visual-Validation
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Section 7.A (Total Weightage display rules), AC-5 (Green when 100%, red otherwise), Section 9 (Color validation rules)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_003 (Weight editing), AX04US03_TC_004 (Parameter deletion), AX04US03_TC_006 (Multiple state changes)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, CSS Framework v2.0
• Performance_Baseline: < 100ms for color transition
• Data_Requirements: Configurable parameter set allowing weightage manipulation

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Parameters configured for easy manipulation
  • CSS color values properly defined (#00FF00 for green, #FF0000 for red)
  • Real-time calculation enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Full parameter management permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
  • Password: TestPass123!
  • Test Parameters allowing various total combinations:
  • • Parameter A: Weight 2 (20.0%)
    • Parameter B: Weight 3 (30.0%)
    • Parameter C: Weight 5 (50.0%)
    • Total: 100.0% (baseline green state)
• Prior_Test_Cases: Parameter creation successful, color CSS definitions loaded

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Condition Parameters page	Page loads with parameters totaling 100%	N/A	Establish baseline
2	Verify initial color state	Total Weightage shows 100.0% in green color	Color: Green (#00FF00 or similar)	Baseline verification
3	Edit Parameter A to reduce weight	Change weight from 2 to 1 using inline edit	New weight: 1	Create under-100% scenario
4	Save the weight change	Total recalculates to 90.0% and turns red	Expected: 90.0% (red)	Under-limit color change
5	Verify red color display	Text color is clearly red, not green	Color: Red (#FF0000 or similar)	Visual verification
6	Add new parameter to reach 100%	Add parameter with weight 1 to restore balance	Name: "Test Parameter", Weight: 1	Restore balance
7	Verify color returns to green	Total shows 100.0% in green color	Color: Green	Return to valid state
8	Edit Parameter C to exceed total	Change weight from 5 to 7	New weight: 7	Create over-100% scenario
9	Save the change	Total recalculates to 120.0% and turns red	Expected: 120.0% (red)	Over-limit color change
10	Verify red color for over-limit	Text color is red, indicating invalid state	Color: Red	Over-limit indication
11	Adjust Parameter C back to 5	Return weight to 5 to restore 100%	Weight: 5	Restore valid state
12	Verify immediate color change	Color changes to green as soon as 100% reached	Color: Green	Real-time validation
13	Test decimal precision	Create scenario with 99.9% total	Adjust weights for 99.9%	Precision testing
14	Verify 99.9% shows red	Non-100% value displays in red	Color: Red	Strict 100% validation
15	Test 100.1% scenario	Create slight over-limit scenario	Total: 100.1%	Precision over-limit
16	Verify 100.1% shows red	Over-limit by 0.1% still shows red	Color: Red	Strict validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Total Weightage color accurately reflects 100% rule (green=exactly 100%, red=any other value)
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Color changes happen immediately upon calculation
  • No intermediate or incorrect colors displayed
  • Decimal precision maintained in color logic
  • Visual contrast sufficient for accessibility
• Negative_Verification:
• • No color display bugs or flickering
  • No incorrect green display for non-100% values
  • No accessibility issues with color choices

---

Test Case 6: Search Parameters Functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_006
• Title: Validate parameter search functionality by name and description with various search patterns
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, MOD-ConditionParams, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point, Search-Feature, User-Experience

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10% of total Condition Parameters feature
• Integration_Points: CxServices, Search-Engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Experience, Search-Analytics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Section 7.A (Search Parameters section), AC-10 (Search by name), Section 5 (Integrated search capability)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_001 (Parameter creation for search data)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Condition Parameters API v2.1, Search Service v1.2, Elasticsearch 7.10+
• Performance_Baseline: < 300ms search response time
• Data_Requirements: Diverse parameter set with varied names and descriptions

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Multiple parameters with diverse names and descriptions
  • Search indexing service running
  • Search functionality enabled in UI
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Read permissions for Condition Parameters
• Test_Data:
• • Username: asset.manager@pacificutility.com
  • Password: TestPass123!
  • Search Test Parameters:
  • • "External Surface Condition" - "Assessment of visible deterioration, corrosion, damage"
    • "Age" - "Evaluation based on asset age relative to expected useful life"
    • "Failure Frequency" - "Analysis of breakdown patterns, maintenance incidents"
    • "Operational Performance" - "Assessment of efficiency, output, and adherence"
    • "Repair Costs" - "Analysis of cumulative maintenance and repair costs"
• Prior_Test_Cases: Multiple parameters created and indexed for search

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Condition Parameters page	Page loads with full parameter list visible	N/A	Establish full list baseline
2	Count total parameters displayed	Record total number for comparison	Expected: 5 parameters	Baseline count
3	Locate Search Parameters field	Search input field visible and accessible	N/A	UI element verification
4	Click in search field	Field becomes active, cursor appears	N/A	Input field activation
5	Test exact name search	Type complete parameter name	Search: "Age"	Exact match test
6	Verify exact match results	Only "Age" parameter displayed	Result: 1 parameter shown	Precise filtering
7	Clear search field	Click clear or delete all text	N/A	Reset functionality
8	Verify full list restoration	All parameters displayed again	Result: 5 parameters shown	Reset verification
9	Test partial name search	Type partial parameter name	Search: "Performance"	Partial match test
10	Verify partial match results	"Operational Performance" parameter shown	Result: 1 parameter shown	Substring matching
11	Test case-insensitive search	Type name in different case	Search: "AGE"	Case sensitivity test
12	Verify case-insensitive results	"Age" parameter displayed despite case difference	Result: 1 parameter shown	Case handling
13	Test description-based search	Type word from parameter description	Search: "assessment"	Description search
14	Verify description search results	Parameters containing "assessment" in description shown	Expected: Multiple parameters	Description indexing
15	Test multi-word search	Type multiple search terms	Search: "surface condition"	Multi-term search
16	Verify multi-word results	Parameters matching either/both terms shown	Expected: "External Surface Condition"	Complex matching
17	Test non-matching search	Type term not in any parameter	Search: "nonexistent"	Negative search test
18	Verify empty results handling	"No results found" message or empty list	Result: 0 parameters, clear message	Graceful handling
19	Test special characters	Type search with special characters	Search: "cost$"	Special character handling
20	Test search performance	Measure response time for search	N/A	Performance validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Search filters parameters correctly by name and description with real-time results
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Case-insensitive search functionality
  • Partial string matching works
  • Clear/reset functionality restores full list
  • Empty search results handled gracefully
  • Search performance meets requirements (< 300ms)
• Negative_Verification:
• • No incorrect filtering or false positives
  • No system errors with special characters
  • No performance degradation with large datasets

---

Test Case 7: Cross-Browser Compatibility - Firefox

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_007
• Title: Validate Condition Parameters functionality across Firefox browser environment
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Compatibility
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, MOD-ConditionParams, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Cross-Browser, Firefox-Testing

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of core functionality across browsers
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Cross-Browser-Testing
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Compatibility-Matrix, Browser-Support
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Cross-browser support requirement, UI consistency across browsers
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US03_TC_001-006 (Core functionality tests)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Firefox 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: All standard dependencies, Firefox-specific CSS/JS compatibility
• Performance_Baseline: Same as Chrome baseline
• Data_Requirements: Same test data as core functionality tests

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Firefox browser installed and updated
  • Same test environment as Chrome tests
  • Cross-browser CSS/JS compatibility verified
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager - Full permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Same credentials and test data as TC_001
• Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality tests passed in Chrome

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Firefox browser	Browser launches successfully	N/A	Browser initialization
2	Navigate to application login	Login page loads with proper styling	URL: https://staging.utilityassets.com/login	CSS compatibility check
3	Perform login process	Authentication successful, no browser-specific issues	Standard login credentials	Authentication compatibility
4	Navigate to Condition Parameters	Page loads with proper layout and styling	N/A	Layout verification
5	Verify UI element rendering	All buttons, modals, forms render correctly	N/A	Visual compatibility
6	Test Add Parameter modal	Modal opens, form elements work properly	N/A	Modal compatibility
7	Test slider functionality	Weight score slider operates smoothly	N/A	Interactive element testing
8	Test inline editing	Edit mode activates and functions correctly	N/A	Complex UI interaction
9	Test search functionality	Search input and results work as expected	N/A	Search feature compatibility
10	Test delete confirmation	Confirmation dialog displays and functions	N/A	Dialog compatibility
11	Verify calculations accuracy	Percentage calculations match Chrome results	N/A	Mathematical consistency
12	Test color changes	Total Weightage colors display correctly	N/A	CSS color compatibility
13	Verify responsive behavior	Page adapts to browser window resizing	N/A	Responsive design check
14	Test keyboard navigation	Tab order and keyboard shortcuts work	N/A	Accessibility compatibility
15	Verify data persistence	Page refresh maintains data correctly	N/A	Session compatibility

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All core functionality works identically to Chrome browser
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • UI elements render correctly without styling issues
  • Interactive components (sliders, modals) function properly
  • Mathematical calculations produce identical results
  • Performance meets same benchmarks as Chrome
• Negative_Verification:
• • No Firefox-specific bugs or limitations
  • No degraded user experience
  • No data corruption or calculation errors

---

Test Case 8: API Integration - CRUD Operations

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_008
• Title: Validate complete API endpoint functionality for parameter CRUD operations with comprehensive data validation
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: API
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Api, Database, MOD-ConditionParams, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-API, Platform-Both, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, API-Testing, Backend-Validation

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of API endpoints
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Authentication-Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, API-Health, Integration-Testing
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: All CRUD operations, data validation rules, authentication requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: All functional test cases depend on these API endpoints

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Postman/API Testing Tool
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: N/A (API Testing)
• Dependencies: API Gateway v3.1, Parameter Service v2.1, PostgreSQL 13+, Authentication Service v2.0
• Performance_Baseline: < 200ms for GET, < 500ms for POST/PUT/DELETE
• Data_Requirements: Clean database state, valid authentication tokens

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • API endpoints accessible
  • Authentication service running
  • Database in clean state
  • Valid API keys/tokens available
• User_Roles_Permissions: API access with Asset Manager permissions
• Test_Data:
• • API Base URL: https://api-staging.utilityassets.com/v2
  • Auth Token: [Generated via OAuth flow]
  • Company ID: pac-northwest-utility-001

Test Parameter Payloads:
{  "name": "API Test Parameter",  "description": "Parameter created via API testing",  "weight": 3}

• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication API tests successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	GET /api/v2/condition-parameters	Returns 200 status with parameter list	Headers: Authorization: Bearer {token}	Baseline data retrieval
2	Verify response schema	JSON schema matches specification	Response contains: id, name, description, weight, percentage, created_at, updated_at	Schema validation
3	POST /api/v2/condition-parameters (valid data)	Returns 201 status with created parameter	Body: {"name": "API Test Parameter", "description": "Test", "weight": 3}	Create operation
4	Verify POST response data	Response contains generated ID and calculated percentage	Response includes: auto-generated ID, percentage calculation	Data integrity check
5	GET /api/v2/condition-parameters/{id}	Returns 200 status with specific parameter	Path: /api/v2/condition-parameters/{new_id}	Read single operation
6	PUT /api/v2/condition-parameters/{id}	Returns 200 status with updated parameter	Body: {"weight": 5}	Update operation
7	Verify percentage recalculation	All parameters show updated percentages	GET all parameters, verify math	Calculation validation
8	DELETE /api/v2/condition-parameters/{id}	Returns 204 status (No Content)	DELETE /api/v2/condition-parameters/{id}	Delete operation
9	Verify deletion	GET returns 404 for deleted parameter	GET /api/v2/condition-parameters/{deleted_id}	Deletion confirmation
10	POST with invalid data	Returns 400 status with validation errors	Body: {"name": "", "weight": 10}	Validation testing
11	Verify error response format	Error response contains field-specific messages	Response: {"errors": {"name": "required", "weight": "must be 1-5"}}	Error handling
12	POST duplicate name	Returns 409 status (Conflict)	Body: {"name": "Age", "weight": 3}	Uniqueness validation
13	Test authentication failure	Returns 401 status (Unauthorized)	Request without Authorization header	Security validation
14	Test authorization failure	Returns 403 status (Forbidden)	Request with insufficient permissions	Permission validation
15	Verify rate limiting	Appropriate rate limit headers present	Multiple rapid requests	Rate limit testing

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All CRUD operations return correct HTTP status codes and properly formatted data
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Response schemas match API specification
  • Percentage calculations accurate in all scenarios
  • Error responses provide clear, actionable messages
  • Authentication and authorization properly enforced
  • Rate limiting implemented correctly
• Negative_Verification:
• • Invalid requests rejected with appropriate errors
  • No data corruption during operations
  • No unauthorized access possible
  • No performance degradation under load

---

Test Case 9: Performance Load Testing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US03_TC_009
• Title: Validate system performance under various load conditions and concurrent user scenarios
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 08, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Condition Parameters Management (AX04US03)
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, MOD-ConditionParams, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Performance-Critical, Load-Testing, Scalability

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 30 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: Performance aspects of all features
• Integration_Points: CxServices, API, Database, Cache-Layer, Load-Balancer
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance, Scalability-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Performance SLA requirements, concurrent user support, system scalability
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: All functional tests must maintain performance under load

Test Environment

• Environment: Performance Testing Environment (Production-like)
• Browser/Version: JMeter/LoadRunner/K6 Performance Tools
• Device/OS: Load Testing Infrastructure
• Screen_Resolution: N/A (Performance Testing)
• Dependencies: Full system stack, monitoring tools, performance baseline data
• Performance_Baseline:
• • Page load: < 3 seconds
  • API response: < 500ms
  • Calculation: < 100ms
  • Concurrent users: 100+ without degradation
• Data_Requirements: Large dataset (1000+ parameters), realistic user patterns

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements:
• • Performance testing environment configured
  • Monitoring and metrics collection enabled
  • Baseline performance measurements established
  • Load testing tools configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple test user accounts with varying permissions
• Test_Data:
• • 50 simulated Asset Manager accounts
  • 1000+ condition parameters in database
  • Realistic parameter names and descriptions
  • Varied weight distributions
• Prior_Test_Cases: Functional tests pass, system stability verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Establish baseline performance	Single user operations within SLA	1 user, all operations	Performance baseline
2	Ramp up to 10 concurrent users	Performance degradation < 10%	10 users, mixed operations	Light load testing
3	Monitor page load times	All page loads < 4 seconds	Average across all users	Load impact measurement
4	Monitor API response times	All API calls < 750ms	CRUD operations under load	API performance under load
5	Test calculation performance	Percentage calculations < 200ms	Complex parameter sets	Calculation engine load
6	Ramp up to 50 concurrent users	Performance degradation < 25%	50 users, realistic patterns	Medium load testing
7	Monitor memory usage	Memory consumption stable, no leaks	System monitoring	Resource utilization
8	Monitor CPU utilization	CPU usage < 80% sustained	System monitoring	Processing capacity
9	Test database performance	Query response times < 100ms	Database monitoring	Data layer performance
10	Ramp up to 100 concurrent users	System remains responsive	100 users, peak load simulation	Heavy load testing
11	Monitor error rates	Error rate < 1% under peak load	Error tracking	System stability
12	Test cache effectiveness	Cache hit ratio > 80%	Cache monitoring	Caching performance
13	Stress test beyond normal load	Graceful degradation, no crashes	150+ users	Stress testing
14	Test recovery after load	System returns to baseline performance	Load reduction to normal	Recovery testing
15	Verify data integrity	No data corruption during load test	Database verification	Data consistency check

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System maintains acceptable performance under 100 concurrent users with < 25% degradation
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Page load times remain under 4 seconds under load
  • API response times stay under 750ms under load
  • No memory leaks or resource exhaustion
  • Error rates remain below 1% under peak load
  • System recovers to baseline after load reduction
• Negative_Verification:
• • No system crashes or service failures
  • No data corruption under concurrent access
  • No permanent performance degradation
  • No cascade failures in dependent services

---

TEST EXECUTION ANALYTICS

Execution Matrix by Priority and Phase

Test Case ID	Priority	Smoke	Regression	Performance	Cross-Browser	Mobile	API
TC_001	P1-Critical	✓	✓	-	✓	✓	-
TC_002	P2-High	-	✓	-	✓	✓	-
TC_003	P1-Critical	✓	✓	-	✓	✓	-
TC_004	P2-High	-	✓	-	✓	✓	-
TC_005	P2-High	-	✓	-	✓	✓	-
TC_006	P3-Medium	-	✓	-	✓	✓	-
TC_007	P2-High	-	✓	-	✓	-	-
TC_008	P2-High	-	✓	-	-	✓	-
TC_009	P1-Critical	✓	✓	✓	-	-	✓
TC_010	P1-Critical	-	-	✓	-	-	-

Test Relationships and Dependencies

Blocking Relationships

• Authentication Tests → All functional tests
• TC_001 (Add Parameter) → TC_003 (Edit Parameter), TC_004 (Delete Parameter)
• TC_003 (Edit Parameter) → TC_005 (Color Validation)
• Database Setup → TC_009 (API Tests)

Parallel Execution Groups

• Group A: TC_006 (Search), TC_007 (Firefox), TC_008 (Mobile) - Can run simultaneously
• Group B: TC_002 (Validation), TC_005 (Color) - Independent tests
• Group C: API tests (TC_009) can run parallel to UI tests

Sequential Requirements

1. Setup Phase: Authentication → Navigation → Data Setup
2. Core CRUD: TC_001 → TC_003 → TC_004
3. Validation: TC_002 → TC_005
4. Performance: Functional tests complete → TC_010

Maintenance and Automation Recommendations

High Automation Priority

• TC_001: Core functionality, high execution frequency
• TC_002: Validation logic, regression critical
• TC_009: API tests, perfect for automation
• TC_010: Performance tests, automated monitoring

Manual Testing Requirements

• TC_005: Color validation requires visual verification
• TC_007, TC_008: Cross-browser/mobile testing needs manual validation
• TC_003: Complex UI interactions benefit from manual verification

Maintenance Effort Assessment

• Low Maintenance: TC_009 (API), TC_010 (Performance) - Stable interfaces
• Medium Maintenance: TC_001-004 (Core CRUD) - UI changes may require updates
• High Maintenance: TC_007, TC_008 (Compatibility) - Browser/device updates

---

COMPREHENSIVE REPORTING SUPPORT

Report Category Mapping for 17 BrowserStack Reports

1. Engineering Reports

• Primary Tests: TC_001, TC_003, TC_006, TC_009, TC_010
• Focus: Core functionality, API integration, performance
• Metrics: Pass/fail rates, execution time, code coverage

2. Product Reports

• Primary Tests: TC_004, TC_008
• Focus: User experience, mobile functionality, feature adoption
• Metrics: User journey completion, mobile usage patterns

3. QA Reports

• Primary Tests: TC_002, TC_005, TC_007
• Focus: Quality metrics, validation coverage, compatibility
• Metrics: Defect density, test coverage, browser support

4. Customer Success Reports

• Primary Tests: All tests with Customer-Enterprise tag
• Focus: Enterprise customer impact, SLA compliance
• Metrics: Customer-facing feature stability, performance SLA adherence

Business Impact Tracking

Revenue Impact Classification

• High Impact: TC_001, TC_003, TC_009, TC_010 (Core business functionality)
• Medium Impact: TC_002, TC_004, TC_007, TC_008 (Supporting functionality)
• Low Impact: TC_005, TC_006 (User experience enhancements)

Risk Assessment Matrix

• Critical Risk: TC_009 (API), TC_010 (Performance) - System stability
• High Risk: TC_001, TC_003, TC_004 (Core CRUD) - Data integrity
• Medium Risk: TC_002, TC_005, TC_007, TC_008 - User experience
• Low Risk: TC_006 - Secondary features

Executive Dashboard Metrics

Key Performance Indicators

1. Feature Stability: Percentage of P1-Critical tests passing
2. Cross-Platform Support: Browser/mobile compatibility scores
3. Performance Compliance: SLA adherence metrics
4. API Health: Integration endpoint success rates
5. User Experience: Mobile and responsive design scores

Trend Tracking Elements

• Weekly: Core functionality test results (TC_001, TC_003, TC_009)
• Monthly: Full regression suite results
• Quarterly: Performance baseline comparisons (TC_010)
• Release: Complete compatibility matrix (TC_007, TC_008)

Compliance and Audit Support

Regulatory Compliance Coverage

• Data Protection: API security tests (TC_009)
• Accessibility: Mobile and responsive tests (TC_008)
• Industry Standards: Performance and reliability tests (TC_010)

Audit Trail Requirements

• Test Execution Records: All test cases with timestamps and results
• Requirements Traceability: Full mapping to acceptance criteria
• Change Documentation: Version control for test case updates
• Performance Baselines: Historical performance data for trend analysis

---

SECURITY TESTING INTEGRATION

Authentication and Authorization Testing

Covered in Test Cases

• TC_009: API authentication and authorization validation
• All Tests: Role-based access control verification

Additional Security Considerations

• Session Management: Timeout handling across all test scenarios
• Data Encryption: Verification of sensitive data protection
• Audit Logging: Parameter change tracking and monitoring
• Input Validation: SQL injection and XSS prevention testing

Data Protection Compliance

B2B Utility SaaS Specific Requirements

• Utility Data Protection: Parameter configurations affecting critical infrastructure
• Multi-Tenant Security: Company data isolation verification
• Regulatory Compliance: SOC2, utility industry standards adherence
• Backup and Recovery: Parameter configuration backup integrity

---

INTEGRATION TESTING STRATEGY

Internal System Integrations

Asset Management System

• Integration Point: Parameter data feeds into asset condition scoring
• Test Coverage: Verify parameter changes update asset scores correctly
• Data Flow: Parameter weights → Calculation engine → Asset health scores

Reporting and Analytics

• Integration Point: Parameter data used in dashboard analytics
• Test Coverage: Verify reporting reflects parameter configuration changes
• Data Flow: Parameter configurations → Analytics engine → Dashboard displays

Audit and Compliance

• Integration Point: Parameter changes logged for audit trails
• Test Coverage: Verify all parameter modifications captured in audit logs
• Data Flow: Parameter CRUD operations → Audit service → Compliance reports

External System Dependencies

Third-Party Risk Assessment Tools

• Integration Point: Parameter weights may feed external risk calculation systems
• Test Coverage: API endpoint compatibility and data format validation
• Monitoring: External system availability and response time tracking

Regulatory Reporting Systems

• Integration Point: Parameter configurations may be required for regulatory submissions
• Test Coverage: Data export functionality and format compliance
• Compliance: Industry-specific reporting requirements validation

---

This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the Condition Parameters Management feature with detailed specifications for all test case components, supporting all 17 BrowserStack test management reports through extensive tagging, business context, and stakeholder reporting requirements.