Skip to main content

Service Request Management (CIS01US06)

Functional Coverage:

Total Test Cases: 12

Total Acceptance Criteria: 20

Coverage Percentage: 100%




1. Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality Scenarios

  1. Service Request Creation Workflow (Steps 1-4)
    • Customer information entry and validation
    • Service selection and configuration
    • Service details and scheduling
    • Payment processing and confirmation
    • Receipt generation and delivery
  2. Service Request Management
    • Service request detail view operations
    • Status lifecycle management (Pending → In-Progress → On Hold → Completed)
    • Quick actions execution
    • Communication tracking
  3. SLA Tracking and Monitoring
    • Real-time SLA countdown functionality
    • Automated alert generation at thresholds
    • SLA breach handling and escalation
    • Performance dashboard updates

Business Rules Scenarios

  1. Customer Information Validation
    • Account number lookup and auto-population
    • Address verification against account
    • Contact information format validation
  2. Service Selection Rules
    • Service category filtering and display
    • Price calculation and display
    • Service eligibility validation
  3. Payment Processing Rules
    • Payment method validation
    • Payment timing option enforcement
    • Terms and conditions acceptance

User Journey Scenarios

  1. Call Center Representative End-to-End Journey
    • Login → Dashboard → Create Request → Monitor SLA → Customer Communication → Request Resolution
  2. Customer Executive In-Person Journey
    • Customer Walk-in → Request Creation → Receipt Generation → Service Scheduling → Follow-up

Integration Point Scenarios

  1. SMART360 Module Integration
    • Customer database synchronization
    • Billing system integration
    • Asset management coordination
  2. External System Integration
    • Email/SMS notification services
    • Payment gateway integration
    • Third-party vendor coordination

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance Scenarios

  1. Response Time Testing
    • Page load times (<3 seconds)
    • API response times (<500ms)
    • Receipt generation time (<30 seconds)
  2. Concurrent User Testing
    • 50+ concurrent call center representatives
    • Peak hour load simulation
    • Database performance under load

Security Scenarios

  1. Authentication and Authorization
    • Role-based access control validation
    • Session management and timeout
    • Password policy enforcement
  2. Data Protection
    • PII data handling compliance
    • Input validation and sanitization
    • Audit trail verification

Compatibility Scenarios

  1. Cross-Browser Testing
    • Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge (latest 2 versions)
    • Mobile responsive design validation
    • Feature compatibility across browsers
  2. Cross-Platform Testing
    • Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
    • iOS 16+, Android 13+
    • Various screen resolutions

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

  1. Data Limits Testing
    • Maximum character limits in text fields
    • Date range boundaries
    • File size limits for attachments
  2. System Capacity Testing
    • Maximum concurrent requests
    • Database connection limits
    • Memory usage boundaries

Invalid Input Scenarios

  1. Data Validation Testing
    • Invalid account numbers
    • Malformed email addresses
    • Invalid phone number formats
  2. Security Testing
    • SQL injection attempts
    • XSS attack prevention
    • CSRF protection validation




2. Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Service Request Creation - Happy Path

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_001
Title: Create new service request with valid customer information and complete workflow
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: June 04, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Request Creation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-ServiceRequest, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Workflow-Complete
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, MxService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Customer DB, Billing System, Notification Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, SLA-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Customer Database, Payment Gateway, Email Service
Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Valid customer accounts in database

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Service Request module enabled, Payment gateway configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Admin
Test_Data: Customer Account: ACT-789456, Service: Water Connection
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Service Requests dashboard

Dashboard loads within 3 seconds showing KPI cards

URL: /service-requests

Verify KPI data

2

Click "Create Service Request" button

Service request creation form opens on Step 1

Button: Create Service Request

Form should show step indicator

3

Enter account number in Account Number field

Field accepts input, Look Up button enabled

Account: ACT-789456

Field validation active
, consumer should active with account no.

4

Click "Look Up" button

Customer details auto-populate within 2 seconds

Action: Look Up

Verify all fields populated And all fields are Read-only after lookup

5

Verify customer name auto-populated

Name field shows "John Smith"

Expected: John Smith

Read-only after lookup

6

Verify service address auto-populated

Address shows "123 Main Street, Pune"

Expected: 123 Main Street, Pune

Address validation

7

Verify contact phone number auto-populated

Phone number show (987) 654-3210

Phone: (987) 654-3210

Format validation

8

Verify contact email number auto-populated

Email show : john.smith@email.com

Email: john.smith@email.com

Format validation

9

Click "Continue" button

Advances to Step 2 - Select Service

Action: Continue

Step indicator updates

10

Search for "Water Connection" in service search

Service appears in Available Services

Search: Water Connection

Service filtering works

11

Click "Select" for Water Connection service

Service selected, Continue button enabled

Service: Water Connection - $150.00

Price displayed correctly

12

Click "Continue" to Step 3

Service Details form loads

Action: Continue

Step 3 form displayed

13

Enter preferred date

Date picker accepts future date

Date: 06/15/2025

Date validation

14

Select preferred time slot

Dropdown shows available times

Time: 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Time slot availability

15

Enter additional instructions

Text area accepts input

Text: "Please call before arrival"

Character limit validation

16

Click "Continue" to Step 4

Payment & Review form loads

Action: Continue

All data carried forward

17

Select "Pay Now" payment option

Pay Now option highlighted as default

Option: Pay Now

Visual indication

18

Select "Cash" payment method

Cash payment details form appears

Method: Cash

Form fields displayed

19

Enter payment amount

Amount field accepts currency value

Amount: 150.00

Currency formatting

20

Enter cash received amount

Cash received field accepts value

Cash Received: 150.00

Calculation validation

21

Select payment date

Date picker shows current date

Date: 06/04/2025

Current date default

22

Check "I agree to terms and conditions"

Checkbox selected, Submit button enabled

Action: Check terms

Button state change

23

Click "Submit Request" button

Request submitted, confirmation page loads

Action: Submit

Success message

24

Verify service request number generated

Unique SR number in format SR-###### displayed

Format: SR-250604-001

Number format validation

25

Verify receipt generation

PDF receipt generated and download option available

File: Service_Receipt_SR-250604-001.pdf

Receipt content validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Service request successfully created with unique SR number
Secondary_Verifications: Customer data populated correctly, Payment processed, Receipt generated
Negative_Verification: No error messages displayed, No data loss during navigation



Test Case 2: Service Request Creation - Invalid Account Number

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_002
Title: Verify error handling for invalid account number during customer lookup
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: June 04, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Service Request Creation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-ServiceRequest, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Error-Handling
Negative, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Customer DB
Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Error-Handling, Input-Validation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Customer Database
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds response
Data_Requirements: Invalid account numbers

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Service Request module enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Call Center Representative access
Test_Data: Invalid Account: INVALID-123
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Create Service Request

Form loads on Step 1 - Customer Info

URL: /service-requests/new

Initial form state

2

Enter invalid account number

Field accepts input, Look Up button enabled

Account: INVALID-123

Input validation

3

Click "Look Up" button

Error message displays within 1 seconds

Action: Look Up

Error handling

4

Verify error message content

Message: "Account number not found. Please verify and try again."

Expected error text

User-friendly message

5

Verify field states

Account number field highlighted in red, other fields remain empty

Visual indicators

Error state styling

6

Verify Continue button state

Continue button remains disabled

Button state

Navigation prevention

7

Clear account number field

Error styling removed, Look Up button disabled

Action: Clear field

State reset

8

Enter another invalid format

Appropriate validation message displays

Account: 123

Format validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Appropriate error message displayed for invalid account
Secondary_Verifications: Field validation styling, Button state management
Negative_Verification: No system crash, No false positive lookups




Test Case 3: SLA Tracking and Alerts

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_003
Title: Verify SLA countdown timer and automated alerts at 75% and 90% thresholds
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: June 04, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: SLA Tracking
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-SLATracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Real-Time
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, MxService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 70%
Integration_Points: Notification Service, Dashboard Service
Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: SLA-Compliance, Real-Time-Monitoring
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: SLA Configuration, Notification Service
Performance_Baseline: Real-time updates
Data_Requirements: Service requests with different SLA timelines

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: SLA rules configured, Alert thresholds set
User_Roles_Permissions: Call Center Representative access
Test_Data: Water Pressure Complaint (24-hour SLA)
Prior_Test_Cases: Service request created

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create water pressure complaint service request

Request created with 24-hour SLA timer

Service: Water Pressure Complaint

Baseline request

2

Navigate to service request detail view

SLA timer shows "23:59:XX" countdown

Action: View details

Real-time countdown

3

Verify SLA status indicator

Status shows "On Track" with green indicator

Visual: Green status

Color coding

4

Wait for SLA to reach 75% threshold (6 hours elapsed)

Automated alert triggered, status changes to yellow

Time: 18:00:XX remaining

Alert generation

5

Check notification received

Alert notification appears in dashboard

Alert: "SLA 75% threshold reached"

Notification system

6

Verify alert details

Alert contains request ID, customer name, time remaining

Content validation

Alert information

7

Continue monitoring until 90% threshold (2.4 hours remaining)

Second alert triggered, status changes to red

Time: 02:24:XX remaining

Critical alert

8

Verify escalation alert

Critical alert notification with escalation details

Alert: "SLA 90% - Escalation Required"

Escalation trigger

9

Check dashboard KPI updates

SLA compliance metrics updated in real-time

Dashboard: SLA tracking

Real-time updates

10

Acknowledge alerts

Alert can be acknowledged, status tracked

Action: Acknowledge

Alert management

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: SLA countdown accurate, Alerts triggered at correct thresholds
Secondary_Verifications: Color-coded status indicators, Real-time dashboard updates
Negative_Verification: No false alerts, No missed notifications




Test Case 4: Receipt Generation and Delivery

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_004
Title: Verify automated receipt generation and multi-channel delivery (email/SMS/print)
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: June 04, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Receipt Generation
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-ReceiptGeneration, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, Document-Generation
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, MxService, ComService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 60%
Integration_Points: PDF Generation Service, Email Service, SMS Gateway
Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Customer-Experience, Document-Generation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: PDF Generation Service, Email/SMS Gateway
Performance_Baseline: <30 seconds generation time
Data_Requirements: Valid email addresses, phone numbers

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Receipt templates configured, Email/SMS services enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Call Center Representative access
Test_Data: Complete service request with customer contact info
Prior_Test_Cases: Service request creation completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete service request creation

Confirmation page loads with receipt options

Completed request: SR-250604-001

Request baseline

2

Verify automatic PDF generation

PDF receipt generated within 30 seconds

File: Service_Receipt_SR-250604-001.pdf

Generation timing

3

Download and open PDF receipt

Receipt contains all request details and formatting

Action: Download PDF

Content validation

4

Verify receipt header information

Header shows company logo, contact details, date/time

Visual elements

Branding validation

5

Verify customer information section

Customer name, account, address displayed correctly

Customer: John Smith, ACT-789456

Data accuracy

6

Verify service details section

Service type, description, charges shown accurately

Service: Water Connection - $150.00

Service information

7

Verify payment information

Payment method, amount, status displayed

Payment: Cash - $150.00 - Pending

Payment details

8

Check unique reference number

SR number prominently displayed and formatted correctly

Reference: SR-250604-001

Tracking reference

9

Verify automatic email delivery

Email sent to customer within 30 seconds

Email: john.smith@email.com

Email delivery

10

Check email content

Email contains PDF attachment and summary

Subject: "Service Request Confirmation"

Email validation

11

Test SMS notification (if phone provided)

SMS sent with reference number and summary

SMS: (987) 654-3210

SMS delivery

12

Verify print functionality

Print dialog opens with proper formatting

Action: Print receipt

Print capability

13

Test receipt regeneration

Can regenerate receipt from request details

Action: Regenerate

Receipt accessibility

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Receipt generated within 30 seconds with accurate content
Secondary_Verifications: Multi-channel delivery successful, Professional formatting
Negative_Verification: No missing information, No delivery failures




Test Case 5: Cross-Browser Compatibility - Service Request Creation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_005
Title: Verify service request creation workflow across multiple browsers and devices
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: June 04, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Cross-Browser Compatibility
Test Type: Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manaual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Both, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Cross-Platform
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, MxService, CrossBrowser

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Frontend Components, Browser APIs
Code_Module_Mapped: Backoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Cross-Platform-Coverage, Browser-Support
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
Dependencies: None
Performance_Baseline: Consistent across browsers
Data_Requirements: Standard test data set

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple browser environments configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Call Center Representative access
Test_Data: Customer Account: ACT-789456, Service: Water Connection
Prior_Test_Cases: None

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test Chrome browser - Desktop

Complete workflow functions identically

Browser: Chrome 115+

Baseline browser

2

Test Firefox browser - Desktop

All features work, styling consistent

Browser: Firefox 110+

Feature parity

3

Test Safari browser - macOS

Full functionality, no rendering issues

Browser: Safari 16+

WebKit compatibility

4

Test Edge browser - Windows

Complete feature support, performance comparable

Browser: Edge Latest

Chromium-based

5

Test mobile Chrome - Android

Responsive design, touch interactions work

Device: Android 13+

Mobile optimization

6

Test mobile Safari - iOS

Touch-friendly interface, proper scaling

Device: iOS 16+

iOS compatibility

7

Test tablet view - iPad

Optimized layout for tablet screen size

Resolution: 1024x768

Tablet responsiveness

8

Verify form validation across browsers

Consistent validation messages and behavior

All browsers

Validation consistency

9

Test date picker functionality

Date picker works in all browser environments

Component: Date picker

Widget compatibility

10

Verify dropdown menus

Service selection dropdowns function properly

Component: Dropdowns

UI component testing

11

Test payment form rendering

Payment forms display correctly across browsers

Component: Payment form

Form compatibility

12

Verify receipt generation

PDF generation works consistently

Function: Receipt generation

Cross-browser PDF

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete workflow functions in all target browsers
Secondary_Verifications: Consistent UI rendering, Performance parity
Negative_Verification: No browser-specific errors, No feature degradation




Test Case 6: API Testing - Service Request Creation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_006
Title: API endpoint testing for critical service request creation operations (Importance >=7)
Created By: QA Team
Created Date: June 04, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: API Testing
Test Type: API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Backend-Services
HappyPath, OnbService, CxService, MxService

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Database, External Services
Code_Module_Mapped: CxBackoffice
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: API-Performance, Backend-Reliability
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: API Testing Tool (Postman/Newman)
Device/OS: Server Environment
Screen_Resolution: N/A
Dependencies: Database, External APIs
Performance_Baseline: <500ms response time
Data_Requirements: Valid API authentication tokens

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: API endpoints deployed, Authentication configured
User_Roles_Permissions: API access credentials
Test_Data: Valid JSON payloads, Authentication tokens
Prior_Test_Cases: API authentication successful

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

POST /api/customers/lookup with valid account

200 OK, customer data returned within 500ms

Account: ACT-789456

Customer lookup API

2

Verify response payload structure

JSON contains: id, name, address, phone, email

Response validation

Data structure

3

POST /api/service-requests with complete payload

201 Created, service request ID returned

Complete SR payload

Request creation

4

Verify auto-generated SR number format

Response contains SR-YYMMDD-### format

SR Number validation

ID generation

5

GET /api/service-requests/{id} for created request

200 OK, complete request details returned

Request ID from step 3

Retrieval verification

6

POST /api/receipts/generate with SR ID

200 OK, PDF URL returned within 30 seconds

SR ID, generation request

Receipt API

7

Verify receipt content via returned URL

PDF accessible, contains all request details

PDF URL from step 6

Content validation

8

POST /api/notifications/send with SR details

200 OK, notification sent confirmation

Email/SMS payload

Notification API

9

PUT /api/service-requests/{id}/status

200 OK, status updated, audit trail created

Status: In-Progress

Status update API

10

GET /api/sla/calculate with SR ID

200 OK, SLA timeline and thresholds returned

SR ID, SLA calculation

SLA calculation API

11

Test API with invalid authentication

401 Unauthorized returned

Invalid token

Security validation

12

Test API with malformed payload

400 Bad Request with error details

Invalid JSON

Input validation

13

Test API performance under load

All responses within 500ms under 100 concurrent requests

Load test payload

Performance validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All critical APIs respond within 500ms with correct data
 Secondary_Verifications: Proper error handling, Security validation
 Negative_Verification: No data corruption, No unauthorized access




Test Case 7: Performance Testing - Concurrent Users

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_007
 Title: Verify system performance with 50+ concurrent call center representatives
 Created By: QA Team
 Created Date: June 04, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance Testing
 Test Type: Performance
 Test Level: System
 Priority: P1-Critical
 Execution Phase: Performance
 Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Load-Testing
HappyPath, AuthService, OnbService, CxService, MxService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
 Revenue_Impact: High
 Business_Priority: Must-Have
 Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
 Compliance_Required: Yes
 SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
 Complexity_Level: High
 Expected_Execution_Time: 30 minutes
 Reproducibility_Score: High
 Data_Sensitivity: Low
 Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
 Integration_Points: Database, Application Server, Web Server
 Code_Module_Mapped: Cxbackoffice
 Requirement_Coverage: Complete
 Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
 Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, System-Reliability
 Trend_Tracking: Yes
 Executive_Visibility: Yes
 Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Performance Testing Environment
 Browser/Version: Load Testing Tool (JMeter/LoadRunner)
 Device/OS: Server Environment
 Screen_Resolution: N/A
 Dependencies: Full System Stack
 Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds page load, <500ms API response
 Data_Requirements: 1000+ test customer accounts

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance environment configured, Load testing tools setup
 User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple test user accounts
 Test_Data: Large dataset of customers and services
 Prior_Test_Cases: Functional tests passing

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Configure load test with 10 concurrent users

Baseline performance established

10 virtual users

Baseline measurement

2

Execute service request creation workflow

All requests complete within 3 seconds

Standard workflow

Performance baseline

3

Gradually increase load to 25 concurrent users

System maintains performance thresholds

25 virtual users

Load scaling

4

Monitor database connection pool

No connection exhaustion, <100ms query time

DB monitoring

Database performance

5

Increase load to 50 concurrent users

Page load times remain <3 seconds

50 virtual users

Target load test

6

Monitor API response times

All APIs respond within 500ms

API monitoring

Service performance

7

Execute peak load test - 75 concurrent users

System handles load with degraded performance

75 virtual users

Stress testing

8

Monitor system resources

CPU <80%, Memory <85%, Disk I/O stable

Resource monitoring

System health

9

Test SLA calculation under load

SLA timers accurate, alerts not delayed

SLA monitoring

Real-time accuracy

10

Verify receipt generation performance

Receipt generation <30 seconds under load

Receipt testing

Document performance

11

Test database transaction integrity

No data corruption or lost transactions

Data validation

Data integrity

12

Execute endurance test - 1 hour duration

System maintains stability over time

Extended test

Stability testing

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System handles 50+ concurrent users within performance thresholds
 Secondary_Verifications: Resource utilization within limits, Data integrity maintained
 Negative_Verification: No system crashes, No data corruption




Test Case 8: Security Testing - Authentication and Authorization

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: CIS01US06_TC_008
 Title: Verify role-based access controls and authentication security measures
 Created By: QA Team
 Created Date: June 04, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security Testing
 Test Type: Security
 Test Level: System
 Priority: P1-Critical
 Execution Phase: Security
 Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Authentication
HappyPath, AuthService, OnbService, CxService, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
 Revenue_Impact: High
 Business_Priority: Must-Have
 Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
 Compliance_Required: Yes
 SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
 Complexity_Level: High
 Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
 Reproducibility_Score: High
 Data_Sensitivity: High
 Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80%
 Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Service
 Code_Module_Mapped: Cxbackoffice
 Requirement_Coverage: Complete
 Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
 Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control
 Trend_Tracking: Yes
 Executive_Visibility: Yes
 Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Security Testing Environment
 Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
 Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
 Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
 Dependencies: Authentication System, Role Management
 Performance_Baseline: Standard security validation
 Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different roles

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Role-based access configured, Security policies enabled
 User_Roles_Permissions: Call Center Rep, Customer Executive, Admin accounts
 Test_Data: Valid and invalid credentials, various user roles
 Prior_Test_Cases: None

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Attempt login with valid Call Center Rep credentials%3