Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Total Test cases:-27
Total Acceptance Criteria -
Total Coverage:
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality Scenarios
- Read Cycle List View Management
- Display read cycles with status indicators
- Filter cycles by month, status, and sort order
- Search cycles by name
- View cycle summary counters
- Read Cycle Detail View Management
- Display comprehensive cycle information
- Show performance metrics with historical comparisons
- Display meter reading quality breakdown
- Show route completion status
- Route Assignment and Dispatch
- Assign routes to available meter readers
- Unassign routes from meter readers
- Validate reader availability and workload
- Manage route status transitions
- Real-time Data Integration
- Sync with meter reader mobile submissions
- Update completion rates dynamically
- Refresh performance metrics
- Handle concurrent supervisor access
Business Rules Scenarios
- Status Transition Validation
- Workload Calculation and Assignment Rules
- Completion Percentage Calculations
- Quality Metrics Calculations
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance Scenarios
- Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
- Route assignment response time
- Real-time data sync performance
- Concurrent user handling
Security Scenarios
- Authentication and session management
- Role-based access control
- Data protection and audit trails
Compatibility Scenarios
- Cross-browser compatibility
- Responsive design validation
- Mobile integration compatibility
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions
- Maximum cycles, routes, and meters handling
- Date range validations
- Workload limit validations
System Failures
- Mobile app connectivity issues
- Real-time sync failures
- Concurrent assignment conflicts
Detailed Test Cases
Test Case 1: Cycle List View Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_001
- Title: Verify Read Cycle List View displays correctly with all required elements
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - List View
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 85% of list view feature covered
- Integration_Points: Database, MX-Service, UI Layer
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
- Dependencies: Database with sample read cycle data, MX-Service API
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
- Data_Requirements: 5 read cycles with different statuses
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Database initialized with test data
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: At least 5 read cycles exist (2 Not Dispatched, 1 Dispatched, 1 In Progress, 1 Completed)
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication test must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All UI elements display correctly and page loads within 3-second baseline
- Secondary_Verifications: Data formatting correct, counter calculations accurate, button states appropriate
- Negative_Verification: No error messages, broken UI elements, or performance issues
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual behavior observed]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC01: ✅ Status indicators (Not Dispatched, Dispatched, In Progress, Completed) clearly displayed
- AC02: ✅ Filter controls (Month, Status, Sort By, Search) present and functional
- AC03: ✅ Key metrics (Meters, Consumers, Readings, Completion %) displayed for each cycle
Test Case 2: Status Counter Calculations
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_002
- Title: Verify status counter tiles calculate and display correct counts for current month
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - List View Counters
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90% of counter calculation logic covered
- Integration_Points: Database query aggregation, MX-Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Dependencies: Database with known test data counts, MX-Service API
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second counter calculation
- Data_Requirements: Specific test data setup with known counts
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Database reset with controlled test data
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Exactly 2 Not Dispatched, 1 Dispatched, 1 In Progress, 1 Completed cycles for current month; Additional cycles from previous months
- Prior_Test_Cases: Database connectivity test must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Counter calculations match expected values based on current month filter business rule
- Secondary_Verifications: Counters update correctly when filters change, calculations are real-time
- Negative_Verification: Previous month data doesn't affect current month counters
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual counter values observed]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of counter displays]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC01: ✅ Status indicators display with accurate counts
- Business Rule: ✅ Counters reflect only current month cycles as specified
Test Case 3: Cycle Search Functionality
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_003
- Title: Verify search functionality filters cycles by name (case-insensitive)
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of search functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Database search queries, MX-Service search API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest
- Dependencies: Database with diverse cycle names, MX-Service search endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms search response
- Data_Requirements: Cycles with names containing "Downtown", "Area", mixed case variations
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Database populated with test cycles having varied names
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Cycles named "Downtown Area Q2", "East Industrial Zone", "NORTH RESIDENTIAL", "south residential"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 (List view display) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Search returns correct filtered results based on cycle name matching (case-insensitive)
- Secondary_Verifications: Partial matches work, special characters handled, spaces trimmed
- Negative_Verification: Invalid searches show appropriate "no results" message without errors
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record search results for each test input]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if search issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of search results]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC02: ✅ Search functionality provides filtering capability for read cycles
- Business Rule: ✅ Case-insensitive search matching implemented correctly
Test Case 4: Filter Combinations
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_004
- Title: Verify multiple filter combinations work correctly together
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Filters
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of filter combination logic covered
- Integration_Points: Database complex queries, MX-Service filtering API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Integration-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest
- Dependencies: Database with diverse test data, MX-Service API
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second filter application
- Data_Requirements: Multiple cycles across different months and statuses
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Database with cycles spanning multiple months and statuses
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: April 2025: "Downtown Area Q2" (In Progress), March 2025: "Commercial District" (Completed)
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003 must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Multiple filters work correctly in combination without conflicts
- Secondary_Verifications: Filter combinations don't break each other, sorting works with filters, counters update
- Negative_Verification: No unexpected results when combining filters, graceful handling of no-result scenarios
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record filtered results for each combination]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if filter conflicts found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of filter combinations]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC02: ✅ Multiple filtering capabilities work together (Month, Status, Sort, Search)
- Business Rule: ✅ Filter combinations apply correctly without conflicts
Test Case 5: Cycle Detail View Navigation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_005
- Title: Verify navigation to cycle detail view and cycle information display
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Detail View
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 80% of detail view navigation covered
- Integration_Points: Navigation service, MX-Service cycle details API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest, Safari Latest, Edge Latest
- Dependencies: MX-Service cycle details API, Database
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds navigation time
- Data_Requirements: "Downtown Area Q2" cycle with complete information
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test cycle "Downtown Area Q2" exists with complete data
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Cycle with Name="Downtown Area Q2", Type="Photo Read", Month="April 2025", Status="In Progress"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 (List view) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Detail view loads correctly with proper cycle information and navigation context
- Secondary_Verifications: Navigation elements work, breadcrumbs accurate, tabs functional, URL handling correct
- Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing information, or navigation errors
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record navigation behavior and data display]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if navigation issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of detail view]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC05: ✅ Detailed view of each read cycle provides comprehensive cycle information
- Navigation: ✅ Proper navigation flow between list and detail views
Test Case 6: Performance Metrics Display and Calculations
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_006
- Title: Verify performance metrics display correctly with proper calculations and historical comparisons
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Performance Metrics
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance calculation logic covered
- Integration_Points: Calculation engine, MX-Service metrics API, Database aggregations
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Performance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Cycle with known metrics data, previous cycle data for comparisons, MX-Service calculation API
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second metric calculation
- Data_Requirements: "Downtown Area Q2" with 89 readings out of 145 meters, quality breakdown: 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test cycle with controlled metrics data, previous cycle data for comparisons
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Current cycle: 89 readings, 145 meters, 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT; Previous cycle data for comparison
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view navigation) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All metrics calculate correctly according to documented business rules with proper rounding
- Secondary_Verifications: Historical comparisons accurate, visual indicators appropriate, real-time updates work
- Negative_Verification: No incorrect calculations, missing percentage changes, or display errors
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual metric values and calculations]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of metrics display]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC06: ✅ Performance metrics (completion rate, reading accuracy, turnaround, photo submission) calculated and displayed
- AC07: ✅ Historical comparisons shown with percentage changes from previous cycle
Test Case 7: Meter Reading Quality Breakdown
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_007
- Title: Verify meter reading quality breakdown displays correct counts and percentages
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Quality Metrics
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of quality breakdown logic covered
- Integration_Points: Quality classification service, MX-Service metrics API, Database aggregations
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Quality classification data, MX-Service quality API
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms quality calculation
- Data_Requirements: 89 total readings: 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test cycle with known quality breakdown data
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Quality data: 72 Normal, 12 Faulty, 5 RCNT readings from total 89
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Quality breakdown shows correct counts and calculated percentages for Normal, Faulty, RCNT
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual progress bars match percentages, totals add up correctly, color coding consistent
- Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, missing data, or incorrect visual representations
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record quality breakdown values and percentages]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if quality calculation errors found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of quality breakdown section]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC04: ✅ Reading quality categorized into Normal, Faulty, and RCNT with counts and percentages
- Business Rule: ✅ Quality percentages calculated correctly and sum to 100%
Test Case 8: Route Completion Status Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_008
- Title: Verify route completion status shows individual route progress correctly
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Status
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 95% of route status display covered
- Integration_Points: Route progress calculation, MX-Service route API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Route completion data, MX-Service route status API
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second status calculation
- Data_Requirements: Routes with various completion levels: 100%, 78%, 75%, 78%, 14%, 0%
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test routes with known completion percentages
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Downtown Routes 1-6 with completions: 28/28, 25/32, 18/24, 15/19, 3/22, 0/20
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Route completion percentages calculate correctly as (Meters Read ÷ Total Meters) × 100
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual progress bars accurate, color coding appropriate, interactive elements work
- Negative_Verification: No incorrect completion percentages or visual inconsistencies
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record route completion percentages and visual display]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if route status issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of route completion section]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC08: ✅ Route completion status provided for all routes with percentage indicators
- AC14: ✅ Route status indicated with color-coded labels (green=completed, blue=in progress, grey=not started)
Test Case 9: Dispatch Tab Navigation and Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_009
- Title: Verify Dispatch tab displays route assignment interface correctly
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Dispatch
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 85% of dispatch interface covered
- Integration_Points: Route management service, MX-Service dispatch API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Route assignment data, MX-Service dispatch endpoints
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds tab load time
- Data_Requirements: 6 routes with various assignment statuses and due dates
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test cycle with routes in different assignment states
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Routes with statuses: Completed, In Progress, Problem, Dispatched, Not Dispatched
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view navigation) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dispatch interface loads with all required elements and proper route assignment functionality
- Secondary_Verifications: Filters functional, search works, table data displays correctly, action buttons appropriate
- Negative_Verification: No broken interface elements, missing functionality, or incorrect action button states
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record dispatch interface display and functionality]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if dispatch interface issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of dispatch tab]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC13: ✅ Detailed route information displayed (meters, consumers, premises, readings)
- AC15: ✅ Assigned dates and due dates tracked and displayed
- AC17: ✅ Actions appropriate to route status (Assign/Unassign based on status)
Test Case 10: Route Assignment Modal Display
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_010
- Title: Verify route assignment modal displays available meter readers with correct information
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Assignment
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90% of assignment modal functionality covered
- Integration_Points: User management service, workload calculation, MX-Service assignment API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: User management system, workload calculation service, MX-Service reader API
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second modal load time
- Data_Requirements: 5 meter readers with varying workloads and availability status
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test meter readers with known workloads and availability
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Readers: John Smith (5 routes, Available), Emma Johnson (3 routes, Available), Sarah Wilson (4 routes, Unavailable)
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Assignment modal displays complete meter reader information with accurate workload calculations
- Secondary_Verifications: Search functionality works, availability status clear, selection logic correct
- Negative_Verification: Unavailable readers clearly indicated and not selectable, modal closes properly without unintended changes
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record modal display and reader information accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if modal issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of assignment modal]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC10: ✅ Route assignment to available meter readers with workload visibility
- AC19: ✅ Meter reader workload displayed to prevent overallocation
Test Case 11: Route Assignment Business Rules Validation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_011
- Title: Verify route assignment respects business rules for reader availability and workload
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Assignment Validation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of assignment business rule validation covered
- Integration_Points: Assignment validation service, workload service, user management, MX-Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Critical-Path-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Assignment validation service, workload calculation API, MX-Service assignment endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds assignment processing
- Data_Requirements: Available and unavailable readers with known workloads
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test readers with controlled availability and workload states
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Robert Brown (2 routes, Available), Sarah Wilson (4 routes, Unavailable), unassigned "Downtown Route 6"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_010 (Assignment modal) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Assignment only succeeds for available readers with proper business rule validation
- Secondary_Verifications: Workload tracking accurate, status updates correctly, concurrent access handled
- Negative_Verification: Cannot assign to unavailable readers, no duplicate assignments, proper error handling
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record assignment behavior and validation responses]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if business rule violations found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of assignment process]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC10: ✅ Route assignment to available meter readers enforced
- AC11: ✅ Assignment to unavailable readers prevented with proper validation
Test Case 12: Route Unassignment Process
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_012
- Title: Verify route unassignment process works correctly with confirmation dialog
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Unassignment
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of unassignment process covered
- Integration_Points: Assignment management service, MX-Service unassignment API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Assignment management API, MX-Service unassignment endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second unassignment processing
- Data_Requirements: Assigned route ready for unassignment testing
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Route assigned to meter reader (from TC_011 or pre-assigned)
- **User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Robert Brown (2 routes, Available), Sarah Wilson (4 routes, Unavailable), unassigned "Downtown Route 6"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_010 (Assignment modal) must pass
Test Procedure:
Primary Verification: Assignment modal displays complete meter reader information Secondary Verifications: Search works, availability status clear, buttons functional Negative Verification: Unavailable readers clearly indicated, modal closes properly
Test Case 13: Route Status Filtering
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_013
- Title: Verify route status filtering works correctly in dispatch view
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Filtering
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of status filtering functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Filtering service, MX-Service filter API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Filter-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Route filtering API, MX-Service filter endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response time
- Data_Requirements: Routes with all possible statuses
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Routes with diverse statuses available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Routes with statuses: Not Dispatched, Dispatched, In Progress, Completed, Problem
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Status filtering returns correct routes for each status category
- Secondary_Verifications: Filter reset works, route counts accurate, filter state persists
- Negative_Verification: No routes from excluded statuses appear in filtered results
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record filtering behavior for each status]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if filtering issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of filtered results]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC09: ✅ Route filtering by status implemented correctly
Test Case 14: Meter Reader Filtering
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_014
- Title: Verify meter reader filtering works correctly showing assigned and unassigned routes
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Reader Filtering
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of reader filtering functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Reader assignment service, MX-Service reader filter API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Assignment-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Reader assignment data, MX-Service reader filter endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response time
- Data_Requirements: Routes assigned to various readers and some unassigned
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Routes with mixed assignment states
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Routes assigned to: John Smith, Emma Johnson, Michael Davis; Some routes unassigned (N/A)
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Reader filtering correctly separates assigned/unassigned routes and filters by specific readers
- Secondary_Verifications: Specific reader filtering works, combined filters work, dropdown populated correctly
- Negative_Verification: Filtered results don't include routes outside filter criteria
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record reader filtering behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if reader filtering issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of reader-filtered results]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC09: ✅ Route filtering by meter reader implemented correctly
Test Case 15: Date Range Filtering
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_015
- Title: Verify date range filtering works correctly for route due dates
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Date Filtering
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Could-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of date filtering functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Date filtering service, MX-Service date filter API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Date-Handling
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Date filtering API, MX-Service date filter endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms filter response time
- Data_Requirements: Routes with various due dates spanning multiple weeks
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Routes with diverse due dates
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Routes with due dates: Apr 10, Apr 15, Apr 20, Apr 25, Apr 30, 2025
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Date range filtering returns routes within specified date range based on due dates
- Secondary_Verifications: Date pickers functional, invalid ranges handled, partial ranges work
- Negative_Verification: Routes outside date range are excluded, error handling for invalid inputs
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record date filtering behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if date filtering issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of date-filtered results]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC09: ✅ Route filtering by date range implemented correctly
- AC15: ✅ Due date tracking enables effective date-based filtering
Test Case 16: Route Search in Dispatch View
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_016
- Title: Verify route search functionality works correctly in dispatch view
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Could-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of route search functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Search service, MX-Service search API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Search-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Route search API, MX-Service search endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 300ms search response time
- Data_Requirements: Routes with varied names for search testing
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Routes with diverse names available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Routes named: "Downtown Route 1", "Downtown Route 2", "East Industrial Route", "NORTH ROUTE"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Route search returns correct filtered results based on route name matching
- Secondary_Verifications: Case-insensitive search works, partial matches work, special characters handled
- Negative_Verification: Invalid searches show "no results" message, search works with other filters
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record search behavior for each input]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if search issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of search results]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC16: ✅ Route search by name functionality implemented correctly
Test Case 17: Cycle Dropdown Navigation
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_017
- Title: Verify cycle dropdown allows switching between active cycles
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Cycle Navigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 95% of cycle navigation functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Cycle management service, MX-Service cycle API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Navigation-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Cycle data with various statuses, MX-Service cycle endpoint
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second cycle switching time
- Data_Requirements: Multiple cycles with active statuses and at least one completed cycle
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Multiple cycles with different statuses available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Active cycles: "Downtown Area Q2", "East Industrial Zone"; Completed cycle: "Commercial District"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_005 (Detail view navigation) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Cycle dropdown allows switching between active cycles with proper data refresh
- Secondary_Verifications: Search in dropdown works, data updates correctly, navigation state maintained
- Negative_Verification: Completed cycles don't appear in dropdown, invalid searches handled gracefully
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record cycle switching behavior and data updates]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if cycle navigation issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of cycle dropdown and switching]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC05: ✅ Detailed view navigation between cycles implemented correctly
- Business Rule: ✅ Only active cycles (not completed) available in dropdown
Test Case 18: Real-time Data Sync
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_018
- Title: Verify real-time data synchronization when meter readers submit readings
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Real-time Integration
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90% of real-time sync functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Meter reader mobile app, real-time sync service, MX-Service sync API, Database
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web, Mobile
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Real-time-Performance
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Meter reader mobile app, real-time sync service, MX-Service sync endpoints
- Performance_Baseline: Updates within 30 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Route assigned to meter reader with mobile app access
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Real-time sync service operational, mobile app configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned, meter reader with mobile access
- Test_Data: "Downtown Route 2" assigned to "Emma Johnson" with unread meters available
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_011 (Route assignment) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Real-time data synchronization works within 30-second SLA requirement
- Secondary_Verifications: Status transitions occur correctly, metrics update accurately, batch sync works
- Negative_Verification: No data loss during sync interruptions, proper error handling
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record sync timing and data accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if sync issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of before/after sync states]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC20: ✅ Automatic cycle status updates base# Photo Meter Reads - Complete Test Suite (MX02US03)
Test Case 19: Concurrent User Access
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_019
- Title: Verify multiple supervisors can work on same cycles simultaneously without conflicts
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Concurrent Access
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 80% of concurrent access scenarios covered
- Integration_Points: Session management, data locking service, MX-Service concurrency handling
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Concurrency-Testing, Data-Integrity
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Multi-user session management, MX-Service concurrency APIs
- Performance_Baseline: No performance degradation with concurrent users
- Data_Requirements: Test cycle with assignable routes
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Two different browser sessions or separate user accounts
- User_Roles_Permissions: Two Meter Reading Supervisor accounts with access to same cycles
- Test_Data: "Downtown Area Q2" cycle with routes available for assignment
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab), TC_011 (Assignment) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Multiple users can work simultaneously without data corruption or conflicts
- Secondary_Verifications: Concurrent assignments work properly, conflicts handled appropriately, real-time updates work
- Negative_Verification: No race conditions, data inconsistencies, or lost updates
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record concurrent user behavior and conflict handling]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if concurrency issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots from both user sessions]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC20: ✅ System handles concurrent supervisor access without data integrity issues
- Concurrency Requirement: ✅ Multiple supervisors can work on same cycles simultaneously
Test Case 20: Performance - Dashboard Load Time
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_020
- Title: Verify dashboard loads within 3 seconds performance requirement
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Performance
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance requirements covered
- Integration_Points: Database query optimization, MX-Service performance, CDN
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Dashboard, SLA-Compliance
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Dependencies: Production-like data volume, CDN, MX-Service performance optimization
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds complete page load
- Data_Requirements: 100+ cycles loaded for realistic performance testing
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Database with realistic data volume (100+ cycles)
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Large dataset simulating production environment
- Prior_Test_Cases: System connectivity tests must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 3-second SLA requirement consistently
- Secondary_Verifications: All UI components load within individual time budgets, performance scales with data
- Negative_Verification: Performance doesn't degrade significantly with larger data sets
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual load times for each test run]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken for full test]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if performance issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring screenshots and timing logs]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- Performance SLA: ✅ Dashboard loads within 3-second requirement
- Scalability: ✅ Performance maintained with realistic data volumes
Test Case 21: Cross-Browser Compatibility
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_021
- Title: Verify Photo Meter Reads functionality works across all supported browsers
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Compatibility
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of core functionality across browsers
- Integration_Points: Browser compatibility layer, MX-Service browser handling
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Report, Compatibility-Dashboard
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Dependencies: Cross-browser testing infrastructure
- Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
- Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and updated
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Standard test cycle and route data
- Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality tests validated on primary browser
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Core functionality works identically across all supported browsers
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual consistency maintained, interactive elements function properly
- Negative_Verification: No browser-specific errors, layout issues, or functionality gaps
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record browser-specific behavior differences]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if browser compatibility issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots from each browser]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- Cross-Browser Support: ✅ Functionality consistent across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
- Visual Consistency: ✅ UI elements render consistently across browsers
Test Case 22: Mobile Responsive Design
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_022
- Title: Verify Photo Meter Reads interface is responsive on mobile devices
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Responsive Design
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Could-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 70% of mobile responsiveness covered
- Integration_Points: Responsive design framework, MX-Service mobile optimization
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile, Tablet
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Mobile-Testing, Responsive-Design
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Device/OS: iPhone (375x667), Android (360x640), Tablet (1024x768)
- Dependencies: Responsive design framework
- Performance_Baseline: Usable interface on mobile devices
- Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Mobile testing devices or browser developer tools
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Standard cycle and route data
- Prior_Test_Cases: Desktop functionality tests must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Interface is usable and functional on mobile devices
- Secondary_Verifications: Touch interactions work, text readable, tables scroll properly
- Negative_Verification: No UI elements are inaccessible or unusable on mobile
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record mobile interface behavior and usability]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if mobile issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots from mobile devices]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- Mobile Responsiveness: ✅ Interface adapts to mobile screen sizes
- Touch Compatibility: ✅ Touch interactions functional on mobile devices
Test Case 23: Data Validation - Business Rules
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_023
- Title: Verify all business rule calculations are accurate and consistent
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Business Rules
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of business rule calculations covered
- Integration_Points: Calculation engine, MX-Service calculation APIs, Database aggregations
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Critical-Path-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Calculation service, test data with known values, MX-Service calculation endpoints
- Performance_Baseline: < 1 second calculation time
- Data_Requirements: Test data with precisely known calculation inputs and expected outputs
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test data with controlled calculation inputs
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Known values: 89 readings out of 145 meters, 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_006 (Performance metrics) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All calculations follow documented business rules with correct mathematical formulas
- Secondary_Verifications: Percentages round correctly, status transitions follow rules, aggregations accurate
- Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, division by zero handled, no inconsistencies
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual calculation values vs expected]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of calculation displays with values]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC06: ✅ All performance metrics calculated correctly according to business rules
- AC07: ✅ Historical comparisons use proper percentage change calculations
- Business Rules: ✅ All weighted calculations and status transitions validated
Test Case 24: Error Handling - Network Failures
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_024
- Title: Verify system handles network failures and connectivity issues gracefully
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Error Handling
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Support
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 85% of error handling scenarios covered
- Integration_Points: Network error handling, MX-Service error responses, retry mechanisms
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Error-Handling, Reliability-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Network simulation tools, MX-Service error simulation
- Performance_Baseline: Graceful degradation during network issues
- Data_Requirements: Standard test data
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Network simulation tools available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Standard cycle and route data
- Prior_Test_Cases: Normal functionality tests must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: System handles network issues gracefully without data corruption
- Secondary_Verifications: Error messages clear and actionable, retry functionality works, recovery possible
- Negative_Verification: No partial data corruption, application crashes, or undefined states
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record error handling behavior and recovery]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if error handling issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of error states and recovery]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- Error Handling: ✅ Network failures handled gracefully with appropriate user feedback
- Data Integrity: ✅ No data corruption during network issues
Test Case 25: Security - Session Management
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_025
- Title: Verify proper session management and timeout handling
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Security
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90% of security session management covered
- Integration_Points: Authentication service, session management, MX-Service security
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Compliance-Report
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Authentication service, session management system, MX-Service security
- Performance_Baseline: Secure session handling without performance impact
- Data_Requirements: Valid user credentials and session configuration
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Session timeout configured for testing (e.g., 30 minutes)
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: Valid supervisor credentials for authentication
- Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication functionality must be validated
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Session management follows security best practices with proper timeout and cleanup
- Secondary_Verifications: Timeouts work correctly, concurrent sessions handled, permissions enforced
- Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access with expired sessions, no session data leakage
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record session management behavior and security responses]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of security states and error messages]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- Security: ✅ Session management implements proper timeout and security controls
- Authentication: ✅ Route assignment operations properly secured with authentication
API Test Case 26: Route Assignment API
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_API_001
- Title: Verify route assignment API endpoint functions correctly with validation
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Assignment API
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of assignment API functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Assignment service, user management, workload calculation, MX-Service assignment API
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: API
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: API-Testing-Report, Integration-Testing, Critical-Path-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Assignment API service, user management API, MX-Service backend
- Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time
- Data_Requirements: Valid route IDs, reader IDs, authentication tokens
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: API service running, test data configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: API access with Meter Reading Supervisor permissions
- Test_Data: Route ID: "route_123", Reader IDs: "reader_001" (available), "reader_999" (unavailable)
- Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication API tests must pass
API Endpoint
- URL: POST /api/routes/{routeId}/assign
- Headers: Authorization: Bearer {token}, Content-Type: application/json
- Body: {"readerId": "reader_001", "assignedBy": "supervisor_id"}
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: API handles route assignments correctly with proper validation and error responses
- Secondary_Verifications: Response format correct, database updated, performance acceptable
- Negative_Verification: Invalid requests rejected with appropriate HTTP status codes and error messages
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record API responses, status codes, and timing]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if API issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [API response logs and database state screenshots]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC10: ✅ Route assignment API properly validates reader availability
- AC11: ✅ API prevents assignment to unavailable readers with proper error responses
API Test Case 27: Real-time Data Sync API
Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX02US03_API_002
- Title: Verify real-time data synchronization API for meter reading updates
- Created By: QA Team
- Created Date: 2024-12-19
- Version: 1.0
Classification
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Real-time Sync API
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Enhanced Tags
Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of sync API functionality covered
- Integration_Points: Mobile app integration, real-time sync service, MX-Service sync API, Database updates
- Code_Module_Mapped: MX
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: API, Mobile
Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: API-Testing-Report, Real-time-Performance, Integration-Testing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability
Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Real-time sync service, mobile app simulation, MX-Service sync endpoints
- Performance_Baseline: < 200ms API response, sync within 30 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Valid reading data, route assignments, meter IDs
Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Sync service operational, test route assigned to reader
- User_Roles_Permissions: Mobile app API access, sync service permissions
- Test_Data: Route "route_123" assigned to "reader_001", meter IDs for reading submission
- Prior_Test_Cases: Assignment API tests must pass
API Endpoint
- URL: POST /api/readings/sync
- Headers: Authorization: Bearer {mobile_token}, Content-Type: application/json
- Body: {"readingId": "reading_001", "meterId": "meter_123", "value": "1234.5", "photoUrl": "photo_url", "timestamp": "ISO_datetime"}
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Real-time sync API maintains data consistency with proper error handling
- Secondary_Verifications: Batch processing works, rate limiting enforced, recovery mechanisms function
- Negative_Verification: Invalid data rejected, no sync failures cause data corruption
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record sync behavior, timing, and data consistency]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if sync issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [API logs, sync timing, database state changes]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC20: ✅ Real-time data synchronization API updates cycle status automatically
- Sync Performance: ✅ Data synchronization completes within 30-second SLA
Test Suite Organization and Execution Summary
Smoke Test Suite (Execute on every build - 5 critical tests)
- TC_001: Cycle List View Display (3 min)
- TC_005: Cycle Detail View Navigation (3 min)
- TC_009: Dispatch Tab Navigation (4 min)
- TC_020: Performance Dashboard Load Time (15 min)
- TC_025: Security Session Management (8 min)
- Total Smoke Suite Time: ~33 minutes
Regression Test Suite (Execute before each release - P1-P2 tests)
- All P1-Critical tests (13 tests): TC_001, TC_002, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_009, TC_010, TC_011, TC_018, TC_020, TC_023, TC_025, API_001, API_002
- All P2-High tests (9 tests): TC_003, TC_004, TC_008, TC_012, TC_013, TC_014, TC_015, TC_016, TC_017, TC_019, TC_021, TC_024
- Total Regression Suite Time: ~120 minutes
Full Test Suite (Execute weekly or major releases - All tests)
- All 27 test cases including P3-Medium: TC_022
- Total Full Suite Time: ~135 minutes
Performance Benchmarks
Integration Dependencies Map
External System Dependencies
- Meter Reader Mobile App
- Reading submission integration (TC_018, API_002)
- Photo upload functionality
- User authentication sync
- Database Systems
- Read cycle data storage (All DB-tagged tests)
- Route assignment tracking
- Performance metrics calculation
- MX-Service APIs
- Assignment management (API_001)
- Real-time sync service (API_002)
- Data calculation engines
BrowserStack Report Categories Coverage
Risk Assessment Matrix
High Risk Areas (Require P1-Critical testing)
- Real-time data synchronization (TC_018, API_002)
- Route assignment business rules (TC_011, API_001)
- Performance under load (TC_020)
- Business rule calculations (TC_023)
- Security and session management (TC_025)
Medium Risk Areas (P2-High testing adequate)
- Cross-browser compatibility (TC_021)
- Concurrent user access (TC_019)
- Error handling and recovery (TC_024)
- Filter combinations (TC_013, TC_014, TC_015)
Low Risk Areas (P3-Medium testing sufficient)
- Mobile responsive design (TC_022)
- Basic UI display elements
- Simple navigation flows
Final Validation Summary
✅ Total Test Cases Generated: 27 (25 Functional + 2 API)
✅ Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100% (All 20 criteria covered)
✅ Business Rules Coverage: 100% (All calculations and validations covered)
✅ Integration Points Coverage: 100% (Mobile app, Database, MX-Service, Cross-service)
✅ Performance Requirements: 100% (All SLA requirements tested)
✅ Security Requirements: 100% (Authentication, session management, permissions)
✅ Error Handling Coverage: 100% (Network failures, invalid inputs, concurrency)
✅ Cross-Platform Support: 100% (Web browsers, mobile responsiveness, API)
Quality Gates for Test Execution
Smoke Test Pass Criteria
- All 5 smoke tests must pass (100% pass rate)
- Performance benchmarks met (< 3 second load time)
- No critical security issues
Regression Test Pass Criteria
- ≥ 95% pass rate for P1-Critical tests
- ≥ 90% pass rate for P2-High tests
- All business rule calculations accurate
- No data integrity issues
Full Suite Pass Criteria
- ≥ 95% overall pass rate
- All acceptance criteria validated
- Cross-browser compatibility confirmed
- API integration fully functional
- Real-time sync within SLA requirements
Test Suite Status: COMPLETE AND READY FOR EXECUTION ✅### Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Route assigned to meter reader (from TC_011 or pre-assigned)
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Reading Supervisor role assigned
- Test_Data: "Downtown Route 5" assigned to "Robert Brown" with status "Dispatched"
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_009 (Dispatch tab), TC_011 (Assignment) must pass
Test Procedure
Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Unassignment process requires confirmation and updates route correctly
- Secondary_Verifications: Confirmation dialog functional, button states update, workload tracking accurate
- Negative_Verification: Cancel doesn't make changes, confirmation required for unassignment
Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record unassignment process behavior]
- Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if unassignment issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Screenshots of unassignment dialog]
Acceptance Criteria Coverage
- AC12: ✅ Route unassignment functionality with appropriate status changes
- AC18: ✅ Confirmation required before unassigning routes from meter readers