Photo Meter Reads (MX02US03)
Photo Meter Reads - Comprehensive Test Suite (MX02US03)
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality Scenarios
- Read Cycle List View Management
- Display read cycles with status indicators
- Filter cycles by month, status, and sort order
- Search cycles by name
- View cycle summary counters
- Read Cycle Detail View Management
- Display comprehensive cycle information
- Show performance metrics with historical comparisons
- Display meter reading quality breakdown
- Show route completion status
- Route Assignment and Dispatch
- Assign routes to available meter readers
- Unassign routes from meter readers
- Validate reader availability and workload
- Manage route status transitions
- Real-time Data Integration
- Sync with meter reader mobile submissions
- Update completion rates dynamically
- Refresh performance metrics
- Handle concurrent supervisor access
Business Rules Scenarios
- Status Transition Validation
- Workload Calculation and Assignment Rules
- Completion Percentage Calculations
- Quality Metrics Calculations
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance Scenarios
- Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
- Route assignment response time
- Real-time data sync performance
- Concurrent user handling
Security Scenarios
- Authentication and session management
- Role-based access control
- Data protection and audit trails
Compatibility Scenarios
- Cross-browser compatibility
- Responsive design validation
- Mobile integration compatibility
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions
- Maximum cycles, routes, and meters handling
- Date range validations
- Workload limit validations
System Failures
- Mobile app connectivity issues
- Real-time sync failures
- Concurrent assignment conflicts
Detailed Test Cases
Test Case 1: Cycle List View Display
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_001
Title: Verify Read Cycle List View displays correctly with all required elements
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - List View
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
- Dependencies: Database with sample read cycle data
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
Prerequisites:
- User logged in as Meter Reading Supervisor
- At least 5 read cycles exist in the system with different statuses
- Sample data includes cycles from current and previous months
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Photo Meter Reads section | Page loads within 3 seconds showing "Photo Meter Reads" header | N/A | Performance validation |
2 | Verify status counter tiles display | Four tiles showing "Not Dispatched", "Dispatched", "In Progress", "Completed" with correct counts | Current month data | Validate business rule calculations |
3 | Verify filter controls are present | Month dropdown, Status dropdown, Sort By dropdown, and Search bar are visible and functional | N/A | UI element validation |
4 | Verify data table headers | Table shows: Read Cycle Name, Month, Meters, Consumers, Readings, Meter Quality, Completion %, Status, Last Run Date, Next Run Date, Actions | N/A | Column structure validation |
5 | Verify sample data display | At least one cycle shows with proper data format and completion percentage with progress bar | "Downtown Area Q2" cycle | Data format validation |
6 | Verify action buttons | "View" and "Dispatch" buttons are present and enabled for appropriate cycle statuses | N/A | Action availability validation |
Primary Verification: All UI elements display correctly and page loads within performance baseline Secondary Verifications: Data formatting, counter calculations, button states Negative Verification: No error messages or broken UI elements
Test Case 2: Status Counter Calculations
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_002
Title: Verify status counter tiles calculate and display correct counts for current month
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - List View Counters
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Dependencies: Database with known test data counts
Prerequisites:
- Test data setup: 2 Not Dispatched, 1 Dispatched, 1 In Progress, 1 Completed cycles for current month
- Additional cycles from previous months exist but should not affect counts
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Photo Meter Reads | Page loads with status counter tiles | N/A | Initial load |
2 | Verify "Not Dispatched" counter | Shows count = 2 | Current month cycles only | Business rule validation |
3 | Verify "Dispatched" counter | Shows count = 1 | Current month cycles only | Business rule validation |
4 | Verify "In Progress" counter | Shows count = 1 | Current month cycles only | Business rule validation |
5 | Verify "Completed" counter | Shows count = 1 | Current month cycles only | Business rule validation |
6 | Change month filter to previous month | Counters update to show previous month's data | Previous month data | Filter impact validation |
7 | Reset filter to current month | Counters return to original values | Current month data | Filter reset validation |
Primary Verification: Counter calculations match expected values based on current month filter Secondary Verifications: Counters update correctly when filters change Negative Verification: Previous month data doesn't affect current month counters
Test Case 3: Cycle Search Functionality
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_003
Title: Verify search functionality filters cycles by name (case-insensitive)
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enter "downtown" in search box | Only cycles containing "downtown" (case-insensitive) are displayed | "downtown" | Case-insensitive search |
2 | Enter "AREA" in search box | Only cycles containing "area" are displayed | "AREA" | Case-insensitive validation |
3 | Enter "xyz123" in search box | "No results found" message displays | "xyz123" | No matches scenario |
4 | Clear search box | All cycles display again | "" | Clear search validation |
5 | Enter partial name "Down" | Cycles containing "Down" are displayed | "Down" | Partial match validation |
Primary Verification: Search returns correct filtered results based on cycle name matching Secondary Verifications: Case-insensitive matching works, partial matches work Negative Verification: Invalid searches show appropriate "no results" message
Test Case 4: Filter Combinations
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_004
Title: Verify multiple filter combinations work correctly together
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Filters
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Set Month filter to "April 2025" | Only April 2025 cycles display | "April 2025" | Month filter |
2 | Set Status filter to "In Progress" | Only April 2025 "In Progress" cycles display | "In Progress" | Combined filters |
3 | Set Sort By to "Next Run Date" | Results sorted by Next Run Date ascending | "Next Run Date" | Sort with filters |
4 | Add search term "Downtown" | Only April 2025, In Progress cycles containing "Downtown", sorted by Next Run Date | "Downtown" | All filters combined |
5 | Reset all filters | All cycles display in default order | Reset all | Filter reset |
Primary Verification: Multiple filters work correctly in combination Secondary Verifications: Filter combinations don't conflict, sorting works with filters Negative Verification: No unexpected results when combining filters
Test Case 5: Cycle Detail View Navigation
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_005
Title: Verify navigation to cycle detail view and cycle information display
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Detail View
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click "View" button for "Downtown Area Q2" cycle | Navigate to cycle detail page showing "Downtown Area Q2" | "Downtown Area Q2" | Navigation validation |
2 | Verify cycle dropdown shows current cycle | Dropdown shows "Downtown Area Q2" as selected | N/A | Dropdown state |
3 | Verify breadcrumb navigation | Shows "Home > Photo Reads > Downtown Area Q2" | N/A | Breadcrumb validation |
4 | Verify "Details" tab is active by default | "Details" tab is highlighted and content is shown | N/A | Default tab state |
5 | Verify cycle information section displays | Shows Cycle Name, Read Type, Month/Period, Status, Date Range, Number of Routes, Number of Meters, Number of Consumers | Cycle data | Information completeness |
6 | Verify Back button functionality | Clicking Back returns to list view | N/A | Navigation return |
Primary Verification: Detail view loads correctly with proper cycle information Secondary Verifications: Navigation elements work, breadcrumbs correct, tabs functional Negative Verification: No broken links or missing information
Test Case 6: Performance Metrics Display and Calculations
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_006
Title: Verify performance metrics display correctly with proper calculations and historical comparisons
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Performance Metrics
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Test Environment:
- Dependencies: Cycle with known metrics: 89 readings out of 145 meters, 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT
Prerequisites:
- "Downtown Area Q2" cycle with known test data
- Previous cycle data exists for comparison calculations
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to "Downtown Area Q2" detail view | Performance metrics section displays | "Downtown Area Q2" | Navigate to test cycle |
2 | Verify Completion Rate calculation | Shows "61%" calculated as (89÷145)*100 | 89 readings, 145 meters | Business rule validation |
3 | Verify Reading Accuracy calculation | Shows "93.5%" calculated as (72÷(72+12+5))*100 | 72 normal, 12 faulty, 5 RCNT | Accuracy calculation |
4 | Verify Avg. Turnaround displays | Shows turnaround time in days format (e.g., "3.2 days") | Calculated from assignment to upload times | Turnaround calculation |
5 | Verify Photo Submission calculation | Shows percentage of readings with valid photos | Photo count ÷ total readings | Photo submission rate |
6 | Verify historical comparison indicators | Each metric shows percentage change from last cycle (↑/↓ with color coding) | Previous cycle data | Trend indicators |
7 | Verify metric color coding | Green for improvements, Red for decreases, Neutral for no change | Comparison data | Visual indicators |
Primary Verification: All metrics calculate correctly according to business rules Secondary Verifications: Historical comparisons accurate, visual indicators appropriate Negative Verification: No incorrect calculations or missing percentage changes
Test Case 7: Meter Reading Quality Breakdown
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_007
Title: Verify meter reading quality breakdown displays correct counts and percentages
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Quality Metrics
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | View meter reading quality section | Displays Normal, Faulty, RCNT categories with counts and percentages | Quality data | Quality breakdown |
2 | Verify Normal reading count and percentage | Shows "72 (81%)" for normal readings | 72 normal out of 89 total | Normal calculation |
3 | Verify Faulty reading count and percentage | Shows "12 (13%)" for faulty readings | 12 faulty out of 89 total | Faulty calculation |
4 | Verify RCNT reading count and percentage | Shows "5 (6%)" for RCNT readings | 5 RCNT out of 89 total | RCNT calculation |
5 | Verify total percentages sum to 100% | Normal + Faulty + RCNT percentages equal 100% | 81% + 13% + 6% = 100% | Percentage total validation |
6 | Verify visual progress bars | Each category shows progress bar proportional to percentage | Visual representation | Progress bar accuracy |
Primary Verification: Quality breakdown shows correct counts and calculated percentages Secondary Verifications: Visual progress bars match percentages, totals add up correctly Negative Verification: No calculation errors or missing data
Test Case 8: Route Completion Status Display
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_008
Title: Verify route completion status shows individual route progress correctly
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Status
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | View Route Completion Status section | Shows list of all routes with completion percentages | Route data | Route status display |
2 | Verify "Downtown Route 1" shows 100% | Route shows complete with 100% progress bar | 28/28 meters read | Completed route |
3 | Verify "Downtown Route 2" shows 78% | Route shows 78% with corresponding progress bar | 25/32 meters read | In progress route |
4 | Verify "Downtown Route 6" shows 0% | Route shows 0% with empty progress bar | 0/20 meters read | Not started route |
5 | Verify progress bar colors | Completed routes show green, in-progress show blue, not started show grey | Visual indicators | Color coding |
6 | Verify route names are clickable/interactive | Route names may have hover effects or click functionality | Interactive elements | Route interaction |
Primary Verification: Route completion percentages calculate correctly Secondary Verifications: Visual progress bars accurate, color coding appropriate Negative Verification: No incorrect completion percentages
Test Case 9: Dispatch Tab Navigation and Display
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_009
Title: Verify Dispatch tab displays route assignment interface correctly
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Dispatch
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click "Dispatch" tab in cycle detail view | Navigate to dispatch view with route assignment interface | N/A | Tab navigation |
2 | Verify filter controls display | Shows Status, Meter Reader, and Date Range filters with Start Date and End Date | Filter controls | Filter availability |
3 | Verify search functionality | "Search by route name..." search bar is present and functional | Search interface | Search availability |
4 | Verify route table headers | Table shows: Select, Route Name, Meters, Consumers, Premises, Readings, Assigned To, Assigned Date, Due Date, Status, Actions | Table structure | Column headers |
5 | Verify sample route data displays | At least one route shows with proper data formatting | Route sample data | Data display |
6 | Verify Action buttons are appropriate | Routes show "Assign" or "Unassign" buttons based on current status | Status-based actions | Action button logic |
Primary Verification: Dispatch interface loads with all required elements Secondary Verifications: Filters functional, search works, table data displays correctly Negative Verification: No broken interface elements or missing functionality
Test Case 10: Route Assignment Modal Display
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_010
Title: Verify route assignment modal displays available meter readers with correct information
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Assignment
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click "Assign" button for "Downtown Route 6" | Assignment modal opens with title "Assign Meter Reader to Downtown Route 6" | "Downtown Route 6" | Modal opening |
2 | Verify search functionality in modal | Search bar with placeholder "Search by name or ID..." is functional | Search interface | Reader search |
3 | Verify meter reader table headers | Shows: User ID, Name, Contact, Workload, Rating, Availability | Table headers | Reader information structure |
4 | Verify reader data displays correctly | John Smith shows: ID=1, Contact=john.smith@example.com, Workload=5 routes, Rating=5 stars, Available | Sample reader data | Data accuracy |
5 | Verify unavailable reader indication | Sarah Wilson shows as "Unavailable" with different visual styling | Unavailable reader | Availability status |
6 | Verify action buttons in modal | "Cancel" and "Assign" buttons are present and functional | Modal actions | Button availability |
7 | Verify modal can be closed | Clicking X or Cancel closes modal without changes | Modal closure | Close functionality |
Primary Verification: Assignment modal displays complete meter reader information Secondary Verifications: Search works, availability status clear, buttons functional Negative Verification: Unavailable readers clearly indicated, modal closes properly
Test Case 11: Route Assignment Business Rules Validation
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_011
Title: Verify route assignment respects business rules for reader availability and workload
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Assignment Validation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Open assignment modal for unassigned route | Modal displays available readers with current workloads | "Downtown Route 6" | Setup |
2 | Attempt to select unavailable reader | Reader selection disabled or error message displays | Sarah Wilson (Unavailable) | Availability validation |
3 | Select available reader with low workload | Reader can be selected successfully | Robert Brown (2 routes) | Low workload selection |
4 | Click "Assign" button | Assignment completes, modal closes, route status updates to "Dispatched" | Assignment action | Successful assignment |
5 | Verify route table updates | Route now shows assigned reader name and assigned date | Updated route data | Status update |
6 | Verify reader workload increases | If checking same reader again, workload count increments | Workload tracking | Workload update |
Primary Verification: Assignment only succeeds for available readers Secondary Verifications: Workload tracking accurate, status updates correctly Negative Verification: Cannot assign to unavailable readers
Test Case 12: Route Unassignment Process
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_012
Title: Verify route unassignment process works correctly with confirmation dialog
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Unassignment
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click "Unassign" button for assigned route | Confirmation dialog opens showing route details and current reader | "Downtown Route 5" | Unassignment initiation |
2 | Verify confirmation dialog content | Shows route name, current assigned reader, and confirmation message | Route and reader details | Dialog content |
3 | Click "Cancel" in confirmation dialog | Dialog closes without making changes, route remains assigned | Cancel action | Cancel functionality |
4 | Click "Unassign" again and then "Confirm" | Route status changes to "Not Dispatched", assigned reader changes to "N/A" | Confirm action | Successful unassignment |
5 | Verify action button changes | "Unassign" button changes to "Assign" button | Button state change | Action button update |
6 | Verify assigned date and reader cleared | Assigned Date shows "N/A", Assigned To shows "N/A" | Cleared assignments | Data clearing |
Primary Verification: Unassignment process requires confirmation and updates route correctly Secondary Verifications: Confirmation dialog functional, button states update Negative Verification: Cancel doesn't make changes, confirmation required for unassignment
Test Case 13: Route Status Filtering
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_013
Title: Verify route status filtering works correctly in dispatch view
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Filtering
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Set Status filter to "Not Dispatched" | Only routes with "Not Dispatched" status display | Filter selection | Status filtering |
2 | Set Status filter to "Dispatched" | Only routes with "Dispatched" status display | Filter selection | Status validation |
3 | Set Status filter to "In Progress" | Only routes with "In Progress" status display | Filter selection | Progress filtering |
4 | Set Status filter to "Completed" | Only routes with "Completed" status display | Filter selection | Completed filtering |
5 | Set Status filter to "All Statuses" | All routes display regardless of status | Reset filter | Filter reset |
6 | Verify route count updates | Route count indicator updates based on filtered results | Count validation | Result count |
Primary Verification: Status filtering returns correct routes for each status Secondary Verifications: Filter reset works, route counts accurate Negative Verification: No routes from excluded statuses appear in filtered results
Test Case 14: Meter Reader Filtering
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_014
Title: Verify meter reader filtering works correctly showing assigned and unassigned routes
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Reader Filtering
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Set Meter Reader filter to "Assigned" | Only routes with assigned readers display | Assigned filter | Assigned routes only |
2 | Set Meter Reader filter to "Unassigned" | Only routes without assigned readers display (N/A in Assigned To column) | Unassigned filter | Unassigned routes only |
3 | Set Meter Reader filter to specific reader name | Only routes assigned to that specific reader display | "John Smith" | Specific reader filter |
4 | Set Meter Reader filter to "All Readers" | All routes display regardless of assignment status | All readers filter | Filter reset |
5 | Combine with status filter | Apply both Meter Reader and Status filters simultaneously | Combined filters | Multiple filter validation |
Primary Verification: Reader filtering correctly separates assigned/unassigned routes Secondary Verifications: Specific reader filtering works, combined filters work Negative Verification: Filtered results don't include routes outside filter criteria
Test Case 15: Date Range Filtering
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_015
Title: Verify date range filtering works correctly for route due dates
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Date Filtering
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Set Start Date to "April 1, 2025" | Date picker accepts the date | "04/01/2025" | Start date selection |
2 | Set End Date to "April 15, 2025" | Date picker accepts the date | "04/15/2025" | End date selection |
3 | Apply date range filter | Only routes with due dates between April 1-15 display | Date range | Date filtering |
4 | Verify filtered results | All displayed routes have due dates within the specified range | Due date validation | Range validation |
5 | Clear date filters | All routes display again regardless of due date | Clear filters | Filter reset |
6 | Test invalid date range (End before Start) | Error message displays or End date auto-adjusts | Invalid range | Error handling |
Primary Verification: Date range filtering returns routes within specified date range Secondary Verifications: Date pickers functional, invalid ranges handled Negative Verification: Routes outside date range are excluded
Test Case 16: Route Search in Dispatch View
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_016
Title: Verify route search functionality works correctly in dispatch view
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Route Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enter "Route 1" in search box | Only routes containing "Route 1" display | "Route 1" | Route name search |
2 | Enter "downtown" in search box | Only routes containing "downtown" (case-insensitive) display | "downtown" | Case-insensitive search |
3 | Enter "ROUTE" in search box | Routes containing "route" display regardless of case | "ROUTE" | Case validation |
4 | Enter partial name "Down" | Routes containing "Down" are displayed | "Down" | Partial match |
5 | Enter non-existent route name | "No routes found" message displays | "XYZ999" | No matches |
6 | Clear search box | All routes display again | "" | Clear search |
Primary Verification: Route search returns correct filtered results Secondary Verifications: Case-insensitive search works, partial matches work Negative Verification: Invalid searches show "no results" message
Test Case 17: Cycle Dropdown Navigation
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_017
Title: Verify cycle dropdown allows switching between active cycles
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Cycle Navigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click cycle dropdown in detail view | Dropdown opens showing searchable list of active cycles | Cycle dropdown | Dropdown functionality |
2 | Verify only active cycles are shown | Only cycles with status "Not Dispatched", "Dispatched", "In Progress" appear | Active cycles only | Business rule validation |
3 | Search for specific cycle in dropdown | Type "East" and see "East Industrial Zone" appear | "East" search | Dropdown search |
4 | Select different cycle from dropdown | Navigate to selected cycle's detail view | "East Industrial Zone" | Cycle switching |
5 | Verify page updates with new cycle data | All metrics, routes, and information update to reflect selected cycle | New cycle data | Data refresh |
6 | Verify URL/breadcrumb updates | URL and breadcrumb reflect the newly selected cycle | URL change | Navigation state |
Primary Verification: Cycle dropdown allows switching between active cycles Secondary Verifications: Search in dropdown works, data updates correctly Negative Verification: Completed cycles don't appear in dropdown
Test Case 18: Real-time Data Sync
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_018
Title: Verify real-time data synchronization when meter readers submit readings
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Real-time Integration
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Test Environment:
- Dependencies: Meter reader mobile app, real-time sync service
- Performance_Baseline: Updates within 30 seconds
Prerequisites:
- Route assigned to meter reader with mobile app access
- Route has unread meters available
- Real-time sync service is operational
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Note current completion percentage for test route | Record baseline completion percentage | Starting percentage | Baseline measurement |
2 | Meter reader submits reading via mobile app | Reading submitted successfully on mobile side | Mobile app submission | External action |
3 | Wait 30 seconds and refresh web interface | Completion percentage increases, readings count increases | Updated data | Real-time sync |
4 | Verify route status updates | If readings progress, status may change from "Dispatched" to "In Progress" | Status transition | Business rule validation |
5 | Verify performance metrics update | Overall cycle metrics reflect new reading data | Metrics update | Calculation refresh |
6 | Submit multiple readings and verify batch updates | Multiple readings sync correctly and metrics update accordingly | Batch submissions | Bulk sync validation |
Primary Verification: Real-time data synchronization works within 30 seconds Secondary Verifications: Status transitions occur correctly, metrics update Negative Verification: No data loss or sync errors during updates
Test Case 19: Concurrent User Access
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_019
Title: Verify multiple supervisors can work on same cycles simultaneously without conflicts
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Concurrent Access
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Environment:
- Requires: Two different browser sessions or users
Prerequisites:
- Two supervisor accounts with access to same cycles
- Test cycle with assignable routes
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | User A and User B both navigate to same cycle dispatch view | Both users see current route assignment status | Same cycle | Concurrent access |
2 | User A assigns Route 1 to Reader 1 | Assignment succeeds, route status updates | Route assignment | First user action |
3 | User B refreshes and views same cycle | User B sees Route 1 is now assigned to Reader 1 | Updated status | Data consistency |
4 | User A assigns Route 2, User B assigns Route 3 simultaneously | Both assignments succeed without conflict | Simultaneous assignments | Conflict handling |
5 | Both users attempt to assign same route to different readers | System prevents conflict or shows error message | Same route conflict | Conflict prevention |
6 | Verify final state consistency | Both users see consistent final assignment state | Final state | Data integrity |
Primary Verification: Multiple users can work simultaneously without data corruption Secondary Verifications: Concurrent assignments work, conflicts handled properly Negative Verification: No race conditions or inconsistent data states
Test Case 20: Performance - Dashboard Load Time
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_020
Title: Verify dashboard loads within 3 seconds performance requirement
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Performance
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
Quality Metrics:
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds
Test Environment:
- Network conditions: Broadband connection
- Browser: Chrome Latest
- Test data: 100+ cycles loaded
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Clear browser cache and cookies | Cache cleared successfully | N/A | Clean test environment |
2 | Navigate to Photo Meter Reads page and start timer | Page begins loading | N/A | Load initiation |
3 | Measure time until page fully loads | Complete page load within 3 seconds | Load time < 3s | Performance validation |
4 | Verify all elements loaded correctly | Status counters, filters, table data all present | Complete UI | Functional validation |
5 | Repeat test 5 times to get average | Average load time remains under 3 seconds | 5 test runs | Consistency validation |
6 | Test with different data volumes | Performance remains acceptable with varying data sizes | Different data sets | Scalability testing |
Primary Verification: Dashboard loads within 3-second performance requirement Secondary Verifications: Consistent performance across multiple loads Negative Verification: Performance doesn't degrade with larger data sets
Test Case 21: Cross-Browser Compatibility
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_021
Title: Verify Photo Meter Reads functionality works across all supported browsers
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Compatibility
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Environment:
- Browsers: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Test basic navigation in Chrome | All pages load correctly, navigation works | Chrome testing | Chrome validation |
2 | Test basic navigation in Firefox | All pages load correctly, navigation works | Firefox testing | Firefox validation |
3 | Test basic navigation in Safari | All pages load correctly, navigation works | Safari testing | Safari validation |
4 | Test basic navigation in Edge | All pages load correctly, navigation works | Edge testing | Edge validation |
5 | Test interactive elements in all browsers | Dropdowns, modals, buttons work consistently | Cross-browser testing | Interaction validation |
6 | Test responsive design across screen sizes | Layout adapts correctly on different screen sizes | Responsive testing | Layout validation |
Primary Verification: Core functionality works across all supported browsers Secondary Verifications: Visual consistency, interactive elements work Negative Verification: No browser-specific errors or layout issues
Test Case 22: Mobile Responsive Design
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_022
Title: Verify Photo Meter Reads interface is responsive on mobile devices
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Responsive Design
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Environment:
- Devices: iPhone (375x667), Android (360x640), Tablet (1024x768)
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Photo Meter Reads on mobile device | Interface adapts to mobile screen size | Mobile view | Responsive layout |
2 | Test touch interactions | Buttons, dropdowns, and modals work with touch | Touch testing | Mobile interaction |
3 | Verify table scrolling | Data tables scroll horizontally on small screens | Table responsiveness | Horizontal scroll |
4 | Test assignment modal on mobile | Modal displays properly and is usable on mobile | Mobile modal | Modal responsiveness |
5 | Verify filter functionality on mobile | Filters collapse appropriately and remain functional | Mobile filters | Filter usability |
6 | Test landscape/portrait orientation | Interface adapts correctly to orientation changes | Orientation testing | Orientation handling |
Primary Verification: Interface is usable on mobile devices Secondary Verifications: Touch interactions work, modals functional Negative Verification: No UI elements are inaccessible on mobile
Test Case 23: Data Validation - Business Rules
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_023
Title: Verify all business rule calculations are accurate and consistent
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Business Rules
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Environment:
- Dependencies: Test data with known calculation values
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Verify completion percentage calculation | (Readings Completed ÷ Total Meters) × 100 | 89÷145×100 = 61.38% | Completion rate formula |
2 | Verify reading accuracy calculation | (Normal Readings ÷ Total Readings) × 100 | 72÷89×100 = 80.90% | Accuracy calculation |
3 | Verify quality breakdown percentages | Each category percentage = (Category Count ÷ Total Readings) × 100 | Normal: 72÷89×100 = 80.90% | Quality percentage |
4 | Verify status transition rules | Status changes according to business rules | Status progression | Status logic |
5 | Verify historical comparison calculations | (Current - Previous) ÷ Previous × 100 | Percentage change formula | Trend calculation |
6 | Verify counter aggregations | Status counters match actual cycle counts | Count validation | Counter accuracy |
Primary Verification: All calculations follow documented business rules Secondary Verifications: Percentages round correctly, status transitions proper Negative Verification: No calculation errors or inconsistencies
Test Case 24: Error Handling - Network Failures
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_024
Title: Verify system handles network failures and connectivity issues gracefully
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Error Handling
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Environment:
- Network simulation tools to simulate connectivity issues
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Simulate network disconnection during page load | Appropriate error message displays | Network offline | Connection error |
2 | Attempt route assignment during network issue | Error message shows, assignment doesn't complete | Assignment attempt | Assignment error |
3 | Restore network connection | User can retry operations successfully | Network restored | Recovery validation |
4 | Simulate slow network conditions | Loading indicators show, operations complete eventually | Slow connection | Timeout handling |
5 | Test retry functionality | User can retry failed operations | Retry operations | Retry mechanism |
6 | Verify data consistency after network issues | No partial or corrupted data from failed operations | Data integrity | Consistency check |
Primary Verification: System handles network issues gracefully Secondary Verifications: Error messages clear, retry functionality works Negative Verification: No data corruption from network failures
Test Case 25: Security - Session Management
Test Case ID: MX02US03_TC_025
Title: Verify proper session management and timeout handling
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Security
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Environment:
- Session timeout configured for testing
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Log in and navigate to Photo Meter Reads | Session established, page loads | Valid credentials | Session start |
2 | Leave browser idle for session timeout period | Session expires, user redirected to login | Idle timeout | Timeout validation |
3 | Attempt to perform actions after timeout | Operations fail, login required | Expired session | Security validation |
4 | Test concurrent sessions | Multiple browser sessions handled correctly | Multiple sessions | Session isolation |
5 | Verify session data clearing | Session data cleared on logout | Logout action | Data cleanup |
6 | Test invalid session handling | Invalid session tokens rejected | Invalid tokens | Security check |
Primary Verification: Session management follows security best practices Secondary Verifications: Timeouts work correctly, concurrent sessions handled Negative Verification: No unauthorized access with expired sessions
API Test Cases (Critical Level ≥7)
API Test Case 1: Route Assignment API
Test Case ID: MX02US03_API_001
Title: Verify route assignment API endpoint functions correctly
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - API
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
API Endpoint: POST /api/routes/{routeId}/assign
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Send valid assignment request | HTTP 200 response with assignment confirmation | Valid route ID and reader ID | Successful assignment |
2 | Send request with invalid route ID | HTTP 404 response with error message | Non-existent route ID | Route validation |
3 | Send request with unavailable reader | HTTP 400 response with availability error | Unavailable reader ID | Reader validation |
4 | Send request with invalid authentication | HTTP 401 response with auth error | Invalid token | Authentication check |
5 | Verify response payload structure | Response includes assignment details and updated status | JSON structure | Response validation |
6 | Test concurrent assignment requests | Proper handling of simultaneous requests | Multiple requests | Concurrency handling |
Primary Verification: API handles route assignments correctly with proper validation Secondary Verifications: Error responses appropriate, authentication enforced Negative Verification: Invalid requests rejected with proper error codes
API Test Case 2: Real-time Data Sync API
Test Case ID: MX02US03_API_002
Title: Verify real-time data synchronization API for meter reading updates
Created Date: 2024-12-19
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Photo Meter Reads - Real-time API
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
API Endpoint: POST /api/readings/sync
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Send reading update from mobile app | HTTP 200 response, data synced to web interface | Valid reading data | Sync validation |
2 | Verify web interface updates | Completion percentages and metrics update within 30 seconds | Updated metrics | Real-time sync |
3 | Send batch reading updates | All readings processed correctly | Multiple readings | Batch processing |
4 | Send invalid reading data | HTTP 400 response with validation errors | Invalid data format | Data validation |
5 | Test API rate limiting | Appropriate rate limiting responses | High request volume | Rate limiting |
6 | Verify data consistency | No data loss or corruption during sync | Sync integrity | Data integrity |
Primary Verification: Real-time sync API maintains data consistency Secondary Verifications: Batch processing works, rate limiting enforced Negative Verification: Invalid data rejected, no sync failures
Test Suite Organization
Smoke Test Suite (Execute on every build)
- MX02US03_TC_001: Cycle List View Display
- MX02US03_TC_005: Cycle Detail View Navigation
- MX02US03_TC_009: Dispatch Tab Navigation
- MX02US03_TC_020: Performance - Dashboard Load Time
Regression Test Suite (Execute before each release)
- All P1-Critical and P2-High priority test cases
- All business rule validation test cases
- All API test cases
- Cross-browser compatibility tests
Full Test Suite (Execute weekly or major releases)
- All test cases including edge cases and P3-Medium/P4-Low priority
- Performance testing under various conditions
- Security testing comprehensive suite
- Mobile responsive design testing
Performance Benchmarks
Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
---|---|---|
Dashboard Load Time | < 3 seconds | Page load complete event |
Route Assignment Response | < 1 second | API response time |
Real-time Sync Delay | < 30 seconds | Mobile to web update time |
Concurrent Users | 50+ simultaneous | Load testing |
Data Refresh Rate | Every 30 seconds | Auto-refresh cycle |
Integration Test Dependencies
External System Dependencies
- Meter Reader Mobile App
- Reading submission API
- Photo upload functionality
- User authentication sync
- Database Systems
- Read cycle data storage
- Route assignment tracking
- Performance metrics calculation
- Real-time Sync Service
- WebSocket connections
- Data synchronization
- Event notification system
Test Data Requirements
Cycle Test Data
- 5 read cycles with different statuses
- Historical data for trend calculations
- Route assignments with various completion levels
User Test Data
- 5 meter readers with different workloads
- 1 unavailable reader for testing
- Multiple supervisor accounts for concurrent testing
Performance Test Data
- 100+ cycles for load testing
- 1000+ routes for scalability testing
- Realistic data volumes for performance validation
Execution Matrix
Test Case | Chrome | Firefox | Safari | Edge | Mobile | Tablet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TC_001-010 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
TC_011-020 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
TC_021-025 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
API_001-002 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A |
BrowserStack Report Mapping
- Quality Dashboard Report: All P1-Critical test cases
- Module Coverage Report: All functional test cases by module
- Performance Report: Performance test cases (TC_020, API response times)
- Cross-Browser Report: Compatibility test cases (TC_021, TC_022)
- API Testing Report: All API test cases
- Security Report: Security test cases (TC_025)
- Integration Report: Real-time sync and external dependency tests
- Regression Report: All regression phase test cases
- Smoke Report: Smoke test suite results
- Business Rules Report: Business rule validation test cases
- User Experience Report: UI/UX and responsive design tests
- Error Handling Report: Error scenario and edge case tests
- Concurrent Testing Report: Multi-user and concurrent access tests
- Data Integrity Report: Data validation and consistency tests
- Customer Impact Report: Revenue-impact and business-critical tagged tests
- Compliance Report: Compliance-required tagged tests
- Executive Summary Report: High-level metrics and critical issues
Risk Assessment
High Risk Areas
- Real-time data synchronization
- Concurrent user access
- Performance under load
- Business rule calculations
Medium Risk Areas
- Cross-browser compatibility
- Mobile responsive design
- Error handling and recovery
- API rate limiting
Low Risk Areas
- Basic UI display
- Static content rendering
- Simple navigation flows
- Standard form interactions
Success Criteria
Functional Acceptance
- All P1-Critical test cases pass
- Business rule calculations are accurate
- Route assignment workflow functions correctly
- Real-time sync operates within performance requirements
Performance Acceptance
- Dashboard loads within 3 seconds
- API responses under 1 second
- Real-time updates within 30 seconds
- Support for 50+ concurrent users
Quality Acceptance
- Zero critical defects
- <2% test case failure rate
- All security requirements validated
- Cross-browser compatibility confirmed
Total Test Cases Generated: 27 (25 Functional + 2 API)
Estimated Execution Time: 8-10 hours for complete suite
Automation Coverage: 60% of test cases planned for automation
Critical Path Coverage: 100% of business-critical workflows covered