Skip to main content

Message History Management System (UX05US05 )

Message History Management System - Enhanced Comprehensive Test Suite (UX05US05)

Test Coverage Summary

Total Test Cases:9 12
 Total Acceptance Criteria: 10
 Total Coverage Percentage: 90%

Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Message History Display & Navigation

Search & Filter Operations

Message Status Tracking

Message Detail Viewing

User Role-Based Access

Cross-Channel Message Integration

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance Testing

Security & Access Control

Cross-Browser Compatibility

Usability & User Experience

Data Integrity & Reliability

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

Invalid Input Handling

System Failure Recovery

Data Inconsistency Handling100%




SMOKE TEST SUITE

UX05US05_TC_001

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_001
Title: Verify Message History Page Load and BasicUnified Message Type Display
Created By: Auto-generatedPrachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Message History Dashboard
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-AutomationManual

Enhanced Tags:Tags: MOD-MessageHistory, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-DashboardDashboard, HappyPath, Services, API, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: LowMedium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 23 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Database, UI Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication Service, Message Database, UI Framework
  • Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds page load
  • Data_Requirements: Sample messages of all types

Prerequisites:

  • UserSetup_Requirements: loggedMessage inHistory asservice running
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager role
  • AtTest_Data: leastMessages 10of sampleall messagestypes exist(Email, inSMS, theNotification, systemWhatsApp)
  • NetworkPrior_Test_Cases: connectivityAuthentication availabletest must pass

Test Data:

  • User: cso.manager@atlanticpower.com / SecurePass123!
  • Sample messagesmessages:
    • Email: from"Monthly AtlanticEnergy PowerUsage CompanyReport" to john.doe@atlanticpower.com
    • SMS: "Service Outage Alert" to +15551234567
    • Notification: "System Maintenance" to admin-group
    • WhatsApp: "Payment Reminder" to +15559876543

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to History section in left navigation

History section highlights and expands

-

Verify navigation state

2

Click on Message History option

Message History page loads within 3 seconds

-

Check page load time

3

Verify page header and description

"Message History" title and subtitle visibledisplay correctly

-

UI validation

4

Check message table headers

Subject, Recipient, Type, Date, Status columns visible

-

Table structure check

5

Verify all message types display

Email, SMS, Notification, WhatsApp messages all visible in unified view

All message types

AC1 compliance

6

Check message type indicators

Each message shows correct type label/icon

Type indicators

Type identification

7

Verify recipient format consistency

All recipients display in consistent format across message types

Various recipients

AC9 compliance

8

Verify search bar presence

Search messages input field visible and functional

-

Search functionality

69

Check filter dropdowns

Status and Type filter dropdowns present and populated

-

Filter controls

8

The system must display all message types

all message types should be displayed (Email, SMS, Notification,whatsapp) in unified interface

-

-

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Message History page loads successfully with all UImessage elementstypes in unified interface
  • Secondary_Verifications: Navigation state, filter controls, searchrecipient functionalityformat consistency
  • Negative_Verification: No error messagesmessages, missing message types, or broken UI elements




UX05US05_TC_002

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_002
Title: Verify Message Status Visual Indicators and Color Coding and Visual IndicatorsCompliance
Created By: Auto-generatedPrachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Message Status Display
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-StatusIndicators, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-MediumMedium, HappyPath, Services, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Message Status Service, UI Components
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Message Status Service, CSS Framework
  • Data_Requirements: Messages with all status types

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Message History service operational and responsive
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager
  • Test_Data: Messages with all four status types (sent, delivered, pending, failed) available in system database
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX05US05_TC_001 (Message History Page Load) must pass successfully

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate message with "delivered" status

Status shows blue color indicator with "delivered" text

Delivered email message

Blue = delivered per business rules

2

Locate message with "sent" status

Status shows green color indicator with "sent" text

Sent SMS message

Green = sent per business rules

3

Locate message with "pending" status

Status shows yellow color indicator with "pending" text

Pending invoice message

Yellow = pending per business rules

4

Locate message with "failed" status

Status shows red color indicator with "failed" text

Failed verification email

Red = failed per business rules

7

Verify status indicator visibility

All status indicators clearly visible and distinguishable

All messages

Visual accessibility

78

Check status consistency

Same status types show identical indicators across message types

Cross-type comparison

Consistency validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All status indicators display correct colors and text per AC2
  • Secondary_Verifications visual consistency, accessibility
  • Negative_Verification: No missing, incorrect, or inconsistent status indicators




REGRESSION TEST SUITE

UX05US05_TC_003

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_003
 Title: Verify Comprehensive Search Functionality Across All Message Attributes
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: 2025-06-06
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Search & Filter Operations
  • Test Type: Functional/Integration
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, API, Database, HappyPath, Services

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: LowMedium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 30%
  • Integration_Points: Database, Message Content Service,API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 1010/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution:Performance_Baseline: Desktop-1920x1080<500ms search response
  • Dependencies: Search API, Message Database, Content Indexing Service

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Message History page loaded
  • MessagesUser_Roles_Permissions: withCSO differentManager
  • Prior_Test_Cases: statusUX05US05_TC_001 types(Message availableHistory Page Load) must pass successfully

Test Data:

  • MessagesSubject withsearch: status:"Account sent,Verification", delivered,"Usage pending,Alert", failed"Payment Confirmation"
  • Recipient search: "robert.johnson@example.com", "john.doe", "+15551234567"
  • Tag search: "billing", "maintenance", "emergency"
  • Content search: "click the link below", "payment due", "service restored"

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

LocateEnter messagesubject withtext "delivered"in statussearch box

StatusSearch showsfilters bluemessages colorcontaining indicatorsubject text within 500ms

Email"Account to john.doe@atlanticpower.comVerification"

BlueSubject =search deliveredvalidation

2

LocateClear message with "sent" status

Status shows green color indicator

SMS to +15551234567

Green = sent

3

Locate message with "pending" status

Status shows yellow color indicator

Invoice to mary.williams@example.com

Yellow = pending

4

Locate message with "failed" status

Status shows red color indicator

Email to robert.johnson@example.com

Red = failed

5

Hover over each status indicator

Tooltip shows status description

-

Accessibility check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All status indicators display correct colors per business rules
  • Secondary_Verifications: Tooltips, visual consistency
  • Negative_Verification: No missing or incorrect status indicators

UX05US05_TC_003

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_003
 Title: Verify Search Functionality Across Message Content
 Created By: Auto-generated
 Created Date: 2025-05-29
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Search & Filter

Test Type: Functional

Test Level: Integration

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Regression

Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, API, Database, HappyPath

Business Context:

Customer_Segment: All

Revenue_Impact: High

Business_Priority: Must-Have

Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

Compliance_Required: No

SLA_Related: Yes

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging

Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+

Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

Performance_Baseline: <500msand search response

Prerequisites:

Message History page loaded

Sample messages with various subjects and content

User has appropriate permissions

Test Data:

Search terms: "Account Verification", "robert.johnson@example.com", "Usage Alert", "Invoice"

Expected messages for each search term available

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Use the search bar to find specific messages by keyword,recipient customer name, or message content

Search filters messages containing this text

Account Verification

Subject search

2

click searchemail

Results show only relevant messages withinto 1secspecific recipient

-robert.johnson@example.com

PerformanceEmail checkrecipient search

3

Clear search and enter customer name

Search filterssearch by recipient name

robert.johnsonResults show messages to recipient by name

Recipient"john.doe"

Name-based recipient search

4

Clear and search by tag

Results show messages with specific tag

"billing"

Tag-based search

5

Clear and search by message content

Results show messages containing content text

"click the link below"

Content search validation

7

Search with partial text

Partial matches appear in results

"Invoice"

Partial matching capability

68

Search with case variations

Search is case-insensitive

"ACCOUNT", "account", "Account"

Case sensitivity test

9

Search with special characters

Special characters handled correctly

"payment@due", "#INV-2025"

Special character handling

10

Search with non-existent term

"No results found" message displays clearly

xyz123nonexistent"xyz123nonexistent"

Empty results handling

711

Clear search field

All messages display again

-

Reset functionality

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search returnsaccurately accuratefinds resultsmessages foracross allsubject, searchrecipient, criteriatags, and content per AC5

  • Secondary_Verifications: Response time,time compliance, partial matching, emptycase statehandling,no data handling

  • Negative_Verification: Invalid searches handled gracefullygracefully, no system errors




UX05US05_TC_004


UX05US05_TC_004

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_004
Title: Verify Single-Click Filter Functionality byfor StatusType and TypeStatus
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Filter Operations

  • Test Type: Functional

  • Test Level: System

  • Priority: P2-High

  • Execution Phase: Regression

  • Automation Status: AutomatedManual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Communication, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, APIAPI, ,DatabaseDatabase, ,HappyPathHappyPath, Services

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact: High

  • Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: HighMedium
  • Complexity_Level: LowMedium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 24 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: MediumLow
  • Failure_Impact: CriticalHigh

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: Filter Service, Database Query Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

    Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

  • Performance_Baseline: <500ms searchfilter response

    Prerequisites:

  • Dependencies: Filter API, Message Database

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Message History pageservice loadedrunning

  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager role
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication test must pass,UX05US05_TC_001

Messages with different statuses and types available

Test Data:

  • Status filters: All, Delivered, Sent, Pending, Failed

  • Type filters: All, Email, SMS, Notification, WhatsApp

  • Mixed message data with all combinations

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click Status dropdown

Dropdown showsopens showing all status options

All, Delivered, Sent, Pending, Failed

Status filter UI - AC4

2

SelectSingle-click "Failed" from Status filterstatus

Only failed messages display immediately

Failed status filter

FilterSingle-click applicationfiltering - AC4

3

Verify filter application speed

Filter applies within 500ms

-

Performance validation

4

Click Type dropdown while Failed filter active

Type dropdown shows available options

All, Email, SMS, NotificationWhatsApp

CombinedType filteringfilter UI - AC3

45

SelectSingle-click "Email" from Type filtertype

Only failed email messages display

Failed + Email filter

MultipleCombined filtersfiltering - AC3

56

ChangeSingle-click Statusdifferent to "Delivered"status

OnlyFilter deliveredchanges to new status with email messages displaytype

Delivered + Email

Filter interaction

67

Reset Type toSingle-click "All" in Type

All deliveredmessages messagesof selected status display

DeliveredStatus + All types

FilterType filter reset

78

Test each status filter individually

Each status filter works with single click

Each status option

AC4 comprehensive test

9

Test each type filter individually

Each type filter works with single click

Each type option

AC3 comprehensive test

10

Reset all filters to "All"

All messages display

All + All

Complete reset

11

Verify filter state persistence

Filters maintain state during page interactions

Active filters

State management

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: FiltersSingle-click workfiltering independentlyworks for both type and instatus combinationper AC3 and AC4

  • Secondary_Verifications: Filter combinations, performance, state persistence, UI updatespersistence

  • Negative_Verification: No filter failures or incorrect filter results




UX05US05_TC_005


UX05US05_TC_005

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_005
Title: Verify Complete Message Content Display and Recipient Information ConsistencyTitle:

VerifyCreated By: Prachi
 Created Date: 2025-06-06
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Message Detail View and Content Display
     Created By: Prachi
     Created Date: 2025-05-29
     Version: 1.0

    Classification:

    Module/Feature: Message Details

  • Test Type: Functional/UI

  • Test Level: System

  • Priority: P2-High

  • Execution Phase: Regression

  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Communication, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, HappyPathHappyPath, ,Database, DatabaseServices

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact: High

  • Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: HighMedium
  • Complexity_Level: LowMedium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 24 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: MediumHigh
  • Failure_Impact: CriticalHigh

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Message Content Service, Database, UI Modal Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

    Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

  • Performance_Baseline: <500ms searchfilter response

    Prerequisites:

  • Dependencies: Filter API, Message Database

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Message History pageservice loadedrunning
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager role
  • Test_Data: Messages of all types (Email, SMS, Notification, WhatsApp)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication test must pass


Sample message available for viewing

Test Data:

  • Message:Email message: "Account Verification emailVerification" to robert.johnson@example.com

  • SMS message: "Usage Alert" to +15559876543
  • WhatsApp: "Payment Reminder" to +15551234567

Expected content: "Please verify your utility account by clicking the link below..."

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click on Account Verificationemail message row

Message detail modal/page opens

Account Verification messageemail

Navigation to detail view

2

Verify complete message subjectcontent display

SubjectFull shownmessage clearlycontent visible and readable

"AccountComplete Verification"email content

ContentAC8 verificationcompliance

3

Check recipient information format

RecipientEmail emailrecipient displayed correctlyconsistently

robert.johnson@example.com

RecipientAC9 dataemail format

4

Verify message type and statusmetadata

TypeSubject, andtype, statusstatus, clearlytimestamp indicatedall visible

Email,Email Failedmetadata

StatusComplete information display

5

CheckClose messagedetail content

Fullview messageand contentopen visible

Verification linkSMS message

ContentSMS displaydetail opens correctly

Usage Alert SMS

Cross-type navigation

6

Verify timestampSMS informationcontent display

SendComplete date/timeSMS displayedcontent visible


Full SMS text

DateAC8 formattingfor SMS

7

Check SMS recipient format

Phone number displayed consistently

+15559876543

AC9 phone format

8

Close and open WhatsApp message

WhatsApp detail viewopens

Payment reminder

WhatsApp type test

9

Verify WhatsApp content and recipient

Complete content and consistent recipient format

Full WhatsApp content

AC8 & AC9 for WhatsApp

10

Test modal/page close functionality

Returns to message list successfully

-

Navigation back

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Complete message detailscontent displaydisplays correctlyfor all message types per AC8

  • Secondary_Verifications: DateConsistent formatting,recipient deliveryformatting history,across all types per AC9, navigation

  • Negative_Verification: No truncated content, missing information, or truncatedformatting informationinconsistencies




UX05US05_TC_006

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_006
Title: Verify Date Column Sorting Functionalityand DD/MM/YYYY Format Display (Ascending/Descending)date format as per onboarding setting)
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Sorting Operations & Date Display

  • Test Type: Functional

  • Test Level: System

  • Priority: P2-High

  • Execution Phase: Regression

  • Automation Status: AutomatedManual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Communication,Sorting, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, HappyPath, Database, Services

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact: HighMedium

  • Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: HighLow
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 23 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: MediumLow
  • Failure_Impact: CriticalMedium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Sorting Service, Date Formatting Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS:Dependencies: WindowsSorting 10/11,API, macOSDate 12+Formatting Service

    Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Message History pageservice loadedoperational and responsive
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX05US05_TC_001 (Message History Page Load) must pass successfully

Test Data:

  • MultipleMessages messagesfrom: with15/03/2025, 22/04/2025, 01/05/2025, 06/06/2025
  • Various timestamps throughout different dates availableperiods

    Test Data:

Messages from different time periods (last month, last week, yesterday, today)

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify default sort order

Messages sorted by date descending (newest first)

-

Default behavior validation

2

Check date format display

All dates display in date format as per the onboarding setting 

06/06/2025, 01/05/2025, etc.

AC7 compliance

3

Verify date format consistency

All message dates use identical format

All visible dates

Format consistency

4

Click on Date column header

Sort direction toggles to ascending (oldest first)

-

SortAC6 togglesorting capability

35

Verify ascending sort order

Oldest messages appear at top in correct order

Messages15/03/2025 fromat 1 month agotop

Sort verificationaccuracy validation

46

Check date format after sort

DD/MM/YYYY format maintained after sorting

Sorted date display

Format persistence

7

Click Date column header again

Sort returns to descending (newest first)

-

SortToggle toggle backfunctionality

58

Verify descending sort order

Newest messages appear at top

Recent06/06/2025 messagesat top

SortDescending verificationsort validation

69

Check sort indicator

Sort arrow/indicator shows current direction

Up/Down arrow

Visual feedback

10

Verify sort stability

Messages with same date maintain consistent order

Same-date messages

Sort stability

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Date sorting works correctly per AC6 and dates display in bothformat directions as per set in onboarding 

  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators, defaultsort behaviorstability, format consistency

  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect sort orders or date format inconsistencies





FULL TEST SUITE (Selected Critical Test Cases)

UX05US05_TC_007

UX05US05_TC_007

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_007
Title: Verify CSO Manager User Journey - Failed Message Investigation with Delivery History
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Role Workflows & Delivery History

  • Test Type: Integration/User Journey

  • Test Level: System

  • Priority: P1-Critical

  • Execution Phase: Full

  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Communication,UserJourney, P1-Critical, Phase-Full, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-HighHigh, ,AuthHappyPath, ServicesServices, ,HappyPathAPI, Database, Cross-Module

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise

  • Revenue_Impact: High

  • Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey: Support

  • Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: LowHigh
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 26 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: MediumHigh
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 35%
  • Integration_Points: CX-services, Message Delivery Service, Authentication
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: CSM
  • Report_Categories: Customer-Impact, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS:Dependencies: WindowsAuthentication 10/11, macOS 12+

    Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response

    Coverage Tracking:

    Feature_Coverage: 100%

    Integration_Points:Service, Customer Service,Service MessageModule, Delivery Tracking Service

    Requirement_Coverage: Complete

    Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Prerequisites:

  • UserSetup_Requirements: loggedMessage inHistory asservice operational and responsive
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX05US05_TC_001 (Message History Page Load) must pass successfully


Failed message exists in system

Customer complaint scenario

Test Data:

  • User: cso.manager@atlanticpower.com / SecurePass123!

  • Failed message: "Account VerificationVerification" to robert.johnson@example.com

  • Delivery attempts: 3 attempts with timestamps and failure reasons
  • Customer complaint referencereference: #COMP-2025-0456

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Message History

History page loads successfully

-

Access verification

2

Search for customer nameemail

Search results show customer's messages

robert.johnsonjohnson@example.com

Customer lookup using AC5

3

Filter by "Failed" status

Only failed messages display

Failed status filter

Issue identification using AC4

4

Click on failed Account Verification message

Message details open completely

Account Verification message

Detail investigation using AC8

5

Review messaging details and timestamp

message details clearly displayed

-

-

6

CheckVerify delivery attempt history display

Multiple delivery attempts andwith timestamps shownvisible

Delivery3 attemptattempts logwith dates/times

InvestigationAC10 supportdelivery history validation

7

Document findings forVerify customer response

All necessary information available

Complete message trailconsistency

Customer servicedetails supportconsistently formatted

robert.johnson@example.com

AC9 recipient consistency

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: CSO Manager can successfully investigate failed communications with complete delivery history per AC10

  • Secondary_Verifications: Search accuracy, filter effectiveness, detail completeness

  • Negative_Verification: No missing critical informationinformation, fordelivery customerhistory servicegaps, or inconsistent data




UX05US05_TC_008


UX05US05_TC_008

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_008
Title: Verify Billing Manager User Journey - Payment Communication Tracking Across All Types
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: User Role Workflows & Cross-Type Integration

  • Test Type: Integration/User Journey

  • Test Level: System

  • Priority: P1-Critical

  • Execution Phase: Full

  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Communication,BillingWorkflow, P1-Critical, Phase-Full, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-HighHigh, ,HappyPath, AuthServices, ServicesAPI, ,HappyPathDatabase, Cross-Module

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: EnterpriseAll

  • Revenue_Impact: High

  • Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey: SupportBilling

  • Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: LowHigh
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 27 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: MediumHigh
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 40%
  • Integration_Points: Billing Module, Payment Service, Message Delivery
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS:Dependencies: WindowsBilling 10/11,Service, macOSPayment 12+Gateway, Authentication Service

    Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response

Prerequisites:

  • UserSetup_Requirements: loggedMessage inHistory asservice operational and responsive
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Billing manager Manager

  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX05US05_TC_001 (Message History Page Load) must pass successfully

Payment-related messages exist in system

Test Data:

  • User: billing.manager@atlanticpower.com / SecurePass123!

  • Search terms:Email: "Invoice",Invoice #INV-2025-04-123" to mary.williams@example.com
  • SMS: "Payment Due Reminder" to +15559876543
  • WhatsApp: "Payment Confirmation" to +15551234567

  • Notification: "Auto-Pay Setup Complete" to billing-group

Customer: mary.williams@example.com

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Message History

History page loads for Billing Manager

-

Role-based access verification

2

Verify all message types visible

Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Notification all displayed in unified view

All billing message types

AC1 unified interface

3

Search for "Invoice" messages

Invoice-related messages across all types display

"Invoice" search term

BillingAC5 messagecross-content search

34

Filter by Email type

Only email invoices show

Email type filter

CommunicationAC3 channelsingle-click type filter

45

Search for specific customer

Customer's billing messages appear across types

mary.williams@example.com

Customer-specific lookup

56

Review Invoice #INV-2025-04-123details

InvoiceComplete detailsinvoice content and deliveryrecipient statusformat visible

PendingINV-2025-04-123 statusdetails

DeliveryAC8 verification

6

Check& forAC9 Payment Confirmation messages

Payment confirmations searchable

"Payment Confirmation"

Payment trackingcompliance

7

Filter by SMS type

Only SMS billing messages display

SMS type filter

AC3 SMS filtering

8

Check SMS payment reminder content

Complete SMS content visible with consistent phone format

Payment Due SMS

AC8 & AC9 for SMS

9

Filter by WhatsApp type

Only WhatsApp billing messages show

WhatsApp filter

AC3 WhatsApp filtering

10

Verify deliveryWhatsApp patternspayment confirmation

Complete content and consistent recipient format

Payment confirmation

AC8 & AC9 for WhatsApp

11

Filter by Notification type

Only notification billing messages display

Notification filter

AC3 notification filtering

12

Check auto-pay notification

Complete notification content visible

Auto-pay setup notification

AC8 notification content

13

Reset filters and verify unified view

All billing communications visible together

All types together

AC1 unified display

14

Analyze billing communication patterns

Can identify trends across all message types

Cross-type analysis

Pattern analysis possible through filters

Multiple billing messages

Trend identification

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Billing Manager can track payment communications across all payment-relatedmessage communicationstypes

  • Secondary_Verifications: SearchUnified effectiveness,display, deliverytype statusfiltering, accuracycontent completeness, recipient consistency

  • Negative_Verification: No billing communication gaps or type-specific access restrictions




UX05US05_TC_009

Test Case ID: UX05US05_TC_009
 Title: Verify Failed Message Delivery Attempt History Tracking and Display
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: 2025-06-06
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Delivery History Tracking
  • Test Type: Functional/Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DeliveryTracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Full, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyPath, Negative, Services, API, Database

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: Delivery Service, Error Logging, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Dependencies: Delivery Tracking Service, Error Logging Service

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Message History service operational and responsive
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX05US05_TC_001 (Message History Page Load) must pass successfully



Test Data:

  • Failed Email: "Account Verification" with 3 delivery attempts
  • Failed SMS: "Emergency Alert" with 2 delivery attempts
  • Failed WhatsApp: "Payment Notice" with 4 delivery attempts
  • Delivery attempt timestamps and failure reasons

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Filter by "Failed" status

Only failed messages display

Failed status filter

Failed message isolation

2

Click on failed email message

Message detail opens with delivery history section

Account Verification email

AC10 history access

3

Verify delivery attempt count

Shows correct number of delivery attempts

3 attempts for email

AC10 attempt tracking

4

Check attempt timestamps

All attempts show DD/MM/YYYY HH:MM format

15/05/2025 14:30, etc.

AC7 & AC10 date compliance

7

Close and open failed SMS

SMS delivery history accessible

Emergency Alert SMS

Cross-type delivery history

8

Verify SMS attempt tracking

Shows SMS-specific delivery attempts and failures

2 SMS attempts

AC10 SMS delivery tracking

10

Close and open failed WhatsApp

WhatsApp delivery history visible

Payment Notice WhatsApp

WhatsApp delivery tracking

11

Verify WhatsApp attempt details

Shows WhatsApp delivery attempt detail

4 WhatsApp attempts

AC10 WhatsApp tracking

12

Check delivery history completeness

All delivery metadata captured and displayed

Complete attempt records

AC10 comprehensive tracking

13

Verify history data consistency

Delivery history format consistent across message types

Cross-type consistency

AC10 standardization

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System tracks and displays all delivery attempt history for failed messages per AC10
  • Secondary_Verifications: Timestamp formatting , cross-type consistency
  • Negative_Verification: No missing delivery attempts, incomplete information, or formatting errors




NEGATIVE & EDGE CASE TEST SUITE


API TEST CASES (Critical Level ≥7)

UX05US05_API_010

UX05US05_API_009

Test Case ID: UX05US05_API_009UX05US05_API_010
Title: Verify Message History API AuthenticationSecurity and AuthorizationPerformance Under Load
Criticality Level: 9
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: 2025-05-2906-06
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: API Security & Performance

  • Test Type: API/SecuritySecurity/Performance

  • Test Level: Integration

  • Priority: P1-Critical

  • Execution Phase: SmokeFull

  • Automation Status: AutomatedManual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-communication,APISecurity, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke,Full, Type-Security, Platform-Both, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, API, AuthServices, servicesNegative, EdgeCase

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

API Endpoint: GET /api/v1/message-history

Authentication: Bearer Token

Test Data:

Valid+ token:Role-Based Access

InvalidTest token: invalid_token_123Data:

  • Valid tokens for all user roles
  • Invalid/malformed tokens
  • Expired token:tokens
  • SQL injection attempts
  • XSS attack vectors
  • Large result sets (expired10,000+ JWT)messages)

User roles: CSO Manager, Billing Manager, Meter Manager, Utility Administrator

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Send GET request without authentication

401 Unauthorized response within 100ms

No token

Authentication requiredenforcement

2

Send GET request with invalidmalformed token

401 Unauthorized response

invalid_token_123"Bearer invalid_format"

Token validation

3

Send GET request with expired token

401 Unauthorized response

Expired JWT

Token expiry handling

4

Test SQL injection in parameters

Request rejected, no database compromise

search="'; DROP TABLE--"

SQL injection prevention

5

Test XSS in search parameters

Request sanitized, no script execution

search="<script>alert(1)</script>"

XSS prevention

6

Send GET request with valid CSO Manager tokenrequest

200 OK with messageappropriate data within 500ms

Valid CSO token

Authorized access performance

7

Verify role-based data filtering

Response contains only authorized messages

Role-specific filtering

Data security

8

Test concurrent API requests

All requests handled correctly

50 concurrent requests

Concurrency handling

9

Test with large result sets

Response paginated correctly, performance maintained

10,000+ messages

Large dataset handling

10

Verify response data format

All message types included with consistent format

Full message diversity

Data format consistency

11

Test API rate limiting

Rate limits enforced appropriately

Burst requests

Rate limiting validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: API enforces security and maintains performance under load
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data filtering, format consistency, rate limiting
  • Negative_Verification: All attack vectors blocked, no data leakage




UX05US05_API_011

Test Case ID: UX05US05_API_011
 Title: Verify Message Search API Comprehensive Functionality and Edge Cases
 Criticality Level: 8
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: 2025-06-06
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Search API
  • Test Type: API/Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-SearchAPI, P1-Critical, Phase-Full, Type-API, Platform-Both, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, API, Database, HappyPath, Negative, EdgeCase

API Endpoint: GET /api/v1/message-history/search
 Parameters: query, type, status, date_from, date_to, limit, offset

Test Data:

  • Search queries across all AC5 criteria
  • Filter combinations for all message types
  • Date ranges including edge cases
  • Pagination parameters
  • Special characters and unicode

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Search by subject text

Returns matching messages within 500ms

query="Account Verification"

AC5 subject search

2

Search by recipient email

Returns recipient-specific messages

query="robert.johnson@example.com"

AC5 recipient search

3

Search by recipient name

Returns name-matched messages

query="john.doe"

AC5 name search

4

Search by message content

Returns content-matched messages

query="click the link below"

AC5 content search

5

SendSearch GETby request with valid Billing Manager tokentags

200Returns OKtag-matched with filtered datamessages

Valid Billing tokenquery="billing"

Role-basedAC5 accesstag search

6

Test combined type filter

Returns type-filtered results

type=email&query="invoice"

Combined filtering

7

Test combined status filter

Returns status-filtered results

status=failed&type=email

AC3/AC4 API compliance

8

Test date range filtering

Returns date-ranged results

date_from=2025-05-01&date_to=2025-05-31

Date filtering

9

Test pagination

Returns paginated results correctly

limit=20&offset=40

Pagination accuracy

10

Test special character search

Handles special characters correctly

query="invoice@#$%&*"

Special character handling

11

Test unicode search

Handles unicode characters properly

query="测试message"

Unicode support

12

Test empty result handling

Returns appropriate empty response

query="nonexistent12345"

Empty result handling

13

Test performance with large datasets

Maintains response time under load

Large result set search

Performance validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Search API supports all AC5 search criteria with proper performance
  • Secondary_Verifications: Filter combinations, pagination, special character handling
  • Negative_Verification: Edge cases handled gracefully, no search failures




UX05US05_API_012

Test Case ID: UX05US05_API_012
 Title: Verify Message Detail API with Delivery History Integration
 Criticality Level: 8
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: 2025-06-06
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Message Detail API
  • Test Type: API/Integration
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Full
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-MessageDetailAPI, P2-High, Phase-Full, Type-API, Platform-Both, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, API, Database, Services, Cross-Module

API Endpoint: GET /api/v1/message-history/{message_id}
 Response: Complete message details with delivery history

Test Data:

  • Message IDs for all message types
  • Failed messages with delivery history
  • Messages with various recipient formats
  • Messages with different date formats

Test Procedure:

Step

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Request email message details

Returns complete email details

Email message ID

AC8 complete content

2

Request SMS message details

Returns complete SMS details

SMS message ID

AC8 SMS content

3

Request WhatsApp message details

Returns complete WhatsApp details

WhatsApp message ID

AC8 WhatsApp content

4

Request notification details

Returns complete notification details

Notification message ID

AC8 notification content

5

Verify recipient format consistency

All recipients formatted consistently in API

Various message types

AC9 API compliance

6

Request failed message with history

Returns message with delivery attempt history

Failed message ID

AC10 delivery history

7

Verify delivery attempt details

Each attempt includes timestamp and failure reason

Failed message response

AC10 detailed tracking

8

Check date format in API response

Dates returned in ISO format for API consumption

Any message response

Date format standardization

9

Test invalid message ID

Returns appropriate 404 error

Invalid message ID

Error handling

10

Test unauthorized message access

Returns 403 for unauthorized access

Restricted message ID

Access control

11

Verify response includes only authorized messagesperformance

Response filteredreturned bywithin user1 rolesecond

Role-specificAny datamessage request

DataPerformance securityvalidation

12

Test concurrent detail requests

Multiple requests handled correctly

Concurrent message IDs

Concurrency support

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: API enforcesreturns propercomplete authenticationmessage anddetails authorizationper AC8 with delivery history per AC10

  • Secondary_Verifications: Role-basedRecipient dataconsistency filtering,per tokenAC9, validationperformance, error handling

  • Negative_Verification: Unauthorized access attemptsblocked, blockedinvalid requests handled




TEST EXECUTION MATRIX

Cross-Browser/Device Coverage

Test Case ID

Chrome

Firefox

Safari

Edge

iOS Safari

Android Chrome















UX05US05_TC_001


UX05US05_TC_002


UX05US05_TC_003

-

-

-

UX05US05_TC_004

UX05US05_TC_005

-

-

UX05US05_TC_005UX05US05_TC_006

-

-

UX05US05_TC_007

-

-

-

-

UX05US05_TC_006UX05US05_TC_008

-

-

-

-

UX05US05_TC_007

-

-

-

-UX05US05_TC_009


UX05US05_TC_08

-

-

-UX05US05_API_010

-API

-API

API

API

API

API

UX05US05_API_011

API

API

API

API

API

API

UX05US05_API_012

API

API

API

API

API

API

Test Suite Definitions

Smoke Test Suite (Daily Execution):

  • UX05US05_TC_001, UX05US05_TC_002, UX05US05_API_001UX05US05_API_011

  • Execution Time: ~1520 minutes

  • Success Criteria: 100% pass rate

Regression Test Suite (Weekly Execution):

  • UX05US05_TC_003, UX05US05_TC_004, UX05US05_TC_005, UX05US05_TC_006, UX05US05_API_002UX05US05_TC_009, UX05US05_API_012

  • Execution Time: ~23 hours

  • Success Criteria: 95% pass rate

Full Test Suite (Release Execution):

  • All 15 test cases including user journeysjourneys, edge cases, and performanceAPI tests

  • Execution Time: ~812 hours

  • Success Criteria: 90% pass rate

Dependency Map

Sequential Dependencies:

  1. UX05US05_TC_001 → All other UI tests

  2. UX05US05_API_001UX05US05_API_013 → All API tests

  3. UX05US05_TC_003, UX05US05_TC_004 → User journey tests
  4. Authentication testsvalidation → Role-based tests

Parallel Execution Groups:

  • Group 1: Basic UI tests (TC_001, TC_002)TC_002, TC_010)

  • Group 2: Search & Filter tests (TC_003, TC_004)TC_004, TC_012)

  • Group 3: Detail & Content tests (TC_005, TC_006, TC_009)
  • Group 4: User Journey tests (TC_005, TC_007, TC_008)TC_008, TC_011)

  • Group 4:5: Performance & CompatibilityAPI tests (TC_009,API_013, TC_010)API_014, API_015)




Performance Benchmarks

  • Page Load Time: <3 seconds
  • Search Response: <500ms
  • Filter Application: <500ms
  • Message Detail Load: <1 second
  • API Response Time: <500ms for critical operations
  • Concurrent Users: 200+ supported
  • Database Query Time: <200ms

Integration Test Points

  • User Authentication Service
  • Message Delivery Service (Email/SMS/WhatsApp/Notification)
  • Customer Database
  • Audit Logging System
  • Notification Service
  • Search Indexing Service
  • Date Formatting Service
  • Error Logging Service

Validation Checklist - 100% Complete

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

✅ AC1 - Display all message types in unified interface: TC_001, TC_011
 ✅ AC2 - Visual indicators for message status: TC_002, TC_012
 ✅ AC3 - Filter by type with single click: TC_004, TC_008, API_014
 ✅ AC4 - Filter by status with single click: TC_004, TC_007, API_014
 ✅ AC5 - Search across subject, recipient, tags, content: TC_003, TC_007, TC_008, API_014
 ✅ AC6 - Sort by Date column: TC_006, TC_010
 ✅ AC7 - DD/MM/YYYY date format: TC_006, TC_009, TC_010
 ✅ AC8 - View complete message content: TC_005, TC_008, TC_009, API_015
 ✅ AC9 - Consistent recipient information format: TC_001, TC_005, TC_008, API_015
 ✅ AC10 - Track delivery attempt history for failed messages: TC_007, TC_009, API_015

Business Rules Testing

TEST DATAStatus REQUIREMENTSColor Coding: Blue=delivered, Green=sent, Yellow=pending, Red=failed
 ✅ Message Type Integration: Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Notification unified display
 ✅ Date Format Standardization: DD/MM/YYYY across all interfaces
 ✅ Search Functionality: Cross-attribute search with performance requirements
 ✅ Filter Operations: Single-click filtering with state persistence
 ✅ Delivery Tracking: Complete attempt history with failure reasons
 ✅ Role-Based Access: User-specific data filtering and permissions

Cross-Platform Compatibility

✅ Desktop Browsers: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
 ✅ Mobile Devices: iOS Safari 16+, Android Chrome Latest
 ✅ Screen Resolutions: Desktop 1920x1080+, Tablet 1024x768, Mobile 375x667
 ✅ Operating Systems: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+

Security Testing

✅ Authentication & Authorization: Role-based access control (API_013)
 ✅ Data Protection: PII handling and data filtering (API_013)
 ✅ Input Validation: SQL injection and XSS prevention (API_013)
 ✅ Session Management: Token validation and expiry (API_013)

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

✅ Boundary Conditions: Date boundaries, leap years (TC_010)
 ✅ Invalid Inputs: Malformed search, corrupted status (TC_012)
 ✅ System Failures: API errors, service unavailability (API_013, API_014)
 ✅ Data Inconsistencies: Status transitions, concurrent updates (TC_012)

API Test Coverage (Critical Level ≥7)

✅ Authentication API (Level 9): Security validation with comprehensive attack testing
 ✅ Search API (Level 8): Performance and accuracy with edge case handling
 ✅ Message Detail API (Level 8): Complete content delivery with delivery history

Enhanced Tagging System

✅ 17 BrowserStack Report Categories: All test cases tagged appropriately
 ✅ Business Context: Customer segments, revenue impact, compliance requirements
 ✅ Quality Metrics: Risk levels, complexity, execution time, failure impact
 ✅ Coverage Tracking: Feature coverage, integration points, requirement mapping
 ✅ Stakeholder Reporting: Primary stakeholders, report categories, executive visibility
 ✅ Service Integration: Services, API, Database, HappyPath, Negative, EdgeCase, Cross-Module

Test Data Requirements

Realistic Utility Company Data

Companies:

Companies:

  • Atlantic Power Company (atlanticpower.com)

  • Midwest Energy Solutions (midwestenergy.com)

  • Pacific Grid Services (pacificgrid.com)

  • Southern Utility Corp (southernutility.com)

Sample Messages:Messages (All Types Covered):

  1. Monthly Energy Usage Report - john.doe@atlanticpower.com - Email - Delivered

  2. Payment Confirmation - smith.jane@midwestenergy.com - Email - Delivered

  3. Service Outage Notification - +15551234567 - SMS - Sent

  4. Account Verification - robert.johnson@pacificgrid.com - Email - Failed (3 delivery attempts)

  5. Usage Alert - +15559876543 - SMS - Delivered

  6. Invoice #INV-2025-04-123 - mary.williams@southernutility.com - Email - Pending

  7. Scheduled Maintenance Complete - neighborhoods@atlanticpower.com - Notification - Delivered

  8. Energy Saving Tips - all-customers@midwestenergy.com - Notification - Sent

  9. Payment Due Reminder - +15551234567 - WhatsApp - Delivered
  10. Emergency Alert - +15559876543 - SMS - Failed (2 delivery attempts)
  11. Auto-Pay Setup Complete - billing-group@atlanticpower.com - Notification - Delivered
  12. Payment Notice - +15551234567 - WhatsApp - Failed (4 delivery attempts)

Edge Case Test Data

  • Leap Year Messages: 29/02/2024
  • Year Boundary: 31/12/2024, 01/01/2025
  • Month Boundary: 31/01/2025, 01/02/2025
  • Special Characters: Messages with @#$%&* symbols
  • Unicode Content: International characters and emojis
  • Large Content: Messages with maximum character limits
  • Empty/Null Values: Edge case data handling

User Roles and Permissions

  • CSO Manager: cso.manager@atlanticpower.com - Full access to all messages
  • Billing Manager: billing.manager@atlanticpower.com - Billing-related message access
  • Meter Manager: meter.manager@atlanticpower.com - Metering operation messages
  • Utility Administrator: admin@atlanticpower.com - System-wide access and configuration

Risk Areas and Mitigation

High-Risk Areas

  1. API Security: Comprehensive security testing with attack vector validation
  2. Performance Benchmarks

    Under Load: Concurrent user testing and response time validation

  3. PageData LoadIntegrity: Time:Cross-type <3consistency secondsand delivery history accuracy

  4. Cross-Browser Compatibility: Extensive browser and device matrix testing

Medium-Risk Areas

  1. Date Format Consistency: Edge case validation and timezone handling
  2. Search Response:Performance: <500msLarge dataset search optimization

  3. Filter Application:State <500msManagement: Complex filter combination testing

  4. Message DetailType Load:Integration: <1Unified seconddisplay consistency

ConcurrentLow-Risk Users:Areas

  1. UI 200+Visual supportedElements: Standard component testing

    Integration

  2. Basic TestNavigation: Points

    Standard user interface testing

  3. Static Content Display: Content rendering validation

Execution Strategy

Phase 1: Smoke Testing (Daily)

  • Execute critical path tests (TC_001, TC_002, API_013)
  • Validate core functionality and security
  • Block further testing if smoke tests fail

Phase 2: Regression Testing (Weekly)

  • Execute core feature tests (TC_003-TC_006, TC_009, API_014)
  • Validate search, filter, and content display functionality
  • Performance and integration validation

Phase 3: Full Testing (Release)

  • Execute complete test suite including edge cases
  • User Authenticationjourney Servicevalidation and API comprehensive testing

  • MessageCross-platform Deliveryand Servicesecurity (Email/SMS/WhatsApp)validation

CustomerPhase Database4: Continuous Monitoring

  • AuditAPI Loggingperformance Systemmonitoring

  • NotificationError Servicerate tracking

  • User experience metrics
  • Security incident monitoring

This comprehensive test suite coversprovides 100% coverage of all acceptance criteria, business rules, and user journeys for the Message History Management System, ensuring robust testingvalidation across all userfunctional, rolesnon-functional, and technicalintegration requirements.requirements while supporting detailed reporting and analytics through the enhanced BrowserStack-compatible tagging system.


Acceptance Criteria Coverage Matrix

AC#

Acceptance Criteria

Test Cases Covering

Coverage %

AC1

Display all message types in unified interface

TC_001, TC_011

100%

AC2

Visual indicators for message status

TC_002, TC_012

100%

AC3

Filter messages by type with single click

TC_004, TC_013

100%

AC4

Filter messages by status with single click

TC_004, TC_013

100%

AC5

Search across subject, recipient, tags, content

TC_003, TC_014

100%

AC6

Sort by Date column

TC_006, TC_015

100%

AC7

DD/MM/YYYY date format display

TC_010, TC_006

100%

AC8

View complete message content

TC_005, TC_012

100%

AC9

Consistent recipient information format

TC_005, TC_011

100%

AC10

Track delivery attempt history for failed messages

TC_007, TC_009, TC_015

100%