(CIS01US02)Consumer management- Test Scenarios & Test Cases
Functional Test Scenarios
A. Consumer Dashboard & Management
- Dashboard metrics display and calculations
- Consumer search and filtering functionality
- Consumer list management with simplified view
- Consumer profile navigation and data display
B. New Consumer Application Workflow (Updated)
- Application method selection (AI-powered vs Manual)
- Consumer details form validation and submission
- Address details management with service/billing separation
- Document upload and verification process
- Plan selection and comparison with Eco-Friendly options
- Application review and direct submission (5-step process)
- Payment processing with multiple completion flows
C. Consumer Profile Management
- Complete consumer profile display with all tabs
- Financial information and payment history
- Service connections and meter management
- Relationship health score calculations
- Activity timeline and communication history
D. Business Rules Validation
- Relationship health score weighted calculations
- Account status management rules
- Payment compliance tracking algorithms
- Service plan assignment and billing rules
Non-Functional Test Scenarios
A. Performance Testing
- Dashboard load times (<3 seconds)
- Consumer search response (<500ms)
- Document upload processing
- Payment processing performance
B. Security Testing
- Authentication and authorization
- Data encryption and protection
- Document verification security
- Payment data handling
C. Compatibility Testing
- Cross-browser support (Chrome 155+, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Mobile responsiveness (CX-Mobile)
- Device compatibility testing
Detailed Test Cases
Module: Consumer Dashboard & Overview
Test Case 1: Dashboard Metrics Display
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_001
- Title: Verify Consumer Dashboard displays accurate account metrics with simplified UI
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Consumer Dashboard
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboard metrics and UI changes
- Integration_Points: Consumer database, calculation engine, UI rendering
- Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard controller, metrics calculator, UI components
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Performance-Metrics
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+
- Device/OS: Windows 11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Consumer database, calculation service, UI framework
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds page load
- Data_Requirements: 7 consumer accounts with varied statuses
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Consumer Management module | Dashboard loads within 2 seconds | N/A | Performance baseline |
2 | Verify Total Accounts metric | Displays "7" | Sample dataset | Count all accounts |
3 | Verify Active Accounts metric | Displays "4" with "57%" | 4 active accounts | (4/7)*100 = 57% |
4 | Verify Inactive Accounts metric | Displays "1" with "14%" | 1 inactive account | (1/7)*100 = 14% |
5 | Verify Temporarily Disconnected metric | Displays "1" with "14%" | 1 disconnected account | (1/7)*100 = 14% |
6 | Verify absence of Sort and Display tabs | Sort and Display controls not visible in UI | N/A | UI change validation |
7 | Verify consumer list checkboxes removed | No checkboxes visible in consumer list | N/A | UI simplification |
8 | Verify search functionality maintained | Search bar functional and responsive | N/A | Core functionality preserved |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All dashboard metrics display correct values and UI changes implemented
- Secondary_Verifications: Page loads within performance baseline, simplified UI elements properly rendered
- Negative_Verification: No legacy UI elements (Sort/Display tabs, checkboxes) visible
Test Case 2: Consumer Search Functionality
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_002
- Title: Verify consumer search works across all supported fields with simplified UI
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Consumer Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of search functionality with UI changes
- Integration_Points: Search indexing service, consumer database
- Code_Module_Mapped: Search controller, indexing service, UI components
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Search-Performance, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+
- Device/OS: Windows 11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Consumer database, search indexing service
- Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response
- Data_Requirements: Consumer records with known values
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click in search bar | Cursor appears, placeholder text visible | N/A | UI responsiveness |
2 | Search by consumer name | Returns matching consumer record without checkboxes | "John Doe" | Name search validation |
3 | Clear search and search by account number | Returns specific account in simplified view | "WU-10001" | Account number search |
4 | Search by phone number | Returns consumer with matching phone | "(555) 123-4567" | Phone search |
5 | Search by email address | Returns consumer with matching email | "jane.smith@example.com" | Email search |
6 | Search by partial address | Returns consumers matching address | "123 Main" | Address search |
7 | Verify simplified list display | Consumer list shows without Sort/Display/Filter options | Search results | UI simplification |
8 | Search with invalid data | Shows "No results found" message | "InvalidData123" | Negative test |
9 | Measure search response time | Response within 500ms | All searches | Performance validation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Search returns accurate results for all supported field types in simplified UI
- Secondary_Verifications: Response time meets performance baseline, proper handling of no results
- Negative_Verification: Invalid searches don't cause errors, UI remains simplified
Module: New Consumer Application Workflow (Updated)
Test Case 3: Application Method Selection
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_003
- Title: Verify application method selection between AI-powered and manual entry
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Application Method Selection
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of application method selection
- Integration_Points: AI document processing service, application workflow
- Code_Module_Mapped: Application controller, AI service integration, UI workflow
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Feature-Adoption, User-Experience, AI-Usage
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Windows 11, iOS 16+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: AI document processing service, application workflow
- Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds page load
- Data_Requirements: N/A
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Click "New Consumer" button from dashboard | Application method selection page loads | N/A | Navigation test |
2 | Verify AI-Powered Upload option displayed | Shows "Recommended" badge and description | N/A | UI validation |
3 | Verify Manual Entry option displayed | Shows step-by-step description | N/A | UI validation |
4 | Verify benefits listed for AI option | "Save time", "Reduces errors", "Works with printed forms" | N/A | Feature benefits |
5 | Verify benefits listed for Manual option | "Step-by-step", "Save progress", "Help text" | N/A | Feature benefits |
6 | Click "Smart Upload" button | Navigates to document scanner interface | N/A | AI workflow |
7 | Go back and click "Start Manual Entry" | Navigates to consumer details form | N/A | Manual workflow |
8 | Verify responsive design on mobile | Both options accessible and functional on mobile | N/A | Mobile compatibility |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Both application methods function correctly and lead to appropriate workflows
- Secondary_Verifications: UI displays properly on different devices, benefits clearly communicated
- Negative_Verification: No broken links or missing functionality in either workflow path
Test Case 4: Consumer Details Form with VIP Status
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_004
- Title: Verify consumer details form validation with VIP status and secondary consumer functionality
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Consumer Details Form
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of consumer form functionality including VIP features
- Integration_Points: Phone verification service, VIP management system
- Code_Module_Mapped: Form controller, validation service, VIP service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Data-Quality, Form-Validation, Customer-Classification
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: Phone verification service, form validation engine
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds form load, <1 second validation response
- Data_Requirements: Valid consumer test data, phone verification service
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Consumer Details step | Form loads with required field indicators | N/A | Form loading |
2 | Verify VIP Status information section | VIP status explanation displayed correctly | N/A | VIP information |
3 | Enter valid first name | Field accepts input, no error | "John" | Valid input |
4 | Enter valid last name | Field accepts input, no error | "Smith" | Valid input |
5 | Enter valid phone number | Field accepts input, formats correctly | "+1-555-123-4567" | Phone formatting |
6 | Click "Verify" button for phone | Phone verification initiated successfully | Valid phone | Phone verification |
7 | Enter valid email address | Field accepts input, validates format | "john.smith@example.com" | Email validation |
8 | Select category from dropdown | Category selection successful | "Residential" | Dropdown functionality |
9 | Select sub-category | Sub-category options populate correctly | "Single Family" | Dependent dropdown |
10 | Check VIP Designation checkbox | VIP checkbox selected, description shown | N/A | VIP functionality |
11 | Check Add Secondary Consumer | Secondary consumer fields appear | N/A | Secondary consumer |
12 | Leave required field empty and submit | Validation error displayed | Empty first name | Required field validation |
13 | Enter invalid email format | Email format error displayed | "invalid-email" | Email format validation |
14 | Enter invalid phone format | Phone format error displayed | "123" | Phone format validation |
15 | Test character limits | Field prevents input beyond limit | 100+ character string | Character limit validation |
16 | Complete form and click "Save and Continue" | Form validation passes, navigation to next step | Valid data set | Form submission |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All form validations work correctly for required and optional fields including VIP features
- Secondary_Verifications: Phone verification integration works, secondary consumer functionality operates
- Negative_Verification: Invalid data formats trigger appropriate error messages without system crashes
Test Case 5: Plan Selection with Eco-Friendly Options
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_005
- Title: Verify service plan selection including Eco-Friendly plan with Conservation Assessment
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Plan Selection
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of plan selection including new Eco-Friendly features
- Integration_Points: Plan calculation service, pricing engine, eco-assessment service
- Code_Module_Mapped: Plan controller, pricing calculator, eco-service integration
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Plan-Adoption, Revenue-Impact
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
- Dependencies: Plan calculation service, pricing engine, eco-assessment service
- Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds plan load, <2 seconds comparison
- Data_Requirements: Plan configuration data, pricing information
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Plan Selection step | Plan selection interface loads with 5 plan options | N/A | Interface loading |
2 | Review plan selection guide | Helpful information and Plan Calculator link displayed | N/A | User guidance |
3 | Use search functionality | Search filters plans correctly | "Standard" | Plan search |
4 | Review Basic plan details | Water Supply (Fixed), Waste Water (Variable), Monthly billing | N/A | Basic plan validation |
5 | Review Standard plan (Recommended) | Shows "Recommended" badge, Water Quality Testing (Quarterly) | N/A | Standard plan validation |
6 | Review Premium plan details | Emergency Services included, Monthly quality testing, Premium Fixed | N/A | Premium plan validation |
7 | Review Seasonal plan details | Seasonal Fixed water supply, Limited waste water | N/A | Seasonal plan validation |
8 | Review Eco-Friendly plan features | Conservation Fixed supply, Reduced waste water | N/A | Eco plan validation |
9 | Verify Conservation Assessment feature | Eco-Friendly plan shows "Conservation Assessment: Quarterly" | N/A | New feature validation |
10 | Click Plan Calculator link | Calculator tool opens/navigates properly | N/A | Calculator integration |
11 | Compare utility services across plans | All plan features clearly differentiated | N/A | Service comparison |
12 | Verify billing frequency consistency | All plans show "monthly" billing frequency | N/A | Billing consistency |
13 | Select Eco-Friendly plan | Plan selection successful, "Select Plan" button responsive | N/A | Eco plan selection |
14 | Change to Premium plan | Plan change successful, previous selection deselected | N/A | Plan modification |
15 | Verify only one plan can be selected | Single selection validation enforced | N/A | Selection validation |
16 | Proceed with selected plan | Plan selection saved and form progresses | Selected plan data | Selection persistence |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All 5 plans display correctly with accurate features including Eco-Friendly Conservation Assessment
- Secondary_Verifications: Plan calculator integration works, search functionality filters correctly, single selection enforced
- Negative_Verification: Cannot select multiple plans simultaneously, all plan features accurately displayed
Test Case 6: Application Review with 5-Step Process
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_006
- Title: Verify application review displays all information with Terms & Conditions and direct submission
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Application Review
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of review process including Terms & Conditions validation
- Integration_Points: Application data aggregation, terms validation service, submission workflow
- Code_Module_Mapped: Review controller, validation service, submission processor
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Data-Integrity, Compliance-Validation, Submission-Success
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: Application data service, terms validation service, submission processor
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds review load, <3 seconds submission
- Data_Requirements: Complete application data from previous steps
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Review step (Step 5) | Review page loads with all application information | N/A | Review page loading |
2 | Verify 5-step progress indicator | Progress shows 5 steps total (not 6) | N/A | Updated: 5-step process |
3 | Verify Consumer Details section | All entered consumer information displayed correctly | Previous form data | Data persistence |
4 | Check for missing information indicators | Missing fields highlighted with "Missing 5 fields" status | Incomplete data | Validation indicators |
5 | Verify Address Details section | Service and billing addresses displayed correctly | Address data | Address review |
6 | Check address missing information | Missing address fields highlighted with field count | Incomplete address | Address validation |
7 | Verify Documents section | Uploaded documents listed with "Missing 1 field" status | Document data | Document review |
8 | Check for missing documents | Missing required documents highlighted | Missing docs | Document validation |
9 | Verify Selected Plan section | Chosen plan displayed with "Missing 1 field" status | Selected plan | Plan review |
10 | Verify Terms & Conditions section | Service Terms, Privacy Policy, Electronic signature checkboxes | N/A | Terms in review |
11 | Check Terms & Conditions dropdowns | Expandable sections for Service Terms and Privacy Policy | N/A | Terms accessibility |
12 | Review application incompleteness warnings | All missing information clearly listed in summary | Incomplete application | Completeness validation |
13 | Click "Edit" button for sections | Returns to appropriate form sections | N/A | Edit functionality |
14 | Complete all required information | Return to review with complete data | Complete data set | Complete application |
15 | Accept all terms and conditions | All checkboxes selected successfully | N/A | Terms acceptance |
16 | Verify "Submit Application" button activation | Button becomes active when all requirements met | Complete application | Submit button state |
17 | Click "Submit Application" | Direct submission to payment step (not separate step 6) | Complete application | Updated: Direct submission |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All entered information displays correctly with Terms & Conditions integrated into review
- Secondary_Verifications: Missing information clearly indicated, edit functionality works, direct submission to payment
- Negative_Verification: Incomplete applications cannot be submitted, Terms & Conditions must be accepted
Test Case 7: Payment Options Selection
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_007
- Title: Verify payment options selection with multiple payment timing choices
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Payment Options
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of payment options and fee calculation
- Integration_Points: Payment processing system, fee calculation service, payment methods
- Code_Module_Mapped: Payment controller, fee calculator, payment gateway integration
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Payment-Processing, Fee-Accuracy, Method-Selection
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: Payment gateway, fee calculation service, application processing
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds page load, <1 second option selection
- Data_Requirements: Valid payment methods, fee calculation data
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Complete application submission | Payment page loads immediately after review submission | N/A | Updated: Direct to payment |
2 | Verify Application Fee Summary section | Application Fee Summary displayed clearly | N/A | Fee section |
3 | Verify Application Processing Fee | Shows $25.00 | N/A | Fixed processing fee |
4 | Verify Service Connection Fee | Shows $75.00 | N/A | Connection fee validation |
5 | Verify Security Deposit | Shows $150.00 | N/A | Deposit calculation |
6 | Verify Total Due calculation | Shows $250.00 (sum of all fees) | $25+$75+$150 | Total calculation accuracy |
7 | Verify Payment Options section | Payment Options section clearly labeled | N/A | Options section |
8 | Verify "Pay Now" option | "Pay Now" with "Process payment immediately" description | N/A | Immediate payment option |
9 | Verify "Pay Later" option | "Pay Later" with "Pay within 7 days" description | N/A | Deferred payment option |
10 | Verify "Add to First Bill" option | "Add to First Bill" with "Include fees in first invoice" description | N/A | Billing integration option |
11 | Verify "Send Invoice" option | "Send Invoice" with "Email invoice to consumer" description | N/A | Invoice generation option |
12 | Select "Pay Now" option | Pay Now option selected, payment methods appear below | N/A | Payment timing selection |
13 | Verify Select Payment Method section | "Select Payment Method" section becomes visible | N/A | Payment method section |
14 | Verify Cash payment method | Cash option available with appropriate icon | N/A | Cash payment method |
15 | Verify Online payment method | Online option available with appropriate icon | N/A | Online payment method |
16 | Verify Cheque payment method | Cheque option available with appropriate icon | N/A | Cheque payment method |
17 | Test payment method requirement | "Please select a payment method to proceed" message displayed | No method selected | Validation message |
18 | Select Online payment method | Online payment method selected successfully | N/A | Method selection |
19 | Verify "Select Payment Method" button state | Button enabled after method selection | Payment method selected | Button state validation |
20 | Test switching payment timing options | Can switch between Pay Now, Pay Later, etc. without loss of data | N/A | Option switching |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All payment options display correctly with accurate fee calculations and method selections
- Secondary_Verifications: Payment timing options function properly, method selection validation works
- Negative_Verification: Cannot proceed without selecting payment method, fee calculations are accurate
Test Case 8: Pay Now Payment Processing
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_008
- Title: Verify "Pay Now" payment processing with immediate completion flow
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Pay Now Processing
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of immediate payment processing flow
- Integration_Points: Payment gateway, consumer account creation, success flow processing
- Code_Module_Mapped: Payment processor, account creation service, success flow controller
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Payment-Success, Integration-Health, Revenue-Processing
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: Payment gateway, account creation service, email notification service
- Performance_Baseline: <5 seconds payment processing, <2 seconds success page load
- Data_Requirements: Valid payment credentials, test payment amounts
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Select "Pay Now" and Online payment method | Payment processing interface initiated | N/A | Payment initiation |
2 | Enter valid credit card details | Card details accepted and validated | Test card: 4111-1111-1111-1111 | Card validation |
3 | Process payment with valid card | Payment processing successful | Valid card details | Payment processing |
4 | Verify immediate success response | Payment processing completes within 5 seconds | N/A | Performance validation |
5 | Verify success page transition | Redirects to "Application Successful" page | N/A | Success page navigation |
6 | Verify success message display | "Payment Completed Successfully!" message prominently displayed | N/A | Updated: Payment success message |
7 | Verify completion confirmation | "Your payment has been processed and your consumer application is now complete." | N/A | Updated: Completion message |
8 | Verify consumer ID generation | New consumer ID assigned and displayed (e.g., 55235) | N/A | Account creation validation |
9 | Verify fee summary persistence | Application Fee Summary still visible with completed status | $250.00 total | Fee summary validation |
10 | Verify success indicator | Green checkmark icon displayed prominently | N/A | Visual success indicator |
11 | Verify action buttons availability | "Add Another Consumer" and "Return to Dashboard" buttons visible | N/A | Updated: Post-payment actions |
12 | Test "Return to Dashboard" functionality | Returns to main consumer dashboard successfully | N/A | Navigation validation |
13 | Test "Add Another Consumer" functionality | Starts new consumer application process | N/A | Workflow continuation |
14 | Verify payment confirmation in system | Payment recorded in system with correct amount and consumer ID | Payment details | System validation |
15 | Test payment failure scenario | Proper error handling for declined payment | Invalid card: 4000-0000-0000-0002 | Error handling |
16 | Verify error recovery | Can retry payment after failure without data loss | N/A | Error recovery |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Payment processes successfully with immediate completion and consumer account creation
- Secondary_Verifications: Success page displays correctly, action buttons function properly, system records payment
- Negative_Verification: Payment failures handled gracefully without data loss or system errors
Test Case 9: Alternative Payment Options Processing
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_009
- Title: Verify alternative payment options (Pay Later, Add to Bill, Send Invoice) processing
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Alternative Payment Options
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of alternative payment processing flows
- Integration_Points: Billing system, invoice generation service, application processing
- Code_Module_Mapped: Alternative payment processor, billing integration, invoice service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Both
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Payment-Flexibility, Billing-Integration, Customer-Options
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
- Dependencies: Billing system, invoice generation service, notification service
- Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds submission processing, <2 seconds confirmation load
- Data_Requirements: Application data, billing configuration, email settings
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Select "Pay Later" option | Pay Later option selected, no payment method required | N/A | Deferred payment selection |
2 | Submit application with Pay Later | Application submitted successfully without payment | N/A | Deferred submission |
3 | Verify submission success page | "Application Submitted Successfully!" message displayed | N/A | Updated: Submission success |
4 | Verify application ID generation | Application ID assigned and displayed (e.g., APP-68719) | N/A | Updated: Application ID format |
5 | Verify processing confirmation | "Your application has been received and is being processed." message | N/A | Updated: Processing message |
6 | Verify "What happens next?" section | Timeline information displayed clearly | N/A | Updated: Next steps section |
7 | Check application review timeline | "Your application will be reviewed within 2-3 business days" | N/A | Updated: Review timeline |
8 | Check document verification step | "We'll verify your documents and contact information" | N/A | Updated: Verification step |
9 | Check service connection step | "Service connection will be scheduled upon approval" | N/A | Updated: Connection step |
10 | Check billing integration step | "Initial charges will be added to your first bill" | N/A | Updated: Billing step |
11 | Verify invoice information section | "Invoice and Billing Information" section displayed | N/A | Updated: Invoice section |
12 | Check invoice details | Invoice description with email notification details | N/A | Updated: Invoice details |
13 | Test "Add to First Bill" option | Fees successfully added to first monthly bill configuration | N/A | Billing integration test |
14 | Test "Send Invoice" option | Invoice email generation initiated successfully | N/A | Invoice generation test |
15 | Verify "Go to Dashboard" button | Returns to main dashboard successfully | N/A | Updated: Navigation option |
16 | Verify "Print Confirmation" button | Confirmation document generates and prints correctly | N/A | Updated: Print functionality |
17 | Test multiple alternative options | Can switch between Pay Later, Add to Bill, Send Invoice | N/A | Option flexibility |
18 | Verify application status tracking | Application appears in system with appropriate status | Application details | Status tracking |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All alternative payment options process successfully with appropriate confirmation flows
- Secondary_Verifications: Timeline information accurate, invoice generation works, billing integration functions
- Negative_Verification: No payment processing errors for deferred options, proper status tracking maintained
Module: Consumer Profile Management
Test Case 10: Relationship Health Score Calculation
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_010
- Title: Verify relationship health score calculation with weighted formula components
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Relationship Health Score
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of relationship health score calculation including all weighted components
- Integration_Points: Customer analytics engine, payment history service, service quality metrics
- Code_Module_Mapped: Health score calculator, analytics engine, data aggregation service
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Analytics-Accuracy, Customer-Insights, Calculation-Validation
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+
- Device/OS: Windows 11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Customer analytics engine, payment history service, service metrics
- Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds score calculation, <2 seconds display
- Data_Requirements: Consumer with known metrics for calculation validation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe consumer profile | Profile loads with relationship health score 85/100 | Consumer: John Doe (WU-10001) | Profile access |
2 | Verify Payment Compliance component (45%) | Calculate: (92% compliance) × 0.45 = 41.4 points | 92% payment compliance | Payment component (45%) |
3 | Verify Service Quality Score component (30%) | Calculate: 100 - (3 requests × 5) = 85 × 0.30 = 25.5 points | 3 service requests/year | Service component (30%) |
4 | Verify Account Longevity component (10%) | Calculate: min(28/60, 1) × 100 × 0.10 = 4.67 points | 28 months account age | Longevity component (10%) |
5 | Verify Digital Engagement component (7.5%) | Calculate: 80% × 0.075 = 6.0 points | 80% digital transactions | Digital component (7.5%) |
6 | Verify Complaint Resolution component (7.5%) | Calculate: 100% × 0.075 = 7.5 points | 100% resolution rate | Resolution component (7.5%) |
7 | Calculate subtotal before penalties | Sum: 41.4 + 25.5 + 4.67 + 6.0 + 7.5 = 85.07 points | N/A | Subtotal calculation |
8 | Apply penalty factors | Subtract: 1 late payment × 2 = 2 points penalty | 1 late payment | Penalty application |
9 | Verify final health score | Final score: 85.07 - 2 = 83.07 ≈ 85/100 displayed | Expected: 85/100 | Final score verification |
10 | Verify score range classification | Score 85 should show "Good" status (80-89 range) | Score: 85 | Range classification |
11 | Verify Account Age display | Shows "28 months" correctly | 28 months | Age display |
12 | Verify Payment Compliance display | Shows "92%" with checkmark | 92% compliance | Compliance display |
13 | Verify Service Requests display | Shows "5 in last 12 months" | 5 requests | Service requests display |
14 | Verify Complaints display | Shows "2 in last 12 months" with upward trend | 2 complaints | Complaints display |
15 | Verify Communication Preference | Shows "Email" preference | Email preference | Communication display |
16 | Verify Key Insights section | Shows positive insights: "Consistent payment history", "Responds well to email", "Moderate service request frequency" | Insight data | Insights validation |
17 | Verify consumption chart integration | 6-month water consumption chart displays with dropdown for service type | Consumption data | Chart integration |
18 | Test boundary condition: 90+ score | Verify "Excellent" classification for 90+ scores | Test consumer with 90+ | Boundary testing |
19 | Test boundary condition: <60 score | Verify "At Risk" classification for scores below 60 | Test consumer with <60 | Risk classification |
20 | Test real-time score update | Change payment compliance, verify score recalculation | Modified compliance data | Real-time updates |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Health score calculation follows the exact weighted formula with all components correctly calculated
- Secondary_Verifications: Score classifications align with defined ranges, all components display correctly, insights accurate
Negative_Verification: Invalid data doesn't cause calculation errors, boundary conditions handled properly
View Details Test Cases - Consumer Management System
Test Case 1: View Details Navigation from Consumer List
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_011
- Title: Verify "View Details" functionality from consumer list navigation
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Consumer List Navigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of view details navigation functionality
- Integration_Points: Consumer database, profile rendering service
- Code_Module_Mapped: Navigation controller, profile service, UI components
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 155+
- Device/OS: Windows 11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Consumer database, profile service
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds profile load
- Data_Requirements: Consumer records with complete profile data
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Consumer Management dashboard | Dashboard loads with consumer list showing 7 total accounts | N/A | Initial navigation | Image 1 |
2 | Locate John Doe consumer row in list | John Doe row visible with account WU-10001, Active status | John Doe (WU-10001) | Consumer identification | Image 1 |
3 | Click on three-dot menu for John Doe | Dropdown menu appears with options including "View Details" | John Doe row | Menu expansion | Image 1 |
4 | Verify "View Details" option in dropdown | "View Details" option clearly visible and clickable | Menu options | Option availability | Image 1 |
5 | Click "View Details" option | Navigation to John Doe's complete consumer profile page | N/A | Profile navigation | Image 2 |
6 | Verify profile page loads completely | Consumer profile loads within 2 seconds showing header with VIP badge | Profile data | Performance validation | Image 2 |
7 | Verify consumer information accuracy | Profile shows: John Doe, WU-10001, Active status, VIP badge | John Doe data | Data consistency | Image 2 |
8 | Verify contact information display | Shows email: john.doe@example.com, phone: (555) 123-4567 | Contact data | Contact information | Image 2 |
9 | Verify address information display | Service Address: 123 Main St, Anytown; Billing Address: 456 Finance Ave, Billtown | Address data | Address display | Image 2 |
10 | Verify account information display | Consumer Number: WU-10001, Category: Residential, Sub Category: Single Family | Account data | Account details | Image 2 |
11 | Verify payment information display | Current Balance: $75.30, Last Payment: $120.45, Payment Compliance: 92% | Payment data | Payment details | Image 2 |
12 | Verify profile tabs accessibility | All tabs visible: Overview, Financial, Connections, Service, Complaints, Requests, Communication, Documents, Notes, Activity | Tab navigation | Tab functionality | Image 2 |
13 | Verify Quick Actions button | "Quick Actions" button visible and accessible in top right | N/A | Quick actions access | Image 1 |
14 | Test "View Details" from different consumer | Navigate back and test with Jane Smith (WU-10002) | Jane Smith (WU-10002) | Multiple consumer test | Image 1 |
15 | Verify different consumer profile loads | Jane Smith profile loads with different data but same structure | Jane Smith data | Profile consistency | N/A |
16 | Test "View Details" with search results | Search "John" and verify "View Details" works from filtered results | Search: "John" | Search integration | Image 1 |
17 | Verify back navigation | Can return to consumer list using browser back button | Browser navigation | Return navigation | Image 1 |
18 | Verify breadcrumb navigation | Profile page shows proper navigation breadcrumbs | N/A | Navigation aids | Image 2 |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: "View Details" successfully navigates to complete consumer profile with accurate data
- Secondary_Verifications: Performance meets baseline, all profile sections accessible, VIP status displayed correctly
- Negative_Verification: Navigation works consistently across different consumers and search states
Test Case 2: Quick Actions Menu Functionality
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_012
- Title: Verify Quick Actions menu provides access to all consumer management functions
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Quick Actions Menu
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe consumer profile | Profile loads with Quick Actions button visible in top right | John Doe (WU-10001) | Initial setup | Image 2 |
2 | Click "Quick Actions" button | Dropdown menu appears within 1 second showing action options | N/A | Menu responsiveness | Image 1 |
3 | Verify "Register Complaint" option | Option visible with complaint icon | N/A | Complaint functionality | Image 1 |
4 | Verify "Communicate" option | Option visible with communication icon | N/A | Communication access | Image 1 |
5 | Verify "Request Service" option | Option visible with service icon | N/A | Service request access | Image 1 |
6 | Verify "View Payments" option | Option visible with payment icon | N/A | Payment history access | Image 1 |
7 | Verify "View Bills" option | Option visible with billing icon | N/A | Billing history access | Image 1 |
8 | Verify "Raise Disconnection" option | Option visible with disconnection icon | N/A | Disconnection request | Image 1 |
9 | Verify "Raise Transfer" option | Option visible with transfer icon | N/A | Transfer request | Image 1 |
10 | Click "Register Complaint" | Navigates to complaint registration form or complaints tab | N/A | Complaint workflow | Image 8 |
11 | Return and test "Communicate" | Opens communication interface or Communication tab | N/A | Communication workflow | Image 2 |
12 | Return and test "Request Service" | Navigates to service request form or Requests tab | N/A | Service workflow | Image 10 |
13 | Return and test "View Payments" | Displays payment history or Financial tab | N/A | Payment workflow | Image 4 |
14 | Return and test "View Bills" | Shows billing information and history | N/A | Billing workflow | Image 4 |
15 | Verify menu closes on outside click | Menu closes when clicking outside dropdown | N/A | UI behavior | Image 1 |
16 | Test Quick Actions on mobile viewport | Menu remains functional on smaller screens | Mobile simulation | Responsive design | N/A |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All Quick Actions menu options are accessible and lead to correct workflows
- Secondary_Verifications: Menu loads quickly, responsive design works, proper navigation flow
- Negative_Verification: Menu closes appropriately, no broken links or navigation errors
Test Case 3: Consumer Profile Tab Navigation and Content
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_013
- Title: Verify comprehensive consumer profile tab navigation and content display
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Profile Tab Navigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe profile via View Details | Profile loads with Overview tab active | John Doe (WU-10001) | Initial setup | Image 3 |
2 | Verify Overview tab content | Shows Relationship Health 85/100, Account Age 28 months, Payment Compliance 92% | Overview data | Overview validation | Image 3 |
3 | Verify Relationship Insights section | Shows Service Requests: 5 in last 12 months, Complaints: 2 in last 12 months | Insights data | Insights display | Image 3 |
4 | Verify Key Insights display | Shows: Consistent payment history, Responds well to email communications, Moderate service request frequency | Key insights | Insights content | Image 3 |
5 | Verify Consumption chart | 6-month water consumption chart visible with dropdown for service type | Consumption data | Chart display | Image 3 |
6 | Click "Financial" tab | Financial tab activates, content loads showing Account Balance and Billing Overview | N/A | Financial navigation | Image 4 |
7 | Verify Account Balance section | Shows Current Balance: $75.30, Last Payment: $120.45, Next Due Date: Apr 30, 2025 | Financial data | Balance information | Image 4 |
8 | Verify Billing Overview section | Shows Rate Plan: Residential Standard, Payment Method: Credit Card (auto), Average Monthly Usage: 4,500 gallons | Billing data | Billing information | Image 4 |
9 | Verify Payment History table | Shows recent payments with Date, Payment #, Amount, Method, Status columns | Payment history | Payment tracking | Image 4 |
10 | Click "Connections" tab | Connections tab activates, utility connections visible | N/A | Connections navigation | Image 5 |
11 | Verify Water Service section | Shows Water Service as Active with Meter Details expandable | Water service | Service display | Image 5 |
12 | Expand Water Service Meter Details | Shows Meter No: M-5678, Device No: D-9012, Meter Type: Smart Water Meter, etc. | Meter data | Meter information | Image 5 |
13 | Verify Electricity Service section | Shows Electricity Service as Active with Meter Details expandable | Electricity service | Service display | Image 6 |
14 | Expand Electricity Meter Details | Shows Meter No: E-3421, Device No: D-7865, Meter Type: Smart Electric Meter, etc. | Meter data | Meter information | Image 6 |
15 | Click "Service" tab | Service tab activates, service orders visible | N/A | Service navigation | Image 7 |
16 | Verify Service Orders table | Shows orders with Order #, Date, Type, Description, Status, Actions columns | Service orders | Service tracking | Image 9 |
17 | Click "Complaints" tab | Complaints tab activates, complaint history visible | N/A | Complaints navigation | Image 8 |
18 | Verify Complaint History table | Shows complaints with Date, Complaint #, Type, Status, Actions columns | Complaint data | Complaint tracking | Image 8 |
19 | Click "Requests" tab | Requests tab activates, service requests visible | N/A | Requests navigation | Image 10 |
20 | Verify Service Requests table | Shows requests with Request ID, Date, Type, Description, Status, Actions columns | Request data | Request tracking | Image 11 |
21 | Click "Communication" tab | Communication tab activates, communication history visible | N/A | Communication navigation | Image 2 |
22 | Verify Communication History | Shows emails, phone calls, SMS with dates, types, and expansion capability | Communication data | Communication tracking | Image 2 |
23 | Click "Documents" tab | Documents tab activates, document repository visible | N/A | Documents navigation | Image 3 |
24 | Verify Document Repository | Shows documents with Type, Sub Type, Date, Verification Status, Actions columns | Document data | Document management | Image 9 |
25 | Click "Notes" tab | Notes tab activates, consumer notes visible | N/A | Notes navigation | Image 4 |
26 | Verify Consumer Notes section | Shows note input field and existing notes with authors and dates | Notes data | Notes functionality | Image 10 |
27 | Click "Activity" tab | Activity tab activates, activity timeline visible | N/A | Activity navigation | Image 5 |
28 | Verify Activity Timeline | Shows activities with filtering options and "View Details" links | Activity data | Activity tracking | Image 11 |
29 | Test tab state persistence on refresh | Active tab remains selected after page refresh | N/A | State persistence | N/A |
30 | Verify responsive tab behavior | Tabs remain functional on mobile viewport | Mobile simulation | Mobile compatibility | N/A |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All profile tabs navigate correctly and display appropriate content as shown in images
- Secondary_Verifications: Tab states persist, data accuracy matches reference images, responsive design functions
- Negative_Verification: No broken tabs, proper loading states, error handling for missing data
Test Case 4: Update Profile Functionality
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_014
- Title: Verify consumer profile update functionality with validation and persistence
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe consumer profile | Profile loads with "Update Profile" button visible | John Doe (WU-10001) | Setup verification | Image 2 |
2 | Click "Update Profile" button | Update modal opens within 2 seconds as shown in interface | N/A | Modal loading | Image 7 |
3 | Verify modal title and description | Shows "Update Consumer Profile" with description text | Modal content | Modal content validation | Image 7 |
4 | Verify pre-populated email field | Current email displayed: "john.doe@example.com" with blue border | Existing data | Data pre-population | Image 7 |
5 | Verify pre-populated phone field | Current phone displayed: "(555) 123-4567" | Existing data | Phone pre-population | Image 7 |
6 | Verify pre-populated service address | Service address shows: "123 Main St, Anytown" | Existing address | Address pre-population | Image 7 |
7 | Verify pre-populated billing address | Billing address shows: "456 Finance Ave, Billtown" | Existing billing | Billing pre-population | Image 7 |
8 | Update email to new valid address | Field accepts new email format | "john.doe.updated@example.com" | Email update | Image 7 |
9 | Update phone to new valid number | Field accepts new phone format | "(555) 987-6543" | Phone update | Image 7 |
10 | Update service address | Service address field allows modification | "456 Oak Ave, Anytown" | Service address update | Image 7 |
11 | Update billing address | Billing address field allows modification | "789 Pine St, Billtown" | Billing address update | Image 7 |
12 | Attempt invalid email format | Validation error displayed | "invalid-email" | Email validation | Image 7 |
13 | Attempt invalid phone format | Validation error displayed | "123" | Phone validation | Image 7 |
14 | Clear required field | Required field validation triggered | Empty email | Required validation | Image 7 |
15 | Enter valid data and click "Save Changes" | Form submits successfully within 3 seconds | Valid complete data | Save operation | Image 7 |
16 | Verify success confirmation | Success message displayed | N/A | Save confirmation | N/A |
17 | Verify profile data persistence | Updated data displayed in profile view | Updated values | Data persistence | Image 2 |
18 | Verify "Cancel" functionality | Modal closes without saving when Cancel clicked | N/A | Cancel behavior | Image 7 |
19 | Verify modal close behavior | Modal closes properly with X button | N/A | UI behavior | Image 7 |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Profile updates save correctly with proper validation and data persistence as shown in modal interface
- Secondary_Verifications: Form validation works for all field types, modal behavior matches interface design
- Negative_Verification: Invalid data rejected, cancel discards changes, required fields enforced
Test Case 5: Communication History Management
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_015
- Title: Verify communication history display and management with filtering and details
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe profile and click Communication tab | Communication tab becomes active | John Doe (WU-10001) | Setup | Image 2 |
2 | Verify Communication History section | Section loads within 2 seconds showing history entries | N/A | Performance | Image 2 |
3 | Verify "Send Message" button | Blue "Send Message" button visible and accessible | N/A | Message functionality | Image 2 |
4 | Verify email communication entry | Email from Apr 18, 2025 10:23 AM "Water Service Maintenance Notification" | Historical email | Email display | Image 2 |
5 | Verify email entry details | Shows "To Customer" with "Maintenance" tag | Email metadata | Email categorization | Image 2 |
6 | Verify phone communication entry | Phone call from Apr 10, 2025 2:15 PM "Billing Question" | Historical phone | Phone display | Image 2 |
7 | Verify phone entry details | Shows "From Customer" with "Billing" tag | Phone metadata | Phone categorization | Image 2 |
8 | Verify email response entry | Email from Mar 25, 2025 11:45 AM "Re: Your March 2025 Water Bill" | Email response | Response tracking | Image 2 |
9 | Verify email response details | Shows "From Customer" with "Information Request" tag | Response metadata | Response categorization | Image 2 |
10 | Verify SMS communication entry | SMS from Mar 15, 2025 9:30 AM "Payment Confirmation" | Historical SMS | SMS display | Image 2 |
11 | Verify SMS entry details | Shows "To Customer" with "Payment" tag | SMS metadata | SMS categorization | Image 2 |
12 | Verify communication type icons | Each entry shows appropriate icon (Email/Phone/SMS) as displayed | Communication types | Type identification | Image 2 |
13 | Verify direction indicators | "To Customer" and "From Customer" clearly indicated | Direction data | Direction tracking | Image 2 |
14 | Verify timestamp display | All entries show accurate date and time format | Timestamps | Time accuracy | Image 2 |
15 | Verify category tags | Communications tagged (Maintenance, Billing, Payment, Information Request) | Category data | Categorization | Image 2 |
16 | Click expand arrow on email entry | Email content/details expand as shown with dropdown arrow | Apr 18 email | Content expansion | Image 2 |
17 | Test "Send Message" functionality | Message composition interface opens | N/A | Message creation | Image 2 |
18 | Verify communication chronological order | Entries displayed in reverse chronological order | All entries | Order validation | Image 2 |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Communication history displays accurately as shown in Image 2 with proper categorization and chronological order
- Secondary_Verifications: All communication types properly identified, content expansion works, send functionality accessible
- Negative_Verification: No missing communications, proper handling of empty states
Test Case 6: Document Repository Management
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_016
- Title: Verify document repository functionality with upload, verification status, and actions
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe profile and click Documents tab | Documents tab becomes active | John Doe (WU-10001) | Setup | Image 3 |
2 | Verify Document Repository section | Section loads within 3 seconds | N/A | Performance | Image 3 |
3 | Verify "Upload Document" button | Blue "Upload Document" button visible and accessible | N/A | Upload functionality | Image 3 |
4 | Verify Service Agreement document | "Service Agreement" Contract from Jan 15, 2023 - Verified (green) | Service Agreement | Document display | Image 3 |
5 | Verify Billing Authorization document | "Billing Authorization" Financial from Jan 15, 2023 - Verified (green) | Billing Auth | Document display | Image 3 |
6 | Verify Water Quality Report | "Water Quality Report" Report from Apr 05, 2025 - Published (blue) | Quality Report | Document display | Image 3 |
7 | Verify Service Change Request | "Service Change Request" Form from Mar 12, 2025 - Processing (yellow) | Change Request | Document display | Image 3 |
8 | Verify Identity Verification document | "Identity Verification" KYC from Jan 15, 2023 - Verified (green) | ID Verification | Document display | Image 3 |
9 | Verify document table columns | Document Type, Sub Type, Date, Verification Status, Actions columns visible | Table headers | Column validation | Image 3 |
10 | Verify verification status indicators | "Verified" (green), "Published" (blue), "Processing" (yellow) as shown | Status indicators | Status display | Image 3 |
11 | Verify document actions | Eye icon (view) and download icon visible for each document | Action icons | Action availability | Image 3 |
12 | Click view icon for Service Agreement | Document opens in viewer/downloads | Service Agreement | Document access | Image 3 |
13 | Click download icon for Billing Authorization | Document downloads successfully | Billing Authorization | Download functionality | Image 3 |
14 | Click "Upload Document" button | Upload dialog/interface opens | N/A | Upload initiation | Image 3 |
15 | Select valid PDF file for upload | File selected and validated | Test PDF file | File selection | N/A |
16 | Choose document type from dropdown | Document type selection available | "Identity Document" | Type classification | N/A |
17 | Choose sub-type from dropdown | Sub-type options populate based on type | "Passport" | Sub-type selection | N/A |
18 | Click "Upload" button | File uploads within 10 seconds | Selected file | Upload processing | N/A |
19 | Verify upload success confirmation | Success message displayed | N/A | Upload confirmation | N/A |
20 | Verify new document appears in list | Uploaded document visible with "Processing" status | New document | Document listing | Image 3 |
21 | Test upload with invalid file type | Error message for unsupported file type | .txt file | File validation | N/A |
22 | Test upload with oversized file | Error message for file size limit | Large file >10MB | Size validation | N/A |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Document repository displays all documents as shown in Image 3 with correct verification status and functional actions
- Secondary_Verifications: Upload functionality works with proper validation, document access functions correctly
- Negative_Verification: Invalid file types rejected, size limits enforced, proper error handling
Test Case 7: Consumer Notes Functionality
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_017
- Title: Verify consumer notes functionality with add, display, and management capabilities
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe profile and click Notes tab | Notes tab becomes active | John Doe (WU-10001) | Setup | Image 4 |
2 | Verify Consumer Notes section | Section loads within 2 seconds | N/A | Performance | Image 4 |
3 | Verify note input field | Text area with placeholder "Add a note about this consumer..." visible | N/A | Input field | Image 4 |
4 | Verify send button | Blue arrow send button visible next to input field | N/A | Send functionality | Image 4 |
5 | Verify existing notes display | Historical notes visible with author and date | Existing notes | Notes display | Image 4 |
6 | Verify first note content | "Customer called to inquire about their current balance." | Note 1 | Content accuracy | Image 4 |
7 | Verify first note metadata | Author: Jane Smith, Date: May 20, 2025 | Note 1 metadata | Metadata display | Image 4 |
8 | Verify second note content | "Informed customer about upcoming maintenance in their area scheduled for May 25th." | Note 2 | Content accuracy | Image 4 |
9 | Verify second note metadata | Author: Robert Johnson, Date: May 18, 2025 | Note 2 metadata | Metadata display | Image 4 |
10 | Click in note input field | Cursor appears in text area | N/A | Input activation | Image 4 |
11 | Type new note content | Text appears as typed | "Follow-up call scheduled for June 10th regarding service upgrade inquiry." | Text input | Image 4 |
12 | Click send button (arrow icon) | Note saves within 1 second | N/A | Note submission | Image 4 |
13 | Verify new note appears | New note added to list with current user and timestamp | New note | Note addition | Image 4 |
14 | Verify chronological order | Notes displayed in reverse chronological order (newest first) | All notes | Order validation | Image 4 |
15 | Verify input field reset | Input field returns to empty state with placeholder | N/A | Field reset | Image 4 |
16 | Test long note input | Long text accepted and displayed correctly | 500+ character note | Long text handling | Image 4 |
17 | Test empty note submission | Empty note submission prevented or handled gracefully | Empty input | Empty validation | Image 4 |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Notes can be added, saved, and displayed correctly as shown in Image 4 with proper metadata
- Secondary_Verifications: Chronological ordering maintained, input field behavior matches interface design
- Negative_Verification: Empty notes handled appropriately, proper user attribution
Test Case 8: Activity Timeline with View Details
Test Case Metadata:
- Test Case ID: CIS01US02_TC_018
- Title: Verify activity timeline functionality with filtering, search, and detailed view capabilities
- Created By: Auto-generated
- Created Date: June 02, 2025
- Version: 1.0
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments | Reference Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to John Doe profile and click Activity tab | Activity tab becomes active | John Doe (WU-10001) | Setup | Image 5 |
2 | Verify Activity Timeline section | Section loads within 3 seconds | N/A | Performance | Image 5 |
3 | Verify search functionality | Search box "Search activities..." visible | N/A | Search availability | Image 5 |
4 | Verify filter functionality | Filter button accessible with filter options | N/A | Filter availability | Image 5 |
5 | Verify filter categories | All, Payments, Billing, Service, Communication, Account filter tabs | Filter options | Category filters | Image 5 |
6 | Verify Payment Processed activity | "Payment Processed" entry from Apr 20, 2025 at 2:45 PM with green icon | Payment activity | Payment tracking | Image 5 |
7 | Verify payment activity details | "Payment of $120.45 was processed via Credit Card" | Payment details | Detail accuracy | Image 5 |
8 | Verify payment activity metadata | "By: System" attribution with "View Details" link | Payment metadata | Attribution tracking | Image 5 |
9 | Click "View Details" on payment activity | Detailed view opens with comprehensive payment information | Payment details | Detail expansion | Image 5 |
10 | Verify Email Sent activity | "Email Sent" Communication entry from Apr 20, 2025 at 10:15 AM with yellow icon | Email activity | Communication tracking | Image 5 |
11 | Verify email activity details | "Payment receipt email sent to customer" | Email details | Detail accuracy | Image 5 |
12 | Click "View Details" on email activity | Detailed view shows email content and delivery status | Email details | Email detail view | Image 5 |
13 | Verify Contact Information Updated activity | "Contact Information Updated" Account entry from Apr 18, 2025 at 3:30 PM with blue icon | Contact update | Account tracking | Image 6 |
14 | Verify contact update details | "Phone number updated from (555) 123-4567 to (555) 987-6543" | Contact details | Change tracking | Image 6 |
15 | Click "View Details" on contact update | Shows before/after values and update timestamp | Contact details | Change detail view | Image 6 |
16 | Verify Bill Generated activity | "Bill Generated" Billing entry from Apr 15, 2025 at 9:00 AM with blue icon | Billing activity | Billing tracking | Image 6 |
17 | Verify bill activity details | "Monthly bill of $120.45 generated for April 2025" | Bill details | Bill information | Image 6 |
18 | Click "View Details" on bill generation | Shows bill breakdown and generation parameters | Bill details | Bill detail view | Image 6 |
19 | Verify Phone Call Received activity | "Phone Call Received" Communication from Apr 10, 2025 at 2:15 PM | Phone activity | Communication tracking | Image 6 |
20 | Verify Service Request Created activity | "Service Request Created" Service from Apr 02, 2025 at 11:30 AM | Service activity | Service tracking | Image 6 |
21 | Verify Email Received activity | "Email Received" Communication from Mar 25, 2025 at 9:45 AM | Email received | Communication tracking | Image 6 |
22 | Test filter by "Payments" category | Only payment-related activities displayed | Payment filter | Filter functionality | Image 5 |
23 | Test filter by "Communication" category | Only communication activities displayed | Communication filter | Filter accuracy | Image 5 |
24 | Test filter by "Billing" category | Only billing-related activities displayed | Billing filter | Filter functionality | Image 5 |
25 | Test search functionality | Search for "payment" returns relevant activities | "payment" search | Search functionality | Image 5 |
26 | Test search with no results | "No activities found" message displayed | "xyz123" search | No results handling | Image 5 |
27 | Verify chronological ordering | Activities displayed in reverse chronological order | All activities | Order validation | Image 5, Image 6 |
28 | Verify activity icons | Each activity type has appropriate colored icon (green, yellow, blue) | All activities | Icon consistency | Image 5, Image 6 |
29 | Verify timestamp accuracy | All timestamps display correctly formatted | All activities | Time formatting | Image 5, Image 6 |
30 | Test "View Details" performance | Detail views load within 2 seconds | Various details | Performance validation | Image 5, Image 6 |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Activity timeline displays all consumer activities as shown in Images 5 and 6 with accurate details and functional "View Details" links
- Secondary_Verifications: Filtering and search work correctly, chronological order maintained, performance meets baseline
- Negative_Verification: Empty search results handled gracefully, filters work independently, no broken detail views
BUSINESS RULES VALIDATION WITH WEIGHTED CALCULATIONS
Business Rule 1: Relationship Health Score Formula
Formula Components:
Relationship Health Score =
(0.45 × Payment Compliance%) +
(0.3 × Service Quality Score) +
(0.1 × Account Longevity Factor) +
(0.075 × Digital Engagement%) +
(0.075 × Complaint Resolution Rate%) -
Penalty Factors
Component Breakdown:
- Payment Compliance (45% Weight)
- Formula: (On-time Payments / Total Payments) × 100
- Test Values: 92% compliance = 41.4 points
- Validation: CIS01US02_TC_010 Step 2
- Service Quality Score (30% Weight)
- Formula: 100 - (Service Requests per Year × 5)
- Test Values: 3 requests/year = 85 × 0.30 = 25.5 points
- Validation: CIS01US02_TC_010 Step 3
- Account Longevity Factor (10% Weight)
- Formula: min(Account Age in Months / 60, 1) × 100
- Test Values: 28 months = (28/60) × 100 × 0.10 = 4.67 points
- Validation: CIS01US02_TC_010 Step 4
- Digital Engagement (7.5% Weight)
- Formula: (Digital Transactions / Total Transactions) × 100
- Test Values: 80% engagement = 6.0 points
- Validation: CIS01US02_TC_010 Step 5
- Complaint Resolution Rate (7.5% Weight)
- Formula: (Resolved Complaints / Total Complaints) × 100
- Test Values: 100% resolution = 7.5 points
- Validation: CIS01US02_TC_010 Step 6
Penalty Factors:
- Late Payment: -2 points each
- Unresolved Complaint: -5 points each
- Service Disconnection: -10 points each
- Fraudulent Activity: -25 points
Score Ranges:
- 90-100: Excellent
- 80-89: Good
- 70-79: Average
- 60-69: Poor
- <60: At Risk
Business Rule 2: Dashboard Metrics Calculations
Dashboard Percentage Calculations:
- Active Accounts %: (Active Accounts / Total Accounts) × 100
- Inactive Accounts %: (Inactive Accounts / Total Accounts) × 100
- Temporarily Disconnected %: (Temp Disconnected / Total Accounts) × 100
Test Values:
- Total: 7, Active: 4, Inactive: 1, Temp Disconnected: 1
- Active %: (4/7) × 100 = 57%
- Inactive %: (1/7) × 100 = 14%
- Temp Disconnected %: (1/7) × 100 = 14%
Validation: CIS01US02_TC_001 Steps 2-5
Business Rule 3: Fee Calculation Rules
Application Fee Structure:
- Application Processing Fee: $25.00 (Fixed)
- Service Connection Fee: $75.00 (Fixed)
- Security Deposit: $150.00 (Fixed)
- Total Due: Sum of all fees = $250.00
Validation: CIS01US02_TC_007 Steps 3-6
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS & SLA DEFINITIONS
Page Load Performance Requirements
Component | SLA Requirement | Test Validation |
---|---|---|
Dashboard Load | <3 seconds | CIS01US02_TC_001 Step 1 |
Consumer Search | <500ms response | CIS01US02_TC_002 Step 9 |
Profile Load | <2 seconds | CIS01US02_TC_010 Step 1 |
Application Form Load | <2 seconds | CIS01US02_TC_004 Step 1 |
Plan Selection Load | <3 seconds | CIS01US02_TC_005 Step 1 |
Review Page Load | <2 seconds | CIS01US02_TC_006 Step 1 |
Payment Processing | <5 seconds | CIS01US02_TC_008 Step 4 |
API Performance Requirements
API Endpoint | SLA Requirement | Test Coverage |
---|---|---|
GET /api/consumers | <500ms | API Performance Suite |
POST /api/applications | <1 second | Application Processing |
POST /api/payments | <3 seconds | Payment Processing |
GET /api/health-score | <2 seconds | Health Score Calculation |
Concurrent User Performance
User Load | Response Time SLA | Test Scenario |
---|---|---|
1-10 users | <2 seconds | Normal operation |
11-50 users | <3 seconds | Peak usage |
51-100 users | <5 seconds | Stress testing |
100+ users | Graceful degradation | Load testing |
Availability SLA
- System Availability: 99.9% uptime
- Planned Maintenance: <4 hours monthly
- Recovery Time Objective (RTO): <1 hour
- Recovery Point Objective (RPO): <15 minutes
VALIDATION CHECKLIST COMPLIANCE
✅ All Acceptance Criteria Covered:
- AC1: Dashboard metrics with simplified UI ✓
- AC2: Consumer search functionality ✓
- AC3: Application method selection ✓
- AC4: Consumer details form with VIP status ✓
- AC5: Plan selection with Eco-Friendly options ✓
- AC6: Application review with 5-step process ✓
- AC7: Payment options selection ✓
- AC8: Pay Now processing ✓
- AC9: Alternative payment options ✓
✅ Business Rules Tested with Weighted Calculations:
- Relationship health score formula (5 components) ✓
- Dashboard percentage calculations ✓
- Fee calculation accuracy ✓
- Account status management ✓
- Payment compliance tracking ✓
✅ Cross-browser/Device Compatibility:
- Chrome 155+ (Primary) ✓
- Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest ✓
- Mobile responsiveness (iOS 16+, Android 13+) ✓
- Responsive design testing ✓
✅ Positive and Negative Scenarios:
- Valid data processing ✓
- Invalid data handling ✓
- Error condition testing ✓
- Boundary value testing ✓
✅ Integration Points Tested:
- AI document processing ✓
- Payment gateway integration ✓
- Document verification service ✓
- Email/SMS notifications ✓
- Health score calculation engine ✓
✅ Security Considerations Addressed:
- Authentication and authorization ✓
- Data encryption and protection ✓
- Input validation and sanitization ✓
- Session management ✓
- Payment data security ✓
✅ Performance Benchmarks Defined:
- Dashboard load time: <3 seconds ✓
- Search response time: <500ms ✓
- API response time: <500ms-3 seconds ✓
- Payment processing: <5 seconds ✓
- Concurrent user handling defined ✓
✅ Realistic Test Data Provided:
- Utility company consumer profiles ✓
- Service plan configurations ✓
- Payment and billing data ✓
- Document samples ✓
- Health score calculation data ✓
✅ Clear Dependency Mapping:
- Test execution order defined ✓
- External system dependencies mapped ✓
- Parallel execution capabilities identified ✓
✅ Proper Tagging for All 17 Reports:
- Module classification ✓
- Priority levels ✓
- Test types and phases ✓
- Platform coverage ✓
- Business impact levels ✓
- Risk assessments ✓
✅ Edge Cases Covered (80% Detail Level):
- Boundary conditions ✓
- Error scenarios ✓
- Network failures ✓
- Data inconsistencies ✓
✅ API Tests for Critical Operations:
- Consumer CRUD operations ✓
- Payment processing APIs ✓
- Application submission APIs ✓
- Health score calculation APIs ✓
INTEGRATION TEST MAPPING
External System Dependencies
AI Document Processing Service
- Test Cases: CIS01US02_TC_003 (Method Selection)
- Dependency Type: External API
- Fallback Strategy: Manual form entry
- Health Check: Service availability validation
- Error Handling: Graceful degradation to manual process
Payment Gateway Integration
- Test Cases: CIS01US02_TC_008 (Pay Now Processing)
- Dependency Type: External Payment Service
- Fallback Strategy: Alternative payment methods
- Health Check: Gateway connectivity test
- Error Handling: Payment retry mechanism
Document Verification Service
- Test Cases: CIS01US02_TC_004 (Document Upload)
- Dependency Type: External Verification API
- Fallback Strategy: Manual document review
- Health Check: Verification service status
- Error Handling: Queue for manual processing
Email/SMS Notification Service
- Test Cases: CIS01US02_TC_009 (Invoice Generation)
- Dependency Type: External Communication Service
- Fallback Strategy: Manual notification process
- Health Check: Service endpoint monitoring
- Error Handling: Retry with exponential backoff
Analytics Engine (Health Score)
- Test Cases: CIS01US02_TC_010 (Health Score Calculation)
- Dependency Type: Internal Service
- Fallback Strategy: Basic score calculation
- Health Check: Calculation service monitoring
- Error Handling: Default score assignment
Integration Test Execution Flow
1. Service Health Checks
↓
2. Authentication & Authorization Tests
↓
3. Consumer Management Core Functions
↓
4. Application Workflow Integration
↓
5. Payment Processing Integration
↓
6. Analytics & Reporting Integration
↓
7. End-to-End Workflow Validation
TEST EXECUTION DEPENDENCIES
Prerequisites Chain
Critical Path Dependencies:
- Infrastructure Setup → All Tests
- Authentication Service → All Functional Tests
- Database Initialization → All Data-Dependent Tests
- External Service Availability → Integration Tests
Test Case Dependencies:
Sequential Dependencies:
- CIS01US02_TC_001 (Dashboard) → CIS01US02_TC_002 (Search)
- CIS01US02_TC_003 (Method Selection) → CIS01US02_TC_004 (Consumer Details)
- CIS01US02_TC_004 (Consumer Details) → CIS01US02_TC_005 (Plan Selection)
- CIS01US02_TC_005 (Plan Selection) → CIS01US02_TC_006 (Review)
- CIS01US02_TC_006 (Review) → CIS01US02_TC_007 (Payment Options)
- CIS01US02_TC_007 (Payment Options) → CIS01US02_TC_008/TC_009 (Payment Processing)
Parallel Execution Groups:
Group 1: Dashboard & Search (Independent)
- CIS01US02_TC_001, CIS01US02_TC_002
Group 2: Profile Management (Independent)
- CIS01US02_TC_010
Group 3: Application Workflow (Sequential)
- CIS01US02_TC_003 → TC_004 → TC_005 → TC_006 → TC_007 → TC_008/TC_009
Blocking Test Scenarios
High Priority Blockers:
- Authentication failure blocks all tests
- Database connectivity issues block data-dependent tests
- Payment gateway unavailability blocks payment tests
Medium Priority Blockers:
Test Execution Order:
- Smoke Tests (15 minutes)
- CIS01US02_TC_001, TC_002, TC_003
- Core Functionality (2 hours)
- CIS01US02_TC_004, TC_005, TC_006, TC_010
- Payment Processing (1 hour)
- CIS01US02_TC_007, TC_008, TC_009
- Integration Tests (45 minutes)
- External service integrations
- Cross-Platform Tests (1 hour)
- Browser and device compatibility
CROSS-PLATFORM TEST MATRIX
Browser Compatibility Matrix
Test Case | Chrome 155+ | Firefox 110+ | Safari 16+ | Edge Latest | iOS Safari | Android Chrome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TC_001 Dashboard | ✓ Primary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✗ N/A | ✗ N/A |
TC_002 Search | ✓ Primary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✗ N/A | ✗ N/A |
TC_003 Method Selection | ✓ Primary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Mobile | ✓ Mobile |
TC_004 Consumer Form | ✓ Primary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Secondary | ✓ Mobile | ✓ Mobile |
TC_005 Plan Selection |