Skip to main content

Bulk Import contacts - CRM1.1P1US01.1

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

  • CSV file upload with drag-and-drop interface and template validation
  • Real-time file validation for required fields (Name, Email, Type, Channel, Stage)
  • 5-step import wizard with progress tracking and status updates
  • Automated duplicate detection with weighted scoring (100%, 95%, 90%, 85%)
  • Manual duplicate resolution with merge/skip options and bulk operations
  • Import completion with comprehensive summary analytics and error reporting

Business Rules:

  • Required fields validation: Name, Email, Type, Channel, Stage (red "Required" badges)
  • Optional fields: Phone, Company, Position, Address, Tags
  • File size limits: 10MB max, 50,000 records max
  • Contact Type validation: 8 specific types (lead, prospect, customer, partner, investor, advisor, potential leader, friend of organization)
  • Stage validation: 7 specific stages (New Lead, Qualified Lead MQL, Nurture/Disqualified, Hot Lead SQL, Opportunity, Customer Won/Lost, Nurturing Ongoing)
  • Channel validation: 11 specific channels (Newsletter Signup, Contact Us, Get Custom Quote, etc.)
  • Duplicate detection scoring: Exact (100%), Email (95%), Phone (90%), Name+Company (85%)

User Journeys by Role:

  • Marketing Operations Manager: Bulk import with comprehensive duplicate handling and analytics
  • Marketing Manager: Quick campaign contact import with validation
  • Sales Development Representative: Access to newly imported qualified leads
  • Account Executive: Consolidated contact data for account management
  • Sales Manager: Team performance tracking and data quality oversight

Integration Points:

  • CRM contact database (Services-CX)
  • File processing API
  • Duplicate detection algorithm
  • Error reporting system
  • Audit logging service

Data Flow:

  • CSV Upload → Header Validation → Processing → Duplicate Detection → Manual Resolution → Import Complete → Contact Database Update

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance:

  • File upload response times under 3 seconds
  • Processing times: 100 contacts (30 seconds), 1000 contacts (90 seconds), 10000+ contacts (5 minutes)
  • Real-time progress updates during processing
  • Concurrent user handling (10+ simultaneous imports)

Security:

  • File format validation preventing malicious uploads
  • Input sanitization for XSS and SQL injection prevention
  • Session management during import process
  • Role-based access control validation

Compatibility:

  • Cross-browser support: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Screen resolution adaptability: Desktop (1920x1080), Tablet (1024x768), Mobile (375x667)
  • Operating system compatibility: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

Usability:

  • Intuitive 5-step wizard navigation with clear progress indicators
  • Comprehensive error messaging with specific resolution guidance
  • Drag-and-drop file upload with visual feedback
  • Real-time duplicate resolution with live counter updates

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions:

  • Maximum file size (10MB) and record count (50,000) testing
  • Minimum required fields validation
  • Empty file and single record file handling
  • Unicode and special character support

Invalid Inputs:

  • Malformed CSV files with missing headers
  • Invalid email formats and phone number formats
  • Unsupported contact types, stages, and channels
  • SQL injection and XSS attempt prevention

System Failures:

  • Network interruption during upload and processing
  • Server timeout scenarios
  • Database connection failures
  • Memory limitations during large file processing




Test Case 1: Import Method Selection Interface Display

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001
Title: Verify import method selection page displays correctly with CSV File Upload active for Marketing Operations Manager
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, UI, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-CRM-Navigation, Marketing-Operations-Manager, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full import access with analytics
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot access admin settings
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Step 1 functionality
  • Integration_Points: CRM Navigation, User Authentication
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: CRM system access, user authentication service
  • Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Valid Marketing Operations Manager credentials

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Marketing Operations Manager logged into CRM system
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager role with import permissions
  • Test_Data: alice.kumar@techcorp.com credentials, active session
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication and CRM access verified

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Marketing Operations Manager

CRM dashboard loads with import permissions

alice.kumar@techcorp.com

Role-based access validation

2

Navigate to CRM main navigation menu

CRM menu displays with "Import Contacts" option visible

N/A

Navigation availability check

3

Click "Import Contacts" from navigation

Import Contacts page loads showing Step 1 of 5

N/A

Entry point verification

4

Verify step progress indicator

"Step 1 of 5" displayed with step 1 highlighted in blue (#3b82f6)

N/A

Progress tracking UI

5

Verify page title and subtitle

Title: "Choose Import Method", Subtitle: "Select how you'd like to import your contacts"

Exact text from user story

Content accuracy

6

Verify CSV File Upload method display

CSV File Upload option shows document icon, "Popular" badge, clickable state

UI specification

Active method validation

7

Verify CSV File Upload description

"Upload a CSV file with your contacts" description displayed

Exact text

Method description

8

Verify inactive methods display

Gmail Contacts, Outlook Contacts, Salesforce, HubSpot, LinkedIn, Zapier, API Import visible but greyed out

All 7 Phase 2 methods

Inactive state validation

9

Verify method badges

Gmail Contacts and Outlook Contacts show "Popular" badge

Badge specification

Badge accuracy

10

Verify hover effects

Only CSV File Upload responds to hover with visual feedback

Hover interaction

Interactive state

11

Click CSV File Upload method

System advances to Step 2 automatically

N/A

Navigation functionality

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: CSV File Upload is the only active/clickable import method
  • Secondary_Verifications: All 8 import methods visible, correct badges, proper step indicator
  • Negative_Verification: Phase 2 methods (Gmail, Outlook, Salesforce, HubSpot, LinkedIn, Zapier, API) not clickable

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record actual behavior and UI states]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: User authentication must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: All subsequent import workflow tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other CRM navigation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Must execute before TC_002

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical entry point for entire import workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Browser refresh during method selection, session timeout
  • Risk_Areas: Method selection state persistence, navigation reliability
  • Security_Considerations: Role-based access verification, session validation

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Session timeout during method selection with recovery mechanism

  • Type: Error/Session Management

  • Rationale: User story mentions session management during import process

  • Priority: P2

  • Scenario_2: Method selection state persistence across browser refresh

  • Type: Edge Case/State Management

  • Rationale: Import process should handle interruptions gracefully

  • Priority: P3




Test Case 2: CSV File Upload Navigation and State Management

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_002
Title: Verify CSV File Upload selection advances to Step 2 with proper state management
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Navigation
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Navigation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Navigation-Flow, State-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full import workflow access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify system settings
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minute
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Step 1 to Step 2 navigation
  • Integration_Points: Navigation State Management, Session Persistence
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Navigation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Smoke-Test-Results, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: CRM system, session management service
  • Performance_Baseline: Navigation < 1 second
  • Data_Requirements: Active user session from TC_001

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 1 displayed correctly
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager permissions
  • Test_Data: Valid session from TC_001 execution
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Execute CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001 successfully

Step 1 displays with CSV File Upload active

From TC_001

Prerequisite validation

2

Verify CSV File Upload method state

Method highlighted with hover effect available

Visual feedback

Interactive state check

3

Click CSV File Upload option

Method selection highlights with visual feedback

N/A

Selection confirmation

4

Verify automatic advancement

System navigates to Step 2 without additional user action

N/A

Auto-progression validation

5

Verify Step 2 page loading

"Upload CSV File" page displays completely

Step 2 content

Page load success

6

Verify progress indicator update

"Step 2 of 5" highlighted, Step 1 shows completed state (checkmark)

Progress UI

Progress tracking

7

Verify session persistence

User session maintained across navigation

Session data

Session management

8

Verify no back button restriction

Step 1 should not have back button (first step rule)

Navigation rules

Business rule validation

9

Test browser back button

Clicking browser back returns to Step 1 correctly

Browser navigation

State persistence

10

Re-select CSV File Upload

Consistent behavior on re-selection

Navigation consistency

Repeatability check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Seamless navigation from Step 1 to Step 2 with state preservation
  • Secondary_Verifications: Progress indicator accuracy, session maintenance, visual feedback
  • Negative_Verification: No navigation errors, no session loss, no UI inconsistencies

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record navigation behavior and state changes]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if navigation issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of navigation flow]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: All Step 2 test cases
  • Parallel_Tests: None (sequential navigation)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must precede Step 2 testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical navigation flow for user experience
  • Edge_Cases: Network latency during navigation, concurrent user sessions
  • Risk_Areas: State persistence, session management, navigation reliability
  • Security_Considerations: Session validation, state tampering prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Navigation behavior under slow network conditions

  • Type: Performance/Network

  • Rationale: User story emphasizes smooth navigation experience

  • Priority: P2

  • Scenario_2: Concurrent user session handling during navigation

  • Type: Integration/Concurrency

  • Rationale: Multiple Marketing Operations Managers may import simultaneously

  • Priority: P3




Test Case 3: CSV Requirements Panel and Field Validation Display

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003
Title: Verify CSV Requirements panel displays all required and optional fields with accurate validation rules
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, UI, Validation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Validation-Engine, Field-Requirements, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full field validation access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify field requirements
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of CSV requirements specification
  • Integration_Points: Field Validation Engine, Template Generation
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Validation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Regression-Coverage, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: CRM system, field validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: Panel load < 2 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Step 2 page loaded from navigation

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 "Upload CSV File" page displayed
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with field access
  • Test_Data: Navigation state from TC_002
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 from Step 1

"Upload CSV File" page loads with progress indicator "Step 2 of 5"

From TC_002

Navigation prerequisite

2

Locate CSV Requirements panel

"CSV Requirements" section header with document icon displayed

UI specification

Panel identification

3

Verify "Required CSV Format" subsection

Subsection heading displayed with proper typography

Typography rules

Section structure

4

Verify required field: Name

"Name" field with red "Required" badge, example "John Doe"

Field specification

Required field validation

5

Verify required field: Email

"Email" field with red "Required" badge, example "john@example.com"

Field specification

Email field validation

6

Verify required field: Type

"Type" field with red "Required" badge, example "lead"

Field specification

Type field validation

7

Verify required field: Channel

"Channel" field with red "Required" badge, example "inbound"

Field specification

Channel field validation

8

Verify required field: Stage

"Stage" field with red "Required" badge, example "prospect"

Field specification

Stage field validation

9

Verify optional field: Phone

"Phone" field without required badge, example "+1 555-123-4567"

Field specification

Optional field display

10

Verify optional field: Company

"Company" field without required badge, example "Acme Corp"

Field specification

Company field display

11

Verify optional field: Position

"Position" field without required badge, example "Sales Manager"

Field specification

Position field display

12

Verify optional field: Address

"Address" field without required badge, example "123 Main St, City, State"

Field specification

Address field display

13

Verify optional field: Tags

"Tags" field without required badge, example "prospect,enterprise"

Field specification

Tags field display

14

Verify two-column layout

Fields displayed in "Field Name

Example Value" format

Layout specification

15

Verify visual hierarchy

Bold field names, consistent spacing, proper color coding

Design specification

Visual design check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All 5 required fields display red "Required" badges with accurate examples
  • Secondary_Verifications: All 5 optional fields display without badges, two-column layout, proper typography
  • Negative_Verification: No missing fields, no incorrect badge placement, no layout inconsistencies

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record field display states and examples]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for field display issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of field requirements panel]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_002 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: File validation test cases
  • Parallel_Tests: Template download testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to file upload testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Foundation for user understanding of CSV requirements
  • Edge_Cases: Different screen resolutions, browser zoom levels
  • Risk_Areas: Field requirement accuracy, example data clarity
  • Security_Considerations: Field validation rules exposure

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Field requirement tooltips or help text validation

  • Type: UI/Usability

  • Rationale: Users may need additional guidance on field requirements

  • Priority: P3

  • Scenario_2: Dynamic field requirement updates based on user role

  • Type: Role-Based/Dynamic

  • Rationale: Different roles may have different field requirements

  • Priority: P2




Test Case 4: Sample CSV Template Download and Content Validation

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_004
Title: Verify sample CSV template download functionality and content matches specification
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Download
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Download, Template, MOD-Import, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-File-Generation, Template-Service, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Template download access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify template content
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of template download functionality
  • Integration_Points: File Generation Service, Template Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Template Generator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Regression-Coverage, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File generation service, browser download capability
  • Performance_Baseline: Download initiation < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Step 2 page with template link

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 page displayed with template download link
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with download permissions
  • Test_Data: Browser download folder accessible
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 CSV requirements

CSV Requirements panel displays correctly

From TC_003

Setup verification

2

Locate download template link

"Download sample CSV template" link with download icon visible

UI specification

Link identification

3

Verify link styling

Blue clickable link with download icon, proper hover effect

Design specification

Link appearance

4

Click "Download sample CSV template"

File download initiates immediately

N/A

Download trigger

5

Verify download notification

Browser shows download progress/completion notification

Browser behavior

Download feedback

6

Navigate to download folder

Downloaded file "contacts_template.csv" present

File system

File presence check

7

Open downloaded CSV file

File opens in default spreadsheet application (Excel/Sheets)

Downloaded file

File accessibility

8

Verify CSV headers

Headers: name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Template specification

Header accuracy

9

Verify required field samples

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead

User story sample data

Sample data accuracy

10

Verify sample record 2

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL)

User story sample data

Multiple records

11

Verify sample record 3

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL)

User story sample data

Complete samples

12

Verify optional field samples

Phone: +91 9876543210, Company: TechCorp, Position: Manager

User story sample data

Optional field data

13

Verify file encoding

File saved as UTF-8 encoding (no character corruption)

Technical requirement

Encoding validation

14

Verify file size

Template file size reasonable (<50KB)

Performance requirement

File efficiency

15

Test multiple downloads

Link allows multiple downloads without errors

Repeatability test

Download reliability

Expected CSV Template Content:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Sales Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education


Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Template downloads successfully with accurate headers and sample data
  • Secondary_Verifications: UTF-8 encoding, proper file format, realistic sample data
  • Negative_Verification: No download failures, no corrupted data, no missing fields

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record download behavior and file content]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for download or content issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of download and file content]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: File upload validation tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other Step 2 UI tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Template used in subsequent upload tests

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Template provides user guidance for proper CSV format
  • Edge_Cases: Different browsers, download folder permissions, antivirus interference
  • Risk_Areas: File generation service availability, encoding consistency
  • Security_Considerations: Template content security, download integrity

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Template download with different user roles and permission levels

  • Type: Role-Based/Security

  • Rationale: Different roles may need different template content

  • Priority: P3

  • Scenario_2: Template download under slow network conditions

  • Type: Performance/Network

  • Rationale: Users may experience varying network speeds

  • Priority: P3





Test Case 5: File Upload Interface and Drag-Drop Functionality

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005
Title: Verify drag-and-drop file upload interface functionality and visual feedback
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, UI, Upload, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-File-Upload, Drag-Drop-Interface, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full file upload access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot upload non-CSV files
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of upload interface functionality
  • Integration_Points: File Upload Service, Browser File API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Upload Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Browser file API, file upload service
  • Performance_Baseline: UI response < 1 second
  • Data_Requirements: Step 2 page loaded

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface displayed
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with upload permissions
  • Test_Data: Valid CSV file ready for testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 upload interface

Upload CSV File page displays with all components

From previous tests

Setup verification

2

Locate upload zone

Large dashed border area visible for drag-and-drop

UI specification

Upload zone identification

3

Verify upload icon

Upload arrow icon (↑) centered in upload zone

Design specification

Visual element check

4

Verify primary instruction text

"Drop your CSV file here" displayed as main instruction

Exact text from user story

Primary guidance

5

Verify secondary instruction text

"or click to browse files" shown as alternative action

Exact text from user story

Alternative guidance

6

Verify Choose File button

Blue "Choose File" button below secondary text

Button specification

Action button presence

7

Verify initial button states

Back button enabled, Import Contacts button disabled (grey)

Initial state rules

Button state validation

8

Test drag-over effect

Dragging CSV file over upload zone highlights border

contacts_valid.csv

Visual feedback

9

Test drag-leave effect

Moving file away from zone removes highlight

N/A

Interaction feedback

10

Test file drop functionality

Dropping CSV file initiates upload process

contacts_valid.csv

Drop upload trigger

11

Test Choose File button click

Clicking button opens file browser dialog

N/A

Browser dialog trigger

12

Verify file browser filter

File dialog shows only CSV files (.csv)

File browser

Format filtering

13

Test file selection

Selecting CSV file closes dialog and begins upload

contacts_valid.csv

File selection flow

14

Verify upload feedback

Upload zone shows file name and success indicator

Selected file

Upload confirmation

15

Verify button state change

Import Contacts button becomes enabled (blue) after successful upload

N/A

State transition

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Drag-and-drop and file browser both successfully upload CSV files
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual feedback, button states, file filtering, upload confirmation
  • Negative_Verification: No upload errors, proper file type filtering, correct state management

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record upload behavior and visual states]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for upload interface issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of upload interface behavior]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: File validation and processing tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Template download tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to file validation testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical user interaction point for file upload workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Large files, network interruption, browser compatibility
  • Risk_Areas: File upload reliability, drag-drop browser support, state management
  • Security_Considerations: File type validation, upload size limits

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Multiple file drag-and-drop handling (should reject multiple files)
  • Type: Edge Case/Validation
  • Rationale: User story specifies single file upload only
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Upload interface behavior on mobile devices with touch interaction
  • Type: Mobile/Touch Interface
  • Rationale: Responsive design requirements for mobile users
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 6: Valid CSV File Upload and Validation Success

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006
Title: Verify successful upload of valid CSV file with all required fields and proper validation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Upload
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Upload, Validation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-File-Validation, CSV-Processing, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full file upload and validation access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot bypass validation rules
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of valid file upload flow
  • Integration_Points: File Upload Service, Validation Engine, CSV Parser
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Upload and Validation Modules
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File upload service, CSV validation engine
  • Performance_Baseline: Upload processing < 5 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file with user story sample data

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with validation access
  • Test_Data: Valid CSV file prepared with sample data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass

Test Data: Valid CSV file (contacts_valid.csv):

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Sales Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education

Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,customer,Get Custom Quote,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO,"321 Tech Hub, Pune",customer,startup

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 upload interface

Upload zone displays correctly with all elements

From TC_005

Interface setup

2

Prepare valid CSV file

File contains all required headers and sample data

contacts_valid.csv

Data preparation

3

Click "Choose File" button

File browser dialog opens filtered for CSV files

N/A

File selection initiation

4

Select valid CSV file

File browser allows selection of contacts_valid.csv

contacts_valid.csv

File selection

5

Confirm file selection

File dialog closes, upload processing begins

Selected file

Upload initiation

6

Verify upload progress

Visual feedback shows file being processed

N/A

Progress indication

7

Verify file upload status

"contacts_valid.csv is ready for import" status message displays

Uploaded filename

Upload confirmation

8

Verify file information display

Filename "contacts_valid.csv" and file size displayed below upload area

File metadata

File details display

9

Verify file size display

File size shown (e.g., "2.1 KB") next to filename

File size data

Size information

10

Verify record count estimation

"4 contacts detected" or similar count shown

CSV record count

Record estimation

11

Verify success visual indicators

Green checkmark or success icon displayed next to file info

Visual feedback

Success confirmation

12

Verify button state transition

Import Contacts button changes from disabled (grey) to enabled (blue)

Button state

State management

13

Verify replace file option

"Replace file" or "Upload different file" option available

UI option

File replacement

14

Test file replacement

Clicking replace allows selecting new file

Alternative CSV

Replacement functionality

15

Confirm final upload state

All validation passed, ready to proceed to processing

Final state

Readiness check

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Valid CSV file uploads successfully and passes all validation checks
  • Secondary_Verifications: File metadata display, record count accuracy, button state changes
  • Negative_Verification: No validation errors, no upload failures, proper state transitions

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record upload behavior and validation results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for upload or validation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of successful upload and validation]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Processing and duplicate detection tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Error validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to Step 3 processing tests

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Foundation test for successful import workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Exact file size limits, character encoding variations
  • Risk_Areas: File validation accuracy, upload reliability, state persistence
  • Security_Considerations: File content validation, malicious file prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Upload behavior with maximum allowed file size (10MB boundary)
  • Type: Boundary/Performance
  • Rationale: User story specifies 10MB limit as critical business rule
  • Priority: P1
  • Scenario_2: Upload validation with special characters in contact names and addresses
  • Type: Data/Internationalization
  • Rationale: Indian names and addresses may contain special characters
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 7: File Format Validation and Rejection Handling

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_007
Title: Verify system correctly rejects non-CSV file formats with appropriate error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Negative
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Negative, Import-Service, Validation, Security, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-File-Validation, Format-Security, Negative

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Standard file upload validation
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot override file format restrictions
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of file format validation
  • Integration_Points: File Validation Engine, Security Scanner
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Validation Security Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File validation service, security scanner
  • Performance_Baseline: Validation response < 2 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Various non-CSV test files

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager standard access
  • Test_Data: Non-CSV files prepared for testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass

Test Data: Test files for format validation:

  • contacts.txt (Text file with CSV data)
  • contacts.xlsx (Excel file with contact data)
  • contacts.pdf (PDF file with contact information)
  • contacts.docx (Word document with contact list)
  • malicious.exe (Executable file)
  • contacts.json (JSON file with contact data)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 upload interface

Upload interface displays correctly

From previous tests

Setup verification

2

Attempt to upload .txt file

File browser may allow selection but system rejects

contacts.txt

Text file rejection

3

Verify .txt file error message

Error: "Invalid file format. Please upload a CSV file."

Error specification

Text format error

4

Verify button remains disabled

Import Contacts button stays disabled (grey)

Button state

State consistency

5

Attempt to upload .xlsx file

System rejects Excel file format

contacts.xlsx

Excel rejection

6

Verify .xlsx error message

Error: "Invalid file format. Please upload a CSV file."

Error specification

Excel format error

7

Attempt to upload .pdf file

System rejects PDF file format

contacts.pdf

PDF rejection

8

Verify .pdf error message

Error: "Invalid file format. Please upload a CSV file."

Error specification

PDF format error

9

Attempt to upload .docx file

System rejects Word document format

contacts.docx

Word rejection

10

Verify .docx error message

Error: "Invalid file format. Please upload a CSV file."

Error specification

Word format error

11

Attempt to upload .exe file

System blocks executable file for security

malicious.exe

Security validation

12

Verify .exe security error

Error: "Invalid file format. Please upload a CSV file." or security warning

Security response

Executable blocking

13

Attempt to upload .json file

System rejects JSON format

contacts.json

JSON rejection

14

Verify error message consistency

All format errors show consistent messaging

Error messages

Message consistency

15

Test error recovery

Upload valid CSV after errors to verify system recovers

contacts_valid.csv

Recovery validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All non-CSV file formats are rejected with appropriate error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Button state remains disabled, error messages are consistent and helpful
  • Negative_Verification: No file format bypass, no security vulnerabilities, no system crashes

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record rejection behavior and error messages]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for validation or security issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of format validation and error handling]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: None (negative testing)
  • Parallel_Tests: Other validation error tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Follows successful upload testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical security validation to prevent malicious file uploads
  • Edge_Cases: Files with multiple extensions, masked file types, corrupted files
  • Risk_Areas: Security bypass attempts, file type spoofing, validation accuracy
  • Security_Considerations: Malware prevention, file content inspection, extension validation

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: File type spoofing attempts (e.g., .exe renamed to .csv)
  • Type: Security/Malicious
  • Rationale: Security requirement to prevent malicious file uploads
  • Priority: P1
  • Scenario_2: Files with double extensions (e.g., contacts.csv.exe)
  • Type: Security/Edge Case
  • Rationale: Common malware technique to bypass validation
  • Priority: P2





Test Case 8: File Size Limit Validation and Boundary Testing

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_008
Title: Verify 10MB file size limit enforcement with boundary testing and appropriate error handling
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Boundary
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Boundary, Import-Service, Validation, Performance, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-File-Processing, Size-Limits, Boundary

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Standard file size limitations
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot override file size limits
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of file size validation
  • Integration_Points: File Processing Service, Storage Validation
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Size Validation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File processing service, storage validation
  • Performance_Baseline: Size validation < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Files of varying sizes for boundary testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager standard access
  • Test_Data: Test files prepared at different sizes
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass

Test Data: Size-based test files:

  • small_file_1mb.csv (1MB CSV file with ~10,000 contacts)
  • medium_file_5mb.csv (5MB CSV file with ~50,000 contacts)
  • boundary_file_10mb.csv (Exactly 10MB CSV file at size limit)
  • oversized_file_11mb.csv (11MB CSV file exceeding limit)
  • large_file_15mb.csv (15MB CSV file well over limit)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 upload interface

Upload interface displays correctly

From previous tests

Setup verification

2

Upload 1MB CSV file

File uploads successfully without size warnings

small_file_1mb.csv

Small file acceptance

3

Verify small file success

File accepted, Import Contacts button enabled

N/A

Normal size processing

4

Upload 5MB CSV file

File uploads successfully with normal processing

medium_file_5mb.csv

Medium file acceptance

5

Verify medium file success

File accepted, processing indicator shows progress

N/A

Medium size processing

6

Upload exactly 10MB file

File uploads successfully at boundary limit

boundary_file_10mb.csv

Boundary acceptance

7

Verify boundary file success

File accepted with message "File size: 10.0 MB"

File size display

Boundary validation

8

Attempt 11MB file upload

System rejects file before/during upload

oversized_file_11mb.csv

Size limit enforcement

9

Verify 11MB rejection error

Error: "File size exceeds 10MB limit. Please upload a smaller file."

Error specification

Size error messaging

10

Verify button remains disabled

Import Contacts button stays disabled after size error

Button state

State consistency

11

Attempt 15MB file upload

System blocks upload immediately

large_file_15mb.csv

Large size blocking

12

Verify large file error

Same error message with size guidance

Error specification

Consistent error handling

13

Test error recovery

Upload valid size file after error to verify recovery

small_file_1mb.csv

Recovery validation

14

Verify recovery success

System clears error and accepts valid file

N/A

Error state clearing

15

Verify file size display accuracy

Uploaded files show correct size information

File metadata

Size display accuracy

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: 10MB file size limit strictly enforced with files above limit rejected
  • Secondary_Verifications: Boundary files accepted, clear error messaging, system recovery
  • Negative_Verification: No size limit bypass, no system crashes with large files

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record size validation behavior and error handling]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for size validation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of size validation and error messages]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Large file performance tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Format validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to content validation tests

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical business rule for system performance and storage management
  • Edge_Cases: Files exactly at limit, compressed files, network interruption during upload
  • Risk_Areas: Storage capacity, processing performance, memory usage
  • Security_Considerations: DoS prevention, resource consumption limits

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: File size validation with network interruption during large file upload
  • Type: Performance/Network
  • Rationale: Large files may fail due to network issues, requiring proper error handling
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Multiple users uploading maximum size files simultaneously
  • Type: Performance/Concurrency
  • Rationale: System should handle concurrent large uploads without degradation
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 9: Required Fields Header Validation

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_009
Title: Verify CSV validation for missing required field headers with specific error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Negative
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Negative, Import-Service, Validation, Headers, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Header-Validation, CSV-Parsing, Negative

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Standard validation access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot bypass required field validation
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of header validation scenarios
  • Integration_Points: CSV Parser, Validation Engine, Error Reporter
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Header Validation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: CSV parser, header validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: Header validation < 2 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV files with missing headers

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager standard access
  • Test_Data: CSV files with various missing header combinations
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass

Test Data: CSV files with missing required headers:

Missing Name header:

  • email,type,channel,stage,phone

alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210

Missing Email header:

  • name,type,channel,stage,phone

Alice Kumar,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210

Missing multiple required headers (Type, Channel, Stage):

  • name,email,phone,company

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,+91 9876543210,TechCorp

Missing all required headers:

  • phone,company,position,address,tags

+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Step 2 upload interface

Upload interface displays correctly

From previous tests

Setup verification

2

Upload CSV missing Name header

System detects missing required header

CSV without name

Header validation

3

Verify Name header error

Error: "Missing required headers: Name"

Error specification

Specific error message

4

Verify button state remains disabled

Import Contacts button stays disabled (grey)

Button state

State consistency

5

Upload CSV missing Email header

System detects missing email header

CSV without email

Email validation

6

Verify Email header error

Error: "Missing required headers: Email"

Error specification

Email specific error

7

Upload CSV missing Type header

System detects missing type header

CSV without type

Type validation

8

Verify Type header error

Error: "Missing required headers: Type"

Error specification

Type specific error

9

Upload CSV missing Channel header

System detects missing channel header

CSV without channel

Channel validation

10

Verify Channel header error

Error: "Missing required headers: Channel"

Error specification

Channel specific error

11

Upload CSV missing Stage header

System detects missing stage header

CSV without stage

Stage validation

12

Verify Stage header error

Error: "Missing required headers: Stage"

Error specification

Stage specific error

13

Upload CSV missing multiple headers

System detects all missing required headers

CSV missing 3 fields

Multiple validation

14

Verify multiple header error

Error: "Missing required headers: Type, Channel, Stage"

Multiple error listing

Comprehensive error

15

Upload valid CSV after errors

Error clears, upload succeeds with all required headers

Valid CSV

Error recovery

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All missing required headers are detected and reported with specific error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages list specific missing fields, button remains disabled
  • Negative_Verification: No header validation bypass, proper error recovery

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record header validation behavior and error messages]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for header validation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of header validation errors]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Content validation tests
  • Parallel_Tests: File format validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to field content validation

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical data quality checkpoint before processing
  • Edge_Cases: Headers with extra spaces, case sensitivity, special characters in headers
  • Risk_Areas: Parser accuracy, error message clarity, validation completeness
  • Security_Considerations: Header injection prevention, validation bypass attempts

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Header validation with case sensitivity (Name vs name vs NAME)
  • Type: Data/Validation
  • Rationale: User story shows lowercase headers in template but validation may be case-sensitive
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Header validation with extra whitespace or special characters
  • Type: Data/Edge Case
  • Rationale: Users may have formatting inconsistencies in their CSV files
  • Priority: P3





Test Case 10: Import Processing Display and Progress Tracking

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_010
Title: Verify import processing screen displays correctly with progress indicators and status updates
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Processing, UI, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Processing-Engine, Progress-Tracking, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full processing visibility
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot interrupt processing once started
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of processing screen functionality
  • Integration_Points: Processing Engine, Progress Tracker, Duplicate Detection
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Processing Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Processing engine, progress tracking service
  • Performance_Baseline: Processing initiation < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file uploaded from TC_006

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Valid CSV file uploaded and ready for processing
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager processing access
  • Test_Data: contacts_valid.csv from TC_006
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete valid CSV upload in Step 2

Import Contacts button enabled (blue)

From TC_006

Processing prerequisite

2

Click Import Contacts button

Navigation to Step 3 processing screen

N/A

Processing initiation

3

Verify progress indicator

"Step 3 of 5" highlighted, steps 1-2 show completed state (checkmarks)

Progress UI

Progress tracking

4

Verify page title

"Processing Import" displayed as main heading

Exact text

Page identification

5

Verify subtitle

"Analyzing contacts and detecting duplicates" shown below title

Exact text

Process description

6

Verify loading animation

Animated spinning icon (blue circular) centered above progress text

Animation spec

Visual feedback

7

Verify animation properties

Smooth rotation at 1-2 seconds per rotation, 48x48px size

Animation details

Animation quality

8

Verify initial status message

"Processing your import..." displayed below loading icon

Exact text

Initial status

9

Verify progress bar initialization

Progress bar starts at 0% with smooth animation

Progress tracking

Initial state

10

Monitor progress advancement

Progress advances in 5-10% increments with smooth transitions

Progress calculation

Progress updates

11

Verify navigation restrictions

Back button disabled, no forward navigation available

Navigation rules

Process protection

12

Verify session lock

Browser refresh shows warning about potential data loss

Session management

Data protection

13

Monitor 60% progress threshold

Status changes to "🔍 Scanning for duplicate contacts..." at 60%

Secondary status

Status transition

14

Verify secondary status styling

Blue color, smaller font, positioned below progress bar

Styling specification

Visual hierarchy

15

Monitor completion

Progress reaches 100% with 1-2 second pause before advancement

Completion rules

Auto-advancement

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Processing screen displays correctly with all required elements and smooth progress tracking
  • Secondary_Verifications: Animation quality, status transitions, navigation restrictions
  • Negative_Verification: No navigation bypass, no process interruption, proper session management

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record processing display and progress behavior]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for processing display issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of processing screen and progress]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Duplicate detection and completion tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (processing is sequential)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must precede duplicate review or completion

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical user feedback during potentially long processing time
  • Edge_Cases: Very large files, slow processing, network interruption
  • Risk_Areas: Progress accuracy, processing reliability, user experience
  • Security_Considerations: Process integrity, session security

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Processing behavior with maximum file size (50,000 records)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: User story specifies maximum capacity that should be tested
  • Priority: P1
  • Scenario_2: Processing interruption handling (network disconnection, browser crash)
  • Type: Error/Recovery
  • Rationale: Long processing times increase interruption risk
  • Priority: P2





Test Case 11: Processing Performance and Time Validation

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011
Title: Verify processing performance meets specified timeframes for different file sizes
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Performance, Import-Service, Processing, Timing, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Processing-Engine, Performance-Validation, Performance

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Standard processing performance
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot accelerate processing
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance requirements
  • Integration_Points: Processing Engine, Performance Monitoring
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Processing Performance Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Processing engine, performance monitoring
  • Performance_Baseline: Specified timeframes per file size
  • Data_Requirements: CSV files of varying sizes

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring tools enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager access
  • Test_Data: Multiple CSV files of different sizes prepared
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_010 must pass

Test Data: Performance test files:

  • small_file_100_contacts.csv (100 contacts, ~50KB)
  • medium_file_1000_contacts.csv (1,000 contacts, ~500KB)
  • large_file_10000_contacts.csv (10,000 contacts, ~5MB)
  • maximum_file_50000_contacts.csv (50,000 contacts, ~10MB)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Start performance monitoring

Performance tools initialized

N/A

Monitoring setup

2

Process 100 contact file

Processing completes in 10-30 seconds

small_file_100_contacts.csv

Small file performance

3

Record actual processing time

Time falls within expected range (10-30 seconds)

Actual timing

Performance validation

4

Monitor system resources

Memory and CPU usage remain within acceptable limits

Resource metrics

Resource efficiency

5

Process 1,000 contact file

Processing completes in 30-90 seconds

medium_file_1000_contacts.csv

Medium file performance

6

Record medium file timing

Time falls within expected range (30-90 seconds)

Actual timing

Performance validation

7

Monitor progress bar accuracy

Progress bar reflects actual processing completion accurately

Progress tracking

Progress accuracy

8

Process 10,000 contact file

Processing completes in 1-5 minutes

large_file_10000_contacts.csv

Large file performance

9

Record large file timing

Time falls within expected range (1-5 minutes)

Actual timing

Performance validation

10

Monitor system stability

System remains stable during large file processing

System metrics

Stability verification

11

Process maximum file (50,000)

Processing completes within 10 minutes

maximum_file_50000_contacts.csv

Maximum capacity

12

Record maximum file timing

Time falls within maximum limit (10 minutes)

Actual timing

Capacity validation

13

Verify no performance degradation

Each subsequent file processes within expected timeframes

All test files

Performance consistency

14

Monitor memory usage

Memory consumption remains reasonable throughout

Memory metrics

Resource management

15

Verify UI responsiveness

User interface remains responsive during processing

User interaction

UI performance

Performance Baselines from User Story:

  • Small Files (<100 contacts): 10-30 seconds
  • Medium Files (100-1000 contacts): 30-90 seconds
  • Large Files (1000-10000 contacts): 1-5 minutes
  • Maximum Files (10000+ contacts): Up to 10 minutes

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All file sizes process within specified time limits
  • Secondary_Verifications: System stability, resource usage, UI responsiveness
  • Negative_Verification: No performance degradation, no memory leaks, no timeouts

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record actual processing times and performance metrics]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Total test duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for performance issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring evidence]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Weekly
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_010 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Large-scale duplicate detection tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (performance testing requires isolation)
  • Sequential_Tests: Performance baseline for other tests

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical SLA validation for user experience
  • Edge_Cases: System load, network latency, concurrent processing
  • Risk_Areas: Performance degradation, resource exhaustion, timeout failures
  • Security_Considerations: DoS prevention, resource limits

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Concurrent user processing performance impact
  • Type: Performance/Concurrency
  • Rationale: Multiple Marketing Operations Managers may import simultaneously
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Processing performance under various system loads
  • Type: Performance/Load
  • Rationale: System performance may vary based on overall system usage
  • Priority: P3





Test Case 12: Duplicate Review Interface Display and KPI Cards

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012
Title: Verify duplicate review screen displays all components correctly with accurate KPI tracking
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Duplicates, UI, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Duplicate-Detection, KPI-Tracking, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full duplicate review and resolution access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify duplicate detection algorithm
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of duplicate review interface
  • Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Engine, KPI Calculator, Filter System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Duplicate Review Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Duplicate detection engine, KPI calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: Interface load < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV with duplicate scenarios processed

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Processing completed with duplicates detected
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager duplicate resolution access
  • Test_Data: CSV file with known duplicate patterns
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates found

Test Data: CSV with duplicate scenarios (contacts_with_duplicates.csv):

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education

Priya Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776656,EduTech Solutions,Manager,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete processing with duplicates found

Advancement to Step 4 duplicate review

From TC_011 with duplicates

Setup condition

2

Verify progress indicator

"Step 4 of 5" highlighted, steps 1-3 show completed state

Progress UI

Progress tracking

3

Verify page title

"Review Duplicate Contacts" displayed as main heading

Exact text

Page identification

4

Verify summary text

"12 duplicates remaining to review. 0 merged, 0 skipped." format

Dynamic text

Summary display

5

Verify KPI cards layout

Three horizontal cards: Merged, Skipped, Remaining

Card layout

KPI structure

6

Verify Merged card

Card shows "0", green color scheme (#22c55e), "Merged" label

Initial state

Merged tracking

7

Verify Skipped card

Card shows "0", orange color scheme (#f97316), "Skipped" label

Initial state

Skipped tracking

8

Verify Remaining card

Card shows total duplicates found, blue color scheme (#3b82f6), "Remaining" label

Duplicate count

Remaining tracking

9

Verify filter cards layout

Four horizontal filter cards below KPI cards

Filter layout

Filter structure

10

Verify Exact Matches filter

Red card showing exact match count, "Exact Matches" label

Match data

Exact filter

11

Verify Email Matches filter

Orange card showing email match count, "Email Matches" label

Match data

Email filter

12

Verify Phone Matches filter

Yellow card showing phone match count, "Phone Matches" label

Match data

Phone filter

13

Verify Name/Company filter

Blue card showing name+company match count, "Name/Company" label

Match data

Name/Company filter

14

Verify filter dropdown

"Filter by match type: All (X)" dropdown with total count

Filter interface

Dropdown filter

15

Verify navigation buttons

Back button enabled, "Process Import (X remaining)" button disabled

Initial state

Button states

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All interface components display correctly with accurate counts and proper styling
  • Secondary_Verifications: KPI cards show correct colors, filter cards show accurate counts
  • Negative_Verification: No missing components, no count inaccuracies, proper button states

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record interface display and count accuracy]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for interface or counting issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of duplicate review interface]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates
  • Blocked_Tests: Duplicate resolution tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (sequential review process)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must precede duplicate resolution

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical decision point for data quality management
  • Edge_Cases: No duplicates found, large number of duplicates, filter edge cases
  • Risk_Areas: Count accuracy, performance with many duplicates, UI responsiveness
  • Security_Considerations: Data privacy in duplicate display

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Interface behavior when no duplicates are found (direct to Step 5)
  • Type: Edge Case/Flow
  • Rationale: User story mentions automatic advancement if no duplicates detected
  • Priority: P1
  • Scenario_2: Duplicate review with maximum file size (50,000 contacts with high duplicate rate)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: Large datasets with many duplicates may impact interface performance
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 13: Duplicate Detection Algorithm Accuracy and Scoring

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013
Title: Verify duplicate detection algorithm accuracy with weighted scoring system (100%, 95%, 90%, 85%)
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Algorithm
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Algorithm, Import-Service, Duplicates, Scoring, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Duplicate-Algorithm, Scoring-Engine, Algorithm

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Algorithm results visibility
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify scoring weights
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of duplicate detection scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Algorithm, Scoring Engine, Matching Rules
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Duplicate Detection Engine
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Duplicate detection algorithm, scoring engine
  • Performance_Baseline: Detection processing < 10 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Curated CSV with specific duplicate scenarios

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review interface loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager algorithm access
  • Test_Data: CSV with controlled duplicate scenarios
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012 must pass

Test Data: Curated duplicate scenarios with existing contacts:

Import CSV data:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager

A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager

Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director

Priya Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776656,EduTech Solutions,Manager

Existing contacts in CRM system:

Name: Alice Kumar, Email: alice@techcorp.com, Company: TechCorp, Position: Manager (for exact match testing)

Name: Raj Singh, Email: raj@company.com, Company: FinServe Ltd, Position: Sales Manager (for name+company match)

Name: Priya Sharma, Email: meera@edutech.com, Company: EduTech Solutions, Position: Director (for email match)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Process CSV with curated duplicate scenarios

Duplicate detection identifies all match types

Above CSV data

Algorithm testing setup

2

Verify exact match detection

Alice Kumar shows 100% match with red "exact" badge

Identical name+email

Perfect match validation

3

Verify exact match scoring

Confidence score displays as red dot with "100%"

Scoring display

Exact score verification

4

Verify email match detection

Contact with meera@edutech.com shows 95% match with orange "email" badge

Same email, different name

Email priority testing

5

Verify email match scoring

Confidence score displays as orange dot with "95%"

Scoring display

Email score verification

6

Verify phone match detection

Contacts with +91 9123456789 show 90% match with yellow "phone" badge

Identical phone number

Phone matching testing

7

Verify phone match scoring

Confidence score displays as yellow dot with "90%"

Scoring display

Phone score verification

8

Verify name+company match

Raj Singh with FinServe Ltd shows 85% match with blue "name company" badge

Same name and company

Combined matching testing

9

Verify name+company scoring

Confidence score displays as blue dot with "85%"

Scoring display

Name+company score verification

10

Verify filter card accuracy

Exact Matches card shows correct count of 100% matches

Filter count

Count accuracy verification

11

Verify email filter accuracy

Email Matches card shows correct count of 95% matches

Filter count

Email count verification

12

Verify phone filter accuracy

Phone Matches card shows correct count of 90% matches

Filter count

Phone count verification

13

Verify name/company filter accuracy

Name/Company card shows correct count of 85% matches

Filter count

Name/company count verification

14

Test filter functionality

Clicking each filter card shows only matching duplicate types

Filter interaction

Filter operation testing

15

Verify algorithm consistency

Running same data multiple times produces identical results

Same test data

Algorithm reliability

Expected Algorithm Results:

  • Exact Match (100%): Alice Kumar + alice@techcorp.com (identical name AND email)
  • Email Match (95%): meera@edutech.com matches (same email, different names)
  • Phone Match (90%): +91 9123456789 matches (same phone, different emails)
  • Name+Company Match (85%): Raj Singh + FinServe Ltd matches (same name and company, different emails)

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Algorithm correctly identifies and scores all duplicate types according to specification
  • Secondary_Verifications: Badge colors match scores, filter counts accurate, consistent results
  • Negative_Verification: No false positives, no missed duplicates, no incorrect scoring

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record detection accuracy and scoring results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for algorithm or scoring issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of detection results and scoring]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Merge and skip functionality tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (algorithm testing requires isolation)
  • Sequential_Tests: Foundation for resolution testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Core business logic for data quality management
  • Edge_Cases: Partial name matches, similar emails, international phone formats
  • Risk_Areas: Algorithm accuracy, scoring consistency, performance with large datasets
  • Security_Considerations: Data privacy in matching, algorithm tampering prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Algorithm performance with international data formats (phone numbers, addresses)
  • Type: Internationalization/Data
  • Rationale: User story includes Indian phone numbers and addresses requiring proper parsing
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Algorithm behavior with edge cases (empty fields, special characters, very long names)
  • Type: Edge Case/Data Quality
  • Rationale: Real-world data contains inconsistencies requiring robust handling
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 14: Merge Functionality and Data Consolidation

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_014
Title: Verify merge functionality consolidates contact data correctly following business rules
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Data
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Merge, Data-Consolidation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Data-Merge, Contact-Consolidation, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full merge operation access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify merge business rules
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of merge functionality
  • Integration_Points: Data Merge Engine, Contact Database, Audit System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Data Merge Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Data merge engine, contact database, audit logging
  • Performance_Baseline: Merge operation < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Duplicate pair ready for merge testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review screen with merge options available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager merge permissions
  • Test_Data: Specific duplicate pair with comprehensive data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass

Test Data: Imported Contact for merge testing:

Name: Alice Kumar

Email: alice@techcorp.com, alice.kumar@techcorp.com

Phone: +91 9876543210

Company: TechCorp

Position: Senior Manager

Address: "123 Business Park, Mumbai"

Tags: prospect, enterprise, vip

Type: lead

Channel: Newsletter Signup

Stage: New Lead

Existing Contact in system:

Name: Alice Kumar

Email: alice@techcorp.com

Phone: +91 9876543211

Company: TechCorp

Position: Manager

Address: "123 Business Park, Mumbai"

Tags: prospect, enterprise

Last Contact: 13 days ago

Type: lead

Channel: Contact Us

Stage: Qualified Lead (MQL)

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to duplicate with merge option available

Duplicate pair displays with dark "Merge" button

Above test data

Setup verification

2

Review duplicate pair details

Both imported and existing contact details visible

Contact data

Data review

3

Click "Merge" button

Merge action executes immediately without confirmation

N/A

Merge trigger

4

Verify immediate UI response

Merged duplicate pair disappears from table instantly

N/A

UI responsiveness

5

Verify KPI counter updates

Merged count increases by 1 (green), Remaining count decreases by 1 (blue)

Counter tracking

Real-time updates

6

Verify data consolidation: emails

Merged contact contains both email addresses

alice@techcorp.com, alice.kumar@techcorp.com

Email combination

7

Verify data consolidation: phones

Both phone numbers retained in merged contact

+91 9876543210, +91 9876543211

Phone combination

8

Verify field priority: position

Imported contact's Position (Senior Manager) takes precedence

Senior Manager

Field precedence

9

Verify field priority: type/channel/stage

Imported contact's classification fields take precedence

lead, Newsletter Signup, New Lead

Classification priority

10

Verify unique data preservation

Unique tags from both contacts combined

prospect, enterprise, vip

Data preservation

11

Verify address handling

Imported contact address takes precedence if different

"123 Business Park, Mumbai"

Address priority

12

Verify historical data retention

Last contact date and history preserved from existing contact

13 days ago

History preservation

13

Verify audit trail creation

Merge action logged with timestamp, user, and details

System logging

Audit compliance

14

Verify merged contact accessibility

Can navigate to merged contact to verify data

Contact database

Data verification

15

Verify no data loss

All unique information from both contacts retained

Complete data set

Data integrity

Data Consolidation Rules (from user story):

  • Email Handling: Combine all unique email addresses
  • Field Priority: Imported contact data takes precedence for conflicting fields
  • Data Preservation: All unique information from both contacts is retained
  • Relationship Linking: Maintain existing relationships/history from original contact

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Data consolidation follows specified business rules with no data loss
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI updates correctly, counters accurate, audit trail created
  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no merge failures, no state inconsistencies

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record merge behavior and data consolidation results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for merge or data issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of merge operation and data consolidation]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Bulk merge operations, completion flow
  • Parallel_Tests: Skip functionality testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to resolution completion testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical data integrity operation affecting customer relationships
  • Edge_Cases: Conflicting data types, circular relationships, data validation failures
  • Risk_Areas: Data loss, merge conflicts, relationship integrity, audit compliance
  • Security_Considerations: Data privacy, merge authorization, audit security

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Merge operation rollback capability in case of data conflicts
  • Type: Error Recovery/Data Integrity
  • Rationale: Complex merges may require rollback if conflicts detected
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Merge behavior with contacts having extensive relationship histories
  • Type: Data Complexity/Integration
  • Rationale: Contacts with many relationships require careful merge handling
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 15: Skip Functionality and Separate Record Maintenance

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_015
Title: Verify skip functionality maintains separate contact records without consolidation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Skip, Record-Separation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Contact-Creation, Record-Management, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full skip operation access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify skip business rules
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of skip functionality
  • Integration_Points: Contact Creation Service, Database, Audit System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Contact Creation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Contact creation service, database, audit logging
  • Performance_Baseline: Skip operation < 2 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Duplicate pair ready for skip testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review screen with skip options available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager skip permissions
  • Test_Data: Duplicate pair suitable for skip testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass

Test Data: Duplicate pair for skip testing:

Imported Contact:

Name: Raj Singh

Email: raj.singh@finserve.com

Phone: +91 9123456789

Company: FinServe Ltd

Position: Senior Manager

Type: prospect

Channel: Contact Us

Stage: Qualified Lead (MQL)


Existing Contact:

Name: Raj Singh  

Email: raj@finserve.com

Phone: +91 9123456789

Company: FinServe Ltd

Position: Manager

Last Contact: 6 days ago

Type: prospect

Channel: Newsletter Signup

Stage: New Lead

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to duplicate with skip option available

Duplicate pair displays with light "Skip" button

Above test data

Setup verification

2

Review duplicate pair for skip decision

Both contacts show potential for separate entities

Contact details

Decision context

3

Click "Skip" button

Skip action executes immediately without confirmation

N/A

Skip trigger

4

Verify immediate UI response

Skipped duplicate pair disappears from table instantly

N/A

UI responsiveness

5

Verify KPI counter updates

Skipped count increases by 1 (orange), Remaining count decreases by 1 (blue)

Counter tracking

Real-time updates

6

Verify no data consolidation

Both contacts remain as completely separate entities

N/A

No merge operation

7

Verify imported contact creation

New contact created with imported data exactly as provided

Imported contact data

Contact creation

8

Verify existing contact preservation

Existing contact remains unchanged in system

Existing contact data

Data preservation

9

Verify separate contact records

Both contacts can be found independently in contact database

Contact database

Record separation

10

Verify imported contact attributes

New contact has all imported fields: raj.singh@finserve.com, Senior Manager

Import data

Attribute accuracy

11

Verify existing contact attributes

Original contact retains all existing data: raj@finserve.com, Manager

Existing data

Preservation accuracy

12

Verify no relationship creation

No automatic relationship established between the contacts

Contact relationships

Independence

13

Verify audit trail creation

Skip action logged with timestamp, user, and contact IDs

System logging

Audit compliance

14

Verify future duplicate potential

Both contacts may appear as duplicates in future imports

Duplicate detection

Future implications

15

Verify contact accessibility

Both contacts accessible through normal CRM navigation

CRM interface

Accessibility check

Skip Business Rules (from user story):

  • No Merge: Skip action leaves both contacts as separate entities
  • Import Proceeds: Imported contact is added as new contact
  • Existing Unchanged: Existing contact remains unchanged in system
  • Duplicate Status: Both contacts may appear as potential duplicates in future

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Both contacts exist as separate entities with no data consolidation
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI updates correctly, counters accurate, audit trail created
  • Negative_Verification: No accidental merging, no data modification, no relationship creation

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record skip behavior and contact separation results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for skip or separation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of skip operation and contact separation]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Bulk skip operations, completion flow
  • Parallel_Tests: Merge functionality testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Alternative to merge for resolution completion

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Important option for maintaining data integrity when contacts are legitimately separate
  • Edge_Cases: Similar but distinct contacts, company reorganizations, name changes
  • Risk_Areas: Data duplication, future duplicate detection accuracy
  • Security_Considerations: Contact creation authorization, audit compliance

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Skip decision guidance or recommendations based on duplicate confidence scores
  • Type: UX/Decision Support
  • Rationale: High confidence duplicates may warrant merge recommendations
  • Priority: P3
  • Scenario_2: Bulk skip operations for similar duplicate types
  • Type: Efficiency/Bulk Operations
  • Rationale: Users may want to skip all low-confidence duplicates quickly
  • Priority: P2





Test Case 16: Bulk Duplicate Resolution Operations

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_016
Title: Verify bulk merge and skip operations for multiple duplicates with real-time counter updates
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Bulk
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Bulk-Operations, Import-Service, Duplicates, Efficiency, MOD-Import, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Bulk-Processing, UI-Efficiency, Bulk-Operations

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Bulk operation access for efficiency
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot bulk-approve without individual review
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of bulk operations functionality
  • Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, UI State Management, Counter System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Bulk Operations Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, User-Acceptance, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Bulk processing engine, UI state management
  • Performance_Baseline: Bulk operations < 5 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple duplicate pairs for bulk testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review with 12+ duplicates available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager bulk permissions
  • Test_Data: CSV with multiple duplicate scenarios
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass with multiple duplicates

Test Data: CSV with 12 duplicate pairs for bulk testing:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

[Additional 8 duplicate pairs following same pattern]

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to duplicate review with 12 duplicates

All 12 duplicate pairs displayed in table

Multiple duplicates

Bulk setup verification

2

Verify bulk selection UI

Master checkbox in table header, individual checkboxes per row

UI elements

Selection interface

3

Select first 3 duplicates using checkboxes

3 rows highlighted, counter shows "3 selected"

Individual selection

Selection functionality

4

Verify bulk action buttons

"Merge Selected" and "Skip Selected" buttons become enabled

Button states

Bulk action availability

5

Click "Merge Selected" button

Bulk merge dialog or immediate execution

Selected items

Bulk merge trigger

6

Verify bulk merge execution

All 3 selected duplicates processed simultaneously

N/A

Bulk processing

7

Verify KPI counter updates

Merged count increases by 3, Remaining decreases by 3

Counter tracking

Bulk counter updates

8

Verify processed rows removed

3 processed duplicate pairs disappear from table

UI updates

Table management

9

Select next 4 duplicates

Additional 4 rows selected and highlighted

Continued selection

Additional selection

10

Click "Skip Selected" button

Bulk skip operation for 4 selected duplicates

Selected items

Bulk skip trigger

11

Verify bulk skip execution

All 4 selected duplicates skipped simultaneously

N/A

Bulk skip processing

12

Verify KPI counter accuracy

Skipped count increases by 4, Remaining decreases by 4

Counter tracking

Skip counter updates

13

Use master checkbox

Select all remaining duplicates with master checkbox

Master selection

Mass selection

14

Verify completion state

When Remaining reaches 0, "Process Import" button enabled

Final state

Completion validation

15

Verify bulk operation efficiency

Bulk operations significantly faster than individual

Performance comparison

Efficiency validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Bulk operations process multiple duplicates efficiently with accurate counter updates
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI responsiveness, selection management, state consistency
  • Negative_Verification: No partial processing, no counter inaccuracies, no UI freezing

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record bulk operation behavior and performance]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for bulk operation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of bulk operations and counter updates]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_014 and TC_015 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Large-scale import completion tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (bulk operations require isolation)
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to completion flow testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical efficiency feature for large-scale data imports
  • Edge_Cases: Network interruption during bulk operations, browser performance limits
  • Risk_Areas: UI responsiveness, data consistency, partial operation failures
  • Security_Considerations: Bulk operation authorization, audit trail completeness

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Bulk operation rollback capability if errors occur during processing
  • Type: Error Recovery/Data Safety
  • Rationale: Bulk operations affecting multiple records need robust error handling
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Performance optimization for very large bulk operations (100+ duplicates)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: Maximum file imports may generate hundreds of duplicates
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 17: Import Completion Summary and Statistics Validation

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_017
Title: Verify import completion screen displays accurate summary statistics with mathematical validation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Completion, Statistics, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Statistics-Engine, Import-Analytics, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full import analytics access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify import statistics
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproduc### STEP 4: Review Duplicate Contacts

Test Case 12: Duplicate Review Interface Display and KPI Cards

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012
Title: Verify duplicate review screen displays all components correctly with accurate KPI tracking
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Happy-Path, Import-Service, Duplicates, UI, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Duplicate-Detection, KPI-Tracking, Happy-Path

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full duplicate review and resolution access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify duplicate detection algorithm
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of duplicate review interface
  • Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Engine, KPI Calculator, Filter System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Duplicate Review Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Duplicate detection engine, KPI calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: Interface load < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV with duplicate scenarios processed

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Processing completed with duplicates detected
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager duplicate resolution access
  • Test_Data: CSV file with known duplicate patterns
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates found

Test Data: CSV with duplicate scenarios (contacts_with_duplicates.csv):

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education

Priya Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776656,EduTech Solutions,Manager,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete processing with duplicates found

Advancement to Step 4 duplicate review

From TC_011 with duplicates

Setup condition

2

Verify progress indicator

"Step 4 of 5" highlighted, steps 1-3 show completed state

Progress UI

Progress tracking

3

Verify page title

"Review Duplicate Contacts" displayed as main heading

Exact text

Page identification

4

Verify summary text

"12 duplicates remaining to review. 0 merged, 0 skipped." format

Dynamic text

Summary display

5

Verify KPI cards layout

Three horizontal cards: Merged, Skipped, Remaining

Card layout

KPI structure

6

Verify Merged card

Card shows "0", green color scheme (#22c55e), "Merged" label

Initial state

Merged tracking

7

Verify Skipped card

Card shows "0", orange color scheme (#f97316), "Skipped" label

Initial state

Skipped tracking

8

Verify Remaining card

Card shows total duplicates found, blue color scheme (#3b82f6), "Remaining" label

Duplicate count

Remaining tracking

9

Verify filter cards layout

Four horizontal filter cards below KPI cards

Filter layout

Filter structure

10

Verify Exact Matches filter

Red card showing exact match count, "Exact Matches" label

Match data

Exact filter

11

Verify Email Matches filter

Orange card showing email match count, "Email Matches" label

Match data

Email filter

12

Verify Phone Matches filter

Yellow card showing phone match count, "Phone Matches" label

Match data

Phone filter

13

Verify Name/Company filter

Blue card showing name+company match count, "Name/Company" label

Match data

Name/Company filter

14

Verify filter dropdown

"Filter by match type: All (X)" dropdown with total count

Filter interface

Dropdown filter

15

Verify navigation buttons

Back button enabled, "Process Import (X remaining)" button disabled

Initial state

Button states

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All interface components display correctly with accurate counts and proper styling
  • Secondary_Verifications: KPI cards show correct colors, filter cards show accurate counts
  • Negative_Verification: No missing components, no count inaccuracies, proper button states

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record interface display and count accuracy]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for interface or counting issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of duplicate review interface]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates
  • Blocked_Tests: Duplicate resolution tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (sequential review process)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must precede duplicate resolution

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical decision point for data quality management
  • Edge_Cases: No duplicates found, large number of duplicates, filter edge cases
  • Risk_Areas: Count accuracy, performance with many duplicates, UI responsiveness
  • Security_Considerations: Data privacy in duplicate display

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Interface behavior when no duplicates are found (direct to Step 5)
  • Type: Edge Case/Flow
  • Rationale: User story mentions automatic advancement if no duplicates detected
  • Priority: P1
  • Scenario_2: Duplicate review with maximum file size (50,000 contacts with high duplicate rate)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: Large datasets with many duplicates may impact interface performance
  • Priority: P2





Test Case 18: Error Report Generation and Content Validation

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_018
Title: Verify error report generation contains accurate validation failures with specific error descriptions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Error
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Error-Handling, Import-Service, Reporting, Validation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Error-Processing, Validation-Reporting, Error-Handling

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full error report access and download
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify error classifications
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of error reporting functionality
  • Integration_Points: Error Processing Engine, Report Generator, File Download
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Error Reporting Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Error processing engine, report generator, file download service
  • Performance_Baseline: Report generation < 5 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV with validation errors for testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Import completion with failed contact validations
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager error report access
  • Test_Data: CSV file containing various validation errors
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Import process with validation failures required

Test Data: CSV with validation errors (contacts_with_errors.csv):

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

John Doe,invalidemailformat,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect

Jane Smith,jane@company.com,invalidtype,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),invalidphone,TechCorp,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead

Bob Johnson,,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,TechCorp,Manager,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",customer

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,customer,InvalidChannel,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876543211,TechCorp,CEO,"321 Tech Hub, Pune",prospect

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,InvalidStage,+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"555 Test Ave, City",financial

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Process CSV with validation errors

Import completes with "Failed to Import" count > 0

contacts_with_errors.csv

Error scenario setup

2

Navigate to Step 5 completion screen

Import summary shows red "Failed to Import" card with error count

Error count display

Error indication

3

Verify error alert visibility

Red alert box displays: "Some contacts couldn't be imported"

Error alert specification

Alert display

4

Verify error alert description

"Download the error report to see which contacts failed and why."

Alert text

User guidance

5

Verify Download Error Report button

Button displayed within error alert, always enabled

Button availability

Download access

6

Click "Download Error Report" button

CSV error report download initiates immediately

N/A

Download trigger

7

Verify file download

File "import_errors_[timestamp].csv" downloads to default location

File system

File generation

8

Open downloaded error report

File opens in spreadsheet application showing error details

Downloaded file

Report accessibility

9

Verify report headers

Headers: Row Number, Name, Email, type, channel, stage, Phone, Company, Position, address, Error Reason, Date

Header specification

Structure validation

10

Verify invalid email error

Row 2: "Email format is invalid - missing @ symbol or domain"

Specific error

Email validation error

11

Verify invalid type error

Row 3: "Contact type 'invalidtype' is not valid. Use: lead, prospect, customer, partner, investor, advisor, potential leader, friend of organization"

Type validation

Type error specificity

12

Verify missing email error

Row 4: "Missing required field: Email"

Required field error

Missing field validation

13

Verify invalid channel error

Row 5: "Channel 'InvalidChannel' is not valid. Use valid channel options"

Channel validation

Channel error specificity

14

Verify invalid stage error

Row 6: "Stage 'InvalidStage' is not valid. Use: New Lead, Qualified Lead (MQL), Nurture/Disqualified, Hot Lead (SQL), Opportunity, Customer (Won/Lost), Nurturing (Ongoing)"

Stage validation

Stage error specificity

15

Verify error completeness

All failed contacts listed with specific reasons and timestamps

Complete error data

Error completeness

Expected Error Types (from user story specification):

  1. Missing Required Field Errors: "Missing required field: [field_name]"
  2. Invalid Data Format Errors: "Email format is invalid - missing @ symbol or domain"
  3. Contact Type Validation: Must be one of 8 valid types (lead, prospect, customer, partner, investor, advisor, potential leader, friend of organization)
  4. Stage Validation: Must be one of 7 valid stages (New Lead, Qualified Lead MQL, etc.)
  5. Channel Validation: Must be one of 11 valid channels (Newsletter Signup, Contact Us, etc.)

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Error report contains all failed contacts with specific, actionable error descriptions
  • Secondary_Verifications: Proper file format, accurate timestamps, complete error details
  • Negative_Verification: No missing errors, no generic error messages, no data corruption

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record error report content and accuracy]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for error reporting issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of error report generation and content]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Import process with validation errors required
  • Blocked_Tests: Error correction and re-import tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Success completion testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Supports error correction workflow

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for user understanding and correction of data quality issues
  • Edge_Cases: All contacts fail, mixed error types, large error reports
  • Risk_Areas: Error categorization accuracy, report completeness, file generation
  • Security_Considerations: Error data privacy, report access control

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Error report generation with maximum file size imports (50,000 contacts with high error rates)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: Large error reports may impact generation performance and file size
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Error report content validation for different user roles and permissions
  • Type: Security/Role-Based
  • Rationale: Different roles may see different levels of error detail for privacy
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 19: Marketing Manager Import Workflow Access

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_019
Title: Verify Marketing Manager role can access import workflow with appropriate permissions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Security/Role-Based
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Role-Based, Import-Service, Security, Access-Control, MOD-Import, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Access-Control, Role-Permissions, Role-Based

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Manager
  • Permission_Level: Standard import access with campaign focus
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot access advanced analytics, limited to campaign-related imports
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Marketing Manager role permissions
  • Integration_Points: Access Control System, Role Management, Import Workflow
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Role-Based Access Control
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Role management system, access control service
  • Performance_Baseline: Role validation < 2 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Marketing Manager user credentials

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Marketing Manager user account configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Manager role with campaign import permissions
  • Test_Data: jane.smith@company.com Marketing Manager credentials
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication system functional

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as Marketing Manager

CRM dashboard loads with Marketing Manager permissions

jane.smith@company.com

Role-based login

2

Navigate to CRM section

CRM navigation shows "Import Contacts" option available

N/A

Access verification

3

Access Import Contacts

Step 1 Choose Import Method loads successfully

N/A

Import access granted

4

Verify CSV File Upload access

CSV File Upload method available and clickable

N/A

Basic import permission

5

Complete CSV upload process

Can upload valid CSV file successfully

Valid campaign CSV

Upload permission

6

Access processing screen

Can view processing progress and status

N/A

Process visibility

7

Access duplicate review

Can view and resolve duplicates

Duplicate pairs

Resolution permission

8

Perform merge operations

Can merge duplicate contacts

Test duplicates

Merge permission

9

Perform skip operations

Can skip duplicate resolution

Test duplicates

Skip permission

10

Access completion summary

Can view import summary and statistics

Import results

Summary access

11

Download error reports

Can download error reports for failed imports

Error scenarios

Report access

12

Verify role restrictions

Cannot access advanced analytics or system settings

Restricted areas

Permission boundaries

13

Test navigation permissions

Can navigate "Back to Contacts" successfully

Navigation links

Contact access

14

Verify data scope

Can only see contacts within permitted scope

Contact database

Data boundaries

15

Test session management

Role permissions maintained throughout session

Session duration

Permission persistence

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Marketing Manager can complete full import workflow within role permissions
  • Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate restrictions in place, data scope limitations respected
  • Negative_Verification: Cannot access restricted functions, cannot exceed role boundaries

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record role-based access and restrictions]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for role or permission issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of role-based functionality]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: User authentication and role assignment
  • Blocked_Tests: Marketing Manager workflow optimization tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Other role-based permission tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive role validation suite

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Validates Marketing Manager can efficiently import campaign contacts
  • Edge_Cases: Role changes during session, permission inheritance, cross-role scenarios
  • Risk_Areas: Permission bypass, data access violations, role privilege escalation
  • Security_Considerations: Role-based data access, permission enforcement, audit compliance

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Marketing Manager collaboration with Marketing Operations Manager on large imports
  • Type: Multi-Role/Collaboration
  • Rationale: User story mentions both roles working on campaign execution
  • Priority: P3
  • Scenario_2: Marketing Manager access to historical import data and analytics
  • Type: Role-Based/Analytics
  • Rationale: Campaign effectiveness tracking may require import history access
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 20: Contact Type Validation with All 8 Valid Types

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_020
Title: Verify contact type validation accepts all 8 valid types and rejects invalid values
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Validation
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Validation, Import-Service, Data-Quality, Type-Validation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Data-Validation, Field-Validation, Validation

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full data validation visibility
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify validation rules
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of contact type validation
  • Integration_Points: Data Validation Engine, Type Classification System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Contact Type Validation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Data validation engine, type classification service
  • Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV files with all contact type variations

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Import workflow ready for data validation testing
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager validation access
  • Test_Data: CSV files with valid and invalid contact types
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic CSV upload functionality working

Test Data: Valid Contact Types (from user story specification):

  1. lead
  2. prospect
  3. customer
  4. partner
  5. investor
  6. advisor
  7. potential leader
  8. friend of organization

CSV with all valid types:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director

Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,partner,Get Custom Quote,Opportunity,+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO

John Investor,john@investor.com,investor,Talk to Expert,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543212,Investment Corp,Partner

Jane Advisor,jane@advisor.com,advisor,Schedule Demo,Nurturing (Ongoing),+91 9876543213,Advisory Ltd,Consultant

Bob Leader,bob@leader.com,potential leader,Trial Request,New Lead,+91 9876543214,Leadership Inc,Director  

Carol Friend,carol@friend.com,friend of organization,Contact Us,Nurturing (Ongoing),+91 9876543215,Community Corp,Volunteer

CSV with invalid types:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company

Test User1,test1@test.com,invalidtype,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TestCorp

Test User2,test2@test.com,LEAD,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543211,TestCorp

Test User3,test3@test.com,customer123,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543212,TestCorp

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Upload CSV with all 8 valid contact types

All contacts process successfully without type validation errors

Valid types CSV

Valid type acceptance

2

Verify "lead" type acceptance

Contact with type "lead" imports successfully

Alice Kumar record

Lead type validation

3

Verify "prospect" type acceptance

Contact with type "prospect" imports successfully

Raj Singh record

Prospect type validation

4

Verify "customer" type acceptance

Contact with type "customer" imports successfully

Meera Sharma record

Customer type validation

5

Verify "partner" type acceptance

Contact with type "partner" imports successfully

Priya Patel record

Partner type validation

6

Verify "investor" type acceptance

Contact with type "investor" imports successfully

John Investor record

Investor type validation

7

Verify "advisor" type acceptance

Contact with type "advisor" imports successfully

Jane Advisor record

Advisor type validation

8

Verify "potential leader" type acceptance

Contact with type "potential leader" imports successfully

Bob Leader record

Potential leader validation

9

Verify "friend of organization" type acceptance

Contact with type "friend of organization" imports successfully

Carol Friend record

Friend of org validation

10

Upload CSV with invalid contact type

System rejects contact with validation error

"invalidtype" value

Invalid type rejection

11

Verify invalid type error message

Error: "Contact type 'invalidtype' is not valid. Use: lead, prospect, customer, partner, investor, advisor, potential leader, friend of organization"

Error specification

Specific error message

12

Test case sensitivity

Contact with "LEAD" (uppercase) gets validation error

Case-sensitive test

Case validation

13

Test numeric/special chars in type

Contact with "customer123" gets validation error

Invalid format

Format validation

14

Verify error report inclusion

Invalid types appear in error report with specific reasons

Error report

Error documentation

15

Test mixed valid/invalid types

Valid types import, invalid types reported as errors

Mixed CSV

Selective validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All 8 valid contact types are accepted, invalid types are rejected with specific error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Case sensitivity enforced, error reporting accurate, mixed validation works correctly
  • Negative_Verification: No valid types rejected, no invalid types accepted, error messages are specific and helpful

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record type validation behavior and error messages]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for type validation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of type validation and error handling]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Basic CSV processing functionality
  • Blocked_Tests: Contact classification and workflow tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Stage and channel validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive data validation suite

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for proper contact classification and CRM workflow routing
  • Edge_Cases: Empty type field, mixed case variations, special characters
  • Risk_Areas: Classification accuracy, workflow routing, data quality impact
  • Security_Considerations: Data classification integrity, business rule enforcement

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Contact type validation with international character sets and localization
  • Type: Internationalization/Localization
  • Rationale: Global CRM usage may require multi-language type support
  • Priority: P3
  • Scenario_2: Dynamic contact type validation based on user role and permissions
  • Type: Role-Based/Dynamic Validation
  • Rationale: Different roles may have access to different contact types
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 21: Complete Import Workflow Integration Test

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_021
Title: Verify complete end-to-end import workflow integration from Step 1 through Step 5 with all systems
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Integration/E2E
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: End-to-End, Import-Service, Integration, Workflow, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Complete-Workflow, System-Integration, End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full workflow access with all integrations
  • Role_Restrictions: Standard business rule limitations
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High#### Test Case 16: Bulk Duplicate Resolution Operations

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_016
Title: Verify bulk merge and skip operations for multiple duplicates with real-time counter updates
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Bulk
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Bulk-Operations, Import-Service, Duplicates, Efficiency, MOD-Import, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Bulk-Processing, UI-Efficiency, Bulk-Operations

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Bulk operation access for efficiency
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot bulk-approve without individual review
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of bulk operations functionality
  • Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, UI State Management, Counter System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Bulk Operations Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, User-Acceptance, Product
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Bulk processing engine, UI state management
  • Performance_Baseline: Bulk operations < 5 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple duplicate pairs for bulk testing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review with 12+ duplicates available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager bulk permissions
  • Test_Data: CSV with multiple duplicate scenarios
  • Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass with multiple duplicates

Test Data: CSV with 12 duplicate pairs for bulk testing:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial

[Additional 8 duplicate pairs following same pattern]

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to duplicate review with 12 duplicates

All 12 duplicate pairs displayed in table

Multiple duplicates

Bulk setup verification

2

Verify bulk selection UI

Master checkbox in table header, individual checkboxes per row

UI elements

Selection interface

3

Select first 3 duplicates using checkboxes

3 rows highlighted, counter shows "3 selected"

Individual selection

Selection functionality

4

Verify bulk action buttons

"Merge Selected" and "Skip Selected" buttons become enabled

Button states

Bulk action availability

5

Click "Merge Selected" button

Bulk merge dialog or immediate execution

Selected items

Bulk merge trigger

6

Verify bulk merge execution

All 3 selected duplicates processed simultaneously

N/A

Bulk processing

7

Verify KPI counter updates

Merged count increases by 3, Remaining decreases by 3

Counter tracking

Bulk counter updates

8

Verify processed rows removed

3 processed duplicate pairs disappear from table

UI updates

Table management

9

Select next 4 duplicates

Additional 4 rows selected and highlighted

Continued selection

Additional selection

10

Click "Skip Selected" button

Bulk skip operation for 4 selected duplicates

Selected items

Bulk skip trigger

11

Verify bulk skip execution

All 4 selected duplicates skipped simultaneously

N/A

Bulk skip processing

12

Verify KPI counter accuracy

Skipped count increases by 4, Remaining decreases by 4

Counter tracking

Skip counter updates

13

Use master checkbox

Select all remaining duplicates with master checkbox

Master selection

Mass selection

14

Verify completion state

When Remaining reaches 0, "Process Import" button enabled

Final state

Completion validation

15

Verify bulk operation efficiency

Bulk operations significantly faster than individual

Performance comparison

Efficiency validation

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Bulk operations process multiple duplicates efficiently with accurate counter updates
  • Secondary_Verifications: UI responsiveness, selection management, state consistency
  • Negative_Verification: No partial processing, no counter inaccuracies, no UI freezing

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record bulk operation behavior and performance]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for bulk operation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of bulk operations and counter updates]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Planned

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_014 and TC_015 must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: Large-scale import completion tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (bulk operations require isolation)
  • Sequential_Tests: Leads to completion flow testing

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical efficiency feature for large-scale data imports
  • Edge_Cases: Network interruption during bulk operations, browser performance limits
  • Risk_Areas: UI responsiveness, data consistency, partial operation failures
  • Security_Considerations: Bulk operation authorization, audit trail completeness

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Bulk operation rollback capability if errors occur during processing
  • Type: Error Recovery/Data Safety
  • Rationale: Bulk operations affecting multiple records need robust error handling
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Performance optimization for very large bulk operations (100+ duplicates)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: Maximum file imports may generate hundreds of duplicates
  • Priority: P3





Test Case 22: Stage Validation with All 7 Valid Stages

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_022
Title: Verify stage validation accepts all 7 valid stages and rejects invalid values with specific error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Validation
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Validation, Import-Service, Data-Quality, Stage-Validation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Data-Validation, Pipeline-Validation, Validation

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full stage validation visibility
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify stage validation rules
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 9 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of stage validation functionality
  • Integration_Points: Data Validation Engine, Pipeline Classification System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Stage Validation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Data validation engine, stage classification service
  • Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV files with all stage variations

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Import workflow ready for stage validation testing
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager validation access
  • Test_Data: CSV files with valid and invalid stages
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic CSV upload functionality working

Test Data: Valid Stages (from user story specification):

  1. New Lead
  2. Qualified Lead (MQL)
  3. Nurture / Disqualified
  4. Hot Lead (SQL)
  5. Opportunity
  6. Customer (Won/Lost)
  7. Nurturing (Ongoing)

CSV with all valid stages:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Nurture / Disqualified,+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director

Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,customer,Get Custom Quote,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO

John Smith,john@investment.com,investor,Talk to Expert,Opportunity,+91 9876543212,Investment Corp,Partner

Jane Doe,jane@advisory.com,advisor,Schedule Demo,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876543213,Advisory Ltd,Consultant

Bob Wilson,bob@community.com,friend of organization,Trial Request,Nurturing (Ongoing),+91 9876543214,Community Corp,Volunteer

CSV with invalid stages:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company

Test User1,test1@test.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,invalidstage,+91 9876543210,TestCorp

Test User2,test2@test.com,prospect,Contact Us,NEW LEAD,+91 9876543211,TestCorp

Test User3,test3@test.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,stage123,+91 9876543212,TestCorp

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Upload CSV with all 7 valid stages

All contacts process successfully without stage validation errors

Valid stages CSV

Valid stage acceptance

2

Verify "New Lead" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "New Lead" imports successfully

Alice Kumar record

New Lead validation

3

Verify "Qualified Lead (MQL)" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "Qualified Lead (MQL)" imports successfully

Raj Singh record

Qualified Lead validation

4

Verify "Nurture / Disqualified" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "Nurture / Disqualified" imports successfully

Meera Sharma record

Nurture/Disqualified validation

5

Verify "Hot Lead (SQL)" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "Hot Lead (SQL)" imports successfully

Priya Patel record

Hot Lead validation

6

Verify "Opportunity" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "Opportunity" imports successfully

John Smith record

Opportunity validation

7

Verify "Customer (Won/Lost)" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "Customer (Won/Lost)" imports successfully

Jane Doe record

Customer validation

8

Verify "Nurturing (Ongoing)" stage acceptance

Contact with stage "Nurturing (Ongoing)" imports successfully

Bob Wilson record

Nurturing validation

9

Upload CSV with invalid stage

System rejects contact with validation error

"invalidstage" value

Invalid stage rejection

10

Verify invalid stage error message

Error: "Stage 'invalidstage' is not valid. Use: New Lead, Qualified Lead (MQL), Nurture / Disqualified, Hot Lead (SQL), Opportunity, Customer (Won/Lost), Nurturing (Ongoing)"

Error specification

Specific error message

11

Test case sensitivity

Contact with "NEW LEAD" (uppercase) gets validation error

Case-sensitive test

Case validation

12

Test numeric/special chars in stage

Contact with "stage123" gets validation error

Invalid format

Format validation

13

Verify error report inclusion

Invalid stages appear in error report with specific reasons

Error report

Error documentation

14

Test mixed valid/invalid stages

Valid stages import, invalid stages reported as errors

Mixed CSV

Selective validation

15

Verify stage-specific workflow routing

Different stages route to appropriate CRM workflows

Pipeline integration

Workflow integration

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All 7 valid stages are accepted, invalid stages are rejected with specific error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Case sensitivity enforced, error reporting accurate, workflow routing correct
  • Negative_Verification: No valid stages rejected, no invalid stages accepted, error messages are specific

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record stage validation behavior and error messages]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for stage validation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of stage validation and error handling]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Basic CSV processing functionality
  • Blocked_Tests: Pipeline workflow routing tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Type and channel validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive data validation suite

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for proper sales pipeline classification and workflow routing
  • Edge_Cases: Empty stage field, mixed case variations, special characters
  • Risk_Areas: Pipeline routing accuracy, stage progression logic, reporting accuracy
  • Security_Considerations: Pipeline data integrity, business rule enforcement

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Stage validation with role-based pipeline access (different roles may see different stages)
  • Type: Role-Based/Pipeline Access
  • Rationale: Sales and marketing roles may have different stage visibility
  • Priority: P3
  • Scenario_2: Stage progression validation (ensuring logical stage transitions)
  • Type: Business Logic/Workflow
  • Rationale: Some stage transitions may be invalid in business context
  • Priority: P2




Test Case 23: Channel Validation with All 11 Valid Channels

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_023
Title: Verify channel validation accepts all 11 valid channels and rejects invalid values with comprehensive error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Validation
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Validation, Import-Service, Data-Quality, Channel-Validation, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Data-Validation, Channel-Attribution, Validation

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full channel validation and attribution access
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify channel attribution rules
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of channel validation functionality
  • Integration_Points: Data Validation Engine, Channel Attribution System, Marketing Analytics
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Channel Validation Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Data validation engine, channel attribution service
  • Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV files with all channel variations

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Import workflow ready for channel validation testing
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager validation access
  • Test_Data: CSV files with valid and invalid channels
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic CSV upload functionality working

Test Data: Valid Channels (from user story specification):

  1. Newsletter Signup
  2. Contact Us
  3. Get Custom Quote
  4. Digital Maturity Assessment
  5. Industry Report
  6. White Paper
  7. ROI Calculator
  8. Talk to Expert
  9. Partners
  10. Schedule Demo
  11. Trial Request

CSV with all valid channels:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position

Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager

Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager

Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Get Custom Quote,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director

Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,Opportunity,+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO

John Smith,john@investment.com,investor,Industry Report,New Lead,+91 9876543212,Investment Corp,Partner

Jane Doe,jane@advisory.com,advisor,White Paper,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543213,Advisory Ltd,Consultant

Bob Wilson,bob@calculator.com,partner,ROI Calculator,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543214,Calculator Corp,Analyst

Sarah Chen,sarah@expert.com,lead,Talk to Expert,Opportunity,+91 9876543215,Expert Corp,Manager

Mike Johnson,mike@partners.com,partner,Partners,New Lead,+91 9876543216,Partners Corp,Director

Lisa Wang,lisa@demo.com,prospect,Schedule Demo,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543217,Demo Corp,VP

David Brown,david@trial.com,lead,Trial Request,New Lead,+91 9876543218,Trial Corp,Manager

CSV with invalid channels:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company

Test User1,test1@test.com,lead,invalidchannel,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TestCorp

Test User2,test2@test.com,prospect,NEWSLETTER SIGNUP,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543211,TestCorp

Test User3,test3@test.com,customer,channel123,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543212,TestCorp

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Upload CSV with all 11 valid channels

All contacts process successfully without channel validation errors

Valid channels CSV

Valid channel acceptance

2

Verify "Newsletter Signup" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Newsletter Signup" imports successfully

Alice Kumar record

Newsletter channel validation

3

Verify "Contact Us" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Contact Us" imports successfully

Raj Singh record

Contact Us validation

4

Verify "Get Custom Quote" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Get Custom Quote" imports successfully

Meera Sharma record

Quote channel validation

5

Verify "Digital Maturity Assessment" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Digital Maturity Assessment" imports successfully

Priya Patel record

Assessment validation

6

Verify "Industry Report" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Industry Report" imports successfully

John Smith record

Report channel validation

7

Verify "White Paper" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "White Paper" imports successfully

Jane Doe record

White Paper validation

8

Verify "ROI Calculator" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "ROI Calculator" imports successfully

Bob Wilson record

Calculator validation

9

Verify "Talk to Expert" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Talk to Expert" imports successfully

Sarah Chen record

Expert channel validation

10

Verify "Partners" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Partners" imports successfully

Mike Johnson record

Partners validation

11

Verify "Schedule Demo" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Schedule Demo" imports successfully

Lisa Wang record

Demo channel validation

12

Verify "Trial Request" channel acceptance

Contact with channel "Trial Request" imports successfully

David Brown record

Trial channel validation

13

Upload CSV with invalid channel

System rejects contact with validation error

"invalidchannel" value

Invalid channel rejection

14

Verify invalid channel error message

Error: "Channel 'invalidchannel' is not valid. Use: Newsletter Signup, Contact Us, Get Custom Quote, Digital Maturity Assessment, Industry Report, White Paper, ROI Calculator, Talk to Expert, Partners, Schedule Demo, Trial Request"

Error specification

Comprehensive error message

15

Test case sensitivity and format validation

Contacts with case variations and invalid formats get validation errors

Case/format tests

Validation accuracy

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: All 11 valid channels are accepted, invalid channels are rejected with comprehensive error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Case sensitivity enforced, channel attribution accurate, marketing analytics integration
  • Negative_Verification: No valid channels rejected, no invalid channels accepted, attribution tracking works

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record channel validation behavior and attribution accuracy]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for channel validation issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of channel validation and attribution]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Basic CSV processing functionality
  • Blocked_Tests: Marketing attribution and analytics tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Stage and type validation tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive data validation suite

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical for marketing attribution and campaign performance tracking
  • Edge_Cases: Empty channel field, mixed case variations, special characters
  • Risk_Areas: Attribution accuracy, campaign tracking, marketing ROI calculation
  • Security_Considerations: Channel data integrity, attribution tampering prevention

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Channel validation with marketing campaign integration and attribution tracking
  • Type: Integration/Marketing Analytics
  • Rationale: Channels directly impact marketing campaign attribution and ROI calculations
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: Channel validation with role-based access (different roles may use different channels)
  • Type: Role-Based/Channel Access
  • Rationale: Sales and marketing teams may have different channel preferences and access
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 24: No Duplicates Found Workflow Path

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_024
Title: Verify automatic advancement from Step 3 to Step 5 when no duplicates are detected during processing
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Functional/Edge-Case
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Edge-Case, Import-Service, Workflow, Auto-Advancement, MOD-Import, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Workflow-Logic, Skip-Step-Logic, Edge-Case

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full workflow visibility including edge cases
  • Role_Restrictions: Cannot force duplicate detection when none exist
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of no-duplicates workflow path
  • Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Engine, Workflow Logic, Auto-Advancement
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Workflow Logic Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Duplicate detection engine, workflow logic service
  • Performance_Baseline: Auto-advancement < 3 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: CSV with completely unique contacts (no duplicates)

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Clean CRM database with no existing contacts that could match
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager full workflow access
  • Test_Data: CSV file with completely unique contacts
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Processing workflow tests must pass

Test Data: CSV with completely unique contacts (no duplicates possible):

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Unique User1,unique1@uniquecorp1.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876000001,UniqueCorp1,Manager,"100 Unique St, Mumbai",unique1

Unique User2,unique2@uniquecorp2.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876000002,UniqueCorp2,Director,"200 Unique Ave, Delhi",unique2

Unique User3,unique3@uniquecorp3.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876000003,UniqueCorp3,VP,"300 Unique Rd, Bangalore",unique3

Unique User4,unique4@uniquecorp4.com,partner,Get Custom Quote,Opportunity,+91 9876000004,UniqueCorp4,CEO,"400 Unique Blvd, Chennai",unique4

Unique User5,unique5@uniquecorp5.com,investor,Talk to Expert,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876000005,UniqueCorp5,Partner,"500 Unique Plaza, Pune",unique5

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Ensure clean CRM database

No existing contacts that could match import data

Database verification

Clean slate setup

2

Upload CSV with completely unique contacts

File uploads successfully with validation passed

Unique contacts CSV

Upload success

3

Initiate import processing

Step 3 processing begins normally

N/A

Processing initiation

4

Monitor processing progress

Progress advances through normal stages (0-60%)

Progress tracking

Normal processing

5

Verify duplicate detection phase

"Scanning for duplicate contacts..." message appears at 60%

Status message

Detection phase

6

Monitor duplicate detection completion

Duplicate scanning completes with zero duplicates found

Detection results

No duplicates detected

7

Verify automatic advancement

System automatically skips Step 4 and advances directly to Step 5

Auto-advancement

Step skipping logic

8

Verify Step 5 completion screen

Import Complete screen displays without duplicate resolution section

Completion screen

Direct advancement

9

Verify progress indicator accuracy

Progress shows Steps 1-3 and 5 completed, Step 4 skipped or not highlighted

Progress UI

Step tracking accuracy

10

Verify import summary statistics

Summary shows: Total contacts, Successfully Imported, 0 Duplicates Found, 0 Merged, 0 Skipped

Statistics accuracy

Zero duplicate stats

11

Verify mathematical accuracy

Total Contacts = Successfully Imported (no duplicates or failures)

Math validation

Simple calculation

12

Verify no error alert

No error alert displayed since no duplicates or failures occurred

UI state

Clean completion

13

Verify contact database integration

All unique contacts successfully imported into CRM database

Database verification

Import success

14

Test navigation options

"Back to Contacts" and "Import More Contacts" buttons function correctly

Navigation testing

Post-import navigation

15

Verify audit trail completeness

All import actions logged including skipped duplicate review step

Audit verification

Complete logging

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: System automatically skips Step 4 when no duplicates are detected and advances directly to Step 5
  • Secondary_Verifications: Progress indicator accuracy, statistics calculation, audit trail completeness
  • Negative_Verification: No forced duplicate review, no UI inconsistencies, no navigation errors

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record auto-advancement behavior and workflow accuracy]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for workflow logic issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of automatic advancement and workflow completion]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Processing workflow tests must pass
  • Blocked_Tests: None (edge case testing)
  • Parallel_Tests: Other workflow edge case tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Alternative path to normal duplicate resolution flow

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Critical workflow optimization for efficient processing when no duplicates exist
  • Edge_Cases: Borderline duplicate matches, detection algorithm edge cases
  • Risk_Areas: Workflow logic accuracy, step skipping reliability, UI state management
  • Security_Considerations: Workflow integrity, audit trail completeness

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: No duplicates found with maximum file size (50,000 unique contacts)
  • Type: Performance/Scale
  • Rationale: Large file processing should maintain same auto-advancement behavior
  • Priority: P2
  • Scenario_2: No duplicates workflow with partial validation failures
  • Type: Mixed Scenario/Edge Case
  • Rationale: Some contacts fail validation but no duplicates detected among valid contacts
  • Priority: P3




Test Case 25: Cross-Browser Compatibility Comprehensive Testing

Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_028
Title: Verify complete import workflow functions consistently across all supported browsers and operating systems
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
  • Test Type: Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support: Tags: Cross-Browser, Import-Service, Compatibility, Multi-Platform, MOD-Import, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Both, Report-QA, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Integration-Testing, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Browser-Support, Platform-Compatibility, Cross-Browser

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Role-Based Context:

  • User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
  • Permission_Level: Full cross-platform import access
  • Role_Restrictions: Browser-specific limitations
  • Multi_Role_Scenario: No

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of cross-browser functionality
  • Integration_Points: Browser APIs, File System Access, JavaScript Compatibility
  • Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Cross-Browser Compatibility Module
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Results, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Multiple browsers as specified
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Multiple browser installations, cross-platform testing tools
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
  • Data_Requirements: Standard test CSV file

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager access on all platforms
  • Test_Data: Cross-browser compatible CSV file
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Individual browser functionality verified

Test Data: Cross-browser compatible CSV:

name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags

Browser Test1,browser1@crosstest.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543501,CrossBrowser Corp,Manager,"Test Address 1, Mumbai",browser,test

Browser Test2,browser2@crosstest.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543502,Compatibility Inc,Director,"Test Address 2, Delhi",compat,test

Duplicate Test,browser1@crosstest.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543503,CrossBrowser Corp,Senior Manager,"Test Address 1, Mumbai",duplicate,test

Browser Matrix Testing:

Browser

Version

OS

Expected Result

Chrome

115+

Windows 10/11

Full functionality

Chrome

115+

macOS 12+

Full functionality

Firefox

110+

Windows 10/11

Full functionality

Firefox

110+

macOS 12+

Full functionality

Safari

16+

macOS 12+

Full functionality

Edge

Latest

Windows 10/11

Full functionality

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test Chrome Windows

Complete workflow functions correctly

Standard CSV

Chrome baseline

2

Verify Chrome drag-and-drop

Drag-and-drop upload works as expected

File upload test

Chrome file API

3

Test Firefox Windows

Complete workflow functions consistently with Chrome

Standard CSV

Firefox compatibility

4

Compare Firefox performance

Performance within 10% variance of Chrome

Performance metrics

Firefox validation

5

Test Safari macOS

Complete workflow functions on Apple platform

Standard CSV

Safari compatibility

6

Verify Safari file handling

Safari file upload and processing work correctly

File operations

Safari file API

7

Test Edge Windows

Microsoft browser full functionality

Standard CSV

Edge compatibility

8

Verify Edge integration

Edge Windows integration features work

System integration

Edge specific features

9

Test Chrome macOS

Cross-platform Chrome consistency

Standard CSV

Chrome macOS

10

Test Firefox macOS

Cross-platform Firefox consistency

Standard CSV

Firefox macOS

11

Compare cross-platform

Functionality consistent across OS platforms

All platforms

Platform consistency

12

Test duplicate detection consistency

Duplicate detection works identically across browsers

Duplicate scenarios

Algorithm consistency

13

Verify JavaScript compatibility

All JavaScript features work across browsers

Interactive elements

JS compatibility

14

Test file download compatibility

Error report downloads work on all browsers

Download testing

Download compatibility

15

Verify responsive design consistency

UI layouts consistent across browsers

UI testing

Design consistency

Browser-Specific Considerations:

  • Chrome: Baseline browser for development and testing
  • Firefox: Privacy-focused users, different JavaScript engine
  • Safari: Apple ecosystem users, WebKit rendering engine
  • Edge: Enterprise Windows environments, Chromium-based

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Complete import workflow functions identically across all supported browsers
  • Secondary_Verifications: Performance consistency, UI layout consistency, feature parity
  • Negative_Verification: No browser-specific failures, no functionality gaps, no performance degradation

Test Results (Template):

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record cross-browser functionality and consistency]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Total cross-browser testing duration]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for browser-specific issues]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Cross-browser evidence and comparison results]

Execution Analytics:

  • Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
  • Maintenance_Effort: High
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships:

  • Blocking_Tests: Individual browser functionality verification
  • Blocked_Tests: Browser-specific optimization tests
  • Parallel_Tests: Mobile compatibility testing
  • Sequential_Tests: Foundation for cross-platform support

Additional Information:

  • Notes: Ensures consistent user experience regardless of browser choice
  • Edge_Cases: Browser updates, extension conflicts, privacy settings
  • Risk_Areas: Browser API differences, rendering inconsistencies, performance variations
  • Security_Considerations: Browser security policies, file access permissions

Missing Scenarios Identified:

  • Scenario_1: Browser extension impact on import functionality (ad blockers, privacy extensions)
  • Type: Browser/Extension Compatibility
  • Rationale: Users often have extensions that may interfere with file uploads and processing
  • Priority: P3
  • Scenario_2: Browser update compatibility (testing with beta/developer versions)
  • Type: Future Compatibility/Update Resilience
  • Rationale: Browser updates may introduce breaking changes requiring proactive testing
  • Priority: P3