Bulk Import contacts - CRM1.1P1US01.1
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality:
- CSV file upload with drag-and-drop interface and template validation
- Real-time file validation for required fields (Name, Email, Type, Channel, Stage)
- 5-step import wizard with progress tracking and status updates
- Automated duplicate detection with weighted scoring (100%, 95%, 90%, 85%)
- Manual duplicate resolution with merge/skip options and bulk operations
- Import completion with comprehensive summary analytics and error reporting
Business Rules:
- Required fields validation: Name, Email, Type, Channel, Stage (red "Required" badges)
- Optional fields: Phone, Company, Position, Address, Tags
- File size limits: 10MB max, 50,000 records max
- Contact Type validation: 8 specific types (lead, prospect, customer, partner, investor, advisor, potential leader, friend of organization)
- Stage validation: 7 specific stages (New Lead, Qualified Lead MQL, Nurture/Disqualified, Hot Lead SQL, Opportunity, Customer Won/Lost, Nurturing Ongoing)
- Channel validation: 11 specific channels (Newsletter Signup, Contact Us, Get Custom Quote, etc.)
- Duplicate detection scoring: Exact (100%), Email (95%), Phone (90%), Name+Company (85%)
User Journeys by Role:
- Marketing Operations Manager: Bulk import with comprehensive duplicate handling and analytics
- Marketing Manager: Quick campaign contact import with validation
- Sales Development Representative: Access to newly imported qualified leads
- Account Executive: Consolidated contact data for account management
- Sales Manager: Team performance tracking and data quality oversight
Integration Points:
- CRM contact database (Services-CX)
- File processing API
- Duplicate detection algorithm
- Error reporting system
- Audit logging service
Data Flow:
- CSV Upload → Header Validation → Processing → Duplicate Detection → Manual Resolution → Import Complete → Contact Database Update
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance:
- File upload response times under 3 seconds
- Processing times: 100 contacts (30 seconds), 1000 contacts (90 seconds), 10000+ contacts (5 minutes)
- Real-time progress updates during processing
- Concurrent user handling (10+ simultaneous imports)
Security:
- File format validation preventing malicious uploads
- Input sanitization for XSS and SQL injection prevention
- Session management during import process
- Role-based access control validation
Compatibility:
- Cross-browser support: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Screen resolution adaptability: Desktop (1920x1080), Tablet (1024x768), Mobile (375x667)
- Operating system compatibility: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Usability:
- Intuitive 5-step wizard navigation with clear progress indicators
- Comprehensive error messaging with specific resolution guidance
- Drag-and-drop file upload with visual feedback
- Real-time duplicate resolution with live counter updates
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions:
- Maximum file size (10MB) and record count (50,000) testing
- Minimum required fields validation
- Empty file and single record file handling
- Unicode and special character support
Invalid Inputs:
- Malformed CSV files with missing headers
- Invalid email formats and phone number formats
- Unsupported contact types, stages, and channels
- SQL injection and XSS attempt prevention
System Failures:
- Network interruption during upload and processing
- Server timeout scenarios
- Database connection failures
- Memory limitations during large file processing
Test Case 1: Import Method Selection Interface Display
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001
Title: Verify import method selection page displays correctly with CSV File Upload active for Marketing Operations Manager
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full import access with analytics
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot access admin settings
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: None
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of Step 1 functionality
- Integration_Points: CRM Navigation, User Authentication
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: CRM system access, user authentication service
- Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Valid Marketing Operations Manager credentials
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Marketing Operations Manager logged into CRM system
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager role with import permissions
- Test_Data: alice.kumar@techcorp.com credentials, active session
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication and CRM access verified
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: CSV File Upload is the only active/clickable import method
- Secondary_Verifications: All 8 import methods visible, correct badges, proper step indicator
- Negative_Verification: Phase 2 methods (Gmail, Outlook, Salesforce, HubSpot, LinkedIn, Zapier, API) not clickable
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual behavior and UI states]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: User authentication must pass
- Blocked_Tests: All subsequent import workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other CRM navigation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must execute before TC_002
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical entry point for entire import workflow
- Edge_Cases: Browser refresh during method selection, session timeout
- Risk_Areas: Method selection state persistence, navigation reliability
- Security_Considerations: Role-based access verification, session validation
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Session timeout during method selection with recovery mechanism
- Type: Error/Session Management
- Rationale: User story mentions session management during import process
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Method selection state persistence across browser refresh
- Type: Edge Case/State Management
- Rationale: Import process should handle interruptions gracefully
- Priority: P3
Test Case 2: CSV File Upload Navigation and State Management
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_002
Title: Verify CSV File Upload selection advances to Step 2 with proper state management
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Navigation
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full import workflow access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify system settings
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minute
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: None
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of Step 1 to Step 2 navigation
- Integration_Points: Navigation State Management, Session Persistence
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Navigation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Smoke-Test-Results, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: CRM system, session management service
- Performance_Baseline: Navigation < 1 second
- Data_Requirements: Active user session from TC_001
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 1 displayed correctly
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager permissions
- Test_Data: Valid session from TC_001 execution
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001 must pass
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Seamless navigation from Step 1 to Step 2 with state preservation
- Secondary_Verifications: Progress indicator accuracy, session maintenance, visual feedback
- Negative_Verification: No navigation errors, no session loss, no UI inconsistencies
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record navigation behavior and state changes]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if navigation issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of navigation flow]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_001 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: All Step 2 test cases
- Parallel_Tests: None (sequential navigation)
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede Step 2 testing
Additional Information:
Missing Scenarios Identified:
Test Case 3: CSV Requirements Panel and Field Validation Display
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003
Title: Verify CSV Requirements panel displays all required and optional fields with accurate validation rules
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full field validation access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify field requirements
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of CSV requirements specification
- Integration_Points: Field Validation Engine, Template Generation
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Validation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Regression-Coverage, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: CRM system, field validation service
- Performance_Baseline: Panel load < 2 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Step 2 page loaded from navigation
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 "Upload CSV File" page displayed
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with field access
- Test_Data: Navigation state from TC_002
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_002 must pass
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All 5 required fields display red "Required" badges with accurate examples
- Secondary_Verifications: All 5 optional fields display without badges, two-column layout, proper typography
- Negative_Verification: No missing fields, no incorrect badge placement, no layout inconsistencies
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record field display states and examples]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for field display issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of field requirements panel]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_002 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: File validation test cases
- Parallel_Tests: Template download testing
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to file upload testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Foundation for user understanding of CSV requirements
- Edge_Cases: Different screen resolutions, browser zoom levels
- Risk_Areas: Field requirement accuracy, example data clarity
- Security_Considerations: Field validation rules exposure
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Field requirement tooltips or help text validation
- Type: UI/Usability
- Rationale: Users may need additional guidance on field requirements
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Dynamic field requirement updates based on user role
- Type: Role-Based/Dynamic
- Rationale: Different roles may have different field requirements
- Priority: P2
Test Case 4: Sample CSV Template Download and Content Validation
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_004
Title: Verify sample CSV template download functionality and content matches specification
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Download
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Template download access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify template content
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: None
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of template download functionality
- Integration_Points: File Generation Service, Template Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Template Generator
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, Regression-Coverage, Product
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: File generation service, browser download capability
- Performance_Baseline: Download initiation < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Step 2 page with template link
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 page displayed with template download link
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with download permissions
- Test_Data: Browser download folder accessible
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass
Test Procedure:
Expected CSV Template Content:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Sales Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Template downloads successfully with accurate headers and sample data
- Secondary_Verifications: UTF-8 encoding, proper file format, realistic sample data
- Negative_Verification: No download failures, no corrupted data, no missing fields
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record download behavior and file content]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for download or content issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of download and file content]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: File upload validation tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other Step 2 UI tests
- Sequential_Tests: Template used in subsequent upload tests
Additional Information:
- Notes: Template provides user guidance for proper CSV format
- Edge_Cases: Different browsers, download folder permissions, antivirus interference
- Risk_Areas: File generation service availability, encoding consistency
- Security_Considerations: Template content security, download integrity
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Template download with different user roles and permission levels
- Type: Role-Based/Security
- Rationale: Different roles may need different template content
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Template download under slow network conditions
- Type: Performance/Network
- Rationale: Users may experience varying network speeds
- Priority: P3
Test Case 5: File Upload Interface and Drag-Drop Functionality
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005
Title: Verify drag-and-drop file upload interface functionality and visual feedback
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full file upload access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot upload non-CSV files
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: None
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of upload interface functionality
- Integration_Points: File Upload Service, Browser File API
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Upload Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Browser file API, file upload service
- Performance_Baseline: UI response < 1 second
- Data_Requirements: Step 2 page loaded
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface displayed
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with upload permissions
- Test_Data: Valid CSV file ready for testing
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Drag-and-drop and file browser both successfully upload CSV files
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual feedback, button states, file filtering, upload confirmation
- Negative_Verification: No upload errors, proper file type filtering, correct state management
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record upload behavior and visual states]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for upload interface issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of upload interface behavior]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_003 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: File validation and processing tests
- Parallel_Tests: Template download tests
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to file validation testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical user interaction point for file upload workflow
- Edge_Cases: Large files, network interruption, browser compatibility
- Risk_Areas: File upload reliability, drag-drop browser support, state management
- Security_Considerations: File type validation, upload size limits
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Multiple file drag-and-drop handling (should reject multiple files)
- Type: Edge Case/Validation
- Rationale: User story specifies single file upload only
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Upload interface behavior on mobile devices with touch interaction
- Type: Mobile/Touch Interface
- Rationale: Responsive design requirements for mobile users
- Priority: P3
Test Case 6: Valid CSV File Upload and Validation Success
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006
Title: Verify successful upload of valid CSV file with all required fields and proper validation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Upload
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full file upload and validation access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot bypass validation rules
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of valid file upload flow
- Integration_Points: File Upload Service, Validation Engine, CSV Parser
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Upload and Validation Modules
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: File upload service, CSV validation engine
- Performance_Baseline: Upload processing < 5 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file with user story sample data
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager with validation access
- Test_Data: Valid CSV file prepared with sample data
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass
Test Data: Valid CSV file (contacts_valid.csv):
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Sales Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education
Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,customer,Get Custom Quote,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO,"321 Tech Hub, Pune",customer,startup
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Valid CSV file uploads successfully and passes all validation checks
- Secondary_Verifications: File metadata display, record count accuracy, button state changes
- Negative_Verification: No validation errors, no upload failures, proper state transitions
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record upload behavior and validation results]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for upload or validation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of successful upload and validation]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Processing and duplicate detection tests
- Parallel_Tests: Error validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to Step 3 processing tests
Additional Information:
- Notes: Foundation test for successful import workflow
- Edge_Cases: Exact file size limits, character encoding variations
- Risk_Areas: File validation accuracy, upload reliability, state persistence
- Security_Considerations: File content validation, malicious file prevention
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Upload behavior with maximum allowed file size (10MB boundary)
- Type: Boundary/Performance
- Rationale: User story specifies 10MB limit as critical business rule
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Upload validation with special characters in contact names and addresses
- Type: Data/Internationalization
- Rationale: Indian names and addresses may contain special characters
- Priority: P2
Test Case 7: File Format Validation and Rejection Handling
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_007
Title: Verify system correctly rejects non-CSV file formats with appropriate error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Negative
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Standard file upload validation
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot override file format restrictions
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of file format validation
- Integration_Points: File Validation Engine, Security Scanner
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Validation Security Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: File validation service, security scanner
- Performance_Baseline: Validation response < 2 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Various non-CSV test files
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager standard access
- Test_Data: Non-CSV files prepared for testing
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass
Test Data: Test files for format validation:
- contacts.txt (Text file with CSV data)
- contacts.xlsx (Excel file with contact data)
- contacts.pdf (PDF file with contact information)
- contacts.docx (Word document with contact list)
- malicious.exe (Executable file)
- contacts.json (JSON file with contact data)
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All non-CSV file formats are rejected with appropriate error messages
- Secondary_Verifications: Button state remains disabled, error messages are consistent and helpful
- Negative_Verification: No file format bypass, no security vulnerabilities, no system crashes
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record rejection behavior and error messages]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for validation or security issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of format validation and error handling]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_005 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: None (negative testing)
- Parallel_Tests: Other validation error tests
- Sequential_Tests: Follows successful upload testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical security validation to prevent malicious file uploads
- Edge_Cases: Files with multiple extensions, masked file types, corrupted files
- Risk_Areas: Security bypass attempts, file type spoofing, validation accuracy
- Security_Considerations: Malware prevention, file content inspection, extension validation
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: File type spoofing attempts (e.g., .exe renamed to .csv)
- Type: Security/Malicious
- Rationale: Security requirement to prevent malicious file uploads
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Files with double extensions (e.g., contacts.csv.exe)
- Type: Security/Edge Case
- Rationale: Common malware technique to bypass validation
- Priority: P2
Test Case 8: File Size Limit Validation and Boundary Testing
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_008
Title: Verify 10MB file size limit enforcement with boundary testing and appropriate error handling
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Boundary
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Standard file size limitations
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot override file size limits
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of file size validation
- Integration_Points: File Processing Service, Storage Validation
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM File Size Validation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: File processing service, storage validation
- Performance_Baseline: Size validation < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Files of varying sizes for boundary testing
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager standard access
- Test_Data: Test files prepared at different sizes
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
Test Data: Size-based test files:
- small_file_1mb.csv (1MB CSV file with ~10,000 contacts)
- medium_file_5mb.csv (5MB CSV file with ~50,000 contacts)
- boundary_file_10mb.csv (Exactly 10MB CSV file at size limit)
- oversized_file_11mb.csv (11MB CSV file exceeding limit)
- large_file_15mb.csv (15MB CSV file well over limit)
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: 10MB file size limit strictly enforced with files above limit rejected
- Secondary_Verifications: Boundary files accepted, clear error messaging, system recovery
- Negative_Verification: No size limit bypass, no system crashes with large files
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record size validation behavior and error handling]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for size validation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of size validation and error messages]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Large file performance tests
- Parallel_Tests: Format validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to content validation tests
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical business rule for system performance and storage management
- Edge_Cases: Files exactly at limit, compressed files, network interruption during upload
- Risk_Areas: Storage capacity, processing performance, memory usage
- Security_Considerations: DoS prevention, resource consumption limits
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: File size validation with network interruption during large file upload
- Type: Performance/Network
- Rationale: Large files may fail due to network issues, requiring proper error handling
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Multiple users uploading maximum size files simultaneously
- Type: Performance/Concurrency
- Rationale: System should handle concurrent large uploads without degradation
- Priority: P3
Test Case 9: Required Fields Header Validation
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_009
Title: Verify CSV validation for missing required field headers with specific error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Negative
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Standard validation access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot bypass required field validation
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of header validation scenarios
- Integration_Points: CSV Parser, Validation Engine, Error Reporter
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Header Validation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, Module-Coverage, User-Acceptance, QA
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: CSV parser, header validation service
- Performance_Baseline: Header validation < 2 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV files with missing headers
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Step 2 upload interface ready
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager standard access
- Test_Data: CSV files with various missing header combinations
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
Test Data: CSV files with missing required headers:
Missing Name header:
- email,type,channel,stage,phone
alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210
Missing Email header:
- name,type,channel,stage,phone
Alice Kumar,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210
Missing multiple required headers (Type, Channel, Stage):
- name,email,phone,company
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,+91 9876543210,TechCorp
Missing all required headers:
- phone,company,position,address,tags
+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All missing required headers are detected and reported with specific error messages
- Secondary_Verifications: Error messages list specific missing fields, button remains disabled
- Negative_Verification: No header validation bypass, proper error recovery
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record header validation behavior and error messages]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for header validation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of header validation errors]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Content validation tests
- Parallel_Tests: File format validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to field content validation
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical data quality checkpoint before processing
- Edge_Cases: Headers with extra spaces, case sensitivity, special characters in headers
- Risk_Areas: Parser accuracy, error message clarity, validation completeness
- Security_Considerations: Header injection prevention, validation bypass attempts
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Header validation with case sensitivity (Name vs name vs NAME)
- Type: Data/Validation
- Rationale: User story shows lowercase headers in template but validation may be case-sensitive
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Header validation with extra whitespace or special characters
- Type: Data/Edge Case
- Rationale: Users may have formatting inconsistencies in their CSV files
- Priority: P3
Test Case 10: Import Processing Display and Progress Tracking
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_010
Title: Verify import processing screen displays correctly with progress indicators and status updates
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full processing visibility
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot interrupt processing once started
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of processing screen functionality
- Integration_Points: Processing Engine, Progress Tracker, Duplicate Detection
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Import Processing Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Processing engine, progress tracking service
- Performance_Baseline: Processing initiation < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file uploaded from TC_006
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Valid CSV file uploaded and ready for processing
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager processing access
- Test_Data: contacts_valid.csv from TC_006
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Processing screen displays correctly with all required elements and smooth progress tracking
- Secondary_Verifications: Animation quality, status transitions, navigation restrictions
- Negative_Verification: No navigation bypass, no process interruption, proper session management
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record processing display and progress behavior]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for processing display issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of processing screen and progress]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_006 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Duplicate detection and completion tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (processing is sequential)
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede duplicate review or completion
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical user feedback during potentially long processing time
- Edge_Cases: Very large files, slow processing, network interruption
- Risk_Areas: Progress accuracy, processing reliability, user experience
- Security_Considerations: Process integrity, session security
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Processing behavior with maximum file size (50,000 records)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: User story specifies maximum capacity that should be tested
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Processing interruption handling (network disconnection, browser crash)
- Type: Error/Recovery
- Rationale: Long processing times increase interruption risk
- Priority: P2
Test Case 11: Processing Performance and Time Validation
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011
Title: Verify processing performance meets specified timeframes for different file sizes
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Standard processing performance
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot accelerate processing
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance requirements
- Integration_Points: Processing Engine, Performance Monitoring
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Processing Performance Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Processing engine, performance monitoring
- Performance_Baseline: Specified timeframes per file size
- Data_Requirements: CSV files of varying sizes
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring tools enabled
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager access
- Test_Data: Multiple CSV files of different sizes prepared
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_010 must pass
Test Data: Performance test files:
- small_file_100_contacts.csv (100 contacts, ~50KB)
- medium_file_1000_contacts.csv (1,000 contacts, ~500KB)
- large_file_10000_contacts.csv (10,000 contacts, ~5MB)
- maximum_file_50000_contacts.csv (50,000 contacts, ~10MB)
Test Procedure:
Performance Baselines from User Story:
- Small Files (<100 contacts): 10-30 seconds
- Medium Files (100-1000 contacts): 30-90 seconds
- Large Files (1000-10000 contacts): 1-5 minutes
- Maximum Files (10000+ contacts): Up to 10 minutes
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All file sizes process within specified time limits
- Secondary_Verifications: System stability, resource usage, UI responsiveness
- Negative_Verification: No performance degradation, no memory leaks, no timeouts
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual processing times and performance metrics]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Total test duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for performance issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring evidence]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_010 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Large-scale duplicate detection tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (performance testing requires isolation)
- Sequential_Tests: Performance baseline for other tests
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical SLA validation for user experience
- Edge_Cases: System load, network latency, concurrent processing
- Risk_Areas: Performance degradation, resource exhaustion, timeout failures
- Security_Considerations: DoS prevention, resource limits
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Concurrent user processing performance impact
- Type: Performance/Concurrency
- Rationale: Multiple Marketing Operations Managers may import simultaneously
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Processing performance under various system loads
- Type: Performance/Load
- Rationale: System performance may vary based on overall system usage
- Priority: P3
Test Case 12: Duplicate Review Interface Display and KPI Cards
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012
Title: Verify duplicate review screen displays all components correctly with accurate KPI tracking
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full duplicate review and resolution access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify duplicate detection algorithm
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of duplicate review interface
- Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Engine, KPI Calculator, Filter System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Duplicate Review Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Duplicate detection engine, KPI calculation service
- Performance_Baseline: Interface load < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV with duplicate scenarios processed
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Processing completed with duplicates detected
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager duplicate resolution access
- Test_Data: CSV file with known duplicate patterns
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates found
Test Data: CSV with duplicate scenarios (contacts_with_duplicates.csv):
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education
Priya Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776656,EduTech Solutions,Manager,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All interface components display correctly with accurate counts and proper styling
- Secondary_Verifications: KPI cards show correct colors, filter cards show accurate counts
- Negative_Verification: No missing components, no count inaccuracies, proper button states
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record interface display and count accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for interface or counting issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of duplicate review interface]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates
- Blocked_Tests: Duplicate resolution tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (sequential review process)
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede duplicate resolution
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical decision point for data quality management
- Edge_Cases: No duplicates found, large number of duplicates, filter edge cases
- Risk_Areas: Count accuracy, performance with many duplicates, UI responsiveness
- Security_Considerations: Data privacy in duplicate display
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Interface behavior when no duplicates are found (direct to Step 5)
- Type: Edge Case/Flow
- Rationale: User story mentions automatic advancement if no duplicates detected
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Duplicate review with maximum file size (50,000 contacts with high duplicate rate)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: Large datasets with many duplicates may impact interface performance
- Priority: P2
Test Case 13: Duplicate Detection Algorithm Accuracy and Scoring
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013
Title: Verify duplicate detection algorithm accuracy with weighted scoring system (100%, 95%, 90%, 85%)
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Algorithm
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Algorithm results visibility
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify scoring weights
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of duplicate detection scenarios
- Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Algorithm, Scoring Engine, Matching Rules
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Duplicate Detection Engine
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Duplicate detection algorithm, scoring engine
- Performance_Baseline: Detection processing < 10 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Curated CSV with specific duplicate scenarios
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review interface loaded
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager algorithm access
- Test_Data: CSV with controlled duplicate scenarios
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012 must pass
Test Data: Curated duplicate scenarios with existing contacts:
Import CSV data:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager
A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager
Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director
Priya Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776656,EduTech Solutions,Manager
Existing contacts in CRM system:
Name: Alice Kumar, Email: alice@techcorp.com, Company: TechCorp, Position: Manager (for exact match testing)
Name: Raj Singh, Email: raj@company.com, Company: FinServe Ltd, Position: Sales Manager (for name+company match)
Name: Priya Sharma, Email: meera@edutech.com, Company: EduTech Solutions, Position: Director (for email match)
Test Procedure:
Expected Algorithm Results:
- Exact Match (100%): Alice Kumar + alice@techcorp.com (identical name AND email)
- Email Match (95%): meera@edutech.com matches (same email, different names)
- Phone Match (90%): +91 9123456789 matches (same phone, different emails)
- Name+Company Match (85%): Raj Singh + FinServe Ltd matches (same name and company, different emails)
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Algorithm correctly identifies and scores all duplicate types according to specification
- Secondary_Verifications: Badge colors match scores, filter counts accurate, consistent results
- Negative_Verification: No false positives, no missed duplicates, no incorrect scoring
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record detection accuracy and scoring results]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for algorithm or scoring issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of detection results and scoring]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Merge and skip functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (algorithm testing requires isolation)
- Sequential_Tests: Foundation for resolution testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Core business logic for data quality management
- Edge_Cases: Partial name matches, similar emails, international phone formats
- Risk_Areas: Algorithm accuracy, scoring consistency, performance with large datasets
- Security_Considerations: Data privacy in matching, algorithm tampering prevention
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Algorithm performance with international data formats (phone numbers, addresses)
- Type: Internationalization/Data
- Rationale: User story includes Indian phone numbers and addresses requiring proper parsing
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Algorithm behavior with edge cases (empty fields, special characters, very long names)
- Type: Edge Case/Data Quality
- Rationale: Real-world data contains inconsistencies requiring robust handling
- Priority: P3
Test Case 14: Merge Functionality and Data Consolidation
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_014
Title: Verify merge functionality consolidates contact data correctly following business rules
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Data
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full merge operation access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify merge business rules
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of merge functionality
- Integration_Points: Data Merge Engine, Contact Database, Audit System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Data Merge Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Data merge engine, contact database, audit logging
- Performance_Baseline: Merge operation < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Duplicate pair ready for merge testing
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review screen with merge options available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager merge permissions
- Test_Data: Specific duplicate pair with comprehensive data
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass
Test Data: Imported Contact for merge testing:
Name: Alice Kumar
Email: alice@techcorp.com, alice.kumar@techcorp.com
Phone: +91 9876543210
Company: TechCorp
Position: Senior Manager
Address: "123 Business Park, Mumbai"
Type: lead
Stage: New Lead
Existing Contact in system:
Name: Alice Kumar
Email: alice@techcorp.com
Phone: +91 9876543211
Company: TechCorp
Position: Manager
Address: "123 Business Park, Mumbai"
Last Contact: 13 days ago
Type: lead
Channel: Contact Us
Stage: Qualified Lead (MQL)
Test Procedure:
Data Consolidation Rules (from user story):
- Email Handling: Combine all unique email addresses
- Field Priority: Imported contact data takes precedence for conflicting fields
- Data Preservation: All unique information from both contacts is retained
- Relationship Linking: Maintain existing relationships/history from original contact
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Data consolidation follows specified business rules with no data loss
- Secondary_Verifications: UI updates correctly, counters accurate, audit trail created
- Negative_Verification: No data corruption, no merge failures, no state inconsistencies
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record merge behavior and data consolidation results]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for merge or data issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of merge operation and data consolidation]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Bulk merge operations, completion flow
- Parallel_Tests: Skip functionality testing
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to resolution completion testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical data integrity operation affecting customer relationships
- Edge_Cases: Conflicting data types, circular relationships, data validation failures
- Risk_Areas: Data loss, merge conflicts, relationship integrity, audit compliance
- Security_Considerations: Data privacy, merge authorization, audit security
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Merge operation rollback capability in case of data conflicts
- Type: Error Recovery/Data Integrity
- Rationale: Complex merges may require rollback if conflicts detected
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Merge behavior with contacts having extensive relationship histories
- Type: Data Complexity/Integration
- Rationale: Contacts with many relationships require careful merge handling
- Priority: P3
Test Case 15: Skip Functionality and Separate Record Maintenance
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_015
Title: Verify skip functionality maintains separate contact records without consolidation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full skip operation access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify skip business rules
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of skip functionality
- Integration_Points: Contact Creation Service, Database, Audit System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Contact Creation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Contact creation service, database, audit logging
- Performance_Baseline: Skip operation < 2 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Duplicate pair ready for skip testing
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review screen with skip options available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager skip permissions
- Test_Data: Duplicate pair suitable for skip testing
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass
Test Data: Duplicate pair for skip testing:
Imported Contact:
Name: Raj Singh
Email: raj.singh@finserve.com
Phone: +91 9123456789
Company: FinServe Ltd
Position: Senior Manager
Type: prospect
Channel: Contact Us
Stage: Qualified Lead (MQL)
Existing Contact:
Name: Raj Singh
Email: raj@finserve.com
Phone: +91 9123456789
Company: FinServe Ltd
Position: Manager
Last Contact: 6 days ago
Type: prospect
Stage: New Lead
Test Procedure:
Skip Business Rules (from user story):
- No Merge: Skip action leaves both contacts as separate entities
- Import Proceeds: Imported contact is added as new contact
- Existing Unchanged: Existing contact remains unchanged in system
- Duplicate Status: Both contacts may appear as potential duplicates in future
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Both contacts exist as separate entities with no data consolidation
- Secondary_Verifications: UI updates correctly, counters accurate, audit trail created
- Negative_Verification: No accidental merging, no data modification, no relationship creation
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record skip behavior and contact separation results]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for skip or separation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of skip operation and contact separation]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Bulk skip operations, completion flow
- Parallel_Tests: Merge functionality testing
- Sequential_Tests: Alternative to merge for resolution completion
Additional Information:
- Notes: Important option for maintaining data integrity when contacts are legitimately separate
- Edge_Cases: Similar but distinct contacts, company reorganizations, name changes
- Risk_Areas: Data duplication, future duplicate detection accuracy
- Security_Considerations: Contact creation authorization, audit compliance
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Skip decision guidance or recommendations based on duplicate confidence scores
- Type: UX/Decision Support
- Rationale: High confidence duplicates may warrant merge recommendations
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Bulk skip operations for similar duplicate types
- Type: Efficiency/Bulk Operations
- Rationale: Users may want to skip all low-confidence duplicates quickly
- Priority: P2
Test Case 16: Bulk Duplicate Resolution Operations
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_016
Title: Verify bulk merge and skip operations for multiple duplicates with real-time counter updates
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Bulk
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Bulk operation access for efficiency
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot bulk-approve without individual review
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of bulk operations functionality
- Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, UI State Management, Counter System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Bulk Operations Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, User-Acceptance, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Bulk processing engine, UI state management
- Performance_Baseline: Bulk operations < 5 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Multiple duplicate pairs for bulk testing
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review with 12+ duplicates available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager bulk permissions
- Test_Data: CSV with multiple duplicate scenarios
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass with multiple duplicates
Test Data: CSV with 12 duplicate pairs for bulk testing:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
[Additional 8 duplicate pairs following same pattern]
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Bulk operations process multiple duplicates efficiently with accurate counter updates
- Secondary_Verifications: UI responsiveness, selection management, state consistency
- Negative_Verification: No partial processing, no counter inaccuracies, no UI freezing
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record bulk operation behavior and performance]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for bulk operation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of bulk operations and counter updates]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_014 and TC_015 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Large-scale import completion tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (bulk operations require isolation)
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to completion flow testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical efficiency feature for large-scale data imports
- Edge_Cases: Network interruption during bulk operations, browser performance limits
- Risk_Areas: UI responsiveness, data consistency, partial operation failures
- Security_Considerations: Bulk operation authorization, audit trail completeness
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Bulk operation rollback capability if errors occur during processing
- Type: Error Recovery/Data Safety
- Rationale: Bulk operations affecting multiple records need robust error handling
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Performance optimization for very large bulk operations (100+ duplicates)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: Maximum file imports may generate hundreds of duplicates
- Priority: P3
Test Case 17: Import Completion Summary and Statistics Validation
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_017
Title: Verify import completion screen displays accurate summary statistics with mathematical validation
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full import analytics access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify import statistics
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproduc### STEP 4: Review Duplicate Contacts
Test Case 12: Duplicate Review Interface Display and KPI Cards
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_012
Title: Verify duplicate review screen displays all components correctly with accurate KPI tracking
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full duplicate review and resolution access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify duplicate detection algorithm
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of duplicate review interface
- Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Engine, KPI Calculator, Filter System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Duplicate Review Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Duplicate detection engine, KPI calculation service
- Performance_Baseline: Interface load < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV with duplicate scenarios processed
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Processing completed with duplicates detected
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager duplicate resolution access
- Test_Data: CSV file with known duplicate patterns
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates found
Test Data: CSV with duplicate scenarios (contacts_with_duplicates.csv):
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education
Priya Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776656,EduTech Solutions,Manager,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",qualified,education
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All interface components display correctly with accurate counts and proper styling
- Secondary_Verifications: KPI cards show correct colors, filter cards show accurate counts
- Negative_Verification: No missing components, no count inaccuracies, proper button states
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record interface display and count accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for interface or counting issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of duplicate review interface]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_011 must pass with duplicates
- Blocked_Tests: Duplicate resolution tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (sequential review process)
- Sequential_Tests: Must precede duplicate resolution
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical decision point for data quality management
- Edge_Cases: No duplicates found, large number of duplicates, filter edge cases
- Risk_Areas: Count accuracy, performance with many duplicates, UI responsiveness
- Security_Considerations: Data privacy in duplicate display
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Interface behavior when no duplicates are found (direct to Step 5)
- Type: Edge Case/Flow
- Rationale: User story mentions automatic advancement if no duplicates detected
- Priority: P1
- Scenario_2: Duplicate review with maximum file size (50,000 contacts with high duplicate rate)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: Large datasets with many duplicates may impact interface performance
- Priority: P2
Test Case 18: Error Report Generation and Content Validation
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_018
Title: Verify error report generation contains accurate validation failures with specific error descriptions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Error
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full error report access and download
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify error classifications
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of error reporting functionality
- Integration_Points: Error Processing Engine, Report Generator, File Download
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Error Reporting Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, QA
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Error processing engine, report generator, file download service
- Performance_Baseline: Report generation < 5 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV with validation errors for testing
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Import completion with failed contact validations
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager error report access
- Test_Data: CSV file containing various validation errors
- Prior_Test_Cases: Import process with validation failures required
Test Data: CSV with validation errors (contacts_with_errors.csv):
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
John Doe,invalidemailformat,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect
Jane Smith,jane@company.com,invalidtype,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),invalidphone,TechCorp,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead
Bob Johnson,,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,TechCorp,Manager,"789 Innovation St, Bangalore",customer
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,customer,InvalidChannel,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876543211,TechCorp,CEO,"321 Tech Hub, Pune",prospect
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,InvalidStage,+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"555 Test Ave, City",financial
Test Procedure:
Expected Error Types (from user story specification):
- Missing Required Field Errors: "Missing required field: [field_name]"
- Invalid Data Format Errors: "Email format is invalid - missing @ symbol or domain"
- Contact Type Validation: Must be one of 8 valid types (lead, prospect, customer, partner, investor, advisor, potential leader, friend of organization)
- Stage Validation: Must be one of 7 valid stages (New Lead, Qualified Lead MQL, etc.)
- Channel Validation: Must be one of 11 valid channels (Newsletter Signup, Contact Us, etc.)
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Error report contains all failed contacts with specific, actionable error descriptions
- Secondary_Verifications: Proper file format, accurate timestamps, complete error details
- Negative_Verification: No missing errors, no generic error messages, no data corruption
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record error report content and accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for error reporting issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of error report generation and content]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Import process with validation errors required
- Blocked_Tests: Error correction and re-import tests
- Parallel_Tests: Success completion testing
- Sequential_Tests: Supports error correction workflow
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for user understanding and correction of data quality issues
- Edge_Cases: All contacts fail, mixed error types, large error reports
- Risk_Areas: Error categorization accuracy, report completeness, file generation
- Security_Considerations: Error data privacy, report access control
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Error report generation with maximum file size imports (50,000 contacts with high error rates)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: Large error reports may impact generation performance and file size
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Error report content validation for different user roles and permissions
- Type: Security/Role-Based
- Rationale: Different roles may see different levels of error detail for privacy
- Priority: P3
Test Case 19: Marketing Manager Import Workflow Access
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_019
Title: Verify Marketing Manager role can access import workflow with appropriate permissions
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Security/Role-Based
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: No
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Manager
- Permission_Level: Standard import access with campaign focus
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot access advanced analytics, limited to campaign-related imports
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of Marketing Manager role permissions
- Integration_Points: Access Control System, Role Management, Import Workflow
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Role-Based Access Control
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, User-Acceptance, Module-Coverage, QA
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Role management system, access control service
- Performance_Baseline: Role validation < 2 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Marketing Manager user credentials
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Marketing Manager user account configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Manager role with campaign import permissions
- Test_Data: jane.smith@company.com Marketing Manager credentials
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication system functional
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Marketing Manager can complete full import workflow within role permissions
- Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate restrictions in place, data scope limitations respected
- Negative_Verification: Cannot access restricted functions, cannot exceed role boundaries
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record role-based access and restrictions]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for role or permission issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of role-based functionality]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: User authentication and role assignment
- Blocked_Tests: Marketing Manager workflow optimization tests
- Parallel_Tests: Other role-based permission tests
- Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive role validation suite
Additional Information:
- Notes: Validates Marketing Manager can efficiently import campaign contacts
- Edge_Cases: Role changes during session, permission inheritance, cross-role scenarios
- Risk_Areas: Permission bypass, data access violations, role privilege escalation
- Security_Considerations: Role-based data access, permission enforcement, audit compliance
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Marketing Manager collaboration with Marketing Operations Manager on large imports
- Type: Multi-Role/Collaboration
- Rationale: User story mentions both roles working on campaign execution
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Marketing Manager access to historical import data and analytics
- Type: Role-Based/Analytics
- Rationale: Campaign effectiveness tracking may require import history access
- Priority: P3
Test Case 20: Contact Type Validation with All 8 Valid Types
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_020
Title: Verify contact type validation accepts all 8 valid types and rejects invalid values
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Validation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full data validation visibility
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify validation rules
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of contact type validation
- Integration_Points: Data Validation Engine, Type Classification System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Contact Type Validation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Data validation engine, type classification service
- Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV files with all contact type variations
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Import workflow ready for data validation testing
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager validation access
- Test_Data: CSV files with valid and invalid contact types
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic CSV upload functionality working
Test Data: Valid Contact Types (from user story specification):
- lead
- prospect
- customer
- partner
- investor
- advisor
- potential leader
- friend of organization
CSV with all valid types:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director
Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,partner,Get Custom Quote,Opportunity,+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO
John Investor,john@investor.com,investor,Talk to Expert,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543212,Investment Corp,Partner
Jane Advisor,jane@advisor.com,advisor,Schedule Demo,Nurturing (Ongoing),+91 9876543213,Advisory Ltd,Consultant
Bob Leader,bob@leader.com,potential leader,Trial Request,New Lead,+91 9876543214,Leadership Inc,Director
Carol Friend,carol@friend.com,friend of organization,Contact Us,Nurturing (Ongoing),+91 9876543215,Community Corp,Volunteer
CSV with invalid types:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company
Test User1,test1@test.com,invalidtype,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TestCorp
Test User2,test2@test.com,LEAD,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543211,TestCorp
Test User3,test3@test.com,customer123,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543212,TestCorp
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All 8 valid contact types are accepted, invalid types are rejected with specific error messages
- Secondary_Verifications: Case sensitivity enforced, error reporting accurate, mixed validation works correctly
- Negative_Verification: No valid types rejected, no invalid types accepted, error messages are specific and helpful
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record type validation behavior and error messages]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for type validation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of type validation and error handling]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Basic CSV processing functionality
- Blocked_Tests: Contact classification and workflow tests
- Parallel_Tests: Stage and channel validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive data validation suite
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for proper contact classification and CRM workflow routing
- Edge_Cases: Empty type field, mixed case variations, special characters
- Risk_Areas: Classification accuracy, workflow routing, data quality impact
- Security_Considerations: Data classification integrity, business rule enforcement
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Contact type validation with international character sets and localization
- Type: Internationalization/Localization
- Rationale: Global CRM usage may require multi-language type support
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Dynamic contact type validation based on user role and permissions
- Type: Role-Based/Dynamic Validation
- Rationale: Different roles may have access to different contact types
- Priority: P3
Test Case 21: Complete Import Workflow Integration Test
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_021
Title: Verify complete end-to-end import workflow integration from Step 1 through Step 5 with all systems
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Integration/E2E
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full workflow access with all integrations
- Role_Restrictions: Standard business rule limitations
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High#### Test Case 16: Bulk Duplicate Resolution Operations
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_016
Title: Verify bulk merge and skip operations for multiple duplicates with real-time counter updates
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Bulk
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Bulk operation access for efficiency
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot bulk-approve without individual review
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of bulk operations functionality
- Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, UI State Management, Counter System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Bulk Operations Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, User-Acceptance, Product
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Bulk processing engine, UI state management
- Performance_Baseline: Bulk operations < 5 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Multiple duplicate pairs for bulk testing
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Duplicate review with 12+ duplicates available
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager bulk permissions
- Test_Data: CSV with multiple duplicate scenarios
- Prior_Test_Cases: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_013 must pass with multiple duplicates
Test Data: CSV with 12 duplicate pairs for bulk testing:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
A. Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543211,TechCorp,Director,"123 Business Park, Mumbai",prospect,enterprise
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
Raj Singh,raj.singh@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager,"456 Corporate Ave, Delhi",lead,financial
[Additional 8 duplicate pairs following same pattern]
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Bulk operations process multiple duplicates efficiently with accurate counter updates
- Secondary_Verifications: UI responsiveness, selection management, state consistency
- Negative_Verification: No partial processing, no counter inaccuracies, no UI freezing
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record bulk operation behavior and performance]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for bulk operation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of bulk operations and counter updates]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_014 and TC_015 must pass
- Blocked_Tests: Large-scale import completion tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (bulk operations require isolation)
- Sequential_Tests: Leads to completion flow testing
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical efficiency feature for large-scale data imports
- Edge_Cases: Network interruption during bulk operations, browser performance limits
- Risk_Areas: UI responsiveness, data consistency, partial operation failures
- Security_Considerations: Bulk operation authorization, audit trail completeness
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Bulk operation rollback capability if errors occur during processing
- Type: Error Recovery/Data Safety
- Rationale: Bulk operations affecting multiple records need robust error handling
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Performance optimization for very large bulk operations (100+ duplicates)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: Maximum file imports may generate hundreds of duplicates
- Priority: P3
Test Case 22: Stage Validation with All 7 Valid Stages
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_022
Title: Verify stage validation accepts all 7 valid stages and rejects invalid values with specific error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Validation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full stage validation visibility
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify stage validation rules
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 9 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of stage validation functionality
- Integration_Points: Data Validation Engine, Pipeline Classification System
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Stage Validation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Data validation engine, stage classification service
- Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV files with all stage variations
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Import workflow ready for stage validation testing
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager validation access
- Test_Data: CSV files with valid and invalid stages
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic CSV upload functionality working
Test Data: Valid Stages (from user story specification):
- New Lead
- Qualified Lead (MQL)
- Nurture / Disqualified
- Hot Lead (SQL)
- Opportunity
- Customer (Won/Lost)
- Nurturing (Ongoing)
CSV with all valid stages:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Digital Maturity Assessment,Nurture / Disqualified,+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director
Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,customer,Get Custom Quote,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO
John Smith,john@investment.com,investor,Talk to Expert,Opportunity,+91 9876543212,Investment Corp,Partner
Jane Doe,jane@advisory.com,advisor,Schedule Demo,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876543213,Advisory Ltd,Consultant
Bob Wilson,bob@community.com,friend of organization,Trial Request,Nurturing (Ongoing),+91 9876543214,Community Corp,Volunteer
CSV with invalid stages:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company
Test User1,test1@test.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,invalidstage,+91 9876543210,TestCorp
Test User2,test2@test.com,prospect,Contact Us,NEW LEAD,+91 9876543211,TestCorp
Test User3,test3@test.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,stage123,+91 9876543212,TestCorp
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All 7 valid stages are accepted, invalid stages are rejected with specific error messages
- Secondary_Verifications: Case sensitivity enforced, error reporting accurate, workflow routing correct
- Negative_Verification: No valid stages rejected, no invalid stages accepted, error messages are specific
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record stage validation behavior and error messages]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for stage validation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of stage validation and error handling]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Basic CSV processing functionality
- Blocked_Tests: Pipeline workflow routing tests
- Parallel_Tests: Type and channel validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive data validation suite
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for proper sales pipeline classification and workflow routing
- Edge_Cases: Empty stage field, mixed case variations, special characters
- Risk_Areas: Pipeline routing accuracy, stage progression logic, reporting accuracy
- Security_Considerations: Pipeline data integrity, business rule enforcement
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Stage validation with role-based pipeline access (different roles may see different stages)
- Type: Role-Based/Pipeline Access
- Rationale: Sales and marketing roles may have different stage visibility
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Stage progression validation (ensuring logical stage transitions)
- Type: Business Logic/Workflow
- Rationale: Some stage transitions may be invalid in business context
- Priority: P2
Test Case 23: Channel Validation with All 11 Valid Channels
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_023
Title: Verify channel validation accepts all 11 valid channels and rejects invalid values with comprehensive error messaging
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Validation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full channel validation and attribution access
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot modify channel attribution rules
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of channel validation functionality
- Integration_Points: Data Validation Engine, Channel Attribution System, Marketing Analytics
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Channel Validation Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Data validation engine, channel attribution service
- Performance_Baseline: Validation processing < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV files with all channel variations
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Import workflow ready for channel validation testing
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager validation access
- Test_Data: CSV files with valid and invalid channels
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic CSV upload functionality working
Test Data: Valid Channels (from user story specification):
CSV with all valid channels:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position
Alice Kumar,alice@techcorp.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TechCorp,Manager
Raj Singh,raj@finserve.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9123456789,FinServe Ltd,Manager
Meera Sharma,meera@edutech.com,lead,Get Custom Quote,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9988776655,EduTech Solutions,Director
Priya Patel,priya@startup.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,Opportunity,+91 9876543211,StartupCorp,CEO
John Smith,john@investment.com,investor,Industry Report,New Lead,+91 9876543212,Investment Corp,Partner
Jane Doe,jane@advisory.com,advisor,White Paper,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543213,Advisory Ltd,Consultant
Bob Wilson,bob@calculator.com,partner,ROI Calculator,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543214,Calculator Corp,Analyst
Sarah Chen,sarah@expert.com,lead,Talk to Expert,Opportunity,+91 9876543215,Expert Corp,Manager
Mike Johnson,mike@partners.com,partner,Partners,New Lead,+91 9876543216,Partners Corp,Director
Lisa Wang,lisa@demo.com,prospect,Schedule Demo,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543217,Demo Corp,VP
David Brown,david@trial.com,lead,Trial Request,New Lead,+91 9876543218,Trial Corp,Manager
CSV with invalid channels:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company
Test User1,test1@test.com,lead,invalidchannel,New Lead,+91 9876543210,TestCorp
Test User2,test2@test.com,prospect,NEWSLETTER SIGNUP,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543211,TestCorp
Test User3,test3@test.com,customer,channel123,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876543212,TestCorp
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All 11 valid channels are accepted, invalid channels are rejected with comprehensive error messages
- Secondary_Verifications: Case sensitivity enforced, channel attribution accurate, marketing analytics integration
- Negative_Verification: No valid channels rejected, no invalid channels accepted, attribution tracking works
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record channel validation behavior and attribution accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for channel validation issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of channel validation and attribution]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Basic CSV processing functionality
- Blocked_Tests: Marketing attribution and analytics tests
- Parallel_Tests: Stage and type validation tests
- Sequential_Tests: Part of comprehensive data validation suite
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical for marketing attribution and campaign performance tracking
- Edge_Cases: Empty channel field, mixed case variations, special characters
- Risk_Areas: Attribution accuracy, campaign tracking, marketing ROI calculation
- Security_Considerations: Channel data integrity, attribution tampering prevention
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Channel validation with marketing campaign integration and attribution tracking
- Type: Integration/Marketing Analytics
- Rationale: Channels directly impact marketing campaign attribution and ROI calculations
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: Channel validation with role-based access (different roles may use different channels)
- Type: Role-Based/Channel Access
- Rationale: Sales and marketing teams may have different channel preferences and access
- Priority: P3
Test Case 24: No Duplicates Found Workflow Path
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_024
Title: Verify automatic advancement from Step 3 to Step 5 when no duplicates are detected during processing
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Functional/Edge-Case
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full workflow visibility including edge cases
- Role_Restrictions: Cannot force duplicate detection when none exist
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of no-duplicates workflow path
- Integration_Points: Duplicate Detection Engine, Workflow Logic, Auto-Advancement
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Workflow Logic Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, Regression-Coverage, Engineering
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Duplicate detection engine, workflow logic service
- Performance_Baseline: Auto-advancement < 3 seconds
- Data_Requirements: CSV with completely unique contacts (no duplicates)
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Clean CRM database with no existing contacts that could match
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager full workflow access
- Test_Data: CSV file with completely unique contacts
- Prior_Test_Cases: Processing workflow tests must pass
Test Data: CSV with completely unique contacts (no duplicates possible):
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Unique User1,unique1@uniquecorp1.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876000001,UniqueCorp1,Manager,"100 Unique St, Mumbai",unique1
Unique User2,unique2@uniquecorp2.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876000002,UniqueCorp2,Director,"200 Unique Ave, Delhi",unique2
Unique User3,unique3@uniquecorp3.com,customer,Digital Maturity Assessment,Hot Lead (SQL),+91 9876000003,UniqueCorp3,VP,"300 Unique Rd, Bangalore",unique3
Unique User4,unique4@uniquecorp4.com,partner,Get Custom Quote,Opportunity,+91 9876000004,UniqueCorp4,CEO,"400 Unique Blvd, Chennai",unique4
Unique User5,unique5@uniquecorp5.com,investor,Talk to Expert,Customer (Won/Lost),+91 9876000005,UniqueCorp5,Partner,"500 Unique Plaza, Pune",unique5
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: System automatically skips Step 4 when no duplicates are detected and advances directly to Step 5
- Secondary_Verifications: Progress indicator accuracy, statistics calculation, audit trail completeness
- Negative_Verification: No forced duplicate review, no UI inconsistencies, no navigation errors
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record auto-advancement behavior and workflow accuracy]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual execution duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for workflow logic issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of automatic advancement and workflow completion]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Processing workflow tests must pass
- Blocked_Tests: None (edge case testing)
- Parallel_Tests: Other workflow edge case tests
- Sequential_Tests: Alternative path to normal duplicate resolution flow
Additional Information:
- Notes: Critical workflow optimization for efficient processing when no duplicates exist
- Edge_Cases: Borderline duplicate matches, detection algorithm edge cases
- Risk_Areas: Workflow logic accuracy, step skipping reliability, UI state management
- Security_Considerations: Workflow integrity, audit trail completeness
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: No duplicates found with maximum file size (50,000 unique contacts)
- Type: Performance/Scale
- Rationale: Large file processing should maintain same auto-advancement behavior
- Priority: P2
- Scenario_2: No duplicates workflow with partial validation failures
- Type: Mixed Scenario/Edge Case
- Rationale: Some contacts fail validation but no duplicates detected among valid contacts
- Priority: P3
Test Case 25: Cross-Browser Compatibility Comprehensive Testing
Test Case ID: CRM1.1P1US01.1_TC_028
Title: Verify complete import workflow functions consistently across all supported browsers and operating systems
Created By: Hetal
Created Date: December 11, 2024
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bulk Import contacts
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Role-Based Context:
- User_Role: Marketing Operations Manager
- Permission_Level: Full cross-platform import access
- Role_Restrictions: Browser-specific limitations
- Multi_Role_Scenario: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of cross-browser functionality
- Integration_Points: Browser APIs, File System Access, JavaScript Compatibility
- Code_Module_Mapped: CRM Cross-Browser Compatibility Module
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Cross-Browser-Results, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing, QA
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Multiple browsers as specified
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Multiple browser installations, cross-platform testing tools
- Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across browsers
- Data_Requirements: Standard test CSV file
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Marketing Operations Manager access on all platforms
- Test_Data: Cross-browser compatible CSV file
- Prior_Test_Cases: Individual browser functionality verified
Test Data: Cross-browser compatible CSV:
name,email,type,channel,stage,phone,company,position,address,tags
Browser Test1,browser1@crosstest.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543501,CrossBrowser Corp,Manager,"Test Address 1, Mumbai",browser,test
Browser Test2,browser2@crosstest.com,prospect,Contact Us,Qualified Lead (MQL),+91 9876543502,Compatibility Inc,Director,"Test Address 2, Delhi",compat,test
Duplicate Test,browser1@crosstest.com,lead,Newsletter Signup,New Lead,+91 9876543503,CrossBrowser Corp,Senior Manager,"Test Address 1, Mumbai",duplicate,test
Browser Matrix Testing:
Test Procedure:
Browser-Specific Considerations:
- Chrome: Baseline browser for development and testing
- Firefox: Privacy-focused users, different JavaScript engine
- Safari: Apple ecosystem users, WebKit rendering engine
- Edge: Enterprise Windows environments, Chromium-based
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Complete import workflow functions identically across all supported browsers
- Secondary_Verifications: Performance consistency, UI layout consistency, feature parity
- Negative_Verification: No browser-specific failures, no functionality gaps, no performance degradation
Test Results (Template):
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record cross-browser functionality and consistency]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Total cross-browser testing duration]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs for browser-specific issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Cross-browser evidence and comparison results]
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: High
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Individual browser functionality verification
- Blocked_Tests: Browser-specific optimization tests
- Parallel_Tests: Mobile compatibility testing
- Sequential_Tests: Foundation for cross-platform support
Additional Information:
- Notes: Ensures consistent user experience regardless of browser choice
- Edge_Cases: Browser updates, extension conflicts, privacy settings
- Risk_Areas: Browser API differences, rendering inconsistencies, performance variations
- Security_Considerations: Browser security policies, file access permissions
Missing Scenarios Identified:
- Scenario_1: Browser extension impact on import functionality (ad blockers, privacy extensions)
- Type: Browser/Extension Compatibility
- Rationale: Users often have extensions that may interfere with file uploads and processing
- Priority: P3
- Scenario_2: Browser update compatibility (testing with beta/developer versions)
- Type: Future Compatibility/Update Resilience
- Rationale: Browser updates may introduce breaking changes requiring proactive testing
- Priority: P3
No Comments