Skip to main content

Rate/ Tariff & Plans Management

Comprehensive Utility Plans & Tariffs Scenarios

Scenario 1 – Residential Electricity Slab Rate Plan

Scenario Description A residential customer needs a tiered electricity plan where higher consumption levels are charged at increasing rates to promote energy conservation.

Objective (Why)

  • Encourage energy conservation through progressive pricing structure
  • Provide affordable base rates for essential electricity needs while discouraging excessive consumption
  • Generate fair revenue based on actual usage patterns

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of $2.3M annually from customers choosing flat-rate competitors due to lack of conservation incentives
  • 15% increase in customer complaints about unfair billing for low-usage households
  • Regulatory compliance issues as 8 states now require progressive electricity pricing for residential customers

Scenario Explanation - in short Sarah Martinez, a residential customer in Phoenix, uses 850 units monthly. Under the slab rate plan:

  • First 300 units: $0.08/unit = $24.00
  • Next 300 units (301-600): $0.12/unit = $36.00
  • Remaining 250 units (601-850): $0.16/unit = $40.00
  • Total electricity charges: $100.00 Monthly bill includes $15 service charge, totaling $115.00

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain to customers how their usage affects billing tiers and help them understand why their per-unit cost changes at different consumption levels. QA → Must test slab calculations across all tier boundaries, validate correct rate application when usage spans multiple tiers, and verify accurate bill generation. Engineers/Interns → Must understand tier logic, rate calculation algorithms, and how the system automatically determines which slab rates apply to specific usage ranges.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports slab rate configuration with unlimited tiers. Example implementation:

  • Utility Service: Electricity
  • Rate Type: Slab
  • Slab 1: 0-300 units at $0.08
  • Slab 2: 301-600 units at $0.12
  • Slab 3: 601+ units at $0.16
  • Service charges can be added as "Service-Specific Charges"

Scenario 2 – Commercial Water Fixed Rate Plan

Scenario Description A commercial business requires a predictable monthly water bill with fixed charges regardless of consumption for better budget planning.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide budget predictability for commercial customers with consistent water usage
  • Simplify billing processes and reduce meter reading frequency requirements
  • Generate stable revenue streams from commercial accounts

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • 25% of commercial customers may switch to competitors offering fixed billing options
  • $890K annual revenue loss from businesses preferring predictable utility costs
  • Increased operational costs of $45K monthly for frequent meter readings and variable billing calculations

Scenario Explanation - in short Green Valley Restaurant pays a fixed monthly water charge of $180 regardless of consumption. Whether they use 2,500 gallons or 4,200 gallons, their water portion remains constant at $180. Additional service charges include $25 delivery fee and $8 administrative charge, totaling $213 monthly.

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must communicate to commercial clients that their bill remains constant regardless of usage variations and explain the benefits of predictable budgeting. QA → Must validate that fixed charges remain constant across different usage scenarios and verify no consumption-based calculations affect the final bill. Engineers/Interns → Must understand that fixed rate logic bypasses consumption calculations and applies predetermined charges regardless of meter readings.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports fixed rate configuration:

  • Utility Service: Water
  • Rate Type: Fixed
  • Fixed Rate: $180.00 (consumption-independent)
  • Consumer Categories: Commercial
  • Service charges: Delivery Charges ($25), Admin Charges ($8)

Scenario 3 – Industrial Gas Seasonal Rate Plan

Scenario Description An industrial facility needs different gas rates during winter heating season versus summer months to reflect supply costs and demand fluctuations.

Objective (Why)

  • Align pricing with seasonal supply costs and market demand patterns
  • Encourage load balancing by incentivizing off-season usage
  • Maintain competitive pricing during peak demand periods while ensuring adequate revenue

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $1.7M annual revenue shortfall during high-cost winter months due to fixed pricing
  • Loss of 12 major industrial accounts to competitors offering seasonal flexibility
  • Inability to pass through 35% winter supply cost increases, resulting in negative margins

Scenario Explanation - in short Midwest Steel Manufacturing consumes 85,000 cubic feet monthly. Their seasonal gas rates are:

  • Winter (Nov 1 - Mar 31): $0.75 per cubic foot = $63,750
  • Summer (Apr 1 - Oct 31): $0.55 per cubic foot = $46,750 January bill (winter rate): $63,750 + $350 capacity charge + $125 delivery fee = $64,225 July bill (summer rate): $46,750 + $350 capacity charge + $125 delivery fee = $47,225

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain to industrial customers how seasonal pricing reflects market conditions and help them plan consumption around rate periods. QA → Must test automatic rate switching on seasonal boundary dates and validate correct seasonal rate application based on billing period dates. Engineers/Interns → Must understand date-based rate logic, seasonal boundary calculations, and how the system determines which seasonal rate applies to specific billing periods.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports seasonal rate configuration:

  • Utility Service: Gas
  • Rate Type: Seasonal
  • Winter Season: Nov 1 - Mar 31 at $0.75/unit
  • Summer Season: Apr 1 - Oct 31 at $0.55/unit
  • Service charges: Capacity based recovery ($350), Delivery Charges ($125)

Scenario 4 – Residential Multi-Utility Bundle Plan

Scenario Description A residential customer wants a single plan covering electricity, water, and gas services with bundled pricing and unified billing.

Objective (Why)

  • Increase customer retention through service bundling and convenience
  • Reduce billing costs by consolidating multiple utility bills into one statement
  • Cross-sell additional utility services to existing customer base

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • 40% of customers may choose single-provider solutions from competitors
  • $3.2M annual revenue loss from customers unbundling services
  • Increased billing costs of $120K annually for separate billing processes across utilities

Scenario Explanation - in short The Johnson family subscribes to "Premium Residential Bundle" covering all utilities:

  • Electricity: 450 units at $0.11/unit = $49.50
  • Water: 3,200 gallons at $0.006/gallon = $19.20
  • Gas: 125 cubic feet at $0.52/unit = $65.00 Subtotal: $133.70, Bundle discount (5%): -$6.69 Service charges: $15 admin fee + $8 meter fee = $23.00 Total monthly bill: $150.01

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain bundled pricing benefits, discount calculations, and how multiple utility services appear on unified billing statements. QA → Must test bundle discount calculations across multiple utilities, validate service charge consolidation, and verify accurate multi-utility bill generation. Engineers/Interns → Must understand multi-utility plan configuration, discount calculation logic, and cross-utility billing integration processes.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports multi-utility plans:

  • Plan can include: Electricity, Water, Gas
  • Each utility can have different rate types (Flat, Slab, Fixed)
  • Bundle discounts can be applied through service charge modifications
  • Unified billing through single plan structure

Scenario 5 – Commercial Electricity Time-Based Rate Plan

Scenario Description A commercial customer needs electricity rates that vary by time of day (peak/off-peak hours) to optimize energy costs during different demand periods.

Objective (Why)

  • Reduce grid strain by incentivizing off-peak electricity consumption
  • Offer cost savings opportunities for businesses with flexible operating schedules
  • Align pricing with actual grid demand and generation costs throughout the day

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $890K annual lost savings opportunities for commercial customers
  • 20% increase in peak-hour grid demand without price incentives to shift usage
  • Loss of 15 major commercial accounts to time-of-use pricing competitors

Scenario Explanation - in short Metro Office Complex consumes electricity across different time periods:

  • Off-Peak (10 PM - 6 AM): 800 units at $0.08/unit = $64.00
  • Standard (6 AM - 4 PM, 8 PM - 10 PM): 1,200 units at $0.12/unit = $144.00
  • Peak (4 PM - 8 PM): 400 units at $0.18/unit = $72.00 Total usage charges: $280.00 Service charges: $45 electric delivery rate + $25 distribution charges = $70.00 Monthly bill total: $350.00

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must help commercial customers understand time-based pricing periods and advise on consumption timing to minimize costs. QA → Must test time-based rate calculations across different hour boundaries and validate correct rate application based on actual usage timestamps. Engineers/Interns → Must understand time-period logic, hourly rate calculations, and how the system determines which time-based rate applies to specific usage intervals.

Does it fit in SMART360 ⚠️ Partial fit - SMART360 supports time-based rates but wireframe indicates "no validation for time based while creating rate":

  • Rate Type: Time-based is supported
  • Gap: System needs enhanced validation for time period conflicts
  • Recommendation: Implement time overlap validation similar to date validation for other rate types

Scenario 6 – Residential Water Flat Rate Plan

Scenario Description A residential customer requires a simple water plan with consistent per-gallon pricing regardless of consumption volume.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide transparent, easy-to-understand water billing for residential customers
  • Encourage water conservation through consistent per-unit pricing signals
  • Simplify billing calculations and customer service explanations

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Customer confusion leading to 30% increase in billing inquiry calls
  • $150K annual cost increase for customer service to explain complex rate structures
  • Potential regulatory issues as flat-rate transparency is preferred for essential services like water

Scenario Explanation - in short Maria Rodriguez uses 4,850 gallons of water monthly. Under flat rate pricing: Water usage: 4,850 gallons × $0.0085/gallon = $41.23 Service charges: $12 water service fee + $3.50 meter charge = $15.50 Total monthly water bill: $56.73 Easy calculation allows Maria to predict her bill based on usage.

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain simple per-gallon pricing and help customers calculate their expected bills based on usage estimates. QA → Must validate flat rate calculations for various consumption levels and verify consistent per-unit pricing across all usage scenarios. Engineers/Interns → Must understand that flat rates apply single unit pricing regardless of consumption volume, with no tier or bracket calculations.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports flat rate configuration:

  • Utility Service: Water
  • Rate Type: Flat
  • Base Unit Rate: $0.0085 per gallon
  • Service charges: Water Service Fees ($12), Meter Charge ($3.50)
  • Consumer Categories: Residential

Scenario 7 – Industrial Waste Management Fixed Monthly Plan

Scenario Description An industrial facility needs predictable monthly waste management costs with fixed pricing for budget planning and operational efficiency.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide cost certainty for industrial waste management budgeting
  • Encourage proper waste disposal through comprehensive service coverage
  • Generate stable revenue from industrial waste management services

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $450K annual revenue loss from industries choosing variable pricing competitors
  • 18% increase in improper waste disposal due to unpredictable cost concerns
  • Loss of 8 major industrial accounts requiring fixed-cost waste management solutions

Scenario Explanation - in short Pacific Manufacturing pays a fixed monthly waste management fee of $2,400 covering:

  • Regular waste collection (3x weekly)
  • Hazardous material handling
  • Recycling processing services
  • Documentation and compliance reporting Total monthly bill: $2,400 (no usage-based calculations) Additional one-time charges may apply for special waste types.

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must communicate comprehensive service coverage included in fixed pricing and handle any special waste requests outside the standard plan. QA → Must validate that waste management charges remain fixed regardless of volume fluctuations and verify proper service inclusion. Engineers/Interns → Must understand fixed pricing logic for waste management services and integration with special charge handling for non-standard waste types.

Does it fit in SMART360 ⚠️ Needs customization - SMART360 primarily handles metered utilities:

  • Waste Management not explicitly listed in utility services
  • Gap: Need to add Waste Management as utility service option
  • Workaround: Can use "Service-Specific Charges" for fixed waste management fees
  • Recommendation: Expand utility service categories to include waste management

Scenario 8 – Commercial Gas Slab Rate Plan

Scenario Description A commercial customer needs tiered gas pricing where larger consumption volumes receive progressively better per-unit rates.

Objective (Why)

  • Reward high-volume commercial gas customers with volume discounts
  • Encourage customer loyalty and prevent switching to competitors
  • Optimize revenue through tiered pricing that balances volume incentives with profitability

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of 25 high-volume commercial accounts worth $1.8M annually
  • Inability to compete with volume discount pricing from regional gas suppliers
  • 30% reduction in commercial gas sales due to uncompetitive flat-rate pricing

Scenario Explanation - in short Downtown Restaurant Group consumes 8,500 cubic feet monthly:

  • First 2,000 cubic feet: $0.85/unit = $1,700
  • Next 3,000 cubic feet (2,001-5,000): $0.78/unit = $2,340
  • Next 3,000 cubic feet (5,001-8,000): $0.72/unit = $2,160
  • Remaining 500 cubic feet (8,001-8,500): $0.68/unit = $340 Total gas charges: $6,540 Service charges: $75 delivery + $25 distribution = $100 Monthly bill: $6,640

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain volume discount benefits to commercial customers and show how increased usage leads to lower per-unit costs. QA → Must test slab calculations for commercial gas rates and validate volume discount tiers apply correctly across usage boundaries. Engineers/Interns → Must understand commercial slab logic differs from residential progressive pricing by offering discounts rather than penalties for higher usage.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports commercial slab rates:

  • Utility Service: Gas
  • Rate Type: Slab
  • Consumer Categories: Commercial
  • Multiple slabs with decreasing rates for volume incentives
  • Service charges: Delivery Charges ($75), Distribution Charges ($25)

Scenario 9 – Residential Multi-Tier Electricity Plan with Service Charges

Scenario Description A residential customer needs a comprehensive electricity plan with multiple consumption tiers, seasonal adjustments, and various service fees.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide detailed electricity pricing that reflects true cost structures
  • Encourage conservation through progressive tier pricing
  • Cover infrastructure and service costs through appropriate fees

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $2.1M revenue shortfall from simplified pricing that doesn't recover infrastructure costs
  • Customer confusion about bill components leading to 45% increase in service calls
  • Inability to implement conservation incentives resulting in 12% higher peak demand

Scenario Explanation - in short The Chen family uses 720 units in December: Electricity tiers:

  • First 400 units: $0.09/unit = $36.00
  • Next 320 units (401-720): $0.13/unit = $41.60 Total electricity: $77.60

Service charges:

  • Electric delivery rate: $18.50
  • Distribution service charges: $12.75
  • Administrative fee: $8.99
  • Meter fee: $4.25
  • Late payment protection: $2.50 Total service charges: $46.99 Final monthly bill: $124.59

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain each service charge component and help customers understand how their total bill is calculated beyond just electricity usage. QA → Must validate all service charge calculations, tier pricing accuracy, and proper itemization on customer bills. Engineers/Interns → Must understand complex billing with multiple service charges, tier calculations, and how various fees are applied and displayed.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports comprehensive service charges:

  • Utility Service: Electricity
  • Rate Type: Slab (multi-tier)
  • Multiple predefined service charges available:
    • Electric Delivery Rate
    • Distribution Service Charges
    • Admin Charges, Meter Fee, Late Payment
  • All charges can be configured as fixed amounts

Scenario 10 – Small Business Water & Electricity Bundle

Scenario Description A small business needs combined water and electricity service with business-appropriate rates and unified billing.

Objective (Why)

  • Serve small business segment with appropriate utility bundling
  • Reduce billing complexity for small business owners
  • Increase revenue through multi-service customer relationships

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • 35% of small businesses choose competitors offering utility bundling
  • $750K annual revenue loss from small business segment
  • Increased billing costs of $65K annually for separate utility billing processes

Scenario Explanation - in short Corner Coffee Shop monthly usage: Electricity: 950 units at $0.115/unit = $109.25 Water: 2,100 gallons at $0.0078/gallon = $16.38 Subtotal: $125.63

Service charges:

  • Electric service charge: $22.00
  • Water service fees: $15.50
  • Small business admin: $12.99
  • Account setup (first month): $35.00 Total with services: $211.12

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must communicate small business pricing benefits and explain how bundled services provide convenience and potential cost savings. QA → Must test small business rate calculations across multiple utilities and validate proper service charge application for business accounts. Engineers/Interns → Must understand business-specific pricing logic, multi-utility integration, and how small business plans differ from residential or large commercial plans.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 supports small business multi-utility plans:

  • Consumer Categories: Commercial, Small Business
  • Multiple utility services: Electricity, Water
  • Business-appropriate service charges available
  • Account Setup Fees can be applied for new customers

Scenario 11 – Industrial Electricity Demand-Based Pricing

Scenario Description A large industrial customer requires electricity pricing based on peak demand periods and consumption patterns for optimal cost management.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide industrial customers with demand-responsive pricing
  • Encourage load management and grid stability through peak demand pricing
  • Generate appropriate revenue from high-demand industrial users

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of 6 major industrial accounts worth $4.2M annually
  • Grid instability from unmanaged industrial demand peaks
  • $880K annual loss from inability to charge demand-based rates

Scenario Explanation - in short Advanced Manufacturing Corp monthly usage: Peak demand: 2,500 kW at $8.50/kW = $21,250 Energy consumption: 450,000 kWh at $0.055/kWh = $24,750 Total electricity charges: $46,000

Service charges:

  • Electric delivery rate: $2,850
  • Distribution service charges: $1,200
  • Capacity based recovery: $750
  • Total regulatory charges: $425 Monthly industrial bill: $51,225

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain demand charges versus energy charges and help industrial customers understand how peak demand affects their total costs. QA → Must validate demand charge calculations, energy consumption pricing, and proper application of industrial-specific service charges. Engineers/Interns → Must understand demand-based pricing logic, peak demand calculations, and how industrial pricing differs from standard consumption-based models.

Does it fit in SMART360 ⚠️ Needs enhancement - SMART360 supports industrial rates but may need demand charge features:

  • Consumer Categories: Industrial (supported)
  • Gap: Demand-based pricing not explicitly shown in rate types
  • Workaround: Use service charges for demand components
  • Recommendation: Add demand-based rate type for industrial customers

Scenario 12 – Residential Off-Grid Solar with Grid Backup

Scenario Description A residential customer with solar panels needs net metering and backup grid electricity service for cloudy days and high-usage periods.

Objective (Why)

  • Support renewable energy adoption through net metering programs
  • Provide reliable backup service when solar generation is insufficient
  • Balance grid maintenance costs with renewable energy incentives

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of environmentally conscious customers to solar-friendly utilities
  • $320K annual revenue loss from customers installing solar with competitors
  • Regulatory compliance issues as 12 states require net metering options

Scenario Explanation - in short Green Family solar home in March: Solar generation: 850 kWh Grid consumption: 920 kWh Net usage: 70 kWh at $0.095/kWh = $6.65 Grid backup availability charge: $25.00 Solar interconnection fee: $8.50 Administrative charges: $5.99 Total monthly bill: $46.14 (Bill shows credits for excess solar generation in sunny months)

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain net metering calculations, solar credits, and how grid backup charges apply even with solar generation. QA → Must validate net usage calculations, solar credit applications, and proper handling of negative usage months. Engineers/Interns → Must understand net metering logic, bidirectional energy flow calculations, and solar interconnection billing processes.

Does it fit in SMART360 ⚠️ Significant gaps - SMART360 needs solar/net metering enhancements:

  • Gap: No net metering or bidirectional usage handling
  • Gap: No solar generation credit calculations
  • Recommendation: Major enhancement needed for renewable energy programs
  • Workaround: Could use negative service charges for solar credits, but not ideal

Scenario 13 – Unmetered Electricity Service Plan

Scenario Description A customer needs electricity service for equipment or areas where installing meters is not practical or cost-effective, requiring fixed monthly charges.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide electricity service for remote locations or equipment where metering is impractical
  • Generate revenue from unmetered connections through fixed pricing
  • Reduce infrastructure costs by avoiding expensive meter installations

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $280K annual revenue loss from customers requiring unmetered connections choosing competitors
  • Loss of agricultural and remote commercial customers (18 accounts worth $165K annually)
  • Increased costs of $95K for unnecessary meter installations in impractical locations

Scenario Explanation - in short Rural Farm Equipment Barn requires electricity for grain dryers and equipment but meter installation would cost $8,500 due to remote location. Monthly unmetered service: Fixed electricity charge: $185.00 (estimated for typical farm equipment usage) Electric delivery rate: $45.00 Distribution service charges: $28.50 Administrative fee: $12.99 Total monthly bill: $271.49 No meter readings required - consistent monthly billing.

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain to customers why unmetered service uses fixed pricing and help them understand cost-effectiveness versus meter installation. QA → Must validate that unmetered services apply fixed charges correctly without any consumption-based calculations or meter reading requirements. Engineers/Interns → Must understand unmetered service logic where fixed charges replace consumption calculations and no meter data integration is required.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 explicitly supports unmetered services:

  • Business rule states: "The Unmetered utility charges should be visible in service charges and the rate name should be shown in the rate field"
  • Rate comes from utility service selection
  • Fixed pricing structure supports unmetered billing

Scenario 14 – Stormwater Management Fee Plan

Scenario Description Property owners need stormwater management service charges based on impervious surface area to fund municipal drainage and flood control systems.

Objective (Why)

  • Fund critical stormwater infrastructure maintenance and improvements
  • Ensure fair cost allocation based on property impact on stormwater systems
  • Comply with EPA stormwater management regulations

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $1.2M annual shortfall in stormwater infrastructure funding
  • Potential EPA fines of $500K for inadequate stormwater management compliance
  • Flood damage liability increasing insurance costs by $180K annually

Scenario Explanation - in short Metro Shopping Center has 85,000 sq ft of impervious surface (parking lots, building roofs): Stormwater fee calculation: 85,000 sq ft ÷ 1,000 × $2.15 = $182.75 Additional charges:

  • Stormwater system maintenance: $45.00
  • Administrative processing: $8.50
  • Environmental compliance fee: $15.25 Total monthly stormwater bill: $251.50 Quarterly billing cycle = $754.50 per quarter

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain stormwater fee calculations based on property characteristics and educate customers about environmental compliance requirements. QA → Must validate stormwater fee calculations based on property data and verify proper application of environmental service charges. Engineers/Interns → Must understand property-based fee calculations, environmental compliance integration, and stormwater management billing logic.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 includes stormwater fees:

  • Predefined service charge: "Strom Water Fee" (note: appears to be typo for "Storm Water Fee")
  • Can be configured as fixed or variable charge
  • Quarterly billing frequency supported

Scenario 15 – Large Commercial Multi-Utility with Discounts

Scenario Description A large commercial customer receives volume discounts and negotiated rates across multiple utility services with complex discount structures.

Objective (Why)

  • Retain high-value commercial customers through competitive pricing
  • Maximize revenue from large accounts while maintaining profitability
  • Provide comprehensive utility solutions for major commercial clients

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of 8 major commercial accounts worth $3.8M annually
  • Inability to compete with bundled commercial utility offerings
  • $450K annual revenue reduction from customers negotiating individual utility contracts

Scenario Explanation - in short Regional Hospital Complex monthly usage: Electricity: 125,000 kWh × $0.089/kWh = $11,125.00 Water: 28,500 gallons × $0.0065/gallon = $185.25 Gas: 15,200 cubic feet × $0.68/cubic ft = $10,336.00 Subtotal: $21,646.25 Large customer discount (8%): -$1,731.70

Service charges:

  • Electric delivery rate: $875.00
  • Water service fees: $125.00
  • Distribution charges: $285.00
  • Large account management: $150.00 Total monthly bill: $21,349.55

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must manage complex large customer relationships, explain discount structures, and coordinate multi-utility service delivery. QA → Must validate volume discount calculations across multiple utilities and verify complex billing with multiple service components. Engineers/Interns → Must understand large customer discount logic, multi-utility rate integration, and complex commercial billing processes.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits well with customization:

  • Multi-utility plans supported
  • Volume discounts can be implemented through service charge modifications
  • Large customer service charges available
  • Complex billing calculations supported

Scenario 16 – Prepaid Utility Service Plan

Scenario Description Customers need prepaid utility service where they pay in advance and service is disconnected when credit balance reaches zero.

Objective (Why)

  • Reduce bad debt and collection costs through prepaid model
  • Provide service options for customers with credit challenges
  • Improve cash flow through advance payment collection

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $890K annual bad debt from customers with payment difficulties
  • Collection costs of $125K annually for delinquent accounts
  • Loss of 450 potential customers who cannot qualify for standard credit terms

Scenario Explanation - in short James Wilson has credit challenges and chooses prepaid electricity: Current balance: $125.00 Monthly usage estimate: 650 units × $0.095/unit = $61.75 Service charges: $18.50 delivery + $8.99 admin = $27.49 Estimated monthly cost: $89.24 Remaining balance after month: $35.76 System sends low balance alert at $25.00 threshold Automatic disconnection if balance reaches $0.00

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must help prepaid customers understand balance management, usage monitoring, and payment options to avoid service disconnection. QA → Must test prepaid balance calculations, automatic disconnect thresholds, and customer notification systems for low balances. Engineers/Interns → Must understand prepaid account logic, real-time balance tracking, and automated service control based on account credits.

Does it fit in SMART360 ⚠️ Major gap - SMART360 lacks prepaid functionality:

  • No prepaid account management features shown
  • No real-time balance tracking or usage monitoring
  • Gap: Prepaid requires significant system enhancement
  • Recommendation: Major development needed for prepaid utility services

Scenario 17 – Municipal Water with Late Payment Penalties

Scenario Description Municipal water customers face progressive late payment penalties and potential service disconnection for overdue accounts.

Objective (Why)

  • Encourage timely payment through progressive penalty structure
  • Minimize collection costs and bad debt through payment incentives
  • Maintain cash flow for essential municipal water services

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $325K annual revenue loss from delayed payments without penalty incentives
  • Increased collection costs of $85K annually for overdue account management
  • Service disruption affecting 12% of municipal customers due to poor payment timing

Scenario Explanation - in short City resident Lisa Park's water bill payment timeline: Original bill (due Feb 15): $67.85 Late payment fee (Feb 16-25): $12.50 (first 10 days) Additional penalty (Feb 26-Mar 7): $25.00 (next 10 days) Final notice fee (Mar 8+): $35.00 Disconnect notice fee: $45.00 Total if paid March 10: $67.85 + $12.50 + $25.00 + $35.00 = $140.35 Potential additional: $45.00 disconnect fee if not paid by March 15

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain late payment fee structure to customers and help them understand escalating penalties for overdue payments. QA → Must validate progressive late fee calculations, proper fee timing, and accurate penalty application based on payment dates. Engineers/Interns → Must understand late payment logic, automated fee calculations, and progressive penalty structures based on overdue periods.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 includes late payment features:

  • Predefined service charge: "Late Payment"
  • Can be configured as progressive fees
  • System can track payment timing and apply appropriate penalties

Scenario 18 – Electricity with Renewable Energy Credits

Scenario Description Environmentally conscious customers purchase renewable energy credits (RECs) as an add-on to standard electricity service.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide environmental sustainability options for eco-conscious customers
  • Generate additional revenue through renewable energy credit sales
  • Support renewable energy development through customer participation

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of 280 environmentally conscious customers to green energy competitors
  • $156K annual revenue loss from REC sales opportunities
  • Reputational damage affecting customer acquisition in sustainability-focused market segments

Scenario Explanation - in short Environmental advocate Susan Chen opts for 100% renewable energy credits: Standard electricity: 485 kWh × $0.098/kWh = $47.53 Renewable energy credits: 485 kWh × $0.025/kWh = $12.13 Service charges:

  • Electric delivery rate: $22.50
  • Distribution service charges: $15.75
  • Green energy processing: $3.99 Total monthly bill: $101.90 Certificate shows 485 kWh from renewable sources

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must educate customers about renewable energy credits, environmental benefits, and additional costs for green energy options. QA → Must validate REC calculations, proper credit application, and accurate green energy billing components. Engineers/Interns → Must understand renewable energy credit logic, environmental tracking, and add-on service billing integration.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits with service charge configuration:

  • RECs can be implemented as additional service charges
  • Variable pricing based on consumption (kWh-based)
  • Green energy fees can be added to standard electricity plans

Scenario 19 – Security Deposit Management Plan

Scenario Description New customers and those with credit issues must pay security deposits that are managed, tracked, and potentially refunded over time.

Objective (Why)

  • Mitigate credit risk through security deposit collection
  • Provide service access for customers with credit challenges
  • Maintain proper escrow management for customer deposits

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • $425K annual bad debt from customers without adequate credit protection
  • Regulatory compliance issues for improper deposit handling
  • Loss of potential customers who need deposit options to establish service

Scenario Explanation - in short New customer Mike Torres establishes service with credit challenges: Required security deposit: $225.00 (based on estimated usage) Monthly electricity bill: $89.45 Security deposit status:

  • Held in interest-bearing account: $225.00
  • Accrued interest (annual 2%): $0.38/month
  • Eligible for refund after 12 months of on-time payments
  • Applied to final bill upon service termination Deposit refund conditions: 12 consecutive on-time payments

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must explain security deposit requirements, refund conditions, and interest accrual to customers establishing new service. QA → Must validate security deposit calculations, interest accrual, and proper deposit management throughout customer lifecycle. Engineers/Interns → Must understand deposit tracking logic, escrow account management, and automated refund processing based on payment history.

Does it fit in SMART360Fits perfectly - SMART360 includes security deposits:

  • Predefined service charge: "Security Deposit"
  • System can track deposits and manage refunds
  • Account management supports deposit lifecycle

Scenario 20 – Bulk Billing for Apartment Complex

Scenario Description Property management companies need master-metered utility billing for apartment complexes with allocation to individual units.

Objective (Why)

  • Provide utility solutions for multi-unit residential properties
  • Enable property managers to allocate costs fairly among tenants
  • Reduce infrastructure costs through master metering

If Not Set – Business Impact

  • Loss of 45 property management accounts worth $1.8M annually
  • Inability to serve multi-unit residential market segment
  • Property managers choose competitors offering bulk billing solutions

Scenario Explanation - in short Sunset Apartments (24 units) master meter billing: Total complex usage: 28,500 kWh × $0.092/kWh = $2,622.00 Complex service charges: $185.00 Total master bill: $2,807.00

Property manager allocation (per unit): Average per unit: $2,807.00 ÷ 24 units = $116.96 Actual allocation by square footage:

  • 1BR units (650 sq ft): $98.50
  • 2BR units (850 sq ft): $128.75
  • 3BR units (1,100 sq ft): $166.50 Property manager handles individual tenant billing

Audience (Why it Matters) - in short CSM → Must work with property managers to explain master billing, allocation methodologies, and tenant billing responsibilities. QA → Must validate master meter billing calculations and ensure proper integration with property management allocation systems. Engineers/Interns → Must understand bulk billing logic, master meter configurations, and property management billing interfaces.

Does it fit in SMART360 ⚠️ Partial fit - SMART360 can handle master billing:

  • Large commercial billing capabilities support bulk usage
  • Gap: No built-in unit allocation or sub-metering features
  • Recommendation: Property manager handles allocation outside system
  • Master billing works, tenant allocation requires external management