Utility management (ONB02US06)

Utility management (ONB02US06)

Coverage1. SummaryProblem Statement

Core Problem

Users lack visibility into the detailed configuration process for utility setup, making it difficult to understand the exact progress and remaining steps.

Pain Points

• Inability to track specific configuration steps
• Unclear which steps are completed or pending
• No clear indication of mandatory vs. optional configuration steps

2. Who Are the Users Facing the Problem?

System Admin

• Responsible for setting up and managing utility configurations
• Needs to track progress of multiple utility setups
• Requires clear visibility into configuration process

3. Jobs To Be Done

For System Admin:

• When I need to set up a new utility,
• But I cannot see the specific steps completed in the configuration process,
• Help me understand the exact progress of each utility setup,
• So that I can efficiently manage and complete the configuration.

4. Solution

Key Capability Areas

1. TotalProgress CoverageTracking:
   • Detailed 100%step-by-step configuration progress
   • Visual indicator for completed and pending steps
   • Step completion status

5. Major Steps Involved

1. Navigate to Setup Dashboard
2. Select a utility to configure
3. View detailed configuration steps
4. Complete each configuration step
5. Track overall and individual step progress
6. Receive guidance on remaining steps

6. Flow Diagram

7. Business Rules

• All 6 configuration steps must be clearly defined
• Progress percentage must accurately reflect completed steps
• Mandatory steps must be clearly distinguished
• Users cannot complete utility setup without finishing mandatory steps
• Required Fields:
  • Utility Name (34marked Testwith Cases/17 Acceptance Criteriaasterisk * 100))
  • Email (marked with asterisk *)
  • Contact Number (marked with asterisk *)
  • City (marked with asterisk *)
  • Address (marked with asterisk *)
• Optional Fields:
  • Website URL
  • Logo Upload
• Field Validations:
  • Utility Name: Must be filled with a valid utility name
  • Email: Must be a valid email format (example shows contacts@example.com)
  • Contact Number: Must follow proper phone number format (example shows (123) 456-7890)
  • City: Must be selected from a dropdown menu
  • Address: Must contain a complete address
  • Website URL: Should follow proper URL format if provided (example shows https://www.example.com)
• User Actions:
  • "Cancel" button: Likely discards form data and closes the dialog
  • "Save Utility" button: Submits the form data and adds the utility to the system
  • "Click to upload logo" area: Allows users to upload a utility company logo
• UI Elements:
  • Modal/Dialog box with close (X) button in top-right corner
  • Dropdown selection for City
  • Text input fields for other data
  • File upload mechanism for the logo

Total8. TestSample CasesData:

• Utility 34Name: Metropolitan Water District
• Email: contact@metrowater.com
• Contact Number: (26415) Functional + 5 Performance/Integration + 3 Security)555-8734
• City: San Francisco
• Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110
• Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com
• Logo Upload: [Metropolitan Water District logo file]

Total9. Acceptance Criteria:

1. The 17
4. Prioritysystem Distribution:must P1-Criticaldisplay (47%) + P2-High (35%) + P3-Medium (18%)

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

• Core Functionality: Setup dashboard, utility configuration, progress tracking
• Business Rules: Progress calculations, field validations, status indicators
• User Journeys: Complete utility setup workflow
• Integration Points: Organization setup dependency, country/state/city dropdown population
• Data Flow: Utility data creation, progress calculation, status updates

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

• Performance: Dashboard load times, form submission, progress calculations
• Security: Form validation, file upload security, data protection
• Compatibility: Cross-browser, responsive design
• Usability: Navigation flow, error handling, guidance tooltips
• Reliability: Data integrity, calculation accuracy, state persistence

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

• Boundary Conditions: Field character limits, file size limits
• Invalid Inputs: Malformed emails, invalid phone numbers, unauthorized file types
• System Failures: Network issues, upload failures
• Data Inconsistencies: Incomplete configurations, progress calculation edge cases







---







Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_001

Title: Verifya detailed breakdown of 6 configuration steps display

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_001
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Organization setup module
• Code_Module_Mapped: Setup Dashboard
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC1
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Organization setup completed
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Valid organization setup data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Organization setup completed
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Valid system admin credentials
• Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Login successful, dashboard accessible	Username: admin@test.com, Password: Test123!	Valid credentials
2	Navigate to Setup Dashboard	Setup Dashboard loads successfully	N/A	Check URL routing
3	Verify configuration steps display	System displays exactly 6 configuration steps clearly labeled	N/A	Count and verify step names
4	Check step breakdown detail	Each step showsmust detailedhave breakdown with clear descriptions	N/A	Verify readability

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System displays exactly 6 configuration steps with detailed breakdown
• Secondary_Verifications: Steps are clearly labeled and organized
• Negative_Verification: No missing or extra steps beyond 6




---




ONB02US06_TC_002

Title: Verify each step hasa clear status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_002
• CreatedUsers By:must Sarvesh
• Createdbe Date:able June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Progress tracking system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Tracking
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC2
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Setup dashboard access
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Fresh utility setup state

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Clean setup state
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Various utility completion states
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Setup Dashboard with new utility	All steps show "Not Started" status	Utility: New Test Utility	Fresh state
2	Complete first configuration step	First step shows "Completed", others "Not Started"	Complete basic info	Status update
3	Partially complete second step	Second step shows "In Progress", first "Completed"	Partial form data	Mid-state verification
4	Verify status consistency	Each step accurately reflects its completion state	N/A	Cross-validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Each step displays correct status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)
• Secondary_Verifications: Status updates reflect actual completion state
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect status displays




---




ONB02US06_TC_003

Title: Verify users canto see which steps are mandatory

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_003
• CreatedThe By:overall Sarveshprogress percentage must match completed steps
• CreatedUsers Date:should Junereceive 17,guidance 2025on incomplete steps
• Version:The 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: Business rules engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: Step Validation
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC3
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Setupconfiguration dashboard accessmust be intuitive and easy to navigate
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Step configuration data

Prerequisites10. Process Changes

• Setup_Requirements: Setup dashboard accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Step mandatory/optional configuration
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Aspect	Current Process	New Process	Impact
Progress Tracking	Opaque	Transparent step-by-step	Improved user understanding (+50% clarity)
Step #Visibility	Limited	Detailed step status	Enhanced user control (+40% efficiency

Action11. Impact from Solving This Problem

Metric	Improvement
User Confidence	ExpectedIncreased Resultby	Test Data	Comments60%
1	Access Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads with step indicators	N/A	Initial state
2	Review each configuration step	Mandatory steps clearly marked with visual indicators	N/A	Visual distinction
3	Identify optional steps	Optional steps distinguished from mandatory ones	N/A	Clear differentiation
4	Verify mandatory step indicators	All required steps have consistent mandatory marking	N/A	Consistency check

VerificationConfiguration Points

• Primary_Verification:Completion Mandatory steps are clearly distinguished with visual indicators
• Secondary_Verifications: Optional steps are clearly marked as non-mandatory
• Negative_Verification: No ambiguity between mandatory and optional steps

---

ONB02US06_TC_004

Title: Verify overall progress percentage matches completed steps with formula

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_004
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC4
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Progress calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Multiple utility completion states

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different completion states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Various utility progress percentages
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Procedure

Step #Rate	ActionImproved by	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments35%
1User Satisfaction	CreateEnhanced utilityby with 45

12. 0User stepsBehavior completedTracking

Metric	Event	Purpose
Step Completion Time	ProgressConfiguration showsStep 0% using formula: (0/6)*100 = 0%Completed	Utility:Understand Teststep Utility A	Baselinecomplexity
2Abandoned Configurations	CompleteSetup 3Process out of 6 stepsAbandoned	ProgressIdentify showsfriction 50% using formula: (3/6)*100 = 50%	Complete: Basic Info, Contact, Address	Mid-progresspoints
3Guidance Interaction	CompleteHelp allTooltip 6 stepsViewed	ProgressMeasure showsuser 100%support using formula: (6/6)*100 = 100%	Complete all configuration steps	Full completion
4	Verify overall progress calculation	Overall progress = (Sum of individual utilities progress) / (Number of utilities)	Multiple utilities with varying progress	Formula validationneed

Verification13. PointsWireframe

https://orgflow-simplifier.lovable.app/

• Primary_Verification:

  
  

  14. Enhancement In The Latest Release

  Setup Dashboard - Business Rules

  1. Overall progressSetup Progress

  • Definition: Displays the average setup completion percentage across all configured utilities.
  • Progress Calculation:
    Overall Setup Progress 
  • 
  • Status Indicator:
    • If progress is 100%, status = "Complete."
    • If progress is less than 100%, status = "In Progress."

  2. Configured Utilities List

  • Utility Display:
    • Each configured utility card must show:
      • Utility Name
      • Description
      • Setup Progress Bar and %
      • Activation Status (Active / Inactive)
      • "Edit" and "Continue Setup" buttons
  • Activation Toggle:
    • Users can activate or deactivate a utility instantly by switching the toggle.
    • No minimum progress % required to activate/deactivate.
  • Progress Visibility:
    • Setup Progress must be displayed as a horizontal progress bar along with a numerical percentage.

  3. Add/Edit New Utility Form

  • State:
    • Must select from predefined dropdown options which will come from selected country in organisation setup.
  • City:
    • Must select from predefined dropdown options based on selected State.
  • GST/HST/VAGST Registration:
    • Optional field.
    • If entered, alphanumeric only; max 30 characters.

  4. Welcome to your Setup Dashboard

  • Display the hardcode text
    • 

  UI Rules

  • The Icons should be Same which are outline with background icon
  • The animations should work as same in the given lovable design.

  Acceptance criteria

  1. The system must display the average setup completion percentage across all configured utilities
  2. The system must calculate overall setup progress using the formula: (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
  3. Secondary_Verifications: Individual utility progress = (Completed steps / Total steps) * 100
  3. Negative_Verification: Progress never exceeds 100% or shows negative values

---

ONB02US06_TC_005

Title: Verify users receive guidance on incomplete steps

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_005
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: User Guidance
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: Help system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Guidance System
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC5
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_003, ONB02US06_TC_013

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Guidance tooltip system
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Incomplete utility configurations

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Utilities with incomplete steps
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Partially completed utilities
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access utility with incomplete steps	System identifies incomplete steps	Utility with 3/6 steps completed	Partial completion
2	Hover over incomplete step	Guidance tooltip appears with next actions	Incomplete step indicator	Tooltip display
3	Click on incomplete step	Detailed guidance panel opens with step requirements	Step 4: Logo Upload	Detailed guidance
4	Review guidance content	Clear instructions provided for completing the step	N/A	Content quality

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Users receive clear guidance on incomplete steps
• Secondary_Verifications: Guidance includes specific next actions and requirements
• Negative_Verification: No guidance shown for completed steps

---

ONB02US06_TC_006

Title: Verify configuration dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_006
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: UI framework
• Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard UI
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC6
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
• Dependencies: Dashboard framework
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Sample utility data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Multiple utilities in different states
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access setup dashboard	Dashboard loads with clear layout and organization	N/A	Initial impression
2	Navigate between different sections	Smooth transitions, clear navigation paths	Various dashboard sections	Navigation flow
3	Test responsive design	Dashboard adapts to different screen sizes	Desktop, Tablet, Mobile views	Responsive behavior
4	Evaluate overall user experience	Interface is intuitive, elements are logically placed	N/A	UX assessment

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate
• Secondary_Verifications: Clear visual hierarchy, logical element placement
• Negative_Verification: No confusing navigation patterns or hidden functionality

---

ONB02US06_TC_007

Title: Verify average setup completion percentage display across utilities

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_007
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: Progress calculation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC7
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004, ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Progress calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different completion states

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple configured utilities
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Utilities with varying progress percentages
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create multiple utilities with different progress	System tracks individual utility progress	Utility A: 50%, Utility B: 75%, Utility C: 100%	Setup state
2	Access setup dashboard	Dashboard displays average setup completion percentage	N/A	Dashboard view
3	Verify calculation accuracy	Average = (50% + 75% + 100%) / 3 = 75%	Three utilities with known progress	Formula verification
4	Add new utility with 0% progress	Average recalculates to (50% + 75% + 100% + 0%) / 4 = 56.25%	New utility with no progress	Dynamic calculation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Average setup completion = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
• Secondary_Verifications: Percentage updates dynamically when utilities are added/modified
• Negative_Verification: Calculation handles division by zero and edge cases

---

ONB02US06_TC_008

Title: Verify overall setup progress calculation formula implementation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_008
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC8
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004, ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Progress calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with precise progress values

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: CleanThe system state
• User_Roles_Permissions:must System Admin
• Test_Data: Utilities with calculated progress values
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create single utility, complete 0 steps	Individual progress = (0/6)*100 = 0%, Overall = 0%	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Baseline
2	Complete 2 steps	Individual progress = (2/6)*100 = 33.33%, Overall = 33.33%	Complete: Basic Info, Contact	Partial progress
3	Add second utility, complete 6 steps	Utility2 progress = (6/6)*100 = 100%, Overall = (33.33+100)/2 = 66.67%	Second utility fully completed	Two utilities
4	Add third utility, complete 3 steps	Utility3 progress = (3/6)*100 = 50%, Overall = (33.33+100+50)/3 = 61.11%	Third utility half completed	Three utilities

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Overall Setup Progress = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
• Secondary_Verifications: Individual utility progress = (Completed steps / Total steps) * 100
• Negative_Verification: Formula handles decimal precision and rounding correctly

---

ONB02US06_TC_009

Title: Verifyshow status showsas "Complete" when progress reaches 100%

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_009
• CreatedThe By:system Sarvesh
• Createdmust Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Status Indicator
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: Status calculation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Status Calculator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC9
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008, ONB02US06_TC_010

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Status calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Fully completed utility

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Utility with all steps completable
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Complete utility configuration data
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new utility	Initialshow status shows "In Progress", progress = 0%	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Initial state
2	Complete 5 out of 6 steps	Status remains "In Progress", progress = 83.33%	Complete all except logo	Near completion
3	Complete final step (6/6)	Status changes to "Complete", progress = 100%	Upload logo file	Full completion
4	Verify status consistency	Status = "Complete" when progress = 100%	N/A	Status validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Status shows "Complete" when progress reaches exactly 100%
• Secondary_Verifications: Status updates immediately upon completion
• Negative_Verification: Status only shows "Complete" at 100%, not before

---

ONB02US06_TC_010

Title: Verify status showsas "In Progress" when progress is less than 100%

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_010
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Status Indicator
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: Status calculation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Status Calculator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC10
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008, ONB02US06_TC_009

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Status calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Partially completed utilities

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Utilities with various completion states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Partial utility configuration data
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_009

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new utility with 0% progress	Status shows "In Progress"	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Initial state
2	Complete 1 step (16.67% progress)	Status remains "In Progress"	Complete: Utility Name	Low progress
3	Complete 3 steps (50% progress)	Status remains "In Progress"	Complete: Name, Email, Contact	Mid progress
4	Complete 5 steps (83.33% progress)	Status remains "In Progress"	Complete all except logo	High progress

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Status shows "In Progress" for any progress < 100%
• Secondary_Verifications: Status remains consistent across different progress levels
• Negative_Verification: Status never shows "Complete" until 100% reached

---

ONB02US06_TC_011

Title: Verify utility card displays Name, Description, Progress Bar, and Activation Status

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_011
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Utility Cards
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: UI renderingThe system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Utilitymust Carddisplay Component
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC11
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007, ONB02US06_TC_012

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: UI rendering framework
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Configured utility with complete data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: At least oneeach configured utility
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Complete utility information
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access utilities dashboard	Dashboard displays configured utilities as cards	N/A	Card layout
2	Verify utility name display	Card shows "Metropolitan Water District"	Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District	Name visibility
3	Check description field	Card displays utility description clearly	Description: Water supply services	Description display
4	Validate progress bar	Horizontal progress bar shows with percentage (e.g., 75%)	Current progress: 75%	Visual progress
5	Check activation status	Card shows "Active" or "Inactive" status clearly	Status: Active	Status indicator

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Each utilitya card displayscontaining Utility Name, Description, Setup Progress Bar with %,percentage, and Activation Status (Active/Inactive)
• Secondary_Verifications:The Allsystem elementsmust areprovide clearly visible"Edit" and properly formatted
• Negative_Verification: No missing or overlapping elements in card layout

---

ONB02US06_TC_012

Title: Verify Edit and Continue Setup buttons functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_012
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Utility Cards
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Form navigation system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Button Actions
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC12
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Form navigation system
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Utilities with different completion states

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Utilities with partial and complete configurations
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Utility configurations in various states
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate utility card with incomplete setup	Card displays "Continue Setup" button	Utility:buttons 50%for complete	Partial setup
2	Click "Continue Setup" button	System navigates to next incomplete step	N/A	Navigation flow
3	Locateeach utility card with complete setup	Card displays "Edit" button	Utility: 100% complete	Complete setup
4	Click "Edit" button	System opens utility edit form	N/A	Edit functionality
5	Verify button states	Buttons are enabled and responsive	N/A	UI responsiveness

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Edit and Continue Setup buttons function correctly and navigate appropriately
• Secondary_Verifications:The Buttonsystem statesmust matchallow utilityusers completionto status
• Negative_Verification: Buttons are not disabledactivate or non-functional

---

ONB02US06_TC_013

Title: Verify activation toggle switch functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_013
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Activation Toggle
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: State management system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Toggle Controller
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC13
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_014

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: State management service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Utility with activation capability

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Configured utility available
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Utility in active/inactive state
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate utility with "Active" status	Toggle switch shows "ON" position	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Active state
2	Click toggle to deactivate	Switch moves to "OFF", status changes to "Inactive" instantly	N/A	Deactivation
3	Click toggle to reactivate	Switch moves to "ON", status changes to "Active" instantly	N/A	Reactivation
4	Verify state persistence	Status remains consistent after page refresh	N/A	Persistence check

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Users can activate/deactivate utilities instantly using a toggle switch
• Secondary_Verifications:The Togglesystem state reflects current activation status
• Negative_Verification: Toggle doesmust not require minimum progress percentage

---

ONB02US06_TC_014

Title: Verify no minimum progress requirement for activation toggle

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_014
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Activation Toggle
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: Business rules engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: Activation Controller
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC14
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_013, ONB02US06_TC_015

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Business rules service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: New utility with 0% progress

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Utility with minimal configuration
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Utility with 0% setup progress
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_013

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new utility with 0% progress	Utility created successfully	Utility: Test Utility Zero Progress	Minimal setup
2	Locate activation toggle	Toggle switch is available and enabled	N/A	Toggle accessibility
3	Attempt to activate utility	Toggleor switchesdeactivate to "Active" without restriction	N/A	No blocking
4	Verify activation success	Utility status shows "Active" despite 0% progress	N/A	Business rule validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Activation toggle works regardless of progress percentageutilities
• Secondary_Verifications:The Nosystem minimummust progress validation prevents activation
• Negative_Verification: System does not block activation for incomplete utilities

---

ONB02US06_TC_015

Title: Verifydisplay setup progress displaysas asa horizontal progress bar with numerical percentage

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_015
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Progress Display
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: UI renderingThe system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Progressmust Barprovide Component
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC15
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: UI rendering framework
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Utilities with various progress levels

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Utilities with different completion percentages
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Progress values at different levels
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View utility with 0% progress	Horizontal progress bar shows empty, displays "0%"	Utility with 0 completed steps	Minimum state
2	View utility with 50% progress	Horizontal progress bar shows half-filled, displays "50%"	Utility with 3/6 completed steps	Mid-range
3	View utility with 100% progress	Horizontal progress bar shows completely filled, displays "100%"	Utility with 6/6 completed steps	Maximum state
4	Verify visual consistency	All progress bars use consistent horizontal layout and styling	N/A	Visual standards

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Setup progress displays as horizontal progress bar with numerical percentage
• Secondary_Verifications: Progress bar visual accurately represents percentage value
• Negative_Verification: No vertical or alternative progress indicators used

---

ONB02US06_TC_016

Title: Verifya State field with predefined dropdown based on country selection

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_016
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Location Selection
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Organization setup module
• Code_Module_Mapped: Location Service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC16
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_017, ONB02US06_TC_022

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Organization setup service, location data service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Organization with country selection

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Organization setup with country selected
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Country selection from organization setup
• Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Add/Edit Utility form	Form loads with State dropdown field	N/A	Form availability
2	Click State dropdown	Dropdown shows predefined options based on organization'sthe country	Country: United States	Country dependency
3	Verify state options	Only states/provinces for selected countryin appear	Expected:organisation California,setup The Texas,system Newmust York, etc.	Filtered list
4	Selectprovide a state	State selection successful, dropdown closes	Selected: California	Selection functionality

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: StateCity field containswith predefined dropdown options based on country selected in organization setup
• Secondary_Verifications: State options are filtered and relevant to organization's country
• Negative_Verification: States from other countries are not displayed

---

ONB02US06_TC_017

Title: Verify City field with predefined dropdown based onthe selected State

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_017
• CreatedThe By:system Sarveshmust provide an optional GST/HST/VAGST Registration field
• CreatedThe Date:system Junemust 17,accept 2025
• Version:only 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature:alphanumeric Location Selection
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Location data service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Location Service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC17
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016, ONB02US06_TC_022

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Location data service, state selection
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: State selection dependency

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: State selected in utility form
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: State selection (e.g., California)
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Select state from dropdown	State selection successful	Selected State: California	State dependency
2	Click City dropdown	City dropdown becomes enabled and populated	N/A	Cascade activation
3	Verify city options	Cities relevant to selected state appear	Expected: San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego	Filtered cities
4	Select a city	City selection successful	Selected City: San Francisco	Selection complete

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: City field provides predefined dropdown options based on selected State
• Secondary_Verifications: City options are filtered and relevant to selected state
• Negative_Verification: Cities from other states are not displayed

---

ONB02US06_TC_018

Title: Verify required fields validation with asterisk marking

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_018
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Form Validation
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: Form validation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Form Validator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Required Fields
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Form validation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Form validation rules

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Required field validation scenarios
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Add Utility form	Form displays with required fields marked with asterisk (*)	N/A	Visual indicators
2	Verify required field marking	Utility Name*, Email*, Contact Number*, City*, Address* show asterisk	Required fields list	Field identification
3	Submit form with empty required fields	Validation errors appearcharacters for allGST/HST/VAGST requiredRegistration fields	Leave required fields empty	Validation trigger
4	Fill one required field, submit	Validation errors appear for remaining empty required fields	Fill only Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District	Partial validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Required fields (Utility Name, Email, Contact Number, City, Address) are marked with asterisk *field
• Secondary_Verifications:The Formsystem validationmust prevents submission without required fields
• Negative_Verification: Optional fields do not show asterisk marking

---

ONB02US06_TC_019

Title: Verify optional fields functionality (Website URL, Logo Upload)

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_019

• Created By: Sarvesh

• Created Date: June 17, 2025

• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Form Validation

• Test Type: Functional

• Test Level: System

• Priority: P2-High

• Execution Phase: Regression

• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All

• Revenue_Impact: Medium

• Business_Priority: Should-Have

• Customer_Journey: Onboarding

• Compliance_Required: No

• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium

• Complexity_Level: Low

• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes

• Reproducibility_Score: High

• Data_Sensitivity: Low

• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%

• Integration_Points: File upload service

• Code_Module_Mapped: Optional Fields Handler

• Requirement_Coverage: Complete

• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA

• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage

• Trend_Tracking: Yes

• Executive_Visibility: No

• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Optional Fields

• Related_Bugs: N/A

• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018, ONB02US06_TC_021

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging

• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

• Dependencies: File upload service

• Performance_Baseline: <1s

• Data_Requirements: Optional field test data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible

• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin

• Test_Data: Optional field values and files

• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Add Utility form	Form displays optional fields without asterisk marking	N/A	Optional field identification
2	Submit form with only required fields filled	Form submission successful without optional fields	Required fields: Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com, Contact: (415) 555-8734, City: San Francisco, Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue	Successful submission
3	Add optional Website URL	URL field accepts valid format	Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com	URL validation
4	Upload optional logo	File upload successful with supported formats	Logo file: PNG/JPG format	File upload

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Optional fields (Website URL, Logo Upload) do not prevent form submission when empty

• Secondary_Verifications: Optional fields accept valid data when provided

• Negative_Verification: Form does not require optional fields for completion

---

ONB02US06_TC_020

Title: Verify field validation rules implementation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_020
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Form Validation
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: Validation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Field Validator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Field Validations
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018, ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Validation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid test data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Form validation rules configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Valid and invalid field data
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter invalid email format	Validation error: "Invalid email format"	Email: invalid-email	Email validation
2	Enter valid email format	No validation error, field accepts input	Email: contact@metrowater.com	Valid email
3	Enter invalid phone format	Validation error: "Invalid phone format"	Phone: 123abc	Phone validation
4	Enter valid phone format	No validation error, field accepts input	Phone: (415) 555-8734	Valid phone
5	Enter invalid URL format	Validation error: "Invalid URL format"	URL: invalid-url	URL validation
6	Enter valid URL format	No validation error, field accepts input	URL: https://www.metrowater.com	Valid URL

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Field validations enforce proper formats for Email, Contact Number, Website URL
• Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and helpful
• Negative_Verification: Invalid data is rejected with appropriate error messages

---

ONB02US06_TC_021

Title: Verifylimit GST/HST/VAGST Registration field functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_021
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Tax Registration
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Tax validation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Tax Field Handler
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Business Rules - GST/HST/VAGST Registration
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Tax validation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Tax registration test data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Various tax registration formats
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate GST/HST/VAGST Registration field	Field is present and marked as optional	N/A	Field presence
2	Enter alphanumeric value within limit	Field accepts valid alphanumeric input	GST: ABC123DEF456	Valid input
3	Enter 30-character alphanumeric value	Field acceptsto maximum length input	GST: ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRST	Max length
4	Attempt to enter 31+ characters	Field restricts input to 30 characters maximum	GST: ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRSTU+	Length restriction
5	Enter special characters	Field rejects special characters, shows validation error	GST: ABC@123#DEF	Invalid characters

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: GST/HST/VAGST Registration field accepts alphanumeric only, max 30 characters
• Secondary_Verifications:The Fieldsystem ismust optionaldisplay and doesn't prevent form submission when empty
• Negative_Verification: Field rejects special characters and enforces character limit

---

ONB02US06_TC_022

Title: Verifythe hardcoded welcome text display

Testas Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_022
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Welcome Message
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minute
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: None
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 5%
• Integration_Points: Content management system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Welcome Text Component
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Welcome Text
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Content rendering system
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Hardcoded text content

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Setup dashboard accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Expected welcome text content
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads successfully	N/A	Initial access
2	Locate welcome message area	"Welcome to your Setup Dashboard" text is displayed prominently	Expected text: "Welcome to your Setup Dashboard"	Text presence
3	Verify text formatting	Text is properly formatted and readable	N/A	Visual presentation
4	Check text consistency	Same welcome text appears consistently across sessions	N/A	Consistency check

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Hardcoded welcome text "Welcome to your Setup Dashboard" is displayed
• Secondary_Verifications: Text is properly formatted and positioned
• Negative_Verification: No dynamic or variable text elementsgiven in welcomebusiness message

---

ONB02US06_TC_023

Title: Verify outline icons with background consistency

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_023rule
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: UI Design
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: None
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 5%
• Integration_Points: Design system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Icon Component
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: UI Rules - Icons
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006, ONB02US06_TC_024

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: DesignThe system components
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Icon design specifications

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with icons accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Design guidelines reference
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Review dashboard icons	All iconsmust use outline style with background	N/A	Icon style verification
2	Check icon consistency	Icons maintain consistent outline and background design	N/A	Design consistency
3	Verify design guidelines compliance	Icons match specified design system standards	Reference: Lovable design	Design compliance
4	Test different icon states	Icons maintain style across hover, active, and default states	N/A	State consistency

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Icons use outline styleicons with background consistent with design guidelines
• Secondary_Verifications:The Iconsystem designmust is consistent across all dashboard elements
• Negative_Verification: No filled or inconsistent icon styles present

---

ONB02US06_TC_024

Title: Verifyimplement animations matchmatching the provided design specifications

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_024
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: UI Animations
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: None
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 5%
• Integration_Points: Animation framework
• Code_Module_Mapped: Animation Controller
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: UI Rules - Animations
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_023, ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Animation framework
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Animation specifications

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with animations accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Animation design reference
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate through dashboard sections	Page transitions animate smoothly	N/A	Transition animations
2	Interact with buttons and controls	Hover and click animations work as designed	N/A	Interactive animations
3	Compare with design reference	Animations match specifications from Lovable design	Reference: Lovable design animations	Design compliance
4	Test animation performance	Animations run smoothly without lag or stuttering	N/A	Performance validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Animations work as specified in the Lovable design reference
• Secondary_Verifications: Animations are smooth and enhance user experience
• Negative_Verification: No broken, missing, or jarring animation effects

---

Performance & Integration Test CasesWireframe

ONB02US06_TC_025

Title: Verify dashboard loading performance under 1 secondhttps://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1errs1E2ZCPORWhFyuNlNWVKYQ6oh6rBb8caMeR0oR2g/edit?usp=sharing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_025
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Performance
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: Performance monitoring system
• Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard Loader
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_027

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities for load testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Multiple utilities with varying completion states
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache	Cache cleared successfully	N/A	Clean state
2	Navigate to Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads in <1 second	N/A	Performance measurement
3	Measure load time with 10 utilities	Dashboard loads in <1 second with multiple utilities	10 utilities with varying progress	Load testing
4	Test with network throttling	Dashboard loads acceptably under slow connections	Simulate 3G connection	Network performance

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Dashboard loading time < 1 second under normal conditions
• Secondary_Verifications: Performance maintained with multiple utilities
• Negative_Verification: No performance degradation with data volume

---

ONB02US06_TC_026

Title: Verify utility creation/editing performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_026
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Performance
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Database performance
• Code_Module_Mapped: Utility CRUD Operations
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_027

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database performance monitoring
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Utility form data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Database performance monitoring enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Complete utility form data
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Fill utility creation form completely	Form accepts all data	Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com, Contact: (415) 555-8734, City: San Francisco, Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue	Complete data
2	Submit new utility creation	Utility created and saved in <1 second	N/A	Creation performance
3	Edit existing utility	Form loads existing data in <1 second	N/A	Edit performance
4	Save utility modifications	Changes saved in <1 second	Modified data	Save performance

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Utility creation/editing operations complete in <1 second
• Secondary_Verifications: Form responsiveness maintained during operations
• Negative_Verification: No timeout or delay issues during CRUD operations

---

ONB02US06_TC_027

Title: Verify progress calculation performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_027
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Performance
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Calculation engine performance
• Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_026

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Calculation engine monitoring
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities for calculation testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different progress states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: 50+ utilities with varying progress
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Complete a configuration step	Individual progress recalculates in <1 second using formula: (completed steps https:/ total steps) * 100	Complete step 3 of 6	Individual calculation
2	View overall progress dashboard	Overall progress calculation displays in <1 second using formula: (Sum of all utility progress) / (Number of utilities)	50 utilities with different progress	Bulk calculation
3	Add new utility	Progress recalculation with new utility in <1 second	Add 51st utility	Dynamic calculation
4	Delete utility	Progress recalculation after deletion in <1 second	Remove one utility	Deletion calculation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Progress calculations (individual and overall) complete in <1 second
• Secondary_Verifications: Real-time calculation updates without lag
• Negative_Verification: No calculation delays with large datasets

---

ONB02US06_TC_028

Title: Verify file upload performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_028
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Performance
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-External-Dependency, Performance

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 10%
• Integration_Points: File upload service
• Code_Module_Mapped: File Upload Handler
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_027

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: File upload service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Test logo files

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: File upload functionality accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Various logo file sizes and formats
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Upload small logo file (50KB)	File uploads and processes in <1 second	PNG file, 50KB	Small file
2	Upload medium logo file (200KB)	File uploads and processes in <1 second	JPG file, 200KB	Medium file
3	Upload large logo file (500KB)	File uploads within acceptable time	PNG file, 500KB	Large file
4	Test upload progress indicator	Progress indicator updates smoothly	Various file sizes	User feedback

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Logo file uploads complete in <1 second for typical file sizes
• Secondary_Verifications: Upload progress provides adequate user feedback
• Negative_Verification: No upload failures or timeouts for supported file sizes

---

ONB02US06_TC_029

Title: Verify API endpoints for utility CRUD operations

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_029
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: API Integration
• Test Type: API
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, API

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 25%
• Integration_Points: Backend API services
• Code_Module_Mapped: Utility API Controller
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, API-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: All API-related acceptance criteria
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_030

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Backend API services
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: API test data sets

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin API access
• Test_Data: Complete utility data payloads
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	POST /api/utilities (Create)	API returns 201 Created with utility object	{"name": "Metropolitan Water District", "email": "contact@metrowater.com", "phone": "(415) 555-8734", "city": "San Francisco", "address": "1234 Reservoir Avenue"}	Create operation
2	GET /api/utilities/:id (Read)	API returns 200 OK with utility details	Utility ID from step 1	Read operation
3	PUT /api/utilities/:id (Update)	API returns 200 OK with updated utility	{"email": "updated@metrowater.com"}	Update operation
4	DELETE /api/utilities/:id (Delete)	API returns 204 No Content	Utility ID from step 1	Delete operation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All CRUD API operations return correct HTTP status codes and data
• Secondary_Verifications: API responses include proper data validation and error handling
• Negative_Verification: Invalid requests return appropriate error codes (400, 404, 422)

---

Security Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_030

Title: Verify input validation prevents injection attacks

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_030
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Security
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 20%
• Integration_Points: Security validation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Input Validator
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Security validation requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_020, ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Security validation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Malicious input test cases

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Security validation enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: SQL injection and XSS attack vectors
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter SQL injection in utility name	Input rejected, validation error displayed	Name: '; DROP TABLE utilities; preview---	SQL injection attempt
2	Enter XSS script in description	Script sanitized or rejected	Description: <script>alert('XSS')</script>	XSS attempt
3	Enter malicious file upload	File rejected with appropriate error	File: malicious.exe	File security
4	Test CSRF protection	Form submission requires valid CSRF token	Invalid CSRF token	CSRF protection

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs are properly validated and rejected
• Secondary_Verifications: Error messages don't reveal system information
• Negative_Verification: No successful injection or script execution

---

ONB02US06_TC_031

Title: Verify file upload security restrictions

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_031
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Security
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: File security service
• Code_Module_Mapped: File Upload Security
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: File upload security requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_032

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: File security scanning service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Various file types for testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: File upload security enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Malicious and valid file samples
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Upload executable file	File rejected with security error	File: test.exe	Executable rejection
2	Upload oversized image	File rejected due to size limit	File: 10MB image	Size limitation
3	Upload valid image formats	Files accepted successfully	Files: PNG, JPG, GIF	Valid formats
4	Test file content validation	Files scanned for malicious content	File with embedded script	Content security

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Only safe file types (PNG, JPG, GIF) are accepted for logo upload
• Secondary_Verifications: File size limits are enforced
• Negative_Verification: Executable files and malicious content are blocked

---

ONB02US06_TC_032

Title: Verify user authorization and access control

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_032
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Security
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Authentication service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Access Control
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: User authorization requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication and authorization service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Different user role accounts

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple user roles configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin, Regular User accounts
• Test_Data: User credentials for different roles
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Access granted to utility management features	Admin credentials	Admin access
2	Access utility creation form	Form accessible and functional	N/A	Admin permissions
3	Login as Regular User	Limited access to utility features	User credentials	User access
4	Attempt utility creation as Regular User	Access denied or restricted functionality	N/A	Permission enforcement

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System Admin role has full access to utility management features
• Secondary_Verifications: Access control is properly enforced based on user roles
• Negative_Verification: Unauthorized users cannot access restricted functionality

---

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

ONB02US06_TC_033

Title: Verify system behavior with maximum character limits

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_033
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Edge Cases
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Validation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: Input Validation
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Edge-Cases
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Field validation requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_021, ONB02US06_TC_034

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Validation service
• Performance_Baseline: <1s
• Data_Requirements: Maximum length test strings

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Form validation enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Maximum length test strings
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_021

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter maximum allowed characters in Utility Name	Field accepts input at character limit	255 character string	Max length test
2	Attempt to exceed character limit in Utility Name	Field restricts input beyond limit	256+ character string	Overflow prevention
3	Enter exactly 30 characters in GST field	Field accepts maximum length	ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRST	GST max length
4	Test boundary conditions for all fields	All fields handle max length appropriately	Various max length strings	Boundary testing

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All fields properly enforce maximum character limits
• Secondary_Verifications: User receives clear feedback when limits are reached
• Negative_Verification: No data truncation or corruption at boundary conditions

---

ONB02US06_TC_034

Title: Verify system handling of network connectivity issues

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_034
• Created By: Sarvesh
• Created Date: June 17, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Error Handling
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 15%
• Integration_Points: Network error handling
• Code_Module_Mapped: Error Handler
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Error-Handling
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Error handling requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_033, ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Network simulation tools
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Network connectivity scenarios

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Network simulation capability
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
• Test_Data: Form data for testing
• Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate network disconnection during form submission	Graceful error handling with retry option	Complete utility form data: Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com	Network failure
2	Test slow network conditions	Loading indicators and timeout handling	N/A	Performance degradation
3	Simulate server unavailability	Appropriate error message displayed	N/A	Server error
4	Test automatic retry mechanisms	System attempts to reconnect and retry	N/A	Recovery testing

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System handles network issues gracefully with appropriate user feedback
• Secondary_Verifications: Data is not lost during network interruptions
• Negative_Verification: No system crashes or data corruption during network issues

---

Test Suite Definitions

Smoke Test Suite

Execution Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
 Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_006, ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_015
 Execution Frequency: Every build deployment
 Expected Duration: 15 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Execution Criteria: P1-P2 priority, automated tests
 Test Cases: All functional test cases (TC_001 through TC_024)
 Execution Frequency: Before each release
 Expected Duration: 2 hours

Performance Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Performance-critical operations
 Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_027, ONB02US06_TC_028
 Execution Frequency: Weekly performance testing
 Expected Duration: 30 minutes

Security Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Security-critical validations
 Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_031, ONB02US06_TC_032
 Execution Frequency: Before major releases
 Expected Duration: 45 minutes

API Test Suite

Execution Criteria: API integration validation
 Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_029
 Execution Frequency: Continuous integration
 Expected Duration: 10 minutes

Full Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Complete feature coverage
 Test Cases: All 34 test cases
 Execution Frequency: Major release cycles
 Expected Duration: 4 hourscoresetting-updated.lovable.app/

---

Execution Matrix

Browser/Device Coverage

Test Case Category	Chrome 115+	Firefox 110+	Safari 16+	Edge Latest	Mobile
Smoke Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Functional Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	Selected
Performance Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗
Security Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗
API Tests	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗

Environment Coverage

• Development: Smoke tests only
• Staging: Full test suite
• Production: Smoke tests + selected regression tests

---

Dependency Map

Test Execution Dependencies

1. Organization Setup → ONB02US06_TC_016, ONB02US06_TC_017
2. Basic Dashboard Access → ONB02US06_TC_001 → All subsequent tests
3. Progress Calculation → ONB02US06_TC_004 → ONB02US06_TC_007, ONB02US06_TC_008
4. Form Validation → ONB02US06_TC_018 → ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

External System Dependencies

• Organization Setup Module: Required for country/state/city dropdowns
• Authentication Service: Required for user access control
• File Upload Service: Required for logo upload functionality
• Location Data Service: Required for state/city dropdown population

---