Utility management (ONB02US06)

1.Coverage Problem StatementSummary

Core Problem

~~Users lack visibility into the detailed configuration process for utility setup, making it difficult to understand the exact progress and remaining steps.~~

Pain Points

~~Inability to track specific configuration steps~~
~~Unclear which steps are completed or pending~~
~~No clear indication of mandatory vs. optional configuration steps~~

2. Who Are the Users Facing the Problem?

~~System Admin~~

~~Responsible for setting up and managing utility configurations~~
~~Needs to track progress of multiple utility setups~~
~~Requires clear visibility into configuration process~~

3. Jobs To Be Done

~~For System Admin:~~

~~When I need to set up a new utility,~~
~~But I cannot see the specific steps completed in the configuration process,~~
~~Help me understand the exact progress of each utility setup,~~
~~So that I can efficiently manage and complete the configuration.~~

4. Solution

Key Capability Areas

~~Progress~~Total ~~Tracking~~Coverage
- ~~Detailed~~: ~~step-by-step~~100% ~~configuration~~(34 ~~progress~~Test Cases/17 Acceptance Criteria * 100)
- ~~Visual~~Total ~~indicator~~Test ~~for~~Cases: ~~completed~~34 ~~and~~(26 ~~pending~~Functional ~~steps~~+ 5 Performance/Integration + 3 Security)
- ~~Step completion status~~

5. Major Steps Involved

~~Navigate to Setup Dashboard~~
~~Select a utility to configure~~
~~View detailed configuration steps~~
~~Complete each configuration step~~
~~Track overall and individual step progress~~
~~Receive guidance on remaining steps~~

6. Flow Diagram

7. Business Rules

~~All 6 configuration steps must be clearly defined~~
~~Progress percentage must accurately reflect completed steps~~
~~Mandatory steps must be clearly distinguished~~
~~Users cannot complete utility setup without finishing mandatory steps~~
~~Required Fields:~~
- ~~Utility Name (marked with asterisk *)~~
- ~~Email (marked with asterisk *)~~
- ~~Contact Number (marked with asterisk *)~~
- ~~City (marked with asterisk *)~~
- ~~Address (marked with asterisk *)~~
~~Optional Fields:~~
- ~~Website URL~~
- ~~Logo Upload~~
~~Field Validations:~~
- ~~Utility Name: Must be filled with a valid utility name~~
- ~~Email: Must be a valid email format (example shows~~ ~~contacts@example.com~~)
- ~~Contact Number: Must follow proper phone number format (example shows (123) 456-7890)~~
- ~~City: Must be selected from a dropdown menu~~
- ~~Address: Must contain a complete address~~
- ~~Website URL: Should follow proper URL format if provided (example shows~~ ~~https://www.example.com~~)
~~User Actions:~~
- ~~"Cancel" button: Likely discards form data and closes the dialog~~
- ~~"Save Utility" button: Submits the form data and adds the utility to the system~~
- ~~"Click to upload logo" area: Allows users to upload a utility company logo~~
~~UI Elements:~~
- ~~Modal/Dialog box with close (X) button in top-right corner~~
- ~~Dropdown selection for City~~
- ~~Text input fields for other data~~
- ~~File upload mechanism for the logo~~

8. Sample Data

~~Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District~~
~~Email: contact@metrowater.com~~
~~Contact Number: (415) 555-8734~~
~~City: San Francisco~~
~~Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110~~
~~Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com~~
~~Logo Upload: [Metropolitan Water District logo file]~~

9.Total Acceptance Criteria

: 17

~~The~~Priority ~~system~~Distribution: ~~must~~P1-Critical ~~display~~(47%) a+ P2-High (35%) + P3-Medium (18%)

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality: Setup dashboard, utility configuration, progress tracking
Business Rules: Progress calculations, field validations, status indicators
User Journeys: Complete utility setup workflow
Integration Points: Organization setup dependency, country/state/city dropdown population
Data Flow: Utility data creation, progress calculation, status updates

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance: Dashboard load times, form submission, progress calculations
Security: Form validation, file upload security, data protection
Compatibility: Cross-browser, responsive design
Usability: Navigation flow, error handling, guidance tooltips
Reliability: Data integrity, calculation accuracy, state persistence

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions: Field character limits, file size limits
Invalid Inputs: Malformed emails, invalid phone numbers, unauthorized file types
System Failures: Network issues, upload failures
Data Inconsistencies: Incomplete configurations, progress calculation edge cases

Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_001

Title: Verify detailed breakdown of 6 configuration steps display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_001
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Organization setup module
Code_Module_Mapped: Setup Dashboard
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Organization setup completed
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Valid organization setup data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Organization setup completed
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Valid system admin credentials
Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Login successful, dashboard accessible	Username: admin@test.com, Password: Test123!	Valid credentials
2	Navigate to Setup Dashboard	Setup Dashboard loads successfully	N/A	Check URL routing
3	Verify configuration steps display	System displays exactly 6 configuration steps clearly labeled	N/A	Count and verify step names
4	Check step breakdown detail	Each step ~~must~~shows ~~have~~detailed abreakdown with clear descriptions	N/A	Verify readability

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System displays exactly 6 configuration steps with detailed breakdown
Secondary_Verifications: Steps are clearly labeled and organized
Negative_Verification: No missing or extra steps beyond 6

ONB02US06_TC_002

Title: Verify each step has clear status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_002
~~Users~~Created ~~must~~By: beSarvesh
Created ~~able~~Date: toJune 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Progress tracking system
Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Tracking
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC2
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Setup dashboard access
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Fresh utility setup state

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Clean setup state
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Various utility completion states
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Setup Dashboard with new utility	All steps show "Not Started" status	Utility: New Test Utility	Fresh state
2	Complete first configuration step	First step shows "Completed", others "Not Started"	Complete basic info	Status update
3	Partially complete second step	Second step shows "In Progress", first "Completed"	Partial form data	Mid-state verification
4	Verify status consistency	Each step accurately reflects its completion state	N/A	Cross-validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Each step displays correct status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)
Secondary_Verifications: Status updates reflect actual completion state
Negative_Verification: No incorrect status displays

ONB02US06_TC_003

Title: Verify users can see which steps are mandatory

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_003
~~The~~Created ~~overall~~By: ~~progress percentage must match completed steps~~Sarvesh
~~Users~~Created ~~should~~Date: ~~receive~~June ~~guidance~~17, ~~on incomplete steps~~2025
~~The~~Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: Business rules engine
Code_Module_Mapped: Step Validation
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC3
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Setup dashboard access
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Step configuration data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Setup dashboard ~~must~~accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: beSystem ~~intuitive~~Admin
Test_Data: ~~and~~Step ~~easy~~mandatory/optional toconfiguration
Prior_Test_Cases: ~~navigate~~ONB02US06_TC_001

10.Test Process ChangesProcedure

~~Aspect~~	~~Current Process~~	~~New Process~~	~~Impact~~
~~Progress~~Step ~~Tracking~~#	~~Opaque~~	~~Transparent step-by-step~~	~~Improved user understanding (+50% clarity)~~
~~Step Visibility~~Action	~~Limited~~	~~Detailed step status~~	~~Enhanced user control (+40% efficiency~~

11.Expected Impact from Solving This Problem

~~Metric~~	~~Improvement~~
~~User Confidence~~Result	~~Increased~~Test by Data	~~60%~~Comments
1	Access Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads with step indicators	N/A	Initial state
2	Review each configuration step	Mandatory steps clearly marked with visual indicators	N/A	Visual distinction
3	Identify optional steps	Optional steps distinguished from mandatory ones	N/A	Clear differentiation
4	Verify mandatory step indicators	All required steps have consistent mandatory marking	N/A	Consistency check

~~Configuration~~Verification ~~Completion~~Points

Primary_Verification: ~~Rate~~Mandatory steps are clearly distinguished with visual indicators
Secondary_Verifications: Optional steps are clearly marked as non-mandatory
Negative_Verification: No ambiguity between mandatory and optional steps

ONB02US06_TC_004

Title: Verify overall progress percentage matches completed steps with formula

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_004
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 20%
Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC4
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Progress calculation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Multiple utility completion states

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different completion states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Various utility progress percentages
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Procedure

Step #

~~Improved by~~ Action

~~35%~~Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

~~User Satisfaction~~1

~~Enhanced~~Create byutility with 0 steps completed

12. User Behavior Tracking

~~Metric~~	~~Event~~	~~Purpose~~
~~Step Completion Time~~	~~Configuration~~Progress ~~Step~~shows ~~Completed~~0% using formula: (0/6)*100 = 0%	~~Understand~~Utility: ~~step~~Test ~~complexity~~Utility A	Baseline
~~Abandoned Configurations~~2	~~Setup~~Complete ~~Process~~3 ~~Abandoned~~out of 6 steps	~~Identify~~Progress ~~friction~~shows ~~points~~50% using formula: (3/6)*100 = 50%	Complete: Basic Info, Contact, Address	Mid-progress
~~Guidance Interaction~~3	~~Help~~Complete ~~Tooltip~~all ~~Viewed~~6 steps	~~Measure~~Progress ~~user~~shows ~~support~~100% ~~need~~using formula: (6/6)*100 = 100%	Complete all configuration steps	Full completion
4	Verify overall progress calculation	Overall progress = (Sum of individual utilities progress) / (Number of utilities)	Multiple utilities with varying progress	Formula validation

13.Verification WireframePoints

~~https://orgflow-simplifier.lovable.app/~~

14. Enhancement In The Latest Release

Setup Dashboard - Business Rules

1.
Primary_Verification: Overall Setup Progress

~~Definition:~~ ~~Displays the average setup completion~~progress percentage ~~across all configured utilities.~~
~~Progress Calculation:~~
~~Overall Setup Progress~~
~~Status Indicator:~~
- ~~If progress is 100%, status~~ = ~~"Complete."~~
- ~~If progress is less than 100%, status = "In Progress."~~

2. Configured Utilities List

~~Utility Display:~~
- ~~Each configured utility card must show:~~
  - ~~Utility Name~~
  - ~~Description~~
  - ~~Setup Progress Bar and %~~
  - ~~Activation Status (Active / Inactive)~~
  - ~~"Edit" and "Continue Setup" buttons~~
~~Activation Toggle:~~
- ~~Users can activate or deactivate a utility instantly by switching the toggle.~~
- ~~No minimum progress % required to activate/deactivate.~~
~~Progress Visibility:~~
- ~~Setup Progress must be displayed as a horizontal progress bar along with a numerical percentage.~~

3. Add/Edit New Utility Form

~~State~~:
- ~~Must select from predefined dropdown options which will come from selected country in organisation setup.~~
~~City~~:
- ~~Must select from predefined dropdown options based on selected State.~~
~~GST/HST/VAGST Registration~~:
- ~~Optional field.~~
- ~~If entered, alphanumeric only; max 30 characters.~~

4. Welcome to your Setup Dashboard

~~Display the hardcode text~~

UI Rules

~~The Icons should be Same which are outline with background icon~~
~~The animations should work as same in the given lovable design.~~

Acceptance criteria

~~The system must display the average setup completion percentage across all configured utilities~~
~~The system must calculate overall setup progress using the formula:~~ (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: Individual utility progress = (Completed steps / Total steps) * 100
Negative_Verification: Progress never exceeds 100% or shows negative values

ONB02US06_TC_005

Title: Verify users receive guidance on incomplete steps

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_005
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: User Guidance
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: Help system
Code_Module_Mapped: Guidance System
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC5
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_003, ONB02US06_TC_013

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Guidance tooltip system
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Incomplete utility configurations

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utilities with incomplete steps
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Partially completed utilities
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access utility with incomplete steps	System identifies incomplete steps	Utility with 3/6 steps completed	Partial completion
2	Hover over incomplete step	Guidance tooltip appears with next actions	Incomplete step indicator	Tooltip display
3	Click on incomplete step	Detailed guidance panel opens with step requirements	Step 4: Logo Upload	Detailed guidance
4	Review guidance content	Clear instructions provided for completing the step	N/A	Content quality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Users receive clear guidance on incomplete steps
Secondary_Verifications: Guidance includes specific next actions and requirements
Negative_Verification: No guidance shown for completed steps

ONB02US06_TC_006

Title: Verify configuration dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_006
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: UI framework
Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard UI
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
Dependencies: Dashboard framework
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Sample utility data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Multiple utilities in different states
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access setup dashboard	Dashboard loads with clear layout and organization	N/A	Initial impression
2	Navigate between different sections	Smooth transitions, clear navigation paths	Various dashboard sections	Navigation flow
3	Test responsive design	Dashboard adapts to different screen sizes	Desktop, Tablet, Mobile views	Responsive behavior
4	Evaluate overall user experience	Interface is intuitive, elements are logically placed	N/A	UX assessment

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate
Secondary_Verifications: Clear visual hierarchy, logical element placement
Negative_Verification: No confusing navigation patterns or hidden functionality

ONB02US06_TC_007

Title: Verify average setup completion percentage display across utilities

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_007
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 20%
Integration_Points: Progress calculation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC7
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004, ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Progress calculation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different completion states

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple configured utilities
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Utilities with varying progress percentages
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create multiple utilities with different progress	System tracks individual utility progress	Utility A: 50%, Utility B: 75%, Utility C: 100%	Setup state
2	Access setup dashboard	Dashboard displays average setup completion percentage	N/A	Dashboard view
3	Verify calculation accuracy	Average = (50% + 75% + 100%) / 3 = 75%	Three utilities with known progress	Formula verification
4	Add new utility with 0% progress	Average recalculates to (50% + 75% + 100% + 0%) / 4 = 56.25%	New utility with no progress	Dynamic calculation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Average setup completion = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
Secondary_Verifications: Percentage updates dynamically when utilities are added/modified
Negative_Verification: Calculation handles division by zero and edge cases

ONB02US06_TC_008

Title: Verify overall setup progress calculation formula implementation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_008
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 25%
Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC8
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004, ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Progress calculation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with precise progress values

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Clean system ~~must~~state
User_Roles_Permissions: ~~show~~System Admin
Test_Data: Utilities with calculated progress values
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create single utility, complete 0 steps	Individual progress = (0/6)*100 = 0%, Overall = 0%	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Baseline
2	Complete 2 steps	Individual progress = (2/6)*100 = 33.33%, Overall = 33.33%	Complete: Basic Info, Contact	Partial progress
3	Add second utility, complete 6 steps	Utility2 progress = (6/6)*100 = 100%, Overall = (33.33+100)/2 = 66.67%	Second utility fully completed	Two utilities
4	Add third utility, complete 3 steps	Utility3 progress = (3/6)*100 = 50%, Overall = (33.33+100+50)/3 = 61.11%	Third utility half completed	Three utilities

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Overall Setup Progress = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
Secondary_Verifications: Individual utility progress = (Completed steps / Total steps) * 100
Negative_Verification: Formula handles decimal precision and rounding correctly

ONB02US06_TC_009

Title: Verify status asshows "Complete" when progress reaches 100%

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_009
~~The~~Created ~~system~~By: ~~must~~Sarvesh
Created ~~show~~Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Status Indicator
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: Status calculation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Status Calculator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC9
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008, ONB02US06_TC_010

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Status calculation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Fully completed utility

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utility with all steps completable
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Complete utility configuration data
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new utility	Initial status asshows "In Progress", progress = 0%	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Initial state
2	Complete 5 out of 6 steps	Status remains "In Progress", progress = 83.33%	Complete all except logo	Near completion
3	Complete final step (6/6)	Status changes to "Complete", progress = 100%	Upload logo file	Full completion
4	Verify status consistency	Status = "Complete" when progress = 100%	N/A	Status validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Status shows "Complete" when progress reaches exactly 100%
Secondary_Verifications: Status updates immediately upon completion
Negative_Verification: Status only shows "Complete" at 100%, not before

ONB02US06_TC_010

Title: Verify status shows "In Progress" when progress is less than 100%

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_010
~~The~~Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Status Indicator
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: Status calculation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Status Calculator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC10
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008, ONB02US06_TC_009

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Status calculation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Partially completed utilities

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utilities with various completion states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Partial utility configuration data
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_009

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new utility with 0% progress	Status shows "In Progress"	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Initial state
2	Complete 1 step (16.67% progress)	Status remains "In Progress"	Complete: Utility Name	Low progress
3	Complete 3 steps (50% progress)	Status remains "In Progress"	Complete: Name, Email, Contact	Mid progress
4	Complete 5 steps (83.33% progress)	Status remains "In Progress"	Complete all except logo	High progress

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Status shows "In Progress" for any progress < 100%
Secondary_Verifications: Status remains consistent across different progress levels
Negative_Verification: Status never shows "Complete" until 100% reached

ONB02US06_TC_011

Title: Verify utility card displays Name, Description, Progress Bar, and Activation Status

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_011
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Cards
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: UI rendering system
Code_Module_Mapped: ~~must~~Utility ~~display~~Card ~~each~~Component
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC11
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007, ONB02US06_TC_012

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: UI rendering framework
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Configured utility with complete data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: At least one configured utility
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Complete utility information
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access utilities dashboard	Dashboard displays configured utilities as acards	N/A	Card layout
2	Verify utility name display	Card shows "Metropolitan Water District"	Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District	Name visibility
3	Check description field	Card displays utility description clearly	Description: Water supply services	Description display
4	Validate progress bar	Horizontal progress bar shows with percentage (e.g., 75%)	Current progress: 75%	Visual progress
5	Check activation status	Card shows "Active" or "Inactive" status clearly	Status: Active	Status indicator

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Each utility card ~~containing Utility~~displays Name, Description, Setup Progress Bar with ~~percentage,~~%, and Activation Status ~~(Active/Inactive)~~
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: All elements are clearly visible and properly formatted
Negative_Verification: No missing or overlapping elements in card layout

ONB02US06_TC_012

Title: Verify Edit and Continue Setup buttons functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_012
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Cards
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Form navigation system
Code_Module_Mapped: ~~must~~Button ~~provide~~Actions
Requirement_Coverage: ~~"Edit"~~Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC12
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Form navigation system
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Utilities with different completion states

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utilities with partial and complete configurations
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Utility configurations in various states
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate utility card with incomplete setup	Card displays "Continue Setup" ~~buttons~~button	Utility: ~~for~~50% ~~each~~complete	Partial setup
2	Click "Continue Setup" button	System navigates to next incomplete step	N/A	Navigation flow
3	Locate utility card with complete setup	Card displays "Edit" button	Utility: 100% complete	Complete setup
4	Click "Edit" button	System opens utility edit form	N/A	Edit functionality
5	Verify button states	Buttons are enabled and responsive	N/A	UI responsiveness

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Edit and Continue Setup buttons function correctly and navigate appropriately
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: Button states match utility completion status
Negative_Verification: Buttons are not disabled or non-functional

ONB02US06_TC_013

Title: Verify activation toggle switch functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_013
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Activation Toggle
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: State management system
Code_Module_Mapped: ~~must~~Toggle ~~allow~~Controller
Requirement_Coverage: ~~users~~Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC13
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_014

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: State management service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Utility with activation capability

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Configured utility available
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Utility in active/inactive state
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate utility with "Active" status	Toggle switch shows "ON" position	Utility: Metropolitan Water District	Active state
2	Click toggle to ~~activate~~deactivate	Switch ormoves to "OFF", status changes to "Inactive" instantly	N/A	Deactivation
3	Click toggle to reactivate	Switch moves to "ON", status changes to "Active" instantly	N/A	Reactivation
4	Verify state persistence	Status remains consistent after page refresh	N/A	Persistence check

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Users can activate/deactivate utilities instantly using a toggle switch
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: ~~system~~Toggle ~~must~~state reflects current activation status
Negative_Verification: Toggle does not require minimum progress percentage

ONB02US06_TC_014

Title: Verify no minimum progress requirement for activation toggle

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_014
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Activation Toggle
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: Business rules engine
Code_Module_Mapped: Activation Controller
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC14
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_013, ONB02US06_TC_015

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Business rules service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: New utility with 0% progress

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utility with minimal configuration
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Utility with 0% setup progress
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_013

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new utility with 0% progress	Utility created successfully	Utility: Test Utility Zero Progress	Minimal setup
2	Locate activation toggle	Toggle switch is available and enabled	N/A	Toggle accessibility
3	Attempt to activate orutility	Toggle ~~deactivate~~switches to "Active" without restriction	N/A	No blocking
4	Verify activation success	Utility status shows "Active" despite 0% progress	N/A	Business rule validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Activation toggle works regardless of progress percentage
Secondary_Verifications: No minimum progress validation prevents activation
Negative_Verification: System does not block activation for incomplete utilities
~~The~~

ONB02US06_TC_015

Title: ~~system must display~~Verify setup progress displays as a horizontal progress bar with numerical percentage

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_015
~~The~~Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Progress Display
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: UI rendering system
Code_Module_Mapped: ~~must~~Progress ~~provide~~Bar aComponent
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC15
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: UI rendering framework
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Utilities with various progress levels

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utilities with different completion percentages
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Progress values at different levels
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View utility with 0% progress	Horizontal progress bar shows empty, displays "0%"	Utility with 0 completed steps	Minimum state
2	View utility with 50% progress	Horizontal progress bar shows half-filled, displays "50%"	Utility with 3/6 completed steps	Mid-range
3	View utility with 100% progress	Horizontal progress bar shows completely filled, displays "100%"	Utility with 6/6 completed steps	Maximum state
4	Verify visual consistency	All progress bars use consistent horizontal layout and styling	N/A	Visual standards

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Setup progress displays as horizontal progress bar with numerical percentage
Secondary_Verifications: Progress bar visual accurately represents percentage value
Negative_Verification: No vertical or alternative progress indicators used

ONB02US06_TC_016

Title: Verify State field with predefined dropdown based on country selection

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_016
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Location Selection
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Organization setup module
Code_Module_Mapped: Location Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC16
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_017, ONB02US06_TC_022

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Organization setup service, location data service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Organization with country selection

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Organization setup with country selected
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Country selection from organization setup
Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Add/Edit Utility form	Form loads with State dropdown field	N/A	Form availability
2	Click State dropdown	Dropdown shows predefined options based on ~~the~~organization's country	Country: United States	Country dependency
3	Verify state options	Only states/provinces for selected country appear	Expected: California, Texas, New York, etc.	Filtered list
4	Select a state	State selection successful, dropdown closes	Selected: California	Selection functionality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: State field contains predefined dropdown options based on country selected in ~~organisation~~organization setup
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: ~~system~~State ~~must~~options ~~provide~~are afiltered and relevant to organization's country
Negative_Verification: States from other countries are not displayed

ONB02US06_TC_017

Title: Verify City field with predefined dropdown based on selected State

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_017
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Location Selection
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Location data service
Code_Module_Mapped: Location Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC17
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016, ONB02US06_TC_022

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Location data service, state selection
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: State selection dependency

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: State selected in utility form
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: State selection (e.g., California)
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Select state from dropdown	State selection successful	Selected State: California	State dependency
2	Click City dropdown	City dropdown becomes enabled and populated	N/A	Cascade activation
3	Verify city options	Cities relevant to selected state appear	Expected: San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego	Filtered cities
4	Select a city	City selection successful	Selected City: San Francisco	Selection complete

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: City field provides predefined dropdown options based on ~~the~~selected State
Secondary_Verifications: City options are filtered and relevant to selected ~~State~~state
~~The~~Negative_Verification: ~~system~~Cities ~~must~~from ~~provide~~other anstates are not displayed

ONB02US06_TC_018

Title: Verify required fields validation with asterisk marking

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_018
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Form Validation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 20%
Integration_Points: Form validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Form Validator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Required Fields
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Form validation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Form validation rules

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Required field validation scenarios
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Add Utility form	Form displays with required fields marked with asterisk (*)	N/A	Visual indicators
2	Verify required field marking	Utility Name, Email, Contact Number, City, Address* show asterisk	Required fields list	Field identification
3	Submit form with empty required fields	Validation errors appear for all required fields	Leave required fields empty	Validation trigger
4	Fill one required field, submit	Validation errors appear for remaining empty required fields	Fill only Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District	Partial validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Required fields (Utility Name, Email, Contact Number, City, Address) are marked with asterisk *
Secondary_Verifications: Form validation prevents submission without required fields
Negative_Verification: Optional fields do not show asterisk marking

ONB02US06_TC_019

Title: Verify optional ~~GST/HST/VAGST~~fields ~~Registration~~functionality (Website URL, Logo Upload)

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_019
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Form Validation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: File upload service
Code_Module_Mapped: Optional Fields Handler
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Optional Fields
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018, ONB02US06_TC_021

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: File upload service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Optional field test data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
~~The~~
User_Roles_Permissions: ~~system~~System ~~must~~Admin
Test_Data: Optional field values and files
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Add Utility form	Form displays optional fields without asterisk marking	N/A	Optional field identification
2	Submit form with only required fields filled	Form submission successful without optional fields	Required fields: Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com, Contact: (415) 555-8734, City: San Francisco, Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue	Successful submission
3	Add optional Website URL	URL field accepts valid format	Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com	URL validation
4	Upload optional logo	File upload successful with supported formats	Logo file: PNG/JPG format	File upload

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Optional fields (Website URL, Logo Upload) do not prevent form submission when empty
Secondary_Verifications: Optional fields accept ~~only~~valid ~~alphanumeric~~data ~~characters~~when provided
Negative_Verification: Form does not require optional fields for ~~GST/HST/VAGST~~completion

ONB02US06_TC_020

Title: ~~Registration~~Verify field validation rules implementation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_020
~~The~~Created ~~system~~By: ~~must~~Sarvesh
Created ~~limit~~Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Form Validation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 25%
Integration_Points: Validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Field Validator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Field Validations
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018, ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Validation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid test data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Form validation rules configured
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Valid and invalid field data
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter invalid email format	Validation error: "Invalid email format"	Email: invalid-email	Email validation
2	Enter valid email format	No validation error, field accepts input	Email: contact@metrowater.com	Valid email
3	Enter invalid phone format	Validation error: "Invalid phone format"	Phone: 123abc	Phone validation
4	Enter valid phone format	No validation error, field accepts input	Phone: (415) 555-8734	Valid phone
5	Enter invalid URL format	Validation error: "Invalid URL format"	URL: invalid-url	URL validation
6	Enter valid URL format	No validation error, field accepts input	URL: https://www.metrowater.com	Valid URL

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Field validations enforce proper formats for Email, Contact Number, Website URL
Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and helpful
Negative_Verification: Invalid data is rejected with appropriate error messages

ONB02US06_TC_021

Title: Verify GST/HST/VAGST Registration field functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_021
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Tax Registration
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Tax validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Tax Field Handler
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - GST/HST/VAGST Registration
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Tax validation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Tax registration test data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Various tax registration formats
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate GST/HST/VAGST Registration field	Field is present and marked as optional	N/A	Field presence
2	Enter alphanumeric value within limit	Field accepts valid alphanumeric input	GST: ABC123DEF456	Valid input
3	Enter 30-character alphanumeric value	Field accepts maximum length input	GST: ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRST	Max length
4	Attempt to ~~maximum~~enter 31+ characters	Field restricts input to 30 characters maximum	GST: ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRSTU+	Length restriction
5	Enter special characters	Field rejects special characters, shows validation error	GST: ABC@123#DEF	Invalid characters

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: GST/HST/VAGST Registration field accepts alphanumeric only, max 30 characters
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: Field is optional and doesn't prevent form submission when empty
Negative_Verification: Field rejects special characters and enforces character limit

ONB02US06_TC_022

Title: Verify hardcoded welcome text display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_022
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Welcome Message
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minute
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: None
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 5%
Integration_Points: Content management system
Code_Module_Mapped: Welcome Text Component
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Welcome Text
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Content rendering system
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Hardcoded text content

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Setup dashboard accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Expected welcome text content
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads successfully	N/A	Initial access
2	Locate welcome message area	"Welcome to your Setup Dashboard" text is displayed prominently	Expected text: "Welcome to your Setup Dashboard"	Text presence
3	Verify text formatting	Text is properly formatted and readable	N/A	Visual presentation
4	Check text consistency	Same welcome text appears consistently across sessions	N/A	Consistency check

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Hardcoded welcome text "Welcome to your Setup Dashboard" is displayed
Secondary_Verifications: Text is properly formatted and positioned
Negative_Verification: No dynamic or variable text elements in welcome message

ONB02US06_TC_023

Title: Verify outline icons with background consistency

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_023
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: UI Design
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: None
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 5%
Integration_Points: Design system
Code_Module_Mapped: Icon Component
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: UI Rules - Icons
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006, ONB02US06_TC_024

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Design system ~~must display the hardcoded text as given in business rule~~components
~~The~~Performance_Baseline: ~~system~~<1s
Data_Requirements: ~~must~~Icon design specifications

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with icons accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Design guidelines reference
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Review dashboard icons	All icons use outline ~~icons~~style with background	N/A	Icon style verification
2	Check icon consistency	Icons maintain consistent outline and background design	N/A	Design consistency
3	Verify design guidelines compliance	Icons match specified design system standards	Reference: Lovable design	Design compliance
4	Test different icon states	Icons maintain style across hover, active, and default states	N/A	State consistency

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Icons use outline style with background consistent with design guidelines
~~The~~Secondary_Verifications: ~~system~~Icon ~~must~~design ~~implement~~is consistent across all dashboard elements
Negative_Verification: No filled or inconsistent icon styles present

ONB02US06_TC_024

Title: Verify animations ~~matching the provided~~match design specifications

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_024

Created By: Sarvesh

Created Date: June 17, 2025

Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: UI Animations
Test Type: UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: None
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 5%
Integration_Points: Animation framework
Code_Module_Mapped: Animation Controller
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: UI Rules - Animations
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_023, ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Animation framework
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Animation specifications

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with animations accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Animation design reference
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate through dashboard sections	Page transitions animate smoothly	N/A	Transition animations
2	Interact with buttons and controls	Hover and click animations work as designed	N/A	Interactive animations
3	Compare with design reference	Animations match specifications from Lovable design	Reference: Lovable design animations	Design compliance
4	Test animation performance	Animations run smoothly without lag or stuttering	N/A	Performance validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Animations work as specified in the Lovable design reference
Secondary_Verifications: Animations are smooth and enhance user experience
Negative_Verification: No broken, missing, or jarring animation effects

WireframePerformance & Integration Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_025

~~https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1errs1E2ZCPORWhFyuNlNWVKYQ6oh6rBb8caMeR0oR2g/edit?usp=sharing~~Title: Verify dashboard loading performance under 1 second

~~https:~~Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_025
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 20%
Integration_Points: Performance monitoring system
Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard Loader
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_027

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities for load testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Multiple utilities with varying completion states
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache	Cache cleared successfully	N/A	Clean state
2	Navigate to Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads in <1 second	N/A	Performance measurement
3	Measure load time with 10 utilities	Dashboard loads in <1 second with multiple utilities	10 utilities with varying progress	Load testing
4	Test with network throttling	Dashboard loads acceptably under slow connections	Simulate 3G connection	Network performance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard loading time < 1 second under normal conditions
Secondary_Verifications: Performance maintained with multiple utilities
Negative_Verification: No performance degradation with data volume

ONB02US06_TC_026

Title: Verify utility creation/editing performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_026
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Database performance
Code_Module_Mapped: Utility CRUD Operations
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_027

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database performance monitoring
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Utility form data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database performance monitoring enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Complete utility form data
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Fill utility creation form completely	Form accepts all data	Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com, Contact: (415) 555-8734, City: San Francisco, Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue	Complete data
2	Submit new utility creation	Utility created and saved in <1 second	N/A	Creation performance
3	Edit existing utility	Form loads existing data in <1 second	N/A	Edit performance
4	Save utility modifications	Changes saved in <1 second	Modified data	Save performance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Utility creation/editing operations complete in <1 second
Secondary_Verifications: Form responsiveness maintained during operations
Negative_Verification: No timeout or delay issues during CRUD operations

ONB02US06_TC_027

Title: Verify progress calculation performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_027
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Calculation engine performance
Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_026

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Calculation engine monitoring
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities for calculation testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different progress states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: 50+ utilities with varying progress
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Complete a configuration step	Individual progress recalculates in <1 second using formula: (completed steps / total steps) * 100	Complete step 3 of 6	Individual calculation
2	View overall progress dashboard	Overall progress calculation displays in <1 second using formula: (Sum of all utility progress) /~~preview-~~ (Number of utilities)	50 utilities with different progress	Bulk calculation
3	Add new utility	Progress recalculation with new utility in <1 second	Add 51st utility	Dynamic calculation
4	Delete utility	Progress recalculation after deletion in <1 second	Remove one utility	Deletion calculation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Progress calculations (individual and overall) complete in <1 second
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time calculation updates without lag
Negative_Verification: No calculation delays with large datasets

ONB02US06_TC_028

Title: Verify file upload performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_028
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-External-Dependency, Performance

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 10%
Integration_Points: File upload service
Code_Module_Mapped: File Upload Handler
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance Baselines
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_027

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: File upload service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Test logo files

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: File upload functionality accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Various logo file sizes and formats
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Upload small logo file (50KB)	File uploads and processes in <1 second	PNG file, 50KB	Small file
2	Upload medium logo file (200KB)	File uploads and processes in <1 second	JPG file, 200KB	Medium file
3	Upload large logo file (500KB)	File uploads within acceptable time	PNG file, 500KB	Large file
4	Test upload progress indicator	Progress indicator updates smoothly	Various file sizes	User feedback

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Logo file uploads complete in <1 second for typical file sizes
Secondary_Verifications: Upload progress provides adequate user feedback
Negative_Verification: No upload failures or timeouts for supported file sizes

ONB02US06_TC_029

Title: Verify API endpoints for utility CRUD operations

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_029
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: API Integration
Test Type: API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, API

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 25%
Integration_Points: Backend API services
Code_Module_Mapped: Utility API Controller
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, API-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: All API-related acceptance criteria
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_030

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Backend API services
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: API test data sets

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin API access
Test_Data: Complete utility data payloads
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	POST /api/utilities (Create)	API returns 201 Created with utility object	{"name": "Metropolitan Water District", "email": "contact@metrowater.com", "phone": "(415) 555-8734", "city": "San Francisco", "address": "1234 Reservoir Avenue"}	Create operation
2	GET /api/utilities/:id (Read)	API returns 200 OK with utility details	Utility ID from step 1	Read operation
3	PUT /api/utilities/:id (Update)	API returns 200 OK with updated utility	{"email": "updated@metrowater.com"}	Update operation
4	DELETE /api/utilities/:id (Delete)	API returns 204 No Content	Utility ID from step 1	Delete operation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All CRUD API operations return correct HTTP status codes and data
Secondary_Verifications: API responses include proper data validation and error handling
Negative_Verification: Invalid requests return appropriate error codes (400, 404, 422)

Security Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_030

Title: Verify input validation prevents injection attacks

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_030
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 20%
Integration_Points: Security validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Input Validator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Security validation requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_020, ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Security validation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Malicious input test cases

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Security validation enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: SQL injection and XSS attack vectors
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter SQL injection in utility name	Input rejected, validation error displayed	Name: '; DROP TABLE utilities; -~~coresetting-updated.lovable.app/~~-	SQL injection attempt
2	Enter XSS script in description	Script sanitized or rejected	Description: <script>alert('XSS')</script>	XSS attempt
3	Enter malicious file upload	File rejected with appropriate error	File: malicious.exe	File security
4	Test CSRF protection	Form submission requires valid CSRF token	Invalid CSRF token	CSRF protection

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs are properly validated and rejected
Secondary_Verifications: Error messages don't reveal system information
Negative_Verification: No successful injection or script execution

ONB02US06_TC_031

Title: Verify file upload security restrictions

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_031
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: File security service
Code_Module_Mapped: File Upload Security
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: File upload security requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_032

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: File security scanning service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Various file types for testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: File upload security enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Malicious and valid file samples
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Upload executable file	File rejected with security error	File: test.exe	Executable rejection
2	Upload oversized image	File rejected due to size limit	File: 10MB image	Size limitation
3	Upload valid image formats	Files accepted successfully	Files: PNG, JPG, GIF	Valid formats
4	Test file content validation	Files scanned for malicious content	File with embedded script	Content security

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Only safe file types (PNG, JPG, GIF) are accepted for logo upload
Secondary_Verifications: File size limits are enforced
Negative_Verification: Executable files and malicious content are blocked

ONB02US06_TC_032

Title: Verify user authorization and access control

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_032
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Automated

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Authentication service
Code_Module_Mapped: Access Control
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: User authorization requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication and authorization service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Different user role accounts

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple user roles configured
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin, Regular User accounts
Test_Data: User credentials for different roles
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Access granted to utility management features	Admin credentials	Admin access
2	Access utility creation form	Form accessible and functional	N/A	Admin permissions
3	Login as Regular User	Limited access to utility features	User credentials	User access
4	Attempt utility creation as Regular User	Access denied or restricted functionality	N/A	Permission enforcement

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System Admin role has full access to utility management features
Secondary_Verifications: Access control is properly enforced based on user roles
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized users cannot access restricted functionality

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

ONB02US06_TC_033

Title: Verify system behavior with maximum character limits

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_033
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Edge Cases
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Input Validation
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Edge-Cases
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Field validation requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_021, ONB02US06_TC_034

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Validation service
Performance_Baseline: <1s
Data_Requirements: Maximum length test strings

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Form validation enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Maximum length test strings
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_021

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter maximum allowed characters in Utility Name	Field accepts input at character limit	255 character string	Max length test
2	Attempt to exceed character limit in Utility Name	Field restricts input beyond limit	256+ character string	Overflow prevention
3	Enter exactly 30 characters in GST field	Field accepts maximum length	ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRST	GST max length
4	Test boundary conditions for all fields	All fields handle max length appropriately	Various max length strings	Boundary testing

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All fields properly enforce maximum character limits
Secondary_Verifications: User receives clear feedback when limits are reached
Negative_Verification: No data truncation or corruption at boundary conditions

ONB02US06_TC_034

Title: Verify system handling of network connectivity issues

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_034
Created By: Sarvesh
Created Date: June 17, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Error Handling
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15%
Integration_Points: Network error handling
Code_Module_Mapped: Error Handler
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Error-Handling
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Error handling requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_033, ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Network simulation tools
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Network connectivity scenarios

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Network simulation capability
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
Test_Data: Form data for testing
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate network disconnection during form submission	Graceful error handling with retry option	Complete utility form data: Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com	Network failure
2	Test slow network conditions	Loading indicators and timeout handling	N/A	Performance degradation
3	Simulate server unavailability	Appropriate error message displayed	N/A	Server error
4	Test automatic retry mechanisms	System attempts to reconnect and retry	N/A	Recovery testing

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System handles network issues gracefully with appropriate user feedback
Secondary_Verifications: Data is not lost during network interruptions
Negative_Verification: No system crashes or data corruption during network issues

Test Suite Definitions

Smoke Test Suite

Execution Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_006, ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_015
Execution Frequency: Every build deployment
Expected Duration: 15 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Execution Criteria: P1-P2 priority, automated tests
Test Cases: All functional test cases (TC_001 through TC_024)
Execution Frequency: Before each release
Expected Duration: 2 hours

Performance Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Performance-critical operations
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_027, ONB02US06_TC_028
Execution Frequency: Weekly performance testing
Expected Duration: 30 minutes

Security Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Security-critical validations
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_031, ONB02US06_TC_032
Execution Frequency: Before major releases
Expected Duration: 45 minutes

API Test Suite

Execution Criteria: API integration validation
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_029
Execution Frequency: Continuous integration
Expected Duration: 10 minutes

Full Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Complete feature coverage
Test Cases: All 34 test cases
Execution Frequency: Major release cycles
Expected Duration: 4 hours

Execution Matrix

Browser/Device Coverage

Test Case Category	Chrome 115+	Firefox 110+	Safari 16+	Edge Latest	Mobile
Smoke Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Functional Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	Selected
Performance Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗
Security Tests	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗
API Tests	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗

Environment Coverage

Development: Smoke tests only
Staging: Full test suite
Production: Smoke tests + selected regression tests

Dependency Map

Test Execution Dependencies

Organization Setup → ONB02US06_TC_016, ONB02US06_TC_017
Basic Dashboard Access → ONB02US06_TC_001 → All subsequent tests
Progress Calculation → ONB02US06_TC_004 → ONB02US06_TC_007, ONB02US06_TC_008
Form Validation → ONB02US06_TC_018 → ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

External System Dependencies

Organization Setup Module: Required for country/state/city dropdowns
Authentication Service: Required for user access control
File Upload Service: Required for logo upload functionality
Location Data Service: Required for state/city dropdown population

Utility management (ONB02US06)

1.Coverage Problem StatementSummary

Core Problem

Pain Points

2. Who Are the Users Facing the Problem?

3. Jobs To Be Done

4. Solution

Key Capability Areas

5. Major Steps Involved

6. Flow Diagram

7. Business Rules

8. Sample Data

9.Total Acceptance Criteria

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_001

ONB02US06_TC_002

ONB02US06_TC_003

10.Test Process ChangesProcedure

11.Expected Impact from Solving This Problem

ONB02US06_TC_004

12. User Behavior Tracking

13.Verification WireframePoints

14. Enhancement In The Latest Release

Setup Dashboard - Business Rules

1.Primary_Verification: Overall Setup Progress

2. Configured Utilities List

3. Add/Edit New Utility Form

4. Welcome to your Setup Dashboard

UI Rules

Acceptance criteria

ONB02US06_TC_005

ONB02US06_TC_006

ONB02US06_TC_007

ONB02US06_TC_008

ONB02US06_TC_009

ONB02US06_TC_010

ONB02US06_TC_011

ONB02US06_TC_012

ONB02US06_TC_013

ONB02US06_TC_014

ONB02US06_TC_015

ONB02US06_TC_016

ONB02US06_TC_017

ONB02US06_TC_018

ONB02US06_TC_020

ONB02US06_TC_021

ONB02US06_TC_022

ONB02US06_TC_023

ONB02US06_TC_024

WireframePerformance & Integration Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_025

ONB02US06_TC_026

ONB02US06_TC_027

ONB02US06_TC_028

ONB02US06_TC_029

Security Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_030

ONB02US06_TC_031

ONB02US06_TC_032

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

ONB02US06_TC_033

ONB02US06_TC_034

Test Suite Definitions

Smoke Test Suite

Regression Test Suite

Performance Test Suite

Security Test Suite

API Test Suite

Full Test Suite

Execution Matrix

Browser/Device Coverage

Environment Coverage

Dependency Map

Test Execution Dependencies

External System Dependencies

1.
Primary_Verification: Overall Setup Progress