Skip to main content

Utility management (ONB02US06)


Coverage Summary

  • Total Coverage: 100% (34 Test Cases/17 Acceptance Criteria * 100)
  • Total Test Cases: 34 (26 Functional + 5 Performance/Integration + 3 Security)
  • Total Acceptance Criteria: 17
  • Priority Distribution: P1-Critical (47%) + P2-High (35%) + P3-Medium (18%)

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

  • Core Functionality: Setup dashboard, utility configuration, progress tracking
  • Business Rules: Progress calculations, field validations, status indicators
  • User Journeys: Complete utility setup workflow
  • Integration Points: Organization setup dependency, country/state/city dropdown population
  • Data Flow: Utility data creation, progress calculation, status updates

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

  • Performance: Dashboard load times, form submission, progress calculations
  • Security: Form validation, file upload security, data protection
  • Compatibility: Cross-browser, responsive design
  • Usability: Navigation flow, error handling, guidance tooltips
  • Reliability: Data integrity, calculation accuracy, state persistence

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

  • Boundary Conditions: Field character limits, file size limits
  • Invalid Inputs: Malformed emails, invalid phone numbers, unauthorized file types
  • System Failures: Network issues, upload failures
  • Data Inconsistencies: Incomplete configurations, progress calculation edge cases






Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_001

Title: Verify detailed breakdown of 6 configuration steps display

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_001
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Organization setup module
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Setup Dashboard
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Organization setup completed
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Valid organization setup data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Organization setup completed
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Valid system admin credentials
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as System Admin

Login successful, dashboard accessible

Username: admin@test.com, Password: Test123!

Valid credentials

2

Navigate to Setup Dashboard

Setup Dashboard loads successfully

N/A

Check URL routing

3

Verify configuration steps display

System displays exactly 6 configuration steps clearly labeled

N/A

Count and verify step names

4

Check step breakdown detail

Each step shows detailed breakdown with clear descriptions

N/A

Verify readability

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: System displays exactly 6 configuration steps with detailed breakdown
  • Secondary_Verifications: Steps are clearly labeled and organized
  • Negative_Verification: No missing or extra steps beyond 6




ONB02US06_TC_002

Title: Verify each step has clear status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_002
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Progress tracking system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Tracking
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Setup dashboard access
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Fresh utility setup state

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Clean setup state
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Various utility completion states
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Setup Dashboard with new utility

All steps show "Not Started" status

Utility: New Test Utility

Fresh state

2

Complete first configuration step

First step shows "Completed", others "Not Started"

Complete basic info

Status update

3

Partially complete second step

Second step shows "In Progress", first "Completed"

Partial form data

Mid-state verification

4

Verify status consistency

Each step accurately reflects its completion state

N/A

Cross-validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Each step displays correct status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)
  • Secondary_Verifications: Status updates reflect actual completion state
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect status displays




ONB02US06_TC_003

Title: Verify users can see which steps are mandatory

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_003
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Business rules engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Step Validation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Setup dashboard access
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Step configuration data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Setup dashboard accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Step mandatory/optional configuration
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Setup Dashboard

Dashboard loads with step indicators

N/A

Initial state

2

Review each configuration step

Mandatory steps clearly marked with visual indicators

N/A

Visual distinction

3

Identify optional steps

Optional steps distinguished from mandatory ones

N/A

Clear differentiation

4

Verify mandatory step indicators

All required steps have consistent mandatory marking

N/A

Consistency check

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Mandatory steps are clearly distinguished with visual indicators
  • Secondary_Verifications: Optional steps are clearly marked as non-mandatory
  • Negative_Verification: No ambiguity between mandatory and optional steps




ONB02US06_TC_004

Title: Verify overall progress percentage matches completed steps with formula

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_004
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Progress calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple utility completion states

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different completion states
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Various utility progress percentages
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create utility with 0 steps completed

Progress shows 0% using formula: (0/6)*100 = 0%

Utility: Test Utility A

Baseline

2

Complete 3 out of 6 steps

Progress shows 50% using formula: (3/6)*100 = 50%

Complete: Basic Info, Contact, Address

Mid-progress

3

Complete all 6 steps

Progress shows 100% using formula: (6/6)*100 = 100%

Complete all configuration steps

Full completion

4

Verify overall progress calculation

Overall progress = (Sum of individual utilities progress) / (Number of utilities)

Multiple utilities with varying progress

Formula validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Overall progress percentage = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
  • Secondary_Verifications: Individual utility progress = (Completed steps / Total steps) * 100
  • Negative_Verification: Progress never exceeds 100% or shows negative values




ONB02US06_TC_005

Title: Verify users receive guidance on incomplete steps

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_005
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: User Guidance
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Help system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Guidance System
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Guidance tooltip system
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Incomplete utility configurations

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utilities with incomplete steps
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Partially completed utilities
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access utility with incomplete steps

System identifies incomplete steps

Utility with 3/6 steps completed

Partial completion

2

Hover over incomplete step

Guidance tooltip appears with next actions

Incomplete step indicator

Tooltip display

3

Click on incomplete step

Detailed guidance panel opens with step requirements

Step 4: Logo Upload

Detailed guidance

4

Review guidance content

Clear instructions provided for completing the step

N/A

Content quality

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Users receive clear guidance on incomplete steps
  • Secondary_Verifications: Guidance includes specific next actions and requirements
  • Negative_Verification: No guidance shown for completed steps




ONB02US06_TC_006

Title: Verify configuration dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_006
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: UI framework
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard UI
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: Dashboard framework
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Sample utility data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Multiple utilities in different states
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access setup dashboard

Dashboard loads with clear layout and organization

N/A

Initial impression

2

Navigate between different sections

Smooth transitions, clear navigation paths

Various dashboard sections

Navigation flow

3

Test responsive design

Dashboard adapts to different screen sizes

Desktop, Tablet, Mobile views

Responsive behavior

4

Evaluate overall user experience

Interface is intuitive, elements are logically placed

N/A

UX assessment

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate
  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear visual hierarchy, logical element placement
  • Negative_Verification: No confusing navigation patterns or hidden functionality




ONB02US06_TC_007

Title: Verify average setup completion percentage display across utilities

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_007
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Progress calculation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Progress calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different completion states

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple configured utilities
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Utilities with varying progress percentages
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create multiple utilities with different progress

System tracks individual utility progress

Utility A: 50%, Utility B: 75%, Utility C: 100%

Setup state

2

Access setup dashboard

Dashboard displays average setup completion percentage

N/A

Dashboard view

3

Verify calculation accuracy

Average = (50% + 75% + 100%) / 3 = 75%

Three utilities with known progress

Formula verification

4

Add new utility with 0% progress

Average recalculates to (50% + 75% + 100% + 0%) / 4 = 56.25%

New utility with no progress

Dynamic calculation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Average setup completion = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
  • Secondary_Verifications: Percentage updates dynamically when utilities are added/modified
  • Negative_Verification: Calculation handles division by zero and edge cases




ONB02US06_TC_008

Title: Verify overall setup progress calculation formula implementation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_008
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Progress calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with precise progress values

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Clean system state
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Utilities with calculated progress values
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create single utility, complete 0 steps

Individual progress = (0/6)*100 = 0%, Overall = 0%

Utility: Metropolitan Water District

Baseline

2

Complete 2 steps

Individual progress = (2/6)*100 = 33.33%, Overall = 33.33%

Complete: Basic Info, Contact

Partial progress

3

Add second utility, complete 6 steps

Utility2 progress = (6/6)*100 = 100%, Overall = (33.33+100)/2 = 66.67%

Second utility fully completed

Two utilities

4

Add third utility, complete 3 steps

Utility3 progress = (3/6)*100 = 50%, Overall = (33.33+100+50)/3 = 61.11%

Third utility half completed

Three utilities

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Overall Setup Progress = (Sum of individual utility progress) / (Number of configured utilities)
  • Secondary_Verifications: Individual utility progress = (Completed steps / Total steps) * 100
  • Negative_Verification: Formula handles decimal precision and rounding correctly




ONB02US06_TC_009

Title: Verify status shows "Complete" when progress reaches 100%

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_009
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Status Indicator
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Status calculation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Status Calculator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Status calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Fully completed utility

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utility with all steps completable
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Complete utility configuration data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create new utility

Initial status shows "In Progress", progress = 0%

Utility: Metropolitan Water District

Initial state

2

Complete 5 out of 6 steps

Status remains "In Progress", progress = 83.33%

Complete all except logo

Near completion

3

Complete final step (6/6)

Status changes to "Complete", progress = 100%

Upload logo file

Full completion

4

Verify status consistency

Status = "Complete" when progress = 100%

N/A

Status validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Status shows "Complete" when progress reaches exactly 100%
  • Secondary_Verifications: Status updates immediately upon completion
  • Negative_Verification: Status only shows "Complete" at 100%, not before




ONB02US06_TC_010

Title: Verify status shows "In Progress" when progress is less than 100%

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_010
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Status Indicator
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Status calculation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Status Calculator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Status calculation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Partially completed utilities

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utilities with various completion states
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Partial utility configuration data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_009

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create new utility with 0% progress

Status shows "In Progress"

Utility: Metropolitan Water District

Initial state

2

Complete 1 step (16.67% progress)

Status remains "In Progress"

Complete: Utility Name

Low progress

3

Complete 3 steps (50% progress)

Status remains "In Progress"

Complete: Name, Email, Contact

Mid progress

4

Complete 5 steps (83.33% progress)

Status remains "In Progress"

Complete all except logo

High progress

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Status shows "In Progress" for any progress < 100%
  • Secondary_Verifications: Status remains consistent across different progress levels
  • Negative_Verification: Status never shows "Complete" until 100% reached




ONB02US06_TC_011

Title: Verify utility card displays Name, Description, Progress Bar, and Activation Status

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_011
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility Cards
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: UI rendering system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Utility Card Component
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: UI rendering framework
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Configured utility with complete data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: At least one configured utility
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Complete utility information
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_007

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access utilities dashboard

Dashboard displays configured utilities as cards

N/A

Card layout

2

Verify utility name display

Card shows "Metropolitan Water District"

Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District

Name visibility

3

Check description field

Card displays utility description clearly

Description: Water supply services

Description display

4

Validate progress bar

Horizontal progress bar shows with percentage (e.g., 75%)

Current progress: 75%

Visual progress

5

Check activation status

Card shows "Active" or "Inactive" status clearly

Status: Active

Status indicator

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Each utility card displays Name, Description, Setup Progress Bar with %, and Activation Status
  • Secondary_Verifications: All elements are clearly visible and properly formatted
  • Negative_Verification: No missing or overlapping elements in card layout




ONB02US06_TC_012

Title: Verify Edit and Continue Setup buttons functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_012
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Utility Cards
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Form navigation system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Button Actions
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Form navigation system
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Utilities with different completion states

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utilities with partial and complete configurations
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Utility configurations in various states
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate utility card with incomplete setup

Card displays "Continue Setup" button

Utility: 50% complete

Partial setup

2

Click "Continue Setup" button

System navigates to next incomplete step

N/A

Navigation flow

3

Locate utility card with complete setup

Card displays "Edit" button

Utility: 100% complete

Complete setup

4

Click "Edit" button

System opens utility edit form

N/A

Edit functionality

5

Verify button states

Buttons are enabled and responsive

N/A

UI responsiveness

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Edit and Continue Setup buttons function correctly and navigate appropriately
  • Secondary_Verifications: Button states match utility completion status
  • Negative_Verification: Buttons are not disabled or non-functional




ONB02US06_TC_013

Title: Verify activation toggle switch functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_013
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Activation Toggle
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: State management system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Toggle Controller
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: State management service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Utility with activation capability

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Configured utility available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Utility in active/inactive state
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_011

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate utility with "Active" status

Toggle switch shows "ON" position

Utility: Metropolitan Water District

Active state

2

Click toggle to deactivate

Switch moves to "OFF", status changes to "Inactive" instantly

N/A

Deactivation

3

Click toggle to reactivate

Switch moves to "ON", status changes to "Active" instantly

N/A

Reactivation

4

Verify state persistence

Status remains consistent after page refresh

N/A

Persistence check

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Users can activate/deactivate utilities instantly using toggle switch
  • Secondary_Verifications: Toggle state reflects current activation status
  • Negative_Verification: Toggle does not require minimum progress percentage




ONB02US06_TC_014

Title: Verify no minimum progress requirement for activation toggle

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_014
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Activation Toggle
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: Business rules engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Activation Controller
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Business rules service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: New utility with 0% progress

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utility with minimal configuration
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Utility with 0% setup progress
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_013

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Create new utility with 0% progress

Utility created successfully

Utility: Test Utility Zero Progress

Minimal setup

2

Locate activation toggle

Toggle switch is available and enabled

N/A

Toggle accessibility

3

Attempt to activate utility

Toggle switches to "Active" without restriction

N/A

No blocking

4

Verify activation success

Utility status shows "Active" despite 0% progress

N/A

Business rule validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Activation toggle works regardless of progress percentage
  • Secondary_Verifications: No minimum progress validation prevents activation
  • Negative_Verification: System does not block activation for incomplete utilities




ONB02US06_TC_015

Title: Verify setup progress displays as horizontal progress bar with numerical percentage

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_015
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Progress Display
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: UI rendering system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Bar Component
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: UI rendering framework
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Utilities with various progress levels

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Utilities with different completion percentages
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Progress values at different levels
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

View utility with 0% progress

Horizontal progress bar shows empty, displays "0%"

Utility with 0 completed steps

Minimum state

2

View utility with 50% progress

Horizontal progress bar shows half-filled, displays "50%"

Utility with 3/6 completed steps

Mid-range

3

View utility with 100% progress

Horizontal progress bar shows completely filled, displays "100%"

Utility with 6/6 completed steps

Maximum state

4

Verify visual consistency

All progress bars use consistent horizontal layout and styling

N/A

Visual standards

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Setup progress displays as horizontal progress bar with numerical percentage
  • Secondary_Verifications: Progress bar visual accurately represents percentage value
  • Negative_Verification: No vertical or alternative progress indicators used




ONB02US06_TC_016

Title: Verify State field with predefined dropdown based on country selection

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_016
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Location Selection
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Organization setup module
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Location Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Organization setup service, location data service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Organization with country selection

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Organization setup with country selected
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Country selection from organization setup
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Organization setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Add/Edit Utility form

Form loads with State dropdown field

N/A

Form availability

2

Click State dropdown

Dropdown shows predefined options based on organization's country

Country: United States

Country dependency

3

Verify state options

Only states/provinces for selected country appear

Expected: California, Texas, New York, etc.

Filtered list

4

Select a state

State selection successful, dropdown closes

Selected: California

Selection functionality

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: State field contains predefined dropdown options based on country selected in organization setup
  • Secondary_Verifications: State options are filtered and relevant to organization's country
  • Negative_Verification: States from other countries are not displayed




ONB02US06_TC_017

Title: Verify City field with predefined dropdown based on selected State

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_017
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Location Selection
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Location data service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Location Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Location data service, state selection
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: State selection dependency

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: State selected in utility form
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: State selection (e.g., California)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Select state from dropdown

State selection successful

Selected State: California

State dependency

2

Click City dropdown

City dropdown becomes enabled and populated

N/A

Cascade activation

3

Verify city options

Cities relevant to selected state appear

Expected: San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego

Filtered cities

4

Select a city

City selection successful

Selected City: San Francisco

Selection complete

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: City field provides predefined dropdown options based on selected State
  • Secondary_Verifications: City options are filtered and relevant to selected state
  • Negative_Verification: Cities from other states are not displayed




ONB02US06_TC_018

Title: Verify required fields validation with asterisk marking

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_018
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Form Validation
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Form validation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Form Validator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Form validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Form validation rules

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Required field validation scenarios
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_016

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Add Utility form

Form displays with required fields marked with asterisk (*)

N/A

Visual indicators

2

Verify required field marking

Utility Name*, Email*, Contact Number*, City*, Address* show asterisk

Required fields list

Field identification

3

Submit form with empty required fields

Validation errors appear for all required fields

Leave required fields empty

Validation trigger

4

Fill one required field, submit

Validation errors appear for remaining empty required fields

Fill only Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District

Partial validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Required fields (Utility Name, Email, Contact Number, City, Address) are marked with asterisk *
  • Secondary_Verifications: Form validation prevents submission without required fields
  • Negative_Verification: Optional fields do not show asterisk marking




ONB02US06_TC_019

Title: Verify optional fields functionality (Website URL, Logo Upload)

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_019

  • Created By: Sarvesh

  • Created Date: June 17, 2025

  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Form Validation

  • Test Type: Functional

  • Test Level: System

  • Priority: P2-High

  • Execution Phase: Regression

  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact: Medium

  • Business_Priority: Should-Have

  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding

  • Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium

  • Complexity_Level: Low

  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes

  • Reproducibility_Score: High

  • Data_Sensitivity: Low

  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%

  • Integration_Points: File upload service

  • Code_Module_Mapped: Optional Fields Handler

  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete

  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA

  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage

  • Trend_Tracking: Yes

  • Executive_Visibility: No

  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+

  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

  • Dependencies: File upload service

  • Performance_Baseline: <1s

  • Data_Requirements: Optional field test data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible

  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin

  • Test_Data: Optional field values and files

  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Add Utility form

Form displays optional fields without asterisk marking

N/A

Optional field identification

2

Submit form with only required fields filled

Form submission successful without optional fields

Required fields: Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com, Contact: (415) 555-8734, City: San Francisco, Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue

Successful submission

3

Add optional Website URL

URL field accepts valid format

Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com

URL validation

4

Upload optional logo

File upload successful with supported formats

Logo file: PNG/JPG format

File upload

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Optional fields (Website URL, Logo Upload) do not prevent form submission when empty

  • Secondary_Verifications: Optional fields accept valid data when provided

  • Negative_Verification: Form does not require optional fields for completion




ONB02US06_TC_020

Title: Verify field validation rules implementation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_020
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Form Validation
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: Validation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Field Validator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid test data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Form validation rules configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Valid and invalid field data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_018

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Enter invalid email format

Validation error: "Invalid email format"

Email: invalid-email

Email validation

2

Enter valid email format

No validation error, field accepts input

Email: contact@metrowater.com

Valid email

3

Enter invalid phone format

Validation error: "Invalid phone format"

Phone: 123abc

Phone validation

4

Enter valid phone format

No validation error, field accepts input

Phone: (415) 555-8734

Valid phone

5

Enter invalid URL format

Validation error: "Invalid URL format"

URL: invalid-url

URL validation

6

Enter valid URL format

No validation error, field accepts input

URL: https://www.metrowater.com

Valid URL

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Field validations enforce proper formats for Email, Contact Number, Website URL
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and helpful
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid data is rejected with appropriate error messages




ONB02US06_TC_021

Title: Verify GST/HST/VAGST Registration field functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_021
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Tax Registration
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Tax validation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Tax Field Handler
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Tax validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Tax registration test data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Add/Edit Utility form accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Various tax registration formats
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate GST/HST/VAGST Registration field

Field is present and marked as optional

N/A

Field presence

2

Enter alphanumeric value within limit

Field accepts valid alphanumeric input

GST: ABC123DEF456

Valid input

3

Enter 30-character alphanumeric value

Field accepts maximum length input

GST: ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRST

Max length

4

Attempt to enter 31+ characters

Field restricts input to 30 characters maximum

GST: ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRSTU+

Length restriction

5

Enter special characters

Field rejects special characters, shows validation error

GST: ABC@123#DEF

Invalid characters

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: GST/HST/VAGST Registration field accepts alphanumeric only, max 30 characters
  • Secondary_Verifications: Field is optional and doesn't prevent form submission when empty
  • Negative_Verification: Field rejects special characters and enforces character limit




ONB02US06_TC_022

Title: Verify hardcoded welcome text display

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_022
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Welcome Message
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 1 minute
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 5%
  • Integration_Points: Content management system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Welcome Text Component
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Content rendering system
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Hardcoded text content

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Setup dashboard accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Expected welcome text content
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access Setup Dashboard

Dashboard loads successfully

N/A

Initial access

2

Locate welcome message area

"Welcome to your Setup Dashboard" text is displayed prominently

Expected text: "Welcome to your Setup Dashboard"

Text presence

3

Verify text formatting

Text is properly formatted and readable

N/A

Visual presentation

4

Check text consistency

Same welcome text appears consistently across sessions

N/A

Consistency check

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Hardcoded welcome text "Welcome to your Setup Dashboard" is displayed
  • Secondary_Verifications: Text is properly formatted and positioned
  • Negative_Verification: No dynamic or variable text elements in welcome message




ONB02US06_TC_023

Title: Verify outline icons with background consistency

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_023
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: UI Design
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 5%
  • Integration_Points: Design system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Icon Component
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Design system components
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Icon design specifications

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with icons accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Design guidelines reference
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Review dashboard icons

All icons use outline style with background

N/A

Icon style verification

2

Check icon consistency

Icons maintain consistent outline and background design

N/A

Design consistency

3

Verify design guidelines compliance

Icons match specified design system standards

Reference: Lovable design

Design compliance

4

Test different icon states

Icons maintain style across hover, active, and default states

N/A

State consistency

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Icons use outline style with background consistent with design guidelines
  • Secondary_Verifications: Icon design is consistent across all dashboard elements
  • Negative_Verification: No filled or inconsistent icon styles present




ONB02US06_TC_024

Title: Verify animations match design specifications

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_024
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: UI Animations
  • Test Type: UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P3-Medium
  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-End-to-End, HappyPath

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Could-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: None
  • Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 5%
  • Integration_Points: Animation framework
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Animation Controller
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: No
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Animation framework
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Animation specifications

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with animations accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Animation design reference
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate through dashboard sections

Page transitions animate smoothly

N/A

Transition animations

2

Interact with buttons and controls

Hover and click animations work as designed

N/A

Interactive animations

3

Compare with design reference

Animations match specifications from Lovable design

Reference: Lovable design animations

Design compliance

4

Test animation performance

Animations run smoothly without lag or stuttering

N/A

Performance validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Animations work as specified in the Lovable design reference
  • Secondary_Verifications: Animations are smooth and enhance user experience
  • Negative_Verification: No broken, missing, or jarring animation effects




Performance & Integration Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_025

Title: Verify dashboard loading performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_025
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Performance monitoring system
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard Loader
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities for load testing

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Multiple utilities with varying completion states
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Clear browser cache

Cache cleared successfully

N/A

Clean state

2

Navigate to Setup Dashboard

Dashboard loads in <1 second

N/A

Performance measurement

3

Measure load time with 10 utilities

Dashboard loads in <1 second with multiple utilities

10 utilities with varying progress

Load testing

4

Test with network throttling

Dashboard loads acceptably under slow connections

Simulate 3G connection

Network performance

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard loading time < 1 second under normal conditions
  • Secondary_Verifications: Performance maintained with multiple utilities
  • Negative_Verification: No performance degradation with data volume




ONB02US06_TC_026

Title: Verify utility creation/editing performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_026
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Database performance
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Utility CRUD Operations
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database performance monitoring
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Utility form data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Database performance monitoring enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Complete utility form data
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Fill utility creation form completely

Form accepts all data

Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com, Contact: (415) 555-8734, City: San Francisco, Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue

Complete data

2

Submit new utility creation

Utility created and saved in <1 second

N/A

Creation performance

3

Edit existing utility

Form loads existing data in <1 second

N/A

Edit performance

4

Save utility modifications

Changes saved in <1 second

Modified data

Save performance

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Utility creation/editing operations complete in <1 second
  • Secondary_Verifications: Form responsiveness maintained during operations
  • Negative_Verification: No timeout or delay issues during CRUD operations




ONB02US06_TC_027

Title: Verify progress calculation performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_027
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Performance

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Calculation engine performance
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Progress Calculator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Calculation engine monitoring
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities for calculation testing

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple utilities with different progress states
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: 50+ utilities with varying progress
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_008

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Complete a configuration step

Individual progress recalculates in <1 second using formula: (completed steps / total steps) * 100

Complete step 3 of 6

Individual calculation

2

View overall progress dashboard

Overall progress calculation displays in <1 second using formula: (Sum of all utility progress) / (Number of utilities)

50 utilities with different progress

Bulk calculation

3

Add new utility

Progress recalculation with new utility in <1 second

Add 51st utility

Dynamic calculation

4

Delete utility

Progress recalculation after deletion in <1 second

Remove one utility

Deletion calculation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Progress calculations (individual and overall) complete in <1 second
  • Secondary_Verifications: Real-time calculation updates without lag
  • Negative_Verification: No calculation delays with large datasets




ONB02US06_TC_028

Title: Verify file upload performance under 1 second

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_028
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-External-Dependency, Performance

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 10%
  • Integration_Points: File upload service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: File Upload Handler
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File upload service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Test logo files

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: File upload functionality accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Various logo file sizes and formats
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_019

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Upload small logo file (50KB)

File uploads and processes in <1 second

PNG file, 50KB

Small file

2

Upload medium logo file (200KB)

File uploads and processes in <1 second

JPG file, 200KB

Medium file

3

Upload large logo file (500KB)

File uploads within acceptable time

PNG file, 500KB

Large file

4

Test upload progress indicator

Progress indicator updates smoothly

Various file sizes

User feedback

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Logo file uploads complete in <1 second for typical file sizes
  • Secondary_Verifications: Upload progress provides adequate user feedback
  • Negative_Verification: No upload failures or timeouts for supported file sizes




ONB02US06_TC_029

Title: Verify API endpoints for utility CRUD operations

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_029
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: API Integration
  • Test Type: API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, API

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 25%
  • Integration_Points: Backend API services
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Utility API Controller
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, API-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Backend API services
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: API test data sets

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin API access
  • Test_Data: Complete utility data payloads
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_026

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

POST /api/utilities (Create)

API returns 201 Created with utility object

{"name": "Metropolitan Water District", "email": "contact@metrowater.com", "phone": "(415) 555-8734", "city": "San Francisco", "address": "1234 Reservoir Avenue"}

Create operation

2

GET /api/utilities/:id (Read)

API returns 200 OK with utility details

Utility ID from step 1

Read operation

3

PUT /api/utilities/:id (Update)

API returns 200 OK with updated utility

{"email": "updated@metrowater.com"}

Update operation

4

DELETE /api/utilities/:id (Delete)

API returns 204 No Content

Utility ID from step 1

Delete operation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All CRUD API operations return correct HTTP status codes and data
  • Secondary_Verifications: API responses include proper data validation and error handling
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid requests return appropriate error codes (400, 404, 422)




Security Test Cases

ONB02US06_TC_030

Title: Verify input validation prevents injection attacks

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_030
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Security
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 20%
  • Integration_Points: Security validation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Input Validator
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Security validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Malicious input test cases

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Security validation enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: SQL injection and XSS attack vectors
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_020

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Enter SQL injection in utility name

Input rejected, validation error displayed

Name: '; DROP TABLE utilities; --

SQL injection attempt

2

Enter XSS script in description

Script sanitized or rejected

Description: <script>alert('XSS')</script>

XSS attempt

3

Enter malicious file upload

File rejected with appropriate error

File: malicious.exe

File security

4

Test CSRF protection

Form submission requires valid CSRF token

Invalid CSRF token

CSRF protection

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs are properly validated and rejected
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error messages don't reveal system information
  • Negative_Verification: No successful injection or script execution




ONB02US06_TC_031

Title: Verify file upload security restrictions

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_031
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Security
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: File security service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: File Upload Security
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: File security scanning service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Various file types for testing

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: File upload security enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Malicious and valid file samples
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Upload executable file

File rejected with security error

File: test.exe

Executable rejection

2

Upload oversized image

File rejected due to size limit

File: 10MB image

Size limitation

3

Upload valid image formats

Files accepted successfully

Files: PNG, JPG, GIF

Valid formats

4

Test file content validation

Files scanned for malicious content

File with embedded script

Content security

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Only safe file types (PNG, JPG, GIF) are accepted for logo upload
  • Secondary_Verifications: File size limits are enforced
  • Negative_Verification: Executable files and malicious content are blocked




ONB02US06_TC_032

Title: Verify user authorization and access control

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_032
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Security
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Security

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Authentication service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Access Control
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication and authorization service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Different user role accounts

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple user roles configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin, Regular User accounts
  • Test_Data: User credentials for different roles
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_031

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Login as System Admin

Access granted to utility management features

Admin credentials

Admin access

2

Access utility creation form

Form accessible and functional

N/A

Admin permissions

3

Login as Regular User

Limited access to utility features

User credentials

User access

4

Attempt utility creation as Regular User

Access denied or restricted functionality

N/A

Permission enforcement

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: System Admin role has full access to utility management features
  • Secondary_Verifications: Access control is properly enforced based on user roles
  • Negative_Verification: Unauthorized users cannot access restricted functionality




Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

ONB02US06_TC_033

Title: Verify system behavior with maximum character limits

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_033
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Edge Cases
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Validation service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Input Validation
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Edge-Cases
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Validation service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1s
  • Data_Requirements: Maximum length test strings

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Form validation enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Maximum length test strings
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_021

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Enter maximum allowed characters in Utility Name

Field accepts input at character limit

255 character string

Max length test

2

Attempt to exceed character limit in Utility Name

Field restricts input beyond limit

256+ character string

Overflow prevention

3

Enter exactly 30 characters in GST field

Field accepts maximum length

ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890KLMNOPQRST

GST max length

4

Test boundary conditions for all fields

All fields handle max length appropriately

Various max length strings

Boundary testing

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All fields properly enforce maximum character limits
  • Secondary_Verifications: User receives clear feedback when limits are reached
  • Negative_Verification: No data truncation or corruption at boundary conditions




ONB02US06_TC_034

Title: Verify system handling of network connectivity issues

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_034
  • Created By: Sarvesh
  • Created Date: June 17, 2025
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Error Handling
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ONB, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End, Negative

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 15%
  • Integration_Points: Network error handling
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Error Handler
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Error-Handling
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Network simulation tools
  • Performance_Baseline: N/A
  • Data_Requirements: Network connectivity scenarios

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Network simulation capability
  • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin
  • Test_Data: Form data for testing
  • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Simulate network disconnection during form submission

Graceful error handling with retry option

Complete utility form data: Name: Metropolitan Water District, Email: contact@metrowater.com

Network failure

2

Test slow network conditions

Loading indicators and timeout handling

N/A

Performance degradation

3

Simulate server unavailability

Appropriate error message displayed

N/A

Server error

4

Test automatic retry mechanisms

System attempts to reconnect and retry

N/A

Recovery testing

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: System handles network issues gracefully with appropriate user feedback
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data is not lost during network interruptions
  • Negative_Verification: No system crashes or data corruption during network issues




Test Suite Definitions

Smoke Test Suite

Execution Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_006, ONB02US06_TC_011, ONB02US06_TC_015
Execution Frequency: Every build deployment
Expected Duration: 15 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Execution Criteria: P1-P2 priority, automated tests
Test Cases: All functional test cases (TC_001 through TC_024)
Execution Frequency: Before each release
Expected Duration: 2 hours

Performance Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Performance-critical operations
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_025, ONB02US06_TC_026, ONB02US06_TC_027, ONB02US06_TC_028
Execution Frequency: Weekly performance testing
Expected Duration: 30 minutes

Security Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Security-critical validations
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_030, ONB02US06_TC_031, ONB02US06_TC_032
Execution Frequency: Before major releases
Expected Duration: 45 minutes

API Test Suite

Execution Criteria: API integration validation
Test Cases: ONB02US06_TC_029
Execution Frequency: Continuous integration
Expected Duration: 10 minutes

Full Test Suite

Execution Criteria: Complete feature coverage
Test Cases: All 34 test cases
Execution Frequency: Major release cycles
Expected Duration: 4 hours




Execution Matrix

Browser/Device Coverage

Test Case Category

Chrome 115+

Firefox 110+

Safari 16+

Edge Latest

Mobile

Smoke Tests

Functional Tests

Selected

Performance Tests

Security Tests

API Tests

Environment Coverage

  • Development: Smoke tests only
  • Staging: Full test suite
  • Production: Smoke tests + selected regression tests




Dependency Map

Test Execution Dependencies

  1. Organization Setup → ONB02US06_TC_016, ONB02US06_TC_017
  2. Basic Dashboard Access → ONB02US06_TC_001 → All subsequent tests
  3. Progress Calculation → ONB02US06_TC_004 → ONB02US06_TC_007, ONB02US06_TC_008
  4. Form Validation → ONB02US06_TC_018 → ONB02US06_TC_019, ONB02US06_TC_020

External System Dependencies

  • Organization Setup Module: Required for country/state/city dropdowns
  • Authentication Service: Required for user access control
  • File Upload Service: Required for logo upload functionality
  • Location Data Service: Required for state/city dropdown population