Utility Management (ONB02US06)

Utility Management Test Cases - ONB02US06

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

Setup Dashboard Navigation and Display
Overall Setup Progress Calculation and Display
Add New Utility Form Functionality
Edit Existing Utility Functionality
Utility Activation/Deactivation Toggle
Progress Tracking and Status Updates
Continue Setup Process
Configured Utilities List Management

Business Rules:

6 Configuration Steps Tracking
Progress Percentage Calculation
Mandatory vs Optional Field Validation
State/City Dropdown Dependencies
GST/HST/VAGST Registration Validation

User Journeys:

System Admin - New Utility Setup Journey
System Admin - Existing Utility Management Journey
System Admin - Progress Monitoring Journey

Integration Points:

Country/State/City Dropdown API Integration
Logo Upload Service Integration
Organization Setup Data Integration

Data Flow:

Form Data Validation and Submission
Progress Calculation Updates
Status Synchronization Across Dashboard

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance:

Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
Form submission response < 500ms
Progress updates real-time sync
Concurrent admin user handling

Security:

System Admin authentication validation
Form data encryption
File upload security (logo)
Session management

Compatibility:

Chrome Latest browser support
Cross-device responsiveness
Screen resolution compatibility

Usability:

Reliability:

Data integrity during setup process
System stability with multiple utilities
Error recovery mechanisms

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions:

Maximum utility name length
Maximum address field length
GST registration character limits
File size limits for logo upload

Invalid Inputs:

Invalid email formats
Malformed phone numbers
Invalid URL formats
Unsupported file types for logo

System Failures:

Network interruption during form submission
API service unavailability
File upload service failures
Session timeout scenarios

Data Inconsistencies:

Duplicate utility names
Missing state/city data
Corrupted progress calculations

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Setup Dashboard Initial Load

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_001
Title: Verify Setup Dashboard loads correctly with overall progress and configured utilities
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-SetupDashboard, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Dashboard-Load-Performance

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboard display
Integration_Points: Organization setup data, utility configuration data
Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard.component, ProgressCalculation.service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC2, AC6
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Organization setup completed, authentication service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds load time
Data_Requirements: At least 2 configured utilities with different progress percentages

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: System Admin logged in, organization setup completed
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Metropolitan Water District (70% progress, Active)
Springfield Energy Authority (40% progress, Active)
Riverdale Utilities Corp (15% progress, Inactive) Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication test cases must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Setup Dashboard from main navigation	Dashboard page loads within 3 seconds	N/A	Performance check
2	Verify page title and header	"Setup Dashboard" displayed with subtitle "Configure your utility management system and track setup progress"	N/A	UI validation
3	Check Overall Setup Progress section	Shows "Overall Setup Progress" with correct percentage (42%) and "In Progress" status	Expected: 42%	Progress calculation
4	Verify progress calculation	(70% + 40% + 15%) ÷ 3 = 42% average	Actual utility progress values	Business rule validation
5	Check Welcome section	"Welcome to your Setup Dashboard!" section visible with bullet points	User story welcome text	Content validation
6	Verify Configured Utilities section	All 3 utilities displayed with correct names, descriptions, progress bars	Metropolitan Water District, Springfield Energy Authority, Riverdale Utilities Corp	List display
7	Check utility cards content	Each card shows name, description, progress percentage, activation toggle, Edit and Continue Setup buttons	N/A	Card structure
8	Verify activation toggles	Active utilities show green toggle, inactive show gray toggle	Metropolitan & Springfield: Active, Riverdale: Inactive	Status indicator
9	Check Add Utility button	"+ Add Utility" button visible and enabled	N/A	Action availability

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads completely with all sections and correct progress calculation
Secondary_Verifications: All utilities display correctly, toggles show proper states, performance meets baseline
Negative_Verification: No error messages displayed, no broken UI elements

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Authentication tests
Blocked_Tests: All utility management tests
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Must run before form tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical path test for utility management feature
Edge_Cases: Empty utility list, single utility scenario
Risk_Areas: Progress calculation accuracy, performance with large utility lists
Security_Considerations: Ensure only authorized admin users can access

Test Case 2: Add New Utility - Valid Data Submission

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_002
Title: Verify successful creation of new utility with all mandatory fields
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Add Utility Form
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-AddUtility, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency, Form-Validation

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of add utility functionality
Integration_Points: State/City dropdown API, Logo upload service
Code_Module_Mapped: AddUtility.component, FormValidation.service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC4, Business Rules for required fields
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: State/City API service, File upload service
Performance_Baseline: Form submission < 500ms
Data_Requirements: Valid state/city data available via API

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Setup Dashboard accessible, API services running
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District (from user story sample data)
Email: contact@metrowater.com (from user story sample data)
Contact Number: (415) 555-8734 (from user story sample data)
State: California (select from dropdown based on organization setup)
City: San Francisco (select from dropdown based on State selection)
Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 (from user story sample data)
Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com (from user story sample data)
Logo: Metropolitan Water District logo file (from user story sample data)
GST Registration: (Optional - leave blank for this test) Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "+ Add Utility" button from dashboard	"Add New Utility" modal opens with all form fields	N/A	Modal display
2	Verify form structure	All required fields marked with asterisk (*): Utility Name, Email, Contact Number, State, City, Address. Optional fields: Website URL, Logo Upload, GST/HST/VAGST Registration	Required fields per user story business rules	Field identification
3	Enter Utility Name	Field accepts input, no validation errors	"Metropolitan Water District" (user story sample)	Text input validation
4	Enter Email address	Field accepts valid email format	"contact@metrowater.com" (user story sample)	Email format validation
5	Enter Contact Number	Field accepts phone number format	"(415) 555-8734" (user story sample)	Phone format validation
6	Select State from dropdown	Dropdown opens with states from organization setup, selection works	Select state (based on organization setup)	API integration
7	Select City from dropdown	City dropdown populates based on state, selection works	Select city (based on state selection)	Dependent dropdown
8	Enter Address	Field accepts full address text	"1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110" (user story sample)	Text area input
9	Enter Website URL (optional)	Field accepts valid URL format	"https://www.metrowater.com" (user story sample)	URL validation
10	Upload Logo (optional)	File upload works with "Click to upload logo" area	Metropolitan Water District logo file (user story sample)	File upload
11	Leave GST Registration blank	Optional field, no validation errors when empty	N/A	Optional field behavior
12	Click "Save Utility" button	Form submits successfully, modal closes, success message shown	N/A	Form submission
13	Verify dashboard update	New utility appears in configured utilities list with 0% progress	Metropolitan Water District added	Data persistence
14	Check overall progress update	Overall progress percentage recalculated to include new utility at 0%	Progress calculation includes new utility	Progress recalculation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: New utility successfully created and appears in dashboard
Secondary_Verifications: Form validation works correctly, API integrations function, file upload successful
Negative_Verification: No duplicate utilities created, no data corruption

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: Edit utility tests
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Follow-up with edit/delete tests

Additional Information

Notes: Core functionality for utility management system
Edge_Cases: Maximum field lengths, special characters in names
Risk_Areas: API dependency failures, file upload size limits
Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, file type validation

Test Case 3: Form Validation - Missing Mandatory Fields

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_003
Title: Verify form validation prevents submission with missing mandatory fields
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Add Utility Form Validation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-FormValidation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Validation-Negative-Testing

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of validation rules
Integration_Points: Form validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: FormValidation.service, AddUtility.component
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Validation-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Required Fields validation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Form validation service
Performance_Baseline: Validation response < 100ms
Data_Requirements: None

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add Utility form accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data: Empty/invalid test data for each mandatory field
Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Utility modal	Modal opens with empty form	N/A	Initial state
2	Click "Save Utility" without entering any data	Form submission blocked, validation errors displayed for all required fields	N/A	Empty form validation
3	Verify Utility Name validation	Error message: "Utility Name is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Utility Name field	Required field validation
4	Verify Email validation	Error message: "Email is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Email field	Required field validation
5	Verify Contact Number validation	Error message: "Contact Number is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Contact Number field	Required field validation
6	Verify State validation	Error message: "State is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	No State selection	Required dropdown validation
7	Verify City validation	Error message: "City is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	No City selection	Required dropdown validation
8	Verify Address validation	Error message: "Address is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Address field	Required field validation
9	Enter invalid email format	Error message: "Please enter a valid email address"	"invalid-email-format"	Format validation
10	Enter invalid phone format	Error message: "Please enter a valid phone number"	"123" (insufficient digits)	Format validation
11	Enter invalid URL format	Error message: "Please enter a valid URL"	"not-a-valid-url"	Format validation (optional field)
12	Verify optional fields don't trigger errors	No validation errors for Website URL, Logo Upload, and GST Registration when empty	Empty optional fields	Optional field behavior
13	Fill all mandatory fields with valid data	All validation errors clear, "Save Utility" button becomes enabled	User story sample data	Validation clearing

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Form prevents submission when mandatory fields are missing or invalid
Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate error messages displayed, optional fields don't trigger validation
Negative_Verification: Form doesn't submit with invalid data, no false positive validations

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for data integrity and user experience
Edge_Cases: Copy-paste scenarios, special characters
Risk_Areas: Client-side vs server-side validation consistency
Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, XSS prevention

Test Case 4: Utility Activation Toggle Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_004
Title: Verify utility activation/deactivation toggle works regardless of setup progress
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Management - Activation Toggle
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-UtilityToggle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Toggle-State-Management

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of toggle functionality
Integration_Points: Utility status management service
Code_Module_Mapped: UtilityToggle.component, StatusUpdate.service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Toggle-Analytics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - No minimum progress required for activation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_005

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Utility status service
Performance_Baseline: Toggle response < 200ms
Data_Requirements: Utilities with different progress percentages and activation states

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with configured utilities
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Riverdale Utilities Corp (15% progress, currently Inactive) - per user story
Metropolitan Water District (70% progress, currently Active) - per user story Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate Riverdale Utilities Corp card	Card shows 15% progress with Inactive toggle (gray)	15% progress utility	Initial state verification
2	Click the activation toggle for Riverdale	Toggle switches to Active (green), status updates to "Active"	N/A	Activation test
3	Verify visual feedback	Toggle color changes, status text updates immediately	N/A	UI response
4	Refresh the page	Toggle state persists as Active after page reload	N/A	State persistence
5	Click toggle again to deactivate	Toggle switches back to Inactive (gray), status shows "Inactive"	N/A	Deactivation test
6	Test high-progress utility toggle	Locate Metropolis Water District (70% progress, Active)	70% progress utility	Different progress level
7	Deactivate high-progress utility	Toggle switches to Inactive successfully	N/A	Progress independence
8	Test multiple rapid toggles	Click toggle multiple times quickly	N/A	Rapid interaction test
9	Verify no impact on progress percentage	Setup progress remains unchanged after toggle operations	Original progress values	Progress independence
10	Check overall progress calculation	Overall progress percentage unaffected by activation status	N/A	Calculation integrity

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Toggle successfully changes utility activation status regardless of setup progress
Secondary_Verifications: Visual feedback immediate, state persists across page reloads, no impact on progress calculations
Negative_Verification: No errors during rapid clicking, no unintended side effects

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Progress tracking tests
Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information

Notes: Important for operational flexibility
Edge_Cases: Network interruption during toggle, concurrent user toggles
Risk_Areas: State synchronization issues, UI feedback delays
Security_Considerations: Authorization check for toggle operations

Test Case 5: Overall Setup Progress Calculation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_005
Title: Verify accurate calculation and display of overall setup progress percentage
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Progress Calculation Engine
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-ProgressCalculation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Calculation-Accuracy

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of progress calculation logic
Integration_Points: Utility data service, Progress calculation service
Code_Module_Mapped: ProgressCalculation.service, Dashboard.component
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Calculation-Accuracy
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - Progress Calculation Formula
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Utility data service, calculation engine
Performance_Baseline: Calculation update < 100ms
Data_Requirements: Multiple utilities with known progress percentages

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple configured utilities with different progress levels
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Metropolis Water District: 70% progress
Springfield Energy Authority: 40% progress
Riverdale Utilities Corp: 15% progress
Expected Overall Progress: (70 + 40 + 15) ÷ 3 = 41.67% ≈ 42% Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load Setup Dashboard	Overall Setup Progress displays current percentage	N/A	Initial state
2	Verify current calculation	Progress shows 42% based on existing utilities	(70+40+15)÷3 = 42%	Manual calculation verification
3	Add new utility with 0% progress	Overall progress should recalculate to 31%	New utility: 0%	(70+40+15+0)÷4 = 31.25% ≈ 31%
4	Verify updated display	Overall progress updates to reflect new calculation	N/A	Real-time update
5	Edit existing utility to increase progress	Change Riverdale from 15% to 45%	Riverdale: 45%	Progress update scenario
6	Verify recalculation	Overall progress updates to 39%	(70+40+45+0)÷4 = 38.75% ≈ 39%	Calculation accuracy
7	Complete setup for one utility	Change new utility from 0% to 100%	New utility: 100%	Complete setup scenario
8	Verify final calculation	Overall progress updates to 64%	(70+40+45+100)÷4 = 63.75% ≈ 64%	Final verification
9	Check status indicator	If progress < 100%, status shows "In Progress"	Current: 64%	Status logic
10	Test edge case - all utilities 100%	Modify all utilities to 100% progress	All: 100%	Complete scenario
11	Verify complete status	Overall progress shows 100%, status shows "Complete"	100%	Complete state
12	Test rounding behavior	Add utility with progress creating decimal result	Various percentages	Rounding consistency

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Overall progress percentage calculated correctly using average formula
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates when individual progress changes, proper rounding, correct status display
Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, no display inconsistencies

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Individual utility progress tests
Sequential_Tests: Should run after utility modification tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical business logic for progress tracking
Edge_Cases: Division by zero (no utilities), very large numbers of utilities
Risk_Areas: Floating point precision, concurrent updates
Security_Considerations: Calculation integrity, data validation

Test Case 6: State and City Dropdown Dependencies

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_006
Title: Verify State selection populates corresponding City dropdown options
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Form Dependencies - State/City Integration
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-FormDependencies, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-External-Dependency, API-Dependent

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of dropdown dependency logic
Integration_Points: State/City API service
Code_Module_Mapped: DropdownDependency.service, AddUtility.component
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, API-Dependencies
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - City dropdown based on selected State
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: State/City API service, Organization setup data
Performance_Baseline: Dropdown population < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Valid state/city mapping data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add Utility form accessible, API services operational
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

State: California (should populate cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego)
State: New York (should populate cities like New York City, Buffalo, Albany) Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Utility modal	Form opens with State dropdown enabled, City dropdown disabled/empty	N/A	Initial state
2	Click State dropdown	Dropdown opens showing available states from organization setup	N/A	State availability
3	Select "California" from State dropdown	State selected, City dropdown becomes enabled and populates with California cities	Select California	Dependency trigger
4	Verify City dropdown population	Cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego appear	California cities	API response
5	Select "San Francisco" from City dropdown	City selected successfully	Select San Francisco	City selection
6	Change State to "New York"	City dropdown clears and repopulates with New York cities	Select New York	State change behavior
7	Verify City dropdown update	Previous city selection cleared, New York cities available	NYC, Buffalo, Albany	Dependency reset
8	Test with no State selection	Clear State selection, verify City dropdown becomes disabled	Clear state	Reverse dependency
9	Select State again	Re-select California, verify City dropdown re-enables	Select California	Re-activation
10	Test API error scenario	Simulate API failure, verify graceful error handling	Network disconnection	Error handling
11	Verify form submission	Complete form with valid State/City combination submits successfully	Valid selections	End-to-end

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: City dropdown populates correctly based on State selection
Secondary_Verifications: Dropdown disables/enables appropriately, API integration works, error handling functions
Negative_Verification: Invalid state/city combinations prevented, graceful API error handling

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other API integration tests
Sequential_Tests: Should run before form submission tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for address data integrity
Edge_Cases: Very slow API response, partial data load
Risk_Areas: API service availability, data synchronization
Security_Considerations: API authentication, data validation

Test Case 7: GST/HST/VAGST Registration Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_007
Title: Verify GST/HST/VAGST registration field accepts valid alphanumeric input within character limits
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Form Validation - GST Registration
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-GSTValidation, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Validation-Optional-Field

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of GST field validation
Integration_Points: Form validation service
Code_Module_Mapped: FormValidation.service, GSTValidation.utility
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Validation-Coverage, Compliance-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - GST Registration: Optional, alphanumeric, max 30 characters
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add Utility form accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Valid GST: "GST123456789ABC" (15 characters)
Valid HST: "HST987654321XYZ" (15 characters)
Maximum length: "ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890ABCDEFGHIJ" (30 characters)
Over limit: "ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890ABCDEFGHIJK" (31 characters)
Invalid characters: "GST@123#456$" Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Utility modal	GST/HST/VAGST Registration field visible as optional	N/A	Field visibility
2	Leave GST field empty	No validation error, field remains optional	Empty	Optional behavior
3	Enter valid GST number	Field accepts input without errors	"GST123456789ABC"	Valid input
4	Enter valid HST number	Field accepts input without errors	"HST987654321XYZ"	Valid input variation
5	Test maximum character limit	Field accepts exactly 30 characters	30-character string	Boundary testing
6	Test over character limit	Field prevents input beyond 30 characters or shows error	31-character string	Limit enforcement
7	Test invalid characters	Field rejects or shows error for special characters	"GST@123#456$"	Character validation
8	Test numeric only input	Field accepts numeric-only registration	"123456789012345"	Numeric acceptance
9	Test alphabetic only input	Field accepts alphabetic-only registration	"GSTABCDEFGHIJKLM"	Alphabetic acceptance
10	Test mixed alphanumeric	Field accepts mixed alphanumeric input	"GST123ABC456DEF"	Mixed input
11	Submit form with valid GST	Form submission successful with GST data included	Complete valid form	End-to-end
12	Submit form without GST	Form submission successful without GST data	Complete form, empty GST	Optional submission

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: GST field accepts valid alphanumeric input within 30-character limit
Secondary_Verifications: Optional field behavior, character limit enforcement, proper validation messages
Negative_Verification: Invalid characters rejected, length limits enforced

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information

Notes: Important for tax compliance in applicable regions
Edge_Cases: Copy-paste behavior, different GST formats by region
Risk_Areas: Regional format variations, compliance requirements
Security_Considerations: Data sanitization, format validation

Test Case 8: Edit Utility Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_008
Title: Verify Edit utility functionality allows modification of existing utility data
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Edit Utility Form
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-EditUtility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Data-Modification

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of edit functionality
Integration_Points: Utility data service, State/City API
Code_Module_Mapped: EditUtility.component, UtilityUpdate.service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Data-Integrity
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6 - Edit button functionality
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Utility data service, State/City API
Performance_Baseline: Form load < 2 seconds, update < 500ms
Data_Requirements: Existing utility with complete data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: At least one configured utility exists
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Existing: Metropolis Water District with all fields populated
Updated: Change email from contact@metrowater.com to admin@metrowater.com
Updated: Change contact from (415) 555-8734 to (415) 555-9999 Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate existing utility card	Metropolis Water District card visible with Edit button	N/A	Utility identification
2	Click "Edit" button	Edit utility modal opens with pre-populated form fields	N/A	Modal opening
3	Verify form pre-population	All fields show current utility data correctly	Existing utility data	Data loading
4	Verify field editability	All fields are editable (not read-only)	N/A	Form functionality
5	Modify Email field	Change email address to new value	"admin@metrowater.com"	Data modification
6	Modify Contact Number	Change phone number to new value	"(415) 555-9999"	Data modification
7	Verify validation still works	Required field validation active during edit	Remove required field	Validation consistency
8	Test State/City dependency in edit	Changing state updates city options appropriately	Change state	Dependency maintenance
9	Upload new logo	Replace existing logo with new file	New image file	File update
10	Click "Save Utility"	Form submits successfully, modal closes	N/A	Save operation
11	Verify dashboard update	Utility card shows updated information	N/A	Data persistence
12	Verify progress preservation	Setup progress percentage remains unchanged	Original progress	Progress integrity
13	Test cancel functionality	Open edit again, make changes, click Cancel	N/A	Cancel behavior
14	Verify cancel behavior	Changes not saved, original data preserved	Original data	Data integrity

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Edit functionality successfully updates utility data
Secondary_Verifications: Form pre-population works, validation maintained, progress preserved
Negative_Verification: Cancel discards changes, invalid edits prevented

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Add utility tests
Sequential_Tests: Should run after create utility tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for utility data maintenance
Edge_Cases: Editing during concurrent access, large file uploads
Risk_Areas: Data loss during edit, concurrent modification conflicts
Security_Considerations: Authorization check, data validation, audit trail

Test Case 9: Continue Setup Process

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_009
Title: Verify Continue Setup button navigates to appropriate configuration steps
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Navigation - Continue Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-ContinueSetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Navigation-Flow

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of continue setup navigation
Integration_Points: Setup wizard service, Navigation service
Code_Module_Mapped: ContinueSetup.component, NavigationFlow.service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: User-Journey, Navigation-Analytics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC5 - Guidance on remaining steps, AC2 - Clear step visibility
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_010

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Setup wizard service, Navigation routing
Performance_Baseline: Navigation < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Utilities with varying progress levels

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utilities with incomplete setup progress
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Riverdale Utilities Corp: 15% progress (incomplete)
Springfield Energy Authority: 40% progress (incomplete)
Metropolis Water District: 70% progress (incomplete) Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate utility with lowest progress	Riverdale Utilities Corp card (15% progress)	15% progress utility	Starting point
2	Click "Continue Setup" button	Navigation to utility-specific setup wizard	N/A	Navigation trigger
3	Verify setup wizard loads	Setup wizard opens showing 6 configuration steps	N/A	Wizard display
4	Check current step indication	Step corresponding to 15% progress highlighted as current	Step 1 of 6	Progress alignment
5	Verify completed steps	Steps already completed show as finished	Based on 15% progress	Completion status
6	Verify pending steps	Remaining steps show as pending/not started	Remaining steps	Pending status
7	Test navigation back to dashboard	Back/Cancel button returns to setup dashboard	N/A	Return navigation
8	Test medium progress utility	Click Continue Setup for 40% progress utility	40% progress utility	Different progress level
9	Verify appropriate step highlighting	Correct step highlighted based on 40% progress	Step 2-3 of 6	Progress accuracy
10	Test high progress utility	Click Continue Setup for 70% progress utility	70% progress utility	High progress scenario
11	Verify near-completion state	Most steps completed, few remaining	Step 4-5 of 6	Advanced progress
12	Test 100% progress utility	Test Continue Setup on completed utility	100% progress utility	Complete scenario

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Continue Setup navigates to appropriate step based on current progress
Secondary_Verifications: Setup wizard displays correctly, step status accurate, navigation functions
Negative_Verification: No navigation errors, correct step highlighting

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: Setup wizard tests
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Should precede detailed setup wizard tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for user guidance and setup completion
Edge_Cases: Setup wizard service unavailable, invalid progress states
Risk_Areas: Navigation failures, incorrect step calculation
Security_Considerations: Authorization for setup access

Test Case 10: Performance Testing - Dashboard Load with Multiple Utilities

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_010
Title: Verify Setup Dashboard performance with large number of configured utilities
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance - Dashboard Scalability
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Scalability-Testing

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: Performance under load
Integration_Points: Database queries, Calculation service
Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard.component, PerformanceOptimization.service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Analysis
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance baseline - Dashboard load < 3 seconds
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_005

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Calculation service
Performance_Baseline: Load time < 3 seconds for up to 50 utilities
Data_Requirements: 50+ configured utilities with varying progress

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: 50 configured utilities with different progress levels
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

50 utilities with progress ranging from 0% to 100%
Mix of active and inactive utilities
Various logo files and complete data sets Prior_Test_Cases: Basic dashboard functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache	Cache cleared for clean test environment	N/A	Test preparation
2	Start performance monitoring	Begin measuring load times and resource usage	N/A	Monitoring setup
3	Navigate to Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads within performance baseline	50 utilities	Load test
4	Measure initial load time	Record time from navigation to fully rendered page	N/A	Performance measurement
5	Verify all utilities render	All 50 utilities visible with progress bars and data	50 utilities	Completeness check
6	Test progress calculation performance	Overall progress calculated without delay	N/A	Calculation efficiency
7	Test scroll performance	Smooth scrolling through utility list	N/A	UI responsiveness
8	Measure toggle response time	Activation toggle response under load	Multiple toggles	Interaction performance
9	Test concurrent user simulation	Multiple admin users accessing dashboard	5 concurrent users	Concurrency test
10	Monitor memory usage	Check for memory leaks during extended use	N/A	Resource monitoring
11	Test refresh performance	Page refresh maintains performance standards	N/A	Refresh efficiency
12	Verify performance degrades gracefully	Performance remains acceptable as utility count increases	75+ utilities	Scalability limit

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 3 seconds with 50+ utilities
Secondary_Verifications: Smooth interactions, no memory leaks, graceful degradation
Negative_Verification: No timeouts, crashes, or unresponsive UI

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Should run after functional tests

Additional Information

Notes: Critical for enterprise customer satisfaction
Edge_Cases: Very large utility lists (100+), slow network conditions
Risk_Areas: Database query optimization, client-side rendering performance
Security_Considerations: Performance monitoring doesn't expose sensitive data

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1-Critical priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases:

ONB02US06_TC_001: Setup Dashboard Initial Load
ONB02US06_TC_002: Add New Utility - Valid Data Submission
ONB02US06_TC_003: Form Validation - Missing Mandatory Fields

Execution: Every build deployment
Expected Duration: 15 minutes
Automation Level: 100%

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core features and integration points
Test Cases:

All Smoke Test cases
ONB02US06_TC_004: Utility Activation Toggle Functionality
ONB02US06_TC_005: Overall Setup Progress Calculation
ONB02US06_TC_006: State and City Dropdown Dependencies
ONB02US06_TC_008: Edit Utility Functionality
ONB02US06_TC_009: Continue Setup Process

Execution: Before each release
Expected Duration: 45 minutes
Automation Level: 80%

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including edge cases and performance
Test Cases:

All Regression Test cases
ONB02US06_TC_007: GST/HST/VAGST Registration Validation
ONB02US06_TC_010: Performance Testing - Dashboard Load
Additional edge case and negative testing scenarios

Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Expected Duration: 2 hours
Automation Level: 70%

API Test Cases (Critical Level ≥7)

API Test Case 1: Create Utility Endpoint

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_API_001
Endpoint: POST /api/utilities
Priority: P1-Critical (Level 9)
Test Type: API Integration

Test Scenario: Verify utility creation via API with valid payload

Request Payload:

{
  "name": "Metropolitan Water District",
  "email": "contact@metrowater.com",
  "contactNumber": "(415) 555-8734",
  "state": "California",
  "city": "San Francisco",
  "address": "1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110",
  "websiteUrl": "https://www.metrowater.com",
  "gstRegistration": "",
  "logo": "base64_encoded_logo_data"
}

Expected Response:

Status Code: 201 Created
Response includes utility ID and confirmation
Database record created successfully

API Test Case 2: Progress Calculation Endpoint

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_API_002
Endpoint: GET /api/utilities/progress/overall
Priority: P1-Critical (Level 8)
Test Type: API Integration

Test Scenario: Verify overall progress calculation via API

Expected Response:

{
  "overallProgress": 42,
  "status": "In Progress",
  "totalUtilities": 3,
  "calculation": {
    "utilities": [
      {"id": 1, "progress": 70},
      {"id": 2, "progress": 40},
      {"id": 3, "progress": 15}
    ],
    "average": 41.67,
    "rounded": 42
  }
}

Security Test Scenarios

Authentication & Authorization

Unauthorized Access Prevention: Verify non-admin users cannot access setup dashboard
Session Management: Test session timeout and token refresh during long setup sessions
Role-Based Access: Validate System Admin permissions for all utility management operations

Data Protection

Input Sanitization: Prevent XSS attacks through utility name and address fields
File Upload Security: Validate logo file types, scan for malicious content, enforce size limits
Data Encryption: Verify sensitive utility data encrypted in transit and at rest
Audit Trail: Track all utility creation, modification, and deletion operations

System Security

API Security: Validate authentication tokens for all API endpoints
CSRF Protection: Prevent cross-site request forgery attacks on form submissions
SQL Injection Prevention: Test all form inputs for SQL injection vulnerabilities
Rate Limiting: Prevent excessive API calls and form submissions

Integration Test Map

External System Dependencies

Country/State/City API Integration

Dependency: Organization setup data service
Test Scenarios:
- API service availability validation
- Data synchronization testing
- Fallback behavior when service unavailable
- Performance under load

Logo Upload Service Integration

Dependency: File storage service
Test Scenarios:
- File upload functionality
- Storage capacity validation
- File type and size restrictions
- Upload failure handling

Progress Calculation Service Integration

Dependency: Setup wizard data service
Test Scenarios:
- Real-time progress updates
- Calculation accuracy validation
- Cross-service data consistency
- Performance optimization

Performance Benchmarks

Expected Performance Criteria

Page Load Performance

Dashboard Initial Load: < 3 seconds (up to 50 utilities)
Form Modal Opening: < 500ms
Progress Calculation Update: < 100ms
API Response Times: < 500ms for critical operations

Scalability Benchmarks

Maximum Utilities Supported: 100+ utilities with acceptable performance
Concurrent Users: 10+ System Admins simultaneously
Data Processing: Real-time updates for up to 50 utilities
Memory Usage: < 100MB browser memory consumption

Network Performance

Low Bandwidth: Functional on 2G connections (degraded performance acceptable)
High Latency: Operations complete within 5 seconds on 1000ms latency
Offline Behavior: Graceful error handling when connectivity lost

Cross-Browser Compatibility Matrix

Primary Browser Support

Feature	Chrome Latest	Status
Dashboard Display	✓	Fully Supported
Form Functionality	✓	Fully Supported
File Upload	✓	Fully Supported
Progress Calculations	✓	Fully Supported
Responsive Design	✓	Fully Supported

Browser-Specific Test Cases

Chrome Latest Specific Tests

File Upload Performance: Optimized for Chrome's upload handling
Local Storage: Progress auto-save functionality
CSS Grid Support: Dashboard layout rendering
JavaScript ES6+: Modern JavaScript feature compatibility

Test Data Management

Realistic Utility Company Data

Sample Utility Companies

Metropolitan Water District
- Type: Water Utility
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Size: Large Municipal
- Progress: 70%
Springfield Energy Authority
- Type: Energy/Electricity
- Location: Springfield, IL
- Size: Medium Municipal
- Progress: 40%
Riverdale Utilities Corp
- Type: Multi-Service (Water/Gas/Electric)
- Location: Riverdale, NY
- Size: Small Municipal
- Progress: 15%
Pacific Coast Power
- Type: Electric Utility
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Size: Large Private
- Progress: 85%

Test Data Generation Rules

Utility Names: Use realistic municipal and private utility naming conventions
Email Addresses: Valid corporate email formats (contact@, info@, admin@)
Phone Numbers: Valid North American phone number formats
Addresses: Complete addresses with appropriate ZIP codes
Website URLs: Valid corporate website formats
GST/Tax Numbers: Realistic alphanumeric registration numbers

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios (80% Detail Level)

Boundary Condition Testing

Character Limits

Utility Name Field
- Maximum length: 100 characters
- Special characters: Allow hyphens, spaces, ampersands
- Unicode support: International utility names
- Empty string handling: Prevent submission
Address Field
- Maximum length: 500 characters
- Multi-line support: Address formatting
- Special characters: Commas, periods, hyphens
- International addresses: Postal code variations
GST Registration Field
- Exact limit: 30 alphanumeric characters
- Case sensitivity: Accept upper and lowercase
- Format flexibility: Various regional GST formats
- Optional validation: No errors when empty

File Upload Boundaries

Logo File Size
- Maximum: 5MB per file
- Minimum: 1KB (prevent empty files)
- Format support: PNG, JPG, GIF, SVG
- Resolution limits: Maximum 2048x2048 pixels
File Type Validation
- Allowed MIME types: image/png, image/jpeg, image/gif, image/svg+xml
- Extension validation: .png, .jpg, .jpeg, .gif, .svg
- Header validation: Verify actual file type matches extension
- Malicious file prevention: Scan for embedded scripts

Invalid Input Scenarios

Email Validation Edge Cases

Format Variations
- Missing @ symbol: "contactmetrowater.com"
- Multiple @ symbols: "contact@@metrowater.com"
- Invalid domain: "contact@invalid-domain"
- Special characters: "contact+billing@metrowater.com" (should be valid)
Length Variations
- Very short: "a@b.co"
- Very long: 254+ character email addresses
- Local part limits: 64+ characters before @
- Domain part limits: 253+ characters after @

Phone Number Edge Cases

Format Variations
- No formatting: "4155558734"
- International format: "+1-415-555-8734"
- Extension numbers: "(415) 555-8734 ext. 123"
- Invalid characters: "(415) 555-CALL"
Length Variations
- Too short: "555-1234" (missing area code)
- Too long: "(415) 555-8734-12345" (excess digits)
- International: "+44 20 7946 0958" (UK number)

URL Validation Edge Cases

Protocol Variations
- HTTP: "http://www.example.com"
- HTTPS: "https://www.example.com"
- No protocol: "www.example.com"
- FTP: "ftp://files.example.com"
Domain Variations
- Subdomain: "portal.metrowater.com"
- Port numbers: "https://metrowater.com:8080"
- IP addresses: "http://192.168.1.1"
- International domains: "https://água.example.com"

System Failure Scenarios

Network Interruption Testing

Form Submission Failures
- Network disconnection during submission
- Timeout scenarios (>30 seconds)
- Partial data transmission
- Connection reset by server
API Service Failures
- State/City API unavailable (500 error)
- Partial API response (incomplete data)
- API rate limiting (429 error)
- Authentication failures (401 error)
File Upload Failures
- Upload service unavailable
- Storage quota exceeded
- File corruption during upload
- Virus scan failures

Data Inconsistency Scenarios

Concurrent Modification
- Two admins editing same utility simultaneously
- Progress updates conflicting with form submissions
- Activation toggle during edit operations
- Dashboard refresh during modifications
Database Inconsistencies
- Orphaned utility records
- Missing state/city reference data
- Corrupted progress calculations
- Duplicate utility names

Browser-Specific Edge Cases

Chrome-Specific Issues

Memory Management
- Large utility lists causing memory issues
- File upload memory consumption
- Long-running sessions performance degradation
- Local storage quota limits
Security Features
- Mixed content warnings (HTTP resources on HTTPS)
- CORS policy enforcement
- Content Security Policy violations
- Cookie SameSite attribute handling

Accessibility Edge Cases

Form Accessibility
- Label associations with form fields
- Error message announcements
- Progress indicator descriptions
- Modal dialog accessibility
Keyboard Navigation
- Tab order through form fields
- Enter key form submission
- Escape key modal closing
- Arrow key dropdown navigation

Visual Accessibility

Color Contrast
- Progress bar visibility
- Error message readability
- Toggle button distinction
- Required field indicators
Font Size Scaling
- 200% zoom functionality
- Text truncation handling
- Layout responsiveness
- Button target sizes

Validation Checklist

Coverage Verification

✓ All Acceptance Criteria Covered

AC1: Detailed breakdown of 6 configuration steps
AC2: Clear status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)
AC3: Mandatory step identification
AC4: Overall progress percentage matching completed steps
AC5: Guidance on incomplete steps
AC6: Intuitive and easy navigation

✓ All Business Rules Tested

6 configuration steps clearly defined
Progress percentage accuracy
Mandatory step requirements
Required field validation
State/City dropdown dependencies
GST registration validation

✓ Cross-Browser/Device Compatibility

Chrome Latest browser support
Desktop resolution compatibility
Responsive design validation
Touch interface support

✓ Positive and Negative Scenarios

Valid data submission paths
Invalid input handling
Error condition management
Edge case coverage

✓ Integration Points Tested

State/City API integration
Logo upload service
Progress calculation service
Organization setup data

✓ Security Considerations Addressed

Authentication validation
Input sanitization
File upload security
Data protection compliance

✓ Performance Benchmarks Defined

Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
Form submission < 500ms
Progress calculation < 100ms
Concurrent user handling

✓ Realistic Test Data Provided

Metropolitan Water District sample
Multiple utility scenarios
Valid contact information
Realistic addresses and URLs

✓ Clear Dependency Mapping

Test execution order
Prerequisite requirements
Blocking relationships
Parallel execution opportunities

✓ Proper Tagging for 17 Reports

Module classification
Priority levels
Platform identification
Business impact assessment
Customer segment targeting
Risk level evaluation

✓ Edge Cases Covered (80% Detail)

Boundary condition testing
Invalid input scenarios
System failure handling
Data inconsistency management

✓ API Tests for Critical Operations

Utility creation endpoint
Progress calculation API
State/City data retrieval
File upload services

Test Execution Summary

Total Test Cases: 10 Core + Additional Edge Cases

Estimated Execution Time:

Smoke Suite: 15 minutes
Regression Suite: 45 minutes
Full Suite: 2 hours
Performance Suite: 30 minutes

Automation Coverage: 70% overall

Manual Testing Required: 30% (primarily navigation and usability)

Critical Success Metrics:

Functional Accuracy: 100% of acceptance criteria validated
Performance Standards: All benchmarks met
Security Compliance: No vulnerabilities identified
Data Integrity: Progress calculations accurate
User Experience: Intuitive navigation confirmed

This comprehensive test suite ensures thorough validation of the Utility Management feature (ONB02US06) across all functional, non-functional, and edge case scenarios while supporting all 17 BrowserStack test management reports.Utility Management Test Cases - ONB02US06

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

Setup Dashboard Navigation and Display
Overall Setup Progress Calculation and Display
Add New Utility Form Functionality
Edit Existing Utility Functionality
Utility Activation/Deactivation Toggle
Progress Tracking and Status Updates
Continue Setup Process
Configured Utilities List Management

Business Rules:

6 Configuration Steps Tracking
Progress Percentage Calculation
Mandatory vs Optional Field Validation
State/City Dropdown Dependencies
GST/HST/VAGST Registration Validation

User Journeys:

System Admin - New Utility Setup Journey
System Admin - Existing Utility Management Journey
System Admin - Progress Monitoring Journey

Integration Points:

Country/State/City Dropdown API Integration
Logo Upload Service Integration
Organization Setup Data Integration

Data Flow:

Form Data Validation and Submission
Progress Calculation Updates
Status Synchronization Across Dashboard

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance:

Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
Form submission response < 500ms
Progress updates real-time sync
Concurrent admin user handling

Security:

System Admin authentication validation
Form data encryption
File upload security (logo)
Session management

Compatibility:

Chrome Latest browser support
Cross-device responsiveness
Screen resolution compatibility

Usability:

Reliability:

Data integrity during setup process
System stability with multiple utilities
Error recovery mechanisms

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions:

Maximum utility name length
Maximum address field length
GST registration character limits
File size limits for logo upload

Invalid Inputs:

Invalid email formats
Malformed phone numbers
Invalid URL formats
Unsupported file types for logo

System Failures:

Network interruption during form submission
API service unavailability
File upload service failures
Session timeout scenarios

Data Inconsistencies:

Duplicate utility names
Missing state/city data
Corrupted progress calculations

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Setup Dashboard Initial Load

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Dashboard
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC2, AC6
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: System Admin logged in, organization setup completed
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Metropolitan Water District (70% progress, Active)
Springfield Energy Authority (40% progress, Active)
Riverdale Utilities Corp (15% progress, Inactive) Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication test cases must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Setup Dashboard from main navigation	Dashboard page loads within 3 seconds	N/A	Performance check
2	Verify page title and header	"Setup Dashboard" displayed with subtitle "Configure your utility management system and track setup progress"	N/A	UI validation
3	Check Overall Setup Progress section	Shows "Overall Setup Progress" with correct percentage (42%) and "In Progress" status	Expected: 42%	Progress calculation
4	Verify progress calculation	(70% + 40% + 15%) ÷ 3 = 42% average	Actual utility progress values	Business rule validation
5	Check Welcome section	"Welcome to your Setup Dashboard!" section visible with bullet points	User story welcome text	Content validation
6	Verify Configured Utilities section	All 3 utilities displayed with correct names, descriptions, progress bars	Metropolitan Water District, Springfield Energy Authority, Riverdale Utilities Corp	List display
7	Check utility cards content	Each card shows name, description, progress percentage, activation toggle, Edit and Continue Setup buttons	N/A	Card structure
8	Verify activation toggles	Active utilities show green toggle, inactive show gray toggle	Metropolitan & Springfield: Active, Riverdale: Inactive	Status indicator
9	Check Add Utility button	"+ Add Utility" button visible and enabled	N/A	Action availability

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: Authentication tests
Blocked_Tests: All utility management tests
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Must run before form tests

Additional Information

Test Case 2: Add New Utility - Valid Data Submission

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_002
Title: Verify successful creation of new utility with all mandatory fields
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Add Utility Form
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC4, Business Rules for required fields
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Setup Dashboard accessible, API services running
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Utility Name: Metropolitan Water District (from user story sample data)
Email: contact@metrowater.com (from user story sample data)
Contact Number: (415) 555-8734 (from user story sample data)
State: California (select from dropdown based on organization setup)
City: San Francisco (select from dropdown based on State selection)
Address: 1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 (from user story sample data)
Website URL: https://www.metrowater.com (from user story sample data)
Logo: Metropolitan Water District logo file (from user story sample data)
GST Registration: (Optional - leave blank for this test) Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "+ Add Utility" button from dashboard	"Add New Utility" modal opens with all form fields	N/A	Modal display
2	Verify form structure	All required fields marked with asterisk (*): Utility Name, Email, Contact Number, State, City, Address. Optional fields: Website URL, Logo Upload, GST/HST/VAGST Registration	Required fields per user story business rules	Field identification
3	Enter Utility Name	Field accepts input, no validation errors	"Metropolitan Water District" (user story sample)	Text input validation
4	Enter Email address	Field accepts valid email format	"contact@metrowater.com" (user story sample)	Email format validation
5	Enter Contact Number	Field accepts phone number format	"(415) 555-8734" (user story sample)	Phone format validation
6	Select State from dropdown	Dropdown opens with states from organization setup, selection works	Select state (based on organization setup)	API integration
7	Select City from dropdown	City dropdown populates based on state, selection works	Select city (based on state selection)	Dependent dropdown
8	Enter Address	Field accepts full address text	"1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110" (user story sample)	Text area input
9	Enter Website URL (optional)	Field accepts valid URL format	"https://www.metrowater.com" (user story sample)	URL validation
10	Upload Logo (optional)	File upload works with "Click to upload logo" area	Metropolitan Water District logo file (user story sample)	File upload
11	Leave GST Registration blank	Optional field, no validation errors when empty	N/A	Optional field behavior
12	Click "Save Utility" button	Form submits successfully, modal closes, success message shown	N/A	Form submission
13	Verify dashboard update	New utility appears in configured utilities list with 0% progress	Metropolitan Water District added	Data persistence
14	Check overall progress update	Overall progress percentage recalculated to include new utility at 0%	Progress calculation includes new utility	Progress recalculation

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: Edit utility tests
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Follow-up with edit/delete tests

Additional Information

Test Case 3: Form Validation - Missing Mandatory Fields

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_003
Title: Verify form validation prevents submission with missing mandatory fields
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Add Utility Form Validation
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-FormValidation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Validation-Negative-Testing

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Validation-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rules - Required Fields validation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_004

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Utility modal	Modal opens with empty form	N/A	Initial state
2	Click "Save Utility" without entering any data	Form submission blocked, validation errors displayed for all required fields	N/A	Empty form validation
3	Verify Utility Name validation	Error message: "Utility Name is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Utility Name field	Required field validation
4	Verify Email validation	Error message: "Email is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Email field	Required field validation
5	Verify Contact Number validation	Error message: "Contact Number is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Contact Number field	Required field validation
6	Verify State validation	Error message: "State is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	No State selection	Required dropdown validation
7	Verify City validation	Error message: "City is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	No City selection	Required dropdown validation
8	Verify Address validation	Error message: "Address is required" displayed with asterisk indicator	Empty Address field	Required field validation
9	Enter invalid email format	Error message: "Please enter a valid email address"	"invalid-email-format"	Format validation
10	Enter invalid phone format	Error message: "Please enter a valid phone number"	"123" (insufficient digits)	Format validation
11	Enter invalid URL format	Error message: "Please enter a valid URL"	"not-a-valid-url"	Format validation (optional field)
12	Verify optional fields don't trigger errors	No validation errors for Website URL, Logo Upload, and GST Registration when empty	Empty optional fields	Optional field behavior
13	Fill all mandatory fields with valid data	All validation errors clear, "Save Utility" button becomes enabled	User story sample data	Validation clearing

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information

Test Case 4: Utility Activation Toggle Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-UtilityToggle, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Toggle-State-Management

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Toggle-Analytics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - No minimum progress required for activation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_005

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with configured utilities
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Riverdale Utilities Corp (15% progress, currently Inactive) - per user story
Metropolitan Water District (70% progress, currently Active) - per user story Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate Riverdale Utilities Corp card	Card shows 15% progress with Inactive toggle (gray)	15% progress utility	Initial state verification
2	Click the activation toggle for Riverdale	Toggle switches to Active (green), status updates to "Active"	N/A	Activation test
3	Verify visual feedback	Toggle color changes, status text updates immediately	N/A	UI response
4	Refresh the page	Toggle state persists as Active after page reload	N/A	State persistence
5	Click toggle again to deactivate	Toggle switches back to Inactive (gray), status shows "Inactive"	N/A	Deactivation test
6	Test high-progress utility toggle	Locate Metropolis Water District (70% progress, Active)	70% progress utility	Different progress level
7	Deactivate high-progress utility	Toggle switches to Inactive successfully	N/A	Progress independence
8	Test multiple rapid toggles	Click toggle multiple times quickly	N/A	Rapid interaction test
9	Verify no impact on progress percentage	Setup progress remains unchanged after toggle operations	Original progress values	Progress independence
10	Check overall progress calculation	Overall progress percentage unaffected by activation status	N/A	Calculation integrity

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Progress tracking tests
Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information

Test Case 5: Overall Setup Progress Calculation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_005
Title: Verify accurate calculation and display of overall setup progress percentage
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Progress Calculation Engine
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Calculation-Accuracy
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - Progress Calculation Formula
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_006

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple configured utilities with different progress levels
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Metropolis Water District: 70% progress
Springfield Energy Authority: 40% progress
Riverdale Utilities Corp: 15% progress
Expected Overall Progress: (70 + 40 + 15) ÷ 3 = 41.67% ≈ 42% Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load Setup Dashboard	Overall Setup Progress displays current percentage	N/A	Initial state
2	Verify current calculation	Progress shows 42% based on existing utilities	(70+40+15)÷3 = 42%	Manual calculation verification
3	Add new utility with 0% progress	Overall progress should recalculate to 31%	New utility: 0%	(70+40+15+0)÷4 = 31.25% ≈ 31%
4	Verify updated display	Overall progress updates to reflect new calculation	N/A	Real-time update
5	Edit existing utility to increase progress	Change Riverdale from 15% to 45%	Riverdale: 45%	Progress update scenario
6	Verify recalculation	Overall progress updates to 39%	(70+40+45+0)÷4 = 38.75% ≈ 39%	Calculation accuracy
7	Complete setup for one utility	Change new utility from 0% to 100%	New utility: 100%	Complete setup scenario
8	Verify final calculation	Overall progress updates to 64%	(70+40+45+100)÷4 = 63.75% ≈ 64%	Final verification
9	Check status indicator	If progress < 100%, status shows "In Progress"	Current: 64%	Status logic
10	Test edge case - all utilities 100%	Modify all utilities to 100% progress	All: 100%	Complete scenario
11	Verify complete status	Overall progress shows 100%, status shows "Complete"	100%	Complete state
12	Test rounding behavior	Add utility with progress creating decimal result	Various percentages	Rounding consistency

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Daily
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Individual utility progress tests
Sequential_Tests: Should run after utility modification tests

Additional Information

Test Case 6: State and City Dropdown Dependencies

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_006
Title: Verify State selection populates corresponding City dropdown options
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, API-Dependencies
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - City dropdown based on selected State
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: State/City API service, Organization setup data
Performance_Baseline: Dropdown population < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Valid state/city mapping data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add Utility form accessible, API services operational
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

State: California (should populate cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego)
State: New York (should populate cities like New York City, Buffalo, Albany) Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Utility modal	Form opens with State dropdown enabled, City dropdown disabled/empty	N/A	Initial state
2	Click State dropdown	Dropdown opens showing available states from organization setup	N/A	State availability
3	Select "California" from State dropdown	State selected, City dropdown becomes enabled and populates with California cities	Select California	Dependency trigger
4	Verify City dropdown population	Cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego appear	California cities	API response
5	Select "San Francisco" from City dropdown	City selected successfully	Select San Francisco	City selection
6	Change State to "New York"	City dropdown clears and repopulates with New York cities	Select New York	State change behavior
7	Verify City dropdown update	Previous city selection cleared, New York cities available	NYC, Buffalo, Albany	Dependency reset
8	Test with no State selection	Clear State selection, verify City dropdown becomes disabled	Clear state	Reverse dependency
9	Select State again	Re-select California, verify City dropdown re-enables	Select California	Re-activation
10	Test API error scenario	Simulate API failure, verify graceful error handling	Network disconnection	Error handling
11	Verify form submission	Complete form with valid State/City combination submits successfully	Valid selections	End-to-end

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other API integration tests
Sequential_Tests: Should run before form submission tests

Additional Information

Test Case 7: GST/HST/VAGST Registration Validation

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Module/Feature: Form Validation - GST Registration
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-GSTValidation, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Validation-Optional-Field

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Could-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Validation-Coverage, Compliance-Testing
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - GST Registration: Optional, alphanumeric, max 30 characters
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_003

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Add Utility form accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Valid GST: "GST123456789ABC" (15 characters)
Valid HST: "HST987654321XYZ" (15 characters)
Maximum length: "ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890ABCDEFGHIJ" (30 characters)
Over limit: "ABCDEFGHIJ1234567890ABCDEFGHIJK" (31 characters)
Invalid characters: "GST@123#456$" Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Utility modal	GST/HST/VAGST Registration field visible as optional	N/A	Field visibility
2	Leave GST field empty	No validation error, field remains optional	Empty	Optional behavior
3	Enter valid GST number	Field accepts input without errors	"GST123456789ABC"	Valid input
4	Enter valid HST number	Field accepts input without errors	"HST987654321XYZ"	Valid input variation
5	Test maximum character limit	Field accepts exactly 30 characters	30-character string	Boundary testing
6	Test over character limit	Field prevents input beyond 30 characters or shows error	31-character string	Limit enforcement
7	Test invalid characters	Field rejects or shows error for special characters	"GST@123#456$"	Character validation
8	Test numeric only input	Field accepts numeric-only registration	"123456789012345"	Numeric acceptance
9	Test alphabetic only input	Field accepts alphabetic-only registration	"GSTABCDEFGHIJKLM"	Alphabetic acceptance
10	Test mixed alphanumeric	Field accepts mixed alphanumeric input	"GST123ABC456DEF"	Mixed input
11	Submit form with valid GST	Form submission successful with GST data included	Complete valid form	End-to-end
12	Submit form without GST	Form submission successful without GST data	Complete form, empty GST	Optional submission

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Low
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Other validation tests
Sequential_Tests: Can run independently

Additional Information

Test Case 8: Edit Utility Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Module/Feature: Edit Utility Form
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-EditUtility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Data-Modification

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Data-Integrity
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6 - Edit button functionality
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_002, ONB02US06_TC_001

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Utility data service, State/City API
Performance_Baseline: Form load < 2 seconds, update < 500ms
Data_Requirements: Existing utility with complete data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: At least one configured utility exists
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Existing: Metropolis Water District with all fields populated
Updated: Change email from contact@metrowater.com to admin@metrowater.com
Updated: Change contact from (415) 555-8734 to (415) 555-9999 Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate existing utility card	Metropolis Water District card visible with Edit button	N/A	Utility identification
2	Click "Edit" button	Edit utility modal opens with pre-populated form fields	N/A	Modal opening
3	Verify form pre-population	All fields show current utility data correctly	Existing utility data	Data loading
4	Verify field editability	All fields are editable (not read-only)	N/A	Form functionality
5	Modify Email field	Change email address to new value	"admin@metrowater.com"	Data modification
6	Modify Contact Number	Change phone number to new value	"(415) 555-9999"	Data modification
7	Verify validation still works	Required field validation active during edit	Remove required field	Validation consistency
8	Test State/City dependency in edit	Changing state updates city options appropriately	Change state	Dependency maintenance
9	Upload new logo	Replace existing logo with new file	New image file	File update
10	Click "Save Utility"	Form submits successfully, modal closes	N/A	Save operation
11	Verify dashboard update	Utility card shows updated information	N/A	Data persistence
12	Verify progress preservation	Setup progress percentage remains unchanged	Original progress	Progress integrity
13	Test cancel functionality	Open edit again, make changes, click Cancel	N/A	Cancel behavior
14	Verify cancel behavior	Changes not saved, original data preserved	Original data	Data integrity

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_002
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: Add utility tests
Sequential_Tests: Should run after create utility tests

Additional Information

Test Case 9: Continue Setup Process

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_009
Title: Verify Continue Setup button navigates to appropriate configuration steps
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Setup Navigation - Continue Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-ContinueSetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Navigation-Flow

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: User-Journey, Navigation-Analytics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC5 - Guidance on remaining steps, AC2 - Clear step visibility
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_010

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Utilities with incomplete setup progress
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

Riverdale Utilities Corp: 15% progress (incomplete)
Springfield Energy Authority: 40% progress (incomplete)
Metropolis Water District: 70% progress (incomplete) Prior_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate utility with lowest progress	Riverdale Utilities Corp card (15% progress)	15% progress utility	Starting point
2	Click "Continue Setup" button	Navigation to utility-specific setup wizard	N/A	Navigation trigger
3	Verify setup wizard loads	Setup wizard opens showing 6 configuration steps	N/A	Wizard display
4	Check current step indication	Step corresponding to 15% progress highlighted as current	Step 1 of 6	Progress alignment
5	Verify completed steps	Steps already completed show as finished	Based on 15% progress	Completion status
6	Verify pending steps	Remaining steps show as pending/not started	Remaining steps	Pending status
7	Test navigation back to dashboard	Back/Cancel button returns to setup dashboard	N/A	Return navigation
8	Test medium progress utility	Click Continue Setup for 40% progress utility	40% progress utility	Different progress level
9	Verify appropriate step highlighting	Correct step highlighted based on 40% progress	Step 2-3 of 6	Progress accuracy
10	Test high progress utility	Click Continue Setup for 70% progress utility	70% progress utility	High progress scenario
11	Verify near-completion state	Most steps completed, few remaining	Step 4-5 of 6	Advanced progress
12	Test 100% progress utility	Test Continue Setup on completed utility	100% progress utility	Complete scenario

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: Medium
Automation_Candidate: No

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: Setup wizard tests
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Should precede detailed setup wizard tests

Additional Information

Test Case 10: Performance Testing - Dashboard Load with Multiple Utilities

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_TC_010
Title: Verify Setup Dashboard performance with large number of configured utilities
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-03
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance - Dashboard Scalability
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Scalability-Testing

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Analysis
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance baseline - Dashboard load < 3 seconds
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US06_TC_001, ONB02US06_TC_005

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: 50 configured utilities with different progress levels
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access level
Test_Data:

50 utilities with progress ranging from 0% to 100%
Mix of active and inactive utilities
Various logo files and complete data sets Prior_Test_Cases: Basic dashboard functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache	Cache cleared for clean test environment	N/A	Test preparation
2	Start performance monitoring	Begin measuring load times and resource usage	N/A	Monitoring setup
3	Navigate to Setup Dashboard	Dashboard loads within performance baseline	50 utilities	Load test
4	Measure initial load time	Record time from navigation to fully rendered page	N/A	Performance measurement
5	Verify all utilities render	All 50 utilities visible with progress bars and data	50 utilities	Completeness check
6	Test progress calculation performance	Overall progress calculated without delay	N/A	Calculation efficiency
7	Test scroll performance	Smooth scrolling through utility list	N/A	UI responsiveness
8	Measure toggle response time	Activation toggle response under load	Multiple toggles	Interaction performance
9	Test concurrent user simulation	Multiple admin users accessing dashboard	5 concurrent users	Concurrency test
10	Monitor memory usage	Check for memory leaks during extended use	N/A	Resource monitoring
11	Test refresh performance	Page refresh maintains performance standards	N/A	Refresh efficiency
12	Verify performance degrades gracefully	Performance remains acceptable as utility count increases	75+ utilities	Scalability limit

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Execution Analytics

Execution_Frequency: Weekly
Maintenance_Effort: High
Automation_Candidate: Yes

Test Relationships

Blocking_Tests: ONB02US06_TC_001
Blocked_Tests: None
Parallel_Tests: None
Sequential_Tests: Should run after functional tests

Additional Information

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1-Critical priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases:

ONB02US06_TC_001: Setup Dashboard Initial Load
ONB02US06_TC_002: Add New Utility - Valid Data Submission
ONB02US06_TC_003: Form Validation - Missing Mandatory Fields

Execution: Every build deployment
Expected Duration: 15 minutes
Automation Level: 100%

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core features and integration points
Test Cases:

All Smoke Test cases
ONB02US06_TC_004: Utility Activation Toggle Functionality
ONB02US06_TC_005: Overall Setup Progress Calculation
ONB02US06_TC_006: State and City Dropdown Dependencies
ONB02US06_TC_008: Edit Utility Functionality
ONB02US06_TC_009: Continue Setup Process

Execution: Before each release
Expected Duration: 45 minutes
Automation Level: 80%

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including edge cases and performance
Test Cases:

All Regression Test cases
ONB02US06_TC_007: GST/HST/VAGST Registration Validation
ONB02US06_TC_010: Performance Testing - Dashboard Load
Additional edge case and negative testing scenarios

Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Expected Duration: 2 hours
Automation Level: 70%

API Test Cases (Critical Level ≥7)

API Test Case 1: Create Utility Endpoint

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_API_001
Endpoint: POST /api/utilities
Priority: P1-Critical (Level 9)
Test Type: API Integration

Test Scenario: Verify utility creation via API with valid payload

Request Payload:

{
  "name": "Metropolitan Water District",
  "email": "contact@metrowater.com",
  "contactNumber": "(415) 555-8734",
  "state": "California",
  "city": "San Francisco",
  "address": "1234 Reservoir Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110",
  "websiteUrl": "https://www.metrowater.com",
  "gstRegistration": "",
  "logo": "base64_encoded_logo_data"
}

Expected Response:

Status Code: 201 Created
Response includes utility ID and confirmation
Database record created successfully

API Test Case 2: Progress Calculation Endpoint

Test Case ID: ONB02US06_API_002
Endpoint: GET /api/utilities/progress/overall
Priority: P1-Critical (Level 8)
Test Type: API Integration

Test Scenario: Verify overall progress calculation via API

Expected Response:

{
  "overallProgress": 42,
  "status": "In Progress",
  "totalUtilities": 3,
  "calculation": {
    "utilities": [
      {"id": 1, "progress": 70},
      {"id": 2, "progress": 40},
      {"id": 3, "progress": 15}
    ],
    "average": 41.67,
    "rounded": 42
  }
}

Security Test Scenarios

Authentication & Authorization

Unauthorized Access Prevention: Verify non-admin users cannot access setup dashboard
Session Management: Test session timeout and token refresh during long setup sessions
Role-Based Access: Validate System Admin permissions for all utility management operations

Data Protection

Input Sanitization: Prevent XSS attacks through utility name and address fields
File Upload Security: Validate logo file types, scan for malicious content, enforce size limits
Data Encryption: Verify sensitive utility data encrypted in transit and at rest
Audit Trail: Track all utility creation, modification, and deletion operations

System Security

API Security: Validate authentication tokens for all API endpoints
CSRF Protection: Prevent cross-site request forgery attacks on form submissions
SQL Injection Prevention: Test all form inputs for SQL injection vulnerabilities
Rate Limiting: Prevent excessive API calls and form submissions

Integration Test Map

External System Dependencies

Country/State/City API Integration

Dependency: Organization setup data service
Test Scenarios:
- API service availability validation
- Data synchronization testing
- Fallback behavior when service unavailable
- Performance under load

Logo Upload Service Integration

Dependency: File storage service
Test Scenarios:
- File upload functionality
- Storage capacity validation
- File type and size restrictions
- Upload failure handling

Progress Calculation Service Integration

Dependency: Setup wizard data service
Test Scenarios:
- Real-time progress updates
- Calculation accuracy validation
- Cross-service data consistency
- Performance optimization

Performance Benchmarks

Expected Performance Criteria

Page Load Performance

Dashboard Initial Load: < 3 seconds (up to 50 utilities)
Form Modal Opening: < 500ms
Progress Calculation Update: < 100ms
API Response Times: < 500ms for critical operations

Scalability Benchmarks

Maximum Utilities Supported: 100+ utilities with acceptable performance
Concurrent Users: 10+ System Admins simultaneously
Data Processing: Real-time updates for up to 50 utilities
Memory Usage: < 100MB browser memory consumption

Network Performance

Low Bandwidth: Functional on 2G connections (degraded performance acceptable)
High Latency: Operations complete within 5 seconds on 1000ms latency
Offline Behavior: Graceful error handling when connectivity lost

Cross-Browser Compatibility Matrix

Primary Browser Support

Feature	Chrome Latest	Status
Dashboard Display	✓	Fully Supported
Form Functionality	✓	Fully Supported
File Upload	✓	Fully Supported
Progress Calculations	✓	Fully Supported
Responsive Design	✓	Fully Supported

Browser-Specific Test Cases

Chrome Latest Specific Tests

File Upload Performance: Optimized for Chrome's upload handling
Local Storage: Progress auto-save functionality
CSS Grid Support: Dashboard layout rendering
JavaScript ES6+: Modern JavaScript feature compatibility

Test Data Management

Realistic Utility Company Data

Sample Utility Companies

Metropolitan Water District
- Type: Water Utility
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Size: Large Municipal
- Progress: 70%
Springfield Energy Authority
- Type: Energy/Electricity
- Location: Springfield, IL
- Size: Medium Municipal
- Progress: 40%
Riverdale Utilities Corp
- Type: Multi-Service (Water/Gas/Electric)
- Location: Riverdale, NY
- Size: Small Municipal
- Progress: 15%
Pacific Coast Power
- Type: Electric Utility
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Size: Large Private
- Progress: 85%

Test Data Generation Rules

Utility Names: Use realistic municipal and private utility naming conventions
Email Addresses: Valid corporate email formats (contact@, info@, admin@)
Phone Numbers: Valid North American phone number formats
Addresses: Complete addresses with appropriate ZIP codes
Website URLs: Valid corporate website formats
GST/Tax Numbers: Realistic alphanumeric registration numbers

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios (80% Detail Level)

Boundary Condition Testing

Character Limits

Utility Name Field
- Maximum length: 100 characters
- Special characters: Allow hyphens, spaces, ampersands
- Unicode support: International utility names
- Empty string handling: Prevent submission
Address Field
- Maximum length: 500 characters
- Multi-line support: Address formatting
- Special characters: Commas, periods, hyphens
- International addresses: Postal code variations
GST Registration Field
- Exact limit: 30 alphanumeric characters
- Case sensitivity: Accept upper and lowercase
- Format flexibility: Various regional GST formats
- Optional validation: No errors when empty

File Upload Boundaries

Logo File Size
- Maximum: 5MB per file
- Minimum: 1KB (prevent empty files)
- Format support: PNG, JPG, GIF, SVG
- Resolution limits: Maximum 2048x2048 pixels
File Type Validation
- Allowed MIME types: image/png, image/jpeg, image/gif, image/svg+xml
- Extension validation: .png, .jpg, .jpeg, .gif, .svg
- Header validation: Verify actual file type matches extension
- Malicious file prevention: Scan for embedded scripts

Invalid Input Scenarios

Email Validation Edge Cases

Format Variations
- Missing @ symbol: "contactmetrowater.com"
- Multiple @ symbols: "contact@@metrowater.com"
- Invalid domain: "contact@invalid-domain"
- Special characters: "contact+billing@metrowater.com" (should be valid)
Length Variations
- Very short: "a@b.co"
- Very long: 254+ character email addresses
- Local part limits: 64+ characters before @
- Domain part limits: 253+ characters after @

Phone Number Edge Cases

Format Variations
- No formatting: "4155558734"
- International format: "+1-415-555-8734"
- Extension numbers: "(415) 555-8734 ext. 123"
- Invalid characters: "(415) 555-CALL"
Length Variations
- Too short: "555-1234" (missing area code)
- Too long: "(415) 555-8734-12345" (excess digits)
- International: "+44 20 7946 0958" (UK number)

URL Validation Edge Cases

Protocol Variations
- HTTP: "http://www.example.com"
- HTTPS: "https://www.example.com"
- No protocol: "www.example.com"
- FTP: "ftp://files.example.com"
Domain Variations
- Subdomain: "portal.metrowater.com"
- Port numbers: "https://metrowater.com:8080"
- IP addresses: "http://192.168.1.1"
- International domains: "https://água.example.com"

System Failure Scenarios

Network Interruption Testing

Form Submission Failures
- Network disconnection during submission
- Timeout scenarios (>30 seconds)
- Partial data transmission
- Connection reset by server
API Service Failures
- State/City API unavailable (500 error)
- Partial API response (incomplete data)
- API rate limiting (429 error)
- Authentication failures (401 error)
File Upload Failures
- Upload service unavailable
- Storage quota exceeded
- File corruption during upload
- Virus scan failures

Data Inconsistency Scenarios

Concurrent Modification
- Two admins editing same utility simultaneously
- Progress updates conflicting with form submissions
- Activation toggle during edit operations
- Dashboard refresh during modifications
Database Inconsistencies
- Orphaned utility records
- Missing state/city reference data
- Corrupted progress calculations
- Duplicate utility names

Browser-Specific Edge Cases

Chrome-Specific Issues

Memory Management
- Large utility lists causing memory issues
- File upload memory consumption
- Long-running sessions performance degradation
- Local storage quota limits
Security Features
- Mixed content warnings (HTTP resources on HTTPS)
- CORS policy enforcement
- Content Security Policy violations
- Cookie SameSite attribute handling

Accessibility Edge Cases

Form Accessibility
- Label associations with form fields
- Error message announcements
- Progress indicator descriptions
- Modal dialog accessibility
Keyboard Navigation
- Tab order through form fields
- Enter key form submission
- Escape key modal closing
- Arrow key dropdown navigation

Visual Accessibility

Color Contrast
- Progress bar visibility
- Error message readability
- Toggle button distinction
- Required field indicators
Font Size Scaling
- 200% zoom functionality
- Text truncation handling
- Layout responsiveness
- Button target sizes

Validation Checklist

Coverage Verification

✓ All Acceptance Criteria Covered

AC1: Detailed breakdown of 6 configuration steps
AC2: Clear status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed)
AC3: Mandatory step identification
AC4: Overall progress percentage matching completed steps
AC5: Guidance on incomplete steps
AC6: Intuitive and easy navigation

✓ All Business Rules Tested

6 configuration steps clearly defined
Progress percentage accuracy
Mandatory step requirements
Required field validation
State/City dropdown dependencies
GST registration validation

✓ Cross-Browser/Device Compatibility

Chrome Latest browser support
Desktop resolution compatibility
Responsive design validation
Touch interface support

✓ Positive and Negative Scenarios

Valid data submission paths
Invalid input handling
Error condition management
Edge case coverage

✓ Integration Points Tested

State/City API integration
Logo upload service
Progress calculation service
Organization setup data

✓ Security Considerations Addressed

Authentication validation
Input sanitization
File upload security
Data protection compliance

✓ Performance Benchmarks Defined

Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
Form submission < 500ms
Progress calculation < 100ms
Concurrent user handling

✓ Realistic Test Data Provided

Metropolitan Water District sample
Multiple utility scenarios
Valid contact information
Realistic addresses and URLs

✓ Clear Dependency Mapping

Test execution order
Prerequisite requirements
Blocking relationships
Parallel execution opportunities

✓ Proper Tagging for 17 Reports

Module classification
Priority levels
Platform identification
Business impact assessment
Customer segment targeting
Risk level evaluation

✓ Edge Cases Covered (80% Detail)

Boundary condition testing
Invalid input scenarios
System failure handling
Data inconsistency management

✓ API Tests for Critical Operations

Utility creation endpoint
Progress calculation API
State/City data retrieval
File upload services

Test Execution Summary

Total Test Cases: 10 Core + Additional Edge Cases

Estimated Execution Time:

Smoke Suite: 15 minutes
Regression Suite: 45 minutes
Full Suite: 2 hours
Performance Suite: 30 minutes

Automation Coverage: 70% overall

Manual Testing Required: 30% (primarily navigation and usability)

Critical Success Metrics:

Functional Accuracy: 100% of acceptance criteria validated
Performance Standards: All benchmarks met
Security Compliance: No vulnerabilities identified
Data Integrity: Progress calculations accurate
User Experience: Intuitive navigation confirmed