System Admin Dashboard (ONB01US01)

Overall Coverage Summary

Total Coverage: 100% (9/9 Acceptance Criteria Covered)

• Total Test Cases: 10 (8 Functional + 2 Non-Functional)
• Total Acceptance Criteria: 9 (Based on document requirements)
• Coverage Percentage: (9/9) × 100 = 100%
• Priority Distribution: 6 P1-Critical (60%) + 3 P2-High (30%) + 1 P3-Medium (10%)

Test Scenario SummaryAnalysis

CriticalA. BusinessFunctional FlowsTest Identified:Scenarios

Core Functionality Scenarios:

1. Organization Setup CompletionProgress FlowTracking - RevenueVisual impactprogress (fasterindicators, billingweighted activation)completion calculation
2. Utility Setup ConfigurationProgress FlowManagement - OperationalStep-by-step readinesssetup guidance, task completion tracking
3. Real-timeUser DashboardAdoption Metrics Visualization - SystemDaily healthactive monitoringusers, growth trends, engagement tracking
4. Security Activity Monitoring - IncidentLogin response
5. Userattempt Adoptiontracking, Trackingauthorized/unauthorized -session Business growth metrics

Test Coverage Distribution:

• Organization Setup: 8 test cases
• Utility Setup: 7 test cases
• User Adoption Metrics: 6 test cases
• Security Activity: 7 test cases management
• Data Upload Process Management: 5- testFile casesupload, validation, smart recognition
• Trial Plan Subscription Management: 4- testPlan casesdetails, upgrade pathways, usage limits

Business Rules Validation Scenarios:

1. Weighted Progress Calculation - Organization setup: Currency (40%), Date Format (30%), Timezone (30%)
2. APIUtility IntegrationSetup Weighting: 8- testCore casesSystem (25%), Service Area (20%), Pricing/Billing (20%), Staff Access (15%), Calendar (10%), IDs/Reference (10%)
3. User Activity Definition - Daily active user = logged in user
4. Trial Plan Limitations - 2 concurrent users, 30-day expiration, 5GB storage

User Journey Scenarios:

1. New System Admin Onboarding - First-time dashboard access through completion
2. Ongoing Setup Management - Returning admin completing partial setups
3. Monitoring and Maintenance - Regular security and adoption monitoring
4. Subscription Management - Plan evaluation and upgrade decisions

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance Scenarios:

• Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
• Real-time metrics refresh < 500ms
• Concurrent admin access (up to _ users)
• Large data upload processing (100MB+ files)

Security Scenarios:

• Role-based access control validation
• Session management and timeouts
• Audit trail for admin actions
• Data encryption verification

Compatibility Scenarios:

• Chrome Latest on Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Desktop resolution 1920x1080+

C. Edge Case & Cross-PlatformError Scenarios

1. Boundary Conditions: 6- testMaximum casesuser limits, file size limits, concurrent sessions

TotalInvalid Test Cases: 51Inputs

 - Malformed data uploads, invalid configuration values

System Failures - Network interruptions, service unavailability

Data Inconsistencies - Partial setup completions, corrupted progress states

---

Detailed Test Cases

ORGANIZATION SETUP TEST CASES

Test Case 1: Organization Setup Progress Calculation

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_001
Title: Verify Organization Setup Progress Calculation with Weighted Tasks

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_001
Title: Verify weighted progress calculation for Organization Setup
Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
Created DateDate:: 2025-06-05June 04, 2025
VersionVersion:: 1.0

Classification

• ClassificationModule/Feature:
  • Module/Feature: Organization Setup
  • Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke/Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

  Enhanced Tags Functional

• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All,Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-EndEnd,

Additional Tags: Onboarding-Services, Database, HappyPath

Business Context

• Customer_Segment:
  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
  • Compliance_Required: NoYes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

  Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level:
    • Risk_Level: High
    • Complexity_Level: Medium
    • Expected_Execution_Time: 35 minutes
    • Reproducibility_Score: High
    • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
    • Failure_Impact: Critical

    Coverage Tracking

    • Feature_Coverage:
      • Feature_Coverage: 100% of organization setup progress calculation logic
      • Integration_Points: Progress calculationtracking engineengine, UI display layer
      • Code_Module_Mapped: ProgressTrackingEngineProgressCalculator, OrganizationSetup
      • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
      • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

      Stakeholder Reporting

      • Primary_Stakeholder:
        • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
        • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-CriticalModule-Coverage
        • Trend_Tracking: Yes
        • Executive_Visibility: Yes
        • Customer_Impact_Level: High

        Requirements Traceability

        • Related_Requirements:
          • Related_Requirements: Business Rule -Rule: Progress CalculationCalculation, Acceptance Criteria 1
          • Related_Bugs: N/A
          • Related_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_002, ONB05US01_TC_003

          Test Environment

          • Environment:
            • Environment: Staging
            • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
            • Device/OS: Windows 10,10/11, DesktopmacOS 12+
            • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
            • Dependencies: Organization setup database, userprogress sessiontracking service
            • Performance_Baseline: <32 seconds for progress calculation
            • Data_Requirements: CleanFresh organization with partial setup completion

            Prerequisites

            • PrerequisitesSetup_Requirements:
              • Setup_Requirements: System Admin loggedaccount inwith organization setup permissions
              • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role
              • Test_Data: Organization "TechCorpID: Utilities"ORG_TEST_001, withAdmin Currency=USD,User: Date Format=MM/DD/YYYY, Timezone=Pendingadmin@testutility.com
              • Prior_Test_Cases: Login successfulfunctionality verified

              Test Procedure

              Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
              1	NavigateLogin toas System Admin Dashboard	DashboardSuccessfully loadslogged withininto 3 secondsdashboard	N/Aadmin@testutility.com / SecurePass123!	BaselineVerify performancedashboard loads
              2	LocateNavigate to Organization Setup section	SectionOrganization Setup section displays with current progress bar	N/A	VisualCheck verificationinitial state
              3	Verify progressCurrency calculationtask is marked complete	ProgressCurrency shows 70%checkmark, (Currencycontributes 40% +to Dateprogress	Currency: Format 30%)USD	Weighted calculation	Critical business rule
              4	CheckVerify Date Format task statusis indicatorsmarked complete	Currency: ✓, Date Format:Format ✓,shows Timezone:checkmark, ○contributes 30% to progress	VisualFormat: indicatorsMM/DD/YYYY	UserWeighted experiencecalculation
              5	Verify "CompleteTimezone Setup"task buttonis statepending	Button enabled butTimezone shows "1pending taskicon, remaining"30% weight not applied	ButtonTarget: interactionEST	UserIncomplete guidancetask

              Verification6

              Verify Pointsoverall progress calculation

              • Primary_Verification:

                Progress bar shows exactly70% (40% + 30% = 70% completion

              • Secondary_Verifications: Correct task status indicators, proper button state
              • Negative_Verification: Progress should not be 66% (simple count-based)

              ---

              Test Case 2: Organization Setup Completion Flow

              Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_002
              Title: Complete organization setup and verify 100% progress
              Created By: Auto-generated
              Created Date: 2025-06-05
              Version: 1.0

              Classification

              • Module/Feature: Organization Setup
              • Test Type: Functional/End-to-End
              • Test Level: System
              • Priority: P1-Critical
              • Execution Phase: Smoke/Regression
              • Automation Status: Automated

              Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-E2E, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

              Business Context

              • Customer_Segment: All
              • Revenue_Impact: High
              • Business_Priority: Must-Have
              • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
              • Compliance_Required: No
              • SLA_Related: Yes

              Prerequisites

              • Test_Data: Organization "TechCorp Utilities", Currency=USD, Date Format=MM/DD/YYYY, Timezone=Pending

              Test Procedure

              Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
              1	Click "Complete Setup" button	Navigate to Organization Setup page)	N/A	NavigationMathematical flowaccuracy
              27	Complete Timezone configuration	SelectTimezone "Easterntask Standardshows Time"checkmark	ESTTimezone: timezoneAmerica/New_York	FinalTask taskcompletion
              3	Save timezone settings	Settings saved successfully	N/A	Data persistence
              4	Return to dashboard	Dashboard loads with updated progress	N/A	Return navigation
              58	Verify organization setupupdated progress calculation	Progress bar showsupdates to 100% completion	All(40% tasks+ complete	Final30% verification
              6	Check+ "Complete Setup" button	Button shows "Setup Complete" and is disabled30%)	N/A	Completion state

              Verification Points

              • Primary_Verification: Organization setup shows 100% completion
              • Secondary_Verifications: All task indicators show completed, button state updated
              • Negative_Verification: No pending tasks should remain

              ---

              Test Case 3: User Invitations Pending Indicator

              Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_003
              Title: Verify user invitation pending count display and functionality
              Created By: Auto-generated
              Created Date: 2025-06-05
              Version: 1.0

              Classification

              • Module/Feature: Organization Setup
              • Test Type: Functional
              • Test Level: Integration
              • Priority: P2-High
              • Execution Phase: Regression
              • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

              Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

              Prerequisites

              • Test_Data: Organization with 2 pending user invitations: "john.doe@techcorp.com", "jane.smith@techcorp.com"

              Test Procedure

              Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
              1	View Organization Setup section	"User invitations (2 pending)" displayed	2 pending invitations	Count accuracy
              2	Click on user invitations task	Navigate to invitation management	N/A	Deep linking
              3	Send one invitation	john.doe@techcorp.com invitation sent	john.doe@techcorp.com	Email processing
              4	Return to dashboard	"User invitations (1 pending)" displayed	1 pending invitation	Real-time update
              5	Complete remaining invitation	jane.smith@techcorp.com invitation sent	jane.smith@techcorp.com	Final invitation
              6	Verify completion	"User invitations" shows ✓ completed	All invitations sent	Task completion

              Verification Points

              • Primary_Verification:
                 Progress percentage accurately reflects weighted task completion
                • Primary_Verification:Secondary_Verifications: PendingVisual countindicators match completion status, real-time updates in real-timework
                • Secondary_Verifications:Negative_Verification: Navigation works correctly, email invitations sent
                • Negative_Verification: CountProgress should not remainexceed at100% 2or aftershow sendingnegative invitationsvalues

                Test Results (Template)

                • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
                • Actual_Results: [Record actual progress calculations and visual displays]
                • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
                • Executed_By: [Tester name]
                • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
                • Defects_Found: [Any bugs discovered]
                • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence attachments]

                ---

                UTILITY SETUP TEST CASES

                Test Case 4:2: Utility Setup Weighted Progress Calculation

                Tracking

                Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_004ONB05US01_TC_002
                TitleTitle:: Verify weighted progress calculation for Utility Setup componentsProgress with Complex Weighted Task System
                Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                Created DateDate:: 2025-06-05June 04, 2025
                VersionVersion:: 1.0

                Classification

                • ClassificationModule/Feature:
                  • Module/Feature: Utility Setup
                  • Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Smoke
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Functional

                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P1-Critical
                • Execution Phase: Smoke
                • Automation Status: Manual

                Enhanced Tags

                Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering,Product, Customer-All,Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                PrerequisitesAdditonal Tags: Onboarding-Services, Database, HappyPath

                Business Context

                • Test_Data:Customer_Segment: All
                • Revenue_Impact: High
                • Business_Priority: Must-Have
                • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
                • Compliance_Required: Yes
                • SLA_Related: Yes

                Test Environment

                • Environment: Staging
                • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
                • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
                • Dependencies: Utility withsetup Coreservice, progress calculation engine

                Prerequisites

                • User_Roles_Permissions: System SettingsAdmin role
                • Test_Data: Utility ID: UTIL_TEST_001
                • Prior_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_001 (25%),Organization Servicesetup Area (20%), Pricing and Billing (20%) completedcompleted)

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Navigate to Utility Setup section	SectionUtility Setup section displays with 50% initial progress bar	N/A	VisualBased verificationon wireframe
                2	Verify progressCore calculationSystem Settings completion	ProgressTask shows 65%checkmark, (25% +weight 20% + 20%)applied	WeightedSettings: calculationBasic config complete	CriticalHighest businessweight ruletask
                3	CheckVerify completedStaff taskand indicatorsAccess Control	CoreTask System:shows ✓,checkmark, Service15% Area:weight ✓, Pricing: ✓applied	Visualroles indicatorsand access control	UserCritical feedbackfor operations
                4	CheckVerify pendingService taskArea indicatorscompletion	StaffTask Access:shows ○,checkmark, Calendar:20% ○,weight IDs: ○applied	PendingArea: tasksMetro Atlanta Region	RemainingCritical workfor operations
                5	Verify "Pricing and Billing pending	Task shows pending icon, 20% weight not applied	Pricing: Not configured	Revenue impact
                6	Complete Pricing and Billing setup	Task updates to checkmark	Rate: $0.12/kWh, Base: $15/month	Configuration input
                7	Verify progress updates to 95%	Progress bar shows: 25% + 20% + 20% + 15% + 10% + 10% = 100%	N/A	All tasks except one
                8	Complete remaining IDs and Reference Numbers	Final task completion, weight applied 10	Utility ID: GA-POWER-001	Complete setup
                9	Verify 100% completion and Continue Setup"Setup button	Button enabled andProgress shows next100%, taskbutton becomes active	Staff and Access ControlN/A	GuidedFull navigationcompletion state

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification:
                  • Primary_Verification: ProgressComplex barweighted showscalculation exactly(6 65%different completionweights) calculates correctly
                  • Secondary_Verifications: CorrectButton taskstates statuschange indicators,appropriately, propervisual buttonprogress guidancematches calculation
                  • Negative_Verification: ProgressPartial shouldcompletions notdon't beround 50%up (simpleto count-based)100%

                  ---

                  Test Case 5:3: UtilityUser SetupAdoption ContinueMetrics Flow

                  Real-time Display

                  Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_005ONB05US01_TC_003
                  TitleTitle:: ContinueValidate utilityUser setupAdoption processMetrics Display and verifyGrowth progress updatesCalculation
                  Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Utility Setup
                  • Test Type: Functional/End-to-End
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced TagsDate: June 04, 2025
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: User Adoption Monitoring
                  • Test Type: Functional
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags

                  Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup,UserAdoption, P1-Critical,P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-E2E,Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product,CSM, Customer-All, Risk-High,Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                  PrerequisitesAdditional Tags: CX-Services, Database, HappyPath

                  • Test_Data: Utility "Metro Power Co" with 65% completion, Staff and Access Control pending

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	ClickAccess "ContinueUser Setup"Adoption buttonsection	NavigateSection todisplays utilitywith setupcurrent pagemetrics	N/A	NavigationReal-time flowdata
                  2	CompleteVerify StaffToday's andUsers Access Controlcount	ConfigureShows rolesexact andcount: permissionseg. 48 users	Admin,Active Operator,users: Viewer roles48	15%From weightwireframe
                  3	SaveVerify configurationWeek Growth percentage	SettingsDisplays saved+15% successfullygrowth indicator	N/AGrowth: +15%	Data persistenceWeek-over-week
                  4	ReturnValidate todaily dashboardactivity chart	DashboardChart loadsshows withMon-Sun updatedactivity progresspattern	N/AActivity data: 7 days	ReturnVisual navigationrepresentation
                  5	Verify utilityweekend setupactivity progressdrop	ProgressLower baractivity showson 80%Sat/Sun completionvisible (65%in + 15%)chart	UpdatedWeekend: calculationLower bars	ProgressBusiness trackingpattern
                  6	CheckTest taskchart completioninteractivity	Staff and Access ControlHover shows ✓daily values	CompletedDaily indicatorvalues displayed	VisualUser feedbackinteraction
                  7	Verify automatic refresh	Metrics update when new user logs in	Simulated login	Real-time update

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Utility setup progress increased to 80%
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Staff and Access Control marked complete, navigation functional
                  • Negative_Verification: Progress should not remain at 65%

                  ---

                  USER ADOPTION METRICS TEST CASES

                  Test Case 6:4: DailySecurity ActiveActivity UsersMonitoring Display

                  Dashboard

                  Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_006ONB05US01_TC_004
                  TitleTitle:: Verify dailySecurity activeActivity users countTracking and trendUnauthorized visualizationAttempt Detection
                  Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: User Adoption
                  • Test Type: Functional/Data Visualization
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced TagsDate: June 04, 2025
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security Activity Monitoring
                  • Test Type: Security
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Smoke
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags

                  Tags: MOD-UserAdoption,Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression,Smoke, Type-DataViz,Security, Platform-Web, Report-CSM,Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium,High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PointCritical.

                  PrerequisitesAdditonal Tags: Auth-Services, Database, HappyPath

                  Security Considerations

                  • Test_Data:SOC2 User activity datacompliance for 7login days,attempt Monday:logging
                  • Audit 45,trail Tuesday:requirements 52,for Wednesday:utility 49,regulations
                  • Real-time Thursday:threat 55,detection Friday: 48, Saturday: 35, Sunday: 38 userscapabilities

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	ViewReview UserSecurity AdoptionActivity section	SectionDisplays displayslogin withattempts graph and metricsbreakdown	N/A	VisualDashboard verificationview
                  2	CheckVerify today'sAuthorized userlogins count	"Today'sShows Users:162 48"total displayedauthorized prominentlylogins	CurrentAuthorized: day count162	KeyFrom metricwireframe
                  3	Verify week growth indicator	"+15%" week-over-week growth shown	Growth calculation	Trend analysis
                  4	Check daily trend graph	Line graph shows 7-day user activity	Weekly data points	Visual trend
                  5	Verify weekend pattern	Saturday (35) and Sunday (38) show lower activity	Weekend data	Pattern recognition
                  6	Hover over graph points	Tooltip shows exact daily values	Interactive data	User experience

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Today's user count displays correctly (48)
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Growth percentage accurate, graph reflects data
                  • Negative_Verification: Weekend days should not show higher activity than weekdays

                  ---

                  SECURITY ACTIVITY TEST CASES

                  Test Case 7: Security Activity Login Attempts Visualization

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_007
                  Title: Verify security activity dashboard displays login attempts correctly
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security Activity
                  • Test Type: Functional/Security Monitoring
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Smoke
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: 7-day login data - Mon: 28 auth/2 unauth, Tue: 32 auth, Wed: 30 auth, Thu: 35 auth/3 unauth, Fri: 30 auth, Sat: 4 auth/8 unauth, Sun: 3 auth/2 unauth

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	View Security Activity section	Bar chart displays loginUnauthorized attempts	N/A	VisualShows verification
                  2	Check authorized login total	"162 logins" displayed in green	Total authorized count	Success metric
                  3	Check15 unauthorized attempts	"15 attempts" displayed in red	TotalUnauthorized: unauthorized count15	Security concern
                  4	VerifyValidate daily breakdown chart	BarGreen chartbars showsfor authorizedauthorized, (green)red andfor unauthorized (red)	Daily7-day activity barsperiod	PatternVisual analysissecurity status
                  5	Identify security concerns	Saturday shows highest unauthorized attempts (8)	Weekend security issue	Risk identification
                  6	Click on unauthorized attempts	DetailedDrills securitydown logto opensdetailed attempt information	Drill-downAttempt functionalitydetails	Investigation toolcapability
                  6	Verify attempt timestamps	Shows exact time and IP for each attempt	IP logs available	Audit trail
                  7	Test alert threshold	System highlights days with >5 unauthorized attempts	Threshold: 5 attempts	Proactive monitoring

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Total authorized logins show 162
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Unauthorized attempts total 15, visual indicators correct
                  • Negative_Verification: Unauthorized attempts should not be displayed in green

                  ---

                  DATA UPLOAD TEST CASES

                  Test Case 8:5: Data Upload Smart Recognition Process Flow

                  Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_008ONB05US01_TC_005
                  TitleTitle:: VerifyValidate dataData uploadUpload functionalitySmart Recognition and smartValidation recognitionProcess
                  Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                  Created DateDate:: 2025-06-05June 04, 2025
                  VersionVersion:: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • ClassificationModule/Feature:
                    • Module/Feature: Data Upload
                    • Test Type: Functional/Integration
                    • Test Level: System
                    • Priority: P1-Critical
                    • Execution Phase: Regression
                    • Automation Status: Manual

                    Enhanced Tags Integration

                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags

                  Tags: MOD-DataUpload, P1-Critical,P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Product,Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PointHigh.

                  PrerequisitesAdditonal Tags: MX-Services, API, Database, HappyPath.

                  • Test_Data: Sample CSV file "customer_data.csv" with 100 customer records

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Click "Go to Data Upload" button	NavigateNavigates to data upload page	N/A	Navigation flowtest
                  2	Upload CSV file viawith drag-and-dropcustomer data	Smart Recognition detects file structure	customers.csv (500 records)	File accepted and processed	customer_data.csv	File handlingprocessing
                  3	Verify smartfield recognitionmapping suggestions	System detectssuggests filefield structuremappings automatically	CSVCustomer formatfields detectedmapped	Auto-AI recognition
                  4	CheckReview dataSmart mappingValidation results	FieldsShows mappederrors, toduplicates, systemdata fieldsintegrity issues	Name→CustomerValidation Name	Field mapping
                  5	Run smart validation	System validates data integrity	95 valid, 5 errorsreport	Data quality
                  5	Test drag and drop functionality	File uploads via drag and drop	large_dataset.xlsx (2MB)	User experience
                  6	ReviewVerify validationfile resultsformat support	ErrorAccepts reportCSV, showsExcel, dataXML issuesformats	DuplicateMultiple emailsfile flaggedtypes	ErrorFormat handlingvalidation
                  7	Complete dataTest integration with existing records	ValidProcessed recordsdata integratedmerges successfullycorrectly	95Integration records processedcomplete	Data integrationconsistency

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: 95 valid records successfully integrated
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Smart recognition works, validation catches errors
                  • Negative_Verification: Invalid records should not be integrated

                  ---

                  TRIAL PLAN TEST CASES

                  Test Case 9:6: Trial Plan Subscription Display

                  Limitations

                  Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_009ONB05US01_TC_006
                  TitleTitle:: Verify trialTrial planPlan detailsLimitations and limitationsUpgrade displayPathway
                  Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                  Created DateDate:: 2025-06-05June 04, 2025
                  VersionVersion:: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • ClassificationModule/Feature:
                    • Module/Feature: Trial Plan Management
                    • Test Type: Functional/Subscription Management
                    • Test Level: System
                    • Priority: P1-Critical
                    • Execution Phase: Smoke
                    • Automation Status: Automated

                    Enhanced Tags Business Logic

                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags

                  Tags: MOD-TrialPlan, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke,Acceptance, Type-Functional,BusinessLogic, Platform-Web, Report-CSM,Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low,High, Business-High,Critical.
                  Additonal Revenue-Impact-High,Tags: Integration-PointBX-Services, Database, HappyPath

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Organization on Free trial plan, 2 users invited, 15 days remaining

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	ViewReview Trial Plan section	Shows "Free" plan displayedwith prominentlylimitations	N/APlan: Free tier	PlanCurrent identificationstatus
                  2	CheckVerify user limit display	Shows "Up to 5 users included" shown	User limit: 5	Plan restriction
                  3	Attempt to add 6th user	System prevents addition with clear message	User #6 blocked	Enforcement
                  4	Check included features	CX, MM, BC modules visible and accessible	3 core modules	Feature access
                  5	Verify storage limitation	Shows 5GB storage capacity	Storage: 5GB	Data limit
                  Tier6	Test export limitation	Export capped at 100 records per operation	Export: 100 max	Functional limit
                  7	Click "Update Subscription"	Shows upgrade options and pricing	Paid plans available	Upgrade path
                  8	Verify 30-day trial countdown	Shows remaining trial days	Days left: 15	Time limitation

                  ---

                  Test Case 7: Cross-Platform Responsive Design

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_007
                  Title: Validate Dashboard Responsive Design Across Screen Resolutions
                  Created By: QA Team
                  Created Date: June 04, 2025
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: UI/UX Responsiveness
                  • Test Type: UI
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags

                  Tags: MOD-UI-UX, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium.
                  Additonal Tags: CX-Services, Cross-Module, HappyPath

                  Test Environment

                  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard at 1920x1080	All sections display properly	Desktop resolution	Full layout
                  2	Resize to 1024x768	Layout adapts, maintains functionality	Tablet view	Responsive design
                  3	Verify includedchart featuresreadability	CX,Charts MM,remain BXreadable featuresat listedall with checkmarkssizes	FeatureAll inclusionsresolutions	ValueData propositionvisualization
                  4	CheckTest upgradebutton pathaccessibility	"UpdateButtons Subscription"are buttontouch-friendly availableon mobile	UpgradeMobile optioninteraction	RevenueUser opportunityexperience
                  5	VerifyValidate trialtext limitationsscaling	StorageText limitedremains toreadable 5GBwithout mentionedhorizontal scroll	StorageText capclarity	Trial restrictionAccessibility
                  6	CheckTest currentnavigation usagemenu	2/5Menu usersadapts currentlyto activesmaller screens	UsageMobile trackingnavigation	Utilization monitorUsability

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Free trial plan correctly displayed
                  • Secondary_Verifications: User limits and features accurate, upgrade option available
                  • Negative_Verification: Should not show paid plan features as unlimited

                  ---

                  API TEST CASES

                  Test Case 10:8: API Integration for Dashboard Metrics API Performance

                  Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_010ONB05US01_TC_008
                  TitleTitle:: Verify dashboard metricsValidate API responseEndpoints timefor andDashboard dataData accuracyRetrieval
                  Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                  Created DateDate:: 2025-06-05June 04, 2025
                  VersionVersion:: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • ClassificationModule/Feature:
                    • Module/Feature: API Integration
                    • Test Type: API/Performance
                    • Test Level: Integration
                    • Priority: P1-Critical
                    • Execution Phase: Regression
                    • Automation Status: Automated

                    Enhanced Tags API

                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Smoke
                  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

                  Enhanced Tags

                  Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression,Smoke, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-PointCritical.

                  PrerequisitesAddtional Tags: Auth-Services, Onboarding-Services, CX-Services, API, Database, Cross-Module, HappyPath

                  • Test_Data: Valid System Admin API token, organization with setup data

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Call GET /api/dashboard/metricsorganization-setup	Returns current organization setup status	org_id: test_001	API responds within 500ms	Admin auth token	Performance baselineresponse
                  2	Verify response structure	JSON contains allprogress, requiredtasks, metricscompletion objectsstatus	StandardValid responseJSON schema	Data contractstructure
                  3	CheckCall organizationGET setup data/api/dashboard/user-adoption	ProgressReturns calculationuser matchesactivity business rulesmetrics	75%date_range: org7 setupdays	DataMetrics accuracyAPI
                  4	VerifyTest userAPI adoptionresponse metricstime	DailyResponse activetime users< and500ms growthfor datacritical returnedoperations	48Performance users, +15%threshold	MetricSpeed accuracyrequirement
                  5	Check security activity data	Login attempts breakdown provided	162 auth, 15 unauth	Security metrics
                  6	Validate error handling	APIReturns returns properappropriate error codes for invalid tokenrequests	Invalid tokenorg_id	Error response

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: API response time under 500ms
                  • Secondary_Verifications: All metrics data accurate and complete
                  • Negative_Verification: Should not return data for unauthorized requests

                  ---

                  Test Case 11: Organization Setup API Integration

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_011
                  Title: Test organization setup API endpoints for dashboard integration
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Organization Setup API
                  • Test Type: API/Integration
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Organization "TechCorp" with partial setup, valid API credentials

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	GET /api/organization/setup-status	Returns current setup progress	Org ID: 12345	Status retrieval
                  2	Verify weighted calculation	API returns 70% progress correctly	Weighted business rules	Calculation accuracy
                  3	POST /api/organization/timezone	Updates timezone setting	EST timezone data	Data update
                  4	GET /api/organization/setup-status	Returns updated 100% progress	Updated calculation	Real-time update
                  5	Test invalid organization ID	API returns 404 error	Invalid ID: 99999	Error handlingscenarios
                  6	Test unauthorizedAPI authentication	Requires valid admin token for access	APIValid returns 401 error	No authJWT token	Security validation

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Setup status API returns accurate weighted progress
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Updates reflect immediately, proper error handling
                  • Negative_Verification: Unauthorized requests should be rejected

                  ---

                  PERFORMANCE & CROSS-PLATFORM TEST CASES

                  Test Case 12: Dashboard Loading Performance

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_012
                  Title: Verify dashboard loads within 3 seconds across platforms
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
                  • Test Type: Performance/Load Time
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Performance
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Both, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Organization with full dataset (1000+ users, 30-day metrics)

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard on Desktop Chrome	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1920x1080 resolution	Desktop baseline
                  2	Load dashboard on Desktop Firefox	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1920x1080 resolution	Cross-browser
                  3	Load dashboard on Tablet Chrome	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1024x768 resolution	Tablet performance
                  4	Load dashboard on Tablet Safari	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1024x768 resolution	iOS compatibility
                  5	Measure API response times	All API calls complete within 500ms	Dashboard metrics	Backend performance
                  6	Test with slow network	Dashboard loads within 5 seconds on 3G	Throttled connection	Network resilience

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All platforms load within 3 seconds
                  • Secondary_Verifications: API responses under 500ms, visual elements render properly
                  • Negative_Verification: Should not exceed 3-second threshold on any platform

                  ---

                  Test Suite Organization

                  Smoke Test Suite (Execute: Every build)

                  • ONB05US01_TC_001 (Organization Setup Progress)
                  • ONB05US01_TC_004 (Utility Setup Progress)
                  • ONB05US01_TC_007 (Security Activity Display)
                  • ONB05US01_TC_009 (Trial Plan Display)
                  • ONB05US01_TC_012 (Dashboard Performance)

                  Regression Test Suite (Execute: Before each release)

                  • All P1-Critical and P2-High test cases (32 test cases)
                  • API integration tests
                  • Cross-platform compatibility tests

                  Full Test Suite (Execute: Weekly/Major releases)

                  • All 51 test cases including edge cases and P3-Medium/P4-Low scenarios

                  Execution Matrix

                  Browser/Device Combinations

                  Platform	Browser	Resolution	Test Cases
                  Desktop	Chrome Latest	1920x1080	All functional tests
                  Desktop	Firefox Latest	1920x1080	Critical path tests
                  Tablet	Chrome/Safari	1024x768	UI/UX focused tests

                  Environment Dependencies

                  • Development: Smoke tests only
                  • Staging: Full regression suite
                  • Production: Smoke tests + Critical API tests

                  API Test Collection (Critical >=7)

                  High Priority API Endpoints:

                  1. GET /api/dashboard/metrics - Priority: 9 (Critical business metrics)
                  2. GET /api/organization/setup-status - Priority: 8 (Revenue impacting)
                  3. POST /api/organization/complete-setup - Priority: 8 (Business completion)
                  4. GET /api/utility/setup-status - Priority: 7 (Operational readiness)
                  5. GET /api/security/activity-summary - Priority: 7 (Security monitoring)

                  Performance Benchmarks

                  Response Time Targets:

                  • Dashboard initial load: <3 seconds
                  • API metrics calls: <500ms
                  • Real-time updates: <1 second
                  • Cross-platform consistency: ±10% variance

                  Concurrent User Handling:

                  • Expected load: 10-50 concurrent System Admins
                  • Performance degradation threshold: >3 seconds
                  • API rate limiting: 100 requests/minute per user

                  Integration Test Map

                  External System Dependencies:

                  1. User Authentication Service - Login validation, session management
                  2. Progress Calculation Engine - Weighted progress computation
                  3. Metrics Aggregation Service - User adoption and security data
                  4. Email Service - User invitation processing
                  5. File Processing Service - Data upload and validation

                  Dependency Health Checks:

                  • Service availability validation before test execution
                  • Fallback scenarios for service unavailability
                  • Monitoring integration for real-time status

                  Risk Assessment & Mitigation

                  High-Risk Areas:

                  1. Weighted Progress Calculation - Business rule complexity
                  2. Real-time Metrics Updates - Data synchronization
                  3. Cross-platform Performance - Rendering consistency
                  4. API Security - Unauthorized access prevention

                  Mitigation Strategies:

                  • Automated progress calculation validation
                  • Real-time monitoring for metric accuracy
                  • Performance benchmarking across platforms
                  • Security penetration testing for API endpoints

                  ---

                  Test Case 13: Organization Setup Edge Case - Invalid Data Handling

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_013
                  Title: Verify organization setup handles invalid data gracefully
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Organization Setup
                  • Test Type: Functional/Error Handling
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorHandling, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Organization setup with invalid currency code "XYZ", malformed date format

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Attempt to save invalid currency	Error message displayed	Currency: "XYZ"	Invalid currency code
                  2	Check progress calculation	Progress remains unchanged	No progress update	Data integrity
                  3	Attempt invalid date format	Validation error shown	Date: "32/13/2025"	Invalid date
                  4	Verify error recovery	User can correct and retry	Valid corrections	Recovery path
                  5	Complete with valid data	Setup progresses normally	USD, MM/DD/YYYY	Normal flow

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Invalid data rejected with clear error messages
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Progress calculation unaffected by invalid attempts
                  • Negative_Verification: System should not accept invalid currency/date formats

                  ---

                  Test Case 14: Utility Setup Component Dependencies

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_014
                  Title: Verify utility setup component dependencies and validation
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Utility Setup
                  • Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-BusinessLogic, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Utility "Metro Power" with Core System Settings incomplete

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Attempt to configure Pricing without Core Settings	Warning message displayed	Skip Core Settings	Dependency validation
                  2	Try to set up Service Area first	System allows but warns	Geographic boundaries	Flexible ordering
                  3	Complete Core System Settings	25% progress gained	System configuration	Foundation setup
                  4	Configure dependent components	No warnings, smooth progression	Pricing, Service Area	Dependency satisfied
                  5	Verify final calculation	All components contribute correctly	100% completion	Weighted calculation

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: System enforces logical dependencies
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Warnings provided for optimal setup order
                  • Negative_Verification: Critical dependencies cannot be bypassed

                  ---

                  Test Case 15: User Adoption Metrics Real-Time Updates

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_015
                  Title: Verify user adoption metrics update in real-time
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: User Adoption
                  • Test Type: Functional/Real-Time Updates
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UserAdoption, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-RealTime, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Dashboard showing 48 active users, monitoring system active

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Simulate new user login	User count increases to 49	New user session	Real-time tracking
                  2	Wait for dashboard refresh	Count updates within 30 seconds	Auto-refresh	Update interval
                  3	Simulate user logout	Count decreases to 48	User session end	Session tracking
                  4	Check weekly growth recalculation	Percentage updates if threshold met	Growth calculation	Trend analysis
                  5	Verify graph data points	New activity reflected in trend line	Visual update	Chart refresh

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: User count updates within 30 seconds
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Graph reflects real-time changes, growth metrics recalculate
                  • Negative_Verification: Stale data should not persist beyond refresh interval

                  ---

                  Test Case 16: Security Activity Threat Detection

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_016
                  Title: Verify security activity identifies and highlights threats
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security Activity
                  • Test Type: Security/Threat Detection
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Security
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Security log with multiple failed login attempts from same IP

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Review security activity dashboard	Unauthorized attempts highlighted in red	15 failed attempts	Visual alert
                  2	Check for pattern recognition	Repeated IP addresses flagged	Same IP: 8 attempts	Threat pattern
                  3	Verify alert severity	High-risk attempts shown prominently	Brute force indicator	Risk assessment
                  4	Click on security concern	Detailed incident report opens	Investigation details	Drill-down capability
                  5	Check incident response options	Block IP, alert admin options available	Response actions	Incident management

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Threat patterns correctly identified and highlighted
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Incident details accessible, response options available
                  • Negative_Verification: False positives should not trigger high-severity alerts

                  ---

                  Test Case 17: Data Upload File Format Validation

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_017
                  Title: Verify data upload validates multiple file formats correctly
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Data Upload
                  • Test Type: Functional/File Processing
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataUpload, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-FileProcessing, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: CSV file (valid), Excel file (XLSX), XML file (valid), TXT file (invalid format)

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Upload valid CSV file	File accepted, smart recognition works	customer_data.csv	Supported format
                  2	Upload Excel XLSX file	File processed successfully	customer_data.xlsx	Office format
                  3	Upload XML file	File parsed and validated	customer_data.xml	Structured data
                  4	Attempt to upload TXT file	File rejected with error message	unsupported.txt	Unsupported format
                  5	Upload corrupted file	Graceful error handling displayed	corrupted.csv	Error recovery
                  6	Check upload history	All attempts logged properly	Upload audit trail	Tracking

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Supported formats processed correctly
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Unsupported formats rejected gracefully, audit trail maintained
                  • Negative_Verification: Corrupted files should not crash the system

                  ---

                  Test Case 18: Trial Plan Limitation Enforcement

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_018
                  Title: Verify trial plan limitations are enforced correctly
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Trial Plan
                  • Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-TrialPlan, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-BusinessLogic, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Trial plan with 2/5 users active, 4.8GB/5GB storage used

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Attempt to invite 4 more users	Warning shown at 5 user limit	6 total invitations	User limit
                  2	Try to upload large file	Storage limit warning displayed	300MB file upload	Storage limit
                  3	Attempt API access	Limited API calls enforced	101st API call	API restriction
                  4	Try to export large dataset	Export capped at 100 records	500 record export	Export limitation
                  5	Check upgrade prompts	Upgrade suggestions displayed	Premium features	Revenue opportunity

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All trial limitations properly enforced
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Clear upgrade paths presented, limits well-communicated
                  • Negative_Verification: Trial users should not access premium features

                  ---

                  Test Case 19: Dashboard Responsiveness Tablet View

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_019
                  Title: Verify dashboard responsive design on tablet devices
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Dashboard UI/UX
                  • Test Type: UI/Responsive Design
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UI, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Responsive, Platform-Tablet, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Tablet device or browser developer tools set to 1024x768

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard on tablet	All sections fit within viewport	1024x768 resolution	Viewport fit
                  2	Check progress bars	Progress indicators remain readable	Visual scaling	Readability
                  3	Test graph interactions	Charts respond to touch/hover	User adoption graph	Touch compatibility
                  4	Verify button accessibility	All buttons remain clickable	Touch targets	Accessibility
                  5	Check navigation flow	Setup navigation works smoothly	Org/Utility setup	Navigation
                  6	Test portrait orientation	Layout adapts to 768x1024	Rotation handling	Orientation

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All UI elements accessible and functional on tablet
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Touch interactions work properly, text remains readable
                  • Negative_Verification: No horizontal scrolling required, no UI elements cut off

                  ---

                  Test Case 20: Concurrent User Session Management

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_020
                  Title: Verify dashboard handles concurrent System Admin sessions
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Session Management
                  • Test Type: Functional/Concurrency
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Performance
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-SessionMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Concurrency, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Multiple System Admin accounts, same organization

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Login with Admin1	Dashboard loads successfully	admin1@techcorp.com	First session
                  2	Login with Admin2 simultaneously	Both sessions active	admin2@techcorp.com	Concurrent access
                  3	Update organization settings in Admin1	Changes saved successfully	Currency update	Data update
                  4	Refresh Admin2 dashboard	Shows updated information	Real-time sync	Data consistency
                  5	Perform simultaneous actions	System handles conflicts gracefully	Concurrent updates	Conflict resolution

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Multiple admin sessions supported
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency maintained, no session conflicts
                  • Negative_Verification: One admin's actions should not break another's session

                  ---

                  ADDITIONAL EDGE CASES AND SPECIALIZED SCENARIOS

                  Test Case 21: Organization Setup Progress Boundary Conditions

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_021
                  Title: Test organization setup progress at boundary conditions
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Organization Setup
                  • Test Type: Functional/Boundary Testing
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Boundary, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Fresh organization with no setup completed

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Check initial progress	Shows 0% completion	No tasks completed	Minimum boundary
                  2	Complete only Currency	Shows 40% completion	Currency: USD	Single task weight
                  3	Complete Currency + Date Format	Shows 70% completion	40% + 30%	Cumulative calculation
                  4	Complete all tasks	Shows 100% completion	All tasks done	Maximum boundary
                  5	Verify button states at each stage	Buttons reflect completion status	State transitions	UI consistency

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Progress calculation accurate at all boundary points
                  • Secondary_Verifications: UI states consistent with progress levels
                  • Negative_Verification: Progress should never exceed 100% or show negative values

                  ---

                  Test Case 22: Utility Setup Complex Workflow

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_022
                  Title: Test utility setup with complex multi-step workflow
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Utility Setup
                  • Test Type: Functional/Workflow
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Workflow, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Utility "Regional Power Corp" with complex service areas and pricing tiers

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Configure Core System Settings	Foundation established (25%)	System parameters	Core foundation
                  2	Set up multiple service areas	Geographic coverage defined (20%)	3 service regions	Service coverage
                  3	Configure tiered pricing structure	Pricing model established (20%)	Residential, Commercial, Industrial	Pricing complexity
                  4	Set up staff with different roles	Access control configured (15%)	5 staff members, 3 roles	Staff management
                  5	Configure complex scheduling	Calendar system ready (10%)	Multiple shift patterns	Scheduling
                  6	Set up ID tracking systems	Reference systems active (10%)	Work orders, customer IDs	ID management
                  7	Verify complete workflow	100% completion achieved	All components integrated	Final verification

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Complex workflow completed successfully
                  • Secondary_Verifications: All components integrate properly, data consistency maintained
                  • Negative_Verification: Partial configurations should not affect other components

                  ---

                  Test Case 23: User Adoption Metrics Data Visualization

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_023
                  Title: Verify user adoption metrics visualization accuracy and interactivity
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: User Adoption
                  • Test Type: Functional/Data Visualization
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UserAdoption, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-DataViz, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: 30-day user activity data with various patterns (weekends, holidays, peaks)

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	View full month trend	Graph shows complete 30-day pattern	Monthly data	Long-term trend
                  2	Hover over data points	Tooltips show exact values	Interactive tooltips	Data precision
                  3	Identify weekend patterns	Lower activity on Sat/Sun visible	Weekend dips	Pattern recognition
                  4	Check holiday impact	Holiday dates show reduced activity	Thanksgiving, Christmas	Special events
                  5	Verify growth calculations	Week-over-week percentages accurate	Mathematical precision	Calculation accuracy
                  6	Test graph zoom/pan	Interactive features functional	Graph manipulation	User interaction

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Graph accurately represents all data points
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Interactive features work properly, patterns clearly visible
                  • Negative_Verification: Data should not be misrepresented or truncated

                  ---

                  Test Case 24: Security Activity Advanced Filtering

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_024
                  Title: Test advanced filtering and analysis of security activity data
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security Activity
                  • Test Type: Functional/Advanced Features
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Advanced, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: 30-day security log with various IP addresses, user agents, and attack patterns

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Filter by IP address	Shows attempts from specific IP	192.168.1.100	IP filtering
                  2	Filter by date range	Shows activity for selected period	Last 7 days	Date filtering
                  3	Filter by attempt type	Shows only unauthorized attempts	Failed logins only	Type filtering
                  4	Analyze attack patterns	Identifies brute force attempts	Multiple rapid attempts	Pattern analysis
                  5	Export filtered results	Security report generated	CSV export	Data export
                  6	Set up alert thresholds	Configurable alert parameters	5 attempts = alert	Alert configuration

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Filtering functions work accurately
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Patterns correctly identified, alerts configurable
                  • Negative_Verification: Filters should not exclude relevant security data

                  ---

                  Test Case 25: Data Upload Large File Handling

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_025
                  Title: Test data upload with large files and performance optimization
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Data Upload
                  • Test Type: Performance/Large Data
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Performance
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataUpload, P3-Medium, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Large CSV file (10MB, 50,000 records), Excel file (5MB, 25,000 records)

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Upload large CSV file	Upload progresses with progress bar	10MB CSV file	Large file handling
                  2	Monitor processing time	Smart recognition completes within 30 seconds	Processing timer	Performance benchmark
                  3	Check memory usage	System remains responsive	Browser performance	Resource management
                  4	Validate large dataset	All 50,000 records processed	Data completeness	Bulk processing
                  5	Test data mapping	Field mapping works with large dataset	Mapping accuracy	Scalability
                  6	Complete integration	All valid records integrated successfully	Final result	Integration success

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Large files processed within acceptable timeframes
                  • Secondary_Verifications: System remains responsive, data integrity maintained
                  • Negative_Verification: Large files should not cause system crashes or timeouts

                  ---

                  API TEST CASES (CONTINUED)

                  Test Case 26: User Adoption Metrics API

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_026
                  Title: Test user adoption metrics API endpoints and data accuracy
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: User Adoption API
                  • Test Type: API/Data Validation
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API-UserAdoption, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: 7-day user activity data, valid API credentials

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	GET /api/adoption/daily-active-users	Returns current DAU count	API endpoint	Metric retrieval
                  2	GET /api/adoption/weekly-growth	Returns growth percentage	Growth calculation	Trend analysis
                  3	GET /api/adoption/activity-trend	Returns 7-day activity array	Daily breakdown	Historical data
                  4	Verify data consistency	API data matches dashboard display	Cross-validation	Data accuracy
                  5	Test date range parameters	API accepts custom date ranges	?start=2025-05-01&end=2025-05-31	Flexible querying
                  6	Test error handling	API handles invalid date ranges	Invalid parameters	Error responseintegrity

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: API returns accurate user adoption metrics
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency with dashboard, proper error handling
                  • Negative_Verification: API should not return stale or incorrect data

                  ---

                  Test Case 27:9: SecurityPerformance ActivityUnder API Integration

                  Load

                  Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_027ONB05US01_TC_009
                  TitleTitle:: TestValidate securityDashboard activityPerformance APIwith forConcurrent real-timeAdmin monitoring integrationUsers
                  Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security Activity API
                  • Test Type: API/Security Monitoring
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Security
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced TagsDate: Tags:June MOD-API-Security,04, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point2025

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Security activity log with authorized/unauthorized login attempts

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	GET /api/security/login-attempts	Returns login attempt breakdown	Daily statistics	Security metrics
                  2	GET /api/security/threat-summary	Returns threat analysis	Threat patterns	Security analysis
                  3	POST /api/security/alert-threshold	Sets alert parameters	Threshold configuration	Alert setup
                  4	GET /api/security/incidents	Returns security incidents	Incident log	Incident tracking
                  5	Test real-time updates	API reflects live security events	Real-time data	Live monitoring
                  6	Verify access control	API requires proper authentication	Security validation	Access control

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Security API provides accurate real-time data
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Threat analysis functional, alerts configurable
                  • Negative_Verification: Unauthorized access should be prevented

                  ---

                  Test Case 28: Data Upload API Processing

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_028
                  Title: Test data upload API for file processing and validation
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Data Upload API
                  • Test Type: API/File Processing
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced TagsVersion: Tags: MOD-API-DataUpload, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point1.0

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Valid CSV file for upload, API authentication token

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	POST /api/upload/file	File upload initiated	Multipart form data	File upload
                  2	GET /api/upload/status/{uploadId}	Returns processing status	Upload tracking	Status monitoring
                  3	GET /api/upload/validation/{uploadId}	Returns validation results	Data validation	Quality check
                  4	POST /api/upload/mapping/{uploadId}	Sets field mapping	Field associations	Data mapping
                  5	POST /api/upload/integrate/{uploadId}	Integrates validated data	Final processing	Data integration
                  6	GET /api/upload/history	Returns upload history	Historical records	Audit trail

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: File upload and processing API functions correctly
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Status tracking works, validation accurate
                  • Negative_Verification: Invalid files should be rejected by API

                  ---

                  PERFORMANCE AND LOAD TESTING

                  Test Case 29: Dashboard Load Testing

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_029
                  Title: Test dashboard performance under concurrent user load
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
                  • Test Type: Performance/Load Testing
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Performance
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-LoadTest, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Load testing tool configured for 50 concurrent System Admins

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Simulate 10 concurrent users	Dashboard loads within 3 seconds	10 users	Baseline load
                  2	Increase to 25 concurrent users	Performance remains acceptable	25 users	Moderate load
                  3	Scale to 50 concurrent users	Dashboard loads within 5 seconds	50 users	Peak load
                  4	Monitor API response times	All APIs respond within 1 second	API performance	Backend performance
                  5	Check system resource usage	CPU/Memory within acceptable limits	Resource monitoring	System health
                  6	Test sustained load	Performance stable over 10 minutes	Sustained testing	Stability test

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard remains functional under peak load
                  • Secondary_Verifications: API performance acceptable, system resources stable
                  • Negative_Verification: System should not crash or become unresponsive

                  ---

                  INTEGRATION TESTING

                  Test Case 30: End-to-End Organization Onboarding

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_030
                  Title: Test complete organization onboarding flow from start to finish
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Complete Onboarding
                  • Test Type: End-to-End/Integration
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-E2E-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-E2E, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: New organization "GreenTech Utilities", fresh System Admin account

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	System Admin first login	Dashboard shows 0% setup progress	New organization	Starting point
                  2	Complete organization setup	Organization setup reaches 100%	Currency, Date, Timezone	Org completion
                  3	Complete utility setup	Utility setup reaches 100%	All 6 components	Utility completion
                  4	Upload initial data	Data integration successful	Customer data CSV	Data onboarding
                  5	Invite initial users	User invitations sent	3 user invitations	Team setup
                  6	Monitor user adoption	Metrics show initial activity	User login tracking	Adoption tracking
                  7	Review security activity	Security dashboard active	Login monitoring	Security baseline
                  8	Verify trial plan status	Trial limitations enforced	5 user limit, 5GB storage	Plan enforcement
                  9	Complete onboarding checklist	All dashboard sections functional	Full feature access	Complete onboarding

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Complete onboarding flow successful from 0% to 100%
                  • Secondary_Verifications: All integrations functional, data flows correctly
                  • Negative_Verification: No setup steps should be skippable or fail silently

                  ---

                  CROSS-PLATFORM AND BROWSER COMPATIBILITY

                  Test Case 31: Firefox Browser Compatibility

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_031
                  Title: Verify dashboard functionality across Firefox browser versions
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Browser Compatibility
                  • Test Type: Compatibility/Cross-Browser
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-CrossBrowser, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Firefox Latest and Firefox ESR versions, complete dashboard data

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard in Firefox Latest	All components render correctly	1920x1080 resolution	Latest version
                  2	Test progress bars visualization	Progress indicators display properly	Org/Utility progress	Visual elements
                  3	Verify chart rendering	User adoption graph functions	Interactive charts	Chart compatibility
                  4	Test button interactions	All buttons respond correctly	Setup buttons	User interactions
                  5	Check responsive behavior	Layout adapts to window resize	Responsive design	Layout flexibility
                  6	Test in Firefox ESR	Core functionality works	Extended support	Legacy support

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All dashboard functions work in Firefox
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual elements render correctly, interactions functional
                  • Negative_Verification: No Firefox-specific rendering issues or broken features

                  ---

                  Test Case 32: Safari Browser Compatibility

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_032
                  Title: Verify dashboard functionality in Safari browser
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Browser Compatibility
                  • Test Type: Compatibility/Cross-Browser
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-CrossBrowser, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Safari 16+ on macOS, complete dashboard configuration

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard in Safari	Dashboard loads within 3 seconds	macOS Safari	WebKit rendering
                  2	Test WebKit-specific features	All animations smooth	CSS transitions	WebKit compatibility
                  3	Verify security section	Charts display correctly	Security activity	Data visualization
                  4	Test file upload functionality	Drag-and-drop works	Data upload	File handling
                  5	Check cookie handling	Session persistence works	Login session	Session management
                  6	Verify touch events	Touch interactions responsive	Tablet mode	Touch compatibility

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Complete functionality in Safari browser
                  • Secondary_Verifications: WebKit-specific features work, performance acceptable
                  • Negative_Verification: No Safari-only bugs or incompatibilities

                  ---

                  Test Case 33: Edge Browser Compatibility

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_033
                  Title: Verify dashboard functionality in Microsoft Edge browser
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Browser Compatibility
                  • Test Type: Compatibility/Cross-Browser
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-CrossBrowser, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Microsoft Edge Latest, Windows 10/11 environment

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard in Edge	All sections load properly	Windows environment	Chromium engine
                  2	Test Microsoft integrations	No conflicts with Windows features	OS integration	Platform harmony
                  3	Verify PDF export features	Reports generate correctly	Dashboard reports	Export functionality
                  4	Test printing functionality	Dashboard prints properly	Print preview	Print compatibility
                  5	Check performance metrics	Load times within acceptable range	Performance baseline	Speed comparison
                  6	Verify security features	Edge security features compatible	Security compatibility	Browser security

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Full functionality in Microsoft Edge
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Windows integration smooth, performance adequate
                  • Negative_Verification: No Edge-specific conflicts or issues

                  ---

                  MOBILE AND TABLET SPECIFIC TESTING

                  Test Case 34: iPad Tablet Interface

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_034
                  Title: Verify dashboard functionality on iPad devices
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Mobile Interface
                  • Test Type: UI/Mobile Compatibility
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Mobile, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Mobile, Platform-Tablet, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: iPad Pro or iPad Air, Safari browser, complete dashboard data

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard on iPad	Interface adapts to tablet layout	1024x768 resolution	Tablet optimization
                  2	Test touch interactions	Progress bars and buttons responsive	Touch targets	Touch usability
                  3	Verify chart interactions	Graphs respond to touch gestures	User adoption chart	Touch charts
                  4	Test pinch-to-zoom	Dashboard scales appropriately	Zoom functionality	Accessibility
                  5	Check orientation changes	Layout adapts to portrait/landscape	Rotation handling	Orientation flexibility
                  6	Verify file upload	Touch-based file selection works	Data upload	Mobile file handling
                  7	Test multi-touch gestures	Advanced gestures functional	Complex interactions	Advanced touch

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard fully functional on iPad
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Touch interactions intuitive, layout responsive
                  • Negative_Verification: No touch-specific usability issues

                  ---

                  Test Case 35: Android Tablet Compatibility

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_035
                  Title: Verify dashboard functionality on Android tablets
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Mobile Interface
                  • Test Type: UI/Mobile Compatibility
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Mobile, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Mobile, Platform-Tablet, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Android tablet (Samsung Galaxy Tab), Chrome browser

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Load dashboard on Android tablet	Dashboard renders correctly	Android Chrome	Android compatibility
                  2	Test Android-specific gestures	Navigation gestures work	Back button, swipes	Platform gestures
                  3	Verify performance	Smooth operation on Android	Performance monitoring	Android optimization
                  4	Test file manager integration	File upload integrates with Android	File picker	OS integration
                  5	Check memory management	No memory issues during use	Resource monitoring	Memory efficiency
                  6	Verify notification handling	System notifications don't interfere	Background notifications	Multitasking

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard functions properly on Android tablets
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Android-specific features work, performance acceptable
                  • Negative_Verification: No Android-only bugs or performance issues

                  ---

                  SECURITY AND PENETRATION TESTING

                  Test Case 36: Authentication Security Testing

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_036
                  Title: Test dashboard authentication security and session management
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security/Authentication
                  • Test Type: Security/Penetration Testing
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Security
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security-Auth, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Valid System Admin credentials, penetration testing tools

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Attempt dashboard access without login	Redirect to login page	No credentials	Access control
                  2	Test session timeout	Session expires after inactivity	30-minute timeout	Session security
                  3	Try accessing with expired token	Access denied, re-authentication required	Expired JWT	Token validation
                  4	Test concurrent session limits	System handles multiple sessions	Session management	Concurrent access
                  5	Attempt privilege escalation	System rejects unauthorized actions	Limited permissions	Permission enforcement
                  6	Test CSRF protection	Cross-site requests blocked	CSRF attacks	Request validation

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Authentication properly enforced
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Session security robust, privilege escalation prevented
                  • Negative_Verification: Unauthorized access should be impossible

                  ---

                  Test Case 37: Data Security and Privacy

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_037
                  Title: Verify data security and privacy protection in dashboard
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Security/Data Protection
                  • Test Type: Security/Privacy
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Security
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security-Data, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Sensitive organization data, security scanning tools

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Check data encryption in transit	HTTPS enforced for all communications	SSL/TLS verification	Transport security
                  2	Verify sensitive data masking	PII appropriately masked in UI	Customer data display	Data privacy
                  3	Test data export security	Exported data properly secured	Report downloads	Export security
                  4	Check browser storage	No sensitive data in localStorage	Browser inspection	Client-side security
                  5	Verify audit logging	All actions properly logged	Activity audit trail	Audit compliance
                  6	Test data retention policies	Old data handled per policy	Data lifecycle	Retention compliance

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All sensitive data properly protected
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Encryption enforced, audit trails complete
                  • Negative_Verification: No sensitive data exposure or security vulnerabilities

                  ---

                  ERROR HANDLING AND RECOVERY

                  Test Case 38: Network Connectivity Issues

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_038
                  Title: Test dashboard behavior during network connectivity problems
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Error Handling
                  • Test Type: Functional/Error Recovery
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorRecovery, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Network simulation tools, stable dashboard session

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Simulate network disconnection	Dashboard shows offline indicator	Network disabled	Offline detection
                  2	Attempt actions while offline	User notified of connectivity issues	Offline actions	User feedback
                  3	Restore network connection	Dashboard automatically reconnects	Network restored	Auto-recovery
                  4	Verify data synchronization	Latest data loads after reconnection	Data sync	Data consistency
                  5	Test slow network conditions	Dashboard shows loading indicators	Throttled connection	Performance graceful degradation
                  6	Check timeout handling	Appropriate timeout messages shown	Request timeouts	Timeout management

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard handles network issues gracefully
                  • Secondary_Verifications: User feedback clear, auto-recovery functional
                  • Negative_Verification: No data corruption or loss during network issues

                  ---

                  Test Case 39: Server Error Recovery

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_039
                  Title: Test dashboard recovery from server errors and service unavailability
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Error Handling
                  • Test Type: Functional/Error Recovery
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorRecovery, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Test environment with controllable service failures

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Simulate API server error (500)	Error message displayed to user	Server 500 response	Server error handling
                  2	Test service unavailable (503)	Graceful degradation activated	Service 503 response	Service degradation
                  3	Simulate database connectivity issues	Cached data displayed where possible	DB connection failure	Data caching
                  4	Test partial service failures	Working components continue functioning	Mixed service health	Partial functionality
                  5	Verify error message clarity	User-friendly error descriptions shown	Error messaging	User communication
                  6	Test automatic retry mechanisms	System attempts reconnection	Retry logic	Auto-recovery

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Server errors handled gracefully
                  • Secondary_Verifications: User experience maintained during failures, clear error communication
                  • Negative_Verification: System should not crash or show technical error details

                  ---

                  ACCESSIBILITY AND USABILITY

                  Test Case 40: Keyboard Navigation

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_040
                  Title: Verify dashboard accessibility through keyboard navigation
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Accessibility
                  • Test Type: Accessibility/Keyboard Navigation
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Accessibility, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Accessibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Complete dashboard configuration, keyboard-only navigation

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Navigate dashboard using Tab key	All interactive elements accessible	Tab navigation	Keyboard focus
                  2	Test progress bar accessibility	Screen reader compatible descriptions	ARIA labels	Screen reader support
                  3	Navigate charts with keyboard	Chart data accessible via keyboard	Graph navigation	Data accessibility
                  4	Test button activation	Enter/Space keys activate buttons	Keyboard activation	Button accessibility
                  5	Verify focus indicators	Clear visual focus indicators shown	Focus visibility	Visual feedback
                  6	Test skip navigation links	Skip links allow efficient navigation	Skip to content	Navigation efficiency

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Complete keyboard navigation possible
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Screen reader compatibility, clear focus indicators
                  • Negative_Verification: No keyboard traps or inaccessible elements

                  ---

                  DATA INTEGRITY AND VALIDATION

                  Test Case 41: Data Consistency Across Sessions

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_041
                  Title: Verify data consistency across multiple user sessions and browser tabs
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Data Integrity
                  • Test Type: Functional/Data Consistency
                  • Test Level: Integration
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataIntegrity, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-DataConsistency, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Multiple browser tabs/windows, System Admin account

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Open dashboard in two browser tabs	Both tabs show identical data	Tab 1 & Tab 2	Initial consistency
                  2	Update organization setup in Tab 1	Progress updates in Tab 1	Organization changes	Data modification
                  3	Refresh Tab 2	Tab 2 shows updated progress	Data synchronization	Cross-tab sync
                  4	Simultaneously update different sections	Both updates processed correctly	Concurrent updates	Conflict resolution
                  5	Check real-time metrics consistency	All tabs show same user adoption data	Live metrics	Real-time consistency
                  6	Verify audit trail accuracy	All changes properly logged	Change tracking	Audit integrity

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Data consistency maintained across sessions
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates synchronized, audit trail accurate
                  • Negative_Verification: No data conflicts or inconsistencies between sessions

                  ---

                  Test Case 42: Data Validation Boundary Testing

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_042
                  Title: Test data validation at boundary conditions and edge cases
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Data Validation
                  • Test Type: Functional/Boundary Testing
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P3-Medium
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataValidation, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Boundary, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Various edge case data inputs for validation testing

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Test maximum user adoption count	System handles large numbers	999,999 users	Upper boundary
                  2	Test zero user activity	Dashboard displays zero gracefully	0 active users	Lower boundary
                  3	Test maximum file upload size	Size limit enforced correctly	6GB file (over limit)	File size boundary
                  4	Test minimum progress values	0% progress displayed correctly	No completed tasks	Progress minimum
                  5	Test date range extremes	Far future/past dates handled	Year 2099/1900	Date boundaries
                  6	Test special characters	Unicode and symbols processed	Special chars in org name	Character validation

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All boundary conditions handled correctly
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate error messages for invalid data, graceful handling of edge cases
                  • Negative_Verification: System should not crash or corrupt data at boundaries

                  ---

                  BUSINESS LOGIC TESTING

                  Test Case 43: Revenue Impact Calculation

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_043
                  Title: Verify business logic for revenue impact tracking and billing activation
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Business Logic
                  • Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P1-Critical
                  • Execution Phase: Acceptance
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-BusinessLogic, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-BusinessRules, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Organization transitioning from trial to paid plan

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Complete organization setup	Setup completion triggers billing eligibility	100% org setup	Revenue milestone
                  2	Complete utility setup	Full operational readiness achieved	100% utility setup	Service readiness
                  3	Verify billing activation trigger	System flags organization for billing	Billing notification	Revenue activation
                  4	Check trial-to-paid transition	Limitations removed, full features enabled	Plan upgrade	Feature unlock
                  5	Monitor subscription metrics	Revenue tracking begins	Subscription active	Revenue tracking
                  6	Verify user limit changes	User limits increased per paid plan	50 user limit	Capacity increase

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Setup completion triggers appropriate business logic
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Revenue tracking activated, feature limitations removed
                  • Negative_Verification: Billing should not activate for incomplete setups

                  ---

                  REPORTING AND ANALYTICS

                  Test Case 44: Executive Dashboard Reporting

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_044
                  Title: Verify executive reporting features and data export functionality
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Reporting
                  • Test Type: Functional/Reporting
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Regression
                  • Automation Status: Manual

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Reporting, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Reporting, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: 30-day dashboard activity data, completed setups

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Generate setup completion report	Report shows organization progress trends	Historical setup data	Progress reporting
                  2	Export user adoption metrics	CSV contains accurate adoption data	User activity export	Data export
                  3	Create security summary report	Security incidents properly categorized	Security report	Risk reporting
                  4	Generate executive summary	High-level KPIs displayed clearly	Executive metrics	Leadership view
                  5	Test report scheduling	Automated reports generated on schedule	Weekly reports	Automation
                  6	Verify report distribution	Reports sent to appropriate stakeholders	Email distribution	Report sharing

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: Reports generated accurately with correct data
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Export formats functional, scheduling works
                  • Negative_Verification: No data omissions or inaccuracies in reports

                  ---

                  COMPLIANCE AND AUDIT

                  Test Case 45: Audit Trail Completeness

                  Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_045
                  Title: Verify comprehensive audit trail for all dashboard activities
                  Created By: Auto-generated
                  Created Date: 2025-06-05
                  Version: 1.0

                  Classification

                  • Module/Feature: Audit/Compliance
                  • Test Type: Functional/Audit
                  • Test Level: System
                  • Priority: P2-High
                  • Execution Phase: Compliance
                  • Automation Status: Automated

                  Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Audit, P2-High, Phase-Compliance, Type-Audit, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                  Prerequisites

                  • Test_Data: Various user activities across all dashboard sections

                  Test Procedure

                  Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                  1	Perform organization setup changes	All changes logged with timestamps	Setup modifications	Change tracking
                  2	Upload and process data files	File operations recorded in audit log	Data upload activity	File audit
                  3	Access security activity section	Security access logged	Security monitoring	Access audit
                  4	Generate and download reports	Report generation/access tracked	Report activity	Report audit
                  5	Review complete audit trail	All activities properly documented	Comprehensive log	Full audit
                  6	Test audit data retention	Historical audit data preserved	90-day retention	Retention compliance

                  Verification Points

                  • Primary_Verification: All user activities logged in audit trail
                  • Secondary_Verifications: Timestamps accurate, user attribution correct
                  • Negative_Verification: No activities should occur without audit logging

                  ---

                  COMPLETE TEST EXECUTION MATRIX

                  Priority-Based Test Execution Schedule

                  P1-Critical Tests (Execute: Daily/Every Build) - 15 Tests

                  1. ONB05US01_TC_001 - Organization Setup Progress Calculation
                  2. ONB05US01_TC_002 - Organization Setup Completion Flow
                  3. ONB05US01_TC_004 - Utility Setup Weighted Progress
                  4. ONB05US01_TC_005 - Utility Setup Continue Flow
                  5. ONB05US01_TC_006 - Daily Active Users Display
                  6. ONB05US01_TC_007 - Security Activity Login Attempts
                  7. ONB05US01_TC_008 - Data Upload Process Flow
                  8. ONB05US01_TC_009 - Trial Plan Subscription Display
                  9. ONB05US01_TC_010 - Dashboard Metrics API Performance
                  10. ONB05US01_TC_011 - Organization Setup API Integration
                  11. ONB05US01_TC_012 - Dashboard Loading Performance
                  12. ONB05US01_TC_016 - Security Activity Threat Detection
                  13. ONB05US01_TC_018 - Trial Plan Limitation Enforcement
                  14. ONB05US01_TC_026 - User Adoption Metrics API
                  15. ONB05US01_TC_027 - Security Activity API Integration

                  P2-High Tests (Execute: Weekly/Pre-Release) - 18 Tests

                  [Tests 013, 014, 015, 017, 019, 020, 028, 031, 032, 034, 038, 039, 041, 044, 045, and additional comprehensive scenarios]

                  P3-Medium Tests (Execute: Monthly/Major Release) - 12 Tests

                  [Tests 021, 022, 023, 024, 025, 033, 035, 040, 042, and additional edge cases]

                  Cross-Platform Execution Matrix

                  Test Scenario	Chrome Desktop	Firefox Desktop	Safari Desktop	Chrome Tablet	Safari Tablet
                  Dashboard Loading	All Tests	Critical Path	Critical Path	UI/UX Focus	UI/UX Focus
                  API Integration	All Tests	Critical Tests	Critical Tests	Core APIs	Core APIs
                  Business Logic	All Tests	All Tests	All Tests	Core Logic	Core Logic
                  Security Testing	All Tests	All Tests	Browser-Specific	Limited	Limited

                  Performance Benchmarks Summary

                  Response Time Targets

                  • Dashboard Initial Load: <3 seconds (P1 requirement)
                  • API Calls: <500ms (Critical operations)
                  • Real-time Updates: <1 second (User adoption, security)
                  • File Upload Processing: <30 seconds (Large files)
                  • Report Generation: <10 seconds (Standard reports)

                  Scalability Targets

                  • Concurrent Users: 50 System Admins simultaneously
                  • Data Volume: Handle organizations with 10,000+ users
                  • File Processing: Up to 10MB files, 50,000 records
                  • API Rate Limits: 100 requests/minute per user

                  Risk Assessment Matrix

                  High-Risk Components (Require Extensive Testing)

                  1. Weighted Progress CalculationModule/Feature: - Business-critical algorithmPerformance
                  2. Real-timeTest Metrics UpdatesType: - Data synchronization complexityPerformance
                  3. APITest SecurityLevel: - Authentication and authorizationSystem
                  4. Trial Plan EnforcementPriority: - Revenue protection

                  Medium-Risk Components (Standard Testing)

                  1. Cross-browser Compatibility - Visual consistencyP2-High
                  5. FileExecution Upload ProcessingPhase: - Performance and validation
                  6. DataAutomation Export FeaturesStatus: - Data integrityManual

                Low-RiskEnhanced Components (Basic Testing)Tags

                1. UI ResponsivenessTags: - Layout adaptation

                2. Error Message Display - User communication
                3. Help Documentation - Content accuracy

                ---

                FINAL VALIDATION CHECKLIST

                Functional Coverage ✓

                • [x] All acceptance criteria covered (9/9)
                • [x] All business rules tested with weighted calculations
                • [x] Cross-platform compatibility verified
                • [x] API endpoints tested for critical operations (≥7 importance)
                • [x] Integration points validated

                Non-Functional Coverage ✓

                • [x] Performance benchmarks defined (<3 sec dashboard load)
                • [x] Security testing comprehensive
                • [x] Error handling and recovery tested
                • [x] Data integrity validation complete
                • [x] Accessibility considerations included

                Test Execution Coverage ✓

                • [x] Smoke test suite defined (5 critical tests)
                • [x] Regression test suite comprehensive (33 tests)
                • [x] Full test suite complete (45 tests)
                • [x] API test collection prioritized (8 critical APIs)
                • [x] Performance test scenarios included

                Traceability Coverage ✓

                • [x] All 17 BrowserStack report categories supported
                • [x] Business context and stakeholder mapping complete
                • [x] Quality metrics and risk assessment included
                • [x] Coverage tracking and dependency mapping done
                • [x] Integration test map comprehensive

                ---

                ADDITIONAL SPECIALIZED TEST SCENARIOS

                Test Case 46: Multi-Timezone Organization Support

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_046
                Title: Verify dashboard handles multi-timezone organization operations
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Timezone Management
                • Test Type: Functional/Internationalization
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P3-Medium
                • Execution Phase: Regression
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Timezone, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-I18N, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Organization "Global Energy Corp" with utilities in EST, PST, and GMT timezones

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Configure organization timezone as EST	Primary timezone set to Eastern	EST (-5 GMT)	Base timezone
                2	Add utility in PST timezone	Utility configured with Pacific time	PST (-8 GMT)	Regional utility
                3	View user adoption metrics	Timestamps displayed in appropriate zones	Time-adjusted data	Timezone awareness
                4	Check security activity times	Login times shown in local timezone	Regional login data	Security timezone
                5	Generate reports across timezones	Reports aggregate data correctly	Cross-zone reporting	Data aggregation
                6	Test daylight saving transitions	System handles DST changes	DST boundary dates	DST compliance

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: All timestamps displayed in correct local timezones
                • Secondary_Verifications: Data aggregation accounts for timezone differences
                • Negative_Verification: No timezone confusion or data misalignment

                ---

                Test Case 47: Large Scale Organization Testing

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_047
                Title: Test dashboard performance with large enterprise organization data
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Scalability
                • Test Type: Performance/Scale Testing
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P2-High
                • Execution Phase: Performance
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Scalability,Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Scale,Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High,Medium, Business-High,High.
                Addtional Revenue-Impact-High,Tags: Integration-End-to-EndAuth-Services, AX-Services, Database, Cross-Module

                Prerequisites

                Performance Baseline

                • Test_Data:Dashboard Enterpriseload organizationtime: with<3 10,000seconds
                • Concurrent users,users: Up to 50 utilities,admins
                • Memory 6usage: months<512MB ofper activity datasession

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Load dashboard with enterprisesingle datauser	DashboardPage loads withinin 5<3 seconds	Large1 datasetadmin user	ScaleBaseline performance
                2	NavigateSimulate between10 setupconcurrent sectionsadmin logins	SectionAll transitionsusers remainload smoothdashboard successfully	Navigation10 performanceconcurrent sessions	UIModerate responsivenessload
                3	GenerateTest userwith adoption25 reportconcurrent users	ReportSystem processesmaintains 10,000<3 usersecond recordsload time	Large25 userconcurrent basesessions	DataHigher processingload
                4	FilterMonitor securitymemory activityusage	SecurityMemory filteringusage handlesremains large<512MB logsper session	6Resource months of logsmonitoring	FilterSystem performanceresources
                5	ExportTest comprehensivereal-time dataupdates with load	LargeMetrics exportsupdate completefor successfullyall users simultaneously	EnterpriseLive exportdata updates	ExportConcurrent scalabilityupdates
                6	TestVerify concurrentdatabase adminconnection accesspool	MultipleNo adminsconnection accesstimeouts simultaneouslyunder load	10DB concurrentconnection adminsmonitoring	ConcurrentBackend scalestability
                7	Test graceful degradation	System maintains core functionality	Peak load conditions	Resilience testing

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: Dashboard maintains performance with enterprise-scale data
                • Secondary_Verifications: All features functional at scale, concurrent access supported
                • Negative_Verification: No performance degradation or timeouts with large datasets

                ---

                Test Case 48:10: DisasterError RecoveryHandling and Backup

                Recovery

                Test Case IDID:: ONB05US01_TC_048ONB05US01_TC_010
                TitleTitle:: VerifyValidate dashboardError dataHandling recoveryfor Network and backupSystem functionalityFailures
                Created ByBy:: Auto-generatedQA Team
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Data Recovery
                • Test Type: Functional/Disaster Recovery
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P2-High
                • Execution Phase: Compliance
                • Automation Status: Manual

                Enhanced TagsDate: June 04, 2025
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Error Handling
                • Test Type: Negative
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P2-High
                • Execution Phase: Regression
                • Automation Status: Manual

                Enhanced Tags

                Tags: MOD-Recovery,ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Compliance,Regression, Type-Recovery,Negative, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering,QA, Customer-All, Risk-High,Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-PointHigh.

                
                PrerequisitesAdditonal Tags: Auth-Services, RX-Services, API, Database, Cross-Module

                • Test_Data: Complete organization setup, user activity data, backup systems

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	CreateDisconnect baselinenetwork during dashboard stateload	AllShows dataappropriate properlyoffline configuredmessage	CompleteNetwork setupinterruption	BaselineConnectivity establishmentfailure
                2	InitiateReconnect data backup processnetwork	BackupDashboard completesrecovers successfullyand loads data	DataNetwork backuprestored	BackupRecovery verificationcapability
                3	Simulate dataAPI corruptionservice unavailability	Displays service maintenance message	API down scenario	SystemService detects data integrity issues	Corrupted data	Issue detectionfailure
                4	ExecuteTest with corrupted session data recovery procedure	RecoveryRedirects processto initiateslogin with clear message	RestoreInvalid operationsession	RecoverySession executionhandling
                5	VerifyUpload malformed data restorationfile	AllShows dashboardvalidation dataerrors, restoredprevents correctlyprocessing	Restored statecorrupted_data.csv	Data verificationvalidation
                6	Test functionalitybrowser post-crash recovery	AllReturns featuresto workdashboard normallystate after restart	FullBrowser functionalityrestart	RecoveryState validation

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: Complete data recovery successful
                • Secondary_Verifications: All functionality restored, data integrity maintained
                • Negative_Verification: No data loss or corruption during recovery

                ---

                Test Case 49: Integration with External Utility Systems

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_049
                Title: Test dashboard integration with external utility management systems
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: External Integration
                • Test Type: Integration/External Systems
                • Test Level: Integration
                • Priority: P2-High
                • Execution Phase: Integration
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Integration, P2-High, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Mock external utility systems (billing, CRM, workforce management)

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Connect to external billing system	Integration established successfully	Billing API connection	External billing
                2	Sync organization data	Organization data synchronized	Org sync process	Data synchronization
                3	Import user data from CRM	User adoption metrics updated	CRM user import	CRM integration
                4	Connect workforce management	Staff data integrated in utility setup	Workforce API	Staff integration
                5	Test data consistency	All systems show consistent data	Cross-system validation	Data consistency
                6	Handle integration failures	Graceful fallback when systems unavailable	Service failure	Failure handling

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: External system integration functional
                • Secondary_Verifications: Data synchronization accurate, failure handling robust
                • Negative_Verification: Integration failures should not break dashboard functionality

                ---

                Test Case 50: Advanced User Behavior Analytics

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_050
                Title: Verify advanced user behavior tracking and analytics features
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: User Analytics
                • Test Type: Functional/Analytics
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P3-Medium
                • Execution Phase: Regression
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Analytics, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Analytics, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Detailed user interaction logs, behavior tracking enabled

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Track dashboard page views	Page view analytics recorded	Landing page visits	View tracking
                2	Monitor setup completion rates	Setup abandonment points identified	Conversion funnel	Funnel analysis
                3	Analyze feature usage patterns	Most/least used features identified	Feature analytics	Usage patterns
                4	Track user engagement time	Time spent in each section measured	Session duration	Engagement metrics
                5	Monitor help/support interactions	Support engagement tracked	Help usage	Support analytics
                6	Generate behavior insights	Actionable insights provided	Analytics dashboard	Insight generation

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: User behavior accurately tracked and analyzed
                • Secondary_Verifications: Insights actionable, analytics comprehensive
                • Negative_Verification: No privacy violations or excessive tracking

                ---

                Test Case 51: Regulatory Compliance Validation

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_051
                Title: Verify dashboard compliance with utility industry regulations
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Regulatory Compliance
                • Test Type: Compliance/Regulatory
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P2-High
                • Execution Phase: Compliance
                • Automation Status: Manual

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compliance, P2-High, Phase-Compliance, Type-Regulatory, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Utility regulation requirements, compliance checklist

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Verify data retention policies	Data retained per regulatory requirements	7-year retention	Retention compliance
                2	Check audit trail completeness	All required activities logged	Comprehensive audit	Audit compliance
                3	Validate security measures	Security controls meet utility standards	Security validation	Security compliance
                4	Test reporting capabilities	Regulatory reports available	Compliance reports	Reporting compliance
                5	Verify access controls	Role-based access meets requirements	Access validation	Access compliance
                6	Check data privacy measures	PII protection meets standards	Privacy validation	Privacy compliance

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: All regulatory requirements met
                • Secondary_Verifications: Documentation complete, controls effective
                • Negative_Verification: No regulatory violations or compliance gaps

                ---

                ADDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA SPECIFIC TEST CASES

                Test Case 52: System Admin Role-Based Access Control

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_052
                Title: Verify System Admin role-based access control and unauthorized access prevention
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Access Control
                • Test Type: Security/Role-Based Access
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P1-Critical
                • Execution Phase: Security
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-AccessControl, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

                Business Context

                • Customer_Segment: All
                • Revenue_Impact: Low
                • Business_Priority: Must-Have
                • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
                • Compliance_Required: Yes
                • SLA_Related: Yes

                Quality Metrics

                • Risk_Level: High
                • Complexity_Level: Medium
                • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
                • Reproducibility_Score: High
                • Data_Sensitivity: High
                • Failure_Impact: Critical

                Coverage Tracking

                • Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC9 - Role-based access control
                • Integration_Points: Authentication service, role management
                • Code_Module_Mapped: AuthorizationModule, RoleValidator
                • Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC9)
                • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

                Stakeholder Reporting

                • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
                • Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Compliance
                • Trend_Tracking: Yes
                • Executive_Visibility: Yes
                • Customer_Impact_Level: High

                Requirements Traceability

                • Related_Requirements: AC9 - Role-based access restriction
                • Related_Bugs: N/A
                • Related_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_036, ONB05US01_TC_037

                Test Environment

                • Environment: Staging
                • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
                • Device/OS: Windows 10, Desktop
                • Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
                • Dependencies: Authentication service, user role database
                • Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds
                • Data_Requirements: Multiple user roles (System Admin, Regular User, Guest)

                Prerequisites

                • Setup_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different roles
                • User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin, Regular User, Guest accounts
                • Test_Data:
                  • System Admin: admin@techcorp.com (full access)
                  • Regular User: user@techcorp.com (limited access)
                  • Guest: guest@techcorp.com (no access)
                • Prior_Test_Cases: User account creation successful

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	Login as System Admin	Access granted to full dashboard	admin@techcorp.com	Full access verification
                2	Verify all dashboard sections accessible	All sections (Org Setup, Utility, Security, etc.) visible	N/A	Permission validation
                3	Logout and login as Regular User	Dashboard access denied or limited view	user@techcorp.com	Role restriction
                4	Attempt to access admin-only sections	"Access Denied" or redirect to login	Unauthorized access	Security enforcement
                5	Try direct URL navigation to admin dashboard	Access blocked with error message	/admin/dashboard	URL protection
                6	Attempt guest user access	Complete access denial	guest@techcorp.com	Guest restrictionpersistence
                7	Verify error messages are user-friendlylogging	Clear,All non-technicalerrors errorlogged descriptionsfor troubleshooting	Error messaginglog analysis	UserDebugging experiencesupport

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: Only System Admin role can access dashboard
                • Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate error messages, URL protection active
                • Negative_Verification: Non-admin users cannot access any admin functionality

                ---

                Test Case 53: Real-Time Dashboard Refresh Interval Indicator

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_053
                Title: Verify dashboard displays refresh interval indicators and real-time update status
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Real-Time Updates
                • Test Type: Functional/Real-Time Indicators
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P1-Critical
                • Execution Phase:Matrix

                  Browser/Device Regression

                • Automation Status: Manual

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-RealTime, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

                Business Context

                • Customer_Segment: All
                • Revenue_Impact: Medium
                • Business_Priority: Must-Have
                • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
                • Compliance_Required: No
                • SLA_Related: Yes

                Quality Metrics

                • Risk_Level: Medium
                • Complexity_Level: Medium
                • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
                • Reproducibility_Score: High
                • Data_Sensitivity: Low
                • Failure_Impact: High

                Coverage Tracking

                • Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC10 - Real-time refresh indicators
                • Integration_Points: Real-time data service, UI refresh mechanism
                • Code_Module_Mapped: RefreshIndicatorComponent, RealTimeDataService
                • Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC10)
                • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Dashboard with real-time metrics active, system with changing data

                Test Procedure

                Combinations

                StepTest #Case	ActionChrome Latest (Desktop)	ExpectedMobile ResultChrome	TestEdge Data	CommentsLatest
                1TC_001-010	Load✓ dashboard and observe refresh indicatorsPrimary	"Last✓ updated" timestamps visibleSecondary	N/A	Initial✓ state
                2	Check refresh interval display	"Updates every 30 seconds" or similar indicator shown	30-second interval	Interval communication
                3	Wait for automatic refresh	Visual indicator shows refresh in progress	Auto-refresh cycle	Real-time validation
                4	Observe data update confirmation	Timestamp updates, "Refreshed" indicator appears	Current timestamp	Update confirmation
                5	Simulate manual refresh action	User can trigger immediate refresh	Manual refresh button	User control
                6	Test during network issues	"Attempting to refresh..." or connection status shown	Network interruption	Error state handling
                7	Verify stale data indicators	Warning when data becomes stale (>2 minutes old)	Stale data warning	Data freshnessValidation

                Verification

                Environment Points

                • Primary_Verification: Clear refresh interval indicators displayed
                • Secondary_Verifications: Manual refresh available, stale data warnings shown
                • Negative_Verification: Users should not be left guessing about data freshness

                ---

                Test Case 54: Organization Setup Button State Transitions

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_054
                Title: Verify Complete Setup button state changes based on task completion status
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Organization Setup
                • Test Type: Functional/UI State Management
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P1-Critical
                • Execution Phase: Smoke
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UIState, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

                Business Context

                • Customer_Segment: All
                • Revenue_Impact: High
                • Business_Priority: Must-Have
                • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
                • Compliance_Required: No
                • SLA_Related: Yes

                Quality Metrics

                • Risk_Level: Medium
                • Complexity_Level: Low
                • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
                • Reproducibility_Score: High
                • Data_Sensitivity: Low
                • Failure_Impact: High

                Coverage Tracking

                • Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC3 - Button enabling based on completion
                • Integration_Points: Organization setup progress engine
                • Code_Module_Mapped: SetupButtonComponent, ProgressValidator
                • Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC3)
                • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Fresh organization with 0% setup completion

                Test Procedure

                Step #Phase	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	View initial organization setup	"Complete Setup" button disabled/grayed out	0% completion	Initial disabled state
                2	Complete Currency configuration	Button remains disabled, shows "2 tasks remaining"	40% completion	Partial completion
                3	Complete Date Format configuration	Button remains disabled, shows "1 task remaining"	70% completion	Near completion
                4	Complete final Timezone task	Button becomes enabled, changes to "Complete Setup"	100% completion	Full enablement
                5	Click enabled "Complete Setup" button	Navigation to organization setup page successful	Button click	Functional validation
                6	Return to dashboard after completion	Button shows "Setup Complete" and is disabled	Completed state	Completion state
                7	Test button hover states	Appropriate tooltips and visual feedback	Mouse hover	User experience

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: Button only enabled when 100% completion reached
                • Secondary_Verifications: Visual state changes clear, helpful messages displayed
                • Negative_Verification: Button should not be clickable when tasks are incomplete

                ---

                Test Case 55: Utility Setup Continue Button Navigation Logic

                Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_055
                Title: Verify Continue Setup button directs to next incomplete utility task correctly
                Created By: Auto-generated
                Created Date: 2025-06-05
                Version: 1.0

                Classification

                • Module/Feature: Utility Setup
                • Test Type: Functional/Navigation Logic
                • Test Level: System
                • Priority: P1-Critical
                • Execution Phase: Regression
                • Automation Status: Automated

                Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Navigation, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

                Business Context

                • Customer_Segment: All
                • Revenue_Impact: High
                • Business_Priority: Must-Have
                • Customer_Journey: Onboarding
                • Compliance_Required: No
                • SLA_Related: Yes

                Coverage Tracking

                • Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC4 - Continue Setup navigation
                • Integration_Points: Utility setup workflow engine
                • Code_Module_Mapped: UtilitySetupNavigator, TaskSequencer
                • Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC4)
                • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

                Prerequisites

                • Test_Data: Utility with mixed completion status (some tasks done, others pending)

                Test Procedure

                Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
                1	View utility setup with Core System Settings complete	"Continue Setup" shows "Next: Service Area"	25% completion	Next task identification
                2	Click "Continue Setup" button	Navigate directly to Service Area configuration	Next task navigation	Correct navigation
                3	Complete Service Area and return	Button updates to "Next: Pricing and Billing"	45% completion	Dynamic next task
                4	Skip to complete Staff and Access Control instead	Button shows "Next: Calendar and Scheduling"	Non-sequential progress	Flexible navigation
                5	Complete all remaining tasks	Button changes to "Setup Complete"	100% completion	Completion state
                6	Test with random completion order	Button always identifies correct next task	Various scenarios	Logic validation
                7	Verify button behavior with no incomplete tasks	Button disabled or shows completion message	All tasks done	Edge case handling

                Verification Points

                • Primary_Verification: Button always directs to next incomplete task
                • Secondary_Verifications: Dynamic button text updates, handles completion gracefully
                • Negative_Verification: Should not navigate to completed or invalid tasks

                ---

                COMPREHENSIVE TEST EXECUTION SUMMARY

                Final Test Case Count: 55 Total Test Cases

                Distribution by Priority:

                • P1-Critical: 22 test cases (40%) - Updated with 4 new critical AC tests
                • P2-High: 21 test cases (38%)
                • P3-Medium: 12 test cases (22%)

                Distribution by Module:

                • Organization Setup: 10 test cases (+2 for AC3 coverage)
                • Utility Setup: 8 test cases (+1 for AC4 coverage)
                • User Adoption: 6 test cases
                • Security Activity: 8 test cases
                • Data Upload: 6 test cases
                • Trial Plan: 4 test cases
                • API Integration: 8 test cases
                • Cross-Platform/Performance: 4 test cases
                • Access Control: 1 test case (new for AC9)

                Distribution by Test Type:

                • Functional: 32 test cases (58%) - Increased functional coverage
                • API: 8 test cases (15%)
                • Performance: 6 test cases (11%)
                • Security: 6 test cases (11%) - Enhanced security testing
                • Integration: 4 test cases (7%)

                100% ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA COVERAGE ACHIEVED

                Complete AC Coverage Mapping:

                • AC1 ✓ Progress Percentages: TC_001, TC_004, TC_021
                • AC2 ✓ Visual Indicators: TC_001, TC_003, TC_021
                • AC3 ✓ Complete Setup Button: TC_002, TC_021, TC_054 (NEW)
                • AC4 ✓ Continue Setup Button: TC_005, TC_014, TC_055 (NEW)
                • AC5 ✓ Active User Count: TC_006, TC_015
                • AC6 ✓ Security Daily Breakdown: TC_007, TC_016, TC_024
                • AC7 ✓ Login Attempt Totals: TC_007, TC_016
                • AC8 ✓ Subscription Display: TC_009, TC_018
                • AC9 ✓ Role-Based Access: TC_036, TC_037, TC_052 (NEW)
                • AC10 ✓ Real-Time Updates: TC_015, TC_041, TC_053 (NEW)

                Test Execution Timeline

                Daily Execution (Smoke Suite) - 8 Tests (+3 new critical)

                Duration: 45 minutes

                • Critical path validation
                • AC coverage validation
                • API health checks
                • Performance baseline

                Weekly Execution (Regression Suite) - 39 Tests (+4 new)

                Duration: 5 hours

                • All P1-Critical and P2-High tests
                • Complete AC coverage
                • Cross-browser validation
                • Integration testing

                Monthly Execution (Full Suite) - 55 Tests (+4 new)

                Duration: 9 hours

                • Complete test coverage
                • All edge cases and boundaries
                • Comprehensive reporting
                • Full AC validation

                Risk-Based Testing Strategy

                High-Risk Areas (Extra Validation):

                1. Weighted Progress Calculation - 6 dedicated test cases
                2. Real-time Data Updates - 4 test cases with monitoring
                3. API Security - 5 security-focused test cases
                4. Cross-Platform Compatibility - 6 platform-specific tests

                Automated vs Manual Testing:

                • Automated: 38 test cases (75%) - Functional, API, Performance
                • Manual: 13 test cases (25%) - UI/UX, Accessibility, Complex workflows

                Quality Gates and Success Criteria

                Release Criteria:

                • P1-Critical: 100% pass rate (18/18)
                • P2-High: 95% pass rate (20/21)
                • P3-Medium: 90% pass rate (11/12)
                • Performance: All benchmarks met (<3 sec load, <500ms API)
                • Security: Zero critical vulnerabilities
                • Cross-Platform: Chrome, Firefox, Safari compatibility confirmed

                Continuous Monitoring:

                • Dashboard load time alerts (>3 seconds)
                • API response time monitoring (>500ms)
                • Error rate thresholds (<1% for P1 features)
                • User adoption metric accuracy (±5% tolerance)

                ---

                APPENDIX: SPECIALIZED TESTING CONFIGURATIONS

                Test Data Templates

                Organization Test Data:

                {
                  "organization": {
                    "name": "TechCorp Utilities",
                    "currency": "USD",
                    "dateFormat": "MM/DD/YYYY", 
                    "timezone": "America/New_York",
                    "industry": "Electric Utility",
                    "size": "Enterprise"
                  }
                }

                Utility Test Data:

                {
                  "utility": {
                    "name": "Metro Power Co",
                    "serviceArea": "Metropolitan Region",
                    "customerCount": 50000,
                    "staffCount": 150,
                    "operationalSince": "1995-01-01"
                  }
                }

                User Activity Test Data:

                {
                  "userActivity": {
                    "dailyActiveUsers": [45, 52, 49, 55, 48, 35, 38],
                    "weekOverWeekGrowth": 15,
                    "totalUsers": 150,
                    "retentionRate": 85
                  }
                }

                API Endpoint Testing Matrix

                Endpoint	Method	Priority	Response TimeEnvironment	Test Cases	Execution Frequency
                /api/dashboard/metricsSmoke	GETStaging	9TC_001, TC_004, TC_008	Every build
                Regression	Staging	TC_002, TC_003, TC_005, TC_007, TC_010	Weekly
                Acceptance	Production-like	TC_006	Pre-release
                Performance	Load Test Env	TC_009	Monthly

                ---

                Test Suite Definitions

                Smoke Test Suite (Critical Path)

                • Test Cases: TC_001, TC_004, TC_008
                • Execution Time: ~20 minutes
                • Purpose: Validate core functionality after deployments
                • Automation Status: High priority for automation

                Regression Test Suite (Feature Validation)

                • Test Cases: TC_002, TC_003, TC_005, TC_007, TC_010
                • Execution Time: ~2 hours
                • Purpose: Comprehensive feature testing before releases
                • Automation Status: Partial automation planned

                Full Test Suite (Complete Coverage)

                • Test Cases: All TC_001-010
                • Execution Time: ~4 hours
                • Purpose: Complete validation for major releases
                • Automation Status: Mixed manual/automated approach

                ---

                API Test Collection (Critical Importance ≥7)

                High Priority API Tests

                1. Organization Setup Progress API - Importance: 9/10
                2. User Adoption Metrics API - Importance: 8/10
                3. Security Activity Logging API - Importance: 9/10
                4. Authentication/Authorization API - Importance: 10/10

                ---

                Performance Benchmarks

                Metric	Target	Critical Threshold
                Dashboard Load Time	<3 seconds	<5 seconds
                API Response Time	<500ms	TC_010,<1 TC_026second
                /api/organization/setup-statusConcurrent Users	GET50 users	8	<300ms	TC_011100 users
                /api/utility/setup-status	GET	7Memory Usage	<300ms512MB/session	TC_005<1GB/session
                /api/security/activity-summary	GET	7Database Query Time	<400ms	TC_027
                /api/upload/file	POST	6200ms	<2000ms	TC_028

                Browser Support Matrix

                Browser	Version	Desktop	Tablet	Test Coverage
                Chrome	Latest	✓	✓	Full Suite
                Firefox	Latest	✓	✗	Critical Path
                Safari	16+	✓	✓	Critical Path
                Edge	Latest	✓	✓	Smoke Tests500ms

                ---

                Integration Test Map

                External Dependencies

                1. Authentication Service - Login/logout functionality
                2. Progress Tracking Engine - Weighted calculation service
                3. Metrics Collection Service - User adoption and security data
                4. File Processing Service - Data upload and validation
                5. Subscription Management API - Plan details and limitations

                Internal Dependencies

                1. User Management System - Role-based access control
                2. Organization Database - Setup configuration storage
                3. Audit Logging System - Security activity tracking
                4. Notification Service - Real-time update delivery

                ---

                Coverage Analysis

                Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

                • ✅ Progress percentages display accurately
                • ✅ Visual task indicators (checkmarks, pending)
                • ✅ Setup button enablement logic
                • ✅ Active user count display
                • ✅ Security activity breakdown
                • ✅ Login attempt tracking
                • ✅ Subscription information display
                • ✅ Role-based access control
                • ✅ Real-time metric updates

                Business Rules Coverage: 100%

                • ✅ Weighted progress calculation (Organization: 40%/30%/30%)
                • ✅ Utility setup weighting (6 different percentages)
                • ✅ Daily active user definition
                • ✅ Trial plan limitations (2 users, 30 days, 5GB)

                User Journey Coverage: 100%

                • ✅ New admin onboarding flow
                • ✅ Ongoing setup management
                • ✅ Security monitoring workflow
                • ✅ Subscription evaluation process

                This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the System Admin Dashboard user story (ONB05US01)functionality with 51appropriate detailedprioritization, realistic test cases,data, ensuringand allproper traceability to business rules, acceptance criteria, and integration requirements are thoroughly validated across all supported platforms and use cases. The test framework supports all 17 BrowserStack test management reports with detailed traceability, quality metrics, and stakeholder-specific reporting.requirements.