System Admin Dashboard (ONB05US01)

Test Scenario Summary

Critical Business Flows Identified:

Organization Setup Completion Flow - Revenue impact (faster billing activation)
Utility Setup Configuration Flow - Operational readiness
Real-time Dashboard Metrics - System health monitoring
Security Activity Monitoring - Incident response
User Adoption Tracking - Business growth metrics

Test Coverage Distribution:

Organization Setup: 8 test cases
Utility Setup: 7 test cases
User Adoption Metrics: 6 test cases
Security Activity: 7 test cases
Data Upload: 5 test cases
Trial Plan Management: 4 test cases
API Integration: 8 test cases
Performance & Cross-Platform: 6 test cases

Total Test Cases: 51

Detailed Test Cases

ORGANIZATION SETUP TEST CASES

Test Case 1: Organization Setup Progress Calculation with Weighted Tasks

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_001
Title: Verify weighted progress calculation for Organization Setup
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke/Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of organization setup progress logic
Integration_Points: Progress calculation engine
Code_Module_Mapped: ProgressTrackingEngine
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Critical
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule - Progress Calculation
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_002, ONB05US01_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10, Desktop
Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
Dependencies: Organization setup database, user session
Performance_Baseline: <3 seconds
Data_Requirements: Clean organization with partial setup

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: System Admin logged in
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin role
Test_Data: Organization "TechCorp Utilities" with Currency=USD, Date Format=MM/DD/YYYY, Timezone=Pending
Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admin Dashboard	Dashboard loads within 3 seconds	N/A	Baseline performance
2	Locate Organization Setup section	Section displays with progress bar	N/A	Visual verification
3	Verify progress calculation	Progress shows 70% (Currency 40% + Date Format 30%)	Weighted calculation	Critical business rule
4	Check task status indicators	Currency: ✓, Date Format: ✓, Timezone: ○	Visual indicators	User experience
5	Verify "Complete Setup" button state	Button enabled but shows "1 task remaining"	Button interaction	User guidance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Progress bar shows exactly 70% completion
Secondary_Verifications: Correct task status indicators, proper button state
Negative_Verification: Progress should not be 66% (simple count-based)

Test Case 2: Organization Setup Completion Flow

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_002
Title: Complete organization setup and verify 100% progress
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup
Test Type: Functional/End-to-End
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke/Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-E2E, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization "TechCorp Utilities", Currency=USD, Date Format=MM/DD/YYYY, Timezone=Pending

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Complete Setup" button	Navigate to Organization Setup page	N/A	Navigation flow
2	Complete Timezone configuration	Select "Eastern Standard Time"	EST timezone	Final task
3	Save timezone settings	Settings saved successfully	N/A	Data persistence
4	Return to dashboard	Dashboard loads with updated progress	N/A	Return navigation
5	Verify organization setup progress	Progress bar shows 100% completion	All tasks complete	Final verification
6	Check "Complete Setup" button	Button shows "Setup Complete" and is disabled	N/A	Completion state

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Organization setup shows 100% completion
Secondary_Verifications: All task indicators show completed, button state updated
Negative_Verification: No pending tasks should remain

Test Case 3: User Invitations Pending Indicator

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_003
Title: Verify user invitation pending count display and functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization with 2 pending user invitations: "john.doe@techcorp.com", "jane.smith@techcorp.com"

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Organization Setup section	"User invitations (2 pending)" displayed	2 pending invitations	Count accuracy
2	Click on user invitations task	Navigate to invitation management	N/A	Deep linking
3	Send one invitation	john.doe@techcorp.com invitation sent	john.doe@techcorp.com	Email processing
4	Return to dashboard	"User invitations (1 pending)" displayed	1 pending invitation	Real-time update
5	Complete remaining invitation	jane.smith@techcorp.com invitation sent	jane.smith@techcorp.com	Final invitation
6	Verify completion	"User invitations" shows ✓ completed	All invitations sent	Task completion

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Pending count updates in real-time
Secondary_Verifications: Navigation works correctly, email invitations sent
Negative_Verification: Count should not remain at 2 after sending invitations

UTILITY SETUP TEST CASES

Test Case 4: Utility Setup Weighted Progress Calculation

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_004
Title: Verify weighted progress calculation for Utility Setup components
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Setup
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Utility with Core System Settings (25%), Service Area (20%), Pricing and Billing (20%) completed

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Utility Setup section	Section displays with progress bar	N/A	Visual verification
2	Verify progress calculation	Progress shows 65% (25% + 20% + 20%)	Weighted calculation	Critical business rule
3	Check completed task indicators	Core System: ✓, Service Area: ✓, Pricing: ✓	Visual indicators	User feedback
4	Check pending task indicators	Staff Access: ○, Calendar: ○, IDs: ○	Pending tasks	Remaining work
5	Verify "Continue Setup" button	Button enabled and shows next task	Staff and Access Control	Guided navigation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Progress bar shows exactly 65% completion
Secondary_Verifications: Correct task status indicators, proper button guidance
Negative_Verification: Progress should not be 50% (simple count-based)

Test Case 5: Utility Setup Continue Flow

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_005
Title: Continue utility setup process and verify progress updates
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Setup
Test Type: Functional/End-to-End
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-E2E, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Utility "Metro Power Co" with 65% completion, Staff and Access Control pending

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Continue Setup" button	Navigate to utility setup page	N/A	Navigation flow
2	Complete Staff and Access Control	Configure roles and permissions	Admin, Operator, Viewer roles	15% weight
3	Save configuration	Settings saved successfully	N/A	Data persistence
4	Return to dashboard	Dashboard loads with updated progress	N/A	Return navigation
5	Verify utility setup progress	Progress bar shows 80% completion (65% + 15%)	Updated calculation	Progress tracking
6	Check task completion	Staff and Access Control shows ✓	Completed indicator	Visual feedback

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Utility setup progress increased to 80%
Secondary_Verifications: Staff and Access Control marked complete, navigation functional
Negative_Verification: Progress should not remain at 65%

USER ADOPTION METRICS TEST CASES

Test Case 6: Daily Active Users Display

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_006
Title: Verify daily active users count and trend visualization
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: User Adoption
Test Type: Functional/Data Visualization
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UserAdoption, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-DataViz, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: User activity data for 7 days, Monday: 45, Tuesday: 52, Wednesday: 49, Thursday: 55, Friday: 48, Saturday: 35, Sunday: 38 users

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View User Adoption section	Section displays with graph and metrics	N/A	Visual verification
2	Check today's user count	"Today's Users: 48" displayed prominently	Current day count	Key metric
3	Verify week growth indicator	"+15%" week-over-week growth shown	Growth calculation	Trend analysis
4	Check daily trend graph	Line graph shows 7-day user activity	Weekly data points	Visual trend
5	Verify weekend pattern	Saturday (35) and Sunday (38) show lower activity	Weekend data	Pattern recognition
6	Hover over graph points	Tooltip shows exact daily values	Interactive data	User experience

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Today's user count displays correctly (48)
Secondary_Verifications: Growth percentage accurate, graph reflects data
Negative_Verification: Weekend days should not show higher activity than weekdays

SECURITY ACTIVITY TEST CASES

Test Case 7: Security Activity Login Attempts Visualization

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_007
Title: Verify security activity dashboard displays login attempts correctly
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security Activity
Test Type: Functional/Security Monitoring
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: 7-day login data - Mon: 28 auth/2 unauth, Tue: 32 auth, Wed: 30 auth, Thu: 35 auth/3 unauth, Fri: 30 auth, Sat: 4 auth/8 unauth, Sun: 3 auth/2 unauth

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Security Activity section	Bar chart displays login attempts	N/A	Visual verification
2	Check authorized login total	"162 logins" displayed in green	Total authorized count	Success metric
3	Check unauthorized attempts	"15 attempts" displayed in red	Total unauthorized count	Security concern
4	Verify daily breakdown	Bar chart shows authorized (green) and unauthorized (red)	Daily activity bars	Pattern analysis
5	Identify security concerns	Saturday shows highest unauthorized attempts (8)	Weekend security issue	Risk identification
6	Click on unauthorized attempts	Detailed security log opens	Drill-down functionality	Investigation tool

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Total authorized logins show 162
Secondary_Verifications: Unauthorized attempts total 15, visual indicators correct
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized attempts should not be displayed in green

DATA UPLOAD TEST CASES

Test Case 8: Data Upload Process Flow

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_008
Title: Verify data upload functionality and smart recognition
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Upload
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataUpload, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Sample CSV file "customer_data.csv" with 100 customer records

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click "Go to Data Upload" button	Navigate to data upload page	N/A	Navigation flow
2	Upload CSV file via drag-and-drop	File accepted and processed	customer_data.csv	File handling
3	Verify smart recognition	System detects file structure automatically	CSV format detected	Auto-recognition
4	Check data mapping	Fields mapped to system fields	Name→Customer Name	Field mapping
5	Run smart validation	System validates data integrity	95 valid, 5 errors	Data quality
6	Review validation results	Error report shows data issues	Duplicate emails flagged	Error handling
7	Complete data integration	Valid records integrated successfully	95 records processed	Data integration

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: 95 valid records successfully integrated
Secondary_Verifications: Smart recognition works, validation catches errors
Negative_Verification: Invalid records should not be integrated

TRIAL PLAN TEST CASES

Test Case 9: Trial Plan Subscription Display

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_009
Title: Verify trial plan details and limitations display
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Trial Plan
Test Type: Functional/Subscription Management
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-TrialPlan, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization on Free trial plan, 2 users invited, 15 days remaining

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Trial Plan section	"Free" plan displayed prominently	N/A	Plan identification
2	Check user limit	"Up to 5 users included" shown	5 user limit	Tier limitation
3	Verify included features	CX, MM, BX features listed with checkmarks	Feature inclusions	Value proposition
4	Check upgrade path	"Update Subscription" button available	Upgrade option	Revenue opportunity
5	Verify trial limitations	Storage limited to 5GB mentioned	Storage cap	Trial restriction
6	Check current usage	2/5 users currently active	Usage tracking	Utilization monitor

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Free trial plan correctly displayed
Secondary_Verifications: User limits and features accurate, upgrade option available
Negative_Verification: Should not show paid plan features as unlimited

API TEST CASES

Test Case 10: Dashboard Metrics API Performance

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_010
Title: Verify dashboard metrics API response time and data accuracy
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: API Integration
Test Type: API/Performance
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Valid System Admin API token, organization with setup data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Call GET /api/dashboard/metrics	API responds within 500ms	Admin auth token	Performance baseline
2	Verify response structure	JSON contains all required metrics objects	Standard response	Data contract
3	Check organization setup data	Progress calculation matches business rules	75% org setup	Data accuracy
4	Verify user adoption metrics	Daily active users and growth data returned	48 users, +15%	Metric accuracy
5	Check security activity data	Login attempts breakdown provided	162 auth, 15 unauth	Security metrics
6	Validate error handling	API returns proper error for invalid token	Invalid token	Error response

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: API response time under 500ms
Secondary_Verifications: All metrics data accurate and complete
Negative_Verification: Should not return data for unauthorized requests

Test Case 11: Organization Setup API Integration

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_011
Title: Test organization setup API endpoints for dashboard integration
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup API
Test Type: API/Integration
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization "TechCorp" with partial setup, valid API credentials

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	GET /api/organization/setup-status	Returns current setup progress	Org ID: 12345	Status retrieval
2	Verify weighted calculation	API returns 70% progress correctly	Weighted business rules	Calculation accuracy
3	POST /api/organization/timezone	Updates timezone setting	EST timezone data	Data update
4	GET /api/organization/setup-status	Returns updated 100% progress	Updated calculation	Real-time update
5	Test invalid organization ID	API returns 404 error	Invalid ID: 99999	Error handling
6	Test unauthorized access	API returns 401 error	No auth token	Security validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Setup status API returns accurate weighted progress
Secondary_Verifications: Updates reflect immediately, proper error handling
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized requests should be rejected

PERFORMANCE & CROSS-PLATFORM TEST CASES

Test Case 12: Dashboard Loading Performance

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_012
Title: Verify dashboard loads within 3 seconds across platforms
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
Test Type: Performance/Load Time
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Both, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization with full dataset (1000+ users, 30-day metrics)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard on Desktop Chrome	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1920x1080 resolution	Desktop baseline
2	Load dashboard on Desktop Firefox	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1920x1080 resolution	Cross-browser
3	Load dashboard on Tablet Chrome	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1024x768 resolution	Tablet performance
4	Load dashboard on Tablet Safari	Page loads completely within 3 seconds	1024x768 resolution	iOS compatibility
5	Measure API response times	All API calls complete within 500ms	Dashboard metrics	Backend performance
6	Test with slow network	Dashboard loads within 5 seconds on 3G	Throttled connection	Network resilience

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All platforms load within 3 seconds
Secondary_Verifications: API responses under 500ms, visual elements render properly
Negative_Verification: Should not exceed 3-second threshold on any platform

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite (Execute: Every build)

ONB05US01_TC_001 (Organization Setup Progress)
ONB05US01_TC_004 (Utility Setup Progress)
ONB05US01_TC_007 (Security Activity Display)
ONB05US01_TC_009 (Trial Plan Display)
ONB05US01_TC_012 (Dashboard Performance)

Regression Test Suite (Execute: Before each release)

All P1-Critical and P2-High test cases (32 test cases)
API integration tests
Cross-platform compatibility tests

Full Test Suite (Execute: Weekly/Major releases)

All 51 test cases including edge cases and P3-Medium/P4-Low scenarios

Execution Matrix

Browser/Device Combinations

Platform	Browser	Resolution	Test Cases
Desktop	Chrome Latest	1920x1080	All functional tests
Desktop	Firefox Latest	1920x1080	Critical path tests
Tablet	Chrome/Safari	1024x768	UI/UX focused tests

Environment Dependencies

Development: Smoke tests only
Staging: Full regression suite
Production: Smoke tests + Critical API tests

API Test Collection (Critical >=7)

High Priority API Endpoints:

GET /api/dashboard/metrics - Priority: 9 (Critical business metrics)
GET /api/organization/setup-status - Priority: 8 (Revenue impacting)
POST /api/organization/complete-setup - Priority: 8 (Business completion)
GET /api/utility/setup-status - Priority: 7 (Operational readiness)
GET /api/security/activity-summary - Priority: 7 (Security monitoring)

Performance Benchmarks

Response Time Targets:

Dashboard initial load: <3 seconds
API metrics calls: <500ms
Real-time updates: <1 second
Cross-platform consistency: ±10% variance

Concurrent User Handling:

Expected load: 10-50 concurrent System Admins
Performance degradation threshold: >3 seconds
API rate limiting: 100 requests/minute per user

Integration Test Map

External System Dependencies:

User Authentication Service - Login validation, session management
Progress Calculation Engine - Weighted progress computation
Metrics Aggregation Service - User adoption and security data
Email Service - User invitation processing
File Processing Service - Data upload and validation

Dependency Health Checks:

Service availability validation before test execution
Fallback scenarios for service unavailability
Monitoring integration for real-time status

Risk Assessment & Mitigation

High-Risk Areas:

Weighted Progress Calculation - Business rule complexity
Real-time Metrics Updates - Data synchronization
Cross-platform Performance - Rendering consistency
API Security - Unauthorized access prevention

Mitigation Strategies:

Automated progress calculation validation
Real-time monitoring for metric accuracy
Performance benchmarking across platforms
Security penetration testing for API endpoints

Test Case 13: Organization Setup Edge Case - Invalid Data Handling

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_013
Title: Verify organization setup handles invalid data gracefully
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup
Test Type: Functional/Error Handling
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorHandling, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization setup with invalid currency code "XYZ", malformed date format

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Attempt to save invalid currency	Error message displayed	Currency: "XYZ"	Invalid currency code
2	Check progress calculation	Progress remains unchanged	No progress update	Data integrity
3	Attempt invalid date format	Validation error shown	Date: "32/13/2025"	Invalid date
4	Verify error recovery	User can correct and retry	Valid corrections	Recovery path
5	Complete with valid data	Setup progresses normally	USD, MM/DD/YYYY	Normal flow

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Invalid data rejected with clear error messages
Secondary_Verifications: Progress calculation unaffected by invalid attempts
Negative_Verification: System should not accept invalid currency/date formats

Test Case 14: Utility Setup Component Dependencies

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_014
Title: Verify utility setup component dependencies and validation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Setup
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-BusinessLogic, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Utility "Metro Power" with Core System Settings incomplete

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Attempt to configure Pricing without Core Settings	Warning message displayed	Skip Core Settings	Dependency validation
2	Try to set up Service Area first	System allows but warns	Geographic boundaries	Flexible ordering
3	Complete Core System Settings	25% progress gained	System configuration	Foundation setup
4	Configure dependent components	No warnings, smooth progression	Pricing, Service Area	Dependency satisfied
5	Verify final calculation	All components contribute correctly	100% completion	Weighted calculation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System enforces logical dependencies
Secondary_Verifications: Warnings provided for optimal setup order
Negative_Verification: Critical dependencies cannot be bypassed

Test Case 15: User Adoption Metrics Real-Time Updates

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_015
Title: Verify user adoption metrics update in real-time
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: User Adoption
Test Type: Functional/Real-Time Updates
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UserAdoption, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-RealTime, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Dashboard showing 48 active users, monitoring system active

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate new user login	User count increases to 49	New user session	Real-time tracking
2	Wait for dashboard refresh	Count updates within 30 seconds	Auto-refresh	Update interval
3	Simulate user logout	Count decreases to 48	User session end	Session tracking
4	Check weekly growth recalculation	Percentage updates if threshold met	Growth calculation	Trend analysis
5	Verify graph data points	New activity reflected in trend line	Visual update	Chart refresh

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: User count updates within 30 seconds
Secondary_Verifications: Graph reflects real-time changes, growth metrics recalculate
Negative_Verification: Stale data should not persist beyond refresh interval

Test Case 16: Security Activity Threat Detection

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_016
Title: Verify security activity identifies and highlights threats
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security Activity
Test Type: Security/Threat Detection
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Security log with multiple failed login attempts from same IP

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Review security activity dashboard	Unauthorized attempts highlighted in red	15 failed attempts	Visual alert
2	Check for pattern recognition	Repeated IP addresses flagged	Same IP: 8 attempts	Threat pattern
3	Verify alert severity	High-risk attempts shown prominently	Brute force indicator	Risk assessment
4	Click on security concern	Detailed incident report opens	Investigation details	Drill-down capability
5	Check incident response options	Block IP, alert admin options available	Response actions	Incident management

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Threat patterns correctly identified and highlighted
Secondary_Verifications: Incident details accessible, response options available
Negative_Verification: False positives should not trigger high-severity alerts

Test Case 17: Data Upload File Format Validation

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_017
Title: Verify data upload validates multiple file formats correctly
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Upload
Test Type: Functional/File Processing
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataUpload, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-FileProcessing, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: CSV file (valid), Excel file (XLSX), XML file (valid), TXT file (invalid format)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Upload valid CSV file	File accepted, smart recognition works	customer_data.csv	Supported format
2	Upload Excel XLSX file	File processed successfully	customer_data.xlsx	Office format
3	Upload XML file	File parsed and validated	customer_data.xml	Structured data
4	Attempt to upload TXT file	File rejected with error message	unsupported.txt	Unsupported format
5	Upload corrupted file	Graceful error handling displayed	corrupted.csv	Error recovery
6	Check upload history	All attempts logged properly	Upload audit trail	Tracking

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Supported formats processed correctly
Secondary_Verifications: Unsupported formats rejected gracefully, audit trail maintained
Negative_Verification: Corrupted files should not crash the system

Test Case 18: Trial Plan Limitation Enforcement

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_018
Title: Verify trial plan limitations are enforced correctly
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Trial Plan
Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-TrialPlan, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-BusinessLogic, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Trial plan with 2/5 users active, 4.8GB/5GB storage used

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Attempt to invite 4 more users	Warning shown at 5 user limit	6 total invitations	User limit
2	Try to upload large file	Storage limit warning displayed	300MB file upload	Storage limit
3	Attempt API access	Limited API calls enforced	101st API call	API restriction
4	Try to export large dataset	Export capped at 100 records	500 record export	Export limitation
5	Check upgrade prompts	Upgrade suggestions displayed	Premium features	Revenue opportunity

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All trial limitations properly enforced
Secondary_Verifications: Clear upgrade paths presented, limits well-communicated
Negative_Verification: Trial users should not access premium features

Test Case 19: Dashboard Responsiveness Tablet View

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_019
Title: Verify dashboard responsive design on tablet devices
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Dashboard UI/UX
Test Type: UI/Responsive Design
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UI, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Responsive, Platform-Tablet, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Tablet device or browser developer tools set to 1024x768

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard on tablet	All sections fit within viewport	1024x768 resolution	Viewport fit
2	Check progress bars	Progress indicators remain readable	Visual scaling	Readability
3	Test graph interactions	Charts respond to touch/hover	User adoption graph	Touch compatibility
4	Verify button accessibility	All buttons remain clickable	Touch targets	Accessibility
5	Check navigation flow	Setup navigation works smoothly	Org/Utility setup	Navigation
6	Test portrait orientation	Layout adapts to 768x1024	Rotation handling	Orientation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All UI elements accessible and functional on tablet
Secondary_Verifications: Touch interactions work properly, text remains readable
Negative_Verification: No horizontal scrolling required, no UI elements cut off

Test Case 20: Concurrent User Session Management

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_020
Title: Verify dashboard handles concurrent System Admin sessions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Session Management
Test Type: Functional/Concurrency
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-SessionMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Concurrency, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Multiple System Admin accounts, same organization

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login with Admin1	Dashboard loads successfully	admin1@techcorp.com	First session
2	Login with Admin2 simultaneously	Both sessions active	admin2@techcorp.com	Concurrent access
3	Update organization settings in Admin1	Changes saved successfully	Currency update	Data update
4	Refresh Admin2 dashboard	Shows updated information	Real-time sync	Data consistency
5	Perform simultaneous actions	System handles conflicts gracefully	Concurrent updates	Conflict resolution

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Multiple admin sessions supported
Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency maintained, no session conflicts
Negative_Verification: One admin's actions should not break another's session

ADDITIONAL EDGE CASES AND SPECIALIZED SCENARIOS

Test Case 21: Organization Setup Progress Boundary Conditions

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_021
Title: Test organization setup progress at boundary conditions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup
Test Type: Functional/Boundary Testing
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Boundary, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Fresh organization with no setup completed

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Check initial progress	Shows 0% completion	No tasks completed	Minimum boundary
2	Complete only Currency	Shows 40% completion	Currency: USD	Single task weight
3	Complete Currency + Date Format	Shows 70% completion	40% + 30%	Cumulative calculation
4	Complete all tasks	Shows 100% completion	All tasks done	Maximum boundary
5	Verify button states at each stage	Buttons reflect completion status	State transitions	UI consistency

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Progress calculation accurate at all boundary points
Secondary_Verifications: UI states consistent with progress levels
Negative_Verification: Progress should never exceed 100% or show negative values

Test Case 22: Utility Setup Complex Workflow

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_022
Title: Test utility setup with complex multi-step workflow
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Setup
Test Type: Functional/Workflow
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Workflow, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Utility "Regional Power Corp" with complex service areas and pricing tiers

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Configure Core System Settings	Foundation established (25%)	System parameters	Core foundation
2	Set up multiple service areas	Geographic coverage defined (20%)	3 service regions	Service coverage
3	Configure tiered pricing structure	Pricing model established (20%)	Residential, Commercial, Industrial	Pricing complexity
4	Set up staff with different roles	Access control configured (15%)	5 staff members, 3 roles	Staff management
5	Configure complex scheduling	Calendar system ready (10%)	Multiple shift patterns	Scheduling
6	Set up ID tracking systems	Reference systems active (10%)	Work orders, customer IDs	ID management
7	Verify complete workflow	100% completion achieved	All components integrated	Final verification

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complex workflow completed successfully
Secondary_Verifications: All components integrate properly, data consistency maintained
Negative_Verification: Partial configurations should not affect other components

Test Case 23: User Adoption Metrics Data Visualization

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_023
Title: Verify user adoption metrics visualization accuracy and interactivity
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: User Adoption
Test Type: Functional/Data Visualization
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UserAdoption, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-DataViz, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: 30-day user activity data with various patterns (weekends, holidays, peaks)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View full month trend	Graph shows complete 30-day pattern	Monthly data	Long-term trend
2	Hover over data points	Tooltips show exact values	Interactive tooltips	Data precision
3	Identify weekend patterns	Lower activity on Sat/Sun visible	Weekend dips	Pattern recognition
4	Check holiday impact	Holiday dates show reduced activity	Thanksgiving, Christmas	Special events
5	Verify growth calculations	Week-over-week percentages accurate	Mathematical precision	Calculation accuracy
6	Test graph zoom/pan	Interactive features functional	Graph manipulation	User interaction

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Graph accurately represents all data points
Secondary_Verifications: Interactive features work properly, patterns clearly visible
Negative_Verification: Data should not be misrepresented or truncated

Test Case 24: Security Activity Advanced Filtering

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_024
Title: Test advanced filtering and analysis of security activity data
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security Activity
Test Type: Functional/Advanced Features
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Advanced, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: 30-day security log with various IP addresses, user agents, and attack patterns

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Filter by IP address	Shows attempts from specific IP	192.168.1.100	IP filtering
2	Filter by date range	Shows activity for selected period	Last 7 days	Date filtering
3	Filter by attempt type	Shows only unauthorized attempts	Failed logins only	Type filtering
4	Analyze attack patterns	Identifies brute force attempts	Multiple rapid attempts	Pattern analysis
5	Export filtered results	Security report generated	CSV export	Data export
6	Set up alert thresholds	Configurable alert parameters	5 attempts = alert	Alert configuration

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Filtering functions work accurately
Secondary_Verifications: Patterns correctly identified, alerts configurable
Negative_Verification: Filters should not exclude relevant security data

Test Case 25: Data Upload Large File Handling

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_025
Title: Test data upload with large files and performance optimization
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Upload
Test Type: Performance/Large Data
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataUpload, P3-Medium, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Large CSV file (10MB, 50,000 records), Excel file (5MB, 25,000 records)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Upload large CSV file	Upload progresses with progress bar	10MB CSV file	Large file handling
2	Monitor processing time	Smart recognition completes within 30 seconds	Processing timer	Performance benchmark
3	Check memory usage	System remains responsive	Browser performance	Resource management
4	Validate large dataset	All 50,000 records processed	Data completeness	Bulk processing
5	Test data mapping	Field mapping works with large dataset	Mapping accuracy	Scalability
6	Complete integration	All valid records integrated successfully	Final result	Integration success

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Large files processed within acceptable timeframes
Secondary_Verifications: System remains responsive, data integrity maintained
Negative_Verification: Large files should not cause system crashes or timeouts

API TEST CASES (CONTINUED)

Test Case 26: User Adoption Metrics API

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_026
Title: Test user adoption metrics API endpoints and data accuracy
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: User Adoption API
Test Type: API/Data Validation
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API-UserAdoption, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: 7-day user activity data, valid API credentials

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	GET /api/adoption/daily-active-users	Returns current DAU count	API endpoint	Metric retrieval
2	GET /api/adoption/weekly-growth	Returns growth percentage	Growth calculation	Trend analysis
3	GET /api/adoption/activity-trend	Returns 7-day activity array	Daily breakdown	Historical data
4	Verify data consistency	API data matches dashboard display	Cross-validation	Data accuracy
5	Test date range parameters	API accepts custom date ranges	?start=2025-05-01&end=2025-05-31	Flexible querying
6	Test error handling	API handles invalid date ranges	Invalid parameters	Error response

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: API returns accurate user adoption metrics
Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency with dashboard, proper error handling
Negative_Verification: API should not return stale or incorrect data

Test Case 27: Security Activity API Integration

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_027
Title: Test security activity API for real-time monitoring integration
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security Activity API
Test Type: API/Security Monitoring
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Security activity log with authorized/unauthorized login attempts

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	GET /api/security/login-attempts	Returns login attempt breakdown	Daily statistics	Security metrics
2	GET /api/security/threat-summary	Returns threat analysis	Threat patterns	Security analysis
3	POST /api/security/alert-threshold	Sets alert parameters	Threshold configuration	Alert setup
4	GET /api/security/incidents	Returns security incidents	Incident log	Incident tracking
5	Test real-time updates	API reflects live security events	Real-time data	Live monitoring
6	Verify access control	API requires proper authentication	Security validation	Access control

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Security API provides accurate real-time data
Secondary_Verifications: Threat analysis functional, alerts configurable
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized access should be prevented

Test Case 28: Data Upload API Processing

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_028
Title: Test data upload API for file processing and validation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Upload API
Test Type: API/File Processing
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-API-DataUpload, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Valid CSV file for upload, API authentication token

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	POST /api/upload/file	File upload initiated	Multipart form data	File upload
2	GET /api/upload/status/{uploadId}	Returns processing status	Upload tracking	Status monitoring
3	GET /api/upload/validation/{uploadId}	Returns validation results	Data validation	Quality check
4	POST /api/upload/mapping/{uploadId}	Sets field mapping	Field associations	Data mapping
5	POST /api/upload/integrate/{uploadId}	Integrates validated data	Final processing	Data integration
6	GET /api/upload/history	Returns upload history	Historical records	Audit trail

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: File upload and processing API functions correctly
Secondary_Verifications: Status tracking works, validation accurate
Negative_Verification: Invalid files should be rejected by API

PERFORMANCE AND LOAD TESTING

Test Case 29: Dashboard Load Testing

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_029
Title: Test dashboard performance under concurrent user load
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
Test Type: Performance/Load Testing
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-LoadTest, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Load testing tool configured for 50 concurrent System Admins

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate 10 concurrent users	Dashboard loads within 3 seconds	10 users	Baseline load
2	Increase to 25 concurrent users	Performance remains acceptable	25 users	Moderate load
3	Scale to 50 concurrent users	Dashboard loads within 5 seconds	50 users	Peak load
4	Monitor API response times	All APIs respond within 1 second	API performance	Backend performance
5	Check system resource usage	CPU/Memory within acceptable limits	Resource monitoring	System health
6	Test sustained load	Performance stable over 10 minutes	Sustained testing	Stability test

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard remains functional under peak load
Secondary_Verifications: API performance acceptable, system resources stable
Negative_Verification: System should not crash or become unresponsive

INTEGRATION TESTING

Test Case 30: End-to-End Organization Onboarding

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_030
Title: Test complete organization onboarding flow from start to finish
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Complete Onboarding
Test Type: End-to-End/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-E2E-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-E2E, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: New organization "GreenTech Utilities", fresh System Admin account

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	System Admin first login	Dashboard shows 0% setup progress	New organization	Starting point
2	Complete organization setup	Organization setup reaches 100%	Currency, Date, Timezone	Org completion
3	Complete utility setup	Utility setup reaches 100%	All 6 components	Utility completion
4	Upload initial data	Data integration successful	Customer data CSV	Data onboarding
5	Invite initial users	User invitations sent	3 user invitations	Team setup
6	Monitor user adoption	Metrics show initial activity	User login tracking	Adoption tracking
7	Review security activity	Security dashboard active	Login monitoring	Security baseline
8	Verify trial plan status	Trial limitations enforced	5 user limit, 5GB storage	Plan enforcement
9	Complete onboarding checklist	All dashboard sections functional	Full feature access	Complete onboarding

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete onboarding flow successful from 0% to 100%
Secondary_Verifications: All integrations functional, data flows correctly
Negative_Verification: No setup steps should be skippable or fail silently

CROSS-PLATFORM AND BROWSER COMPATIBILITY

Test Case 31: Firefox Browser Compatibility

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_031
Title: Verify dashboard functionality across Firefox browser versions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Browser Compatibility
Test Type: Compatibility/Cross-Browser
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-CrossBrowser, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Firefox Latest and Firefox ESR versions, complete dashboard data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard in Firefox Latest	All components render correctly	1920x1080 resolution	Latest version
2	Test progress bars visualization	Progress indicators display properly	Org/Utility progress	Visual elements
3	Verify chart rendering	User adoption graph functions	Interactive charts	Chart compatibility
4	Test button interactions	All buttons respond correctly	Setup buttons	User interactions
5	Check responsive behavior	Layout adapts to window resize	Responsive design	Layout flexibility
6	Test in Firefox ESR	Core functionality works	Extended support	Legacy support

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All dashboard functions work in Firefox
Secondary_Verifications: Visual elements render correctly, interactions functional
Negative_Verification: No Firefox-specific rendering issues or broken features

Test Case 32: Safari Browser Compatibility

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_032
Title: Verify dashboard functionality in Safari browser
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Browser Compatibility
Test Type: Compatibility/Cross-Browser
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-CrossBrowser, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Safari 16+ on macOS, complete dashboard configuration

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard in Safari	Dashboard loads within 3 seconds	macOS Safari	WebKit rendering
2	Test WebKit-specific features	All animations smooth	CSS transitions	WebKit compatibility
3	Verify security section	Charts display correctly	Security activity	Data visualization
4	Test file upload functionality	Drag-and-drop works	Data upload	File handling
5	Check cookie handling	Session persistence works	Login session	Session management
6	Verify touch events	Touch interactions responsive	Tablet mode	Touch compatibility

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete functionality in Safari browser
Secondary_Verifications: WebKit-specific features work, performance acceptable
Negative_Verification: No Safari-only bugs or incompatibilities

Test Case 33: Edge Browser Compatibility

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_033
Title: Verify dashboard functionality in Microsoft Edge browser
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Browser Compatibility
Test Type: Compatibility/Cross-Browser
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-CrossBrowser, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Microsoft Edge Latest, Windows 10/11 environment

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard in Edge	All sections load properly	Windows environment	Chromium engine
2	Test Microsoft integrations	No conflicts with Windows features	OS integration	Platform harmony
3	Verify PDF export features	Reports generate correctly	Dashboard reports	Export functionality
4	Test printing functionality	Dashboard prints properly	Print preview	Print compatibility
5	Check performance metrics	Load times within acceptable range	Performance baseline	Speed comparison
6	Verify security features	Edge security features compatible	Security compatibility	Browser security

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Full functionality in Microsoft Edge
Secondary_Verifications: Windows integration smooth, performance adequate
Negative_Verification: No Edge-specific conflicts or issues

MOBILE AND TABLET SPECIFIC TESTING

Test Case 34: iPad Tablet Interface

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_034
Title: Verify dashboard functionality on iPad devices
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Mobile Interface
Test Type: UI/Mobile Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Mobile, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Mobile, Platform-Tablet, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: iPad Pro or iPad Air, Safari browser, complete dashboard data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard on iPad	Interface adapts to tablet layout	1024x768 resolution	Tablet optimization
2	Test touch interactions	Progress bars and buttons responsive	Touch targets	Touch usability
3	Verify chart interactions	Graphs respond to touch gestures	User adoption chart	Touch charts
4	Test pinch-to-zoom	Dashboard scales appropriately	Zoom functionality	Accessibility
5	Check orientation changes	Layout adapts to portrait/landscape	Rotation handling	Orientation flexibility
6	Verify file upload	Touch-based file selection works	Data upload	Mobile file handling
7	Test multi-touch gestures	Advanced gestures functional	Complex interactions	Advanced touch

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard fully functional on iPad
Secondary_Verifications: Touch interactions intuitive, layout responsive
Negative_Verification: No touch-specific usability issues

Test Case 35: Android Tablet Compatibility

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_035
Title: Verify dashboard functionality on Android tablets
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Mobile Interface
Test Type: UI/Mobile Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Mobile, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Mobile, Platform-Tablet, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Android tablet (Samsung Galaxy Tab), Chrome browser

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard on Android tablet	Dashboard renders correctly	Android Chrome	Android compatibility
2	Test Android-specific gestures	Navigation gestures work	Back button, swipes	Platform gestures
3	Verify performance	Smooth operation on Android	Performance monitoring	Android optimization
4	Test file manager integration	File upload integrates with Android	File picker	OS integration
5	Check memory management	No memory issues during use	Resource monitoring	Memory efficiency
6	Verify notification handling	System notifications don't interfere	Background notifications	Multitasking

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard functions properly on Android tablets
Secondary_Verifications: Android-specific features work, performance acceptable
Negative_Verification: No Android-only bugs or performance issues

SECURITY AND PENETRATION TESTING

Test Case 36: Authentication Security Testing

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_036
Title: Test dashboard authentication security and session management
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security/Authentication
Test Type: Security/Penetration Testing
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security-Auth, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Valid System Admin credentials, penetration testing tools

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Attempt dashboard access without login	Redirect to login page	No credentials	Access control
2	Test session timeout	Session expires after inactivity	30-minute timeout	Session security
3	Try accessing with expired token	Access denied, re-authentication required	Expired JWT	Token validation
4	Test concurrent session limits	System handles multiple sessions	Session management	Concurrent access
5	Attempt privilege escalation	System rejects unauthorized actions	Limited permissions	Permission enforcement
6	Test CSRF protection	Cross-site requests blocked	CSRF attacks	Request validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Authentication properly enforced
Secondary_Verifications: Session security robust, privilege escalation prevented
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized access should be impossible

Test Case 37: Data Security and Privacy

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_037
Title: Verify data security and privacy protection in dashboard
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security/Data Protection
Test Type: Security/Privacy
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Security-Data, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Sensitive organization data, security scanning tools

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Check data encryption in transit	HTTPS enforced for all communications	SSL/TLS verification	Transport security
2	Verify sensitive data masking	PII appropriately masked in UI	Customer data display	Data privacy
3	Test data export security	Exported data properly secured	Report downloads	Export security
4	Check browser storage	No sensitive data in localStorage	Browser inspection	Client-side security
5	Verify audit logging	All actions properly logged	Activity audit trail	Audit compliance
6	Test data retention policies	Old data handled per policy	Data lifecycle	Retention compliance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All sensitive data properly protected
Secondary_Verifications: Encryption enforced, audit trails complete
Negative_Verification: No sensitive data exposure or security vulnerabilities

ERROR HANDLING AND RECOVERY

Test Case 38: Network Connectivity Issues

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_038
Title: Test dashboard behavior during network connectivity problems
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Error Handling
Test Type: Functional/Error Recovery
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorRecovery, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Network simulation tools, stable dashboard session

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate network disconnection	Dashboard shows offline indicator	Network disabled	Offline detection
2	Attempt actions while offline	User notified of connectivity issues	Offline actions	User feedback
3	Restore network connection	Dashboard automatically reconnects	Network restored	Auto-recovery
4	Verify data synchronization	Latest data loads after reconnection	Data sync	Data consistency
5	Test slow network conditions	Dashboard shows loading indicators	Throttled connection	Performance graceful degradation
6	Check timeout handling	Appropriate timeout messages shown	Request timeouts	Timeout management

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard handles network issues gracefully
Secondary_Verifications: User feedback clear, auto-recovery functional
Negative_Verification: No data corruption or loss during network issues

Test Case 39: Server Error Recovery

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_039
Title: Test dashboard recovery from server errors and service unavailability
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Error Handling
Test Type: Functional/Error Recovery
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-ErrorRecovery, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Test environment with controllable service failures

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate API server error (500)	Error message displayed to user	Server 500 response	Server error handling
2	Test service unavailable (503)	Graceful degradation activated	Service 503 response	Service degradation
3	Simulate database connectivity issues	Cached data displayed where possible	DB connection failure	Data caching
4	Test partial service failures	Working components continue functioning	Mixed service health	Partial functionality
5	Verify error message clarity	User-friendly error descriptions shown	Error messaging	User communication
6	Test automatic retry mechanisms	System attempts reconnection	Retry logic	Auto-recovery

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Server errors handled gracefully
Secondary_Verifications: User experience maintained during failures, clear error communication
Negative_Verification: System should not crash or show technical error details

ACCESSIBILITY AND USABILITY

Test Case 40: Keyboard Navigation

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_040
Title: Verify dashboard accessibility through keyboard navigation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Accessibility
Test Type: Accessibility/Keyboard Navigation
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Accessibility, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Accessibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Complete dashboard configuration, keyboard-only navigation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate dashboard using Tab key	All interactive elements accessible	Tab navigation	Keyboard focus
2	Test progress bar accessibility	Screen reader compatible descriptions	ARIA labels	Screen reader support
3	Navigate charts with keyboard	Chart data accessible via keyboard	Graph navigation	Data accessibility
4	Test button activation	Enter/Space keys activate buttons	Keyboard activation	Button accessibility
5	Verify focus indicators	Clear visual focus indicators shown	Focus visibility	Visual feedback
6	Test skip navigation links	Skip links allow efficient navigation	Skip to content	Navigation efficiency

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete keyboard navigation possible
Secondary_Verifications: Screen reader compatibility, clear focus indicators
Negative_Verification: No keyboard traps or inaccessible elements

DATA INTEGRITY AND VALIDATION

Test Case 41: Data Consistency Across Sessions

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_041
Title: Verify data consistency across multiple user sessions and browser tabs
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Integrity
Test Type: Functional/Data Consistency
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataIntegrity, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-DataConsistency, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Multiple browser tabs/windows, System Admin account

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open dashboard in two browser tabs	Both tabs show identical data	Tab 1 & Tab 2	Initial consistency
2	Update organization setup in Tab 1	Progress updates in Tab 1	Organization changes	Data modification
3	Refresh Tab 2	Tab 2 shows updated progress	Data synchronization	Cross-tab sync
4	Simultaneously update different sections	Both updates processed correctly	Concurrent updates	Conflict resolution
5	Check real-time metrics consistency	All tabs show same user adoption data	Live metrics	Real-time consistency
6	Verify audit trail accuracy	All changes properly logged	Change tracking	Audit integrity

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Data consistency maintained across sessions
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates synchronized, audit trail accurate
Negative_Verification: No data conflicts or inconsistencies between sessions

Test Case 42: Data Validation Boundary Testing

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_042
Title: Test data validation at boundary conditions and edge cases
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Validation
Test Type: Functional/Boundary Testing
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-DataValidation, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Boundary, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Various edge case data inputs for validation testing

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Test maximum user adoption count	System handles large numbers	999,999 users	Upper boundary
2	Test zero user activity	Dashboard displays zero gracefully	0 active users	Lower boundary
3	Test maximum file upload size	Size limit enforced correctly	6GB file (over limit)	File size boundary
4	Test minimum progress values	0% progress displayed correctly	No completed tasks	Progress minimum
5	Test date range extremes	Far future/past dates handled	Year 2099/1900	Date boundaries
6	Test special characters	Unicode and symbols processed	Special chars in org name	Character validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All boundary conditions handled correctly
Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate error messages for invalid data, graceful handling of edge cases
Negative_Verification: System should not crash or corrupt data at boundaries

BUSINESS LOGIC TESTING

Test Case 43: Revenue Impact Calculation

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_043
Title: Verify business logic for revenue impact tracking and billing activation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Business Logic
Test Type: Functional/Business Rules
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-BusinessLogic, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-BusinessRules, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization transitioning from trial to paid plan

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Complete organization setup	Setup completion triggers billing eligibility	100% org setup	Revenue milestone
2	Complete utility setup	Full operational readiness achieved	100% utility setup	Service readiness
3	Verify billing activation trigger	System flags organization for billing	Billing notification	Revenue activation
4	Check trial-to-paid transition	Limitations removed, full features enabled	Plan upgrade	Feature unlock
5	Monitor subscription metrics	Revenue tracking begins	Subscription active	Revenue tracking
6	Verify user limit changes	User limits increased per paid plan	50 user limit	Capacity increase

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Setup completion triggers appropriate business logic
Secondary_Verifications: Revenue tracking activated, feature limitations removed
Negative_Verification: Billing should not activate for incomplete setups

REPORTING AND ANALYTICS

Test Case 44: Executive Dashboard Reporting

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_044
Title: Verify executive reporting features and data export functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Reporting
Test Type: Functional/Reporting
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Reporting, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Reporting, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: 30-day dashboard activity data, completed setups

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Generate setup completion report	Report shows organization progress trends	Historical setup data	Progress reporting
2	Export user adoption metrics	CSV contains accurate adoption data	User activity export	Data export
3	Create security summary report	Security incidents properly categorized	Security report	Risk reporting
4	Generate executive summary	High-level KPIs displayed clearly	Executive metrics	Leadership view
5	Test report scheduling	Automated reports generated on schedule	Weekly reports	Automation
6	Verify report distribution	Reports sent to appropriate stakeholders	Email distribution	Report sharing

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Reports generated accurately with correct data
Secondary_Verifications: Export formats functional, scheduling works
Negative_Verification: No data omissions or inaccuracies in reports

COMPLIANCE AND AUDIT

Test Case 45: Audit Trail Completeness

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_045
Title: Verify comprehensive audit trail for all dashboard activities
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Audit/Compliance
Test Type: Functional/Audit
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Compliance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Audit, P2-High, Phase-Compliance, Type-Audit, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Various user activities across all dashboard sections

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Perform organization setup changes	All changes logged with timestamps	Setup modifications	Change tracking
2	Upload and process data files	File operations recorded in audit log	Data upload activity	File audit
3	Access security activity section	Security access logged	Security monitoring	Access audit
4	Generate and download reports	Report generation/access tracked	Report activity	Report audit
5	Review complete audit trail	All activities properly documented	Comprehensive log	Full audit
6	Test audit data retention	Historical audit data preserved	90-day retention	Retention compliance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All user activities logged in audit trail
Secondary_Verifications: Timestamps accurate, user attribution correct
Negative_Verification: No activities should occur without audit logging

COMPLETE TEST EXECUTION MATRIX

Priority-Based Test Execution Schedule

P1-Critical Tests (Execute: Daily/Every Build) - 15 Tests

ONB05US01_TC_001 - Organization Setup Progress Calculation
ONB05US01_TC_002 - Organization Setup Completion Flow
ONB05US01_TC_004 - Utility Setup Weighted Progress
ONB05US01_TC_005 - Utility Setup Continue Flow
ONB05US01_TC_006 - Daily Active Users Display
ONB05US01_TC_007 - Security Activity Login Attempts
ONB05US01_TC_008 - Data Upload Process Flow
ONB05US01_TC_009 - Trial Plan Subscription Display
ONB05US01_TC_010 - Dashboard Metrics API Performance
ONB05US01_TC_011 - Organization Setup API Integration
ONB05US01_TC_012 - Dashboard Loading Performance
ONB05US01_TC_016 - Security Activity Threat Detection
ONB05US01_TC_018 - Trial Plan Limitation Enforcement
ONB05US01_TC_026 - User Adoption Metrics API
ONB05US01_TC_027 - Security Activity API Integration

P2-High Tests (Execute: Weekly/Pre-Release) - 18 Tests

[Tests 013, 014, 015, 017, 019, 020, 028, 031, 032, 034, 038, 039, 041, 044, 045, and additional comprehensive scenarios]

P3-Medium Tests (Execute: Monthly/Major Release) - 12 Tests

[Tests 021, 022, 023, 024, 025, 033, 035, 040, 042, and additional edge cases]

Cross-Platform Execution Matrix

Test Scenario	Chrome Desktop	Firefox Desktop	Safari Desktop	Chrome Tablet	Safari Tablet
Dashboard Loading	All Tests	Critical Path	Critical Path	UI/UX Focus	UI/UX Focus
API Integration	All Tests	Critical Tests	Critical Tests	Core APIs	Core APIs
Business Logic	All Tests	All Tests	All Tests	Core Logic	Core Logic
Security Testing	All Tests	All Tests	Browser-Specific	Limited	Limited

Performance Benchmarks Summary

Response Time Targets

Dashboard Initial Load: <3 seconds (P1 requirement)
API Calls: <500ms (Critical operations)
Real-time Updates: <1 second (User adoption, security)
File Upload Processing: <30 seconds (Large files)
Report Generation: <10 seconds (Standard reports)

Scalability Targets

Concurrent Users: 50 System Admins simultaneously
Data Volume: Handle organizations with 10,000+ users
File Processing: Up to 10MB files, 50,000 records
API Rate Limits: 100 requests/minute per user

Risk Assessment Matrix

High-Risk Components (Require Extensive Testing)

Weighted Progress Calculation - Business-critical algorithm
Real-time Metrics Updates - Data synchronization complexity
API Security - Authentication and authorization
Trial Plan Enforcement - Revenue protection

Medium-Risk Components (Standard Testing)

Cross-browser Compatibility - Visual consistency
File Upload Processing - Performance and validation
Data Export Features - Data integrity

Low-Risk Components (Basic Testing)

UI Responsiveness - Layout adaptation
Error Message Display - User communication
Help Documentation - Content accuracy

FINAL VALIDATION CHECKLIST

Functional Coverage ✓

[x] All acceptance criteria covered (9/9)
[x] All business rules tested with weighted calculations
[x] Cross-platform compatibility verified
[x] API endpoints tested for critical operations (≥7 importance)
[x] Integration points validated

Non-Functional Coverage ✓

[x] Performance benchmarks defined (<3 sec dashboard load)
[x] Security testing comprehensive
[x] Error handling and recovery tested
[x] Data integrity validation complete
[x] Accessibility considerations included

Test Execution Coverage ✓

[x] Smoke test suite defined (5 critical tests)
[x] Regression test suite comprehensive (33 tests)
[x] Full test suite complete (45 tests)
[x] API test collection prioritized (8 critical APIs)
[x] Performance test scenarios included

Traceability Coverage ✓

[x] All 17 BrowserStack report categories supported
[x] Business context and stakeholder mapping complete
[x] Quality metrics and risk assessment included
[x] Coverage tracking and dependency mapping done
[x] Integration test map comprehensive

ADDITIONAL SPECIALIZED TEST SCENARIOS

Test Case 46: Multi-Timezone Organization Support

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_046
Title: Verify dashboard handles multi-timezone organization operations
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Timezone Management
Test Type: Functional/Internationalization
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Timezone, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-I18N, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Organization "Global Energy Corp" with utilities in EST, PST, and GMT timezones

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Configure organization timezone as EST	Primary timezone set to Eastern	EST (-5 GMT)	Base timezone
2	Add utility in PST timezone	Utility configured with Pacific time	PST (-8 GMT)	Regional utility
3	View user adoption metrics	Timestamps displayed in appropriate zones	Time-adjusted data	Timezone awareness
4	Check security activity times	Login times shown in local timezone	Regional login data	Security timezone
5	Generate reports across timezones	Reports aggregate data correctly	Cross-zone reporting	Data aggregation
6	Test daylight saving transitions	System handles DST changes	DST boundary dates	DST compliance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All timestamps displayed in correct local timezones
Secondary_Verifications: Data aggregation accounts for timezone differences
Negative_Verification: No timezone confusion or data misalignment

Test Case 47: Large Scale Organization Testing

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_047
Title: Test dashboard performance with large enterprise organization data
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Scalability
Test Type: Performance/Scale Testing
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Scalability, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Scale, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Enterprise organization with 10,000 users, 50 utilities, 6 months of activity data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard with enterprise data	Dashboard loads within 5 seconds	Large dataset	Scale performance
2	Navigate between setup sections	Section transitions remain smooth	Navigation performance	UI responsiveness
3	Generate user adoption report	Report processes 10,000 user records	Large user base	Data processing
4	Filter security activity	Security filtering handles large logs	6 months of logs	Filter performance
5	Export comprehensive data	Large exports complete successfully	Enterprise export	Export scalability
6	Test concurrent admin access	Multiple admins access simultaneously	10 concurrent admins	Concurrent scale

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard maintains performance with enterprise-scale data
Secondary_Verifications: All features functional at scale, concurrent access supported
Negative_Verification: No performance degradation or timeouts with large datasets

Test Case 48: Disaster Recovery and Backup

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_048
Title: Verify dashboard data recovery and backup functionality
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Recovery
Test Type: Functional/Disaster Recovery
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Compliance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Recovery, P2-High, Phase-Compliance, Type-Recovery, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Complete organization setup, user activity data, backup systems

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create baseline dashboard state	All data properly configured	Complete setup	Baseline establishment
2	Initiate data backup process	Backup completes successfully	Data backup	Backup verification
3	Simulate data corruption scenario	System detects data integrity issues	Corrupted data	Issue detection
4	Execute data recovery procedure	Recovery process initiates	Restore operation	Recovery execution
5	Verify data restoration	All dashboard data restored correctly	Restored state	Data verification
6	Test functionality post-recovery	All features work normally	Full functionality	Recovery validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete data recovery successful
Secondary_Verifications: All functionality restored, data integrity maintained
Negative_Verification: No data loss or corruption during recovery

Test Case 49: Integration with External Utility Systems

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_049
Title: Test dashboard integration with external utility management systems
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: External Integration
Test Type: Integration/External Systems
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Integration
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Integration, P2-High, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-External-Dependency

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Mock external utility systems (billing, CRM, workforce management)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Connect to external billing system	Integration established successfully	Billing API connection	External billing
2	Sync organization data	Organization data synchronized	Org sync process	Data synchronization
3	Import user data from CRM	User adoption metrics updated	CRM user import	CRM integration
4	Connect workforce management	Staff data integrated in utility setup	Workforce API	Staff integration
5	Test data consistency	All systems show consistent data	Cross-system validation	Data consistency
6	Handle integration failures	Graceful fallback when systems unavailable	Service failure	Failure handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: External system integration functional
Secondary_Verifications: Data synchronization accurate, failure handling robust
Negative_Verification: Integration failures should not break dashboard functionality

Test Case 50: Advanced User Behavior Analytics

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_050
Title: Verify advanced user behavior tracking and analytics features
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: User Analytics
Test Type: Functional/Analytics
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Analytics, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Analytics, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Detailed user interaction logs, behavior tracking enabled

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Track dashboard page views	Page view analytics recorded	Landing page visits	View tracking
2	Monitor setup completion rates	Setup abandonment points identified	Conversion funnel	Funnel analysis
3	Analyze feature usage patterns	Most/least used features identified	Feature analytics	Usage patterns
4	Track user engagement time	Time spent in each section measured	Session duration	Engagement metrics
5	Monitor help/support interactions	Support engagement tracked	Help usage	Support analytics
6	Generate behavior insights	Actionable insights provided	Analytics dashboard	Insight generation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: User behavior accurately tracked and analyzed
Secondary_Verifications: Insights actionable, analytics comprehensive
Negative_Verification: No privacy violations or excessive tracking

Test Case 51: Regulatory Compliance Validation

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_051
Title: Verify dashboard compliance with utility industry regulations
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Regulatory Compliance
Test Type: Compliance/Regulatory
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Compliance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-Compliance, P2-High, Phase-Compliance, Type-Regulatory, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Utility regulation requirements, compliance checklist

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Verify data retention policies	Data retained per regulatory requirements	7-year retention	Retention compliance
2	Check audit trail completeness	All required activities logged	Comprehensive audit	Audit compliance
3	Validate security measures	Security controls meet utility standards	Security validation	Security compliance
4	Test reporting capabilities	Regulatory reports available	Compliance reports	Reporting compliance
5	Verify access controls	Role-based access meets requirements	Access validation	Access compliance
6	Check data privacy measures	PII protection meets standards	Privacy validation	Privacy compliance

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All regulatory requirements met
Secondary_Verifications: Documentation complete, controls effective
Negative_Verification: No regulatory violations or compliance gaps

ADDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA SPECIFIC TEST CASES

Test Case 52: System Admin Role-Based Access Control

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_052
Title: Verify System Admin role-based access control and unauthorized access prevention
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Access Control
Test Type: Security/Role-Based Access
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-AccessControl, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC9 - Role-based access control
Integration_Points: Authentication service, role management
Code_Module_Mapped: AuthorizationModule, RoleValidator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC9)
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Dashboard, Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC9 - Role-based access restriction
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB05US01_TC_036, ONB05US01_TC_037

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10, Desktop
Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication service, user role database
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Multiple user roles (System Admin, Regular User, Guest)

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different roles
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin, Regular User, Guest accounts
Test_Data:
- System Admin: admin@techcorp.com (full access)
- Regular User: user@techcorp.com (limited access)
- Guest: guest@techcorp.com (no access)
Prior_Test_Cases: User account creation successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Access granted to full dashboard	admin@techcorp.com	Full access verification
2	Verify all dashboard sections accessible	All sections (Org Setup, Utility, Security, etc.) visible	N/A	Permission validation
3	Logout and login as Regular User	Dashboard access denied or limited view	user@techcorp.com	Role restriction
4	Attempt to access admin-only sections	"Access Denied" or redirect to login	Unauthorized access	Security enforcement
5	Try direct URL navigation to admin dashboard	Access blocked with error message	/admin/dashboard	URL protection
6	Attempt guest user access	Complete access denial	guest@techcorp.com	Guest restriction
7	Verify error messages are user-friendly	Clear, non-technical error descriptions	Error messaging	User experience

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Only System Admin role can access dashboard
Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate error messages, URL protection active
Negative_Verification: Non-admin users cannot access any admin functionality

Test Case 53: Real-Time Dashboard Refresh Interval Indicator

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_053
Title: Verify dashboard displays refresh interval indicators and real-time update status
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Real-Time Updates
Test Type: Functional/Real-Time Indicators
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-RealTime, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC10 - Real-time refresh indicators
Integration_Points: Real-time data service, UI refresh mechanism
Code_Module_Mapped: RefreshIndicatorComponent, RealTimeDataService
Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC10)
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Dashboard with real-time metrics active, system with changing data

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Load dashboard and observe refresh indicators	"Last updated" timestamps visible	N/A	Initial state
2	Check refresh interval display	"Updates every 30 seconds" or similar indicator shown	30-second interval	Interval communication
3	Wait for automatic refresh	Visual indicator shows refresh in progress	Auto-refresh cycle	Real-time validation
4	Observe data update confirmation	Timestamp updates, "Refreshed" indicator appears	Current timestamp	Update confirmation
5	Simulate manual refresh action	User can trigger immediate refresh	Manual refresh button	User control
6	Test during network issues	"Attempting to refresh..." or connection status shown	Network interruption	Error state handling
7	Verify stale data indicators	Warning when data becomes stale (>2 minutes old)	Stale data warning	Data freshness

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Clear refresh interval indicators displayed
Secondary_Verifications: Manual refresh available, stale data warnings shown
Negative_Verification: Users should not be left guessing about data freshness

Test Case 54: Organization Setup Button State Transitions

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_054
Title: Verify Complete Setup button state changes based on task completion status
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Organization Setup
Test Type: Functional/UI State Management
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-OrgSetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-UIState, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC3 - Button enabling based on completion
Integration_Points: Organization setup progress engine
Code_Module_Mapped: SetupButtonComponent, ProgressValidator
Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC3)
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Fresh organization with 0% setup completion

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View initial organization setup	"Complete Setup" button disabled/grayed out	0% completion	Initial disabled state
2	Complete Currency configuration	Button remains disabled, shows "2 tasks remaining"	40% completion	Partial completion
3	Complete Date Format configuration	Button remains disabled, shows "1 task remaining"	70% completion	Near completion
4	Complete final Timezone task	Button becomes enabled, changes to "Complete Setup"	100% completion	Full enablement
5	Click enabled "Complete Setup" button	Navigation to organization setup page successful	Button click	Functional validation
6	Return to dashboard after completion	Button shows "Setup Complete" and is disabled	Completed state	Completion state
7	Test button hover states	Appropriate tooltips and visual feedback	Mouse hover	User experience

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Button only enabled when 100% completion reached
Secondary_Verifications: Visual state changes clear, helpful messages displayed
Negative_Verification: Button should not be clickable when tasks are incomplete

Test Case 55: Utility Setup Continue Button Navigation Logic

Test Case ID: ONB05US01_TC_055
Title: Verify Continue Setup button directs to next incomplete utility task correctly
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: 2025-06-05
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Utility Setup
Test Type: Functional/Navigation Logic
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags Tags: MOD-UtilitySetup, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Navigation, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of AC4 - Continue Setup navigation
Integration_Points: Utility setup workflow engine
Code_Module_Mapped: UtilitySetupNavigator, TaskSequencer
Requirement_Coverage: Complete (AC4)
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Prerequisites

Test_Data: Utility with mixed completion status (some tasks done, others pending)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View utility setup with Core System Settings complete	"Continue Setup" shows "Next: Service Area"	25% completion	Next task identification
2	Click "Continue Setup" button	Navigate directly to Service Area configuration	Next task navigation	Correct navigation
3	Complete Service Area and return	Button updates to "Next: Pricing and Billing"	45% completion	Dynamic next task
4	Skip to complete Staff and Access Control instead	Button shows "Next: Calendar and Scheduling"	Non-sequential progress	Flexible navigation
5	Complete all remaining tasks	Button changes to "Setup Complete"	100% completion	Completion state
6	Test with random completion order	Button always identifies correct next task	Various scenarios	Logic validation
7	Verify button behavior with no incomplete tasks	Button disabled or shows completion message	All tasks done	Edge case handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Button always directs to next incomplete task
Secondary_Verifications: Dynamic button text updates, handles completion gracefully
Negative_Verification: Should not navigate to completed or invalid tasks

COMPREHENSIVE TEST EXECUTION SUMMARY

Final Test Case Count: 55 Total Test Cases

Distribution by Priority:

P1-Critical: 22 test cases (40%) - Updated with 4 new critical AC tests
P2-High: 21 test cases (38%)
P3-Medium: 12 test cases (22%)

Distribution by Module:

Organization Setup: 10 test cases (+2 for AC3 coverage)
Utility Setup: 8 test cases (+1 for AC4 coverage)
User Adoption: 6 test cases
Security Activity: 8 test cases
Data Upload: 6 test cases
Trial Plan: 4 test cases
API Integration: 8 test cases
Cross-Platform/Performance: 4 test cases
Access Control: 1 test case (new for AC9)

Distribution by Test Type:

Functional: 32 test cases (58%) - Increased functional coverage
API: 8 test cases (15%)
Performance: 6 test cases (11%)
Security: 6 test cases (11%) - Enhanced security testing
Integration: 4 test cases (7%)

100% ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA COVERAGE ACHIEVED

Complete AC Coverage Mapping:

AC1 ✓ Progress Percentages: TC_001, TC_004, TC_021
AC2 ✓ Visual Indicators: TC_001, TC_003, TC_021
AC3 ✓ Complete Setup Button: TC_002, TC_021, TC_054 (NEW)
AC4 ✓ Continue Setup Button: TC_005, TC_014, TC_055 (NEW)
AC5 ✓ Active User Count: TC_006, TC_015
AC6 ✓ Security Daily Breakdown: TC_007, TC_016, TC_024
AC7 ✓ Login Attempt Totals: TC_007, TC_016
AC8 ✓ Subscription Display: TC_009, TC_018
AC9 ✓ Role-Based Access: TC_036, TC_037, TC_052 (NEW)
AC10 ✓ Real-Time Updates: TC_015, TC_041, TC_053 (NEW)

Test Execution Timeline

Daily Execution (Smoke Suite) - 8 Tests (+3 new critical)

Duration: 45 minutes

Critical path validation
AC coverage validation
API health checks
Performance baseline

Weekly Execution (Regression Suite) - 39 Tests (+4 new)

Duration: 5 hours

All P1-Critical and P2-High tests
Complete AC coverage
Cross-browser validation
Integration testing

Monthly Execution (Full Suite) - 55 Tests (+4 new)

Duration: 9 hours

Complete test coverage
All edge cases and boundaries
Comprehensive reporting
Full AC validation

Risk-Based Testing Strategy

High-Risk Areas (Extra Validation):

Weighted Progress Calculation - 6 dedicated test cases
Real-time Data Updates - 4 test cases with monitoring
API Security - 5 security-focused test cases
Cross-Platform Compatibility - 6 platform-specific tests

Automated vs Manual Testing:

Automated: 38 test cases (75%) - Functional, API, Performance
Manual: 13 test cases (25%) - UI/UX, Accessibility, Complex workflows

Quality Gates and Success Criteria

Release Criteria:

P1-Critical: 100% pass rate (18/18)
P2-High: 95% pass rate (20/21)
P3-Medium: 90% pass rate (11/12)
Performance: All benchmarks met (<3 sec load, <500ms API)
Security: Zero critical vulnerabilities
Cross-Platform: Chrome, Firefox, Safari compatibility confirmed

Continuous Monitoring:

Dashboard load time alerts (>3 seconds)
API response time monitoring (>500ms)
Error rate thresholds (<1% for P1 features)
User adoption metric accuracy (±5% tolerance)

APPENDIX: SPECIALIZED TESTING CONFIGURATIONS

Test Data Templates

Organization Test Data:

{
  "organization": {
    "name": "TechCorp Utilities",
    "currency": "USD",
    "dateFormat": "MM/DD/YYYY", 
    "timezone": "America/New_York",
    "industry": "Electric Utility",
    "size": "Enterprise"
  }
}

Utility Test Data:

{
  "utility": {
    "name": "Metro Power Co",
    "serviceArea": "Metropolitan Region",
    "customerCount": 50000,
    "staffCount": 150,
    "operationalSince": "1995-01-01"
  }
}

User Activity Test Data:

{
  "userActivity": {
    "dailyActiveUsers": [45, 52, 49, 55, 48, 35, 38],
    "weekOverWeekGrowth": 15,
    "totalUsers": 150,
    "retentionRate": 85
  }
}

API Endpoint Testing Matrix

Endpoint	Method	Priority	Response Time	Test Cases
/api/dashboard/metrics	GET	9	<500ms	TC_010, TC_026
/api/organization/setup-status	GET	8	<300ms	TC_011
/api/utility/setup-status	GET	7	<300ms	TC_005
/api/security/activity-summary	GET	7	<400ms	TC_027
/api/upload/file	POST	6	<2000ms	TC_028

Browser Support Matrix

Browser	Version	Desktop	Tablet	Test Coverage
Chrome	Latest	✓	✓	Full Suite
Firefox	Latest	✓	✗	Critical Path
Safari	16+	✓	✓	Critical Path
Edge	Latest	✓	✓	Smoke Tests

This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the System Admin Dashboard user story (ONB05US01) with 51 detailed test cases, ensuring all business rules, acceptance criteria, and integration requirements are thoroughly validated across all supported platforms and use cases. The test framework supports all 17 BrowserStack test management reports with detailed traceability, quality metrics, and stakeholder-specific reporting.