Setting--Facility Types Management (AX04US06)

Facility Types Management - Complete Test Cases (AX04US06)

Test Scenario Analysis - Enhanced

A. Functional Test Scenarios

1. Core Functionality: Facility type CRUD operations, search, expand/collapse, three-dot menu actions
2. Business Rules: Name uniqueness, character validation, description requirements, keyboard accessibility
3. User Journeys: Asset Manager viewing/analyzing, Utility Administrator managing with role-based permissions
4. Integration Points: Facility management systems, asset registry systems, audit trail systems
5. Data Flow: Facility type creation → validation → storage → display → audit logging

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

1. Performance: Page load (<3s), search response (<300ms), form submission (<2s), animation duration (200ms)
2. Security: Role-based access, input validation, XSS prevention, CSRF protection
3. Compatibility: Cross-browser support (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge), responsive design
4. Usability: Keyboard navigation, accessibility, error handling, character count indicators
5. Reliability: Data integrity, session management, error recovery, audit trail persistence

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

1. Boundary Conditions: Min/max character limits, concurrent operations, bulk operations
2. Invalid Inputs: Special characters, duplicate names, empty fields, oversized data
3. System Failures: Network timeouts, server errors, database unavailability, external system failures
4. Data Inconsistencies: Orphaned references, validation conflicts, audit trail gaps

---

Test Case 1: Create New Facility Type - Happy Path

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_001

Title: Successfully create a new facility type with valid data and verify system-generated ID assignment

Created By: Prachi

Created Date: August 11, 2025

Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)

Test Type: Functional

Test Level: Integration

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Smoke

Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, MOD-Facility, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-User-Acceptance, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Must-Have, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-FacilityManagement-AssetRegistry, CRUD-Operations, Happy-Path

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise/SMB/All

Revenue_Impact: Medium

Business_Priority: Must-Have

Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

Compliance_Required: Yes

SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium

Complexity_Level: Medium

Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes

Reproducibility_Score: High

Data_Sensitivity: Medium

Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 25% of create functionality

Integration_Points: Facility Management System, Asset Registry, Audit Trail System, Database

Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06

Requirement_Coverage: Complete

Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering

Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Test-Results, User-Acceptance, Engineering

Trend_Tracking: Yes

Executive_Visibility: Yes

Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC2, AC10, AC11, AC14, Business Rule 4.1, 4.2, Sample Data section

Related_Bugs: N/A

Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_002, AX04US06_TC_003, AX04US06_TC_013

Test Environment

Environment: Staging

Browser/Version: Chrome 115+

Device/OS: Windows 10/11

Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

Dependencies: Database, Authentication Service, Facility Management API, Asset Registry API, Audit Trail Service

Performance_Baseline: Form submission <2s, page response <1s

Data_Requirements: Valid user session, empty facility types list, system ID generator active

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Clean database state, user logged in as Utility Administrator, system ID generator configured

User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator with facility type creation permissions

Test_Data: Username: admin@citywater.com, Password: SecurePass123!, Expected ID format: FT001

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality (AUTH_TC_001), Navigation functionality (NAV_TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Dashboard > Settings > Facility Types	Facility Types page loads with title "Facility Types", subtitle "Manage facility types and their descriptions for your water utility system", breadcrumb visible	URL: /settings/facility-types	Verify page load <3s, AC1
2	Verify page header elements	Title "Facility Types" visible, subtitle displayed, breadcrumb "Dashboard > Settings > facility-types" shown	N/A	Business Rule 1 validation
3	Locate and click "+ Add Facility Type" button	Button visible in top-right corner, dark blue background (#1f2937), white text with plus icon, Add New Facility Type form appears inline below button	N/A	Business Rule 1.2, form should slide down
4	Verify form structure	Form title "Add New Facility Type", Name field with placeholder "Enter facility type name", Description field with placeholder "Enter facility type description"	N/A	Business Rule 4.1, 4.2
5	Enter facility type name in Name field	Field accepts input, real-time validation active, no error messages,	"Water Distribution Hub" (22 characters)	Business Rule 4.2.1, min 3 max 50 chars
6	Enter facility type description in Description field	Field accepts input, textarea auto-resizes,	"Facility that manages water distribution to multiple service areas and monitors flow rates for optimal pressure." (126 characters)	Business Rule 4.2.2, min 10 max 500 chars
7	Verify Save button state	Save button enabled with disk icon (💾), gray background (#6b7280), white text	N/A	Business Rule 4.3, should enable when all fields valid
8	Click "💾 Save" button	Form submits successfully, loading spinner appears briefly, success message "Facility type created successfully" displays, form closes automatically	N/A	Performance: <2s submission time
9	Verify new facility type in list	New facility type "Water Distribution Hub" appears in alphabetical order with system-generated ID FT001, expand/collapse chevron visible	Expected ID: FT001	AC2, AC14 audit trail created
10	Verify audit trail creation	Database audit log contains creation entry with timestamp, user ID, and facility type ID	admin@citywater.com, FT001, timestamp	AC14 compliance requirement
11	Verify integration with external systems	Facility type available in Facility Management System and Asset Registry with same ID FT001	FT001 in external systems	AC16 integration requirement

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: New facility type successfully created with system-generated ID FT001 and appears in list with proper alphabetical ordering

Secondary_Verifications: Form validation works correctly, success message displays, audit trail created, external system integration successful, performance meets baseline

Negative_Verification: No duplicate entries created, no system errors logged, no orphaned data in external systems

---

Test Case 2: Create Facility Type - Duplicate Name Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_002

Title: Validate duplicate facility type name prevention with real-time and submission validation

Created By: Prachi

Created Date: August 11, 2025

Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)

Test Type: Functional

Test Level: Integration

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Regression

Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Negative, Consumer, API, Database, MOD-Facility, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Regression-Coverage, Report-API-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Must-Have, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Database-Validation, Duplicate-Prevention

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All

Revenue_Impact: Low

Business_Priority: Must-Have

Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

Compliance_Required: Yes

SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High

Complexity_Level: Medium

Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes

Reproducibility_Score: High

Data_Sensitivity: Low

Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 30% of validation functionality

Integration_Points: Validation API, Database Constraints, Real-time Validation Service

Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06

Requirement_Coverage: Complete

Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA

Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Regression-Coverage, API-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, QA

Trend_Tracking: Yes

Executive_Visibility: No

Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC5, AC18, Business Rule 4.2.1, Real-time validation requirements

Related_Bugs: N/A

Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_001 (Must pass first)

Test Environment

Environment: Staging

Browser/Version: Chrome 115+

Device/OS: Windows 10/11

Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

Dependencies: Database with existing facility types, API validation service, Real-time validation engine

Performance_Baseline: Validation response <1s, real-time check <300ms

Data_Requirements: Existing facility type FT001 "Water Treatment Plant"

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Database with existing facility type FT001 "Water Treatment Plant" from TC_001

User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator permissions

Test_Data: Existing facility type: FT001 "Water Treatment Plant", Test user: admin@citywater.com

Prior_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_001 (Create facility type must pass)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Settings > Facility Types page	Page loads successfully with existing facility type FT001 "Water Treatment Plant" visible in list	URL: /settings/facility-types	Verify pre-requisite data exists
2	Click "+ Add Facility Type" button	Add New Facility Type form appears inline below button, form fields empty and ready for input	N/A	Business Rule 1.2 form display
3	Enter existing facility type name (exact match)	Real-time validation triggers immediately, error message appears below name field: "Facility type name already exists"	"Water Treatment Plant"	Case-sensitive duplicate check
4	Verify Save button state during real-time validation	Save button remains disabled, background color gray (#6b7280), tooltip shows "Please fix validation errors"	N/A	Business Rule 4.3 button state
5	Enter description field	Description field accepts input normally, character counter updates, but form remains invalid due to name error	"Duplicate name test description for validation." (45 characters)	Form should allow description entry
6	Attempt to click disabled Save button	No action occurs, button remains disabled, error message persists below name field	N/A	Disabled button should not respond
7	Test case-insensitive duplicate check	Real-time validation triggers, same error message appears	"water treatment plant" (lowercase)	Business Rule 4.2.1 case-insensitive
8	Test with leading/trailing spaces	Real-time validation triggers, error message appears (spaces should be trimmed)	" Water Treatment Plant "	Input sanitization check
9	Clear name field and enter valid unique name	Error message disappears, Save button becomes enabled, field validates successfully	"Water Processing Center"	Validation recovery test
10	Revert to duplicate name and attempt submission	Form prevents submission, error message redisplays, focus returns to name field	"Water Treatment Plant"	Final submission validation
11	Verify no duplicate entry created in database	Database query confirms only original FT001 exists, no duplicate records created	Query: SELECT * FROM facility_types WHERE name LIKE '%Water Treatment Plant%'	Data integrity verification

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Duplicate name validation prevents creation at both real-time and submission levels

Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are clear and helpful, form state management correct, case-insensitive validation works

Negative_Verification: No duplicate entry created in database, no system errors logged, no orphaned audit records

---

Test Case 3: Edit Existing Facility Type with Inline Editing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_003
• Title: Successfully edit existing facility type name and description using inline editing with hover interactions
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, UI, MOD-Facility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Regression-Coverage, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-API-Database, Inline-Editing

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise/SMB
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 40% of edit functionality
• Integration_Points: API, Database, UI Components, Audit Trail System
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Regression-Coverage, Product
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC3, AC12, AC14, Business Rule 2.2, 4.3, Hover interaction requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_001, AX04US06_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Authentication Service, UI components, Audit Trail Service
• Performance_Baseline: Edit form load <1s, save operation <2s, hover response <100ms
• Data_Requirements: Existing facility type FT002 to edit

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Existing facility type FT002 "Water Storage Facility" with description
• User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator with edit permissions
• Test_Data: Facility type: FT002 "Water Storage Facility", New name: "Water Storage Tank Complex", User: admin@citywater.com
• Prior_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_001 (Facility type creation must be completed)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Settings > Facility Types page	Page loads with facility types list, FT002 "Water Storage Facility" visible in list	URL: /settings/facility-types	Verify prerequisite data
2	Locate FT002 "Water Storage Facility" row	Row visible with facility type name, collapsed state (chevron down), no action icons visible initially	FT002 "Water Storage Facility"	Business Rule 2.2 initial state
3	Hover over FT002 row	Edit icon (pencil) appears on right side, delete icon (trash) appears, three-dot menu visible, cursor changes to pointer	N/A	Business Rule 2.2 hover behavior
4	Click edit (pencil) icon	Inline editing mode activates, name field becomes editable text input, description field becomes editable textarea, Save/Cancel buttons appear	N/A	Business Rule 4.3 inline editing
5	Verify edit form state	Name field pre-populated with "Water Storage Facility", description field pre-populated, character counters visible, field validation active	Current name/description	Form should retain current values
6	Modify facility type name	Name field updates with new value, real-time validation active, character count updates (26 characters)	"Water Storage Tank Complex"	Business Rule 4.2.1 validation
7	Update description field	Description field accepts changes, textarea auto-resizes, character count indicator updates (remaining: 500-138=362)	"Facility that stores treated water in elevated tank complexes and underground reservoirs for distribution pressure management." (138 characters)	Business Rule 4.2.2 requirements
8	Verify Save button state	Save button enabled with disk icon (💾), gray background (#6b7280), Cancel button visible with X icon (✖)	N/A	Business Rule 4.3 button states
9	Click "💾 Save" button	Changes saved successfully, loading spinner appears briefly, success message "Facility type updated successfully" displays, edit mode closes	N/A	Performance: <2s save time
10	Verify changes persisted in list	Updated name "Water Storage Tank Complex" visible in list, alphabetical order maintained, system ID FT002 unchanged	FT002 "Water Storage Tank Complex"	AC3 data persistence
11	Expand updated facility type	Click row to expand, updated description visible with label "Description:" in bold, new description text shown	Updated description visible	Business Rule 2.3 expand behavior
12	Verify audit trail creation	Database audit log contains update entry with timestamp, user ID, facility type ID, and change details	admin@citywater.com, FT002, before/after values	AC14 audit requirement
13	Refresh page and verify persistence	Page reload maintains changes, updated name and description still visible, no data loss	F5 refresh	Data persistence verification

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Facility type successfully updated with new name and description, changes persist across page refresh
• Secondary_Verifications: Inline editing works smoothly, hover interactions proper, validation during edit, audit trail created with change details
• Negative_Verification: Original data not corrupted, no duplicate entries created, system ID unchanged, no orphaned audit records

  ---

Test Case 4: Delete Facility Type with Associated Facilities Protection

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_004
• Title: Prevent deletion of facility type with associated facilities and validate referential integrity protection
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Negative, Consumer, API, Database, CrossModule, MOD-Facility, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Integration-Testing, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Must-Have, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-FacilityManagement-Database, Data-Integrity

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 35% of delete functionality and 50% of referential integrity
• Integration_Points: Facility Management System, Database Constraints, Referential Integrity Engine, Audit Trail System
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06, Facility Management Module
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC6, AC16, Business Rule 2.2, Database referential integrity requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_005, Facility Creation with Type Assignment tests

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Facility Management System, Database with referential integrity constraints, Associated facilities
• Performance_Baseline: Validation check <1s, dialog response <500ms
• Data_Requirements: Facility type FT003 with 2 associated facilities: FC001, FC002

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Facility type FT003 "Water Treatment Plant" with associated facilities FC001 "Main WTP", FC002 "Backup WTP"
• User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator with delete permissions
• Test_Data: Facility type: FT003 "Water Treatment Plant", Associated facilities: FC001 "Main WTP", FC002 "Backup WTP", User: admin@citywater.com
• Prior_Test_Cases: Facility creation with facility type assignment (FAC_TC_001, FAC_TC_002)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Settings > Facility Types page	Page loads successfully with facility types list including FT003 "Water Treatment Plant"	URL: /settings/facility-types	Verify prerequisite data exists
2	Verify associated facilities exist	Database query confirms FC001 "Main WTP" and FC002 "Backup WTP" are linked to FT003	Query: SELECT * FROM facilities WHERE facility_type_id = 'FT003'	Referential integrity setup
3	Hover over FT003 "Water Treatment Plant" row	Edit icon (pencil), delete icon (trash), and three-dot menu appear on hover, cursor changes to pointer	FT003 row	Business Rule 2.2 hover behavior
4	Click delete (trash) icon	Confirmation dialog appears with title "Delete Facility Type", message "Are you sure you want to delete this facility type?", Confirm/Cancel buttons	N/A	Standard deletion confirmation dialog
5	Click "Confirm Delete" in dialog	Error dialog appears immediately with title "Cannot Delete", detailed message "Cannot delete facility type 'Water Treatment Plant' because it has 2 associated facilities. Please reassign or remove associated facilities first."	Error message shows count: 2 facilities	Business Rule referential integrity
6	Verify error dialog details	Dialog shows facility type name, exact count of associated facilities, clear instruction for resolution, OK button to close	FT003, 2 facilities count	User-friendly error messaging
7	Click "OK" to close error dialog	Error dialog closes, returns to facility types list, original confirmation dialog also closed	N/A	Proper dialog state management
8	Verify facility type still exists in list	FT003 "Water Treatment Plant" remains in list unchanged, no visual indication of deletion attempt	FT003 unchanged	Data integrity maintained
9	Verify associated facilities unchanged	Database query confirms FC001 and FC002 still linked to FT003, no orphaned records	Same query as step 2	Referential integrity preserved
10	Check audit trail	Audit log contains deletion attempt entry with timestamp, user ID, facility type ID, and failure reason	admin@citywater.com, FT003, "deletion prevented - associated facilities"	AC14 audit requirement
11	Test three-dot menu delete option	Click three-dot menu, select "Delete" option, same protection behavior occurs	Three-dot menu > Delete	Alternative deletion path
12	Verify system stability	No database errors logged, application remains responsive, no memory leaks detected	System health check	System integrity verification

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Deletion prevented when facilities are associated with clear error messaging and facility count
• Secondary_Verifications: Error message informative and actionable, data integrity maintained across all systems, audit trail complete
• Negative_Verification: No orphaned facility records, no system errors, no partial deletions, no data corruption

---

Test Case 5: Search Functionality with Real-time Filtering

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_005
• Title: Search facility types by name and description with real-time filtering and highlighting
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, UI, MOD-Facility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Low, Search-Functionality, Real-time-Filter

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 60% of search functionality
• Integration_Points: Search API, Database Full-text Search, Real-time Filter Engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Product
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC7, Business Rule 1.1, Real-time search performance requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_001, AX04US06_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Search API, Database with full-text indexing, Real-time filtering service
• Performance_Baseline: Search response <300ms, real-time filter <200ms
• Data_Requirements: Database with 7+ facility types including: FT001 "Water Distribution Hub", FT002 "Water Storage Tank Complex", FT003 "Water Treatment Plant", FT004 "Wastewater Lift Station"

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Database with diverse facility types for comprehensive search testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Any valid user role (Asset Manager or Utility Administrator)
• Test_Data: Search terms: "water", "treatment", "storage", "lift", "distribution", User: admin@citywater.com
• Prior_Test_Cases: Facility types TC_001, TC_002, TC_003 must exist in system

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Settings > Facility Types page	Page loads with complete list of facility types visible, search field visible in header	URL: /settings/facility-types	Verify all test data present
2	Verify search field initial state	Search field visible with placeholder "Search facility types...", field empty, cursor not focused, full list displayed	N/A	Business Rule 1.1 initial state
3	Click in search field	Search field gains focus, cursor visible, placeholder text fades, field border highlights	N/A	UI focus behavior
4	Type first character	No filtering occurs, full list remains visible (minimum 2 characters required)	"w"	Business Rule 1.1 minimum chars
5	Type second character to trigger search	Real-time filtering begins, results update immediately, matching facility types shown	"wa"	Should show all "water" related types
6	Complete search term	Results filtered to show FT001 "Water Distribution Hub", FT002 "Water Storage Tank Complex", FT003 "Water Treatment Plant", search term "water" highlighted in yellow	"water"	Case-insensitive search with highlighting
7	Verify search highlighting	Matching term "water" highlighted in yellow background in facility type names, highlighting visible in both collapsed and expanded states	N/A	Search term highlighting requirement
8	Test performance timing	Measure search response time from keystroke to results display, should be <300ms	"water" typed	Performance baseline validation
9	Expand filtered facility type	Click FT003 "Water Treatment Plant" row, expands to show description, search term highlighted in description if present	FT003 description	Search in description content
10	Clear search field	Click X button or delete all text, all facility types become visible again, highlighting removed	Clear to empty	Reset to full list
11	Test description-only search	Enter term that exists only in descriptions, not in names	"treatment"	Should match FT003 description
12	Verify description search results	Results show facility types containing "treatment" in description, term highlighted in expanded description text	"treatment" in descriptions	Description content search
13	Test partial word matching	Enter partial term, verify partial matching works correctly	"stor"	Should match "storage" in FT002
14	Test case-insensitive search	Enter mixed case search term, verify case-insensitive matching	"WATER" (uppercase)	Case insensitive requirement
15	Test search with special characters	Enter search with spaces, hyphens, verify proper handling	"lift station"	Special character handling
16	Test no results scenario	Enter term with no matches, verify "No results found" message displayed	"nuclear"	No match handling

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Search accurately filters facility types by name and description with real-time updates <300ms
• Secondary_Verifications: Search term highlighting visible, case-insensitive matching works, performance meets baseline, proper no-results handling
• Negative_Verification: No false positives in search results, no performance degradation, no search bypass vulnerabilities

---

Test Case 6: Expand/Collapse Functionality with Keyboard Accessibility

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_006
• Title: Expand and collapse facility type descriptions with mouse and keyboard interactions including accessibility compliance
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, UI, Accessibility, MOD-Facility, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Report-User-Acceptance, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Cross-Browser-Results, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Could-Have, Revenue-Impact-None, UI-Interaction, Keyboard-Navigation

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: None
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes (Accessibility)
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: None
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 50% of UI interaction and 80% of accessibility features
• Integration_Points: UI Components, CSS Animations, Accessibility Framework
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: User-Acceptance, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Cross-Browser-Results, Product
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC8, AC9, Business Rule 2.3, Keyboard accessibility requirements (ADA compliance)
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_005

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: UI framework, CSS animations, Accessibility API, Screen reader compatibility
• Performance_Baseline: Animation duration 200ms, keyboard response <100ms
• Data_Requirements: Facility types with descriptions: FT003 "Water Treatment Plant", FT004 "Wastewater Lift Station"

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Facility types with comprehensive descriptions present in database
• User_Roles_Permissions: Any valid user role (keyboard navigation universal)
• Test_Data: Facility types: FT003 "Water Treatment Plant" with description, FT004 "Wastewater Lift Station" with description, User: admin@citywater.com

Prior_Test_Cases: Basic page loading functionality (AX04US06_TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Settings > Facility Types page	Page loads with facility types collapsed, all chevron icons pointing down, no descriptions visible	URL: /settings/facility-types	Business Rule 2.3 initial state
2	Verify initial accordion state	All facility types in collapsed state, chevron icons pointing down (▼), descriptions hidden, consistent spacing	All rows collapsed	Accordion initial behavior
3	Click on FT003 "Water Treatment Plant" row	Row expands smoothly, chevron rotates 180° to up position (▲), description becomes visible with label "Description:" in bold, animation duration ~200ms	FT003 row click	Business Rule 2.3 expand animation
4	Verify expanded description display	Description text visible in gray color (#6b7280), proper left padding for visual hierarchy, line breaks preserved, "Description:" label in bold	FT003 description content	Business Rule 2.3 description styling
5	Click on FT004 "Wastewater Lift Station" row	FT003 auto-collapses (chevron rotates to down), FT004 expands (chevron rotates to up), only one row expanded at a time	FT004 row, FT003 auto-collapse	Accordion behavior - only one expanded
6	Click expanded FT004 row again	FT004 collapses, chevron rotates to down position, description becomes hidden, smooth reverse animation	FT004 collapse	Toggle functionality

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Expand/collapse functionality works smoothly with proper animations and accordion behavior via mouse and keyboard
• Secondary_Verifications: Keyboard accessibility meets ADA compliance, screen reader compatibility, visual indicators correct, performance within baseline
• Negative_Verification: No multiple rows expanded simultaneously, no focus loss, no animation artifacts

---

Test Case 7: Form Validation - Comprehensive Input Testing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_007
• Title: Validate facility type name and description field constraints with comprehensive error handling and character count indicators
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Unit
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Negative, Consumer, API, Validation, Security, MOD-Facility, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Smoke-Test-Results, Report-Module-Coverage, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Must-Have, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Input-Validation, Character-Limits

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 80% of validation functionality
• Integration_Points: Validation API, Client-side validation, Character counting service, Security validation
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Validation, Smoke-Test-Results, Module-Coverage, QA
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC10, AC11, AC18, AC19, Business Rule 4.2.1, 4.2.2, Character count indicator requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX04US06_TC_001, AX04US06_TC_002

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Validation service, Client-side validation library, Character counting utility, XSS protection
• Performance_Baseline: Validation response <100ms, character count update real-time
• Data_Requirements: Clean form state, validation test data sets

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Add facility type form open and ready for input validation testing
• User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator permissions
• Test_Data: Comprehensive validation test data including edge cases, boundary values, malicious inputs
• Prior_Test_Cases: Form display functionality (AX04US06_TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add Facility Type form	Form displays with empty fields, character count indicators visible: Name (0/50), Description (0/500)	N/A	Business Rule 4.2.1, 4.2.2 indicators
2	Test name field minimum length	Error message appears below field: "Name must be at least 3 characters", Save button disabled, character count shows 2/50	"AB" (2 characters)	Business Rule 4.2.1 minimum
3	Test name field maximum length	Input truncated at 50 characters, error message: "Name cannot exceed 50 characters", character count shows 50/50 red	"Water Treatment Plant Processing and Distribution Center Complex" (55+ chars, truncated)	Business Rule 4.2.1 maximum
4	Test name field invalid characters	Error message: "Invalid characters: @ # $ % ^ * < > ?	[ ]", invalid characters highlighted, Save button disabled	"Water@Plant#1$Test%Center^"
5	Test name field with only spaces	Error message: "Name cannot be only spaces", field validation fails, Save button disabled	" " (3 spaces)	Business Rule 4.2.1 content validation
6	Test name field leading spaces	Error message: "Name cannot start with spaces", field highlighted, automatic space trimming	" Water Plant"	Input sanitization
7	Test name field trailing spaces	Error message: "Name cannot end with spaces", automatic space trimming on blur	"Water Plant "	Input sanitization
8	Test name field consecutive spaces	Error message: "Consecutive spaces not allowed", spaces collapsed automatically	"Water Plant Center"	Business Rule 4.2.1 spacing
9	Test name field numeric-only	Error message: "Name cannot be only numbers", validation fails	"12345"	Business Rule 4.2.1 content rules
10	Test description field minimum length	Error message: "Description must be at least 10 characters", Save button disabled, character count shows 9/500	"Too short" (9 characters)	Business Rule 4.2.2 minimum
11	Test description field maximum length	Input truncated at 500 characters, character count shows 500/500 red, warning message appears	501+ character description text	Business Rule 4.2.2 maximum
12	Test description field HTML prevention	HTML tags stripped or escaped, error message: "HTML tags not allowed", content sanitized	"Test <script>alert('xss')</script> description"	Security validation
13	Test character count real-time updates	Character counts update immediately as typing, color changes: green (<80%), yellow (80-95%), red (95-100%)	Type in both fields simultaneously	Real-time indicator behavior
14	Test valid inputs	All validation passes, error messages disappear, Save button enabled, character counts normal	Name: "Water Processing Center" (23 chars), Description: "Advanced facility for water processing and quality control operations." (69 chars)	Successful validation path
15	Test form submission with valid data	Form submits successfully, validation complete, facility type created with ID FT005	Valid test data from step 14	End-to-end validation flow

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All validation rules enforced correctly with appropriate error messages and character count indicators
• Secondary_Verifications: Real-time validation works, character count updates immediately, error messages clear and actionable, HTML sanitization effective
• Negative_Verification: No invalid data accepted, no security vulnerabilities, no validation bypass possible

---

Test Case 8: Performance Testing - Response Times and Load Testing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_008
• Title: Validate page load times, operation response times, and concurrent user performance meet SLA requirements
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Performance, Consumer, API, Database, Load-Testing, MOD-Facility, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Performance-Metrics, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Should-Have, Revenue-Impact-Medium, SLA-Critical, Scalability

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of performance requirements
• Integration_Points: Database, API Gateway, Search Engine, UI Rendering, Concurrent Processing
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Performance baseline requirements, SLA requirements, Scalability requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: All functional test cases for performance comparison

Test Environment

• Environment: Production-like staging with realistic infrastructure
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Production-equivalent infrastructure, 100+ facility types in database, Load testing tools, Performance monitoring
• Performance_Baseline: Page load <3s, API response <500ms, search <300ms, concurrent users 50+
• Data_Requirements: Database with 150+ facility types for realistic load testing

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment with realistic data volume and infrastructure matching production capacity
• User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple test user accounts for concurrent testing
• Test_Data: 150+ facility types, 10 concurrent user sessions, Load testing scripts
• Prior_Test_Cases: All functional tests must pass before performance testing

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Measure page load time	Initial page load completes within 3 seconds,	URL: /settings/facility-types	Cold load baseline
3	Measure facility types list rendering	150+ facility types render within 4 seconds, progressive loading if implemented	150 facility types dataset	Scalability test
4	Test search performance	Search results appear within 300ms for all test queries, no performance degradation	Search terms: "water", "treatment", "storage"	Search baseline
5	Test real-time search performance	Character-by-character search maintains <200ms response time	Type "water treatment" slowly	Real-time performance
6	Measure form submission time	Create operation completes within 2 seconds, includes validation and database save	New facility type creation	CRUD performance
7	Measure edit operation time	Inline edit save completes within 2 seconds, includes validation and update	Edit existing facility type	Update performance
8	Test expand/collapse animation	All animations complete within 200ms, no visual lag or stuttering	Multiple rapid expand/collapse	UI performance
9	Test concurrent user load - 10 users	System maintains performance with 10 simultaneous users, response times within 150% of baseline	10 concurrent sessions	Concurrency baseline
10	Test concurrent user load - 25 users	System maintains acceptable performance with 25 users, response times within 200% of baseline	25 concurrent sessions	Load testing
11	Test concurrent user load - 50 users	System handles 50 users without errors, response times within 300% of baseline, no system failures	50 concurrent sessions	Maximum load test
12	Test memory usage during operations	Memory consumption remains stable, no memory leaks detected, garbage collection effective	Monitor during all operations	Memory performance
13	Test database query performance	Database response times <100ms for simple queries, <500ms for complex searches	Database monitoring	Backend performance
14	Test API endpoint performance	All API endpoints respond within SLA: GET <300ms, POST <500ms, PUT <500ms, DELETE <200ms	API performance monitoring	API baseline
15	Test performance under data stress	System maintains performance with 500+ facility types, pagination or virtual scrolling effective	500+ facility types	Data volume stress test

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All operations meet or exceed performance baseline requirements under normal and stress conditions
• Secondary_Verifications: No performance degradation with increased data volume, concurrent user handling effective, memory usage stable
• Negative_Verification: No memory leaks detected, no performance bottlenecks, no system failures under load

---

---

Test Case 9: Role-based Access Control Testing

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX04US06_TC_009
• Title: Validate role-based access control for Asset Manager and Utility Administrator roles with appropriate permission enforcement
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: August 11, 2025
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Facility Types Management (AX04US06)
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

• Tags: Security, Consumer, API, Authorization, MOD-Facility, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Report-Security-Validation, Report-Quality-Dashboard, Report-Module-Coverage, Report-Customer-Segment-Analysis, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Must-Have, Revenue-Impact-High, Role-Based-Access, Permission-Control

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 90% of access control functionality
• Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Engine, Role Management, UI Permission Control
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX04US06
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Security-Validation, Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Customer-Segment-Analysis, Engineering
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC17, User role definitions, Security requirements, Permission matrix
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: All functional test cases for permission validation

Test Environment

• Environment: Security testing environment
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication service, Authorization engine, Role management system
• Performance_Baseline: Permission check <100ms, role validation <200ms
• Data_Requirements: User accounts: asset_manager@citywater.com, utility_admin@citywater.com

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Two test user accounts with different roles configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager (read-only), Utility Administrator (full access)
• Test_Data: Users: asset_manager@citywater.com (Asset Manager role), utility_admin@citywater.com (Utility Administrator role)
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication functionality working

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as Asset Manager	Successful login, user role: Asset Manager, session established	asset_manager@citywater.com	Role verification
2	Navigate to Facility Types page	Page loads, facility types visible, no create/edit/delete controls visible	URL: /settings/facility-types	Read-only access
3	Verify Asset Manager UI restrictions	"+ Add Facility Type" button hidden, edit icons not visible on hover, delete icons not visible	UI permission enforcement	Visual permission control
4	Attempt API call to create facility type	API returns 403 Forbidden, error message "Insufficient permissions", no facility type created	POST /api/facility-types	API-level protection
5	Test three-dot menu for Asset Manager	Menu shows only "Export" option, edit/delete/duplicate options hidden or disabled	Three-dot menu access	Menu permission filtering
6	Verify search and view permissions	Search functionality available, expand/collapse works, export available	Asset Manager capabilities	Allowed operations
7	Logout and login as Utility Administrator	Successful login, user role: Utility Administrator, full permissions	utility_admin@citywater.com	Role switching
8	Verify Utility Administrator UI access	All controls visible: "+ Add Facility Type" button, edit icons on hover, delete icons, three-dot menu full	UI full access	Complete permission set
9	Test create operation as Utility Administrator	Form accessible, validation works, successful creation, audit trail shows utility_admin user	Create new facility type	Create permission
10	Test edit operation as Utility Administrator	Inline editing accessible, save operation successful, changes persist, audit trail updated	Edit existing facility type	Edit permission
11	Test delete operation as Utility Administrator	Delete option available, confirmation dialog appears, deletion successful (or prevented if dependencies)	Delete operation	Delete permission
12	Test bulk operations access	Bulk import/export options available, file upload works, bulk processing successful	Bulk operations	Advanced permissions
13	Verify audit trail role tracking	All operations logged with correct user roles, permission checks logged, role changes tracked	Audit log review	Role audit compliance

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Role-based permissions enforced correctly at UI and API levels for both Asset Manager and Utility Administrator roles
• Secondary_Verifications: UI elements properly hidden/shown based on role, API protection effective, audit trail includes role information
• Negative_Verification: No permission bypasses possible, no unauthorized access, no role escalation vulnerabilities