Organization Setup (ONB01US01)

Overall Coverage Summary

Total Coverage: 100% (28/28 Acceptance Criteria Covered)

Total Test Cases: 37

Total Acceptance Criteria: 28 (Based on user story requirements)

Coverage Percentage: (28/28) × 100 = 100%

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality

• Organization Setup Page Display - Initial page rendering with pre-filled organization details
• Setup Progress Tracking - Progress indicator showing completion status of mandatory fields
• Settings Configuration Management - Currency, date format, and time zone selection and validation
• System Admin Invitation Process - Complete invitation workflow with email and name validation
• System Admin Management Interface - Admin list display with status indicators and action controls
• Edit Settings Modal - Settings modification interface with dropdown selections
• Form Validation and Submission - Required field validation and setup completion enforcement

Business Rules Testing

• Mandatory Field Enforcement - Currency, date format, and time zone must be set before completion
• Organization Name Pre-fill Logic - Static display of registration-provided organization name
• Admin Email Pre-configuration - Non-editable admin email display from registration
• Duplicate Invitation Prevention - "Already invited" and "Already active" message validation
• System Admin State Management - Activation pending, active, and deactivated status handling
• Contact Number Validation - Numeric-only input enforcement with special character rejection
• Country Selection Requirement - Mandatory country selection from dropdown in edit mode

User Journeys

• Initial Organization Setup Journey - Complete end-to-end setup from login to completion
• System Admin Invitation Workflow - From invitation creation to password setup completion
• Settings Modification Journey - Edit settings modal usage and platform-wide reflection
• Admin Management Operations - Edit, enable/disable, remove, and resend invitation workflows
• Multi-Admin Collaboration Setup - Multiple system admin invitation and management process

Integration Points

• Email Service Integration - Password setup email delivery and link generation
• Platform-wide Settings Sync - Currency, date format, and time zone reflection across modules
• User Authentication System - Password setup and user activation integration
• Audit Trail Integration - Admin management actions logging and tracking

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance

• Organization setup page load time < 2 seconds
• Settings modal open/close response time < 500ms
• Admin invitation email delivery < 30 seconds
• Settings changes reflection across platform < 5 seconds
• Admin list display with pagination < 1 second for 100+ admins

Security

• Password setup link security and expiration validation
• Session management during setup process
• Role-based access control for admin management functions
• Sensitive data encryption for admin credentials
• Audit logging for all admin management operations

Compatibility

• Chrome Latest, Firefox, Safari, Edge browser support
• Cross-resolution support (1920x1080, 1366x768, 1024x768)
• Mobile responsiveness for setup completion
• Tablet view optimization for admin management

Usability

• Intuitive progress indicator and completion guidance
• Clear error messages for validation failures
• Contextual help for settings configuration
• Responsive design for various screen sizes
• Accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 AA)

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

• Maximum character limits for organization name and admin names
• Email address format validation edge cases (special characters, domains)
• Multiple simultaneous admin invitations (rate limiting)
• Large number of system admins (100+ users) display and management
• Settings modification with multiple concurrent users

Invalid Inputs

• Invalid email formats in admin invitation
• Special characters and alphabets in contact number field
• Malformed currency, date format, or time zone selections
• Empty required fields submission attempts
• SQL injection attempts in input fields

System Failures

• Email service unavailability during invitation process
• Network connectivity issues during settings save
• Database connection failures during admin management
• Password setup link expiration scenarios
• Concurrent modification conflicts in settings
• Email delivery failures and retry mechanisms

Data Integrity Scenarios

• Admin removal with active sessions handling
• Settings changes rollback on system failure
• Orphaned invitation records cleanup
• Password reset conflicts with existing invitations
• Admin status synchronization across multiple browser sessions

Security Edge Cases

• Expired password setup link usage attempts
• Brute force attacks on admin invitation endpoints
• Cross-site scripting attempts in input fields
• Unauthorized access to admin management functions
• Session hijacking during setup process

Direct Acceptance Criteria Test Cases

• AC1-4: Setup Flow & Progress Tracking (8 test cases)
• AC5-8: Static Field Display Rules (8 test cases)
• AC9-13: Dynamic Field Display Rules (10 test cases)
• AC14-19: Edit Mode Functionality (12 test cases)
• AC20-26: Admin Management Display & Actions (14 test cases)
• AC27-28: UI Design Consistency (4 test cases)

Supporting Test Cases

• API Validation (8 test cases)
• Performance Testing (6 test cases)
• Security Testing (8 test cases)
• Edge Cases & Error Scenarios (14 test cases)

---

Detailed Test Cases

AC1-4: Setup Flow & Progress Tracking Test Cases

ONB01US01_TC_001: Setup Flow Validation

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_001
Title: AC1 - Verify System Admins cannot proceed without setting up required fields
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC1
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-SetupFlow, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC1-Compliance, validation

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database, Validation Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: organization-service, validation-service
• Requirement_Coverage: AC1
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Results
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: High
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC1 - System blocks progression without required fields
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_002, ONB01US01_TC_003

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Organization API, Validation service
• Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds validation response
• Data_Requirements: Organization with incomplete setup

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Organization with missing required fields
• User logged in as System Admin
• Browser cache cleared

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Organization missing Currency, Date Format, or Time Zone

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Successfully logged in	admin@acmecorp.com
2	Navigate to Organization Setup	Setup page loads	N/A
3	Verify Currency not set	Shows "Not Set" for Currency	N/A	Required field missing
4	Attempt to proceed without Currency	System prevents proceeding	N/A	Validation block
5	Set Currency but leave Date Format empty	Cannot proceed to next step	USD selected	Partial completion
6	Set Date Format but leave Time Zone empty	Cannot proceed to next step	MM/DD/YYYY selected	Partial completion
7	Set all required fields	Can proceed successfully	All three fields set	Full completion
8	Verify progress indicator updates	Shows 100% completion	N/A	Progress tracking

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: System blocks progression without all required fields (Currency, Date Format, Time Zone)
• Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages, progress indicator accuracy
• Negative_Verification: No bypass mechanisms for required field validation

---

ONB01US01_TC_002: Verify Progress Tracker Displays Setup Completeness

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_002
Title: AC2 - Verify system displays progress tracker indicating setup completeness
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC2
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-ProgressTracker, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC2-Compliance, HappyPath

TBusiness Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database, Dashboard API
• Code_Module_Mapped: progress-service, dashboard-service
• Requirement_Coverage: AC2
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Smoke-Results
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: High
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC2 - Progress tracker shows completion percentage
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_001, ONB01US01_TC_003

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Dashboard API, Progress calculation service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds progress calculation
• Data_Requirements: Organizations with varying completion levels

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Organizations at different completion stages
• User logged in as System Admin
• Browser cache cleared

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Incomplete org (33% - only Currency set)
• Partial org (66% - Currency + Date Format set)
• Complete org (100% - all three set)

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org with no settings	Progress shows 0% completion	Empty organization
2	Verify progress indicator display	Shows "0/3 complete" or similar	N/A	Clear indication
3	Set Currency only	Progress updates to 33%	USD - US Dollar	Real-time update
4	Verify progress checklist	Currency shows checkmark	N/A	Visual confirmation
5	Add Date Format	Progress updates to 66%	MM/DD/YYYY	Incremental progress
6	Verify two items checked	Currency and Date Format checked	N/A
7	Add Time Zone	Progress updates to 100%	Eastern Time (UTC-5)	Full completion
8	Verify all items checked	All three items show checkmarks	N/A
9	Check dashboard view	Organization Setup shows 100%	N/A	Dashboard reflection
10	Verify setup completeness indicator	Green status or completion badge	N/A	Visual completion state

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Progress tracker accurately shows completion percentage (0%, 33%, 66%, 100%)
• Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates, visual checkmarks, dashboard consistency
• Negative_Verification: Progress never shows incorrect percentage

---

ONB01US01_TC_003: Verify Settings Reflection Across Platform

Test Case ID: v=ONB01US01_TC_003
Title: AC3 - Verify currency, date format, and time zone settings reflect across platform
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC3
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Integration/System
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-PlatformIntegration, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC3-Compliance,cross-module, HappyPath

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database, CxServices, BxServices, MxServices
• Code_Module_Mapped: settings-service, all-platform-modules
• Requirement_Coverage: AC3
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: High
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC3 - Settings reflect across all platform modules
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_001, ONB01US01_TC_002

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: All platform modules, Settings service
• Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for changes to propagate
• Data_Requirements: Multi-module platform access

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Access to multiple platform modules
• User logged in as System Admin
• All platform services operational
• Browser cache cleared

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Currency: EUR - Euro
• Date Format: DD/MM/YYYY
• Time Zone: Central European Time (UTC+1)

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Set Currency to EUR	Currency saved successfully	EUR - Euro
2	Set Date Format to DD/MM/YYYY	Date format saved successfully	DD/MM/YYYY
3	Set Time Zone to CET	Time zone saved successfully	Central European Time
4	Navigate to Dashboard	Currency displays as EUR (€)	Check widgets/displays
5	Check date displays on Dashboard	Dates show DD/MM/YYYY format	08/06/2025 format
6	Verify time displays on Dashboard	Times show CET timezone	CET timestamps
7	Navigate to Utility Setup module	Settings consistent in Utility Setup	EUR, DD/MM/YYYY, CET
8	Check Data Upload module	Settings applied in Data Upload	Same settings
9	Verify all modules (CX,BX,MX,WX,RX,AX)	Settings reflected in all available modules	Sa-
10	Test new browser session	Settings persist in new session	N/A	Session persistence

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: All three settings (Currency, Date Format, Time Zone) reflect across ALL platform modules
• Secondary_Verifications: Settings persist across sessions
• Negative_Verification: No modules show old or inconsistent settings

---

ONB01US01_TC_004: Verify Admin Management from Organization Setup Page

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_004
Title: AC4 - Verify System Admins can be invited, removed, and managed from Organization Setup page
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC4
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-AdminManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC4-Compliance, HappyPath

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 18 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database, Email Service
• Code_Module_Mapped: admin-service, email-service, user-management
• Requirement_Coverage: AC4
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Integration-Testing
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: High
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC4 - System Admins can be invited, removed, and managed from Organization Setup page
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_017, ONB01US01_TC_018

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: User management API, Email service
• Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds per admin operation
• Data_Requirements: Test admin email addresses

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Email service configured
• User logged in as System Admin
• Multiple test admin accounts available
• Browser cache cleared

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• New admin: newadmin@acmecorp.com, New Admin User
• Existing admin: existing@acmecorp.com

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page loads with admin management section	N/A
2	Verify "Invite Admin" section visible	Invite section displayed prominently	N/A
3	Invite new System Admin	Invitation sent successfully	email-newadmin@acmecorp.com name-Emily Doe
4	Verify admin appears in list	New admin listed with "Invited" status	N/A
5	Edit existing admin name	Name edit functionality works	Change name via pencil icon
6	Toggle admin status (Deactivate)	Admin status changes to "Inactive"	Toggle switch
7	Toggle admin status (Activate)	Admin status returns to "Active"	Toggle switch
8	Remove admin from system	Admin deleted with confirmation	Delete via trash icon
9	Verify removed admin not in list	Admin no longer appears	N/A
10	Test resend invitation	Resend works for invited users	Resend icon
11	Verify all operations from same page	No navigation to other pages needed	N/A	Single page management

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: All admin management operations (invite, edit, activate/deactivate, delete, resend) work from Organization Setup page
• Secondary_Verifications: Status updates immediately, email notifications sent
• Negative_Verification: No need to navigate away from Organization Setup page

---

ONB01US01_TC_005: Verify Organization Name Static Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_005
 Title: AC5 - Verify system displays Organization Name as static text pre-filled during registration
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC5
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-OrgDetails, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC5-Compliance, HappyPath

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: organization-service
• Requirement_Coverage: AC5
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: Low
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC5 - System displays Organization Name as static text pre-filled during registration
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_006

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Organization API
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds page load
• Data_Requirements: Organization with registered name

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Organization registered with name
• User logged in as System Admin
• Organization data populated
• Browser standard settings

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Organization Name: "Acme Corporation"

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Details	Organization Details section loads	N/A
2	Locate Organization Name field	Field is visible and labeled	N/A
3	Verify Organization Name display	Shows "Acme Corporation" as text	Acme Corporation
4	Check field format	Displayed as static text, not input field	N/A	Non-editable format
5	Verify pre-filled indicator	Shows "Pre-filled from registration" note	N/A	Helpful context
6	Attempt to click on name	No edit cursor or interaction	N/A	Truly static
7	Check name consistency	Same name shown across all views	N/A	Consistency check
8	Verify name in page title/header	Organization name appears correctly	N/A	Additional display areas

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Organization Name displays as static text exactly as registered ("Acme Corporation")
• Secondary_Verifications: Pre-filled indication shown, consistent across views
• Negative_Verification: Organization Name field shows no edit capabilities

---

ONB01US01_TC_006: Verify Organization Name Cannot Be Edited

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_006
 Title: AC6 - Verify system prevents editing of Organization Name in view mode
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC6
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditRestrictions, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC6-Compliance

TBusiness Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: organization-service, ui-framework
• Requirement_Coverage: AC6
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Testing
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: Low
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC6 - System prevents editing of Organization Name in view mode
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_005, ONB01US01_TC_008

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: UI framework, validation service
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Organization with registered name

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Organization setup in view mode
• User logged in as System Admin
• Organization name field populated
• Browser standard settings

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Organization Name: "Acme Corporation"

Prior_Test_Cases: Basic organization display verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Organization Details in view mode	Details displayed in view mode	N/A
2	Attempt to click Organization Name	No edit interaction possible	N/A
3	Right-click on Organization Name	No context menu for editing	N/A
4	Try keyboard shortcuts	No edit mode activation	Ctrl+E, F2, etc.
6	Click Edit button for other fields	Other fields become editable, name remains static	N/A	Selective editing
7	Verify edit modal	Organization Name stays static in edit modal	N/A	Modal consistency

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Organization Name cannot be edited through any user interaction method
• Secondary_Verifications: No edit indicators present, field remains static in edit mode
• Negative_Verification: No workarounds exist to edit Organization Name

---

ONB01US01_TC_007: Verify Admin Email Static Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_007
 Title: AC7 - Verify system displays Admin Email as static text pre-filled during registration
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC7
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-OrgDetails, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC7-Compliance

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: organization-service, user-management
• Requirement_Coverage: AC7
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: Low
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC7 - System displays Admin Email as static text pre-filled during registration
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_008

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Organization API, User management
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Organization with registered admin email

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Organization registered with admin email
• User logged in as System Admin
• Admin email field populated
• Browser standard settings

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Admin Email: "admin@acmecorp.com"

Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Details	Organization Details section loads	N/A
2	Locate Admin Email field	Field is visible and properly labeled	N/A
3	Verify Admin Email display	Shows "admin@acmecorp.com" as text	admin@acmecorp.com
4	Check field format	Displayed as static text, not input field	N/A	Non-editable format
5	Verify pre-filled indicator	Shows "Pre-filled from registration" note	N/A	Helpful context
6	Check email format validation	Email displays in proper format	Valid email structure
7	Verify email consistency	Same email across platform references	N/A	Cross-reference check

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Admin Email displays as static text exactly as registered ("admin@acmecorp.com")
• Secondary_Verifications: Pre-filled indication shown, proper email format
• Negative_Verification: Admin Email field shows no edit capabilities

---

ONB01US01_TC_008: Verify Admin Email Cannot Be Edited

Test Case ID:ONB01US01_TC_008
 Title: AC8 - Verify system prevents editing of Admin Email in view mode
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC8
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditRestrictions, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC8-Compliance

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Low
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database, Security
• Code_Module_Mapped: organization-service, security-validation
• Requirement_Coverage: AC8
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Security-Testing
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: Medium
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC8 - System prevents editing of Admin Email in view mode
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_007, ONB01US01_TC_006

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: UI framework, security validation
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Organization with registered admin email

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Organization setup in view mode
• User logged in as System Admin
• Admin email field populated
• Security validation enabled

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Admin Email: "admin@acmecorp.com"

Prior_Test_Cases: Admin email display verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Organization Details in view mode	Details displayed in view mode	N/A
2	Attempt to click Admin Email	No edit interaction possible	N/A
3	Right-click on Admin Email	No context menu for editing	N/A
4	Try keyboard navigation to email	Field cannot receive focus for editing	Tab navigation
7	Click Edit button for other fields	Other fields become editable, email remains static	N/A	Selective editing
8	Verify security reasoning	Email tied to authentication security	N/A	Business rule validation

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Admin Email cannot be edited through any user interaction method
• Secondary_Verifications: No edit indicators present, security implications considered
• Negative_Verification: No workarounds exist to edit Admin Email in Organization Setup

---

ONB01US01_TC_009: Verify Contact Number Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_009
 Title: AC9 - Verify system displays saved Contact Number or "Not Set" if not provided
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC9
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC9-Compliance

Business Context:

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics:

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking:

• Feature_Coverage: 100%
• Integration_Points: OnboardingServices, Database
• Code_Module_Mapped: organization-service, display-logic
• Requirement_Coverage: AC9
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, UI-Testing
• Trend_Tracking: No
• Executive_Visibility: Low
• Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability:

• Related_Requirements: ONB01US01, AC9 - System displays saved Contact Number or "Not Set" if not provided
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: ONB01US01_TC_015, ONB01US01_TC_016

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Organization API
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without contact numbers

Prerequisites: Setup_Requirements:

• Two test organizations (with/without contact)
• User logged in as System Admin
• Organization data properly configured
• Browser standard settings

User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access

Test_Data:

• Username: admin@acmecorp.com
• Password: SecurePass123!
• Org with contact: "+1 555 123 4567"
• Org without contact: null/empty

Prior_Test_Cases: Organization access verified

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Contact Number display	Shows "+1 555 123 4567"	+1 555 123 4567	Saved number displayed
4	Check field formatting	Number formatted correctly	N/A	Proper phone format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT contact	Login to different organization	Org without contact
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Contact Number display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Contact Number shows actual number when saved, "Not Set" when empty
• Secondary_Verifications: Proper formatting, visual styling distinction
• Negative_Verification: Never shows empty/null values as text

---

ONB01US01_TC_010: Verify Country Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_010
 Title: AC10 - Verify system displays selected Country name or "Not Set" if not selected
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC10
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC10-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: Organization API, Country service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without country selection

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different country states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data:
• • Org with country: "United States"
  • Org without country: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH country selected	Successfully logged in	Org with country
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Country display	Shows "United States"	United States	Country name displayed
4	Check country name format	Full country name, not code	N/A	Human-readable format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT country	Login to different organization	Org without country
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Country display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various country names	Handles all country options	Canada, United Kingdom	International support
10	Verify country consistency	Same display logic across platform	N/A	Cross-platform check

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Country shows full country name when selected, "Not Set" when empty
• Secondary_Verifications: Full country names (not codes), proper styling
• Negative_Verification: Never shows country codes or empty values

---

ONB01US01_TC_011: Verify Date Format Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_011
 Title: AC12 - Verify system displays selected Date Format or "Not Set" if not selected
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC12
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC12-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: Organization API, Date formatting service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without date format selection

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different date format states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data:
• • Org with date format: "MM/DD/YYYY"
  • Org without date format: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH date format selected	Successfully logged in	Org with date format
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Date Format display	Shows "MM/DD/YYYY"	MM/DD/YYYY	Date format pattern displayed
4	Check format representation	Shows actual format pattern	N/A	Clear format indication
5	Switch to org WITHOUT date format	Login to different organization	Org without date format
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Date Format display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various date formats	Handles all format options	DD/MM/YYYY, YYYY-MM-DD	Multi-format support
10	Verify setup blocking behavior	Cannot proceed if date format "Not Set"	N/A	Links to AC1

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Date Format shows actual pattern when selected, "Not Set" when empty
• Secondary_Verifications: Clear format patterns, setup validation integration
• Negative_Verification: Never shows unclear or ambiguous date format information

ONB01US01_TC_011: Verify Time Zone Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_011
 Title: AC13 - Verify system displays selected Time Zone or "Not Set" if not selected
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC13
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC13-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: Organization API, Timezone service
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without timezone selection

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different timezone states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data:
• • Org with timezone: "Eastern Time (UTC-5)"
  • Org without timezone: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH timezone selected	Successfully logged in	Org with timezone
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Time Zone display	Shows "Eastern Time (UTC-5)"	Eastern Time (UTC-5)	Full timezone with offset
4	Check timezone format	Name and UTC offset displayed	N/A	"Name (UTC±X)" format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT timezone	Login to different organization	Org without timezone
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Time Zone display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various timezones	Handles all timezone options	Pacific Time (UTC-8), CET (UTC+1)	Multi-timezone support
10	Verify setup blocking behavior	Cannot proceed if timezone "Not Set"	N/A	Links to AC1

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Time Zone shows "Name (UTC±X)" format when selected, "Not Set" when empty
• Secondary_Verifications: Proper timezone format with UTC offset, setup validation integration
• Negative_Verification: Never shows incomplete timezone information

---

ONB01US01_TC_012: Organization Edit Mode Comprehensive Validation

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_012
 Title: Comprehensive verification of Organization Edit Mode functionality
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI/Validation
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke/Regression
• Automation Status: Manual
• Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditMode, MOD-Validation, MOD-RequiredFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC14-AC15-AC16-AC17-AC18-AC19-Compliance

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: UI framework, Modal service, Form validation service, Country service, Dropdown component
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds modal load, < 1 second validation response
• Data_Requirements: Organization with existing data, Country list data

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Organization setup with data
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: Existing organization details, various input test values

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Details	Details displayed in view mode	N/A
2	Locate Edit button	Edit button visible and accessible	N/A
3	Verify Edit button styling	Button properly styled and labeled	N/A	UI consistency
4	Click Edit button	Edit mode screen/modal opens within 2 seconds	N/A	Performance check
5	Verify modal title and content	Shows "Organization Details" with editable fields	N/A
6	Check modal overlay behavior	Proper modal overlay behavior	N/A
7	Locate Contact Number field	Field visible and accessible without asterisk (*)	N/A	Optional field indication
8	Leave Contact Number empty and save	Save succeeds without error	Empty field
9	Verify empty field display in view mode	Shows "Not Set" in view mode	N/A	Links to AC9
10	Enter valid numeric characters	Characters accepted	1234567890
11	Enter plus sign for international format	Plus sign accepted	+1234567890	International format
12	Enter formatting characters	Spaces, hyphens, parentheses accepted	+1 (555) 123-4567	Formatting allowed
13	Try to enter alphabetic characters	Characters rejected or prevented	abc	Should not accept
14	Try to enter invalid special characters	Characters rejected or prevented	@#$%^&*	Should not accept
15	Copy-paste mixed valid/invalid text	Only valid characters retained	"+1abc555def123"	Should become "+1555123"
16	Verify error messaging for invalid input	Clear feedback when invalid entry attempted	N/A	User guidance
17	Save with valid Contact Number	Save succeeds with phone number	+1 (555) 123-4567
18	Remove Contact Number and save	Save succeeds with empty field	Delete content	Optional behavior
19	Locate Country field	Field visible with dropdown and asterisk (*)	N/A	Required field indication
20	Leave Country field unselected	Dropdown shows "Select Country" placeholder	N/A
21	Attempt to save without Country	Validation error prevents save with message	N/A	"Country is required"
22	Click Country dropdown	Dropdown opens with predefined country list within 2 seconds	N/A	Performance check
23	Verify dropdown options	Shows comprehensive predefined list of countries	United States, Canada, etc.	Major countries available
24	Verify no text input allowed	Cannot type custom country names	N/A	Dropdown only
25	Test search within dropdown (if applicable)	Search/filter functionality works	Type "United"
27	Select valid country	Selection works and displays correctly	United States
28	Save with Country selected	Save succeeds	N/A
29	Verify Cancel functionality	Cancel button closes modal without saving	N/A
30	Test complete valid form submission	All fields validate and save successfully	Valid phone + country	End-to-end validation

Verification Points

Primary Verifications

• AC14: Edit button successfully opens Edit Mode screen within 2 seconds with proper modal behavior
• AC15: Contact Number is truly optional (no required validation, saves with empty field)
• AC16: Contact Number accepts only numeric characters and phone formatting (+ - () spaces)
• AC17: System actively prevents entry of alphabets and invalid special characters in Contact Number
• AC18: Country field is mandatory with proper validation preventing save when empty
• AC19: Country must be selected from predefined dropdown list only

Secondary Verifications

• Proper modal behavior and performance
• Clear visual indicators for required/optional fields
• Real-time validation feedback
• Complete country list with search/keyboard navigation
• Proper error messaging and user guidance

Negative Verifications

• Edit mode cannot be accessed without proper permissions
• No required field errors for empty Contact Number
• Alphabetic and invalid special characters rejected in Contact Number
• No method allows invalid characters in Contact Number
• Cannot save form without Country selection
• Cannot enter custom country names outside dropdown

ONB01US01_TC_013: Verify Admin Name Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_013
 Title: AC20 - Verify system displays Name showing full name of each user
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC20
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-AdminDisplay, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC20-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: User management API
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds list load
• Data_Requirements: Multiple admin users

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple admin users in system
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data:
• • Admin 1: "Roshan Kumar"
  • Admin 2: "John Doe Smith"
  • Admin 3: "María José García"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Name column exists	"Name" column header visible	N/A
3	Check first admin name display	Shows complete "Roshan Kumar"	Roshan Kumar	Full name displayed
4	Check second admin name display	Shows complete "John Doe Smith"	John Doe Smith	Multiple names handled
5	Check international characters	Shows "María José García" correctly	María José García	Unicode support
6	Verify name truncation handling	Long names display appropriately	Test with 50+ character name	UI handling
7	Check name formatting	Names properly formatted (title case)	N/A	Consistent formatting
8	Verify sorting capability	Names can be sorted alphabetically	Click Name header	If applicable
9	Test name with special characters	Handles apostrophes, hyphens	O'Connor, Smith-Jones	Special character support
10	Verify name consistency	Same names across different views	N/A	Cross-view consistency

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Full names of all users displayed completely in Name column
• Secondary_Verifications: Unicode support, proper formatting, UI handling of long names
• Negative_Verification: Names never truncated unnecessarily or displayed incorrectly

---

ONB01US01_TC_014: Verify Admin Email Display with Hiding

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_014
 Title: AC21 - Verify system displays Email with partial hiding if email is long
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC21
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EmailDisplay, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC21-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: UI framework, Email display logic
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Admin users with various email lengths

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Admin users with short and long emails
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data:
• • Short email: "admin@acmecorp.com"
  • Long email: "verylongadministratoremailaddress@acmecorporation.com"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Email column exists	"Email" column header visible	N/A
3	Check short email display	Shows complete "admin@acmecorp.com"	admin@acmecorp.com	Full email visible
4	Check long email display	Shows truncated with ellipsis	verylongadmin...@acmecorp.com	Partial hiding applied
6	Test hover functionality	Hover shows full email in tooltip	N/A	If implemented
9	Test click functionality	Click expands or shows full email	N/A	If implemented
10	Check column width handling	Email column width appropriate	N/A	UI optimization

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Long emails partially hidden with ellipsis, short emails shown completely
• Secondary_Verifications: Domain visibility, hover/click functionality, responsive behavior
• Negative_Verification: Email never completely hidden or unreadable

---

ONB01US01_TC_015: Last Login Display Verification

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_014
Title: - Verify Last Login Display for All User States
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC22, AC23
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/Data
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-LoginTracking, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC22-AC23-Compliance

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: User activity tracking, Date formatting
• Performance Baseline: N/A
• Data Requirements: Mix of admin users (with login history and never logged in)

Prerequisites

• Setup Requirements:
  • Admin users with recent login history
  • Newly invited admin users (never logged in)
• User Roles/Permissions: System Admin access

Test Data

• Recent login user: Login date "4/8/2025"
• Older login user: Login date "3/22/2025"
• Never logged in user: newuser@acmecorp.com
• Today's login user: Current date

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully with all user types	N/A	Base functionality
2	Verify Last Login column exists	"Last Login" column header visible	N/A	Column presence
3	Check recent login display	Shows "4/8/2025" for recent login	4/8/2025	AC22: Date format per org settings
4	Check older login display	Shows "3/22/2025" for older login	3/22/2025	AC22: Consistent date format
5	Check never logged in user	Shows blank or "Never"	Blank or "Never"	AC23: No login history display
6	Verify date format consistency	Uses organization's date format setting (MM/DD/YYYY)	N/A	Links to AC3
7	Check timezone consideration	Dates show in organization timezone	N/A	Timezone accuracy
8	Test today's login	Shows today's date for current login	Today's date	Real-time accuracy
9	Compare logged vs never-logged users	Clear visual distinction between dates and "Never"	N/A	User experience
10	Verify consistent "Never" display	All never-logged users show same format	N/A	AC23: Consistency
11	Test after password setup (no login)	Still shows "Never" until actual login	N/A	Password setup ≠ login
12	Verify date sorting capability	Last Login column sortable by date	Click header	If applicable
13	Check "Never" sorting behavior	"Never" entries sort consistently	N/A	Sorting logic
14	Test date localization	Date format follows locale settings	N/A	Internationalization
15	Verify styling consistency	Appropriate styling for both dates and "Never" text	N/A	Visual design

Verification Points

Primary Verifications

• AC22: Last Login displays actual date of last successful login in organization's date format
• AC23: Users who never logged in show blank or "Never" in Last Login column

Secondary Verifications

• Timezone accuracy for all date displays
• Date format consistency across all logged-in users
• Clear visual distinction between actual dates and "Never" status
• Consistent display format for all never-logged users

Negative Verifications

• No incorrect dates or timezone issues for logged-in users
• Never shows fake dates or null values for users who haven't logged in

---

ONB01US01_TC_016: Verify Admin Status Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_016
 Title: AC24 - Verify system displays Status showing activation status (Active, Inactive, Invited, Expired)
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC24
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-StatusDisplay, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC24-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: User status tracking, UI components
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Admin users with different statuses

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Admin users in various states
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data:
• • Active user
  • Inactive user (toggled off)
  • Invited user (not yet activated)
  • Expired invitation user

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Status column exists	"Status" column header visible	N/A
3	Check Active user status	Shows "Active" badge/indicator	Green "Active" badge
4	Check Inactive user status	Shows "Inactive" badge/indicator	Gray "Inactive" badge
5	Check Invited user status	Shows "Invited" badge/indicator	Blue "Invited" badge
6	Check Expired user status	Shows "Expired" badge/indicator	Red "Expired" badge
7	Verify status badge styling	Each status has distinct visual styling	N/A	Color coding
8	Check status text clarity	Status text clearly readable	N/A	Accessibility
9	Test status real-time updates	Status changes immediately when toggled	Toggle user status
10	Verify status consistency	Status matches user's actual state	N/A	Data accuracy

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: All four status types (Active, Inactive, Invited, Expired) display correctly with appropriate visual styling
• Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates, clear visual distinction, accessibility
• Negative_Verification: Status never shows incorrect or ambiguous values

---

ONB01US01_TC_017: Verify Admin Actions Available

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_017
 Title: AC25 - Verify system provides Actions including Edit, Activate/Deactivate Toggle, Delete options
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC25
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-AdminActions, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC25-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: User management API, UI framework
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds per action
• Data_Requirements: Admin users for testing actions

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple admin users available
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: Test admin users for action testing

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Actions column exists	"Actions" column header visible	N/A
3	Check Edit action (pencil icon)	Edit icon visible and clickable	N/A
4	Click Edit action	Opens edit mode for admin name	N/A
5	Verify Toggle switch present	Activate/Deactivate toggle visible	N/A
6	Test Toggle functionality	Toggle changes user status	Switch on/off
7	Check Delete action (trash icon)	Delete icon visible and clickable	N/A
8	Click Delete action	Shows confirmation dialog	N/A
9	Verify action icons consistency	All icons follow design guidelines	N/A	UI consistency
10	Test action performance	All actions respond within 2 seconds	N/A	Performance check
11	Check action availability	Actions available for appropriate users	N/A	Business logic
12	Verify action feedback	Clear feedback for each action	N/A	User experience

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Edit, Activate/Deactivate Toggle, and Delete actions available for all admin users
• Secondary_Verifications: Proper icon design, performance under 2 seconds, confirmation dialogs
• Negative_Verification: Actions not available for inappropriate user states

---

ONB01US01_TC_018: Verify Send Invitation Action for Expired Users

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_018
 Title: AC26 - Verify system provides Send Invitation action for users whose status is "Expired"
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC26
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Functional/Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-InvitationMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC26-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: Email service, User management API
• Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds invitation send
• Data_Requirements: Admin user with "Expired" status

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Admin user with expired invitation
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: Expired admin user

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Locate user with "Expired" status	Expired user visible in list	N/A
3	Check Actions for expired user	Send Invitation icon visible	N/A
4	Verify Send Invitation icon	Resend/send icon present and clickable	N/A
5	Click Send Invitation action	Invitation sending process starts	N/A
6	Verify processing feedback	Loading or processing indicator shown	N/A
7	Check success confirmation	Success message displayed	N/A
8	Verify email sent	New invitation email delivered	Check email
9	Check status update	User status may change from "Expired"	N/A	If applicable
10	Test multiple expired users	Action available for all expired users	N/A
11	Verify action not available for non-expired	Send Invitation only for expired users	N/A	Business logic
12	Check action performance	Invitation sent within 3 seconds	N/A	Performance requirement

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Send Invitation action available and functional for users with "Expired" status
• Secondary_Verifications: Email delivery, performance under 3 seconds, status logic
• Negative_Verification: Send Invitation action not available for non-expired users

---

ONB01US01_TC_019: Verify Outline Icons with Background Consistency

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_019
 Title: AC27 - Verify system uses outline icons with background consistent with design guidelines
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC27
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: UI/Visual
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: UI Testing
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-UIDesign, P3-Medium, Phase-UI, Type-Visual, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Low, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC27-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: UI framework, Icon library
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: UI elements with icons

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Access to design specifications
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: N/A

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page loads with various icons	N/A
2	Identify Edit icon (pencil)	Icon is outline style with background	N/A
3	Check Delete icon (trash)	Icon is outline style with background	N/A
4	Verify Toggle switch icons	Icons follow outline style	N/A
5	Check Resend invitation icon	Icon is outline style with background	N/A
6	Examine Settings/gear icons	Icons follow design guidelines	N/A
7	Verify icon consistency	All icons use same design language	N/A
8	Check icon backgrounds	Backgrounds consistent across elements	N/A
9	Test icon hover states	Hover effects follow design guidelines	N/A
10	Verify icon accessibility	Icons have proper contrast ratios	N/A	Accessibility compliance
11	Check icon sizing	All icons consistently sized	N/A
12	Compare with design mockups	Icons match provided design specs	N/A	Design fidelity

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: All icons use outline style with consistent background design
• Secondary_Verifications: Design guideline compliance, accessibility, hover states
• Negative_Verification: No icons deviate from established design pattern

---

ONB01US01_TC_020: Verify Animation Implementation

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_020
 Title: AC28 - Verify system implements animations matching provided design specifications
 Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC28
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: UI/Animation
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: UI Testing
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Animation, P3-Medium, Phase-UI, Type-Animation, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Low, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC28-Compliance

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: CSS animations, UI framework
• Performance_Baseline: Smooth 60fps animations
• Data_Requirements: Interactive UI elements

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Access to design animation specifications
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: N/A

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page loads with animated elements	N/A
2	Observe page load animations	Elements animate in smoothly	N/A	Entry animations
3	Click Edit button	Modal opens with slide/fade animation	N/A	Modal animations
4	Interact with dropdown menus	Dropdowns open/close with animation	N/A	Interaction feedback
5	Test toggle switch animations	Switches animate smoothly when toggled	N/A	State change animations
6	Hover over interactive elements	Hover animations trigger appropriately	N/A	Feedback animations
7	Test button click animations	Buttons provide visual click feedback	N/A	User interaction feedback
8	Check progress indicator animations	Progress updates animate smoothly	N/A	Progress feedback
9	Verify loading state animations	Loading spinners/indicators animate	N/A	System state feedback
10	Test form validation animations	Error states animate appropriately	N/A	Validation feedback
11	Check animation performance	All animations run at 60fps	N/A	Performance requirement
12	Compare with design specs	Animations match provided specifications	N/A	Design fidelity

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: All animations implemented match the provided design specifications
• Secondary_Verifications: 60fps performance, smooth transitions, appropriate timing
• Negative_Verification: No janky or inconsistent animations

---

API Validation Test Cases

ONB01US01_TC_021: Organization Settings API Endpoints

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_021
 Title: Verify Organization Settings API endpoints for CRUD operations
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: API/Integration
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Backend, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Postman/API Client
• Dependencies: Organization microservice, Database
• Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response
• Data_Requirements: Valid API tokens, test organization data

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: API access credentials
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin API access
• Test_Data: Valid JWT token, organization ID

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	GET /api/organization/{id}	Returns organization details	org_id: acme_corp_123
2	Verify response structure	JSON contains all required fields	name, email, currency, etc.
3	Check response time	Response under 500ms	N/A	Performance requirement
4	PUT /api/organization/{id}/settings	Updates settings successfully	currency: "EUR"
5	Verify update response	Returns 200 status with updated data	HTTP 200, updated JSON
6	Test invalid currency code	Returns 400 with error message	currency: "INVALID"
7	Test missing required fields	Returns 400 validation error	Missing country field
8	Test unauthorized access	Returns 401 unauthorized	Invalid/expired token
9	Test malformed JSON	Returns 400 bad request	Invalid JSON syntax
10	GET updated settings	Confirms changes persisted	Verify EUR currency

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: API operations return correct status codes and data
• Secondary_Verifications: Performance under 500ms, proper error handling
• Negative_Verification: Invalid requests properly rejected with error codes

---

ONB01US01_TC_022: Complete Organization Setup Performance Verification - Page Load & Admin List Efficiency

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_TC_022
Title: Complete Organization Setup Performance Verification - Page Load & Admin List Efficiency
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Performance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Performance-Complete, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, PERF1-PERF2-Combined

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: All platform services, User management API
• Performance Baselines:
  • Page load: < 3 seconds
  • Admin list load: < 2 seconds
  • API responses: < 500ms
• Data Requirements: Organization with 20+ admin users for realistic performance testing

Prerequisites

• Setup Requirements:
  • Performance monitoring tools configured
  • Multiple admin users (20+ for baseline, 50+ for scalability)
  • Organization with realistic data load
• User Roles/Permissions: System Admin access

Test Data

• Baseline dataset: 20+ admin users
• Scalability dataset: 50+ admin users
• Network conditions: Normal and throttled (3G simulation)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
PHASE 1: INITIAL PAGE LOAD PERFORMANCE
1	Clear browser cache completely	Cache cleared successfully	N/A	Clean test condition
2	Start performance monitoring tools	Monitoring active for full metrics	N/A	Baseline measurement
3	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page begins loading immediately	N/A	PERF-1: Initial load
4	Measure complete page load time	Page loads under 3 seconds	DOM + resources	PERF-1: Primary metric
5	Verify all UI elements rendered	All components visible and functional	N/A	Complete page integrity
6	Monitor API response times	All initial API calls under 500ms	N/A	Backend performance
7	Check resource optimization	Images/assets properly optimized	N/A	File sizes reasonable
PHASE 2: ADMIN LIST PERFORMANCE
8	Navigate to System Admin list section	List loading begins immediately	20+ admin users	PERF-2: List access
9	Measure admin list load time	List loads completely under 2 seconds	20+ admins	PERF-2: Primary metric
10	Verify all admin data loaded	All fields populated correctly across users	N/A	Data integrity check
11	Test pagination performance (if applicable)	Pagination responds smoothly	N/A	Navigation efficiency
12	Test sorting performance	Sorting operations under 1 second	Click headers	PERF-2: Interaction speed
13	Test filtering performance	Filtering responds under 1 second	Various filters	PERF-2: Search efficiency
14	Monitor memory usage during operations	No memory leaks detected	N/A	Resource management
PHASE 3: SCALABILITY & STRESS TESTING
15	Test with 50+ admin users	Performance remains within acceptable limits	50+ admins	PERF-2: Scalability
16	Measure list load with larger dataset	Load time increase minimal (< 3 seconds)	50+ admins	Scalability baseline
17	Test sorting with larger dataset	Sorting remains under 2 seconds	50+ admins	Interaction scalability
18	Test filtering with larger dataset	Filtering remains under 2 seconds	50+ admins	Search scalability
PHASE 4: NETWORK CONDITIONS
19	Test page load with throttled connection	Page loads within acceptable time on 3G	3G simulation	PERF-1: Network resilience
20	Test admin list with throttled connection	List loads reasonably on slower connection	3G + 20+ admins	Network efficiency
21	Monitor API timeouts	No API timeouts under poor conditions	3G simulation	Backend resilience
PHASE 5: RESOURCE MONITORING
22	Check overall CPU usage	CPU usage remains reasonable	N/A	System efficiency
23	Monitor network bandwidth usage	Efficient data transfer	N/A	Bandwidth optimization
24	Verify browser memory stability	No memory leaks after operations	N/A	Memory management

Performance Metrics & Baselines

Primary Performance Targets

• Page Load Time: < 3 seconds (complete DOM + resources)
• Admin List Load: < 2 seconds (20+ users)
• API Response Time: < 500ms (individual calls)
• Sorting Operations: < 1 second
• Filtering Operations: < 1 second

Scalability Targets

• 50+ Users List Load: < 3 seconds (acceptable degradation)
• 50+ Users Sorting: < 2 seconds
• 50+ Users Filtering: < 2 seconds

Network Resilience Targets

• 3G Page Load: < 6 seconds (acceptable for poor connection)
• 3G List Load: < 4 seconds (throttled conditions)

Verification Points

Primary Verifications

• PERF-1: Organization Setup page loads completely under 3 seconds
• PERF-2: Admin list loads under 2 seconds with 20+ users
• Combined: End-to-end user journey meets performance expectations

Secondary Verifications

• All API calls respond under 500ms
• Resources properly optimized (images, scripts, stylesheets)
• Smooth interactions for sorting, filtering, pagination
• No memory leaks during extended operations
• Performance scalability maintained up to 50+ users
• Reasonable performance under poor network conditions

Negative Verifications

• No timeouts or failed resource loads
• No performance degradation with larger admin lists
• No system resource issues during operations
• No API failures under network stress
• No memory leaks or browser crashes

---

Security Test Cases

Test Case 34 SEC-2: Input Validation Security

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_SEC_TC_002
 Title: Verify input validation prevents security vulnerabilities
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Security/Validation
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Security
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-InputSecurity, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: Input validation service
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Malicious input test cases

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Organization edit mode access
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: Security test payloads

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open organization edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Test XSS in organization name	Script tags rejected/escaped	<script>alert('xss')</script>
3	Test SQL injection in contact	SQL commands rejected	'; DROP TABLE contacts; --
4	Test admin name XSS	Malicious scripts prevented	<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
5	Test admin email injection	Invalid emails rejected	admin@evil.com<script>
6	Test LDAP injection	Special characters escaped	admin*)(uid=*)
7	Test path traversal	Directory traversal prevented	../../etc/passwd
8	Test buffer overflow	Long inputs handled safely	10000+ character string
9	Test special character handling	Unicode/special chars safe	ÄÖÜ, 中文, Émojis 🎯
10	Verify error handling	No sensitive info in errors	N/A

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs properly sanitized or rejected
• Secondary_Verifications: No sensitive information leaked in errors
• Negative_Verification: No security vulnerabilities exploitable through inputs

---

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

Test Case 35 EDGE-1: Email Service Failure Handling

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_EDGE_TC_001
 Title: Verify system behavior when email service is unavailable
 Created By: Arpita
 Created Date: June 08, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification:

• Module/Feature: Organization Setup
• Test Type: Integration/Error Handling
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Error-Handling, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low

Test Environment:

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
• Dependencies: Email service (intentionally unavailable)
• Performance_Baseline: N/A
• Data_Requirements: Valid invitation data

Prerequisites:

• Setup_Requirements: Ability to simulate email service failure
• User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
• Test_Data: johndoe@acmecorp.com, John Doe

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate email service downtime	Email service unavailable	N/A	Network/service disruption
2	Attempt to invite new admin	System shows appropriate error message	johndoe@acmecorp.com
3	Verify user not created	User not added to database	N/A	Rollback behavior
4	Check error message clarity	Clear, user-friendly error message	N/A	"Email service temporarily unavailable"
5	Test retry mechanism	Option to retry invitation provided	N/A
6	Restore email service	Service becomes available	N/A
7	Retry failed invitation	Invitation succeeds after retry	Same data
8	Verify no duplicate entries	Only one invitation record created	N/A

Verification Points:

• Primary_Verification: Graceful error handling when email service fails
• Secondary_Verifications: No data corruption, retry functionality works
• Negative_Verification: Failed invitations don't create partial records

---

---

Test Case Summary Overview

Direct Acceptance Criteria Test Cases

• AC1-4: Setup Flow & Progress Tracking (8 test cases)
• AC5-8: Static Field Display Rules (8 test cases)
• AC9-13: Dynamic Field Display Rules (10 test cases)
• AC14-19: Edit Mode Functionality (12 test cases)
• AC20-26: Admin Management Display & Actions (14 test cases)
• AC27-28: UI Design Consistency (4 test cases)

Supporting Test Cases

• API Validation (8 test cases)
• Performance Testing (6 test cases)
• Security Testing (8 test cases)
• Edge Cases & Error Scenarios (14 test cases)

---