Organization Setup (ONB01US01)

Overall Coverage Summary

Total Coverage: 100% (28/28 Acceptance Criteria Covered)

Total Test Cases: 92 (56 Functional + 36 Non-Functional)

Total Acceptance Criteria: 28 (Based on user story requirements)

Coverage Percentage: (28/28) × 100 = 100%

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality

Organization Setup Page Display - Initial page rendering with pre-filled organization details
Setup Progress Tracking - Progress indicator showing completion status of mandatory fields
Settings Configuration Management - Currency, date format, and time zone selection and validation
System Admin Invitation Process - Complete invitation workflow with email and name validation
System Admin Management Interface - Admin list display with status indicators and action controls
Edit Settings Modal - Settings modification interface with dropdown selections
Form Validation and Submission - Required field validation and setup completion enforcement

Business Rules Testing

Mandatory Field Enforcement - Currency, date format, and time zone must be set before completion
Organization Name Pre-fill Logic - Static display of registration-provided organization name
Admin Email Pre-configuration - Non-editable admin email display from registration
Duplicate Invitation Prevention - "Already invited" and "Already active" message validation
System Admin State Management - Activation pending, active, and deactivated status handling
Contact Number Validation - Numeric-only input enforcement with special character rejection
Country Selection Requirement - Mandatory country selection from dropdown in edit mode

User Journeys

Initial Organization Setup Journey - Complete end-to-end setup from login to completion
System Admin Invitation Workflow - From invitation creation to password setup completion
Settings Modification Journey - Edit settings modal usage and platform-wide reflection
Admin Management Operations - Edit, enable/disable, remove, and resend invitation workflows
Multi-Admin Collaboration Setup - Multiple system admin invitation and management process

Integration Points

Email Service Integration - Password setup email delivery and link generation
Platform-wide Settings Sync - Currency, date format, and time zone reflection across modules
User Authentication System - Password setup and user activation integration
Audit Trail Integration - Admin management actions logging and tracking

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance

Organization setup page load time < 2 seconds
Settings modal open/close response time < 500ms
Admin invitation email delivery < 30 seconds
Settings changes reflection across platform < 5 seconds
Admin list display with pagination < 1 second for 100+ admins

Security

Password setup link security and expiration validation
Session management during setup process
Role-based access control for admin management functions
Sensitive data encryption for admin credentials
Audit logging for all admin management operations

Compatibility

Chrome Latest, Firefox, Safari, Edge browser support
Cross-resolution support (1920x1080, 1366x768, 1024x768)
Mobile responsiveness for setup completion
Tablet view optimization for admin management

Usability

Intuitive progress indicator and completion guidance
Clear error messages for validation failures
Contextual help for settings configuration
Responsive design for various screen sizes
Accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 AA)

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

Maximum character limits for organization name and admin names
Email address format validation edge cases (special characters, domains)
Multiple simultaneous admin invitations (rate limiting)
Large number of system admins (100+ users) display and management
Settings modification with multiple concurrent users

Invalid Inputs

Invalid email formats in admin invitation
Special characters and alphabets in contact number field
Malformed currency, date format, or time zone selections
Empty required fields submission attempts
SQL injection attempts in input fields

System Failures

Email service unavailability during invitation process
Network connectivity issues during settings save
Database connection failures during admin management
Password setup link expiration scenarios
Concurrent modification conflicts in settings
Email delivery failures and retry mechanisms

Data Integrity Scenarios

Admin removal with active sessions handling
Settings changes rollback on system failure
Orphaned invitation records cleanup
Password reset conflicts with existing invitations
Admin status synchronization across multiple browser sessions

Security Edge Cases

Expired password setup link usage attempts
Brute force attacks on admin invitation endpoints
Cross-site scripting attempts in input fields
Unauthorized access to admin management functions
Session hijacking during setup process

Direct Acceptance Criteria Test Cases

AC1-4: Setup Flow & Progress Tracking (8 test cases)
AC5-8: Static Field Display Rules (8 test cases)
AC9-13: Dynamic Field Display Rules (10 test cases)
AC14-19: Edit Mode Functionality (12 test cases)
AC20-26: Admin Management Display & Actions (14 test cases)
AC27-28: UI Design Consistency (4 test cases)

Supporting Test Cases

API Validation (8 test cases)
Performance Testing (6 test cases)
Security Testing (8 test cases)
Edge Cases & Error Scenarios (14 test cases)

Detailed Test Cases

AC1-4: Setup Flow & Progress Tracking Test Cases

Test Case AC1-1: Verify System Admins Cannot Proceed Without Required Fields

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC1_TC_001
Title: AC1 - Verify System Admins cannot proceed without setting up required fields
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC1
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Setup Flow Validation
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-SetupFlow, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC1-Compliance

Business Context:

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Organization API, Validation service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds validation response
Data_Requirements: Organization with incomplete setup

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization with missing required fields
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Organization missing Currency, Date Format, or Time Zone
Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as System Admin	Successfully logged in	admin@acmecorp.com
2	Navigate to Organization Setup	Setup page loads	N/A
3	Verify Currency not set	Shows "Not Set" for Currency	N/A	Required field missing
4	Attempt to proceed without Currency	System prevents proceeding	N/A	Validation block
5	Set Currency but leave Date Format empty	Cannot proceed to next step	USD selected	Partial completion
6	Set Date Format but leave Time Zone empty	Cannot proceed to next step	MM/DD/YYYY selected	Partial completion
7	Set all required fields	Can proceed successfully	All three fields set	Full completion
8	Verify progress indicator updates	Shows 100% completion	N/A	Progress tracking

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: System blocks progression without all required fields (Currency, Date Format, Time Zone)
Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messages, progress indicator accuracy
Negative_Verification: No bypass mechanisms for required field validation

Test Case AC2-1: Verify Progress Tracker Displays Setup Completeness

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC2_TC_001
Title: AC2 - Verify system displays progress tracker indicating setup completeness
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC2
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Progress Tracking
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-ProgressTracker, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC2-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Dashboard API, Progress calculation service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds progress calculation
Data_Requirements: Organizations with varying completion levels

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organizations at different completion stages
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Incomplete org (33% - only Currency set)
- Partial org (66% - Currency + Date Format set)
- Complete org (100% - all three set)

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org with no settings	Progress shows 0% completion	Empty organization
2	Verify progress indicator display	Shows "0/3 complete" or similar	N/A	Clear indication
3	Set Currency only	Progress updates to 33%	USD - US Dollar	Real-time update
4	Verify progress checklist	Currency shows checkmark	N/A	Visual confirmation
5	Add Date Format	Progress updates to 66%	MM/DD/YYYY	Incremental progress
6	Verify two items checked	Currency and Date Format checked	N/A
7	Add Time Zone	Progress updates to 100%	Eastern Time (UTC-5)	Full completion
8	Verify all items checked	All three items show checkmarks	N/A
9	Check dashboard view	Organization Setup shows 100%	N/A	Dashboard reflection
10	Verify setup completeness indicator	Green status or completion badge	N/A	Visual completion state

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Progress tracker accurately shows completion percentage (0%, 33%, 66%, 100%)
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates, visual checkmarks, dashboard consistency
Negative_Verification: Progress never shows incorrect percentage

Test Case AC3-1: Verify Settings Reflection Across Platform

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC3_TC_001
Title: AC3 - Verify currency, date format, and time zone settings reflect across platform
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC3
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Platform Integration
Test Type: Integration/System
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-PlatformIntegration, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC3-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: All platform modules, Settings service
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for changes to propagate
Data_Requirements: Multi-module platform access

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Access to multiple platform modules
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Currency: EUR - Euro
- Date Format: DD/MM/YYYY
- Time Zone: Central European Time (UTC+1)

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Set Currency to EUR	Currency saved successfully	EUR - Euro
2	Set Date Format to DD/MM/YYYY	Date format saved successfully	DD/MM/YYYY
3	Set Time Zone to CET	Time zone saved successfully	Central European Time
4	Navigate to Dashboard	Currency displays as EUR (€)	Check widgets/displays
5	Check date displays on Dashboard	Dates show DD/MM/YYYY format	08/06/2025 format
6	Verify time displays on Dashboard	Times show CET timezone	CET timestamps
7	Navigate to Utility Setup module	Settings consistent in Utility Setup	EUR, DD/MM/YYYY, CET
8	Check Data Upload module	Settings applied in Data Upload	Same settings
9	Verify Integrations module	Settings reflected in Integrations	Same settings
10	Test new browser session	Settings persist in new session	N/A	Session persistence
11	Check mobile responsive view	Settings apply on mobile view	Mobile screen size
12	Verify API responses	API returns data in correct format	Check API responses	Backend consistency

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All three settings (Currency, Date Format, Time Zone) reflect across ALL platform modules
Secondary_Verifications: Settings persist across sessions, mobile compatibility
Negative_Verification: No modules show old or inconsistent settings

Test Case AC4-1: Verify Admin Management from Organization Setup Page

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC4_TC_001
Title: AC4 - Verify System Admins can be invited, removed, and managed from Organization Setup page
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC4
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Admin Management
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-AdminManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC4-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User management API, Email service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds per admin operation
Data_Requirements: Test admin email addresses

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Email service configured
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- New admin: newadmin@acmecorp.com, New Admin User
- Existing admin: existing@acmecorp.com

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page loads with admin management section	N/A
2	Verify "Invite Admin" section visible	Invite section displayed prominently	N/A
3	Invite new System Admin	Invitation sent successfully	newadmin@acmecorp.com
4	Verify admin appears in list	New admin listed with "Invited" status	N/A
5	Edit existing admin name	Name edit functionality works	Change name via pencil icon
6	Toggle admin status (Deactivate)	Admin status changes to "Inactive"	Toggle switch
7	Toggle admin status (Activate)	Admin status returns to "Active"	Toggle switch
8	Remove admin from system	Admin deleted with confirmation	Delete via trash icon
9	Verify removed admin not in list	Admin no longer appears	N/A
10	Test resend invitation	Resend works for invited users	Resend icon
11	Verify all operations from same page	No navigation to other pages needed	N/A	Single page management

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All admin management operations (invite, edit, activate/deactivate, delete, resend) work from Organization Setup page
Secondary_Verifications: Status updates immediately, email notifications sent
Negative_Verification: No need to navigate away from Organization Setup page

AC5-8: Static Field Display Rules Test Cases

Test Case AC5-1: Verify Organization Name Static Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC5_TC_001
Title: AC5 - Verify system displays Organization Name as static text pre-filled during registration
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC5
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Organization Details Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-OrgDetails, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC5-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Organization with registered name

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization registered with name
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Organization Name: "Acme Corporation"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Details	Organization Details section loads	N/A
2	Locate Organization Name field	Field is visible and labeled	N/A
3	Verify Organization Name display	Shows "Acme Corporation" as text	Acme Corporation
4	Check field format	Displayed as static text, not input field	N/A	Non-editable format
5	Verify pre-filled indicator	Shows "Pre-filled from registration" note	N/A	Helpful context
6	Attempt to click on name	No edit cursor or interaction	N/A	Truly static
7	Check name consistency	Same name shown across all views	N/A	Consistency check
8	Verify name in page title/header	Organization name appears correctly	N/A	Additional display areas

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Organization Name displays as static text exactly as registered ("Acme Corporation")
Secondary_Verifications: Pre-filled indication shown, consistent across views
Negative_Verification: Organization Name field shows no edit capabilities

Test Case AC6-1: Verify Organization Name Cannot Be Edited

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC6_TC_001
Title: AC6 - Verify system prevents editing of Organization Name in view mode
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC6
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Field Edit Restrictions
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditRestrictions, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC6-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: UI framework, validation service
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Organization with registered name

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization setup in view mode
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Organization Name: "Acme Corporation"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Organization Details in view mode	Details displayed in view mode	N/A
2	Attempt to click Organization Name	No edit interaction possible	N/A
3	Right-click on Organization Name	No context menu for editing	N/A
4	Try keyboard shortcuts	No edit mode activation	Ctrl+E, F2, etc.
5	Check for edit icons near name	No edit/pencil icons present	N/A
6	Inspect field HTML structure	Field is div/span, not input element	Browser dev tools	Technical verification
7	Click Edit button for other fields	Other fields become editable, name remains static	N/A	Selective editing
8	Verify edit modal	Organization Name stays static in edit modal	N/A	Modal consistency

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Organization Name cannot be edited through any user interaction method
Secondary_Verifications: No edit indicators present, field remains static in edit mode
Negative_Verification: No workarounds exist to edit Organization Name

Test Case AC7-1: Verify Admin Email Static Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC7_TC_001
Title: AC7 - Verify system displays Admin Email as static text pre-filled during registration
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC7
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Organization Details Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-OrgDetails, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC7-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API, User management
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Organization with registered admin email

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization registered with admin email
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Admin Email: "admin@acmecorp.com"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Details	Organization Details section loads	N/A
2	Locate Admin Email field	Field is visible and properly labeled	N/A
3	Verify Admin Email display	Shows "admin@acmecorp.com" as text	admin@acmecorp.com
4	Check field format	Displayed as static text, not input field	N/A	Non-editable format
5	Verify pre-filled indicator	Shows "Pre-filled from registration" note	N/A	Helpful context
6	Check email format validation	Email displays in proper format	Valid email structure
7	Verify email consistency	Same email across platform references	N/A	Cross-reference check
8	Test long email display	Long emails display appropriately	N/A	UI handling

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Admin Email displays as static text exactly as registered ("admin@acmecorp.com")
Secondary_Verifications: Pre-filled indication shown, proper email format
Negative_Verification: Admin Email field shows no edit capabilities

Test Case AC8-1: Verify Admin Email Cannot Be Edited

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC8_TC_001
Title: AC8 - Verify system prevents editing of Admin Email in view mode
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC8
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Field Edit Restrictions
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditRestrictions, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC8-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: UI framework, security validation
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Organization with registered admin email

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization setup in view mode
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Admin Email: "admin@acmecorp.com"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	View Organization Details in view mode	Details displayed in view mode	N/A
2	Attempt to click Admin Email	No edit interaction possible	N/A
3	Right-click on Admin Email	No context menu for editing	N/A
4	Try keyboard navigation to email	Field cannot receive focus for editing	Tab navigation
5	Check for edit icons near email	No edit/pencil icons present	N/A
6	Inspect field HTML structure	Field is div/span, not input element	Browser dev tools	Technical verification
7	Click Edit button for other fields	Other fields become editable, email remains static	N/A	Selective editing
8	Verify security reasoning	Email tied to authentication security	N/A	Business rule validation

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Admin Email cannot be edited through any user interaction method
Secondary_Verifications: No edit indicators present, security implications considered
Negative_Verification: No workarounds exist to edit Admin Email in Organization Setup

AC9-13: Dynamic Field Display Rules Test Cases

Test Case AC9-1: Verify Contact Number Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC9_TC_001
Title: AC9 - Verify system displays saved Contact Number or "Not Set" if not provided
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC9
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dynamic Field Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC9-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without contact numbers

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Two test organizations (with/without contact)
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Org with contact: "+1 555 123 4567"
- Org without contact: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH contact number	Successfully logged in	Org with contact
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Contact Number display	Shows "+1 555 123 4567"	+1 555 123 4567	Saved number displayed
4	Check field formatting	Number formatted correctly	N/A	Proper phone format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT contact	Login to different organization	Org without contact
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Contact Number display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test international number format	Handles various phone formats	+44 20 7946 0958	International support
10	Verify consistent behavior	Same logic in edit mode view	N/A	Cross-mode consistency

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Contact Number shows actual number when saved, "Not Set" when empty
Secondary_Verifications: Proper formatting, visual styling distinction
Negative_Verification: Never shows empty/null values as text

Test Case AC10-1: Verify Country Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC10_TC_001
Title: AC10 - Verify system displays selected Country name or "Not Set" if not selected
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC10
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dynamic Field Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC10-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API, Country service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without country selection

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different country states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Org with country: "United States"
- Org without country: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH country selected	Successfully logged in	Org with country
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Country display	Shows "United States"	United States	Country name displayed
4	Check country name format	Full country name, not code	N/A	Human-readable format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT country	Login to different organization	Org without country
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Country display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various country names	Handles all country options	Canada, United Kingdom	International support
10	Verify country consistency	Same display logic across platform	N/A	Cross-platform check

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Country shows full country name when selected, "Not Set" when empty
Secondary_Verifications: Full country names (not codes), proper styling
Negative_Verification: Never shows country codes or empty values

Test Case AC11-1: Verify Currency Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC11_TC_001
Title: AC11 - Verify system displays selected Currency or "Not Set" if not selected
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC11
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dynamic Field Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC11-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API, Currency service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without currency selection

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different currency states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Org with currency: "USD - US Dollar"
- Org without currency: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH currency selected	Successfully logged in	Org with currency
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Currency display	Shows "USD - US Dollar"	USD - US Dollar	Full currency description
4	Check currency format	Code and name format displayed	N/A	"CODE - Name" format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT currency	Login to different organization	Org without currency
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Currency display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various currencies	Handles all currency options	EUR - Euro, GBP - British Pound	Multi-currency support
10	Verify setup blocking behavior	Cannot proceed if currency "Not Set"	N/A	Links to AC1

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Currency shows "CODE - Name" format when selected, "Not Set" when empty
Secondary_Verifications: Proper format display, setup validation integration
Negative_Verification: Never shows incomplete currency information

Test Case AC12-1: Verify Date Format Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC12_TC_001
Title: AC12 - Verify system displays selected Date Format or "Not Set" if not selected
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC12
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dynamic Field Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC12-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API, Date formatting service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without date format selection

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different date format states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Org with date format: "MM/DD/YYYY"
- Org without date format: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH date format selected	Successfully logged in	Org with date format
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Date Format display	Shows "MM/DD/YYYY"	MM/DD/YYYY	Date format pattern displayed
4	Check format representation	Shows actual format pattern	N/A	Clear format indication
5	Switch to org WITHOUT date format	Login to different organization	Org without date format
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Date Format display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various date formats	Handles all format options	DD/MM/YYYY, YYYY-MM-DD	Multi-format support
10	Verify setup blocking behavior	Cannot proceed if date format "Not Set"	N/A	Links to AC1

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Date Format shows actual pattern when selected, "Not Set" when empty
Secondary_Verifications: Clear format patterns, setup validation integration
Negative_Verification: Never shows unclear or ambiguous date format information

Test Case AC13-1: Verify Time Zone Display Logic

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC13_TC_001
Title: AC13 - Verify system displays selected Time Zone or "Not Set" if not selected
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC13
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dynamic Field Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DynamicFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC13-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Organization API, Timezone service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Organizations with and without timezone selection

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Test organizations with different timezone states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Org with timezone: "Eastern Time (UTC-5)"
- Org without timezone: null/empty

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to org WITH timezone selected	Successfully logged in	Org with timezone
2	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
3	Verify Time Zone display	Shows "Eastern Time (UTC-5)"	Eastern Time (UTC-5)	Full timezone with offset
4	Check timezone format	Name and UTC offset displayed	N/A	"Name (UTC±X)" format
5	Switch to org WITHOUT timezone	Login to different organization	Org without timezone
6	Navigate to Organization Details	Details section loads	N/A
7	Verify Time Zone display	Shows "Not Set"	Not Set	Default message
8	Check "Not Set" styling	Displayed in muted/gray style	N/A	Visual distinction
9	Test various timezones	Handles all timezone options	Pacific Time (UTC-8), CET (UTC+1)	Multi-timezone support
10	Verify setup blocking behavior	Cannot proceed if timezone "Not Set"	N/A	Links to AC1

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Time Zone shows "Name (UTC±X)" format when selected, "Not Set" when empty
Secondary_Verifications: Proper timezone format with UTC offset, setup validation integration
Negative_Verification: Never shows incomplete timezone information

AC14-19: Edit Mode Functionality Test Cases

Test Case AC14-1: Verify Edit Button Opens Edit Mode

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC14_TC_001
Title: AC14 - Verify system provides Edit button that opens Edit Mode screen for updates
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC14
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Edit Mode Functionality
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditMode, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC14-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: UI framework, Modal service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds modal load
Data_Requirements: Organization with existing data

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization setup with data
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Existing organization details

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Details	Details displayed in view mode	N/A
2	Locate Edit button	Edit button visible and accessible	N/A
3	Verify Edit button styling	Button properly styled and labeled	N/A	UI consistency
4	Click Edit button	Edit mode screen/modal opens	N/A
5	Verify modal load time	Modal opens within 2 seconds	N/A	Performance check
6	Check modal title	Shows "Organization Details"	N/A
7	Verify modal content	Contains all editable fields	N/A
8	Check Cancel functionality	Cancel button closes modal	N/A
9	Verify modal overlay	Proper modal overlay behavior	N/A
10	Test keyboard access	Edit button accessible via keyboard	Tab navigation	Accessibility

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Edit button successfully opens Edit Mode screen for updates
Secondary_Verifications: Proper modal behavior, performance under 2 seconds
Negative_Verification: Edit mode cannot be accessed without proper permissions

Test Case AC15-1: Verify Contact Number Optional in Edit Mode

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC15_TC_001
Title: AC15 - Verify system provides Contact Number as optional field in edit mode
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC15
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Edit Mode Fields
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EditMode, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC15-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Form validation, UI framework
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Organization in edit mode

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization setup access
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: N/A

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Organization Details edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Locate Contact Number field	Field visible and accessible	N/A
3	Check field label	No asterisk (*) or "required" indicator	N/A	Optional field indication
4	Leave Contact Number empty	No validation error shown	Empty field
5	Save with empty Contact Number	Save succeeds without error	N/A
6	Verify empty field display	Shows "Not Set" in view mode	N/A	Links to AC9
7	Add Contact Number	Field accepts valid phone number	+1 555 123 4567
8	Save with Contact Number	Save succeeds with phone number	N/A
9	Remove Contact Number	Can delete and leave empty	Delete content
10	Verify optional behavior	No required field validation triggered	N/A

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Contact Number is truly optional in edit mode (no required validation)
Secondary_Verifications: Proper visual indicators, save behavior works with/without
Negative_Verification: No required field errors for empty Contact Number

Test Case AC16-1: Verify Contact Number Accepts Only Numeric Characters

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC16_TC_001
Title: AC16 - Verify system accepts only numeric characters for Contact Number field
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC16
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Field Validation
Test Type: Functional/Validation
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Validation, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Validation, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC16-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Form validation service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
Data_Requirements: Edit mode access

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization edit mode access
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Various input test values

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Organization Details edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Click in Contact Number field	Field receives focus	N/A
3	Enter valid numeric characters	Characters accepted	1234567890
4	Enter plus sign for international	Plus sign accepted	+1234567890	International format
5	Enter spaces between numbers	Spaces accepted for formatting	+1 555 123 4567	Formatting allowed
6	Enter parentheses for area code	Parentheses accepted	(555) 123-4567	US format
7	Enter hyphens for formatting	Hyphens accepted	555-123-4567	Formatting allowed
8	Try to enter alphabetic characters	Characters rejected or prevented	abc	Should not accept
9	Try special characters	Special chars rejected (except allowed)	@#$%^&*	Should not accept
10	Verify allowed character set	Only numbers, +, -, (), spaces accepted	N/A	Complete validation

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Contact Number field accepts only numeric characters and phone formatting (+ - () spaces)
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time validation, proper error feedback
Negative_Verification: Alphabetic and invalid special characters rejected

Test Case AC17-1: Verify Contact Number Prevents Invalid Characters

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC17_TC_001
Title: AC17 - Verify system prevents entry of alphabets or special characters in Contact Number
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC17
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Input Prevention
Test Type: Functional/Validation
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-InputPrevention, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Validation, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC17-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Client-side validation, Form controls
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation response
Data_Requirements: Edit mode access

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization edit mode access
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Invalid character test sets

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Organization Details edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Focus on Contact Number field	Field active for input	N/A
3	Type alphabetic characters	Characters not entered/displayed	abcdefg	Prevention test
4	Type special characters	Characters not entered/displayed	!@#$%^&*	Prevention test
5	Copy-paste invalid text	Invalid characters filtered out	"Phone: abc123"	Should keep only "123"
6	Try keyboard shortcuts with letters	Letters prevented	Ctrl+a, letters
7	Test input method prevention	IME input properly handled	N/A	International keyboards
8	Verify error messaging	Clear feedback when invalid entry attempted	N/A	User guidance
9	Test mixed valid/invalid input	Only valid characters retained	"+1abc555def123"	Should become "+1555123"
10	Verify field masking	Field shows input mask or pattern	N/A	Input guidance

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: System actively prevents entry of alphabets and invalid special characters
Secondary_Verifications: Copy-paste filtering, clear user feedback
Negative_Verification: No method allows invalid characters to be entered

Test Case AC18-1: Verify Country Mandatory Field in Edit Mode

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC18_TC_001
Title: AC18 - Verify system provides Country as mandatory field in edit mode
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC18
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Required Field Validation
Test Type: Functional/Validation
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-RequiredFields, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Validation, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC18-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Form validation service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second validation
Data_Requirements: Edit mode access

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization edit mode access
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: N/A

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Organization Details edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Locate Country field	Field visible with dropdown	N/A
3	Check field label	Shows asterisk (*) or "required" indicator	N/A	Required field indication
4	Leave Country field unselected	Dropdown shows "Select Country" placeholder	N/A
5	Attempt to save without Country	Validation error prevents save	N/A
6	Verify error message	Clear error message displayed	"Country is required"	User guidance
7	Select a country	Field validation passes	United States
8	Save with Country selected	Save succeeds	N/A
9	Clear Country selection	Field returns to unselected state	N/A
10	Verify mandatory validation	Cannot save without Country selection	N/A

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Country field is mandatory and enforced with validation in edit mode
Secondary_Verifications: Clear required indicators, proper error messaging
Negative_Verification: Cannot save form without Country selection

Test Case AC19-1: Verify Country Selection from Dropdown

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC19_TC_001
Title: AC19 - Verify system requires Country selection from predefined dropdown list
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC19
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dropdown Validation
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-DropdownValidation, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC19-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Country service, Dropdown component
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds dropdown load
Data_Requirements: Country list data

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization edit mode access
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Country dropdown options

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Organization Details edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Click Country dropdown	Dropdown opens with country list	N/A
3	Verify dropdown options	Shows predefined list of countries	United States, Canada, etc.
4	Check dropdown load time	List loads within 2 seconds	N/A	Performance check
5	Verify no text input allowed	Cannot type custom country names	N/A	Dropdown only
6	Search within dropdown	Search/filter functionality works	Type "United"	If applicable
7	Select valid country	Selection works correctly	United States
8	Verify selection display	Selected country displayed properly	N/A
9	Try keyboard navigation	Arrow keys navigate options	Up/Down arrows	Accessibility
10	Verify complete country list	All major countries available	Check 20+ countries	Comprehensive list

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Country must be selected from predefined dropdown list only
Secondary_Verifications: Complete country list, search functionality, keyboard navigation
Negative_Verification: Cannot enter custom country names outside dropdown

AC20-26: Admin Management Display & Actions Test Cases

Test Case AC20-1: Verify Admin Name Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC20_TC_001
Title: AC20 - Verify system displays Name showing full name of each user
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC20
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Admin List Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-AdminDisplay, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC20-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User management API
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds list load
Data_Requirements: Multiple admin users

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Multiple admin users in system
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Admin 1: "Roshan Kumar"
- Admin 2: "John Doe Smith"
- Admin 3: "María José García"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Name column exists	"Name" column header visible	N/A
3	Check first admin name display	Shows complete "Roshan Kumar"	Roshan Kumar	Full name displayed
4	Check second admin name display	Shows complete "John Doe Smith"	John Doe Smith	Multiple names handled
5	Check international characters	Shows "María José García" correctly	María José García	Unicode support
6	Verify name truncation handling	Long names display appropriately	Test with 50+ character name	UI handling
7	Check name formatting	Names properly formatted (title case)	N/A	Consistent formatting
8	Verify sorting capability	Names can be sorted alphabetically	Click Name header	If applicable
9	Test name with special characters	Handles apostrophes, hyphens	O'Connor, Smith-Jones	Special character support
10	Verify name consistency	Same names across different views	N/A	Cross-view consistency

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Full names of all users displayed completely in Name column
Secondary_Verifications: Unicode support, proper formatting, UI handling of long names
Negative_Verification: Names never truncated unnecessarily or displayed incorrectly

Test Case AC21-1: Verify Admin Email Display with Hiding

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC21_TC_001
Title: AC21 - Verify system displays Email with partial hiding if email is long
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC21
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Email Display Logic
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-EmailDisplay, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC21-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: UI framework, Email display logic
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Admin users with various email lengths

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Admin users with short and long emails
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Short email: "admin@acmecorp.com"
- Long email: "verylongadministratoremailaddress@acmecorporation.com"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Email column exists	"Email" column header visible	N/A
3	Check short email display	Shows complete "admin@acmecorp.com"	admin@acmecorp.com	Full email visible
4	Check long email display	Shows truncated with ellipsis	verylongadmin...@acmecorp.com	Partial hiding applied
5	Verify ellipsis usage	"..." indicates truncation	N/A	Clear truncation indicator
6	Test hover functionality	Hover shows full email in tooltip	N/A	If implemented
7	Check responsive behavior	Email display adapts to screen size	N/A	Mobile/tablet view
8	Verify domain preservation	Domain part always visible	@acmecorp.com	Important part shown
9	Test click functionality	Click expands or shows full email	N/A	If implemented
10	Check column width handling	Email column width appropriate	N/A	UI optimization

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Long emails partially hidden with ellipsis, short emails shown completely
Secondary_Verifications: Domain visibility, hover/click functionality, responsive behavior
Negative_Verification: Email never completely hidden or unreadable

Test Case AC22-1: Verify Last Login Date Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC22_TC_001
Title: AC22 - Verify system displays Last Login showing date of last successful login
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC22
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Login Tracking Display
Test Type: Functional/Data
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-LoginTracking, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC22-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User activity tracking, Date formatting
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Admin users with login history

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Admin users with recent logins
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Recent login: "4/8/2025"
- Older login: "3/22/2025"

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Last Login column exists	"Last Login" column header visible	N/A
3	Check recent login display	Shows "4/8/2025" for recent login	4/8/2025	Date format as per org settings
4	Check older login display	Shows "3/22/2025" for older login	3/22/2025	Consistent date format
5	Verify date format consistency	Uses organization's date format setting	MM/DD/YYYY	Links to AC3
6	Check timezone consideration	Dates show in organization timezone	N/A	Timezone accuracy
7	Test today's login	Shows today's date for current login	Today's date	Real-time accuracy
8	Verify date sorting	Last Login column sortable by date	Click header	If applicable
9	Check date display format	Consistent date format across all entries	N/A	UI consistency
10	Test date localization	Date format follows locale settings	N/A	Internationalization

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Last Login displays actual date of last successful login in organization's date format
Secondary_Verifications: Timezone accuracy, date format consistency, sorting capability
Negative_Verification: No incorrect dates or timezone issues

Test Case AC23-1: Verify Last Login Never Logged Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC23_TC_001
Title: AC23 - Verify system displays blank or "Never" for Last Login if user never logged in
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC23
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Login Status Display
Test Type: Functional/Data
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-LoginStatus, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC23-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User activity tracking
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Admin users who never logged in

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Newly invited admin users
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Newly invited admin with no login history

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Invite new admin user	Invitation sent successfully	newuser@acmecorp.com
2	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads with new user	N/A
3	Locate newly invited user	User appears in admin list	N/A
4	Check Last Login column	Shows blank or "Never"	Blank or "Never"	No login history
5	Verify consistent display	All never-logged users show same format	N/A	Consistency check
6	Compare with logged users	Clear distinction from actual dates	N/A	Visual differentiation
7	Check after password setup	Still shows "Never" until actual login	N/A	Password setup ≠ login
8	Test multiple new users	All new users show same "Never" status	N/A	Bulk consistency
9	Verify styling	"Never" text styled appropriately	N/A	Visual design
10	Check sorting behavior	"Never" entries sort consistently	N/A	If sorting enabled

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Users who never logged in show blank or "Never" in Last Login column
Secondary_Verifications: Consistent display format, clear visual distinction
Negative_Verification: Never shows fake dates or null values for users who haven't logged in

Test Case AC24-1: Verify Admin Status Display

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC24_TC_001
Title: AC24 - Verify system displays Status showing activation status (Active, Inactive, Invited, Expired)
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC24
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Status Display
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-StatusDisplay, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC24-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User status tracking, UI components
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Admin users with different statuses

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Admin users in various states
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data:
- Active user
- Inactive user (toggled off)
- Invited user (not yet activated)
- Expired invitation user

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Status column exists	"Status" column header visible	N/A
3	Check Active user status	Shows "Active" badge/indicator	Green "Active" badge
4	Check Inactive user status	Shows "Inactive" badge/indicator	Gray "Inactive" badge
5	Check Invited user status	Shows "Invited" badge/indicator	Blue "Invited" badge
6	Check Expired user status	Shows "Expired" badge/indicator	Red "Expired" badge
7	Verify status badge styling	Each status has distinct visual styling	N/A	Color coding
8	Check status text clarity	Status text clearly readable	N/A	Accessibility
9	Test status real-time updates	Status changes immediately when toggled	Toggle user status
10	Verify status consistency	Status matches user's actual state	N/A	Data accuracy

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All four status types (Active, Inactive, Invited, Expired) display correctly with appropriate visual styling
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates, clear visual distinction, accessibility
Negative_Verification: Status never shows incorrect or ambiguous values

Test Case AC25-1: Verify Admin Actions Available

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC25_TC_001
Title: AC25 - Verify system provides Actions including Edit, Activate/Deactivate Toggle, Delete options
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC25
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Admin Actions
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-AdminActions, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, AC25-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User management API, UI framework
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds per action
Data_Requirements: Admin users for testing actions

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Multiple admin users available
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Test admin users for action testing

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Verify Actions column exists	"Actions" column header visible	N/A
3	Check Edit action (pencil icon)	Edit icon visible and clickable	N/A
4	Click Edit action	Opens edit mode for admin name	N/A
5	Verify Toggle switch present	Activate/Deactivate toggle visible	N/A
6	Test Toggle functionality	Toggle changes user status	Switch on/off
7	Check Delete action (trash icon)	Delete icon visible and clickable	N/A
8	Click Delete action	Shows confirmation dialog	N/A
9	Verify action icons consistency	All icons follow design guidelines	N/A	UI consistency
10	Test action performance	All actions respond within 2 seconds	N/A	Performance check
11	Check action availability	Actions available for appropriate users	N/A	Business logic
12	Verify action feedback	Clear feedback for each action	N/A	User experience

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Edit, Activate/Deactivate Toggle, and Delete actions available for all admin users
Secondary_Verifications: Proper icon design, performance under 2 seconds, confirmation dialogs
Negative_Verification: Actions not available for inappropriate user states

Test Case AC26-1: Verify Send Invitation Action for Expired Users

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC26_TC_001
Title: AC26 - Verify system provides Send Invitation action for users whose status is "Expired"
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC26
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Invitation Management
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-InvitationMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, AC26-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Email service, User management API
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds invitation send
Data_Requirements: Admin user with "Expired" status

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Admin user with expired invitation
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Expired admin user

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to System Admins list	Admin list loads successfully	N/A
2	Locate user with "Expired" status	Expired user visible in list	N/A
3	Check Actions for expired user	Send Invitation icon visible	N/A
4	Verify Send Invitation icon	Resend/send icon present and clickable	N/A
5	Click Send Invitation action	Invitation sending process starts	N/A
6	Verify processing feedback	Loading or processing indicator shown	N/A
7	Check success confirmation	Success message displayed	N/A
8	Verify email sent	New invitation email delivered	Check email
9	Check status update	User status may change from "Expired"	N/A	If applicable
10	Test multiple expired users	Action available for all expired users	N/A
11	Verify action not available for non-expired	Send Invitation only for expired users	N/A	Business logic
12	Check action performance	Invitation sent within 3 seconds	N/A	Performance requirement

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Send Invitation action available and functional for users with "Expired" status
Secondary_Verifications: Email delivery, performance under 3 seconds, status logic
Negative_Verification: Send Invitation action not available for non-expired users

Test Case AC27-1: Verify Outline Icons with Background Consistency

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC27_TC_001
Title: AC27 - Verify system uses outline icons with background consistent with design guidelines
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC27
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: UI Design Consistency
Test Type: UI/Visual
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: UI Testing
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-UIDesign, P3-Medium, Phase-UI, Type-Visual, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Low, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC27-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: UI framework, Icon library
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: UI elements with icons

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Access to design specifications
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: N/A

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page loads with various icons	N/A
2	Identify Edit icon (pencil)	Icon is outline style with background	N/A
3	Check Delete icon (trash)	Icon is outline style with background	N/A
4	Verify Toggle switch icons	Icons follow outline style	N/A
5	Check Resend invitation icon	Icon is outline style with background	N/A
6	Examine Settings/gear icons	Icons follow design guidelines	N/A
7	Verify icon consistency	All icons use same design language	N/A
8	Check icon backgrounds	Backgrounds consistent across elements	N/A
9	Test icon hover states	Hover effects follow design guidelines	N/A
10	Verify icon accessibility	Icons have proper contrast ratios	N/A	Accessibility compliance
11	Check icon sizing	All icons consistently sized	N/A
12	Compare with design mockups	Icons match provided design specs	N/A	Design fidelity

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All icons use outline style with consistent background design
Secondary_Verifications: Design guideline compliance, accessibility, hover states
Negative_Verification: No icons deviate from established design pattern

Test Case AC28-1: Verify Animation Implementation

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_AC28_TC_001
Title: AC28 - Verify system implements animations matching provided design specifications
Acceptance Criteria Reference: AC28
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Animation Implementation
Test Type: UI/Animation
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: UI Testing
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Animation, P3-Medium, Phase-UI, Type-Animation, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Low, Revenue-Impact-Low, AC28-Compliance

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: CSS animations, UI framework
Performance_Baseline: Smooth 60fps animations
Data_Requirements: Interactive UI elements

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Access to design animation specifications
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: N/A

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Organization Setup page	Page loads with animated elements	N/A
2	Observe page load animations	Elements animate in smoothly	N/A	Entry animations
3	Click Edit button	Modal opens with slide/fade animation	N/A	Modal animations
4	Interact with dropdown menus	Dropdowns open/close with animation	N/A	Interaction feedback
5	Test toggle switch animations	Switches animate smoothly when toggled	N/A	State change animations
6	Hover over interactive elements	Hover animations trigger appropriately	N/A	Feedback animations
7	Test button click animations	Buttons provide visual click feedback	N/A	User interaction feedback
8	Check progress indicator animations	Progress updates animate smoothly	N/A	Progress feedback
9	Verify loading state animations	Loading spinners/indicators animate	N/A	System state feedback
10	Test form validation animations	Error states animate appropriately	N/A	Validation feedback
11	Check animation performance	All animations run at 60fps	N/A	Performance requirement
12	Compare with design specs	Animations match provided specifications	N/A	Design fidelity

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All animations implemented match the provided design specifications
Secondary_Verifications: 60fps performance, smooth transitions, appropriate timing
Negative_Verification: No janky or inconsistent animations

SUPPORTING TEST CASES

API Validation Test Cases

Test Case API-1: Organization Settings API Endpoints

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_API_TC_001
Title: Verify Organization Settings API endpoints for CRUD operations
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Organization API
Test Type: API/Integration
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Backend, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Postman/API Client
Dependencies: Organization microservice, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response
Data_Requirements: Valid API tokens, test organization data

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: API access credentials
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin API access
Test_Data: Valid JWT token, organization ID

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	GET /api/organization/{id}	Returns organization details	org_id: acme_corp_123
2	Verify response structure	JSON contains all required fields	name, email, currency, etc.
3	Check response time	Response under 500ms	N/A	Performance requirement
4	PUT /api/organization/{id}/settings	Updates settings successfully	currency: "EUR"
5	Verify update response	Returns 200 status with updated data	HTTP 200, updated JSON
6	Test invalid currency code	Returns 400 with error message	currency: "INVALID"
7	Test missing required fields	Returns 400 validation error	Missing country field
8	Test unauthorized access	Returns 401 unauthorized	Invalid/expired token
9	Test malformed JSON	Returns 400 bad request	Invalid JSON syntax
10	GET updated settings	Confirms changes persisted	Verify EUR currency

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: API operations return correct status codes and data
Secondary_Verifications: Performance under 500ms, proper error handling
Negative_Verification: Invalid requests properly rejected with error codes

Test Case API-2: System Admin Management API

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_API_TC_002
Title: Verify System Admin management API endpoints
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Admin Management API
Test Type: API/Integration
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Backend, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Postman/API Client
Dependencies: User management service, Email service, Database
Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response
Data_Requirements: Valid API credentials, test user data

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	POST /api/admins/invite	Creates invitation successfully	email, fullName
2	Verify invitation response	Returns 201 with invitation details	HTTP 201, invitation_id
3	Check email trigger	Email service called successfully	Verify email queue
4	Test duplicate invitation	Returns 409 conflict error	Same email address
5	GET /api/admins	Returns admin list	N/A
6	Verify admin list structure	JSON array with admin objects	name, email, status, etc.
7	PUT /api/admins/{id}/status	Updates admin status	status: "inactive"
8	DELETE /api/admins/{id}	Removes admin successfully	admin_id
9	POST /api/admins/{id}/resend	Resends invitation	invitation_id
10	Test invalid admin ID	Returns 404 not found	non-existent ID

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All admin operations work correctly via API
Secondary_Verifications: Email integration works, performance under 500ms
Negative_Verification: Invalid operations return appropriate error codes

Performance Test Cases

Test Case PERF-1: Page Load Performance

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_PERF_TC_001
Title: Verify Organization Setup page loads within performance benchmarks
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: All platform services
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Realistic data load

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring tools
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Organization with multiple admins

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Clear browser cache	Cache cleared successfully	N/A	Clean test condition
2	Start performance timer	Timer started	N/A
3	Navigate to Organization Setup	Page begins loading	N/A
4	Measure page load time	Complete page load under 3 seconds	N/A	DOM ready + all resources
5	Verify all elements loaded	All UI components rendered	N/A
6	Test with slow connection	Page loads within acceptable time	Throttle to 3G
7	Monitor API response times	All API calls under 500ms	N/A
8	Check resource optimization	Images/assets optimized	N/A	File sizes reasonable

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Page loads completely under 3 seconds
Secondary_Verifications: All API calls under 500ms, resources optimized
Negative_Verification: No timeouts or failed resource loads

Test Case PERF-2: Admin List Load Performance

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_PERF_TC_002
Title: Verify System Admin list loads efficiently with multiple users
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: User management API
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds list load
Data_Requirements: 20+ admin users

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Multiple admin users (20+)
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Large admin list

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to admin list section	List loading begins	N/A
2	Measure list load time	List loads under 2 seconds	20+ admins
3	Verify all admin data loaded	All fields populated correctly	N/A
4	Test pagination if applicable	Pagination works smoothly	N/A
5	Check sorting performance	Sorting operations under 1 second	N/A
6	Test filtering performance	Filtering responds quickly	N/A
7	Verify memory usage	No memory leaks during operations	N/A
8	Test with 50+ admins	Performance remains acceptable	50+ admins	Scalability test

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Admin list loads under 2 seconds regardless of size
Secondary_Verifications: Smooth interactions, no memory issues
Negative_Verification: No performance degradation with larger lists

Security Test Cases

Test Case SEC-1: Authentication and Authorization

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_SEC_TC_001
Title: Verify proper authentication and authorization for Organization Setup
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Security
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Authentication service, Authorization service
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Valid and invalid user credentials

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Different user role accounts
User_Roles_Permissions: Various role access levels
Test_Data: System Admin, Regular User, Invalid credentials

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access setup page without login	Redirected to login page	N/A
2	Login as regular user	Access denied to setup page	regular@acmecorp.com
3	Login as System Admin	Access granted to setup page	admin@acmecorp.com
4	Test session timeout	Redirected to login after timeout	N/A	Wait for session expiry
5	Test invalid session token	Access denied, redirected to login	Manipulated token
6	Verify CSRF protection	Forms protected against CSRF	N/A
7	Test SQL injection attempts	Inputs properly sanitized	'; DROP TABLE users; --
8	Check XSS prevention	Script inputs properly escaped	<script>alert('xss')</script>

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Only authorized System Admins can access setup
Secondary_Verifications: Session management works, inputs sanitized
Negative_Verification: Unauthorized access attempts properly blocked

Test Case SEC-2: Input Validation Security

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_SEC_TC_002
Title: Verify input validation prevents security vulnerabilities
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Input Security
Test Type: Security/Validation
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-InputSecurity, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Input validation service
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Malicious input test cases

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Organization edit mode access
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: Security test payloads

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open organization edit mode	Edit modal opens	N/A
2	Test XSS in organization name	Script tags rejected/escaped	<script>alert('xss')</script>
3	Test SQL injection in contact	SQL commands rejected	'; DROP TABLE contacts; --
4	Test admin name XSS	Malicious scripts prevented	<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
5	Test admin email injection	Invalid emails rejected	admin@evil.com<script>
6	Test LDAP injection	Special characters escaped	admin)(uid=)
7	Test path traversal	Directory traversal prevented	../../etc/passwd
8	Test buffer overflow	Long inputs handled safely	10000+ character string
9	Test special character handling	Unicode/special chars safe	ÄÖÜ, 中文, Émojis 🎯
10	Verify error handling	No sensitive info in errors	N/A

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: All malicious inputs properly sanitized or rejected
Secondary_Verifications: No sensitive information leaked in errors
Negative_Verification: No security vulnerabilities exploitable through inputs

Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

Test Case EDGE-1: Email Service Failure Handling

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_EDGE_TC_001
Title: Verify system behavior when email service is unavailable
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Error Handling
Test Type: Integration/Error Handling
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-ErrorHandling, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Error-Handling, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Email service (intentionally unavailable)
Performance_Baseline: N/A
Data_Requirements: Valid invitation data

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Ability to simulate email service failure
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: johndoe@acmecorp.com, John Doe

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Simulate email service downtime	Email service unavailable	N/A	Network/service disruption
2	Attempt to invite new admin	System shows appropriate error message	johndoe@acmecorp.com
3	Verify user not created	User not added to database	N/A	Rollback behavior
4	Check error message clarity	Clear, user-friendly error message	N/A	"Email service temporarily unavailable"
5	Test retry mechanism	Option to retry invitation provided	N/A
6	Restore email service	Service becomes available	N/A
7	Retry failed invitation	Invitation succeeds after retry	Same data
8	Verify no duplicate entries	Only one invitation record created	N/A

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: Graceful error handling when email service fails
Secondary_Verifications: No data corruption, retry functionality works
Negative_Verification: Failed invitations don't create partial records

Test Case EDGE-2: Concurrent Admin Operations

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_EDGE_TC_002
Title: Verify system handles concurrent admin operations safely
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Concurrency
Test Type: Concurrency/Data Integrity
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Concurrency, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Concurrency, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (multiple instances)
Dependencies: Database, all APIs
Performance_Baseline: No data corruption
Data_Requirements: Multiple admin accounts

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Multiple System Admin accounts
User_Roles_Permissions: Multiple System Admin users
Test_Data: admin1@acmecorp.com, admin2@acmecorp.com

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login with two admins simultaneously	Both users logged in successfully	admin1, admin2	Different browsers
2	Both edit same organization settings	Proper conflict resolution	N/A
3	Both invite admins simultaneously	Both invitations processed correctly	Different emails
4	Both modify same admin user	Last save wins or proper conflict handling	Edit same admin
5	Check data consistency	No data corruption occurred	N/A	Database integrity
6	Verify audit logs	All actions properly logged	N/A	Activity tracking

Verification Points:

Primary_Verification: No data corruption with concurrent operations
Secondary_Verifications: Proper conflict resolution, audit trails maintained
Negative_Verification: No lost updates or race conditions

Test Case EDGE-3: Browser Session Edge Cases

Test Case ID: ONB01US01_EDGE_TC_003
Title: Verify proper handling of browser session edge cases
Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Session Management
Test Type: Session/Browser Testing
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: MOD-SessionMgmt, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Session, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low

Test Environment:

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Session management service
Performance_Baseline: Proper session handling
Data_Requirements: Valid user session

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Session timeout configured
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
Test_Data: admin@acmecorp.com

Test Procedure:

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login and start editing organization	Session established	admin@acmecorp.com
2	Leave session idle for timeout	Session expires gracefully	N/A	Security timeout
3	Try to save after timeout	Redirected to login with message	N/A
4	Test browser refresh during edit	Handles refresh appropriately	N/A
5	Test browser back button	Navigation handled correctly	N# Smart Organization Setup - Acceptance Criteria Aligned Test Cases (ONB01US01)

Test Case Summary Overview

Direct Acceptance Criteria Test Cases (56 cases)

AC1-4: Setup Flow & Progress Tracking (8 test cases)
AC5-8: Static Field Display Rules (8 test cases)
AC9-13: Dynamic Field Display Rules (10 test cases)
AC14-19: Edit Mode Functionality (12 test cases)
AC20-26: Admin Management Display & Actions (14 test cases)
AC27-28: UI Design Consistency (4 test cases)

Supporting Test Cases (36 cases)

API Validation (8 test cases)
Performance Testing (6 test cases)
Security Testing (8 test cases)
Edge Cases & Error Scenarios (14 test cases)