O & M--Schedules Management (AX03US04)

SMART360 Asset Failure Reporting System - Test Cases

User Story: AX05US01 - Asset Failure Management

---

Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

1. Failure Reporting Dashboard - Real-time metrics and failure overview
2. Mobile-First Failure Reporting - GPS-enabled asset identification and reporting
3. Asset Identification Methods - Location-based, map-based, and manual search
4. Failure Classification - Priority-based classification with service impact
5. Documentation and Evidence - Photo/video uploads and comprehensive notes
6. Automated Workflow - Service order generation and status tracking
7. Notification System - Real-time alerts for critical failures

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

1. Performance - Mobile responsiveness, GPS accuracy, load handling
2. Security - Role-based access, data protection, audit trails
3. Compatibility - Mobile device support, offline capabilities
4. Usability - Field-friendly interface, error handling
5. Integration - Work order system, asset registry, notification services

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

1. Offline Operations - Mobile functionality without network connectivity
2. GPS Accuracy - Location services in various environmental conditions
3. File Upload Limits - Large file handling and storage constraints
4. Data Validation - Invalid inputs and boundary conditions

---

Test Case 1: Failure Dashboard Overview (Happy Path)

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_001
• Title: Validate failure dashboard displays real-time metrics and failure list
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Happy-Path, Dashboard, Real-Time, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Happy-Path

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 90%
• Integration_Points: Database, Real-Time-Updates, Dashboard-Metrics
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Critical, Real-Time-Performance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC1, AC12
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_002, AX05US01_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Asset database, failure reporting system, real-time metrics service
• Performance_Baseline: Page load < 3 seconds, metrics refresh every 5 minutes
• Data_Requirements: Sample failure data, various statuses and priorities

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: User authenticated with Asset Manager role
• User_Roles_Permissions: Dashboard access permissions enabled
• Test_Data:
• • Active failures: 12 total, 3 critical, 8 awaiting action
  • Average resolution time: 4.2 hours
  • Recent failures with various priorities and statuses
• Prior_Test_Cases: Login successful (AX01US01_TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Field Alerts > Failures	Dashboard loads with metrics section	N/A	Main dashboard access
2	Verify "Total Open Failures" metric	Shows count of non-closed failures	COUNT(failures WHERE status NOT IN ('Closed', 'Resolved')) = 12	Currently unresolved
3	Verify "Critical Failures (24h)" metric	Shows critical failures from last 24 hours	COUNT(failures WHERE priority='Critical' AND reported_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL 1 DAY) = 3	Reported today
4	Verify "Awaiting Action" metric	Shows failures needing attention	COUNT(failures WHERE status IN ('New', 'Pending Action', 'Needs Attention')) = 8	Need attention
5	Verify "Avg Resolution Time" metric	Shows last 30 days average	AVG(resolved_date - reported_date WHERE resolved_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL 30 DAYS) = 4.2 hours	Last 30 days
6	Check dashboard auto-refresh	Metrics update every 5 minutes	Timer verification	Auto-refresh functionality
7	Verify "Report New Failure" button	Button visible and accessible	N/A	Primary action availability
8	Check failures table headers	Correct column headers displayed	Failure ID, Asset ID/Name, Location, etc.	Table structure
9	Verify failure ID format	IDs follow FAIL-YYYY-### pattern	FAIL-2025-004	ID format validation
10	Check priority color coding	Priorities show correct colored badges	Critical=Red, High=Orange, etc.	Visual indicators
11	Check status color coding	Status badges properly color-coded	Status-specific colors	Status visualization
12	Verify failure description truncation	Long descriptions truncated with "..."	50 character limit	Text formatting
13	Test description hover tooltip	Full text appears on hover	Complete description	Tooltip functionality
14	Check actions dropdown	Three-dot menu with Edit, Comment, etc.	Standard action options	Action availability
15	Verify timestamp format	Date/time in YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format	Consistent formatting	Time display

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays accurate real-time failure metrics and properly formatted failure list
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • All metrics reflect current database state
  • Color coding follows business rules
  • Auto-refresh functionality works
  • Table formatting meets specifications
• Negative_Verification: No incorrect metrics displayed, no UI rendering issues

---

Test Case 2: Mobile Failure Reporting with GPS Asset Search

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_002
• Title: Test mobile failure reporting using GPS-based asset identification
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Mobile, GPS, Asset-Identification, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Mobile, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Integration-GPS

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 85%
• Integration_Points: GPS, Mobile-Interface, Asset-Database, Location-Services
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Mobile-Testing, GPS-Integration, Field-Operations
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC2, AC3, AC4, AC14
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_001, AX05US01_TC_003

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Mobile Safari iOS 16+, Mobile Chrome Android 13+
• Device/OS: iPhone 14, Samsung Galaxy S23
• Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667
• Dependencies: GPS services, mobile-optimized interface, asset database with GPS coordinates
• Performance_Baseline: GPS scan < 10 seconds, form submission < 5 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Assets with GPS coordinates within 500m test radius

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Mobile device with GPS enabled, field technician credentials
• User_Roles_Permissions: Field Force Technician role with reporting permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Test location with nearby assets: Water Treatment Plant
  • Assets within 500m: P-045 (100m), V-789 (250m), H-123 (400m)
  • GPS coordinates: 40.7128° N, 74.0060° W
• Prior_Test_Cases: Mobile authentication successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access failures page on mobile	Mobile-optimized interface loads	Mobile browser	Responsive design
2	Tap "Report New Failure" button	Failure reporting form opens	N/A	Mobile navigation
3	Verify unique failure ID generation	New ID in FAIL-YYYY-### format	Auto-generated	ID creation
4	Check asset identification dropdown	Three methods available	GPS, Map, Manual options	Method selection
5	Select "Search Assets in My Location"	GPS location method selected	GPS option	GPS method selection
6	Tap "Scan for Nearby Assets" button	GPS location request prompt	Location permission	GPS activation
7	Grant location permissions	GPS scanning initiated	Allow location access	Permission handling
8	Wait for GPS scan completion	Nearby assets displayed in table	500m radius search	GPS search results
9	Verify assets sorted by distance	Closest assets appear first	P-045 (100m) first	Distance sorting
10	Check asset information display	Asset ID, name, distance shown	Complete asset details	Data presentation
11	Select asset P-045	Asset selection registered	P-045 selected	Asset selection
12	Verify selected asset display	"Selected Assets" section populated	"P-045 - Main Pump Station A"	Selection confirmation
13	Select failure priority	Priority dropdown functional	"Critical" selected	Priority assignment
14	Choose failure mode	Failure mode dropdown works	"Bearing Failure"	Mode classification
15	Enter failure description	Text area accepts input on mobile	Detailed description	Mobile text input
16	Select observed symptoms	Multi-select checkboxes work	"Unusual Noise", "Vibration"	Symptom selection
17	Set failure date/time	Date/time picker functional on mobile	Current timestamp	Date/time handling
18	Test photo upload	Camera/gallery access works	Take/select photo	Mobile photo upload
19	Submit failure report	Submission successful, confirmation shown	Unique failure ID returned	Form submission
20	Verify service order auto-creation	Critical failure triggers service order	SO-YYYY-### created	Workflow automation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Mobile GPS-based asset identification works accurately and failure reporting completes successfully
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • GPS accuracy within acceptable range (±50m)
  • Mobile interface fully functional
  • Photo upload works on mobile devices
  • Service order auto-creation triggers
• Negative_Verification: No GPS errors, mobile interface responsive, no form submission failures

---

Test Case 3: Manual Asset Search and Selection

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_003
• Title: Validate manual asset search functionality with filtering and selection
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Asset-Search, Manual-Selection, Database-Integration, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 80%
• Integration_Points: Asset-Database, Search-Engine, Filter-System
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Search-Functionality, Database-Integration, User-Experience
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC3, AC4
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_002, AX05US01_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 116+
• Device/OS: Windows 11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Asset registry database, search indexing service
• Performance_Baseline: Search results < 2 seconds, filter application < 1 second
• Data_Requirements: Comprehensive asset database with various asset types, facilities, networks

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Asset database populated with test data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Asset search permissions enabled
• Test_Data:
• • Search terms: "Pump", "P-045", "Main Station"
  • Filter options: Facility types, Network systems
  • Expected results with condition and risk scores
• Prior_Test_Cases: Failure reporting form loaded

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Select "Manual Search by ID/Name"	Manual search interface appears	Manual option selected	Search method selection
2	Enter partial asset ID	Search suggestions appear	"P-0"	Partial matching
3	Verify search results display	Table shows matching assets	Asset details table	Search results format
4	Check search result columns	Correct columns displayed	Asset ID, Name, System, Facility, Location, Scores	Table structure
5	Test search by asset name	Name-based search works	"Main Pump"	Name search capability
6	Apply facility filter	Results filtered by facility	"Water Treatment" facility	Facility filtering
7	Apply network/system filter	Results filtered by network	"Distribution" system	Network filtering
8	Apply location filter	Geographic filtering works	Specific region	Location-based filtering
9	Verify combined filters	Multiple filters work together	All filters applied	Filter combination
10	Check condition score display	Color-coded condition scores	IF score >= 76 THEN 'Green' ELSE IF score >= 51 THEN 'Yellow' ELSE 'Red'	Condition visualization
11	Check risk score display	Color-coded risk scores	IF score <= 25 THEN 'Green' ELSE IF score <= 50 THEN 'Yellow' ELSE IF score <= 75 THEN 'Orange' ELSE 'Red'	Risk visualization
12	Test asset selection	Single asset can be selected	Radio button selection	Selection mechanism
13	Verify "Selected Assets" update	Selection appears in confirmation section	"P-045 - Main Pump Station A"	Selection confirmation
14	Test selection change	Can change selected asset	Different asset selected	Selection modification
15	Clear search filters	Reset button clears all filters	All filters cleared	Filter reset
16	Test empty search results	"No assets found" message	Invalid search term	Empty results handling
17	Verify asset details accuracy	Selected asset data accurate	Cross-reference with database	Data accuracy

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Manual asset search functions correctly with accurate filtering and selection capabilities
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Search performance within acceptable limits
  • Filter combinations work properly
  • Asset scoring displays correctly
  • Selection mechanism functions properly
• Negative_Verification: Invalid searches handled gracefully, no incorrect asset selection

---

Test Case 4: Failure Classification and Priority Assignment

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_004
• Title: Validate failure priority assignment and classification business rules
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Priority-Assignment, Business-Rules, Classification, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 95%
• Integration_Points: Business-Rules-Engine, Priority-Logic, Classification-System
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Priority-Management
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC5, AC6, AC9, AC10
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_002, AX05US01_TC_005

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Business rules engine, failure classification database
• Performance_Baseline: Priority assignment < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Failure mode catalog, symptom database, priority definitions

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Business rules configured, failure classification system operational
• User_Roles_Permissions: Priority assignment permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Priority levels: Critical, High, Medium, Low
  • Failure modes: Bearing Failure, Seal Leak, Electrical Fault, etc.
  • Symptoms: Unusual Noise, Vibration, Leak, etc.
• Prior_Test_Cases: Asset selected, basic failure form loaded

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open priority dropdown	Four priority levels displayed	Critical, High, Medium, Low	Priority options
2	Verify priority color coding	Correct colors for each priority	Critical=Red, High=Orange, etc.	Visual indicators
3	Select "Critical" priority	Priority selection registered	Critical priority	High-impact selection
4	Check priority help text	Guidance displayed for Critical	"Immediate service impact"	Priority guidance
5	Open failure mode dropdown	Predefined failure modes available	Bearing Failure, Seal Leak, etc.	Mode options
6	Select failure mode	Mode selection registered	"Bearing Failure"	Mode classification
7	Enter failure description	Text validation (20-1000 chars)	Detailed description (>20 chars)	Description validation
8	Test minimum character validation	Error for <20 characters	LEN(description) < 20 → VALIDATION_ERROR("Minimum 20 characters required")	Minimum validation
9	Test maximum character validation	Error for >1000 characters	LEN(description) > 1000 → VALIDATION_ERROR("Maximum 1000 characters allowed")	Maximum validation
10	Open observed symptoms	Multi-select checkboxes available	Various symptom options	Symptom selection
11	Select multiple symptoms	Multiple selections allowed	"Unusual Noise", "Vibration"	Multi-select capability
12	Set failure date/time	Date/time picker functional	Current timestamp	Time setting
13	Test future date restriction	Future dates not allowed	Tomorrow's date	Date validation
14	Verify auto service order trigger	Critical priority triggers SO creation	Service order generated	Automation rule
15	Test priority-based routing	Critical failures route to O&M Manager	Notification sent	Routing logic
16	Add additional notes	Optional field functional	Contextual information	Additional documentation
17	Verify priority consistency	Same failure type suggests same priority	Consistent recommendations	Priority guidance

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Failure classification follows business rules and priority assignment triggers appropriate workflows
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Input validation works correctly
  • Service order auto-creation functions
  • Priority-based routing operational
  • Help text provides clear guidance
• Negative_Verification: Invalid inputs rejected, future dates blocked, required fields enforced

---

Test Case 5: Photo and Video Upload Documentation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_005
• Title: Test photo and video upload functionality with file validation and storage
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: File-Upload, Documentation, Mobile, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Both, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Support
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 85%
• Integration_Points: File-Storage, Mobile-Camera, Content-Validation
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: File-Management, Mobile-Functionality, Storage-Systems
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC8
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_002, AX05US01_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+ (desktop), Mobile Safari/Chrome
• Device/OS: Windows 11, iOS 16+, Android 13+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Mobile-375x667
• Dependencies: File storage service, image processing, video handling
• Performance_Baseline: Upload < 30 seconds per 10MB file
• Data_Requirements: Test media files of various formats and sizes

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: File storage operational, camera permissions available
• User_Roles_Permissions: File upload permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Valid files: pump_failure.jpg (5MB), bearing_noise.mp4 (8MB)
  • Invalid files: large_video.mov (60MB), document.pdf
  • Supported formats: JPG, PNG, GIF, MP4, MOV, AVI
• Prior_Test_Cases: Failure form in progress, basic details entered

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Photos/Videos section	Upload section displayed	N/A	Section availability
2	Click "Choose Files" button	File selection dialog opens	N/A	File picker activation
3	Select valid JPG image	File selected for upload	pump_failure.jpg (5MB)	Image file selection
4	Verify upload progress indicator	Progress bar shows upload status	Visual progress	Upload feedback
5	Confirm successful upload	File appears with thumbnail	Thumbnail and metadata	Upload completion
6	Test multiple file selection	Multiple files can be selected	3 files simultaneously	Batch upload
7	Upload valid MP4 video	Video file uploaded successfully	bearing_noise.mp4 (8MB)	Video upload
8	Test file size validation	10MB limit enforced per file	FILE_SIZE <= 10,485,760 bytes (10MB × 1024² bytes/MB)	Size validation
9	Test oversized file rejection	Files >10MB rejected	FILE_SIZE > 10,485,760 bytes → REJECT("File too large")	Size limit enforcement
10	Test total size limit	50MB total limit enforced	SUM(all_file_sizes) <= 52,428,800 bytes (50MB × 1024²)	Total size validation
11	Test unsupported format	PDF files rejected	document.pdf	Format validation
12	Verify supported formats	All specified formats accepted	JPG, PNG, GIF, MP4, MOV, AVI	Format acceptance
13	Test mobile camera integration	Camera opens from mobile device	Mobile device testing	Camera functionality
14	Take photo with mobile camera	Photo captured and uploaded	Mobile camera photo	Mobile integration
15	Verify file metadata display	Filename, size, upload time shown	Complete metadata	Metadata presentation
16	Test file download	Uploaded files can be downloaded	Download functionality	File retrieval
17	Test file deletion	Files can be removed before submission	Delete capability	File management
18	Verify thumbnail generation	Images show thumbnail previews	Visual thumbnails	Preview generation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Photo and video uploads work correctly with proper validation and storage
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • File size and format validation effective
  • Mobile camera integration functional
  • Metadata properly captured and displayed
  • File management operations work
• Negative_Verification: Invalid formats rejected, size limits enforced, no upload failures

---

Test Case 6: Offline Mobile Functionality

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_006
• Title: Validate offline mobile functionality with data synchronization when connectivity restored
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: Integration
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Offline, Mobile, Synchronization, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Mobile, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Integration-Offline

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: Medium
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 70%
• Integration_Points: Offline-Storage, Data-Sync, Mobile-App, Network-Detection
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Mobile-Functionality, Offline-Capabilities, Data-Synchronization
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC14
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_002, AX05US01_TC_005

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Mobile Safari iOS 16+, Mobile Chrome Android 13+
• Device/OS: iPhone 14, Samsung Galaxy S23
• Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667
• Dependencies: Offline storage system, data synchronization service
• Performance_Baseline: Offline storage < 2 seconds, sync completion < 30 seconds
• Data_Requirements: Offline-capable failure reporting interface

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Mobile app installed, offline functionality enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: Field technician with offline reporting permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Test failure data for offline entry
  • Sample photos for offline upload
  • Network connectivity controls
• Prior_Test_Cases: Mobile authentication completed

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data & Formula	Comments
1	Access mobile app with connectivity	Normal online functionality confirmed	Network status = "Connected"	Baseline functionality
2	Disable device network connectivity	Offline mode indicator appears	network_status = 'Offline' → SHOW_OFFLINE_INDICATOR()	Offline detection
3	Start new failure report offline	Form loads with offline capabilities	offline_mode = true → ENABLE_LOCAL_STORAGE()	Offline functionality
4	Complete asset identification offline	GPS and cached assets available	cached_assets = SELECT * FROM local_asset_cache WHERE distance <= 500m	Offline asset access
5	Fill out failure details offline	Form accepts all inputs locally	form_data_stored = localStorage.setItem('draft_failure', JSON.stringify(data))	Offline data entry
6	Take photos while offline	Camera functions and stores locally	photo_storage = indexedDB.store('offline_photos', photo_blob)	Offline media capture
7	Submit failure report offline	Report saved to local storage with pending status	status = 'Pending_Sync' AND local_queue_size = local_queue_size + 1	Local storage capability
8	Verify offline confirmation	Confirmation shows sync pending status	"Report saved. Will sync when online."	Offline feedback
9	Create second failure offline	Multiple offline reports supported	offline_queue_count = COUNT(local_failures WHERE sync_status = 'Pending')	Multiple offline entries
10	Check offline report queue	Pending reports visible in queue interface	Queue shows 2 reports with timestamps	Offline queue management
11	Re-enable network connectivity	Connectivity restored, auto-sync triggers	network_status = 'Connected' → TRIGGER_AUTO_SYNC()	Connectivity restoration
12	Monitor sync progress	Progress indicator shows sync status	sync_progress = (completed_syncs / total_pending) × 100%	Sync monitoring
13	Verify successful data sync	Reports uploaded to server successfully	sync_success_rate = successful_uploads / total_attempts = 100%	Sync completion
14	Check server-side data persistence	Offline reports appear in online dashboard	SELECT COUNT(*) FROM failures WHERE created_offline = true	Data persistence
15	Verify photo sync with reports	Photos uploaded and linked correctly	photo_sync_size = SUM(photo_file_sizes) WHERE failure_id IN (offline_reports)	Media synchronization
16	Test draft persistence during offline	Drafts saved every 30 seconds while offline	auto_save_interval = 30000ms → localStorage.setItem('draft', form_data)	Draft management
17	Verify conflict resolution	No data conflicts during sync	conflict_resolution = 'client_wins' WHERE created_offline = true	Conflict handling

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Mobile application functions completely offline and synchronizes all data correctly when connectivity is restored
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Offline storage works reliably for forms and media
  • Multiple reports can be queued offline without data loss
  • Auto-sync triggers immediately on connectivity restoration
  • Draft auto-save functions offline every 30 seconds
• Negative_Verification: No data loss during network transitions, no sync conflicts or duplicate entries

Test Case 7: Critical Failure Notifications and Real-Time Alerts

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_007
• Title: Validate immediate notification system for critical failures with multi-channel delivery
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Critical-Alerts, Notifications, Real-Time, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration, Platform-Both, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Integration-Notifications

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 90%
• Integration_Points: Notification-Service, Email-System, SMS-Gateway, Push-Notifications, Dashboard-Alerts
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Critical-Alerts, Communication-Systems, SLA-Management, Real-Time-Performance
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC10
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_004, AX05US01_TC_008, AX05US01_TC_011

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+ (desktop), Mobile Safari/Chrome
• Device/OS: Windows 11, iOS 16+, Android 13+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Mobile-375x667
• Dependencies: Notification service, email server, SMS gateway, push notification service, real-time dashboard
• Performance_Baseline: Notifications delivered within 60 seconds, 99.5% delivery success rate
• Data_Requirements: O&M Manager contact information, notification preferences, escalation rules

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: All notification services operational, communication channels configured and tested
• User_Roles_Permissions: Field technician (reporter), O&M Manager (primary recipient), Asset Manager (secondary)
• Test_Data:
• • O&M Manager: manager@utility.com, (555) 987-6543
  • Asset Manager: assets@utility.com, (555) 123-7890
  • Critical failure scenario: Main transformer failure at water treatment plant
• Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication and failure creation functional

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data & Formula	Comments
1	Report critical priority failure	Critical failure submitted successfully	priority = 'Critical' AND asset_criticality = 'High'	Critical failure creation
2	Verify immediate email notification	Email sent to O&M Manager within 60 seconds	email_delay = email_sent_time - failure_submitted_time <= 60 seconds	Email alert delivery
3	Check email content and formatting	Email contains complete failure details	Email includes: Failure ID, Asset ID, Location, Description, Photos	Email content validation
4	Verify SMS notification delivery	SMS sent to configured phone numbers	sms_recipients = SELECT phone FROM users WHERE role = 'O&M_Manager' AND sms_enabled = true	SMS alert delivery
5	Check SMS content optimization	SMS contains essential info within character limits	SMS_LENGTH <= 160 characters AND includes (Failure_ID, Asset, Priority, Location)	SMS format validation
6	Verify real-time dashboard alert	Dashboard shows critical failure banner	dashboard_alert_visible = true WHERE failure_priority = 'Critical'	Dashboard notification
7	Test push notification delivery	Mobile push notifications sent to relevant users	push_notification_sent = true WHERE user_role IN ('O&M_Manager', 'Field_Supervisor')	Push notification delivery
8	Verify multi-recipient notification	All stakeholders receive appropriate alerts	notification_count = COUNT(notifications) WHERE failure_id = current_failure	Multi-recipient handling
9	Test escalation workflow timing	Secondary notifications after 15 minutes no response	IF response_time > 900 seconds THEN SEND(escalation_notifications)	Escalation mechanism
10	Verify notification preferences compliance	Users receive only preferred notification types	notification_channels = SELECT preferred_channels FROM user_preferences WHERE user_id = recipient	Preference compliance
11	Check notification audit trail	All notification attempts logged with results	notification_log = INSERT INTO notification_history (failure_id, recipient, channel, status, timestamp)	Audit compliance
12	Test notification retry mechanism	Failed notifications automatically retried	retry_count = CASE WHEN delivery_failed THEN retry_count + 1 ELSE 0 END	Retry logic
13	Verify service order auto-notification	SO creation triggers additional notifications	IF service_order_created THEN NOTIFY(assigned_technician, dispatcher)	Workflow notification
14	Test notification delivery rate SLA	99.5% delivery success rate maintained	delivery_success_rate = (successful_deliveries / total_attempts) × 100% >= 99.5%	SLA validation
15	Verify emergency contact escalation	Critical failures trigger emergency contact list	emergency_contacts = SELECT * FROM emergency_contacts WHERE failure_priority = 'Critical'	Emergency escalation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Critical failures trigger immediate multi-channel notifications to all relevant stakeholders within SLA timeframes
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • All notification channels function correctly (email, SMS, push, dashboard)
  • Content is appropriate and complete for each channel type
  • Escalation workflows activate when response times exceed thresholds
  • Delivery success rates meet SLA requirements (99.5%)
• Negative_Verification: No missed critical notifications, no duplicate alerts, no delivery to unauthorized recipients

---

Test Case 8: Automated Service Order Generation and Integration

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_008
• Title: Test automatic service order creation for Critical and High priority failures with workflow integration
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Service-Orders, Automation, Workflow, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Integration-WorkOrder

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 85%
• Integration_Points: Work-Order-System, Asset-Database, Priority-Logic, Resource-Assignment
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, Workflow-Automation, Service-Operations, Resource-Management
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC9, AC16
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_004, AX05US01_TC_007, AX05US01_TC_011

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Work order management system, asset database, resource management system, business rules engine
• Performance_Baseline: Service order creation < 5 seconds, data transfer accuracy 100%
• Data_Requirements: Critical/High priority failures, asset information, technician availability, work order templates

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Work order system integrated and operational, business automation rules configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: Service order creation automation enabled for system, resource assignment permissions
• Test_Data:
• • Critical failure: P-045 Main Pump Bearing Failure
  • High failure: V-789 Control Valve Actuator Malfunction
  • Medium failure: H-123 Fire Hydrant Paint Chipping
  • Available technicians with skill sets
• Prior_Test_Cases: Failure reporting and priority assignment functional

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data & Formula	Comments
1	Report Critical priority failure	Failure submitted with critical status	failure_priority = 'Critical' AND asset_id = 'P-045'	Critical failure submission
2	Verify automatic SO creation trigger	Service order auto-generated within 5 seconds	IF priority IN ('Critical', 'High') THEN CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER() WHERE response_time <= 5 seconds	Automation trigger
3	Check service order ID format	SO ID follows correct naming convention	service_order_id = 'SO-' + YEAR(NOW()) + '-' + LPAD(sequence, 3, '0')	ID format validation
4	Verify descriptive SO naming	Service order name auto-generated correctly	so_name = 'Repair ' + asset_id + ' - ' + failure_mode + ' - ' + DATE_FORMAT(NOW(), '%Y-%m-%d')	Name generation logic
5	Check priority inheritance	SO inherits exact failure priority level	service_order.priority = failure.priority WHERE service_order.failure_id = failure.id	Priority mapping
6	Verify asset information transfer	Complete asset details copied to service order	so_asset_data = SELECT * FROM assets WHERE id = failure.asset_id	Data transfer accuracy
7	Check failure context inclusion	Failure description and photos linked to SO	so_context = failure.description + failure.photos WHERE so.failure_id = failure.id	Context transfer
8	Test High priority failure automation	High priority also triggers SO creation	failure_priority = 'High' → CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER() = true	High priority automation
9	Verify High priority SO creation	Second service order created successfully	so_count = COUNT(service_orders) WHERE created_date >= test_start_time	High priority handling
10	Test Medium priority exclusion	Medium priority does NOT trigger automatic SO	failure_priority = 'Medium' → CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER() = false	Medium priority rule
11	Verify Medium priority behavior	No automatic service order created	so_created = false WHERE failure_priority IN ('Medium', 'Low')	Business rule validation
12	Check SO status initialization	New service orders start with correct status	initial_status = 'New' WHERE service_order.created_date = NOW()	Status initialization
13	Verify bi-directional linking	Failure record shows linked service order	failure.linked_service_order_id = service_order.id	Bi-directional linking
14	Test SO details accessibility	Service order details accessible from failure view	SELECT so.* FROM service_orders so JOIN failures f ON so.failure_id = f.id	Navigation functionality
15	Verify resource assignment logic	Service orders assigned based on skill requirements	assigned_technician = SELECT user_id FROM users WHERE skills LIKE '%' + required_skill + '%'	Resource allocation
16	Check SLA target assignment	Service orders inherit SLA targets from priority	so_sla_hours = CASE WHEN priority = 'Critical' THEN 4 WHEN priority = 'High' THEN 24 END	SLA inheritance
17	Test bulk SO creation	Multiple failures can trigger simultaneous SOs	bulk_so_count = COUNT(*) FROM service_orders WHERE created_date BETWEEN test_start AND test_end	Bulk processing

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Critical and High priority failures automatically generate service orders with accurate information transfer and proper workflow integration
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • Service order format, naming, and ID generation follow standards
  • Complete asset and failure context transferred accurately
  • Priority inheritance and SLA assignment function correctly
  • Medium and Low priority failures properly excluded from automation
• Negative_Verification: No duplicate service orders created, no data corruption during transfer, no unauthorized SO creation

---

Test Case 9: Cross-Browser Compatibility and Mobile Responsiveness

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_009
• Title: Validate failure reporting functionality across different browsers and responsive design on various devices
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Compatibility
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Cross-Browser, Responsive, Compatibility, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Both, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, UI-Testing

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 60 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 75%
• Integration_Points: Browser-Compatibility, Responsive-Design, Cross-Platform-UI
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Partial
• Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Compatibility-Testing, Cross-Platform-Support, UI-Validation, Mobile-Experience
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: NFR-Compatibility, Mobile-Interface-Requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_002, AX05US01_TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 116+, Safari 16+, Edge 115+, Mobile browsers
• Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 13+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667, Large-2560x1440
• Dependencies: Cross-browser testing tools, device emulation, responsive design framework
• Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across platforms, responsive breakpoints at 768px, 1024px
• Data_Requirements: Standard failure reporting test dataset across all platforms

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple browser/device combinations available, responsive testing tools configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard failure reporting permissions across all platforms
• Test_Data: Consistent test data set used across all platform combinations
• Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality verified on primary Chrome desktop browser

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data & Formula	Comments
1	Test Chrome desktop (1920x1080)	All functionality works as baseline reference	viewport = {width: 1920, height: 1080}, browser = 'Chrome'	Primary browser validation
2	Test Firefox desktop (1920x1080)	UI renders correctly, all features fully functional	cross_browser_compatibility = COMPARE(chrome_baseline, firefox_results)	Firefox compatibility
3	Test Safari desktop (macOS)	Mac-specific rendering and interactions work correctly	safari_specific_tests = ['date_picker', 'file_upload', 'gps_access']	Safari compatibility
4	Test Edge desktop (1920x1080)	Microsoft Edge functionality confirmed	edge_compatibility_score = FUNCTIONAL_TESTS_PASSED / TOTAL_TESTS × 100%	Edge compatibility
5	Test tablet landscape (1024x768)	Responsive design adapts properly for tablet view	IF viewport_width <= 1024 THEN APPLY(tablet_layout) ELSE APPLY(desktop_layout)	Tablet responsiveness
6	Test tablet portrait (768x1024)	Portrait orientation layout functions correctly	orientation_test = ROTATE(tablet_view) AND VERIFY(layout_adaptation)	Portrait mode testing
7	Test mobile iPhone (375x667)	Mobile-optimized layout displays and functions correctly	mobile_layout_score = UI_ELEMENTS_ACCESSIBLE / TOTAL_UI_ELEMENTS × 100%	iOS mobile compatibility
8	Test mobile Android (375x667)	Android-specific functionality works properly	android_compatibility = VERIFY(touch_events, camera_access, gps_functionality)	Android compatibility
9	Test large desktop (2560x1440)	High resolution display scaling appropriate	scaling_factor = viewport_width / base_width WHERE base_width = 1920	High-DPI testing
10	Verify GPS functionality cross-platform	Location services work consistently on all platforms	gps_accuracy_variance = MAX(platform_accuracy) - MIN(platform_accuracy) <= 10 meters	Location compatibility
11	Test file upload across browsers	Upload functionality consistent across all browsers	upload_success_rate = successful_uploads / total_upload_attempts >= 95%	Upload compatibility
12	Test camera integration on mobile	Camera access works on iOS and Android devices	camera_access_test = VERIFY(camera_permission, image_capture, image_storage)	Camera compatibility
13	Verify form validation consistency	Validation messages display properly across browsers	validation_consistency = COMPARE_VALIDATION_MESSAGES_ACROSS_BROWSERS()	Validation consistency
14	Test responsive breakpoints	Layout adjusts correctly at 768px and 1024px breakpoints	responsive_breakpoints = [768, 1024] AND VERIFY(layout_changes_at_breakpoints)	Breakpoint validation
15	Verify touch interactions	Touch gestures work correctly on touch-enabled devices	touch_events = ['tap', 'swipe', 'pinch_zoom'] AND VERIFY(touch_response)	Touch compatibility
16	Test performance consistency	Load times remain acceptable across all platforms	performance_variance = MAX(load_time) - MIN(load_time) <= 2 seconds	Performance parity
17	Verify offline functionality	Offline mode works on supported mobile platforms	offline_support = VERIFY(data_persistence, sync_capability) WHERE platform = 'mobile'	Offline compatibility
18	Test accessibility features	Screen readers and keyboard navigation work across browsers	accessibility_score = WCAG_COMPLIANCE_TESTS_PASSED / TOTAL_ACCESSIBILITY_TESTS	Accessibility validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Failure reporting functionality works consistently across all supported browsers and devices with proper responsive behavior
• Secondary_Verifications:
• • UI renders correctly at all screen resolutions and orientations
  • Touch interactions function properly on mobile devices
  • Performance remains within acceptable variance across platforms
  • Responsive breakpoints trigger appropriate layout changes
• Negative_Verification: No browser-specific errors, no functionality loss on any platform, no significant performance degradation

---

Test Case 10: Comprehensive Data Validation and Error Handling

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_010
• Title: Comprehensive validation testing for all failure reporting form fields with robust error handling scenarios
• Created By: Prachi
• Created Date: 2025-08-29
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

• Tags: Data-Validation, Error-Handling, Negative-Testing, Security, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 95%
• Integration_Points: Validation-Engine, Error-Handling-System, Security-Layer, Form-Processing
• Code_Module_Mapped: AX
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity, Security-Testing, Error-Handling-Coverage
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC7, AC15, Security-Requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: AX05US01_TC_001, AX05US01_TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
• Device/OS: Windows 11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Form validation engine, error handling framework, security validation layer
• Performance_Baseline: Validation response < 200ms, error handling < 500ms
• Data_Requirements: Comprehensive invalid data sets, boundary value test cases, security payload samples

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: All validation rules configured, error messages defined, security measures active
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard failure reporting permissions with validation testing access
• Test_Data:
• • Invalid descriptions: <20 chars, >1000 chars, special characters, malicious scripts
  • Invalid dates: future dates, malformed formats, boundary dates
  • Invalid files: oversized, wrong formats, malicious content
  • Boundary test values for all numeric and text fields
• Prior_Test_Cases: Basic form loading and functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data & Formula	Comments
1	Submit form with no asset selected	Asset selection validation error displayed	asset_selected = null → VALIDATION_ERROR('Asset selection required')	Required field validation
2	Submit form with no priority selected	Priority selection validation error shown	priority_selected = null → VALIDATION_ERROR('Priority level required')	Priority requirement
3	Submit form with no failure mode	Failure mode validation error displayed	failure_mode = null → VALIDATION_ERROR('Failure mode required')	Mode requirement
4	Enter description under 20 characters	Minimum length validation error triggered	LEN(description) < 20 → VALIDATION_ERROR('Minimum 20 characters required')	Minimum validation
5	Enter description over 1000 characters	Maximum length validation error triggered	LEN(description) > 1000 → VALIDATION_ERROR('Maximum 1000 characters allowed')	Maximum validation
6	Enter future failure date	Future date validation error displayed	`failure# SMART360 Asset Failure Reporting System - Test Cases