Skip to main content

O & M--Schedules Management (AX03US04)

SMART360 Asset Failure Reporting System - Test Cases

User Story: AX05US01 - Asset Failure Management



Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

  1. Failure Reporting Dashboard - Real-time metrics and failure overview
  2. Mobile-First Failure Reporting - GPS-enabled asset identification and reporting
  3. Asset Identification Methods - Location-based, map-based, and manual search
  4. Failure Classification - Priority-based classification with service impact
  5. Documentation and Evidence - Photo/video uploads and comprehensive notes
  6. Automated Workflow - Service order generation and status tracking
  7. Notification System - Real-time alerts for critical failures

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

  1. Performance - Mobile responsiveness, GPS accuracy, load handling
  2. Security - Role-based access, data protection, audit trails
  3. Compatibility - Mobile device support, offline capabilities
  4. Usability - Field-friendly interface, error handling
  5. Integration - Work order system, asset registry, notification services

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

  1. Offline Operations - Mobile functionality without network connectivity
  2. GPS Accuracy - Location services in various environmental conditions
  3. File Upload Limits - Large file handling and storage constraints
  4. Data Validation - Invalid inputs and boundary conditions



Test Case 01:1: Failure Dashboard KPIOverview and(Happy Table Comprehensive ValidationPath)

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID:ID: AX03US04_TC_001AX05US01_TC_001
  • Title:Title: VerifyValidate Schedulesfailure Dashboarddashboard displays accuratereal-time KPIsmetrics and functionalfailure schedule table with complete user interactionslist
  • Created By:By: Prachi
  • Created Date:Date: 2025-01-1508-29
  • Version:Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature:Feature: SchedulesAsset Failure Management (AX03US04)AX05US01)
  • Test Type:Type: Functional
  • Test Level:Level: IntegrationSystem
  • Priority:Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase:Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status:Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

  • Tags:Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer,Dashboard, Real-Time, MOD-Schedules,FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration,Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering,QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Happy-Path
  • Additional Context: Dashboard-Testing, KPI-Validation, Table-Functionality, Data-Accuracy, User-Interface

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required:Compliance_Required: NoYes
  • SLA_Related:SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level:Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Complexity_Level:Data_Sensitivity High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity:: Medium
  • Failure_Impact:Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage:Feature_Coverage: 50% (Dashboard KPI and table functionality)90%
  • Integration_Points:Integration_Points Analytics-Service,: Database, UI-ComponentsReal-Time-Updates, Dashboard-Metrics
  • Code_Module_Mapped:Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage:Requirement_Coverage: Complete (Covers Acceptance Criteria #12, #14)
  • Cross_Platform_Support:Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder:Primary_Stakeholder: EngineeringQA
  • Report_Categories:Report_Categories: Dashboard-Analytics,Quality-Dashboard, KPI-Accuracy,Business-Critical, Table-Functionality, User-ExperienceReal-Time-Performance
  • Trend_Tracking:Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility:Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level:Customer_Impact_Level: CriticalHigh

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment:Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version:Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS:OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution:Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies:Dependencies: AnalyticsAsset service,database, Database,failure UIreporting componentssystem, real-time metrics service
  • Performance_Baseline:Performance_Baseline: DashboardPage load < 3 seconds, KPImetrics calculationrefresh <every 25 secondsminutes
  • Data_Requirements:Data_Requirements: MixedSample datasetfailure withdata, knownvarious metricsstatuses forand validationpriorities

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements:Setup_Requirements: DatabaseUser populatedauthenticated with testAsset schedulesManager representing various statesrole
  • User_Roles_Permissions:User_Roles_Permissions: O&M Manager with full dashboardDashboard access andpermissions analytics permissionsenabled
  • Test_Data:
    • Total Active Schedules:Test_Data 47 schedules in Active status:
    • Schedules Due (Next 7 Days): 12 schedules with due dates between today and +7 days
    • Overdue Schedules: 3 schedules with due dates in the past
    • Completion Rate (Last 30 Days): 89% calculated from completed vs. total scheduled runs
    • Schedule Types: Mix of Preventive Maintenance (35) and Inspection (12) schedules
    • Test Schedules for Display:
      • PM-PUMP-001:Active "Monthlyfailures: Pump12 Inspectiontotal, -3 Stationcritical, 3"8 awaiting action
      • INSP-HYDR-005:Average "Quarterlyresolution Hydranttime: Inspection"4.2 hours
      • PM-VALVE-003:Recent "Annualfailures Valvewith Maintenance"various priorities and statuses
    • User Credentials:Prior_Test_Cases: john.smith@utilitycompany.comLogin successful (AX01US01_TC_001)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication successful, user has proper role assignments

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

A1

Login as O&M Manager

Authentication successful, redirected to main menu

john.smith@utilitycompany.com

Valid credentials

A21

Navigate to O&MField →Alerts Schedules> Failures

Schedules dashboardDashboard loads withinwith 3metrics secondssection

N/A

PerformanceMain baselinedashboard access

A3

Verify page title

Shows "Preventive Maintenance & Inspections"

Page title

Correct page loaded

A4

Check page subtitle

Shows "Manage and track all scheduled preventive maintenance tasks and inspections"

Subtitle text

Descriptive information

A52

Verify "CreateTotal Open Failures" metric

Shows count of non-closed failures

COUNT(failures WHERE status NOT IN ('Closed', 'Resolved')) = 12

Currently unresolved

3

Verify "Critical Failures (24h)" metric

Shows critical failures from last 24 hours

COUNT(failures WHERE priority='Critical' AND reported_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL 1 DAY) = 3

Reported today

4

Verify "Awaiting Action" metric

Shows failures needing attention

COUNT(failures WHERE status IN ('New', 'Pending Action', 'Needs Attention')) = 8

Need attention

5

Verify "Avg Resolution Time" metric

Shows last 30 days average

AVG(resolved_date - reported_date WHERE resolved_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL 30 DAYS) = 4.2 hours

Last 30 days

6

Check dashboard auto-refresh

Metrics update every 5 minutes

Timer verification

Auto-refresh functionality

7

Verify "Report New Schedule"Failure" button

Button visible inand top-right corner, properly styledaccessible

Create buttonN/A

Primary action availableavailability

B18

LocateCheck KPIfailures cardstable sectionheaders

FourCorrect KPIcolumn cardsheaders displayed horizontally in top section

4Failure cardsID, Asset ID/Name, Location, etc.

CardTable layout verificationstructure

B29

Verify "Totalfailure ActiveID Schedules" cardformat

ShowsIDs "47"follow withFAIL-YYYY-### blue background and calendar iconpattern

Count: 47FAIL-2025-004

ActiveID countformat accuracyvalidation

B310

Check cardpriority subtitlecolor coding

ShowsPriorities "Currentlyshow active"correct belowcolored the countbadges

SubtitleCritical=Red, textHigh=Orange, etc.

ContextVisual informationindicators

B411

Check status color coding

Status badges properly color-coded

Status-specific colors

Status visualization

12

Verify "Schedulesfailure Duedescription (Next 7 Days)" cardtruncation

ShowsLong "12"descriptions truncated with orange background and clock icon"..."

Count:50 12character limit

DueText date calculationformatting

B5

Check due schedules subtitle

Shows "Upcoming tasks"

Subtitle text

Clear labeling

B6

Verify "Overdue Schedules" card

Shows "3" with red background and warning icon

Count: 3

Overdue identification

B7

Check overdue subtitle

Shows "Need attention" in red text

Subtitle emphasis

Urgency indication

B8

Verify "Completion Rate" card

Shows "89%" with green background and checkmark icon

Rate: 89%

Performance metric

B9

Check completion subtitle

Shows "Overall performance"

Subtitle text

Performance context

B1013

Test KPI carddescription hover effectstooltip

CardsFull showtext subtle elevation/shadowappears on hover

HoverComplete statesdescription

InteractiveTooltip feedbackfunctionality

C114

Check actions dropdown

Three-dot menu with Edit, Comment, etc.

Standard action options

Action availability

15

Verify tabletimestamp column headersformat

Shows:Date/time Schedulein ID,YYYY-MM-DD ScheduleHH:MM Name, Type, Frequency, Runs, Assets, Next Due Date, Last Completed, Progress, Status, Actionsformat

ColumnConsistent structureformatting

Time display

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays accurate real-time failure metrics and properly formatted failure list
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • All metrics reflect current database state
    • Color coding follows business rules
    • Auto-refresh functionality works
    • Table formatting meets specifications
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect metrics displayed, no UI rendering issues



Test Case 2: Mobile Failure Reporting with GPS Asset Search

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_002
  • Title: Test mobile failure reporting using GPS-based asset identification
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Mobile, GPS, Asset-Identification, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Mobile, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Integration-GPS

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: GPS, Mobile-Interface, Asset-Database, Location-Services
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Mobile-Testing, GPS-Integration, Field-Operations
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Mobile Safari iOS 16+, Mobile Chrome Android 13+
  • Device/OS: iPhone 14, Samsung Galaxy S23
  • Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: GPS services, mobile-optimized interface, asset database with GPS coordinates
  • Performance_Baseline: GPS scan < 10 seconds, form submission < 5 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Assets with GPS coordinates within 500m test radius

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Mobile device with GPS enabled, field technician credentials
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Field Force Technician role with reporting permissions
  • Test_Data:
    • Test location with nearby assets: Water Treatment Plant
    • Assets within 500m: P-045 (100m), V-789 (250m), H-123 (400m)
    • GPS coordinates: 40.7128° N, 74.0060° W
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Mobile authentication successful

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Access failures page on mobile

Mobile-optimized interface loads

Mobile browser

Responsive design

2

Tap "Report New Failure" button

Failure reporting form opens

N/A

Mobile navigation

3

Verify unique failure ID generation

New ID in FAIL-YYYY-### format

Auto-generated

ID creation

4

Check asset identification dropdown

Three methods available

GPS, Map, Manual options

Method selection

5

Select "Search Assets in My Location"

GPS location method selected

GPS option

GPS method selection

6

Tap "Scan for Nearby Assets" button

GPS location request prompt

Location permission

GPS activation

7

Grant location permissions

GPS scanning initiated

Allow location access

Permission handling

8

Wait for GPS scan completion

Nearby assets displayed in table

500m radius search

GPS search results

9

Verify assets sorted by distance

Closest assets appear first

P-045 (100m) first

Distance sorting

10

Check asset information display

Asset ID, name, distance shown

Complete headerasset setdetails

Data presentation

C211

Select asset P-045

Asset selection registered

P-045 selected

Asset selection

12

Verify selected asset display

"Selected Assets" section populated

"P-045 - Main Pump Station A"

Selection confirmation

13

Select failure priority

Priority dropdown functional

"Critical" selected

Priority assignment

14

Choose failure mode

Failure mode dropdown works

"Bearing Failure"

Mode classification

15

Enter failure description

Text area accepts input on mobile

Detailed description

Mobile text input

16

Select observed symptoms

Multi-select checkboxes work

"Unusual Noise", "Vibration"

Symptom selection

17

Set failure date/time

Date/time picker functional on mobile

Current timestamp

Date/time handling

18

Test photo upload

Camera/gallery access works

Take/select photo

Mobile photo upload

19

Submit failure report

Submission successful, confirmation shown

Unique failure ID returned

Form submission

20

Verify service order auto-creation

Critical failure triggers service order

SO-YYYY-### created

Workflow automation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Mobile GPS-based asset identification works accurately and failure reporting completes successfully
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • GPS accuracy within acceptable range (±50m)
    • Mobile interface fully functional
    • Photo upload works on mobile devices
    • Service order auto-creation triggers
  • Negative_Verification: No GPS errors, mobile interface responsive, no form submission failures



Test Case 3: Manual Asset Search and Selection

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_003
  • Title: Validate manual asset search functionality with filtering and selection
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Asset-Search, Manual-Selection, Database-Integration, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 80%
  • Integration_Points: Asset-Database, Search-Engine, Filter-System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Search-Functionality, Database-Integration, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 116+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Asset registry database, search indexing service
  • Performance_Baseline: Search results < 2 seconds, filter application < 1 second
  • Data_Requirements: Comprehensive asset database with various asset types, facilities, networks

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Asset database populated with test data
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Asset search permissions enabled
  • Test_Data:
    • Search terms: "Pump", "P-045", "Main Station"
    • Filter options: Facility types, Network systems
    • Expected results with condition and risk scores
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Failure reporting form loaded

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Select "Manual Search by ID/Name"

Manual search interface appears

Manual option selected

Search method selection

2

Enter partial asset ID

Search suggestions appear

"P-0"

Partial matching

3

Verify search results display

Table shows matching assets

Asset details table

Search results format

4

Check firstsearch rowresult datacolumns

Correct (PM-PUMP-001)columns displayed

Asset ID, Name, System, Facility, Location, Scores

Table structure

5

Test search by asset name

Name-based search works

"Main Pump"

Name search capability

6

Apply facility filter

Results filtered by facility

"Water Treatment" facility

Facility filtering

7

Apply network/system filter

Results filtered by network

"Distribution" system

Network filtering

8

Apply location filter

Geographic filtering works

Specific region

Location-based filtering

9

Verify combined filters

Multiple filters work together

All fieldsfilters populated correctly with proper formattingapplied

PM-PUMP-001Filter combination

10

Check condition score display

Color-coded condition scores

IF score >= 76 THEN 'Green' ELSE IF score >= 51 THEN 'Yellow' ELSE 'Red'

Condition visualization

11

Check risk score display

Color-coded risk scores

IF score <= 25 THEN 'Green' ELSE IF score <= 50 THEN 'Yellow' ELSE IF score <= 75 THEN 'Orange' ELSE 'Red'

Risk visualization

12

Test asset selection

Single asset can be selected

Radio button selection

Selection mechanism

13

Verify "Selected Assets" update

Selection appears in confirmation section

"P-045 - Main Pump Station A"

Selection confirmation

14

Test selection change

Can change selected asset

Different asset selected

Selection modification

15

Clear search filters

Reset button clears all filters

All filters cleared

Filter reset

16

Test empty search results

"No assets found" message

Invalid search term

Empty results handling

17

Verify asset details accuracy

Selected asset data accurate

Cross-reference with database

Data accuracy

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Manual asset search functions correctly with accurate filtering and selection capabilities
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • Search performance within acceptable limits
    • Filter combinations work properly
    • Asset scoring displays correctly
    • Selection mechanism functions properly
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid searches handled gracefully, no incorrect asset selection



Test Case 4: Failure Classification and Priority Assignment

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_004
  • Title: Validate failure priority assignment and classification business rules
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Priority-Assignment, Business-Rules, Classification, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: Business-Rules-Engine, Priority-Logic, Classification-System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Business-Rules-Validation, Priority-Management
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Business rules engine, failure classification database
  • Performance_Baseline: Priority assignment < 500ms
  • Data_Requirements: Failure mode catalog, symptom database, priority definitions

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Business rules configured, failure classification system operational
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Priority assignment permissions
  • Test_Data:
    • Priority levels: Critical, High, Medium, Low
    • Failure modes: Bearing Failure, Seal Leak, Electrical Fault, etc.
    • Symptoms: Unusual Noise, Vibration, Leak, etc.
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Asset selected, basic failure form loaded

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

C31

Open priority dropdown

Four priority levels displayed

Critical, High, Medium, Low

Priority options

2

Verify Schedulepriority IDcolor formattingcoding

Correct colors for each priority

Critical=Red, High=Orange, etc.

Visual indicators

3

Select "Critical" priority

Priority selection registered

Critical priority

High-impact selection

4

Check priority help text

Guidance displayed for Critical

"PM-PUMP-001"Immediate appearsservice as blue hyperlinkimpact"

HyperlinkPriority formatguidance

5

NavigationOpen failure mode dropdown

Predefined failure modes available

Bearing Failure, Seal Leak, etc.

Mode options

6

Select failure mode

Mode selection registered

"Bearing Failure"

Mode classification

7

Enter failure description

Text validation (20-1000 chars)

Detailed description (>20 chars)

Description validation

8

Test minimum character validation

Error for <20 characters

LEN(description) < 20 → VALIDATION_ERROR("Minimum 20 characters required")

Minimum validation

9

Test maximum character validation

Error for >1000 characters

LEN(description) > 1000 → VALIDATION_ERROR("Maximum 1000 characters allowed")

Maximum validation

10

Open observed symptoms

Multi-select checkboxes available

Various symptom options

Symptom selection

11

Select multiple symptoms

Multiple selections allowed

"Unusual Noise", "Vibration"

Multi-select capability

C412

Set failure date/time

Date/time picker functional

Current timestamp

Time setting

13

Test future date restriction

Future dates not allowed

Tomorrow's date

Date validation

14

Verify auto service order trigger

Critical priority triggers SO creation

Service order generated

Automation rule

15

Test priority-based routing

Critical failures route to O&M Manager

Notification sent

Routing logic

16

Add additional notes

Optional field functional

Contextual information

Additional documentation

17

Verify priority consistency

Same failure type suggests same priority

Consistent recommendations

Priority guidance

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Failure classification follows business rules and priority assignment triggers appropriate workflows
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • Input validation works correctly
    • Service order auto-creation functions
    • Priority-based routing operational
    • Help text provides clear guidance
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid inputs rejected, future dates blocked, required fields enforced



Test Case 5: Photo and Video Upload Documentation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_005
  • Title: Test photo and video upload functionality with file validation and storage
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: File-Upload, Documentation, Mobile, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Both, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Support
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: File-Storage, Mobile-Camera, Content-Validation
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: File-Management, Mobile-Functionality, Storage-Systems
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+ (desktop), Mobile Safari/Chrome
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, iOS 16+, Android 13+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: File storage service, image processing, video handling
  • Performance_Baseline: Upload < 30 seconds per 10MB file
  • Data_Requirements: Test media files of various formats and sizes

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: File storage operational, camera permissions available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: File upload permissions
  • Test_Data:
    • Valid files: pump_failure.jpg (5MB), bearing_noise.mp4 (8MB)
    • Invalid files: large_video.mov (60MB), document.pdf
    • Supported formats: JPG, PNG, GIF, MP4, MOV, AVI
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Failure form in progress, basic details entered

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Photos/Videos section

Upload section displayed

N/A

Section availability

2

Click "Choose Files" button

File selection dialog opens

N/A

File picker activation

3

Select valid JPG image

File selected for upload

pump_failure.jpg (5MB)

Image file selection

4

Verify upload progress indicator

Progress bar shows upload status

Visual progress

Upload feedback

5

Confirm successful upload

File appears with thumbnail

Thumbnail and metadata

Upload completion

6

Test multiple file selection

Multiple files can be selected

3 files simultaneously

Batch upload

7

Upload valid MP4 video

Video file uploaded successfully

bearing_noise.mp4 (8MB)

Video upload

8

Test file size validation

10MB limit enforced per file

FILE_SIZE <= 10,485,760 bytes (10MB × 1024² bytes/MB)

Size validation

9

Test oversized file rejection

Files >10MB rejected

FILE_SIZE > 10,485,760 bytes → REJECT("File too large")

Size limit enforcement

10

Test total size limit

50MB total limit enforced

SUM(all_file_sizes) <= 52,428,800 bytes (50MB × 1024²)

Total size validation

11

Test unsupported format

PDF files rejected

document.pdf

Format validation

12

Verify supported formats

All specified formats accepted

JPG, PNG, GIF, MP4, MOV, AVI

Format acceptance

13

Test mobile camera integration

Camera opens from mobile device

Mobile device testing

Camera functionality

14

Take photo with mobile camera

Photo captured and uploaded

Mobile camera photo

Mobile integration

15

Verify file metadata display

Filename, size, upload time shown

Complete metadata

Metadata presentation

16

Test file download

Uploaded files can be downloaded

Download functionality

File retrieval

17

Test file deletion

Files can be removed before submission

Delete capability

File management

18

Verify thumbnail generation

Images show thumbnail previews

Visual thumbnails

Preview generation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Photo and video uploads work correctly with proper validation and storage
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • File size and format validation effective
    • Mobile camera integration functional
    • Metadata properly captured and displayed
    • File management operations work
  • Negative_Verification: Invalid formats rejected, size limits enforced, no upload failures



Test Case 6: Offline Mobile Functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_006
  • Title: Validate offline mobile functionality with data synchronization when connectivity restored
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Offline, Mobile, Synchronization, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Mobile, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Integration-Offline

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 70%
  • Integration_Points: Offline-Storage, Data-Sync, Mobile-App, Network-Detection
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Mobile-Functionality, Offline-Capabilities, Data-Synchronization
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Mobile Safari iOS 16+, Mobile Chrome Android 13+
  • Device/OS: iPhone 14, Samsung Galaxy S23
  • Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: Offline storage system, data synchronization service
  • Performance_Baseline: Offline storage < 2 seconds, sync completion < 30 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Offline-capable failure reporting interface

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Mobile app installed, offline functionality enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Field technician with offline reporting permissions
  • Test_Data:
    • Test failure data for offline entry
    • Sample photos for offline upload
    • Network connectivity controls
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Mobile authentication completed

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data & Formula

Comments

1

Access mobile app with connectivity

Normal online functionality confirmed

Network status = "Connected"

Baseline functionality

2

Disable device network connectivity

Offline mode indicator appears

network_status = 'Offline' → SHOW_OFFLINE_INDICATOR()

Offline detection

3

Start new failure report offline

Form loads with offline capabilities

offline_mode = true → ENABLE_LOCAL_STORAGE()

Offline functionality

4

Complete asset identification offline

GPS and cached assets available

cached_assets = SELECT * FROM local_asset_cache WHERE distance <= 500m

Offline asset access

5

Fill out failure details offline

Form accepts all inputs locally

form_data_stored = localStorage.setItem('draft_failure', JSON.stringify(data))

Offline data entry

6

Take photos while offline

Camera functions and stores locally

photo_storage = indexedDB.store('offline_photos', photo_blob)

Offline media capture

7

Submit failure report offline

Report saved to local storage with pending status

status = 'Pending_Sync' AND local_queue_size = local_queue_size + 1

Local storage capability

8

Verify offline confirmation

Confirmation shows sync pending status

"Report saved. Will sync when online."

Offline feedback

9

Create second failure offline

Multiple offline reports supported

offline_queue_count = COUNT(local_failures WHERE sync_status = 'Pending')

Multiple offline entries

10

Check Scheduleoffline Namereport displayqueue

ShowsPending "Monthlyreports Pumpvisible Inspectionin -queue Station 3" truncated if needed with tooltipinterface

FullQueue nameshows 2 reports with timestamps

ContentOffline queue management

11

Re-enable network connectivity

Connectivity restored, auto-sync triggers

network_status = 'Connected' → TRIGGER_AUTO_SYNC()

Connectivity restoration

12

Monitor sync progress

Progress indicator shows sync status

sync_progress = (completed_syncs / total_pending) × 100%

Sync monitoring

13

Verify successful data sync

Reports uploaded to server successfully

sync_success_rate = successful_uploads / total_attempts = 100%

Sync completion

14

Check server-side data persistence

Offline reports appear in online dashboard

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM failures WHERE created_offline = true

Data persistence

15

Verify photo sync with reports

Photos uploaded and linked correctly

photo_sync_size = SUM(photo_file_sizes) WHERE failure_id IN (offline_reports)

Media synchronization

16

Test draft persistence during offline

Drafts saved every 30 seconds while offline

auto_save_interval = 30000ms → localStorage.setItem('draft', form_data)

Draft management

17

Verify conflict resolution

No data conflicts during sync

conflict_resolution = 'client_wins' WHERE created_offline = true

Conflict handling

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Mobile application functions completely offline and synchronizes all data correctly when connectivity is restored
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • Offline storage works reliably for forms and media
    • Multiple reports can be queued offline without data loss
    • Auto-sync triggers immediately on connectivity restoration
    • Draft auto-save functions offline every 30 seconds
  • Negative_Verification: No data loss during network transitions, no sync conflicts or duplicate entries

Test Case 7: Critical Failure Notifications and Real-Time Alerts

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_007
  • Title: Validate immediate notification system for critical failures with multi-channel delivery
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Critical-Alerts, Notifications, Real-Time, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration, Platform-Both, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Integration-Notifications

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 90%
  • Integration_Points: Notification-Service, Email-System, SMS-Gateway, Push-Notifications, Dashboard-Alerts
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Critical-Alerts, Communication-Systems, SLA-Management, Real-Time-Performance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+ (desktop), Mobile Safari/Chrome
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, iOS 16+, Android 13+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: Notification service, email server, SMS gateway, push notification service, real-time dashboard
  • Performance_Baseline: Notifications delivered within 60 seconds, 99.5% delivery success rate
  • Data_Requirements: O&M Manager contact information, notification preferences, escalation rules

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: All notification services operational, communication channels configured and tested
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Field technician (reporter), O&M Manager (primary recipient), Asset Manager (secondary)
  • Test_Data:
    • O&M Manager: manager@utility.com, (555) 987-6543
    • Asset Manager: assets@utility.com, (555) 123-7890
    • Critical failure scenario: Main transformer failure at water treatment plant
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication and failure creation functional

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data & Formula

Comments

1

Report critical priority failure

Critical failure submitted successfully

priority = 'Critical' AND asset_criticality = 'High'

Critical failure creation

2

Verify immediate email notification

Email sent to O&M Manager within 60 seconds

email_delay = email_sent_time - failure_submitted_time <= 60 seconds

Email alert delivery

3

Check email content and formatting

Email contains complete failure details

Email includes: Failure ID, Asset ID, Location, Description, Photos

Email content validation

4

Verify SMS notification delivery

SMS sent to configured phone numbers

sms_recipients = SELECT phone FROM users WHERE role = 'O&M_Manager' AND sms_enabled = true

SMS alert delivery

5

Check SMS content optimization

SMS contains essential info within character limits

SMS_LENGTH <= 160 characters AND includes (Failure_ID, Asset, Priority, Location)

SMS format validation

6

Verify real-time dashboard alert

Dashboard shows critical failure banner

dashboard_alert_visible = true WHERE failure_priority = 'Critical'

Dashboard notification

7

Test push notification delivery

Mobile push notifications sent to relevant users

push_notification_sent = true WHERE user_role IN ('O&M_Manager', 'Field_Supervisor')

Push notification delivery

8

Verify multi-recipient notification

All stakeholders receive appropriate alerts

notification_count = COUNT(notifications) WHERE failure_id = current_failure

Multi-recipient handling

C59

Test escalation workflow timing

Secondary notifications after 15 minutes no response

IF response_time > 900 seconds THEN SEND(escalation_notifications)

Escalation mechanism

10

Verify Typenotification badgespreferences compliance

"PreventiveUsers Maintenance"receive inonly blue,preferred "Inspection"notification in purpletypes

Colornotification_channels coding= SELECT preferred_channels FROM user_preferences WHERE user_id = recipient

VisualPreference categorizationcompliance

C611

Check Frequencynotification displayaudit trail

ShowsAll "Monthly",notification "Quarterly",attempts "Annually"logged clearlywith results

Frequencynotification_log text= INSERT INTO notification_history (failure_id, recipient, channel, status, timestamp)

ScheduleAudit timingcompliance

C712

Test notification retry mechanism

Failed notifications automatically retried

retry_count = CASE WHEN delivery_failed THEN retry_count + 1 ELSE 0 END

Retry logic

13

Verify Runsservice columnorder auto-notification

ShowsSO completed/totalcreation formattriggers "24/25"additional notifications

RunIF statisticsservice_order_created THEN NOTIFY(assigned_technician, dispatcher)

ExecutionWorkflow trackingnotification

C814

Test notification delivery rate SLA

99.5% delivery success rate maintained

delivery_success_rate = (successful_deliveries / total_attempts) × 100% >= 99.5%

SLA validation

15

Verify emergency contact escalation

Critical failures trigger emergency contact list

emergency_contacts = SELECT * FROM emergency_contacts WHERE failure_priority = 'Critical'

Emergency escalation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Critical failures trigger immediate multi-channel notifications to all relevant stakeholders within SLA timeframes
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • All notification channels function correctly (email, SMS, push, dashboard)
    • Content is appropriate and complete for each channel type
    • Escalation workflows activate when response times exceed thresholds
    • Delivery success rates meet SLA requirements (99.5%)
  • Negative_Verification: No missed critical notifications, no duplicate alerts, no delivery to unauthorized recipients



Test Case 8: Automated Service Order Generation and Integration

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_008
  • Title: Test automatic service order creation for Critical and High priority failures with workflow integration
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Service-Orders, Automation, Workflow, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Integration-WorkOrder

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: Work-Order-System, Asset-Database, Priority-Logic, Resource-Assignment
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Integration-Testing, Workflow-Automation, Service-Operations, Resource-Management
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Work order management system, asset database, resource management system, business rules engine
  • Performance_Baseline: Service order creation < 5 seconds, data transfer accuracy 100%
  • Data_Requirements: Critical/High priority failures, asset information, technician availability, work order templates

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Work order system integrated and operational, business automation rules configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Service order creation automation enabled for system, resource assignment permissions
  • Test_Data:
    • Critical failure: P-045 Main Pump Bearing Failure
    • High failure: V-789 Control Valve Actuator Malfunction
    • Medium failure: H-123 Fire Hydrant Paint Chipping
    • Available technicians with skill sets
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Failure reporting and priority assignment functional

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data & Formula

Comments

1

Report Critical priority failure

Failure submitted with critical status

failure_priority = 'Critical' AND asset_id = 'P-045'

Critical failure submission

2

Verify automatic SO creation trigger

Service order auto-generated within 5 seconds

IF priority IN ('Critical', 'High') THEN CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER() WHERE response_time <= 5 seconds

Automation trigger

3

Check Assetsservice columnorder ID format

ShowsSO assetID countfollows "5correct assets"naming convention

Assetservice_order_id count= 'SO-' + YEAR(NOW()) + '-' + LPAD(sequence, 3, '0')

ScopeID indicationformat validation

C94

Verify Nextdescriptive DueSO Datenaming

ShowsService datesorder inname DD/MM/YYYYauto-generated format consistentlycorrectly

Dateso_name formatting= 'Repair ' + asset_id + ' - ' + failure_mode + ' - ' + DATE_FORMAT(NOW(), '%Y-%m-%d')

ConsistentName formattinggeneration logic

C105

Check Progresspriority indicatorsinheritance

VisualSO progressinherits barsexact withfailure percentagepriority "3/5 Complete"level

Progressservice_order.priority display= failure.priority WHERE service_order.failure_id = failure.id

VisualPriority completionmapping

C116

Verify Statusasset badgesinformation transfer

"Active"Complete inasset green,details "Inactive"copied into greyservice order

so_asset_data = SELECT * FROM assets WHERE id = failure.asset_id

Data transfer accuracy

7

Check failure context inclusion

Failure description and photos linked to SO

so_context = failure.description + failure.photos WHERE so.failure_id = failure.id

Context transfer

8

Test High priority failure automation

High priority also triggers SO creation

failure_priority = 'High' → CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER() = true

High priority automation

9

Verify High priority SO creation

Second service order created successfully

so_count = COUNT(service_orders) WHERE created_date >= test_start_time

High priority handling

10

Test Medium priority exclusion

Medium priority does NOT trigger automatic SO

failure_priority = 'Medium' → CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER() = false

Medium priority rule

11

Verify Medium priority behavior

No automatic service order created

so_created = false WHERE failure_priority IN ('Medium', 'Low')

Business rule validation

12

Check SO status initialization

New service orders start with correct status

initial_status = 'New' WHERE service_order.created_date = NOW()

Status indication

State visualizationinitialization

C1213

CheckVerify Actionsbi-directional columnlinking

Three-dotFailure menurecord withshows hoverlinked revealservice order

Actionsfailure.linked_service_order_id menu= service_order.id

AvailableBi-directional operationslinking

D114

ClickTest "ScheduleSO Name"details column headeraccessibility

ColumnService sortsorder alphabeticallydetails A-Zaccessible withfrom upfailure arrowview

AscendingSELECT sortso.* FROM service_orders so JOIN failures f ON so.failure_id = f.id

Column sorting

D2

Click Schedule Name header again

Sort reverses to Z-A with down arrow

Descending sort

Reverse sorting

D3

Sort by "Next Due Date"

Dates sort chronologically, earliest first

Date sorting

Temporal ordering

D4

Sort by "Status"

Groups Active schedules first, then Inactive

Status grouping

Status-based sorting

D5

Verify sort persistence

Sort order maintained during other operations

Sort stability

State maintenance

D6

Click "Export" button

Export dropdown menu appears with format options

Export menu

ExportNavigation functionality

D715

SelectVerify "Exportresource toassignment CSV"logic

CSVService orders assigned based on skill requirements

assigned_technician = SELECT user_id FROM users WHERE skills LIKE '%' + required_skill + '%'

Resource allocation

16

Check SLA target assignment

Service orders inherit SLA targets from priority

so_sla_hours = CASE WHEN priority = 'Critical' THEN 4 WHEN priority = 'High' THEN 24 END

SLA inheritance

17

Test bulk SO creation

Multiple failures can trigger simultaneous SOs

bulk_so_count = COUNT(*) FROM service_orders WHERE created_date BETWEEN test_start AND test_end

Bulk processing

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Critical and High priority failures automatically generate service orders with accurate information transfer and proper workflow integration
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • Service order format, naming, and ID generation follow standards
    • Complete asset and failure context transferred accurately
    • Priority inheritance and SLA assignment function correctly
    • Medium and Low priority failures properly excluded from automation
  • Negative_Verification: No duplicate service orders created, no data corruption during transfer, no unauthorized SO creation



Test Case 9: Cross-Browser Compatibility and Mobile Responsiveness

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_009
  • Title: Validate failure reporting functionality across different browsers and responsive design on various devices
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Compatibility
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Cross-Browser, Responsive, Compatibility, MOD-FailureMgmt, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Both, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, UI-Testing

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 60 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 75%
  • Integration_Points: Browser-Compatibility, Responsive-Design, Cross-Platform-UI
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Partial
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Both

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Compatibility-Testing, Cross-Platform-Support, UI-Validation, Mobile-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 116+, Safari 16+, Edge 115+, Mobile browsers
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 13+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667, Large-2560x1440
  • Dependencies: Cross-browser testing tools, device emulation, responsive design framework
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance across platforms, responsive breakpoints at 768px, 1024px
  • Data_Requirements: Standard failure reporting test dataset across all platforms

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Multiple browser/device combinations available, responsive testing tools configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Standard failure reporting permissions across all platforms
  • Test_Data: Consistent test data set used across all platform combinations
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality verified on primary Chrome desktop browser

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data & Formula

Comments

1

Test Chrome desktop (1920x1080)

All functionality works as baseline reference

viewport = {width: 1920, height: 1080}, browser = 'Chrome'

Primary browser validation

2

Test Firefox desktop (1920x1080)

UI renders correctly, all features fully functional

cross_browser_compatibility = COMPARE(chrome_baseline, firefox_results)

Firefox compatibility

3

Test Safari desktop (macOS)

Mac-specific rendering and interactions work correctly

safari_specific_tests = ['date_picker', 'file_upload', 'gps_access']

Safari compatibility

4

Test Edge desktop (1920x1080)

Microsoft Edge functionality confirmed

edge_compatibility_score = FUNCTIONAL_TESTS_PASSED / TOTAL_TESTS × 100%

Edge compatibility

5

Test tablet landscape (1024x768)

Responsive design adapts properly for tablet view

IF viewport_width <= 1024 THEN APPLY(tablet_layout) ELSE APPLY(desktop_layout)

Tablet responsiveness

6

Test tablet portrait (768x1024)

Portrait orientation layout functions correctly

orientation_test = ROTATE(tablet_view) AND VERIFY(layout_adaptation)

Portrait mode testing

7

Test mobile iPhone (375x667)

Mobile-optimized layout displays and functions correctly

mobile_layout_score = UI_ELEMENTS_ACCESSIBLE / TOTAL_UI_ELEMENTS × 100%

iOS mobile compatibility

8

Test mobile Android (375x667)

Android-specific functionality works properly

android_compatibility = VERIFY(touch_events, camera_access, gps_functionality)

Android compatibility

9

Test large desktop (2560x1440)

High resolution display scaling appropriate

scaling_factor = viewport_width / base_width WHERE base_width = 1920

High-DPI testing

10

Verify GPS functionality cross-platform

Location services work consistently on all platforms

gps_accuracy_variance = MAX(platform_accuracy) - MIN(platform_accuracy) <= 10 meters

Location compatibility

11

Test file downloadsupload withinacross 3browsers

Upload functionality consistent across all browsers

upload_success_rate = successful_uploads / total_upload_attempts >= 95%

Upload compatibility

12

Test camera integration on mobile

Camera access works on iOS and Android devices

camera_access_test = VERIFY(camera_permission, image_capture, image_storage)

Camera compatibility

13

Verify form validation consistency

Validation messages display properly across browsers

validation_consistency = COMPARE_VALIDATION_MESSAGES_ACROSS_BROWSERS()

Validation consistency

14

Test responsive breakpoints

Layout adjusts correctly at 768px and 1024px breakpoints

responsive_breakpoints = [768, 1024] AND VERIFY(layout_changes_at_breakpoints)

Breakpoint validation

15

Verify touch interactions

Touch gestures work correctly on touch-enabled devices

touch_events = ['tap', 'swipe', 'pinch_zoom'] AND VERIFY(touch_response)

Touch compatibility

16

Test performance consistency

Load times remain acceptable across all platforms

performance_variance = MAX(load_time) - MIN(load_time) <= 2 seconds

CSVPerformance generation

File exportparity

D817

Verify CSVoffline contentfunctionality

DownloadedOffline filemode containsworks currenton tablesupported viewmobile platforms

offline_support = VERIFY(data_persistence, sync_capability) WHERE platform = 'mobile'

Offline compatibility

18

Test accessibility features

Screen readers and keyboard navigation work across browsers

accessibility_score = WCAG_COMPLIANCE_TESTS_PASSED / TOTAL_ACCESSIBILITY_TESTS

Accessibility validation

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Failure reporting functionality works consistently across all supported browsers and devices with proper responsive behavior
  • Secondary_Verifications:
    • UI renders correctly at all screen resolutions and orientations
    • Touch interactions function properly on mobile devices
    • Performance remains within acceptable variance across platforms
    • Responsive breakpoints trigger appropriate layout changes
  • Negative_Verification: No browser-specific errors, no functionality loss on any platform, no significant performance degradation



Test Case 10: Comprehensive Data Validation and Error Handling

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX05US01_TC_010
  • Title: Comprehensive validation testing for all failure reporting form fields with robust error handling scenarios
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-08-29
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Asset Failure Management (AX05US01)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Data-Validation, Error-Handling, Negative-Testing, Security, MOD-FailureMgmt, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 95%
  • Integration_Points: Validation-Engine, Error-Handling-System, Security-Layer, Form-Processing
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity, Security-Testing, Error-Handling-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Form validation engine, error handling framework, security validation layer
  • Performance_Baseline: Validation response < 200ms, error handling < 500ms
  • Data_Requirements: Comprehensive invalid data sets, boundary value test cases, security payload samples

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: All validation rules configured, error messages defined, security measures active
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Standard failure reporting permissions with validation testing access
  • Test_Data:
    • Invalid descriptions: <20 chars, >1000 chars, special characters, malicious scripts
    • Invalid dates: future dates, malformed formats, boundary dates
    • Invalid files: oversized, wrong formats, malicious content
    • Boundary test values for all numeric and text fields
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Basic form loading and functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data & Formula

Comments

1

Submit form with no asset selected

Asset selection validation error displayed

asset_selected = null → VALIDATION_ERROR('Asset selection required')

Required field validation

2

Submit form with no priority selected

Priority selection validation error shown

priority_selected = null → VALIDATION_ERROR('Priority level required')

Priority requirement

3

Submit form with no failure mode

Failure mode validation error displayed

failure_mode = null → VALIDATION_ERROR('Failure mode required')

Mode requirement

4

Enter description under 20 characters

Minimum length validation error triggered

LEN(description) < 20 → VALIDATION_ERROR('Minimum 20 characters required')

Minimum validation

5

Enter description over 1000 characters

Maximum length validation error triggered

LEN(description) > 1000 → VALIDATION_ERROR('Maximum 1000 characters allowed')

Maximum validation

6

Enter future failure date

Future date validation error displayed

`failure# SMART360 Asset Failure Reporting System - Test Cases



Back to top