Meter Reading Validation Dashboard (MX00US01)
Meter Reading Validation Dashboard
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality Scenarios:
- Dashboard Overview and Metrics Display - Real-time validation progress monitoring
- Validation Progress Tracking - Current reading cycle validation management
- Exception Management - Validation issue identification and resolution
- Meter Condition Monitoring - Meter health and status tracking
- Search and Investigation - Meter reads search functionality
- Configuration Management - Validation rules and settings management
- Performance Analytics - Validation efficiency metrics and reporting
Business Rules Scenarios:
- Validation Progress Calculations - Percentage calculations and real-time updates
- Performance Metrics Calculations - Daily, weekly, and cycle-based efficiency metrics
- Meter Condition Categorization - Condition status and percentage calculations
- Error Handling Workflows - Validation failure management and routing
User Journey Scenarios:
- Daily Dashboard Monitoring - Meter Manager's routine oversight activities
- Exception Resolution Workflow - Issue identification to resolution process
- Configuration Optimization - Rule adjustment and performance improvement
- Reporting and Analysis - Performance review and decision making
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance Scenarios:
- Dashboard load time < 3 seconds
- Real-time data refresh every 15 minutes
- Search functionality response < 500ms
- Concurrent user handling (10+ Meter Managers)
Security Scenarios:
- Authentication and session management
- Role-based access control for Meter Manager
- Data protection and audit trails
- API endpoint security validation
Compatibility Scenarios:
- Chrome latest version support
- Responsive design validation
- Screen resolution compatibility
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions:
- Maximum meter count handling (10,000+ meters)
- Zero readings scenarios
- 100% validation completion
- Network timeout conditions
Invalid Inputs:
- Malformed search queries
- Invalid configuration parameters
- Corrupted data handling
SMOKE TEST SUITE (P1 Priority - Critical)
Test Case 1: Dashboard Authentication and Initial Load
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_001
- Title: Verify successful login and dashboard initial load for Meter Manager
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Last Modified: June 09, 2025
- Test Case Author: QA Team Lead
- Review Status: Approved
- Approval Date: June 09, 2025
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Authentication & Dashboard Overview
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
- Test Category: Core Functionality
- Complexity: Medium
- Risk Assessment: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding/Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Foundation for all dashboard operations
- ROI_Impact: Critical - 100% of users require successful login
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of authentication flow
- Integration_Points: SMART360 authentication service, dashboard service
- Code_Module_Mapped: auth.service.js, dashboard.component.js, user.middleware.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-01
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/auth/login, /api/dashboard/summary
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Authentication-Health, Core-Functionality
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Login Success Rate, Dashboard Load Time
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
- Dependencies: SMART360 authentication service, meter reading database, session management service
- Performance_Baseline: <1 second dashboard load
- Network_Requirements: Stable internet connection, minimum 10 Mbps
- Database_State: Sample data loaded with active read cycles
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system configured and running
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role with dashboard access permissions
- Test_Data:
- Username: meter.manager@utility.com
- Password: SecurePass123!
- Active read cycles: Savaii 202501 R2, North Zone 202501 R1
- Sample meter data: 12,450 total readings
- Prior_Test_Cases: None (foundation test)
- Environmental_Prep: Clear browser cache, ensure test data integrity
- External_Dependencies: Authentication service healthy
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads successfully with all summary cards visible and accurate data
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Performance meets <1 second requirement
- User role permissions correctly applied
- All UI elements properly rendered
- Navigation menu accessible
- Negative_Verification:
- No error messages displayed
- No broken UI elements or images
- No console errors in browser developer tools
- Data_Verification: Summary card values match expected test data
- Security_Verification: User session properly established with appropriate tokens
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed description of actual behavior observed]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Name of person who performed the test]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken to complete test]
- Performance_Metrics: [Dashboard load time, API response times]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Links to evidence, console logs, network traces]
- Browser_Compatibility: [Results across different browsers tested]
- Notes: [Additional observations or context]
Test Case 2: Summary Cards Data Display and Calculation Accuracy
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_002
- Title: Verify summary cards display correct aggregated data and calculation accuracy across all active cycles
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Last Modified: June 09, 2025
- Test Case Author: Data Validation Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Dashboard Overview - Summary Cards & Calculations
- Test Type: Functional/Data Validation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: Data Accuracy
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Accurate metrics drive operational decisions
- ROI_Impact: Data accuracy directly affects billing accuracy (25% improvement target)
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of summary card calculations
- Integration_Points: Meter reading database, calculation engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: calculator.service.js, dashboard.model.js, aggregation.utils.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-01, AC-02, AC-03
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/meter-readings/summary, /api/metrics/calculations
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Data-Quality-Dashboard, Business-Metrics, Calculation-Accuracy
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Data Accuracy Rate, Calculation Performance
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Dependencies: Meter reading database with verified sample data, calculation service
- Performance_Baseline: Calculations complete within 500ms
- Database_State: Consistent test dataset loaded
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible from TC_001
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated
- Test_Data:
- Savaii 202501 R2: 2,450 meters
- North Zone 202501 R1: 1,890 meters
- Total expected readings: 12,450
- Expected missing readings: 2,730
- Expected validated readings: 9,720
- Expected exempted readings: 620
- Expected validation rate: 78.12%
- Expected exemption rate: 4.98%
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 must pass
- Data_Validation: Test data mathematically verified
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All summary cards display mathematically accurate aggregated values
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Percentage calculations accurate to expected precision (rounded appropriately)
- Progress bars visually represent calculated percentages
- Real-time updates function correctly
- Icons and subtitles display properly
- Negative_Verification: No data inconsistencies or calculation errors
- Performance_Verification: Calculations complete within 500ms baseline
- Business_Logic_Verification: Rounding follows business rules (0.5 rounds up)
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed calculation results and UI observations]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Name of data validation specialist]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken including calculations]
- Calculation_Accuracy: [Mathematical verification results]
- Performance_Metrics: [Calculation response times]
- Defects_Found: [Any calculation discrepancies or UI issues]
- Data_Consistency_Check: [Verification of data integrity]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of calculations and results]
Test Case 3: Active Read Cycles Tab and Zone Card Display
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_003
- Title: Verify Active Read Cycles tab displays current reading cycles with accurate zone information
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: UI/UX Testing Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Read Cycle Management - Active Cycles Display
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Core Navigation
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Primary interface for operational monitoring
- ROI_Impact: Enables 30% improvement in operational efficiency
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of active cycles display and zone card functionality
- Integration_Points: Read cycle service, zone management service
- Code_Module_Mapped: read-cycles.component.js, zone-card.component.js, cycle-service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-04, AC-05
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web, Tablet
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/read-cycles/active, /api/zones/{zoneId}
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: UI-Functionality, Zone-Management, Navigation-Health
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Zone Visibility, Navigation Success Rate
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Desktop and Tablet
- Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080, 1024x768
- Dependencies: Read cycle service, zone data service, staff directory
- Performance_Baseline: Tab switching <200ms, zone cards load <500ms
- Database_State: Active cycles with complete zone information
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded from TC_001 and TC_002
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with zone access
- Test_Data:
- Active Cycles Count: 6
- Savaii 202501 R2: Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025, Photo reading, 2,450 meters
- North Zone 202501 R1: Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025, Manual reading, 1,890 meters
- East Zone 202501 R1: Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025, Photo reading, 2,100 meters
- West Zone 202501 R1: Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025, Mixed reading, 1,750 meters
- Central Zone 202501 R1: Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025, Photo reading, 2,300 meters
- Industrial Zone 202501 R1: Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025, Manual reading, 980 meters
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_002 must pass
- Staff_Assignments: All zones have assigned validators and supervisors
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Active Read Cycles tab displays exactly 6 zone cards with complete and accurate information
- Secondary_Verifications:
- All cards show correct date ranges (Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 30, 2025)
- Reading method icons correctly represent photo/manual/mixed
- Progress bars present on all cards with appropriate color coding
- Staff assignments visible and accurate
- View Cycle buttons accessible on all cards
- Negative_Verification: No missing cards, broken layouts, or incomplete information
- Visual_Verification: Consistent styling, proper alignment, responsive behavior
- Accessibility_Verification: Tab navigation works with keyboard, screen reader compatibility
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed observations of tab behavior and zone card display]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [UI/UX testing specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for complete verification]
- Zone_Card_Count: [Actual number of cards displayed]
- Data_Accuracy: [Verification of zone information accuracy]
- UI_Consistency: [Assessment of visual consistency and layout]
- Defects_Found: [Any UI issues, data discrepancies, or layout problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of tab states and zone cards]
- Accessibility_Notes: [Keyboard navigation and screen reader testing results]
FUNCTIONAL TEST SUITE (P1-P2 Priority)
Test Case 4: Zone Card Data Accuracy and Progress Visualization
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_004
- Title: Verify zone cards display accurate metrics, progress indicators, and staff assignments for each reading cycle
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Data Accuracy Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Read Cycle Management - Zone Card Data Accuracy
- Test Type: Functional/Data Validation
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: Data Integrity
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Accurate zone monitoring enables targeted resource allocation
- ROI_Impact: Supports 20% improvement in resource utilization
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of zone card data display and calculation accuracy
- Integration_Points: Zone service, meter reading service, staff service, calculation engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: zone-card.component.js, zone-metrics.service.js, progress-bar.component.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-05 (Zone card information display)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web, Tablet
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/zones/{zoneId}/metrics, /api/staff/assignments/{zoneId}
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Zone-Performance, Data-Accuracy, Progress-Tracking
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Zone Performance Accuracy, Progress Tracking Reliability
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Zone service, meter reading database, staff directory, calculation service
- Performance_Baseline: Zone data loads within 500ms
- Database_State: Complete zone data with verified metrics
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Active Read Cycles tab accessible from TC_003
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with zone data access
- Test_Data:
- Savaii 202501 R2: 2,450 meters, 90% collection, 25% missing, 65% validation, 8% exempted
- Validator: John Doe, Supervisor: Jane Smith, Reading Method: Photo
- North Zone 202501 R1: 1,890 meters, 95% collection, 17% missing, 78% validation, 7% exempted
- Validator: Robert Johnson, Supervisor: Sarah Williams, Reading Method: Manual
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003 must pass
- Data_Integrity: All zone metrics mathematically verified
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All zone cards display mathematically accurate metrics with correct staff assignments
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Progress bars visually represent calculated percentages accurately
- Color coding follows established UI standards (blue=collection, green=validation, yellow=missing, red=exempted)
- Staff assignments are current and properly formatted
- Reading method icons correctly represent actual collection methods
- All numerical values formatted consistently across cards
- Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, missing data, or inconsistent formatting
- Visual_Verification: Progress bars proportionally accurate, colors accessible
- Data_Integrity_Verification: Zone totals contribute correctly to summary calculations
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed metrics verification and visual assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Data accuracy specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for complete zone verification]
- Calculation_Accuracy: [Mathematical verification of all percentages]
- Visual_Consistency: [Assessment of progress bar accuracy and color coding]
- Staff_Assignment_Accuracy: [Verification of personnel information]
- Defects_Found: [Any data discrepancies or visual issues]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of zone cards and progress indicators]
Test Case 5: View Cycle Navigation and Detailed Information Access
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_005
- Title: Verify "View Cycle" button navigates to detailed cycle information with proper context preservation
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Navigation Testing Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Read Cycle Management - Navigation & Detail Access
- Test Type: Functional/Navigation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Navigation
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Enables drill-down analysis for operational decision making
- ROI_Impact: Supports detailed operational analysis and problem resolution
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of cycle detail navigation functionality
- Integration_Points: Navigation service, cycle detail service, breadcrumb service
- Code_Module_Mapped: navigation.service.js, cycle-detail.component.js, breadcrumb.component.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-06 (View Cycle navigation)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web, Tablet
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/cycles/{cycleId}/details, /api/navigation/breadcrumb
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Navigation-Health, User-Experience, Detail-Access
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Navigation Success Rate, Detail Access Frequency
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iPad
- Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080, 1024x768
- Dependencies: Navigation service, cycle detail service, breadcrumb service
- Performance_Baseline: Navigation completes within 1 second, detail page loads within 2 seconds
- Database_State: Complete cycle detail data available
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Zone cards displayed from TC_004
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with cycle detail access
- Test_Data:
- Target cycle: Savaii 202501 R2
- Expected detail data: Individual meter readings, validation status, exception details
- Navigation context: Dashboard → Active Cycles → Cycle Detail
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_003, TC_004 must pass
- Browser_State: Active session with zone cards loaded
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: "View Cycle" button successfully navigates to detailed cycle information within performance baseline
- Secondary_Verifications:
- URL correctly updates to reflect cycle context
- Breadcrumb navigation functions properly
- Page title updates appropriately
- Cycle-specific data loads correctly
- Back navigation preserves context
- Negative_Verification: No broken navigation, missing context, or performance degradation
- Performance_Verification: Navigation timing meets <1 second requirement
- Accessibility_Verification: Navigation works with keyboard and assistive technologies
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed navigation behavior and timing observations]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Navigation testing specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for navigation testing]
- Navigation_Performance: [Actual timing measurements]
- Context_Preservation: [Assessment of state management]
- Defects_Found: [Any navigation issues or performance problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of navigation flow and detail pages]
Test Case 6: Completed Read Cycles Tab and Historical Data Display
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_006
- Title: Verify Completed Read Cycles tab displays accurate historical cycle data with proper reporting capabilities
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Historical Data Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Read Cycle Management - Historical Data Display
- Test Type: Functional/Data Display
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Historical Data
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (audit trail)
- SLA_Related: No
- Business_Value: Provides historical analysis and audit trail for compliance
- ROI_Impact: Enables performance trend analysis and regulatory compliance
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of historical cycle display functionality
- Integration_Points: Historical data service, reporting service, export service
- Code_Module_Mapped: completed-cycles.component.js, historical-data.service.js, report-export.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-04 (Read cycle tab toggle)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/read-cycles/completed, /api/reports/cycle-export
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Historical-Analysis, Audit-Trail, Performance-Trends
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Historical Data Access, Report Generation Frequency
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Historical data service, report generation service
- Performance_Baseline: Tab switch <200ms, data load <1 second
- Database_State: Historical cycles with complete audit data
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible with completed cycles data
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with historical data access
- Test_Data:
- March 2025 Savaii: 2,450 total, 92% validated, 8% estimated, Finalized by: John Doe
- March 2025 North: 1,890 total, 95% validated, 5% estimated, Finalized by: Robert Johnson
- March 2025 East: 2,100 total, 89% validated, 11% estimated, Finalized by: Michael Brown
- March 2025 West: 1,750 total, 97% validated, 3% estimated, Finalized by: David Wilson
- February 2025 All Zones: 8,500 total, 94% validated, 6% estimated, Finalized by: Sarah Williams
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_003 must pass
- Data_Integrity: Historical data mathematically verified and audit-ready
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Completed Read Cycles tab displays accurate historical data with proper audit trail
- Secondary_Verifications:
- All historical entries show complete information
- Date ranges formatted consistently (Mar 1, 2025 - Mar 31, 2025)
- Percentage calculations accurate for all entries
- Staff finalizations properly recorded
- Action buttons functional and accessible
- Negative_Verification: No missing historical data, calculation errors, or broken functionality
- Audit_Verification: Complete audit trail with proper personnel attribution
- Performance_Verification: Historical data loads within performance baseline
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed historical data verification and functionality assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Historical data specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for historical data verification]
- Data_Accuracy: [Verification of historical calculations and audit information]
- Functionality_Assessment: [Report generation and sorting capabilities]
- Defects_Found: [Any historical data issues or functionality problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of historical data display and functionality]
Test Case 7: Validation Rules Configuration Access and Interface
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_007
- Title: Verify Meter Manager can access validation rules configuration with proper interface and permissions
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Configuration Testing Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Configuration - Validation Rules Access
- Test Type: Functional/Configuration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Configuration Management
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Enables customizable validation logic for different utility requirements
- ROI_Impact: Supports 90% improvement in validation consistency
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of validation rules configuration access and interface
- Integration_Points: Configuration service, validation engine, permission service
- Code_Module_Mapped: validation-rules.component.js, config.service.js, permission.middleware.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-07 (Configuration section access), AC-08 (Validation rules configuration)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/configuration/validation-rules, /api/permissions/validate
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Configuration-Health, Permission-Verification, Interface-Functionality
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Configuration Access Success Rate, Rule Modification Frequency
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Configuration service, validation engine, user permission service
- Performance_Baseline: Modal opens within 200ms, rules load within 500ms
- Database_State: Current validation rules configuration available
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded with configuration section visible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager role with configuration access permissions
- Test_Data:
- Current validation rules state
- Expected rules: Consumption Check, Meter Reading Check, Zero Consumption Alert, Negative Consumption Check, High Consumption Alert
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 (authentication) must pass
- Permission_Verification: Meter Manager permissions confirmed
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Meter Manager can access validation rules configuration with complete interface elements
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Configuration section properly positioned and visible
- Validation Rules card displays with correct icon and description
- Modal opens within performance baseline with all required elements
- All 5 validation rules displayed with accurate descriptions
- Toggle switches present and functional for each rule
- Action buttons properly positioned and accessible
- Negative_Verification: No missing interface elements, broken functionality, or permission errors
- Permission_Verification: Access granted only with appropriate Meter Manager permissions
- Performance_Verification: Modal opening meets <200ms requirement
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed interface verification and access assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Configuration testing specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for configuration access verification]
- Interface_Completeness: [Assessment of all required elements]
- Performance_Metrics: [Modal opening timing and responsiveness]
- Permission_Verification: [Confirmation of appropriate access control]
- Defects_Found: [Any interface issues or access problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of configuration interface and modal]
Test Case 8: Validation Rules Enable/Disable Functionality and State Management
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_008
- Title: Verify validation rules can be enabled/disabled with proper state persistence and immediate effect
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: State Management Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Configuration - Validation Rules State Management
- Test Type: Functional/State Management
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: Configuration Persistence
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Enables dynamic validation logic adaptation for different operational requirements
- ROI_Impact: Supports 90% improvement in validation consistency and 40% reduction in false positives
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of validation rule state management and persistence
- Integration_Points: Configuration service, validation engine, database persistence layer
- Code_Module_Mapped: validation-rules.component.js, rule-state.service.js, config-persistence.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-08 (Validation rules enable/disable)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/configuration/validation-rules (GET/PUT), /api/validation/rule-status
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Configuration-Reliability, State-Management, Validation-Engine-Health
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Configuration Change Success Rate, Rule State Accuracy
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Configuration service, validation engine, persistence layer, cache service
- Performance_Baseline: State changes <300ms, persistence <1 second
- Database_State: Current validation configuration with known state
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Validation Rules modal open from TC_007
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with configuration modification rights
- Test_Data:
- Initial state: All rules enabled by default
- Target modifications: Disable Zero Consumption Alert, Enable High Consumption Alert
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_007 must pass (modal access)
- State_Verification: Current rule states recorded as baseline
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Validation rules can be enabled/disabled with immediate visual feedback and persistent state storage
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Toggle switches respond immediately to user interaction
- Visual states accurately represent enabled/disabled status
- Save operation completes within performance baseline
- State persistence survives modal close/reopen cycle
- Cancel functionality properly discards unsaved changes
- Negative_Verification: No state inconsistencies, save failures, or visual glitches
- Performance_Verification: State changes <300ms, save operations <1 second
- Data_Integrity_Verification: Saved states match user selections exactly
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed state management behavior and persistence verification]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [State management specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for state management testing]
- State_Persistence_Accuracy: [Verification of saved vs. intended states]
- Performance_Metrics: [State change timing and save operation duration]
- UI_Response_Quality: [Assessment of visual feedback and user experience]
- Defects_Found: [Any state management issues or persistence problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of state changes and persistence verification]
Test Case 9: Validation Rules Business Logic Enforcement During Active Cycles
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_009
- Title: Verify validation rules cannot be disabled during active reading cycles with proper business rule enforcement
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Business Logic Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Configuration - Business Rules Enforcement
- Test Type: Functional/Business Logic
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Business Rule Validation
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (data integrity)
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Ensures
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Browser-Compatibility, Cross-Platform-Support, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Browser Support Coverage, Cross-Browser Performance Consistency
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080, 1366x768
- Dependencies: All dashboard services available across browser environments
- Performance_Baseline: Consistent performance within 10% variance across browsers
- Database_State: Identical test data across all browser sessions
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: All target browsers installed and updated
- User_Roles_Permissions: Same Meter Manager credentials across all browsers
- Test_Data: Identical dataset: Savaii 202501 R2, consistent test readings
- Prior_Test_Cases: Core functionality verified in primary browser (Chrome)
- Browser_Environment: Clean browser states, no conflicting extensions
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard functions identically across all supported browsers with consistent visual appearance
- Secondary_Verifications:
- All interactive elements work properly in each browser
- Visual styling remains consistent (layout, colors, fonts)
- Performance metrics stay within acceptable variance
- Form controls and modals function identically
- JavaScript functionality operates correctly across engines
- Negative_Verification: No browser-specific errors, rendering issues, or functionality gaps
- Performance_Verification: Load times consistent within 10% across browsers
- Visual_Verification: Pixel-perfect consistency in layout and styling
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed cross-browser behavior comparison and compatibility assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Cross-browser testing specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Total time across all browser testing]
- Browser_Compatibility_Matrix: [Pass/fail status for each browser tested]
- Performance_Variance: [Performance differences between browsers]
- Visual_Consistency_Assessment: [Evaluation of styling and layout consistency]
- Defects_Found: [Any browser-specific issues or compatibility problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence from each browser for comparison]
Test Case 10: Validator Setup - Staff Assignment Interface and Functionality
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_010
- Title: Verify validators and supervisors can be assigned to reading cycles through intuitive interface
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Staff Management Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Configuration - Validator Setup & Staff Assignment
- Test Type: Functional/User Management
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Staff Management
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (audit trail)
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Enables optimal workload distribution and accountability tracking
- ROI_Impact: Supports 20% better allocation of validator resources and improved accountability
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of staff assignment interface and functionality
- Integration_Points: Staff directory service, assignment service, cycle management service
- Code_Module_Mapped: validator-setup.component.js, staff-assignment.service.js, staff-directory.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-07 (Configuration access), AC-10 (Validator setup and assignment)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/staff/directory, /api/assignments/cycles, /api/staff/search
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Staff-Management, Assignment-Tracking, Workforce-Optimization
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Assignment Success Rate, Staff Utilization Distribution
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Staff directory service, assignment tracking service, notification service
- Performance_Baseline: Modal opens <300ms, staff search <500ms, assignment save <1 second
- Database_State: Complete staff directory with available validators and supervisors
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with configuration section accessible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with staff assignment permissions
- Test_Data:
- Available validators: John Smith, Maria Garcia, Robert Johnson, Emma Davis, Lisa Wong, David Brown
- Available supervisors: David Brown, Lisa Wong, Emma Davis, Robert Johnson, Sarah Williams
- Target cycles: Savaii 202501 R2, North Zone 202501 R1, Industrial Zone 202501 R1
- Assignment capacity: Multiple validators per cycle supported
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_007 (configuration access) must pass
- Staff_Directory: Verified staff members available in system
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Validators and supervisors can be successfully assigned to reading cycles with intuitive interface
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Modal opens within performance baseline
- Staff dropdown shows available personnel correctly
- Visual tags distinguish between validators (blue) and supervisors (green)
- Multiple validators can be assigned to single cycle
- Assignment changes persist properly
- Remove functionality works correctly
- Negative_Verification: No assignment failures, interface errors, or data loss
- Performance_Verification: All operations meet specified timing requirements
- Data_Integrity_Verification: Assignments save and persist accurately
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed staff assignment functionality and interface assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Staff management specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for assignment testing]
- Assignment_Success_Rate: [Percentage of successful assignments completed]
- Interface_Usability: [Assessment of user experience and workflow efficiency]
- Performance_Metrics: [Modal opening, search, and save operation timings]
- Data_Persistence_Verification: [Confirmation of assignment state retention]
- Defects_Found: [Any assignment issues or interface problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of assignment interface and successful operations]
Test Case 11: Validator Search Functionality and Staff Filtering
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_011
- Title: Verify validator search functionality filters staff members accurately by name with responsive performance
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Search Functionality Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Configuration - Staff Search & Filtering
- Test Type: Functional/Search
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Search & Filter
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
- Business_Value: Improves efficiency in staff assignment by enabling quick personnel location
- ROI_Impact: Reduces staff assignment time by 60% in large organizations
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of staff search and filtering functionality
- Integration_Points: Staff directory service, search engine, filtering service
- Code_Module_Mapped: staff-search.component.js, search-filter.service.js, staff-directory.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-10 (search validators and supervisors by name)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/staff/search, /api/staff/filter
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Search-Performance, User-Experience, Staff-Directory-Health
- Trend_Tracking: No
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Search Success Rate, Search Response Time
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Staff directory service, search indexing service
- Performance_Baseline: Search results <300ms, no lag during typing
- Database_State: Complete staff directory with diverse name patterns
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Validator Setup modal open from TC_010
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with staff directory access
- Test_Data:
- Available staff: John Smith, Maria Garcia, Robert Johnson, Emma Davis, Lisa Wong, David Brown, Sarah Williams
- Search test cases: "john", "garcia", "xyz" (non-existent), partial names, case variations
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_010 must pass (validator setup access)
- Staff_Directory: Verified staff members loaded in search index
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Staff search functionality accurately filters personnel by name with responsive performance
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Search responds within 300ms performance baseline
- Partial name matching works for both first and last names
- Case-insensitive search functionality
- Real-time filtering updates as user types
- Empty results handled gracefully with appropriate messaging
- Search reset restores complete staff list
- Negative_Verification: No search errors, performance degradation, or incorrect filtering
- Performance_Verification: Search operations meet <300ms requirement
- User_Experience_Verification: Intuitive search behavior with immediate feedback
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed search functionality behavior and performance assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Search functionality specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for search testing]
- Search_Accuracy: [Percentage of correct search results]
- Performance_Metrics: [Search response times and filtering speed]
- User_Experience_Assessment: [Evaluation of search intuitiveness and responsiveness]
- Defects_Found: [Any search issues or performance problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of search functionality and results]
Test Case 12: Exemption Codes Management - Creation, Editing, and Organization
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_012
- Title: Verify exemption codes can be created, edited, and managed with proper remark options and validation
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Code Management Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Configuration - Exemption Codes Management
- Test Type: Functional/Configuration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Code Management
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (audit trail)
- SLA_Related: No
- Business_Value: Enables standardized exception handling and improves reporting capabilities by 80%
- ROI_Impact: Supports consistent exception documentation and audit trail maintenance
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 7 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Medium
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of exemption code management functionality
- Integration_Points: Code management service, validation service, audit service
- Code_Module_Mapped: exemption-codes.component.js, code-management.service.js, validation.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers AC-07 (Configuration access), AC-11 (Exemption codes management)
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/exemption-codes, /api/exemption-codes/{codeId}, /api/exemption-codes/remarks
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Code-Management, Standardization-Progress, Configuration-Health
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Code Usage Distribution, Standardization Compliance Rate
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Code management service, validation engine, persistence layer
- Performance_Baseline: Code operations <500ms, modal opens <300ms
- Database_State: Existing exemption codes with associated remarks
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard with configuration section accessible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with code management permissions
- Test_Data:
- Existing codes: NI (Not Inspected), NR (No Reading), UM (Unmetered)
- New code to add: AC (Access Denied)
- Remark options: Multiple predefined remarks per code
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_007 (configuration access) must pass
- Code_Management: Verified existing codes present and functional
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Exemption codes can be created, viewed, and managed with complete remark option functionality
- Secondary_Verifications:
- All existing codes display with accurate information and remark counts
- Add new code form functions properly with validation
- New codes integrate seamlessly into existing list
- Edit functionality provides access to modify existing codes
- Delete functionality includes appropriate confirmation safeguards
- Remark options expand/collapse properly for each code
- Negative_Verification: No code management errors, data loss, or interface failures
- Data_Validation: Code format validation, description requirements, remark handling
- Performance_Verification: All operations complete within specified timing requirements
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed code management functionality and data handling assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Code management specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for code management testing]
- Code_Creation_Success: [Success rate of new code creation]
- Data_Integrity: [Verification of code and remark data accuracy]
- Interface_Functionality: [Assessment of management interface usability]
- Defects_Found: [Any code management issues or data problems]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of code management interface and operations]
INTEGRATION TEST SUITE (P2-P3 Priority)
Test Case 13: Cross-Browser Compatibility Verification
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_013
- Title: Verify dashboard functions correctly across all supported browsers with consistent behavior
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Cross-Browser Testing Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Cross-Browser Compatibility
- Test Type: Compatibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: Browser Compatibility
- Complexity: Medium
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
- Business_Value: Ensures consistent user experience across different browser environments
- ROI_Impact: Supports broader user adoption and reduces support overhead
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes (across all browsers)
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: High
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of core dashboard functionality across supported browsers
- Integration_Points: Browser rendering engines, JavaScript engines, CSS processors
- Code_Module_Mapped: All frontend components, browser-specific polyfills
- Requirement_Coverage: Cross-browser support requirement
- Cross_Platform_Support: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- API_Endpoints_Covered: All dashboard APIs across different browsers
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Browser-Compatibility, Cross-Platform-Support, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- **Customer# Meter Reading Validation Dashboard - Complete Test Cases Suite (MX03US01)
Test Case Metadata Information
- Product: SMART360 Utility SaaS Platform
- Module: Meter Reading Validation Dashboard
- User Story: MX03US01
- Generated Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Total Test Cases: 45
- Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%
Test Case 14: Real-time Data Updates and Synchronization
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_014
- Title: Verify dashboard updates with real-time meter reading data and maintains synchronization
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Real-time Integration Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Real-time Data Integration & Synchronization
- Test Type: Integration/Data Flow
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
- Test Category: Real-time Data
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Enables real-time operational visibility and immediate decision making
- ROI_Impact: Supports proactive issue resolution and operational efficiency improvements
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Medium
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: High
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of real-time data synchronization functionality
- Integration_Points: Real-time data feed, dashboard update service, WebSocket connections
- Code_Module_Mapped: real-time-updates.service.js, data-sync.service.js, websocket.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Real-time data requirements
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/real-time/updates, /api/data-sync/status, WebSocket endpoints
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Real-time-Performance, Data-Sync-Health, Integration-Reliability
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Data Sync Latency, Real-time Update Success Rate
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Dependencies: Real-time data feed service, WebSocket server, meter reading collection system
- Performance_Baseline: Updates appear within 5 seconds, no data inconsistency
- Database_State: Active meter reading collection with real-time feed enabled
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded with baseline data, real-time feed active
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with real-time data access
- Test_Data:
- Baseline: 12,450 total readings, 9,720 validated, 2,730 missing, 620 exempted
- Test injection: Additional validated reading for Savaii zone
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_002 must pass (baseline functionality)
- Real_Time_Service: Confirmed active and responsive
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard updates automatically with real-time meter reading data within performance baseline
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Summary cards reflect new readings within 5 seconds
- Percentage calculations update automatically and accurately
- Zone-specific data synchronizes properly
- Visual progress indicators adjust to new data
- Batch updates process correctly without data loss
- Negative_Verification: No data inconsistencies, sync failures, or performance degradation
- Performance_Verification: Updates appear within 5-second requirement
- Data_Integrity_Verification: All calculations remain mathematically accurate after updates
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed real-time synchronization behavior and performance assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Real-time integration specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for real-time testing]
- Sync_Latency_Measurements: [Actual timing of data updates]
- Data_Consistency_Verification: [Mathematical accuracy after updates]
- Performance_Metrics: [Update frequency and response times]
- Defects_Found: [Any synchronization issues or data inconsistencies]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Visual evidence of real-time updates and data changes]
Test Case 15: Performance Testing with Large Datasets
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_015
- Title: Verify dashboard performance and responsiveness with large-scale meter reading datasets (50,000+ readings)
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Performance Testing Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Performance & Scalability Under Load
- Test Type: Performance/Load Testing
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: Performance & Scalability
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Ensures system scalability for large utility operations
- ROI_Impact: Supports enterprise-scale deployments and prevents performance degradation
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboard functionality under large dataset conditions
- Integration_Points: Database query optimization, calculation engine, rendering pipeline
- Code_Module_Mapped: dashboard.component.js, calculation.service.js, data-aggregation.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Performance requirements for large-scale operations
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: All dashboard APIs under load conditions
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Performance-Benchmarks, Scalability-Assessment, System-Capacity
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: System Response Time Under Load, Scalability Thresholds
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Performance Testing Environment
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
- Device/OS: High-spec testing machine (16GB RAM, SSD)
- Dependencies: Performance database with large dataset, monitoring tools
- Performance_Baseline: <1 second load time, stable memory usage
- Database_State: 50,000+ meter readings across 25 zones with complete data
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Performance environment with large dataset loaded
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager with access to large dataset
- Test_Data:
- 50,000+ meter readings across 25 zones
- Mixed reading types (photo, manual, estimated)
- Complete validation history and staff assignments
- Representative data distribution
- Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified in normal conditions
- Performance_Monitoring: System monitoring tools active and configured
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard maintains <1 second load time and responsive performance with 50,000+ meter readings
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Memory usage remains below 100MB threshold
- All interactive elements respond within specified timeframes
- Calculation performance meets baseline requirements
- UI rendering scales properly with large datasets
- Network requests remain optimized and efficient
- Negative_Verification: No performance degradation, memory leaks, or system instability
- Scalability_Verification: System performance scales linearly with data volume
- Resource_Efficiency_Verification: CPU and memory usage remain within acceptable limits
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed performance measurements and scalability assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [Performance testing specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for performance testing]
- Load_Time_Measurements: [Actual dashboard load times with large dataset]
- Resource_Usage_Analysis: [CPU, memory, and network utilization]
- Performance_Benchmarks: [Comparison against baseline requirements]
- Scalability_Assessment: [System behavior under large data volumes]
- Defects_Found: [Any performance issues or scalability problems]
- Performance_Charts: [Graphs and metrics from monitoring tools]
API TEST SUITE (Critical Level >=7)
Test Case 16: Authentication API Validation and Security
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_016
- Title: Verify authentication API validates credentials, returns secure tokens, and handles security scenarios
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: API Security Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Authentication API Security
- Test Type: API/Security
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: API Security
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Onboarding/Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (security standards)
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Foundation of system security and user access control
- ROI_Impact: Critical for system security and regulatory compliance
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
- Defect_Probability: Low
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of authentication API endpoints and security scenarios
- Integration_Points: Authentication service, token management, session management
- Code_Module_Mapped: auth.api.js, token.service.js, security.middleware.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete authentication and security requirements
- Cross_Platform_Support: All platforms
- API_Endpoints_Covered: POST /api/auth/login, GET /api/auth/validate-token, POST /api/auth/refresh
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: API-Security-Health, Authentication-Performance, Security-Compliance
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: Critical
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Authentication Success Rate, Security Incident Rate
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- API_Base_URL: https://api-staging.smart360.utility.com
- Authentication: Service-to-service testing credentials
- Dependencies: Authentication service, user directory, token storage
- Performance_Baseline: API responses <200ms, token generation <100ms
- Security_Context: SSL/TLS enabled, secure token storage configured
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: API testing environment configured with security protocols
- User_Roles_Permissions: Test accounts for different roles (Meter Manager, Validator)
- Test_Data:
- Valid credentials: meter.manager@utility.com / SecurePass123!
- Invalid credentials: invalid@test.com / wrongpass
- Expired token scenarios
- Security_Configuration: JWT token settings, session timeout configurations
- API_Documentation: Current API specification and security requirements
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Authentication API properly validates credentials and returns secure JWT tokens with appropriate claims
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Invalid credentials return 401 without exposing sensitive information
- Token structure includes all required claims and security headers
- Rate limiting protects against brute force attacks
- Token validation endpoint properly verifies active tokens
- Expired tokens are rejected with appropriate error messages
- Security_Verification: No sensitive data exposure, proper input sanitization, audit logging active
- Performance_Verification: API responses meet <200ms requirement
- Compliance_Verification: Security headers and protocols meet enterprise standards
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Detailed API behavior and security assessment]
- Execution_Date: [Date when test was executed]
- Executed_By: [API security specialist name]
- Execution_Time: [Time taken for API security testing]
- Response_Time_Analysis: [API performance measurements]
- Security_Compliance_Check: [Assessment of security controls and headers]
- Token_Validation_Results: [JWT token structure and claims verification]
- Rate_Limiting_Verification: [Security protection mechanism testing]
- Defects_Found: [Any security vulnerabilities or API issues]
- Security_Logs: [Audit trail and security monitoring verification]
Test Case 17: Meter Reading Data API Integration and Accuracy
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX03US01_TC_017
- Title: Verify meter reading data API returns accurate aggregated metrics with proper data filtering and performance
- Created By: Test Automation Framework
- Created Date: June 09, 2025
- Version: 2.0
- Test Case Author: Data API Specialist
- Review Status: Approved
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Retrieval API & Business Logic
- Test Type: API/Data Validation
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
- Test Category: Data API
- Complexity: High
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (data accuracy)
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Provides accurate data foundation for operational decisions and billing
- ROI_Impact: Ensures 25% improvement in billing accuracy through reliable data APIs
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of meter reading data API endpoints and business logic
- Integration_Points: Meter reading database, calculation engine, filtering service
- Code_Module_Mapped: meter-data.api.js, aggregation.service.js, filtering.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete data API and calculation requirements
- Cross_Platform_Support: All platforms
- API_Endpoints_Covered: GET /api/meter-readings/summary, GET /api/meter-readings/zones/{zoneId}, GET /api/meter-readings/cycles/{cycleId}
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Data-API-Health, Calculation-Accuracy, API-Performance
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Data API Accuracy Rate, API Response Performance
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- API_Base_URL: https://api-staging.smart360.utility.com
- Authentication: Valid API tokens for data access
- Dependencies: Meter reading database, calculation service, zone management
- Performance_Baseline: API responses <500ms, data accuracy 100%
- Database_State: Verified test dataset with known calculation results
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: API testing tools configured with valid authentication
- User_Roles_Permissions: API access with meter reading data permissions
- Test_Data:
- Expected summary: 12,450 total, 9,720 validated, 2,730 missing, 620 exempted
- Zone-specific data: Savaii 202501 R2 with 2,450 meters
- Calculation verification: 78% validation rate, 5% exemption rate
- Authentication: Valid JWT token for API access
- Data_Integrity: Test dataset mathematically verified for accuracy testing
# Test Procedure
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes (data integrity)
- SLA_Related: Yes
- Business_Value: Ensures data integrity by preventing validation rule changes that could invalidate in-progress readings
- ROI_Impact: Prevents data corruption and maintains audit trail integrity (100% data consistency requirement)
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
- Defect_Probability: Medium
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of business rule enforcement for active cycle protection
- Integration_Points: Configuration service, cycle status service, business rule engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: business-rules.service.js, cycle-status.middleware.js, validation-protection.service.js
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete - covers business rule: "Validation rules cannot be disabled during an active reading cycle"
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
- API_Endpoints_Covered: /api/cycles/status, /api/configuration/validation-rules/restrictions
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Business-Logic-Compliance, Data-Integrity, Rule-Enforcement
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
- Business_Metric_Tracked: Business Rule Compliance Rate, Data Integrity Violations
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Dependencies: Business rule engine, cycle status service, configuration service
- Performance_Baseline: Rule validation <100ms, error messaging immediate
- Database_State: Active reading cycles in progress with validation rules applied
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Active reading cycles exist and validation rules modal accessible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager authenticated with configuration access
- Test_Data:
- Active cycles: Savaii 202501 R2, North Zone 202501 R1 (in progress)
- Current rule states: All validation rules enabled
- Expected restriction: Cannot disable any rule during active cycles
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_007, TC_008 must pass
- Active_Cycle_Verification: Confirmed active cycles with validation in progress
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Validation rules cannot be disabled during active reading cycles with clear business rule enforcement
- Secondary_Verifications:
- Warning messages display immediately upon restriction violation
- Toggle states remain protected and unchanged
- Consistent enforcement across all validation rules
- Save operations appropriately restricted or warned
- Non-restricted operations (enabling rules) remain functional
- Negative_Verification: No business rule circumvention, data integrity breaches, or inconsistent enforcement
- Business_Logic_Verification: Rule applies universally to all active validation rules
User_Experience_Verification: Clear messaging and feedback for restriction understanding
Test Case 11: Validation Issue Detail View
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_011
Title: Verify clicking View action button navigates to detailed issue view
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Exception Management
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Suite 6: Search Functionality
Test Case 12: Search Meter Reads by Meter Number
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_012
Title: Verify search functionality works correctly for meter number queries
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Search and Investigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Test Procedure:
Test Case 13: Search Meter Reads by Account Number
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_013
Title: Verify search functionality works correctly for account number queries
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Search and Investigation
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Suite 7: Configuration Management
Test Case 14: Validation Rules Configuration Access
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_014
Title: Verify Meter Manager can access and view validation rules configuration
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Configuration Management
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Case 15: Estimation Rules Management
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_015
Title: Verify estimation rules can be accessed and managed through dashboard
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Configuration Management
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Full
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Case 16: Validator Setup Configuration
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_016
Title: Verify validator setup allows assignment and workload management
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Configuration Management
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Full
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Case 17: Exemption Codes Management
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_017
Title: Verify exemption codes can be configured and managed
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Configuration Management
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Full
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Suite 8: API Integration Test Cases
Test Case 18: Dashboard Data API Response Validation
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_018
Title: Verify dashboard metrics API returns accurate data in expected format
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: API Integration
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context:
- Revenue_Impact: High
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Test Procedure:
Test Case 19: Validation Issues API Integration
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_019
Title: Verify validation issues API provides complete issue data for dashboard display
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: API Integration
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Test Procedure:
Test Case 20: Meter Conditions API Data Validation
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_020
Title: Verify meter conditions API provides accurate condition distribution data
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: API Integration
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Test Procedure:
Test Suite 9: Performance and Load Testing
Test Case 21: Dashboard Load Performance Under Normal Load
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_021
Title: Verify dashboard loads within acceptable time limits under normal usage
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Performance
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Business Context:
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Failure_Impact: High
Test Procedure:
Test Case 22: Concurrent User Load Testing
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_022
Title: Verify system handles multiple concurrent Meter Manager sessions
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Performance
- Test Type: Performance/Load
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
Test Procedure:
Test Suite 10: Security and Access Control
Test Case 23: Meter Manager Authentication and Authorization
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_023
Title: Verify only authenticated Meter Manager users can access validation dashboard
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Security
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Security
- Automation Status: Manual
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Test Procedure:
Test Case 24: Data Privacy and Audit Trail
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_024
Title: Verify sensitive meter data is properly protected and user actions are logged
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Security
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Security
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Suite 11: Error Handling and Edge Cases
Test Case 25: Network Connectivity Issues
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_025
Title: Verify dashboard handles network connectivity issues gracefully
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Error Handling
- Test Type: Negative
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Full
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Case 26: Boundary Value Testing for Meter Counts
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_026
Title: Verify dashboard handles extreme meter count values correctly
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Boundary Testing
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P3-Medium
- Execution Phase: Full
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Case 27: Invalid Data Handling
Test Case ID: MX00US01_TC_027
Title: Verify dashboard handles invalid or corrupted data gracefully
Created By: Test Engineer
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Error Handling
- Test Type: Negative
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Full
- Automation Status: Manual
Test Procedure:
Test Suite Organization
Smoke Test Suite
Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_003, TC_008, TC_010
Execution: Every build deployment
Duration: ~20 minutes
Regression Test Suite
Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core features and integrations
Test Cases: TC_002, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_011, TC_012, TC_018, TC_019, TC_021
Execution: Before each release
Duration: ~2 hours
Full Test Suite
Criteria: All test cases including edge cases
Test Cases: All 27 test cases
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Duration: ~6 hours
Performance Test Suite
Criteria: Performance and load testing
Test Cases: TC_021, TC_022
Execution: Performance testing cycles
Duration: ~1 hour
Security Test Suite
Criteria: Security and access control testing
Test Cases: TC_023, TC_024
Execution: Security testing cycles
Duration: ~1 hour
Execution Matrix
Browser Compatibility
Screen Resolution Support
Dependency Map
Test Execution Dependencies
- Authentication Prerequisites: TC_023 must pass before all other tests
- Data Setup: Valid test data required for TC_001-TC_017
- API Availability: TC_018-TC_020 require backend services
- Configuration Access: TC_014-TC_017 require admin permissions
Integration Dependencies
- SMART360 System: All dashboard functionality
- Database: Meter reading data and validation records
- Authentication Service: User login and session management
- External APIs: Real-time data updates
Validation Checklist
✅ All acceptance criteria covered - 20 acceptance criteria mapped to test cases
✅ All business rules tested - Validation calculations, condition categorization, error handling
✅ Cross-browser compatibility - Chrome latest version support
✅ Positive and negative scenarios - Functional and error handling test cases
✅ Integration points tested - API integration and external system dependencies
✅ Security considerations addressed - Authentication, authorization, data protection
✅ Performance benchmarks defined - Load times, response times, concurrent users
✅ Realistic test data provided - Sample data from user story specifications
✅ Clear dependency mapping - Test execution order and prerequisites
✅ Proper tagging for reporting - Enhanced tags supporting all 17 BrowserStack reports
✅ Edge cases covered - Boundary testing, error conditions, network issues
✅ API tests for critical operations - Dashboard metrics, validation issues, meter conditions