Skip to main content

Meter Inventory Management Test Cases (MX01US03)

Meter Inventory Management

Total Test Casescases (MX01US03)

:12
Total Acceptance Criteria-15

Total Percentage :- 85%

Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

  1. Inventory Dashboard & Overview Management
  2. Meter Search & Filtering Operations
  3. Bulk Meter Addition (Manual & CSV)
  4. Meter Disposal Management
  5. Meter Specifications Viewing
  6. Inventory Reporting & Export
  7. Work Order Integration
  8. Meter Lifecycle Tracking

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

  1. Performance Testing (Response < 1sec)
  2. Security & Authorization
  3. Cross-Browser Compatibility
  4. Data Integrity & Validation
  5. Concurrent User Handling

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

  1. Boundary Value Testing
  2. Invalid Input Handling
  3. System Failure Recovery
  4. Data Inconsistency Management

FUNCTIONAL TEST CASES

Test Case 1: Inventory Dashboard Access and Overview Display

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_001
Title: Verify Meter Supervisor can access inventory dashboard and view summary metrics
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 03, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:

  • Module/Feature: Inventory Dashboard
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: MOD-Dashboard, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End

Business Context:

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking:

  • Feature_Coverage: 85%
  • Integration_Points: SMART360 Authentication, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Dashboard.js, InventoryService.js
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting:

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:

Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: SMART360 Authentication Service, Inventory Database
  • Performance_Baseline: < 1 second page load
  • Data_Requirements: Active meter inventory data

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Valid SMART360 account with Meter Supervisor permissions
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Device Manager role with inventory access
  • Test_Data: Minimum 5 in-stock meters, 2 disposed meters
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication successful

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to SMART360 login page

Login page displays

URL: https://smart360.utility.com

-

2

Enter valid Device Manager credentials

Authentication successful

Username: device.manager@utility.com, Password: SecurePass123!

-

3

Click on "Meters" section from main menu

Meters section opens

-

Main navigation should be visible

4

Select "Inventory" tab

Inventory dashboard loads

-

Default view should be "In Stock"

5

Verify summary metrics display

Shows "X meters available in stock"

Expected: "5 meters available in stock"

Count should match actual inventory

6

Verify tab structure

Both "In Stock" and "Disposed" tabs visible

-

Tabs should be clearly labeled

7

Click "Disposed" tab

Disposed meters view loads

Expected: "2 disposed meters"

Count should match disposed inventory

8

Verify page load time

Dashboard loads within performance benchmark

< 1 second

Use browser dev tools to measure

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays with correct meter counts
  • Secondary_Verifications: Navigation elements present, tabs functional, performance within limits
  • Negative_Verification: No error messages, no broken UI elements

Test Case 2: Advanced Meter Search Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_002
Title: Verify comprehensive meter search functionality with multiple parameters and performance requirements
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Search & Filter Engine
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Search Service, Filter Service, Database Query Engine
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-SearchService.js, MX-FilterEngine.js, MX-DatabaseQuery.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Adoption, Search-Analytics, Performance-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Search Indexing Service, Database Query Optimizer, Filter Processing Engine
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second search response time
Data_Requirements: Diverse meter inventory with all meter types and manufacturers from sample data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Logged in as Device Manager with search permissions enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Search and filter access permissions
Test_Data: Complete sample data set: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000, SMART, Elster, Warehouse A), SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, PHOTO, Sensus, Warehouse B), SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic, MANUAL, Itron, Warehouse A), SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5, ULTRASONIC, Kamstrup, Field Office), SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR, Badger, Warehouse B)
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard

Dashboard displays with search bar visible

-

Pre-condition verification

2

Click in search bar to activate

Search bar becomes active with cursor blinking

-

UI interaction validation

3

Enter specific device number search

Exact match results display instantly

Search: "SN-56789"

AC-003 exact match testing

4

Verify search result accuracy

Returns single result: FlowMaster 3000 (SN-56789)

Expected: 1 result matching SN-56789

Precision validation

5

Clear search and enter model search

Results filtered by model name

Search: "FlowMaster 3000"

AC-003 model search testing

6

Verify model search results

Returns SN-56789 with FlowMaster 3000 model

Expected: Device SN-56789 (DM1234)

Model-based filtering

7

Test partial matching capability

Partial match results display

Search: "Flow"

Business rule: partial matching

8

Verify partial match results

Returns both FlowMaster and UltraFlow meters

Expected: SN-56789 (FlowMaster), SN-89012 (UltraFlow)

Partial matching validation

9

Clear search and access advanced filters

Filter panel opens with all options visible

Click "Filters" button

AC-004 filter access

10

Test Type filter functionality

Type dropdown displays all meter types

Available options: SMART, PHOTO, MANUAL, ULTRASONIC, AMR

Type filter validation

11

Select "SMART" type filter

Results filtered to show only SMART meters

Selection: SMART

AC-004 type filtering

12

Verify SMART filter results

Shows only SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000)

Expected: 1 SMART meter result

Filter accuracy check

13

Add Manufacturer filter

Combined type and manufacturer filtering

Additional filter: Manufacturer = "Elster"

Combined filter testing

14

Verify combined filter results

Shows SN-56789 matching both SMART type AND Elster manufacturer

Expected: 1 result (SN-56789)

AC-004 multi-filter validation

15

Add Location filter

Triple filter combination applied

Additional filter: Location = "Warehouse A"

AC-004 location filtering

16

Verify triple filter results

Results match all three criteria (SMART, Elster, Warehouse A)

Expected: 1 result (SN-56789)

Complex filtering validation

17

Test filter combinations for different manufacturers

Filter by manufacturer variety

Test filters: Sensus, Itron, Kamstrup, Badger

Manufacturer coverage

18

Verify location-based filtering

Filter by different warehouse locations

Test locations: Warehouse A, Warehouse B, Field Office

Location filter accuracy

19

Clear all filters

All meters display again with reset state

Click "Clear All Filters"

Filter reset functionality

20

Test search performance benchmark

Search response time within 1 second

Various search terms with timing

Performance requirement validation

21

Test empty search handling

System handles empty search gracefully

Search: "" (empty string)

Edge case handling

22

Test invalid search terms

No results message displayed appropriately

Search: "NonexistentMeter123"

No-results scenario

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Search returns accurate, filtered results for device numbers, models, types, manufacturers, and locations with sub-1-second response time
Secondary_Verifications: Partial matching works correctly, filters combine properly, performance consistently within limits, empty/invalid searches handled gracefully
Negative_Verification: No invalid results returned, no system errors on edge cases, no performance degradation under various search loads

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record search accuracy, filter combinations, response times]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-003 ✓, AC-004 ✓ (100% coverage for search and filtering requirements)




Test Case 3: Bulk Meter Addition - Manual Entry Method

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_003
Title: Verify bulk meter addition functionality using manual entry method with complete validation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bulk Operations - Manual Entry
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-BulkOps, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Service, Validation Service, Inventory Database, Audit Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-BulkAddService.js, MX-ValidationEngine.js, MX-InventoryDB.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Feature-Reliability, Bulk-Operations-Analytics, Data-Integrity
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Bulk Addition Service, Form Validation Service, Database Transaction Manager, Audit Logging Service
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for bulk processing of up to 100 meters
Data_Requirements: Valid meter specification data, unique device numbers not in existing system

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Device Manager logged in with bulk addition permissions enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter addition authorization, bulk operations access
Test_Data: New meter device numbers: SN-11111, SN-22222, SN-33333, SN-44444, SN-55555 (ensuring no duplicates with existing inventory)
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard

Dashboard loads with bulk addition button visible

-

Pre-condition verification

2

Click "Bulk Add Meters" button in top-right corner

Bulk addition modal opens overlaying current page

-

Modal launch validation

3

Verify "Manual Entry" radio button is selected by default

Manual Entry option is pre-selected and active

-

Default selection verification

4

Verify form structure and required fields

All required fields visible: Type, Manufacturer, Model, Initial Warehouse, Device Numbers

Required fields per business rules

AC-006 form validation

5

Click Meter Type dropdown

Type dropdown opens showing all available options

Available options: SMART, PHOTO, MANUAL, ULTRASONIC, AMR

Type selection validation

6

Select "ULTRASONIC" meter type

Type field populated with ULTRASONIC selection

Selection: ULTRASONIC

Business rule: required field

7

Click Manufacturer dropdown

Manufacturer options display filtered appropriately

Available: Elster, Sensus, Itron, Kamstrup, Badger

Manufacturer selection

8

Select "Kamstrup" manufacturer

Manufacturer field shows Kamstrup selection

Selection: Kamstrup

Business rule: required field

9

Click Model dropdown

Model options display filtered by selected manufacturer

Available Kamstrup models

Model filtering validation

10

Select model for Kamstrup

Model field populated with selection

Selection: UltraFlow X7 (new model)

Business rule: required field

11

Enter Initial Warehouse location

Warehouse field accepts text input

Input: "Distribution Center North"

Business rule: required field

12

Enter device numbers in text area (one per line)

Text area accepts multiple device numbers properly formatted

Device Numbers:<br/>SN-11111<br/>SN-22222<br/>SN-33333<br/>SN-44444<br/>SN-55555

5 unique device numbers

13

Verify device number format validation

System accepts properly formatted device numbers

Format validation for SN-XXXXX pattern

Input validation check

14

Click "Add Meters" button

Processing indicator appears and bulk addition begins

-

Processing initiation

15

Wait for processing completion

Success confirmation message displays with accurate count

Expected: "5 meters added successfully"

AC-006 success feedback

16

Verify modal closes automatically

Modal closes and returns to main inventory view

-

UI flow completion

17

Search for first added meter

Newly added meter appears in inventory search results

Search: "SN-11111"

AC-007 duplicate prevention verification

18

Verify meter details accuracy

All meter details match entered information

Expected: Type=ULTRASONIC, Manufacturer=Kamstrup, Model=UltraFlow X7, Location=Distribution Center North

Data integrity validation

19

Search for all added meters

All 5 meters appear in inventory with correct details

Search each: SN-11111 through SN-55555

Complete batch verification

20

Verify inventory count update

Dashboard meter count increases by 5

Previous count + 5 new meters

Inventory synchronization

21

Test form reset after successful addition

Form fields clear for next operation

All fields should be reset to default state

Form state management

22

Test cancel functionality

Cancel button properly closes modal without saving

Click Cancel button

Cancel operation validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All 5 meters successfully added with correct details (Type=ULTRASONIC, Manufacturer=Kamstrup, Model=UltraFlow X7, Location=Distribution Center North)
Secondary_Verifications: Form validation works properly, success feedback provided, inventory count updated, modal behavior correct
Negative_Verification: No duplicate entries created, no data corruption, no processing errors

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record number of meters added, data accuracy, processing time]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-006 ✓, AC-007 ✓ (100% coverage for bulk addition and validation requirements)




Test Case 4: Bulk Meter Addition - CSV Upload Method

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_004
Title: Verify bulk meter addition functionality using CSV upload method with batch validation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Bulk Operations - CSV Upload
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-BulkOps, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: CSV Parser Service, File Upload Service, Batch Validation Engine, Database Transaction Manager
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-CSVParser.js, MX-FileUpload.js, MX-BatchValidator.js, MX-InventoryDB.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Bulk-Operations-Analytics, File-Processing-Metrics, Data-Integrity
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: CSV Processing Engine, File Upload Infrastructure, Validation Pipeline, Database Transaction System
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds for 100 meters CSV processing
Data_Requirements: Valid CSV file with proper headers and device number data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: CSV file prepared with headers: device_number, Valid file upload permissions configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Bulk upload permissions, file processing authorization
Test_Data: CSV file: meter_bulk_upload.csv with content:<br/>device_number<br/>SN-66666<br/>SN-77777<br/>SN-88888<br/>SN-99999<br/>SN-10101
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard and click "Bulk Add Meters"

Bulk addition modal opens successfully

-

Modal access verification

2

Select "CSV Upload" radio button

CSV upload interface becomes active

Click CSV Upload option

Interface mode switching

3

Verify CSV upload interface elements

File upload area and metadata fields are visible

UI elements: Choose File button, Type dropdown, Manufacturer dropdown, Model dropdown, Initial Warehouse field

AC-006 interface validation

4

Select Meter Type for batch application

Type dropdown populated and selected

Selection: PHOTO

Metadata for all uploaded meters

5

Select Manufacturer for batch application

Manufacturer dropdown shows selection

Selection: Sensus

Batch metadata application

6

Select Model for batch application

Model dropdown filtered by manufacturer

Selection: AquaTrack 300 (new model)

Model consistency validation

7

Enter Initial Warehouse for batch

Warehouse field accepts input

Input: "Regional Depot East"

Location for all uploaded meters

8

Click "Choose file" button

Standard OS file browser dialog opens

-

File selection interface

9

Select prepared CSV file

File name appears in upload field

File: meter_bulk_upload.csv

File selection confirmation

10

Verify file upload instructions

Clear guidance message displays about CSV format

Expected message: "CSV must include device numbers. Type, manufacturer, model, and warehouse will be applied to all imported meters."

User guidance validation

11

Verify file content preview

System shows preview of file contents or row count

Expected: 5 device numbers detected

File parsing verification

12

Click "Add Meters" button

Processing begins with loading indicator

-

Upload processing initiation

13

Monitor processing progress

Progress indicator shows upload status

Visual feedback during processing

User experience validation

14

Verify successful upload completion

Success confirmation displays with accurate count

Expected: "5 meters added successfully"

AC-006 success feedback

15

Verify modal closure

Modal closes automatically after success

Return to main inventory view

UI flow completion

16

Search for uploaded meters

All uploaded meters appear in search results

Search: SN-66666, SN-77777, SN-88888, SN-99999, SN-10101

AC-007 upload verification

17

Verify metadata application

All uploaded meters have correct metadata applied

Expected for all: Type=PHOTO, Manufacturer=Sensus, Model=AquaTrack 300, Location=Regional Depot East

Metadata consistency validation

18

Verify inventory count update

Dashboard count increases by 5 meters

Previous inventory count + 5

Inventory synchronization

19

Test file format validation

Invalid CSV files are rejected appropriately

Test with: .txt file, .xlsx file, malformed CSV

File type validation

20

Test empty CSV handling

Empty or header-only CSV shows appropriate error

Empty CSV file

Edge case handling

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: CSV upload processes successfully with all 5 meters added and correct metadata (Type=PHOTO, Manufacturer=Sensus, Model=AquaTrack 300, Location=Regional Depot East) applied to all uploaded meters
Secondary_Verifications: File format validation works, batch processing completes within performance limits, user guidance clear, progress feedback provided
Negative_Verification: Invalid file formats rejected, empty files handled gracefully, no partial uploads on validation failures

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record upload success, metadata application, processing time, file validation results]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-006 ✓, AC-007 ✓ (100% coverage for bulk addition and validation requirements)




Test Case 5: Meter Disposal Management with Business Rule Enforcement

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_005
Title: Verify comprehensive meter disposal functionality with complete audit trail and business rule validation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Disposal Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Disposal, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
**Expected_Execution


Test Environment:

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Dependencies: Disposal Service, Work Order Integration, Audit Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds disposal processing

Prerequisites:

  • Setup_Requirements: Meter available for disposal (not assigned to active work order)
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Supervisor-level authorization for disposal
  • Test_Data: In-stock meter SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001

Test Procedure:

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Search for meter to dispose

Target meter appears in results

Search: "SN-78901"

WaterMetric Basic should display

2

Click disposal action for meter

Disposal confirmation dialog opens

-

Modal with disposal form

3

Verify disposal reasons dropdown

Valid reasons display

Options: Damaged, Decommissioned, Lost, Defective, End of Life

All business rule reasons

4

Select disposal reason

Reason field populated

Selection: "End of Life"

Common disposal scenario

5

Enter disposal date

Date field accepts input

Date: "2025-06-03"

Current date

6

Enter authorization details

Authorization field populated

Authorization: "SUPERVISOR-001"

Supervisor code

7

Add disposal notes

Notes field accepts input

Notes: "Meter reached end of service life after 8 years of operation"

Detailed reasoning

8

Click "Confirm Disposal"

Processing begins

-

Confirmation required

9

Verify disposal success

Success message displays

Expected: "Meter SN-78901 successfully disposed"

Clear confirmation

10

Check "In Stock" tab

Meter no longer appears

Search: "SN-78901" in In Stock

Should return no results

11

Check "Disposed" tab

Meter appears in disposed list

-

Switch to Disposed tab

12

Verify disposed meter details

All disposal information correct

Expected: Device=SN-78901, Reason=End of Life, Date=2025-06-03, Lifespan calculated

Complete audit trail

13

Verify lifespan calculation

System calculates service years

Expected format: "8 years 5 months"

Auto-calculated from install date

Verification Points:

  • Primary_Verification: Meter successfully moved from In Stock to Disposed with complete audit trail
  • Secondary_Verifications: Business rules enforced, lifespan calculated, authorization captured
  • Negative_Verification: Meter cannot be found in In Stock after disposal

Test Case 6: Meter Specifications Display and Technical Details

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_006
Title: Verify comprehensive meter specifications display functionality with complete technical details
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Specifications Library
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Specifications, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Specifications Database, Meter Catalog Service, Technical Documentation API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-SpecificationService.js, MX-TechnicalCatalog.js, MX-MetadataDB.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Technical-Data-Quality, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
Dependencies: Technical Specifications Database, Meter Metadata Service, Modal Display Service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second specification load time
Data_Requirements: Meters with complete specification data across all meter types

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Access to inventory with meters having complete technical specifications
User_Roles_Permissions: Specification viewing permissions
Test_Data: Sample meters with complete specs: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000, SMART), SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, PHOTO), SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic, MANUAL), SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5, ULTRASONIC), SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR)
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard In Stock tab

Dashboard displays with meters list

-

Pre-condition verification

2

Locate SMART meter in inventory list

Target meter visible with specifications icon

Meter: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000)

SMART meter selection

3

Click specifications icon for SMART meter

Specifications modal opens displaying technical details

Click specs icon for SN-56789

AC-005 specifications access

4

Verify SMART meter technical specifications

All core technical specs displayed accurately

Expected specs for FlowMaster 3000:<br/>Max Flow: 25 m³/s<br/>Accuracy: ±1.5%<br/>Pressure Rating: 16 bar<br/>Flow Range: 0.5-25 gpm<br/>Battery Life: 10 years

AC-013 technical details validation

5

Verify SMART meter communication specifications

Communication details present and accurate

Expected communication specs:<br/>Radio: 900MHz<br/>Communication: 900MHz radio<br/>Compatible With: AMI Network A

SMART meter communication data

6

Verify SMART meter manufacturing details

Manufacturing information complete

Expected manufacturing details:<br/>Manufacture Date: 2023-01-15<br/>Calibration Date: 2023-02-01

Manufacturing data validation

7

Verify SMART meter physical specifications

Physical measurements displayed

Expected physical specs:<br/>Dial Length: 99mm<br/>Dial Count: 6

Physical characteristics

8

Close SMART meter specifications

Modal closes and returns to inventory view

Click close or outside modal

Modal close functionality

9

Select PHOTO meter for specifications

PHOTO meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200)

PHOTO meter type testing

10

Verify PHOTO meter specifications

PHOTO-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for AquaTrack 200:<br/>Optical reading capability<br/>Flow Range: 0.1-15 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±2%<br/>Compatible With: Handheld Reader X

PHOTO meter validation

11

Select MANUAL meter for specifications

MANUAL meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic)

MANUAL meter type testing

12

Verify MANUAL meter specifications

MANUAL-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for WaterMetric Basic:<br/>Mechanical register<br/>Flow Range: 0.25-20 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±3%<br/>Communication: Visual (manual reading)

MANUAL meter validation

13

Select ULTRASONIC meter for specifications

ULTRASONIC meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5)

ULTRASONIC meter type testing

14

Verify ULTRASONIC meter specifications

ULTRASONIC-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for UltraFlow X5:<br/>Ultrasonic technology<br/>Flow Range: 0.05-30 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±0.5%<br/>Battery Life: 15 years<br/>Communication: RF 433MHz<br/>Compatible With: AMI Network B

ULTRASONIC meter validation

15

Select AMR meter for specifications

AMR meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR)

AMR meter type testing

16

Verify AMR meter specifications

AMR-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for ReadyFlow AMR:<br/>Flow Range: 0.1-25 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±1%<br/>Battery Life: 12 years<br/>Communication: AMR 900MHz<br/>Compatible With: Drive-by System Y

AMR meter validation

17

Test specifications completeness across all types

All meter types show complete specification sets

Verify no missing critical technical data

Data completeness validation

18

Test specification modal performance

All specification loads complete within 1 second

Time all modal opens

Performance requirement

19

Test responsive design for specifications

Specifications display properly on different screen sizes

Test on desktop, tablet, mobile resolutions

Cross-device compatibility

20

Verify specification data formatting

All numerical values, dates, and text properly formatted

Check units, date formats, decimal precision

Data presentation quality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete and accurate specifications display for all meter types (SMART, PHOTO, MANUAL, ULTRASONIC, AMR) with all technical details present and correctly formatted
Secondary_Verifications: Modal functionality works across devices, performance within 1-second load time, data formatting consistent and professional
Negative_Verification: No missing specification data, no display errors, no performance issues across different meter types

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record specification completeness, accuracy, load times, formatting quality]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-005 ✓, AC-013 ✓ (100% coverage for specifications display requirements)




Test Case 7: Inventory Export with Context Preservation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_007
Title: Verify inventory export functionality with complete search, filter, and sort context preservation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Export & Reporting
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Export, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Export Service, File Generation Engine, Query Context Manager, Download Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-ExportService.js, MX-FileGenerator.js, MX-QueryContext.js, MX-DownloadManager.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Export-Usage-Analytics, Data-Access-Metrics, File-Generation-Performance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Export Processing Service, File Generation Infrastructure, Context State Manager, Download Handler
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds export generation for up to 500 records
Data_Requirements: Diverse inventory data for comprehensive export testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Logged in with export permissions enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Export and download permissions
Test_Data: Complete sample inventory: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000, SMART, Elster, Warehouse A), SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, PHOTO, Sensus, Warehouse B), SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic, MANUAL, Itron, Warehouse A), SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5, ULTRASONIC, Kamstrup, Field Office), SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR, Badger, Warehouse B)
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access), MX01US03_TC_002 (Search functionality) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard with full inventory visible

Dashboard displays complete meter inventory

-

Starting state with all meters

2

Verify baseline export without filters

Export contains all inventory meters

Click export, select CSV format

Baseline export test

3

Download and verify complete export content

CSV contains all 5 sample meters with complete details

Expected: All meters (SN-56789 through SN-90123) with full specifications

Full inventory export validation

4

Apply search filter to inventory

Results filtered to specific search criteria

Search: "SMART"

AC-012 search context preservation

5

Verify search results display

Only SMART meters shown in inventory view

Expected: 1 result (SN-56789 FlowMaster 3000)

Search filtering confirmation

6

Export search-filtered results

Export dialog opens with search context

Click export button while search active

Context preservation test

7

Download and verify search-filtered export

CSV contains only SMART meters from search

Expected: Only SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000) in export file

Business rule: searched items only

8

Clear search and apply manufacturer filter

Filter results by manufacturer

Clear search, Filter: Manufacturer = "Sensus"

Filter context testing

9

Verify manufacturer filter results

Only Sensus meters displayed

Expected: 1 result (SN-67890 AquaTrack 200)

Filter application verification

10

Export manufacturer-filtered results

Export contains only filtered manufacturer data

Export with Sensus filter active

Filter context preservation

11

Download and verify manufacturer export

CSV contains only Sensus meters

Expected: Only SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, Sensus)

Business rule: filtered items only

12

Apply location-based filter

Filter by warehouse location

Filter: Location = "Warehouse A"

Location filtering test

13

Verify location filter results

Only Warehouse A meters displayed

Expected: 2 results (SN-56789, SN-78901)

Location filter validation

14

Export location-filtered results

Export reflects location filter context

Export with Warehouse A filter

Location context preservation

15

Apply sorting to filtered results

Sort results by manufacturer alphabetically

Sort: Manufacturer A-Z on Warehouse A results

Sort context testing

16

Verify sort order in display

Results appear in alphabetical order by manufacturer

Expected order: Elster (SN-56789), Itron (SN-78901)

Sort application verification

17

Export sorted and filtered results

Export maintains both filter and sort context

Export with location filter + sort active

Business rule: sorted order preserved

18

Download and verify sorted export

CSV maintains alphabetical sort order

Expected: Elster meter first, then Itron meter

Sort context preservation validation

19

Apply complex multi-context scenario

Combine search + filter + sort

Search: "Flow", Filter: Type=ANY, Sort: Model A-Z

Complex context testing

20

Export complex context results

Export preserves all applied contexts

Export with search+filter+sort active

Comprehensive context preservation

21

Test PDF export format

PDF export generates successfully

Select PDF format instead of CSV

Alternative format testing

22

Verify export file naming convention

Files have descriptive, timestamped names

Expected format: "meter_inventory_2025-06-10_filtered.csv"

File naming validation

23

Test export performance benchmark

Export generation completes within 3 seconds

Time various export operations

Performance requirement

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Export files contain exactly the data matching current view context (search results, filtered items, sorted order) with no additional or missing data
Secondary_Verifications: Multiple export formats work (CSV, PDF), file naming convention followed, performance within 3-second limit
Negative_Verification: No data outside current context included in exports, no export failures, no performance degradation

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record export accuracy, context preservation, file formats, performance times]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-012 ✓ (100% coverage for exportable inventory reports requirement)




Test Case 8: Work Order Integration and Automatic Status Updates

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_008
Title: Verify automatic meter status updates through comprehensive work order system integration
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Work Order Integration
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Integration
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Very High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Work Order Management System, Status Update API, Installation Service API, Disposal Integration API, Customer Management System
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-WorkOrderIntegration.js, MX-StatusUpdateService.js, MX-InstallationAPI.js, MX-CustomerAPI.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Integration-Health, Work-Order-Analytics, Status-Update-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Integration Testing Environment
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Work Order Management System API, Customer Management System, Installation Service API, Status Synchronization Service, Real-time Update Handler
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds status update processing, < 5 seconds cross-system synchronization
Data_Requirements: Available meters for installation, customer data, work order system access

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Work Order system integration active and tested, Customer management system accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Work order creation/approval permissions, meter assignment authorization, installation completion rights
Test_Data: Available meter: SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR, Badger, Warehouse B), Customer: Metro Water District, Address: 456 Industrial Blvd, Installation Team: TECH-005
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify target meter initial status in inventory

Meter shows as "Available" in In Stock tab

Meter: SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR)

AC-010 starting state verification

2

Access Work Order Management System

Work order system accessible and functional

Navigate to work order creation interface

External system availability

3

Create new installation work order

Work order created successfully with meter assignment

Work Order Details:<br/>WO-2025-INS-001<br/>Type: Meter Installation<br/>Customer: Metro Water District<br/>Service Address: 456 Industrial Blvd<br/>Assigned Meter: SN-90123<br/>Technician: TECH-005<br/>Scheduled Date: 2025-06-10

AC-010 work order creation

4

Verify work order details and meter assignment

Work order shows correct meter assignment and customer details

Confirm WO-2025-INS-001 assigned to SN-90123

Work order validation

5

Check meter status during active work order

Meter remains in In Stock but shows assignment status

Expected: SN-90123 status = "Assigned to WO-2025-INS-001"

Assignment tracking

6

Attempt to dispose meter with active work order

System prevents disposal with clear error message

Try to dispose SN-90123 while assigned

AC-011 business rule enforcement

7

Verify disposal prevention error

Appropriate error message displays

Expected: "Cannot dispose meter SN-90123 assigned to active work order WO-2025-INS-001"

Business rule validation

8

Complete installation work order

Installation marked as completed in work order system

Installation Details:<br/>Completion Date: 2025-06-10<br/>Installation Time: 14:30<br/>Technician: TECH-005<br/>Installation Notes: "Standard installation completed successfully. Meter operational and reading properly."

Installation completion

9

Submit work order for supervisor approval

Work order submitted for approval workflow

Approver: SUPERVISOR-004

Business rule: approval required

10

Approve installation work order

Supervisor approves completed installation

Approval Details:<br/>Approved By: SUPERVISOR-004<br/>Approval Date: 2025-06-10<br/>Approval Time: 15:45<br/>Comments: "Installation approved. Customer activation authorized."

Business rule: supervisor approval

11

Monitor automatic status update

System automatically processes status change

Wait for integration sync (should occur within 5 seconds)

AC-010 automatic integration

12

Verify meter removal from In Stock

Meter SN-90123 no longer appears in In Stock inventory

Search: "SN-90123" in In Stock tab

Should return no results

13

Check meter installation status

Meter shows as installed with customer details

Expected status: Installed at Metro Water District, 456 Industrial Blvd, Installation Date: 2025-06-10

Installation status confirmation

14

Create disposal work order for previously installed meter

Disposal work order created for meter removal

Work Order Details:<br/>WO-2025-DIS-001<br/>Type: Meter Disposal<br/>Current Location: Metro Water District<br/>Meter: (Previously installed meter)<br/>Disposal Reason: Defective<br/>Technician: TECH-006

Disposal workflow testing

15

Complete disposal work order

Disposal work order completed and approved

Completion Details:<br/>Disposal Date: 2025-06-10<br/>Reason: Defective<br/>Authorization: SUPERVISOR-004<br/>Disposal Location: Certified Disposal Facility

Disposal completion

16

Verify automatic disposal status update

Meter automatically appears in Disposed tab

Check Disposed tab for disposed meter

AC-010 disposal integration

17

Verify disposed meter details

Complete disposal information displayed

Expected: Disposal date, reason, authorization, lifespan calculation

Disposal data validation

18

Test integration performance

All status updates complete within 2-5 second benchmarks

Time each integration event

Performance requirement validation

19

Verify integration error handling

System handles temporary work order system unavailability gracefully

Simulate work order system downtime

Error resilience testing

20

Test data synchronization consistency

All systems maintain consistent meter status information

Cross-verify status in inventory and work order systems

Data consistency validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Meter SN-90123 automatically transitions from In Stock → Assigned → Installed based on work order completion and approval, with complete audit trail and customer assignment details
Secondary_Verifications: Business rules enforced (cannot dispose assigned meters), integration timing within 2-5 seconds, data synchronization across systems maintained
Negative_Verification: Cannot dispose meters with active work orders, no data inconsistencies between systems, no integration failures

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record integration success, status update timing, business rule enforcement, data consistency]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-010 ✓, AC-011 ✓ (100% coverage for work order integration requirements)




NON-FUNCTIONAL TEST CASES

Test Case 9: Performance Testing - System Response Times

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_009
Title: Verify all meter inventory operations meet performance benchmarks under normal and stress conditions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance Optimization
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Database Query Engine, Search Service, Export Service, Bulk Processing Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-PerformanceMonitor.js, MX-DatabaseOptimizer.js, MX-CacheManager.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, SLA-Compliance, System-Health
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Performance Testing Environment (Production-like)
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, Load testing infrastructure, Database performance counters
Performance_Baseline: Dashboard < 1 sec, Search < 1 sec, Export < 3 sec, Bulk operations < 5 sec
Data_Requirements: Large dataset with 1000+ meters for realistic performance testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment with large dataset, monitoring tools configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Performance testing account with full system access
Test_Data: Performance dataset with 1000 meters across all types and manufacturers
Prior_Test_Cases: System functional in test environment

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Measure cold dashboard load time

Dashboard loads within 1 second from cold start

First login, empty cache

Cold load performance

2

Measure warm dashboard load time

Dashboard loads within 0.5 seconds on subsequent loads

After initial load, cached state

Warm load performance

3

Test search response time with various queries

All searches complete within 1 second

Search terms: device numbers, models, manufacturers

Search performance validation

4

Measure filter application performance

Filter results display within 1 second

Various filter combinations

Filter performance

5

Test pagination performance

Page navigation completes within 1 second

Navigate through multiple pages of results

Pagination efficiency

6

Measure bulk addition performance (manual)

50 meters process within 3 seconds

Manual bulk entry of 50 meters

Manual bulk performance

7

Measure bulk addition performance (CSV)

100 meters process within 5 seconds

CSV upload with 100 meters

CSV bulk performance

8

Test maximum bulk load (500 meters)

500 meters process within acceptable timeframe

CSV with 500 meters (maximum allowed)

Maximum load testing

9

Measure export generation performance

Export completes within 3 seconds for 500 records

Various export scenarios

Export performance

10

Test concurrent user simulation

System maintains performance with multiple users

Simulate 10 concurrent users at < 1 req/minute each

Concurrent load testing

11

Measure database query performance

All database operations complete within benchmarks

Monitor database response times

Database performance

12

Test memory usage under load

Memory usage remains stable during operations

Monitor memory consumption

Memory efficiency

13

Verify CPU utilization

CPU usage remains within acceptable limits

Monitor CPU during operations

Resource utilization

14

Test network latency impact

Performance maintained across different network conditions

Simulate various network speeds

Network resilience

15

Measure API response times

All API calls complete within 500ms

Time critical API operations

API performance validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All operations meet performance benchmarks - Dashboard < 1s, Search < 1s, Export < 3s, Bulk operations within specified limits
Secondary_Verifications: System maintains performance under concurrent load, resource usage efficient, no performance degradation over time
Negative_Verification: No timeout errors, no performance failures under normal load conditions

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record all timing measurements, resource usage, concurrent load results]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring reports and evidence]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: Performance SLA Requirements ✓ (100% coverage for performance requirements)




Test Case 10: Security Testing - Authorization and Data Protection

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_010
Title: Verify comprehensive security controls, authorization mechanisms, and data protection for meter inventory system
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security & Authorization
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Very High
Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Service, Audit Trail Service, Data Encryption Service, Session Management
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-AuthService.js, MX-PermissionManager.js, MX-AuditLogger.js, MX-SecurityValidator.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control-Metrics, Audit-Trail-Quality
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Security Testing Environment
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication infrastructure, Authorization service, Security scanning tools, Audit logging system
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second security validation, < 2 seconds authentication
Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different permission levels

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple user accounts configured: Device Manager (full access), Regular User (limited access), Admin (system access), Unauthorized User (no access)
User_Roles_Permissions: Test accounts with varying permission levels for comprehensive authorization testing
Test_Data: User accounts: meter.supervisor@utilityco.com (Device Manager), regular.user@utilityco.com (Limited), admin.user@utilityco.com (Admin), unauthorized.user@external.com (No access)
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system operational

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test unauthorized system access

Access denied for users without proper credentials

User: unauthorized.user@external.com

Access control validation

2

Verify error message for unauthorized access

Clear access denied message displayed

Expected: "Access denied. Insufficient privileges for meter inventory system."

Security feedback

3

Test regular user access limitations

Regular user can view but cannot perform administrative actions

User: regular.user@utilityco.com

Role-based access control

4

Attempt bulk addition with regular user

Bulk addition functionality not accessible to regular users

Regular user attempting bulk add

Permission enforcement

5

Verify bulk addition permission error

Appropriate permission error message

Expected: "Insufficient permissions for bulk meter operations"

Permission validation feedback

6

Test Device Manager full access

Device Manager can access all inventory functions

User: meter.supervisor@utilityco.com

Full permission validation

7

Verify disposal authorization requirement

Disposal requires supervisor-level authorization code

Attempt disposal without proper authorization

Authorization enforcement

8

Test invalid supervisor authorization

Invalid authorization codes rejected

Invalid authorization: "INVALID-AUTH-001"

Authorization validation

9

Verify valid supervisor authorization

Valid authorization codes accepted

Valid authorization: "SUPERVISOR-005"

Authorization acceptance

10

Test session management

User sessions timeout after inactivity period

Leave session idle for 30+ minutes

Session security

11

Verify session timeout behavior

Automatic logout after timeout with security message

Expected: "Session expired for security. Please log in again."

Session management validation

12

Test data encryption in transit

All data transmission uses HTTPS/TLS encryption

Monitor network traffic during operations

Data protection validation

13

Verify SQL injection prevention

Malicious SQL inputs properly rejected

Test inputs: '; DROP TABLE meters; --, ' OR '1'='1

Input sanitization

14

Test XSS attack prevention

Script injection attempts blocked

Test inputs: <script>alert('XSS')</script>, javascript:alert('XSS')

Cross-site scripting prevention

15

Verify CSRF protection

Cross-site request forgery attacks prevented

Attempt CSRF attacks on critical operations

CSRF protection validation

16

Test audit trail creation

All user actions properly logged with complete details

Perform various operations and verify audit logs

Audit logging validation

17

Verify audit trail completeness

Audit logs contain user ID, action, timestamp, IP address, affected resources

Check audit log entries for completeness

Audit data quality

18

Test password policy enforcement

Strong password requirements enforced

Test weak passwords during account creation

Password security

19

Verify account lockout protection

Account lockout after multiple failed login attempts

Attempt 5 failed logins

Brute force protection

20

Test data access controls

Users can only access data within their authorization scope

Verify data filtering by user permissions

Data access control

21

Verify sensitive data handling

PII and sensitive meter data properly protected

Check data masking and access controls

Data sensitivity protection

22

Test API security

API endpoints properly secured with authentication/authorization

Test API access without proper credentials

API security validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All security controls function correctly - unauthorized access blocked, role-based permissions enforced, supervisor authorization required for disposal, complete audit trails created
Secondary_Verifications: Data encryption active, input validation prevents attacks, session management secure, password policies enforced
Negative_Verification: No security bypasses possible, no unauthorized data access, no successful injection attacks

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record security test results, permission enforcement, audit trail completeness, attack prevention]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Security testing evidence and audit trail examples]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: Security Requirements ✓ (100% coverage for security and authorization requirements)




EDGE CASE & ERROR HANDLING TEST CASES

Test Case 11: Boundary Value Testing - Bulk Operations Limits

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_011
Title: Verify system behavior at boundary conditions and maximum operational limits
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Boundary Value Testing
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Edge-Case
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-BulkOps, P2-High, Phase-Edge-Case, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, Validation Service, Error Handling Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-BulkValidator.js, MX-BoundaryChecker.js, MX-ErrorHandler.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Edge-Case-Coverage, Boundary-Testing-Results, Error-Handling-Quality
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Bulk Processing Service, File Validation Service, Error Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 10 seconds for maximum batch processing
Data_Requirements: Test files with varying sizes and edge case data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Ability to generate test CSV files with specific record counts
User_Roles_Permissions: Bulk addition permissions
Test_Data: CSV files with 1, 499, 500, 501, 1000 meter records for boundary testing
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_003 (Manual bulk addition) and MX01US03_TC_004 (CSV upload) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test minimum boundary - single meter manual entry

Single meter processes successfully

Manual entry: 1 unique device number

Lower boundary validation

2

Test minimum boundary - single meter CSV

Single meter CSV processes successfully

CSV file with 1 meter record

CSV minimum boundary

3

Test near-maximum boundary (499 meters)

499 meters process successfully within time limits

CSV file with 499 unique device numbers

Near-maximum boundary

4

Test exact maximum boundary (500 meters)

500 meters process successfully at maximum limit

CSV file with exactly 500 unique device numbers

Maximum boundary validation

5

Verify 500-meter processing performance

Processing completes within acceptable timeframe

Monitor processing time for 500 meters

Performance at maximum

6

Test boundary violation (501 meters)

System rejects upload with clear error message

CSV file with 501 unique device numbers

Boundary violation test

7

Verify boundary violation error message

Clear, user-friendly error message about 500-meter limit

Expected: "Maximum batch size is 500 meters. Your file contains 501 meters. Please reduce the batch size."

Error message validation

8

Test significantly over limit (1000 meters)

System consistently rejects oversized batches

CSV file with 1000 meters

Extreme boundary test

9

Test empty CSV file

Appropriate error handling for empty files

CSV file with headers only, no data rows

Empty file handling

10

Test CSV with only headers

Validation error for header-only files

CSV with device_number header but no data

Header-only validation

11

Test maximum device number length

Very long device numbers handled appropriately

Device numbers with 100+ characters

Length boundary testing

12

Test minimum device number length

Single character device numbers validated

Device numbers: "A", "1", "X"

Minimum length validation

13

Test special characters in device numbers

Special character validation applied consistently

Device numbers with: @#$%^&*()+=[]{}

;':",./<>?

14

Test unicode characters in device numbers

Unicode character handling validated

Device numbers with: émétér-001, 测试仪表-002

Unicode boundary testing

15

Test maximum warehouse name length

Very long warehouse names handled properly

Warehouse name with 500+ characters

Warehouse name boundary

16

Test null/empty required fields

All required field validations enforced

Submit with empty Type, Manufacturer, Model fields

Required field boundaries

17

Test concurrent boundary operations

Multiple users hitting boundaries simultaneously

Two users each uploading 500 meters simultaneously

Concurrency boundaries

18

Test memory usage at boundaries

System memory usage remains stable at maximum loads

Monitor memory during 500-meter processing

Memory boundary validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System properly enforces 500-meter maximum limit with clear error messages, processes exactly 500 meters successfully, rejects 501+ meters consistently
Secondary_Verifications: Edge cases handled gracefully (empty files, extreme lengths, special characters), performance acceptable at boundaries, memory usage stable
Negative_Verification: No boundary bypasses possible, no system crashes at limits, no data corruption at boundaries

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record boundary behavior, error messages, processing times, edge case handling]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if boundary issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of boundary testing and error messages]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: Boundary Conditions ✓ (100% coverage for boundary value requirements)




Test Case 12: Duplicate Device Number Prevention and Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_012
Title: Verify comprehensive duplicate device number detection and prevention across all input methods
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Validation - Duplicate Prevention
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Validation
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Validation, P1-Critical, Phase-Validation, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Validation Engine, Database Constraint System, Duplicate Detection Service, Error Reporting Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-DuplicateValidator.js, MX-DatabaseConstraints.js, MX-ValidationEngine.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Data-Integrity-Metrics, Validation-Quality, Duplicate-Prevention-Analytics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database Unique Constraint System, Real-time Validation Service, Error Message Service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second duplicate validation response
Data_Requirements: Existing meters in system for duplicate testing against

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Existing meters in inventory database for duplicate testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter addition permissions for testing
Test_Data: Known existing device numbers: SN-56789, SN-67890, SN-78901, SN-89012, SN-90123 from sample data
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Attempt manual addition of existing device number

Duplicate validation error displays immediately

Device Number: SN-56789 (known existing)

AC-007 duplicate prevention

2

Verify duplicate error message clarity and guidance

Clear, specific error message with guidance

Expected: "Device number SN-56789 already exists in inventory. Please use a unique device number."

Error message validation

3

Test duplicate detection timing

Validation occurs in real-time during input

Enter SN-56789 and observe immediate validation

Real-time validation

4

Attempt CSV upload with single duplicate

Entire batch rejected when duplicate detected

CSV containing: SN-56789 (existing), SN-NEW-001 (new)

Batch duplicate detection

5

Verify batch rejection behavior

No meters added when duplicates found in batch

Verify inventory count unchanged after failed upload

All-or-nothing processing

6

Test multiple duplicates in CSV

Multiple duplicates properly identified

CSV containing: SN-56789, SN-67890 (both existing), SN-NEW-002, SN-NEW-003

Multiple duplicate detection

7

Verify multiple duplicate error reporting

Error message lists all duplicate device numbers found

Expected: "Duplicate device numbers found: SN-56789, SN-67890. Please remove duplicates and try again."

Comprehensive error reporting

8

Test case sensitivity handling

Case variations treated as same device number

Test variations: sn-56789, SN-56789, Sn-56789, sN-56789

Case-insensitive validation

9

Verify case insensitive duplicate detection

All case variations rejected as duplicates

All variations should trigger duplicate error

Case handling validation

10

Test leading/trailing whitespace handling

Whitespace normalized before duplicate checking

Test: " SN-56789 ", "SN-56789", " SN-56789"

Whitespace normalization

11

Verify whitespace duplicate detection

Whitespace variations rejected as duplicates

All whitespace variations should trigger duplicate error

Whitespace handling

12

Test duplicates within same manual batch

Internal batch duplicates detected

Manual entry with: SN-NEW-004, SN-NEW-005, SN-NEW-004 (repeated)

Internal duplicate detection

13

Verify internal batch duplicate error

Clear error about duplicates within submission

Expected: "Duplicate device number SN-NEW-004 found within your submission. Each device number must be unique."

Internal validation

14

Test duplicates within same CSV file

CSV internal duplicates detected and rejected

CSV with: SN-NEW-006, SN-NEW-007, SN-NEW-006 (repeated)

CSV internal duplicates

15

Test duplicate detection performance

Validation completes within 1 second even with large datasets

Test duplicate checking with 500-meter CSV

Performance validation

16

Test concurrent duplicate attempts

Multiple users attempting same device number simultaneously

Two users trying to add SN-NEW-008 at same time

Concurrency duplicate handling

17

Verify database constraint enforcement

Database-level constraints prevent duplicates even if validation bypassed

Attempt direct database insertion of duplicate

Database integrity

18

Test duplicate detection across disposed meters

Cannot reuse device numbers from disposed meters

Attempt to add device number: DM8765 (from disposed sample data)

Disposed meter duplicate check

19

Verify disposed meter duplicate error

Clear error about reusing disposed meter device number

Expected: "Device number DM8765 was previously used for a disposed meter. Device numbers cannot be reused."

Disposed duplicate validation

20

Test API duplicate validation

API endpoints properly validate duplicates

POST API request with existing device number

API duplicate prevention

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All duplicate device number scenarios properly detected and prevented across manual entry, CSV upload, and API methods with clear error messages and no data corruption
Secondary_Verifications: Case-insensitive and whitespace-normalized validation, internal batch duplicate detection, performance within 1-second limit
Negative_Verification: No duplicates allowed under any circumstances, no validation bypasses possible, no database constraint violations

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record duplicate detection accuracy, error message quality, validation performance, edge case handling]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if duplicate validation issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of duplicate detection and error messages]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-007 ✓ (100% coverage for duplicate prevention requirements)

Test Case 6: Meter Specifications Display and Technical Details

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_006
Title: Verify comprehensive meter specifications display functionality with complete technical details
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Specifications Library
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Specifications, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90%
Integration_Points: Specifications Database, Meter Catalog Service, Technical Documentation API
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-SpecificationService.js, MX-TechnicalCatalog.js, MX-MetadataDB.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Technical-Data-Quality, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
Dependencies: Technical Specifications Database, Meter Metadata Service, Modal Display Service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second specification load time
Data_Requirements: Meters with complete specification data across all meter types

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Access to inventory with meters having complete technical specifications
User_Roles_Permissions: Specification viewing permissions
Test_Data: Sample meters with complete specs: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000, SMART), SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, PHOTO), SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic, MANUAL), SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5, ULTRASONIC), SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR)
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard In Stock tab

Dashboard displays with meters list

-

Pre-condition verification

2

Locate SMART meter in inventory list

Target meter visible with specifications icon

Meter: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000)

SMART meter selection

3

Click specifications icon for SMART meter

Specifications modal opens displaying technical details

Click specs icon for SN-56789

AC-005 specifications access

4

Verify SMART meter technical specifications

All core technical specs displayed accurately

Expected specs for FlowMaster 3000:<br/>Max Flow: 25 m³/s<br/>Accuracy: ±1.5%<br/>Pressure Rating: 16 bar<br/>Flow Range: 0.5-25 gpm<br/>Battery Life: 10 years

AC-013 technical details validation

5

Verify SMART meter communication specifications

Communication details present and accurate

Expected communication specs:<br/>Radio: 900MHz<br/>Communication: 900MHz radio<br/>Compatible With: AMI Network A

SMART meter communication data

6

Verify SMART meter manufacturing details

Manufacturing information complete

Expected manufacturing details:<br/>Manufacture Date: 2023-01-15<br/>Calibration Date: 2023-02-01

Manufacturing data validation

7

Verify SMART meter physical specifications

Physical measurements displayed

Expected physical specs:<br/>Dial Length: 99mm<br/>Dial Count: 6

Physical characteristics

8

Close SMART meter specifications

Modal closes and returns to inventory view

Click close or outside modal

Modal close functionality

9

Select PHOTO meter for specifications

PHOTO meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200)

PHOTO meter type testing

10

Verify PHOTO meter specifications

PHOTO-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for AquaTrack 200:<br/>Optical reading capability<br/>Flow Range: 0.1-15 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±2%<br/>Compatible With: Handheld Reader X

PHOTO meter validation

11

Select MANUAL meter for specifications

MANUAL meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic)

MANUAL meter type testing

12

Verify MANUAL meter specifications

MANUAL-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for WaterMetric Basic:<br/>Mechanical register<br/>Flow Range: 0.25-20 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±3%<br/>Communication: Visual (manual reading)

MANUAL meter validation

13

Select ULTRASONIC meter for specifications

ULTRASONIC meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5)

ULTRASONIC meter type testing

14

Verify ULTRASONIC meter specifications

ULTRASONIC-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for UltraFlow X5:<br/>Ultrasonic technology<br/>Flow Range: 0.05-30 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±0.5%<br/>Battery Life: 15 years<br/>Communication: RF 433MHz<br/>Compatible With: AMI Network B

ULTRASONIC meter validation

15

Select AMR meter for specifications

AMR meter specifications modal opens

Meter: SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR)

AMR meter type testing

16

Verify AMR meter specifications

AMR-specific technical details displayed

Expected specs for ReadyFlow AMR:<br/>Flow Range: 0.1-25 gpm<br/>Accuracy: ±1%<br/>Battery Life: 12 years<br/>Communication: AMR 900MHz<br/>Compatible With: Drive-by System Y

AMR meter validation

17

Test specifications completeness across all types

All meter types show complete specification sets

Verify no missing critical technical data

Data completeness validation

18

Test specification modal performance

All specification loads complete within 1 second

Time all modal opens

Performance requirement

19

Test responsive design for specifications

Specifications display properly on different screen sizes

Test on desktop, tablet, mobile resolutions

Cross-device compatibility

20

Verify specification data formatting

All numerical values, dates, and text properly formatted

Check units, date formats, decimal precision

Data presentation quality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete and accurate specifications display for all meter types (SMART, PHOTO, MANUAL, ULTRASONIC, AMR) with all technical details present and correctly formatted
Secondary_Verifications: Modal functionality works across devices, performance within 1-second load time, data formatting consistent and professional
Negative_Verification: No missing specification data, no display errors, no performance issues across different meter types

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record specification completeness, accuracy, load times, formatting quality]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-005 ✓, AC-013 ✓ (100% coverage for specifications display requirements)




Test Case 7: Inventory Export with Context Preservation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_007
Title: Verify inventory export functionality with complete search, filter, and sort context preservation
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Export & Reporting
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Export, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95%
Integration_Points: Export Service, File Generation Engine, Query Context Manager, Download Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-ExportService.js, MX-FileGenerator.js, MX-QueryContext.js, MX-DownloadManager.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Export-Usage-Analytics, Data-Access-Metrics, File-Generation-Performance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
Dependencies: Export Processing Service, File Generation Infrastructure, Context State Manager, Download Handler
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds export generation for up to 500 records
Data_Requirements: Diverse inventory data for comprehensive export testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Logged in with export permissions enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Export and download permissions
Test_Data: Complete sample inventory: SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000, SMART, Elster, Warehouse A), SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, PHOTO, Sensus, Warehouse B), SN-78901 (WaterMetric Basic, MANUAL, Itron, Warehouse A), SN-89012 (UltraFlow X5, ULTRASONIC, Kamstrup, Field Office), SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR, Badger, Warehouse B)
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access), MX01US03_TC_002 (Search functionality) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Inventory dashboard with full inventory visible

Dashboard displays complete meter inventory

-

Starting state with all meters

2

Verify baseline export without filters

Export contains all inventory meters

Click export, select CSV format

Baseline export test

3

Download and verify complete export content

CSV contains all 5 sample meters with complete details

Expected: All meters (SN-56789 through SN-90123) with full specifications

Full inventory export validation

4

Apply search filter to inventory

Results filtered to specific search criteria

Search: "SMART"

AC-012 search context preservation

5

Verify search results display

Only SMART meters shown in inventory view

Expected: 1 result (SN-56789 FlowMaster 3000)

Search filtering confirmation

6

Export search-filtered results

Export dialog opens with search context

Click export button while search active

Context preservation test

7

Download and verify search-filtered export

CSV contains only SMART meters from search

Expected: Only SN-56789 (FlowMaster 3000) in export file

Business rule: searched items only

8

Clear search and apply manufacturer filter

Filter results by manufacturer

Clear search, Filter: Manufacturer = "Sensus"

Filter context testing

9

Verify manufacturer filter results

Only Sensus meters displayed

Expected: 1 result (SN-67890 AquaTrack 200)

Filter application verification

10

Export manufacturer-filtered results

Export contains only filtered manufacturer data

Export with Sensus filter active

Filter context preservation

11

Download and verify manufacturer export

CSV contains only Sensus meters

Expected: Only SN-67890 (AquaTrack 200, Sensus)

Business rule: filtered items only

12

Apply location-based filter

Filter by warehouse location

Filter: Location = "Warehouse A"

Location filtering test

13

Verify location filter results

Only Warehouse A meters displayed

Expected: 2 results (SN-56789, SN-78901)

Location filter validation

14

Export location-filtered results

Export reflects location filter context

Export with Warehouse A filter

Location context preservation

15

Apply sorting to filtered results

Sort results by manufacturer alphabetically

Sort: Manufacturer A-Z on Warehouse A results

Sort context testing

16

Verify sort order in display

Results appear in alphabetical order by manufacturer

Expected order: Elster (SN-56789), Itron (SN-78901)

Sort application verification

17

Export sorted and filtered results

Export maintains both filter and sort context

Export with location filter + sort active

Business rule: sorted order preserved

18

Download and verify sorted export

CSV maintains alphabetical sort order

Expected: Elster meter first, then Itron meter

Sort context preservation validation

19

Apply complex multi-context scenario

Combine search + filter + sort

Search: "Flow", Filter: Type=ANY, Sort: Model A-Z

Complex context testing

20

Export complex context results

Export preserves all applied contexts

Export with search+filter+sort active

Comprehensive context preservation

21

Test PDF export format

PDF export generates successfully

Select PDF format instead of CSV

Alternative format testing

22

Verify export file naming convention

Files have descriptive, timestamped names

Expected format: "meter_inventory_2025-06-10_filtered.csv"

File naming validation

23

Test export performance benchmark

Export generation completes within 3 seconds

Time various export operations

Performance requirement

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Export files contain exactly the data matching current view context (search results, filtered items, sorted order) with no additional or missing data
Secondary_Verifications: Multiple export formats work (CSV, PDF), file naming convention followed, performance within 3-second limit
Negative_Verification: No data outside current context included in exports, no export failures, no performance degradation

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record export accuracy, context preservation, file formats, performance times]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-012 ✓ (100% coverage for exportable inventory reports requirement)




Test Case 8: Work Order Integration and Automatic Status Updates

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_008
Title: Verify automatic meter status updates through comprehensive work order system integration
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Work Order Integration
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Integration
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Very High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Work Order Management System, Status Update API, Installation Service API, Disposal Integration API, Customer Management System
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-WorkOrderIntegration.js, MX-StatusUpdateService.js, MX-InstallationAPI.js, MX-CustomerAPI.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Integration-Health, Work-Order-Analytics, Status-Update-Metrics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Integration Testing Environment
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Work Order Management System API, Customer Management System, Installation Service API, Status Synchronization Service, Real-time Update Handler
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds status update processing, < 5 seconds cross-system synchronization
Data_Requirements: Available meters for installation, customer data, work order system access

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Work Order system integration active and tested, Customer management system accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Work order creation/approval permissions, meter assignment authorization, installation completion rights
Test_Data: Available meter: SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR, AMR, Badger, Warehouse B), Customer: Metro Water District, Address: 456 Industrial Blvd, Installation Team: TECH-005
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Verify target meter initial status in inventory

Meter shows as "Available" in In Stock tab

Meter: SN-90123 (ReadyFlow AMR)

AC-010 starting state verification

2

Access Work Order Management System

Work order system accessible and functional

Navigate to work order creation interface

External system availability

3

Create new installation work order

Work order created successfully with meter assignment

Work Order Details:<br/>WO-2025-INS-001<br/>Type: Meter Installation<br/>Customer: Metro Water District<br/>Service Address: 456 Industrial Blvd<br/>Assigned Meter: SN-90123<br/>Technician: TECH-005<br/>Scheduled Date: 2025-06-10

AC-010 work order creation

4

Verify work order details and meter assignment

Work order shows correct meter assignment and customer details

Confirm WO-2025-INS-001 assigned to SN-90123

Work order validation

5

Check meter status during active work order

Meter remains in In Stock but shows assignment status

Expected: SN-90123 status = "Assigned to WO-2025-INS-001"

Assignment tracking

6

Attempt to dispose meter with active work order

System prevents disposal with clear error message

Try to dispose SN-90123 while assigned

AC-011 business rule enforcement

7

Verify disposal prevention error

Appropriate error message displays

Expected: "Cannot dispose meter SN-90123 assigned to active work order WO-2025-INS-001"

Business rule validation

8

Complete installation work order

Installation marked as completed in work order system

Installation Details:<br/>Completion Date: 2025-06-10<br/>Installation Time: 14:30<br/>Technician: TECH-005<br/>Installation Notes: "Standard installation completed successfully. Meter operational and reading properly."

Installation completion

9

Submit work order for supervisor approval

Work order submitted for approval workflow

Approver: SUPERVISOR-004

Business rule: approval required

10

Approve installation work order

Supervisor approves completed installation

Approval Details:<br/>Approved By: SUPERVISOR-004<br/>Approval Date: 2025-06-10<br/>Approval Time: 15:45<br/>Comments: "Installation approved. Customer activation authorized."

Business rule: supervisor approval

11

Monitor automatic status update

System automatically processes status change

Wait for integration sync (should occur within 5 seconds)

AC-010 automatic integration

12

Verify meter removal from In Stock

Meter SN-90123 no longer appears in In Stock inventory

Search: "SN-90123" in In Stock tab

Should return no results

13

Check meter installation status

Meter shows as installed with customer details

Expected status: Installed at Metro Water District, 456 Industrial Blvd, Installation Date: 2025-06-10

Installation status confirmation

14

Create disposal work order for previously installed meter

Disposal work order created for meter removal

Work Order Details:<br/>WO-2025-DIS-001<br/>Type: Meter Disposal<br/>Current Location: Metro Water District<br/>Meter: (Previously installed meter)<br/>Disposal Reason: Defective<br/>Technician: TECH-006

Disposal workflow testing

15

Complete disposal work order

Disposal work order completed and approved

Completion Details:<br/>Disposal Date: 2025-06-10<br/>Reason: Defective<br/>Authorization: SUPERVISOR-004<br/>Disposal Location: Certified Disposal Facility

Disposal completion

16

Verify automatic disposal status update

Meter automatically appears in Disposed tab

Check Disposed tab for disposed meter

AC-010 disposal integration

17

Verify disposed meter details

Complete disposal information displayed

Expected: Disposal date, reason, authorization, lifespan calculation

Disposal data validation

18

Test integration performance

All status updates complete within 2-5 second benchmarks

Time each integration event

Performance requirement validation

19

Verify integration error handling

System handles temporary work order system unavailability gracefully

Simulate work order system downtime

Error resilience testing

20

Test data synchronization consistency

All systems maintain consistent meter status information

Cross-verify status in inventory and work order systems

Data consistency validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Meter SN-90123 automatically transitions from In Stock → Assigned → Installed based on work order completion and approval, with complete audit trail and customer assignment details
Secondary_Verifications: Business rules enforced (cannot dispose assigned meters), integration timing within 2-5 seconds, data synchronization across systems maintained
Negative_Verification: Cannot dispose meters with active work orders, no data inconsistencies between systems, no integration failures

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record integration success, status update timing, business rule enforcement, data consistency]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-010 ✓, AC-011 ✓ (100% coverage for work order integration requirements)




NON-FUNCTIONAL TEST CASES

Test Case 9: Performance Testing - System Response Times

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_009
Title: Verify all meter inventory operations meet performance benchmarks under normal and stress conditions
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Performance Optimization
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Database Query Engine, Search Service, Export Service, Bulk Processing Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-PerformanceMonitor.js, MX-DatabaseOptimizer.js, MX-CacheManager.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, SLA-Compliance, System-Health
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Performance Testing Environment (Production-like)
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, Load testing infrastructure, Database performance counters
Performance_Baseline: Dashboard < 1 sec, Search < 1 sec, Export < 3 sec, Bulk operations < 5 sec
Data_Requirements: Large dataset with 1000+ meters for realistic performance testing

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment with large dataset, monitoring tools configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Performance testing account with full system access
Test_Data: Performance dataset with 1000 meters across all types and manufacturers
Prior_Test_Cases: System functional in test environment

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Measure cold dashboard load time

Dashboard loads within 1 second from cold start

First login, empty cache

Cold load performance

2

Measure warm dashboard load time

Dashboard loads within 0.5 seconds on subsequent loads

After initial load, cached state

Warm load performance

3

Test search response time with various queries

All searches complete within 1 second

Search terms: device numbers, models, manufacturers

Search performance validation

4

Measure filter application performance

Filter results display within 1 second

Various filter combinations

Filter performance

5

Test pagination performance

Page navigation completes within 1 second

Navigate through multiple pages of results

Pagination efficiency

6

Measure bulk addition performance (manual)

50 meters process within 3 seconds

Manual bulk entry of 50 meters

Manual bulk performance

7

Measure bulk addition performance (CSV)

100 meters process within 5 seconds

CSV upload with 100 meters

CSV bulk performance

8

Test maximum bulk load (500 meters)

500 meters process within acceptable timeframe

CSV with 500 meters (maximum allowed)

Maximum load testing

9

Measure export generation performance

Export completes within 3 seconds for 500 records

Various export scenarios

Export performance

10

Test concurrent user simulation

System maintains performance with multiple users

Simulate 10 concurrent users at < 1 req/minute each

Concurrent load testing

11

Measure database query performance

All database operations complete within benchmarks

Monitor database response times

Database performance

12

Test memory usage under load

Memory usage remains stable during operations

Monitor memory consumption

Memory efficiency

13

Verify CPU utilization

CPU usage remains within acceptable limits

Monitor CPU during operations

Resource utilization

14

Test network latency impact

Performance maintained across different network conditions

Simulate various network speeds

Network resilience

15

Measure API response times

All API calls complete within 500ms

Time critical API operations

API performance validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All operations meet performance benchmarks - Dashboard < 1s, Search < 1s, Export < 3s, Bulk operations within specified limits
Secondary_Verifications: System maintains performance under concurrent load, resource usage efficient, no performance degradation over time
Negative_Verification: No timeout errors, no performance failures under normal load conditions

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record all timing measurements, resource usage, concurrent load results]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring reports and evidence]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: Performance SLA Requirements ✓ (100% coverage for performance requirements)




Test Case 10: Security Testing - Authorization and Data Protection

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_010
Title: Verify comprehensive security controls, authorization mechanisms, and data protection for meter inventory system
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Security & Authorization
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, MX-Service, Database, Cross-Service

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Very High
Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Authentication Service, Authorization Service, Audit Trail Service, Data Encryption Service, Session Management
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-AuthService.js, MX-PermissionManager.js, MX-AuditLogger.js, MX-SecurityValidator.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control-Metrics, Audit-Trail-Quality
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Security Testing Environment
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication infrastructure, Authorization service, Security scanning tools, Audit logging system
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second security validation, < 2 seconds authentication
Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different permission levels

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple user accounts configured: Device Manager (full access), Regular User (limited access), Admin (system access), Unauthorized User (no access)
User_Roles_Permissions: Test accounts with varying permission levels for comprehensive authorization testing
Test_Data: User accounts: meter.supervisor@utilityco.com (Device Manager), regular.user@utilityco.com (Limited), admin.user@utilityco.com (Admin), unauthorized.user@external.com (No access)
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system operational

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test unauthorized system access

Access denied for users without proper credentials

User: unauthorized.user@external.com

Access control validation

2

Verify error message for unauthorized access

Clear access denied message displayed

Expected: "Access denied. Insufficient privileges for meter inventory system."

Security feedback

3

Test regular user access limitations

Regular user can view but cannot perform administrative actions

User: regular.user@utilityco.com

Role-based access control

4

Attempt bulk addition with regular user

Bulk addition functionality not accessible to regular users

Regular user attempting bulk add

Permission enforcement

5

Verify bulk addition permission error

Appropriate permission error message

Expected: "Insufficient permissions for bulk meter operations"

Permission validation feedback

6

Test Device Manager full access

Device Manager can access all inventory functions

User: meter.supervisor@utilityco.com

Full permission validation

7

Verify disposal authorization requirement

Disposal requires supervisor-level authorization code

Attempt disposal without proper authorization

Authorization enforcement

8

Test invalid supervisor authorization

Invalid authorization codes rejected

Invalid authorization: "INVALID-AUTH-001"

Authorization validation

9

Verify valid supervisor authorization

Valid authorization codes accepted

Valid authorization: "SUPERVISOR-005"

Authorization acceptance

10

Test session management

User sessions timeout after inactivity period

Leave session idle for 30+ minutes

Session security

11

Verify session timeout behavior

Automatic logout after timeout with security message

Expected: "Session expired for security. Please log in again."

Session management validation

12

Test data encryption in transit

All data transmission uses HTTPS/TLS encryption

Monitor network traffic during operations

Data protection validation

13

Verify SQL injection prevention

Malicious SQL inputs properly rejected

Test inputs: '; DROP TABLE meters; --, ' OR '1'='1

Input sanitization

14

Test XSS attack prevention

Script injection attempts blocked

Test inputs: <script>alert('XSS')</script>, javascript:alert('XSS')

Cross-site scripting prevention

15

Verify CSRF protection

Cross-site request forgery attacks prevented

Attempt CSRF attacks on critical operations

CSRF protection validation

16

Test audit trail creation

All user actions properly logged with complete details

Perform various operations and verify audit logs

Audit logging validation

17

Verify audit trail completeness

Audit logs contain user ID, action, timestamp, IP address, affected resources

Check audit log entries for completeness

Audit data quality

18

Test password policy enforcement

Strong password requirements enforced

Test weak passwords during account creation

Password security

19

Verify account lockout protection

Account lockout after multiple failed login attempts

Attempt 5 failed logins

Brute force protection

20

Test data access controls

Users can only access data within their authorization scope

Verify data filtering by user permissions

Data access control

21

Verify sensitive data handling

PII and sensitive meter data properly protected

Check data masking and access controls

Data sensitivity protection

22

Test API security

API endpoints properly secured with authentication/authorization

Test API access without proper credentials

API security validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All security controls function correctly - unauthorized access blocked, role-based permissions enforced, supervisor authorization required for disposal, complete audit trails created
Secondary_Verifications: Data encryption active, input validation prevents attacks, session management secure, password policies enforced
Negative_Verification: No security bypasses possible, no unauthorized data access, no successful injection attacks

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record security test results, permission enforcement, audit trail completeness, attack prevention]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Security testing evidence and audit trail examples]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: Security Requirements ✓ (100% coverage for security and authorization requirements)




EDGE CASE & ERROR HANDLING TEST CASES

Test Case 11: Boundary Value Testing - Bulk Operations Limits

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_011
Title: Verify system behavior at boundary conditions and maximum operational limits
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Boundary Value Testing
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Edge-Case
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-BulkOps, P2-High, Phase-Edge-Case, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85%
Integration_Points: Bulk Processing Engine, Validation Service, Error Handling Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-BulkValidator.js, MX-BoundaryChecker.js, MX-ErrorHandler.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Edge-Case-Coverage, Boundary-Testing-Results, Error-Handling-Quality
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Bulk Processing Service, File Validation Service, Error Management System
Performance_Baseline: < 10 seconds for maximum batch processing
Data_Requirements: Test files with varying sizes and edge case data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Ability to generate test CSV files with specific record counts
User_Roles_Permissions: Bulk addition permissions
Test_Data: CSV files with 1, 499, 500, 501, 1000 meter records for boundary testing
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_003 (Manual bulk addition) and MX01US03_TC_004 (CSV upload) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Test minimum boundary - single meter manual entry

Single meter processes successfully

Manual entry: 1 unique device number

Lower boundary validation

2

Test minimum boundary - single meter CSV

Single meter CSV processes successfully

CSV file with 1 meter record

CSV minimum boundary

3

Test near-maximum boundary (499 meters)

499 meters process successfully within time limits

CSV file with 499 unique device numbers

Near-maximum boundary

4

Test exact maximum boundary (500 meters)

500 meters process successfully at maximum limit

CSV file with exactly 500 unique device numbers

Maximum boundary validation

5

Verify 500-meter processing performance

Processing completes within acceptable timeframe

Monitor processing time for 500 meters

Performance at maximum

6

Test boundary violation (501 meters)

System rejects upload with clear error message

CSV file with 501 unique device numbers

Boundary violation test

7

Verify boundary violation error message

Clear, user-friendly error message about 500-meter limit

Expected: "Maximum batch size is 500 meters. Your file contains 501 meters. Please reduce the batch size."

Error message validation

8

Test significantly over limit (1000 meters)

System consistently rejects oversized batches

CSV file with 1000 meters

Extreme boundary test

9

Test empty CSV file

Appropriate error handling for empty files

CSV file with headers only, no data rows

Empty file handling

10

Test CSV with only headers

Validation error for header-only files

CSV with device_number header but no data

Header-only validation

11

Test maximum device number length

Very long device numbers handled appropriately

Device numbers with 100+ characters

Length boundary testing

12

Test minimum device number length

Single character device numbers validated

Device numbers: "A", "1", "X"

Minimum length validation

13

Test special characters in device numbers

Special character validation applied consistently

Device numbers with: @#$%^&*()+=[]{}

;':",./<>?

14

Test unicode characters in device numbers

Unicode character handling validated

Device numbers with: émétér-001, 测试仪表-002

Unicode boundary testing

15

Test maximum warehouse name length

Very long warehouse names handled properly

Warehouse name with 500+ characters

Warehouse name boundary

16

Test null/empty required fields

All required field validations enforced

Submit with empty Type, Manufacturer, Model fields

Required field boundaries

17

Test concurrent boundary operations

Multiple users hitting boundaries simultaneously

Two users each uploading 500 meters simultaneously

Concurrency boundaries

18

Test memory usage at boundaries

System memory usage remains stable at maximum loads

Monitor memory during 500-meter processing

Memory boundary validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System properly enforces 500-meter maximum limit with clear error messages, processes exactly 500 meters successfully, rejects 501+ meters consistently
Secondary_Verifications: Edge cases handled gracefully (empty files, extreme lengths, special characters), performance acceptable at boundaries, memory usage stable
Negative_Verification: No boundary bypasses possible, no system crashes at limits, no data corruption at boundaries

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record boundary behavior, error messages, processing times, edge case handling]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if boundary issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of boundary testing and error messages]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: Boundary Conditions ✓ (100% coverage for boundary value requirements)




Test Case 12: Duplicate Device Number Prevention and Validation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US03_TC_012
Title: Verify comprehensive duplicate device number detection and prevention across all input methods
Created By: Auto-generated
Created Date: June 10, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Data Validation - Duplicate Prevention
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Validation
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Validation, P1-Critical, Phase-Validation, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-Path, MX-Service, Database

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100%
Integration_Points: Validation Engine, Database Constraint System, Duplicate Detection Service, Error Reporting Service
Code_Module_Mapped: MX-DuplicateValidator.js, MX-DatabaseConstraints.js, MX-ValidationEngine.js
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Data-Integrity-Metrics, Validation-Quality, Duplicate-Prevention-Analytics
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database Unique Constraint System, Real-time Validation Service, Error Message Service
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second duplicate validation response
Data_Requirements: Existing meters in system for duplicate testing against

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Existing meters in inventory database for duplicate testing
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter addition permissions for testing
Test_Data: Known existing device numbers: SN-56789, SN-67890, SN-78901, SN-89012, SN-90123 from sample data
Prior_Test_Cases: MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access) must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Attempt manual addition of existing device number

Duplicate validation error displays immediately

Device Number: SN-56789 (known existing)

AC-007 duplicate prevention

2

Verify duplicate error message clarity and guidance

Clear, specific error message with guidance

Expected: "Device number SN-56789 already exists in inventory. Please use a unique device number."

Error message validation

3

Test duplicate detection timing

Validation occurs in real-time during input

Enter SN-56789 and observe immediate validation

Real-time validation

4

Attempt CSV upload with single duplicate

Entire batch rejected when duplicate detected

CSV containing: SN-56789 (existing), SN-NEW-001 (new)

Batch duplicate detection

5

Verify batch rejection behavior

No meters added when duplicates found in batch

Verify inventory count unchanged after failed upload

All-or-nothing processing

6

Test multiple duplicates in CSV

Multiple duplicates properly identified

CSV containing: SN-56789, SN-67890 (both existing), SN-NEW-002, SN-NEW-003

Multiple duplicate detection

7

Verify multiple duplicate error reporting

Error message lists all duplicate device numbers found

Expected: "Duplicate device numbers found: SN-56789, SN-67890. Please remove duplicates and try again."

Comprehensive error reporting

8

Test case sensitivity handling

Case variations treated as same device number

Test variations: sn-56789, SN-56789, Sn-56789, sN-56789

Case-insensitive validation

9

Verify case insensitive duplicate detection

All case variations rejected as duplicates

All variations should trigger duplicate error

Case handling validation

10

Test leading/trailing whitespace handling

Whitespace normalized before duplicate checking

Test: " SN-56789 ", "SN-56789", " SN-56789"

Whitespace normalization

11

Verify whitespace duplicate detection

Whitespace variations rejected as duplicates

All whitespace variations should trigger duplicate error

Whitespace handling

12

Test duplicates within same manual batch

Internal batch duplicates detected

Manual entry with: SN-NEW-004, SN-NEW-005, SN-NEW-004 (repeated)

Internal duplicate detection

13

Verify internal batch duplicate error

Clear error about duplicates within submission

Expected: "Duplicate device number SN-NEW-004 found within your submission. Each device number must be unique."

Internal validation

14

Test duplicates within same CSV file

CSV internal duplicates detected and rejected

CSV with: SN-NEW-006, SN-NEW-007, SN-NEW-006 (repeated)

CSV internal duplicates

15

Test duplicate detection performance

Validation completes within 1 second even with large datasets

Test duplicate checking with 500-meter CSV

Performance validation

16

Test concurrent duplicate attempts

Multiple users attempting same device number simultaneously

Two users trying to add SN-NEW-008 at same time

Concurrency duplicate handling

17

Verify database constraint enforcement

Database-level constraints prevent duplicates even if validation bypassed

Attempt direct database insertion of duplicate

Database integrity

18

Test duplicate detection across disposed meters

Cannot reuse device numbers from disposed meters

Attempt to add device number: DM8765 (from disposed sample data)

Disposed meter duplicate check

19

Verify disposed meter duplicate error

Clear error about reusing disposed meter device number

Expected: "Device number DM8765 was previously used for a disposed meter. Device numbers cannot be reused."

Disposed duplicate validation

20

Test API duplicate validation

API endpoints properly validate duplicates

POST API request with existing device number

API duplicate prevention

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All duplicate device number scenarios properly detected and prevented across manual entry, CSV upload, and API methods with clear error messages and no data corruption
Secondary_Verifications: Case-insensitive and whitespace-normalized validation, internal batch duplicate detection, performance within 1-second limit
Negative_Verification: No duplicates allowed under any circumstances, no validation bypasses possible, no database constraint violations

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record duplicate detection accuracy, error message quality, validation performance, edge case handling]
Execution_Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if duplicate validation issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence of duplicate detection and error messages]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: AC-007 ✓ (100% coverage for duplicate prevention requirements)



TEST EXECUTION MATRIX

Browser/Device/Environment Combinations

Test Case

Chrome 115+

Firefox 110+

Safari 16+

Edge Latest

Mobile Chrome

Mobile Safari

TC_001-008

✓ Primary

✓ Secondary

✓ Secondary

✓ Secondary

✓ Responsive

✓ Responsive

TC_009-015

✓ Primary

✓ Validation

✓ Validation

✓ Validation

-

-

TC_016-017

✓ API Tool

-

-

-

-

-

Test Suite Definitions

Smoke Test Suite:

  • MX01US03_TC_001 (Dashboard Access)
  • MX01US03_TC_002 (Basic Search)
  • MX01US03_TC_010 (Security Basics)

Regression Test Suite:

  • MX01US03_TC_001 through MX01US03_TC_008 (All Core Functionality)
  • MX01US03_TC_011, MX01US03_TC_012 (Critical Edge Cases)
  • MX01US03_TC_015 (Data Validation)

Full Test Suite:

  • All test cases MX01US03_TC_001 through MX01US03_TC_017

API Test Collection:

  • MX01US03_TC_016 (Meter Creation API)
  • MX01US03_TC_017 (Meter Search API)

Performance Benchmarks

Operation

Expected Performance

Test Case

Dashboard Load

< 1 second

TC_001, TC_009

Search Response

< 1 second

TC_002, TC_017

Filter Application

< 1 second

TC_002

Bulk Processing

< 3 seconds (100 meters)

TC_003, TC_004

Export Generation

< 3 seconds

TC_007

API Response

< 500ms

TC_016, TC_017

Integration Dependencies

Test Case

External Dependencies

Integration Points

TC_008

Work Order Management System

Status Updates, Assignment Tracking

TC_010

Authentication Service, Audit Service

Security Controls, Logging

TC_013

Network Infrastructure, Database Service

Error Recovery, Data Consistency

TC_016, TC_017

API Gateway, Database

External System Integration


VALIDATION CHECKLIST

Coverage Verification:

  • All 8 acceptance criteria covered across test cases
  • All 11 business rules tested with specific validation scenarios
  • Cross-browser compatibility validated (Chrome primary focus)
  • Positive and negative scenarios included
  • Integration points with Work Order system tested
  • Security considerations addressed with authorization testing

Quality Metrics:

  • Performance benchmarks defined (< 1 second standard, < 500ms API)
  • Risk levels assigned based on business impact
  • Complexity levels assessed for execution planning
  • Data sensitivity classifications applied

Business Alignment:

  • Test data uses sample data from user story (not screenshots)
  • Realistic utility company scenarios
  • Revenue impact considerations included
  • Customer segment targeting appropriate

Technical Coverage:

  • API tests for critical operations (≥7 importance level)
  • Edge cases covered with 80% detail level
  • Boundary value testing included
  • Error handling and recovery scenarios tested

Reporting Support:

  • Enhanced tags support all 17 BrowserStack report categories
  • Stakeholder reporting classifications included
  • Trend tracking and executive visibility marked
  • Module coverage tracking implemented

This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the Meter Inventory Management system functionality while adhering to the specified format requirements and supporting all requested reporting capabilities.