Meter Device Summary Dashboard (MX01US01)

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC13: ✓ System updates dashboard metrics at least once every 24 hours (Steps 1-12)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

Dashboard KPI display with 8 meter statistic cards
Meter search functionality (Device # and Meter # options)
Service module access (Add Single Meter, Add Bulk Meters, View All Meters, Raise Service Orders)
Search results display with comprehensive meter details

Business Rules:

Total Meters calculation excluding disposed meters
Percentage calculations for all meter categories
Role-based service module access
Real-time data updates (24-hour cycle)

User Journeys:

Meter Manager: Monitor fleet health → Search specific meters → Access service modules
Meter Supervisor: Review inventory → Track faulty meters → Plan maintenance

Integration Points:

SMART360 Database connectivity
Meter Data Service API
User Authentication Service
External WX Module for service orders

Data Flow:

Database → API → Dashboard KPI cards
Search input → Query processing → Results display
Service module selection → Navigation → Form/List views

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance: Dashboard load <1 second, Search response <500ms, Concurrent user support Security: Role-based access control, B2B utility data protection Compatibility: Chrome Latest browser support, Desktop 1920x1080 resolution Usability: Intuitive navigation, clear error messaging, consistent UI Reliability: 24-hour data refresh, system stability, error recovery

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions: Maximum meter counts, empty search results, invalid permissions Invalid Inputs: Malformed device numbers, SQL injection attempts, unauthorized access System Failures: Database connectivity issues, API timeouts, service unavailability Data Inconsistencies: Missing meter data, calculation errors, stale information

Complete Test Cases

Test Case 1: Dashboard KPI Cards Display Validation

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_001
Title: Verify Dashboard Displays All KPI Cards with Accurate Meter Statistics and Calculations
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Services
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Inventory-View, Navigation, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80% of inventory view functionality
Integration_Points: Navigation-Service, Meter-List-Service, Database
Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, MeterListController, MX-Inventory-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Navigation-Flow, User-Journey
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC10, BR-Service-Module-Access, BR-View-All-Meters
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_004-Single, TC_005-Bulk, TC_007-ServiceOrders

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Service Module Router, Meter List Service, Database
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
Data_Requirements: Complete meter inventory data

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with View All permissions
Test_Data: Complete meter inventory (9,875 meters excluding disposed)
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Comments
1	Locate "View All Meters" card	Card visible with list/grid icon	Third service card
2	Verify card description	Shows "Browse and search the complete meter inventory"	Inventory access description
3	Verify list icon display	List/grid icon visible on card	Visual indicator
4	Hover over "View All Meters" card	Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)	Interactive feedback
5	Click on "View All Meters" card	Navigation initiated, loading indicator appears
6	Verify navigation success	Navigates to Meter List page	URL contains /meter-list
7	Verify page load time	Page loads within 2 seconds	Performance check
8	Verify meter list page load	Complete meter inventory displays in table/grid format	All meters except disposed
9	Verify meter list contains sample data	Shows meters matching dashboard totals (9,875 total)	Data consistency
10	Verify breadcrumb navigation	Shows "Dashboard > View All Meters"	Navigation context

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to complete meter inventory
Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency with dashboard totals, navigation time
Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing data, or unauthorized access

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Navigation success and inventory display validation]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and inventory page screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC10: ✓ System provides access to the View All Meters functionality with proper description (Steps 1-2, 5-6)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 2: Device Number Search Functionality

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_002
Title: Verify Meter Search Functionality Using Device Number with Comprehensive Results Display
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Search
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Search-Device, Results-Display, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of search functionality
Integration_Points: Search-Service, Database-Query-Engine
Code_Module_Mapped: SearchController, MeterQueryService, ResultsFormatter, MX-Search-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Search-Performance, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6, AC7, BR-Search-Device, BR-Results-Display
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001-Dashboard, TC_003-Meter-Search, TC_009-Invalid-Search

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Search Service, Database with sample meter data
Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response time
Data_Requirements: Sample device data: DEV-5678, DEV-4231, DEV-7891

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded successfully, search functionality accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Authenticated user (Meter Manager or Supervisor)
Test_Data: Device IDs from sample data section
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard display must pass

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate Meter Search section on dashboard	Search section visible with radio buttons and input field		Below KPI cards
2	Verify default search option	"Device #" radio button selected by default
3	Verify search input field state	Input field enabled and placeholder text visible	Placeholder: "Enter device number..."
4	Click on "Device #" radio button if not selected	Radio button becomes selected, "Meter #" deselected
5	Enter valid device number in search field	Text appears correctly in input field	DEV-5678	No special characters issues
6	Click Search button	Search request initiated, loading indicator appears
7	Verify search response time	Results appear within 500ms		Use browser dev tools
8	Verify search results table headers	Headers: Device ID, Device Type, Meter Number, Installation Date, Location, Status		All 6 columns present
9	Verify specific device result data	DEV-5678, Smart Electric, 12542901, 2024-01-15, Block A, Zone 3, Active	Sample data values	All fields populated
10	Verify result formatting	Date format: YYYY-MM-DD, Status with appropriate color coding		Status: green for Active
11	Test second device search	Clear field, enter DEV-4231, click Search	DEV-4231
12	Verify second device results	DEV-4231, Smart Water, 10385672, 2023-11-02, Block C, Zone 1, Faulty	Sample data values	Status: red for Faulty
13	Test third device search	Clear field, enter DEV-7891, click Search	DEV-7891
14	Verify third device results	DEV-7891, Basic Gas, 20475632, 2022-08-17, Block B, Zone 2, Normal	Sample data values	Status: normal color

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Device search returns correct meter information with all required fields
Secondary_Verifications: Response time under 500ms, proper formatting, status color coding
Negative_Verification: No incorrect device data, missing fields, or performance issues

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record search results and response times]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Search results screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC6: ✓ System allows searching by either Device # or Meter # (Steps 2-4)
AC7: ✓ System displays comprehensive search results including device ID, type, meter number, installation date, location, and status (Steps 8-14)
Coverage: 2/16 Acceptance Criteria = 12.5%

Test Case 3: Meter Number Search Functionality

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_003
Title: Verify Meter Search Functionality Using Meter Number with Accurate Results
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Search
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Search-Meter, Validation, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: High

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of search functionality
Integration_Points: Search-Service, Database-Query-Engine
Code_Module_Mapped: SearchController, MeterQueryService, ResultsFormatter, MX-Search-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Search-Performance, User-Experience
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6, AC7, BR-Search-Meter, BR-Results-Display
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001-Dashboard, TC_002-Device-Search, TC_009-Invalid-Search

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Search Service, Database with sample meter data
Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response time
Data_Requirements: Sample meter numbers: 12542901, 10385672, 20475632

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded successfully, search functionality accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Authenticated user (Meter Manager or Supervisor)
Test_Data: Meter numbers from sample data section
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must be accessible

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Click on "Meter #" radio button	Radio button selected, "Device #" deselected
2	Verify input field placeholder	Placeholder changes to "Enter meter number..."
3	Enter valid meter number	Text appears in search field	12542901
4	Click Search button	Search executes, results display		Response time <500ms
5	Verify meter search results	DEV-5678, Smart Electric, 12542901, 2024-01-15, Block A, Zone 3, Active	Sample data
6	Test second meter number	Clear and search for 10385672	10385672
7	Verify second result	DEV-4231, Smart Water, 10385672, 2023-11-02, Block C, Zone 1, Faulty	Sample data	Status: Faulty
8	Test third meter number	Clear and search for 20475632	20475632
9	Verify third result	DEV-7891, Basic Gas, 20475632, 2022-08-17, Block B, Zone 2, Normal	Sample data	Status: Normal

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Meter number search returns correct device information
Secondary_Verifications: All result fields populated, proper status display
Negative_Verification: No duplicate results or incorrect data mapping

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Record search results and response times]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Search results screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC6: ✓ System allows searching by either Device # or Meter # (Steps 1-2)
AC7: ✓ System displays comprehensive search results including device ID, type, meter number, installation date, location, and status (Steps 5, 7, 9)
Coverage: 2/16 Acceptance Criteria = 12.5%

Test Case 4: Add Single Meter Service Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_004
Title: Verify Add Single Meter Service Module Access and Navigation Functionality
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Services
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Service-Module, Navigation, MX-Service, Cross-service, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 75% of service module functionality
Integration_Points: Navigation-Service, Form-Rendering-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, NavigationHandler, MX-Service-Module
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Navigation-Flow, User-Journey
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC8, BR-Service-Module-Access, BR-Add-Single-Meter
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_005-Bulk, TC_006-ViewAll, TC_007-ServiceOrders

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Service Module Router, Add Meter Form Service
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
Data_Requirements: N/A

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Add Meter permissions
Test_Data: N/A
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Scroll to Meter Services section	Services section visible with 4 service cards		Below search section
2	Locate "Add Single Meter" card	Card visible with plus icon and title		First service card
3	Verify card description text	Shows "Register a new meter device in the system"		Below card title
4	Verify card visual elements	Icon, title, description properly aligned and styled		UI consistency check
5	Hover over "Add Single Meter" card	Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)		Interactive feedback
6	Click on "Add Single Meter" card	Navigation initiated, loading indicator appears
7	Verify navigation success	Successfully navigates to Add Meter form page		URL contains /add-meter
8	Verify form page load time	Page loads within 2 seconds		Performance check
9	Verify form page elements	Add meter form displays with required fields		Form validation
10	Verify breadcrumb navigation	Shows "Dashboard > Add Single Meter"		Navigation context

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to correct form
Secondary_Verifications: Visual design, hover effects, navigation time
Negative_Verification: No broken links, error pages, or unauthorized access

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Navigation success and timing results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and form page screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC8: ✓ System provides access to the Add Single Meter functionality with proper description (Steps 2-3, 6-7)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 5: Add Bulk Meters Service Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_005
Title: Verify Add Bulk Meters Service Module Access and Data Upload Navigation
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Services
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Bulk-Import, Navigation, MX-Service, Cross-service, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 75% of bulk import functionality
Integration_Points: Navigation-Service, File-Upload-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, BulkImportHandler, MX-Bulk-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Navigation-Flow, User-Journey
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC9, BR-Service-Module-Access, BR-Add-Bulk-Meters
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_004-Single, TC_006-ViewAll, TC_007-ServiceOrders

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Service Module Router, Bulk Upload Service
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
Data_Requirements: N/A

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Bulk Import permissions
Test_Data: N/A
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate "Add Bulk Meters" card in services section	Card visible with upload icon and title		Second service card
2	Verify card description	Shows "Import multiple meters via spreadsheet"		Bulk import description
3	Verify upload icon display	Upload/document icon visible on card		Visual indicator
4	Hover over "Add Bulk Meters" card	Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)		Interactive feedback
5	Click on "Add Bulk Meters" card	Navigation initiated, loading indicator appears
6	Verify navigation success	Navigates to data upload module		URL contains /bulk-upload
7	Verify upload page load time	Page loads within 2 seconds		Performance check
8	Verify upload page elements	File upload interface with instructions displayed		Upload functionality
9	Verify supported file formats	Shows accepted formats (.xlsx, .csv)		File type validation
10	Verify breadcrumb navigation	Shows "Dashboard > Add Bulk Meters"		Navigation context

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to bulk upload interface
Secondary_Verifications: Visual design, file format support, navigation time
Negative_Verification: No broken links, error pages, or unauthorized access

Test Case 6: View All Meters Service Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_006
Title: Verify View All Meters Service Module Access and Complete Inventory Navigation
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Services
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Service-Orders, WX-Integration, MX-Service, Cross-service, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of service order functionality
Integration_Points: WX-Module, Service-Order-Management, External-Systems
Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, ServiceOrderController, MX-WX-Integration
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Integration-Testing, Business-Impact
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC11, BR-Service-Module-Access, BR-Raise-Service-Orders, BR-Service-Type-Selection
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_004-Single, TC_005-Bulk, TC_006-ViewAll

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Service Module Router, WX Module, Service Order Management
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
Data_Requirements: N/A

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated, WX module available
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Service Order permissions
Test_Data: N/A
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	click on view icon card in services section	Card visible with upload icon and title		Second service card
2	Verify card description	Shows "Import multiple meters via spreadsheet"		Bulk import description
3	Verify upload icon display	Upload/document icon visible on card		Visual indicator
4	Hover over "Add Bulk Meters" card	Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)		Interactive feedback
5	Click on "Add Bulk Meters" card	Navigation initiated, loading indicator appears
6	Verify navigation success	Navigates to data upload module		URL contains /bulk-upload
7	Verify upload page load time	Page loads within 2 seconds		Performance check
8	Verify upload page elements	File upload interface with instructions displayed		Upload functionality
9	Verify supported file formats	Shows accepted formats (.xlsx, .csv)		File type validation
10	Verify breadcrumb navigation	Shows "Dashboard > Add Bulk Meters"		Navigation context

Test Case 7: Raise Service Orders Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_007
Title: Verify Raise Service Orders Service Module Access and Service Type Selection
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Meter Services
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of service order functionality
Integration_Points: WX-Module, Service-Order-Management, External-Systems
Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, ServiceOrderController, MX-WX-Integration
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Integration-Testing, Business-Impact
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC11, BR-Service-Module-Access, BR-Raise-Service-Orders, BR-Service-Type-Selection
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_004-Single, TC_005-Bulk, TC_006-ViewAll

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Service Module Router, WX Module, Service Order Management
Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
Data_Requirements: N/A

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated, WX module available
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Service Order permissions
Test_Data: N/A
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Comments
1	Locate "Raise Service Orders" card	Card visible with service/wrench icon	Fourth service card
2	Verify card description	Shows service order creation description	Maintenance/inspection requests
3	Verify service icon display	Service/wrench icon visible on card	Visual indicator
4	Hover over "Raise Service Orders" card	Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)	Interactive feedback
5	Click on "Raise Service Orders" card	Navigation initiated, loading indicator appears
6	Verify navigation success	Navigates to service order form	URL contains /service-orders
7	Verify form page load time	Page loads within 2 seconds	Performance check
8	Verify service type selection enabled	Service type dropdown/options available	Key differentiator from add meter
9	Verify form has meter selection	Can select meters for service orders	Integration with meter data
10	Verify service order types	Shows maintenance, inspection, replacement options	Business rule validation
11	Verify breadcrumb navigation	Shows "Dashboard > Raise Service Orders"	Navigation context

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to service order form with type selection
Secondary_Verifications: Service type options, meter selection integration, navigation time
Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing service types, or unauthorized access

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Navigation success and service form validation]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and form page screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC11: ✓ System provides access to the Raise Service Orders functionality with proper description (Steps 1-2, 5-6)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 8: Dashboard Performance Under Normal Load

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_008
Title: Verify Dashboard Load Performance and Response Times Under Normal Operating Conditions
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Load-Testing, Response-Time, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: High

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of performance scenarios
Integration_Points: Database-Connection-Pool, Cache-Service, Load-Balancer
Code_Module_Mapped: DashboardController, PerformanceMonitor, MX-Performance-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, System-Health, SLA-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC13, BR-Performance-Requirements, SLA-Dashboard-Load
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001-Dashboard, TC_013-Concurrent-Users

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Cache Service, Load Balancer
Performance_Baseline: Dashboard <1 second, Search <500ms, API <500ms
Data_Requirements: Full dataset with 9,875 meters

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring tools enabled
User_Roles_Permissions: Valid user credentials
Test_Data: Complete meter dataset
Prior_Test_Cases: System baseline established

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open browser dev tools performance tab	Performance monitoring active		Record network timing
2	Clear browser cache and cookies	Clean performance baseline		Ensure fresh load
3	Navigate to dashboard URL	Page load initiated		Start performance recording
4	Measure initial page load time	Complete load under 1 second	Target: <1000ms	DOM content + resources
5	Verify all KPI cards loaded	8 cards display with data within baseline		No loading indicators remain
6	Test search performance	Execute device search	DEV-5678	Measure response time
7	Verify search response time	Results display within 500ms	Target: <500ms	From click to results
8	Test multiple rapid searches	Execute 5 consecutive searches	Different device IDs	System stability
9	Verify consistent performance	All searches maintain <500ms response		No performance degradation
10	Measure memory usage	Monitor browser memory consumption		Memory leak detection
11	Test concurrent dashboard access	Open 3 browser tabs with dashboard		Multi-tab performance
12	Verify performance consistency	All tabs maintain <1 second load time		No resource conflicts

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 1 second, search responds within 500ms
Secondary_Verifications: Memory usage stable, multiple tabs perform consistently
Negative_Verification: No timeouts, memory leaks, or performance degradation

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Performance metrics and timing results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if performance issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC13: ✓ System updates dashboard metrics at least once every 24 hours (Performance baseline validation)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 9: Invalid Search Input Error Handling

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_009
Title: Verify Error Handling and User Feedback for Invalid Search Inputs and Edge Cases
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Search Error Handling
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Error-Handling, Edge-Cases, User-Experience, MX-Service, Database

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95% of error scenarios
Integration_Points: Search-Validation-Service, Error-Handler
Code_Module_Mapped: SearchValidator, ErrorMessageService, MX-Validation-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Error-Handling, User-Experience, Edge-Case-Coverage
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: BR-Error-Handling, BR-Invalid-Search, UX-Requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_002-Device-Search, TC_003-Meter-Search

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Search Service, Validation Service, Error Handler
Performance_Baseline: Error messages display within 200ms
Data_Requirements: Invalid search terms, special characters, empty strings

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, search functionality accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
Test_Data: Invalid search terms, special characters, empty strings
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must be functional

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Select "Device #" radio button	Radio button selected
2	Enter non-existent device number	Text appears in search field	INVALID-999
3	Click Search button	Search executes, error handling triggered
4	Verify "No results found" message	Clear message displays below search	"No results found for 'INVALID-999'"
5	Verify error message styling	Error message has appropriate styling (color, icon)		User-friendly display
6	Test empty search input	Clear field, leave empty, click Search	""
7	Verify empty input validation	Error message: "Please enter a search term"		Input validation
8	Test special characters in device search	Enter special characters	@#$%^&*()
9	Verify special character handling	Appropriate error or sanitized search		Security consideration
10	Test very long device number	Enter 50+ character string	DEVICE-123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345
11	Verify long input handling	System handles gracefully without errors		Input length validation
12	Switch to "Meter #" and test invalid meter	Select Meter #, enter invalid number	999999999
13	Verify meter number error handling	"No results found" message displays		Consistent error handling
14	Test SQL injection attempt	Enter SQL injection string	' OR 1=1 --
15	Verify security protection	Input sanitized, no security breach		Security validation
16	Test with leading/trailing spaces	Enter " DEV-5678 " with spaces	" DEV-5678 "
17	Verify space handling	System trims spaces and finds result		Input normalization

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All invalid inputs handled gracefully with appropriate error messages
Secondary_Verifications: Error message styling, response times, input sanitization
Negative_Verification: No system crashes, security vulnerabilities, or unclear error states

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Error messages and system behavior recorded]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Error message screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

No direct AC coverage - This test case covers error handling scenarios not explicitly mentioned in acceptance criteria
Coverage: 0/16 Acceptance Criteria = 0%

Test Case 10: Role-Based Access Control Validation

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_010
Title: Verify Role-Based Access Control for Meter Manager and Supervisor Service Module Permissions
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Security and Access Control
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Security
Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, RBAC, Authentication, Authorization, MX-Service, Cross-service

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of role-based scenarios
Integration_Points: Authentication-Service, Authorization-Service, RBAC-Engine
Code_Module_Mapped: AuthController, PermissionValidator, RoleManager, MX-Auth-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control, Risk-Management
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC12, BR-Role-Access, BR-Service-Module-Permissions, Security-Requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_004-TC_007 Service Modules

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Authentication Service, RBAC Service, User Management System
Performance_Baseline: Authentication response <2 seconds
Data_Requirements: Valid Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor test accounts

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Test user accounts configured with appropriate roles
User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor test credentials
Test_Data: manager@utility.com, supervisor@utility.com credentials
Prior_Test_Cases: User account setup completed

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Logout any current user session	User logged out successfully		Clear authentication state
2	Login with Meter Manager credentials	Successful authentication and dashboard access	manager@utility.com / Test123!
3	Navigate to dashboard	Dashboard loads with manager permissions
4	Verify Meter Manager service access	All 4 service modules visible and accessible	Add Single, Add Bulk, View All, Raise Orders
5	Click on "Add Single Meter"	Successfully navigates to add meter form		Permission validation
6	Return to dashboard and test "Add Bulk Meters"	Successfully navigates to bulk upload
7	Return to dashboard and test "View All Meters"	Successfully navigates to meter list
8	Return to dashboard and test "Raise Service Orders"	Successfully navigates to service order form
9	Logout Meter Manager	User logged out successfully
10	Login with Meter Supervisor credentials	Successful authentication	supervisor@utility.com / Test123!
11	Navigate to dashboard	Dashboard loads with supervisor permissions
12	Verify Meter Supervisor KPI access	Can view all dashboard KPI cards		Data visibility check
13	Test supervisor service module access	Verify appropriate service modules accessible	Per role permissions
14	Verify any restricted modules	Modules requiring higher permissions show as disabled/hidden		Permission enforcement
15	Test search functionality access	Both roles can use search functionality		Basic functionality access
16	Verify role-specific data filtering	Each role sees appropriate meter data scope		Data access control

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Each role has correct access to service modules per business rules
Secondary_Verifications: Data visibility, navigation permissions, feature availability
Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, privilege escalation, or data leakage

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Role permissions and access results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Access control evidence]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC12: ✓ System restricts access to service modules based on user role permissions (Steps 4-8, 13-14)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 11: Data Refresh and Real-Time Updates

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_011
Title: Verify Dashboard Data Updates Within 24-Hour Refresh Cycle and Real-Time Synchronization
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Data Synchronization
Test Type: Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Integration
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-DataSync, P2-High, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Real-Time, Data-Refresh, MX-Service, Database, Cross-service

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 25 hours (overnight test)
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: High

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of data refresh scenarios
Integration_Points: Database-Sync-Service, Meter-Data-Pipeline, Cache-Manager
Code_Module_Mapped: DataRefreshService, SyncScheduler, CacheInvalidator, MX-Sync-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Data-Integrity, System-Integration, SLA-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC13, BR-Data-Refresh, BR-24Hour-Update
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001-Dashboard-Display

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Database, Data Pipeline, Scheduler Service
Performance_Baseline: Data updates within 24 hours
Data_Requirements: Controlled test data with known update schedule

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Data refresh schedule configured, test meters in database
User_Roles_Permissions: Database access for test data manipulation
Test_Data: Baseline meter counts at test start
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 baseline dashboard working

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Record current dashboard timestamp	Note "Last updated" timestamp at dashboard bottom		Baseline recording
2	Record current KPI values	Document all 8 KPI card values	Total: 9,875, Active: 8,542, etc.
3	Insert new meter record in database	Add test meter to trigger data change	Test Device: TEST-001	Controlled data change
4	Wait for next refresh cycle	Monitor for data update within 24 hours		Automated monitoring
5	Refresh dashboard page	Load latest dashboard data		Manual page refresh
6	Verify timestamp updated	"Last updated" shows new timestamp		Within 24-hour window
7	Verify KPI values reflect changes	Total meters increased to 9,876	Expected: 9,876	Data consistency
8	Verify percentage recalculations	All percentages recalculated with new total		Automatic recalculation
9	Test real-time meter status change	Update test meter status to "Faulty"	TEST-001 → Faulty
10	Wait for next refresh cycle	Monitor for status change reflection
11	Verify faulty meter count updated	Faulty meters count increased by 1	Expected: 413	Status change tracking
12	Clean up test data	Remove test meter from database		Test cleanup

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Data updates within 24-hour cycle with accurate calculations
Secondary_Verifications: Timestamp accuracy, percentage recalculations, status changes
Negative_Verification: No stale data, calculation errors, or refresh failures

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Data refresh timing and accuracy results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if sync issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Before/after dashboard screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC13: ✓ System updates dashboard metrics at least once every 24 hours (Steps 1-12)
Coverage:/Feature:** Dashboard KPI Display
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Test Case 12: KPI Percentage Calculation Accuracy

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_012
Title: Verify Mathematical Accuracy of All KPI Percentage Calculations and Business Rule Compliance
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Business Logic Calculations
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Calculations, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Mathematical-Validation, Business-Rules, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of calculation scenarios
Integration_Points: Calculation-Engine, Database-Aggregation-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: KPICalculationEngine, MeterStatisticsService, MX-Calculation-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Business-Rules-Compliance, Mathematical-Accuracy, Data-Integrity
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: BR-Percentage-Calculations, BR-Electric-Meters, BR-Water-Meters, BR-Gas-Meters, BR-Normal-Condition, BR-Faulty-Meters, BR-RNT-Meters
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001-Dashboard-Display

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Dashboard Service, Calculation Engine, Database
Performance_Baseline: Calculations complete within dashboard load time
Data_Requirements: Sample data: Total(9,875), Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible with sample data loaded
User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
Test_Data: Sample data from user story
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must display KPI cards

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to dashboard and load KPI data	All KPI cards display with values
2	Calculate Electric Meters percentage manually	(4,128 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 41.8%	4,128 electric meters	Manual calculation
3	Verify Electric Meters percentage display	Dashboard shows 41.8% for Electric Meters	Expected: 41.8%	Precision to 1 decimal
4	Calculate Water Meters percentage manually	(3,254 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 32.9%	3,254 water meters
5	Verify Water Meters percentage display	Dashboard shows 32.9% for Water Meters	Expected: 32.9%
6	Calculate Gas Meters percentage manually	(1,160 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 11.7%	1,160 gas meters
7	Verify Gas Meters percentage display	Dashboard shows 11.7% for Gas Meters	Expected: 11.7%
8	Verify meter type total validation	Electric + Water + Gas = Total Meters	4,128 + 3,254 + 1,160 = 8,542 ≠ 9,875	Note: Missing 1,333 meters
9	Calculate Normal Condition percentage	(7,845 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 79.5%	7,845 normal meters
10	Verify Normal Condition percentage display	Dashboard shows 79.5% for Normal Condition	Expected: 79.5%
11	Calculate Faulty Meters percentage	(412 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 4.2%	412 faulty meters
12	Verify Faulty Meters percentage display	Dashboard shows 4.2% for Faulty Meters	Expected: 4.2%
13	Calculate RNT Meters percentage	(285 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 2.9%	285 RNT meters
14	Verify RNT Meters percentage display	Dashboard shows 2.9% for RNT Meters	Expected: 2.9%
15	Calculate Active Meters percentage	(8,542 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 86.5%	8,542 active meters
16	Verify Active Meters percentage (if displayed)	Dashboard shows 86.5% for Active Meters	Expected: 86.5%
17	Verify condition total validation	Normal + Faulty + RNT should account for categorized meters	7,845 + 412 + 285 = 8,542	Matches active meters

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All percentage calculations mathematically accurate to 1 decimal place
Secondary_Verifications: Totals validate, no rounding errors, consistent decimal precision
Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, missing percentages, or inconsistent totals

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Calculation accuracy and percentage validation results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
Screenshots_Logs: [KPI cards with percentage values]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC2: ✓ System categorizes meters by type (Electric, Water, Gas) with accurate counts and percentages (Steps 2-7)
AC3: ✓ System categorizes meters by condition status (Normal, Faulty, RNT) with accurate counts and percentages (Steps 9-14)
Coverage: 2/16 Acceptance Criteria = 12.5%

Test Case 13: Concurrent User Performance Testing

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_013
Title: Verify Dashboard Performance and Data Consistency with Multiple Concurrent Users
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Performance and Scalability
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Concurrent-Users, Load-Testing, MX-Service, Database, Cross-service

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Medium

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 85% of concurrent scenarios
Integration_Points: Load-Balancer, Database-Connection-Pool, Session-Manager
Code_Module_Mapped: ConcurrencyManager, LoadBalancer, MX-Scalability-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Testing, System-Capacity
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Performance-Requirements, Scalability-Requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_008-Performance, TC_001-Dashboard

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Load Balancer, Database Connection Pool, Session Management
Performance_Baseline: <1 second per user, consistent across 10+ concurrent users
Data_Requirements: Full meter dataset for realistic load testing

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Load testing tools configured, multiple user accounts available
User_Roles_Permissions: 10 valid user accounts with appropriate permissions
Test_Data: Complete meter dataset (9,875 meters)
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 and TC_008 baseline performance established

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Setup 10 concurrent user sessions	10 browser instances/tabs opened	Users 1-10	Load testing simulation
2	Simultaneously navigate all users to dashboard	All dashboards load within 1 second each		Performance consistency
3	Verify data consistency across sessions	All users see identical KPI values	Same data for all users
4	Execute concurrent searches	All 10 users search simultaneously	Mixed device/meter searches
5	Measure search response times	All searches complete within 500ms		Performance under load
6	Test concurrent service module access	Users access different service modules simultaneously		Resource contention testing
7	Monitor system resource usage	CPU, memory, database connections stable		System stability check
8	Verify no data corruption	All users continue to see accurate, consistent data		Data integrity validation
9	Test peak load scenario	Increase to 15 concurrent users	Users 1-15	Stress testing
10	Measure degradation under peak load	Performance degradation <10%		Acceptable performance loss
11	Verify system recovery	Return to 10 users, performance normalizes		Recovery validation
12	Clean up test sessions	Close all concurrent sessions		Resource cleanup

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System supports 10+ concurrent users with <10% performance degradation
Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency, resource stability, recovery capability
Negative_Verification: No system crashes, data corruption, or resource exhaustion

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Concurrent user performance and stability results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if performance issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring data]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

No direct AC coverage - This test case covers scalability requirements not explicitly mentioned in acceptance criteria
Coverage: 0/16 Acceptance Criteria = 0%

Test Case 14: Search Results Format and Field Validation

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_014
Title: Verify Search Results Display All Required Fields with Proper Formatting and Data Accuracy
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Search Results Display
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Results-Format, Data-Display, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 90% of results display scenarios
Integration_Points: Search-Results-Formatter, Database-Query-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: ResultsFormatter, SearchResultsController, MX-Display-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: User-Experience, Data-Presentation, Format-Validation
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC7, BR-Search-Results-Display, UX-Requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_002-Device-Search, TC_003-Meter-Search

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Search Service, Results Formatter, Database
Performance_Baseline: Results display within 500ms
Data_Requirements: Sample device data: DEV-7891, DEV-4231, DEV-5678

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, search functionality working
User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
Test_Data: Sample device data from user story
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_002 and TC_003 basic search functionality working

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Execute device search	Search completes successfully	DEV-7891
2	Verify results table headers	Headers: Device ID, Device Type, Meter Number, Installation Date, Location, Status	All 6 required columns
3	Verify Device ID field	Shows "DEV-7891" in correct format	DEV-7891
4	Verify Device Type field	Shows "Basic Gas"	Basic Gas
5	Verify Meter Number field	Shows "20475632" as numeric value	20475632
6	Verify Installation Date field	Shows "2022-08-17" in YYYY-MM-DD format	2022-08-17	Date formatting
7	Verify Location field	Shows "Block B, Zone 2" with proper formatting	Block B, Zone 2	Location display
8	Verify Status field	Shows "Normal" with appropriate color coding	Normal	Status indicator
9	Test different status displays	Search for faulty meter to verify status colors	DEV-4231 (Faulty)	Color coding validation
10	Verify faulty meter status display	Status shows "Faulty" with red indicator	Faulty status
11	Test active meter status	Search for active meter	DEV-5678 (Active)
12	Verify active meter status display	Status shows "Active" with green indicator	Active status
13	Verify table responsiveness	Results table adjusts properly to browser width		UI responsiveness
14	Verify data alignment	All columns properly aligned (left, center, right as appropriate)		Visual consistency
15	Test column sorting	Click on column headers to verify sorting functionality		Interactive features
16	Verify results pagination	If multiple results, pagination controls work correctly		Large result sets

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All required fields display with proper formatting and accurate data
Secondary_Verifications: Color coding, alignment, responsiveness, sorting functionality
Negative_Verification: No missing fields, incorrect formatting, or broken layout

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Results format and field validation results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if formatting issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Search results display screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC7: ✓ System displays comprehensive search results including device ID, type, meter number, installation date, location, and status (Steps 2-8)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 15: API Response Validation for Dashboard Data

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_015
Title: Verify Dashboard API Endpoints Return Accurate Meter Data with Proper Response Structure
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: API Validation
Test Type: API
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: API
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-API, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Backend-Validation, Data-Integrity, MX-Service, Database, Cross-service

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 95% of API scenarios
Integration_Points: Dashboard-API, Database-Connection, Authentication-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: DashboardAPIController, MeterDataService, MX-API-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: API-Performance, Data-Integrity, Backend-Quality
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, AC5, API-Requirements, Performance-Requirements
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_001-Dashboard, TC_008-Performance

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Dashboard API, Database, Authentication Service
Performance_Baseline: API responses <500ms
Data_Requirements: Sample meter data matching user story

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, authentication configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Valid API credentials
Test_Data: Sample data: Total(9,875), Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)
Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and database connectivity working

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Execute API call to dashboard data endpoint	API responds with 200 status code	GET /api/meter-summary
2	Verify API response time	Response received within 500ms	Target: <500ms	Performance requirement
3	Verify response structure	JSON contains all required KPI fields		Schema validation
4	Verify total meters count	API returns totalMeters: 9875	Expected: 9875
5	Verify active meters count	API returns activeMeters: 8542	Expected: 8542
6	Verify electric meters count	API returns electricMeters: 4128	Expected: 4128
7	Verify water meters count	API returns waterMeters: 3254	Expected: 3254
8	Verify gas meters count	API returns gasMeters: 1160	Expected: 1160
9	Verify normal condition count	API returns normalMeters: 7845	Expected: 7845
10	Verify faulty meters count	API returns faultyMeters: 412	Expected: 412
11	Verify RNT meters count	API returns rntMeters: 285	Expected: 285
12	Verify pending service orders	API returns pendingServiceOrders: 156	Expected: 156
13	Verify pending installations	API returns pendingInstallations: 78	Expected: 78
14	Verify data types	All numeric fields return as integers/numbers		Type validation
15	Test API with invalid authentication	API returns 401 Unauthorized	Invalid token	Security validation
16	Test API response caching	Verify appropriate cache headers		Performance optimization
17	Test API error handling	Invalid parameters return proper error codes		Error handling

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: API returns all required data fields matching dashboard display
Secondary_Verifications: Response time, data types, authentication security, error handling
Negative_Verification: No missing fields, incorrect data types, or security bypasses

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [API response validation and performance results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if API issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [API response data and timing]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC1: ✓ System displays accurate total count of all registered meters (Step 4)
AC2: ✓ System categorizes meters by type (Electric, Water, Gas) with accurate counts (Steps 6-8)
AC3: ✓ System categorizes meters by condition status (Normal, Faulty, RNT) with accurate counts (Steps 9-11)
AC4: ✓ System displays count of pending service orders (Step 12)
AC5: ✓ System displays count of pending installations (Step 13)
Coverage: 5/16 Acceptance Criteria = 31.25%

Test Case 16: Dashboard Last Update Timestamp Validation

# Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_016
Title: Verify Dashboard Maintains Accurate Date-Time Stamp of Last Update
Created By: QA Test Generator
Created Date: 2025-06-02
Version: 1.0

# Classification

Module/Feature: Data Timestamp Management
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Timestamp, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Timestamp-Validation, Data-Freshness, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Low
Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of timestamp scenarios
Integration_Points: Timestamp-Service, Data-Refresh-Service
Code_Module_Mapped: TimestampManager, DataRefreshService, MX-Timestamp-Service
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Data-Quality, System-Monitoring, User-Information
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC16, BR-Last-Update-Timestamp
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: TC_011-Data-Refresh

# Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
Dependencies: Timestamp Service, System Clock
Data_Requirements: Current system time for validation

# Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, system time synchronized
User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
Test_Data: Current system timestamp
Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loading successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Comments
1	Navigate to dashboard	Dashboard loads successfully
2	Locate last update timestamp	Timestamp visible at bottom of dashboard
3	Verify timestamp format	Format: "Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS" or similar	Standard format
4	Verify timestamp is recent	Timestamp is within last 24 hours	Data freshness check
5	Record current timestamp	Note the displayed timestamp value	Baseline recording
6	Refresh the page	Page reloads successfully
7	Verify timestamp remains same	Same timestamp displayed (no automatic update)	Consistency check
8	Wait for system refresh cycle	Monitor for timestamp change	If applicable
9	Verify timestamp updates after refresh	New timestamp reflects latest update	If refresh occurs
10	Check timestamp accuracy	Timestamp matches server time within acceptable margin	Accuracy validation

# Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays accurate last update timestamp
Secondary_Verifications: Format consistency, freshness within 24 hours
Negative_Verification: No missing timestamp, incorrect format, or stale data indicators

# Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Timestamp format and accuracy results]
Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
Executed_By: [Tester name]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if timestamp issues found]
Screenshots_Logs: [Dashboard timestamp screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC16: ✓ System maintains accurate date-time stamp of when the dashboard was last updated (Steps 2-10)
Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Complete Acceptance Criteria Coverage Summary

Coverage Analysis by Test Case

Test Case	Acceptance Criteria Covered	Coverage %
TC_001	AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, AC5, AC14	37.5%
TC_002	AC6, AC7	12.5%
TC_003	AC6, AC7	12.5%
TC_004	AC8	6.25%
TC_005	AC9	6.25%
TC_006	AC10	6.25%
TC_007	AC11	6.25%
TC_008	AC13	6.25%
TC_009	None (Error handling)	0%
TC_010	AC12	6.25%
TC_011	AC13	6.25%
TC_012	AC2, AC3	12.5%
TC_013	None (Performance)	0%
TC_014	AC7	6.25%
TC_015	AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, AC5	31.25%
TC_016	AC16	6.25%

Complete Acceptance Criteria Coverage

AC1: ✓ System displays accurate total count of all registered meters
Covered by: TC_001, TC_015

AC2: ✓ System categorizes meters by type (Electric, Water, Gas) with accurate counts and percentages
Covered by: TC_001, TC_012, TC_015

AC3: ✓ System categorizes meters by condition status (Normal, Faulty, RNT) with accurate counts and percentages
Covered by: TC_001, TC_012, TC_015

AC4: ✓ System displays count of pending service orders with priority indication
Covered by: TC_001, TC_015

AC5: ✓ System displays count of pending installations with today's schedule indication
*Covered by# Meter Device Summary Dashboard - Complete Test Cases User Story Reference: MX01US01 - Device Management Dashboard
Generated Date: June 02, 2025
Test Framework Version: BrowserStack Enhanced Template v2.0