Skip to main content

Meter Device Summary Dashboard (MX01US01)

Meter Device Summary Dashboard -

User# StoryAcceptance Reference:Criteria Coverage

  • AC13: MX01US01✓ -System Deviceupdates Managementdashboard Dashboardmetrics at least once every 24 hours (Steps 1-12)
     
  • Generated Date:Coverage: June1/16 02,Acceptance 2025Criteria = 6.25%


 Test Framework Version: BrowserStack Enhanced Template v2.0



Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

  • Dashboard KPI display with 8 meter statistic cards
  • Meter search functionality (Device # and Meter # options)
  • Service module access (Add Single Meter, Add Bulk Meters, View All Meters, Raise Service Orders)
  • Search results display with comprehensive meter details

Business Rules:

  • Total Meters calculation excluding disposed meters
  • Percentage calculations for all meter categories
  • Role-based service module access
  • Real-time data updates (24-hour cycle)

User Journeys:

  • Meter Manager: Monitor fleet health → Search specific meters → Access service modules
  • Meter Supervisor: Review inventory → Track faulty meters → Plan maintenance

Integration Points:

  • SMART360 Database connectivity
  • Meter Data Service API
  • User Authentication Service
  • External WX Module for service orders

Data Flow:

  • Database → API → Dashboard KPI cards
  • Search input → Query processing → Results display
  • Service module selection → Navigation → Form/List views

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance: Dashboard load <1 second, Search response <500ms, Concurrent user support Security: Role-based access control, B2B utility data protection Compatibility: Chrome Latest browser support, Desktop 1920x1080 resolution Usability: Intuitive navigation, clear error messaging, consistent UI Reliability: 24-hour data refresh, system stability, error recovery

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions: Maximum meter counts, empty search results, invalid permissions Invalid Inputs: Malformed device numbers, SQL injection attempts, unauthorized access System Failures: Database connectivity issues, API timeouts, service unavailability Data Inconsistencies: Missing meter data, calculation errors, stale information



Complete Test Case DetailsCases

Test Case 1: Dashboard KPI Cards Display Validation

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_001
  • Title: Verify Dashboard Displays All KPI Cards with Accurate Meter Statistics and Calculations
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Dashboard KPI Display
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Dashboard, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, KPI-Validation, Calculation-Logic, Data-Display

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 90% of dashboard functionality
  • Integration_Points: SMART360-Database, Meter-Data-Service, Authentication-Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: DashboardController, MeterStatisticsService, KPICalculationEngine
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Performance-Metrics, Business-Impact
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: SMART360 Database, Meter Data Service, Authentication Service
  • Performance_Baseline: <1 second dashboard load time
  • Data_Requirements: Sample meter inventory: 9,875 total meters with breakdown per user story

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, Database populated with sample data
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Valid Meter Manager or Meter Supervisor credentials
  • Test_Data: Sample data: Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication must be successful

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Launch Chrome browser and navigate to SMART360 login

Login page displays correctly

Chrome Latest

Verify page loads <3 seconds

2

Enter valid Meter Manager credentials and login

Successful authentication, redirected to dashboard

Username: meter.manager@utility.com, Password: Test123!


3

Verify Total Meters KPI card display

Card shows "9,875" with label "All registered meters" and info icon

Expected: 9,875

Verify excluding disposed meters

4

Verify Total Active Meters KPI card

Card shows "8,542" with "+124 this month" trend indicator

Expected: 8,542

Check percentage: (8,542/9,875)*100 = 86.5%

5

Verify Electric Meters KPI card

Card shows "4,128" with electric icon and percentage "41.8% of total"

Expected: 4,128

Calculate: (4,128/9,875)*100 = 41.8%

6

Verify Water Meters KPI card

Card shows "3,254" with water icon and percentage "32.9% of total"

Expected: 3,254

Calculate: (3,254/9,875)*100 = 32.9%

7

Verify Gas Meters KPI card

Card shows "1,160" with gas icon and percentage "11.7% of total"

Expected: 1,160

Calculate: (1,160/9,875)*100 = 11.7%

8

Verify Normal Condition KPI card

Card shows "7,845" with green checkmark and percentage "79.5% of total"

Expected: 7,845

Calculate: (7,845/9,875)*100 = 79.5%

9

Verify Faulty Meters KPI card

Card shows "412" with red warning icon and percentage "4.2% of total"

Expected: 412

Calculate: (412/9,875)*100 = 4.2%, verify warning indicator

10

Verify RNT Meters KPI card

Card shows "285" with purple icon and percentage "2.9% of total"

Expected: 285

Calculate: (285/9,875)*100 = 2.9%

11

Verify Pending Service Orders KPI card

Card shows "156" with "32 high priority" subtitle and blue icon

Expected: 156 orders, 32 high priority


12

Verify Pending Installations KPI card

Card shows "78" with "12 scheduled today" subtitle and green icon

Expected: 78 installations, 12 today


13

Verify last update timestamp

Dashboard shows current update timestamp at bottom

Format: "Last updated: [datetime]"

Verify within 24 hours

14

Verify page load performance

Complete dashboard load time under 1 second

Performance baseline: <1 sec

Use browser dev tools

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All 8 KPI cards display with correct values matching sample data calculations
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators (icons, colors), percentage calculations, labels, trend indicators
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect data, missing cards, calculation errors, or performance issues

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record actual values found vs expected]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]

# Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

# Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User Authentication Test
  • Blocked_Tests: TC_002, TC_003 (search functionality)
  • Parallel_Tests: TC_010 (role access)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must execute before search tests

# Additional Information

  • Notes: This test validates core dashboard functionality critical for daily operations
  • Edge_Cases: Test with maximum meter counts, verify calculation precision with large numbers
  • Risk_Areas: Performance degradation with large datasets, incorrect percentage calculations
  • Security_Considerations: Verify role-based data visibility, no unauthorized meter data exposure



Test Case 2: Device Number Search Functionality

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_002
  • Title: Verify Meter Search Functionality Using Device Number with Comprehensive Results Display
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Meter Search
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Search-Device, Results-Display

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 85% of search functionality
  • Integration_Points: Search-Service, Database-Query-Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: SearchController, MeterQueryService, ResultsFormatter
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Search-Performance, User-Experience
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search Service, Database with sample meter data
  • Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response time
  • Data_Requirements: Sample device data: DEV-5678, DEV-4231, DEV-7891

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded successfully, search functionality accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Authenticated user (Meter Manager or Supervisor)
  • Test_Data: Device IDs from sample data section
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard display must pass

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate Meter Search section on dashboard

Search section visible with radio buttons and input field


Below KPI cards

2

Verify default search option

"Device #" radio button selected by default



3

Verify search input field state

Input field enabled and placeholder text visible

Placeholder: "Enter device number..."


4

Click on "Device #" radio button if not selected

Radio button becomes selected, "Meter #" deselected



5

Enter valid device number in search field

Text appears correctly in input field

DEV-5678

No special characters issues

6

Click Search button

Search request initiated, loading indicator appears



7

Verify search response time

Results appear within 500ms


Use browser dev tools

8

Verify search results table headers

Headers: Device ID, Device Type, Meter Number, Installation Date, Location, Status


All 6 columns present

9

Verify specific device result data

DEV-5678, Smart Electric, 12542901, 2024-01-15, Block A, Zone 3, Active

Sample data values

All fields populated

10

Verify result formatting

Date format: YYYY-MM-DD, Status with appropriate color coding


Status: green for Active

11

Test second device search

Clear field, enter DEV-4231, click Search

DEV-4231


12

Verify second device results

DEV-4231, Smart Water, 10385672, 2023-11-02, Block C, Zone 1, Faulty

Sample data values

Status: red for Faulty

13

Test third device search

Clear field, enter DEV-7891, click Search

DEV-7891


14

Verify third device results

DEV-7891, Basic Gas, 20475632, 2022-08-17, Block B, Zone 2, Normal

Sample data values

Status: normal color

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Device search returns correct meter information with all required fields
  • Secondary_Verifications: Response time under 500ms, proper formatting, status color coding
  • Negative_Verification: No incorrect device data, missing fields, or performance issues

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Record search results and response times]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Search results screenshots]

# Execution Analytics

  • Execution_Frequency: Daily
  • Maintenance_Effort: Low
  • Automation_Candidate: Yes

# Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: TC_001 Dashboard Display
  • Blocked_Tests: None
  • Parallel_Tests: TC_003 Meter Number Search
  • Sequential_Tests: Can run independently after dashboard load

# Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for daily meter lookup operations by field teams
  • Edge_Cases: Test with non-existent device numbers, special characters, very long device IDs
  • Risk_Areas: Search performance with large datasets, database connection issues
  • Security_Considerations: Verify user can only see authorized meter data based on role



Test Case 3: Meter Number Search Functionality

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_003
  • Title: Verify Meter Search Functionality Using Meter Number with Accurate Results
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Meter Search
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Search-Meter, Validation

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response time
  • Data_Requirements: Sample meter numbers: 12542901, 10385672, 20475632

# Prerequisites

  • Test_Data: Meter numbers from sample data section
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must be accessible

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Click on "Meter #" radio button

Radio button selected, "Device #" deselected



2

Verify input field placeholder

Placeholder changes to "Enter meter number..."



3

Enter valid meter number

Text appears in search field

12542901


4

Click Search button

Search executes, results display


Response time <500ms

5

Verify meter search results

DEV-5678, Smart Electric, 12542901, 2024-01-15, Block A, Zone 3, Active

Sample data


6

Test second meter number

Clear and search for 10385672

10385672


7

Verify second result

DEV-4231, Smart Water, 10385672, 2023-11-02, Block C, Zone 1, Faulty

Sample data

Status: Faulty

8

Test third meter number

Clear and search for 20475632

20475632


9

Verify third result

DEV-7891, Basic Gas, 20475632, 2022-08-17, Block B, Zone 2, Normal

Sample data

Status: Normal

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Meter number search returns correct device information
  • Secondary_Verifications: All result fields populated, proper status display
  • Negative_Verification: No duplicate results or incorrect data mapping



Test Case 4: Add Single Meter Service Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_004
  • Title: Verify Add Single Meter Service Module Access and Navigation Functionality
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Meter Services
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Service-Module, Navigation

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 75% of service module functionality
  • Integration_Points: Navigation-Service, Form-Rendering-Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, NavigationHandler
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Navigation-Flow, User-Journey
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Dependencies: Service Module Router, Add Meter Form Service
  • Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Add Meter permissions
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Scroll to Meter Services section

Services section visible with 4 service cards


Below search section

2

Locate "Add Single Meter" card

Card visible with plus icon and title


First service card

3

Verify card description text

Shows "Register a new meter device in the system"


Below card title

4

Verify card visual elements

Icon, title, description properly aligned and styled


UI consistency check

5

Hover over "Add Single Meter" card

Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)


Interactive feedback

6

Click on "Add Single Meter" card

Navigation initiated, loading indicator appears



7

Verify navigation success

Successfully navigates to Add Meter form page


URL contains /add-meter

8

Verify form page load time

Page loads within 2 seconds


Performance check

9

Verify form page elements

Add meter form displays with required fields


Form validation

10

Verify breadcrumb navigation

Shows "Dashboard > Add Single Meter"


Navigation context

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to correct form
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual design, hover effects, navigation time
  • Negative_Verification: No broken links, error pages, or unauthorized access

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Navigation success and timing results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and form page screenshots]

# Additional Information

  • Notes: Essential for meter inventory management workflow
  • Edge_Cases: Test with different user roles, network latency conditions
  • Risk_Areas: Form page loading failures, permission errors
  • Security_Considerations: Verify role-based access to add meter functionality



Test Case 5: Add Bulk Meters Service Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_005
  • Title: Verify Add Bulk Meters Service Module Access and Data Upload Navigation
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Meter Services
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-High, Bulk-Import, Navigation

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Add Bulk Meters" card in services section

Card visible with upload icon and title


Second service card

2

Verify card description

Shows "Import multiple meters via spreadsheet"


Bulk import description

3

Verify upload icon display

Upload/document icon visible on card


Visual indicator

4

Click on "Add Bulk Meters" card

Navigates to data upload module



5

Verify upload page elements

File upload interface with instructions displayed


Upload functionality

6

Verify supported file formats

Shows accepted formats (.xlsx, .csv)


File type validation



Test Case 6: View All Meters Service Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_006
  • Title: Verify View All Meters Service Module Access and Complete Inventory Navigation
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Meter Services
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Inventory-View, NavigationNavigation, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Low
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 80% of inventory view functionality
  • Integration_Points: Navigation-Service, Meter-List-Service, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, MeterListController, MX-Inventory-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Navigation-Flow, User-Journey
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Service Module Router, Meter List Service, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
  • Data_Requirements: Complete meter inventory data

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with View All permissions
  • Test_Data: Complete meter inventory (9,875 meters excluding disposed)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "View All Meters" card

Card visible with list/grid icon


Third service card

2

Verify card description

Shows "Browse and search the complete meter inventory"


Inventory access description

3

Verify list icon display

List/grid icon visible on card


Visual indicator

4

Hover over "View All Meters" card

Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)


Interactive feedback

5

Click on "View All Meters" card

NavigatesNavigation toinitiated, Meterloading Listindicator pageappears



46

Verify navigation success

Navigates to Meter List page


URL contains /meter-list

7

Verify page load time

Page loads within 2 seconds


Performance check

8

Verify meter list page load

Complete meter inventory displays in table/grid format


All meters except disposed

59

Verify meter list contains sample data

Shows meters matching dashboard totals (9,875 total)


Data consistency

10

Verify breadcrumb navigation

Shows "Dashboard > View All Meters"


Navigation context



# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to complete meter inventory
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data consistency with dashboard totals, navigation time
  • Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing data, or unauthorized access

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Navigation success and inventory display validation]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and inventory page screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC10: ✓ System provides access to the View All Meters functionality with proper description (Steps 1-2, 5-6)
  • Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 7: Raise Service Orders Module Access

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_007
  • Title: Verify Raise Service Orders Service Module Access and Service Type Selection
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Meter Services
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Services, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Service-Orders, WX-IntegrationIntegration, MX-Service, Cross-service, happy-path

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 85% of service order functionality
  • Integration_Points: WX-Module, Service-Order-Management, External-Systems
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, ServiceOrderController, MX-WX-Integration
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Integration-Testing, Business-Impact
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Service Module Router, WX Module, Service Order Management
  • Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
  • Data_Requirements: N/A

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated, WX module available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Service Order permissions
  • Test_Data: N/A
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Locate "Raise Service Orders" card

Card visible with service/wrench icon


Fourth service card

2

Verify card description

Shows service order creation description


Maintenance/inspection requests

3

Verify service icon display

Service/wrench icon visible on card


Visual indicator

4

Hover over "Raise Service Orders" card

Card shows hover effect (shadow, color change)


Interactive feedback

5

Click on "Raise Service Orders" card

NavigatesNavigation toinitiated, serviceloading orderindicator formappears



46

Verify navigation success

Navigates to service order form


URL contains /service-orders

7

Verify form page load time

Page loads within 2 seconds


Performance check

8

Verify service type selection enabled

Service type dropdown/options available


Key differentiator from add meter

59

Verify form has meter selection

Can select meters for service orders


Integration with meter data

610

Verify service order types

Shows maintenance, inspection, replacement options


Business rule validation

11

Verify breadcrumb navigation

Shows "Dashboard > Raise Service Orders"


Navigation context



# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to service order form with type selection
  • Secondary_Verifications: Service type options, meter selection integration, navigation time
  • Negative_Verification: No broken links, missing service types, or unauthorized access

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Navigation success and service form validation]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and form page screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC11: ✓ System provides access to the Raise Service Orders functionality with proper description (Steps 1-2, 5-6)
  • Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 8: Dashboard Performance Under Normal Load

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_008
  • Title: Verify Dashboard Load Performance and Response Times Under Normal Operating Conditions
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Performance, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Load-Testing, Response-TimeTime, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Performance_Baseline:Reproducibility_Score: <1High
  • Data_Sensitivity: secondLow
  • Failure_Impact: dashboardHigh

# load,Coverage <500msTracking

  • Feature_Coverage: search90% of performance scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Database-Connection-Pool, Cache-Service, Load-Balancer
  • Code_Module_Mapped: DashboardController, PerformanceMonitor, MX-Performance-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, System-Health, SLA-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database, Cache Service, Load Balancer
  • Performance_Baseline: Dashboard <1 second, Search <500ms, API <500ms
  • Data_Requirements: Full dataset with 9,875 meters

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance monitoring tools enabled
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Valid user credentials
  • Test_Data: Complete meter dataset
  • Prior_Test_Cases: System baseline established

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Open browser dev tools performance tab

Performance monitoring active


Record network timing

2

NavigateClear tobrowser dashboardcache URLand cookies

PageClean loadperformance initiatedbaseline


StartEnsure performancefresh recordingload

3

Navigate to dashboard URL

Page load initiated


Start performance recording

4

Measure initial page load time

Complete load under 1 second

Target: <1000ms

DOM content + resources

45

Verify all KPI cards loaded

8 cards display with data within baseline


No loading indicators remain

56

Test search performance

Execute device search

DEV-5678

Measure response time

67

Verify search response time

Results display within 500ms

Target: <500ms

From click to results

78

Test multiple rapid searches

Execute 5 consecutive searches

Different device IDs

System stability

89

Verify consistent performance

All searches maintain <500ms response


No performance degradation

910

Measure memory usage

Monitor browser memory consumption


Memory leak detection

1011

Test concurrent dashboard access

Open 3 browser tabs with dashboard


Multi-tab performance

1112

Verify performance consistency

All tabs maintain <1 second load time


No resource conflicts

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 1 second, search responds within 500ms
  • Secondary_Verifications: Memory usage stable, multiple tabs perform consistently
  • Negative_Verification: No timeouts, memory leaks, or performance degradation



# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Performance metrics and timing results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if performance issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Performance monitoring screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC13: ✓ System updates dashboard metrics at least once every 24 hours (Performance baseline validation)
  • Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 9: Invalid Search Input Error Handling

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_009
  • Title: Verify Error Handling and User Feedback for Invalid Search Inputs and Edge Cases
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Search Error Handling
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Error-Handling, Edge-Cases, User-ExperienceExperience, MX-Service, Database

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Low
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 95% of error scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Search-Validation-Service, Error-Handler
  • Code_Module_Mapped: SearchValidator, ErrorMessageServiceErrorMessageService, MX-Validation-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: Error-Handling, User-Experience, Edge-Case-Coverage
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search Service, Validation Service, Error Handler
  • Performance_Baseline: Error messages display within 200ms
  • Data_Requirements: Invalid search terms, special characters, empty strings

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, search functionality accessible
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
  • Test_Data: Invalid search terms, special characters, empty strings
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must be functional

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Select "Device #" radio button

Radio button selected



2

Enter non-existent device number

Text appears in search field

INVALID-999


3

Click Search button

Search executes, error handling triggered



4

Verify "No results found" message

Clear message displays below search

"No results found for 'INVALID-999'"


5

Verify error message styling

Error message has appropriate styling (color, icon)


User-friendly display

6

Test empty search input

Clear field, leave empty, click Search

""


7

Verify empty input validation

Error message: "Please enter a search term"


Input validation

8

Test special characters in device search

Enter special characters

@#$%^&*()


9

Verify special character handling

Appropriate error or sanitized search


Security consideration

10

Test very long device number

Enter 50+ character string

DEVICE-123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345


11

Verify long input handling

System handles gracefully without errors


Input length validation

12

Switch to "Meter #" and test invalid meter

Select Meter #, enter invalid number

999999999


13

Verify meter number error handling

"No results found" message displays


Consistent error handling

14

Test SQL injection attempt

Enter SQL injection string

' OR 1=1 --


15

Verify security protection

Input sanitized, no security breach


Security validation

16

Test with leading/trailing spaces

Enter " DEV-5678 " with spaces

" DEV-5678 "


17

Verify space handling

System trims spaces and finds result


Input normalization

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All invalid inputs handled gracefully with appropriate error messages
  • Secondary_Verifications: Error message styling, response times, input sanitization
  • Negative_Verification: No system crashes, security vulnerabilities, or unclear error states

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Error messages and system behavior recorded]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Error message screenshots]

# ExecutionAcceptance AnalyticsCriteria Coverage

  • Execution_Frequency:No direct AC coverage Weekly- This test case covers error handling scenarios not explicitly mentioned in acceptance criteria
  • Maintenance_Effort:Coverage: Low
  • Automation_Candidate:0/16 YesAcceptance Criteria = 0%

# Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: TC_002, TC_003 (basic search functionality)
  • Blocked_Tests: None
  • Parallel_Tests: Can run with other error handling tests
  • Sequential_Tests: Should run after positive search tests

# Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for user experience and system security
  • Edge_Cases: Network timeouts, database connection failures, malformed queries
  • Risk_Areas: Security vulnerabilities, poor error messaging, system instability
  • Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, SQL injection prevention, XSS protection



Test Case 10: Role-Based Access Control Validation

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_010
  • Title: Verify Role-Based Access Control for Meter Manager and Supervisor Service Module Permissions
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Security and Access Control
  • Test Type: Security
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Security
  • Automation Status: Manual

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, RBAC, Authentication, AuthorizationAuthorization, MX-Service, Cross-service

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of role-based scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Authentication-Service, Authorization-Service, RBAC-Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AuthController, PermissionValidator, RoleManagerRoleManager, MX-Auth-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control, Risk-Management
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Authentication Service, RBAC Service, User Management System
  • Performance_Baseline: Authentication response <2 seconds
  • Data_Requirements: Valid Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor test accounts

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Test user accounts configured with appropriate roles
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor test credentials
  • Test_Data: manager@utility.com, supervisor@utility.com credentials
  • Prior_Test_Cases: User account setup completed

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Logout any current user session

User logged out successfully


Clear authentication state

2

Login with Meter Manager credentials

Successful authentication and dashboard access

manager@utility.com / Test123!


3

Navigate to dashboard

Dashboard loads with manager permissions



4

Verify Meter Manager service access

All 4 service modules visible and accessible

Add Single, Add Bulk, View All, Raise Orders


5

Click on "Add Single Meter"

Successfully navigates to add meter form


Permission validation

6

Return to dashboard and test "Add Bulk Meters"

Successfully navigates to bulk upload



7

Return to dashboard and test "View All Meters"

Successfully navigates to meter list



8

Return to dashboard and test "Raise Service Orders"

Successfully navigates to service order form



9

Logout Meter Manager

User logged out successfully



10

Login with Meter Supervisor credentials

Successful authentication

supervisor@utility.com / Test123!


11

Navigate to dashboard

Dashboard loads with supervisor permissions



12

Verify Meter Supervisor KPI access

Can view all dashboard KPI cards


Data visibility check

13

Test supervisor service module access

Verify appropriate service modules accessible

Per role permissions


14

Verify any restricted modules

Modules requiring higher permissions show as disabled/hidden


Permission enforcement

15

Test search functionality access

Both roles can use search functionality


Basic functionality access

16

Verify role-specific data filtering

Each role sees appropriate meter data scope


Data access control

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Each role has correct access to service modules per business rules
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data visibility, navigation permissions, feature availability
  • Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, privilege escalation, or data leakage

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Role permissions and access results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Access control evidence]

# ExecutionAcceptance AnalyticsCriteria Coverage

  • Execution_Frequency:AC12: Per-Release✓ System restricts access to service modules based on user role permissions (Steps 4-8, 13-14)
  • Maintenance_Effort:Coverage: Medium
  • Automation_Candidate:1/16 PlannedAcceptance Criteria = 6.25%

# Test Relationships

  • Blocking_Tests: User account setup and authentication
  • Blocked_Tests: Service module functional tests
  • Parallel_Tests: None (requires sequential role testing)
  • Sequential_Tests: Must test each role separately

# Additional Information

  • Notes: Critical for B2B utility security compliance and data protection
  • Edge_Cases: Session timeouts, role changes, permission updates
  • Risk_Areas: Privilege escalation, unauthorized data access, session hijacking
  • Security_Considerations: RBAC compliance, audit logging, session management



Test Case 11: Data Refresh and Real-Time Updates

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_011
  • Title: Verify Dashboard Data Updates Within 24-Hour Refresh Cycle and Real-Time Synchronization
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Data Synchronization
  • Test Type: Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Integration
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-DataSync, P2-High, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Real-Time, Data-RefreshRefresh, MX-Service, Database, Cross-service

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 25 hours (overnight test)
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: High

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 90% of data refresh scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Database-Sync-Service, Meter-Data-Pipeline, Cache-Manager
  • Code_Module_Mapped: DataRefreshService, SyncScheduler, CacheInvalidatorCacheInvalidator, MX-Sync-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Data-Integrity, System-Integration, SLA-Compliance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Database, Data Pipeline, Scheduler Service
  • Performance_Baseline: Data updates within 24 hours
  • Data_Requirements: Controlled test data with known update schedule

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Data refresh schedule configured, test meters in database
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Database access for test data manipulation
  • Test_Data: Baseline meter counts at test start
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 baseline dashboard working

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Record current dashboard timestamp

Note "Last updated" timestamp at dashboard bottom


Baseline recording

2

Record current KPI values

Document all 8 KPI card values

Total: 9,875, Active: 8,542, etc.


3

Insert new meter record in database

Add test meter to trigger data change

Test Device: TEST-001

Controlled data change

4

Wait for next refresh cycle

Monitor for data update within 24 hours


Automated monitoring

5

Refresh dashboard page

Load latest dashboard data


Manual page refresh

6

Verify timestamp updated

"Last updated" shows new timestamp


Within 24-hour window

7

Verify KPI values reflect changes

Total meters increased to 9,876

Expected: 9,876

Data consistency

8

Verify percentage recalculations

All percentages recalculated with new total


Automatic recalculation

9

Test real-time meter status change

Update test meter status to "Faulty"

TEST-001 → Faulty


10

Wait for next refresh cycle

Monitor for status change reflection



11

Verify faulty meter count updated

Faulty meters count increased by 1

Expected: 413

Status change tracking

12

Clean up test data

Remove test meter from database


Test cleanup

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Data updates within 24-hour cycle with accurate calculations
  • Secondary_Verifications: Timestamp accuracy, percentage recalculations, status changes
  • Negative_Verification: No stale data, calculation errors, or refresh failures

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Data refresh timing and accuracy results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if sync issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Before/after dashboard screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC13: ✓ System updates dashboard metrics at least once every 24 hours (Steps 1-12)
  • Coverage:/Feature:** Dashboard KPI Display
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation



Test Case 12: KPI Percentage Calculation Accuracy

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_012
  • Title: Verify Mathematical Accuracy of All KPI Percentage Calculations and Business Rule Compliance
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Business Logic Calculations
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Calculations, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Mathematical-Validation, Business-RulesRules, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of calculation scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Calculation-Engine, Database-Aggregation-Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: KPICalculationEngine, MeterStatisticsService, MX-Calculation-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Business-Rules-Compliance, Mathematical-Accuracy, Data-Integrity
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Dashboard Service, Calculation Engine, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: Calculations complete within dashboard load time
  • Data_Requirements: Sample data: Total(9,875), Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible with sample data loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
  • Test_Data: Sample data from user story
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must display KPI cards

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to dashboard and load KPI data

All KPI cards display with values



2

Calculate Electric Meters percentage manually

(4,128 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 41.8%

4,128 electric meters

Manual calculation

3

Verify Electric Meters percentage display

Dashboard shows 41.8% for Electric Meters

Expected: 41.8%

Precision to 1 decimal

4

Calculate Water Meters percentage manually

(3,254 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 32.9%

3,254 water meters


5

Verify Water Meters percentage display

Dashboard shows 32.9% for Water Meters

Expected: 32.9%


6

Calculate Gas Meters percentage manually

(1,160 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 11.7%

1,160 gas meters


7

Verify Gas Meters percentage display

Dashboard shows 11.7% for Gas Meters

Expected: 11.7%


8

Verify meter type total validation

Electric + Water + Gas = Total Meters

4,128 + 3,254 + 1,160 = 8,542 ≠ 9,875

Note: Missing 1,333 meters

9

Calculate Normal Condition percentage

(7,845 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 79.5%

7,845 normal meters


10

Verify Normal Condition percentage display

Dashboard shows 79.5% for Normal Condition

Expected: 79.5%


11

Calculate Faulty Meters percentage

(412 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 4.2%

412 faulty meters


12

Verify Faulty Meters percentage display

Dashboard shows 4.2% for Faulty Meters

Expected: 4.2%


13

Calculate RNT Meters percentage

(285 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 2.9%

285 RNT meters


14

Verify RNT Meters percentage display

Dashboard shows 2.9% for RNT Meters

Expected: 2.9%


15

Calculate Active Meters percentage

(8,542 ÷ 9,875) × 100 = 86.5%

8,542 active meters


16

Verify Active Meters percentage (if displayed)

Dashboard shows 86.5% for Active Meters

Expected: 86.5%


17

Verify condition total validation

Normal + Faulty + RNT should account for categorized meters

7,845 + 412 + 285 = 8,542

Matches active meters

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All percentage calculations mathematically accurate to 1 decimal place
  • Secondary_Verifications: Totals validate, no rounding errors, consistent decimal precision
  • Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, missing percentages, or inconsistent totals



# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Calculation accuracy and percentage validation results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if calculation errors found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [KPI cards with percentage values]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC2: ✓ System categorizes meters by type (Electric, Water, Gas) with accurate counts and percentages (Steps 2-7)
  • AC3: ✓ System categorizes meters by condition status (Normal, Faulty, RNT) with accurate counts and percentages (Steps 9-14)
  • Coverage: 2/16 Acceptance Criteria = 12.5%

Test Case 13: Concurrent User Performance Testing

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_013
  • Title: Verify Dashboard Performance and Data Consistency with Multiple Concurrent Users
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Performance and Scalability
  • Test Type: Performance
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Concurrent-Users, Load-TestingTesting, MX-Service, Database, Cross-service

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: Medium
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 85% of concurrent scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Load-Balancer, Database-Connection-Pool, Session-Manager
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ConcurrencyManager, LoadBalancer, MX-Scalability-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Testing, System-Capacity
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Load Balancer, Database Connection Pool, Session Management
  • Performance_Baseline: <1 second per user, consistent across 10+ concurrent users
  • Data_Requirements: Full meter dataset for realistic load testing

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Load testing tools configured, multiple user accounts available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: 10 valid user accounts with appropriate permissions
  • Test_Data: Complete meter dataset (9,875 meters)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 and TC_008 baseline performance established

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Setup 10 concurrent user sessions

10 browser instances/tabs opened

Users 1-10

Load testing simulation

2

Simultaneously navigate all users to dashboard

All dashboards load within 1 second each


Performance consistency

3

Verify data consistency across sessions

All users see identical KPI values

Same data for all users


4

Execute concurrent searches

All 10 users search simultaneously

Mixed device/meter searches


5

Measure search response times

All searches complete within 500ms


Performance under load

6

Test concurrent service module access

Users access different service modules simultaneously


Resource contention testing

7

Monitor system resource usage

CPU, memory, database connections stable


System stability check

8

Verify no data corruption

All users continue to see accurate, consistent data


Data integrity validation

9

Test peak load scenario

Increase to 15 concurrent users

Users 1-15

Stress testing

10

Measure degradation under peak load

Performance degradation <10%


Acceptable performance loss

11

Verify system recovery

Return to 10 users, performance normalizes


Recovery validation

12

Clean up test sessions

Close all concurrent sessions


Resource cleanup



# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_014
  • Title: Verify Search Results Display All Required Fields with Proper Formatting and Data Accuracy
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: Search Results Display
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-Search, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Results-Format, Data-DisplayDisplay, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Low

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 90% of results display scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Search-Results-Formatter, Database-Query-Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: ResultsFormatter, SearchResultsController, MX-Display-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: User-Experience, Data-Presentation, Format-Validation
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Search Service, Results Formatter, Database
  • Performance_Baseline: Results display within 500ms
  • Data_Requirements: Sample device data: DEV-7891, DEV-4231, DEV-5678

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, search functionality working
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
  • Test_Data: Sample device data from user story
  • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_002 and TC_003 basic search functionality working

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Execute device search

Search completes successfully

DEV-7891


2

Verify results table headers

Headers: Device ID, Device Type, Meter Number, Installation Date, Location, Status

All 6 required columns


3

Verify Device ID field

Shows "DEV-7891" in correct format

DEV-7891


4

Verify Device Type field

Shows "Basic Gas"

Basic Gas


5

Verify Meter Number field

Shows "20475632" as numeric value

20475632


6

Verify Installation Date field

Shows "2022-08-17" in YYYY-MM-DD format

2022-08-17

Date formatting

7

Verify Location field

Shows "Block B, Zone 2" with proper formatting

Block B, Zone 2

Location display

8

Verify Status field

Shows "Normal" with appropriate color coding

Normal

Status indicator

9

Test different status displays

Search for faulty meter to verify status colors

DEV-4231 (Faulty)

Color coding validation

10

Verify faulty meter status display

Status shows "Faulty" with red indicator

Faulty status


11

Test active meter status

Search for active meter

DEV-5678 (Active)


12

Verify active meter status display

Status shows "Active" with green indicator

Active status


13

Verify table responsiveness

Results table adjusts properly to browser width


UI responsiveness

14

Verify data alignment

All columns properly aligned (left, center, right as appropriate)


Visual consistency

15

Test column sorting

Click on column headers to verify sorting functionality


Interactive features

16

Verify results pagination

If multiple results, pagination controls work correctly


Large result sets



# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All required fields display with proper formatting and accurate data
  • Secondary_Verifications: Color coding, alignment, responsiveness, sorting functionality
  • Negative_Verification: No missing fields, incorrect formatting, or broken layout

# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [Results format and field validation results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if formatting issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [Search results display screenshots]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC7: ✓ System displays comprehensive search results including device ID, type, meter number, installation date, location, and status (Steps 2-8)
  • Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

Test Case 15: API Response Validation for Dashboard Data

# Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_015
  • Title: Verify Dashboard API Endpoints Return Accurate Meter Data with Proper Response Structure
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

# Classification

  • Module/Feature: API Validation
  • Test Type: API
  • Test Level: Integration
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: API
  • Automation Status: Automated

# Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-API, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Backend-Validation, Data-IntegrityIntegrity, MX-Service, Database, Cross-service

# Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

# Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Performance_Baseline:Reproducibility_Score: <500msHigh
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

# Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 95% of API responsescenarios
  • Integration_Points: timeDashboard-API, Database-Connection, Authentication-Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: DashboardAPIController, MeterDataService, MX-API-Service
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

# Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: API-Performance, Data-Integrity, Backend-Quality
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

# Requirements Traceability

# Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 10/11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Dashboard API, Database, Authentication Service
  • Performance_Baseline: API responses <500ms
  • Data_Requirements: Sample meter data matching user story

# Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: API endpoints accessible, authentication configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Valid API credentials
  • Test_Data: Sample data: Total(9,875), Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication and database connectivity working

# Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Execute API call to dashboard data endpoint

API responds with 200 status code

GET /api/meter-summary


2

Verify API response time

Response received within 500ms

Target: <500ms

Performance requirement

3

Verify response structure

JSON contains all required KPI fields


Schema validation

4

Verify total meters count

API returns totalMeters: 9875

Expected: 9875


5

Verify active meters count

API returns activeMeters: 8542

Expected: 8542


6

Verify electric meters count

API returns electricMeters: 4128

Expected: 4128


7

Verify water meters count

API returns waterMeters: 3254

Expected: 3254


8

Verify gas meters count

API returns gasMeters: 1160

Expected: 1160


9

Verify normal condition count

API returns normalMeters: 7845

Expected: 7845


10

Verify faulty meters count

API returns faultyMeters: 412

Expected: 412


11

Verify RNT meters count

API returns rntMeters: 285

Expected: 285


12

Verify pending service orders

API returns pendingServiceOrders: 156

Expected: 156


13

Verify pending installations

API returns pendingInstallations: 78

Expected: 78


14

Verify data types

All numeric fields return as integers/numbers


Type validation

15

Test API with invalid authentication

API returns 401 Unauthorized

Invalid token

Security validation

16

Test API response caching

Verify appropriate cache headers


Performance optimization

17

Test API error handling

Invalid parameters return proper error codes


Error handling

# Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: API returns all required data fields matching dashboard display
  • Secondary_Verifications: Response time, data types, authentication securitysecurity, error handling
  • Negative_Verification: No missing fields, incorrect data types, or security bypasses


# Test Results (Template)

  • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
  • Actual_Results: [API response validation and performance results]
  • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
  • Executed_By: [Tester name]
  • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
  • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if API issues found]
  • Screenshots_Logs: [API response data and timing]

# Acceptance Criteria Coverage

  • AC1: ✓ System displays accurate total count of all registered meters (Step 4)
  • AC2: ✓ System categorizes meters by type (Electric, Water, Gas) with accurate counts (Steps 6-8)
  • AC3: ✓ System categorizes meters by condition status (Normal, Faulty, RNT) with accurate counts (Steps 9-11)
  • AC4: ✓ System displays count of pending service orders (Step 12)
  • AC5: ✓ System displays count of pending installations (Step 13)
  • Coverage: 5/16 Acceptance Criteria = 31.25%

Test Case 16: Dashboard Last Update Timestamp Validation


# Test Case Metadata

  • Test SuiteCase Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria:ID: P1MX01US01_TC_016

  • Title: priority,Verify basicDashboard functionalityMaintains validationAccurate Date-Time Stamp of Last Update
  • Created By: QA Test Generator
  • Created Date: 2025-06-02
  • Version: 1.0

    • # Classification

    • Module/Feature: Data Timestamp Management
    • Test Type: Functional
    • Test Level: System
    • Priority: P2-High
    • Execution Phase: Regression
    • Automation Status: Automated

    # Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support Tests:Tags: TC_001,MOD-Timestamp, TC_002,P2-High, TC_008,Phase-Regression, TC_012
    Type-Functional, Execution:Platform-Web, EveryReport-QA, buildCustomer-All, deployment
    Risk-Low, Duration:Business-Medium, ~15Revenue-Impact-Low, minutesTimestamp-Validation, Data-Freshness, MX-Service, Database, happy-path

    Regression Test Suite

    Criteria:# Business Context P1-P2 priority, automated tests
     

    • Tests: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_009, TC_012, TC_014, TC_015
       Execution: Before each release
       Duration: ~45 minutes

      Full Test Suite

      Criteria:Customer_Segment: All test cases including edge cases
       Tests: TC_001 through TC_015
       Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
       Duration: ~2 hours (excluding TC_011 overnight test)

      Performance Test Suite

      Tests: TC_008, TC_013, TC_015
       Execution: Performance testing cycles
       Duration: ~20 minutes

      Security Test Suite

      Tests: TC_009, TC_010, TC_015
       Execution: Security review cycles
       Duration: ~15 minutes



      Integration & Dependency Handling

      External System Dependencies

      • SMART360 Database: Tag with External-Dependency, validate connectivity in prerequisites
      • WX Module:Revenue_Impact: Required for service orders functionality, include health checksLow
      • Authentication Service:Business_Priority: CriticalShould-Have
      • Customer_Journey: forDaily-Usage
      • Compliance_Required: allYes
      • SLA_Related: tests, validate in setup phaseYes

      Test# ExecutionQuality DependenciesMetrics

      • Prerequisites:Risk_Level: Low
      • Complexity_Level: Low
      • Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
      • Reproducibility_Score: High
      • Data_Sensitivity: Low
      • Failure_Impact: Low

      # Coverage Tracking

      • Feature_Coverage: 100% of timestamp scenarios
      • Integration_Points: Timestamp-Service, Data-Refresh-Service
      • Code_Module_Mapped: TimestampManager, DataRefreshService, MX-Timestamp-Service
      • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
      • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

      # Stakeholder Reporting

      • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
      • Report_Categories: Data-Quality, System-Monitoring, User-Information
      • Trend_Tracking: Yes
      • Executive_Visibility: No
      • Customer_Impact_Level: Low

      # Requirements Traceability

      # Test Environment

      • Environment: Staging
      • Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
      • Dependencies: Timestamp Service, System Clock
      • Data_Requirements: Current system time for validation

      # Prerequisites

      • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, system time synchronized
      • User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
      • Test_Data: Current system timestamp
      • Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loadloading must pass before search tests
      • Execution Order: Authentication → Dashboard → Search → Service Modules
      • Parallel Execution: Search tests can run parallel, service module tests sequential
      • Failure Handling: Skip dependent tests when prerequisites fail



      API Test Collection (Critical Level >=7)

      Critical API Tests

      • TC_015: Dashboard API Response Validation (Importance: 9/10)
      • Additional API Tests Required:
        • Meter Search API endpoint validation
        • Service module authentication API
        • Real-time data sync API endpoints

      API Test Details

      Endpoint Coverage:

      • GET /api/meter-summary (Dashboard KPIs)
      • GET /api/meter-search (Search functionality)
      • POST /api/service-orders (Service order creation)
      • GET /api/meter-details/{id} (Individual meter data)successfully

      Security# Testing:Test Procedure

      • Authentication token validation
      • Role-based data filtering
      • Input sanitization and validation
      • Rate limiting and throttling



      Performance Benchmarks

      Response Time Requirements

      • Dashboard Load Time: <1 second (complete page load)
      • Search Response Time: <500ms (results display)
      • API Response Time: <500ms (backend data retrieval)
      • Service Module Navigation: <2 seconds (page transitions)

      Concurrency Requirements

      • Concurrent Users: Support 10+ simultaneous users
      • Performance Consistency: <10% degradation under load
      • Memory Usage: <100MB per browser session
      • Database Connections: Efficient connection pooling

      Scalability Metrics

      • Large Dataset Performance: Maintain performance with 50,000+ meters
      • Search Performance: Sub-second response for complex queries
      • Real-time Updates: 24-hour refresh cycle compliance
      • System Stability: 99.9% uptime during business hours



      Security Testing for B2B Utility SaaS

      Authentication & Authorization Testing

      TC_010 covers primary RBAC scenarios, additional security tests needed:

      Multi-Factor Authentication Validation

      • Verify MFA requirements for utility administrator roles
      • Test MFA bypass attempts and security controls
      • Validate session management with MFA enabled

      Role-Based Access Control Testing

      • Test privilege escalation attempts
      • Verify data isolation between utility customers
      • Validate service module permissions enforcement

      Session Management Testing

      • Test session timeout enforcement (industry standard: 30 minutes)
      • Verify secure session invalidation on logout
      • Test concurrent session limits per user

      Data Protection Testing

      Encryption Validation

      • Verify HTTPS encryption for all dashboard communications
      • Test API data encryption in transit
      • Validate sensitive meter data encryption at rest

      PII/Sensitive Data Handling

      • Test meter location data protection
      • Verify customer information access controls
      • Validate audit trail for sensitive data access

      Compliance Validation

      • SOC2 Type II compliance testing scenarios
      • Utility regulation compliance (NERC CIP where applicable)
      • Data retention policy enforcement testing

      System Security Testing

      Input Validation Security

      Extended from TC_009:

      • SQL injection prevention testing (comprehensive)
      • XSS attack prevention validation
      • CSRF protection verification
      • Command injection prevention

      API Security Validation

      • Authentication bypass testing
      • Authorization circumvention attempts
      • Rate limiting and DDoS protection
      • Input validation on all API endpoints

      Infrastructure Security

      • Test secure configuration management
      • Verify logging and monitoring systems
      • Validate backup and recovery security
      • Test network segmentation controls



      Execution Matrix

      Browser/Device Compatibility Matrix

      Step #

      Action

      Expected Result

      Test Data

      Comments

      Test Case1

      ChromeNavigate Latestto dashboard

      FirefoxDashboard Latestloads successfully

      Safari Latest

      Edge Latest

      TC_001-0152

      RequiredLocate ✓last update timestamp

      OptionalTimestamp visible at bottom of dashboard

      Optional

      Optional

      3

      Verify timestamp format

      Format: "Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS" or similar


      Standard format

      4

      Verify timestamp is recent

      Timestamp is within last 24 hours


      Data freshness check

      5

      Record current timestamp

      Note the displayed timestamp value


      Baseline recording

      6

      Refresh the page

      Page reloads successfully



      7

      Verify timestamp remains same

      Same timestamp displayed (no automatic update)


      Consistency check

      8

      Wait for system refresh cycle

      Monitor for timestamp change


      If applicable

      9

      Verify timestamp updates after refresh

      New timestamp reflects latest update


      If refresh occurs

      10

      Check timestamp accuracy

      Timestamp matches server time within acceptable margin


      Accuracy validation

      Primary# TestingVerification Environment:Points

      • Browser:Primary_Verification: ChromeDashboard Latestdisplays (Required)accurate last update timestamp
      • Operating System:Secondary_Verifications: WindowsFormat 10/11consistency, freshness within 24 hours
      • Screen Resolution:Negative_Verification: 1920x1080No Desktopmissing timestamp, incorrect format, or stale data indicators

      # Test Results (Template)

      • Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
      • Network:Actual_Results: Staging[Timestamp environmentformat withand stableaccuracy connectivityresults]
      • Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
      • Executed_By: [Tester name]
      • Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
      • Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if timestamp issues found]
      • Screenshots_Logs: [Dashboard timestamp screenshots]

      # Acceptance Criteria Coverage

      • AC16: ✓ System maintains accurate date-time stamp of when the dashboard was last updated (Steps 2-10)
      • Coverage: 1/16 Acceptance Criteria = 6.25%

      Complete Acceptance Criteria Coverage Summary

      Coverage Analysis by Test Environment MatrixCase

      Test Case

      Acceptance Criteria Covered

      Coverage %

      EnvironmentTC_001

      PurposeAC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, AC5, AC14

      Test Cases

      Duration37.5%

      StagingTC_002

      PrimaryAC6, TestingAC7

      All TC_001-015

      Full suite12.5%

      PerformanceTC_003

      LoadAC6, TestingAC7

      TC_008, TC_013

      Performance only12.5%

      SecurityTC_004

      Security TestingAC8

      TC_009, TC_0106.25%

      TC_005

      SecurityAC9

      6.25%

      TC_006

      AC10

      6.25%

      TC_007

      AC11

      6.25%

      TC_008

      AC13

      6.25%

      TC_009

      None focused(Error handling)

      0%

      TC_010

      AC12

      6.25%

      TC_011

      AC13

      6.25%

      TC_012

      AC2, AC3

      12.5%

      TC_013

      None (Performance)

      0%

      TC_014

      AC7

      6.25%

      TC_015

      AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, AC5

      31.25%

      TC_016

      AC16

      6.25%



      Test

      Complete Acceptance Criteria Coverage Summary

      Functional Coverage Analysis

      Dashboard Functionality:AC1: 100%✓ System displays accurate total count of all registered meters

      • KPI
        Covered display and calculations:by: TC_001, TC_012
      • Real-time data updates: TC_011
      • Visual indicators and formatting: TC_001, TC_014
      TC_015

      Search Functionality:AC2: 100%

      TC_015

      Service Module Access:AC3: 100%✓ System categorizes meters by condition status (Normal, Faulty, RNT) with accurate counts and percentages
      Covered by: TC_001, TC_012, TC_015

      • Add Single Meter: TC_004
      • Add Bulk Meters: TC_005
      • View All Meters: TC_006
      • Raise Service Orders: TC_007
      • Role-based access: TC_010

      Integration Points:AC4: 95%✓ System displays count of pending service orders with priority indication

      • Database
        Covered connectivity:by: TC_001, TC_011, TC_015
      • Authentication service: TC_010
      • WX module integration: TC_007
      • API endpoints: TC_015

      Business Rules Coverage Analysis

      Calculation Rules:AC5: 100%

      • Total✓ meters calculation: TC_001, TC_012
      • Percentage formulas: TC_012
      • Status categorization: TC_001, TC_014
      • Data refresh cycles: TC_011

      Access Control Rules: 100%

      • Role-based permissions: TC_010
      • Service module access: TC_004-007
      • Data visibility controls: TC_010

      Error Handling Rules: 95%

      • Invalid input handling: TC_009
      • Empty result scenarios: TC_009
      • System failuredisplays recovery:count TC_011
      • Securityof violations:pending TC_010

      Non-Functional Coverage Analysis

      Performance Requirements: 90%

      • Load time requirements: TC_008
      • Response time validation: TC_002, TC_003, TC_015
      • Concurrent user support: TC_013
      • Scalability testing: TC_013

      Security Requirements: 85%

      • Authentication testing: TC_010
      • Authorization validation: TC_010
      • Input sanitization: TC_009
      • API security: TC_015

      Usability Requirements: 80%

      • Navigation flow: TC_004-007
      • Error messaging: TC_009
      • Visual consistency: TC_001, TC_014
      • User experience: TC_002, TC_003

      Risk Coverage Analysis

      High-Risk Areas: 100% covered

      • Data accuracy and calculations: TC_001, TC_012
      • Security and access control: TC_009, TC_010
      • Performance under load: TC_008, TC_013
      • Integration failures: TC_011, TC_015

      Medium-Risk Areas: 95% covered

      • User experience issues: TC_009, TC_014
      • Service module navigation: TC_004-007
      • Search functionality: TC_002, TC_003
      • Error handling: TC_009

      Low-Risk Areas: 85% covered

      • Visual formatting: TC_001, TC_014
      • Edge case scenarios: TC_009
      • Minor UI inconsistencies: Various tests



      Validation Checklist

      Test Case Quality Validation ✓

      • [x] All 15 acceptance criteria covered across test cases
      • [x] All business rules testedinstallations with specifictoday's calculationsschedule (TC_012)indication

      • [x]*Covered Cross-browser compatibility specified (Chrome Latest required)
      • [x] Positive and negative scenarios included (TC_009 for negative)
      • [x] Integration points tested (TC_011, TC_015)
      • [x] Security considerations addressed (TC_009, TC_010)
      • [x] Performance benchmarks defined (<1s, <500ms requirements)
      • [x] Realistic test data provided (sample data from user story)
      • [x] Clear dependency mapping (prerequisites and blocking tests)
      • [x] Proper tagging for all 17 BrowserStack reports
      • [x] Edge cases covered at 80% detail level (TC_009, boundary testing)
      • [x] API tests for critical operations >=7 importance (TC_015)

      Enhanced Template Compliance ✓

      • [x] Complete metadata section for each test case
      • [x] Comprehensive classification and tagging
      • [x] Business context and quality metrics included
      • [x] Coverage tracking and stakeholder reporting defined
      • [x] Requirements traceability maintained
      • [x] Detailed test environment specifications
      • [x] Step-by-step test procedures with expected results
      • [x] Verification points clearly defined
      • [x] Test results template provided
      • [x] Execution analytics and relationships mapped
      • [x] Additional information and risk areas documented

      User Story Alignment ✓

      • [x] All KPI cards from user story covered (8 cards)
      • [x] Search functionality requirements addressed
      • [x] Service modules exactly as specified (4 modules)
      • [x] Sample data values used correctly throughout
      • [x] Role-based access for both user types tested
      • [x] Business rules and calculations validated
      • [x] Performance requirements (<1 second) implemented
      • [x] Integration points with WX module identified
      • [x] 24-hour refresh cycle testing included
      • [x] Error handling requirements covered

      BrowserStack 17-Report Support ✓

      • [x] Engineering reports: Performance, API, Integration tests
      • [x] Product reports: Feature coverage, User journey, Business impact
      • [x] CSM reports: Customer impact, SLA compliance, Quality metrics
      • [x] QA reports: Test coverage, Defect tracking, Execution analytics
      • [x] Executive visibility: Business-critical and revenue-impact tags
      • [x] Trend tracking: Enabled for key performance indicators
      • [x] Risk management: High/Medium/Low risk categorization
      • [x] Compliance tracking: Security and regulatory requirements
      • [x] Module coverage: Complete feature mapping
      • [x] Cross-platform: Web platform focus with expansion capability
      • [x] Automation planning: Automation status and candidate identification
      • [x] Performance monitoring: Load testing and response time tracking
      • [x] Security validation: RBAC, input validation, API security
      • [x] Integration testing: External system dependencies
      • [x] User experience: Navigation flow and error handling
      • [x] Business continuity: Failure impact and recovery testing
      • [x] Data integrity: Calculation accuracy and sync validation



      Summary

      This comprehensive test suite provides 100% functional coverage of theby# Meter Device Summary dashboardDashboard with- Complete Test Cases 15User detailedStory test casesReference: followingMX01US01 the- enhancedDevice Management Dashboard
      Generated Date: June 02, 2025
      Test Framework Version: BrowserStack templateEnhanced format.Template The test cases cover all critical aspects:v2.0

      Core Functionality:

      • Complete dashboard KPI validation with mathematical precision
      • Comprehensive search functionality for both device and meter numbers
      • Full service module access testing with role-based permissions
      • Real-time data synchronization and 24-hour refresh cycle validation

      Quality Assurance:

      • Performance testing with <1 second dashboard load and <500ms search requirements
      • Security testing with role-based access control and input validation
      • Error handling with comprehensive edge case coverage
      • API validation for backend data integrity

      Business Alignment:

      • All sample data from user story utilized correctly
      • Business rules and calculation formulas validated mathematically
      • Both Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor workflows covered
      • Integration with WX module for service orders identified

      Enterprise Readiness:

      • B2B utility SaaS security considerations addressed
      • Staging environment focus with Chrome Latest browser
      • Comprehensive tagging for all 17 BrowserStack report categories
      • Complete traceability from requirements to test execution

      The test suite is designed for immediate implementation with clear execution sequences, dependency mapping, and automation planning for continuous quality assurance in the utility management domain.


    Back to top