(MX01US01) - Meter Device Summary Dashboard
Meter Device Summary Dashboard -
User Story Reference: MX01US01 - Device Management Dashboard
Generated Date: June 02, 2025
Test Framework Version: BrowserStack Enhanced Template v2.0
Test Scenario Analysis
A. Functional Test Scenarios
Core Functionality:
- Dashboard KPI display with 8 meter statistic cards
- Meter search functionality (Device # and Meter # options)
- Service module access (Add Single Meter, Add Bulk Meters, View All Meters, Raise Service Orders)
- Search results display with comprehensive meter details
Business Rules:
- Total Meters calculation excluding disposed meters
- Percentage calculations for all meter categories
- Role-based service module access
- Real-time data updates (24-hour cycle)
User Journeys:
- Meter Manager: Monitor fleet health → Search specific meters → Access service modules
- Meter Supervisor: Review inventory → Track faulty meters → Plan maintenance
Integration Points:
- SMART360 Database connectivity
- Meter Data Service API
- User Authentication Service
- External WX Module for service orders
Data Flow:
- Database → API → Dashboard KPI cards
- Search input → Query processing → Results display
- Service module selection → Navigation → Form/List views
B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios
Performance: Dashboard load <1 second, Search response <500ms, Concurrent user support Security: Role-based access control, B2B utility data protection Compatibility: Chrome Latest browser support, Desktop 1920x1080 resolution Usability: Intuitive navigation, clear error messaging, consistent UI Reliability: 24-hour data refresh, system stability, error recovery
C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios
Boundary Conditions: Maximum meter counts, empty search results, invalid permissions Invalid Inputs: Malformed device numbers, SQL injection attempts, unauthorized access System Failures: Database connectivity issues, API timeouts, service unavailability Data Inconsistencies: Missing meter data, calculation errors, stale information
Test Case Details
Test Case 1: Dashboard KPI Cards Display Validation
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_001
- Title: Verify Dashboard Displays All KPI Cards with Accurate Meter Statistics and Calculations
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Dashboard KPI Display
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90% of dashboard functionality
- Integration_Points: SMART360-Database, Meter-Data-Service, Authentication-Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: DashboardController, MeterStatisticsService, KPICalculationEngine
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Performance-Metrics, Business-Impact
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: SMART360 Database, Meter Data Service, Authentication Service
- Performance_Baseline: <1 second dashboard load time
- Data_Requirements: Sample meter inventory: 9,875 total meters with breakdown per user story
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, Database populated with sample data
- User_Roles_Permissions: Valid Meter Manager or Meter Supervisor credentials
- Test_Data: Sample data: Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)
- Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication must be successful
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All 8 KPI cards display with correct values matching sample data calculations
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators (icons, colors), percentage calculations, labels, trend indicators
- Negative_Verification: No incorrect data, missing cards, calculation errors, or performance issues
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record actual values found vs expected]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence file references]
# Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
# Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: User Authentication Test
- Blocked_Tests: TC_002, TC_003 (search functionality)
- Parallel_Tests: TC_010 (role access)
- Sequential_Tests: Must execute before search tests
# Additional Information
- Notes: This test validates core dashboard functionality critical for daily operations
- Edge_Cases: Test with maximum meter counts, verify calculation precision with large numbers
- Risk_Areas: Performance degradation with large datasets, incorrect percentage calculations
- Security_Considerations: Verify role-based data visibility, no unauthorized meter data exposure
Test Case 2: Device Number Search Functionality
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_002
- Title: Verify Meter Search Functionality Using Device Number with Comprehensive Results Display
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Meter Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 85% of search functionality
- Integration_Points: Search-Service, Database-Query-Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: SearchController, MeterQueryService, ResultsFormatter
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Search-Performance, User-Experience
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Search Service, Database with sample meter data
- Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response time
- Data_Requirements: Sample device data: DEV-5678, DEV-4231, DEV-7891
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded successfully, search functionality accessible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Authenticated user (Meter Manager or Supervisor)
- Test_Data: Device IDs from sample data section
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard display must pass
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Device search returns correct meter information with all required fields
- Secondary_Verifications: Response time under 500ms, proper formatting, status color coding
- Negative_Verification: No incorrect device data, missing fields, or performance issues
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Record search results and response times]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Search results screenshots]
# Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
# Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: TC_001 Dashboard Display
- Blocked_Tests: None
- Parallel_Tests: TC_003 Meter Number Search
- Sequential_Tests: Can run independently after dashboard load
# Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for daily meter lookup operations by field teams
- Edge_Cases: Test with non-existent device numbers, special characters, very long device IDs
- Risk_Areas: Search performance with large datasets, database connection issues
- Security_Considerations: Verify user can only see authorized meter data based on role
Test Case 3: Meter Number Search Functionality
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_003
- Title: Verify Meter Search Functionality Using Meter Number with Accurate Results
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Meter Search
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Performance_Baseline: <500ms search response time
- Data_Requirements: Sample meter numbers: 12542901, 10385672, 20475632
# Prerequisites
- Test_Data: Meter numbers from sample data section
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must be accessible
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Meter number search returns correct device information
- Secondary_Verifications: All result fields populated, proper status display
- Negative_Verification: No duplicate results or incorrect data mapping
Test Case 4: Add Single Meter Service Module Access
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_004
- Title: Verify Add Single Meter Service Module Access and Navigation Functionality
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Meter Services
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Low
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 75% of service module functionality
- Integration_Points: Navigation-Service, Form-Rendering-Service
- Code_Module_Mapped: ServiceModuleController, NavigationHandler
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Feature-Usage, Navigation-Flow, User-Journey
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Medium
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Dependencies: Service Module Router, Add Meter Form Service
- Performance_Baseline: <2 seconds navigation time
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, user authenticated
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Supervisor with Add Meter permissions
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard loaded successfully
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Service card accessible and navigates to correct form
- Secondary_Verifications: Visual design, hover effects, navigation time
- Negative_Verification: No broken links, error pages, or unauthorized access
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Navigation success and timing results]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Service card and form page screenshots]
# Additional Information
- Notes: Essential for meter inventory management workflow
- Edge_Cases: Test with different user roles, network latency conditions
- Risk_Areas: Form page loading failures, permission errors
- Security_Considerations: Verify role-based access to add meter functionality
Test Case 5: Add Bulk Meters Service Module Access
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_005
- Title: Verify Add Bulk Meters Service Module Access and Data Upload Navigation
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Meter Services
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
# Test Procedure
Test Case 6: View All Meters Service Module Access
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_006
- Title: Verify View All Meters Service Module Access and Complete Inventory Navigation
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Meter Services
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
# Test Procedure
Test Case 7: Raise Service Orders Module Access
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_007
- Title: Verify Raise Service Orders Service Module Access and Service Type Selection
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Meter Services
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
# Coverage Tracking
- Integration_Points: WX-Module, Service-Order-Management, External-Systems
# Test Procedure
Test Case 8: Dashboard Performance Under Normal Load
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_008
- Title: Verify Dashboard Load Performance and Response Times Under Normal Operating Conditions
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Performance_Baseline: <1 second dashboard load, <500ms search
# Test Environment
- Performance_Baseline: Dashboard <1 second, Search <500ms, API <500ms
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Dashboard loads within 1 second, search responds within 500ms
- Secondary_Verifications: Memory usage stable, multiple tabs perform consistently
- Negative_Verification: No timeouts, memory leaks, or performance degradation
Test Case 9: Invalid Search Input Error Handling
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_009
- Title: Verify Error Handling and User Feedback for Invalid Search Inputs and Edge Cases
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Search Error Handling
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Low
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Low
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 95% of error scenarios
- Integration_Points: Search-Validation-Service, Error-Handler
- Code_Module_Mapped: SearchValidator, ErrorMessageService
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: QA
- Report_Categories: Error-Handling, User-Experience, Edge-Case-Coverage
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: No
- Customer_Impact_Level: Low
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Performance_Baseline: Error messages display within 200ms
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, search functionality accessible
- User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
- Test_Data: Invalid search terms, special characters, empty strings
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 dashboard must be functional
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All invalid inputs handled gracefully with appropriate error messages
- Secondary_Verifications: Error message styling, response times, input sanitization
- Negative_Verification: No system crashes, security vulnerabilities, or unclear error states
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Error messages and system behavior recorded]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Error message screenshots]
# Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
# Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: TC_002, TC_003 (basic search functionality)
- Blocked_Tests: None
- Parallel_Tests: Can run with other error handling tests
- Sequential_Tests: Should run after positive search tests
# Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for user experience and system security
- Edge_Cases: Network timeouts, database connection failures, malformed queries
- Risk_Areas: Security vulnerabilities, poor error messaging, system instability
- Security_Considerations: Input sanitization, SQL injection prevention, XSS protection
Test Case 10: Role-Based Access Control Validation
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_010
- Title: Verify Role-Based Access Control for Meter Manager and Supervisor Service Module Permissions
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Security and Access Control
- Test Type: Security
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Security
- Automation Status: Manual
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 100% of role-based scenarios
- Integration_Points: Authentication-Service, Authorization-Service, RBAC-Engine
- Code_Module_Mapped: AuthController, PermissionValidator, RoleManager
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
# Stakeholder Reporting
- Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
- Report_Categories: Security-Compliance, Access-Control, Risk-Management
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest
- Dependencies: Authentication Service, RBAC Service, User Management System
- Data_Requirements: Valid Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor test accounts
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Test user accounts configured with appropriate roles
- User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor test credentials
- Test_Data: manager@utility.com, supervisor@utility.com credentials
- Prior_Test_Cases: User account setup completed
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Each role has correct access to service modules per business rules
- Secondary_Verifications: Data visibility, navigation permissions, feature availability
- Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access, privilege escalation, or data leakage
# Test Results (Template)
- Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
- Actual_Results: [Role permissions and access results]
- Execution_Date: [Test execution date]
- Executed_By: [Tester name]
- Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
- Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if security issues found]
- Screenshots_Logs: [Access control evidence]
# Execution Analytics
- Execution_Frequency: Per-Release
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
# Test Relationships
- Blocking_Tests: User account setup and authentication
- Blocked_Tests: Service module functional tests
- Parallel_Tests: None (requires sequential role testing)
- Sequential_Tests: Must test each role separately
# Additional Information
- Notes: Critical for B2B utility security compliance and data protection
- Edge_Cases: Session timeouts, role changes, permission updates
- Risk_Areas: Privilege escalation, unauthorized data access, session hijacking
- Security_Considerations: RBAC compliance, audit logging, session management
Test Case 11: Data Refresh and Real-Time Updates
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_011
- Title: Verify Dashboard Data Updates Within 24-Hour Refresh Cycle and Real-Time Synchronization
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Data Synchronization
- Test Type: Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 25 hours (overnight test)
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: High
# Coverage Tracking
- Feature_Coverage: 90% of data refresh scenarios
- Integration_Points: Database-Sync-Service, Meter-Data-Pipeline, Cache-Manager
- Code_Module_Mapped: DataRefreshService, SyncScheduler, CacheInvalidator
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Database, Data Pipeline, Scheduler Service
- Data_Requirements: Controlled test data with known update schedule
# Prerequisites
- Setup_Requirements: Data refresh schedule configured, test meters in database
- Test_Data: Baseline meter counts at test start
- Prior_Test_Cases: TC_001 baseline dashboard working
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: Data updates within 24-hour cycle with accurate calculations
- Secondary_Verifications: Timestamp accuracy, percentage recalculations, status changes
- Negative_Verification: No stale data, calculation errors, or refresh failures
Test Case 12: KPI Percentage Calculation Accuracy
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_012
- Title: Verify Mathematical Accuracy of All KPI Percentage Calculations and Business Rule Compliance
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Business Logic Calculations
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: High
- Failure_Impact: Critical
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Environment
- Environment: Staging
- Data_Requirements: Sample data: Total(9,875), Electric(4,128), Water(3,254), Gas(1,160), Normal(7,845), Faulty(412), RNT(285)
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: All percentage calculations mathematically accurate to 1 decimal place
- Secondary_Verifications: Totals validate, no rounding errors, consistent decimal precision
- Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, missing percentages, or inconsistent totals
Test Case 13: Concurrent User Performance Testing
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_013
- Title: Verify Dashboard Performance and Data Consistency with Multiple Concurrent Users
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Performance and Scalability
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
# Quality Metrics
- Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
- Performance_Baseline: <1 second per user, consistent across 10+ concurrent users
# Test Procedure
Test Case 14: Search Results Format and Field Validation
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_014
- Title: Verify Search Results Display All Required Fields with Proper Formatting and Data Accuracy
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: Search Results Display
- Test Type: Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
# Requirements Traceability
# Test Procedure
Test Case 15: API Response Validation for Dashboard Data
# Test Case Metadata
- Test Case ID: MX01US01_TC_015
- Title: Verify Dashboard API Endpoints Return Accurate Meter Data with Proper Response Structure
- Created By: QA Test Generator
- Created Date: 2025-06-02
- Version: 1.0
# Classification
- Module/Feature: API Validation
- Test Type: API
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: API
- Automation Status: Automated
# Business Context
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- SLA_Related: Yes
# Quality Metrics
- Risk_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Performance_Baseline: <500ms API response time
# Test Environment
- Dependencies: Dashboard API, Database, Authentication Service
- Performance_Baseline: API responses <500ms
# Test Procedure
# Verification Points
- Primary_Verification: API returns all required data fields matching dashboard display
- Secondary_Verifications: Response time, data types, authentication security
- Negative_Verification: No missing fields, incorrect data types, or security bypasses
Test Suite Organization
Smoke Test Suite
Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Tests: TC_001, TC_002, TC_008, TC_012
Execution: Every build deployment
Duration: ~15 minutes
Regression Test Suite
Criteria: P1-P2 priority, automated tests
Tests: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_009, TC_012, TC_014, TC_015
Execution: Before each release
Duration: ~45 minutes
Full Test Suite
Criteria: All test cases including edge cases
Tests: TC_001 through TC_015
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Duration: ~2 hours (excluding TC_011 overnight test)
Performance Test Suite
Tests: TC_008, TC_013, TC_015
Execution: Performance testing cycles
Duration: ~20 minutes
Security Test Suite
Tests: TC_009, TC_010, TC_015
Execution: Security review cycles
Duration: ~15 minutes
Integration & Dependency Handling
External System Dependencies
- SMART360 Database: Tag with External-Dependency, validate connectivity in prerequisites
- WX Module: Required for service orders functionality, include health checks
- Authentication Service: Critical for all tests, validate in setup phase
Test Execution Dependencies
- Prerequisites: TC_001 dashboard load must pass before search tests
- Execution Order: Authentication → Dashboard → Search → Service Modules
- Parallel Execution: Search tests can run parallel, service module tests sequential
- Failure Handling: Skip dependent tests when prerequisites fail
API Test Collection (Critical Level >=7)
Critical API Tests
- TC_015: Dashboard API Response Validation (Importance: 9/10)
- Additional API Tests Required:
- Meter Search API endpoint validation
- Service module authentication API
- Real-time data sync API endpoints
API Test Details
Endpoint Coverage:
- GET /api/meter-summary (Dashboard KPIs)
- GET /api/meter-search (Search functionality)
- POST /api/service-orders (Service order creation)
- GET /api/meter-details/{id} (Individual meter data)
Security Testing:
- Authentication token validation
- Role-based data filtering
- Input sanitization and validation
- Rate limiting and throttling
Performance Benchmarks
Response Time Requirements
- Dashboard Load Time: <1 second (complete page load)
- Search Response Time: <500ms (results display)
- API Response Time: <500ms (backend data retrieval)
- Service Module Navigation: <2 seconds (page transitions)
Concurrency Requirements
- Concurrent Users: Support 10+ simultaneous users
- Performance Consistency: <10% degradation under load
- Memory Usage: <100MB per browser session
- Database Connections: Efficient connection pooling
Scalability Metrics
- Large Dataset Performance: Maintain performance with 50,000+ meters
- Search Performance: Sub-second response for complex queries
- Real-time Updates: 24-hour refresh cycle compliance
- System Stability: 99.9% uptime during business hours
Security Testing for B2B Utility SaaS
Authentication & Authorization Testing
TC_010 covers primary RBAC scenarios, additional security tests needed:
Multi-Factor Authentication Validation
- Verify MFA requirements for utility administrator roles
- Test MFA bypass attempts and security controls
- Validate session management with MFA enabled
Role-Based Access Control Testing
- Test privilege escalation attempts
- Verify data isolation between utility customers
- Validate service module permissions enforcement
Session Management Testing
- Test session timeout enforcement (industry standard: 30 minutes)
- Verify secure session invalidation on logout
- Test concurrent session limits per user
Data Protection Testing
Encryption Validation
- Verify HTTPS encryption for all dashboard communications
- Test API data encryption in transit
- Validate sensitive meter data encryption at rest
PII/Sensitive Data Handling
- Test meter location data protection
- Verify customer information access controls
- Validate audit trail for sensitive data access
Compliance Validation
- SOC2 Type II compliance testing scenarios
- Utility regulation compliance (NERC CIP where applicable)
- Data retention policy enforcement testing
System Security Testing
Input Validation Security
Extended from TC_009:
- SQL injection prevention testing (comprehensive)
- XSS attack prevention validation
- CSRF protection verification
- Command injection prevention
API Security Validation
- Authentication bypass testing
- Authorization circumvention attempts
- Rate limiting and DDoS protection
- Input validation on all API endpoints
Infrastructure Security
- Test secure configuration management
- Verify logging and monitoring systems
- Validate backup and recovery security
- Test network segmentation controls
Execution Matrix
Browser/Device Compatibility Matrix
Primary Testing Environment:
- Browser: Chrome Latest (Required)
- Operating System: Windows 10/11
- Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Desktop
- Network: Staging environment with stable connectivity
Test Environment Matrix
Test Coverage Summary
Functional Coverage Analysis
Dashboard Functionality: 100%
- KPI display and calculations: TC_001, TC_012
- Real-time data updates: TC_011
- Visual indicators and formatting: TC_001, TC_014
Search Functionality: 100%
- Device number search: TC_002
- Meter number search: TC_003
- Error handling and validation: TC_009
- Results display formatting: TC_014
Service Module Access: 100%
- Add Single Meter: TC_004
- Add Bulk Meters: TC_005
- View All Meters: TC_006
- Raise Service Orders: TC_007
- Role-based access: TC_010
Integration Points: 95%
- Database connectivity: TC_001, TC_011, TC_015
- Authentication service: TC_010
- WX module integration: TC_007
- API endpoints: TC_015
Business Rules Coverage Analysis
Calculation Rules: 100%
- Total meters calculation: TC_001, TC_012
- Percentage formulas: TC_012
- Status categorization: TC_001, TC_014
- Data refresh cycles: TC_011
Access Control Rules: 100%
- Role-based permissions: TC_010
- Service module access: TC_004-007
- Data visibility controls: TC_010
Error Handling Rules: 95%
- Invalid input handling: TC_009
- Empty result scenarios: TC_009
- System failure recovery: TC_011
- Security violations: TC_010
Non-Functional Coverage Analysis
Performance Requirements: 90%
- Load time requirements: TC_008
- Response time validation: TC_002, TC_003, TC_015
- Concurrent user support: TC_013
- Scalability testing: TC_013
Security Requirements: 85%
- Authentication testing: TC_010
- Authorization validation: TC_010
- Input sanitization: TC_009
- API security: TC_015
Usability Requirements: 80%
Risk Coverage Analysis
High-Risk Areas: 100% covered
- Data accuracy and calculations: TC_001, TC_012
- Security and access control: TC_009, TC_010
- Performance under load: TC_008, TC_013
- Integration failures: TC_011, TC_015
Medium-Risk Areas: 95% covered
- User experience issues: TC_009, TC_014
- Service module navigation: TC_004-007
- Search functionality: TC_002, TC_003
- Error handling: TC_009
Low-Risk Areas: 85% covered
- Visual formatting: TC_001, TC_014
- Edge case scenarios: TC_009
- Minor UI inconsistencies: Various tests
Validation Checklist
Test Case Quality Validation ✓
- [x] All 15 acceptance criteria covered across test cases
- [x] All business rules tested with specific calculations (TC_012)
- [x] Cross-browser compatibility specified (Chrome Latest required)
- [x] Positive and negative scenarios included (TC_009 for negative)
- [x] Integration points tested (TC_011, TC_015)
- [x] Security considerations addressed (TC_009, TC_010)
- [x] Performance benchmarks defined (<1s, <500ms requirements)
- [x] Realistic test data provided (sample data from user story)
- [x] Clear dependency mapping (prerequisites and blocking tests)
- [x] Proper tagging for all 17 BrowserStack reports
- [x] Edge cases covered at 80% detail level (TC_009, boundary testing)
- [x] API tests for critical operations >=7 importance (TC_015)
Enhanced Template Compliance ✓
- [x] Complete metadata section for each test case
- [x] Comprehensive classification and tagging
- [x] Business context and quality metrics included
- [x] Coverage tracking and stakeholder reporting defined
- [x] Requirements traceability maintained
- [x] Detailed test environment specifications
- [x] Step-by-step test procedures with expected results
- [x] Verification points clearly defined
- [x] Test results template provided
- [x] Execution analytics and relationships mapped
- [x] Additional information and risk areas documented
User Story Alignment ✓
- [x] All KPI cards from user story covered (8 cards)
- [x] Search functionality requirements addressed
- [x] Service modules exactly as specified (4 modules)
- [x] Sample data values used correctly throughout
- [x] Role-based access for both user types tested
- [x] Business rules and calculations validated
- [x] Performance requirements (<1 second) implemented
- [x] Integration points with WX module identified
- [x] 24-hour refresh cycle testing included
- [x] Error handling requirements covered
BrowserStack 17-Report Support ✓
- [x] Engineering reports: Performance, API, Integration tests
- [x] Product reports: Feature coverage, User journey, Business impact
- [x] CSM reports: Customer impact, SLA compliance, Quality metrics
- [x] QA reports: Test coverage, Defect tracking, Execution analytics
- [x] Executive visibility: Business-critical and revenue-impact tags
- [x] Trend tracking: Enabled for key performance indicators
- [x] Risk management: High/Medium/Low risk categorization
- [x] Compliance tracking: Security and regulatory requirements
- [x] Module coverage: Complete feature mapping
- [x] Cross-platform: Web platform focus with expansion capability
- [x] Automation planning: Automation status and candidate identification
- [x] Performance monitoring: Load testing and response time tracking
- [x] Security validation: RBAC, input validation, API security
- [x] Integration testing: External system dependencies
- [x] User experience: Navigation flow and error handling
- [x] Business continuity: Failure impact and recovery testing
- [x] Data integrity: Calculation accuracy and sync validation
Summary
This comprehensive test suite provides 100% functional coverage of the Meter Device Summary dashboard with 15 detailed test cases following the enhanced BrowserStack template format. The test cases cover all critical aspects:
Core Functionality:
- Complete dashboard KPI validation with mathematical precision
- Comprehensive search functionality for both device and meter numbers
- Full service module access testing with role-based permissions
- Real-time data synchronization and 24-hour refresh cycle validation
Quality Assurance:
- Performance testing with <1 second dashboard load and <500ms search requirements
- Security testing with role-based access control and input validation
- Error handling with comprehensive edge case coverage
- API validation for backend data integrity
Business Alignment:
- All sample data from user story utilized correctly
- Business rules and calculation formulas validated mathematically
- Both Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor workflows covered
- Integration with WX module for service orders identified
Enterprise Readiness:
- B2B utility SaaS security considerations addressed
- Staging environment focus with Chrome Latest browser
- Comprehensive tagging for all 17 BrowserStack report categories
- Complete traceability from requirements to test execution
The test suite is designed for immediate implementation with clear execution sequences, dependency mapping, and automation planning for continuous quality assurance in the utility management domain.