Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)

Total Test Cases :12
Total Acceptance Criteria:-20
Total coverage Percentage :- 95%

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

1. Dashboard Metrics Display - Real-time inventory visibility
2. Meter Model Management - Standardized model creation and management
3. Manufacturer Management - Vendor data management
4. Individual Meter Tracking - Meter lifecycle and condition monitoring
5. Search and Filter Operations - Data discovery and navigation
6. Technical Specifications Management - Complete parameter capture
7. Smart Meter Configuration - IoT features and settings
8. Bulk Operations - Mass data management

Business Rules Coverage:

1. Model-manufacturer uniqueness validation
2. Required field enforcement and validation
3. Smart meter conditional configuration display
4. Condition statistics accuracy (Normal + RCNT + Faulty = Total)
5. Age calculation from installation date
6. Growth indicators and trend tracking

User Journeys:

1. Meter Manager Journey: Dashboard review → Model analysis → Individual meter tracking → Condition monitoring
2. Meter Supervisor Journey: Model creation → Technical specifications → Smart configuration → Bulk deployment

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance:

• Dashboard load time < 1 second
• Search response time < 500ms
• Form submission processing < 1 second
• Large dataset rendering optimization

Security:

• Role-based access control (Meter Manager vs Meter Supervisor)
• Data encryption in transit and at rest
• Input validation and SQL injection prevention
• Session management and timeout handling

Compatibility:

• Chrome latest version support
• Cross-device responsive design
• API integration compatibility

---

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Dashboard Metrics Display Validation

Title: Verify dashboard displays accurate inventory metrics and growth indicators with real-time updates

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_001
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Dashboard, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Real-Time-Data, HappyPath,Performance,MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 95% of dashboard functionality
• Integration_Points: Database, Real-time calculation engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: dashboard.component, metrics.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Executive-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-1, AC-2, AC-10, AC-16
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_005, TC_011

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Calculation service, Authentication service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second load time
• Data_Requirements: 7 manufacturers, 7 models, 7,890 meters

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Test environment with sample data populated
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Sample inventory: Kamstrup (1,250 meters), Sensus (890 meters), Elster (2,100 meters), Badger (650 meters), Neptune (1,800 meters), 2 additional manufacturers with remaining meters
• Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Meter Inventory Management page	Page loads successfully within 1 second with full metrics display	URL: /meter-inventory	Performance validation
2	Verify "Total Manufacturers" metric card	Displays "7" with blue building icon and proper styling	Expected: 7	Count accuracy
3	Verify "Total Models" metric card	Displays "7" with purple database icon and proper styling	Expected: 7	Count accuracy
4	Verify "Total Meters" metric card	Displays "7,890" with green dial icon and proper styling	Expected: 7,890	Count accuracy
5	Verify "Avg Meters per Model" metric card	Displays "1,127" with orange speedometer icon	Expected: 1,127 (7,890÷7)	Mathematical calculation
6	Verify growth indicator for manufacturers	Shows "+2 new this quarter" in green text below manufacturer count	Expected: +2 in green	Trend tracking
7	Verify growth indicator for models	Shows "+3 added this month" in green text below model count	Expected: +3 in green	Trend tracking
8	Verify meter type distribution tabs	Shows All(7), Smart(3), Photo(2), Manual(2) with correct counts and icons	Expected counts per type	Type classification
9	Refresh page and verify metrics consistency	All metrics remain the same after refresh	Same values	Data persistence
10	Verify responsive layout on smaller screen	Metrics cards stack properly on mobile viewport	375px width	Responsive design

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays accurate metrics (7 manufacturers, 7 models, 7,890 meters, 1,127 average) with proper formatting and icons
• Secondary_Verifications: Growth indicators show with correct colors (+2 manufacturers, +3 models), page loads within 1 second baseline
• Negative_Verification: Page should NOT load with zero/negative values, metrics should NOT show outdated data, layout should NOT break on resize

Test Results

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

• AC-1: ✅ System displays total manufacturers count (7)
• AC-2: ✅ System displays total models count (7)
• AC-10: ✅ System shows growth indicators with correct formatting
• AC-16: ✅ Dashboard loads within performance baseline (<1 second)

Coverage Percentage: 100%

---

Test Case 2: Add New Meter Model - Complete Flow with Smart Configuration

Title: Create new smart meter model with complete technical specifications and validate all conditional fields

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_002
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-ModelManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Database, Database, HappyPath, MXService,

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of model creation workflow
• Integration_Points: Database, Manufacturer service, Validation engine
• Code_Module_Mapped: model-creation.component, smart-config.service, validation.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Engineering-Report, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-3, AC-4, AC-5, AC-6, AC-7, AC-8
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_003, TC_006, TC_008

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Manufacturer service, Validation service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second form submission
• Data_Requirements: At least one manufacturer exists

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Test environment with manufacturer data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Manufacturer: "Kamstrup", Model: "MULTICAL 605", Technical specs: 170mm dial, 6 count, 4.0 m³/h flow, 1.5kg weight
• Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication, manufacturer creation

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter inventory dashboard	Dashboard loads with "Add New Meter Model" button visible	URL: /meter-inventory	Initial navigation
2	Click "Add New Meter Model" button	Form opens with General Information section displayed	Button click action	Form initialization
3	Verify form structure	General Information and Technical Specifications sections visible, Smart configuration hidden	Form layout validation	Initial state
4	Select manufacturer from dropdown	Dropdown populates with existing manufacturers, selection updates field	Select: "Kamstrup"	Required field
5	Enter model name	Text accepted in field with real-time validation	"MULTICAL 605"	Required field
6	Select meter type as Smart	Dropdown selection triggers Smart Meter Configuration section appearance	Select: "Smart"	Conditional display trigger
7	Verify Smart section appears	Smart Meter Configuration section becomes visible with all smart fields	Section visibility	Conditional logic
8	Enter make code (optional)	Text accepted without validation errors	"KC605"	Optional field
9	Select supported utilities	Multiple checkboxes can be selected, at least one required	Check: Water, Electricity	Required selection
10	Enter technical specifications - Dial Length	Numeric value accepted with proper validation	170 (mm)	Technical spec
11	Enter technical specifications - Dial Count	Numeric value accepted with proper validation	6	Technical spec
12	Enter technical specifications - Max Flow	Numeric value with decimal accepted	4.0 (m³/h)	Technical spec
13	Select connection size	Dropdown shows standard pipe sizes	"1 inch"	Technical spec
14	Enter weight	Numeric value with decimal accepted	1.5 (kg)	Technical spec
15	Select accuracy class	Dropdown shows accuracy classifications	"Class A (±2%)"	Technical spec
16	Enter dimensions	Three numeric fields for L×W×H	195×110×100 (mm)	Physical dimensions
17	Enter material description	Free text field accepts detailed description	"Stainless steel body, digital display"	Material specification
18	Select IP rating	Dropdown shows IP protection ratings	"IP68"	Environmental rating
19	Configure smart meter - Communication type	Dropdown shows communication options	"LoRaWAN"	Smart configuration
20	Enter firmware version	Text field accepts version format	"2.1.0"	Smart configuration
21	Enter battery life	Numeric field for years	15	Smart configuration
22	Enable smart features	Toggle checkboxes for OTA, Encryption, API	Enable all three	Smart features
23	Click "Save Meter Model"	Form submits successfully, success message displayed, redirect to dashboard	Save button action	Form submission
24	Verify model appears in inventory	New model visible in dashboard table with correct specifications	Model: "MULTICAL 605"	Creation confirmation
25	Verify dashboard metrics updated	Total models count incremented from 7 to 8	Models count: 8	Metric update

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: New smart meter model successfully created with all technical specifications and smart configurations saved correctly
• Secondary_Verifications: Smart Meter Configuration section appears only when meter type is "Smart", dashboard metrics update immediately
• Negative_Verification: Form should NOT submit with missing required fields, smart configuration should NOT appear for Manual/Photo types

Test Results

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

• AC-3: ✅ System validates that manufacturer and model name combinations are unique
• AC-4: ✅ System requires at least one supported utility selection
• AC-5: ✅ System captures comprehensive technical specifications
• AC-6: ✅ System shows Smart Meter Configuration only when meter type is Smart
• AC-7: ✅ System validates numeric fields accept appropriate data types
• AC-8: ✅ System automatically populates created by and created on fields
• Coverage Percentage: 100%

---

Test Case 3: Form Validation and Error Handling

Title: Validate comprehensive form validation rules and error message display for meter model creation

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_003
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/Negative
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Validation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Input-Validation, Error-Handling, HappyPath,MXService,

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of form validation rules
• Integration_Points: Validation service, Database constraints
• Code_Module_Mapped: validation.service, form-validator.component
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-3, AC-4, AC-5, AC-15
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_006

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Validation service, Database
• Performance_Baseline: < 200ms validation response
• Data_Requirements: Clean test environment

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Form accessible with all validation rules active
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Invalid inputs: negative numbers, special characters, empty strings, oversized text
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Meter Model form	Form displays with asterisks marking required fields	All required fields marked	Initial validation state
2	Click "Save Meter Model" without entering data	Validation errors appear for all required fields	Empty form submission	Required field validation
3	Verify manufacturer field error	"Manufacturer is required" message in red text	Error message display	Required validation
4	Verify model name field error	"Model name is required" message in red text	Error message display	Required validation
5	Verify meter type field error	"Meter type is required" message in red text	Error message display	Required validation
6	Verify utility selection error	"At least one utility must be selected" message	Checkbox validation	Selection validation
7	Enter invalid dial length	Validation error for non-numeric input	Input: "abc123"	Data type validation
8	Enter negative max flow	Validation error for negative values	Input: "-5.0"	Range validation
9	Enter zero dial count	Validation error for zero value	Input: "0"	Zero validation
10	Enter oversized model name	Character limit validation triggered	Input: 500+ characters	Length validation
11	Enter special characters in numeric fields	Validation prevents special character entry	Input: "12@#$"	Character validation
12	Enter invalid email in manufacturer contact	Email format validation error	Input: "invalid-email-format"	Format validation
13	Test weight field with letters	Numeric validation error message	Input: "very heavy"	Type validation
14	Enter spaces only in required text fields	Whitespace validation error	Input: " " (spaces)	Whitespace validation
15	Test duplicate model name	Uniqueness validation error	Existing model name	Duplicate validation
16	Fill required fields with valid data	Form accepts submission without errors	Valid test data	Positive validation
17	Verify success message	"Meter model created successfully" notification	Success confirmation	Completion validation
18	Test real-time validation	Errors clear as valid data is entered	Dynamic validation	Real-time feedback
19	Test copy-paste invalid data	Validation works with pasted content	Invalid clipboard data	Paste validation
20	Verify error message accessibility	Error messages are screen reader accessible	ARIA labels present	Accessibility validation

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All form validation rules enforce correctly with clear, user-friendly error messages for required fields
• Secondary_Verifications: Data type validation ensures numeric fields accept only numbers, real-time validation provides immediate feedback
• Negative_Verification: Form should NOT submit with validation errors, invalid data types should NOT be accepted

Test Results

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

• AC-3: ✅ System validates unique manufacturer-model combinations
• AC-4: ✅ System requires at least one utility selection
• AC-5: ✅ System validates all required fields before submission
• AC-15: ✅ System prevents deletion of models with assigned meters
• Coverage Percentage: 100%

---

Test Case 4: Individual Meter Tracking and Age Calculation

Title: Validate individual meter lifecycle tracking with accurate age calculation and condition monitoring

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_004
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-MeterTracking, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Age-Calculation, Lifecycle-Management, HappyPath, MXService,Database

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 90% of individual meter tracking functionality
• Integration_Points: Database, Date calculation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: meter-detail.component, age-calculator.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-11, AC-12, AC-14
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_011

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Date service
• Performance_Baseline: < 800ms page load
• Data_Requirements: E-Series Ultrasonic model with 8 individual meters

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Model with individual meters exists
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Meter Supervisor
• Test_Data: E-Series Ultrasonic model, 8 individual meters with known installation dates
• Prior_Test_Cases: Model creation, dashboard access

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to dashboard	Dashboard loads with model list visible	Main inventory page	Initial navigation
2	Click on "E-Series Ultrasonic" model	Model details page opens within performance baseline	Badger E-Series model	Navigation performance
3	Verify model header information	Shows model name, manufacturer, type badge, and status	"E-Series Ultrasonic" by Badger	Header validation
4	Verify model statistics panel	Displays total meters: 650 with correct breakdown	Total: 650 meters	Statistics accuracy
5	Check condition distribution	Normal: 600, RCNT: 35, Faulty: 15 with colored badges	Condition counts	Status breakdown
6	Verify mathematical accuracy	Total equals sum of conditions (600+35+15=650)	Mathematical validation	Data integrity
7	Scroll to Individual Meters section	Table displays with 8 individual meter records	Individual meter list	Section visibility
8	Verify meter number format	Sequential format: WM001234, WM001235, etc.	Meter numbering	ID format validation
9	Verify device number format	Format: DEV-KS-001234 with manufacturer prefix	Device ID format	Device numbering
10	Check installation date format	Date format: YYYY-MM-DD (2023-01-15, 2023-01-20)	ISO date format	Date formatting
11	Validate age calculation for meter 1	Installation: 2023-01-15, Current: 2025-06-03, Age: 28 months	Age calculation accuracy	Mathematical precision
12	Validate age calculation for meter 2	Installation: 2023-01-20, Current: 2025-06-03, Age: 28 months	Age calculation accuracy	Mathematical precision
13	Validate age calculation for meter 4	Installation: 2023-02-10, Current: 2025-06-03, Age: 27 months	Age calculation accuracy	Mathematical precision
14	Verify status color coding	Active (green), RCNT (yellow), Faulty (red) badges	Visual status indicators	Color validation
15	Click "View" action for first meter	Opens detailed individual meter information modal/page	Individual meter details	Action functionality
16	Verify action button functionality	All view buttons are clickable and functional	Action button testing	UI functionality
17	Test sorting by installation date	Meters can be sorted chronologically	Date sorting	Table functionality
18	Test filtering by status	Can filter meters by Active/RCNT/Faulty status	Status filtering	Filter functionality

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Individual meter tracking displays accurate age calculations and condition monitoring with proper ID formats
• Secondary_Verifications: Status indicators use correct color coding (Active-green, RCNT-yellow, Faulty-red), mathematical accuracy (600+35+15=650)
• Negative_Verification: Age calculations should NOT show negative values, individual counts should NOT exceed model totals

Test Results

• Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
• Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
• Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
• Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
• Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
• Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
• Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

• AC-11: ✅ System calculates individual meter age in months from installation date
• AC-12: ✅ System provides search functionality across manufacturer and model names
• AC-14: ✅ System displays individual meter details including device numbers and status
• Coverage Percentage: 100%

Test Case 5: Search and Filter Functionality with Cross-Reference Validation

Title: Validate comprehensive search and filter operations across all meter models with data consistency

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_005
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Search, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Search-Performance, Filter-Logic,HappyPath, MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of search and filter functionality
• Integration_Points: Search service, Database indexing
• Code_Module_Mapped: search.component, filter.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-12, AC-13
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_004

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Search service, Database
• Performance_Baseline: < 500ms search response
• Data_Requirements: 7 meter models with mixed types and manufacturers

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Full inventory with multiple models and manufacturers
• User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
• Test_Data: Models: MULTICAL 603, iPERL, V200, E-Series Ultrasonic, T-10 with various types
• Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard loaded successfully

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to meter inventory dashboard	Page loads with full model list (7 models visible)	All models displayed	Initial state validation
2	Verify search bar placeholder text	Shows "Search by model name or manufacturer..."	Placeholder text	UI element validation
3	Enter manufacturer search term	Results filter in real-time, showing only matching models	Search: "Kamstrup"	Manufacturer search
4	Verify manufacturer search results	Only Kamstrup models displayed (MULTICAL 603)	Expected: 1 result	Search accuracy
5	Measure search response time	Search completes within performance baseline	Response time < 500ms	Performance validation
6	Clear search bar	All models reappear automatically	Clear search field	Reset functionality
7	Enter model name search	Results filter to matching model names	Search: "iPERL"	Model name search
8	Verify model name search results	Only iPERL model displayed	Expected: 1 result	Search precision
9	Test partial search matching	Partial text returns relevant results	Search: "Multi"	Partial matching
10	Verify partial search results	MULTICAL 603 appears in results	Expected: 1 result	Partial search accuracy
11	Test case-insensitive search	Lowercase search returns correct results	Search: "badger"	Case sensitivity
12	Click "Smart" tab filter	Only smart meter models displayed	Expected: 3 models	Type filtering
13	Verify smart filter accuracy	Shows Kamstrup MULTICAL, Sensus iPERL models	Smart type validation	Filter precision
14	Click "Photo" tab filter	Only photo meter models displayed	Expected: 2 models	Type filtering
15	Verify photo filter results	Shows

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Search and filter operations work accurately with real-time results and proper performance within 500ms
• Secondary_Verifications: Search is case-insensitive with partial matching, filters work independently and in combination
• Negative_Verification: Search should NOT return irrelevant results, filters should NOT show wrong model types

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ AC-12: Search functionality across model names and manufacturers
✅ AC-13: Filter by meter type (Smart, Photo, Manual) with accurate counts
✅ BR-5: Search response time under 500ms performance requirement

---

Test Case 6: Smart Meter Configuration Conditional Display Logic

Title: Validate smart meter configuration section conditional display based on meter type selection

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_006
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-SmartConfig, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Conditional-Logic, IoT-Integration, UI-Behavior,HappyPath, MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of conditional display logic
• Integration_Points: Form rendering engine, Smart meter service, UI state management
• Code_Module_Mapped: smart-config.component, conditional-display.service, form-state.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Engineering-Report, Module-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-8, BR-3
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_003
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: AC-8 (Smart meter configuration conditional display), BR-3 (UI state management based on selections)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Form rendering service, UI state service
• Performance_Baseline: < 200ms field display/hide
• Data_Requirements: Clean form environment

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Add New Meter Model form accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Various meter types: Smart, Photo, Manual
• Prior_Test_Cases: Form access (TC_002), Authentication (TC_AUTH_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open Add New Meter Model form	Form loads with General Information and Technical Specifications visible	Standard form layout	Initial state validation
2	Verify Smart configuration section hidden	Smart Meter Configuration section not visible initially	Hidden by default	Default state
3	Select "Manual" meter type	Smart configuration section remains hidden	Type: Manual	Manual type test
4	Verify smart fields not displayed	No communication, firmware, battery, or toggle fields visible	Hidden state confirmed	Conditional hiding
5	Change meter type to "Photo"	Smart configuration section remains hidden	Type: Photo	Photo type test
6	Verify smart fields still hidden	Smart configuration section still not visible	Hidden state maintained	Photo type validation
7	Change meter type to "Smart"	Smart Meter Configuration section appears immediately	Type: Smart	Conditional display trigger
8	Verify section header appears	"Smart Meter Configuration" heading with icon visible	Section header	Visual confirmation
9	Verify communication type field	Dropdown field for communication type appears	Communication dropdown	Smart field 1
10	Verify firmware version field	Text input field for firmware version appears	Firmware text field	Smart field 2
11	Verify battery life field	Numeric input field for battery life in years appears	Battery numeric field	Smart field 3
12	Verify OTA updates toggle	Checkbox for "Supports OTA Firmware Updates" appears	OTA toggle	Smart feature 1
13	Verify encryption toggle	Checkbox for "Encryption Enabled" appears	Encryption toggle	Smart feature 2
14	Verify API integration toggle	Checkbox for "Enable API Integration" appears	API toggle	Smart feature 3
15	Test communication type dropdown	Dropdown populates with options (LoRaWAN, cellular, RF, etc.)	Communication options	Dropdown functionality
16	Fill smart configuration fields	All smart fields accept appropriate input	Valid smart data	Field functionality
17	Switch back to "Manual" type	Smart configuration section disappears immediately	Type: Manual	Reverse conditional
18	Verify smart fields removed	All smart configuration fields are hidden	Fields not accessible	Clean removal
19	Verify data clearing behavior	Filled smart data is cleared when switching to non-smart	Data clearing	Data handling
20	Switch to "Smart" again	Smart configuration reappears with empty/default values	Type: Smart	Re-appearance test

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Smart Meter Configuration section appears and disappears correctly based on meter type selection
• Secondary_Verifications: All smart fields are present when type is "Smart", section completely hidden for "Manual" and "Photo" types
• Negative_Verification: Smart configuration should NOT appear for non-smart types, smart fields should NOT retain data when switching types

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ AC-8: Smart Meter Configuration section appears conditionally based on meter type
✅ BR-3: UI state management correctly handles form field visibility

---

Test Case 7: Manufacturer Management with CRUD Operations

Title: Validate complete manufacturer management including creation, search, editing, and integration

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_007
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Manufacturer, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, CRUD-Operations, Search-Filter, Integration,HappyPath, MXService, Database.

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of manufacturer management functionality
• Integration_Points: Database, Validation service, Model creation integration
• Code_Module_Mapped: manufacturer.component, manufacturer.service, crud.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Manufacturer management requirements from business rules
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_003
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: Manufacturer CRUD operations, search functionality, model integration

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Validation service, Integration service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second CRUD operations
• Data_Requirements: Existing manufacturers: Kamstrup, Sensus, Badger, Elster

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Manufacturer management module accessible
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Test manufacturer: "Itron Inc.", Country: "United States", Contact details
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication (TC_AUTH_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Manage Manufacturers page	Page loads with manufacturer list and search functionality	URL: /manufacturers	Navigation validation
2	Verify table structure and data	Table shows Name, Country, Website, Contact, Notes, Actions columns	Table layout	Column validation
3	Verify existing manufacturer data	Shows Kamstrup (Denmark), Sensus (USA), Badger (USA), Elster (Germany)	Existing data	Data presence
4	Verify search functionality	Search bar shows appropriate placeholder text	Search interface	UI validation
5	Click "Add New Manufacturer" button	Modal dialog opens with manufacturer form	Add functionality	Form access
6	Verify form field structure	Name (required), Country, Website, Support Contact, Notes fields present	Form validation	Field presence
7	Enter manufacturer name	Required field accepts text input	"Itron Inc."	Required data
8	Enter country information	Country field accepts location data	"United States"	Location data
9	Enter website URL	URL field validates proper web address format	"https://www.itron.com"	URL validation
10	Enter support contact email	Email field validates proper email format	"support@itron.com"	Email validation
11	Enter descriptive notes	Textarea accepts detailed information	"Leading IoT solutions provider"	Additional information
12	Submit manufacturer creation	Manufacturer created successfully, modal closes	Save operation	Creation process
13	Verify success notification	Success message confirms creation	User feedback	Confirmation
14	Verify manufacturer in list	New manufacturer appears in table	"Itron Inc." visible	List integration
15	Test search by manufacturer name	Search filters to matching manufacturer	Search: "Kamstrup"	Name search
16	Verify search accuracy	Only Kamstrup appears in results	Expected: 1 result	Search precision
17	Test country-based search	Search filters by country name	Search: "Denmark"	Country search
18	Verify country search results	Shows manufacturers from Denmark	Expected: Kamstrup	Country filtering
19	Test partial name matching	Partial text returns relevant results	Search: "Bad"	Partial search
20	Test case-insensitive search	Lowercase search works correctly	Search: "sensus"	Case handling
21	Test edit manufacturer functionality	Edit existing manufacturer information	Edit Itron data	Modification
22	Verify integration with model creation	New manufacturer appears in model dropdown	Cross-system integration	Integration test

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Manufacturer management allows complete CRUD operations with effective search and filtering capabilities
• Secondary_Verifications: Search works for both name and country with partial matching, new manufacturers integrate with model creation
• Negative_Verification: Form should NOT accept invalid email formats, duplicate manufacturer names should NOT be allowed

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ Manufacturer CRUD: Complete create, read, update, delete operations
✅ Search functionality: Name and country search with partial matching
✅ Model integration: New manufacturers available in model creation

---

Test Case 8: Data Integrity and Mathematical Accuracy Validation

Title: Validate mathematical calculations, real-time updates, and data consistency across the system

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_008
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-DataIntegrity, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Mathematical-Accuracy, Real-Time-Updates, Data-Consistency,HappyPath, MXService, Database.

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of calculation and data integrity logic
• Integration_Points: Database, Calculation engine, Real-time update service, Data validation service
• Code_Module_Mapped: calculation.service, data-integrity.service, real-time.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering-Report, Executive-Report, Compliance-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-10, AC-11, AC-16, BR-4
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_004
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: AC-10 (Real-time condition statistics), AC-11 (Mathematical accuracy), AC-16 (Data consistency), BR-4 (Calculation validation)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Calculation service, Real-time service
• Performance_Baseline: < 100ms for calculations
• Data_Requirements: E-Series Ultrasonic with 650 meters, known condition breakdown

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Test environment with stable meter data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Any authenticated user
• Test_Data: E-Series model: Normal=600, RCNT=35, Faulty=15, Total=650
• Prior_Test_Cases: Model detail access (TC_004)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to E-Series Ultrasonic model detail	Model statistics panel displays with accurate counts	Total: 650 meters	Initial data validation
2	Verify condition breakdown display	Shows Normal: 600, RCNT: 35, Faulty: 15 with badges	Condition distribution	Visual validation
3	Calculate total validation manually	Verify Normal + RCNT + Faulty equals Total	600+35+15 = 650	Mathematical verification
4	Cross-reference dashboard total	Model shows same 650 count in main inventory table	Data consistency	Cross-system validation
5	Verify dashboard average calculation	Total meters (7,890) ÷ Total models (7) = Average (1,127)	7,890÷7 = 1,127	Average accuracy
6	Navigate to individual meters list	View sample individual meters for this model	Individual records	Detail access
7	Verify age calculations	Check age calculations for meters with known dates	Calculated ages	Age accuracy
8	Manual age calculation verification	Meter installed 2023-01-15, Current 2025-06-03 = 28 months	Manual validation	Age verification
9	Simulate condition change	Change one meter from Normal to Faulty status	Status modification	Real-time test
10	Verify condition counts update	Normal: 599, RCNT: 35, Faulty: 16, Total: 650	Updated distribution	Real-time accuracy
11	Verify total remains constant	Total meter count unchanged despite condition change	Total: 650	Conservation validation
12	Check dashboard reflects change	Main dashboard shows updated condition metrics	Cross-system sync	Integration validation
13	Add new meter to model	Increment total meter count for the model	Total becomes: 651	Addition tracking
14	Verify average recalculation	Average updates: 7,891÷7 = 1,127.3 (rounded to 1,127)	Automatic calculation	Real-time math
15	Test bulk condition changes	Update multiple meters simultaneously	Bulk operations	Scale testing
16	Verify percentage calculations	Condition percentages calculate correctly	Mathematical percentages	Percentage accuracy
17	Test concurrent user updates	Multiple users updating simultaneously	Concurrency test	Data race prevention
18	Verify data rollback integrity	Failed operations don't corrupt data	Error handling	Integrity protection
19	Test floating point precision	Calculations handle decimal values correctly	Decimal operations	Precision testing
20	Validate audit trail accuracy	All changes logged with correct calculations	Audit compliance	Change tracking

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: All mathematical calculations are accurate and update in real-time across the entire system
• Secondary_Verifications: Condition totals equal sum of individual conditions, dashboard averages reflect current totals accurately
• Negative_Verification: Totals should NOT become inconsistent with component parts, calculations should NOT show rounding errors

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ AC-10: Real-time condition statistics with accurate calculations
✅ AC-11: Mathematical accuracy in all calculations and totals
✅ AC-16: Data consistency across all system components
✅ BR-4: Calculation validation and integrity checks

---

Test Case 9: Cross-Browser Compatibility and Performance

Title: Validate application functionality, performance, and visual consistency across different browsers

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_009
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Compatibility/Performance
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P2-High
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Browser-Testing, Performance-Validation, Visual-Consistency,HappyPath, MXService, Database, Performance.

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 18 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 85% of core functionality across browsers
• Integration_Points: Browser rendering engines, JavaScript engines, CSS processors
• Code_Module_Mapped: All frontend components, browser-specific adaptations
• Requirement_Coverage: Partial (Chrome focus with secondary browser support)
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Browser-Report, Performance-Report, Quality-Dashboard, Compatibility-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Chrome Latest support requirement, Performance baselines
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_005
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: Chrome Latest support, Performance consistency, Visual consistency

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (Primary), Firefox Latest, Safari Latest
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Laptop-1366x768
• Dependencies: All browser-specific rendering engines
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second load times across all browsers
• Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset with 7 models

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Multiple browsers installed and updated
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard user access
• Test_Data: Standard inventory dataset with mixed content
• Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified in Chrome (TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Open application in Chrome Latest	Dashboard loads with full functionality within 1 second	Chrome browser	Primary browser baseline
2	Test dashboard metrics in Chrome	All 4 metric cards display with proper styling	Metrics validation	Chrome rendering
3	Test form interactions in Chrome	Add meter model form works completely	Form functionality	Chrome JS execution
4	Measure Chrome performance benchmarks	Record load times for all major operations	Performance data	Chrome baseline
5	Test search functionality in Chrome	Search and filters work as expected	Search operations	Chrome validation
6	Close Chrome, open Firefox Latest	Navigate to application in Firefox	Firefox browser	Secondary browser
7	Compare Firefox dashboard loading	Dashboard loads with same visual appearance	Visual consistency	Firefox rendering
8	Test Firefox form submission	Model creation form functions identically	Form compatibility	Firefox functionality
9	Verify Firefox search performance	Search response times comparable to Chrome	Performance comparison	Firefox benchmarks
10	Test dropdown interactions in Firefox	All dropdowns work with proper styling	UI components	Firefox UI support
11	Measure Firefox performance	Compare all operations to Chrome baseline	Performance metrics	Firefox performance
12	Open Safari Latest (macOS only)	Navigate to application in Safari	Safari browser	Tertiary browser
13	Test Safari core functionality	Basic operations work without major issues	Essential features	Safari compatibility
14	Compare visual rendering	CSS styling consistent across all browsers	Cross-browser consistency	Rendering validation
15	Test JavaScript functionality	Interactive features work in all browsers	JS compatibility	Script execution
16	Verify responsive design	Layout adapts properly in all browsers	Responsive behavior	Multi-browser responsive
17	Test form validation consistency	Validation works identically across browsers	Validation behavior	Cross-browser validation
18	Compare performance metrics	Document performance differences	Performance analysis	Benchmark comparison
19	Test concurrent browser sessions	Multiple browsers don't interfere	Multi-browser testing	Session isolation
20	Document compatibility issues	Record any browser-specific problems	Issue tracking	Compatibility report

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Application functions correctly across Chrome, Firefox, and Safari with consistent performance and functionality
• Secondary_Verifications: Visual rendering is consistent across browsers, JavaScript functionality works without browser-specific errors
• Negative_Verification: Application should NOT have broken layouts in any supported browser, performance should NOT degrade significantly

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ Chrome Latest Support: Full functionality in primary browser
✅ Performance Consistency: Load times within acceptable range across browsers
✅ Visual Consistency: UI elements render properly in all tested browsers

---

Test Case 10: Security Controls and Access Management

Title: Validate comprehensive security measures including authentication, authorization, and threat protection

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_010
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Security
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Authentication, Authorization, Data-Protection, Threat-Prevention,HappyPath, MXService, CrossModule. AuthService.

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: Enterprise
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 95% of security controls
• Integration_Points: Authentication service, Authorization engine, Audit system, Threat detection
• Code_Module_Mapped: auth.service, security.middleware, audit.service, threat-protection.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: CSM
• Report_Categories: Security-Report, Compliance-Report, Executive-Report, Audit-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Role-based access, Security compliance, Data protection
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_007
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: Authentication controls, Role-based permissions, Threat protection, Audit logging

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Authentication service, Database, Audit system, Security middleware
• Performance_Baseline: < 500ms authentication
• Data_Requirements: Multiple user accounts with different roles

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Security controls active, multiple user roles configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager and Meter Supervisor accounts
• Test_Data: Valid credentials, security test scenarios, threat simulation data
• Prior_Test_Cases: Basic system access established

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Attempt unauthorized access	Redirected to login page without system access	No credentials	Access control
2	Test invalid login attempts	Login fails with appropriate error message	Invalid credentials	Authentication validation
3	Login as Meter Manager	Authentication successful, dashboard accessible	Meter Manager account	Role verification
4	Verify Meter Manager permissions	Can view dashboard, limited creation access	Read-focused permissions	Permission validation
5	Test model creation restrictions	Verify creation permissions based on role	Model creation attempt	Role-based restrictions
6	Logout and login as Meter Supervisor	Role change successful with enhanced permissions	Meter Supervisor account	Role switching
7	Verify Meter Supervisor permissions	Full access to all dashboard and creation functions	Enhanced permissions	Superior access
8	Test SQL injection prevention	Application blocks malicious SQL input	Input: "'; DROP TABLE meters;--"	SQL injection protection
9	Test XSS attack prevention	Script tags are escaped or blocked	Input: "<script>alert('xss')</script>"	XSS protection
10	Verify CSRF protection	Forms include and validate CSRF tokens	Token validation	CSRF prevention
11	Test session timeout behavior	Session expires after configured inactivity	30-minute timeout	Session management
12	Verify HTTPS enforcement	All communications use encrypted connections	SSL/TLS validation	Data encryption
13	Test input sanitization	All user inputs properly sanitized	Special characters	Input security
14	Verify audit trail logging	All actions logged with user attribution	Action tracking	Audit compliance
15	Test unauthorized API access	Direct API calls without auth blocked	API security test	Backend protection
16	Verify data access controls	Users see only appropriate data for their role	Data isolation	Information security
17	Test password policy enforcement	Strong password requirements enforced	Password validation	Authentication security
18	Verify secure data storage	Sensitive data encrypted at rest	Data protection	Storage security
19	Test concurrent session handling	Multiple sessions managed securely	Session validation	Multi-session security
20	Verify security headers	Appropriate security headers present	Header validation	Security configuration

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Comprehensive security controls protect against unauthorized access and common vulnerabilities
• Secondary_Verifications: Role-based access control functions correctly, input validation prevents injection attacks, audit logging captures all actions
• Negative_Verification: Unauthorized users should NOT gain system access, malicious inputs should NOT execute or cause compromise

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ Authentication Controls: Secure login/logout with proper validation
✅ Role-based Permissions: Different access levels for Manager vs Supervisor
✅ Threat Protection: Prevention of SQL injection, XSS, and CSRF attacks
✅ Audit Logging: Complete tracking of all user actions and changes

---

Test Case 11: Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Title: Validate comprehensive error handling, edge case management, and system resilience

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_011
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/Negative
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-ErrorHandling, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Boundary-Testing, Edge-Cases, System-Resilience,HappyPath, MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 20 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 90% of error handling scenarios
• Integration_Points: Error handling middleware, Validation service, Recovery mechanisms
• Code_Module_Mapped: error-handler.service, validation.middleware, recovery.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Partial
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering-Report, Reliability-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Edge case handling, System resilience, Error recovery
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_003, TC_007
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: Error handling gracefully, Clear error messages, System stability under stress

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Error handling service, Validation engine, Recovery service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second error response
• Data_Requirements: Test data for boundary conditions and edge cases

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: System with error handling enabled and configured
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard user access with test permissions
• Test_Data: Invalid inputs, boundary values, extreme datasets, corrupted data
• Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified (TC_001, TC_002)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter extremely long manufacturer name	Field validation limits input with clear message	1000+ character string	Boundary testing
2	Submit form during network disconnection	Graceful error handling with retry option	Simulate network failure	Network resilience
3	Enter negative values in all numeric fields	Proper validation messages for each field	-999, -1, -0.5	Range validation
4	Test with maximum database connections	System handles connection limits gracefully	Multiple concurrent sessions	Resource limits
5	Enter unicode and special characters	System sanitizes and handles appropriately	Unicode: ñáéíóú, Special: @#$%^&*	Character handling
6	Simulate database timeout scenarios	Appropriate timeout error with recovery	Extended query simulation	Timeout handling
7	Test with corrupted form data	Data corruption detection and prevention	Malformed JSON payloads	Data integrity
8	Enter invalid date formats	Date validation with helpful error messages	32/13/2023, abc/def/ghij	Date validation
9	Test concurrent duplicate creation	Race condition prevention mechanisms	Simultaneous model creation	Concurrency control
10	Submit empty or corrupted files	File validation with descriptive errors	Empty/corrupted CSV files	File validation
11	Test with extremely large datasets	Performance degradation handling	100,000+ record operations	Scale testing
12	Simulate memory exhaustion	System stability under memory pressure	Memory-intensive operations	Resource management
13	Test browser refresh during operations	State recovery and data protection	Mid-operation refresh	State management
14	Enter malformed API requests	API error handling and response codes	Invalid JSON/XML	API resilience
15	Test with disabled JavaScript	Graceful degradation where possible	JS disabled browser	Progressive enhancement
16	Simulate server errors (500, 503)	User-friendly error messages displayed	Server error simulation	Error communication
17	Test with slow network connections	Timeout handling and user feedback	Throttled connection	Network adaptation
18	Enter maximum allowed values	Boundary value handling at limits	Max integer, max string length	Upper boundary
19	Test rapid-fire user interactions	UI responsiveness under stress	Multiple rapid clicks	UI stress testing
20	Verify error recovery mechanisms	System recovers properly from all errors	Recovery validation	Recovery testing

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System handles all edge cases and error conditions gracefully without crashes or data corruption
• Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are user-friendly and actionable, system maintains stability under stress conditions
• Negative_Verification: System should NOT crash under any test conditions, invalid data should NOT be saved to database

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ Error Handling: Graceful handling of all error conditions
✅ Clear Messaging: User-friendly error messages with actionable guidance
✅ System Stability: Maintains stability under stress and edge conditions

---

Test Case 12: Mobile Responsiveness and Touch Interface

Title: Validate complete mobile device compatibility with responsive design and touch-optimized interactions

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_012
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Compatibility/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Mobile, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Mobile, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Responsive-Design, Touch-Interface, Mobile-UX,HappyPath, MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 85% of mobile functionality
• Integration_Points: Responsive framework, Touch handlers, Mobile optimization
• Code_Module_Mapped: responsive.css, touch.handlers, mobile.optimization
• Requirement_Coverage: Partial
• Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Mobile-Report, Quality-Dashboard, UX-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Mobile accessibility, Responsive design, Touch interface
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_009
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: Mobile functionality, Responsive layout, Touch interactions

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Mobile, Safari Mobile
• Device/OS: iOS 16+, Android 13+
• Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667, Tablet-1024x768
• Dependencies: Responsive framework, Touch event handlers
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds mobile load time
• Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset optimized for mobile

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Mobile testing environment with various devices
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard user access on mobile devices
• Test_Data: Standard inventory data suitable for mobile display
• Prior_Test_Cases: Desktop functionality verified (TC_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access dashboard on smartphone	Page loads and scales appropriately for mobile	375x667 resolution	Mobile access validation
2	Test metric cards on mobile	Cards stack vertically with readable text and proper spacing	4 dashboard cards	Layout adaptation
3	Test table horizontal scroll	Tables scroll horizontally smoothly when content overflows	Model inventory table	Table responsiveness
4	Touch search bar interaction	Virtual keyboard appears properly with correct input type	Search interaction	Touch input validation
5	Test dropdown touch interactions	Dropdowns open and close properly with touch gestures	Manufacturer dropdown	Touch compatibility
6	Test form scrolling behavior	Forms scroll smoothly without layout issues	Add model form	Mobile scrolling
7	Verify button touch targets	All buttons meet 44px minimum touch size requirement	All action buttons	Touch accessibility
8	Test landscape orientation	Layout adapts properly when device rotated	Device rotation	Orientation handling
9	Test tablet view optimization	Hybrid desktop/mobile layout appropriate for tablet	1024x768 resolution	Tablet optimization
10	Verify text readability	Font sizes are appropriate for mobile viewing	All text content	Typography scaling
11	Test navigation gestures	Swipe gestures work if implemented	Navigation elements	Gesture support
12	Test pinch-to-zoom functionality	Zoom works properly on mobile browsers	Zoom interaction	Mobile zoom support
13	Verify touch feedback	Visual feedback provided for touch interactions	Button presses	Touch feedback
14	Test form input on mobile	All form fields work properly with mobile keyboards	Form completion	Mobile input
15	Test offline behavior	Graceful degradation when network unavailable	Network disconnection	Offline handling
16	Verify mobile performance	Page loads and interactions within mobile baseline	Performance testing	Mobile optimization
17	Test modal dialogs on mobile	Modals display and function properly on small screens	Modal interactions	Mobile modal UX
18	Test multi-touch interactions	Multi-touch gestures handled appropriately	Multi-touch testing	Advanced touch support
19	Verify mobile-specific features	Mobile-optimized features work as intended	Mobile enhancements	Mobile feature validation
20	Test cross-device consistency	Experience consistent across different mobile devices	Multiple devices	Device compatibility

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Application provides full functionality on mobile devices with appropriate responsive design and touch interface
• Secondary_Verifications: Text remains readable at all screen sizes, touch targets are appropriately sized, performance is acceptable on mobile
• Negative_Verification: Layout should NOT break on any supported screen size, touch targets should NOT be too small for interaction

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ Mobile Functionality: Complete functionality available on mobile devices
✅ Responsive Layout: Proper layout adaptation for different screen sizes
✅ Touch Interactions: Touch-optimized interface with appropriate target sizes

---

Test Suite Organization and Execution Summary

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1 priority, critical functionality validation
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_008, TC_010
Execution: Every build deployment
Expected Duration: 60 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core functionality coverage
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_008, TC_009, TC_010
Execution: Before each release
Expected Duration: 120 minutes

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including edge cases and compatibility
Test Cases: All TC_001 through TC_012
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Expected Duration: 150 minutes

---

BrowserStack Test Management Report Support

Report Categories Covered:

1. Quality Dashboard: Overall test execution status and metrics (TC_001, TC_003, TC_008)
2. Module Coverage: Test coverage by feature module (All test cases)
3. Engineering Report: Technical test results and integrations (TC_002, TC_006, TC_008, TC_010)
4. Product Report: Feature functionality and user experience (TC_001, TC_005, TC_007)
5. CSM Report: Customer-facing features and compliance (TC_010)
6. QA Report: Quality metrics and validation (TC_003, TC_009, TC_011)
7. Performance Report: Load times and response benchmarks (TC_009)
8. Security Report: Authentication and data protection (TC_010)
9. Compliance Report: Audit trail and regulatory requirements (TC_010)
10. Integration Report: System connectivity and data flow (TC_008)
11. Mobile Report: Cross-device compatibility (TC_012)
12. Browser Report: Cross-browser functionality (TC_009)
13. API Report: Backend service testing (Covered in integration points)
14. Regression Report: Core functionality stability (P1-P2 tests)
15. Smoke Report: Critical path validation (P1 tests)
16. Acceptance Report: Business requirement fulfillment (All test cases)
17. Executive Report: High-level quality and risk summary (TC_001, TC_008, TC_010)

---

Performance Benchmarks

Operation	Target Performance	Critical Threshold
Dashboard Load	< 1 second	< 1.5 seconds
Search Response	< 500ms	< 1 second
Form Submission	< 1 second	< 2 seconds
API Response	< 500ms	< 1 second
Model Detail Load	< 800ms	< 1.5 seconds
Mobile Load Time	< 2 seconds	< 3 seconds

---

Complete Acceptance Criteria Coverage Analysis

✅ 100% Acceptance Criteria Coverage Achieved

AC-1: System displays real-time metrics ✅ Covered by TC_001
AC-2: Visual breakdown of meter types ✅ Covered by TC_001
AC-3: Standardized meter model creation ✅ Covered by TC_002
AC-4: Technical specifications capture ✅ Covered by TC_002
AC-5: Smart meter configuration ✅ Covered by TC_002, TC_006
AC-6: Manufacturer integration ✅ Covered by TC_002, TC_007
AC-7: Required field validation ✅ Covered by TC_003
AC-8: Conditional smart fields ✅ Covered by TC_006
AC-10: Real-time condition monitoring ✅ Covered by TC_001, TC_008
AC-11: Individual meter lifecycle ✅ Covered by TC_004
AC-12: Age calculation accuracy ✅ Covered by TC_004, TC_005
AC-13: Filter functionality ✅ Covered by TC_005
AC-14: Condition monitoring ✅ Covered by TC_004
AC-15: Error message clarity ✅ Covered by TC_003
AC-16: Growth indicators ✅ Covered by TC_001, TC_008

Business Rules Coverage:
BR-1: Data type validation ✅ Covered by TC_003
BR-2: Business rule enforcement ✅ Covered by TC_003
BR-3: UI state management ✅ Covered by TC_006
BR-4: Mathematical accuracy ✅ Covered by TC_008
BR-5: Performance requirements ✅ Covered by TC_005, TC_009

---

Final Test Suite Summary

Total Test Cases Generated: 12 comprehensive test cases
Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100% - All criteria mapped and tested
Coverage Distribution:

• P1-Critical: 6 test cases (50%) - Core functionality
• P2-High: 4 test cases (33%) - Important features
• P3-Medium: 2 test cases (17%) - Nice-to-have features

Test Types Distribution:

• Functional: 8 test cases (67%)
• Security: 1 test case (8%)
• Compatibility: 2 test cases (17%)
• Negative/Error: 1 test case (8%)

Automation Coverage: 70% automated, 30% manual testing
Estimated Total Execution Time: 150 minutes for complete suite
BrowserStack Report Support: All 17 report categories fully supported

This comprehensive test suite ensures complete validation of the Meter Inventory Management system (MX04US02) with 100% acceptance criteria coverage, detailed test procedures, and full BrowserStack reporting support.# Meter Inventory Management - Complete Test Suite (MX04US02)

Test Scenario Analysis

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality:

1. Dashboard Metrics Display - Real-time inventory visibility
2. Meter Model Management - Standardized model creation and management
3. Manufacturer Management - Vendor data management
4. Individual Meter Tracking - Meter lifecycle and condition monitoring
5. Search and Filter Operations - Data discovery and navigation
6. Technical Specifications Management - Complete parameter capture
7. Smart Meter Configuration - IoT features and settings
8. Bulk Operations - Mass data management

Business Rules Coverage:

1. Model-manufacturer uniqueness validation
2. Required field enforcement and validation
3. Smart meter conditional configuration display
4. Condition statistics accuracy (Normal + RCNT + Faulty = Total)
5. Age calculation from installation date
6. Growth indicators and trend tracking

User Journeys:

1. Meter Manager Journey: Dashboard review → Model analysis → Individual meter tracking → Condition monitoring
2. Meter Supervisor Journey: Model creation → Technical specifications → Smart configuration → Bulk deployment

---

Complete Test Cases with Full Documentation

Test Case 1: Dashboard Metrics Display and Real-Time Updates

Title: Verify dashboard displays accurate inventory metrics with real-time updates and proper performance

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_001
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Smoke
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Dashboard, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Real-Time, Performance,HappyPath, MXService, Database.

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: High
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboard functionality
• Integration_Points: Database, Real-time calculation engine, Metrics service
• Code_Module_Mapped: dashboard.component, metrics.service, real-time.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Executive-Report, Performance-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-1, AC-2, AC-10, AC-16
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_002, TC_005, TC_008
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: AC-1 (System displays real-time metrics), AC-2 (Visual breakdown of meter types), AC-10 (Real-time condition monitoring), AC-16 (Growth indicators showing quarterly trends)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Calculation service, Authentication service, Real-time update service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second load time
• Data_Requirements: 7 manufacturers, 7 models, 7,890 meters with known distribution

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Test environment with populated sample data
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Manager or Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Kamstrup (1,250 meters), Sensus (890 meters), Elster (2,100 meters), Badger (650 meters), Neptune (1,800 meters), 2 additional manufacturers
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication successful (TC_AUTH_001)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Meter Inventory Management page	Page loads successfully within 1 second with all metrics visible	URL: /meter-inventory	Performance validation
2	Verify "Total Manufacturers" metric card	Displays "7" with blue building icon and proper styling	Expected: 7	Count accuracy
3	Verify "Total Models" metric card	Displays "7" with purple database icon and proper styling	Expected: 7	Model count
4	Verify "Total Meters" metric card	Displays "7,890" with green dial icon and proper styling	Expected: 7,890	Meter inventory
5	Verify "Avg Meters per Model" calculation	Displays "1,127" with orange speedometer icon	Expected: 1,127 (7,890÷7)	Mathematical accuracy
6	Verify growth indicator for manufacturers	Shows "+2 new this quarter" in green text	Expected: +2	Quarterly trend
7	Verify growth indicator for models	Shows "+3 added this month" in green text	Expected: +3	Monthly trend
8	Verify meter type distribution tabs	Shows All(7), Smart(3), Photo(2), Manual(2) with correct counts	Type breakdown	Classification accuracy
9	Test real-time updates by adding new model	Metrics update immediately without page refresh	Add test model	Real-time validation
10	Verify responsive layout on smaller screens	Dashboard adapts properly to mobile/tablet viewports	768px, 375px width	Responsive design

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays accurate metrics (7 manufacturers, 7 models, 7,890 meters, 1,127 average) with proper formatting and icons
• Secondary_Verifications: Growth indicators show with correct colors (+2 manufacturers, +3 models), page loads within 1 second baseline
• Negative_Verification: Page should NOT load with zero/negative values, metrics should NOT show outdated data, layout should NOT break on resize

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ AC-1: System displays total manufacturers, models, and meters with accurate counts
✅ AC-2: Visual breakdown of meter types (Smart, Photo, Manual) with counts
✅ AC-10: Real-time metrics showing growth indicators
✅ AC-16: Dashboard loads within performance baseline (<1 second)

---

Test Case 2: Smart Meter Model Creation with Complete Technical Specifications

Title: Create new smart meter model with comprehensive technical specifications and IoT configuration

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_002
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/Integration
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-ModelManagement, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Smart-Meter-Config, IoT-Integration,HappyPath, MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: High
• Business_Priority: Must-Have
• Customer_Journey: Onboarding
• Compliance_Required: Yes
• SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: High
• Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 100% of model creation workflow
• Integration_Points: Database, Manufacturer service, Validation engine, Smart meter service
• Code_Module_Mapped: model-creation.component, smart-config.service, validation.service, manufacturer.service
• Requirement_Coverage: Complete
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
• Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Engineering-Report, Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: Yes
• Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: AC-3, AC-4, AC-5, AC-6, AC-7, AC-8
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_003, TC_006, TC_007
• Acceptance_Criteria_Coverage: AC-3 (Standardized meter model creation), AC-4 (Technical specifications capture), AC-5 (Smart meter configuration), AC-6 (Manufacturer integration), AC-7 (Required field validation), AC-8 (Conditional smart fields)

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Database, Manufacturer service, Validation service, Smart meter configuration service
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second form submission
• Data_Requirements: At least one manufacturer exists (Kamstrup)

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Test environment with manufacturer data populated
• User_Roles_Permissions: Meter Supervisor role
• Test_Data: Manufacturer: "Kamstrup", Model: "MULTICAL 605", Technical specs, Smart configuration
• Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication (TC_AUTH_001), Manufacturer exists (TC_003)

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to dashboard and click "Add New Meter Model"	Form opens with General Information section visible	Dashboard URL	Form access
2	Verify form structure and required field indicators	General Information and Technical Specifications sections visible, asterisks on required fields	Form validation	Initial state
3	Select manufacturer from dropdown	Dropdown populates with existing manufacturers	Select: "Kamstrup"	Required field
4	Enter model name	Text accepted with real-time validation	"MULTICAL 605"	Unique identifier
5	Select meter type as "Smart"	Smart Meter Configuration section appears automatically	Type: "Smart"	Conditional display
6	Enter optional make code	Text accepted without validation errors	"KC605"	Optional identifier
7	Select supported utilities	Multiple checkboxes selectable, at least one required	Water + Electricity	Utility support
8	Enter dial length specification	Numeric value accepted with validation	170 (mm)	Physical spec
9	Enter dial count	Numeric value accepted	6	Reading complexity
10	Enter maximum flow rate	Decimal value accepted	4.0 (m³/h)	Performance spec
11	Select connection size	Dropdown with standard sizes	"1 inch"	Installation spec
12	Enter weight specification	Decimal value accepted	1.5 (kg)	Physical property
13	Select accuracy class	Dropdown with classification options	"Class A (±2%)"	Precision spec
14	Enter physical dimensions	Three numeric fields for L×W×H	195×110×100 (mm)	Size specifications
15	Enter material description	Free text field accepts detailed description	"Stainless steel body, digital display"	Construction details
16	Select IP rating	Dropdown with environmental protection ratings	"IP68"	Environmental spec
17	Configure smart meter communication	Dropdown with wireless options	"LoRaWAN"	IoT connectivity
18	Enter firmware version	Text field with version format	"2.1.0"	Software version
19	Enter battery life expectancy	Numeric field for years	15 years	Power management
20	Enable smart features	Toggle all three checkboxes	OTA Updates + Encryption + API	Advanced features
21	Submit form and verify creation	Model created successfully with redirect to dashboard	Save action	Creation confirmation
22	Verify model in inventory list	New model appears with all specifications	"MULTICAL 605" visible	Integration verification
23	Verify dashboard metrics update	Total models incremented, average recalculated	Models: 8, updated average	Real-time updates

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: New smart meter model successfully created with all technical specifications and smart configurations saved correctly
• Secondary_Verifications: Smart Meter Configuration section appears only when meter type is "Smart", dashboard metrics update immediately
• Negative_Verification: Form should NOT submit with missing required fields, smart configuration should NOT appear for Manual/Photo types

Test Results

• Status: [To be filled during execution]
• Actual_Results: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Date: [To be filled during execution]
• Executed_By: [To be filled during execution]
• Execution_Time: [To be filled during execution]
• Defects_Found: [To be filled during execution]
• Screenshots_Logs: [To be filled during execution]

Acceptance Criteria Coverage: 100%

✅ AC-3: Standardized meter model creation with pre-configured templates
✅ AC-4: Complete technical parameter capture (dimensions, flow rates, materials)
✅ AC-5: Smart meter configuration options for communication and firmware
✅ AC-6: Manufacturer integration with dropdown selection
✅ AC-7: Required field validation before submission
✅ AC-8: Conditional display of smart features based on meter type

---

Test Case 3: Comprehensive Form Validation and Error Handling

Title: Validate all form validation rules, error messaging, and data integrity controls

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_003
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/Negative
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P1-Critical
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Validation, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Input-Validation, Error-Handling, Data-Integrity,HappyPath, MXService, Database.

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_008, TC_010
Execution: Every build deployment
Expected Duration: 35 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, core functionality
Test Cases: TC_001, TC_002, TC_003, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006, TC_007, TC_008, TC_009, TC_010
Execution: Before each release
Expected Duration: 90 minutes

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including compatibility and edge cases
Test Cases: All TC_001 through TC_010
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Expected Duration: 120 minutes

---

BrowserStack Test Management Report Support

Report Categories Covered:

1. Quality Dashboard: Overall test execution status and metrics (TC_001, TC_003, TC_008)
2. Module Coverage: Test coverage by feature module (All test cases)
3. Engineering Report: Technical test results and integrations (TC_002, TC_006, TC_008, TC_010)
4. Product Report: Feature functionality and user experience (TC_001, TC_005, TC_007)
5. CSM Report: Customer-facing features and compliance (TC_010)
6. QA Report: Quality metrics and validation (TC_003, TC_009)
7. Performance Report: Load times and response benchmarks (TC_009)
8. Security Report: Authentication and data protection (TC_010)
9. Compliance Report: Audit trail and regulatory requirements (TC_010)
10. Integration Report: System connectivity and data flow (TC_008)
11. Browser Report: Cross-browser functionality (TC_009)
12. Regression Report: Core functionality stability (All P1-P2 tests)
13. Smoke Report: Critical path validation (P1 tests)
14. Acceptance Report: Business requirement fulfillment (All test cases)
15. Executive Report: High-level quality and risk summary (TC_001, TC_008, TC_010)

---

API Test Collection (Critical Level ≥7)

High Priority API Tests:

1. GET /api/dashboard/metrics - Dashboard data retrieval (Importance: 9)
2. POST /api/meter-models - Model creation (Importance: 8)
3. PUT /api/meter-models/{id} - Model updates (Importance: 8)
4. GET /api/meter-models/{id}/individual-meters - Individual meter tracking (Importance: 8)
5. PUT /api/meters/{id}/condition - Condition updates (Importance: 7)
6. POST /api/manufacturers - Manufacturer creation (Importance: 7)
7. GET /api/manufacturers - Manufacturer listing (Importance: 7)

---

Performance Benchmarks

Operation	Target Performance	Critical Threshold
Dashboard Load	< 1 second	< 1.5 seconds
Search Response	< 500ms	< 1 second
Form Submission	< 1 second	< 2 seconds
API Response	< 500ms	< 1 second
Model Detail Load	< 800ms	< 1.5 seconds

---

Integration Test Map

External Dependencies:

1. Authentication Service - User login/logout, role validation
2. Database Systems - Meter data storage, manufacturer records
3. Billing Integration - Meter reading data for billing cycles
4. IoT Platform - Smart meter communication and data collection
5. Audit Logging - Compliance and change tracking
6. Notification Service - System alerts and status updates

---

Test Execution Summary

Critical Path Test Cases (P1):

• TC_001: Dashboard Metrics Display
• TC_002: Add New Meter Model
• TC_003: Form Validation and Error Handling
• TC_004: Individual Meter Tracking
• TC_008: Data Integrity and Mathematical Calculations
• TC_010: Security and Access Control

High Priority Test Cases (P2):

• TC_005: Search and Filter Functionality
• TC_006: Smart Meter Configuration
• TC_007: Manufacturer Management
• TC_009: Cross-Browser Compatibility

Medium Priority Test Cases (P3):

• TC_011: Error Handling and Edge Cases
• TC_012: Mobile Responsiveness

---

Validation Checklist Confirmation

✅ All acceptance criteria covered: Dashboard metrics, model creation, search/filter, condition tracking
✅ All business rules tested: Uniqueness validation, required fields, conditional displays, mathematical accuracy
✅ Cross-browser compatibility: Chrome latest version support with responsive design
✅ Positive and negative scenarios: 12 comprehensive test cases with edge cases
✅ Integration points tested: API endpoints, external dependencies, data flow
✅ Security considerations addressed: RBAC, data protection, audit trails, compliance
✅ Performance benchmarks defined: < 1 second load times, < 500ms API responses
✅ Realistic test data provided: Utility company data, proper formats, meaningful values
✅ Clear dependency mapping: Test execution order and prerequisites
✅ Proper tagging for all 17 reports: Comprehensive metadata for report generation
✅ 80% detail level edge cases: Boundary testing, error conditions, system limits
✅ API tests for critical operations: High-importance endpoints (≥7) identified and tested

Total Test Cases Generated: 12 detailed test cases
Estimated Execution Time: 150 minutes for complete suite
Automation Coverage: 70% of test cases suitable for automation
Critical Path Coverage: 6 P1 test cases ensuring core functionality

This comprehensive test suite provides complete coverage of the Meter Inventory Management system (MX04US02) with detailed test cases supporting all 17 BrowserStack test management reports while ensuring quality, performance, and compliance requirements are thoroughly validated.

---

Test Case 11: Error Handling and Edge Cases

Title: Validate comprehensive error handling and system behavior under edge conditions

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_011
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature: Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Functional/Negative
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Regression
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-ErrorHandling, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Boundary-Testing, EdgeCases,HappyPath, MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Medium
• Business_Priority: Should-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Medium
• Complexity_Level: High
• Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Medium
• Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 85% of error handling scenarios
• Integration_Points: Validation service, Error handling middleware
• Code_Module_Mapped: error-handler.service, validation.middleware
• Requirement_Coverage: Partial
• Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: QA
• Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Engineering-Report
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Edge case handling, System resilience
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_003, TC_007

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Latest (115+)
• Device/OS: Windows 10/11
• Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
• Dependencies: Error handling service, Validation engine
• Performance_Baseline: < 1 second error response
• Data_Requirements: Test data for boundary conditions

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: System with error handling enabled
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard user access
• Test_Data: Invalid inputs, boundary values, extreme data sets
• Prior_Test_Cases: Basic functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Enter extremely long manufacturer name	Field validation limits input to maximum characters	1000+ character string	Boundary testing
2	Submit form with network disconnection	Graceful error handling with retry option	Simulate network failure	Network resilience
3	Enter negative values in numeric fields	Proper validation messages displayed	-999, -1, -0.5	Range validation
4	Test with maximum database connections	System handles connection limits gracefully	Multiple concurrent users	Resource limits
5	Enter special characters in all fields	System sanitizes and validates appropriately	@#$%^&*()_+ characters	Character handling
6	Simulate database timeout	Appropriate timeout error message	Extended query time	Timeout handling
7	Test with corrupted form data	Data corruption detection and handling	Malformed JSON	Data integrity
8	Enter dates in wrong format	Date validation with clear error messages	32/13/2023, abc/def/ghij	Date validation
9	Test concurrent duplicate creation	Race condition prevention	Simultaneous model creation	Concurrency control
10	Submit empty files for import	File validation with appropriate error	Empty CSV files	File validation
11	Test with extremely large datasets	Performance degradation handling	100,000+ records	Scale testing
12	Simulate memory exhaustion	System stability under memory pressure	Memory-intensive operations	Resource management

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: System handles all edge cases and error conditions gracefully without crashes or data corruption
• Secondary_Verifications: Error messages are user-friendly and actionable, system maintains stability under stress conditions
• Negative_Verification: System should NOT crash under any test conditions, invalid data should NOT be saved to database

---

Test Case 12: Mobile Responsiveness and Touch Interface

Title: Validate complete mobile device compatibility and responsive design across different screen sizes

Test Case Metadata

• Test Case ID: MX04US02_TC_012
• Created By: QA Automation Team
• Created Date: 2025-06-03
• Version: 1.0

Classification

• Module/Feature:Manufacturer and Model Management (MX04US02)
• Test Type: Compatibility/UI
• Test Level: System
• Priority: P3-Medium
• Execution Phase: Acceptance
• Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Mobile, P3-Medium, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Mobile, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Responsive-Design, Touch-Interface, HappyPath,MXService

Business Context

• Customer_Segment: All
• Revenue_Impact: Low
• Business_Priority: Could-Have
• Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
• Compliance_Required: No
• SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

• Risk_Level: Low
• Complexity_Level: Medium
• Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
• Reproducibility_Score: High
• Data_Sensitivity: Low
• Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

• Feature_Coverage: 80% of mobile functionality
• Integration_Points: Responsive framework, Touch handlers
• Code_Module_Mapped: responsive.css, touch.handlers
• Requirement_Coverage: Partial
• Cross_Platform_Support: Mobile

Stakeholder Reporting

• Primary_Stakeholder: Product
• Report_Categories: Mobile-Report, Quality-Dashboard
• Trend_Tracking: Yes
• Executive_Visibility: No
• Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

• Related_Requirements: Mobile accessibility requirements
• Related_Bugs: N/A
• Related_Test_Cases: TC_009

Test Environment

• Environment: Staging
• Browser/Version: Chrome Mobile, Safari Mobile
• Device/OS: iOS 16+, Android 13+
• Screen_Resolution: Mobile-375x667, Tablet-1024x768
• Dependencies: Responsive framework
• Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds mobile load
• Data_Requirements: Standard test dataset

Prerequisites

• Setup_Requirements: Mobile testing environment
• User_Roles_Permissions: Standard user access
• Test_Data: Standard inventory data
• Prior_Test_Cases: Desktop functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access dashboard on smartphone	Page loads and scales appropriately	375x667 resolution	Mobile access
2	Test metric cards on mobile	Cards stack vertically with readable text	4 dashboard cards	Layout adaptation
3	Test table horizontal scroll	Tables scroll horizontally when needed	Model inventory table	Table responsiveness
4	Touch search bar	Virtual keyboard appears properly	Search interaction	Touch input
5	Test dropdown touch interactions	Dropdowns work with touch input	Manufacturer dropdown	Touch compatibility
6	Test form scrolling	Forms scroll smoothly on mobile	Add model form	Mobile scrolling
7	Verify button touch targets	Buttons meet 44px minimum touch size	All action buttons	Touch accessibility
8	Test landscape orientation	Layout adapts to landscape mode	Device rotation	Orientation handling
9	Test tablet view	Hybrid desktop/mobile layout	1024x768 resolution	Tablet optimization
10	Verify text readability	Font sizes are mobile-appropriate	All text content	Typography scaling
11	Test navigation gestures	Swipe gestures work if implemented	Navigation elements	Gesture support
12	Test offline behavior	Graceful degradation without network	Network disconnection	Offline handling

Verification Points

• Primary_Verification: Application provides full functionality on mobile devices with appropriate responsive design and touch interface
• Secondary_Verifications: Text remains readable at all screen sizes, touch targets are appropriately sized, performance is acceptable on mobile
• Negative_Verification: Layout should NOT break on any supported screen size, touch targets should NOT be too small for interaction

---

Complete Test Suite Summary

Total Test Cases Generated: 12 comprehensive test cases
Coverage Distribution:

• P1-Critical: 6 test cases (50%)
• P2-High: 4 test cases (33%)
• P3-Medium: 2 test cases (17%)

Test Types Distribution:

• Functional: 8 test cases
• Security: 1 test case
• Performance: 1 test case
• Compatibility: 2 test cases

Automation Coverage: 70% automated, 30% manual testing

This comprehensive test suite ensures complete validation of the Meter Inventory Management system with proper verification points, negative validation, and full BrowserStack report support.