ID & Reference Format Settings (ONB02US07)

User Story: ONB02US07

Overall Coverage Summary

Total Coverage: 100% (~~9/9~~15/15 Acceptance Criteria Covered)
Total Test Cases: 1115 (913 Functional + 2 Non-Functional)
Total Acceptance Criteria: 915 (Based on user story requirements)
Coverage Percentage: (~~9/9)~~15/15) × 100 = 100%

Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality

ID Format Configuration Management - Create, edit, view, delete ID format configurations
Master vs Transaction ID Categorization - Proper categorization and handling of different ID types
Format Component Management - Entity type, prefix, sequence, utility service, date element, separator configuration
Live Preview Generation - Real-time preview of ID formats based on configuration
Format Validation - Duplicate prevention, length validation, pattern validation
Audit Trail Management - Comprehensive logging of all configuration changes

Enhanced Features

Advanced Format Builder - Enhanced customization options and component reordering
Multi-sample Preview - Multiple example generation with different scenarios
Contextual Help System - In-context guidance and tooltips
Format Testing - Test format with specific inputs and edge cases
Format Dashboard - Usage statistics and health indicators

User Journeys

Utility Administrator Complete Workflow - End-to-end ID format management
System Admin Audit Review - Complete audit and oversight workflow
Cross-role Collaboration - Multi-user scenarios and handoffs

Integration Points

Entity Creation Integration - ID generation for new customers, meters, bills, payments
System Configuration Integration - Integration with other SMART360 modules
User Authentication Integration - Role-based access control validation

Data Flow Scenarios

ID Generation Process - Format application to new entity creation
Configuration Change Impact - Effects on new ID generation
Audit Data Flow - Change tracking and log generation

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance

~~Response Time Validation~~ ~~- Page load and configuration update performance~~
~~Concurrent User Handling~~ ~~- Multiple administrators accessing simultaneously~~
~~Large Configuration Set Performance~~ ~~- Performance with many format configurations~~

Security

~~Authentication & Authorization~~ ~~- Role-based access control~~
~~Session Management~~ ~~- Timeout and session security~~
~~Data Protection~~ ~~- Sensitive configuration data handling~~
~~Audit Trail Security~~ ~~- Tamper-proof logging~~

Compatibility

~~Cross-Browser Testing~~ ~~- Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge compatibility~~
~~Responsive Design~~ ~~- Desktop, tablet, mobile compatibility~~
~~Cross-Platform Testing~~ ~~- Windows, macOS, iOS, Android~~

Usability

~~User Interface Navigation~~ ~~- Intuitive navigation and workflow~~
~~Error Handling~~ ~~- Clear error messages and recovery~~
~~Help System Effectiveness~~ ~~- Contextual help and guidance~~

Reliability

~~System Stability~~ ~~- Continuous operation under normal load~~
~~Error Recovery~~ ~~- Recovery from network issues and timeouts~~
~~Data Integrity~~ ~~- Configuration consistency and accuracy~~

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

~~Maximum/Minimum Values~~ ~~- Sequence length limits, prefix length limits~~
~~Format Length Limits~~ ~~- Maximum total ID length validation~~
~~Entity Volume Limits~~ ~~- Maximum entities per format type~~

Invalid Inputs

~~Malformed Configuration Data~~ ~~- Invalid characters, formats~~
~~Unauthorized Access Attempts~~ ~~- Access beyond permitted roles~~
~~Injection Attack Prevention~~ ~~- SQL injection, XSS prevention~~

System Failures

~~Network Connectivity Issues~~ ~~- Handling of connectivity problems~~
~~Service Unavailability~~ ~~- Backend service failure scenarios~~
~~Database Connection Issues~~ ~~- Database connectivity problems~~

Data Inconsistencies

~~Duplicate Format Prevention~~ ~~- Handling duplicate format attempts~~
~~Conflicting Configuration States~~ ~~- Resolution of configuration conflicts~~
~~Audit Log Consistency~~ ~~- Ensuring complete audit trail~~

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: "CreateGenerate NewUnique MasterIDs IDWithin FormatEntity for Customer Entity"Domain"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_001

Title: Verify ~~Utility~~system ~~Administrator~~generates ~~can~~unique ~~create~~IDs ~~new~~within ~~Master~~each IDentity's ~~format~~respective ~~for~~domain

Test CustomerCase entity
Metadata

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: ~~Planned-for-Automation~~Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-~~IDFormat,~~Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Master-ID-Creation, Customer-Entity, Format-Builder, Onboarding Services, cx Services, API, Database, HappyPath, Cross module

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 25% of ID format creation feature
Integration_Points: Entity creation system, audit logging
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering/Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Feature-Adoption
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: ONB02US07 Acceptance Criteria ~~1, 2, 5~~1
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US07_TC_002, ~~ONB02US07_TC_005~~ONB02US07_TC_007

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: SMART360 authentication service, database connectivity
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Valid utility administrator credentials

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system accessible, test environment configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator role with ID format management permissions
Test_Data: Valid admin credentials (admin@utilitytest.com / TestPass123!)
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication successful

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	~~Navigate~~Create toCustomer ~~SMART360~~ID ~~login page~~format	~~Login~~Format ~~page~~created ~~displays correctly~~successfully	~~N/A~~Entity: Customer	~~Verify~~Domain ~~UI elements~~setup
2	~~Enter~~Generate ~~Utility~~5 ~~Administrator~~Customer ~~credentials~~IDs	~~Successful~~All ~~authentication~~IDs unique within Customer domain	~~admin@utilitytest.com~~Sequential ~~/ TestPass123!~~generation	~~Check~~Uniqueness ~~session creation~~test
3	~~Navigate~~Create toMeter ~~System~~ID ~~Configuration menu~~format	~~Menu~~Format ~~expands~~created ~~with configuration options~~successfully	~~N/A~~Entity: Meter	~~Verify~~Separate ~~navigation~~domain
4	~~Click~~Generate ~~"ID~~5 &Meter ~~Reference Format Settings"~~IDs	IDAll ~~Format~~IDs ~~Settings~~unique ~~page~~within ~~loads~~Meter domain	~~N/A~~Sequential generation	~~Page~~Domain ~~load < 3 seconds~~isolation
5	Verify ~~Master~~Customer and Meter ID ~~and Transaction ID options visible~~uniqueness	~~Both~~IDs ~~configuration~~unique ~~types~~within ~~displayed~~respective domains	~~N/A~~Cross-domain check	UIDomain ~~validation~~
6	~~Click "Master ID" configuration type~~	~~Master ID section becomes active~~	~~N/A~~	~~Section highlighting~~
7	~~Click "Create New Format" button~~	~~New format creation modal opens~~	~~N/A~~	~~Modal display validation~~
8	~~Select "Customer" from Entity dropdown~~	~~Customer entity selected~~	~~Entity: Customer~~	~~Dropdown functionality~~
9	~~Enter sequence length~~	~~Sequence length set to 4 digits~~	~~Sequence: 4~~	~~Number validation~~
10	~~Enter prefix~~	~~Prefix field populated~~	~~Prefix: CUST~~	~~Text validation~~
11	~~Select utility service~~	~~Water (WA) service selected~~	~~Service: Water (WA)~~	~~Service selection~~
12	~~Configure date element~~	~~YYYYMM format selected~~	~~Date: YYYYMM~~	~~Date format validation~~
13	~~Set starting number~~	~~Starting number set to 1~~	~~Start: 1~~	~~Number validation~~
14	~~Select separator~~	~~Hyphen (-) selected~~	~~Separator: -~~	~~Character validation~~
15	~~Verify live preview displays~~	~~Preview shows: WA-CUST-202406-0001~~	~~N/A~~	~~Preview accuracy~~
16	~~Click "Save Configuration" button~~	~~Success message displays, modal closes~~	~~N/A~~	~~Save operation~~
17	~~Verify new format appears in table~~	~~Customer ID format listed in Master ID table~~	~~N/A~~	~~Table update validation~~
18	~~Check format details in table~~	~~All configured details match input~~	~~N/A~~	~~Data consistency~~separation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: ~~New~~System ~~Customer~~generates IDunique ~~format~~IDs ~~successfully~~within ~~created~~each ~~and~~entity ~~visible in Master ID table~~domain
Secondary_Verifications: ~~Live~~No ~~preview~~ID ~~accuracy,~~collisions ~~configuration~~within ~~persistence,~~same ~~audit~~entity ~~log entry created~~type
Negative_Verification: No ~~error messages displayed, no~~ duplicate ~~formats~~IDs ~~created~~generated within same domain

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 2: "LiveClassify PreviewID DynamicFormats Updatesas DuringMaster Configuration"or Transaction"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_002

Title: Verify ~~live~~system ~~preview~~classifies ~~updates~~ID ~~dynamically~~formats as ~~format~~either ~~components are modified~~

~~Created By~~~~: Arpita~~
~~Created Date~~~~: June 08, 2025~~
~~Version~~~~: 1.0~~

Classification

~~Module/Feature~~:Master ID &or ~~Reference~~Transaction ~~Format Settings~~
~~Test Type~~~~: Functional~~
~~Test Level~~~~: Integration~~
~~Priority~~~~: P2-High~~
~~Execution Phase~~~~: Regression~~
~~Automation Status~~~~: Automated~~

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

~~Tags~~: MOD-IDFormat, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Real-time-Preview, Dynamic-Updates, UI-Validation, Onboarding Services, Database, HappyPathID

Business Context

~~Customer_Segment~~~~: All~~
~~Revenue_Impact~~~~: Medium~~
~~Business_Priority~~~~: Should-Have~~
~~Customer_Journey~~~~: Daily-Usage~~
~~Compliance_Required~~~~: No~~
~~SLA_Related~~~~: No~~

Quality Metrics

~~Risk_Level~~~~: Medium~~
~~Complexity_Level~~~~: Medium~~
~~Expected_Execution_Time~~~~: 3 minutes~~
~~Reproducibility_Score~~~~: High~~
~~Data_Sensitivity~~~~: Low~~
~~Failure_Impact~~~~: Medium~~

Coverage Tracking

~~Feature_Coverage~~~~: 100% of live preview feature~~
~~Integration_Points~~~~: Frontend preview engine, format validation~~
~~Code_Module_Mapped~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Requirement_Coverage~~~~: Complete~~
~~Cross_Platform_Support~~~~: Web~~

Stakeholder Reporting

~~Primary_Stakeholder~~~~: Engineering/QA~~
~~Report_Categories~~~~: Feature-Quality, User-Experience~~
~~Trend_Tracking~~~~: Yes~~
~~Executive_Visibility~~~~: No~~
~~Customer_Impact_Level~~~~: Medium~~

Requirements Traceability

~~Related_Requirements~~~~: ONB02US07 Enhanced Solution - Multi-sample Preview~~
~~Related_Bugs~~~~: N/A~~
~~Related_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_003~~

Test Environment

~~Environment~~~~: Staging~~
~~Browser/Version~~~~: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+~~
~~Device/OS~~~~: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+~~
~~Screen_Resolution~~~~: Desktop-1920x1080~~
~~Dependencies~~~~: Real-time preview service, format validation engine~~
~~Performance_Baseline~~~~: < 500ms preview update~~
~~Data_Requirements~~~~: Access to ID format configuration interface~~

Prerequisites

~~Setup_Requirements~~~~: User logged in as Utility Administrator~~
~~User_Roles_Permissions~~~~: ID format configuration access~~
~~Test_Data~~~~: Existing format configuration or new format creation initiated~~
~~Prior_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001 (login and navigation)~~

Test Procedure

~~Step #~~	~~Action~~	~~Expected Result~~	~~Test Data~~	~~Comments~~
1	~~Open ID format configuration modal~~	~~Configuration form and preview area visible~~	~~N/A~~	~~UI loading~~
2	~~Set initial configuration~~	~~Initial preview displays~~	~~Entity: Customer, Prefix: CUST~~	~~Baseline setup~~
3	~~Modify prefix from CUST to CONS~~	~~Preview updates to show CONS in format~~	~~New Prefix: CONS~~	~~Real-time update~~
4	~~Change sequence length from 4 to 6~~	~~Preview shows 6-digit sequence (000001)~~	~~Sequence: 6~~	~~Length validation~~
5	~~Modify utility service from WA to EL~~	~~Preview updates to show EL in format~~	~~Service: Electric (EL)~~	~~Service change~~
6	~~Change date format from YYYYMM to YYMM~~	~~Preview shows 2-digit year format~~	~~Date: YYMM~~	~~Date format change~~
7	~~Modify separator from hyphen to underscore~~	~~Preview shows underscores as separators~~	~~Separator: _~~	~~Separator change~~
8	~~Change starting number from 1 to 100~~	~~Preview shows sequence starting from 000100~~	~~Start: 100~~	~~Number change~~
9	~~Clear prefix field~~	~~Preview updates without prefix component~~	~~Prefix: [empty]~~	~~Component removal~~
10	~~Add prefix back~~	~~Preview restores with prefix component~~	~~Prefix: METER~~	~~Component restoration~~
11	~~Select different entity type~~	~~Preview updates with entity-appropriate format~~	~~Entity: Meter~~	~~Entity change~~
12	~~Make rapid successive changes~~	~~Preview updates smoothly without lag~~	~~Multiple rapid changes~~	~~Performance test~~

Verification Points

~~Primary_Verification~~~~: Preview updates dynamically with each configuration change~~
~~Secondary_Verifications~~~~: Update performance < 500ms, no UI freezing, accurate format representation~~
~~Negative_Verification~~~~: No incorrect preview display, no delayed or missed updates~~

Test Case 3: "Duplicate ID Format Validation and Prevention"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_003

~~Title~~~~: Verify duplicate ID format validation prevents creation of identical formats~~

Metadata

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-~~IDFormat,~~Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-~~Validation,~~Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, ~~Integration-Validation-Engine,~~Classification-Logic, ~~Duplicate-Prevention,~~Master-Transaction-ID, Onboarding Services, cx Services, mx Services, bx Services, Database, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of classification feature
Integration_Points: Entity classification system, UI categorization
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering/Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Business-Logic
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: ONB02US07 Acceptance Criteria 2
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_012

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: SMART360 classification engine, database connectivity
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds classification response
Data_Requirements: Entity type configurations

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: ID Format Settings page accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Entity types for Master and Transaction classification
Prior_Test_Cases: Navigation and authentication verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to ID Format Settings	Master and Transaction ID sections visible	N/A	UI verification
2	Create Customer format in Master ID	Format classified as Master ID	Entity: Customer	Master classification
3	Create Meter format in Master ID	Format classified as Master ID	Entity: Meter	Master classification
4	Create Bill format in Transaction ID	Format classified as Transaction ID	Entity: Bill	Transaction classification
5	Create Payment format in Transaction ID	Format classified as Transaction ID	Entity: Payment	Transaction classification
6	Verify classification persistence	Classifications remain after page refresh	N/A	Data persistence

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System properly classifies formats as Master or Transaction ID
Secondary_Verifications: Classification persists across sessions
Negative_Verification: No incorrect classification assignments

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 3: "Preserve Existing Entity IDs During Format Changes"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_003

Title: Verify system does not change existing entity IDs when ID format changes are made

Test Case Metadata

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Data-Integrity, Backward-Compatibility, Onboarding Services, cx Services, Database, API

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 48 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of ~~duplicate~~format ~~validation~~change impact feature
Integration_Points: ~~Validation~~Entity ~~engine,~~management ~~database~~system, ~~uniqueness~~format ~~constraints~~application engine
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering/Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Data-Integrity, System-Reliability
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: ~~Business~~ONB02US07 ~~Rule~~Acceptance 16Criteria ~~- Prevent duplicate ID formats~~3
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US07_TC_001, ~~ONB02US07_TC_004~~ONB02US07_TC_007

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: ~~Format~~Entity ~~validation~~database, ~~service,~~format ~~database~~management ~~constraint validation~~service
Performance_Baseline: < 23 seconds ~~validation~~format ~~response~~update
Data_Requirements: Existing ~~Customer~~entity IDrecords ~~format~~with ingenerated ~~system~~IDs

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: ~~System~~Existing Customer entities with ~~existing~~generated ~~Customer ID format configured~~IDs
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Existing ~~format:~~Customer ~~Entity=Customer,~~format ~~Prefix=CUST,~~and ~~Service=WA~~generated entity IDs
Prior_Test_Cases: ~~ONB02US07_TC_001~~Format ~~(existing~~creation ~~format~~and ~~creation)~~entity generation completed

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	~~Navigate~~Create ~~to Master~~Customer ID ~~configuration~~format	~~Master~~Format IDcreated ~~section~~with ~~active~~pattern CUST-YYYYMM-0001	~~N/A~~Initial format	~~Section~~Baseline ~~access~~setup
2	~~Click~~Generate ~~"Create~~3 ~~New~~Customer ~~Format"~~entities	~~Creation~~IDs ~~modal~~generated: ~~opens~~CUST-202406-0001, 0002, 0003	~~N/A~~Entity creation	~~Modal~~Existing ~~display~~data
3	~~Select~~Modify Customer ID format	Format updated to CONS-YYMM-00001	Modified format	Format change
4	Verify existing Customer IDs unchanged	Original IDs remain: CUST-202406-0001, 0002, 0003	N/A	Data preservation
5	Create new Customer entity	New ID follows new format: CONS-2406-00001	New entity	New format applied

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Existing entity IDs remain unchanged after format modification
Secondary_Verifications: New entities use updated format
Negative_Verification: No existing ID modifications occur

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 4: "Require Active ID Format for Each Entity Type"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_004

Title: Verify system requires at least one active ID format for each entity type

Test Case Metadata

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Validation, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Validation-Engine, Business-Rules, Onboarding Services, Database, EdgeCase

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Onboarding
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 100% of active format validation
Integration_Points: Validation engine, format status management
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering/QA
Report_Categories: Business-Rules, Data-Validation, System-Reliability
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: ONB02US07 Acceptance Criteria 4
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_009

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Format validation service, business rules engine
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds validation response
Data_Requirements: Entity format configurations

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: ID format management interface accessible
User_Roles_Permissions: Utility Administrator access
Test_Data: Customer ~~selected~~entity inwith ~~dropdown~~single active format
Prior_Test_Cases: Format creation functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create Customer ID format	Format created and active	Entity: Customer	~~Entity~~Initial ~~selection~~setup
42	~~Enter~~Attempt ~~identical~~to ~~prefix~~deactivate asonly ~~existing~~Customer format	~~Field~~System ~~accepts~~prevents ~~input~~	~~Prefix: CUST~~	~~Same as existing~~
5	~~Select identical utility service~~	~~Service selected~~	~~Service: Water (WA)~~	~~Same as existing~~
6	~~Configure identical date format~~	~~Date format selected~~	~~Date: YYYYMM~~	~~Same as existing~~
7	~~Set identical separator~~	~~Separator selected~~	~~Separator: -~~	~~Same as existing~~
8	~~Set identical sequence length~~	~~Sequence length configured~~	~~Sequence: 4~~	~~Same as existing~~
9	~~Click "Save Configuration"~~	~~Validation error message displays~~	~~N/A~~	~~Error handling~~
10	~~Verify error message content~~	~~Clear message about duplicate format~~	~~N/A~~	~~Message clarity~~
11	~~Verify modal remains open~~	~~Configuration modal stays accessible~~	~~N/A~~	~~UI behavior~~
12	~~Modify one component (prefix)~~	~~Field accepts new value~~	~~Prefix: CONS~~	~~Component change~~
13	~~Click "Save Configuration" again~~	~~Format saves successfully~~deactivation	N/A	Validation ~~pass~~test
143	~~Verify~~Create ~~new~~second Customer ID format ~~in table~~	~~Modified~~Second format ~~appears~~created insuccessfully	Alternative ~~list~~format	Multiple formats
4	Deactivate first Customer format	Deactivation allowed	N/A	~~Success~~Valid ~~confirmation~~deactivation
155	Attempt ~~exact~~to ~~duplicate~~deactivate ~~again~~last active format	~~Same~~System ~~validation~~prevents ~~error occurs~~deactivation	~~Previous data~~N/A	~~Consistency~~Protection ~~check~~rule

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System ~~prevents~~enforces ~~creation~~at ofleast ~~duplicate~~one IDactive ~~formats~~format ~~for same~~per entity type
Secondary_Verifications: Clear error ~~messaging,~~messaging UIfor ~~remains~~violation ~~functional, validation consistency~~attempts
Negative_Verification: NoCannot ~~duplicate~~leave ~~formats~~entity ~~saved,~~type nowithout ~~system~~active ~~errors~~format

Test orResults crashes(Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 4:5: "System AdminMaintain Audit LogHistory Accessfor andID Filtering"Format Changes"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_004ONB02US07_TC_005

Title: Verify ~~System~~system ~~Admin can access and filter~~maintains audit ~~logs~~history records for all ID format changes

Test Case Metadata

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-~~AuditLogs,~~Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-CSM/QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Audit-System, System-Admin-Role, Compliance-Tracking, auth Services, ax Services, Database, HappyPath

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 67 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 80% of audit log feature
Integration_Points: Audit logging service, user authentication
Code_Module_Mapped: Onboarding
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: CSM/QA
Report_Categories: Compliance-Dashboard, System-Governance, Change-Tracking
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: ~~System~~ONB02US07 ~~Admin~~Acceptance ~~access~~Criteria ~~to audit logs, filter functionality~~5
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: ONB02US07_TC_001, ~~ONB02US07_TC_005~~ONB02US07_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Audit logging service, role-based access control
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds log loading
Data_Requirements: System Admin credentials, existing audit records

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Existing ID format changes in system for audit data
User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin (IT Director) role
Test_Data: sysadmin@utilitytest.com / AdminPass123!, audit records from previous test cases
Prior_Test_Cases: Format changes from ~~ONB02US07_TC_001-003~~previous test cases

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	~~Login~~Create ~~with~~new ~~System~~Customer ~~Admin~~ID ~~credentials~~format	~~Successful~~Audit ~~authentication~~log entry created for format creation	~~sysadmin@utilitytest.com~~Entity: ~~/ AdminPass123!~~Customer	~~Role~~Creation ~~verification~~audit
2	~~Navigate~~Modify toCustomer ID ~~& Reference Format Settings~~format	~~Page~~Audit ~~loads~~log ~~with~~entry ~~admin~~created ~~view~~for format modification	~~N/A~~Modified data	~~Access~~Modification ~~validation~~audit
3	~~Click~~Access ~~"Audit~~audit ~~Logs"~~logs ~~tab~~as System Admin	~~Audit~~All ~~logs~~format ~~interface~~changes ~~displays~~visible in audit trail	N/A	~~Tab~~Audit ~~navigation~~access
4	Verify audit log ~~table columns~~details	~~Action,~~Complete IDchange ~~Configuration,~~information ~~Modified By, Date & Time, Details visible~~recorded	N/A	UIDetail ~~structure~~validation
5	Filter audit logs by entity type	Filtering works correctly	Filter: Customer	Filter functionality

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Complete audit trail maintained for all format changes
Secondary_Verifications: Audit logs accessible to authorized users
Negative_Verification: No missing audit entries for any changes

Test Results (Template)

Status: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Not-Tested]
Actual_Results: [Template for recording actual behavior]
Execution_Date: [When test was executed]
Executed_By: [Who performed the test]
Execution_Time: [Actual time taken]
Defects_Found: [Bug IDs if issues discovered]
Screenshots_Logs: [Evidence references]

Test Case 6: "Auto-Generate ID Format Names Based on Entity Type"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_006

Title: Verify system auto-generates ID format names based on entity type

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Auto-Generation, Naming-Convention, Onboarding Services, Database, HappyPath

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create Customer ID format	System generates "Customer ID" as format name	Entity: Customer	Auto-naming
2	Create Meter ID format	System generates "Meter ID" as format name	Entity: Meter	Auto-naming
3	Create Bill format	System generates "Bill Number" as format name	Entity: Bill	Auto-naming
4	Create Payment format	System generates "Payment Reference" as format name	Entity: Payment	Auto-naming
5	Verify ~~existing~~naming ~~log entries display~~consistency	~~Previous~~All format ~~changes~~names ~~shown~~follow entity-based pattern	N/A	~~Data~~Pattern ~~retrieval~~
6	~~Use search functionality~~	~~Enter "Customer" in search~~	~~Search: "Customer"~~	~~Search operation~~
7	~~Verify filtered results~~	~~Only Customer-related logs shown~~	~~N/A~~	~~Filter accuracy~~
8	~~Clear search filter~~	~~All logs visible again~~	~~N/A~~	~~Filter reset~~
9	~~Use "Select Action" filter~~	~~Choose "Updated" from dropdown~~	~~Filter: Updated~~	~~Action filtering~~
10	~~Verify action filter results~~	~~Only update actions shown~~	~~N/A~~	~~Filter validation~~
11	~~Apply multiple filters simultaneously~~	~~Search + Action filter together~~	~~Search: "Meter", Action: Updated~~	~~Combined filtering~~
12	~~Click on a log entry~~	~~Detailed view opens/expands~~	~~N/A~~	~~Detail access~~
13	~~Verify detailed information~~	~~Configuration details, user, timestamp visible~~	~~N/A~~	~~Detail completeness~~
14	~~Test "Show Advanced Filters"~~	~~Additional filter options appear~~	~~N/A~~	~~Advanced features~~
15	~~Export audit data (if available)~~	~~Export functionality works~~	~~N/A~~	~~Data export~~verification

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System ~~Admin~~automatically ~~can~~generates ~~access~~appropriate ~~audit~~format ~~logs and apply filters successfully~~names
Secondary_Verifications: ~~Complete~~Naming ~~audit~~follows ~~trail~~consistent ~~visible,~~pattern
Negative_Verification: ~~filter~~No ~~combinations~~manual ~~work,~~name ~~detailed~~entry ~~information~~required

Test accessibleCase 7: "Auto-Increment Sequence Numbers for New IDs"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_007

Title: Verify system automatically increments current sequence numbers when generating new IDs

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Sequence-Management, Auto-Increment, Onboarding Services, cx Services, API, Database, HappyPath

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create Customer ID format with start number 1	Format created with sequence starting at 1	Start: 1	Initial setup
2	Generate first Customer ID	ID generated: CUST-202406-0001	N/A	First ID
3	Generate second Customer ID	ID generated: CUST-202406-0002	N/A	Auto-increment
4	Generate third Customer ID	ID generated: CUST-202406-0003	N/A	Continued increment
5	Verify current sequence number	System shows current number as 4	N/A	Counter verification

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System automatically increments sequence numbers
Secondary_Verifications: Current number tracking accurate
Negative_Verification: No sequence number skipping or duplication

Test Case 8: "Allow Configurable Starting Numbers with Default Value"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_008

Title: Verify system allows configurable starting numbers with default value of 1

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Configuration-Management, Default-Values, Onboarding Services, Database, HappyPath

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create new ID format without specifying start number	Default starting number set to 1	N/A	Default verification
2	Create ID format with custom start number	Starting number set to specified value	Start: 100	Custom configuration
3	Generate ID with default start	First ID uses sequence 0001	N/A	Default usage
4	Generate ID with custom start	First ID uses sequence 0100	N/A	Custom usage
5	Verify configuration persistence	Start numbers persist after system restart	N/A	Persistence test

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System allows configurable starting numbers with default of 1
Secondary_Verifications: Configuration persists correctly
Negative_Verification: No invalid starting number acceptance

Test Case 9: "Prevent Duplicate ID Formats for Same Entity Type"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_009

Title: Verify system prevents duplicate ID formats for the same entity type

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Validation, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product/QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Validation-Engine, Duplicate-Prevention, Data-Integrity, Onboarding Services, Database, API, EdgeCase

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create Customer ID format	Format created successfully	Entity: Customer, Prefix: CUST	Initial format
2	Attempt to create identical Customer format	System prevents creation with error message	Same configuration	Duplicate prevention
3	Modify one component and save	Format creation allowed	Prefix: CONS	Valid variation
4	Attempt exact duplicate again	System prevents with same error	Original config	Consistency check
5	Verify error message clarity	Clear duplicate format message displayed	N/A	Error messaging

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: System prevents duplicate ID formats for same entity
Secondary_Verifications: Clear error messaging, UI remains functional
Negative_Verification: No duplicate formats saved

Test Case 10: "Role-Based Access Control for ID Format Management"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_010

Title: Verify only Utility Administrator or System Admin roles can create or modify ID formats

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Security
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Security, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Role-Based-Access, Security-Validation, auth Services, Onboarding Services, Security, API

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login as Utility Administrator	Access granted to ID format creation	admin@utilitytest.com	Admin access
2	Create new ID format	Format creation successful	Entity: Customer	Admin capability
3	Login as System Admin	Access granted to ID format management	sysadmin@utilitytest.com	System admin access
4	Modify existing ID format	Modification successful	Updated config	System admin capability
5	Login as regular user	Access denied to ID format management	user@utilitytest.com	Restricted access

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Only authorized roles can manage ID formats
Secondary_Verifications: Appropriate error messages for unauthorized access
Negative_Verification: No unauthorized ~~access~~format tomanagement ~~restricted data, no missing audit entries~~possible

Test Case 5:11: "Generate Format Preview with Actual Data"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_011

Title: Verify system generates preview showing format appearance with actual data

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Real-time-Preview, Dynamic-Updates, UI-Validation, Onboarding Services, Database, HappyPath

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Configure Customer ID format	Preview displays: WA-CUST-202406-0001	Complete configuration	Live preview
2	Change prefix to CONS	Preview updates to: WA-CONS-202406-0001	Prefix: CONS	Dynamic update
3	Change date format to YYMM	Preview updates to: WA-CONS-2406-0001	Date: YYMM	Format change
4	Change utility service to EL	Preview updates to: EL-CONS-2406-0001	Service: Electric	Service change
5	Verify preview accuracy	Preview matches expected format pattern	N/A	Accuracy validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Preview accurately shows format with actual data
Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates as configuration changes
Negative_Verification: No preview display errors

Test Case 12: "Validate Master and Transaction ID Entity Classification"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_012

Title: Verify system correctly classifies entities as Master ID or Transaction ID types

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Classification-Logic, Entity-Management, Onboarding Services, cx Services, mx Services, bx Services, Database

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Create Consumer format in Master ID	Consumer classified as Master ID	Entity: Consumer	Master classification
2	Create Meter format in Master ID	Meter classified as Master ID	Entity: Meter	Master classification
3	Create Payment format in Transaction ID	Payment classified as Transaction ID	Entity: Payment	Transaction classification
4	Create Service Order format in Transaction ID	Service Order classified as Transaction ID	Entity: Service Order	Transaction classification
5	Verify classification enforcement	System enforces proper entity-type mapping	N/A	Classification rules

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Entities correctly classified by Master/Transaction type
Secondary_Verifications: Classification rules enforced consistently
Negative_Verification: No incorrect entity-type assignments

Test Case 13: "Validate Prefilled Format Standards"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_013

Title: Verify system provides correct prefilled formats for each entity type

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Functional
Test Level: System
Priority: P3-Medium
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-Onboarding, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Prefilled-Data, Default-Formats, Onboarding Services, cx Services, mx Services, bx Services, Database, HappyPath

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Consumer entity format	Prefilled format shows: Con-0001	Entity: Consumer	Consumer prefill
2	Access Meter entity format	Prefilled format shows: Mtr-0001	Entity: Meter	Meter prefill
3	Access Request entity format	Prefilled format shows: Req-0001	Entity: Request	Request prefill
4	Access Payment entity format	Prefilled format shows: mmyy-0001	Entity: Payment	Payment prefill
5	Access Service Order entity format	Prefilled format shows: So-0001	Entity: Service Order	Service Order prefill
6	Access Billing entity format	Prefilled format shows: Inv-0001	Entity: Billing	Billing prefill

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All entity types have correct prefilled formats
Secondary_Verifications: Prefilled formats follow defined standards
Negative_Verification: No incorrect or missing prefilled formats

Test Case 14: "Cross-Browser Compatibility Validation"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_005ONB02US07_TC_014

Title: Verify ~~cross-browser compatibility for~~ ID format configuration interface works across all supported browsers

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Compatibility
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-~~IDFormat,~~Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Multi, Report-QA/Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Cross-Platform, Browser-Compatibility, UI-Consistency, Onboarding Services, Cross module

Business Context

~~Customer_Segment~~~~: All~~
~~Revenue_Impact~~~~: Medium~~
~~Business_Priority~~~~: Should-Have~~
~~Customer_Journey~~~~: Daily-Usage~~
~~Compliance_Required~~~~: No~~
~~SLA_Related~~~~: No~~

Quality Metrics

~~Risk_Level~~~~: Medium~~
~~Complexity_Level~~~~: High~~
~~Expected_Execution_Time~~~~: 20 minutes~~
~~Reproducibility_Score~~~~: High~~
~~Data_Sensitivity~~~~: Low~~
~~Failure_Impact~~~~: Medium~~

Coverage Tracking

~~Feature_Coverage~~~~: 100% of browser compatibility~~
~~Integration_Points~~~~: Multiple browser engines, UI components~~
~~Code_Module_Mapped~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Requirement_Coverage~~~~: Complete~~
~~Cross_Platform_Support~~~~: Web (Multi-browser)~~

Stakeholder Reporting

~~Primary_Stakeholder~~~~: QA/Engineering~~
~~Report_Categories~~~~: Compatibility-Matrix, Platform-Coverage~~
~~Trend_Tracking~~~~: Yes~~
~~Executive_Visibility~~~~: No~~
~~Customer_Impact_Level~~~~: Medium~~

Requirements Traceability

~~Related_Requirements~~~~: Cross-platform support requirements~~
~~Related_Bugs~~~~: N/A~~
~~Related_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001-004~~

Test Environment

~~Environment~~~~: Staging~~
~~Browser/Version~~~~: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest~~
~~Device/OS~~~~: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+~~
~~Screen_Resolution~~~~: Desktop-1920x1080, 1366x768~~
~~Dependencies~~~~: All supported browsers installed~~
~~Performance_Baseline~~~~: Consistent performance across browsers~~
~~Data_Requirements~~~~: Same test data across all browsers~~

Prerequisites

~~Setup_Requirements~~~~: Multiple browsers available for testing~~
~~User_Roles_Permissions~~~~: Utility Administrator access~~
~~Test_Data~~~~: Standard format configuration data~~
~~Prior_Test_Cases~~~~: Functional validation completed~~

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Test Chrome browser functionality	All features work correctly	Standard test data	Baseline browser
2	Test Firefox browser functionality	Identical behavior to Chrome	Same test data	Mozilla engine
3	Test Safari browser functionality	Consistent UI and functionality	Same test data	WebKit engine
4	Test Edge browser functionality	Same results across all features	Same test data	Chromium engine
5	Verify UI ~~element positioning~~consistency	~~Consistent~~Layout ~~layout~~and ~~across~~controls ~~browsers~~work identically	N/A	~~Visual~~Cross-browser ~~consistency~~
6	~~Test form field behavior~~	~~Input handling identical~~	~~Various inputs~~	~~Form compatibility~~
7	~~Verify dropdown functionality~~	~~All dropdowns work correctly~~	~~N/A~~	~~Control consistency~~
8	~~Test modal dialog behavior~~	~~Modals display and function properly~~	~~N/A~~	~~Dialog compatibility~~
9	~~Verify live preview rendering~~	~~Preview accuracy across browsers~~	~~Format configurations~~	~~Rendering consistency~~
10	~~Test responsive behavior~~	~~Interface adapts to different screen sizes~~	~~N/A~~	~~Responsive design~~
11	~~Verify JavaScript functionality~~	~~All interactive features work~~	~~N/A~~	~~Script compatibility~~
12	~~Test CSS rendering~~	~~Styling consistent across browsers~~	~~N/A~~	~~Style compatibility~~
13	~~Verify error message display~~	~~Error messages appear correctly~~	~~Invalid inputs~~	~~Error handling~~
14	~~Test navigation behavior~~	~~Menu and tab navigation works~~	~~N/A~~	~~Navigation consistency~~
15	~~Performance comparison~~	~~Similar load times across browsers~~	~~N/A~~	~~Performance parity~~UI

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All ~~core~~ functionality works identically across supported browsers
Secondary_Verifications: UI consistency, performance ~~parity, error handling uniformity~~parity
Negative_Verification: No browser-specific ~~issues, no missing functionality in any browser~~issues

Test Case 6: "API Endpoint Authentication and Format Creation"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_006

~~Title~~~~: Verify API endpoint for ID format creation with authentication validation~~

~~Created By~~~~: Arpita~~
~~Created Date~~~~: June 08, 2025~~
~~Version~~~~: 1.0~~

Classification

~~Module/Feature~~~~: ID & Reference Format Settings~~
~~Test Type~~~~: API~~
~~Test Level~~~~: Integration~~
~~Priority~~~~: P1-Critical~~
~~Execution Phase~~~~: Smoke~~
~~Automation Status~~~~: Automated~~

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

~~Tags~~: MOD-IDFormat, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-API, Platform-Backend, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-API-Endpoint, Authentication-Security, Data-Validation, auth Services, Onboarding Services, API, Database, HappyPath

Business Context

~~Customer_Segment~~~~: All~~
~~Revenue_Impact~~~~: High~~
~~Business_Priority~~~~: Must-Have~~
~~Customer_Journey~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Compliance_Required~~~~: No~~
~~SLA_Related~~~~: Yes~~

Quality Metrics

~~Risk_Level~~~~: High~~
~~Complexity_Level~~~~: High~~
~~Expected_Execution_Time~~~~: 8 minutes~~
~~Reproducibility_Score~~~~: High~~
~~Data_Sensitivity~~~~: High~~
~~Failure_Impact~~~~: Critical~~

Coverage Tracking

~~Feature_Coverage~~~~: 100% of API creation endpoint~~
~~Integration_Points~~~~: Authentication service, database layer, validation engine~~
~~Code_Module_Mapped~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Requirement_Coverage~~~~: Complete~~
~~Cross_Platform_Support~~~~: API (Platform-agnostic)~~

Stakeholder Reporting

~~Primary_Stakeholder~~~~: Engineering~~
~~Report_Categories~~~~: API-Quality, Integration-Health, Security-Validation~~
~~Trend_Tracking~~~~: Yes~~
~~Executive_Visibility~~~~: Yes~~
~~Customer_Impact_Level~~~~: High~~

Requirements Traceability

~~Related_Requirements~~~~: API security, format creation functionality~~
~~Related_Bugs~~~~: N/A~~
~~Related_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_007~~

Test Environment

~~Environment~~~~: Staging~~
~~Browser/Version~~~~: N/A (API Testing)~~
~~Device/OS~~~~: API Client~~
~~Screen_Resolution~~~~: N/A~~
~~Dependencies~~~~: API endpoint, authentication service, database~~
~~Performance_Baseline~~~~: < 500ms response time~~
~~Data_Requirements~~~~: Valid API credentials, test payload data~~

Prerequisites

~~Setup_Requirements~~~~: API endpoint accessible, authentication service running~~
~~User_Roles_Permissions~~~~: API access with Utility Administrator privileges~~
~~Test_Data~~~~: API key, valid format creation payload~~
~~Prior_Test_Cases~~~~: Authentication service validation~~

Test Procedure

~~Step #~~	~~Action~~	~~Expected Result~~	~~Test Data~~	~~Comments~~
1	~~Send POST request without auth token~~	~~401 Unauthorized response~~	~~No auth header~~	~~Security validation~~
2	~~Send POST with invalid auth token~~	~~401 Unauthorized response~~	~~Invalid token~~	~~Token validation~~
3	~~Send POST with expired auth token~~	~~401 Unauthorized response~~	~~Expired token~~	~~Token expiry check~~
4	~~Send POST with valid auth token and complete payload~~	~~201 Created response~~	~~Valid payload below~~	~~Success scenario~~
5	~~Verify response contains created format ID~~	~~Response includes generated format ID~~	~~N/A~~	~~Response validation~~
6	~~Send POST with missing required fields~~	~~400 Bad Request response~~	~~Payload missing entity~~	~~Field validation~~
7	~~Send POST with invalid entity type~~	~~400 Bad Request response~~	~~Entity: "InvalidType"~~	~~Data validation~~
8	~~Send POST with invalid sequence length~~	~~400 Bad Request response~~	~~Sequence: -1~~	~~Boundary validation~~
9	~~Send POST with excessively long prefix~~	~~400 Bad Request response~~	~~Prefix: "VERYLONGPREFIX123"~~	~~Length validation~~
10	~~Send POST with invalid characters in prefix~~	~~400 Bad Request response~~	~~Prefix: "CU$T@"~~	~~Character validation~~
11	~~Send POST duplicate format payload~~	~~409 Conflict response~~	~~Duplicate config~~	~~Duplicate prevention~~
12	~~Verify error response format~~	~~JSON with error details~~	~~N/A~~	~~Error structure~~
13	~~Check response time for valid request~~	~~Response time < 500ms~~	~~Valid payload~~	~~Performance check~~
14	~~Send POST with SQL injection attempt~~	~~400 Bad Request, no injection~~	~~Malicious payload~~	~~Security test~~
15	~~Verify database record created~~	~~Format exists in database~~	~~N/A~~	~~Data persistence~~

~~Valid API Payload:~~

{
  "entity": "Customer",
  "idType": "Master",
  "prefix": "CUST",
  "sequenceLength": 4,
  "utilityService": "WA",
  "dateElement": "YYYYMM",
  "startingNumber": 1,
  "separator": "-",
  "description": "Customer Master ID Format"
}

Verification Points

~~Primary_Verification~~~~: API correctly creates ID format with proper authentication~~
~~Secondary_Verifications~~~~: Proper error responses, data validation, performance within limits~~
~~Negative_Verification~~~~: No unauthorized access, no malformed data accepted, no SQL injection possible~~

Test Case 7:15: "Concurrent User Performance and System Stability"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_007ONB02US07_TC_015

Title: Verify system performance with concurrent users accessing ID format configuration

Created By: Arpita
Created Date: June 08, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: ID & Reference Format Settings
Test Type: Performance
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Performance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: MOD-~~IDFormat,~~Onboarding, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Concurrent-Users, Load-Testing, System-Stability, auth Services, Onboarding Services, Database, Cross ~~module~~

Business Context

~~Customer_Segment~~~~: Enterprise~~
~~Revenue_Impact~~~~: Medium~~
~~Business_Priority~~~~: Should-Have~~
~~Customer_Journey~~~~: Daily-Usage~~
~~Compliance_Required~~~~: No~~
~~SLA_Related~~~~: Yes~~

Quality Metrics

~~Risk_Level~~~~: Medium~~
~~Complexity_Level~~~~: High~~
~~Expected_Execution_Time~~~~: 15 minutes~~
~~Reproducibility_Score~~~~: Medium~~
~~Data_Sensitivity~~~~: Low~~
~~Failure_Impact~~~~: Medium~~

Coverage Tracking

~~Feature_Coverage~~~~: 100% of concurrent access scenarios~~
~~Integration_Points~~~~: Database connection pool, session management, caching layer~~
~~Code_Module_Mapped~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Requirement_Coverage~~~~: Complete~~
~~Cross_Platform_Support~~~~: Web~~

Stakeholder Reporting

~~Primary_Stakeholder~~~~: Engineering/QA~~
~~Report_Categories~~~~: Performance-Dashboard, System-Reliability, Scalability-Metrics~~
~~Trend_Tracking~~~~: Yes~~
~~Executive_Visibility~~~~: Yes~~
~~Customer_Impact_Level~~~~: High~~

Requirements Traceability

~~Related_Requirements~~~~: Concurrent user handling, system performance~~
~~Related_Bugs~~~~: N/A~~
~~Related_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_008~~

Test Environment

~~Environment~~:module, Performance ~~Testing Environment~~
~~Browser/Version~~~~: Chrome 115+ (multiple instances)~~
~~Device/OS~~~~: Load testing infrastructure~~
~~Screen_Resolution~~~~: N/A~~
~~Dependencies~~~~: Load testing tools, performance monitoring~~
~~Performance_Baseline~~~~: < 3 seconds page load, < 500ms API response~~
~~Data_Requirements~~~~: Multiple test user accounts~~

Prerequisites

~~Setup_Requirements~~~~: Load testing environment configured, monitoring tools active~~
~~User_Roles_Permissions~~~~: Multiple Utility Administrator and System Admin accounts~~
~~Test_Data~~~~: 10 concurrent user credentials, varied test scenarios~~
~~Prior_Test_Cases~~~~: Functional validation completed~~

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Establish baseline with single user	Record baseline performance metrics	1 user	Performance baseline
2	Simulate 2 concurrent Utility Admins	System handles both users without degradation	2 users	Initial concurrency
3	Add 1 System Admin concurrent access	3 users access system simultaneously	3 users	Mixed roles
4	Increase to 5 concurrent ~~Utility Admins~~	~~Page load time remains < 5 seconds~~	5 users	~~Moderate load~~
5	~~Add 2 more System Admins (7 total)~~	System maintains responsiveness	75 users	Higher load
6	~~Test simultaneous format creation~~	~~All users can create formats without conflict~~	~~7 users creating~~	~~Concurrent operations~~
7	~~Test simultaneous audit log access~~	~~All System Admins access logs successfully~~	~~System Admins~~	~~Concurrent reads~~
85	Monitor ~~database~~system ~~connection usage~~performance	~~Connections~~Performance remains within acceptable limits	~~N/A~~	~~Resource monitoring~~
9	~~Check memory and CPU utilization~~	~~System resources within normal range~~	~~N/A~~	~~System health~~
10	~~Test session management~~	~~No session conflicts or crossover~~	~~All users~~	~~Session isolation~~
11	~~Simulate network latency~~	~~Performance degrades gracefully~~	~~Simulated delays~~	~~Network resilience~~
12	~~Test rapid successive operations~~	~~System handles burst operations~~	~~Rapid clicks/operations~~	~~Burst handling~~
13	~~Monitor error rates~~	~~Error rate remains < 1%~~	~~N/A~~	~~Error monitoring~~
14	~~Test graceful user logout~~	~~Users can log out cleanly under load~~	~~N/A~~	~~Session cleanup~~
15	~~Verify data consistency~~	~~All format changes properly saved~~	~~N/A~~	~~Data integrity~~

Verification Points

~~Primary_Verification~~~~: System maintains performance with up to 7 concurrent users (2 roles)~~
~~Secondary_Verifications~~~~: No data corruption, proper session management, resource utilization within limits~~
~~Negative_Verification~~~~: No system crashes, no session conflicts, no data loss~~

Test Case 8: "Enhanced Contextual Help System Validation"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_008

~~Title~~~~: Verify enhanced contextual help system provides accurate guidance~~

~~Created By~~~~: Arpita~~
~~Created Date~~~~: June 08, 2025~~
~~Version~~~~: 1.0~~

Classification

~~Module/Feature~~~~: ID & Reference Format Settings~~
~~Test Type~~~~: Functional~~
~~Test Level~~~~: System~~
~~Priority~~~~: P3-Medium~~
~~Execution Phase~~~~: Regression~~
~~Automation Status~~~~: Manual~~

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

~~Tags~~: MOD-HelpSystem, P3-Medium, Phase-Regression, Type-Usability, Platform-Web, Report-Product/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium, Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-Help-Engine, User-Experience, Enhanced-Features, Onboarding Services, HappyPath

Business Context

~~Customer_Segment~~~~: All~~
~~Revenue_Impact~~~~: Low~~
~~Business_Priority~~~~: Could-Have~~
~~Customer_Journey~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Compliance_Required~~~~: No~~
~~SLA_Related~~~~: No~~

Quality Metrics

~~Risk_Level~~~~: Low~~
~~Complexity_Level~~~~: Medium~~
~~Expected_Execution_Time~~~~: 10 minutes~~
~~Reproducibility_Score~~~~: High~~
~~Data_Sensitivity~~~~: None~~
~~Failure_Impact~~~~: Low~~

Coverage Tracking

~~Feature_Coverage~~~~: 100% of enhanced help features~~
~~Integration_Points~~~~: Help content system, UI tooltips, contextual guidance~~
~~Code_Module_Mapped~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Requirement_Coverage~~~~: Complete~~
~~Cross_Platform_Support~~~~: Web~~

Stakeholder Reporting

~~Primary_Stakeholder~~~~: Product/QA~~
~~Report_Categories~~~~: User-Experience, Feature-Adoption, Support-Reduction~~
~~Trend_Tracking~~~~: Yes~~
~~Executive_Visibility~~~~: No~~
~~Customer_Impact_Level~~~~: Low~~

Requirements Traceability

~~Related_Requirements~~~~: Enhanced Solution - Contextual Help System~~
~~Related_Bugs~~~~: N/A~~
~~Related_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_009~~

Test Environment

~~Environment~~~~: Staging~~
~~Browser/Version~~~~: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+~~
~~Device/OS~~~~: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+~~
~~Screen_Resolution~~~~: Desktop-1920x1080~~
~~Dependencies~~~~: Help content service, tooltip engine~~
~~Performance_Baseline~~~~: < 1 second help content load~~
~~Data_Requirements~~~~: Complete help content database~~

Prerequisites

~~Setup_Requirements~~~~: Enhanced help system enabled, content populated~~
~~User_Roles_Permissions~~~~: Utility Administrator access~~
~~Test_Data~~~~: Standard user credentials~~
~~Prior_Test_Cases~~~~: Basic navigation functionality verified~~

Test Procedure

~~Step #~~	~~Action~~	~~Expected Result~~	~~Test Data~~	~~Comments~~
1	~~Hover over Entity field label~~	~~Tooltip appears with entity explanation~~	~~N/A~~	~~Hover functionality~~
2	~~Verify tooltip content accuracy~~	~~Clear explanation of entity types~~	~~N/A~~	~~Content validation~~
3	~~Hover over Prefix field~~	~~Contextual help about prefix usage~~	~~N/A~~	~~Field-specific help~~
4	~~Check prefix examples in tooltip~~	~~Real-world examples shown~~	~~N/A~~	~~Example quality~~
5	~~Hover over Sequence Length field~~	~~Length guidance and implications~~	~~N/A~~	~~Technical guidance~~
6	~~Verify sequence length calculations~~	~~Math examples for volume planning~~	~~N/A~~	~~Calculation help~~
7	~~Hover over Date Element field~~	~~Date format options explained~~	~~N/A~~	~~Format guidance~~
8	~~Check date format examples~~	~~Multiple date format examples~~	~~N/A~~	~~Format examples~~
9	~~Access in-context help icon~~	~~Detailed help panel opens~~	~~N/A~~	~~Help panel access~~
10	~~Verify help panel content~~	~~Comprehensive format building guide~~	~~N/A~~	~~Content completeness~~
11	~~Test help search functionality~~	~~Search finds relevant help topics~~	~~Search: "prefix"~~	~~Search accuracy~~
12	~~Verify best practice recommendations~~	~~System suggests optimal configurations~~	~~N/A~~	~~Recommendation engine~~
13	~~Check format impact guidance~~	~~Clear explanations of setting effects~~	~~N/A~~	~~Impact clarity~~
14	~~Test help panel navigation~~	~~Easy navigation between help topics~~	~~N/A~~	~~Navigation usability~~
15	~~Verify help content accessibility~~	~~Help accessible via keyboard navigation~~	~~N/A~~	~~Accessibility~~

Verification Points

~~Primary_Verification~~~~: Enhanced help system provides accurate, contextual guidance~~
~~Secondary_Verifications~~~~: Help content is complete, accessible, and searchable~~
~~Negative_Verification~~~~: No missing help content, no broken help links, no accessibility issues~~

Test Case 9: "Format Testing Engine with Edge Case Validation"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_009

~~Title~~~~: Verify format testing feature validates ID generation with edge cases~~

~~Created By~~~~: Arpita~~
~~Created Date~~~~: June 08, 2025~~
~~Version~~~~: 1.0~~

Classification

~~Module/Feature~~~~: ID & Reference Format Settings~~
~~Test Type~~~~: Functional~~
~~Test Level~~~~: System~~
~~Priority~~~~: P2-High~~
~~Execution Phase~~~~: Regression~~
~~Automation Status~~~~: Planned-for-Automation~~

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

~~Tags~~: MOD-FormatTesting, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Validation, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering/QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Testing-Engine, Edge-Case-Validation, Enhanced-Features, Onboarding Services, cx Services, mx Services, bx Services, Database, API

Business Context

~~Customer_Segment~~~~: All~~
~~Revenue_Impact~~~~: Medium~~
~~Business_Priority~~~~: Should-Have~~
~~Customer_Journey~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Compliance_Required~~~~: No~~
~~SLA_Related~~~~: No~~

Quality Metrics

~~Risk_Level~~~~: Medium~~
~~Complexity_Level~~~~: High~~
~~Expected_Execution_Time~~~~: 12 minutes~~
~~Reproducibility_Score~~~~: High~~
~~Data_Sensitivity~~~~: Low~~
~~Failure_Impact~~~~: Medium~~

Coverage Tracking

~~Feature_Coverage~~~~: 100% of format testing feature~~
~~Integration_Points~~~~: ID generation engine, validation rules, edge case handlers~~
~~Code_Module_Mapped~~~~: Onboarding~~
~~Requirement_Coverage~~~~: Complete~~
~~Cross_Platform_Support~~~~: Web~~

Stakeholder Reporting

~~Primary_Stakeholder~~~~: Engineering/QA~~
~~Report_Categories~~~~: Feature-Quality, Edge-Case-Coverage, System-Reliability~~
~~Trend_Tracking~~~~: Yes~~
~~Executive_Visibility~~~~: No~~
~~Customer_Impact_Level~~~~: Medium~~

Requirements Traceability

~~Related_Requirements~~~~: Enhanced Solution - Format Testing capability~~
~~Related_Bugs~~~~: N/A~~
~~Related_Test_Cases~~~~: ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_003~~

Test Environment

~~Environment~~~~: Staging~~
~~Browser/Version~~~~: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+~~
~~Device/OS~~~~: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+~~
~~Screen_Resolution~~~~: Desktop-1920x1080~~
~~Dependencies~~~~: Format testing service, ID generation engine~~
~~Performance_Baseline~~~~: < 2 seconds test execution~~
~~Data_Requirements~~~~: Various edge case test scenarios~~

Prerequisites

~~Setup_Requirements~~~~: Format testing feature enabled~~
~~User_Roles_Permissions~~~~: Utility Administrator access~~
~~Test_Data~~~~: ID format configuration ready for testing~~
~~Prior_Test_Cases~~~~: Format creation functionality verified~~

Test Procedure

~~Step #~~	~~Action~~	~~Expected Result~~	~~Test Data~~	~~Comments~~
1	~~Access format testing interface~~	~~Testing panel opens in configuration modal~~	~~N/A~~	~~Feature access~~
2	~~Test with minimum sequence number~~	~~ID generated correctly with 0001~~	~~Starting: 1~~	~~Minimum boundary~~
3	~~Test with maximum sequence number~~	~~ID generated with max value (9999 for 4 digits)~~	~~Starting: 9999~~	~~Maximum boundary~~
4	~~Test sequence rollover scenario~~	~~System handles sequence exceeding max digits~~	~~Starting: 10000~~	~~Rollover handling~~
5	~~Test with leap year date~~	~~Date element handles Feb 29 correctly~~	~~Date: 2024-02-29~~	~~Leap year edge case~~
6	~~Test with end-of-year date~~	~~Date transitions properly across years~~	~~Date: 2024-12-31~~	~~Year transition~~
7	~~Test with empty prefix~~	~~ID generates without prefix component~~	~~Prefix: [empty]~~	~~Component omission~~
8	~~Test with special characters in allowed range~~	~~System handles permitted special chars~~	~~Prefix: "TEST-1"~~	~~Character validation~~
9	~~Test with maximum field lengths~~	~~All fields at maximum allowed length~~	~~Max length data~~	~~Length boundaries~~
10	~~Test multiple rapid generations~~	~~System generates unique sequential IDs~~	~~Rapid generation~~	~~Uniqueness test~~
11	~~Test with different utility services~~	~~Format adapts to different service codes~~	~~Service: EL, GA, SW~~	~~Service variation~~
12	~~Test concurrent ID generation simulation~~	~~Multiple simultaneous requests handled~~	~~Concurrent simulation~~	~~Concurrency test~~
13	~~Verify test results display~~	~~Clear indication of test success/failure~~	~~N/A~~	~~Result reporting~~
14	~~Test format with all optional fields empty~~	~~System generates minimal valid ID~~	~~All optional empty~~	~~Minimal configuration~~
15	~~Validate test performance~~	~~Test execution completes within time limit~~	N/A	Performance validation

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: ~~Format~~System ~~testing~~maintains ~~accurately~~performance ~~validates~~with IDconcurrent ~~generation under edge conditions~~users
Secondary_Verifications: ~~Proper~~No ~~handling~~data ofcorruption, ~~boundary~~proper ~~conditions,~~session ~~clear test result reporting~~management
Negative_Verification: No ~~invalid IDs generated, no~~ system ~~errors~~crashes ~~during~~or ~~testing~~data conflicts

Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite

Criteria: P1 priority, basic functionality validation
Test Cases: ONB02US07_TC_001, ~~ONB02US07_TC_003,~~ONB02US07_TC_002, ~~ONB02US07_TC_006~~ONB02US07_TC_007, ONB02US07_TC_009, ONB02US07_TC_010
Execution: Every build deployment
Duration: ~1520 minutes

Regression Test Suite

Criteria: P1-P2 priority, automated tests
Test Cases: ~~ONB02US07_TC_001,~~ONB02US07_TC_001 ~~ONB02US07_TC_002,~~through ~~ONB02US07_TC_003,~~ONB02US07_TC_012, ~~ONB02US07_TC_004,~~ONB02US07_TC_014, ~~ONB02US07_TC_005, ONB02US07_TC_006, ONB02US07_TC_007, ONB02US07_TC_009~~ONB02US07_TC_015
Execution: Before each release
Duration: ~6075 minutes

Full Test Suite

Criteria: All test cases including edge cases
Test Cases: ONB02US07_TC_001 through ~~ONB02US07_TC_010~~ONB02US07_TC_015
Execution: Weekly or major release cycles
Duration: ~90 minutes

API Test Collection (Critical Level ≥7)

High Priority API Endpoints

1. POST /api/v1/id-formats - Create ID Format

Importance Level: 9
Authentication: Required (Bearer token)
Rate Limiting: 100 requests/hour per user
Test Coverage: ~~ONB02US07_TC_006~~ONB02US07_TC_001, ONB02US07_TC_009

2. PUT /api/v1/id-formats/{id} - Update ID Format

Importance Level: 8
Authentication: Required (Bearer token)
Validation: Duplicate prevention, business rules
Test Coverage: ~~Update scenarios in regression suite~~ONB02US07_TC_003

3. GET /api/v1/id-formats/validate - Validate Format

Importance Level: 8
Authentication: Required (Bearer token)
Purpose: Real-time validation during configuration
Test Coverage: ~~Validation~~ONB02US07_TC_009, ~~testing scenarios~~ONB02US07_TC_011

4. GET /api/v1/audit-logs/id-formats - Retrieve Audit Logs

Importance Level: 7
Authentication: Required (System Admin role)
Filtering: Date range, user, action type
Test Coverage: ~~ONB02US07_TC_004~~ONB02US07_TC_005

Performance Benchmarks

Expected Performance Criteria

Page Load Performance

Dashboard Load: < 3 seconds
Configuration Modal: < 2 seconds
Audit Logs Page: < 5 seconds
Large Format List: < 4 seconds

API Response Times

Format Creation: < 500ms
Format Validation: < 200ms
Format Retrieval: < 300ms
Audit Log Query: < 1 second

Concurrent User Performance

2-3 Users: No performance degradation
4-5 Users: < 10% performance impact
6-7 Users: < 20% performance impact
8+ Users: Graceful degradation with user notification

Integration Test Map

Internal System Integrations

1. Authentication Service Integration

Purpose: Role-based access control
Test Coverage: All test cases verify proper authentication
Critical Scenarios: Token validation, role verification, session management

2. Database Layer Integration

Purpose: Data persistence and retrieval
Test Coverage: Format creation, modification, audit logging
Critical Scenarios: ACID compliance, concurrent access, data integrity

3. Validation Engine Integration

Purpose: Business rule enforcement
Test Coverage: Duplicate prevention, format validation, constraint checking
Critical Scenarios: Real-time validation, edge case handling

External System Dependencies

1. Utility Service Catalog

Purpose: Available utility service types
Test Coverage: Service selection validation
Fallback: Default service options available

2. Entity Management System

Purpose: Available entity types for ID format assignment
Test Coverage: Entity dropdown population
Fallback: Core entity types (Customer, Meter, Bill, Payment) always available

Dependency Map

Test Execution Dependencies

Sequential Dependencies

Authentication → All subsequent tests
Format Creation → Format Modification tests
Format Changes → Audit Log tests
Basic Functionality → Performance tests

Parallel Execution Groups

Group A: Format creation, validation testing
Group B: Audit log access, filtering tests
Group C: UI compatibility, responsive design tests
Group D: API testing, performance testing

Failure Handling

Authentication Failure: Skip all dependent tests
Database Connectivity: Mark infrastructure tests as blocked
Service Unavailability: Use fallback test scenarios
Performance Environment Issues: Execute functional tests only

Edge Case Coverage (80% Detail Level)

Boundary Value Testing

Sequence Length Boundaries: 1 digit (minimum) to 10 digits (maximum)
Prefix Length: Empty, 1 character, 10 characters (maximum)
Date Format Variations: YYYY, YYMM, YYYYMM, YYYYMMDD
Starting Number Ranges: 0, 1, 999999999 (max for sequence length)

Special Character Handling

Allowed Separators: Hyphen, underscore, period, none
Prefix Special Characters: Alphanumeric only validation
Unicode Character Support: Extended character set testing
Case Sensitivity: Upper/lower case handling

Date and Time Edge Cases

Leap Year Handling: February 29th date elements
Year Transitions: December 31st to January 1st
Month Boundaries: End-of-month date handling
Timezone Considerations: UTC vs local time formatting

Volume and Scale Testing

Large Entity Volumes: 1 million+ entities per format
Many Format Configurations: 100+ different formats
High-Frequency Generation: 1000+ IDs per minute
Long-Running Sequences: Sequence number exhaustion scenarios

Security Test Scenarios

Authentication & Authorization Testing

Role-Based Access: Utility Admin vs System Admin permissions
Session Security: Session timeout, concurrent session handling
Token Security: JWT validation, token refresh, token revocation

Input Validation Security

SQL Injection Prevention: Malicious input in all fields
XSS Prevention: Script injection in text fields
CSRF Protection: Cross-site request forgery prevention

Data Protection Testing

Audit Trail Integrity: Tamper-proof logging verification
Configuration Data Security: Encryption of sensitive settings
Access Logging: Complete audit trail of configuration access

API Security Testing

Authentication Bypass Attempts: Unauthorized API access
Rate Limiting: API abuse prevention
Parameter Tampering: Invalid parameter manipulation

Validation Checklist

✅ Comprehensive Coverage Verification

[x] All 15 acceptance criteria covered with test cases
[x] All business rules tested with weighted calculations
[x] Cross-browser/device compatibility included
[x] Positive and negative scenarios covered
[x] Integration points tested
[x] Security considerations addressed
[x] Performance benchmarks defined
[x] Realistic test data provided
[x] Clear dependency mapping included
[x] Proper tagging for all 17 BrowserStack reports
[x] Edge cases covered at 80% detail level
[x] API tests for critical operations (≥7 importance) included

Acceptance Criteria Coverage Matrix

Acceptance Criteria	Test Case	Coverage Status
1. Generate unique IDs within each entity's domain	TC_001	✅ Complete
2. Classify ID formats as Master ID or Transaction ID	TC_002	✅ Complete
3. Not change existing entity IDs when format changes	TC_003	✅ Complete
4. Require at least one active ID format per entity	TC_004	✅ Complete
5. Maintain audit history for all ID format changes	TC_005	✅ Complete
6. Auto-generate ID format names based on entity type	TC_006	✅ Complete
7. Auto-increment current sequence numbers	TC_007	✅ Complete
8. Allow configurable starting numbers with default	TC_008	✅ Complete
9. Prevent duplicate ID formats for same entity type	TC_009	✅ Complete
10. Role-based access control for format management	TC_010	✅ Complete
11. Generate preview showing format with actual data	TC_011	✅ Complete
12. Classify Master and Transaction ID entities correctly	TC_012	✅ Complete
13. Provide correct prefilled formats for each entity	TC_013	✅ Complete
14. Cross-browser compatibility support	TC_014	✅ Complete
15. Concurrent user performance and stability	TC_015	✅ Complete

Report Coverage Matrix

Report Category	Test Cases Supporting	Coverage Level
Quality Dashboard	TC_001, ~~TC_003,~~TC_002, ~~TC_006,~~TC_007, ~~TC_007~~TC_009, TC_010	High
Module Coverage	All test cases	Complete
Feature Adoption	TC_006, TC_008, ~~TC_009~~TC_011, TC_013	Medium
Performance Metrics	~~TC_007~~TC_015	High
Security Validation	~~TC_006,~~TC_010, Security scenarios	High
Compatibility Matrix	~~TC_005, TC_010~~TC_014	Complete
API Health	~~TC_006,~~ API test collection	High
User Experience	~~TC_002,~~TC_011, ~~TC_008, TC_010~~TC_013	Medium
Compliance Tracking	~~TC_004,~~TC_005, ~~Audit scenarios~~TC_010	High
Integration Health	All integration scenarios	High
Error Tracking	Negative test scenarios	Medium
Trend Analysis	All automated test cases	High
Executive Summary	P1-Critical test cases	High
Platform Coverage	~~TC_005, TC_010~~TC_014	Complete
Business Impact	All P1-P2 test cases	High
Customer Journey	TC_001, ~~TC_004,~~TC_005, ~~TC_008~~TC_010	Medium
Risk Assessment	All test cases by risk level	Complete

Summary

This comprehensive test suite provides ~~complete~~100% coverage for all 15 acceptance criteria of the ID & Reference Format Settings user ~~story,~~story ~~supporting~~(ONB02US07). The test cases are organized to align directly with each acceptance criterion, making navigation and validation straightforward.

Key Coverage Highlights:

15 detailed test cases covering all acceptance criteria
Complete functional coverage of ID format management
Security and performance testing included
Cross-browser compatibility validation
API testing for critical endpoints (≥7 importance level)
Comprehensive audit trail testing
Role-based access control validation
Edge case coverage at 80% detail level
Integration testing with all system dependencies

Execution Strategy:

Smoke Tests: 5 critical test cases (~20 minutes)
Regression Tests: 14 test cases (~75 minutes)
Full Suite: All 15 test cases (~90 minutes)

The test suite supports all 17 BrowserStack test management reports ~~with~~through ~~detailed~~comprehensive tagging and ensures complete traceability from acceptance criteria to test ~~cases,~~execution ~~performance benchmarks, integration mapping, and extensive edge case coverage. |~~results.

ID & Reference Format Settings (ONB02US07)

User Story: ONB02US07

Overall Coverage Summary

Test Scenario Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality

Enhanced Features

User Journeys

Integration Points

Data Flow Scenarios

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios

Performance

Security

Compatibility

Usability

Reliability

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios

Boundary Conditions

Invalid Inputs

System Failures

Data Inconsistencies

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: "CreateGenerate NewUnique MasterIDs IDWithin FormatEntity for Customer Entity"Domain"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_001

Test CustomerCase entityMetadata

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Quality Metrics

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Test Case 2: "LiveClassify PreviewID DynamicFormats Updatesas DuringMaster Configuration"or Transaction"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_002

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Quality Metrics

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Verification Points

Test Case 3: "Duplicate ID Format Validation and Prevention"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_003

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Quality Metrics

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Test Case 3: "Preserve Existing Entity IDs During Format Changes"

Test Case: ONB02US07_TC_003

Test Case Metadata

Classification

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Business Context

Quality Metrics

Coverage Tracking

Stakeholder Reporting

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Prerequisites

Test Procedure

Verification Points

Test Results (Template)

Test Case 4: "Require Active ID Format for Each Entity Type"

Test CustomerCase entity
Metadata