Skip to main content

Dashboard--O&M Dashboard (AX01US03)

SMART360 O&M Dashboard Test Case Suite (AX01US03)

Test Scenario Summary

Based on the Asset Management Intelligence Platform requirements, I've identified 127 test scenarios across 8 major functional areas:

  1. Priority Action Bar Testing (15 scenarios)
  2. Performance KPIs Validation (18 scenarios)
  3. Work Order Management (22 scenarios)
  4. Asset Performance Analytics (16 scenarios)
  5. Predictive Maintenance (14 scenarios)
  6. Resource Optimization (12 scenarios)
  7. Integration & Cross-Department (18 scenarios)
  8. Security & Compliance (12 scenarios)



TC001 - Priority Action Bar - Overdue Tasks Calculation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX01US03_TC_001
  • Title: Verify Overdue Tasks count calculation and display accuracy with real-time updates
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-01-17
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: O&M Dashboard (AX01US03)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, MOD-Asset, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Formula-Validation

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 25% of Priority Action Bar
  • Integration_Points: CMMS, Database, Real-time
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Dashboard-Priority
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Formula-Validation, Business-Critical
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: CMMS Database, Work Order Service, Real-time Data Pipeline
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds load time
  • Data_Requirements: 50+ work orders with varying due dates and statuses

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: CMMS system operational, test data loaded
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with full dashboard access
  • Test_Data:
    • 7 overdue work orders (Due_Date < Current_Date, Status != 'Completed')
    • 15 current work orders (Due_Date >= Current_Date)
    • 5 completed work orders (Status = 'Completed', Due_Date < Current_Date)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Login authentication must pass

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to O&M Dashboard

Dashboard loads successfully within 3 seconds

URL: /dashboard/om

Verify page load performance

2

Locate "Overdue Tasks" widget in Priority Action Bar

Widget displays with count and "View Details" button

N/A

Should be prominently displayed in red

3

Verify overdue count calculation

Count shows "7"

Formula: COUNT(Work Orders) WHERE Due_Date < Current_Date AND Status != 'Completed'

Cross-reference with database query

4

Hover over widget

Tooltip displays correctly

"The total number of work orders that have passed their scheduled due date. Click 'View Details' to take action."

Verify tooltip content matches requirements

5

Click "View Details" button

Navigates to filtered work order list showing exactly 7 overdue items

Pre-filtered list with WO-001 through WO-007

Verify filtering accuracy

6

Verify real-time update by completing one overdue work order

Count updates to "6" within 5 minutes

Mark WO-001 as 'Completed'

Test real-time synchronization

7

Test formula with edge case

Create work order with Due_Date = Current_Date

Should NOT be counted as overdue

Boundary condition testing

8

Verify data refresh timestamp

"Last Updated" timestamp visible and current

Should show time within last 5 minutes

Data freshness indicator

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Overdue count matches formula calculation exactly
  • Secondary_Verifications: Tooltip content, navigation functionality, real-time updates, timestamp accuracy
  • Negative_Verification: Completed overdue tasks should NOT be included in count, current date tasks should NOT be overdue




TC002 - Emergency WOs Widget Functionality

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX01US03_TC_002
  • Title: Verify Emergency WOs count calculation, display, and priority handling
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-01-17
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: O&M Dashboard (AX01US03)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, Emergency, MOD-Emergency, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of Emergency WOs widget
  • Integration_Points: Work Order Database, Emergency Classification Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Emergency-WO
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Emergency-Response, Quality-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Work Order Database, Emergency Classification Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for count calculation
  • Data_Requirements: Mix of emergency and non-emergency work orders

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Work order system operational, emergency classification configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with emergency work order access
  • Test_Data:
    • 3 open work orders with type = 'Reactive' (Emergency)
    • 8 open work orders with type = 'Preventive' (Non-emergency)
    • 2 completed emergency work orders
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard authentication

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to Priority Action Bar

Emergency WOs widget visible with count

N/A

Widget visibility

2

Verify emergency count calculation

Shows "3" emergency work orders

Formula: COUNT(WOs) WHERE Status = 'Open' AND Type = 'Reactive'

Count accuracy

3

Verify widget styling

Emergency widget has red/urgent visual indicators

Red color scheme, urgent icon

Visual urgency indicators

4

Click "View Details" button

Opens filtered list showing only 3 emergency work orders

WO-E001, WO-E002, WO-E003

Filtering accuracy

5

Create new emergency work order

Count updates to "4" within real-time threshold

Add WO-E004 with Type='Reactive', Status='Open'

Real-time updates

6

Change work order from preventive to emergency

Count increases appropriately

Change WO-P001 from 'Preventive' to 'Reactive'

Type change handling

7

Complete an emergency work order

Count decreases to reflect completion

Mark WO-E001 as 'Completed'

Status change impact

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Emergency WO count accurately reflects only open reactive work orders
  • Secondary_Verifications: Visual indicators, filtering, real-time updates
  • Negative_Verification: Preventive and completed work orders should NOT be counted


TC003 - SLA Breaches Widget with Detailed Analytics

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX01US03_TC_003
  • Title: Verify SLA Breaches count, categorization, and detailed breach analysis
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-01-17
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: O&M Dashboard (AX01US03)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, SLA-Compliance, MOD-SLA, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Compliance-Critical

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 12 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of SLA Breaches widget
  • Integration_Points: SLA Monitoring Service, Compliance Database, Alert System
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX-SLA-Monitoring
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: QA
  • Report_Categories: SLA-Compliance, Quality-Dashboard, Executive-Dashboard
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: SLA Monitoring Service, Compliance Database, Time Tracking System
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for SLA calculation
  • Data_Requirements: SLA definitions, historical breach data, response time logs

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: SLA monitoring active, breach detection configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with SLA monitoring access
  • Test_Data:
    • Response Time SLA: 4 hours maximum
    • Resolution SLA: 24 hours maximum
    • Uptime SLA: 99.5% minimum
    • Current Breaches: 2 in last 30 days (1 response time, 1 uptime)
  • Prior_Test_Cases: SLA configuration, monitoring system setup

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comments

1

Navigate to SLA Breaches widget

Widget displays with count "2"

N/A

Widget visibility

2

Verify breach count calculation

Shows accurate count for selected period

Formula: COUNT(SLA_Breach_Events) for selected date range

Count accuracy verification

3

Click "View Details" button

Opens detailed breach analysis showing 2 specific breaches

Breach-1: Response time (5.2h > 4h SLA), Breach-2: Uptime (99.2% < 99.5% SLA)

Breach detail accuracy

4

Verify breach categorization

Breaches properly categorized by SLA type

Response Time breach, Availability breach

Categorization logic

5

Check breach severity indicators

Critical breaches highlighted with appropriate urgency

Response time breach = High severity, Uptime breach = Critical severity

Severity calculation

6

Test real-time breach detection

New SLA breach appears within monitoring threshold

Create work order with 5-hour response time

Real-time monitoring

7

Verify historical trend analysis

Breach trends show improvement/decline over time

Compare current month vs previous months

Trend analysis

8

Test date filter impact

Breach count updates for different time periods

Change to "Last 7 Days" - should show subset

Filter responsiveness

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: SLA breach count and categorization are accurate
  • Secondary_Verifications: Severity indicators, trend analysis, real-time detection
  • Negative_Verification: Resolved breaches or SLA compliance should NOT be counted as breaches





TC004 - Work Order Completion Rate with Progress Bar Validation

Test Case Metadata

  • Test Case ID: AX01US03_TC_004
  • Title: Verify WO Completion Rate calculation, progress bar accuracy, and visual representation in Priority Action Bar
  • Created By: Prachi
  • Created Date: 2025-01-17
  • Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: O&M Dashboard (AX01US03)
  • Test Type: Functional
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags

  • Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, UI, Analytics, MOD-Asset, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Visual-Validation, Progress-Bar, KPI-Critical

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: Yes
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 25% of Priority Action Bar (WO Completion Rate component)
  • Integration_Points: Work Order Database, Completion Tracking Service, Visual Rendering Engine
  • Code_Module_Mapped: AX-WO-Completion
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: KPI-Dashboard, Performance-Metrics, Visual-Analytics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 118+, Safari 16+
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
  • Dependencies: Work Order Database, Completion Tracking Service, UI Rendering Engine, Date/Time Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds for calculation and visual rendering
  • Data_Requirements: Work orders with completion status and due dates across multiple time periods

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Work order completion tracking operational, visual rendering engine configured
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager role with work order analytics access
  • Test_Data:
    • Period: Last 30 days (default)
    • Work Orders Due in Period: 80 total work orders
    • Completed Work Orders: 70 completed by due date
    • Overdue Completions: 5 completed after due date
Back to top