Dashboard--Compliance Management (AX01US05)

Comprehensive Test Cases - Compliance Management (AX01US05)

Test Scenario Summary

This document covers comprehensive test scenarios for the Compliance Management module of SMART360 Asset Management system, supporting all 17 BrowserStack test management reports. The test cases focus on Asset Manager (Compliance Focus) workflows including predictive monitoring, violation response, regulatory reporting, and public health protection.

Coverage Overview:

Functional Test Scenarios: 25 test cases covering core compliance features
Integration Test Scenarios: 12 test cases for external system interactions
Performance Test Scenarios: 8 test cases for load and response time validation
Security Test Scenarios: 15 test cases for B2B utility SaaS security requirements
Edge Case & Error Scenarios: 18 test cases for boundary conditions and failure handling

TEST CASE 1: Compliance Dashboard Access and Overview Display

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_001
Title: Verify Compliance Dashboard loads with correct KPIs and overview data
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Smoke
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, MOD-Compliance, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Low, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Point, Happy-path
Additional Context: Dashboard-Load, KPI-Display, Real-Time-Data

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise/SMB/All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15% (Dashboard overview portion)
Integration_Points: LIMS, SCADA, CMMS
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Dashboard
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage, Executive-Dashboard
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC13, Business Rule: Data Refresh Cadence
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_002, AX01US05_TC_003

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: LIMS service, SCADA system, CMMS database
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
Data_Requirements: Active compliance data for last 90 days

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Compliance module activated in SMART360
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager (Compliance Focus) role
Test_Data:
- Overall Compliance: 66.7%
- Quality Exceedances: 8 instances
- Water Quality Monitor: 89.3%
- Overdue Inspections: 3 pending
- Customer Complaints: 12 water quality complaints
Prior_Test_Cases: User authentication must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Login to SMART360 with Asset Manager credentials	Login successful, dashboard loads	Username: asset.manager@utilityco.com, Password: SecurePass123!	Verify session establishment
2	Navigate to Compliance tab from top navigation	Compliance dashboard loads within 3 seconds	N/A	Monitor page load performance
3	Verify Overall Compliance KPI display	Shows 66.7% with appropriate color coding (Red/Yellow based on threshold)	Expected: 66.7%	Validate calculation accuracy
4	Verify Quality Exceedances counter	Shows "8" with "This month" subtitle	Expected: 8 exceedances	Check data refresh timestamp
5	Verify Water Quality Monitor percentage	Shows 89.3% with progress bar visualization	Expected: 89.3%	Validate progress bar accuracy
6	Verify Overdue Inspections count	Shows "3" with "Pending" status	Expected: 3 overdue	Check status indicator
7	Verify Customer Complaints display	Shows "12" with downward trend arrow (↓ 18.5%)	Expected: 12 complaints, -18.5% trend	Validate trend calculation
8	Check "Last Updated" timestamp	Displays current timestamp within 4 hours for water quality data	Within 4-hour window	Verify data freshness

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All KPI values display correctly with proper formatting and color coding
Secondary_Verifications: Page loads within performance baseline, data timestamps are current, navigation elements are functional
Negative_Verification: No error messages, no broken UI elements, no missing data indicators

TEST CASE 2: Primary Standards Compliance Monitoring

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_002
Title: Validate Primary Standards Compliance watchlist displays correct parameter status
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, MOD-Compliance, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, LIMS-Integration

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 20% (Primary standards monitoring)
Integration_Points: LIMS, Regulatory-Database
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Standards
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Integration-Testing, Regulatory-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC1, AC14, Business Rule: Primary Standards Compliance
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_001, AX01US05_TC_014

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: LIMS system, Regulatory standards database
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds data refresh
Data_Requirements: Recent sample results for key contaminants

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: LIMS integration configured, regulatory limits loaded
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager (Compliance Focus) access
Test_Data:
- Total Coliform: 0 / 5% (OK status)
- Lead (90th percentile): 8.2 / 15 ppb (OK status)
- Copper: 0.95 / 1.3 ppm (OK status)
- TTHMs: 67 / 80 ppb (WARN status - approaching limit)
Prior_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_001 must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access Primary Standards Compliance section	Section loads with parameter watchlist	N/A	Verify section visibility
2	Verify Total Coliform parameter display	Shows "0 / 5%" with OK status and green indicator	Result: 0, Limit: 5%, Status: OK	Check status color coding
3	Verify Lead parameter display	Shows "8.2 / 15 ppb" with OK status	Result: 8.2 ppb, Limit: 15 ppb, Status: OK	Validate units display
4	Verify Copper parameter display	Shows "0.95 / 1.3 ppm" with OK status	Result: 0.95 ppm, Limit: 1.3 ppm, Status: OK	Check decimal precision
5	Verify TTHMs parameter with WARN status	Shows "67 / 80 ppb" with WARN status and yellow indicator	Result: 67 ppb, Limit: 80 ppb, Status: WARN	Validate warning threshold (>80% of limit)
6	Check Last Sample Date for each parameter	Each parameter shows recent sample date	Within last 30 days for each	Verify data currency
7	Hover over WARN status parameter	Tooltip displays warning explanation	"Latest sample for TTHMs was 67 ppb against a limit of 80 ppb..."	Test hover functionality
8	Verify parameter sorting	Parameters sorted by status (WARN first, then OK)	WARN status items appear first	Check sorting logic

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: All parameters display correct results, limits, and status indicators
Secondary_Verifications: Tooltips work properly, status color coding is accurate, sample dates are current
Negative_Verification: No parameters show incorrect status, no missing data, no calculation errors

TEST CASE 3: Active Violations Response Management

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_003
Title: Verify active violations display with correct severity classification and response workflows
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Negative, Consumer, API, Database, CrossModule, MOD-Compliance, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Violation-Management

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 25% (Violation management workflow)
Integration_Points: CMMS, Notification-Service, Regulatory-API
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Violations
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Violation-Tracking, Customer-Impact
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC2, AC7, Sample Data: Violation Response
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_001, AX01US05_TC_007

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: CMMS system, Notification service, Work order system
Performance_Baseline: < 1 second violation display
Data_Requirements: Active violations with various severity levels

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Violation management workflows configured
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager with violation response permissions
Test_Data:
- Violation 1: Monitoring Violation (Total Coliform) - MAJOR severity
- Violation 2: Treatment Technique (Disinfection) - CRITICAL severity
- Violation 3: Public Notification - MINOR severity
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access test must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Active Violations section	Section displays with violation cards	N/A	Check section loading
2	Verify violation sorting order	Violations sorted by severity (CRITICAL, MAJOR, MINOR) then due date	Expected order: Critical → Major → Minor	Validate sorting algorithm
3	Check CRITICAL violation display	Shows red card with "CRITICAL" tag, violation details visible	Treatment Technique violation with red styling	Verify critical color coding
4	Verify MAJOR violation information	Shows orange card with violation type, parameter, dates	Monitoring Violation, Total Coliform, detected Jan 15, due Feb 15	Check data completeness
5	Validate status tags on violations	Each violation shows status (CORRECTING, MONITORING, INVESTIGATING)	Various status indicators	Verify status accuracy
6	Click on CRITICAL violation card	Opens detailed violation response workflow	Treatment Technique violation details	Test navigation functionality
7	Verify due date highlighting	Overdue violations show visual emphasis	Red highlighting for past due dates	Check date comparison logic
8	Test violation filtering functionality	Clicking violation type filters dashboard to that violation context	Filter applies to entire dashboard	Verify filter integration

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Violations display with correct severity classification and complete information
Secondary_Verifications: Status indicators are accurate, sorting works properly, clicking opens detailed views
Negative_Verification: No violations show incorrect severity, no missing critical information, no broken navigation

TEST CASE 4: Sampling Schedule Progress Tracking

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_004
Title: Validate sampling schedule displays correct progress tracking and status indicators
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, MOD-Compliance, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Sampling-Management

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 15% (Sampling schedule portion)
Integration_Points: Laboratory-Schedule, Calendar-System
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Sampling
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: Module-Coverage, Sampling-Compliance
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule: Sampling Schedule section
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_001

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 118+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Laboratory scheduling system
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds refresh
Data_Requirements: Sampling schedules for multiple facilities/networks

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Sampling schedules configured in system
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager read access to sampling data
Test_Data:
- Bacteriological: 28/30 samples (BEHIND status)
- Chemical: 45/50 samples (ON TRACK status)
- Radiological: 2/4 samples (OVERDUE status)
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Locate Sampling Schedule section	Section visible with progress tracker rows	N/A	Verify section rendering
2	Verify Bacteriological sampling progress	Shows "28/30" with BEHIND status and yellow indicator	Progress: 28/30, Status: BEHIND	Check progress calculation
3	Check Chemical sampling display	Shows "45/50" with ON TRACK status and green indicator	Progress: 45/50, Status: ON TRACK	Validate on-track logic
4	Verify Radiological sampling status	Shows "2/4" with OVERDUE status and red indicator	Progress: 2/4, Status: OVERDUE	Check overdue detection
5	Validate progress bar visualization	Progress bars accurately reflect completion percentage	Visual bars match numerical values	Test visual accuracy
6	Check frequency display	Each row shows sampling frequency (Daily, Monthly, Quarterly)	Various frequencies shown	Verify frequency accuracy
7	Verify Next Due Date column	Shows upcoming due dates for each sampling category	Realistic future dates	Check date calculation
8	Test hover tooltip on status indicators	Tooltips explain status meanings and current pace	Detailed status explanations	Verify tooltip content

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Progress tracking accurately reflects sampling completion status
Secondary_Verifications: Status indicators match progress calculations, visual elements display correctly
Negative_Verification: No incorrect progress calculations, no missing status indicators

TEST CASE 5: Facility Performance Summary Comparison

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_005
Title: Verify facility performance cards display comparative compliance metrics
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, MOD-Compliance, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Point, Facility-Management

Business Context

Customer_Segment: Enterprise
Revenue_Impact: Medium
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Medium
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Medium
Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 18% (Facility comparison functionality)
Integration_Points: Facility-Database, Asset-Management
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Facilities
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Facility-Performance, Comparative-Analysis
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule: Facility Performance Summary
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_001, AX01US05_TC_006

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Facility management system, Asset database
Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds for facility data load
Data_Requirements: Multiple facilities with compliance and operational data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Multiple facilities configured with compliance data
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager access to facility performance data
Test_Data:
- Main Treatment Plant: 92.5% compliance, 15 MGD capacity, 1 violation, COMPLIANT status
- South Water Treatment: 87.3% compliance, 8 MGD capacity, 2 violations, WARNING status
- East Facility: 78.1% compliance, 5 MGD capacity, 4 violations, VIOLATION status
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access established

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Navigate to Facility Performance Summary	Section loads with facility cards	N/A	Check section rendering
2	Verify Main Treatment Plant card	Shows facility name, 92.5% compliance score, 15 MGD capacity, 1 violation, COMPLIANT status with green indicator	All specified data visible	Check highest performing facility
3	Check South Water Treatment facility	Displays 87.3% compliance, 8 MGD capacity, 2 violations, WARNING status with yellow indicator	Warning status data accurate	Validate warning threshold
4	Verify East Facility with violations	Shows 78.1% compliance, 5 MGD capacity, 4 violations, VIOLATION status with red indicator	Violation status correctly identified	Check violation status logic
5	Validate last inspection dates	Each facility card shows recent inspection date	Realistic inspection dates	Verify date display format
6	Check facility location/district display	Location information visible for each facility	Geographic identifiers shown	Verify location data
7	Click on facility card	Dashboard filters to selected facility, all widgets update to facility-specific data	Filter applies to entire dashboard	Test filtering functionality
8	Verify facility card sorting	Cards arranged by compliance performance or status priority	Logical arrangement of cards	Check sorting algorithm

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Facility cards display accurate comparative compliance metrics
Secondary_Verifications: Status indicators match compliance scores, filtering works correctly
Negative_Verification: No facilities show incorrect status, no missing critical data

TEST CASE 6: Date Range Filter Functionality

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_006
Title: Validate date range filtering updates all dashboard components correctly
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/UI
Test Level: Integration
Priority: P2-High
Execution Phase: Regression
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, Database, CrossModule, MOD-Compliance, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Low, Filter-Functionality

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: Low
Business_Priority: Should-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: No
SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: Low
Complexity_Level: Medium
Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: Low
Failure_Impact: Low

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 12% (Filter functionality)
Integration_Points: Data-Aggregation, Dashboard-Components
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Common-Filters
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: QA
Report_Categories: UI-Testing, Filter-Validation
Trend_Tracking: No
Executive_Visibility: No
Customer_Impact_Level: Low

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: Business Rule: Date Range Filter
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: All other dashboard test cases

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Safari 16+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: Data aggregation service
Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds filter application
Data_Requirements: Historical compliance data spanning multiple time periods

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Historical compliance data available for different time periods
User_Roles_Permissions: Standard Asset Manager access
Test_Data: Compliance data for Last 30 Days, Last 90 Days, Year-to-Date periods
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access working

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Verify default date range selection	Dashboard defaults to "Last 90 Days" view	Default: Last 90 Days	Check initial state
2	Click on date range filter dropdown	Dropdown shows all available options (Last 30 Days, Last 90 Days, Year-to-Date, Last Fiscal Year, Custom Range)	All 5 options visible	Verify dropdown functionality
3	Select "Last 30 Days" option	All KPIs and data refresh to show 30-day period, loading indicator appears during refresh	Data updates across all widgets	Test filter application
4	Verify KPI value changes	Overall compliance percentage updates to reflect 30-day period	Different values from 90-day view	Check data accuracy
5	Check violations and exceedances update	Active violations and quality exceedances counts adjust for new time period	Count changes appropriately	Verify count recalculation
6	Select "Year-to-Date" filter	Dashboard recalculates all metrics for current year period	YTD data displayed	Test longer time period
7	Verify "Custom Range" functionality	Opens date picker allowing start and end date selection	Date picker appears	Check custom range option
8	Apply custom date range	Dashboard updates to show data for selected custom period	User-defined period data	Test custom filtering

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Date range filter successfully updates all dashboard components
Secondary_Verifications: Performance meets baseline during filter changes, all data accurately reflects selected time period
Negative_Verification: No components fail to update, no performance degradation, no incorrect date calculations

TEST CASE 7: Predictive Compliance Alert System

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_007
Title: Verify predictive compliance monitoring generates alerts before violations occur
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, CrossModule, MOD-Compliance, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Predictive-Analytics

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: Medium
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 30% (Predictive monitoring core functionality)
Integration_Points: AI-Analytics, Asset-Management, SCADA, Alert-System
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Predictive
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Product
Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Predictive-Analytics, Risk-Management
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC5, Solution: Predictive Compliance Monitoring
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_003, AX01US05_TC_008

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: AI analytics service, Asset condition monitoring, SCADA integration
Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds alert generation
Data_Requirements: Historical water quality trends, asset condition data

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Predictive analytics engine configured, asset correlation models active
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager with predictive alert access and maintenance coordination permissions
Test_Data:
- Chlorine residual trending downward: 0.8 ppm (approaching 0.5 ppm minimum)
- Asset condition: Chlorine injection pump at 72% health score
- Predicted violation: Total coliform risk in 15 days without intervention
Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard access and violation management tests must pass

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access predictive alerts dashboard section	Predictive monitoring panel displays with risk indicators	N/A	Check predictive panel availability
2	Verify early warning alert generation	System displays alert for chlorine residual decline trend	Alert: "Chlorine levels trending below minimum - intervention recommended within 7 days"	Test alert generation logic
3	Check asset correlation in alert	Alert shows related asset (chlorine injection pump) with condition score	Asset: CHL-001, Condition: 72%, Recommendation: Immediate maintenance	Verify asset-compliance correlation
4	Validate prediction timeline	Alert specifies predicted violation timeframe (15 days)	Timeline: "Potential coliform violation in 15 days without corrective action"	Check prediction accuracy
5	Test preventive action trigger	Click alert to generate preventive maintenance work order	Work order created automatically with priority flagging	Verify workflow integration
6	Verify risk score calculation	System displays quantified compliance risk score	Risk Score: 8.5/10 (High) based on trend analysis	Check risk scoring algorithm
7	Check notification escalation	Alert escalates to maintenance team and operations manager	Notifications sent to relevant personnel	Test notification distribution
8	Validate alert resolution tracking	System tracks when preventive action resolves prediction	Alert status updates to "Resolved" when maintenance completed	Check resolution workflow

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Predictive alerts generate correctly with accurate asset correlation and timeline predictions
Secondary_Verifications: Risk scores calculate properly, preventive actions trigger automatically, notifications reach appropriate personnel
Negative_Verification: No false positive alerts, no missing critical predictions, no failed workflow integrations

TEST CASE 8: Automated Regulatory Reporting Generation

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_008
Title: Verify automated compilation and submission of regulatory compliance reports
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Consumer, API, Database, CrossModule, MOD-Compliance, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Regulatory-Reporting

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Support
Compliance_Required: Yes
SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

Risk_Level: High
Complexity_Level: High
Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
Reproducibility_Score: High
Data_Sensitivity: High
Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

Feature_Coverage: 35% (Automated reporting functionality)
Integration_Points: LIMS, Regulatory-Portal, Document-Management, Audit-Trail
Code_Module_Mapped: AX-Compliance-Reporting
Requirement_Coverage: Complete
Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
Report_Categories: Regulatory-Compliance, Integration-Testing, Audit-Trail
Trend_Tracking: Yes
Executive_Visibility: Yes
Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Related_Requirements: AC6, AC18, Solution: Automated Regulatory Reporting
Related_Bugs: N/A
Related_Test_Cases: AX01US05_TC_001, AX01US05_TC_018

Test Environment

Environment: Staging
Browser/Version: Chrome 115+
Device/OS: Windows 10/11
Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
Dependencies: LIMS integration, Regulatory submission portal, Document storage
Performance_Baseline: < 30 seconds report generation
Data_Requirements: Complete monthly compliance data for automated compilation

Prerequisites

Setup_Requirements: Regulatory reporting templates configured, submission portals connected
User_Roles_Permissions: Asset Manager with report generation and submission authority
Test_Data:
- Monthly Water Quality Compliance Report template
- Overall Compliance: 89.3% (Target: 95%)
- Total Coliform: 94.5% compliance, Lead: 98.2% compliance, TTHMs: 87.3% compliance
- 3 minor violations, 1 major violation reported
Prior_Test_Cases: Data integration and dashboard functionality verified

Test Procedure

Step #	Action	Expected Result	Test Data	Comments
1	Access regulatory reporting module	Reporting dashboard loads with scheduled and available reports	N/A	Check module accessibility
2	Select "Monthly Water Quality Report"	Template loads with auto-populated compliance data	Report type: Monthly Water Quality Compliance	Verify template selection
3	Verify automatic data compilation	All compliance metrics populate from integrated systems	Overall: 89.3%, Coliform: 94.5%, Lead: 98.2%, TTHMs: 87.3%	Check data auto-population
4	Validate violation summary inclusion	Report includes violation details with severity classification	3 minor violations, 1 major violation with descriptions	Verify violation integration
5	Check audit trail documentation	Supporting documentation automatically attached with metadata	Complete audit trail with timestamps and data sources	Test documentation compilation
6	Review data validation checks	System performs quality checks and flags inconsistencies	Validation passes with green indicators	Check data validation
7	Generate final report	PDF report creates with proper formatting and regulatory compliance	Professional formatted regulatory submission	Test report generation
8	Verify submission tracking	System logs submission with confirmation tracking	Submission logged with timestamp and confirmation number	Check submission workflow

Verification Points

Primary_Verification: Automated report generation includes all required compliance data with proper formatting
Secondary_Verifications: Data validation works correctly, audit trails are complete, submission tracking functions properly
Negative_Verification: No missing required data, no formatting errors, no submission failures

TEST CASE 9: Public Health Notification Management

Test Case Metadata

Test Case ID: AX01US05_TC_009
Title: Validate intelligent public notification system with risk-based communication protocols
Created By: Prachi
Created Date: December 9, 2024
Version: 1.0

Classification

Module/Feature: Compliance Management (AX01US05)
Test Type: Functional/Integration
Test Level: System
Priority: P1-Critical
Execution Phase: Acceptance
Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Tags: Happy-Path, Negative, Consumer, API, Database, CrossModule, MOD-Compliance, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-CSM, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, Public-Health

Business Context

Customer_Segment: All
Revenue_Impact: High
Business_Priority: Must-Have
Customer_Journey: Support