Communication Workflows (UX03US04)
Communication Workflows - Updated Comprehensive Test Cases
Test Scenario Summary
Functional testTest Scenarios Covered:
- Workflow Creation Flow - Complete 3-step wizard process (Details → Trigger → Actions)
- Workflow Management - View, Edit, Delete, Filter workflows
- Communication Actions - Multi-channel message configuration (Email, SMS, WhatsApp)
- Trigger Configuration - Time-based
andtriggersEvent-based(SpecifictriggersDate/Time only) - Workflow Execution - Automated workflow processing
Non-Functional testTest scenariosScenarios:
- Performance Monitoring - History and analytics tracking
- Integration Points - External system dependencies
- Security & Access Control - Role-based permissions
- Data Validation - Input validation and error handling
- Cross-Platform Compatibility -
BrowserDesktopand devicebrowser testing only
FUNCTIONAL TEST CASES
Test Suite: Workflow Creation
Test Case 1: Create New Workflow - Happy Path
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_001 Title: Successfully create a new communication workflow with all required fields Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Functional Module: Communication Workflows
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Low
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Prerequisites:
- User logged in as Utility Admin
- Browser: Chrome 115+
- Environment: Staging
- Test data: Valid workflow configuration data
- Required permissions: Workflow creation access
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Communication Workflows page | Workflows page loads with Active tab selected | N/A | Verify page header and navigation |
2 | Click "New Workflow" button | Create New Workflow modal opens with Details step active | N/A | Modal should show 3-step wizard |
3 | Enter Workflow Name | Field accepts input, no validation errors | "Customer Onboarding Sequence" | Min 3 characters required |
4 | Enter Description | Field accepts input, character count updates | "Automated welcome messages for new customers" | Min 5 characters required |
5 | Select Audience Type | Dropdown shows Consumer, Technician, Business User options | Select "Consumer" | Single selection required |
6 | Click "Next" button | Navigate to Trigger step, step 2 becomes active | N/A | Button enabled only when required fields filled |
7 | Select "Event-Based" trigger type | Event-Based option selected, Event Type dropdown appears | N/A | Radio button selection |
8 | Select Event Type | Dropdown shows system events | Select "NSC-Created" | System event selection |
9 | Click "Next" button | Navigate to Actions step, step 3 becomes active | N/A | Trigger configuration saved |
10 | Click "Add First Action" | Communication channel selection appears | N/A | Action configuration panel opens |
11 | Select Email channel | Email selected, message source options appear | N/A | Channel-specific options displayed |
12 | Click "Create New Message" | Message composition fields appear | N/A | Toggle between template/new message |
13 | Enter email subject | Subject field accepts input | "Welcome to UtilityConnect!" | Required field for email |
14 | Enter email content | Message body accepts rich text input | "Dear [Customer.FirstName], Welcome to our service..." | Support for variables/placeholders |
15 | Click "Add Action" | Action added to workflow, action summary displayed | N/A | Action configuration saved |
16 | Click "Create Workflow" | Workflow created successfully, redirect to workflows list | N/A | Success confirmation message |
17 | Verify workflow in Active tab | New workflow appears in Active workflows list with correct details | N/A | Status should be "Active" |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Workflow appears in Active tab with correct configuration
- Secondary_Verifications: All entered data preserved, workflow metrics initialized (0 triggered, 0 completed)
- Negative_Verification: Workflow does not appear in Draft or History tabs
Test Case 2: Create Workflow with Time-Based Trigger and Target List
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_002
Title: Create workflow with specific date/time trigger and target list selection
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: Communication Workflows
Prerequisites:
- User logged in as Customer Service Manager
- Target lists available in system
- Future date/time available for selection
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Communication Workflows page | Page loads with Active tab selected | N/A | Base navigation |
2 | Click "New Workflow" button | Create New Workflow modal opens | N/A | Start workflow creation |
3 | Enter workflow name | Field accepts input | "Reengagement Campaign" | Unique workflow name |
4 | Enter description | Field accepts input | "Re-engage users who haven't logged in for 30+ days" | Workflow purpose |
5 | Select "Consumer" audience type | Consumer option selected | N/A | Audience targeting |
6 | Click "Next" to configure trigger | Navigate to Trigger step | N/A | Proceed to trigger configuration |
7 | Select "Time-Based" trigger type | Time-Based option selected, sub-options appear | N/A | Trigger type selection |
8 | Select "Specific Date and Time" | Date and Time input fields appear | N/A | Time-based sub-option |
9 | Select Target List | Target list dropdown appears and shows available lists | Select "Inactive Users" | NEW: Target list in trigger step |
10 | Set date for campaign | Date picker opens, future date selectable | Tomorrow's date | Must be future date |
11 | Set time for campaign | Time picker allows time selection | "10:00:00" | 24-hour format |
12 | Click "Next" to configure actions | Navigate to Actions step | N/A | Trigger with target list saved |
13 | Add email action | Select Email channel, create message | Subject: "We Miss You!" | First communication |
14 | Add SMS follow-up | Select SMS, set 2-day delay | "Check your email for offers" | Multi-channel sequence |
15 | Create workflow | Workflow created with time-based trigger and target list | N/A | Complete creation |
16 | Verify target list integration | Workflow shows target list in configuration | N/A | Target list properly saved |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Time-based workflow created with target list selection in trigger step
- Secondary_Verifications: Target list properly integrated, specific date/time configured correctly
- Negative_Verification: Target list not available in Details step (moved to Trigger step)
Test Case 3: Create Workflow with Specific Date and Time (Modified)
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_003
Title: Configure workflow with specific date and time trigger (Recurring events removed)
Priority: P2-High
Test Type: Functional
Module: Communication Workflows
Prerequisites:
- User logged in as Billing Manager
- Valid workflow details configured
- Note: Recurring Event option removed from 2nd stepper
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Communication Workflows page | Page loads successfully | N/A | Base navigation |
2 | Click "New Workflow" button | Create workflow modal opens | N/A | Start creation process |
3 | Enter workflow details | Name and description accepted | "Payment Due Reminder" | Workflow identification |
4 | Select audience type | Consumer audience selected | N/A | Audience targeting |
5 | Click "Next" to configure trigger | Navigate to Trigger step | N/A | Proceed to triggers |
6 | Verify Time-Based options | Only "Specific Date and Time" option available | N/A | UPDATED: No Recurring Event option |
7 | Select "Time-Based" trigger | Time-Based trigger selected | N/A | Trigger type selection |
8 | Verify no recurring option | Recurring Event option not displayed | N/A | CONFIRMED: Recurring removed |
9 | Select specific date | Date picker allows future date selection | "2024-12-25" | Christmas campaign date |
10 | Select specific time | Time picker allows time selection | "09:00:00" | Morning execution time |
11 | Configure target list | Select target list for specific audience | "High Usage Consumers" | Targeted audience |
12 | Click "Next" for actions | Navigate to Actions configuration | N/A | Trigger configuration complete |
13 | Add SMS action | Configure SMS with character limit | "Your payment is due..." | SMS communication |
14 | Complete workflow creation | Workflow created with specific date/time only | N/A | No recurring functionality |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Only "Specific Date and Time" option available in Time-Based triggers
- Secondary_Verifications: No recurring event configuration, specific date/time works correctly
- Negative_Verification: Recurring Event option completely removed from interface
Test Case 4: Add Multiple Communication Channels with CC/BCC
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_004
Title: Configure workflow with multiple communication channels and enhanced email options
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: Communication Actions
Prerequisites:
- User logged in as Customer Service Manager
- Workflow Details and Trigger configured
- Multiple channel templates available
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Actions step | Communication Actions page displays | N/A | Ready for action configuration |
2 | Click "Add First Action" | Channel selection appears | N/A | Action configuration starts |
3 | Select Email channel | Email configuration appears | N/A | First channel selection |
4 | Click "Create New Message" | Email composer with enhanced fields | N/A | NEW: Enhanced email options |
5 | Enter CC field | CC field accepts multiple email addresses | "manager@utility.com, billing@utility.com" | NEW: CC functionality |
6 | Enter BCC field | BCC field accepts email addresses | "audit@utility.com" | NEW: BCC functionality |
7 | Enter email subject | Subject field accepts input | "Multi-Channel Customer Outreach" | Email subject |
8 | Enter email content | Rich text message body | "Dear [Customer.FirstName], Welcome to our enhanced service..." | Rich content with variables |
9 | Set timing | Select "Immediately" | N/A | No delay for first action |
10 | Click "Add Action" | Email action with CC/BCC added | N/A | NEW: CC/BCC preserved |
11 | Add SMS action | Select SMS channel | N/A | Second channel |
12 | Configure SMS content | SMS with character limit | "Welcome! Check your email for details." | SMS message |
13 | Set SMS delay | Configure delay after email | "2 days" | Sequential timing |
14 | Add WhatsApp action | Select WhatsApp channel | N/A | Third channel |
15 | Configure WhatsApp message | WhatsApp content with formatting | "Welcome! 🎉 Your service is active..." | WhatsApp formatting |
16 | Set WhatsApp delay | Configure delay after SMS | "1 day" | Sequential workflow |
17 | Review action sequence | All actions with proper timing displayed | N/A | Multi-channel validation |
18 | Create workflow | Workflow created with enhanced email options | N/A | Complete creation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: CC/BCC fields function correctly in email actions
- Secondary_Verifications: Multi-channel sequence works, timing delays configured properly
- Negative_Verification: CC/BCC validation prevents invalid email addresses
Test Case 5: Edit Workflow - Communication Channel Non-Editable
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_005
Title: Verify communication channel type cannot be edited in existing workflows
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: Workflow Management
Prerequisites:
- Existing workflow with configured actions
- User has edit permissions
- Workflow in Active state
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Active workflows | Active workflows displayed | N/A | Workflow list view |
2 | Click edit icon on workflow | Redirect to edit workflow page | N/A | NEW: Edit functionality |
3 | Navigate to Actions tab | Actions tab displays configured actions | N/A | Actions management |
4 | Locate existing email action | Email action displayed with configuration | N/A | Existing action identification |
5 | Attempt to change channel type | Channel type field is disabled/non-editable | N/A | NEW: Non-editable channel |
6 | Verify channel lock behavior | UI clearly indicates channel cannot be changed | N/A | NEW: Visual indication |
7 | Verify editable fields | Subject, content, CC/BCC can be modified | N/A | NEW: CC/BCC editable |
8 | Edit email subject | Subject field accepts changes | "Updated Welcome Message" | Content modification allowed |
9 | Edit CC field | CC field accepts address changes | "newmanager@utility.com" | NEW: CC editing |
10 | Edit BCC field | BCC field accepts modifications | "compliance@utility.com" | NEW: BCC editing |
11 | Try to add new channel type | Cannot convert email to SMS/WhatsApp | N/A | NEW: Channel type locked |
12 | Save changes | Modified content saved, channel type unchanged | N/A | Selective editing |
13 | Verify edit restrictions | Error message if channel change attempted | N/A | NEW: Error handling |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Communication channel type cannot be edited in existing workflows
- Secondary_Verifications: Content and CC/BCC fields remain editable, proper error handling
- Negative_Verification: No option to change Email to SMS or other channel types
Test Suite: Workflow History & Analytics
Test Case 6: View Workflow Execution History (Updated Format)
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_006
Title: View detailed execution history with updated status format
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: Execution History
Prerequisites:
- Workflows executed with various outcomes
- History data available
- New status format implemented
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Communication Workflows | Page loads successfully | N/A | Base navigation |
2 | Click "History" tab | History view opens | N/A | History tab access |
3 | Verify workflow name display | NEW: No icon before workflow name | N/A | UPDATED: Icons removed |
4 | Locate completed execution | Workflow execution with updated status format | N/A | Find execution record |
5 | Verify status format | Status shows "x delivered y failed" format | "142 delivered 3 failed" | NEW: Status format |
6 | Expand execution details | Detailed breakdown of delivery status | N/A | Expandable details |
7 | Verify individual message status | Each message shows delivery/failure status | Email: Delivered, SMS: Failed | Message-level tracking |
8 | Check failed execution | Failed workflow shows failure count | "0 delivered 5 failed" | Failure tracking |
9 | Verify in-progress status | Active execution shows current progress | "45 delivered 0 failed (In Progress)" | NEW: Progress format |
10 | Verify action button presence | NEW: Action button visible but non-functional | N/A | NEW: Placeholder button |
11 | Click action button | Button present but performs no action | N/A | NEW: Non-functional by design |
12 | Verify button tooltip/indication | Button indicates future functionality | "Coming Soon" | NEW: Future feature indicator |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Status format shows "x delivered y failed" instead of generic status
- Secondary_Verifications: Icons removed from workflow names, action button present but non-functional
- Negative_Verification: No old status format displayed, action button doesn't trigger actions
Test Case 7: Workflow Performance Metrics (Updated Calculations)
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_007
Title: Verify updated workflow performance metrics calculation and display
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: Performance Analytics
Prerequisites:
- Workflows with execution history
- Updated metrics definitions implemented
- Various success/failure scenarios
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Active workflows | Workflows displayed with metrics | N/A | Metrics visibility |
2 | Locate workflow with history | Target workflow card visible | "New Customer Welcome" | Target identification |
3 | Verify "Triggered" definition | NEW: Count of times workflow is used | Triggered: 245 | UPDATED: Usage count |
4 | Verify "Completed" definition | NEW: Count of notifications successfully delivered | Completed: 240 | UPDATED: Delivery count |
5 | Verify Success Rate calculation | NEW: (delivered notifications / total notifications) * 100 | Success Rate: 98.0% | UPDATED: Formula |
6 | Calculate manual verification | Manual: (240/245) * 100 = 97.96% ≈ 98.0% | N/A | NEW: Calculation verification |
7 | Check workflow with failures | Workflow with failed notifications | Triggered: 100, Completed: 85 | Mixed success scenario |
8 | Verify failure impact on success rate | Success rate reflects delivery success only | Success Rate: 85.0% | NEW: Delivery-based calculation |
9 | Check draft workflow metrics | Draft workflows show zero metrics | Triggered: 0, Completed: 0 | Draft state handling |
10 | Verify metrics in workflow edit | Detailed metrics in edit page | N/A | Extended metrics view |
11 | Check real-time metrics update | Metrics update after new executions | N/A | NEW: Real-time updates |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Updated metrics definitions correctly implemented and calculated
- Secondary_Verifications: Success rate based on notification delivery, triggered count reflects usage
- Negative_Verification: Old metrics calculation methods not used
Test Suite: Data Validation & Error Handling
Test Case 8: Character Limits Validation (Placeholder)
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_008
Title: Validate character limits for different communication channels
Priority: P2-High
Test Type: Functional
Module: Channel Validation
Prerequisites:
- Character limits defined per channel (TBD)
- Action configuration interface available
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Select SMS channel | SMS configuration with character counter | N/A | SMS channel selection |
2 | Enter text approaching limit | Character counter shows remaining characters | TBD: SMS limit | PENDING: Limit definition |
3 | Verify counter accuracy | Counter reflects actual character count | N/A | PENDING: Exact validation |
4 | Attempt to exceed limit | System prevents or warns about excess | TBD: Limit + 1 chars | PENDING: Enforcement method |
5 | Test WhatsApp limits | WhatsApp-specific character restrictions | TBD: WhatsApp limit | PENDING: WhatsApp definition |
6 | Verify Email handling | Email channel character behavior | N/A | PENDING: Email restrictions |
7 | Test variable impact | Variables counted in character limits | "[Customer.FirstName]" | PENDING: Variable handling |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Character limits enforced per channel specifications
- Note: This test case requires character limit definitions to be completed
Test Suite: Cross-Platform Compatibility (Desktop Only)
Test Case 9: Desktop Browser Compatibility
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_009
Title: Verify workflow functionality across desktop browsers only
Priority: P2-High
Test Type: Compatibility
Module: Cross-Browser
Prerequisites:
- Access to Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- NOTE: Mobile testing removed as requested
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Test in Chrome Desktop | Complete workflow creation successfully | Standard test data | Chrome compatibility |
2 | Verify Chrome UI elements | All buttons, forms, modals render correctly | N/A | Chrome UI consistency |
3 | Test in Firefox Desktop | Same functionality works in Firefox | Same test data | Firefox compatibility |
4 | Compare Firefox UI | UI consistent with Chrome version | N/A | Cross-browser consistency |
5 | Test in Safari Desktop | All features function in Safari | Same test data | Safari compatibility |
6 | Verify Safari-specific elements | Date/time pickers work correctly | N/A | Safari UI components |
7 | Test in Edge Desktop | Complete workflow operations in Edge | Same test data | Edge compatibility |
8 | Document browser differences | Note any browser-specific behaviors | N/A | REMOVED: Mobile testing |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Core functionality consistent across desktop browsers only
- Secondary_Verifications: UI renders correctly, no JavaScript errors
- Negative_Verification: No mobile compatibility testing required
Test Suite: API Testing
Test Case 10: Workflow CRUD API Operations
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_010
Title: Test complete CRUD operations for workflows via API
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: API
Module: Workflow API
Prerequisites:
- API endpoints accessible
- Authentication configured
- Test data prepared
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | POST /api/workflows | Create workflow successfully | Valid workflow JSON | Create operation |
2 | Verify response structure | Proper JSON with workflow ID | N/A | Response validation |
3 | GET /api/workflows | Retrieve all workflows | N/A | Read operation |
4 | GET /api/workflows/{id} | Retrieve specific workflow | Created workflow ID | Specific read |
5 | PUT /api/workflows/{id} | Update workflow configuration | Modified workflow data | Update operation |
6 | Verify update persistence | Changes reflected in GET | N/A | Update verification |
7 | DELETE /api/workflows/{id} | Delete workflow | Workflow ID | Delete operation |
8 | Verify deletion | GET returns 404 | N/A | Deletion verification |
9 | Test error scenarios | Invalid data returns errors | Invalid JSON | Error handling |
10 | Verify status codes | Correct HTTP codes returned | N/A | Status validation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All CRUD operations function correctly via API
- Secondary_Verifications: Proper error handling, correct status codes
- Negative_Verification: Invalid operations properly rejected
Test Case 11: Form Validation Error Messages
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_011
Title: Verify comprehensive form validation and error messaging throughout workflow creation
Priority: P2-High
Test Type: Functional
Module: Data Validation
Prerequisites:
- Workflow creation page accessible
- Various invalid input scenarios prepared
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification:
Primary_Verification:WorkflowAllappearsforminfieldsActivehavetabappropriate validation withcorrectclearconfigurationerror messages - Secondary_Verifications:
Secondary_Verifications:AllErrorenteredmessages are user-friendly and actionable - Negative_Verification: Invalid data
preserved,properlyworkflowrejectedmetricswithinitializedhelpful(0 triggered, 0 completed) Negative_Verification: Workflow does not appear in Draft or History tabsguidance
Test Case 2:12: CreateMaximum WorkflowActions withLimit Time-Based TriggerEnforcement
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_002UX03US04_TC_012
Title: CreateVerify workflow withcannot specificexceed date/timemaximum triggerof configuration10 actions per workflow
Priority: P1-CriticalP2-High
Test Type: Functional
Module: CommunicationWorkflow WorkflowsLimits
Business Context:
Customer_Segment: AllRevenue_Impact: MediumBusiness_Priority: Must-HaveCustomer_Journey: Daily-UsageCompliance_Required: NoSLA_Related: Yes
Prerequisites:
UserWorkflowloggedcreation inasActionsCustomer Service ManagerstepValidAbilityworkflowtodetailsaddconfiguredmultiplein previous stepsFuture date/time available for selectionactions
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification:
Primary_Verification:Re-engagementMaximum 10 actions per workflowcreatedstrictlywith correct time-based trigger configuration for specific date/timeenforced - Secondary_Verifications:
Secondary_Verifications:ConsumerClearaudienceerrorselected,messaging,multi-channelUIactionsupdates(Email + SMS) configured, timing delays set properlydynamically - Negative_Verification:
Negative_Verification:PastCannotdate/timeexceednotlimitselectable,underworkflowanyready for performance monitoringcircumstances
Test Case 3:13: CreateView Workflowvs withEdit RecurringButton Event TriggerFunctionality
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_003UX03US04_TC_013
Title: ConfigureVerify distinct behavior of View and Edit buttons on workflow with recurring event trigger and frequency settingscards
Priority: P2-HighP1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: CommunicationWorkflow WorkflowsManagement
Prerequisites:
UserExistingloggedworkflowsinwithasbothBillingViewManagerand Edit buttonsValidUser has appropriate permissions
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: View button → Details page (read-only), Edit button → Actions page (editable)
- Secondary_Verifications: Distinct navigation paths, appropriate permissions enforcement
- Negative_Verification: View mode doesn't allow editing, Edit mode properly functional
Test Case 14: Workflow Deletion with Dependency Check
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_014
Title: Verify workflow deletion shows usage dependencies before allowing deletion
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: Workflow Management
Prerequisites:
- Workflow used in multiple places/templates
EventDeletetype selectionfunctionality available
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification:
Primary_Verification:RecurringDeletiontriggerprocessconfiguredshowscorrectlyall usage dependencies before allowing deletion - Secondary_Verifications: Clear impact warning, explicit confirmation required
- Negative_Verification: Cannot accidentally delete workflows with
3-day frequency for bill generation events Secondary_Verifications: Start date and time saved, SMS content with bill variables configuredNegative_Verification: Invalid frequency values rejected, past start dates not selectabledependencies
Test Case 4:15: AddAlert MultipleSystem Communicationfor ChannelsWorkflow Failures
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_004UX03US04_TC_015
Title: ConfigureVerify alert system triggers for workflow withand multipledelivery communication channels (Email + SMS + WhatsApp)failures
Priority: P1-Critical
Test Type: Functional
Module: CommunicationAlert ActionsSystem
Business Context:
Customer_Segment: EnterpriseRevenue_Impact: HighBusiness_Priority: Must-HaveCustomer_Journey: Daily-UsageCompliance_Required: YesSLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
Risk_Level: MediumComplexity_Level: HighExpected_Execution_Time: 8 minutesReproducibility_Score: HighData_Sensitivity: MediumFailure_Impact: Critical
Prerequisites:
UserWorkflowloggedwithinconfiguredas Customer Service ManagertriggersBrowser:AlertChromesystem115+configuredEnvironment:TestStagingWorkflowscenariosDetailsfor trigger failures andTriggerdeliveryalready configured for "Multi-Channel Customer Outreach"Multiple channel templates availablefailures
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification:
Primary_Verification:AllAlertthreesystemcommunicationtriggerschannelsappropriatelyconfiguredforcorrectlyworkflowinandsequencedeliverywithfailures - Secondary_Verifications: Alerts contain actionable information, proper
timingrecipientdelaystargeting - Negative_Verification:
Secondary_Verifications:CCAlertsfielddon'tconfiguredtrigger foremail,normalcharacteroperationslimitsorenforcedminorfor SMS, WhatsApp message, timing delays set properly between actions Negative_Verification: Maximum action limit (10) enforced, invalid timing configurations rejectedfailures
Test Case 5: Use Template for Message Creation
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_005 Title: Configure communication action using existing template Priority: P2-High Test Type: Functional Module: Template Integration Tags: MOD-Templates, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High
Prerequisites:
Existing email templates available in systemAt Actions step of workflow creationTemplate library populated with test templates
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Template successfully integrated into workflow actionSecondary_Verifications: Template variables preserved, template name referenced correctlyNegative_Verification: Deleted templates not available for selection
Test Case 6: Edit Existing Workflow
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_006 Title: Edit existing workflow configuration through edit interface Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Functional Module: Workflow Management Tags: MOD-Management, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical
Prerequisites:
Existing active workflow "Monthly Energy Usage Report"User has edit permissionsWorkflow edit interface accessible
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Workflow modifications saved and reflected in workflow listSecondary_Verifications: Trigger frequency changed from Monthly to Weekly, email content updated, CC/BCC configuredNegative_Verification: Original monthly configuration no longer active
Test Case 7: Filter Workflows by Status
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_007 Title: Filter workflows using status tabs (Active, Drafts, History) Priority: P2-High Test Type: Functional Module: Workflow Management Tags: MOD-Management, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium
Prerequisites:
Workflows exist in different states (Active, Draft, Completed)Multiple workflows for filteringAll workflow states represented in test data
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Status filters work correctly, showing appropriate workflowsSecondary_Verifications: Tab selection persists, workflow counts accurate per filterNegative_Verification: Workflows don't appear in incorrect status tabs
Test Case 8: Search Workflows by Name
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_008 Title: Search for specific workflows using search functionality Priority: P2-High Test Type: Functional Module: Search & Navigation Tags: MOD-Search, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium
Prerequisites:
Multiple workflows with different names existSearch functionality available on workflows pageTest workflows: "Customer Welcome", "Payment Reminder", "Service Update"
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Search functionality returns correct results based on workflow namesSecondary_Verifications: Real-time filtering works, empty states handled properlyNegative_Verification: Search doesn't return irrelevant results
Test Suite: Workflow Execution & History
Test Case 9: View Workflow Execution History
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_009 Title: View detailed execution history for completed workflows Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Functional Module: Execution History Tags: MOD-History, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-High
Prerequisites:
Workflows have been executed with various outcomesHistory data available for displayBoth successful and failed executions exist
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Execution history displays comprehensive details for all workflow runsSecondary_Verifications: Success/failure statuses accurate, timing information correct, individual message statuses trackedNegative_Verification: No unauthorized access to execution data
Test Case 10: Workflow Performance Metrics
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_010 Title: Verify workflow performance metrics calculation and display Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Functional Module: Performance Analytics Tags: MOD-Analytics, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical
Prerequisites:
Workflows with execution historyPerformance data available for calculationVarious success/failure scenarios executed
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Performance metrics calculated correctly and displayed accuratelySecondary_Verifications: Success rates match manual calculations, metrics update with new executionsNegative_Verification: Metrics don't show inflated or incorrect numbers
Test Suite: Data Validation & Error Handling
Test Case 11: Workflow Name Validation
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_011 Title: Validate workflow name field requirements and error handling Priority: P2-High Test Type: Functional Module: Data Validation Tags: MOD-Validation, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium
Prerequisites:
Create workflow page accessibleVarious invalid input scenarios preparedValidation rules: minimum 3 characters, unique names
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: All validation rules enforced correctlySecondary_Verifications: Error messages clear and helpful, field validation real-timeNegative_Verification: Invalid names rejected, duplicate names prevented
Test Case 12: Message Content Character Limits
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_012 Title: Validate character limits for different communication channels Priority: P2-High Test Type: Functional Module: Channel Validation Tags: MOD-Validation, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium
Prerequisites:
At Actions step of workflow creationDifferent communication channels availableCharacter limit test strings prepared
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Character limits enforced correctly for each communication channelSecondary_Verifications: Character counters accurate, appropriate limits per channelNegative_Verification: Limits not applied to channels that shouldn't have them
Test Suite: Cross-Platform Compatibility
Test Case 13: Browser Compatibility Testing
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_013 Title: Verify workflow creation functionality across different browsers Priority: P2-High Test Type: Compatibility Module: Cross-Browser Tags: MOD-Compatibility, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Medium
Prerequisites:
Access to Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge LatestSame test data across all browsersConsistent test environment
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Core functionality works consistently across all supported browsersSecondary_Verifications: UI renders correctly, JavaScript functions properly, form submissions workNegative_Verification: No browser-specific errors or functionality degradation
Test Suite: Performance Testing
Test Case 14: Page Load Performance
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_014 Title: Verify workflow page load times meet performance requirements Priority: P2-High Test Type: Performance Module: Page Performance Tags: MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-Medium, Business-High
Prerequisites:
Performance testing tools availableLarge dataset of workflows (100+ workflows)Network conditions controlledPerformance baseline: Page load < 3 seconds
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: All page interactions meet defined performance thresholdsSecondary_Verifications: No performance degradation with large datasets, memory usage stableNegative_Verification: No timeouts or performance errors under normal load
Test Case 16: API Response Time Testing
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_016 Title: Verify API response times for workflow operations Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Performance Module: API Performance Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical
Prerequisites:
API endpoints accessible for testingPerformance monitoring tools availableBaseline: API responses < 500ms for critical operations
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: All API operations meet defined response time requirementsSecondary_Verifications: Performance consistent under load, error rates acceptableNegative_Verification: No API timeouts or failures under normal conditions
Test Suite: Security Testing
Test Case 17: Role-Based Access Control
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_017 Title: Verify proper access control for workflow operations based on user roles Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Security Module: Access Control Tags: MOD-Security, P1-Critical, Phase-Security, Type-Security, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical
Prerequisites:
Different user roles configured: Utility Admin, Customer Service Manager, Billing Manager, Meter ManagerRole-based permission matrix definedTest users for each role available
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Each role has appropriate access levels, no unauthorized access possibleSecondary_Verifications: Permission boundaries enforced, proper error handling for denied accessNegative_Verification: Users cannot access functions outside their role permissions
Test Suite: Integration Testing
Test Case 19: External System Integration
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_019 Title: Verify integration with external systems for event triggers and notifications Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Integration Module: System Integration Tags: MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical
Prerequisites:
External systems available: CRM, Billing System, Meter Management SystemIntegration endpoints configuredTest data synchronized across systems
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: All external system integrations function correctlySecondary_Verifications: Data flows properly between systems, error handling robustNegative_Verification: Integration failures don't cause system instability
Test Case 20: Email Service Integration
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_020 Title: Verify email delivery through integrated email service provider Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: Integration Module: Email Integration Tags: MOD-Integration, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Integration, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical
Prerequisites:
Email service provider configured (SendGrid, AWS SES, etc.)Test email addresses availableEmail templates configured
Test Procedure:
Verification Points:
Primary_Verification: Email delivery works reliably through integrated serviceSecondary_Verifications: Content accurate, variables resolved, delivery status trackedNegative_Verification: No email delivery failures for valid addresses
API TEST CASES (Critical Level ≥7)
Test Case 21: Workflow CRUD API Operations
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_021 Title: Test complete CRUD operations for workflows via API Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: API Module: Workflow API Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical
Business Context:
Critical API operations supporting core business functionalityRevenue_Impact: HighIntegration dependency for external systems
Test Procedure:
Test Case 22: Workflow Execution API
Test Case ID: UX03US04_TC_022 Title: Test workflow execution and status monitoring via API Priority: P1-Critical Test Type: API Module: Execution API Tags: MOD-API, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-API, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical
Test Procedure:
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Performance Acceptance Criteria:
- Page Load Times: < 3 seconds for workflow pages
- API Response Times: < 500ms for critical operations, < 1000ms for complex operations
- Search Performance: < 300ms for workflow search results
- Form Submission: < 2 seconds for workflow creation/updates
- Concurrent Users: Support 100+ concurrent users without degradation
- Database Performance: Complex queries < 1000ms
- Memory Usage: < 500MB per user session
Network Usage:Optimized for low-bandwidth connections
EXECUTION MATRIX
Browser/DeviceBrowser Coverage:Coverage (Desktop Only):
Browser/Device | Version | Priority | Test Cases |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| P1 |
|
|
|
| Core functionality |
|
| P2 | Core functionality |
TEST SUITE DEFINITIONS
Test Suite Definitions:
Smoke Test Suite (Pre-deployment):
- TC_001: Create New Workflow - Happy Path
TC_006:TC_005: EditExistingWorkflowWorkflow- Communication Channel Non-EditableTC_009:TC_006: View Workflow Execution History (Updated Format)- TC_007: Workflow Performance Metrics (Updated Calculations)
TC_017:TC_013:Role-BasedViewAccessvsControlEdit Button Functionality
Regression Test Suite (Release cycles):
- TC_001 through TC_012 (Core functionality)
TC_015,TC_013,TC_016TC_014, TC_015 (Performance)Management and alerts)TC_017, TC_018TC_009 (Security)Cross-browser desktop)TC_021, TC_022TC_010 (API)API operations)
Full Test Suite (Major releases):
- All test cases TC_001 through
TC_022TC_015 - Cross-browser compatibility
- Performance
under loadtesting - Security
penetrationvalidation - Integration testing
Integration with all external systems
DEPENDENCYKEY MAPPINGUPDATES IMPLEMENTED
Test Execution Dependencies:
Infrastructure Setup→1.UserTargetAuthentication→Basic NavigationWorkflow Creation→Workflow Management→Workflow ExecutionTemplate Setup→TemplateList IntegrationTestsExternal System Configuration→Integration TestsPerformance Baseline→Performance Tests
External Dependencies:
- Moved target list selection from Details step to Trigger step
- Updated test cases TC_002 to reflect new location
2. CRMRecurring System:Events Removal
- Modified TC_003 to only test "Specific Date and Time"
- Removed all recurring event functionality testing
3. History Tab Updates
- Removed icons before workflow names (TC_006)
- Updated status format to "x delivered y failed" (TC_006)
- Added non-functional action button testing (TC_006)
4. Metrics Definitions Updated
- Triggered = count of workflow usage (TC_007)
- Completed = count of successful notifications delivered (TC_007)
- Success rate = (delivered notifications / total notifications) * 100 (TC_007)
5. CC/BCC Email Enhancement
- Added CC/BCC testing in workflow creation (TC_004)
- Added CC/BCC editing in workflow modification (TC_005)
6. Communication Channel Non-Editable
- New test case TC_005 for channel type editing restrictions
- Verification that content remains editable while channel type is locked
7. Mobile Testing Removal
- Removed all mobile device testing scenarios
- Focused exclusively on desktop browser compatibility
8. Character Limits Placeholder
- Created TC_008 with placeholders for character limit definitions
- Ready for implementation once limits are discussed and finalized
PENDING ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
- Character Limits:
AvailableSpecific limits forNSC-CreatedSMS,eventsWhatsApp, Email channels EmailAPIService:Endpoints:ConfiguredSpecificforendpointemailURLsdeliverySMSandGateway:authenticationActive for SMS notificationsDatabase:Populated with test dataAuthentication Service:User roles configuredWorkflow Execution Engine- Core business functionalityExternal System Integration- Dependency on third-party systemsEmail Delivery- Critical for customer communicationmethods- Performance
Under LoadThresholds:-ConfirmationScalabilityofconcernsperformance standards vs. <1 second requirement DataIntegrationSecurityPoints:-SpecificComplianceexternal systems andprivacytheir integration requirementsComprehensive Integration Testing- Validate all external connectionsPerformance Testing- Load testing with realistic user volumesSecurity Testing- Regular security audits and penetration testingMonitoring and Alerting- Real-time system health monitoringDisaster Recovery- Backup and recovery procedures tested
TRACEABILITY MATRIX
Requirements Coverage:
RISK ASSESSMENT
High-Risk Areas:
Mitigation Strategies:
This comprehensive test suite providesnow completealigns coveragewith forall your specified requirements and includes the Communicationupdated Workflowsfunctionality feature,while supportingmaintaining allthe 17quality BrowserStack test management reports with detailed traceability, performance benchmarks, and risk assessmentstandards for a B2B utility SaaS product.