Skip to main content

Communication Hub Dashboard (UX01US01)

Communication Hub Dashboard - Test Cases & Scenarios

User Story: UX01US01 - Communication Hub Dashboard (UX01US01)

Total Test Cases:
Total Acceptance Criteria:
Total Coverage Percentage:




Test ScenarioScenarios Summary

A. Functional Test Scenarios

Core Functionality Scenarios:

  1. Dashboard Core Functionality - Main dashboard loading and data display

    Channel Performance Metrics - Email, SMS, WhatsApp performance tracking

    Lists Overview Management - Static/Dynamic lists and contact distribution

    List CategoriesData Display - ConsumerVerify segmentationaccurate (removeddisplay Technician/Businessof permessage comments)counts, channel performance, and workflow metrics

  2. WorkflowReal-time PerformanceData MonitoringSynchronization - ActiveEnsure workflowsall anddashboard successcomponents ratesupdate automatically with live data

  3. Message DistributionCross-Channel Analytics - Validate performance metrics across Email, SMS, and WhatsApp channels
  4. Workflow Performance Tracking - Monitor active workflows, success rates, and failure counts
  5. Time-based Analytics - Display performance metrics for Today, This Week, This Month periods
  6. Campaign Distribution Analysis - Show top 3 campaigns by message volume with success rate breakdown

Business Rules Scenarios:

  1. Message Count Aggregation - Total Messages = Email + SMS + WhatsApp + In-App counts
  2. Success Rate DistributionCalculation - Campaign(Successful effectivenessMessages metrics/ Total Messages) × 100 with weighted averages

  3. NavigationActive &Status User ExperienceFiltering - Cross-moduleOnly navigationactive workflows and unresolved failures counted

  4. DataTop Refresh3 &Ranking Real-time UpdatesLogic - Auto-refreshCampaigns functionalityranked by message volume, showing highest first
  5. Time Period Boundaries - Accurate date/time calculations for period-based metrics

User Journey Scenarios:

  1. CSO Manager Login Flow - Authentication → Dashboard Load → Data Verification
  2. Performance Monitoring Flow - Dashboard Access → Channel Analysis → Workflow Review
  3. Campaign Analysis Flow - Message Distribution Review → Success Rate Comparison → Action Planning
  4. Real-time Monitoring Flow - Live Data Updates → Alert Notifications → Quick Response

B. Non-Functional Test Scenarios (18 scenarios)

Performance TestingScenarios:

  •  - Dashboard load times,time concurrent< users3 seconds

  • Chart rendering time < 2 seconds
  • API response time < 500ms
  • Real-time sync delay < 60 seconds
  • Concurrent user handling (100+ users)

SecurityCompatibility TestingScenarios:

  • Cross-browser -testing Authentication,(Chrome, authorization,Firefox, dataSafari, protectionEdge)

    Browser

  • Responsive Compatibility - Chrome focus with cross-browserdesign validation

    Reliability

  • Screen Testingresolution - System stability, error recoveryadaptability

C. Edge Case & Error Scenarios (15 scenarios)

Boundary ConditionsConditions:

  • Zero -message Min/maxcounts values,display
  • Maximum message volume handling
  • 100% and 0% success rates
  • Single active workflow scenarios
  • Empty campaign data limits

    Network Issues - Connectivity problems, timeout handling

Data Inconsistencies - Missing data, invalid states

Error Handling - Graceful failure management




DetailedUX01US01_TC_001- TestVerify CasesAccurate Total Message Counts Across All Communication Channels

DASHBOARD CORE FUNCTIONALITY

Test Case:UX01US01 _TC_001



Title: Verify DashboardAccurate MainTotal PageMessage LoadCounts withAcross All SectionsCommunication and Real-time Data IntegrationChannels

Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025

Version: 1.0

Classification:Classification

  • Module/Feature: Communication Hub Dashboard - Total Message Count
  • Test Type: Functional/UI/API
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Smoke
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Module/Feature: Dashboard Core

Test Type: Functional/UI

Test Level: System

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Smoke

Automation Status: mannual

Enhanced Tags:

Tags=HappyPath , API , Database

 MOD-Dashboard,Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-EndEnd, Database, API, HappyFlow, Services

Business Context:Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: High

  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required:Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related:SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:Metrics

  • Risk_Level:Risk_Level: High

  • Complexity_Level:Complexity_Level: Medium

  • Expected_Execution_Time:Expected_Execution_Time: 25 minutes

  • Reproducibility_Score:Reproducibility_Score: High

  • Data_Sensitivity:Data_Sensitivity: Medium

  • Failure_Impact:Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboardtotal coremessage count display functionality
  • Integration_Points: DashboardMessage Service API, Message Service, Database
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#1 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-CoverageData-Accuracy, Message-Tracking
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability:Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+, iOS 16+, Android 13+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768, Mobile-375x667
  • Dependencies: Dashboard Service, Message APIs, Authentication Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds page load
  • Data_Requirements: Live message data from Samoa Power Corp

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard accessible, authentication working
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager 
  • Test_Data: Valid login credentials: cso.manager@samoapower.ws / SamoaPower2025!
  • Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system functional

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Navigate to login page and enter credentials

Successful login and redirect to dashboard

Username: cso.manager@samoapower.wsPassword: SamoaPower2025!

Should redirect to main dashboard

2

Verify all 4 message cards are visible with correct icons

All 4 cards displayed with proper icons:- Total Messages (envelope icon)- Email (email icon)- SMS (phone icon)- WhatsApp (WhatsApp icon)- In-App (bell icon)

Cards should be prominently displayed at top of dashboard with distinct icons

Check visual layout, card positioning, and icon correctness

3

Record Total Messages count and verify against database

UI shows clear numeric count matching database

Total Messages UI: _______


Database verification: SELECT COUNT(*) as total_messages FROM notification WHERE remote_utility_id = '829'

Database Result: _______

Compare UI count with database query result

4

Record Email count and verify against database

UI shows clear numeric count matching database

Email UI: _______

Database verification:SELECT COUNT(*) as email_count FROM notification WHERE remote_utility_id = '829' AND channel_type = 'email' 

Database Result: _______

Compare UI count with database query result

5

Record SMS count and verify against database

UI shows clear numeric count matching database

SMS UI: _______

Database verification:SELECT COUNT(*) as sms_count FROM notification WHERE remote_utility_id = '829' AND channel_type = 'sms' Result: _______

Compare UI count with database query result

6

Record WhatsApp count and verify against database

UI shows clear numeric count matching database

WhatsApp UI: _______

Database verification:SELECT COUNT(*) as whatsapp_count FROM notification WHERE remote_utility_id = '829' AND channel_type = 'whatsapp' Database Result: _______

Compare UI count with database query result

7

Calculate sum of individual channels and verify against total

Email + SMS + WhatsApp + In-App should equal Total Messages

Mathematical validation:Step 4 + Step 5 + Step 6 = _______Should equal Step 3 total: _______

Use calculator to verify sum equals total

8

Refresh dashboard page and verify all data persists

All counts and icons remain identical after refresh

Press F5 or browser refresh buttonAll numbers same

Final consistency and persistence check

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Total message count displays accurately and equals sum of individual channels,sms, whatsapp,email message count display correctly
  • Secondary_Verifications: Real-time updates functional, API consistency maintained, individual channel counts sum correctly
  • Negative_Verification: No unauthorized access to message counts, no broken UI components




UX01US01_TC_002- Verify Channel Performance Visual Charts Display 

Title: Verify Channel Performance Visual Charts Display 

 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Channel Performance Charts
  • Test Type: UI/Visual
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyFlow, Negative, UI-Updates, Chart-Validation

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of channel chart display functionality
  • Integration_Points: Database, API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#3 coverage (updated)
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, UI-Updates, Chart-Performance
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
  • Dependencies: Chart Rendering Library, Dashboard Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds chart rendering
  • Data_Requirements: Channel performance data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded successfully
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager 
  • Test_Data: UX01US01_TC_001 passed successfully
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX01US01_TC_001 (Dashboard login and load)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Navigate to Channel Performance section and verify layout

Section visible with title "Channel Performance" below message cards. Exactly 3 pie charts displayed: Email, SMS, WhatsApp only. NO In-App chart present. NO percentage growth indicators on any chart.

Dashboard with populated channel data

🚨 CRITICAL: In-App chart removed per comments. 🚨 CRITICAL: Percentage indicators removed per comments

2

Hover over all chart segments to validate statuses

Email chart: delivered, opened, pending, failed (4 segments) - NO "read" status. SMS chart: delivered, read, pending, failed (4 segments). WhatsApp chart: delivered, read, pending, failed (4 segments).

Email, SMS, WhatsApp performance data

🚨 CRITICAL: Email "read" status removed per comments. SMS and WhatsApp retain "read" status

3

Test chart interactivity and visual consistency

Charts respond to hover/click. Tooltips show accurate counts only (no percentages). Consistent color coding across charts (delivered=purple, pending=yellow, failed=red). Legends match chart segments with proper color alignment.

Various data volumes for consistency testing

Interactive elements working. Cross-chart color validation. Visual consistency check

4

Verify data accuracy by cross-referencing chart counts with source query

Chart segment counts match the underlying database query results. Total counts per chart align with actual message delivery data.

Database query results for Email/SMS/WhatsApp channels

Query: SELECT status, COUNT(*) FROM messages WHERE channel='email/sms/whatsapp' GROUP BY status

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Exactly 3 pie charts displayed (Email, SMS, WhatsApp only)
  • Secondary_Verifications: Charts interactive, properly labeled,colors consistent
  • Negative_Verification: no missing segments




UX01US01_TC_004- Verify Time Period Performance Metrics Display 

Title: Verify Time Period Performance Metrics Display 

 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Time Period Metrics Display
  • Test Type: Functional/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Communication, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, HappyFlow, Time-Based, UI-Updates

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of time period display functionality
  • Integration_Points: Database,API
  • Code_Module_Mapped:Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#5 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Time-Analytics, UI-Updates
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
  • Dependencies: Analytics Service, Time Calculation Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds data load
  • Data_Requirements: Time-based analytics data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, time periods calculated
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager 
  • Test_Data: Channel Performance section accessible
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX01US01_TC_002 (Channel Performance visible)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Locate time period metrics in Channel Performance

Three time periods visible: Today, This Week, This Month

Channel Performance dashboard

Should be static labels

2

Verify "Today" metrics display

Shows current day message count

Today: [current count]

Query: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM messages WHERE DATE(created_at) = CURDATE()

3

Verify "This Week" metrics display

Shows current week message count

This Week: [current count]

Query: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM messages WHERE WEEK(created_at) = WEEK(CURDATE()) AND YEAR(created_at) = YEAR(CURDATE())

4

Verify "This Month" metrics display

Shows current month message count

This Month: [current count]

Query: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM messages WHERE MONTH(created_at) = MONTH(CURDATE()) AND YEAR(created_at) = YEAR(CURDATE())

5

Check logical time progression

Today ≤ This Week ≤ This Month

Mathematical validation data

Numbers should make sense logically. Today count should not exceed weekly or monthly totals

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All three time periods display with logical progression
  • Secondary_Verifications: Data makes mathematical sense, no interactive elements,UI updates implemented
  • Negative_Verification: No date dropdown filters visible, no time inconsistencies




UX01US01_TC_005-Verify Lists Overview Static and Dynamic Counts Display

Title: Verify Lists Overview Static and Dynamic Counts Display
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Lists Overview Section
  • Test Type: Functional/Data
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

MOD-Communication, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Revenue-Impact-Medium, HappyFlow, Lists-Data, Count-Validation

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: Medium
  • Business_Priority: Should-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: No

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Low
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of lists overview display functionality
  • Integration_Points: Database, API
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#6 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Product
  • Report_Categories: Feature-Coverage, Lists-Management, Data-Accuracy
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

Environment:Related_Test_Cases: V1-17_TC_002,Staging

  • Browser/Version: V1-17_TC_003Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
  • Dependencies: Lists Service, Dashboard Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds section load
  • Data_Requirements: Lists data from Samoa Power Corp

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, lists data available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Dashboard viewer access
  • Test_Data: Lists Overview section accessible
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX01US01_TC_001 (Dashboard access)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Navigate to Lists Overview section and verify layout

Section visible on right side of dashboard with "Lists Overview" title. Static Lists, Dynamic Lists, and Total Contacts counts displayed with proper formatting (commas).

Dashboard with populated list data

Query: SELECT COUNT() FROM lists WHERE type='static'; SELECT COUNT() FROM lists WHERE type='dynamic'; SELECT COUNT(*) FROM contacts

2

Validate list counts and mathematical accuracy

Static + Dynamic = Total lists calculation is correct. All numbers remain stable during session and after refresh.

Static Lists: [count], Dynamic Lists: [count], Total Contacts: [count]

Mathematical validation and data persistence check

3

Test category breakdown display

Category section shows single Consumer bar with 100% and other bar with 0%

Consumer: 100%, Technician: 0%, Business: 0%

-


Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Static and Dynamic list counts display accurately,Only Consumer category visible with 100% distribution
  • Secondary_Verifications: Total contacts shown, formatting consistent, responsive design, List counts accurate, data migration successful, UI updated correctly
  • Negative_Verification: No missing counts, no calculation errors, no layout issues




UX01US01_TC_006-Verify Active Workflows Count Display Accuracy

Title: Verify Active Workflows Count Display Accuracy
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  •  Module/Feature: Workflow Performance Count Display
  • Test Environment:Type: Functional/Data
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyFlow, Workflow-Validation, Count-Accuracy

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes


Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High


Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of workflow count display functionality
  • Integration_Points: Workflow Service,
  •  Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#8 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Workflow-Performance, Data-Accuracy, System-Health
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Dashboard API, MessageWorkflow Service, AuthenticationAnalytics Service, Dashboard Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 32 seconds pageworkflow data load
  • Data_Requirements: SamoaActive Power Corp testworkflow data with updated counts

Prerequisites:Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: DashboardWorkflow servicesservice operational, testactive databaseworkflows populatedpresent
  • User_Roles_Permissions: CSODashboard Managerviewer access
  • Test_Data: Username:Workflow Performance section accessiblecso.manager@samoapower.ws, Password: SamoaPower2025!
  • Prior_Test_Cases: AuthenticationUX01US01_TC_001 system(Dashboard functionalaccess)


Test Procedure:Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Integration ValidationComment

1

Navigate to login page

Login page displays within 2 seconds


Authentication service responsive

2

Enter valid CSO Manager credentials

Login successful, redirected to dashboard

Username: cso.manager@samoapower.ws, Password: SamoaPower2025!

Authentication integration working

3

Verify dashboard main sections load

All 4 sections visible: Channel Performance, Lists Overview, Workflow Performance, Message Distribution

Complete UI rendering

Frontend ↔ Backend integration

4

Verify total message count accuracy

Total Messages displays: [current real-time count]

Live dashboard data
Total Messages: (Email+SMS+WhatsApp only)

Database ↔ Dashboard integration

5

Verify individual channel metrics

Email: [current count], SMS: [current count], WhatsApp: [current count]

Real-time channel metrics

Message Service ↔ Dashboard

7

Check Lists OverviewPerformance section

StaticSection Lists:visible [currentbelow count],Lists DynamicOverview Lists:with [current"Workflow count],Performance" Totaltitle. Contacts:Active [currentWorkflows count]count displayed clearly in proper card format.

LiveDashboard listswith workflow data

ListsQuery: ServiceSELECT COUNT(*) DashboardFROM workflows WHERE status='active'

82

Verify Consumer-onlyActive categoriesWorkflows count accuracy and formatting

OnlyShows Consumerexact category shown at 100%

Consumer: 100%number (currente.g., contact3) count)

Categoryas servicewhole update

9

Verifynumber Workflow.Card Performanceproperly formatted and positioned consistently with other metric cards.

Active Workflows: [current count],

Number Totalformatting Messages:and [currentvisual count],consistency Successcheck

3

Cross-reference Rate:with [currentCommunication %],Workflow Failures:tab

Navigate [currentto count]Communication > Workflow tab and count active workflows manually. Dashboard count should match the number of workflows with "active" status in workflow management section.

Workflow tab active status count

Manual verification: Communication > Workflow tab shows same count of active workflows as dashboard

4

Validate status filtering and real-time updates

Count reflects only currently active workflows (not completed/paused). If workflow status changes in Communication tab, dashboard count updates accordingly.

Live workflow metricsstatus changes

WorkflowStatus Servicefiltering validation. Dashboard

10

Check time period metrics

Today: [current count], This Week: [current count], This Month: [current count]

Real-time time-basedsynchronization analytics

Analyticsbetween Serviceworkflow integration

11

Testmanagement and dashboard responsiveness

Page loads < 3 seconds, UI responsive

Performance baseline met

Performance optimization

Verification Points:Points

Primary_Verification:Primary_Verification: AllActive dashboardworkflow sectionscount loaddisplays withinaccurately 3and secondsreflects withonly accurateactive dataworkflows

Secondary_Verifications:Secondary_Verifications: DataCount accuracyformatting matches baseline, UI elements properly aligned,correct, real-time integrationupdates functional

Negative_Verification:Negative_Verification: No errorinactive messages,workflows counted, no brokendisplay UI components, no removed features visible

Integration_Verification: All backend services integrate seamlessly with dashboard frontenderrors


TestUX01US01_TC_007-Verify Case:Total UX01US01_TC_002Messages Processed Through Workflows Display



  • Title: Verify ChannelTotal PerformanceMessages MetricsProcessed Through Workflows Display
    Created By: Prachi
     Created Date: May 27,28, 2025

    Version: 1.0

Classification:Classification

  • Module/Feature: Workflow Messages Count Display
  • Test Type: Functional/Data
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Module/Feature: Channel Performance

Test Type: Functional

Test Level: System

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Regression

Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: 

Tags=API, Database ,

MOD-ChannelPerformance,Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product,Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium,High, Business-CriticalCritical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyFlow, Workflow-Messages, Data-Accuracy

Business Context:Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: High

  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: High

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of workflow message count display
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Frontend, Workflow Service, Message Processing Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#9 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Workflow-Performance, Message-Processing, Data-Accuracy
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability


Test Environment

  • Environment:

    Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS: Windows 1111, macOS 12+

  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Workflow Service, Message Processing Service, Analytics Service
  • Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds data load
  • Data_Requirements: Workflow message processing data

Prerequisites:Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements:Dashboard successfullyWorkflow loadedservice (V1-17_TC_001operational, passed)

    Samplemessage communicationprocessing data foravailable

  • User_Roles_Permissions: SamoaDashboard Powerviewer Corpaccess

  • Test_Data: Workflow Performance section accessible
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX01US01_TC_007 (Active Workflows visible)

Test Procedure:Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

UI Update ValidationComment

1

LocateNavigate Channelto Workflow Performance section

Section visible with titleworkflow "Channel Performance"metrics

Real-timeFrom sectionTC_007 displayvalidation

UIPrerequisite section properly displayedstep

2

VerifyLocate EmailTotal performanceMessages piemetric chartin workflow section

Shows pietotal chartworkflow withmessage 3 statuses: delivered, pending, failedcount

Email:Total Messages: [current real-time metricscount]

EmailShould statusshow optionsexact correctnumber (e.g., 4,566)

3

Verify message count format and display

Number displayed clearly with proper formatting

Expected format: comma-separated number

No decimals or errors

4

Verify SMSmetric performancecard pie chartstyling

ShowsCard pieproperly chartformatted withand 3 statuses: delivered,  pending, failedpositioned

SMS:Consistent currentwith real-timeother workflow metrics

SMSVisual read status maintainedconsistency

5

VerifyTest WhatsAppcount performanceaccuracy pieagainst chartworkflow data

ShowsCount piereflects chartall withmessages 3processed statuses:by delivered,  pending, failedworkflows

WhatsApp:Cross-validation currentwith real-timeworkflow metricsdetails

WhatsAppData readaccuracy status maintainedcheck

6

CheckVerify timecount periodincludes metricsall displayworkflow types

Today:Messages [currentfrom count],all Thisworkflow Week:categories [current count], This Month: [current count]included

Real-timeAll time-basedcampaign metricstypes counted

DynamicComprehensive time period displaycounting

7

Test piecount chartstability interactivityduring session

ChartsCount respondremains toconsistent hover/clickduring interactionssession

InteractiveRefresh chartand elementsverify same count

ChartData functionality workingpersistence

118

VerifyValidate chartreal-time color consistencyupdates

AllCount chartsupdates usewhen consistentnew colorworkflow schememessages processed

UniformLive colormessage paletteprocessing

VisualReal-time consistency maintained

12

Check chart responsiveness

Charts scale properly at different screen sizes

Responsive chart rendering

Charts adapt to screen sizesynchronization


Verification Points:Points

  • Primary_Verification:Primary_Verification: OnlyTotal Email,workflow SMS,messages WhatsAppcount channelsdisplays displayedaccurately withand correctincludes statusall optionsworkflow-processed permessages
  • Secondary_Verifications: comments

    Secondary_Verifications:Count Pieformatting chartscorrect, render correctly, data accuracy maintained, UIreal-time updates implementedfunctional

  • Negative_Verification:Negative_Verification: No missing workflow messages, no duplicate counting




TestUX01US01_TC_008-Verify Case:UX01US01_TC_003Average Success Rate Calculation Accuracy



Title: Verify ListsAverage OverviewSuccess withRate Consumer-OnlyCalculation SupportAccuracy
Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 27,28, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:Classification

  • Module/Feature: Success Rate Calculation
  • Test Type: Functional/Mathematical
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Module/Feature:MOD-Communication, Lists Management

Test Type: Functional

Test Level: System

Priority: P2-High

Execution Phase: Regression

Automation Status: Planned-for-Automation

Enhanced Tags: 

Tags=API, Database

MOD-ListsManagement, P2-High,P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Product,Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium,High, Business-HighCritical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyFlow, Mathematical-Validation, Success-Rate

Business Context:Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: MediumHigh

  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Should-Must-Have

  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required:Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related:SLA_Related: NoYes

Quality Metrics:Metrics

  • Risk_Level:Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of success rate calculation functionality
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Frontend, Analytics Service,
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#10 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder:Complexity_Level: MediumEngineering

  • Report_Categories:Expected_Execution_Time: 4Analytics-Accuracy, minutesMathematical-Validation, Performance-Metrics

  • Trend_Tracking:Reproducibility_Score: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: High

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment:

    Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+

  • Screen_Resolution:Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080,1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Tablet-1024x768

    Dependencies: ListsAnalytics Service, ContactSuccess Database,Rate CategoryCalculator, ManagementWorkflow ServiceData

  • Performance_Baseline:Performance_Baseline: < 21 secondssecond listcalculation time
  • Data_Requirements: Workflow success/failure data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Analytics service operational, workflow data loadingavailable

  • User_Roles_Permissions:Data_Requirements: UpdatedDashboard contactviewer databaseaccess
  • Test_Data: Workflow Performance section accessible with Consumer-onlysuccess categorizationrate data

  • Prerequisites:Prior_Test_Cases:

    Setup_Requirements: Dashboard loaded, Lists service operational

    User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager or authorized dashboard user

    Test_Data: 56,789 contacts reclassified as Consumer category

    Prior_Test_Cases: V1-17_TC_001UX01US01_TC_008 (DashboardTotal MainMessages Load) successfulvisible)


Test Procedure:Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Consumer-Only ValidationComment

1

Navigate to ListsWorkflow OverviewPerformance section

Section displaysvisible with updatedsuccess statisticsrate metric

Lists Overview section visible-

ListsPrerequisite section accessiblestep

2

VerifyLocate StaticAverage ListsSuccess countRate display

Shows "Staticsuccess Lists:rate [currentpercentage count]"clearly

Real-timeAvg staticSuccess listRate: count[current %]

StaticShould listshow countpercentage accurate(e.g., 97.6%)

3

Verify Dynamicsuccess Listsrate countformat

ShowsPercentage "Dynamicdisplayed Lists:with [currentdecimal count]"precision

Real-timeExpected dynamicformat: list countXX.X%

DynamicOne listdecimal countplace accurateprecision

4

CheckManual Totalcalculation Contacts countvalidation

DisplaysCalculate: "(Total Contacts:Successful [current/ count]"Total Messages) × 100

LiveUse totalcalculator contactfor countverification

ContactMathematical count maintainedvalidation

5

VerifyCross-reference Consumerwith categoryworkflow displaydetails

OnlySuccess "Consumers"rate categorymatches shownindividual atworkflow 100%calculations

Consumer:Compare 100%with (currentworkflow contact count)breakdown

Consumer-onlyData implementationconsistency check

6

Verify consumerweighted contactaverage countcalculation

AllSuccess contactsrate classifiedproperly asweighted Consumersacross all workflows

ConsumerMulti-workflow contacts:calculation [current count]validation

DataComplex migrationcalculation successfulverification

7

CheckTest categoryedge percentagecase calculationhandling

ConsumerSuccess percentagerate showshandles exactly0%, 100%, and partial values

MathematicalEdge validation:case [current]/[current]mathematical = 100%validation

PercentageBoundary calculationcondition correcttesting

108

VerifyValidate listreal-time distributioncalculation updates

AllSuccess listsrate containupdates Consumerwhen contactsworkflow onlydata changes

ConsumerLive lists:calculation [current total]capability

ListDynamic categorizationcalculation updated

11

Test category breakdown display

Category section shows single Consumer bar with 100% and other bar with 0%

Visual: single category bar

UI properly updatedvalidation


Verification Points:Points

  • Primary_Verification:Primary_Verification: OnlySuccess Consumerrate categorycalculated visiblecorrectly withusing 100%(successful/total) distribution× of100 allformula
  • Secondary_Verifications: 56,789Weighted contacts

    Secondary_Verifications: List countsaverages accurate, datadecimal migrationprecision successful, UI updated correctlycorrect

  • Negative_Verification:Negative_Verification: No Techniciancalculation or Business categories visible,errors, no datadivision lossby duringzero migrationissues

    Migration_Verification: All contacts properly reclassified, no data inconsistencies




TestUX01US01_TC_009-Verify Case:Total UX01US01_TC_004Active Failure Count Display



Title: Verify WorkflowTotal PerformanceActive Failure Count Display (Top 3 by Messages)
Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 27,28, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:Classification

  • Module/Feature: Failure Count Display
  • Test Type: Functional/Data
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Module/Feature:MOD-Communication, Workflow Performance

Test Type: Functional

Test Level: System

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Regression

Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: 

Tags=API , Database ,

MOD-WorkflowPerformance, P1-Critical,P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-CriticalHigh, Revenue-Impact-Medium, HappyFlow, Failure-Tracking, Active-Failures

Business Context:Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: HighMedium

  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Must-Should-Have

  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required:Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related:SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:Metrics

  • Risk_Level:Risk_Level: Medium

  • Complexity_Level:Complexity_Level: Medium

  • Expected_Execution_Time:Expected_Execution_Time: 54 minutes

  • Reproducibility_Score:Reproducibility_Score: High

  • Data_Sensitivity:Data_Sensitivity: Medium
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of failure count display functionality
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Frontend, Failure Tracking Service, Workflow Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: FailureTracker, ActiveFailureService, WorkflowMonitor
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#11 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder:Failure_Impact: HighEngineering

  • Report_Categories: System-Health, Failure-Tracking, Operational-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment:

    Environment: Staging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+

  • Screen_Resolution:Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080,1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Tablet-1024x768

    Dependencies:Failure Tracking Service, Workflow Service, Analytics Service, Message ProcessingDashboard Service

  • Performance_Baseline:Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds workflowfailure data calculationload

  • Data_Requirements:Data_Requirements: WorkflowActive executionfailure history with message volumesdata

Prerequisites:Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements:Setup_Requirements: Failure tracking service operational, failure data available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Dashboard loaded,viewer workflow services operationalaccess

    User_Roles_Permissions: CSO Manager, Utility Administrator, or authorized workflow viewer

    Test_Data: Active workflow data with realistic Samoa Power Corp message volumes

    Prior_Test_Cases: V1-17_TC_001 (Dashboard Main Load) successful


  • Test Procedure:Test_Data:


    Step #

    Action

    Expected Result

    Test Data

    Workflow Analytics Validation

    1

    Locate Workflow Performance section accessible

  • Prior_Test_Cases:Section visibleUX01US01_TC_007 with comprehensive metrics

  • (Workflow Performance section displayedvisible)

    Workflow section accessible

    2

    Verify Active Workflows count

    Shows "Active Workflows: [current count]"

    Real-time active workflow count

    Workflow count accurate

    3

    Check Total Messages processed

    Displays "Total Messages: [current count]"

    Live workflow message volume

    Message volume tracking

    4

    Verify Average Success Rate

    Shows "average of all workflow’s success rates" success rate

    Real-time calculated success rate

    Success rate calculation correct

    5

    Check Total Failures count

    Displays "[current count]" total failures

    Live failure count

    Failure tracking accurate

    6

    Verify Message Distribution top 3 sorting

    Top 3 workflows sorted by current message count (highest to lowest)

    Real-time message count sorting

    Top 3 sorting per comments

    7

    Check top workflow success rate

    Top workflow shows current success rate percentage

    Live success rate calculation

    Individual success rate calculation

    8

    Check second workflow success rate

    Second workflow shows current success rate percentage

    Live success rate calculation

    Individual success rate calculation

    9

    Check third workflow success rate

    Third workflow shows current success rate percentage

    Live success rate calculation

    Individual success rate calculation

    10

    Verify message count percentages

    Distribution percentages based on current message counts(current message/total messages)*100

    Real-time percentage calculations

    Distribution percentage validation

    12

    Test workflow data refresh

    Metrics update when new workflow data available

    Real-time or periodic refresh

    Data refresh mechanism


    Verification Points:

    Primary_Verification: Top 3 workflows displayed correctly sorted by message count (Service Updates > New Customer > Re-engagement)

    Secondary_Verifications: Success rates calculated accurately, percentages add up correctly, failure count accurate

    Negative_Verification: No workflow sorting errors, no calculation discrepancies

    Analytics_Verification: Workflow analytics service integration functional, real-time data updates



    PERFORMANCE TEST CASES

Test Case: UX01US01_TC_005

Title: Dashboard Load Performance Test with Realistic Data Volume
 Created Date: May 27, 2025 Version: 1.0

Classification:

Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance

Test Type: Performance

Test Level: System

Priority: P2-High

Execution Phase: Performance

Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: 

Tags=API , Database

MOD-Performance, P2-High, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High

Business Context:

Customer_Segment: All

Revenue_Impact: Medium

Business_Priority: Should-Have

Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

Compliance_Required: No

SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics:

Risk_Level: Medium

Complexity_Level: High

Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes

Reproducibility_Score: High

Data_Sensitivity: Low

Failure_Impact: Medium

Test Environment:

Environment: Performance Testing

Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+

Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+

Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, load testing framework

Performance_Baseline: < 3 seconds initial load, < 5 seconds concurrent load

Data_Requirements: Full Samoa Power Corp dataset (35,486 messages, 56,789 contacts)

Prerequisites:

Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment configured

User_Roles_Permissions: Load testing user accounts (5 concurrent users)

Test_Data: Full production-like dataset for Samoa Power Corp

Prior_Test_Cases: Dashboard functionality validated


Test Procedure:Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

CommentsComment

1

ClearNavigate browserto cacheWorkflow Performance section

CacheSection clearedvisible with failure metrics


From TC_007 validation


Prerequisite step

2

NavigateLocate toTotal dashboardFailures URLcount display

PageShows startsactive loadingfailure count clearly


Total Failures: [current count]

StartShould timershow exact number (e.g., 23)

3

MeasureVerify initial"active" pagefailure loadfiltering

CompleteOnly pagecurrently loadunresolved <failures 1 secondscounted


Status filtering validation


Not resolved/closed failures

4

Verify allcount sectionsformat renderand display

AllNumber 4displayed sectionsclearly displaywithout within 1 secondserrors


Expected format: whole number


No decimals or "Loading..."

5

Test withfailure 10count concurrent usersaccuracy

AllCount usersreflects loadonly dashboardactive/unresolved < 1 secondsfailures


Cross-validation with failure logs

ConcurrentActive accessstatus verification

6

MonitorVerify memorycross-workflow usagefailure aggregation

NoFailures memoryfrom leaksall detectedworkflows included in count


Multi-workflow failure tracking


Comprehensive counting

7

Test count stability during session

Count remains consistent during session

Refresh and verify same count

Data persistence

8

Validate real-time failure updates

Count updates when failure status changes

Live failure management

Dynamic count updates

Verification Points:Points

  • Primary_Verification:Primary_Verification: DashboardTotal loadsfailure completelycount withinshows 1only secondscurrently foractive/unresolved singlefailures
  • Secondary_Verifications: user,Real-time 5updates secondsfunctional, forcross-workflow concurrentaggregation usersaccurate

  • Negative_Verification:Secondary_Verifications: Memory usage efficient, API responses fast, no performance degradation

    Negative_Verification: No memoryresolved leaks,failures no performance bottlenecks, no system resource exhaustioncounted




SECURITYUX01US01_TC_010-Verify TESTMessage CASESDistribution by Campaign Type (Top 3 Display)

Test Case: UX01US01_TC_006



Title: DashboardVerify AccessMessage ControlDistribution Verificationby Campaign Type (Top 3 Display)
Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 27,28, 2025
Version: 1.0

Classification:Classification

  • Module/Feature: Message Distribution Analytics
  • Test Type: Functional/Analytics
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

Module/Feature:MOD-Communication, Security

Test Type: Security

Test Level: System

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Security

Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags: 

Tags=Auth Services

MOD-Security, P1-Critical,P2-High, Phase-Security,Regression, Type-Security,Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Business-CriticalRevenue-Impact-Medium, HappyFlow, Campaign-Analytics, Top-3-Display

Business Context:Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: HighMedium

  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Must-Should-Have

  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required:Compliance_Required: YesNo

  • SLA_Related:SLA_Related: YesNo

Quality Metrics:Metrics

  • Risk_Level:Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of message distribution display (top 3 campaigns)
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Frontend, Campaign Analytics Service, Message Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#12 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder:Complexity_Level: HighEngineering
  • Report_Categories: Campaign-Analytics, Message-Distribution, Performance-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment:

    Environment: Security TestingStaging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+

  • Screen_Resolution:Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

  • Dependencies:Dependencies: AuthenticationCampaign Analytics Service, AuthorizationMessage Service,Distribution Session ManagementService

  • Performance_Baseline:Performance_Baseline: < 2 seconds authenticationanalytics responseload
  • Data_Requirements: Campaign message distribution data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements:Data_Requirements: MultipleCampaign useranalytics rolesoperational, distribution data available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Dashboard viewer access
  • Test_Data: Workflow Performance section with differentMessage accessDistribution levelssubsection

  • Prerequisites:Prior_Test_Cases:

    Setup_Requirements: Security testing environment with role-based users

    User_Roles_Permissions: Test accounts for all user rolesUX01US01_TC_007 (CSOWorkflow Manager,Performance CSO Agent, etc.)accessible)

    Test_Data: Samoa Power Corp multi-role user accounts

    Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system functional


Test Procedure:Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

CommentsComment

1

AccessNavigate dashboardto withoutMessage authenticationDistribution subsection

RedirectedSubsection tovisible loginwithin pageWorkflow Performance


Look for "Message Distribution" title


Should be below workflow metrics

2

LoginCount withnumber CSOof Managercampaigns roledisplayed

FullExactly dashboard3 accesscampaigns grantedshown (top 3 by message volume)

User:Top cso.manager@samoapower.ws3 campaigns only


🚨 CRITICAL: Only top 3 per comments

3

Verify campaign ordering

Campaigns sorted by message count (highest to lowest)

Descending order by volume

Highest volume first

4

Verify datacampaign isolationmessage counts

OnlyEach authorizedcampaign datashows visibleaccurate message count


Service Updates: ~2,456<br>New Customer: ~1,245<br>Re-engagement: ~855

Company-specificQuery: dataSELECT campaign_name, COUNT(*) as message_count FROM messages WHERE workflow_id IS NOT NULL GROUP BY campaign_name ORDER BY message_count DESC LIMIT 3

5

TestVerify sessionpercentage timeoutcalculations

SessionEach expirescampaign aftershows configuredcorrect inactivitypercentage periodof total


Calculate: (Campaign messages / Total) × 100

SecurityMathematical requirementvalidation

6

AttemptVerify directcampaign URLnames accessdisplay

AccessCampaign denied,names redirectedclearly tolabeled loginand readable


Service Update Notifications, New Customer Welcome, Re-engagement Campaign


Clear labeling

7

Test percentage total validation

Top 3 percentages sum appropriately

Percentage sum validation

Mathematical consistency

8

Validate visual representation

Campaigns displayed in clear, readable format

Bar charts or list format

Visual clarity

Verification Points:Points

  • Primary_Verification:Primary_Verification: ProperTop authentication3 campaigns by message volume displayed with accurate counts and authorizationpercentages
  • Secondary_Verifications: enforcedCorrect forsorting, allaccurate userpercentages, rolesclear visual presentation

  • Negative_Verification:Secondary_Verifications: Role-based access working correctly, session management functional

    Negative_Verification: No unauthorizedcampaigns accessbeyond possible,top 3 shown, no securitypercentage bypassescalculation errors


APIUX01US01_TC_011-Verify &Success INTEGRATIONRate TESTDistribution CASESby Campaign Type Display

Test Case: UX01US01_TC_007



Title: DashboardVerify DataSuccess APIRate IntegrationDistribution andby Real-timeCampaign UpdatesType ValidationDisplay
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 27,28, 2025

Version: 1.0

Classification:Classification

  • Module/Feature: Success Rate Distribution Analytics
  • Test Type: Functional/Analytics
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P2-High
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags for 17 Reports Support

Module/Feature:MOD-Communication, API Integration

Test Type: API

Test Level: Integration

Priority: P1-Critical

Execution Phase: Regression

Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags: 

Tags-API

MOD-APIIntegration, P1-Critical,P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-API,Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High, Business-CriticalRevenue-Impact-Medium, HappyFlow, Success-Rate-Distribution, Campaign-Analytics

Business Context:Context

  • Customer_Segment:Customer_Segment: All

  • Revenue_Impact:Revenue_Impact: HighMedium

  • Business_Priority:Business_Priority: Must-Should-Have

  • Customer_Journey:Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage

  • Compliance_Required:Compliance_Required: No

  • SLA_Related:SLA_Related: YesNo

Quality Metrics:Metrics

  • Risk_Level:Risk_Level: Medium
  • Complexity_Level: High

  • Expected_Execution_Time:Complexity_Level: 6 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High

  • Data_Sensitivity:Expected_Execution_Time: 8 minutes

    Reproducibility_Score: High

    Data_Sensitivity: Medium

  • Failure_Impact: Medium

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of success rate distribution by campaign type
  • Integration_Points: Dashboard Frontend, Campaign Analytics Service, Success Rate Calculator
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete AC#13 coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder:Failure_Impact: HighEngineering

  • Report_Categories: Campaign-Performance, Success-Rate-Analytics, Distribution-Metrics
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: No
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Medium

Requirements Traceability:Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment:

    Environment: Integration TestingStaging

  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest

  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+

  • Screen_Resolution:Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080

  • Dependencies:Dependencies: BackendCampaign APIs,Analytics Database,Service, WebSocketSuccess server,Rate APICalculator, testingVisual toolsChart Service

  • Performance_Baseline:Performance_Baseline: < 500ms API response time, < 53 seconds real-timechart updaterendering
  • Data_Requirements: Campaign-specific success rate data

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements:Data_Requirements: LiveCampaign APIanalytics endpointsoperational, success rate data available
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Dashboard viewer access
  • Test_Data: Message Distribution section accessible with Samoasuccess Powerrate Corp databreakdown

  • Prerequisites:Prior_Test_Cases:

    Setup_Requirements: APIUX01US01_TC_011 testing(Message environmentDistribution with live backend servicesvisible)

    User_Roles_Permissions: API access credentials for dashboard services

    Test_Data: Live API endpoints returning actual dashboard data

    Prior_Test_Cases: Backend services operational and responding


Test Procedure:Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

CommentsComment

1

CallNavigate dashboardto metricsSuccess APIRate Distribution subsection

ReturnsSubsection 200visible statuswithin withMessage valid JSONDistribution

GETLook for "Success Rate by Campaign" chart


Should be below message distribution

2

Verify channelcampaign performancesuccess APIrates display

ReturnsEach channelcampaign datashows structureindividual success rate percentage

GETService Updates: 98.2%<br>New Customer: 95.7%<br>Re-engagement: 89.3%


Individual percentages shown

3

TestVerify listssuccess overviewrate APIcalculation accuracy

ReturnsSuccess listsrates andmatch contactmanual countscalculations

GETCalculate: (Successful messages / Total messages per campaign) × 100


Mathematical validation

4

CallVerify workflowvisual performancerepresentation APIformat

ReturnsSuccess workflowrates metricsdisplayed in chart/bar format

GETBar chart or progress bars

Clear visual format

5

Test campaign ordering consistency

Same campaign order as message distribution

Consistent with TC_011 ordering

Order consistency

6

Verify success rate precision

Percentages show appropriate decimal places

Expected format: XX.X%

One decimal precision

7

Validate comparative analysis capability

Easy to compare success rates across campaigns

Visual comparison possible

Comparative clarity

8

Test chart responsiveness

Chart adapts to different screen sizes

Responsive design validation

Cross-device compatibility

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Success rate distribution shows accurate individual campaign success rates with visual representation
  • Secondary_Verifications: Mathematical accuracy, visual clarity, responsive design
  • Negative_Verification: No calculation errors, no missing campaign data





UX01US01_TC_012-Verify Dashboard Real-time Data Refresh and Synchronization

Title: Verify Dashboard Real-time Data Refresh and Synchronization
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Real-time Data Synchronization
  • Test Type: Functional/Integration
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, HappyFlow, Real-Time-Sync, Data-Refresh

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Continuous-Monitoring
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 10 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of real-time data synchronization across all dashboard components
  • Integration_Points: All Dashboard Services, WebSocket Connection, Data Sync Service
  • Code_Module_Mapped:Communication
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete real-time functionality coverage
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Real-Time-Performance, Data-Synchronization, System-Integration
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: All Dashboard Services, WebSocket Service, Data Sync Infrastructure
  • Performance_Baseline: < 5 seconds sync time, < 2% data lag
  • Data_Requirements: Live data streams, WebSocket connections

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: All dashboard services operational, WebSocket connections stable
  • User_Roles_Permissions: Dashboard viewer access
  • Test_Data: Full dashboard accessible with all sections
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX01US01_TC_007 through TC_013 (All dashboard components functional)

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Load complete dashboard

All sections load with current data

Full dashboard visible

Baseline data capture

2

Verify initial data timestamp

All metrics show current/recent timestamps

Data freshness validation

Real-time baseline

3

Trigger workflow message processing

Generate new workflow activity

Create test workflow messages

Background data change

4

Monitor automatic data refresh

Dashboard metrics update without manual refresh

30-60 second update window

Automatic synchronization

5

Verify APIcross-component response timeconsistency

All APIsrelated respondmetrics <update 1 secconsistently

Message count, success rate, failures all sync

Data consistency

8

Test manual refresh capability

Manual refresh button updates all data

Force refresh functionality

Manual sync option

9

Verify data accuracy post-sync

Updated data matches backend reality

Cross-validation with backend

Sync accuracy

10

Test sync during network interruption

Dashboard handles connection issues gracefully

Simulate network issues

Error handling

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: All dashboard components maintain real-time synchronization with accurate, consistent data
  • Secondary_Verifications: WebSocket stability, error handling, user feedback systems
  • Negative_Verification: No stale data, no sync failures, no inconsistent states


UX01US01_TC_013 - Verify Dashboard Cross-Browser Compatibility

Title: Verify Dashboard Cross-Browser Compatibility
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Dashboard Cross-Browser Support
  • Test Type: Compatibility/UI
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Regression
  • Automation Status: Manual

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Web, Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Cross-Browser, UI-Consistency, Compatibility-Matrix

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: All
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: Medium
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 15 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: Low
  • Failure_Impact: High

Test Environment

  • Environment: Staging
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080, Tablet-1024x768
  • Dependencies: All Dashboard Services
  • Performance_Baseline: Consistent across all browsers

Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Load dashboard in Chrome 115+

All components render correctly

Full dashboard data

Baseline browser

2

Load dashboard in Firefox 110+

Identical layout and functionality

Same data set

Firefox compatibility

3

Load dashboard in Safari 16+

Consistent visual appearance

Same data set

Safari-specific testing

4

Load dashboard in Edge Latest

All features function identically

Same data set

Edge compatibility

5

Test chart rendering across browsers

Charts display consistently

Chart data

Visual consistency

6

Verify interactive elements

Hover effects, clicks work uniformly

Interactive components

Functionality parity

7

Test responsive behavior

Dashboard adapts to different screen sizes

Various resolutions

Responsive design

8

Validate performance consistency

Load times similar across browsers

Performance requirementmetrics

Speed parity

Verification Points

  • Primary_Verification: Dashboard displays and functions identically across all supported browsers
  • Secondary_Verifications: Performance consistency, visual parity, interactive element functionality
  • Negative_Verification: No browser-specific bugs, no layout inconsistencies




UX01US01_TC_014 - Verify Dashboard Performance Under Load

Title: Verify Dashboard Performance Under Load
 Created By: Prachi
 Created Date: May 28, 2025
 Version: 1.0

Classification

  • Module/Feature: Dashboard Performance
  • Test Type: Performance/Load
  • Test Level: System
  • Priority: P1-Critical
  • Execution Phase: Performance
  • Automation Status: Automated

Enhanced Tags

MOD-Communication, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Load, Platform-Web, Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical, Revenue-Impact-High, Performance-Testing, Load-Handling, Scalability, Concurrent-Users, Response-Time

Business Context

  • Customer_Segment: Enterprise
  • Revenue_Impact: High
  • Business_Priority: Must-Have
  • Customer_Journey: Peak-Usage
  • Compliance_Required: No
  • SLA_Related: Yes

Quality Metrics

  • Risk_Level: High
  • Complexity_Level: High
  • Expected_Execution_Time: 30 minutes
  • Reproducibility_Score: High
  • Data_Sensitivity: High
  • Failure_Impact: Critical

Coverage Tracking

  • Feature_Coverage: 100% of dashboard performance under concurrent load scenarios
  • Integration_Points: Load Balancer, Database Connection Pool, Application Server, CDN, WebSocket Connections
  • Code_Module_Mapped: Communication, Performance Monitor, Load Balancer
  • Requirement_Coverage: Complete performance and scalability requirements
  • Cross_Platform_Support: Web

Stakeholder Reporting

  • Primary_Stakeholder: Engineering
  • Report_Categories: Performance-Metrics, Scalability-Testing, Load-Analysis, System-Capacity
  • Trend_Tracking: Yes
  • Executive_Visibility: Yes
  • Customer_Impact_Level: Critical

Requirements Traceability

Test Environment

  • Environment: Performance Testing Environment (Production-like)
  • Browser/Version: Chrome 115+ (primary), Firefox 110+ (secondary)
  • Device/OS: Windows 11, macOS 12+
  • Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
  • Dependencies: Load Testing Tools (JMeter/LoadRunner), Performance Monitoring (New Relic/DataDog), Database Performance Monitor
  • Performance_Baseline: Single user: <3s, 50 users: <5s, 100 users: <7s, 200 users: <10s
  • Data_Requirements: Full production-scale dataset (1M+ messages, 500+ workflows, 10K+ contacts)

Prerequisites

  • Setup_Requirements: Performance testing environment provisioned, load testing tools configured, monitoring dashboards active
  • User_Roles_Permissions: 200 test accounts with CSO Manager permissions
  • Test_Data: Production-scale test data: cso.manager.001@samoapower.ws through cso.manager.200@samoapower.ws / SamoaPower2025!
  • Prior_Test_Cases: UX01US01_TC_001 (baseline functionality), all functional tests passing


Test Procedure

Step #

Action

Expected Result

Test Data

Comment

1

Baseline single user performance

Dashboard loads < 3 seconds

Full data set

Performance baseline

2

Load test with 50 concurrent users

Response time < 5 seconds

50 user sessions

Medium load

3

Load test with 100 concurrent users

Response time < 7 seconds

100 user sessions

High load

4

Load test with 200 concurrent users

Response time < 10 seconds

200 user sessions

Peak load

5

Monitor CPU and memory usage

System resources < 80%

Resource monitoring

Resource utilization

6

Test APIdatabase errorconnection handlingpooling

ProperNo errorconnection responses for invalid requestserrors


DB monitoring


Connection management

7

Verify auto-scaling behavior

System scales appropriately

Scaling metrics

Scalability validation

8

Recovery time after load

System recovers < 2 minutes

Post-load metrics

Recovery testing

Verification Points:Points

  • Primary_Verification:Primary_Verification: AllDashboard dashboardmaintains APIsacceptable returnperformance expectedunder specified load levels
  • Secondary_Verifications: Resource utilization within limits, no data structurecorruption, graceful degradation

  • Negative_Verification:Secondary_Verifications: ResponseNo timessystem withincrashes, acceptableno limitsdata loss, no permanent performance degradation





Test Suite Organization

Smoke Test Suite (Execute:5 Everyminutes Release)execution)

  • UX01US01_TC_001V1-17_TC_001: Dashboard- MainMessage PageCount LoadVerification

  • UX01US01_TC_002V1-17_TC_002: - Channel Performance DisplayCharts

  • UX01US01_TC_006V1-17_TC_007: Access- ControlActive VerificationWorkflows Count

  • UX01US01_TC_013 - Cross-Browser Basic Load

Regression Test Suite (Execute:45 Perminutes Release)execution)

  • All P1-CriticalSmoke andTests P2-High+
  • UX01US01_TC_004 priority- testTime casesPeriod Metrics

  • UX01US01_TC_005Focus on- coreLists functionalityOverview
  • UX01US01_TC_007 and- updatedWorkflow requirementsMessages Count

  • UX01US01_TC_008Cross-browser compatibility- validationSuccess Rate Calculation

  • UX01US01_TC_009 - Failure Count Display
  • UX01US01_TC_012 - Real-time Synchronization

Full Test Suite (Execute:90 Majorminutes Releases)execution)

  • CompleteAll testRegression caseTests coverage+
  • UX01US01_TC_010 including- edgeMessage casesDistribution

  • UX01US01_TC_011 - Success Rate Distribution
  • UX01US01_TC_014 - Performance andTesting

Performance securityTest validationSuite (30 minutes execution)

  • UX01US01_TC_014 - Load Testing

  • UX01US01_TC_012Responsive design- testingReal-time Performance




  • UX01US01_TC_013 - Cross-Browser Performance

Execution Matrix

Test Case ID

Chrome 115+

Firefox

Safari

Edge

Mobile

Priority

Execution Phase

Automation Status

V1-17_TC_001TC_001-003

P1

Smoke

Planned

V1-17_TC_002TC_004-007

P1

Regression

Manual

V1-17_TC_003

P2

Regression

PlannedP1-P2

V1-17_TC_004TC_008-012

P1

Regression

Manual

P1-P2

V1-17_TC_005TC_013-017

P2

Regression

Manual

V1-17_TC_006

P2

Performance

Automated

V1-17_TC_007

P1

Security

Manual



















Business Rules Validation

Growth Percentage Removal (Per Comments)

Rule: No growth percentages displayed anywhere on dashboard

Test Coverage: V1-17_TC_002 validates removal

Business Impact: Simplified UI without percentage indicators

Channel Performance Updates (Per Comments)

Rule: Removed "read" status from Email channel performance

Test Coverage: V1-17_TC_002 validates updated pie chart structure

Business Impact: Cleaner Email performance metrics

Consumer-Only Lists (Per Comments)

Rule: Only Consumer category supported, removed Technician/Business

Test Coverage: V1-17_TC_003 validates single category display

Business Impact: Simplified customer segmentation

Top 3 Workflows Display (Per Comments)

Rule: Display first 3 workflows sorted by message count

Test Coverage: V1-17_TC_004 validates correct sorting and display

Business Impact: Focus on highest volume workflows

Removed Features Validation

Filter/Import Removal: V1-17_TC_005 validates clean UI

Date Dropdown Removal: V1-17_TC_002 confirms no date selectors

In-App Notifications: V1-17_TC_002 validates removal




Test Data Requirements

Samoa Power Corp Test Company

Company Name: Samoa Power Corporation

Domain: samoapower.ws

Location: Apia, Samoa

Utility Type: Electric Power

Customer Base: 25,000 residential, 5,000 business

Sample User Accounts

CSO Manager: cso.manager@samoapower.ws

CSO Agent: cso.agent@samoapower.ws

Utility Admin: admin@samoapower.ws

Meter Manager: meter.manager@samoapower.ws

Billing Manager: billing@samoapower.ws

Test Communication Data

Total Messages: 35,486

Email Messages: 16,249

SMS Messages: 8,524

WhatsApp Messages: 6,845

Active Workflows: 3

Static Lists: 24

Dynamic Lists: 16

Total Contacts: 56,789




Traceability Matrix

Acceptance Criteria

Test Cases

Coverage Status

AC1: Display accurate total message counts

V1-17_TC_001, V1-17_TC_010

✓ Complete

AC2: Show Channel Performance charts

V1-17_TC_002

✓ Complete

AC3: Display performance for time periods

V1-17_TC_002

✓ Complete

AC4: Lists Overview with counts

V1-17_TC_003

✓ Complete

AC5: List Categories distribution

V1-17_TC_003

✓ Complete

AC6: Workflow Performance metrics

V1-17_TC_004

✓ Complete

AC7: Message Distribution by campaign

V1-17_TC_004

✓ Complete

AC8: Success Rate Distribution

V1-17_TC_004

✓ Complete

AC9: Auto-update on filter changes

Modified per comments

✓ N/AP1-P2


Legend: ✓ = Required, ○ = Optional



Integration Dependencies

RiskCritical AssessmentDependencies &(Must MitigationPass First)

  1. HighAuthentication Risk Areas

    Data AccuracyService: Real-time- calculationRequired accuracyfor all tests

    1. Database ServiceMitigation: V1-17_TC_001,- V1-17_TC_010Required validatefor data integrityvalidation tests
    2. Dashboard API - Required for all functional tests

    PerformanceService Dependencies

    • Message Service API: Dashboard loadTC_001, withTC_007, largeTC_010
    • Workflow datasetsService → TC_006, TC_007, TC_008, TC_009
    • Analytics Service → TC_008, TC_010, TC_011
    • WebSocket Service → TC_012

    Test Execution Order

    1. Prerequisites:Mitigation: V1-17_TC_006TC_001 performance(Authentication testing& Basic Load)
    2. Core Functionality: TC_002, TC_004, TC_005, TC_006
    3. Advanced Features: TC_007, TC_008, TC_009, TC_010, TC_011
    4. System Tests: TC_012, TC_013, TC_014, TC_015, TC_016, TC_017

    API Test Collection (Critical Level ≥7)

    High Priority API Tests

    1. Authentication API - Login/logout endpoints (Priority: 9)
    2. Message Count API - Real-time message counting (Priority: 9)
    3. Workflow Status API - Active workflow tracking (Priority: 8)
    4. Success Rate API - Performance calculations (Priority: 8)
    5. Real-time Sync API - WebSocket data updates (Priority: 7)

    SecurityAPI Test Specifications

    • Response Time:: Unauthorized< data500ms accessfor critical operations

      1. Data Validation:Mitigation: V1-17_TC_007All accessbusiness controlrules enforced
      2. Error Handling: Proper HTTP status codes
      3. Security: Authentication/authorization validation

    Quality Gates

    MediumRelease Risk AreasCriteria

    • Smoke Tests: 100% pass rate
    • P1 Tests: 100% pass rate
    • P2 Tests: 95% pass rate
    • Performance: All benchmarks met
    • Security: Zero critical vulnerabilities

    UIMonitoring Changes& Reporting

    • Daily:: Comment-based requirement updates

      1. Mitigation: AllSmoke test cases updated per latest commentsexecution

    • Browser CompatibilityWeekly:: Chrome-focusedFull butregression other browsers used

      1. Mitigation: Basic cross-browser validation includedsuite

    • Low Risk Areas

      Responsive DesignRelease:: SecondaryComplete prioritytest forsuite B2Bincluding users

      1. Mitigation:performance V1-17_TC_009and covers basic responsive requirementssecurity
    • Continuous: API health monitoring