Bento Menu (ONB07)
Bento Menu (ONB07) - Comprehensive Test Cases Based on Acceptance Criteria
Test Scenario Analysis Summary
Functional Test Scenarios (Based on 20 Acceptance Criteria)
- Grid Display Consistency (AC1, AC6, AC9, AC10, AC19)
- Performance Requirements (AC2)
- Role-Based Access Control (AC3, AC11)
- Navigation Functionality (AC4, AC8, AC12, AC13)
- Keyboard Accessibility (AC5, AC15)
- Visual Design Standards (AC7, AC14, AC16, AC18)
- Responsive Layout (AC17)
- Error Handling (AC20)
Integration Points Identified
- Authentication Service → Role validation
- Authorization Service → Permission checking
- Module Services → Individual module availability
- Navigation Tracking → User behavior analytics
- Utility Selection Service → Multi-utility context
Test Cases - Part 1 (AC1-AC10)
Test Case 1: Grid Display Consistency Validation
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_001
Title: Verify Bento Menu displays all 12 core modules in consistent 4×3 grid layout
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Core Display
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-End-to-End, UI-Layout, Grid-Display,
HappyFlow, Database-Read, Services-UI
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 2 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Critical
Coverage Tracking:
- Feature_Coverage: 25%
- Integration_Points: UI Service, Database, Authentication
- Code_Module_Mapped: BentoMenuComponent, GridLayoutService
- Requirement_Coverage: Complete
- Cross_Platform_Support: Web
Stakeholder Reporting:
- Primary_Stakeholder: Product
- Report_Categories: Quality-Dashboard, Module-Coverage
- Trend_Tracking: Yes
- Executive_Visibility: Yes
- Customer_Impact_Level: High
Requirements Traceability:
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome 115+, Firefox 110+, Safari 16+, Edge Latest
- Device/OS: Windows 10/11, macOS 12+
- Screen_Resolution: Desktop-1920x1080
- Dependencies: Authentication Service, Module Registry, Database
- Performance_Baseline: <0.5 seconds
- Data_Requirements: Valid user with admin permissions
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: SMART360 system deployed and operational
- User_Roles_Permissions: System Admin access
- Test_Data: admin@utilityco.com / SecurePass123!
- Prior_Test_Cases: Login functionality verified
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Login to SMART360 system | Successful authentication, dashboard displayed | admin@utilityco.com | Prerequisite step |
2 | Navigate to Bento Menu | Menu button accessible from current screen | N/A | AC13 validation |
3 | Click Bento Menu button | Grid displays within 0.5 seconds | N/A | AC2 performance requirement |
4 | Verify grid structure | 4×3 grid layout with 12 module tiles | N/A | AC1, AC6 validation |
5 | Verify first row modules | Utility Setup, Plan & Tariff, Call Center displayed | N/A | AC9 functional organization |
6 | Verify second row modules | Consumer Services, Meter Data, Billing displayed | N/A | AC9 functional organization |
7 | Verify third row modules | Service Orders, Asset Management, Reports & Analytics | N/A | AC9 functional organization |
8 | Verify fourth row modules | Communication Hub, Integration Hub, Organisation Setup | N/A | AC9 functional organization |
9 | Validate tile consistency | All tiles same size, proper spacing maintained | N/A | AC10, AC19 styling |
10 | Check visual hierarchy | Clear distinction between functional areas | N/A | AC14 visual design |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All 12 modules displayed in correct 4×3 grid layout
- Secondary_Verifications: Consistent styling, proper spacing, functional organization
- Negative_Verification: No extra modules, no missing modules, no layout distortion
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Daily
- Maintenance_Effort: Low
- Automation_Candidate: Yes
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Login functionality
- Blocked_Tests: Individual module navigation tests
- Parallel_Tests: Performance tests
- Sequential_Tests: Must run before navigation tests
Test Case 2: Performance Load Time Validation
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_002
Title: Verify Bento Menu loads within 0.5 seconds of user interaction
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Performance
- Test Type: Performance
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Performance
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Performance, Type-Performance, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Performance, API-Performance,
HappyFlow, Database-Performance, Services-Performance
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: High
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 3 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: High
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Performance_Baseline: <0.5 seconds
- Dependencies: Performance monitoring tools, Network simulation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Initialize performance monitoring | Timing tools active and recording | N/A | Setup for measurement |
2 | Login to system | Baseline performance established | admin@utilityco.com | Starting point |
3 | Navigate to any module | Current screen loaded | N/A | Test from various starting points |
4 | Click Bento Menu button | Menu appears within 0.5 seconds | N/A | AC2 primary requirement |
5 | Measure grid rendering time | All 12 tiles visible and interactive <0.5s | N/A | Complete load validation |
6 | Test from different modules | Consistent performance across all entry points | Various starting modules | Comprehensive coverage |
7 | Simulate slow network | Performance maintained under network stress | Throttled connection | Edge case testing |
8 | Test concurrent access | Performance maintained with multiple users | 10 concurrent sessions | Load validation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Menu load time consistently under 0.5 seconds
- Performance_Verification: Time to interactive measurement
- Network_Verification: Performance under various network conditions
Test Case 3: Role-Based Permission Display
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_003
Title: Verify modules display based on user role permissions with disabled states
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Security
- Test Type: Security/Functional
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Security, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Authorization, API-Security,
HappyFlow, NegativeTest, Database-Security, Services-Authorization
Prerequisites:
- Test users for each role: System Admin, Utility Administrator, CSO Manager, Billing Manager, O&M Manager, Asset Manager
- Permission matrix configured in system
- Role validation service operational
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Login as System Admin | Full access to all modules | sysadmin@utilityco.com | Highest privilege level |
2 | Access Bento Menu | All 12 modules enabled and clickable | N/A | AC3, AC11 validation |
3 | Login as Utility Administrator | Role-specific access granted | utiladmin@utilityco.com | Mid-level permissions |
4 | Access Bento Menu | Modules per role permissions, some disabled | N/A | Disabled state validation |
5 | Attempt restricted module access | Clear indication of access restriction | N/A | Negative test scenario |
6 | Test CSO Manager role | CX Dashboard access for Call Center/Consumer Services | csomanager@utilityco.com | Specific role validation |
7 | Test Billing Manager role | Bill Setup access for Billing module | billingmgr@utilityco.com | Billing-specific access |
8 | Validate visual indicators | Clear distinction between enabled/disabled modules | N/A | AC11 requirement |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Correct modules displayed per role permissions
- Security_Verification: Restricted modules properly disabled
- Visual_Verification: Clear indication of access levels
Test Case 4: Single-Click Module Navigation
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_004
Title: Verify direct navigation to permitted modules with single click
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Navigation
- Test Type: Functional/Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Navigation, API-Navigation,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-Navigation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | Menu grid displayed | N/A | Starting point |
2 | Click "Utility Setup" tile | Navigate to selected utility dashboard | N/A | AC4 + utility selection |
3 | Verify utility selection bar | Utility selector visible in dashboard | N/A | Context-aware navigation |
4 | Return to Bento Menu | Menu accessible via navigation | N/A | AC8 requirement |
5 | Click "Plan & Tariff" tile | Redirect to Plan and Tariff module | N/A | Specific module mapping |
6 | Click "Call Center" tile | Navigate to CX Dashboard | N/A | CX dashboard integration |
7 | Click "Consumer Services" tile | Navigate to CX Dashboard | N/A | Shared dashboard access |
8 | Click "Meter Data" tile | Navigate to Meter Dashboard | N/A | New dashboard access |
9 | Click "Billing" tile | Navigate to Bill Setup | N/A | Setup-focused navigation |
10 | Test remaining modules | Service Orders→Master, Asset→Dashboard, etc. | N/A | Complete module coverage |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Single-click navigation to correct destinations
- Integration_Verification: Proper module loading and functionality
- Context_Verification: Appropriate utility context maintained
Test Case 5: Keyboard Navigation Support
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_005
Title: Verify complete keyboard navigation throughout menu grid interface
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Accessibility
- Test Type: Accessibility/Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Accessibility, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Accessibility, API-Accessibility,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-Accessibility
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Bento Menu | Menu displayed and ready | N/A | Starting point |
2 | Press Tab key | Focus moves to first module tile | N/A | AC5, AC15 validation |
3 | Continue Tab navigation | Focus moves through all 12 tiles in logical order | N/A | Tab order verification |
4 | Press Shift+Tab | Focus moves in reverse order | N/A | Reverse navigation |
5 | Use arrow keys | Focus moves in grid pattern (up/down/left/right) | N/A | Grid navigation |
6 | Press Enter on focused tile | Module navigation occurs | N/A | Keyboard activation |
7 | Press Space on focused tile | Alternative activation method | N/A | Accessibility standard |
8 | Test with screen reader | Proper announcements for each module | NVDA/JAWS | AC15 screen reader support |
9 | Verify focus indicators | Clear visual indication of focused element | N/A | Visual accessibility |
10 | Test escape key functionality | Return to previous state or close menu | N/A | Standard keyboard behavior |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Complete keyboard navigation functionality
- Accessibility_Verification: Screen reader compatibility
- Standards_Verification: WCAG 2.1 compliance
Test Case 6: Grid Layout Positioning Consistency
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_006
Title: Verify consistent positioning of modules in 4×3 grid layout
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Layout
- Test Type: UI/Visual
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-UI, API-Layout,
HappyFlow, Database-UI, Services-Layout
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | Grid displayed | N/A | Initial load |
2 | Verify exact positioning | Row 1: Utility Setup, Plan & Tariff, Call Center | N/A | AC6 fixed positioning |
3 | Verify row 2 positioning | Consumer Services, Meter Data, Billing | N/A | Consistent layout |
4 | Verify row 3 positioning | Service Orders, Asset Management, Reports & Analytics | N/A | Design compliance |
5 | Verify row 4 positioning | Communication Hub, Integration Hub, Organisation Setup | N/A | Complete grid validation |
6 | Refresh page multiple times | Positioning remains consistent across loads | N/A | Stability testing |
7 | Test different user roles | Layout remains identical regardless of permissions | Various user roles | Consistency validation |
8 | Measure tile spacing | Consistent gaps between all tiles | N/A | AC10 spacing requirement |
9 | Validate grid alignment | Perfect grid alignment maintained | N/A | Visual consistency |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Exact positioning matches design specifications
- Consistency_Verification: Layout identical across all conditions
- Spacing_Verification: Uniform spacing throughout grid
Test Case 7: Module Tile Content Validation
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_007
Title: Verify each module tile displays correct icon, name, and descriptive text
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Content
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Content, API-Content,
HappyFlow, Database-Content, Services-Content
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | All tiles visible | N/A | Starting point |
2 | Verify Utility Setup tile | Gear icon, "Utility Setup", "Configure core utility settings and parameters" | N/A | AC7 content validation |
3 | Verify Plan & Tariff tile | Calculator icon, "Plan & Tariff", "Manage pricing plans and tariff structures" | N/A | Icon and text accuracy |
4 | Verify Call Center tile | Headset icon, "Call Center", "Customer support and call center management" | N/A | Descriptive text validation |
5 | Verify Consumer Services tile | Person icon, "Consumer Services", "Customer account and service management" | N/A | Content completeness |
6 | Verify Meter Data tile | Meter icon, "Meter Data", "Meter reading and data collection" | N/A | Functional description |
7 | Verify Billing tile | Document icon, "Billing", "Invoice generation and payment processing" | N/A | Process description |
8 | Verify remaining 6 tiles | Correct icons, names, descriptions per specification | Service Orders, Asset Mgmt, Reports, Communication, Integration, Organisation | Complete content audit |
9 | Validate text readability | All text clearly visible and properly formatted | N/A | AC18 visual hierarchy |
10 | Check icon quality | Icons render clearly at all supported resolutions | N/A | Visual quality assurance |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: All tile content matches specifications exactly
- Visual_Verification: Icons and text render clearly
- Consistency_Verification: Uniform formatting across all tiles
Test Case 8: Return Navigation Consistency
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_008
Title: Verify consistent method to return to Bento Menu from any module
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Navigation
- Test Type: Functional/Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Navigation, API-Navigation,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-Navigation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Utility Setup from menu | Module loads successfully | N/A | AC8 testing start |
2 | Locate return navigation | Consistent menu/home button visible | N/A | Navigation availability |
3 | Click return button | Navigate back to Bento Menu | N/A | Return functionality |
4 | Navigate to Plan & Tariff | Module loads | N/A | Different module test |
5 | Test return navigation | Same return method available | N/A | Consistency validation |
6 | Navigate to CX Dashboard (via Call Center) | Dashboard loads | N/A | Dashboard navigation |
7 | Test return from dashboard | Consistent return method works | N/A | Complex navigation return |
8 | Test from all 12 modules | Return navigation works from every module | All modules | Complete coverage |
9 | Test deep navigation | Return works from sub-modules and nested screens | Reports → Specific Report | Deep navigation testing |
10 | Validate return method consistency | Same UI element/method across all modules | N/A | AC8 consistency requirement |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Consistent return method available from all modules
- Navigation_Verification: Return functionality works reliably
- Consistency_Verification: Same user experience across all modules
Test Case 9: Functional Area Organization
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_009
Title: Verify modules properly organized in grid according to functional areas
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Organization
- Test Type: Functional/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium,
Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UI, API-Organization,
HappyFlow, Services-Organization
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | Grid displayed | N/A | Starting analysis |
2 | Analyze first row functional grouping | Configuration modules: Utility Setup, Plan & Tariff, Call Center | N/A | AC9 functional organization |
3 | Analyze second row grouping | Customer-focused: Consumer Services, Meter Data, Billing | N/A | Customer service cluster |
4 | Analyze third row grouping | Operations: Service Orders, Asset Management, Reports & Analytics | N/A | Operational modules |
5 | Analyze fourth row grouping | System/Admin: Communication Hub, Integration Hub, Organisation Setup | N/A | Administrative functions |
6 | Validate logical flow | Modules grouped by workflow relationships | N/A | User workflow logic |
7 | Verify visual separation | Clear visual distinction between functional areas | N/A | AC14 visual design |
8 | Test user comprehension | Users can quickly identify module categories | User testing scenarios | Usability validation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Logical functional grouping maintained
- User_Experience_Verification: Intuitive organization for end users
- Visual_Verification: Clear distinction between functional areas
Test Case 10: Tile Sizing and Spacing Consistency
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_010
Title: Verify all 12 module tiles maintain consistent sizing and spacing
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Layout
- Test Type: UI/Visual
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium,
Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UI, API-Layout,
HappyFlow, Services-Layout
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | Grid displayed | N/A | Visual measurement start |
2 | Measure tile dimensions | All tiles exactly same width and height | N/A | AC10 sizing consistency |
3 | Measure horizontal spacing | Consistent gaps between columns | N/A | Spacing uniformity |
4 | Measure vertical spacing | Consistent gaps between rows | N/A | Grid alignment |
5 | Check tile padding | Internal spacing consistent across all tiles | N/A | Content alignment |
6 | Verify margin consistency | Outer margins uniform around grid | N/A | Overall layout balance |
7 | Test across different resolutions | Proportional consistency maintained | Various screen sizes | Responsive consistency |
8 | Validate pixel-perfect alignment | Tiles align to grid system | N/A | Design specification compliance |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Perfect sizing and spacing consistency
- Measurement_Verification: Exact pixel measurements match specifications
- Resolution_Verification: Consistency across all supported resolutions
Test Case 11: Permission Access Visual Indicators
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_011
Title: Verify visual indication of module access permissions for users
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Security Visual
- Test Type: Security/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Security, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Authorization, API-Security,
HappyFlow, NegativeTest, EdgeCase, Database-Security, Services-Authorization
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: Enterprise
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Must-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: Yes
- SLA_Related: Yes
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: High
- Complexity_Level: Medium
- Expected_Execution_Time: 4 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: High
- Data_Sensitivity: Medium
- Failure_Impact: High
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest
- Dependencies: Authorization Service, Role Management System
- Data_Requirements: Multiple user roles with different permissions
Prerequisites:
- Setup_Requirements: Role-based permission matrix configured
- User_Roles_Permissions: Test users for each role level
- Test_Data: Various user accounts with different access levels
- Prior_Test_Cases: Authentication system validation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Login as limited-permission user | Successful authentication | limiteduser@utilityco.com | AC11 testing start |
2 | Access Bento Menu | Menu displays with permission indicators | N/A | Visual permission validation |
3 | Identify enabled modules | Accessible modules clearly highlighted/enabled | N/A | Positive permission indication |
4 | Identify disabled modules | Restricted modules visually disabled/greyed out | N/A | Negative permission indication |
5 | Verify hover states | Different hover behavior for enabled vs disabled | N/A | Interactive feedback |
6 | Test tooltip information | Clear explanation of access restrictions | N/A | User guidance |
7 | Attempt click on disabled module | No navigation, clear feedback message | N/A | Negative test scenario |
8 | Login as different role | Visual indicators update appropriately | csomanager@utilityco.com | Role switching validation |
9 | Compare permission displays | Consistent visual language across roles | N/A | Visual consistency |
10 | Test with maximum permissions | All modules enabled for admin users | sysadmin@utilityco.com | Full access validation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Clear visual distinction between accessible and restricted modules
- Security_Verification: No unauthorized access possible through UI manipulation
- UX_Verification: Intuitive understanding of permission levels
Execution Analytics:
- Execution_Frequency: Weekly
- Maintenance_Effort: Medium
- Automation_Candidate: Planned
Test Case 12: User Position Maintenance
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_012
Title: Verify system maintains user position when returning to previously accessed modules
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu State Management
- Test Type: Functional/Integration
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-StateManagement, API-Session,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Database-Session, Services-StateManagement
Business Context:
- Customer_Segment: All
- Revenue_Impact: Medium
- Business_Priority: Should-Have
- Customer_Journey: Daily-Usage
- Compliance_Required: No
- SLA_Related: No
Quality Metrics:
- Risk_Level: Medium
- Complexity_Level: High
- Expected_Execution_Time: 5 minutes
- Reproducibility_Score: Medium
- Data_Sensitivity: Low
- Failure_Impact: Medium
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest, Firefox Latest
- Dependencies: Session Management, State Persistence Service
- Data_Requirements: Complex multi-module navigation scenarios
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to Reports & Analytics from menu | Module loads, navigate to specific report | Template Report #R001 | AC12 testing setup |
2 | Scroll to specific position in report | Position established in module | Page 3, Section 5 | State to be maintained |
3 | Return to Bento Menu | Menu displays | N/A | Navigation back |
4 | Navigate to different module | Billing → Bill Setup loads | Bill Setup Dashboard | Different module access |
5 | Return to Bento Menu again | Menu displays | N/A | Second return |
6 | Re-access Reports & Analytics | Return to same report at same position | Template Report #R001 | AC12 position maintenance |
7 | Verify scroll position maintained | Same page and section displayed | Page 3, Section 5 | State verification |
8 | Test with form data | Fill form in Consumer Services, navigate away | Customer form with partial data | Form state testing |
9 | Return to Consumer Services | Form data preserved | N/A | Data persistence validation |
10 | Test across browser refresh | State maintained after page reload | N/A | Session persistence |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: User position and state maintained across navigation
- Session_Verification: State persistence across different modules
- Data_Verification: Form data and scroll positions preserved
Test Case 13: Two-Click Menu Accessibility
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_013
Title: Verify Bento Menu accessible from any screen within maximum 2 clicks
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Accessibility
- Test Type: Functional/Navigation
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Smoke
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Smoke, Type-Functional, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Navigation, API-Navigation,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-Navigation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navigate to deepest module level | Access Utility Setup → Configuration → Advanced Settings | N/A | AC13 deep navigation test |
2 | Count clicks to Bento Menu | Menu accessible within 2 clicks maximum | N/A | Click count validation |
3 | Test from Bill Setup dashboard | Navigate to specific billing configuration | Bill Type Configuration | Different deep level |
4 | Access Bento Menu | Maximum 2 clicks required | N/A | Consistent access pattern |
5 | Test from CX Dashboard reports | Navigate to customer analytics section | Customer Satisfaction Report | Dashboard deep dive |
6 | Return to Bento Menu | 2-click accessibility maintained | N/A | Accessibility verification |
7 | Test from Integration Hub settings | Access ONB integration configuration | Integration → ONB Settings | Integration deep navigation |
8 | Verify menu accessibility | Within 2-click limit | N/A | Compliance validation |
9 | Test from all 12 module deep states | Verify 2-click rule across all modules | All modules → sub-sections | Comprehensive coverage |
10 | Document navigation paths | Record actual click counts for each path | N/A | Performance documentation |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Maximum 2 clicks from any system location
- Navigation_Verification: Consistent access pattern across all modules
- Performance_Verification: Efficient navigation design
Test Case 14: Visual Design Distinction
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_014
Title: Verify clear visual design distinguishes between different functional areas
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Visual Design
- Test Type: UI/Visual
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium,
Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UI, API-Visual,
HappyFlow, Services-UI
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | Full grid displayed | N/A | AC14 visual analysis |
2 | Analyze configuration area | Utility Setup, Plan & Tariff, Call Center visually grouped | N/A | Functional area 1 |
3 | Analyze customer service area | Consumer Services, Meter Data, Billing show related styling | N/A | Functional area 2 |
4 | Analyze operations area | Service Orders, Asset Management, Reports distinct styling | N/A | Functional area 3 |
5 | Analyze admin area | Communication Hub, Integration Hub, Organisation Setup grouped | N/A | Functional area 4 |
6 | Verify color coding | Different color schemes for functional areas | N/A | Visual distinction validation |
7 | Check icon consistency | Related modules use consistent icon styles | N/A | Icon family validation |
8 | Validate spacing patterns | Visual separation between functional groups | N/A | Layout distinction |
9 | Test user comprehension | Users can identify functional areas quickly | User testing | Usability validation |
10 | Cross-reference with design specs | Visual implementation matches design | Design Document v2.1 | Design compliance |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Clear visual distinction between functional areas
- Design_Verification: Implementation matches specifications
- Usability_Verification: Intuitive functional grouping
Test Case 15: Screen Reader Accessibility
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_015
Title: Verify proper accessibility features including screen reader support
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Accessibility
- Test Type: Accessibility
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Acceptance, Type-Accessibility, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Accessibility, API-Accessibility,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-Accessibility
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome Latest with NVDA, Firefox with JAWS
- Dependencies: Screen reader software, Accessibility testing tools
- Data_Requirements: WCAG 2.1 compliance validation
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Activate screen reader | NVDA/JAWS running and configured | NVDA 2024.1 | AC15 accessibility testing |
2 | Navigate to Bento Menu | Menu announced as "Navigation grid with 12 modules" | N/A | Grid structure announcement |
3 | Tab through module tiles | Each tile properly announced with name and description | N/A | Content accessibility |
4 | Verify ARIA labels | Proper role, state, and property announcements | N/A | ARIA implementation |
5 | Test disabled module announcement | Restricted modules announced as "unavailable" or "disabled" | Limited user account | Permission state communication |
6 | Verify landmark regions | Grid identified as navigation landmark | N/A | Structural accessibility |
7 | Test keyboard-only navigation | Complete functionality without mouse | N/A | Keyboard accessibility |
8 | Validate focus management | Logical focus order and visible focus indicators | N/A | Focus management |
9 | Test with high contrast mode | Grid remains usable in high contrast | Windows High Contrast | Visual accessibility |
10 | Verify zoom compatibility | Functionality maintained at 200% zoom | Browser zoom 200% | Zoom accessibility |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Complete screen reader support
- WCAG_Verification: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
- Usability_Verification: Effective accessibility for disabled users
Test Case 16: Module Selection Visual Feedback
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_016
Title: Verify proper visual feedback when module tile is selected
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Interaction
- Test Type: UI/Functional
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium,
Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UI, API-Interaction,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-UI
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hover over Utility Setup tile | Visual hover state activated | N/A | AC16 feedback testing |
2 | Click and hold on tile | Active/pressed state displayed | N/A | Click feedback |
3 | Release click | Selection confirmation before navigation | N/A | Selection feedback |
4 | Test hover on all 12 tiles | Consistent hover behavior across all modules | N/A | Consistency validation |
5 | Test focus indicators | Clear focus outline when navigating with keyboard | N/A | Keyboard focus feedback |
6 | Verify loading states | Loading indicator during module transition | N/A | Transition feedback |
7 | Test disabled tile feedback | Different visual feedback for restricted modules | Limited user | Restriction feedback |
8 | Validate animation timing | Smooth transitions within performance guidelines | N/A | Animation validation |
9 | Test across different devices | Touch feedback on mobile/tablet devices | Mobile/Tablet | Multi-device feedback |
10 | Cross-browser consistency | Identical feedback across all browsers | Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge | Browser compatibility |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Clear visual feedback for all interaction states
- Consistency_Verification: Uniform feedback across all tiles
- Performance_Verification: Smooth animations without lag
Test Case 17: Responsive Grid Layout
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_017
Title: Verify grid layout is responsive and displays correctly on different screen sizes
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Responsive Design
- Test Type: Compatibility/UI
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Compatibility, Platform-Both,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Medium, Business-High,
Revenue-Impact-Medium, Integration-Responsive, API-Layout,
HappyFlow, EdgeCase, Services-Responsive
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Browser/Version: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
- Device/OS: Desktop, Tablet, Mobile
- Screen_Resolution: 1920x1080, 1366x768, 1024x768, 768x1024, 414x896, 375x667
- Dependencies: Responsive design framework, CSS Grid support
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access menu on desktop (1920x1080) | 4×3 grid displays perfectly | N/A | AC17 responsive testing |
2 | Resize to laptop (1366x768) | Grid adapts maintaining functionality | N/A | Standard laptop resolution |
3 | Test on tablet landscape (1024x768) | Grid reorganizes appropriately | iPad landscape | Tablet optimization |
4 | Test on tablet portrait (768x1024) | Vertical grid layout or responsive adaptation | iPad portrait | Portrait optimization |
5 | Test on large mobile (414x896) | Mobile-optimized grid layout | iPhone Pro | Large mobile adaptation |
6 | Test on standard mobile (375x667) | Compact grid maintains usability | iPhone standard | Standard mobile |
7 | Verify touch targets | Minimum 44px touch targets on mobile | N/A | Mobile usability |
8 | Test extreme ratios | Ultra-wide and narrow screen adaptations | 2560x1080, 320x568 | Edge case resolutions |
9 | Validate breakpoint behavior | Smooth transitions between breakpoints | N/A | Responsive transitions |
10 | Cross-device consistency | Functionality preserved across all sizes | N/A | Universal usability |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Grid adapts appropriately to all screen sizes
- Usability_Verification: Functionality maintained across all devices
- Performance_Verification: Responsive transitions perform smoothly
Test Case 18: Visual Hierarchy Implementation
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_018
Title: Verify clear visual hierarchy helps users quickly identify module functions
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Information Architecture
- Test Type: UI/Usability
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Acceptance
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Acceptance, Type-UI, Platform-Web,
Report-Product, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium,
Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UI, API-Visual,
HappyFlow, Services-UI
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | Grid displayed with clear hierarchy | N/A | AC18 hierarchy testing |
2 | Analyze typography hierarchy | Module names, descriptions use appropriate font sizes | N/A | Text hierarchy validation |
3 | Evaluate icon prominence | Icons appropriately sized for quick recognition | N/A | Icon hierarchy |
4 | Assess color hierarchy | Important modules emphasized through color | N/A | Color-based hierarchy |
5 | Test scanning patterns | Users can quickly scan and locate desired modules | User testing | Usability validation |
6 | Verify contrast ratios | Text and icons meet accessibility contrast requirements | WCAG 2.1 standards | Contrast validation |
7 | Analyze information density | Appropriate balance of information per tile | N/A | Information hierarchy |
8 | Test with different user roles | Hierarchy adapts based on user permissions | Various roles | Role-based hierarchy |
9 | Validate reading flow | Natural reading pattern supported by design | N/A | Reading flow validation |
10 | Compare with design system | Implementation matches design system guidelines | Design System v3.0 | Design consistency |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Clear visual hierarchy supports quick module identification
- Usability_Verification: Users can efficiently locate desired modules
- Design_Verification: Hierarchy implementation matches design standards
Test Case 19: Styling Consistency Validation
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_019
Title: Verify consistent styling of all module tiles according to design specifications
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Design System
- Test Type: UI/Visual
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P2-High
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P2-High, Phase-Regression, Type-UI, Platform-Web,
Report-Engineering, Customer-All, Risk-Low, Business-Medium,
Revenue-Impact-Low, Integration-UI, API-Design,
HappyFlow, Database-UI, Services-Design
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Access Bento Menu | All tiles displayed | N/A | AC19 styling validation |
2 | Measure tile dimensions | All tiles exactly same width and height | 240px × 160px | Dimension consistency |
3 | Verify border radius | Consistent corner rounding across all tiles | 8px radius | Border consistency |
4 | Check shadow properties | Identical drop shadow on all tiles | 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1) | Shadow consistency |
5 | Validate color scheme | Consistent color palette usage | Design system colors | Color consistency |
6 | Verify typography | Font family, sizes, weights consistent | Inter font family | Typography consistency |
7 | Check spacing/padding | Internal spacing identical across tiles | 16px padding | Spacing consistency |
8 | Validate icon specifications | Icons same size, style, alignment | 24px × 24px icons | Icon consistency |
9 | Test state variations | Hover, active, disabled states styled consistently | N/A | State consistency |
10 | Cross-browser validation | Styling identical across all browsers | Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge | Browser consistency |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Perfect styling consistency across all tiles
- Design_Verification: Implementation matches design specifications exactly
- Browser_Verification: Consistent rendering across all browsers
Test Case 20: Error Handling and Module Unavailability
Test Case ID: ONB07_TC_020
Title: Verify graceful error handling when modules are unavailable with clear error messages
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Error Handling
- Test Type: Functional/Negative
- Test Level: System
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Regression
- Automation Status: Manual
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Regression, Type-Negative, Platform-Web,
Report-QA, Customer-All, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-ErrorHandling, API-Error,
NegativeTest, EdgeCase, Database-Error, Services-ErrorHandling
Test Environment:
- Environment: Staging
- Dependencies: Service monitoring, Error simulation tools
- Data_Requirements: Ability to simulate service failures
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Simulate Billing service downtime | Billing module shows unavailable state | Service: Billing API down | AC20 error handling |
2 | Access Bento Menu | Menu loads with clear error indication for Billing | N/A | Graceful degradation |
3 | Attempt to click unavailable module | Clear error message displayed | "Billing service temporarily unavailable" | Error communication |
4 | Verify other modules functionality | Remaining 11 modules continue to work | N/A | Isolated failure handling |
5 | Simulate database connectivity issues | Menu handles database errors gracefully | DB connection timeout | Database error handling |
6 | Test network timeout scenarios | Appropriate timeout handling with user feedback | Network latency simulation | Network error handling |
7 | Simulate authentication service failure | Clear authentication error with recovery options | Auth service down | Authentication error handling |
8 | Test malformed API responses | System handles corrupt data without crashing | Invalid JSON response | Data validation error handling |
9 | Verify error recovery | Services automatically recover when available | Service restoration | Recovery mechanism |
10 | Test multiple simultaneous failures | System remains stable with multiple service failures | Multiple services down | Resilience testing |
Verification Points:
- Primary_Verification: Clear error messages for all failure scenarios
- Stability_Verification: System remains stable under all error conditions
- Recovery_Verification: Automatic recovery when services restore
Error Scenarios Covered:
Test Relationships:
- Blocking_Tests: Basic system health checks
- Blocked_Tests: Module-specific functionality tests
- Parallel_Tests: Performance monitoring
- Sequential_Tests: Recovery validation tests
API Test Cases (Critical Level ≥7)
Test Case 21: Bento Menu API Authentication
Test Case ID: ONB07_API_TC_001
Title: Verify authentication and authorization for Bento Menu API endpoints
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu API Security
- Test Type: API/Security
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-API, Platform-Backend,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-API, API-Security,
HappyFlow, NegativeTest, EdgeCase, Database-API, Services-API
API Endpoints Tested:
- GET /api/v1/bento-menu/modules
- GET /api/v1/bento-menu/user-permissions/{userId}
- POST /api/v1/bento-menu/navigation-tracking
- GET /api/v1/bento-menu/module-status
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GET /api/v1/bento-menu/modules with valid token | 200 OK, modules list returned | Bearer token: valid JWT | Happy flow |
2 | GET /api/v1/bento-menu/modules with invalid token | 401 Unauthorized | Bearer token: expired/invalid | Security validation |
3 | GET /api/v1/bento-menu/modules without token | 401 Unauthorized | No Authorization header | Authentication requirement |
4 | GET /api/v1/bento-menu/user-permissions/{userId} | 200 OK, permissions object | userId: test-user-123 | Permission endpoint |
5 | POST /api/v1/bento-menu/navigation-tracking | 201 Created, tracking logged | Navigation event payload | Tracking endpoint |
6 | Test rate limiting | 429 Too Many Requests after threshold | 100 requests/minute | Rate limiting validation |
7 | Test API response times | All endpoints respond <500ms | N/A | Performance requirement |
8 | Validate response schemas | All responses match OpenAPI schema | JSON Schema validation | Contract validation |
Test Case 22: Database Integration Testing
Test Case ID: ONB07_DB_TC_001
Title: Verify database operations for Bento Menu module data and user preferences
Created By: Test Automation Framework
Created Date: 2025-06-09
Version: 1.0
Classification:
- Module/Feature: Bento Menu Database
- Test Type: Integration/Database
- Test Level: Integration
- Priority: P1-Critical
- Execution Phase: Integration
- Automation Status: Automated
MOD-BentoMenu, P1-Critical, Phase-Integration, Type-Database, Platform-Backend,
Report-Engineering, Customer-Enterprise, Risk-High, Business-Critical,
Revenue-Impact-High, Integration-Database, API-Database,
HappyFlow, NegativeTest, EdgeCase, Database-CRUD, Services-Database
Database Operations Tested:
- Module configuration retrieval
- User permission queries
- Navigation tracking inserts
- State persistence operations
Test Procedure:
Step # | Action | Expected Result | Test Data | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Query module configuration table | 12 modules returned with correct metadata | SELECT * FROM bento_modules | Module data validation |
2 | Query user permissions | Correct role-based permissions returned | User ID: admin-123 | Permission data validation |
3 | Insert navigation tracking record | Record successfully inserted | Navigation event data | Tracking data persistence |
4 | Update user preferences | Preferences saved correctly | Custom module order | User customization |
5 | Test database connection pooling | Multiple concurrent connections handled | 50 simultaneous queries | Connection management |
6 | Validate data integrity | Foreign key constraints enforced | Invalid user reference | Data integrity validation |
7 | Test transaction rollback | Failed operations roll back correctly | Simulated transaction failure | Transaction management |
8 | Performance testing | Complex queries execute <100ms | N/A | Database performance |
Test Suite Organization Summary
Smoke Test Suite (15 minutes)
Test Cases: ONB07_TC_001, ONB07_TC_004, ONB07_TC_013
Coverage: Basic functionality, navigation, accessibility Execution: Every deployment
Regression Test Suite (60 minutes)
Test Cases: ONB07_TC_001-006, ONB07_TC_011, ONB07_TC_013, ONB07_TC_017, ONB07_TC_020
Coverage: Core functionality, security, responsive design, error handling Execution: Before each release
Full Test Suite (120 minutes)
Test Cases: All ONB07_TC_001-020 plus API and Database tests
Coverage: Complete feature validation Execution: Weekly and major releases
API Test Suite (30 minutes)
Test Cases: ONB07_API_TC_001, ONB07_DB_TC_001
Coverage: Backend integration, database operations Execution: Integration pipeline
Performance Test Suite (45 minutes)
Test Cases: ONB07_TC_002, ONB07_TC_017, Performance variants
Coverage: Load testing, responsive performance Execution: Weekly and pre-release
BrowserStack Report Tag Summary
All test cases support the 17 BrowserStack reports through comprehensive tagging:
- Engineering Reports - MOD-BentoMenu, Type-, Integration-
- Product Reports - Business-, Customer-Journey-, Revenue-Impact-*
- CSM Reports - Customer-, Revenue-Impact-
- QA Reports - Phase-, Priority-, Risk-*
- Module Coverage - Feature_Coverage percentages
- Cross-Platform - Platform-, Compatibility-
- Security - Security-*, Type-Security
- Performance - Performance-*, Type-Performance
- API - Type-API, API-*
- User Journey - HappyFlow, Customer-Journey-*
- Risk Assessment - Risk_Level, Failure_Impact
- Compliance - Compliance_Required
- Execution Analytics - Automation_Candidate, Execution_Frequency
- Trend Tracking - Trend_Tracking enabled
- Executive Dashboard - Executive_Visibility for P1 tests
- Integration Coverage - Integration-* for all touchpoints
- Customer Impact - Customer_Impact_Level for all scenarios
Validation Checklist Completion
✅ All 20 acceptance criteria covered
✅ Business rules tested with appropriate scenarios
✅ Cross-browser/device compatibility included
✅ Positive, negative, and edge case scenarios
✅ Integration points thoroughly tested
✅ Security considerations addressed
✅ Performance benchmarks defined
✅ Realistic test data provided
✅ Clear dependency mapping
✅ Proper tagging for all 17 reports
✅ Edge cases covered at 80% detail level
✅ API tests for critical operations (≥7 importance)
✅ Database integration testing included