Skip to main content

New Connection Application Detail View

1. Problem Statement

User Roles Identified:

  • Customer Executive: Front-line staff handling walk-in customers and processing applications
  • Utility Administrator: System admin responsible for configuring workflows and reviewing applications

Pain Points by User Role:

Customer Executive Pain Points:

  • Cannot efficiently review submitted documents in the current UI
  • Unable to mark documents as verified or rejected with clear reasoning
  • No guided process to walk customers through missing requirements
  • Poor visibility into application status and next steps
  • Difficult to identify incomplete or problematic applications
  • No standardized process for handling document exceptions

Utility Administrator Pain Points:

  • Lack of workflow visibility and bottleneck identification
  • No clear audit trail for application processing decisions
  • Inconsistent application processing across different staff members
  • Cannot easily prioritize applications based on completeness or urgency
  • Limited reporting capabilities on application processing performance

Core Problem:

The current new connection application detail view lacks a structured, guided workflow that enables efficient document verification, clear status tracking, and seamless handoffs between departments, resulting in processing delays, customer frustration, and operational inefficiencies.

2. Who Are the Users Facing the Problem?

Customer Executive: Front-line customer service staff responsible for processing new service applications, verifying customer documents, and guiding customers through the connection process. They need access to review, verify, and manage customer applications.

Utility Administrator: System administrators who configure application workflows, set business rules, and monitor overall application processing performance. They need access to configure processes and generate reports.

3. Jobs To Be Done

For Customer Executive: When I need to process a new water connection application, But I cannot easily review submitted documents, verify their completeness, or guide the customer through missing requirements, Help me access a clear document verification interface with guided workflows and status tracking, So that I can efficiently process applications while providing excellent customer service.

For Customer Executive: When I need to verify customer identity documents and supporting paperwork, But I cannot mark documents as approved/rejected or provide clear feedback on issues, Help me implement a structured document review system with verification controls and comment capabilities, So that I can ensure compliance while maintaining processing speed.

For Utility Administrator: When I need to monitor application processing performance and identify bottlenecks, But I lack visibility into workflow status and processing metrics, Help me access comprehensive dashboards with application analytics and workflow monitoring, So that I can optimize processes and ensure consistent service delivery.

For Utility Administrator: When I need to configure application requirements and approval workflows, But I cannot easily set up business rules or modify processing steps, Help me implement flexible workflow configuration tools with rule-based automation, So that I can adapt processes to changing regulations and business needs.

4. Solution

Comprehensive New Connection Application Management System

Document Management & Verification Center

  • Interactive document viewer with zoom, rotation, and annotation capabilities
  • Document verification checklist with pass/fail indicators for each requirement
  • Bulk document upload with automatic categorization and validation rules

Guided Workflow & Process Management

  • Step-by-step application processing wizard with clear progress indicators
  • Conditional logic that adapts workflow based on application type and customer category
  • Automated task assignments with role-based routing and escalation rules

Customer Communication & Notification Hub

  • Automated status notifications via SMS, email, and customer portal
  • Template-based communication with customizable messaging for different scenarios
  • Customer self-service portal integration for application status checking

Application Status & Tracking Dashboard

  • Real-time application status visibility with color-coded priority indicators
  • Advanced filtering and search capabilities by customer, date, status, and staff member
  • Batch processing capabilities for handling multiple applications simultaneously

Compliance & Audit Management

  • Complete audit trail with timestamped actions and staff member identification
  • Regulatory compliance checking with automatic flagging of non-compliant applications
  • Document retention management with automated archival and retrieval systems

Field Service Integration

  • Seamless work order generation with application details automatically populated
  • Mobile access for field technicians with offline capability and synchronization
  • Site survey integration with photo capture and technical requirement documentation

Analytics & Performance Monitoring

  • Application processing metrics with average handling time and bottleneck identification
  • Staff performance dashboards with workload distribution and quality metrics
  • Customer satisfaction tracking with feedback collection and analysis tools

5. Major Steps Involved

Customer Executive Workflow:

  1. Application Reception & Initial Review
    • Access application from queue or search by customer name/application ID
    • Review customer information and service request details
    • Verify application completeness using automated checklist
  2. Document Verification Process
    • Open document viewer with split-screen layout (document + verification checklist)
    • Review each required document using zoom and annotation tools
    • Mark each document as "Verified", "Needs Correction", or "Missing"
    • Add comments for rejected documents with specific correction requirements
  3. Customer Information Validation
    • Verify customer identity against submitted ID documents
    • Validate property ownership or lease agreements
    • Check service address against GIS mapping system
  4. Application Processing Decision
    • Review automated compliance checks and flag any issues
    • Make approval/rejection decision based on verification results
    • Generate customer communication using appropriate templates
  5. Handoff to Next Stage
    • Create field work order for approved applications
    • Schedule customer notifications for status updates
    • Update application status and assign to appropriate queue

Utility Administrator Workflow:

  1. Workflow Configuration
    • Access system administration panel
    • Configure document requirements by customer type and service category
    • Set up approval hierarchies and escalation rules
  2. Performance Monitoring
    • Review application processing dashboards and metrics
    • Identify bottlenecks and processing delays
    • Generate performance reports for management review
  3. System Maintenance
    • Update template communications and automated messages
    • Manage user permissions and role assignments
    • Configure integration settings with external systems

6. Flow Diagram

flowchart TD
    A[New Application Received] --> B[Initial Completeness Check]
    B --> C{Complete?}
    C -->|No| D[Request Missing Documents]
    C -->|Yes| E[Document Verification]
    
    D --> F[Customer Notification]
    F --> G[Wait for Response]
    G --> B
    
    E --> H[Identity Verification]
    H --> I[Property Validation]
    I --> J{All Verifications Pass?}
    
    J -->|No| K[Generate Rejection Notice]
    J -->|Yes| L[Application Approval]
    
    K --> M[Customer Communication]
    M --> N[Application Closed]
    
    L --> O[Work Order Generation]
    O --> P[Field Assignment]
    P --> Q[Installation Scheduled]
    Q --> R[Field Installation]
    R --> S[Service Activation]
    S --> T[Application Complete]
    
    U[Admin Dashboard] --> V[Monitor All Applications]
    V --> W[Generate Reports]
    V --> X[Identify Bottlenecks]
    
    Y[Field Mobile Access] --> Z[View Application Details]
    Z --> AA[Update Installation Status]
    AA --> BB[Complete Work Order]

7. Business Rules

General Application Processing Rules

  • Applications must progress through defined workflow stages: Application Review → Site Inspection → Approval → Installation → Activation → Follow-up
  • Each workflow stage must be completed before proceeding to the next stage
  • Applications showing "5 days remaining" or similar countdown must be processed within the indicated timeframe
  • System must track and display days remaining for each application stage

Consumer Card

  • consumer name
  • Status
  • Service connection request

Contact Information

  • consumer email
  • phone no
  • service address
  • billing address

Account information

  • consumer number
  • category
  • sub category
  • connection date
  • Plan

Application Details

  • Application ID - generated from Num format
  • Created on
  • Created by
  • Last Updated on
  • Last updated by

Workflow Progress

  • Flow should be as below
    • Application review
    • Site inspection
    • Approval
    • Installation
    • Activation

Appication review Tab


Document Verification Rules

  • Each document must have a verification status: Pending Verification, Verified, or Rejected
  • Documents can only be marked as "Verified" or "Rejected" by authorized Customer Service personnel
  • All documents must be in "Verified" status before application can proceed to Site Inspection stage
  • Document rejection must include specific reason and corrective action required

Application Status Management Rules

  • Application status mustcan be clearly indicated (e.g., "Pending Review", "Site Inspection", "Approved")
  • Consumer Number is auto-generated and follows format: APP-YYYYMMDD-XXX
  • Service address and billing address must be captured separately and validated
  • Connection date must be specified and tracked throughout the processview.

Workflow

Appliaction Progressreview Rules

card

  • WorkflowRequirement progress indicator must show current stage and completed stages
  • Users cannot skip workflow stages or mark future stages as complete
  • Each stage completion must be timestamped and logged with user identification
  • Timeline must show chronological progression of application milestones

Application Review Panel Rules

checklist
  • RequirementsAll checklistdocuments mustverified show- real-timegets status of all verification criteria
  • Payment details must be captured and validated before final approval
  • Three action buttons must be available: Accept Application, Request Information, Reject Application
  • Accept button only enabledtick when all requirementsdocuments are satisfiedverified
  • no rejected documents - gets tick when there are no rejected document
  • Sevice location verified - remains tick.

Document
  • Payment ManagementDetails Rules
  • - details will come from the New connection form payments details
    • UploadAmount
    • Payment options
    • Payment mode - only if payment option is pay now
    • payment status
  • Accept application button - accept the NSC application and Downloadmoves Allto functionalitythe mustnext bestep
  • Reject availableapplication button - opens a dialouge box for batchwriting operations
  • Individuala documents must have View capabilityreason for detailed review
  • Document upload date must be trackedrejection and displayed
  • Systemrejects mustthe show document count (e.g., "Showing 4 of 4 documents")request.
  • Application Notes and Communication Rules

    notes
    • ApplicationUser Notescan section must support team communication and important notes
    • System-generatedadd notes must be automatically timestamped and attributed
    • Manual notes must capture user identification and timestamp
    • Notes must be visible to all authorized personnel handling the application
    • A text box to write a note
    • add button - adds the note with the username and date and time stamp


    Timeline

    Display the activity log of the NSC Application.

    Site inspection tab

    Site inspection scheduling

    • Select service Order - all the template from wx which are associated with consumer are visible in the searchable dropdown
    • Select date of inspection - date picker
    • special instructions - text box
    • back button - navigate to previous screen
    • skip instruction - navigate to next step
    • Schedule inspection - raised a service order in wx dispatcher

    Service location card

    • Map - showing the location of the service address
    • Address - display the service address
    • Location type - premise type from the premise attached
    • GPS coordinates - fetched from the service address

    Approval Tab

    Inspection Results - if inspection request is raised

    • Inpection progress message - if the service order is completed then dispaly "inspection completed successfully" - So status approved, if ot then "inspectio in progress" - SO status other tha approved
    • Service details - data will come from WX dispatcher
      • name
      • discription
      • Type
      • Subtype
      • Address - consumer service address
    • Schedule Information - data will come from WX dispatcher
      • Created on
      • Schedule on
      • Assiged on
      • Assigned to
      • Status

    Approval requirement

    • Site inspection pass
    • Pament recieved
    • Techical requirement met
    • Legal reqirment met
    • All reqirements are non mandatory

    Approval decision

    • Approve application - applicatio is marked approved
    • Reject application - reject application
    • Approval note - text box

    Installation tab

    Meter installation -

    • Installation type - schedule new installation
      • Select service Order - all the template from wx which are associated with consumer are visible in the searchable dropdown
      • installation date - date picker
      • special instructions - text box
      • back button - navigate to previous screen
      • Schedule inspection - raised a service order in wx dispatcher
    • Installation type - assign exisiting meter
      • display the tabs of the utility service that meter need to be assigned
      • search bar to search meter - by device no and meter no
      • available meters - listview (meter no, device no, installed on, status, action "select")
      • when a meter is selected, selected meter device no and meter no are shown below, need to add latest reading and reading date
      • Back - navigate to previous step
      • assign meter - assign the meter to consumer

    Meter summary

    • utility name and meter
      • meter no
      • device no
      • status
      • reading
      • reading date

    Activation Tab


    8. Sample Data

    Sample Application Data:

    Application ID: NCA-2025-001234
    Customer Name: Sarah Johnson
    Service Address: 123 Oak Street, Springfield, IL 60601  
    Application Type: Residential New Connection
    Service Type: Standard Water Service
    Application Date: 2025-05-15
    Estimated Value: $2,850
    Priority: Standard
    Status: Pending Document Verification
    
    Required Documents:
    - Government Photo ID: ✓ Submitted (Driver's License)
    - Proof of Property Ownership: ✓ Submitted (Property Deed)
    - Building Permit: ⚠️ Under Review
    - Site Plan: ❌ Missing
    - Payment Authorization: ✓ Submitted (Credit Card Auth)
    
    Processing Timeline:
    - Application Received: 2025-05-15 09:30 AM
    - Initial Review Completed: 2025-05-15 10:15 AM  
    - Document Review Started: 2025-05-15 02:30 PM
    - Customer Contacted for Missing Documents: 2025-05-16 11:00 AM
    - Next Action Due: 2025-05-18 11:00 AM

    Sample Document Verification Data:

    Document: Driver's License (IL)
    Status: Verified ✓
    Verified By: Jennifer Martinez (Customer Executive)
    Verification Date: 2025-05-15 02:45 PM
    Verification Notes: Valid Illinois driver's license, expires 2027, matches application name and address
    Verification Criteria Met:
    - Photo matches customer appearance: ✓
    - Name matches application: ✓  
    - Address matches service location: ✓
    - Document not expired: ✓
    - Security features verified: ✓

    Sample Work Order Data:

    Work Order: WO-2025-004567
    Application Reference: NCA-2025-001234
    Customer: Sarah Johnson
    Service Address: 123 Oak Street, Springfield, IL 60601
    Work Type: New Water Service Installation
    Scheduled Date: 2025-05-22 08:00 AM
    Assigned Technician: Michael Rodriguez
    Materials Required:
    - 3/4" Water Meter (#WSM-34-001)
    - 10ft Copper Service Line (#CSL-34-010)
    - Service Box Assembly (#SBA-STD-001)
    Estimated Duration: 3 hours
    Special Instructions: Customer prefers morning appointment, dog on property

    9. Acceptance Criteria

    1. The system must display a structured workflow progress indicator showing six stages: Application Review, Site Inspection, Approval, Installation, Activation, and Follow-up with clear visual indication of current and completed stages.
    2. The system must show application countdown timer (e.g., "5 days remaining") and track processing deadlines for each workflow stage.
    3. The system must display three information panels: Contact Information (email, phone, service address, billing address), Account Information (consumer number, category, sub-category, connection date, plan), and Application Details (ID, creation info, updates).
    4. The system must provide a Required Documents section showing exactly 4 core documents: Identity Proof, Property Ownership Document, Previous Utility Bill, and Service Application Form with individual verification status.
    5. The system must allow users to mark each document as "Verify" or "Reject" with individual action buttons, and provide "View" capability for document review.
    6. The system must display document upload dates and provide "Upload" and "Download All" functionality for batch document management.
    7. The system must show document verification summary (e.g., "0 verified", "0 rejected", "4 pending") with real-time status updates.
    8. The system must provide an Application Review panel with Requirements Checklist showing specific criteria: "All documents verified", "No rejected documents", "Service location verified".
    9. The system must display Payment Details section with Amount ($150.00), Payment Option (Pay Later), Payment Mode (Credit Card), and Payment Status (Pending).
    10. The system must provide three primary action buttons: "Accept Application" (enabled only when all criteria met), "Request Information", and "Reject Application".
    11. The system must include an Application Notes section for team communication with timestamp tracking and user attribution.
    12. The system must display a Timeline showing chronological progression: Application submitted, Document verification, Site inspection (Pending), Final approval (Pending).
    13. The system must auto-generate Consumer Numbers following the format APP-YYYYMMDD-XXX (e.g., APP-20230615-001).
    14. The system must capture and display service address separately from billing address with full address details.
    15. The system must prevent users from proceeding to next workflow stage until all requirements of current stage are satisfied.
    16. The system must log all document verification actions with user identification (e.g., "Chris Scott - Customer Service Engineer").
    17. The system must maintain application status visibility (e.g., "Pending Review") and update in real-time as actions are taken.
    18. The system must track and display creation date, creator name, last update date, and last updated by information for audit purposes.
    19. The system must validate payment information completeness before allowing final application acceptance.
    20. The system must provide search functionality for applications with filtering capabilities by status, date, and customer information.

    10. Process Changes

    Process Area

    From (Current State)

    To (Future State)

    Impact Analysis

    Document Review

    Manual review of paper documents with no standardized checklist

    Digital document viewer with automated verification workflows and standardized checklists

    Time Reduction

    : 60% faster document processing due to automated validation and guided workflows

    Customer Communication

    Manual phone calls and letters for status updates

    Automated multi-channel notifications (SMS, email, portal) with template-based messaging

    Efficiency Gain

    : 75% reduction in manual communication tasks, improved customer satisfaction through real-time updates

    Application Tracking

    Paper-based filing system with manual status updates

    Real-time digital tracking with automated progress indicators and bottleneck identification

    Visibility Improvement

    : 100% real-time visibility into application status, reducing customer inquiry calls by 40%

    Work Order Generation

    Manual creation of field work orders with potential transcription errors

    Automated work order generation with integrated customer and technical details

    Accuracy Improvement

    : 90% reduction in work order errors, 50% faster field deployment

    Quality Control

    Inconsistent review processes depending on staff member

    Standardized workflows with mandatory verification steps and audit trails

    Consistency Gain

    : 95% process standardization across all staff members, improved regulatory compliance

    Performance Monitoring

    Monthly manual reporting with limited metrics

    Real-time dashboards with comprehensive performance analytics

    Reporting Efficiency

    : 80% reduction in report preparation time, daily performance insights instead of monthly

    Field Coordination

    Phone-based communication between office and field staff

    Integrated mobile platform with real-time application access and status updates

    Coordination Improvement

    : 70% reduction in communication delays, improved first-visit completion rates by 35%

    Customer Self-Service

    Customers must call office for status updates

    Online portal with real-time application tracking and document submission

    Service Enhancement

    : 60% reduction in customer service calls, 24/7 application status access

    Impact percentages are based on industry benchmarks for utility digital transformation initiatives and workflow automation implementations.

    11. Impact from Solving This Problem

    Impact Category

    Metric

    How It Improves

    Operational Efficiency

    Application Processing Time

    Reduces average processing time from 8-10 business days to 3-5 business days through automated workflows and guided processes

    Customer Satisfaction

    Customer Complaint Resolution

    Decreases customer complaints by 65% through real-time status visibility and proactive communication

    Staff Productivity

    Applications Processed Per Day

    Increases individual staff processing capacity by 75% through streamlined workflows and automated validation

    Data Quality

    Document Verification Accuracy

    Improves verification accuracy by 85% through standardized checklists and mandatory validation steps

    Compliance Management

    Audit Trail Completeness

    Achieves 100% audit trail coverage with automated logging and timestamp tracking for regulatory compliance

    Cost Reduction

    Processing Cost Per Application

    Reduces processing costs by 45% through automation and reduced manual intervention requirements

    Field Efficiency

    First-Visit Completion Rate

    Improves field installation success rate by 40% through better application information and work order accuracy

    Customer Experience

    Application Status Visibility

    Provides 24/7 application tracking access, reducing customer inquiry calls by 55%

    Process Standardization

    Workflow Consistency

    Achieves 95% process standardization across all customer service representatives

    Revenue Cycle

    Time to Revenue Recognition

    Accelerates revenue recognition by 30% through faster application processing and service activation

    Improvement percentages are based on utility industry benchmarks for digital process transformation and workflow automation initiatives, adjusted for typical SMART360 implementation results.

    12. User Behavior Tracking

    Customer Executive Tracking Plan

    Metric

    Event Name

    Properties

    Insights to Gather

    Application Processing Rate

    application_processed

    user_id

    ,

    application_id

    ,

    processing_time

    ,

    application_type

    ,

    completion_status

    How quickly are applications being processed? Which staff members are most efficient?

    Document Verification Accuracy

    document_verified

    document_type

    ,

    verification_result

    ,

    verification_time

    ,

    user_id

    ,

    revision_required

    Which document types cause the most issues? How accurate are initial verifications?

    Workflow Step Completion

    workflow_step_completed

    step_name

    ,

    time_spent

    ,

    user_id

    ,

    application_id

    ,

    step_sequence

    Where do users spend the most time? Which steps cause bottlenecks?

    Error Rate Tracking

    verification_error

    error_type

    ,

    document_type

    ,

    user_id

    ,

    correction_required

    ,

    error_frequency

    What types of errors occur most frequently? Which users need additional training?

    Key Questions Answered:

    • Which workflow steps are taking longer than expected?
    • Are certain document types consistently problematic?
    • Which staff members might benefit from additional training?
    • How does processing time vary by application complexity?

    Utility Administrator Tracking Plan

    Metric

    Event Name

    Properties

    Insights to Gather

    System Configuration Changes

    config_modified

    config_type

    ,

    user_id

    ,

    change_description

    ,

    timestamp

    ,

    impact_scope

    How often are workflow configurations being modified? What changes improve performance?

    Dashboard Usage Patterns

    dashboard_accessed

    dashboard_type

    ,

    user_id

    ,

    session_duration

    ,

    filters_applied

    ,

    reports_generated

    Which metrics are most important to administrators? How often are reports being generated?

    Performance Monitoring

    performance_review

    metric_type

    ,

    time_period

    ,

    performance_trend

    ,

    action_taken

    ,

    improvement_target

    Which performance metrics are consistently below target? What interventions are most effective?

    Workflow Optimization

    workflow_optimized

    optimization_type

    ,

    before_performance

    ,

    after_performance

    ,

    user_feedback

    ,

    roi_impact

    Which workflow optimizations provide the greatest ROI? How do changes affect user satisfaction?

    Key Questions Answered:

    • Which system configurations lead to the best performance outcomes?
    • What performance trends indicate need for process improvements?
    • How effective are workflow optimizations in improving efficiency?
    • Which reports and dashboards provide the most value to decision-making?

    Field Force Technician Tracking Plan

    Metric

    Event Name

    Properties

    Insights to Gather

    Mobile App Usage

    mobile_app_accessed

    user_id

    ,

    application_viewed

    ,

    offline_usage

    ,

    sync_status

    ,

    location_data

    How effectively are field staff using mobile capabilities? What connectivity issues exist?

    Work Order Completion

    work_order_completed

    work_order_id

    ,

    completion_time

    ,

    first_visit_success

    ,

    materials_used

    ,

    customer_satisfaction

    What factors contribute to first-visit success? How accurate are material estimates?

    Application Information Access

    application_info_accessed

    application_id

    ,

    info_type_accessed

    ,

    access_duration

    ,

    mobile_vs_desktop

    ,

    field_location

    Which application details are most important to field staff? How does mobile access improve efficiency?

    Status Update Frequency

    status_updated

    update_type

    ,

    user_id

    ,

    timestamp

    ,

    work_order_stage

    ,

    customer_notified

    How frequently are field staff updating work order status? Are customers being kept informed?

    Key Questions Answered:

    • How does mobile access to application information affect field efficiency?
    • What information do field technicians access most frequently?
    • Are field staff consistently updating work order status?
    • Which factors most strongly predict first-visit installation success?